HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.sr.387 Silverado Dr.0019.2007.ASLUFile
Eck gacord Navigate Form Reports Format Iab Help
EX H Fl -� L'. �
J �� bump 1 'i3j 9 0
Mainf Custom Fields Fees Actions Parcels
Ratting Status Fee Summary Routngyistay Attachments
o
$
Permit Type I aslu - Aspen Land Use
Permit b 1g.2007.AAU
Adhess 387 SILVERADO DR
J ApVSuite
City JASPEN
Slate CO 1 Zip 81611 J
Permit information
__II
Master Part —J
Ruutng Queue aslu07 Applled 03128!2007 J
A
j Project
J Status pendng Approved F— J
Desorption
ADMIN VARIANCE FOR RDS
Issued F—J
Final F —J
Submitted CHARLES CUNNIFFE 925.5590
Clock Runntng Days f 0 Expies D02212008 J
Owner
Last Name PROVINE IOHN R J
Fust Name F
PO BOX 8769
Phone F970) 948
ASPEN C081612
r Ownals Applicant?
Applicant
Last Name PROVINE JOHN R J
First Name F
PO BOX 8769
Phone (970]948 -0813 Cust It 127S86 J
ASPEN CO 81612
''. Lender
Last Name
phone
Fist Name
Enter the master peril number
Record:1 dl
NOTICE OF APPROVAL
For Residential Design Standard Variance
at 387 Silverlode Drive for
Garage Location in Front of House Wall
Parcel ID No. 273707430004
APPLICANT: John Provine, P.O. Box 8769, Aspen, Colorado 81612
REPRESENTATIVE: Janver Darrington, Cunniffe Architects
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 387 Siverlode Drive
VARIANCE: Residential Design Standard Variance- 26.410.040(C)(b)
SUMMARY:
On behalf of John Provine, Janver Darrington, has applied for a Residential Design
Standard Variance for the garage to be located in front of the front most house wall,
where the standard calls for the garage to be located ten (10) feet behind the front wall of
the house, pursuant to Section 26.410.040(C)(b) of the Land Use Code (Chapter 26 of
the City of Aspen Municipal Code).
STAFF EVALUATION:
The variance is requested as part of a remodeling of a portion of an existing house on the
subject property. Staff finds the variance request meets the context standard for granting
a variance: an appropriate design in the context of the vicinity is achieved and site
constraints. The existing home is located on a curved street and is pie- shaped, which
allows for a smaller area of frontage facing the street than is common in the immediate
neighborhood. Numerous houses in the neighborhood also have garages that are located
in front of the house. In this case, the front entranceway will be located so that it is still
visible and prominent from the street, just not in front of the garage. Staff finds that the
new entranceway to the house is an aesthetic improvement over the somewhat
"contrived" location of the house entranceway that was attached to the garage.
Staff finds that the proposed variance meets the criteria for a residential design standard
variance pursuant to section 26.410.020(D)(1) of the City of Aspen Land Use Code.
DECISION:
The Community Development Director finds the Residential Design Standard
Variance to be consistent with the review criteria (Exhibit A) and thereby,
APPROVES the administrative variance as specified below.
The approved variances, allow for:
1. The garage location to be forward of the wall of the house with the condition
that the garage be brought no further toward the street in the process of
remodel and additions associated with this project at this time.
APP VED BY:
Joyce A. Allgaier Date
Community Development Deputy Director
Attachments:
Exhibit A - Review Criteria
Administrative Variance from Residential Design Standards
Municipal Code Section 26.410.020.D below:
J
Exhibit A
Review Criteria
D. Variances.
1. Administrative Variances. The applicant may seek an administrative variance for
not more than three (3) of the individual requirements. An applicant who desires a
variance from the Residential Design Standards shall demonstrate, and the
Community Development Director shall find that the variances, if granted, would:
a. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the
context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the
particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the
director may consider the relationship of the proposed development with
adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity
as the director feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or,
b. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site - specific
constraints.
■
ag
U
(CD -
D k.
(D
7 out
LEVEL PLAN
U111VER LEVEL PLAN
bENERAL NOTES
■
ag
U
(CD -
D k.
(D
7 out
LEVEL PLAN
U111VER LEVEL PLAN
NOTICE OF APPROVAL RF,
For Residential Design Standard Variance L j 2001
at 387 Silverlode Drive for
Garage Location in Front of House Wall OF ASPEN
Parcel ID No. 273707430004 JY Df{/f OPMENT
APPLICANT: John Provine, P.O. Box 8769, Aspen, Colorado 81612
REPRESENTATIVE: Janver Darrington, Cunniffe Architects
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 387 Siverlode Drive
VARIANCE: Residential Design Standard Variance- 26.410.040(C)(b)
SUMMARY:
On behalf of John Provine, Janver Darrington, has applied for a Residential Design
Standard Variance for the garage to be located in front of the front most house wall,
where the standard calls for the garage to be located ten (10) feet behind the front wall of
the house, pursuant to Section 26.410.040(C)(b) of the Land Use Code (Chapter 26 of
the City of Aspen Municipal Code).
STAFF EVALUATION:
The variance is requested as part of a remodeling of a portion of an existing house on the
subject property. Staff finds the variance request meets the context standard for granting
a variance as an appropriate design in the context of the vicinity is achieved and
considering the lot shape. The existing home is located on a curved street and is pie -
shaped allowing for a smaller area of frontage facing the street than is common in the
immediate neighborhood. Numerous houses in the neighborhood also have garages that
are located in front of the house. In this case, the front entranceway will be located so that
it is still visible and prominent from the street, just not in front of the garage. Staff finds
that the new entranceway to the house is an aesthetic improvement over the somewhat
"contrived" location of the house entranceway that was attached to the garage.
Staff finds that the proposed variance meets the criteria for a residential design standard
variance pursuant to section 26.410.020(D)(1) of the City of Aspen Land Use Code.
DECISION:
The Community Development Director finds the Residential Design Standard
Variance to be consistent with the review criteria (Exhibit A) and thereby,
APPROVES the administrative variance as specified below.
The approved variances, allow for:
ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION
APPLICANT:
Name:
Location: 315n _Y�
(Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate)
Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) Zn 30 o n 43000,4
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROJECT: ,,I i y OF A5I'try
G ply nEVELOP;NT
Name: �QoJll -11: ` — QSiIDE tACC
Address: SQL Vrcg4y>6 112.
Phone #:
TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply):
❑
Conditional Use
❑
Conceptual PUD
❑
Conceptual Historic Devt.
❑
Special Review
❑
Final PUD (& PUD Amendment)
❑
Final Historic Development
❑
Design Review Appeal
❑
Conceptual SPA
❑
Minor Historic Devt.
❑
GMQS Allotment
❑
Final SPA (& SPA Amendment)
❑
Historic Demolition
❑
GMQS Exemption
❑
Subdivision
❑
Historic Designation
❑
ESA — 8040 Greenline, Stream
❑
Subdivision Exemption (includes
❑
Small Lodge Conversion/
Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff,
condominiumization)
Expansion
❑
Mountain View Plane
Lot Split
❑
Temporary Use
❑
Lot Line Adjustment
❑
Text/Map Amendment
/ `
WS
EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.)
PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.)
Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $
❑ Pre - Application Conference Summary
❑ Attachment #l, Signed Fee Agreement
❑ Response to Attachment 43, Dimensional Requirements Form
❑ Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards
All plans that are larger than 8.5" x I I" must be folded and a floppy disk with an electronic copy of all written
text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application.
RETAIN FOR PERAIAWNT SCOW
CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees
CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and
(hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
/�% I. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for
(hereinafter, THE PROJECT).
2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of
2000) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a
condition precedent to a determination of application completeness.
3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed
project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the
application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that
APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed
to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their
hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity
and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are
incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to
process APPLICANT'S application.
4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to
complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council
to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project
consideration, unless current billings me paid in full prior to decision.
5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right
to collect full fees prior to a det-unpriarion of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an
initial deposit in the amount of $) (10 which is for _ hours of Community
Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay
additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application
mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $235.00 per planner hour over the initial
deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further
agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no
case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid.
CITY OF ASPEN APPLICAN"1'I
Chris Bendon
Community Development Director Date:
Billing Address and Telephone Nu4tber:
Re f ('oed
onwA*
C:\Documents and Settings \johannahr\Desktop\2007 Land Use Fees.doc
RETAW FOR PERMANENT RECORD
ATTACHMENT
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM
Project:
Applicant:
Location:
Zone District:
Lot Size:
Lot Area:
(for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas
within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the
definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.)
Commercial net leasable:
Existing:
Proposed:
Number of residential units:
Existing:
Proposed:
Number of bedrooms:
Existing:
Proposed:
Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only):
DIMENSIONS:
Floor Area:
Existing:
Allowable:
Proposed:
Principal bldg. height:
Existing:
Allowable:
Proposed:
Access. bldg. height:
Existing:
Allowable:
Proposed:
On -Site parking:
Existing:
Required.•
Proposed:
% Site coverage:
Existing:
Required:
Proposed:
% Open Space:
Existing:
Required:
Proposed:
Front Setback:
Existing:
Required:
Proposed:
Rear Setback:
Existing:
Required:
Proposed:
Combined F /R:
Existing:
Required.
Proposed:
Side Setback:
Existing:
Required.
Proposed:
Side Setback:
Existing:
Required:
Proposed:
Combined Sides:
Existing:
Required:
Proposed:
Distance Between
Existing
Required:
Proposed:
Buildings
Existing non - conformities or encroachments:
Variations requested:
----- __
- --�
7mmm'
Now
tea,