Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.drac.overlay.19950425,.- A G E N D A OVERLAY ZONE DISTRICT REVIEW COMMITTEE REGULAR MEETING April 25, 1995, Tuesday 4:00 P.M. 2nd Floor Meeting Room City Hall I. ROLL CALL II. COMMENTS III. NEW BUSINESS A. Longoria - 936 King St., Amy Amidon (moved to May ~ B. Braden - 926 E. Hopkins, Amy Amidonyai,Is~L -r~ oti\~ ~ ~v ~_ C. Hirsch - 635 Sneaky Lane, Leslie Lamont IV. OLD BUSINESS A. Farish - 844 Roaring Fork Drive, Kim Johnson V. ADJOURN - 5:00 PM ~,~.-'. TO: Overlay Zone District Sub-Committee THRII: Stan Clauson, Community Development Director FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RS: 926 E. Hopkins Avenue DATE: April 25, 1995 SDMMARY: This project is located in the East Aspen neighborhood, therefore both the general guidelines (Chapter 1 of the "Neighborhood Character Guidelines") and the specific guidelines for East Aspen (Chapter 2) will be applied. The project is a new duplex (the existing structure is to be torn down) and has a proposed FAR of 3,600 sq. ft. on a 6,000 sq. ft. lot. The special review process is mandatory as is compliance with the Committee's findings. APPLICANT: Ralph Braden, represented by Gibson and Reno. " ' LOCATION: 926 E. Hopkins, Lots Q and R, Block 26, East Aspen Addition, City of Aspen. STAFF COMMENTS: Please refer to the application for the complete representation of the proposal. Planning staff finds that this project is not in compliance with the several aspects of the general and specific neighborhood guidelines and also does not meet the submission requirements for a complete application. Rather than discuss each guideline (including those which are met), only the elements of the proposal which warrant further discussion are highlighted below. The applicable general and specific guidelines have been grouped together by subject. STAFF EVALIIATION: Site Design General Guidelines- 6. Orient the primary entrance of a building toward the street. Specific Guidelines- 19. Provide a front yard in all development. Response: No front yard is provided. The driveway spans 40' of the 60' frontage. According to Engineering the maximum allowable curb cut for this lot is 10'. `~ The entranceways to the units are located on the sides of the building about halfway back on the lot. Defining the primary entrance is important to a building's relationship to the ~~*'+~ pedestrian and the streetscape. The front yard setback is approximately 12' deeper than the neighboring properties. Staff finds that the buildings should be brought into a closer alignment to respect the established building line. (Staff is uncertain of the proposed setback for the redevelopment of Valley Hi, which may affect this condition.) Garacea General Guidelines- 12. Minimize the visual impact of garages. Response: The property does have access to an alley. Location of parking in this area may not be appropriate due to visual impacts on the river, however, the proposed location of the garages is not sympathetic to the streetscape. According to the guidelines, no more than 50~ of the building's facade may be devoted to garages. In addition, garage doors are to broken down into smaller units. Given these points and the fact that the proposed curb cut width is not permissible, the applicant must restudy the treatment of the garages. Some possible solutions will include decreasing the size of the garages, accessing the garage from the side or from the alley if possible, and pushing the second story living space closer to the street so that the garages are recessed. ,."'~ Architectural Features Specific Guidelines- 25. The use of porches is strongly encouraged. 26. Clearly identify the primary entrance. Response: A deck is provided at the second story, but no porches have been designed along the street. Again, the entry does not address the street. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that this proposal is not in compliance with the "Neighborhood Character Guidelines." In order to exceed 85$ of the allowed F.A.R. the proposal must be restudied. Staff recommends tabling with the following conditions: 1) Submit a letter from the owner describing the character of the neighborhood in order to complete the application. Submit neighborhood photos (may be presented at meeting.) 2) Restudy the location, access and treatment of the garages as described above. 3) Restudy the entrances to the units so that they are clearly identifiable and oriented towards the street. 4) Bring the building into alignment with the front setback as established by the adjacent structures. 5) Restudy the treatment of the front setback in order to provide -^""~e a front yard. ~r ~~ ~~~ ~ MErtoRANnoM TO: Overlay Zone District Sub-Committee FROM: Leslie Lamont, Deputy Director RE: Hirsch Interim Overlay Review DATE: April 25, 1995 SUMDSARY: This review is based on the General Guidelines found in the Neighborhood Character Design Guidelines for design and character. Special Review is mandatory although the parcel is 24,792 square feet so compliance with the review is voluntary. Planning staff believes that this project, with recommended changes, complies with the General Guidelines. APPLICANTS: Tom and Maureen Hirsch, represented by Paul Bierman- Lytle LOCATION: 635 Sneaky Lane, zoned R-30. STA_~F COMMENTS: Please refer to the application information for a more complete representation of the proposal. Because the site ,-. is not within a "core neighborhood", only the General Guidelines found in Chapter 1 of the Guidelines, will apply to this review. The applicants propose to add approximately 1,930 square feet of floor area onto their existing single family residence. The majority of the new floor area is a two story wing to the west of the home in an attempt to balance the garage wing on the east side of the home. The front entrance is being relocated in between the east and west wings facing Sneaky Lane. In addition, a partial second floor is being added to the garage and the garage entrance is being shifted to face the street. The additions to the existing home will increase the total floor area of the house to 99~ of the allowable floor area of the site. General Guidelines: The General Guidelines are meant to be broad in nature and address design variables that are common to all areas. Mass and Scale - -""° 1. Buildings should help establish a sense of human scale that is inviting to pedestrians. 1 ~. response: Most homes along Sneaky Lane are well set back from the __ street and tucked into groves of cottonwoods and aspens. The existing home, which is setback significantly from the road, presents a flat windowless profile. The front door is around to the side of the garage and is not visible from the street or from the existing driveway. The renovation will relocate the front door to a more prominent position in between the east and west wings and the existing parking area will be converted to a front courtyard pedestrian friendly area. 2. Nep buildings should appear similar in scale to those in the established neighborhood, or to the scale that is desired for the neighborhood; and 3. The street elevation of a building should be designed to appear in scale pith those seen traditionally. response: The architectural style of the homes along Sneaky Lane are varied. The homes are set back from the street and surrounded by mature vegetation. The mass of most homes is divided within the structure between one and two story elements and portions of buildings are set back from each other. In a few instances the garage is a seperate structure. The proposed addition to the Hirsch residence will not bring the home closer to the road and will balance the existing garage portion of the home. The home may be viewed as three seperate pieces, the east and west, and with a center connection. However, the partial second floor added to the garage will eliminate the one story element that exists and found in other homes in the neighborhood. Fortunately, the second story is setback from the overhang of the garage which will add some punctuation to the facade. Other than proposing a lower roof height from the rest of the house, the facade of the new addition on the west of the home is rather blank and undefined. According to the submitted plans, only one window per floor is provided. 12. Minimize the visual impact of garages. response: Currently the garage is entered from a drive that encompasses a significant amount of front yard space. A mix of aspens and cottonwoods and ground cover exist between the garage and the road. It is this type of garage door orientation that is encouraged by the Guidelines. However, the applicants propose to reorient the entrance of the garage door toward Sneaky Lane and redefine the front yard to create a landscaped walkway leading to the front door. Most of the existing vegetation will be lost to the new drive and garage entrance. The garage is and will be the ,,.~, closest portion of the home to the road. 2 HECOMMBNDATION: Staff recommends approval of this addition with the recommendation that the elevation of the west addition is changed to provide additional elements to break of the tall, blank wall. In addition, staff would recommend that the proposed orientation of the garage door be abed or reduced in scale to minimize the visual impact from Sneaky Y\,ane. xBCOMMENDBD MOTION: "I move to approve the Hirsch Special Overlay Review with the recommendations outlin d in staff's memo dated April 25, 1995." ATTACHMBNTB: A. Application „»_ 8. Submitted Plans // `~. 3 rsErtoitAxnort TO: Overlay Zone District Sub-Committee BROM: Rim Johnson, Planner RE: Farish FAR Special Review Continued Hearing DATE: April 25, 1995 (844 Roaring Fork Road) On April 5, 1995, this item was introduced to the FAR Committee. The project had previously been reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission for compliance with the Hallam Lake Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) review. During the FAR review, Committee members from the P&Z became aware of the complete demolition aspect of the project. Demolition to the extent shown during FAR review was not presented during the ESA review. They believe that demolition of the existing structure is pertinent to the ESA review and might alter the approval or conditions assigned to the project by P&Z. At the time of this memo, staff has scheduled a discussion of the issue with staff and the City Attorney, and is researching the ~...- application information and minutes of the P&Z meeting. An update information will be presented at the April 25 FAR meeting. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS Three sets 11"x1 T, OR APPLICANT: ADDRESS: ZONE DISTRICT: PPLEMENT TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION IMPORTANT clear. fully IabilQd drawings must be submitted in a format no larger than e dozen sets of blueprints may be submitted in lieu of the 11"x1T format. Sunnvbrook Colorado, Inc. 936 King Street, Aspen, CO R 15A LOT SIZE (SQUARE FEET): 20 , 123 EXISTING FAR: ?_ 5 2 3 ALLOWABLE FAR: 4807 PROPOSED FAA: 479 t .4 t EXISTING NET LEASABLE(commercial): N7A PROPOSED NET IFASABLE (commerciag: N/A EXISTING %OF SITE COVERAGE: 13.4 $ PROPOSED %OF SITE COVERAGE: 17 ~ EXISTING °k OF OPEN SPACE (Commerdaq: N/A PROPOSED%OFOPENSPACE(Commer.): _ N/A EXISTING MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Prindoal Bldo.: 23 f t / ~,~• N/A PAOPOSEDMAXIMUMHE1GHi: _ppdoalBldo.: 24'-7" /Accesa_xv~l q: N/A PROPOSED%OFDEMOLITION: Approximately 90~: Reusing existing founda EXISTING NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 3 PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 3 p 1 us A . D . U . EXISTING ON-SITE PARKING SPACES: 4 ON-SITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: 5 ETBA K EXISTING: ALLOWABLE: PROPOSED: Front: 30 Front: ~s Front: ~ti ~ Rear. la Rear: ~p Rear: , z s Side: 29 + 81 Side: 10 Side: 22.5 + 79 CombinedFront/Rear: a5 CombinedFrURr. as CombinedFront/Rear. an EXISTING NONCONFORMITIES/ _ None ENCROACHMENTS: VARIATIONS R Q 1 T D (~gibl . Inr 1 andma rkc Only ~ti~~~~r°r com i ilia findin g must be made by HPC!: FAR: Nn n P Minimum Distance Behveen Buildngs: I SETBACKS: Front: Parking:Spaces: Rear: Open Space (Commerpal): Side: Height (Cottage Infill Only): Combined FAJRr: Site Coverage (Cottage Infill Only): on 031~/fl5 11:50 '$fll fill E950 ALPRI LOUEP. ;~~ ~.~ a~ ~i` ii .. ............ ~I005 ~~~j ~lv~wl ~ _ 1~~93< ,(/ ~ /dJ U A, ~> /~w/ ~/ ~ ~' 4SWs., F~v pfCK~isT',Rt, ;. hBYc-15-1995 19:57 -.._--_ _ . . _. __ .. a:r.' 91 671 56959 _~~. P.03 LONGORIA RESIDENCE 936 King Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: A parcel of land being part of Lots 19, 20, 21 and 22, Block 14 of the original Hughes Addition to Aspen, Colorado, and being fully within Tract 40, East Aspen Addition. Said parcel is more fully described as follows: Beginning at the point whence comer 11 of said Tract 40 bears North 13 degrees 44 minutes West, 176.64 feet; thence South 22, degrees 33 minutes West, 110.07 feet; thence North 64 degrees 25 minutes West, 98.87 feet to the easterly line of the patented portion of the Sunset Lode U.S.M.S. No. 5310; thence North 34 degrees 47 minutes 42 seconds East 109.03 feet along said Easterly line, thence South 66 degrees 09 minutes East, 75.63 feet to the point of beginning. PARCEL B: A parcel of land being part of Lots 17, 18 and 19, Block 14, of the original Hughes Addition and being wholly within the patented portion of the Sunset Lode U.S.M.S. No. 5310. Said parcel is more fully described as follows: Commencing at a point whence Comer 11 of Tract 40, East Aspen Addition bears North 13 degrees 44 minutes West, 176.64 feet; thence North 66 degrees 09 minutes West, 75.63 feet to a point on the Easterly line of the patented portion of said Sunset Lode, the true point of beginning; thence South 34 degrees 47 minutes 43 seconds West, 109.03 feet along said Easterly line; thence North 64 degrees 25 minutes West, 93.41 feet; thence North 26 degrees 52 minutes East, 103.58 feet; thence South 66 degrees 34 minutes East, 108.65 feet to the true point of beginning. County of Pitkin, State of Colorado i t, ,~ w•,~ ~ ~~ ~a~ \~ '~ ~~ ~ y ~` 1 ~ ~e" ~ ja: ~~ j ~O f~oo .~ \~OQI ~~ ~p r, ~ ~~,~ / ~i `6~Y \ ~ ~ r \ ~\ ~; ,~~X 1 ~ ~ t t _ _. e r ` ~= /i 4~ (1 .'1\\I // ~ ,."- 0 O rmnn~ EEC`' - ' ~.l / / ~ I h~ ~ GR ~C2EEK 1 i rcQ"~_~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~, . e // ' ~ / ~ l r;. i i ~~ , .-~ A r i ~ ~ i~ ~ _' v` _ 2H' ~ ~~~~c ~~~ ~\ ~, II ~~ ~ 0 ~~ ~ VICINITY MAP ~~~ Scale: 1" = 1000' -' Longoria Residence • 936 King Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 ~~; ,i /r ~` / 1~ ~ J , .. ~. t = ~, ~~o ~~ ~~Z ~I ' 1 n ' ~~~ I U\~%/ c'! 4 \ ~\ ~` ~~~ ~~ 1 A „ d \ ~~ _..u1/ls/85 11140. X91 Kil 5e95`J ~,,. ALFRI LODER - L~not -Y - ~. r. - -- ~ _ - r.. ~~~~ ~jl.~..~Pi`~/ ~~~~ _ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~- ~~~ ' _ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~v .. MRR-15-1995 1055 91 871 56959 ~ _ .. .-..^; P. 01 ---- o.~ii~ia:> iii-~iy 'L)ll1....+371 SBHSJ - -... _- ALFRI LOVER ~~\) L/ k~loo: a.-.0 /J ~s 1 cf~W a~.~~.~p~.- ~ce,eac. ~ .~?~ - ~-~ ~~~.~ ~,.. ~~,, ~~°~ . ~- ~. ~ ..-~ ~,...~~ s U_ ~- s .~. .~~~ ~~~~~ MNR-15-1995 10 56 91 871 56959 p.02 March 17, 1995 a;s«a~5 t.coRroRArED AACIIITEGIti RE A.\D PL~.u\I~G Kim Johnson Community Development Department City of Aspen 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Kim, Baker Fallin Associates, Inc. submits the enclosed application and drawings for major alterations and additions to an existing residence at 936 King Street in Aspen, for the F.A.R. overlay review process. The existing two story house was built in 1987. Part of the foundation and a few other minor existing features are to be incorporated in the new house which will also be two stories. An accessory unit is to be built at Garden Level. The garage is to remain in its present location at the rear of the house. The following discussion addresses questions pertinent to the Smuggler Mountain Neighborhood Character Design Guidelines for the City of Aspen. Mass and Scale The longest elevations are North and South facing and are treated differently as befits the site. The South elevation facing King Street is broken into six different vertical planes with roof lines comparably varied. The North elevation, while one continuous wall on the second story, is relieved on the first floor by the flat- roofed garage. The privacy of the neighboring house to the North is preserved both by the simple massing of the North wall and by the absence of many windows- The narrower elevations are those on the East and West and they share the same articulation as the South elevation so that the house appears in scale to passers-by on King Street. Also, the new house will be closer to the small clumps of cottonwood trees and thus more "nestled" than the existing house. It is felt that the extremely different treatment of the North as opposed to the combined East-West-South facade reflects, respectively, the private versus the public appearance of the house. ^ JOAN R. BAKER, AIA, President • RICHARD A. FALUN Vice President • DAVID E.K. PAAIII'O Associate L80 UrE AvENVE • ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 • 303/925-4252 • Fax 303/925-2639 ~l15 ('iRaNDAVENUE • GLENIX'OOD SPRINGS, COLORaI)O 81601 • 303/928-9704 • Fax 303/928-9628 Page Two March 17, 1995 Also, the nearest house, a large two story chalet-like structure to the North, is on higher ground so that when the new house is viewed from King Street it will appear both smaller and lower and, by contrast, more articulated than this neighbor. And in terms of solid-to-void ratios it will be in scale with the three other houses on the North side of King Street. Site Plan The existing house faces almost due South and is well sited on the Westerly half of the property leaving a large useful open yard to the East. The new house will do the same. The many small and one or two large cottonwood trees are to be retained on the front where they will eventually mature and serve to join visually with the larger neighborhood cottonwoods characteristic of this sub-area in the Smuggler neighborhood. Building Materials Rough sawn cedar siding and cedar shingles are the predominant surface materials with portions of the foundation and the front patio walls and entry way walls to be stone masonry similar to the neighboring house to the Northeast. Architectural Features The entry porch is directly off the concrete paved driveway and although clearly differentiated from the rest of the house by its use of masonry, it is very much in scale. A simple stone parapet wall and stairs identify the entrance at slightly above ground level. While the south facade contains many windows, they are broken up visually by mullions every 24 to 30 inches. The large living room window walls are likewise broken visually and in scale with the second story, and by glass doors onto the stone walled patio. Baker Fallin feels that the proposed major alterations to the existing house will be in keeping with the character of the existing King Street area. Sincerely, ~/~-`-_ Richard A. Fallin, Vice-President C~ Gary and Debra M!~or'e 1006 E. Hyman Ave. Aspen, CO 81.611 (.~0:,) 9~5-575 eAX 92L-4540 17 I~iarch 1.9`.'35 ~esl ie Larncmt Aspen/Pitl~.ir! Planning Offict~ 13N South galena Str'ee't Rspery C~~lorado 8161.1 RE^ Moore Overlay Development Review Replication Dear !._esli.e: F~lease C4nS1dBY' tl"115 1F_?t t:er^ ar! applicati~~n f~~r' the Overlay Development Review. 1. Ti-:+`; at?(Ji:iCa',; :I.C:n s sl_Fbrnitted by Gary and Debra M:-~c:re, - - ~.,= attaeheeJ letter ia!.Ith::,ritt>eci I:1Y Dick. VoJ.4< - ~_~wnFarJ. Please r..e fr^orn Dicl+. Volk. as ccxhibit 1. 2. "!"he nropr:~sed developrnesnt is tc? occur° on I_~~t 7. R c and So!.rth . _. , ;., ,+. 1; 3, tl :n::;- i J4<lahi>rua (-.tats ~'!cai.L':r~ n ,; r: thE~ C.i.tY nF Aspen. 3. A+..''.;achecJ is a ~:;~_}rvc-~Y (1.993) cif the parcel. A cl_Irrent s!_rr'vey ~,_ r`i C pr:~C: r.': t.h i l! :, i.: ...l SiiSBd W7.tti _t'S7 !. F? 't.. i3 ril0?y l:; at 'nk?et a71G C!Y! '`"c.i ~: ,. ._': "1 L~~9;~ I~j ~,.U'4'6`i ._ 'xlllbJ. 'C :... 4a. =1 rn.lr're=rrt cer'~ti.'!`:i.r^,r{:e .Pr..,:~rn Stewart "f~itle 1r~s~..irance Co, r~'c._s:i.r a .w~~'r°l,r~,r';.4; r•IL:,.. +r'c~rn a{: t: ~r^rey -'-ori! T_dii :i==:. a{:t ached as exhibit ~. 4b. An 8 i/c"x1.1" vicir!itY rnap locating the s!_rb.~ect parcel w:ithir! ti}<:= i;:i.1:y r::f As<:?er! ~=a at;tact'}ec:a aes r>;hit?it 4. 5. The prcy:~erty described above in #~ hies within ar! eclectic:? r!eii:;i°it?~:n^il.;c~::a w:i.t;: a .w ;ety of architect!.ir a;. styles. this r!e.g! ~?r!~ r. r: i.il,= + :~]cl ar!d r!ew s:inglc-+ `rami h:_,mes, rn::~,i: -~( W 'll~il c.: '~bc2.i.n f,l r.r sss~ry ilwr_: ?. 1. iYtg L:r i~.;s (RIJ!ll. I'{cone •~i~es range frcal ~srnal l (f:.rcur't~ dE•vF ':1J4=rnent p<:arc'els) t ~ c~'r}e ~f ti-}e iaryest h:>:,~Fr; lei r,l7cd i. thcr .;:y l.irni!';s. Thre F='x i.=:i-i.nc: t~.-~pc~er<ioir~ c:r(° the nei.gFrbnrhr~~~d is ntostl.y f7.at, 5:.;1'1`'ial lYtC!r'C' i7 •:; 1;hP L•tV!>^• ~-~Yi ::if,e SidP_ (S~~llt it ra Yld WBSt .' dr!C) d °_.t ee:J ban'rr. ~:n 'ti°}e r!!~rti'i ar'!d ea<.>t i~o~.rr!dry. Special Feratl.u^e=, inc].L.I%,je '.:he ~"I. •.'e t' a'.'!(5 .'. <d.r't]F:' CC:t tC?nah7iit:) tt'ee53 t`1 i':]t.lgh~:: !1t. i h'18iii SG:i `i F:4?? ;]llOtY!la r"a pl'7 .. i-~'t 't; r.:lCll _LI t: ~_~ i~. F.Xfl 1. 171 .J, 6. We are proposing to b;.rild a Single Family Dwelling with ar, attached, above grade, Accessory Dwelling unit (ADUi. Th:s ADU W111 be IISCPd a5 in'teY'lril hOl.lSi.r;g f~4' 1riiNed]a'te f'23fn1ijy. Ti,e a.i.lbwa!;- le FAR of 4,150sq' incl~_rdes 700 sq" of an ADU, q;_ralif;;ng f~rr- the 25r~sq' FRR Bonus. This proposed developemer;t complies with the "Neighb~_rhood Character Design G;.ridelines" in that: A) MASS & SCALE The building is designed in proportional segments that arse connected and the eaves are low at setback. perimeters or, the r;ar•th and east pr•oper•ty bc~undries. The roof Iir;es rise up tc. the rnair; ridges which are located toward the center of the building envelope. The larger dormers/ga61e ends tend tr_. face the views to the so~.tth and west. H) BUILDING FORM The ~_rr;ique c;_~r•ved river front lot creates an interesting 6;_rilding design which ar•e comrnc~n ir; the Oklahrma Flats area. we have a variety c.f r•c,of fcrr^nrsq gable and shed. A uniG~_ie stair t~ ewer creates a vertical coriipi invent tc~ the s;.tr•ro;_ir;diny 50 L-.. 11Z~ foot tall Aspen grid Cottonwood trees. Tire lot has do~er~s of these tr^ees and the scale c.f them sho;~rld help the pr~~posed house t.:? nestle into the site. Mininnun trees wiil be removed as the rna~or•ity are withir, pr~:~posed setbacks. Porch rc:of=; defir;e the entries for bath the main ho;_ise and th,e ADU. `he '.-•ecessed walls under these porches create broaken wall masses and adci s~,~idow 1 ir;es, C> SITE PLRN To create nmr•e open space in the front yard, we kept the house away from the setback which provides additional area fore landscaping and yard use. The primary entrance is within this space, making it fucti_rr,al and appealing t~:? pedestr•ans, even though the iot is at the vary er;d of Spring Street, a "dead er;d". The garage is set back. 4Q~ feet fry?rn the Sprir:g Street pr•~~i:er'ty line, allowing a large tree tc~ remain in the center of the -Front yard with proposed- driveway c;_irving aro;ar,d it. Another h;.rge (i5~ foot) L'.~ttc~nwc.c.d will offset the proposed garacle c~rrr,er ar;d ADU entry, th~_rs shielding the garages mass frc~ai 5prir;g Stree. D> BUILDING MATERIALS External b;.rilding materials will consist cif river- r•c~ck. and horizontal woad sidin_y with vertical siding on stair tr_~wer'. Copper standing seam rc.~c~fs c~asver the shed downers. Wood shingle=_ are on the X112 pitches. Rl.l. materials are natural 't~~ the arr=a. E) RRCHITECTURRL FEATURES Porches identify the primary entr•ar;ce and the ADU entrance, 6c~th orier;ted tc. the street. As shover; ir; the elevatic~r~s; there are .a variety cif windows ar;d di_;ur• shapes whirr, are similar i.n scale t~_~ these in this neighbor^h~x?d.. 7. See attached site/landscape plan, floor plans, elevations, etc. Shoi.~ld y~-~~_i have and q~_iestions or req~.iir^e any additional ir,fr~rmati.on, p7.ease d~~ riot hesitate to cal?.. Yoi.tr5 tt^ll l(//y(n~y/ ''/~\~//'~ ~CGar^y ~~one avid Debr^a Moor^ea uDM:dvd Rttachr~rents (~ Exhi.bits) SUPPLEMENT TO~xS~ DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS IMPORTANT Three sets of olear. fully Iabeied drawings must be submitted in a format no larger than 11"x1T, OR one dozen sets of blueprints may be submitted in lieu of the 11"x1T format. APPLICANT: Wop~ed \ Lot- j. y 2 ~ ~tz(.ti-I/a- o+' ADDRESS:/Lo-).'~ $ICXiLi~ Ok.1Ahc~~a / ~1AtSA~Dti-~toC,Y~~etf~'~?i1 ZONE DISTRICT: LOT SIZE (SQUARE FEET): EXISTING FAR: ALLOWABLE FAR: PROPOSED FAR: EXISTING NET LEASABLE (commercal): PROPOSED NET LEASABLE (commercial): EXISTING %OF SITE COVERAGE: PROPOSED %OF SITE COVERAGE: EXISTING %OF OPEN SPACE (Commerdal): PROPOSED %OF OPEN SPACE (Commer.): EXISTING MAXIMUM HEIGHT: PROPOSED MAXIMUM HEIGHT: PROPOSED %OF DEMOLffK)N: EXISTING NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: EXISTING ON•SITE PARKING SPACES: ON-SITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: 'I Bklo.• lAccessorv~Qg: ~I ?_5~ Inio- t2d~rA~ssavB. Imo. ~ ~ ~ =/ F} SETBACKS: EXISTING: ALLOWABLE: ~ PROPOSED: ~ Front: Front: Z~ Front: 25 Rear: Rear: ~- ~ ( Rear: n3T_ Side: Side: i ~ ' Side: ~ o Combined FronURear: Combined FrVRr: Combined FronVRear: EXISTING NONCONFORMITIESI ENCROACHMENTS: VARIATIONS REQUESTED lelioible fo r Landmarks Only;~haracter com tibili ndinc must be made by HPCI: FAR: Minimum Distance Between euildirgs: SETBACKS: Front: Parking Spaces: Rear: Open Space (Commerdal): Side: Height (Cottage Infili Only): Combined FnlRr: Site Coverage (Cottage Intill Onfy): ~~ ~~ N, /} N' ~A'