HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.su.Oblock.A17-93
/
~
.;;~,
~
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen
DATE RECEIVED:~26(93 PARCEL ID AND CAS~ NO.
DATE COMPLETE: . :J'i.al <:f.,3 2737-182-38-024/025 A17-93
. . I STJI.FF MEMBER: LL
PROJECT NAME: O'Block Townhouses Substantial Subdivision Amendment.
Condominiumization and Vested Riahts
Project Address:
Legal Address: Lots D-I and N-S. Block 112. City of Aspen
APPLICANT: Howard Bass & Harris Cahn. c/o GUY Associates
Applicant Address:
REPRESENTATIVE: Ted GUY. Guv Associates (or Stan Mathis)
Representative Address/Phone: Box 1640
, Basalt. CO 81621 927-3167
----------------------------------_._-----------------~--------
--------------------------------------------------------------
FEES: PLANNING
ENGINEER
HOUSING
ENV. HEALTH
TOTAL
$ 942.00
$ 234.00
$ 55.00
$
$1231. 00
# APPS RECEIVED
# PLATS RECEIVED
7
7
TYPE OF APPLICATION: STAFF APPROVAL:
1 STEP:
2 STEP:
P&Z Meeting Date
PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO
VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO
PUBLIC HEARING: YES.~.~
VESTED RIGHTS: YES ~
CC Meeting Date rn~ IQ
DRC Meeting Date
-------------------------------~-------------------------------
---------~------------------7------------______________________
REFERRALS: . /
/City Attorney V Parks Dept. School District
~ pity Engineer Bldg Inspector Rocky Mtn NatGas
Housing Dir. Fire Marshal CDOT
II Aspen Water HolYCross Clean Air Board
vI City Electric Mtn. Bell Open Space Board
.. Envir.Hlth.. j ACSD Other
\1' Zoning . Energy Center Other
DATE REFERRED: 3/7--'-'. INITIALS: f4! DUE: 1/ /; ~
;~;~~=;;;;~;~~================;~;;=;;;;;;~~~71~~=~;~;~~~~~=
City Atty city Eng.ineer --\;Z,oning ..."...-A-Env. 4.-,Heal th
X Jl9using :A {s~lO'e ~other: ~
~_N)O S .
FILE STATUS AND LOCATION:
1)
2)
r-. .~1 i~
Il;N[) tSE AWIJ:CATICN FeD,
Project NaDe ~ IDWN-\-tOtJ'SES sJEDtVl~010
i t..Ol0 o-;r "" t-l-?
P.roj~ I.oca:ti.cn eL.04:- tt'1-, ell:"( OF ~fE.,..j
.
(<...........- LL t cal:h.
.ll.LLJ..L,;a,.U;:: L.f -==
"H"-~.iat:e)
, l.ot: & bl.ocX p............., legal descr:ipt:icn lob:9::e
3) Pr tl. Zarlnq F2-M-F 4) I.ot Size 3t::a:o SF
5) ~1i<=r\t's NaDe, All. & Ib:ne # ttOVVl'<(20 el'<'h ~ 11fo,,zt2.IS A CAH1J
~T~ K6u,~~ It:. ) b:x \~} ~-r.. GO 810Z}
6) . ~_ ,ldLive's NaDe, h.ll. & Ib:ne #TEo6:J, %,.:2... ~~ ~Tt+iS
1BF~. K.. Au'f ~-r;:s::, fG eo<1tAo ~I.IW
.
7) Type of Applicat.icn (Pl= dledc all tiIa:t ~ly) :
0:n:1i.ti.a1a1 Q;e
~~SPA
Final SPA
_ O:n::ept:ual Histaric DeIr.
Final Bistaric DeIr.
_ ~i",l Review
8040 Greenl.ine
_~RD
Himr Bistaric DeIr.
_ stream Klrg:i.n Final RD
_ !b:D:It:irin v.i.esr Plane.x !':Ill-rlivisicn
X Cl.a..J.....J:r>inmi ,...:oti.al _ Tex:l:~ Aweo.~tl.
Bistaric DellDliticn
_ I.ot Split/IDt Lina _ GM;;!S Exeopt:icn
Adjust::ment
_ Bistaric Designati.cn
_ GM;;!S AlloI:::ment
^ Vested Rights
8) Descd.pl:icn of Ex:ist:iDJ Uses (rnm1"Pr ani type of ex:i.st:inq st:rur::tures; ~
SI. ft.; J1I~ of Ltih.UUIb; any previ.als cq:provaJ.s granted to the !JLq.<= Ly) .
1-\t6-1E... ('l)T~ ~~ -t we (t) Tub ~ f~rFl
-
UNrrs kJD f'aJ~(+) -S"1u19l0 ADU/s.
9) Descd.pl:icn of Del/PJ. i ..-,L AI;plicaticn r-12Dvt
~~LTO ~Ut'::E.. Q'f=.'5[{2€Bf ~I~ ~ CcMbtbIJ
1J~M12rJ ~00 ~tlJet Sft2L-l G1iJ42E.. 10 o-l Ht2AoF fl21~
GtH2W-:e~ rff k..L6'1 1'bI2- 'two &-OJ;:-, &J2- LJLHI.
10) Have yal ~ the follaiinJ?
~ Re:sj;la....... to At!-"" ~ ...~ ,L 2, Min:i.uum !':I1l-mi =i.cn CaItel:rt:s
/<.. Respo.lSe to A~ lu.-,L 3, ~ifi.c Snl-mi=ial CaItel:rt:s
~ Respc:Dse to At!-"" l...-tl. 4, Review st:arrla:I:ds f= Yalr AI;plicaticn
,,~\
~'.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
File
FROM:
Leslie Lamont, Deputy Director
DATE:
September 27, 1994
RE:
Plat Amendment - Enclave at Little Nell
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
The applicants have proposed to change the name of the subdivision
the Enclave at Little Nell to The Enclave at Aspen.
The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposed plat change.
Recommended approval with the condition that a note be included on
the plat that the amended plat does not supersede all the other
aspects of the existing recorded plat. This amendment only changes
the title of the plat.
The applicant has 180 days to record an amended plat.
!"""-.
f"'\
~
.4
GAlRfKlElD & HECHT, P.C
.-2.
RONALD GARFIELD*
ANDREWV. HECIIT**
MlCHAELJ.HERRON*"""
DAVID L. LENYO
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
VICTORIAN SQUARE BUILDING
601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
".,.. --"-Gf.counsel:
ROBERT E. KENDIG
KRISTI S. FERRARO"''''*'''
PATRICK D. McALLISTER"**'"
TELEPHONE
(303) 925.1936
TELECOPIER
(303) 925.3008
. also admitted 10
New York Bar
.. also admitted 10
District or Columbia Bar
.u also admitted to
Florida Bar
.u. also admitted to
Pennsylvania Bar
..... also admitted to
Pennsylvania Bar and
New Jersey Bar
September 1, 1994
VIA HAND DELIVERY
Ms. Leslie Lamont, Assistant City Planner
City of Aspen Planning Dept.
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Enclave at Little Nell
Dear Leslie:
Enclosed you will find our firms check made payable to the City of Aspen in the amount of
$215.00 together with a copy of an amended plat for the above referenced project which is submitted
to you pursuant to the City of Aspen Land Use Code ~ 7.308 seeking an insubstantial amendment to
the plat, to wit change of name "The Enclave at Little Nell" to "The Enclave at Aspen."
I would submit to you that based upon the criteria of ~ 7.308 that the proposed amendment
is insubstantial and will have no effect adverse or otherwise on the surrounding community or the
previous approvals granted to this Project.
I would appreciate your contacting me after your review of the enclosure to advise me
whether it meets with your approval. !fit does, I will submit the two (2) mylars to the owners and
the other signatories for execution and deliver them to you for execution by the City, the City
Engineer and for recordation.
.
r-.
..
.
GARfllELD 8< IfIIECIIH, I'.C.
Ms. Leslie Lamont, Assistant City Planner
September 1, 1994
Page 2
r"l
I thank you for your cooperation in this regard.
MJH\rdb
enclosures
c:\mjh\b&sinc\ltrcbk.
.
Very truly yours,
@
Michael 1. Herron
/
~\
~
MEMORANDUM
TO:
File
FROM:
Leslie Lamont, Senior Planner
RE:
Oblock Townhome Insubstantial
SUbdivision Agreement
Amendment
to
the
DATE:
November 12, 1993
--------------------------------~------~------~---------~--------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The applicant seeks to amend the Oblock SUbdivision
agreement in order to include conditions of approval, by the
Engineering and Streets Department, pertaining to lowering the
alley four feet.
Staff is processing this change to the SUbdivision agreement as an
insubstantial amendment to the agreement.
ZONING: Residential Multi-family (R/MF)
REFERRAL COMMENTS:
The Engineering and Streets Department and the Attorney's Office
have reviewed the amendment to the subdivision agreement. All
three offices have signed~off on this agreement.
STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant proposes to lower the alley four
feet to accommodate access to the garages which are off of the
alley. The alley, which is a public right-of-way, runs between
lots D, E, F, G, H, I and N, 0, P, Q, R, and S of Block 112. The
Oblock subdivision consists of 10 townhomes on either side of the
alley. In order to reduce the calculable floor area on site, the
developer has lowered the garages of the individual townhomes. The
Engineering Department has codified grade limitations for garage
ramps and the alley must be lowered four feet to be consistent with
those grades.
Pursuant to Section 24-7-1006 an insubstantial amendment to an
approved subdivision plan may be authorized by the Planning
Director provided that ~ the amendment has no effect on the
conditions and representations limiting the approved plat.
Although the above language speaks to amendments of a plat, staff
has selected this review route to amend the SUbdivision agreement.
It is necessary to amend the agreement and record this amendment
because there are several conditions that staff has imposed on the
applicant in order to ensure that lowering the alley does not
negatively impact the City or residents.
The applicant has maintained that the approved plat and site plan
showed an elevation change of four feet in the alley. But the
Streets and Engineering Departments did not detect this change (it
~.
r4
was very innocuous on the plans). Therefore, prior to issuance of
a permit for work in the right-of-way, the Engineering and Streets
Departments have imposed several conditions of approval and these
will be recorded as an amendment to the subdivision agreement.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the amendment to the
subdivision agreement in order for the developer to lower the alley
on Block 112 four feet with the following condition:
1. The applicant shall record, with the Pitkin County Clerk and
Recorder's office the First Addendum to amended and Restated
Subdivision Agreement for Oblock Townhomes.
I hereby approve of the insubstantial amendment
to the subdivision agreement of the Oblock
Townhomes pursuant to Section 24-7-1006 of the
Mu~ode.
Oian Moore~~lanning Director
2
OCT 05 '93 15'58 THEODORE K GUY ASSOC PC A
/"""<'
I
~
.
.
~~n~
o
P.2
~
tor
--
.
....-
I
I
I
T.W.
~hOlAl +~.L_ .
4-e protect- ~T ~
.fn:>M ~I'\~~V\
I
I
~ RAIL AT EOOE
'-. -'-. - Qf -'.QI\C. WHERE 00"
~"c
~.<; .<p.>
'WN
TN.OCCUlt. K GUY ASSOC.A'I'158 I:tc
...C...'....c:T. Ai\fD .ftI"'CTU~ aN"'NI!"A.
Oel-oCIL.
Cl<E!c
".0. sox. S40
ElASAL T. COLOl'lAQo 81 ea.
(303) &&7-3. &7
Tl2E.E:.
OF
----------. -"-". .__... 0__.
-""T
C I. I
;J"lot-l
.-
! .
,"'"
MESSAGE DISPLAY
TO LESLIE LAMONT
From: Bill Earley
Postmark: Jul 14,93 11:16 AM
Subject: O'BLOCK TOWNHOUSES
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Message:
IT LOOKS LIKE THEY WILL SAVE $15000 BY ONLY NEEDING SINGLE PHASE
POWER TO THE TOWNHOUSES.
-------========x========-------
1"""\
r)
Vlllc..
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and Council
Amy Margerum, City Manage~
Diane Moore, city Planning Directo~
Leslie Lamont, Senior Planner ~
THRU:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
June 14, 1993
RE: Oblock Subdivision Amendment, Condominiumization and
Vested Rights - Second Reading Ordinance 28, Series of
1993
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The applicants, Butch and Sundance Investments Inc.,
.request to amend the approved subdivision for the Oblock parcel and
request vested rights status for the amended subdivision. A
substantial amendment to an approved subdivision is a one step
review by Council.
The applicants also request condominiumization of the 10 dwelling
units.
Staff recommends approval of the sUbdivision amendment, vested
rights and condominiumization.
Please .see attached Ordinance 28, Series of 1993, Exhibit A.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: Council approved first reading of
Ordinance 28, Series of 1993 at the May 10, 1993 meeting.
Council approved the Oblock subdivision in April of 1990. The
sUbdivision included 10 three-bedroom townhomes, four accessory
dwelling units, and an underground parking garage.
Nine of the townhomes are to be developed using TOR's created with
the preservation of Smuggler Mobile Home Park. A single family
residence originally occupied the Oblock parcel, thus providing the
tenth development right for the subdivision.
CURRENT ISSUES:
A. Pro~osed Amendments
The applicants propose the following amendments to the approved
SUbdivision:
a.. A common underground parking garage will be eliminated and
the applicant will.provide 10 private on-grade garages with
r-
'''""''.
two cars per garage. A maximum of 9 cars will be parked
adjacent to the alley but within private property.
b. Eliminating the below grade garage will change the storm
drainage requirements. Each driveway will have a full width
trench drain to collect surface drainage and direct it to a
sump pump system which will lift stormwater run-off to storm
drains.
c. The encroachment license in the alley will be terminated
as it will no longer be required.
d. Concurrent with the amendment to the subdivision, the
applicants request condominiumization of the ten free market
units.
e. The project will comply with the SUbdivision Design
Standards as approved for Oblock Townhouse SUbdivision in
1990.
f. All easements granted with the original approval will
remain.
g. No change will be made to the previous lot layout and the
subdivision will utilize the nine Transfer of Development
Rights from the Smuggler Dev~lopment Agreement.
h. Four accessory dwelling units, 350 square feet each, will
be developed in the project. The project has already received
a conditional use for the accessory dwelling units.
Please see site plan, Exhibit C.
B. Review standards
1. SUbdivision: Pursuant to Section
amendment [to a SUbdivision development
by the city council, provided that
consistent with the approved plat.
Response: Although the underground garage is being eliminated, the
project will still comply with the parking requirements of the R/MF
zone district which .is one space per bedroom. Fewer spaces may be
provided through. Special Review. The applicants have not requested
Special Review. With the surface parking, 39.25% of the site is
still calculable open space. The open space requirement in the
R/MF zone district requirement is 35%.
24-7-1006 B., any other
order] shall be approved
the proposed change is
According to the referral comments, the proposed amendments do not
increase the impacts to public facilities other than those
identified in the original sUbdivision. Conditions of approval
2
........
~
~
that were imposed during the first subdivision review will remain
in effect. Please see referral comments, Exhibit B.
The Pedestrian and Bikeway Plan has been adopted since the original
approval and all sidewalks, curbs and gutters shall comply with the
Ped Plan.
2. Condominiumization: During original sUbdivision review the
applicants did not request condominiumization. With the amendment
of 'the subdivision approval, condominiumization is now being
requested.
Due to the ongoing review of the condominium regulations, staff
recommends that language be included in the ordinance stating that
certain risks are undertaken by the applicant in regards to
anticipated text amendments, and that if adopted, these amendments
may result in the lifting of requirements currently in place.
Pursuant to Section 24-7-1007, the condominiumization of
residential units requires the following:
a. Purchase rights of existing tenants
Response: N/A
b. Six month minimum lease requirement
Response: The application states that the units shall be
restricted to six month minimum leases, with no more than two
shorter tenancies per year.
c. Affordable Housing Impact fee
Response: The nine units that will be developed with the
TOR I S are exempt from the impact fee. The proj ect is
voluntarily providing four accessory dwelling. units, one of
which will cover the affordable housing impact for the tenth
free market unit that is being developed absent the TOR.
d. Building inspection
Response: During the development, the project will be
thoroughly inspected by the building department.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the amendment to the
approved subdivision for the Oblock development, vested rights for
the amended subdivision and condominiumization of the ten free
market units with the following conditions (these conditions of
approval include relevant conditions from the original sUbdivision
approval):
3
~
~.
1. Prior to the issuance of any building permits and within 180
days of final approval, the applicant shall file with the Pitkin
County Clerk and Recorder an amended sUbdivision plat and
sUbdivision agreement. Failure to file within 180 days of final
approval will render the approval invalid.
2. Prior to filing, the amended plat shall be reviewed and
approved by the Engineering and Planning Departments.
3. The final plat shall meet the requirements of Section 24-7-
1004.0 and shall:
a. Indicate utility easements necessary for the development.
b. Indicate curb, sidewalk and street light locations to
comply with the Pedestrian Bikeway Plan.
c. Above grade trash service area.
4. The amended subdivision agreement shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department. The subdivision agreement
shall include but not be limited to:
a. an agreement to join any future improvements districts for
the purpose of constructing improvements in the public right-
of-way.
5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall
provide a storm runoff drainage study meeting the requirements of
Section 24-7-1004.C.4.f.
6. Prior to recordation of the final plat and sUbdivision
agreement, the applicant shall submit documentation to the Planning
Department demonstrating that downstream collection constraints can
be mitigated to the satisfaction of the ACSD. Actual cost and
financial guarantee shall be incorporated into the amended
sUbdivision agreement.
7. Prior to recordation of the final plat and sUbdivision
agreement, the applicant shall review with the Water Department
water supply requirements, proposed connection to the city system
and adequacy of fire protection.
8. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant
shall provide $7000 worth of trees to the Parks Department for
replacement of trees that were removed after .the 1990 sUbdivision
approval. In lieu of replacing the trees on-site, with Pa.rk I s
Department approval, the. developer shall donate $7000 worth of
trees to the City of Aspen.
9. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant
shall submit for Parks Department review a new landscape plan that
4
"'"
"'"
identifies the relocation of removed trees, indicates trees to
remain, and indicates tree calipers. The applicant shall also work
with the Parks Department to preserve two trees that may suffer
heavy damage due to construction. Removal of any tree larger than
6" in caliper shall require a tree removal permit.
10. The applicant shall bond for five years the cost of the trees
(as determined by an independent third party). In the event the
relocated trees do not survive the money shall be available for the
Parks Department to use for replacement vegetation. Language to
this affect shall be included in the sUbdivision agreement.
11. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, deed
restrictions for the accessory dwelling units shall be approved by
the Housing Authority and recorded with the Pitkin County Clerk and
Recorders Office with proof of recordation to the Planning
Department. The deed restriction shall state that the accessory
units meet the housing guidelines for such units, meets the
definition of Resident Occupied Unit, and if rented, shall be
rented for periods of six months or longer.
12. Prior to final inspection by the Building Department, the
accessory dwelling units shall be inspected to confirm that the
units comply with the housing guidelines for such units.
13. All representations that the applicant has made regarding this
amendment shall be adhered to during any development.
14. The applicant shall.. file a condominium plat to be reviewed
and approved by the Engineering Department and the plat shall
include but not limited to:
a) A legal description of the condominiumized property.
15. Prior to filing the condominium plat, the applicant shall deed
restrict the condominiumized residential units to a six month
minimum lease, with no more than 2 shorter tenancies per year.
16. The Building Department shall inspect the building prior to
filing the final plat.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve Ordinance 28, Series of 1993
amending the Oblock .subdivision and granting condominiumization."
CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS:
ATTACHMENTS:
A. ordinance 28, Series of 1993
B. Referral Comments
C. Amended Site Plan
5
/""'\
.,-"
MESSAGE DISPLAY
TO Leslie Lamont
From: Rebecca Baker
Postmark: Jun 09,93 2:16 PM
Subject: O'Block Subdivision
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Message:
Mr. Bass has submitted a mitigation plan for the $7,000 worth of
trees previously removed, of which George has reviewed and approved.
However, on the latest landscape plan submitted, it shows a large
spruce to be relocated. This tree must survive a minimum of two years
after transplanting or must be replaced with comparable valued trees.
Every effort must be taken to ensure the tree is transplanted
successfully and maintainted after transplanting.
-------========x========--_____
,-,
.",",
MEMORANDUM
TO:
LESLffi.LAMONT,. PLANNING DEPARTMENT
LARRY BALLENGER, WATER SUP~ENT
JUNE 7, 1993
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
o BLOCK TOWNHOUSES
The Aspen Water Department would like to receive more information pertinent to the proposed
development.
· Water supply requirements.
· Proposed connection to the City system.
· Adequacy of fire protection.
The City of Aspen does have adequate supplies of water to meet the requirements of the
proposed development. The adequacy of existing infrastructure must be reviewed/compared to
the requirements of the proposal prior to our Department's committal of water service to the
development.
cc: Judy McKenzie
LB:rl
labl0/0Block.mem
· r."='.'=~l
/
/
/'
'''~.
/~-
....
I
I
II ..
.L..I
...-- ---
-.--'
! . r
I I
\~/ !J-
" }.E~~
. r.':::'-.::l
i .
//
.,:
.,
"'.
I
i
~--
/
I. ..
r"O'"
r='..'...'.. ........1
..... . -'-'-"" .
, .
,
, iTa"'- "0 .._'. ....~'" hO . "j!
J
. u 1"
r' '-'----........~"'; .
~ I:
.t.:...:i J
City '(:ou il
'.
Approv
.~.~
''r-
I
J..--
,.
/.
." .'-Fl. -.
. !e:...::
. :-:-:.:! -I. -
".
,.
/
."
'.
J I
'-
I
. I
. I.
J I
,. __L.L_.
'PUBLIC' ALLEY:
'---.....- . ..
"
.---.-::::.1
!
,
'.
,
-('
I
r- --
..IaS~
,
I"'~ .
:lCl9L.
"
.,
, J .~. .
--. "--.-.
~._-- -.. . ~ """'-~--,-_.. ~
. -- ---- --~
..' . . Jtl)' " .
': /V'vt N'\. ;;, ; s. ~n
'7.'~.--?:N ......!.~16/t"",.f~ . . .
;- . ~ . .. <, r-l r=--
. ,. ~y-" A" .~ L,'. . . - '" }
. v-'-- ~ ;..>
, . hN' A ~ ,Z .-\ "'I^ . r~. I
r"T-- ..
I
I
I
" nee
/
--("
,
~'T
_>Ow ,,1<""
~,... ,.,~,
-......--. "_.
t
,
.,
=r~~
t' ''''",
~... /
. I
: --'I .
N>\t0.. '1 .
_. I " . ~__--.
< i-:..-" :.'~. -< .:z~.....
'1.1 I~.\..? ~'. i,~?- .
"~'''---' -""":~~'l.~
.". ...--..
I
j-.-.
/
.. r,'.i
I.."
,
j-"
. i.
!
"'- /- ~_.
/
'} ~ e.y.; t
It{~L/, " 'Y"
.".;-'.";:1,'
. ...",,,11": _~_ . .
.'\
/
'.
",,-
.,
I
i
/
'"
,
.. ,
... L_..
,.
"1.
/""'\
/'''~~\
\-l <;,
HOWARD BASS
PO BOX 5078
ASPEN, CO 81612.
303-920-2277
JUDe
1993
Mr. George Robinson
ASPEN ?ARK COMMISSION
130 South Galena
C\_sper.:., /::'0 81611 ~
~
?E:
Eass-~ahn Properties
Durant and Cooper
!'"spen J CO
",1:
-:',:'2.':' Geo;:ge:
Tl-.:.:l.S lS
to confirm the folla\~ing:
The developers of the above parcel
trees to their C~l:rent landscapi~g
on the above property.
':1 p ~;
wi I: add $7000.00 of
plans a~d pla~t :lem
of tnls, the developer
may aona~e ~rees werth $7000.00 to the City of Aspen.
The landscaplng pian will be amended befor~ any C.O. IS a~e ~_32U.?i
r~1.; 1-1,:.:; ;cb.
Slrl:::.,ere~_'j
Ee''.-l
!"""\
.!"""\,
..
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THRU:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
May 10, 1993
RE: Oblock Subdivision Amendment, Condominiumization and
Vested Rights - First Reading Ordinance __, series of
1993
=================================================================
SUMHARY: The applicants, Butch and Sundance. Investments Inc.,
request to amend the approved sUbdivision fo.r theOblock parcel and
request vested rights status for the amended subdivision. A
substantial amendment to an approved subdivision is a one step
review by Council.
The applicants also request condominiumization of the 10 dwelling
units.
.Staff recommends approval of the subdiv.ision
condominiumization. ~ )
Please see attached ordinanc~, Series of 1993,
amendment
and
Exhibit A.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: Council approved the Oblock SUbdivision
in April of 1990. The subdiVision included 10 three-bedroom
townhomes, four accessory dwelling units, and an underground
parking garage.
Nine of the townhomes are to be developed using TOR's created with
the preservation of Smuggler Mobile Home Park. A single family
residence originally occupied the Oblock parcel, thus providing the
tenth development right for the subdivision.
CURRENT ISSUES:
A. Prol'osed Amendments
The applicants propose the following amendments to the approved
subdivision:
a. A common underground parking garage will be eliminated and
the applicant will provide 10 private on-grade garages with
two cars per garage. A maximum of 9 cars. will be parked
adjacent to the alley but within private property.
~
,-,
The applicant has proposed a text amendment which seeks to
allow stacked parking for multi-family residences provided
each residence has it's own garage and driveway. If the text
amendment (which was tabled to May 18 by the Commission at May
4, 1993) is not approved, 29 off-street parking spaces can be
accommodated on-site. However it is the applicants preference
to use the driveways and not encumber yard space for a parking
space.
b. Eliminating the below grade garage will change the storm
drainage requirements. Each driveway will have a full width
trench drain to collect surface drainage and direct it to a
sump pump system which will lift stormwater run-off to storm
drains. .
c. The encroachment license in the alley will be terminated
as it will no longer be required.
d. Concurrent with the amendment to the subdivision, the
applicants request condominiumization of the ten free market
units.
e. The project will comply with the Subdivision Design
Standards as approved for Oblock Townhouse Subdivision in
1990.
f. All easements granted with the original approval will
remain.
g. No change will be made to the previous lot layout and the
subdivision will utilize the nine Transfer of Development
Rights from the Smuggler Development Agreement.
h. Four accessory dwelling units, 350 square feet each, will
be developed in the project. The project has already received
a conditional use for the accessory dwelling units.
Please see site plan, Exhibit B.
B. Review Standards
1. Subdivision: Pursuant to section 24-7-1006 B., any other
amendment [to a subdivision development order] shall be approved
by the city council, provided that the proposed change is
consistent with the approved plat.
Response: Although the underground garage is being eliminated, the
project will still comply with the parking requirements of the R/MF
zone district which is one space per bedroom. Fewer. spaces may be
provided through special Review. The applicants have not requested
Special Review. with the surface parking, 39.25% of the site is
2
~.
~
still calculable open space. The open space requirement in the
R/MF zone district requirement is 35%.
According to the referral comments, the proposed amendments do not
increase the impacts to pUblic facilities other than those
identified in the original subdivision. Conditions of approval
that were imposed during the first subdivision review will remain
in effect. Please see referral comments, Exhibit C.
The Pedestrian and Bikeway Plan has been adopted since the original
approval and all sidewalks, curbs and gutters shall comply with the
Ped Plan.
2. Condominiumization: During original subdivision review the
applicants did not request condominiumization. with the amendment
of the subdivision approval, condominiumization is now being
requested.
Due to the ongoing review of the condominium regulations, staff
recommends that language be included in the ordinance stating that
certain risks are undertaken by the applicant in regards to
anticipated text amendments, and that if adopted, these amendments
may result in the lifting of requirements currently in place.
Pursuant to Section 24-7-1007, the condominiumization of
residential units requires the following:
a. Purchase rights of existing tenants
Response: N/A
b. six month minimum lease requirement
Response: The application states that the units shall be
restricted to six month minimum leases, with no more than two
shorter tenancies per year.
c. Affordable Housing Impact fee
Response: The nine units that will be developed with the
TOR's are exempt from the impact fee. . The project is
voluntarily providing four accessory dwelling units, one of
which will cover the affordable housing impact for the tenth
free market unit that is being developed absent theTDR.
d. Building inspection
Response: During the development, the project will be
thoroughly inspected by the building department.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the amendment to the
approved subdivision for the Oblock development, vested rights for
3
I"'"
1""'.
the amended subdivision and condominiumization of the ten free
market units with the following conditions (these conditions of
approval include relevant conditions from the original sUbdivision
approval):
1. Prior to the issuance of any building permits and within 180
days of final approval, the applicant shall file with the Pitkin
County Clerk and Recorder an amended subdivision plat and
subdivision agreement. Failure to file within 180 days of final
approval will render the approval invalid.
2. Prior to filing, the amended plat shall be reviewed and
approved by the Engineering and Planning Departments.
3. The final plat shall meet the requirements of section 24-7-
1004.0 and shall:
a.Indicate utility easementsne'S+,ss;:J~e
b. Indicate curb and sidewalk~cations 1:0
Pedestrian Bikeway Plan.
c. Above grade trash service area.
4. The amended subdivision agreement shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department. The subdivision agreement
shall include but not be limited to:
development.
comply with
a. an agreement to join any future improvements districts for
the purpose of constructing improvements in the public right-
of-way.
b. language binding the applicant to a bond for five years
the value of the large trees to be relocated and replaced.
4. Prior to issuance of abuilding permit, the applicant shall
provide a storm runoff drainage study meeting the requirements of
Section 24-7-1004.C.4.f.
5. Prior to recordation of the final plat and. subdivision
aqreement, the applicant shall submit documentation to the Planning
Department demonstrating that downstream collection constraints can
be mitigated to the satisfaction of the ACSD. Actual cost and
financial quarantee shall be incorporated into the amended
subdivision agreement.
6. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant
shall provide $7000 worth of trees to the Parks Department for
replacement of trees that were removed after the 1990 subdivision
approval.
4
1"".
~1
7. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant
shall submit for Parks Department review a new landscape plan that
identifies the relocation of removed trees, indicates trees to
remain, and indicates tree calipers. The applicant shall also work
with the Parks Department to preserve two trees that may suffer
heavy damage due to construction. Removal of any tree larger than
6" in caliper shall require a tree removal permit.
8. The applicant shall bond for five years the cost of the trees
(as determined by an independent third party). In the event the
relocated trees do not survive the money shall be available for the
Parks Department to use for replacement vegetation. Language to
this affect shall be included in the subdivision agreement.
9. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, deed restrictions
for the accessory dwelling units shall be approved by the Housing
Authority and recorded with the pitkin County Clerk and Recorders
Office with proof of .recordation to the Planning Department. The
deed restriction shall state that the accessory units meet the
hciusing guidelines for such units, meets the definition of Resident
occupied unit, and if rented, shall be rented for periods of six
months or longer.
10. All representations that the applicant has made regarding this
amendment shall be adhered to during any development.
RECOMMENDED MOTrON: fIr move to read Ordinance _, series of 1993."
"I move to approve Ordinance , Series of 1993, on first reading
amending the Oblock subdivision and granting condominiumization."
CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS:
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Ordinance I Series of 1993
B. Amended site Plan
C. Referral Comments
5
,t;--"",
,.......,}
MESSAGE DISPLAY
TO Leslie Lamont
From: Rebecca Baker
Postmark: Apr 29,93 3:28 PM
Subject: O'Block referral comments
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Message:
We have reviewed the landscape plan for the proposed O'Block
SUbdivision amendment and the plan/drawing is very incomplete. It
shows "existing trees to remain" but only points to 2-3 trees. The
drawing doesn't show any calipers on the trees. Additionally, there
are 2 trees that would be extremely damaged by construction if they
were to remain as proposed. George also pointed out that Mr. Bass
still owes $7,000 worth of trees from a previous removal. I will
contact Guy & Associates to inform them of our concerns and will
request a more detailed landscape plan.
-----~-========x========-----__
/""'\
~.
MEMORANDUM
To: Leslie Lamont, Planning Office
From: Chuck Roth,City Engineer C12-
Date: April 18, 1993
Re: O'Block Townhouses Subdivision - Amendment No. 1 (Substantial Amendment),
Condominiumizationand Vested Rights
Having reviewed the above referenced application, the Engineering Department has the
following comments:
1. Curb and Gutter - The proposed curb shown on East Cooper Avenue is not correctly
located. The typical location for a curb within a 75' right.of-way is 17.5' from the property
line. The Engineering Department review memo of November 19, 1989, pointed out that
the curb should perhaps be located closer to the property line than typical in order to
allow for a bike lane to connect with the Highway 82 bike lane that was constructed east
of the site in the summer of 1989. It is recommended that the bike lane be provided for
at this. time. The Ped Plan provides for a 6' bike . lane.
2. Sidewalks -. The Pedestrian and Bikeway Plan has .been adopted since the first
application was submitted. The location of the sidewalk as shown along East Durant does
not conform with the guidelines of the plan and must contain a five foot buffer and snow
storage space between the curb and the sidewalk.
3. Utilities - Easements must be provided for transformers and pedestals as needed so
that none of these facilities are located in the alley right"of-way. There is a natural gas
regulator station. located in the public right-of-Way one block from the proposed
development. The applicant should contact the natural gas company and provide an
easement as needed for relocating the station out of the public right-of-way.
4. Development. in the Public Right-of-way - Given the continuous problems of
unapproved work and development in public rights-of-way, we advise the applicant as
follows:
The applicant shall consult city engineering (920-5080) for design
considerations of development within public rights-of-way, parks department
(920-5120) for vegetation species, and shall obtain permits for any work or
/""'\.
~
development, including landscaping, within public rights"of-way from city
streets department (920.5130).
Recommended Conditions of Approval
1. The final plat meet the requirement of Section 24-7-1004,D and shall:
a. Indicate utility easements necessary for the. development.
b. Indicate curb and sidewalk locations to comply with Pedestrian Bikeway Plan.
2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide a storm runoff
drainage study meeting the requirements of Section 24- 7-1004.C.4.f.
3. . The applicant shall agree to join any future improvement districts which may be
formed for the purpose of constructing improvements in the public right-of-way.
cc: Bob Gish, Public Works Director
M93.111
r-.
."""'-
Tela (303) 925.3601
:Aspen C9onsolidated Sanitation q)isbnct APR I 6 1993
565 North Mill Street ..._'0'.'...
Aspen, Colorado 81611
FAX #(303)925:2537........
Sy Kelly. Chairman
John J. Snyder. Treas.
Louis Popish. Secy.
Albert Bishop
Frank Loushin
Bruce Matherly, Mgr.
Apri I 16, 1993
Leslie Lamont
Planning Office
130 S. Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
He: O'Block Subdivision Amendment
Dear Leslie:
.
We sti II have suff'icient capaci ty to serve this project. The
project was last reviewed by our office in November of 1989.
There are still significant downstream constraints that will have
to be upgraded prior to connection. The costs associated with the
upgrades needed would be paid by the applicant as a proportionate
development impact fee. The actual cost of the. additional fee was
estimated in 1989 and may no longer be accurate. Our regular
connection fees can be estimated once detailed plans are
available and a tap permit is completed. Fees must be paid prior
to connection to the District system.
All clear water connections such as foundation drains, roof
drains, driveway drains and snowmelt faoilities must be directed
to a dry well or similar structure as clear water connections are
prohibited from the District's system.
The modification of the underground parking plan may reduce
impacts, onsite, to the District's collection system as compared
to the previous application.
Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
.(3.......~r-..<~ cO'
Bruce Matherly
District Manager
EPA AWARDS OF EXCELLENCE
1976 . 1986 . 1990
REGIONAL AND NATIONAL
!""'\
.1""'\,
C1ty Council
Approved
By Ordinance
ExhibitB
, 19_
TO:
LESLIE LAMONT
FROM:
BILL EARLEY
DATE:
4/15/93
RE:
O'Block Townhouses
I have reviewed the Amended SUbdivision on O'Block TOwnhouses and
I question the need for three phase. power to this project. I
contacted Ted Guy (927-3167) and discussed the heating requirements
and potential load on our systems. Based upon our conversation,
it does.not appear that three phase power will be needed. He was
going to check with the owner and get back to me.
THEDDDRE K G~SSDCIATES PC
ARCHITECTS AND ST'~_ _iCTURAL ENGINEERS
~
March 26, 1993
Leslie LaMont
City of Aspen Planning Department
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: Oblock Subdivision
Dear Leslie:
Attached are seven (7) copies of our application for an Amendment to the previously approved
Oblock Townhouses Subdivision and a check for $1,231.00 for the application fee.
The proposed change is to revise off street parking from commom underground structure to
individual on grade private garages which is consistent with the previously approved plat in all
respects.
With this application we are also requesting approval of Condominiumization of the previously
approved Townhouse units prior to the start of construction.
With this application we are asking for three (3) years vesting of the amended subdivision plat.
We have attended a preapplication conference and hope to be scheduled for the April 26, 1993 Qty
Council Meeting because of the minor nature of our proposed amendment.
Thanks for your help in assisting us prepare this Application. Please feel free to call at any time to
clarify any information in our application.
Sincerely yours:
-~~:-
Theoc:lore uy, President
THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC
TKG/tg
93102 L2
Attachments:
cc: Butch & Sundance Investments, Inc
23280 STATE HIGHWAY BE
P. D. BOX 1640
BASALT, CDLOFlA0081621
(:303) 927_31 87
;"-0-,
f. ,
A.
ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Phone 920-5090 FAX 920-5197
MEMORANDUM
TO:
City Engineer
Aspen Water Department
Electric Department
Zoning Administration
Parks Department
Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District
Leslie Lamont, Planning Office
FROM:
RE: O'Block Townhouses Substantial Subdivision Amendment,
Condominiumization and Vested Rights
DATE:
March 26, 1993
Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted by Howard Bass and Harris
Cabn. .
Please return your comments to me no later than April 16, 1993.
Thank you.
/"""\
.~
ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado .81611
(303) 920-5090 FAX# (303) 920-5197
March 26, 1993
Ted Guy
Guy Associates
Box 1640
Basalt, CO 81621
Re: 0 I Block Townhouses Substantial SUbdivision Amendment,
Condominiumization and Vested Rights
Case A17-93
Dear Ted,
The Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the
captioned application. We have determined that this application
is complete.
We have scheduled this application before the Aspen City Council
on Monday, May 10, 1993 at a meeting to begin.at 5:00 p.m. Should
these dates be inconvenient for you please contact me within 3
working days of the date of this letter. After that the agenda
dates will be considered final and changes to the schedule or
tabling of the application will only be allowed for unavoidable
technical problems. The Friday before the meeting dates, we will
call to inform you that a copy of the memo pertaining to the
application is available at the Planning Office.
If you have any questions, please call Leslie Lamont, the planner
assigned to your case at 920-5101.
Sincerely,
ru;fU\~
Suzanne L. Wolff
Administrative Assistant
forms:cc.no.ph
THEODORE K I3Ur.SSOCIATES PC
ARCHITECTS AND STR.....;TURAL ENGINEERS
~
SUBDIVISION APPLICATION SUBMISSION
SUBDIVISION AMENDMENT
CONDOMINIUMIZA TlON
VESTING
OBlOCK TOWNHOUSES SUBDIVISION
MARCH 26, 1993
SUMMARY
The prior approval of the 10 free-market unit Oblock Townhouses Subdivision in 1 990 found this
Subdivision to be consistent with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan, and with the character of
the existing land uses in the area. The previous approval found the proposed subdivision will not
adversely affect the future development of surrounding areas.
The Subdivision shall be in compliance with all applicable requirements of this chapter.
This amendment to the previously approved subdivision changes the following:
a) A common underground parking garage will be modified to 10 private on
grade garages for 2 cars. A maximum of nine (9) cars will be parked
on grade along the alley. The applicant has applied separately for a
text amendment to allow multifamily units with private garages and
private driveways to meet the same parking requirements .as single
family and duplex uses.
b) Without a full underground parking level storm drainage requirements
for the proposed subdivision modification will be lessened dramatically.
Each driveway will have a full width trench drain to collect surface
drainage and direct it to a sump pump system which will lift storm
drainage to storm drains.
c) Project will comply with Subdivision Design Standards as approved for
Oblock Townhouse Subdivision in 1990.
d) All easements contained in Oblock Subdivision approval will remain
except encroachment license in alley will be terminated since it will no
longer be required.
e) Concurrent with review of subdivision we are requesting approval of
condominization of the ten (10) free-market units. Each unit shall be
placed on its own limited common element and will share a common
access easement, 1 0'-0" wide, between adjoining units. No change will
be made to previously approved lot layout.
f) Development will be served by utility extensions as approved in 1 990
Oblock Subdivision approval.
g) This subdivision utilizes nine (9) transfer units from the Smuggler
Development Agreement. Four ADU's will be constructed within the
Subdivision.
23280 STATE HIGHWAY 62
P.O. BOX 1840
BASALT. COLQRAOOS1821
(3031 827_:3187
.
.~
THEODORE K GU~SOCIATES PC
ARCHITECTS AND STR'I.. _rURAL ENGINEERS
/~
Oblock T o\W1houses
Subdivision Application Submission
March 26, 1993
Page 2
RESPONSE TO ATTACHMENT 2 MINIMUM SUBMISSION CONTENTS
SUBDIVISION and CONDOMINIUMIZATION
rrEM 1: APPLICANT
Howard Bass and Harris A. Cahn - Owners
Butch & Sun dance Investments, Inc. - Developers
c/ 0 Ted Guy and/or Stan Mathis
Theodore K Guy Associates PC
Box 1640
Basalt, CO 81621
(303) 927-3167
rrEM 2: LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lots 0-1 and N-S of Block 11 2
City and Townsite of Aspen
Pitkin County, Colorado
rrEM 3: OWNERSHIP
Sho\W1 on the attached Commitment for Title Insurance dated 3/1 /93 and issued by
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company for Howard Bass and Harris A. Cahn.
rrEM 4: VICINITY MAP
Shown on the attached Amended Final Plat of the Oblock TO\W1houses Subdivision
rrEM 5: PROPOSAL
We are proposing to amend the prior subdivision to replace the common underground parking
structure with private on grade garages for two cars for .each free market unit. The
proposed units will contain approximately 3700 SF plus a 450 SF garage.
The Project will contain the exact same mixture of units, nine (9) three bedroom and one
(1) two bedroom free market units and four (4) studio ADU's.
One additional spruce tree will be preserved without requiring relocation.
The License agreement for the Alley Encroachment will be vacated with approval of this
amendment because it is no longer needed.
2:3280 STATE HIGHWAY BE!
P.O. BOX 1840
BASALT, COLORAOO 81821
C3Q3) 827.3187
o
...,iO
THEODORE K GU~.SSOCIATES PC
ARCHITECTS AND STA, _TURAL ENGINEERS
I""";
Oblock TO\W1houses
Subdivision Application Submission
March 26, 1993
Page 3
RESPONSE TO ATTACHMENT 3. SPECIFIC SUBMISSION CONTENTS
SUBDIVISION
Draft of the Amended Final Plat prepared by Aspen Survey Engineers is attached.
The existing Contours are shown on the attached survey prepared by Aspen Survey
Engineers.
A Landscape Plan , sheet L-1, prepared by Theodore K Guy Associates PC is attached.
Proposed Landscaping preserves all of the trees from the prior submittal except one
additional interior lot spruce tree will be preserved on lot N without requiring relocation.
Site Tabulation Data is as follows
Number of Units
three bedroom units
two bedroom units
studio ADU
9
1
4
Total Bedrooms
33
Ground Coverage
Structures
Parking areas
Open Space
(36000 SF Total)
(45.9%)
(39.25%)
1 6540 SF
5330 SF
14130 SF
No new letters from Utilities have been provided since this amendment does not alter utility
use from previously approved subdivision.
Subdivision Agreement from previous approval is attached hereto.
The License agreement for the Alley Encroachment will be vacated with approval of this
amendment because it is no longer needed.
CONDOMINIUMIZATlON
No structures yet exist for this subdivision so no provisions are required to accommodate
existing tenants.
Responsibilities of Condominium O\W1ers and of Homeowners Association are specified in the
Attached Condominium Declaration.
23280 STATE HIGHWAY 82
P.O. SOX 1640
BASALT, COLORA0081S81
(303l 827_;31 87
.
~
THEODORE K GU""""'.SSOCIATES PC
ARCHITECTS AND BTR ~'TURAL, ENGINEERS
.,......."
Oblock T o\W1houses
Subdivision Application Submission
March 26, 1993
Page 4
RESPONSE TO ATTACHMENT 4. REVIEW STANDARDS FOR APPLICATION
SUBDIVISION
1. General Requirements: The subdivision was found to be consistent with the Aspen Area
Comprehensive Plan and the character of the existing land uses in the Area. The
Subdivision will not adversely affect the future development of surrounding areas and
will be in compliance with all applicable requirements of this chapter.
2. Land Suitability: The land was found to be suitable for development in 1990 when
originally approved. The amended parking plan will be compatible with existing spatial
patterns and does not require premature extension of public facilities or unnecessary
public cost.
3. Improvements: will be installed in conformance with the requirements of prior
approvals.
4. Design Standards: Construction of subdivision will comply with the City of Aspen
Design Standards. Storm Drainage plans will be submitted at the time of the Building
Permit Application:
5. Affordable Housing: will be provided with four 350 SF studio Accessory Dwelling Units
in four of the ten units. The Project received prior approval with nine (9) transferred
development units from the Smuggler Trailer Park Developer.
CONDOMINIUMIZATION
1. Purchase Rights: There are no existing Tenants so purchase rights are not applicable to
this condominiumization.
2. Lease Limits: The units shall be restricted to six (6) month minimum leases, with no
more than two (2) shorter tenancies per year.
3. Affordable Housing Impact Fees: this development contains no existing residential units
and is exempt from the provisions of the impact fees for housing.
TKG/tg/lmd
93102
23280 STATE HIGHWAY sa
1='.0. SOX 1840
BASALT, COLORAOO 81621
(3OSJ 927.3187
~ELLOtK CONSTRUCTION
I~034421241
MAR 25'93
,......."
15:04 No.002 P.01
This. letter does hereby authorize the firm of Theodore K. Guy
Assocl~tes, P.C.. and more speolfloally Ted Guy & stan Mathis to
act on behalf of But~h & Sundance Investments, Inc., optlonees of
the Oblock Townhouses Subdivision AKA Lots 0 E F G H I and N 0 P Q
R S of block One Hundred Twelve~ A pen, Colorado.
Chuok Bel lock, President
M.r.23 '93 15:09
~ ,......."
" rTLEMENT MESA PARTNERS FAX 303-" '-9721
P. 2
"
This letter does hereby authorize Chuck Bellock, President of
Butch & Sundance Investments, Inc. as optionee to act on behalf of
Harris Cahn and Howard Bass owners of Oblock Townhouses Subdivision
AKA lots D E F G H rand N 0 P Q R S of Block One Hundred Twelve
Aspen, Colorado.
.~
....~~
HqWar ss
Mar.23 '93 15:08
~ATTLEMENT MESA PARTNERS FAX 3(~85-9721
P. 1
'. ~~-
This letter does hereby authorize the firm of Theodore K. Guy
Associates P.C. and more specifically Ted Guy & Stan Mathis to act
on behalf of Harris Cahn & Howard Bass, owners of the Oblock
Townhouses Subdivision AKA Lots 0 E F G H I and N 0 P Q R S of
block One Hundred Twelve Aspen, Colorado.
Co.
Post-It" brand fax transmittal memo 71171
....
.no*3tJ3 .
N
"9'1'4'0
Dept.
.. 0:W26/93 09: 06
'a'303 925 4157
."'.
sCHMSR GORDN MYR
141002
SCHMUSBl GORDON MEYER INC.
,......."
~"'.O. Box 2155
Aspen, Colorado 81e12
(303) 92IXJlZl
Fax (303) 925-4157
CONSULTING ENGINEUS . SURVEYORS
March 25, 1993
Mr. Ted Guy
Theodore K. Guy Associates, P.C.
P.O. Box 1640
Basalt, Co. 81621
RE: Oblock Property
Updated Estimated Cost of Public Improvements
Dear Ted:
This letter is in follow-up to your request for an updated schedule of costs for public
improvements for the Oblock Property. I have eliminated items relevant to the subgrade tunnel
between the parking structures due to changes in the project design~
I have. identified public improvements pursuant to Aspen Municipal Code, Section 7-1004C.3A
and have included only improvements that will provide an upgrade of existing main utility lines
or improvements within the right-of-way, such as curb, gutter, sideWalk and pavement. I have
not included in these cost estimates servies lines, or cost elements such as demolition, on the
belief that the city would not undertake demolition work in the event the projed. did not
commence. I would anticipate .that financial guarantees will be required pursuant to Aspen
Municipal Code, Section 7-1006.D. requiring a guarantee for 100% of the estimated cost of public
improvements. As you know, the City Engineer will need to sign off on both the. list of
improvements and the estimated costs thereof.
Public improvements relevant to the Oblock Paroel include the follOwing:
1.
Sidewalk - 650 In.ft. x 5 ft. wide =
361 sq.yd. @ $30 sq.yd.
$10,833
2.
Base course 361 sq. yd. x Il yd. =:
eo cubic yds. x 2 ton/cu.yd. = 120.00'
tons @'$1S/tOn
Handicap ramps'2 each @$500
SubtotaloSiclewalk
Curb and gutter 650 In. ft. @ $15
per In.ft.
$2,160
$ 1,000
$1 3.935
$ 9.750
3.
Alley pavement 200 In.ft. x 20 ft.
wide = 444 sq.yd @ 3" depth = 37.04
cu.yd. x 2 ton/cu.yd. = 74.08 torn;; @
$55/ton
$ 4,074
1001 Grand Avenue, Suite 2.E. Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 . ~lX3) 945-1004
00/26/93 09:07
tt303 925 4157
.,-..,
SCHMSR GORDN MYR
141003
,......."
March 25, 1993
Mr. Ted Guy
Page 2
Base course 444 sq.yd. x 6" = 74.07
cu.yd. x 2 ton/cu.yd. = 148.15 ton x
Sl8/ton
Prep subgrade
$ 2,667
$ 1,500
. Subtotal.Paving
$ 8.241
4.
Street lights - Aspen Antique style
6 each at $5500
$33.000
5. Water line - Based on discussions with Jim Markalunas of the Aspen Water Cept
on August 16, 1989, he indicated that we would be permitted to tap an existing 14
inch main in the Cooper Avenue right-of-way with an 8 inch ductile line main
extension along West End Street for possible future interconnect by the CitY of .
Aspen. This short main extension, which I would now estimate at approximately
75 feet in length, would represent a portion of a public water System improvement
allowing a Mure interconnect to Durant Avenue. The estimated cost of this main
extension is as follows.: .
75 In. ft. 8" DIP main @ $35/1n.ft.
S" Tee, I each @ $300
$2,625
Tie in to existing main(Lump sum)
$ 300
$ 1,500
$ 200
$ 700
8" plug, I each @ $200
8" gate valve, I each @ $700
Pavement repair 75 In.ft. x 20 ft. .c..
167 sq.yd. x .11 yd. -: 18.66 cu. yd. x
2 ton/cu.Yd. = :g tOns @ ~/ton
$2,035
Subtotal, water main extension
$ 7.360
6. Bectric Extension - In a discussio.n with Don Gilbert, the City's .8ectric
Superintendent on August 18, 1989, he indicated 1hat the project would require an
extension of 3 phase primasyfrom Original Street along the existing alley. Bectric
system improvement estimates' are as follows:
3 phase primary in conduit 250 (n. ft.
@ $5O/ln.ft.
$12,500
Service transformer I each @ $15,000
$(5,000
l5C/iMUESER GORDON MEYI5R, INe..
/
OU26/93 09:07
'5'303 925 4157
1"'"'.
SCHMSR GORDN MYR
~004
.~
March 25, 1993
Mr. Ted Guy
Page 3
Connection to existing system (Lump Sum)
$ 2,000
Subtotal electric improvements
S29.500
Total estimate for all public
improvements
$101.786.
Respectfully submitted,
_MU"~MEYa~
. Hammond, P.E.
Principal-Aspen Office.
.IHJ1a.S1B1lG
SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER.1NC.
P.l
, .MAR 24 '93 04:12PM PITKIN COUNTY TITLE
. 1"""'\"""""
riiI CommonWeah.lllll
,~ L,,!lJ1d Title Insurance Company
COMMl~IIIT FOB. TITLE IlIISURUCB
SCHBDULB A
1. Effective Date: 03/01/93
at 08:30 A.M.
Case No. PCT-7484
2. policy or policies to be issued:
(a) ALTA OWner's Policy-Form B-1970
(Re'J. 10-17-70 & 10-17-84 or 10-21-87)
proposed Insured:
A1!lount$
premium$
(b) ALTA Loan Policy,
CReI/. 1a-21-m
proposed Insured:
TO BE DETERMINED
Amount$ TBIl
premium $
Tax Cert. $ 20.00
3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or
referred to in this commitment is at the effective date hereof vested
in:
HOWARD BASS and HARRIS A. CAHN
4. The land referred to in this commitment is described as follows:
See Attached Exhibit "A"
countersigned at: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC.
601 E. HOPKINS
ASPEN, CO. 81611
303-925-1766
Fax 303-925-6527
Schedule A-PG.l
This Commitment is invalid
unless the Insuring
provisions and Schedules
A and B are attached.
Authorized officer or agent
-...-- .~...-
~--.,",.,._....,."""..;..,..".=",.."".,...""..,..",,-::-"'
~AR 24 '93 04:13PM PITKIN COUNTY TITLE
~.
rriI Commonwealtil<ll
L:;J Land Title Insurance Company
P.2
,......."
EXHIBIT A
OBLOCK TOWNHOUSES SUBDIVISION, according to the Final Plat of the
Oblock Townhouses Subdivision recorded October 8, 1990 in Plat Book
25 at page 8.
FORMERLY KNOWN AS:
LOTS D, E, F, G, H, I, N, 0, P, Q, R, S,
BLOCK 112,
CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN.
COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO.
,MAR 24 '93 04:13PM PITKIN COUNTY TITLE
~ .........,
.1';1 Commonweal....l(/)
~ Land Title Insurance Company
SCKBDULI B -SBCTIOR 1
REQVIREMSII'rS
P.3
The following are the requirements to be complied with:
'ITEM (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors
of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured.
ITEM (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be
insured must be executed and duly filed for record to-wit:
1. Deed of Trust from: Howard Bass and Harris A. Cahn
to the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin
for the use of : To be determined
to secure : $0.00
~.....- "'''rv'\
.~
MAR 24 '93 04:13PM PITKIN COUNTY TITLE
I",
CommonWeai...d*
Land Title Insurance Company
SCHEDULE B SECTION 2
EXCEPTIONS
P.4
........,
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the
following unless the sarne are disposed of to the satisfaction of the
Company:
1. R1ghts or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records.
2. Easel1lQnts, or claims of easements, not shown by t.he public records.
3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boun<la.ry lines,short.age in area, enchroachlllents,
any facts which a correct survey and inspect.ion of the premises would disclose
and which are not Shown by the public records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or mat.erial heretofore or
hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records.
5. Defects, liens, enCumbra.nces, adverse claims or other matters, if any,
created, f1ret appearing in the public records or attaching. subsequent to the
effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires
of record fOr value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by
this commitment.
6. 'ru.es clue ancl payable; and any tax, special a8lllessment, charge or lien imposed.
for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing district.
7. Reservations and exceptions as set forth in the Deeds from the City
of Aspen of record providing as follows: "That .no title shall be
hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or
to any valid mining clai:m Or possession held under existing laws".
8. Reservation of minerals underlying the subject property as set forth
in Deed recorded in Book 131 at page 81 and other various
instruments of record.
9. Easement for electric transformer as granted to The City of Aspen,
unrecorded, dated October 13, 19~6.
10. Encroachments and all matters as disclosed on Survey by Alpine
surveys, dated April 5, 1988 as Job No. 88-43.
11. All matters as set forth in Encroachment Agreement recorded October
9, 1990 in Book 631 at page 500.
12. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set
forth in Subdivision Agreement for Oblock Townhouses recorded
October 8, 1990 in Book 631 at Page 504.
13. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of
subje~t property recorded October 8, 1990 in Plat Book 25 at Page 8.
(Continued)
"'_' 4.._....
< MAR 24 '93 04:13PM PITKIN COUNTY TITLE P.5
t-.. 1"""'\
rriiI Commonwea.h.n~
. t=3 Land Title Insurance Company
14. Deea of Trust from: aass Cahn Properties, a New Jersey Partnership
To the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin
For the use of : Elizabeth Sinclair as Personal Representative of
the Estate of Matthew Oblock, Deceased
To secure : $1,450,000.00
Dated : December 9, 1988
Recoraed : December 8, 1988 in Book 580 at Page 464
Receptcion No. : 306744
Agreement extending the terms of the Deed of Trust on the above Deed
of Trust was recorded June 15, 1989 in Book 610 at Page 717.
This commitment is invalid unless
the Insuring provisions and Schedules
A and a are attached.
Scheaule.a-Section 2
commitment No. PCT-7484
-'--;0;-',.: '~i""--1 . .t ~___}
=';.. -=. - .. 61".717,
!~~"='~;DttD~~:"~-7' ~="=-'~''''-!-r8' ~6- ,.~,T"4
II .f .__~
II ,..---... J8lll ..... II' Ll ..... .- ,'_ ~<< -I
~ "-"1.4. CMo,. "-.,....,,.,__........,.. 'ji_ '#}
1. .-........... "'~" ,f ifUI..... ;;;
. --. ...O.-H7I.........~...._..,IIJ III 1'Ifll''''"_., ,
! --~.__.._~..... "<"-"' .,
j f'I'kln <_..___~..__ DIe" 12.,...
,I." ....--.,..... ",,l '.
Ii' ...-.-:::::.'.'" .'..=......-- t' ,~.. Jr, ,_ .....
--.. T....... """""'" '--..r _ MII_UlOe.......'._._...._...:
! PIlIoI..c-l'....,,_T"'.lr.......,. .,It
H;' --.,,, b., HJo- 1<-. .... M17. ........ "If .do, '''" .1\.
-......-----..-- !
,...... !J.'. _~__.. 1W!n.0< ~ 1"~_""rtoI'fy _
I'.... ...lng Ifni.., - on UIo ZitI> CloT of - <IU*f't... __l'Iari ."" u..
"U... pn...lpor bot..... ply. "" _"'"" __ 1-"1'" _ ~T_1n
.....m K... berw. _rtty. 'JiUIH. olnl_I...t. f. w....b.. "II." _ .~,
- thoo prl.. "'Ie., ~_ "'1_ __ . 0...-, edfuttQlo ~"j'~' ,_
I --......-.---...-...-..-__._i.-_......
-.......-....
~ -.-...-.. -....-.......-----.-.....-
51-..---..__..__""",_.... __..
~1!.:P"kl" ._.._..... ~ ;;
)'. ,
III...~A, l.ol.. D.I. P, c. "_I,.'-eII; III. Clty.....T-..,A_.
~,y, , d
~...rul., LotoH.O. p.Q, 1t-','"""m.c,ty_T__A_. .I
Iii ....... ~ .'''.. ... ~ "',~... \r.~ 1 ~
'iii' ' '" I .,
I ., '1 ""',1 c" '.~
: II,,' '\t:'<<"
I ...._.._..._.. !I~
....--..........--.....-=.... .. k__"1
.._.._...._.._-~...._...,- ......-.....--.....---..
-_...,..-......._...,- ---~..- .""....___...;00;...._.._
..-.........---..---..-...-.........-....-
1 --__._.........__._.........___.._...____
---..--...-..--..----__......0-;.._..._.. _.
.. ...-.....-..-....--.....------.......-......-...-
1'...-..--..--.... --........_....__.. Pltt<In jl
......."-....--.........-.-..--.....-......- ......-...--...
1-...-..---.-------.....-...-..-- ..-- -"-
I --..---......=......r_.. PUllin ._.......__.._
--=...-.....- ..._~.._....._-..........__..__..-
=. --..---....--....----....-...-.-... .-
' -....-.....-....---.....-...........--..-..--...--.- ..
. ..__..__....~-_.._.._--"'....._._.._..=--I '
ll_.......__.._~.......___...__.._..._.,.._... __ I
'1--.....-..--......-....--..-------..--.....-/1
' -...-..-.............-....---.........-...=-----..-
-~...-._.._.....--_....__..__.... --"'-'--"'1
_.,=...-...._-----..._....._~-_.._-...-
'~-- ..-........-....---......-.....-....-...--...-
" -....-..-..............=--...--..=.....--............--..-
['-...........- -_...~--.. ....-....=........-.....-
,I _......_..___._........_~.........._ ..._........_..__..
--...--..............-..-..-....-...........-..--.....-..-....-
...~..._...,_......._..__..._.._..._....._-_.....----.....,
'[ ........-...,..........-.......-..--...-------.. .... "'-...
- _.._.....-...-......._-..~---.........__..-..__...
...-.........,.,---...-...----..-- -...--........-..
.....-..-...-........- ,..........._..-...._~---....__..-...._....-
....._.............-......_...-........~..._....__.-.__.._... \'
_....._.......~--....._- l'
....--........ # .
'I ~
=~..:_._..:__:'._= ~ -~~1I:: ';~
--....-.. _.._~-..._"- "fl' '0
::.." , tI . ' r,{,;""'f.' '
~ ",.. iI .l';L.4'UJ'
,,";;..
'7,'
~f
f
~
i
,
,
.
, \
J oj
1 u
~
~1
.
i
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
i
r
.
.
.-
" ,
.-,"'1"
1~
.,.cp
,."';J,
.......:~=:'..":~::-z;.........!_;.:..:=S:~==~.:..:.i~:.= "'",,8-
-~_._..__..__.._.._-...._ ...: ... 1f
-..--.........-- -..-_.._=_...._.r ,.... J"
--....-..,- .... --....-...........----- ...... 'f'
-..-.--...................-....-... _.- . ill..
-r- ~r~11 r,:,f ~'~\.~Iili
_......_~.._.._...,..._..___..._...- '" "
. .
-=........-..---.....-...--....-........-.... ,) '"
- _.........~-_..~- - ................... .........---.. I
-..-........---..-..==..--....-...-... ,.I,
-............--..........-.-. - -..-.---- ,~,
-.....-.......--...........--....-..=....-...--. ~
=..-......-....-..--....-. ..-....-...-..
.._-..__...._.......~......_--- ......-.....-...
-~.._---~....._.....---..._.."....._....._....
-........--.....-..........................-...........-,...........-..
_...~.._....__..._.._-_...._.._......_..._..-
-..--....--......-
.............._~._-".....-...._.-=r..--._.....
-......-. --_.._.._...,..._~._-- ..._-_.,.
-..-.__..__..too_.._...__~..,.._~..,_.._..__.......
--..._.._._...,.._""..__...._-........~_..,._""'......
..,... _..._---~_......-...~--_....._....-..=...
.....-...=--.....-..-..-.--..-........-....... --
.....-..- ....-----.--
..._....<_..._.....~.._.._.._--_..__..._....._.
-....-.-.---....-.....-....--.......-.-=
-_.._..__..._.._,.._-_....._~_.....-... -
--.-..-....---..-..--..-..=..-....-...........
-.--"-'''___''_.._.r.-.... ....=___..................
..--.....- -----..-...---..-.......... ...-.......-
-........----.-. --..--_....._.._--~....-......-
.._-_._.._...._~.._.._,...._......__.....,_...__..
...--...--......-.....-..----..--...----.... 'r
----.....--...=-----..-.....-....-..... )
-----.... ..----.....- ";.
.....-.~..-......--..-.....-.._...._...-.."..___..... ili.
:.."';:;::::.':""...:;:==.::.'":::':.=<::::..../.....::::......,:::...... a.Ti
---......-......--.........-...-...--......-....-....... .,
.-..-....--..;::,E..-.... . -- -- - 'z'./
..-.....-..-- -..-....--.........-..-...- ''I
"--"-'--'" ..-....--.........-.....--.. 1.',
...----...........-..-.....-..---..-....-.. .iL f)
.......-- lith ... DIt ..~ ~ fII ,t.;
IIoo.......A.CaINo ["i
......i~; .
....D L.r ~.f!.:,~"t;., j
,/".1. . ''t
11 .. ,..~... ,,t. ,
~1~ "~\!E I.~ "~'~~-,rt.
=.- ~. di
""- -..... '!Ii.."
i 'I' II /II i, I lil~.
I ,J'I i ,/ 1~I'tlli
! i '! 1 i ~~J:
. j II "iJ ~
-
P11~'"
-.-
-.
...----........
..lbr.I.A.CO...._..........
-.,_.......
"'--'''1-'1'1.
,
~
~
!
~
~. i,.
~!
e ~I
!
I
Ii
1
r
,~
......
~Jf
It.
.
-
I .
'11
I
~
"'"
9'."
:.I
,
.
>
I
, I
~,.
-.
".
1
L
~"-'
"
"'-'/'l
-
--.
I
I
.
~
,
,
I
I
I
,
,
~
~,"'lilI
-
--
~~-
_!t."';
-~
I
I
-
'J
-
."
0.
- --
'""
... 5'>1l ..461
.~
-.
---
~""-
--
,=-
-
1
~ 412\"
DUrHIf"TAUllT
...._-._... .," .... 1'10'-' ... N
""'C>JI!I~lu,'_J"""..r'...r..h
__~ ~'" "''I.. .... )011, ...,... Col...-
.
3061
'I
-
IIIU
ii
I
. ij
.,
>-
r.
"
I
ft
j
'I
I
',I
..
"
l't"~aHn
"nl.('""ftt10~~n
--....-....--....., ",-..
PltI<i" .-.<<---....--.IJ<';
_.........'..............e....I'r_.tt.. .~IIB:!
'"
..-.--.-.--....--_. ,1"1 .....
__.. ON IItllh.. r.... _.td PUt, '"'""_....110 l'l(l _._...._..
Utzo..'b 1...101. .. '0.._1 ..,........h. .r UHI ElIU.', 01 IIan_ Obi...,
110....*'11. _ ..d.... (a ..... Offt.. Io. IS', u,n, Coler""" IUiU
-...-..-....---......-
...-.. ...(0) _"'__latholoU....l.._.... ~.""'J.._t
"",,11 lie ,.,obl. 1I........t.. I'". """ J_. L I'". ., ....... ._ tilt
'...<1..1_11_........,.'...1......1011.
lIiWlM'89
l'
.........-.....-.-..--....-...-.........
-....,...-.....
)~
.-
.-..---..-
-
':'1.-
,.
Lot. D. t, P. '. I, I. I, 0, P, 4. . ... "
11Mb IU
Cln"""_tTl:Q'""",,
.I
..
~
.,'-
B'
~
ft
" ,
..
"
,. ,
~ ~
I
..
H
,
..
,
"
"
,
,
'I
"
,
"
:! mB..........-..._.__._.._..... _;?:__....
~_~_~.._..._M..."'__..__......_....__. ...._.._..
--.""...-........-......... .-..0.-.........---.. ......_..,_
...............----..---..--.......-....-
--...-.-.........---..........-..............-..--...-
.....-..........-...-....-..--.-....--.......;..;..-...-.....-
," .-....-...-...-,-....-..............-.-..........-....--
........-....-...-...--........--...--......-.....-....-
...----..__.... Iloorll _.......~_.....~_.. P1'U..
-..-...""....-...........-.-..-....-...............-......-..
---.:..----__......_..._........_...,'_....._... J ..._...._
-.-.....-.-....=.....'-.. '''~tft .......___.._
.....-.........-....... --....-...--.-..........--.....--.-
_._~..._.._...._...-.........__.-......_..._._....
-_..._......_....__......_...........,...-=..._.~...._..,.-
........-...-....-...--.....-..-....- ..-......--..5E-
----..-.........----..--..--..-.........- -
.....-....-..--..--.....--..--.......-.-...-- -
-...-.........--...-...-.-..-..--....-.-..-.-
-~_._~_......._..--.........._~-_.~..__..._..._.
-"=..-....-- _.._'......._....~_._~......-.._-...-
~ ~-......._.__...-...:r,.._~.._.._.._-....-
......_~_..._.._------~ _....._,_..........~--'..-
-. ..~,_...._~-_..~--........ ...,~....=.._-...-
---......_._~__.....--.J..~...._~_...._. ..._...........__.
-....---.......-..-".......-...-............-,-..-..-.......-
..............,-...--..--..-......-......---....---.....
--......_..,~-_.._-.._.___...__. II ..._...
-.--...- .__.._...._--,,---.-...~_....._._.._-...
=...-....---....-.........-.....-......-.....-.......-...
.-..-....-..-..-,..-.-.....-..-----.......-.......
.....--.....-..--.-...............--.......-- ..--..-....
-......-........-........--
~-
...
"".-.oIi
".
1-
."
'~~
'1Il
~.
lI;;
CO
..
....--.........
~
.
....., 0",,",'" _"'"
........---......----..--.-__.......____",:;,;..'.... f1
. .-,.
,
.
.
---..
-.
.
"I_,~, ~
.......
-
....Jl_
jI;.'~;1
..
,.......
,
.."
~
.._,
Ml._....__
.
.....,.
.
~ 1~;-=-...!~
.~, ._'~~~
'"'
""
......-..-......--. -" ._-..._~...-..__......_..
.._....-..~-_..._-~..-...__...._ ......__ w_..._
---.-......-.....-...-...-.-.-.......-..........-..-...
_..-.....~.._-._..._.._._--=_.....,_..--.......
-...._~......~<_.-._---....._..-......,- ,._---,--
...-..-..--.........-..-..-..-...... ,..-.-....... ......
ClII>OltA..._".....
"" 5~~ ..4115
tii
i'!l t~
-..--..-....-...--....---....-....=. .....--.
...-.......--.........--......-..--......-.....-.
'....--........-..---".....-...--....,-.........-.....
~_.._.....-...__....._, ' ....,.............=..........._--
..--'-.....---...-.==.. --....=_n
--....-.....--,...-..--. _. -..-.....- --
-.......-.-.....--...-......--....-....-"...--...--
..........--..-....-....---.....--...-....-...-...
--.......-.-....-.......--------..,......-..,.--..
.....-...........-- .....-......--_..._.. II. ...__.._.....
...-.........--...".......-...-..-.......--.....................--........-..
-.-.........-.........-.---............-....-..-..-
-..-.......--..--
.. -~. ". . - y ,-
'--...-..---..-,......-,....-......-- -....."
-.............-..-.....""....-...-- . ~ ..-..--.......
=-..--.-... --..-,.............-.....
....... ~- .,' '.-........--............-..=...
...... .._.....,_..__._,~-,..,.........__.. --
. --
;-
..............."'''''.'''..'.....T__........_,..__.._....._.._....._..
_..~--_._._-~.._-..._....=_......_._--
-_....._~-""'..._.._,~-......- ......~---...,_.....-
~_....._.._~..- .........--......-..<-...._-~- ......- ..-..
.....--......-,..-.-.........--..-..-"...----..,..-...
..........-.-...... ----....--....-.......-................-........-
-,...__.__._...._..__.._--......'"~..._.~--..._-
.._-~._.......-_...._.4_~.._.........__..__...__..
...--...-.............-.....-..=""__K____......_____
---.........-......---..-...- ---.........,-.-....-.....
---.-...--........---.....- , ,,~
......T...._.._._.._.._.,__._____~.._...............___.._
..-.-...--...-..-..........-.--"..=.............. -_.
-........_.._~-........----'......__....- ...... .....-....-....-
....--...--.........--...-...-........--,...---...-.......
.-.......-....__.__.,...-.._~ . "._1. _, _
..-.~...--.._-=-..._....__.................-........-
..--..-.-.......,.. ..-....-..............-----.
-,
-.
,.
......c_
"_" puu.
r
l_.<;;,.""...
, . ,~,.,.~.~.
...~...~ 110_.,... ....,....
.._T.I'.rt...,.f....ColoI.~...."V:...~..
~'J''''..':;
~ 'L;'~,,!
U---~[h""'~'/
'-...::.:.':.;;....
-
"'------...
..M .. .AIlo',I.A.c....
""..,..-........"...
-..-......
","--<.,I..1.r/'f/
-~
l"...~",o..
~~
Anr'....
L;
I
MJ~~,
II_Fr_'"
O'c$~t1r
I........~.._tl~t'"
.
..
,.
II'!
~.~~
~-,\
~
,
...