The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.1350 Mountain View Dr.0021.2007.ASLU_ .... Fde Felt gecord Uavg*e Form Reoot(s Format lab Help { �.'. hump i .... _. Main Custom Fields -Fe � ey [Uwns Parcek Pooling Status Fee Summary flouting H�stpy Attachmads -:.... gr ......._... ,_. .__. --- Pemit Typal �Atpen Lard Use ._______ ._ .. _______ -- Pafmdp rW21.2W2 ASLU Addmss 11350 MOUNTAIN-VIEW DR �-� AptAWe Qti gp Qty rASPEN SIaM ED 1611 i Master Permd — RoWsig Queue asMA7 Aq>bad IOah5SI2007 _ Pf*cl ;. Status Jpenm Approved _ .................� DescrVion (VARIANCE ADDITION TO SINGLE FAMILYRESIDENCE Issued 1 , i Fwd j ? Submitted'RYANHOFFNER - 920.9A28 Clock lRurrsq pays' D Expaes 03)3012006 _ Last Name.FPISH Fust Nama'ADAM &KATHY 1356 MDUNiAiN NEW OR (ASPEN CO 81611 ' } Phone 1 j} ?v OwnerlsAWkcant? __ ........ _.__._,____.,--------- „__.,.__. ... Last Name.FPISH First Name;ADAM&KATHY Phone 4970)309 2910 Gun q ' -27608 Londe Lad Name; J, Firer Name i' ! Enter fine doted name _ _ AnDenGoldbl r.:. Reemd: 2 of 2 RD CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPME ARTMENT Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and ADAM r ism A (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for rZESIOeNT -)^L_ DES16N srAl40/AV-0 yM2.IANL.c (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 48 (Series of 2006) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ which is for — hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $235.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT By: B Chris Bendon ZN� �hyy Community Development Director Date: Billing Address and Telephone Number: Required 196a MUNNrnIN VIEW OZVE ASP&M G v 81,411 (��v►- 3on - z°I to C: \Documents and Settings \johannahr \Desktop \LUFeeAgree.doc ATTACHMENT 2 —LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICANT: Name: ADAM # KAri'Y FRISLH Location: 139'0 r10W4T- JN VIEW DR. &I T 30 "L" ". wES: MtADaW JciAODN I6164 (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 2.77 3 So 13 015 [>a B REPRESENTATIVE: Name: WYAN HoFFNEIZ 5TWDl0 13 AR.GHITEGTS Address: Sul we) G,2,+t4D6 PLA41✓ # ),Q+ Phone #: 97-0. 01 +2 8 PROJECT: Name: FP,4SGH AyyiTION Address: 135U 11o1n.NTAw V1cL✓ DRIVE ArSFEAI, GU, Phone #: 3Of) • 2°110 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): ❑ Conditional Use ❑ Conceptual PUD ❑ Conceptual Historic Devt. ❑ Special Review ❑ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ❑ Final Historic Development ❑ Design Review Appeal ❑ Conceptual SPA ❑ Minor Historic Devt. ❑ GMQS Allotment ❑ Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) ❑ Historic Demolition ❑ GMQS Exemption ❑ Subdivision ❑ Historic Designation ❑ ESA — 8040 Greenline, Stream ❑ Subdivision Exemption (includes ❑ Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane F] Lot Split El Temporary Use Other: VAR IANGe ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑_ Text/Map Amendment EXISTING CONDTnONS: (description of existing buildings uses previous approvals, etc.) .5lNhLe RAVIJL�l ONE STOR`I 12r51GeNz -,a LATH AN A1i'lcGHED �'WZ> GA:R. G7,kTZPrhG PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings uses modifications etc.) A 706 5.t. ADD/r10N TV A- SI.VhLt ONiE srniaY MCSIDEdGJSr. T11E AJ1jPcA -1 1N1_t4ADCS A NIASre2— 9U1TE� UFFILC � FHTQ.y /F4rnD2aoY1 Have you attached the following? FEES DuE: $ NSA ❑ Pre - Application Conference Summary & Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement WA ❑ Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form Rr Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded and a Floppy disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. r N... Apra 2, 2007 City of Aspen Community Development 130 S. Galena Street 3rd Floor Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Administrative Variance to the Residential Design Standards Attn: Planning Staff / Joyce Allgaier The applicant seeks a variance to the Residential Design Standard for the requirement that the entry door be no more that ten feet (10' -0 ") back from the front most wall of the building. The proposed entry is an addition to a non - conforming front door setback. The existing front door is currently setback twenty four (24' -0 ") from the front most wall of the residence. The new entry addition improves the existing non - conformance with a setback of eighteen feet (18' -0 ") from the front most wall of the building. The proposed entry complies with the street facing door and covered porch requirements of the Design Standard. a. The proposed addition maintains an appropriate pattern of design to the existing residence. This addition does not create any new roollines or massing to the existing home. The proposed entry is a benign addition to the 1960's era home that is consistent with the architecture and the neighborhood. Any attempt to conform to this design standard would impact the home by creating a "scabbed on" addition. b. The front most wall of the residence is the attached two car garage that was an addition to the original 1960's home. This earlier garage addition creates an unfair constraint to the current Residential Design Standards because this addition was built prior to any design standards and is what created the original non-conformity. Sincerely, Ryan Hoffner, AIA Studio B Architects S[4[ IMPROVEMENT SURVEY SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE SIM. PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO LOT 3, BLOCK 1 WEST MEADOW SUB- DIVISION 1350 MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE ASPEN, COLORADO 61611 PROPOSED ADDITION REBAR AND NF _601". I SITE PLAN $GALE: 1:1D LOT 1 CITY CF aww GPS MONUMENT SI. YS REBM BENCHMARK'1=7 . .77m.Oa "•d.i / P5j 4L16' ' Dtz Ap 0ti ^ry / d D11 / IX M4NSio`'''/ 0121 \.., DLS rooD GE DIV OILS LOT 3, BLK 1 16,975 SOFT. m(record) GL1z / OL1P D10• O16' D �Q;DLii D14 \` ONE STORY < ` FRAME RESIDENCE ` .n2dsa C Mtd' rINCH PIPE \ �-\ /•]az61e PROPOSED ADD 10 \ ` o DID • • \ •S� MIZ y DLI Y y� i 72.0' DRAINAGFIUTILITY EASEMENT p \ Bk 2A PG. 245 ?Op ' \ \ D6' DLI 9l \ '91• Dfi- D114 +d' •\ LOT 2 01 DID \ a DL1I' ,•IRON PIPE .]ezdFa -• LOT 4 T' �502`�W PAVED DRIVEWAY •\ .]02535 \ DIY u' REBARAIq RPC L30161A De DIT Dua DOT ::1 Z O LU 9 p Q U cl)N 1.1.. w 90 Zo 2 w 0. Q m PROPOSED ADDITION 6.0' \ DRAINAGE/UTILTTY \� EASEMENT BK. 2A PG. 245 ,•IRON PIPE .]ezdFa -• LOT 4 T' �502`�W PAVED DRIVEWAY •\ .]02535 \ DIY u' REBARAIq RPC L30161A De DIT Dua DOT ::1 Z O LU 9 p Q U cl)N 1.1.. w 90 Zo 2 w 0. Q m ma E r� o.. To SrtE PLAN Al2 } I t 1 3F -102' �.. �. lk I O ~ >0 > O Q Q U CO LL W ❑ Z � O Zo oz Wa �U) m - ma EXISTING FLOOR PLAN X2.1 ----------------------------------------------- i z > 0 E ❑0 o > z C) D Cl) o w CL U) LL M 12722ME FLOOR PLANS A2.1 soon OEM L2IEXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION SGLE: Vi' =1' -0' 40.tl ...wsa w..ae ww. L IIPM o co ~ o� 30 � = U C/) LL wo ?o o z zo LU Q ma °s 8" Or�Yp Ta- EXISTING ELEVATIONS X3.1 2 SOUTH ELEVATION � / SG1LE'tl1' =1' -0' gee 000.s Z >� O ~ O 30 p wo Q z0 0 Z O 0 U U a o N nQ LL - ma ELEVATIONS A3.1