HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.drac.19990107
AGENDA
` DESIGN REVIEW APPEALS COMMITTEE
January 7,1999
4:00 p.m.
Thursday
Regular Meeting
City Council Chambers, City Hall
I. Roll Call
II. Minutes
III. Comments (Committee, Staff and Public)
IV. Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest
- V. New Business
A. River Bluff Townhouse Condominium, 155 Lone Pine
Road, Units 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10,11 and 12 -Volume Standard
- windows between 9 and 15 feet above the finished floor.
APpraved 4- I
VI. Adjourn
Attachment 8
County of Pitkin
State of Colorado
ss.
AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT
TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATIONS
SECTION 26.52.060(E)
I ~~,,"` ~, ~ ~ ~.~~~ ,being or representing an
,
Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice
requirements pursuant to Section 26.52.060(E) of the Aspen Municipal Code in the following
manner:
1. By mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by first-class postage prepaid U.S.
Mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property, as indicated
on the attached list, on the ~ day of ~._, 199 (which is ~ days prior to the public
hearing date of ~' )•
2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from
the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the ~~day
o~Q1~N~ , 199, to the ~ day of -J QQ,U\ , 199 ~ . (Must be posted for at least
~~11 days before the hearing date). A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto.
=~•::1 ~ ~
`; _ i \'.
~; = - -!
. _ t., .,.
' ' ~~UBLIC 1~6TICE
DATE 1 3
TIME't
~~ ~~«
PLACE_
PURPOSE ~a~'~~
(~v~an jrww~~c[ WRAC) y[~hcw of A
~n~c.~ rroR A ~ARIMI~ F~ 11E
u.a~x~
„~R~
pens v A e.nob6av wa+ooo. or u.w,:L,`~
•IYw~
Si a e
Signed before me thisday of ~ ~-
199g,. by
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
My Commission expires: ~~~~
Notary Public
A
__
9~d~
DESIGN REVIEW APPEALS COMMITTEE
NAME OF PROJECT: ~~ J ~ ~l~U F'~ ~,~„p~
Q~ (vrr. Pow ~ Gi~3sap,.C - iSS t~nf6fl~~
CITY CLERK: ~4C,-1`t~ L1~11~ Rs~ ~ ~S~
STAFF: ~,C1"C~I-I- ~A~S
WITNESSES
EXHIBITS
MOTION:
sE~Y ~-~S a~+e.C
® ~Ofl~. C-~~N~I
o y~~ ~4~.c.~Y.
0
O
8
0
Staff Report /
Affidavit of Notice /
Board Criteria Sheet ~ ~~
~~O't"O S ~
Ib~o°
S G"f'~ ~RrAe`I
ors
rt-~.
~si~nd Mo
B~.~D n~! ~.-
~ADD eS
STEVE BUETTOW YES! NO_ MARY HIRSCH-~S I~-
BOB BLAICH YES~QO_ GILBERT SANCHEZ YES_ NO~,~
ROGER MOYER YES~IVO_ TIM MOONEY YES/NO_
DRACFORM.DOC
'TE--~ ~`bU~ bf= i~P-061,~~ SEE Ulvf~ e`ST-Ad~D~~2D a~
PP-o~ tsifl-~(i ~~~~
MEMORANDUM
TO: The Design Review Appeal Committee
TIIRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director
FROM: Mitch Haas, Planner/Interim Deputy Director
RE: River Bluff Townhouse Condominiums (155 Lone Pine Road, Units 2, 3, 4,
5, 7, 9, 10, 11, and 12) request for Variances from the "Volume" provision
(Section 26.58.040(F)(12)) of the Residential Design Standards
DATE: January 7, 1999
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Chapter 26.8, Residential Design Standards, Section
26.58.020(B), of the Aspen Municipal Code, "an applicant shall pre?are an application for
review and approval by staff: In order to proceed with additional land use reviews or obtain
a Development Order, staff shall find the submitted development application consistent with
the Residential Design Guidelines." This Section goes on to state that "if an application is
found to be inconsistent with any item of the Residential Design Guidelines the applicant
may either amend the application or appeal staff's findings to the Design Review Appeal
Board [DRAG] pursuant to Chapter 26.22, Design Review Appeal Board. "
Community Development Department staff reviewed the application to remodel units 2, 3, 4,
5, 7, 9, 10, 1 I, and 12 of the River Bluff Townhouse Condominiums for compliance with the
"Residential Design Standards," (see Exhibit A). In staffs review, it was determined that
the proposed designs violate the "Volume" standard. Thus, the applicants are requesting a
variance from this standard (which is described below) in order to allow for approval of the
architectural designs as proposed. The proposed design is provided in the attached Exhibit
A, where Sheet A-3.0 highlights the noncomplying windows.
Pursuant to Section 26.22.010 of the code, an appeal for exemption from the Residential
Design Standards may be granted if the exception would: (1) yield greater compliance with
the Aspen Area Community Plan; (2) more effectively address the issue or problem a given
standard or provision responds to; or, (3) be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related
to unusual site specific constraints.
Staff is recommending approval of variances from the Volume provision of the
Residential Design Standards as it would apply to the proposed remodel of Units 2, 3, 4,
5, 7, 9, 10, 11, and 12 of the River Bluff Townhouse Condominiums.
APPLICANT: The applying owners include Roger Cazl Schultz (Unit 2), Roberta Allen
(Unit 3), Frances Ginsburg (Unit 4), Jerome Ginsberg (Unit 5), Joseph Starn (Unit 7),
John F. Guiltinan (Unit 9), Mazk Richmond and Sam Shamie (Unit 10), Glenn A. Daly
(Unit 11), and Alexander G. Kaspaz (Unit 12), all of whom aze being represented by
Yong Cho, azchitect, of Studio Completiva, Inc.
Note that the above provided list of applicants includes the owners of nine (9) of the
twelve (12) condominium units (75% of the owners), and Section 26.52.040, Initiation of
a Development Application, of the Aspen Municipal Code states that "A development
application may be initiated by over ffty (.i0) percent of the owners of real property of a
proposed development." Therefore, under the rules governing the City, the applicant is
authorized to initiate this development application irrespective of the private agreements
entered into by the homeowners under their Condominium Declazations.
LOCATION: The River Bluff Townhouse Condominiums (a/k/a Lone Pine
Condominiums) are located at 15~ Lone Pine Road (described as Lot 2, Lone Pine
Subdivision), which is situated north of Gibson Avenue, east of Red Mountain Road, south
of Lone Pine Road, and west of the Mocklin Subdivision. The property is zoned R/MFA,
Residential Multi-Family.
FAR (Floor :Area Ratio): It has been confirmed by the City Zoning Officer that, under the
current codes, the River Bluff Townhouses have 2,725.8 square feet of available/unused
floor area remaining. With twelve (12) units, this breaks down to approximately 227 square
feet of available FAR per unit, assuming the remaining FAR is to be evenly distributed. The
proposed remodel would add a total of 114 square feet of floor area to each included unit.
With nine (9) units included in the application, the remodel would use 1,026 square feet (9 x
114) of the site's total remaining FAR, leaving 1,699.8 square feet of unused FAR for the
site, or 227 square feet of unused FAR for each of the four (4) units not included in this
application and 113 square feet of unused FAR for each of the nine (9) units that are '~''
included.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Section 26..i8.040(F)(12), Volume
The proposed design contains a series of south elevation window groupings (one grouping
per unit on Units 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, and 12) where said windows would violate the
"Volume" standard (please refer to Exhibit A, Sheet A-3.0). The "volume" standard reads as
follows:
For the purpose of calculating floor area ratio and allowable floor area for a building
or portion thereof whose principal use is residential, a determination shall be made as to
its interior plate heights. All areas with an exterior expression of a plate height of
greater than ten (10) feet, shall be counted as two (2) square feet for each one (1) square
foot of floor area. Exterior expression shall be defined as facade penetrations between
nine (9) and twelve (I2) feet above the level of the finished floor, and circular, semi-
circular or non-orthogonal fenestration between nine (9) and fifteen (15) feet above the
level of the finished floor.
Simply put, as it relates to the subject case, this standard requires that there be no windows
(facade penetrations/fenestration) in any areas that lie between nine (9) and twelve (12) feet
above the finished floor height of the particular room, and no non-orthogonal windows in
_. z
any areas that lie between nine (9) and fifreen (15) feet above the finished floor. As Sheet
3.0 of Exhibit A indicates, the proposed design would result in each of the aforementioned
units containing approximately 13.5 square feet ((9 x 3) _ 2) oftriangular-shaped glazing in
areas between 9' and 11' 10" above the finished floor height of the second story.
Given the lack of compliance with the "volume" standard, the applicants are left with the
choice of pursuing one of the following three (3) options. First, the applicants could accept
the two-to-one (2:1) floor area penalty for each violating window while ensuring that the
entire building, including FAR penalties, would fall within set FAR limitations. Second,
they could redesign the proposed remodels such that the new form would comply with the
"volume" standard, as well as the rest of the residential design standards. Lastly, the
applicants could appeal staff s findings to the Design Review Appeal Board.
Rather than accept the floor area penalties (not enough remaining FAR per unit to make this
a viable option) or redesign the proposed remodels, the applicants have chosen to seek a
variance from the "volume" standard. Consequently, if variances are not granted, the
applicant would have to create new designs that would comply with the volume standard. If
a variance is to be granted, it must be justified according to one of the three variance criteria
outlined above (on page one of this memorandum).
According to the proposed revisions to the Residential Design Standards, the purpose/intent
of the "Volume" standard "is to ensure that each residential building has street facing
architectural details and elements which provide human scale to the facade, enhance the
walking experience, and reinforce local building traditions." Although proposed code
amendments do not hold any force in the review of current applications, staff feels this
information might be helpful in understanding the issues/concerns that the volume standard
attempts to address.
Since the proposed design does not yield greater compliance with the Aspen Area
Community Plan, if the requested variances are to be justified, it would need to be on the
grounds that either the proposed design is necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual
site specific constraints, or the proposed design more effectively provides street-Facing
architectural details and elements which provide human scale to the facade, enhance the
walking experience, and reinforce local building traditions than would a design that meets
the exact letter of the "Volume" standard.
In terms of site specific constraints, there are no unusual physical conditions (i.e.,
topography, natural hazards, etc.) where reasons of fairness would dictate that the proposed
noncomplying windows must be included in the design. The site is presently developed and
has been occupied for a considerable amount of time. Given that the units have been
occupied since at least the early 1980s and have proven to be adequately livable, it would be
difficult to make the case that there are site specific constraints where the only fair way to
develop the site would be with a variance from the Residential Design Standards. The
noncomplying windows appear to be included for decorative reasons, and for purposes of
maximizing views from and sunlight into the master bedroom suites. Also, the existing roofs
above the master bedrooms suites shed snow directly onto the balconies of the suites, and the
3
proposed remodel would eliminate these balconies and redirect snow from the roofs to the
sides of the units. Notwithstanding the reasoning behind the proposed design, staff maintains
that there are no site specific constraints that make these windows necessary.
With regard to effectively providing street-facing architectural details and elements which
provide human scale to the facade, enhance the walking experience, and reinforce local
building traditions, staff feels the requested variance could be justified on these grounds.
The south elevations (subject of the application) face Gibson Avenue, which has a sidewalk
on its north side. This sidewalk sits roughly 10-1~ feet lower in elevation than the base of
the River Bluff Townhouses. Nevertheless, staff feels that the proposed remodel would add
some architectural relief to the currently somewhat unbroken verticality by injecting new
roof angles and glazing, thereby potentially enhancing the walking experience. Since the
proposed windows of the townhouses would be set some 25-35 feet higher than the
sidewalks, staff feels that whatever human-scale already exists on the facade would not be
adversely affected. Cross gables with glazing in the south-facing gable ends are consistent
with local building traditions.
Moreover, the proposal could easily be made to comply with the volume standard if the
glazing in the gable ends would stop at nine feet above the floor height; however, staff is of
the opinion that this would result in a less successful overall design. Based on this
consideration and those explained in the preceding paragraph, staff feels the design of the
proposed remodel, with the noncomplying windows, should be approved since it more
effectively addresses the issue the volume standard responds to.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the DRAC approve variances from
Section 26.58.040(F)(12), Volume, of the Residential Design Standards for the proposed
noncomplying windows on the south elevations of Units 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, and 12 of the
River Bluff Townhouse Condominiums, as indicated in Exhibit A. These variances should
be granted based on a finding that the proposed design more effectively addresses the issue
or problem the given standard or provision responds to.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve variances from the Volume provision
of the Residential Design Standards as it would apply to the proposed remodel of Units 2, 3,
4, 5, 7, 9, ]0, 11, and 12 of the River Bluff Townhouse Condominiums, as indicated in
Exhibit A. These approvals are based on a finding that the proposed design more effectively
addresses the issue or problem the given standard or provision responds to."
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit "A" -Submitted application package
c:\home\mitchh\hpc&drac\rivbl uff. doc
""~
4
~c
5_ZOZ(n IP
OOZUF.-~'+= .^9
ooa
~'
crz a~
na >
wn o~N
;'iJ
mx zo -„1~
W liJ LI- ~
~
l.Iggg1 j 11111 11111 11111
:<~ yY C~
C
yy
U LnOnm S M1' U U
p ~Ubm J U I
a~h too N i 1;1 Q
O~ a2~
~ s
i g
4
p #
ff~~
~d$54
~ _ a ,
-- -_ ~ ~
-- ~®
_ -_
m ~ __3.. ~~--
In ~ 1
~' o
a m~
~a
_ __ N
~,, a
j i
-? - ~,I~ ~~~wG-_~~l o
O
Z
f~
0
0
.:
3
w
z
Y
.)
N
Z
rn
- ~
F ~
O
C O
U
~: Z
z
i
0
t
a
$
AQ~
3
~ ~
1
~
Z
J
y
~ ~ b
Z ~ J
~ ~..3 _R
4b< CO
rl
a
n
"' ~ bm
b
a
~^'. {~ n ~ mronF ~ n
s
°
€ l >
' e~
c^
e
p A z ~
m
~R i~
D Y D 5 blbo l°.I C
fI
b
u ~ ob0011
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 r f
.. .. mJIIW~D :.
k ~
-
In cu f, r~ m
C7 Z X W
l
~~~~ N'"D O n fTl
ova Z--_1-U)U
s ~ -- I G L O O
-
vl o Cl~ In L O Z S
~ z oz in~r~
OU ZOI-~G ~"'°
pnl ~~ <°aowa
~'NNT^I
.b
- a' b s
~
~ rc ~ 7c°.mm
w[L OLr~ ~ij~ ~ ~~too
W L~J Ii ~ U
~
O~ 4
Q ~ ~
1.,
4
' II111 11111 11111
'
a a a '~ g
¢
~ al
4 3
Z
~ ~~
~
~ ~
~
N ~ W C'
ka~~~ Z E
ri
z "
-~
~~
ao
Zrcl,~
~~in
x
L•J~ VI Z
_ I
IOQ~
~?3°-
o L~
~OOi:i
LJ O Z V)
o~ a~-
~ I~/
z ~,
o_ -!
I>ff I
I~1
_ 1
1.1
<J
'L
V)
X
Li
i1
1
/ '~
rJ I
z 4
Q
~i
_1
tli
~.
~6
..0-,6 -~
~~
~~
o,
_~
°_
m
In
-~
m
r -
i
v ~ z
b O S~ °"~
' ~ yo it
t: ~~ 4~
----- -_ ~~ B ~
~n
~g ~8 ~B
~g ~~ ~~
b
!1 ~ ~~~4
~ ~~~ ~
g
D ~
C 1 ~ ~s9 §e
b
~..3 =R
°
O
4w<
~ n wtia
~ ~ ,
w~
m ~ c mbn n
n n wwb~
~
y
'
~ D
z ~ bb
w
'
- ~ bbob
y
n a ~ 5 muoo~ ~~
i i~~ ~ C i i~ ~ i .. i ~ ~ i i C wvww..7 :.
A
r^c~ ~rn m
O L X Q7
aU
g N'O O - U
g
~~J ~~- Z~
~s° =Jt;-i C7Z00
oino (I~VI Z D Z ~
~~~EIVED
~'`~?3199A
. -aJJPi-:ti~~
CC7dtaL4I1Y vE/~ ,^,?'Ac."J-
MASTER BEDROOM EYPAr SIONS
OF SELECTED CHITS AT
RIVER BLUFF TOWNHOUSE CONDOMINItiMS
November I9, 1998
Submitted by
Studio Completiva Inc.
1410 Grant Street
Suite B 303
Denver, CO 80203
SCOPE OF WORK ~+
Selected unit owners at River Bluff Townhouse Condo wish to expand there second floor master ..
bedroom which faces south towards .Aspen Mountain.
Plan: Essentially, the existing master bedroom balcony becomes par[ of the bedroom. The
bedroom expansion [o the south is defined by the south edge of the e:isting balcom• and the west
wall (see attached dtawingsl. There are minor modifications to the itnerior Layout that include
relocation of the master closet and addition of a fireplace (gas appliance). Total square footage
added is l I~ sf.
Elevation: All existing elevations retrain as is except for the second floor, south elevation. A
.dormer will be added to the existing sloping roof as shown in drawing A.i.0 and :~i.1.
RESPONSES TO ATT,~C:-IiV1E~IT
GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
L The applicant's name address. and telephone number. contained within a letter signed by the
applicant stating the name, address and telephone number of any representative authorized to
act on behalf of the applicant.
SEE. IT.4CHED PRGOF OF O ~Y.VER.SHIP SECTION
?. The street address and legal description of the parcel on which the development is proposed
to occur.
Expansions to bedrooms at selected units are to occur at Lone Pine Condominiums. The
address for the River Blutif Townhome .-association is: SOS South Galena Street Suite .~.
Aspen, Colorado 31611.
For individual unit owner 's address and legal description see attached improvemenr sun•ev
and disclosure of ownership.
S. Disclosure of ownership of the pazcel on which the development is proposed to occur,
consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company listing the names of all
owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgements, liens, easements, contracts and
agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owners' right to apply for the
development review.
SEE.-1TT.lCHED
d. An 8 ;;" x I ]" vicinity map locating the subject pazcel within the City of Aspen.
SEE ATT~ICHED
RESPONSES TO ATTACHMENT 3
GENERAL SUBb[ISSION REQL`II2EVIEYTS
1. Neighborhood block plan a[ l"=.0'
TO BE SL'B,LIITTED
2. Site Plan
SEE.-1TT ICHED SLRY'E7
3. All buildins elevations. roof and Yloor plans at 1/3"=1'-0"
SEE dTTdCHED DRd 6VINGS LiVDER SCOPE OF II'ORK: Ttipica! unit's ?idJloor plans.
elevations (south and east) and roof plan.
4. .~. graphic verification that the project meets or does not mee[ the "Primary Mass" standard.
Information not szzbmitted per direction: of aj~cer at Comtnzrnity Development.
~. Photographic panorama. Show elevations of all buildinss on both sides of the block.
including present condition of the subject property. Label photos and mount on a
presentation board.
TO BE SL'B,YlITTED
6. A written explanation of the requested variance and a discussion of why a variance would' be
appropriate and would not compromise the intended =gals of the "Residential Desist
Standazds." The applicant may provide any offsettins design features that may mitigate
impacts of the variance requested.
SEE FOLLOWING PAGE
The applicant seeks a variance from an ordinance that pertains to window placements. The
current design for the glazing at the dormer does not meet the following:
~. for the purpose of calcula[inB floor area ratio and allowable door area for a building or
portion thereof whose principal use is residential. a determination shall be made as to its interior
plate heights. All areas with an exterior expression of a plate height greater than ten (I O) feet
shall be counted as two (_) square .'eet for each one (t) square foot oT floor area. Exterior
expression shall be defined as facade penetrations between nine (9) and tve!ve (I _) feet above
the level of the finished door and circular. ;emi-circular or non-orthownal fenestration bern'een
nine (9) and fifteen (1 ~) feet above the level of the finished floor.
The current 2lazins design at ;econd floor bedroom includes facade penetration betveen 9 and 1"'
feet. (shaded area on the south elevation drawing)
We believe a variance should be granted based on following considera[ions
The window design meets the general intention of the ordinance:
The said ordinance regarding glazing placement was adopted to deter overuse of glazing that
resulted in aluminum cunains wallsiBlass structural walls spanning several floors with
unintettvpted dazing. Such design detracted from the overall sense of community, place and
identifying, aesthetical characteristics of aspen. Though the design may not meet the
ordinance to the letter. w'e believe it establishes and maintains a building facade that has a
sense of scale. materialirv and characteristics that are consistent with the intention of the
ordinance and the aesthetics concerns of .aspen.
2. Facade below the glazing:
The glazing does not immediately start from the floor plate of the second level. A low wall
approximately 2'-1 I" tall serves as a base for the window areas, thus, minimizing overall
glazing sf. If the low wall above the floor plate is subtracted from the height of the glazing,
the height of Blazing is under 9`-0".
3. Building Location:
The condominium complex is not close to other buildings. The complex is hidden. private
and well screened from the public and neighbors. The complex is nearly surrounded by roads
and landscaping making the units difficult to see from the street or adjacent buildings.
Change in dazing will not have a large impact on the immediate area or to the public.
iycos Road daps tttp:: roadmaps.iycos.com:90; cgi-Stn, mgcustomcennect
ROADMAPS
R i N
_?AAPav~ST~; ~ o~loom
~oort
a~
No
7 ~
St wri
n
S.~r~ R
W r~er
-_ spin ~~'St
y riangle_ rk ,y
! ~A A
'n ra~cts A
r b
iii ~ s~h~
Y
~~ 2~ ~+~.
~~ ~ ~"~ ~
~~a!!a o erande aaiiy;t 3
1 of rn ~ St veld ,)
.. j ~ ~ ,,
Z Blgler~r ~p~A-`r a>rsr 2~
hj az A n
"1
'" paApcke
'~ Park
.~T~a. ~~
1908 GeoSystsrtn Gbbat Coro.; O 1998 NavTech ..,
- Return To Mag
Custom Search . TopNews .TOP 5%. Ci Guide . StockFind
PeopleFind .Companies Online .Road Maps . Saftvrare .About Lycos . Hamel
Add Your Site to Lycos .Advertise with Lycos. Jabs4YOU . G ~ c Yellow Papes . New2Net
Lycos Germany .Lycos Sweden .Lycos UK
Coppyyrigght0 1997 Lycos,lnc.
~lfRights Reserved.
Lycos® L5 a registered trademark of
Carnegie Mellon University
Questions 8 Comments
ertns an con i tons
.~~~
r ..C r . , Homo ,.~.r mw
Ur.+1T3 v
A i tAC;~i1fIE?ii t
(„ANII tJS~ AAP! tC~7]CN FARM
'. ?rciec: ~ar,;e ~E~RCOM _Yx~Ar.-;ov !a 21vc0. 3UAE= 'CWiJHONSc~oc.
Z ?rcyes»'c~ucr. X55 ~ cu v~NC 2r. ~~ unt,-r s 2 ~ c - ~>
_ RE~ Su2ve~ =02 =:Gpl 7ESC~;PTtc.U
(InCiC.aLE SSe°:.'sCC25S::CL 3nC ~ICGC nll1T,CEf 0! ~'1elE~ dnC ~:.IIUStCS ~eSC.:vDCn1
~Z Su~2v E'! ~
3. ?^esent_cntrg GCM FA s. L.^tsi~ oa.ooo o= :wv=zsHIP
?. Aociic3nfsname.accrassana:,ncnenut:tae- Ro~_~,caa-'.. ~c~tu~'=
IS5 LouE DINS (2.o A.D ytNIT~ Z A57~N .C $l~o if 'ci.~ ~i0. 3i$•5(o'?'Z
o. Representative'a nacre. address. attd ~i^cne.^.LICRLe! Yar.~. ~~C ~Q~=+1 TFGT
STUQ(t7 CoMPt,ETr~/A-+.~ di tr ,~AN^' <_~ c„tTS ~.;,,,z r ~iyc2 •_o `~cZa3
7. Type ci a:.>riic.^ucn (c:':es.''c ad .:'tat apply):
Te._: 303 • 83°I, o. a: r
Can~ii;cnai Use _ Carc.~tt:ai S?.4 Ccn~^a:ai AFC
_
SpeGaf ~aview _ F~naf SP,4 _ Ftrai -F
_
89~C Gze.^,rirte Dcn~=mil 't~D Mincr HF:
_
_ Strzam ~Ltargir. Fral ?'JD ,_ Reicr~cn -FC
Succivisicn _ ~ e.~^JMap Amend. H'ssta:ic ~tdmari<
GdAQS ailceTtern _ G~t1CS exernpticn pemclP~..ttiai Deme
View Platte _ Cortdcntiniurrtization_~ Design RESrie~v
_
_ lot Sci"rtlLct i:ne Ap~ai Cotrnii.~°
AdjusaretT[
8. Descrnticn ci axisting uses (rumcer and type Qi existing saz:ct:tes,
apprtymtTate sq. ° . numi~er of bedrecros, arty ptevieus appttrials gT~reed b ate
.property) EAgi UYIT 1S APatDXIMATELY 1.900 SF
_ -rrag¢.£ ~yE I i uNITS AT Rweti. at.uFF Towt~uouSE Co*f,DO MuJIUNS .
_ THE u~SE. Fot~ TW6 ~~~ITS IS RESIDE.N'CIAL.. EAGN NNl'S
'tYPt~wY fiACH Nul certTAtn15 3 8DE-MS ANO ; 0.A'T}iRoo~S
r QFcviou5 p,ppp.oVA1. po0. LIVING (joaM wAS C.aANTED IN I~ $~
8. Descipticn c! deveicpmerit application
EXPANSIVrt of Tti6 F7E94.oOM oN 5£coKO DLcGQr A ,J DaC+-Me{L
AND M1NOiL ~,nnniFl~CTt0~1 To 2a1TEO.xofL AR_no.,._,~._. I„Ay„~iT
AD91TIONAL SF~ APPRaxI~+ATEtr`f 110 Sr
t 0. Have yeu ~mpieted and attadTed ate fCUowinc~?
~ Aitactmertt t-Land use application farm
/ Respcnse b7 Atiactttrre~ 2
/ Response b Atta~tmerrt 3
09;I0i98 1:16 TX/RX Y0.2638 P.00~
_ _ _ _ _ _
- -- - •,
l.(NIT ¢ ;~
arAC~M~.~r ;
Latin us>= aP~! IICA'i1aN Et3ftlld
'. P~ieC: nacre ~E'.. RcoM eX 7rfN5+ON (a 21y EtL 3ruFF TOWNHC'fSc !F nloO
Z. ?!O}eC :CCoIlCr. ir77 r_.^NF 7rNC 21'A1~ !l n(!1~ Tj /r1N~T 7~j`.
2E~ SUQVEY t:D2 ~-iCaAL O~:GiZtP'ION
(incic~e srreec acc.^zss::cz and diccrnumcer or -feces and ~cuncs des~acnj
~Lgy ~ SuRv E Y ~
j. P2Se!'1L =^:t2nC '~''! 'r A 4. ~ .^`! SiZ~ v¢DOC ~ ~~v K 52s N I ?
~_ AoQfic~nt's -ame. 3cdress ana :,acne nurrrer SECoraF. GtasaE2::
ISS LIKE OIN;; 2c 1.D uNiT~+ $ ASrEN ~O SICaiI
TtL: 212 • ~p a}4 • ~2:. .
@. Represer>ta~~e•s nan;e. adCrESS. and rrcne numaer YONG- G:~C AR~:r+TF~T
STUDI ~MPIr-QUA *I Id'n !, p.AN` 5"' cul'c ~, 'Snz t~Fi:~l~2 ~~ ~ 20^
i. Type er asrpiicaucn ;c:~ecc ad that apply):
_ Ccncit;cn~i ! 'se
_ S17eC:3i ,Feview
800 Gaze.^,rirte
Stream r~tzsr~in
_ Sucdivisicn
_ Gk1GS ailcsnent
View Flare
Lct SciitlL:t !_ne
Adiusarerrz
T21..: 303 • a3q . awq
_ Co:,cxn:ai SP.4 _
_ Fnai SP,4
Ccn~pcT:ai P':D
_ Frai ~I„D
_ TexilMan Arrertd. -_
G~1QS exemcticn
C~sdcminiumzzaticn~
Ccn~^^•_; ; ;FC
FRa1 'r.FC
Mincr !-ii=
Reic~cn riFC
Histcr'o ~rd.^aric
DemclParJai Demc
OesiSri ,48vie'»r
Appsai C-RSniti`e
8. Desc:;n~cn ci existing uses (numaer and type of existing ,
apprnxffnate sG_ ° _ numi~er of bedrooms, arty previous apprnvais gresrroed to ~e
1A S .
~RcW euS APPtLOVP1. poR LiVfHG (teeh~ wpS li0.PINiE17 IN 19$ 1
9. Desaipticn Cf deveicpmerd aDQiiCatI.OR
EX7ANSIOr~ of THE 6EOa.ovt,1 oN 56coy0 nLacfz~, 4 hlH~1 OecLMejZ
AND MINC'C M ~rF ~ A'T<av TO TilTCernO w•7.e nn -.... , n.~, ~-Z
P991TIONAL SF~ AP?RnKI-+ATELY 110 SF
10. Have you cmple*.ed and attaci;ed ifte feUowing?
~ Attac:~ment t-Land use application firrrR
/ Response m A~rnerrt 2
Response b AttaC'trneclt 3
.~.,,
A i t AC;~ME"!T 1
LANt1 iISS APP! 'C,aT]GN FGF23Y!
.. a".:ie~'am@~'rG:R:.C`~ n;C?rN51n0N~~•21VE7L BI..Lt%F ~oU:1JMCU+E C.~n101)
z. ~T.'~EC CCuIIC^ ~r7 '7 ir,tJF =!!~~ ~(JA UN i" 4 i / !;/Nl. i i - 5
22' <uQ,l~.. -0Q -e1bAL OESCZ;P"tor,l
(1nCIC~ 5'SE°t .aCC2_S::Ct 3nC ~iCGC~n1,:.TCe! Or tTlete3 a[iC i.C12nCS d ~..IICn)
R~t:~2 SuRvEY ~
,,. present _crnrg 2 M = ~ 1. L_^t Sim veoao - : w v = z H i P
~_ ACOIICa71t'3 name. =cctzss anc :,acne ntuzicer ~ ° sEPy sTARni
IS5 .cuE OINc 20Aa :tNIT= 1 45G8;`J CO. 31(x!1
=~ 9'io • X26 • ;o
"o. Rern?sr:ntacle'= nacre. address. 31`.d .i;C^3numce! `loN~: ~~+~' ~iR~%i1TEL~
Crl~nln ~,, .. nl r .,,. .1~ ta.ln i 2.AN"' ST [utTC s,an Z FtaV=Q ' 7_ ?~o Za j
i . Type cf arrpiicaticn ;c::e~c ail that ~pciy):
_ Candiccnai Use _
_ SDe+~al ,~eiie•,v ,
Stream 11Aarctn
Suncivisicn
r Cn1AC.S allcare!it _
_ View P!ai-i~
lot Sc~rt/Lai Line
Ac3us~rie!tt
Conc.~pivai S?A _
Fnai Sr.4 _
Cal~ctuai ~l.'D
Frai ?L'D +
TexJMaa Amend_ _
GYtCS exe:noticn
C~ideminitunaation~
Con~.^u:al ; ;FC
F;nai -FC
Mincr HFG
Reic~dcn AFC
Histcnc ! zridirar!c
DernolPa~ai Demo
Design Resriew
Acpeai Ccn.rritt2e
8. Descrntion ci exis>ing uses (Horne! and type of existing strz:.
apprrximate sq_ a .number of bedrocros, arty previous aocrnvais g to die
property) EAc>{ uulr I~P°+2ox'r^gTai-Y 1, 900 5F
THE?E.?.IL>= tl-uNtTS AT R1UCiLOI.IIFF 'Cowt~uouSE CoNpoMtN1UTAS•
Tk'e u5 ~ PoiL THE ~*i1TS 1 5 RESIDENTIAIr . ERL'A uNl'i
Q1~c~louq APPi~vP1, poR LlV1N6 (ieelH WpS 6aANTED l!J t9 $
8. Des.~icticncfdeve:cpme!itacpfication
EXPA*t5~ori of THE 6E9R.ooM o*1 Sficoµp tL~p~Y A iiE~.t Oe(iME¢.
AND MiKOtL M elt:t~ ~'TtOV To 'LT e~n0 Ac ne ...,1.. ~y ILT
i1DDlTt oN A L SF ~• aP (toRtraATcL'( 11 O SF
10. Have ycu cmpieted and atla~ied *he ioilowvig?
~ Attac:iment S- Land tees applicaticn i>rrrrt
/ Respcnse to A~ Z
/ Response tc Atiac~smetrt 3
09i10i98 15:16 TX/RX Y0.2638 P.OOV
- __a.~.,---__-=~~ ~. z
Ai taC:?ME"fT1
t.,ANII t~E Afoot 'C.1 T 1GN FORM
P''cier: ~ar^e 3c;`L^eM eX7nN510N C'`Lt~ESL 3t,uFF -owNNCKSG C; aoc
=. ~T.}EL. '.ccsacR X55 ! .^11F PiNr 20A~ ilN 7"f 't q ~ Uty lT - -~
• ZE~ Sut?veY -04 ''-aGAL O~SC;Z;PTtaN
(IRCiCn'tE~uL?I nQC25S: ~Oi:3nC CtCCt~^L1TCel.^,r,'rieteS anC:.CI2nCS ~e5lw'IDIICR)
r'~~_.Z SuZ'~=Y ~
... P•'esent _cntrg R M ~ A 4. L.:t sib ?aonc : ~ o •~ N = 2 z H, P
~_ Aoctic~rt's name. sacress and ;,rene numoer .TONN ~. r:,ut~-, ~,ar1
f55 L-HE ?INi 12c~~ (ANI"~ 9 ASPEN CO 3!l~~1 `=L% a4f!•o40.9$l¢
6. Represe~-Hue's Horne. adcrESS. and pitons numoer YaN~~ c~+C act~+1T~~ j
STUDIC C~MPI,P-nIA ~ kiln /RANT 5TH cu~~c Q,•~ez nc~, /-^ ~ ~ 4 ya ~
TEL: 3 0 3. 839 . c9a _
.r
r'. Type ci a~~iicancR (c:;ec'c ad chat apniy):
CARCiLICR~i Use
5oecaf Revieav
_ Stream ~Ltarrin
r Suocivisicn
_, GL1GS ailom^eRI
1/'~ ?lane
lot Scfit/Lrt'_ne
Acjustmerrt
_ Carc~•izsai Sr~.4 _
_ Fnai SP.4
_ Can~Itnsai PUD
_ Frai ?'JD _
TezilMap Amend- _..__
_ G~1CS exemption
C~dcminiumsation~
UNIT a 4
Can~^z<:.ai ~ :FC
F:rnai ; :FC
Minor ~ii=C
f4eic~~ccn ;HFC
HLstcric `zndr:arc
Dema/PsrJai Desnc
Design ftavievu
Apc$ai Ccmmi
8. Desz:;pTicn of existuTg uses (numoer and type of existing ~ ~ ,
approxirltate sc. ° .numoer of bedrooms, arty pra?viaus apprCV21s gras>f+si to ~;e
prnpeRy) EAGN Ux1T S pvpstoXtMA7ELY 1.900 sp
THERe.~P--E li-uN1TS AT RlUCti0l.t4FF '[o,,u~,Jy;oK$E ~eNDoM~NIUNS.
Tk`c u5E Fo(~ TpE utJITS IS RESI~EntTlgt.,. EAGH uNl'f
?V Plfa~wY EACH KNl coKSRtNS 3 8D X15 0.Ne i tS iTUe ..pµ4
PFEv~euS 11pP¢eVPI. Fo0. LtV{H4 KeeM WAS t:P.ANTED IN I°~il~
8. Desci>rticn cf devca{~ment appficaticn •
EXPAHStor~ of TriE ~E09..oOM oN SficoKp F.~a3y,._,g ~w Oa[+-MEN
AHD MINOQ- MnDIFI t. q'ClOe.f TO 'fil7ae ...o DEaown l.7Yn~i "1'
P991TtoNgl. SF~ FPPRo><twATELY 110 Sl:
10. Have you cmpieted and aita~ted tits i'cilowing?
,~ Atta~mertt .-Land use application faint
/ Response to Aiia~'tmerrt 2
/ RQSpcnse b Atiactment 3
~g/l~/~fl IS•iR TV/nv •rn ,.......
uNtr *~ i o
ATiAC:-iMi:3'f'f' Z
L.~NQ USE AFP! CATICN EaRM
', Prc)ec:'arre Bc'~RGO!~ nXP^cr5iou ~ ¢.tVEdp,c,uFF To u;nl.tc;,(,'E C`NCR_
Z. P!giEC''•CC.a.ZC.^. X57 Lo1JF_ 7rplc 20AQ~. IANi'T '~ l0 !•,~Nt~ =-il
RE~ Su¢vGY Fo¢ ~GA~ 7~SCa.~PTtoN _
(1RCiCare Saee*_ nCC."c'SS::CL 3nQ ~iCC:C"numoer Cr :Hates anC :.curses Qes~nDCR~)
softy E Y
,,. Present _cn1Rg 2 +t F ~ ~. LcT sip ? g~ o a ~ W ~+= 2s H 1 P
°. Ap06c3nr3 came. ~CCr25S ant! :,RCne RUIt;1:er MpYl,IL RIC,M'M o 'r~:
(35 LokE ?iNc +2c?.r , NNIT~+ . n :15?EN. CO SIl/o 11 Ei. % ?0s,.5~2' look
o. Reorese~rzacve'=_ nacre, adcnns, and pitane numt,er~ Nr~ c~+C. ARr~ii?e(,T
STU010 GoMOI,F-nJA ~tiL la.ln i0.AN'^ ST c,lr_, Tc~ ~,q2 F~IV=2 '~' `ho2a3
7. Type ci appiic,"ticR ;c:~ec~c ad ;stet apniy):
TE_: ~ie3 a3 1 ' ~I I 1 T
Ccnc ~cRai Use Corc.+piuai S?.q C;,n~^tt;d ^rC
_
Soe~al Revie•N Finai SRA _ Fnai HFC
_
8040 G-ee^.rirte C:.n~ptuai PUD ~ Mircr 4FC
_ Stream lrizsgir. f= Hal PUD Reict~cR i ::=C
Subdivisicn TextlMan Amend- Hisiaric ~ndrrraric
_
GdAGS aiicanent G~ACS exempticn DemIIlPartiai 'Jame
View Ptane ~ Candcminiurr;izaticn1/ Design Review
_ Loi Sciii/f_ct Lane Appeai Ccrnmiiiea
Adi'us~ent
8. Des:~:nt)cn ci existing uses (numcer and :ype a:' existing saz:c~:res.
appn~ttate sc. ° . nurlcer at ixdreams, arty previous aportnals gratrned ~ dte
properly) EACH LLtttT S APP4tOX1MAT~L'r 11900 Sp
_ THE4~E ~P-c 1~- UNITS AT RSV81L OI.UFF 'LowhlL7ouSE CoiapoMIN1UN5
THE= u5c FoFL 7p£ ~1~tTS IS RESIp@t3T1gt... EAGN uNt'T
~euS APP?~VAt. Fo P. LlV ll'14
17 t N 1
S. Descictlcn ci 3ev~cprttent applicaticn
EXPAUStori of TH6 2~EORooM oN SE•coKO >= o ~,4~efZ
AND MINO{L M DIF\! OTlOn1 To 'Ca1T e~.+a fACn ,,,,u~: ~Y ~~'~,
ACVtTIVN AL SF ~ AP R.eKt-nATEi.~( l1Q Sr
10. Flave ycu ~mpieted and att-actted tite iailowing?
~, Ai#acnment 1-Land use application term
/ Resacnsa to A~ 2
~ Response ~ Ati-acttment 3
09/10/98 15:16 TX/RX N0.2638 P.004
..~. _
UNIT ~~~
ATTAC:iiIAE.a! T t
LANQ U58 AFB! 'CATIGN FGRild """`"'
t. Freiec:.~are ?EDRroM fixP'~NSiou Q zwe¢ 3,.ur -owNF,cv.S° ,-NOa
Z Pro~'c~ticn ~~~ ~_~ur= v~NC zc,~o uNt-rs io Cuter- =-11„
_ 2E' SuR~r=-~ 002 ~6AL OESC2tpTto.U
(InClCate SL'e°t nCC25S .Ct 3rSC C10C:t ^L11TC°!' Or ,nletee anC :.auttcs Cesc-.ptlCR)
~' ~ Su,2vEY
~. ?2sent_antng `Zyt rA S. L."t31Z° P2ooP oa ~wN=QSNiP
a_ AOOiicarrr'; ,„ame. 3CCrz55 and ;.rcne nurrher 5AM SN AMl
IS5 Lo17E ?iNi; (LcA.D NNiT~ r0 ASSN co SICoI( ~ci.~ Zd•9.61to•5oo3
r
6. Represe~rtatve'<_ nare. adcftESS.:rd ?i^ane numt:er YoniG- c~C. aRr~ITe~7
~TUDtO inMPt.F-n/a t1t' t_a-~n t~ANT 5~~ c,,,_^ a,-e2 r,V~2 rn 4+ 2a3
`EU 303.83`l• 9°9
7. Type or a>rpiic,--z;crt (c:~ecc ad .fiat apeiy):
_ Canciiicnsi Use
Spet~al zevie~,v
80aG G+'zertrirte
~~ Stn?3m i1A3rf In
Succivisicn
GdAGS alictmerst
View ?tart=
Lai Scfit/Urt Lne
Acjus~rlent
_ Co.^.c.°pttai SP.4 _
_ Fnai Si-A
Con~ptua! ?'JD _
Fral ?'JD _
TexSlMan Amend_ _
_ G~1CS exemption
C~dcminium>zatian~
Ccn~,^tud ~ ;FC
Fnai rFC
Minor'-'rFC
ReiGGtICn i-!FC
H'IStoric Lancrraric
Demc/Partiai Demc
Design Review
Apnea! C:.rrsniiSe°
8. Desc:;nticn cr existing uses (numcer and type ai axisiing sa•uc'rres,
apprexanate sc. ° . numt~er of bedraams, arty pceviaus approvals to ~e
property) EAC1a uxl~ ~S APFiKoxIrHATa+..Y 1, goo SF
TxER ~ ti. uNlTS A7 RIV 6(>` OUtFF Towe.IJ-lou$E ColdOO MMlUNS.
T1i`c u5~ FofL 'rNfi utJ1TS IS RESIDENTIpIr &ALN vnll?
,ouS APPP-evP1. FoP- L1vlNL (teeNl
IN
8. Descripticn cf deveiopmer-t appfi~ton
ExYANSION of Tli9 6FAR.ooM ON Sficotyo n ~~ ~,a ~~ Oet>_M R
,~ AND M1110 ~L M DIF_ r ~'ClOr.l To 2i1T o~nd As ne ..,,~.. ~ n r~.,Y
PDOITION qL SF ~ hPPRoKINATEL`( 110 5'r ~-i--_---
10. Have you cmpieted and attadted the ieBowQlg?
„~ Aitou~merrt t-Land use application faint
/ Resoanse to A 2
~ Response tc Attaa:tmerrt 3
~.
i.L~V iT ~ 1~
ATi AC:~9VIEaf'T ?
L.ANa U5~ AA?! 'CaT(GN EGRAd
'. Y"C1eC:.^.ni"2 ~•=70..:OM s7~7,'7N51oN -? ~2;uGyL 3u.~cF -~at(cu:E GcNO~
L 3!C~'.CC.'at'1Ci: ~n77 !~U~. 7rt.IC 2G4i1 !AtJI~f I~ ZUNI"' .'L)
r2E: Sut?vEY ~a4 ~-iuAL O.SCt;?Ttonl _
(11'1CJCa}re SII'e°L 3CC.'255:.(7t and CiCC:C~RttrllQe! :.r rneres anC CCtlrtCS tjeS~CIICR)
~. P"2Sent _^.PinC~ 2'^ r ?. 'L. ~ "t SiZ,° y4.ooC o a : w K 525 H I P
5. Appticarr>?s game. 3ct:rzss ana :,cone ntuttbty GI.~NrI A . 74 :~'
f55 ~cuE ?iNB a.caD uN1T~ II aS~N ro gt(o~t TE;.:'~o •°~5.94q-?~
6. Rencese.^racve's nar:e. address. ara ~i:cne nt.tmttr `(o I - t:t•+0,_•_Aar..+ITEG7
STUDtD IAMP~-rte ,.~~_, Id.ln !.R.~N" c- ci,ITC 7C~nz »c_UV=2 in 'hayp3
7. Type oi` acpiicaticn ;c::ec~ ad :hat aaniy):
_ Can~iiicnai Use
_ SceGal ieriew
8x40 G'e°<tiine
,_, Stream Marrir.
Sucdivisicn
c~nas aucaTTesst
View Plan=
_ lot SpiitlL~t Lne
Adjus7rerrt
`~~: 303 • b39.999
_ Cort.~cz:ai S?.4 _
_ Finai ~P,4-,~JJ n _
vv'n~N`. ... rUD ~~
_ Final ?'JD _
_ Te.-illbian Amend. _
GdtiCS exemaben
Ccrtdorrtiniumizatien_~
Can~^ad :rPC
Fnat i..~v
Minor i-iPC
Reic~cn HPC
Historic Lan ;
Densc/Paroal Qemc
Oeairn Review
Appeal C.~mrii•
8. DesL :ption ai existing uses (rt,:mcer and type ~ existing sCUC.zsres,
apprnxamate sq. ° -number of bQdracros. any previous aPornvals gr~rtlced to itte
Tk~c u5F FofL TpE CtS IS RESlOEt3Tlglr. EaGit wtJl"T
K5.
QPcvrouS APP4aVP1.Foiti LiVfN4(ieoM WAS f.0.ANTE17 IN I°18?
s. Descipticn at deveicament app!'ic~iiort
EXPANStotJ oP THE 2~fioR-oar•~t oN SEeoxO at_-no2~(~1 rl~Def>•ME{L
ANO MINOfL MnnrFtr ~^CtO.f To Til7tsor..o Anne...rr._. WY~r~'r
ItflOtTtoNAI- SF '• APPRnKINATEI.`f 110 SF
? 0. Have you ccmpieted and atta~ted the >=eflowa:g?
_]C_ Attaczment 1- Land Ilse application fnrrtt
/ Response m A 2
~, Response x Atta~tmesrt 3
09;10/98 15:16 TX/RX N0.2638 P.OOd ~
__
- - --~.:~_-._ _ -. w..
vtNl ; ~ ;^~
arac:~~n~.~r 1
LANQ USE AF?~!~T70N FaR91R
'. ProieC:-ame 3E.0.coM fixPnr15iou Gr 2luF.IL3UAF~'owNHcw~c cc NOD.
Z. ''eiE~ cc-„act. X55 t_a NF_ P!Nc 2.cat~ l unt-r ,e l2 / ANt" _- ~i)
_ 2Et :uQVEY Fo4 ;-:GAL 7~cR.IP'+tor.l
(InCICa~ Stre°t nQC.^255::Qt ana rtaCC.~umCer Or ntere3 anQ ~CUrtCS CeSC.~JDCn
~. P2sent =cn:n ~ M F A d RZF r.,2 5u;ty e Y
g L.^'fS '° pao~F oa ;wK<OSNIP
/"""
_,,i
?. Aopiicam'; name. Cress and ;.i;one numcer AI.EXANOE{L G, cAc?aF>`
IS5 ;.cWE 7iN;r R,oO.D. NNIT~* l2 g5pgy , ~ 1(y it `cL ~ ?79 • °2S• 6Z7s1-
c. Reorese:7cacve's name. addtees. arld phone numi:er KON(. ANC a0.c.,1iTEGT
STU010 /9MPI,F-• IA Iyif_f411~ / RAN^' SY 4L-~ ~~e z n i ~ q~ ZO ;
?Et: 303• '33y • 9°9
i . Type cr anpticaucn ,cLecc atl mat apniy):
_ CAnCILICnc! Use _ G]rc,~piuai SP.4 C;.nC:.^st:.~i .-FC
SoeGai ;~e~riew Fnai 5PA !_ Frtai HFC
_, 80aC Greanrine C:.n~ptua! ?lla
~ Mincer tfP
_ Stream Martin Frei ?'JD Reic~ccn HFC
Sucaivisicn TextlMaa Amenc. }.uric ~ncrarc
GdACS ailotrnem G~tCS exernpticn Qerra/Fartiai Demc
View ?lane C~sdominiumiz3tion~ Demon Review
_ lat SciitlLct L'ne AppQal Ccrrsrli~
Adjusarern
8. Desain>;cz1 ai existing uses (numoe.• and type ei sxisrirtg struc~:res.
apprc~nate sq. ° . nurrttter of bedrearrls, arty previous apprt]Yals gra+tied to tfte
property) E1Cli t1NIT lS PPWZDXIMATEL7 11 E00 SF
TNE4-e. ~P~-E ti uNtTS AT R1Vl=~ 6l.uF~ 'r..~~yaouS~ Co x00 MIN1UNS.
Tkt, uSE. Fof>+ TpE u~JITS I S RESIDENTIgL EpGA yNl?
ef~c'.rtouS PPP@~vAl. Fof~ LIV lN4 f+veM WAS fs0.ANTED IN 19$~
9. Descpdcn cf deveicpmerlt app&cation '
ExPA*+SION of TH0 6EOR.ooM oN SficoKp ~~~~p µE, t Oec1.MER.
AND MINOQ, McDt FI LA^ROti] TO 'rilTte...o rye no -..~. ~ n.: _..-r
PO91TIONAL SF~ APPRoxIHATELY 110 SF
10. Have you cmpieted and attached tite icUawing?
~. Atiacnmerrt S- Land use application £otm
/ Respcnse to Ati~'ttttent 2
~ Response ~ Atia~tmerrt 3
~.. e;
09/10/98 15:16 TY/uv vn ~...,.. _ __