Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.su.Sunny Park Costly I"'" --, ~"- C. ~ 11r'~( (; F.r," j. 3~ ~,~ P!y EH l\J. .......'" J:... ....... ~l .;-' ..i.\.. ... "';.., ~,- '--- ~ '1 '. F ",an"""'>> ct'II":1;""'~.J;di","" (~q;',f<. !tr.,..~ V.. It,AClt.t~~(t:,,".J'<.. .\\:,.. h ".,\:.<...1:.tPj' <.; (!~,"l:: ...\:;)I...~ r::EtI,ORANDUI1 TO: I\spen City Council FROI<1: P.lanning Staff (HC) RE: Subdiv.ision Exempt.ion - Sunny Park Apartments DATE: October.23, 1975 .--._-~ This is an application for subdivis.ion exemption by Jeff Costley for Sunny Park Apartments located at 105 Park Cil'cl e. The project is currently under constructi on and has recently appl i ed for an occupancy permit from the Building Departl';ent, when it was discovered that the building permit vias issued -in elTor (see the attached m2111ofrom Cl ayton ll:eyri ng) . Since the project consists of only fOUl' (if) apartment units, it is exempt from open'space dedication requirements of the subdivision regulations. The Planning and Zoning COll'mission on October' 21, 1975, recommended granting the subdivision exemption Vlith tho condition that a subdivision plat be recorded for the property. The Pl ann.i IJ9 Offi ce feels that no si gnifi cant. public purpose Vloul d be accompl ished by processing this project through full subdivision procedures and recomm2ncls granting the subdivision exemption. We sincerely regret that r,jr. Costley through no fault of his o\~n has experienced this unexpected delay.in finishing his project. . . '" ...."'<~.,,--'-..._''',-''''''',~.~,~''~..,r'...,~..''''''...._-_..''''........,...~~'~-'......,.,...."'/'iJ:~~'.~.'__~',...,.,~....',.,..,.~4"'-'l";:"1:.:il"""'T"".."~.,..:'?'y,.".'C'~"9'""'~,~'l'Z~:">\"OO::~,..~.... ..,..,~:~;rr'O:,'{.'.. y . 1""'<.. . P Ii J "4~:5 ^ ~,_." especially sihce they would)1. I t 'have 1:;0. ,-",end the money on grad' ng. . Schiffer said that he liked the Kravatsky plan the best since 't had the best circulation pattern. Stanford reminded them that these were justi.nterim plans. Schiffer thought that the shut wouldn't work unless they have more stops and make it convenie for people on all. ends of the area to get on a bus as soon as arrive at the parking lot. Hunt thought that if they were goi to lock into a plan, he thought plan C was the best since no earthmoving would be needed therefore less expensive. Otte wa in favor of plan A. Collins.asked if the Planning Office had. ny cost figures and Stanford noted that he didn't have any figure but thaI: it~would probably be. based on use of city crews. Jen ins questioned why they needed so much land for the Post Office an Cole explained that they required 25 ~mployee stalls, plus are s for trucks and delivery areas. Mahoney noted that the P.O. wa paying the City a good price for the land and that the Ci~y would be losing water rights uniess they use the G~ury Hole wa er. Dunaway questioned whether they have the right to change the r ad aI1dStanford thought .that since it.s a city street, all it woul take'is some help from the Engineering Department. Schiffer questioned members on whether anyone was prepared to ake action at this meeting. Jenkins thought that they should sett e the P.O. purchase question first then consider interim plans. stanford asked if they could recommend just having the optimum use of ..the parking on the property. Otte questioned vlhether i they didn't state how they felt today, would they lose the opt_on on the road being changed? Stanford thought that since the pr p- erty came under SPA, both the City and p.o.:property would hav to. come to them for consideration of the entire project so the would have the option at a later time. Jenkins questioned wha the next move would be and Stanford thought that it would be t ru City CdUncil. Jenkins also asked who would make the decision about the Rio Grande and Schiffer thought it would be the P & .Schiffer suggested that they move to have Council and the plan ing office take into consideration the maximum use of the property and try and use. every possible use of the road. .Notion Jenkins moved to recommend to City Council that in their negoti- ations with the Post Office, they take into consideration' the optimum use of the entire Rio Grande propertv, with any possible realignment of Spring Stre.et and to consider the Kravatsky pIa, as well as the plan recommended by. the Planning Office and fur her moved that Council, confer with the P & Z before entering into final plans. Otte seconded. All in favor, motion carried. Change in __.Ninutes Mojo wanted to adjust the minutes on the stream margin for To Wells to include any disruption of vegetation by construction. .Notion Hunt moved to amend the minutes as recommended by Mojo. Otte seconded. All in favor, motion carried. Subdivision: Butterbaugh/ Rogers, lots 3 & 4, block _RiveJView Mojo explained that this was a duplex with two lots at the ea tern end of Hopkins. .It is an exist:i:ng duplex on platted lots and blocks. Mojo said that the. Planning Office recommended appro al 5 conditional upon applicant's agreement to join the street improvement district,- sidevia.lk district, and drainage distric He also noted that applicant had agreed to covenant to long t rm leasing restrictions. The City Engineer had noted that the building does meet the. designing elements under section 20-10 c. . . Hunt moved to grant an exemption.from subdivision for the But er~ baugh/Rgers duplex under section 20-10-c of the code conditi nal upon.the.applicant agreeing to join sidewalk, streets (curb a d gutter) and drainage districts and that they restrict rentals to long term only or until Council decides about thatrestrictio in the code. Collins seconded. All in favor, motion .carried Special Review:' Otte withdrew himself from the discussion. ...".Sunn p::Irk gllh~ -' Exemption from Mojo noted that they may exempt a.building if it conforms wit thE P.U.D'IJ intent and purpose of P.U.D. and they were not recommending exemption from subdivision only r>UD. lle said that they have two car garag6, with storage space, the first floor has Iivin roar Motion ~ -4- f v , '" . '011I11,. e.', MorelCn I. '.III~. eo. Re ular Meetin Special; cent 11 Metion Motien cemmissiener Comments .Mall .:Buses 1'"'. ^ I . RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves A ril 15, 1975 I As en Plannin and Zenin dining reem, kitchen and bedreem. Secend fleer had master bed eom, bath, c,lesej:; with washer and dryer and Meje said that the Planning Office recemmended the -exemptien. Meje said that thee was a tetal of 5,730 sq ft on the building site with plenty o.f. epen space. He also. neted that there were eight on-site park{ g places inside the carpert area. Schiffer neted that the purpo e ej PUD was to. weed eut peep Ie trying to. get. in additienal.units a d Mojo. said he was cenvinced after loeking at the preperty, that' applicant was net trying to. play the "doer game".. Hunt meved to. accept the Sunny Park applicant under special re iew procedures. Cellins secended. All in favor, motian carried. Collins maved to. grant exemptien frem PUD as recammended by th Planning Office. Hunt secanded. All in faver, matian carried Hunt questianed Stanfard whether it weuldn't be pas sible to. reschedule the agenda sa that the public is nat kept waiting.' Schiffer nated that they had changed their schedule several me ths ago because they weuld get bagged dawn by the. prajects and nev~r get anything accamplished - planning wise. Hunt understaad thtt but said he hated to. see people wait far two. haurs while they discuss plans for the Ria Grande. Jenkins cemmented that alth ugh the applicants did deserve to. be heard, mast will anly come be ore them ance in his lifetime while they have to. work with this alf . th.e time. Stanfard caw~ented that they had a chaice af preser i~~. their freshness far the praj ects or the applicants. Schiffer .... thaught that they shauld have same flexibility. Stanfard remi ded members that it was up to. their discretian whether to. change t,e agenda during the meeting, if it laaks like it will be a late night. Hunt thaught that the ane who. l'mkes up the agenc.a shc'.21.2 te::e ~-" into. cansideratian. Stanfard caw~ented that he liked tl,a t.sch"ic~"." af Sill Kane who. presentedxeraxed .caPieS.befare the meeti~g a['.i- had everything c.a\-m far them to. loak at. . , Hunt wished.ta camment that the fire at the Slape had caused prablems far the Fire Dept. because af the mall. Evidentallyt 'lias impassible far the snarkel unit to get into. the mall becau ~ of the planters az;.d Hine Company e:{tension~ He thought that t ~o<r"':' shauld respansible far fire safety in the mall. Jenkins noted the" that mall planters, etc. dic.n't even have a building permitwh'ch, wauld hav3 pratected them fram fire hazards and would have Siv n a certain amaunt af allawance af distance far the big truck2 to. ass thro.ugh into. the mall. Hunt 2.sked if they had any centrol evel- t'-., placing af t!1e planters in the ,,;:tensian and Schiffer said ,,;:at -c:-:cc; hadn't been asked far appraval on any of the mall. Schiffer thought that .they shauld wark out areas of jurisdictian. Otte said he wauld like to. see t!1e guidelines an the Mall Canur.issia 's limitatians. "Hunt thought that if it was just routine mainten nee, then that was ane thing, but if they are building and planning, then P & Z shauld give the appraval. Otte thought that there as a basic canflict between the two. Canunissians. .. .. .:.. .. Otte noted that he had seen buses parking on Bleeker Street tol service theladges in that area and questiened whether they weke .suppOse!c'r.t.a' .be there? Stanford said that they had cantacted the bus depot .and asked them to. use the Ria Grande but it \qasn't a law that theycouldn t park there. Eve Henuneyer asked if anyone was using the Ria Grande propert since she had a guest use the parking lot and it laaked pretty bad. She suggested at least sending the city grader down to. th . -5- f . , C:iii~;~",'