HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.su.Larkin.1976
;
....-"..
'"'
/<,~
at,
p",p.
'"'
~-
-A
CounNlot.1n
A.........
-
~~
i
llOO_o.o.......,
___,c.",_~
Xl3_:l2O_~
December 2, 1976
Mr. Hal Clark
Planning Office
City of Aspen
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Dear Hal:
Purguant to your suggestion, I enclose a copy of the conceptual
sub-division of the property currently owned by Fritz Benedict
and Fred Larkin in undivided interests. Fred is desirous of
subdividing and Fritz is not. Consequently they have decided
to separate their interests. At this point it is not known
which half each party will take, though it can be decided in
short order. The land across Ute Avenue would remain in common
ownership, while the balance would be split along the red line
and then one half subdivided as shown. It is my understanding
that the "Larkin" site was subdivided out sometime ago - probably
when the cemete~y land was given to the city.
The question is, can we divide the property as
divide the half Larkin takes at the same time?
questions are these:
shown and soo-
The additional
1. It has been my understanding that there was sufficient land,
including the proposed road and cul-de-sac, to allow fourteen
single family dwellings, or twenty-eight duplexes. Frit~
has only shown twelve sites, thinking the private road had
to be deducted from the site prior to platting to make the
net sites not less than 15,000 square feet each. Is this
correct or can the road be included in the computations if
we do it as a PUD?
~o 2.
Can we combine the units so long as we do not exceed the
allowable total under a PUD?
tJ13.
00 you think we can put duplexes on the site (or "tri" and
"four" plexes where topography might dictate)? Lots 11 and
12 for instance would lend themselves better to clustering
mostly on 11 due to the drop off toward the river. Further
it might be more desirable to put all the units on the north
half back on lots 1 through 3 and the north end of 4 making
less visual impact on Ute Avenue.
,
""..
T"
-
r"
,...,
December 2, 1976
Mr. Hal Clark
Page Two
..
Can yo~ tell me what size water and sewer would be required
for 12, 14, 24 or 28 units and whether any storm drainage would
be required?
Hal, I Would greatly appreciate your reviewing this as Soon as
possible and dropping me a line. I am anxious to tell Fred what
the best potential for the land Would appear to be and when it
might be achieved.
h regards,
EdW~\'~ ~19)1L
EWB/lrk
Enclosure