The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.1215 E Hopkins Ave.0064.2006.ASLU- 1215 E HOPKINS DEMO/VARIANCE 273718107001 0064.2006.ASLU 1 1ck. A al.8 \1 e A FALF 34Â®teuj 1.24'OU./. li g 1 f THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0064.2006.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBER 2737-18-1-07-001 PROJECT ADDRESS 1215 E. Hopkins Ave. PLANNER Jason Lasser CASE DESCRIPTION Demo/Variance REPRESENTATIVE Adam Rothberg DATE OF FINAL ACTION 5/21/08 CLOSED BY Amy DeVault J AGE- 408,01 9.[AFF REVILV\/ 1 0 1' 2 1' 1;1| a -1.. 1 1 1 1.1 1.-1. 11 1- #*' - 1 1 ... 1 - ...1 4. 1 -. --I i DIe idit Record (lavgate Poem Reports Forglat Lab Melp 1 3 * ?42 21 4 v 1,3 1,9 1. lump t 3 +~2 - 4~0 1 Â£1 93 29 0 - . :43 J $ Main Routing Status Fee Summae Actions Routing!11*tow Perm,t Type 941 ~,7 #1*1 i L,Td-6AOB04 - Pe! mit # Z)064.2006.ASLU -=- Address 1215 E HOPKINS AVE Apt/Suite 1 City IASPEN State#CO -1 Zip 01611 71 PeniÂ¢ Inlotmatk>n :f f.kee#etted.-W. R<~Â£Â£Â£Â£Â£Â£Â£<eÂ« Mastef Permit 1 21 Routing Queue ~ask,06 Apnlie# t12/11/2006 Piciect Status pending Approved j Descnpti:on [Â·EMO FOR SINGLE FAMILA RESIDENCE OFAPRE.... 294l 'Â·,U FT *VARIANCE Issued I FROM STRICT It'ITERPERTATION OF DESIGN STANDARDS - Final 1 Submitted {ADAM ROTHBERG 948-0480 Clock. ,Running Days : 13 E.Â«,5,2007 1 0 wner - Expkes 1 1 041. i f Last Name RATTNER 1 i Fust Name STEPHEN Il.:3 E HOPK,11: AVE ~ASPEN CO 81611 P o ne 4 9 Owner 1 s Applicatit ? iApplicant < < <~<<2<.~<<<<<<24<22<22<22<2~ : '.-<â‚¬~Â«0:~~â‚¬â‚¬Â« Â«<.â€¢~ Â«â‚¬-<~~<~. s~<2Â«*â‚¬~Â«Ceee**â‚¬Ce*2ee~ 2 44<22<22<22<2<~eee~e~~ 424<<22<22Â«22<22<Â«~4~e<4Eâ‚¬~~ 22<22Â«<~ ~<2Â«* Las:t Name :RATTNER 1 Fust Name 'WEPHEN . |ASPEN CO 81611 1215 E HOPKINS AVE Cult # 127347 Phone 1 Ler,def Last Name I 3 Flist N ame Phone i - Record 24 0132 -.--!di.uoÂ«hedo:<4.Â·!684% }0~Â·~ ptl~ Xoq~Ool sdnojg . 6 ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICANT: Name: 71 r. GrE fr)-EN RAT--Ck)-EL (Z. Location: 12 15 E Horicies Ave LOT H , ft.ob/ttiATorrf 9ue ojelsio.0 ,. ASFER< CO (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 11 31 - 1% I -0-7 -ool REPRESENTATIVE: Name: -lOW B G tÂ·Â·01 AE-1-i d , ABLH erear , LL C - -lo uta tul+Sl i R Address: 1 3Ox 4-701 , EFAO LE, 09 8(op st Phone #: 3 70 - 62 - o g-q 2 PROJECT: Name: A 0/3-rE/M yt.04Â£-,5-A-1,6.r HoM.E *De : STRUE tup ZiEE:FiE--)31-60?JEEL Address: 246-7 FBOVE,00â‚¬ C.(TEÂ£-5 , l,t/JEG-730., A-Â· 9133 2-7 Phone #: 1 9 9 - 297 - 1 11 5- TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): U Conditional Use j Conceptual PUD U Conceptual Historic Devt. El Special Review Â£ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) U Final Historic Development C] Design Review Appeal D Conceptual SPA U Minor Historic Devt. U GMQS Allotment ~1 Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) 0 Historic Demolition D GMQS Exemption C Subdivision El Historic Designation D ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream ~ Subdivision Exemption (includes U Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane El Lot Split [3 Temporary Use E Other: 64 84(A % Â¥*01AOCa U Lot Line Adjustment U Text/Map Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description ofexisting buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) 'Dra Prfjx* Ma ft-tje -4~til~ Loww ~rofose; 0.1- Re Cooler OR 96* Harb>4 0,0 H'244)Avett 095 - The ~oject hos been fulnalÂ·j Â·Gr oer,1,1,7 U44 14 rkvM b* ?41\2-r Re>Â·Dente , + 8(0640 fâ‚¬Cvl'1~1 44% 60-4 ,>5080 -6( 4 Sevid 11 600 64 durgAH j 09 rte yrofeoÂ·ho PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) A 4906.*Le ft*Â·i 1&2 4Â«ct Odâ‚¬f~â‚¬1-te|,DA cÂ·~t<D avtjtl Crt )00;41).4 02(1/4104 6 664 rediesÂ¥92. /3 J ' J & Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 70 5 1 71 Pre-Application Conference Summary Â® Attachment # 1, Signed Fee Agreement El Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form Â® Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards All plans that are larger than 8.5" x 11" must be folded and a noppy disk with an electronic copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of CitÂ¥ of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and - 1Â»i A d Â· MA.E-[ 1 0 (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for 1EM--ro '261- r-iES 10213<16 (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings andFor approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty ofrecovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ -70 9 which is for hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $235.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days ofthe billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT Â«-~~233-:tÂ»j~9 -- i By: By: )27.4 6, t'~Aer, n Chris Bendon Community Development Director Date: 1-2 -06 Bill To Mailing Address and Telephone Number: 'fO 8,1- 9701 EAC:, 1.-g Ice *(612, f (970) 420-Or-1 Z ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: 4'TE-Je A-07 EPEBBIâ‚¬ @Pr-ria g.-a 1226,22130-E Applicant: Ace; U Â»42-0 A - =30*4 5 . HA-(2-T-J 41., /4Â¢t-(-f \TGZST j U,--<> Location: /2-/s- t. HOFAUT ZIVE. (fu>T- 9.FBov( isofbfav 6(/SFibl#-le,Al,) Zone District: MErpiuM ;74)051 -rx fe_gs[9%#in,~-u (2-6) Lot Size: 6, i 10 60. VT Lot Area: 4 1 9 z 9 â‚¬-QÂ· F-r. (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition ofLot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: NIA Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing: \ Proposed: Number of bedrooms: Existing: 2 Proposed: 4- Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): AJA DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: Allowable: 2 1 932- Proposed: 2,43*0 Principal bldg. height: Existing: Allowabi" 29 ~ Proposed: 20 ' Access. bldg. height: Existing. Allowable: , Proposed. / On-Site parking: Existing: Required: 2 Proposed: 3 % Site coverage: Existing.- Required: 1,0%70 Proposed: 3 019 % Open Space: Existing: Required: - Proposed: Front Setback: Existing. Required: 16 t Proposed: \0' / Rear Setback: Existing: Required: r o Proposed: 10 Combined F/R: Existing: Required: 20' Proposed: 20< / Side Setback: Existing: Required: 6-7 Proposed: 6,1 Side Setback: Existing.- Required: 3 Proposed: 0 Combined Sides: Existing: Required: 1(Â· 7 Proposed: 11-7 Distance Between Existing Required: - Proposed: Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: 71 * Cot 6 A 001 - c OR IE c *1 : ,c, 0 -_ifl_ _u '(d fk. Variations requested: l . 66Â£048 1Â»907'4 ~Hoo>E s WARAC {5 + g' tut OT\-+ j 2 6740* 4 2 4/ALL â‚¬15 7-MA-6/4 john G. Martin, Architect, LLC Ihgle, CO 81631 Fax: 970-328-0593 RO. Box 4701 Phone: 970-328-0592 www.jch@zar(in.com johnmrtin@centurytelnet Pre-Application Conference Summary - Rattner Residence To Whom It May Concern: Adam Rothberg (Project Manager and Owner Representative) and John G. Martin (Architect of project) met with James Lindt and Todd Grange, Cily of Aspen Community Development Department Planners, for a pre- application conference at 10:00 am November 6,2006. We discussed the development project for the property located at 1215 East Hopkins Avenue (Lot 4, Promentory Subdivision). The owner is Stephen Rattner. The project consists ofthe demolition of an existing small house at the site and the development of a single-family home ofapproximately 2,940 sq. ft. FAR in it's place. The property is zoned Medium Density Residential (R- 6). We discussed the design of house in the context ofthe complex zoning regulations and residential design standards as applied to this site. In short, the house as designed and presented meets all the criteria except for one item. The item is described as follows, with a description of how we intend to address it. 1. The garage as designed does not meet the following design consideration as quoted from the Residential Design Standards: C. PARKING, GARAGES AND CARPORTS. The intent of the following parking, garages, and carport standards is to minimize the potential for conflicts between pedestrian and automobile tragic by placing parking, garages, and carports on alleys, or to minimize the presence of garages and carports as a lifeless part of the streetscape where alleys do not exist. 2. For all residential uses that have access only from a public street, the following standards shall apply: a. On the streetfacing facade(s), the width ofthe living area on thefirstfloor shall be at leastfive (5) feet greater than the width of the garage or carport. b. The front facade of the garage or the front most supporting column of a carport shall be set back at least ten feet (10' 0'5 furtherfrom the street than the front most wall of the house. - We will be asking for a staff-approval variance based on site context hardships and neighborhood conformity. James Lindt surmised that the (1) request for variance would likely be approved at staff level. 1 rum.11 1 John G. Martin, Architect, LLC RO. Box 4701 Phone: 970-32*-0592 E.*lego 81631 Fax: 970-328-0593 Application for Administrative Variance - Garage Location To Whom It May Concern: Adam Rothberg (Project Manager and Owner Representative) and John G. Martin (Architect of project) representing the owner Stephen Rattner, met with James Lindt and Todd Grange, City of Aspen Community Development Department Planners, for a pre-application conference at 10:00 am November 6,2006. We discussed the new-construction development project of a single-family home at the property located at 1215 East Hopkins Avenue (Lot 4, Promentory Subdivision). As a result of issues discussed at that meeting, we respectfully submit this request for Administrative Variance - Garage Location. The following is an excerpt from 26.410.040 - Residential Design Standards - City of Aspen Land Use Code: C. PARKING, GARAGES AND CARPORTS. The intent ofthe following parking, garages, and carport standards is to minimize the potential for conflicts between pedestrian and automobile trajfic by placing parking, garages, and carports on alleys, or to minimize the presence of garages and carports as a lifeless part of the streetscape where alleys do not exist. 2. For all residential uses that have access only from a public street, the following standards shall apply: a. On the streetfacing facade(s), the width of the living area on thefirstfloor shall be at leastfive (5) feet greater than the width of the garage or carport. b. The frontfacade of the garage or the#ont most supporting column of a carport shall be set back at least ten feet (10' 09 further from the street than the front most wail ofthe house. The following is an excerpt from 26.410.020 Procedures for Review - Residential Design Standards - City of Aspen Land Use Code: C. Appeal of Adverse Determination. If an application is found to be inconsistent with any item of the Residential Design Standards, the applicant may either amend the application or seek a variance as set forth below. D. Variances. 1. Administrative Variances. The applicant may seek an administrative variance for not more than three (3) of the individual requirements. An applicant who desires a variance from the Residential Design Standards shall demonstrate, and the Community Development Director shall find that the variances, if granted, would: a. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the director may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity as the directorfeels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or, b. Be clearly necessary for reasons offairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Rationale for granting an Administrative Variance - Garage Location The garage and driveway location chosen for the specific house design at 1215 East Hopkins Avenue is the most logical site location for this small, narrow lot located at the southwest corner of East Hopkins and Midland Avenues and can be argued both in terms of "a neighborhood context" and "b. unusual site-specific constraints". A. Neighborhood Context: The lot is longer in the north-south direction along Midland Avenue and shorter in the east-west direction along East Hopkins Avenue. It is the fourth lot ofsimilar shape and size in the west-to-east direction ofthe southerly side ofEast Hopkins Avenue. All four houses on East Hopkins Avenue (including the existing structure of this 1 *,1â€ž2..'t'liI-TA~I~~I~'.TI,~T"'.7~~1 RTI; lot) have driveways and/or entrances which face East Hopkins Avenue. Also all three houses along the north side ofHopkins Avenue have garage entrances to this street. Midland Avenue, on the other hand, has very few driveway entrances. Only mid-block houses with no other alternative have garage and driveways which face this street. All the other houses along Midland in both directions have their garages oriented to the feeder streets, not directly from Midland Avenue. Therefore there is a noticeable contextual Hopkins block and wider Midland Avenue neighborhood precedence and pattern for putting our garage on the north short side of the lot facing East Hopkins Avenue. B. Unusual Site Specific Constraints: The other reason that that the chosen garage location makes logical design sense is both the size of the lot and the terrain ofthe site. The lot is small and actually non-conforming in the minimum lot width requirement. Also the Town of Aspen planners have already determined and agreed that the Front Setback line faces East Hopkins Avenue while the Alternative Front Setback line faces Midland Avenue. Again, if we put the garage at the logical location of facing the Front Setback line, the non-conforming width of this lot line proves to be a hardship in meeting the strictinterpretadon ofthe design criter'ia: "a. On the streetfacing facade(sh thewidth ofthe living area on the first floor shall be at least five (5) feet greater than the width of the garage or carport. b. Thefrontfacade of the garage or the front most supporting column of a carport shall be set back at least ten feet (10'0") further from the street than thefront most wallofthe house.". There simply is noroomtomake it work. The terrain ofthe site conspires to make the garage location proposed, the logical location. East Hopkins Avenue, and specifically the location for a driveway entrance to the lot, is a flat area adjacent to a relatively flat spot on the relatively flat East Hopkins Avenue and is in fact the location for the current gravel driveway. Once East Hopkins reaches the corner with Midland Avenue the grades start to rise. The grades rise even more as you travel south on Midland Avenue from the corner, but the grades drop quickly into the lot right at the lot line. To access a driveway from any point along Midland Avenue would literally put the driveway and garage three to six feet above existing grades within the lot. Such a "garage in the air" would seem very out-of-place in the context of surrounding neighborhood and indeed the design guidelines. Therefore, we respectfully request that a variance from the strict interpretation of the Residential Design Standards as it applies to the garage location on this particular site, be granted. Sincerely, 352---dae:s.*53&zr John G. Martin â€¢ Page 2 PO.Box 4701 Phone: 970-328-0592 john G. Martin, Architect, LLC E.gle, co 81631 I;ax: 970-328-0593 www.joingnmrtin.com john,martin*enturytelnet Rattner Residence - Location Map Date: 11/7/2006 Location: 1215 East Hopkins Avenue I. (Lot 4, Promentory Subdivision) 9,/B/Bfer JZ*Lap,#-4 ir Â· - Z--7 I. ~223**ihi*..:'iki-131 . 6 Aspen &475(/#39'MjEW/litil ~10 'i - talt i 'Fli'.... 0. 1 21=- --r* V. 1-*i:'9181'* %1~- b ...Â£ # ~~ 911 ' = .- 4 F. i~ill li~-- ':lillijr - 1 - --- Eae )A**229' I =20~ 320 ~ ~11:, 7 = = A----9 . 2 9'Ji '438 -621 /.74"KNers,Ue ACC:lieÂ·,1 - , Mi<Wir/Al MI ) A.,9 Htil Le.1 Sl,If -= """r 13Â£62 .--i- .. i ---j*S = --6 .....Ii.UL 120%- 7-- SMUGGLUR-*P . n vtE - .%9 L E ..A . , 6 .61.,Jmr -9.. 112fjELHOPKINS'AVE .. L: 122.-i, Â· . ~ 13 *Dthr ~~ 4 2 . i ~.b -- .~ . 1 0- -. 1211 121 A , E-5 -7 ;3.1 :-# 4 11' 4 ' ~4=r y - rA|~L=-F./.r#- <51 4 't,- 4 , 28(5+ : L * 1 4 - I Â¢9it-02L ifi J 104 3 1 - -5-L=22,(Wily- I 21:1, E . -1 z :U t ./ . t.&Â£-1- .Â¥=3 i 4 ~~2151â€¢- / ,) M 4,-71 .. f 71 2 *4 bi 7, " i - 5 4 . -1-7 - ~ 211-0 - I .... . . 7 190 -. 221 J #I -<IL A +Emil 12.5 E .1 -r 2 - ,/PErte,f >-7, 1.(ap :-Â· efri,3 Â·,Â· 7 A-,zIM 5 C m'.- Â·rr. 2 19@2 21.b Ls,4 I t'r ~ 1 John G. Martin, Architect, LLC Eagle, CO 81631 Fax: 970-328-0593 RO. Box 4701 Phone: 970-328-0592 www.joimgunrtn.com john.marâ‚¬n@oenturytel.net , cm 4. Rattner Residence - - 1 9. Midland Ave. Photos . Location: 1215 East Hopkins Avenue + Aspen 1 / -1/ '' . 6 4 ..1 K. 1. 1 f 9E*:r --a . C- fio ~ 44 0 E -7 ... , ug, - ..1.*Py,â‚¬.1,1 :Â¥7:2..â€¢. 5,2.. . 9 at , 0.24,-1 a 4 ./RAN, I ; 'f'' .77'. 07 % ..R., . 1, t~ j . Â¥ 1-h- 6. 1, 41 ...... . - 13~1'' 3..94 5 . -1,2 E k - + 4-.MAN~~ *Â¥0Â·19*6- -d. G L 29 - I I 'r tÂ· 7 ng J - . 22 r - 'ira - **,f. A ./ 4 $44.-L .1. ... 06. 4 ,..,.4.4 -%:, - Â¥ 149 - 4,0 - .72. 1 -..INJ# 9.-f~ ~2 - 4 4.1 r - - - 8 2 ~"4 6 - --111 A h .2 Â· f -' 7 -7 54' i d.,7l - 1 - 14 01 --- 0 - hi .Â·twi~~2:%+ ~- 4 1 - - 1 , .2 AfsÂ· r V ' 1 - .... ,&-f# 9 r - 3% ~ 4111*.0 icf 51 - 4 .1 - 0 - -44 tj 7 r Â¥- f f . r c ..Tr . 2 - '.Ji. a ....0 . j. r .... 9 >r. - 17 I I. ' .44%.9/3Â· Â· -,3 2,Al/MEY'BCD . 2-: -7/4/5.1Â£ t :.1>.'. , _zÂ·j Â» 2, . -, i /1.1 â‚¬ 11 51 1 :1 , 1 6 ''.,1 1.111.,11') 1,1 0111 111 11 lie.<1 111 1 + 1 1. . e /4 . 4 I' 2 6 .. - . - .. 1-. + W - 4 -* tit 8 - - bil e .4,4FGAM kt 0. 4 b. 1 67'll'.Strilititi'.4 .74Â£41,4,;:1 Â·Â· Il N *t ./Imka.-,10*â€¢t-1 - 2 t. I.; Â·2,5 14 %*t dileÂ·. 37,1. *.. .) 4: r... .-r- . Â¥ r I . */ -l..p-*.--/ - . ' I 2.-ir i . . I â€¢21. - , ,19 I ' 4-5'- I: ..:. I .ViB.- 1.. ia~~ , 31 . */.- 4't & . UW i.7 n" . . f Â·'.7-+Fr. =).4't:-44 RE,k,FIL- 7/.291.9 - .. . '- .Â· i '31.~2~ Â·Â· - . .. . Â» t..~ 1 1 t.- -7 .A>L- i. â€¢I 0*Ze...9 , f , .: 4. 1 I I - -/0#u; AA â‚¬ S /.. -4, S_ A-Â·At .,Â¥& f f..te< 4'Dl/. - Â¢ ** - ill P b -It i I. .t JJZ - f -7 2- 4-2. - - - 13='THE}347 b zâ‚¬-AFT,- te .b- - - - , . 4, I V . e . Al 4.1,4...Uk--Â©r':..,404*51 2 1~ i .AL 4. 420% 1 2 4.24 - : i~ -v ~ ;.EMP,1, aft /*F,36P<R#*- 2...:I.*Ii /' #4434*~.5 plaip Â» I I I â€¢ 1 h Aft.,.,./m,.,.17.Cla.:29%3*214 a., A:.2,'91= c UK *gy 01 I * Â·~: 32 - 9~' 41.'-i 22-1-- 46.4**FT*.1 24Â», 4- UtÂ¥#ild,1 2 .: . 1 7-, 4 - 4 k 42.11 â€¢ â€¢St- T :illf, -- - .. ...iri ~1 - i L --1 t 'r - .F IX~m 11 t.1- , 6 1 4/li//I 11, .:<4Â· 1 2'Â·41:jt'P:1/.7 k fri#ft/: - - - ....'ll--- b -4 Li: Il'.A r '. 4 â‚¬Â¥ 9- A..1 Â¥ t't ' I - 9 - r. - .-" ~rf , - Â· 1 11", A 1 . ''EPT~,9 ./ . I 401 411 111,14;11 1 I I. Ir, . I Â¥ ,â€žÂ¥ 1. L I .. - 1,1"f - - 1, .12~111 1 .: ..11 .16 1 ; 11 . . 1 %,1, 4 1,-Â¢f~'!~ c ' 1;11 ..46 . 1 4 .. tÂ¥ ' 1., P..1 11 f-/2~~IN-1 'Â· 1,â€ž. ...1.511:qit///a... t.. . A . 1 R 5,~I'll/ ' p'IMI 1 . ~~i b El ~ 1 . 1! 1! 40 ,1 1 0 *? R 11 M ~ 1.*RV## . *. 4.-* 11, 1 . 1 , 1 ...--1 , ' 1/ ',I, i ~i'Mu' t 160. f. 4. - I :52,4 . 4,1 IFI , - : 1-; I 1 1 '. '.1 1,2, Z .. i ' 1. 1 = 'C 1 J 1, lit . A'll Â®.1 1, 901 , , I A. . C - - ir h 1 - I .& . ..... - Â·111 , 't' , -01 , I 9,1111 141 1//////,Bu,k - -:424 , p 'llill--/ r1i- ' lilli , .< ' ' . .1//11.-4''I lili 1@11 i'" 1# 14 *11'**1"221,25"'llibluswilk , 11'll-=/IMMI'l'./.' ..,!1, ,1/ 1. B. v ,04 4 4,#iME& i 4 I ,,4.-414 Â©1-4 / i, W- 1111111*6- '.-'*.-4 ~ t...1. 4, . 4018:,# 142 .~ ~ i ~ 93*3~12.. i ' '.i. 1 9 :.ahAM/4 487: /. 1 - ".1.-.Illi 41. " '4 t. 5. F I. 11'.*Ij ' 1 1 1 1111111 1 .11,11 1:1l~1, , 11 r , h i.:I 11 . 244, 7 1 2 -t:** 1 =21* , - 1 1 , 54 ..A.r, 4,Â·Â· rt .. r i . â€¢3 ' *1 '1 ..4 F lei,, , 6 3/4 *.2, 9=, f '1 . u' Â· Oulb.itâ€¢Â·,s:4.,0.12,Â· . 1Â¢119 1 " * 4 "21 1.'api"i,1 -: IN 0 ./.,\ - .' 50$9 11.47' :â€¢*0 . 0.4 t.'. 11 ., r 11 '11'*, ~i'' 1101011-M- .. - : . 1&~1~~1 1:1 2 :.,11 11:11M3*ir#1,21 ..4 1. - . id%livp'11~x.-1.,7-, 3 ")11<,TA ,r,~ , '' j,i 1 k-,4 J.. 44Ah'..' i .....Tu 9 L 1'.1110.,i. ..J 3, f,1 9>.7.tr> 1 : 9. '1 -- 'BMEy;,~bbp *~ | i k '.,SI'., 0.1 ....1 . . ~11911/ 11~~ 4 'Imill'imilib '1 11 11 '11! â€¢Ef~ 1*Â·ra L.''U,/ ~' ~0 Â·"f ; Â·,;*rth'rt:R , . t '. , 0 * ~Ef~ '~.A ~i,~?r-- Â·Â· Â·-:tlpft 1~~,i, 1Â¢, ,6*, . ,~ ~ 4 0, 1 14'b - '.MIFfri i. :' * - , . 4/ i Â·1-:'.ir â€¢ 2 6 ,/:I# - - 1.1-., 40 1 071= 1 4* 4 - 4 4 ' 04 .1 9 , .,11 1 1 .1 . 11,14111 I ' 4, 1 .. 14, i- 1,4- !1111111/////~11 6 1 , I j, 3 f ( '11~1~111 r, 4 1,1,11,11111 1 2 4'' 11 .1 r 1 I : 2 . , I. Fli :- - ' 'I & , 1 - 111.----*1 , 4 - 4*' i . i \# 1~ Â·.t4<'{L; - - 4 .1. 2 0.,4.0., â‚¬ ". .%.1.:0 1 4 -1,1 ....gll.'. .:2 'Â·D, 9:... LEGEND AND 'S O SURVEY MOf-ENT. FNE-EAR ~TH CAP AS DESCRIeED 0 ~ines A SURVEY CONTROL N 0-----0 FENCE TITLE INFORMATION Flll,ISHED Er: A =med.C WED. APRL 24, 2006 CALLS Â»1 ( ) RECORD POSTED ADDRESS 7215 1-10 0 UTLFIY POLE &7 SLU,TED TEXT DENOTES BUUNG TO PROPENTY TlE 0 10 20 ..1. .E U. 1 ,!10, 19398 - OVENHEAD lmI,Ine 2 FOOT CONTOURS (81.DJ 1*,1â€ž A~ Ted 79+3.10 4*D NO MATTED SETBACKS 7.4110 ~ ~ TREE CUIPER (D-CE-OUS, F-CON,~ - ~' WATER VAE EAST HOPKINS AVENUE 10. 30. 'a.. SC4Â£0 41 (423') 8 RE â€ž41 - lilli 2 / 8 7,_ SETBACKS 17 /1 GRA ZONNING SETBACKS 0 2. lilli 1:1 1 2. 145 0 3. 2,1. 3317 Im 12 0, '457 ..... h "- 9. ' OR mi INLL 7943.65 = LOT 2 ' ' 0 2, 7.1. B a. - ASS JOS 4 NO. 82*SA HOUSE 2 6 SLOPE LEGEND 2 . / 4 :- .7 41 LAYER (30) SLOPE P--5--R--C 1Â® 7....1 ~ SLOPE 21-30% (131-2-0-40) 135 St +/- 0.1.- AL; 011 ~ SLOPES 30-lot (137-2-0-12) 335 St +/- al,- LOT 3 9' i _ z ~ SLOPES > 401 (134-2-0-14) 790 St 0/- 181 0 C â€¢! 0, 2 /1 2. .rÂ·' 5 7*4111 1 4 9 r er .. VICINITY MAP 1'-400' 0 CERTFICATION 'D "Duf."TWIP M' 1~ .....=92'r:6.= iiidifi/:APS<lfilmolgialibria#HAir* 2 EXCEPT AS IEREON SHOWN. 10(OERGROUND UnlfnES MTH NO ABOVECROUND APPURTDUNCES. AND DOCUIENTS Of RECORD NOT SlPFUED TO THE SURâ‚¬rOR ARE EXCEPTED. THIS SURMY IS VOID UNLEES VET STAMPED 1/2. O. P,Fl â€¢CCESS E0SE1Â£}IT WITH THE SEAL OF THE SURâ‚¬IOR 8E1OW. RED 9018 0.3 EAST RED. 10.108889 2 ~ ./.t .101*4 1Â£ HOWORTH PALS. 28047 0 M /1 IMPROVEMENT TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 6 2&.ap- LOT 4. 8LOCK 1 PROWONTORY SUeÂ©MSION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED ...0 B NOVE~liER 4. 1457 N PLAT 000< 2A AT PAGE 240. PITKIN COUITY COLORADO. MT- LOT 5 co,rr/le 4170 39. Fr. 0/- PREPARED BY 2= ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. 210 SOUTH SALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 JOB 240644 1 1/ -ch. U~, ~ 1 1 -----------1------- --------7 1 1 1 - f ----]*13-61 I / -'1 1 N. 9. 0-1. 1 \ Fee j J GARAGE I 7 Â·Â· , Â· il 21- i L___----~ 24 - 1 -14 f\-d-4--1 17 -=====---===== 1.ull â€¢.1 .BAJ..1 STORAGE AREA ~I ' 1 il 12 -r 2 r--lEi- - , 11=2=7"lj / Mil 10 6 1 5 -%61. 1/.1 1 1 I LF | 4 orm,le 04 . Z~-----al ---412 # 224 SH FE 1 /3*19/13/VipMrtE-' 0 %8 1 3 2 /11 & 1 r -- Â»t/ ~.11 1 :M 35* 1.611 , - r#:ZE rte .6 0 w 11 - .&38 1 6 '- ill / 12:1 L_ . CE.1 - Â· . -firj 1 1 i.0 -1-- - f it j * 2% f 0 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ez 1 2 1/8' - 1'-0' SODI-8/-t O SS]80013. MHVRAVIMW~*_~41 / -ht i-- r _ 1 /-6. a zf-,Â· 1 . 1 1, I J /-3 ' 1-CAR | Â»D 0 -4 GARAGE I 1 #1 \ 2.-L F ~ ~ -4~ L----- . % Itt STORAGE ~ J]fe- j l. 1, Wt Â£ .. *-T Jl / 12 1 AREA 1 ' A 1 %\/ /h @13 ' *rn / 4 ---p =1=9 TI-t 9+ = rt L___Lk_- I; 41 qi r 11@~ a. lil - P -- - .- rm=r-1 i j i 9 SrrrING 0/ / =2*9 6 es EN 1 M D-Â¢ .ill ; r--1 (*iLE & AÂ© 6==~, ff I i U-!1-taÂ»=29=Z flf- 0 Uâ€ž 1 111 1 1 111 1 1 ~ ..1139= . b , - UZZ 0 0=0* Â£ .2 l__ _ r'~1-- -32 < 1 /0-1 il - - - ---1 - -==Â£11 1 - Ill-- - -lij 1 vE 1 7 - 0 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN *z 1 2 1/8' - 1'-0" 902-BE-10 ~SONSOMe 00 &,diÂ¥ 1.0!11&!Pqnsim-14 Â»01 ... ifi 1 . '... itiÂ· 4,2,41 Â®111 1 1' 1 1 /. .. - 1 lift- 1. :42â€¢ 6 -6 i./1 . -- 4, .S~' ~ --- - -I + 1 . St ---01â€¢ -67- E-k L. - 2,1 - lt -f -- -- - - t. - = --C- 7 --- C Â»-",17 -6 -21 7- - La;~ 1.,lay~ .-F '- 1 '' 1 ,--â‚¬=i Â¥7 -'ll,/..........'~mil...F-, .-~ - ~ 1. Â¢/ . -% 2 1 . r h. + 1.4 - ,- I.,Â· â€ž:L/44+ + .1 1. .4 1 4/ + . 1.4 J~:4 + ..3 11.2 , f 2.1}41.. - .V~~#*#- . 41 ...9,64 - . I *HBA 2.6- - ' 2..d- -'IN...riw 19 4â€¢f'Ust; 4 - 11--- -< 1 0 7'r - .iwii'A'./.'-- irs "+ -7>Â·+499 1 ...1 +1 .... . +P. .0.- ~ br' Â® *4 v -*L.â€ž~ . - '44 4 2 1. 1 ?4 1 -'but . i 1 '- Â·11 - 1 h 1- 1 . erâ€¢&3UJUJ~al---- ., ULLLUL_I ""6..,----- 421/IL--- *Of El- 9 1 1,/1.3 IKE<~b . I I m 41 Â£* ~~~ g Â©-- -:i~ ~ ~-77-~ 31~~'~~~~ 1*Â·!.i~*:MhaUS *Ullic 6-1 I i 27'*AF#' EE' lai , Â·Â· 1 + T 45#SAWS-MI,.,1 -!110 3 1 ': rn.54.31':i: . =mFIfiw t .1?%~ 3. Ill .1 ..7 -4~?13*Ot':132'erâ€ž -:Â»=.t~ f ~ -#~-I;-7~'~Jiti,23Â·*24/2 1.0 , 4, 4 --- ..aw 1 p#WI )-'. I:/1: I' ~?Â·' ' 'rap , /*. ' I Â£ I .: . 11 + #34 4 1, r.Â· 4. 1 - 1 ,1 Â£-C '1 t-- '~ '' .PV.: -7 *--* I 1:6 - 1-: A. =14 4 in $ it /<W. ..*%pt,Â· . '1 ~t.~~1Â·,3,//'; *. I 1. 1 . t~ 4. I : â‚¬.tÂ·~4~~i.iÂ· F,3./.606631- 1 -- .0- 449 ..9 '4.-Â· .1 0 Â·1% IX ' 9*9Lf.. Â· .2 e "04+02..9* .3*+6./.t' 4, i & ...1.. 10..... 0 11,4 ittÂ·' Â· 4.3 Art -r-, 9 '.t'#1 I ~ 44Â·~'Â·*,42.~..1.f ?>It 1 1. 1 . ..1 3.iÂ·,M .Â· r 1 :C.: 3.:1 4 i 1 1 ..,.'41 ,Â· )11 1 1 1 - 1 1- -Im '. 9 1 Zi: 1 01:11 - -1-1 3.1,3 -. .4-- I.*.'I ~* M. I '-*.'y;4..12*~ 6 *<:4Â· :-L.'. :I, -t' '* - -~B -4-4.2 =5Â¥-r.Z.K.4 rk - 4 4 -6 '.2 4.-,fi' '.4:- , i'Â·~...7.i. A '~r VICINITY MAP DRAWING INDEX DE I.T.RETE REr-*LL IS . CE (Â»â‚¬RED .TH HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS NOTE: BENCHMARK NOTE E---*haRAL DRAVG---1 -Â· WOE VOEER ..T HAÂ·10/l nE le,IBE .0â‚¬ VENEER. 1 1 , IN PLACE& AL"* nâ‚¬ MI OF nE *LL. 00(LO/" ~ THE MAXIMUMI HE16+IT ALLO~ED ON â„¢IS PROPERTÂ¥ 15 | SITE PLAN 15 BASED FROM SURVEr PROVIDED ...ar--------~ i ,~RE TO OE ~,rE~1N6(-Ep 10â„¢ nâ‚¬ STONE VE+EER, TIE DICTATED BY TIâ‚¬ WARIENTY DEEP ASEOCIATE[ WITH â„¢15 br OPOER. THE SURVEY, INCLUI[>1,46 BENCHMARK 129.tomamowpLA" = 11 E~US OF nâ‚¬ ,Â·,ALLS. As nâ‚¬~ BECO~E 9,!ALLEâ€¢2, *RE TO 61/E ,â€¢IAÂ¥ TO ALL eOULDERS. T}E TOP OF nâ‚¬ Nâ€¢LL PROPER rf AND 5 noRE RESTRIOnvE THAN TIE Glrf OF= fo RMATION. IS REFERENCED PROM LM.1&2.......W'Ir* 29 91Â©1'LO el Â«ANC>OMA+[P ALL// PLANTI./ .1*> ASPEN HEIGHT REGUIRMENTS 1 d~ASGES TO OVER FLOvl THE Ii,IALL- -- 1 = 1!. 1,irmt) Deed frecorded Decernber M, leâ€žeook FMPROVEMENT TOPOGRAPHIC SLRVEY L./11*EfvEL FLOOR PLIN I r. 7.... Ra=*~5 133 at Pcge 38 as Receptiron Nmber 105869) rurnhg with tlÂ·u -742SF'uyg,sp~~ye~,~ MI~o~~~ RECO*DED ~ [bil*Eiji*ILE===IZE Sub.jert property sh,tes t~,t, ~No structure on this lot sholl Nyt,&fEs'*f?INIEERS. INC, , 8/ceed bentq feet In height (ch,f,/SE //IWed). fraa-ed [36 15GUTH ELEvATION Lai~ ASPE4 ./00 8.11 verticall, From the 10â€¢18*t poN of . rsactlon I sald Mele,U w. /29-38,6 GÂ¥-1*Â¥-/LE;XÂ¥// structure Ilth tFe rÂ«ural g-cde of the Ic,<1 to '1Â¥, hlgle" â€ž../00 - 2408/ [*TE=Â¥7-//7-GEZXEGE---223 po. of roo~ ridge.Â· g /~-h SITE WALL DESIGN l A. I .ill. SECTIO. 2 / 290 4 ~ NOT TO SCALE AID ]8UILD- 9ECTIOND ~~ â€¢14 :901â‚¬CUEE' - OEW-5 \A ExiFIBEE-----------1 lili PETA/5 - 2...~..~... el,"ARr .J'll.il#..Ill//Ill/-FOR ALL li~i~l~*~d~,~iEaj,Rle,r Po,2 5Â»*3Le-FAMIL r lee SleET FOR *REA GAGULANON5,5{TE DFORI~TIoll RB6ARD**3 - 6 R,â€¢,oE 0,1.Tuls OF ,â‚¬12E THAN, 1 eEPROOM 15 2.-f,Â£&1hli.&& .IE'.5././.-ADGE----- GOVERAOE.....TION' A~t>./HT SLOPIES. ORAIN,~GE. ORA' PIN. LmLI'f'E5 A PARKINe SPACE Cahblers OF AN OPEN ..A FRIPWA*EXLQIXIBIO CONTRACTOR NOTES GALCÂ·4LATIOND. CURBâ€¢6(,TrER, 91Â©12,6. TOF,5,41,7 BOTTOMB OF ,Â·â‚¬,~su,~* e~ FeE~ rÂ·,oE er le f,BET lole Ahl? 1 SrIE ,~LI.5. EL,le SLOPES. A,C ExeTING FEET HIGIÂ·Ir ...1./. ../.1/ GUEBT FIRIÂ»*3 6PAc.In' DRIVE).Y HAS BEEN PROvIOED ntuall NOT REal~ED, ZONING STATISTICS LOT 3 . / .00 FLAN (M; POR A 1 LOT AREA â€¢ Â®JICM,P CO~~TRWTKÂ»l/ ..... DO~13POUT 1 1 LOCATIO,15 <rr/ EXISTI*9 NOOPEN FE,EE . n) PETER CloSeT LCCATIOH~ 1943'-6 =&-52=-m==6- REMAIN./.46Â£;cals-n/ ALL UTILITÂ¥ LOCIT,ale Pom OF-nRAL 7941 ~./.*-il. EZE-LOT AREâ€¢, 60Â»m2.... 10 VERIFY REPRE5ENT' LOPEIT , IT~,CT~A~ -.... 06m- 0/ T. A~;M,Cf.-I.,T,~Km;~1L $ EX!5TÂ»6- d ~~, REau,RED SIZE OF 6,2/DE Â»Ir'ReE//* / XTIAErE 7 2 CALCALATING ,â‚¬16HT PiROPOSED â€¢ ]*Il rROPOSED â€¢ 50â€¢1!> V 61â‚¬02 \ reETAN,ING N,0,LL . E~Â£,LeSl~E. ,Â·â„¢ s~ton.RUGE EDGEOF F,412 r}~LOGR ARE' R,â€¢:T,C, : STONE VE}â‚¬52 ...45'14 E .2 -=~009ES'I AGP10,LT ,410-0 â€¢ 2Â»2 6, 5:Wi:Vg - _ ORWrELL BELIN EMPING .HT, Â·MEdÂ·-3 -- -- I -- CRY,â€¢ELL 62*TE Â· / ~ ..[PE 90+1 &â‚¬1> â€¢ 20'. ,CX(*~= Irâ„¢ ,07.~ /,~1,~/10/1 -AAN;TL- .,-*aL . / DASHED =&..aE&6=~ ~C~K=. ~T~ICTI*/--râ„¢ REC---,r,. RA *~UP,â‚¬e â€¢135 5,. (,5,1 or FAR) R-U~ne ~Ut.GrT W." A LAmu~ 0, -E=~ a-D 0.1 A-:,Pno - 0. ec cp, ~â‚¬14 ONÂ·SRADE I. - 10' - PROPOSE' â€¢N. S.F. *-= Rc *bing'BAff,5 per:%:428 FLASSION' PAT. i . 12â€¢6â‚¬ -[8-ma#,3,1.-Ce TRENGÂ·H... --1 4 601.022[, 4 .xll,EED -/ CON~$*UCTIONDOCU-ln Sr-=TVR~ DOCU,lerr&,A,~C-L .0102.. 51-/B r---4- M %1 IRE; DIVIL ./. 1 / ULOT 4 \ j J__ il" TRBKH ..11,1 FAR CALCULATIONS: 2 Â¢8 6 f, 1 RE, Or/' 0.& 1 1. i A. , 6*r -- 794\ 1 Obâ‚¬12 LEVEL 3.038 SF. UNEXPOSED %: 15.7 55 ' p ~ MAWLEMEL 606 SF. GENERAL NOTES: 2 - li~- 5 EEMENTFIR4675.F. - S 2251 6.F. Â¥041,1 RETAININe )41,0,LL - i 11 e 1 'fr~ BARAVE ALLOHANCE: -375 5.F. / 1 / / a %1 \ 5 6IRA9E BCUDERS.AUED 1 ~ 1 7- --7,â€ž_ ~~ 12122252____2124 .~ OVER SIOT<RETE )/ I T ~ ~ ~ U U , 2 / MAIN LEVEL FAR: 2343 S.P. *Il~~~C. CM~IIAMCHM=-D~ 0.*.I'=,IÂ»,r/le//40#./* r- 22 - , 1"% 4-- 42 TOTAL FAR 13863-5-Fl ~~ -- 18 '29 9 1 m â‚¬ MT TO EXCEED . 2,432 SIN t==Cm;-&.-: - =V ~ Â« - -~L J\ A. --- 7 \1 w g , - ~0 GROSS AREA SUMMARY: /1 10'. E - - -- & EXISTÂ»eÂ·-' 4. MAIN LEVEL. 2,08/ 9.F. j U F.-i---- - 4% LOPER LEVEL, 3021 SP. 001*DRETE -f ..%---~/Coll/,6 DRIVE.'ll \ REI CIVIL DR,-1105. -7947 FLU] 8 PEÂ»IA.NT ....ATION / T , ST./.Ar,01,4/L BELOW GARAGE. 540 Sy. FIMISHEC> #/PE 9*0~~ AMG,1â„¢Gr-Â»10-NCRUâ€ž-. DASIED HALL V ..6 EX1571Â»66R,~OE + NATURAL .f2118 FLA.65.. "A-79*4~-LalloTICE-WL-Ra-,11.~I~~T~eTc- PROPOSED GRADE EXTENT *ALL ROOF N NALKNAY M;,0,1 DRIVEN,r T. FIRE PROTECTION D %/RETE....LK ROOF OVER11Â»lsâ‚¬51Â©./1 ENTRY FATIO EXIDTING CURB * GUTTER NTH 9TEF5 k 501-10Lf MATCHED.k,GEL . ARESUPPRE9*NSYSTEal 43â€¢1... 1 GUrIER MIDLAND AVENUE 0,â‚¬RHANeS 91,4'. DOT ~'Â»'k. COLO./ i ,Â·Exn,RED. AUTOMATIC SPIUÂ«LER & AL,1,1,1,1 SYSTEM R.O.W WIDTH UNPLATTED EXTEIC MORE T-/ 185Â· ASR~QÂ·OBYâ„¢ECITYOFASPEN EEâ‚¬7.--W::&6*& PIPE gTAL RAILINe TO PEET efro,/ ALL REaulIzED 010/REQUIIMEN'S FOR SET'BACK L./5 1-+RR-OOR/<111,3â€žssEMBLy PUelk:3 5TAIR HA,URAILS 644 11 ~ ......=C.--- MTDKCE DESON MANUAL. 10â„¢ AID. ~-KT~A&,1--.-Ill.*,7/.m-L ~Eâ‚¬Â¥Ems~ PROJECT NORTH NO. WP-3510, OR APPROVED.TERNATE. Doc'llithrls AND SHILL #trAN. *InÂ«)1~ LÂ»hm,4. All RIGIfl5, ,Â£1U0N; â„¢E COP-l,Ir,ER[OF. â‚¬ PERSO,L *MA la-0 Cold' ao,my m =/50â€žeEÂ£* 011 0â„¢emU -Lt *. 1~â‚¬5{ DOCIAkhlvs 04 - uâ€ž 0~10 ~MOJECr. INOR FOR AD0m045 TO n,S .0.El NOR r[* nâ‚¬ CC-01104 OF 1-5 ~&,ECT . 1, ........â‚¬>,--0.-.rT,â„¢.Il ./.4 LI'll 'Imt nE -0â€¢ .pâ€¢â‚¬ss *â€¢mEN coâ€¢I'l l â„¢E AR:'.r.1 .10 -c' Ap'll./. THIS SYMBOL REFERS TO PRa,ECT NORTH. F'OR Z BE~. m=.UU=ji:A==Tan'm&-~U' 546:T,l REFER TC SITE PLAN OR SUI;,EY $- LIGHTING LEGEND n,Â»aulnr. *)JC# PUM'OSES OF % PR<kET AS hOrm â„¢ESE .Ntls 4AY NOT BE COPe. 00.1/ Â£ mOI.KiÂ¥E-Ow-7 8 to I Al,r * Rm,our - SPEC;,C 1,1,011 *~mEN CD)150,CT Â»440 PE.UIS5O4 I 71Â£ ANC,0/. % 1-1 ~0.~42> '161+T FIXâ„¢~i 1 0 1- /~~1 SITE PLAN , i./lili-wl'*i#----1 < [l-_Lumpill-1-_3 12=ri/8=1-0 LOOZ--90-21 :1!AM3/ 0018 BOOZ-/7-1 4 /2 :NOIS[Aoli :=75/3 :Joj autoH X1!u~i-3~ju1Â§ mo;snj v ,oqumN lors If9I:oo* igimni @!qqoa pue @AMS inu,Av sup~doll *Rq 5IZI luols,!Pqns 011â€¢3304 't le 1 . \ -aeol. ch:~e -Ak- ~JjÂ»f j )tIP Y.~0-=i )>943333tf~' L ~ 9.-0. veneer /'0*/1~e 2/ me.gurld ... ... ./ 4>bÂ«Â«Â«Â«Â«-zz=Â«4~ =Â« :<** 7 3 \ W ivit/ZBL- , P -N, 1.-11 h..~- 219 11 /- 1 \ 32'-4 - ' 411-3 IR_J 1 11,7 . 1 -- - 2 U. r _ . . & i-J'-11 1 1 #Vh.JH- .Â» 41 --- -- k :1 \ I l( 1 y /J 1-2 -2 AP=============i- t 47'fin IJ 63 4 1 11 STORAGE 2 61 AREA \ %14##993 0 1 1 L - 1-2 ful- -=4 ' - 2 3 22'-7- /1 Sm y g 1/V,-C j,: :J N 1 tu 1- 7 r il ~ ~ ~ ~ . r/- /71 lar~ -9 _- & g 1 'Entr=&34px'7*--1 ,Â·.5. /7*===m -p43 3-4&11 ts= =29 -9 2, k t / 1 44--t, 1 luj i 1 1 L ran fike) L --11 1 A 8/1 0 - 1 11 1 1---#.=4 1 0- b 4 1--==t-LE- '-i' 1 - '1-----â€ž=21 - -1 :m. 1 - 11~ I / 2 d â‚¬ 22 2 CO rn MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ~Z ~SUOISIAok! :s][relms{KO f dmets .9 0.011 4.=/40.Â§ moisno v mqumN FIS ZOOZ-GO-Z: IAN3d 9018 9007-U- D Â·I Al/ 02Â¤Â·0~6 ar' Ira,~i 41,),w. F.Â»~. 4|P- 974*)4Ue ..# nugav gun~doH 1 lott PromentorySubdivi,io As ~~~~~ ~ ~~IR ~~~~~U ~3.:~- ----- --7 15-, 28'-7 12'-1 3 It 11 1 1 ~ BEDROOM ~ EXERCISE 7 A MECH/ 4 2 1 8 FAMILY / REC , .1 63 ROOM 4 - 1/ /1/1 h-. / M % 1 - 2.61 14% 1 / / 10 1 BEDROOM 3 11 631 13'-1Â· 110 ' -0 2, 1â€¢-0~ ih,tar -1 1 fa it 1 UJ I la' ~ BEDROOM 2 J > BEDROOM 5 1 -31~ 4 1 -Â»q Ill ~ 1 21/11 4 11 - 1 +111 1~ f i 1 ~22]1 i F~ | 1 / 1 du / 9 '-2=11=1 1 -"~~~~"~ *~ 7-Â»ItdHil~1 - *1 - ~ LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ~~ N ~_..~ 1 /4 = 1-0 CI/ :910(I NESI ~SUOIS~AON 203 1.oH *mi-45.S mol,no) v <WRN NONS -Go-ZI :llrIM3d 90-18 ~00HZ--1 t ,\3' 22Efia OUNni 2!qq'G PUE OA@ls EV InuakÂ¥ sup[doH )-3 5IZI 51Â¥ 'uo!S-!Pqnstioluoul{>4I 't 101 I .Â· M 9'tÂ©~9,1"lL~* re\L ,"r..24IP'.r *â„¢ I .r--Â« .- --1 4Nt h. ---4-7 ~ 6 *Al , 4 4 :.:Â· 4 1 . 522 *Ni<.6. - . 1 : 4,9 1 -ts : 1 * 4- .Â« 'hit .34-11-- -6- it* .34.Â·-- 7..~ . 4 ...1,4-*- 6 1 V .3,9,6,r -2 1 d Â£ I' ""*i'*'""*I, , 1/ . ' r l.0 . i. 1 4 1 401,4 1 -- . QÂ» ~ 4- -A - 11 1 r A ; ibill. Â»V - 3.=,ry-'.ovvi.,9 1&4 il 1 W, 4.1 , ......IMT -4 *14. r .-/ r. 1. 7, --7 4/1/ p *Ntt e, 4 ' , limpli -' 7-E r e 1â‚¬3 fer- -- i . 21 r7- '3 - I . 1, : .... , f .4 U./as e,r'. 4 . â‚¬ 1 I ./ I 4. j .9. FO.'.43: 7. ti/0: sip , I. 7--1 - 1% : 0 :15 9 - : 1/~,. 1.1 - . . 4. 46 r 'r . * 40 i l'' 1,47 r , 4> . . I . I.- 0~~.:1' / 1 5 . 4. - r . Â» 2.- 7 . 2.- . 1 . h P . . *C.4 1.4 t : .4 Â¢hk. J , - A"'A. 7' 4+* 24/4 4-- 1 I k.' iÂ¥ O, f 1 I. 41 ..4 - , . .A I .... , . 1-4 - 1 . I AÂ· Dek ..1 I . / 0:â€¢â€¢ A . .... 1 - f .. 1 ..,A.1 7 -1.0, , . ./Im . 4 Â¥14 ... kf,4,..4 2 Ri -7--~ 4 2 r vi -,FY ; /9194 I + att 4.0-,0-41 . 1 -- $ . f Ch T ... ' I 4 7 9.. r ... . I . -Â·r f .....4 .... 1*U , .1. 0 4 1 -- . 1 - 1 4 . .f 1.t...... .- Kill, 1 41 . +A. 1 i 4 & 1 1 . 4 4.' . \\ \4 14 1 Â» ' 'I \ i 1-24*7*t- '*21 2Â§21.* U -0,11 ---I. . i*14*1 ' 2~4~ 0 2, 1. \ d 'Pr- 7- 10 0 p ~94, i 1 /..>al\1/ 44 I \, 1:9 +W- G A , \ 1~ ~F 1.* rr 1 , m>lkÂ¢Uff 4 4*1 , 1/ -p/%, 2.- I - I Â¥11]Fli....., 1 $--1 -2.: -â€ž1 4 44 4 K -r - 1-75.0 .- .g.. 1 .- ~, 4%.1.- ..71 64 1 A p......U..3- ' MAAIOW~W..&1*kjlx**S~ - P~ hi I. L- 'tj i MOUNA- ee k j.ill -I i 1-, . . i .. V., U ~ ...4 if L \ 4 Â¥1 17 - J L li . ..% 1 * t' v< lif<*&443#145 :132_#37'~ ~ .1 . N. I. Â£ Chii _ -9.- *-- - .t' - -2).m/'* 9 . / j I. I -1 1. . ./ I .2.. r- ' t 00 - Ii. f . .. -- 1 -, 1 I - J .64/~/i. --~ Fir.ilmilillk.1..'Izilillillillillilill . 14â„¢ I jdl/illl ': fi.E .......6i ./ 1 -ts 4 A .1. 7./....... .9," vrlill 5- -7--/ -- r . . 4 , 1 4 v a~~ 21,/r , J Xy '73 7. , t 4. 4 qlvi:90/<//1//460&)'- ./lizillillilliA 4 k' 61/0 I . ..C . :1 I k . Amisit f.~ -/Jdin . . < . -' 9,/ 1 1 i f. ./. - 'ir b t. , ., I '- .rk 7 râ„¢tr %42 â‚¬ ':.,1.01~ 22: -VE. Â»R~ 490,,ja ~ - 4 .rÂ·" m 15 \2:.1-- 0 , -4/849 , Lt , 'Axj....2 h - ./ -il--* *41~'61.../. . I . - -1/ DI"- - '....JL ' .Â· 449 ' ./- :*2- /'-I,/ -- t j /7 \ 'PAMIR 1.millil 'Â·aÂ· ; , . Cillr- v. r I I -- ~.241*f 449.,-419. .7, A i. ' .t S - i' -1. 1 ~494-- 2/, 1 .- ' - m. ' '. pri , I 4, C. i . , , 9:\11 1 1 45?,1. .Y . 7 : 04 . r -A - 1 - ,6 1 -,-Â· -4.. i-f flf . 4 W. 'A I 4 .* *2 .- 1 -I , t - . i . Â¢1 1 -P â€¢- I ../ M. . . -, t .. . Â· 9 ft' Â·- 7 -'. a.kit-- .P. ~ - L --I- . 0 A. Tgr , 4,9.kik: 1 . 1 . e.. 6 4 , R.â€¢ A f 1 ... 1 = I. -1, t ' . 'm'F r i . /4 / C. = .:.4 4 2,4,4*'ff'.. -44* ' L *3- ../ .. R' 6. I I . - .7. 1 . ..r,4 - r - 2 Â£0. . 4: I. 2.'3~ " 6621 - ' I <I. -'. . 7 1,Â· r 2- a .=-I- 2 #~r-Il- . , LA e, 3, . -4 1 . 0 t . I . - Â£ -x~24.F-~ L.1 F#*Â§19 ....- --2. p A k. , -16.- A4 11 1 ) /A 4 4 4 m...1410.1 --- =~,1 ti - - ... 1, C I tn, 4 -/22. I i tf .t.1...4 , ~ 1 0 1 ~991 11 v 1. l-4/*,5/ ii -'--WI/p -& 1 'r_ " 411Â£4 182 * S-z,~ Â»i' I i.ar-*kL~*U 11 ' h , '.VA - . ' . -7 L . 1////1, I I. I.- 1. 9 -7 Â£31, .4. I - 4 , // '. ...1 4/9 11 -melt â€¢E -~ .ir _..&- - - -&-10/8*.- i L /51 1 L .1:9 ~ t./M,5-#&9 "->-4 .1/523 4 7 9 1 AN. I-.. AE.Â§2~~ sh r~ 11/99 1.Ill ~ 17 ov* Hpff Jvj ~ 141~ Mt.#,--._ ALL:&,0.-_ / S hi . 2 01 -I â€¢ , 4/......... 2/4.>Â·I /. .-. - (Al! 9 110 1 MD y k' i. J 9'VAINs - . I F 1 111 e ..It j P . r 41 . F' . .4 ..1 - 4 *v I. I ./ li 4. e 0 . I -7 4 'ital w ; 4 .- . 6 -~ -4+ e le I Â» 4 t , 1Â· . â€¢ 11,11 11,?K)'15 \415' \4-41 K14 3 0 4- p All,Â¥. - ..::C ihilillillillilililillillillillillillill -. 31 11~-Â£.4. 1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Â·r 1 - - -9-24kj -4 4. 4 . -. ... 7, At i g l 011 bLAN.b - Yvt, bl.-/1-N b , ... ---141;1/ ~ I . "*e W. 10.9 4 . . -imEr. 4, - - 01. . - .1.,iEiii,r-, .A ,.4 p-'.#51 4 er, I 1 â‚¬444 4 .. 2 i 1 th 1 bLAND -- 1 2-\ 5 04, ~ b LA-61 6 k.*te' rE -- + 41 - 5 U Zi 16 4/ :1- 12< ///J & A :AM-Ju. 3& 5Â£40 i4i . 1.1 - U ...:91'*"371 1 1, 1 .490 prit il P 4 I. 2 12- /M, 1.AND ... r '4,2.4 6 - 2, '; '16 *0*,Fy - ..:R - AL- 2 - 1 4, 11 1,4, .. i ' ' IMI ./r- I I , 3: '.4 r. - 7 ,4 ..... 1.%, e '' , i2 . . 4.- .5 . 4 h. 0 . ' ./. , A.,- 't : : 6 11~2':42?: ; .4., 0rl/' / A , rt --t, fe. r. r ,Â·C-â€¢ L* 4-*,0. =rÂ· ' 1 1 , I . + ---e-- r , ... a 7 -1 ' 4 \ 1 i / / 14 " , 4 . , l. & ./4,4 Â¥ 4 1 I, 1 A P. . ' f -4,91 â€¢ , 4 1. 51.. /9/ f ,!4 I -214 i '. Ar , Ni ~'' J f .., -4. - <- 213 f y . Illillillillillillili5 ~~illill, I. m - -' . , -- 4,49-1.66 1 - 1, , . 4 '' 4 1 4 17. 1.-â€¢Â·iâ€¢r--r 4 9 clikE Â£, -~~ l, 4/;243/ggrt> ,-7,-~.~: 1.lillite.iRET I :Pli//4/ /32/ .TENLf t. - a.,F- . . t~, 0,08 Avfwks illillillillllilli~~~~~ 4. . m,EW// 6 W "A .. dÂ¢A . h 1.---1//// r- - /- , - -14, A 6 , , 9 : f. t 12- ..11; . , 1 - i e "68:3<I i. 1 S . - ' â€¢rm ./ I. -1 12.01 HerKILL 3 0,2- FA 4- ./ , It f-Mullil i 6 1,10 . --7~1 '.9 hi . . le h H. ial 4 1. / mir - W , ..1 - *. P.Z-*I, -- - . - 7... * - I I f. i h, ' A \ 1 'b.li~, 4 . f ...J.... . 1 a * ...L 2 .... / : ~ ~~~. Identify hom | <Top-most layer> % 1.34 - parcels Location: | 2,628,853,260 1,495,915.668 Feet 11, Promontory Field I Value - 0. FID 3636 Shape Polygon /* ' I AREA 6276.2125 PERIMETER 335.903824 1 3 1.. , NAME Promontory )4 L ,. FILING BLOCK - , MULTJD ./. EXEMPT A ls,6 TYPE rs PARCEL 273718107001 ACCOUNTNO R004883 SUBNAME PROMONTORY r AT . - ADDRES51 2467 PROVENCE CIR 4 2/t OWNERNAME 1215 EAST HOPKINS LLC , I j, 2-'t ADDRESS2 c 4 g. CITY WESTON ' . C Â».. I le 1. STATE FL * 7 ZIPCODE 33327 STREETNO 1215 . . -1 ./51 I ./ .4 STREETDIR E . ...9. STREETNAME HOPKINS STREETSUF AVE 1 + â€¢L STREETALP , -.... , r. LOT_1 4 . 1 1 4 ..2 ANDTHRU BLOCK_1 1 a . ANDLOT REMARK , .-1 IMPORVECD 1212 -- 1 VACANTCD ASSESSVAL 117370 0 11' . ,/il -4- ---7-7 ACTVAL 1474500 â€¢ 0 2 It 11 IMPACT 74500 1 A Custom Single-Family Home for: Steve and Debbie Rattner ~ Ii,Illillum.141, . 1... lilli -Ii==IM-Ii* :.,2--2=*41,-0-<Fi kmillile/L-IJIL,1 1 11111'MT,liMUir:L....d 1215 East Hopkins Avenue ~~ -2-1--11-=_ ~ Lot 4, Promentory Subdivision, Aspen, CO 1 BUILDING PERMIT SET 12/05/07 . 53 mi I.... 0 1 -1 ZE _ o =a M Â¥~'WA .0-- ,â€¢50 - - d -21% â‚¬41Â« ---'/~ rr- %-/6-*.6..1/Emil.Yr."IMMA,2..... - -1Â£ _ 6 C i 0.7.-- , 1-3 4 3 EN IR - 400*"~,0 '0*- OV J . k . 1 â€¢ _L-E _Ck/_ L_ .* I. irillit~ 1./. - Ii,Jiner,Hir'~Elfilifip~~~1~~~41,1,5,-P a. --: _il--1---=- 9 - - 1 -- + 1 41 . I ......,... . I. ., Â·:I,.':'& ijA,~,# ;6Â· ~ : * â€¢ ole(I onssI :SUOISIAOH :swelInsuoo uqof dumS :ioJ amoH LI!mEd-JIBUYS uxolsno v loqumN19049 LOOZ-50-Z L :1IVdB3d 9018 iounni O!qqaa p E OAMS anu@AÂ¥ SUFIdoH lierIZI OV 00'uodsv ium,siMPqns kiojuomoid 't 101 VICINITY MAP DRAWING INDEX / /4. i STONE VEMEER THAT MATCHES T}Â·E HOUNE STOhE VEhER THE SHOT<ARETE RETAININS PCALL- IS TO BE COVERED WITH HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS NOTE: BENCHMARK NOTE: ARCHITECTURAL- DRAWINGS I .e IN PLACES, FLONS T}Â·E BASE OF T}Â·E riALL, BCULDE925 THE MAKINUM HEIeHT ALLO}NED ON THIS PROPERTY 19 THE SITE PLAN 19 BASED FROM SURVEY PROVIDED A' SITE PLAN ARE TO BEE INTERMINGLED WTH TIE ST)E VENEER THE DICTATED BY' THE MARRENTÂ¥ DEEP ASSOCIATED MITH THIS 3Â¥ OWNER. THE SURVEr, INGLUDINe BENCHMARK Al,1 DEMOLITION PLAN ENDS OF TIE PiALLS, AS THEY BECOME SMAL.LER, ARE TO BIVE WAY TO ALL BGUIERS. THE TOP OF TIE 1 PROPERTY AND IS MORE RESTRICTIVE THAN THE CITY OF NFORMATION, 15 REFERENCED FROM: A2 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHOAA.D BE RANDOM AND ALLOPV PLANnNeS AND ASPEN HEIeHT REQUIRMENTS: Re~,4. A eRASSES TO OVER FL.04â€¢1 THE VIALL IMPROVEMENT TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY A) MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN * = The hlarranty Dead (recorded December Iq, iq51 In Book A--76 mjei'prf. LOT 4. BLOCK 1, PROMONTORY SUBDMSION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED A4 ROOF PLAN ~ 7 r.4 - lu.za .5./ -2. ~U 183 ot Page 35 as Reception Number 10586q) running Mith the NOVEMBER 4, 1957 IN PLAT EOOK 2* AT PAGE 240. Pm<IN COUNTY COLOFDO. Aa NOT USED i ./Â·In... jllt~I/)4L.=z'yrri -0-zt~7/ subject propertg states that, 'No structure on this lot shall ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. ~ exceed tÂ»lenty feet ir height (chlmneys excluded), measured 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET Abrrl ELEVATION Ll.32..GE~ ASPEN. COLORZO 81611 - -/,-1 -,7 vertically From the lowest point of Intersectlor of sald PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 Al hDRTH ELEVATION structure with the natural grade of the land to the highest AB EAST 4 HEST ELEVATIONS WE 8/05 JOB 2408*C Aq BUILDINe SECTIOhS r $ ...4/ 1 NOT TO SCALE ill I 1 A BUILDINe SECTIOPE A12 DETAILS ~* SITE WALL DESIGN pojnt oF rooF ridge," AIO BUILDING SECTIONS 69 A13 DETAILS A5FEN ZONIN6 NOTES: 41Â¥IL EN@INEERINe NOTE: FARKINe NOTE: A]44 SCHEDUILES - DETAILS SEE ARSHITECTURAL FAR- SUMMARY SEE CIVIL ENeINEERIN6 DRAMINGS FOR ALL THE PARKINS REGUIRMENT FOR SINeLE-FAMILÂ·r HOME SHEET FOR AREA CALCULATIONS, SITE INFORMATON REGARDING - GRADE DATVMS, OF MORE THAN I BEDROOM 15 2 PARKINe 5PALES. LI LANDSCAPE PLAN GOVERAeE CALCULATIONS. AND HEIGHT SLOFES, DRAINAÂ« DRAIN PAE, UTILITIES, A PARKIN* SPACE CONSISTe OF AN OPEN AREA pr FAR PLAN CALCULATIONS CONTRACTOR NOTES CALCULATIONS. CURDÂ¢eUTTER, SHORINS, TOPS AND BOTTOMS OF MEASURINS 56 FEET MIDE Br le FEET LONS AND 1 SITE WALLS, SLAB SLOPES, AND EXISTINe FEET HIGHT. CONDITIONS. A THIRD) elIEST PARKINe SPACE IN THE DRIVEPVAY HA5 BEEN PROVIDED THOUeH NOT REQUIRED. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMEN.NOTE. MIE-WAISTRul,698660~ia INCUL.UNG ARCHITECRI,AL SHEETS HAiE BEEN ZONING STATISTICS PREPARED IN REBPONSE T. â„¢E SPECIFIC BUIC SERVICES REQUESTED BY THE LOT 3 OVMER CONTE-UT,43 CONTINUED INVOLVEMENT. Sa.ECTIONS AND DECISaN SEE ROOF PLAN (A4) FOR 6'RADE AT BLDS. C00Â·ER ~ LOT AREA = 6J-10 SF. 1.WONG BY THE GENERAL CONâ„¢ACTORAND OWIER T-OUGH CO-LET,ON OF GUTTER VV DOWePOUT -76143'-6" 1 METER GLOBE LOOATBON: 7941 ki.DWED = 3025 Sy. 0501 LOT NqEAJ LOGAT-10% (TYP) -7 U r- EXISTING POODEN FENCE - TO CON~ACTOR TO VERIFY -7 REPRESENTS LO~EST / SITE COVEUGE: ....=...1....... SCOPE OF R./.Cna DESIGN CONCeTS APPROVED ;V T1~2 C~ANEFt A~E~ INCLI~*E Dll.~91810~16 (~F T+~E BU"'~(1 T}~E TYPEES * 5 ALL UTILITY LOCATIO,6 ~ REMAIN OURINS CONSTRUCTION. POINT OF NATURAL STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS AND AN OUn.INE OF THEE ARCHmECTURAL AND ~RUCTURAL -48 ELEMENTS OF CONSTRUCTION. 13, 1 -EXISTINS- 1 / t AND REGUIRED S\ZE OF / GRADE INTERSEETING 1 FROPOSED = 3045 Sf. 4/ SHED ENCLOSURE. NITH STRUSBELEOR EDGE OF FAR (FLOOR AREA RATIO) : T}ESE CONSTRUCTION *laENTS PRCMDE./ SCOPE OF SERVICES AS OUTUNED I RETAINING HALL - Plm'OSES OF ASPHAL-T AU.O'rE> = 21,82 SF. J T,â‚¬ AGREEMENT FOR,~CHITECTURAL *ER'ACEE A,0 n,EREFORE DO NOT STONE VENEER OVER ) _ ~ ~ PROPOSED = 2,554 S.F. 17 N 01046'14'~ 112.86' ~ 7942 GALa;LATINe PEI(3HT. ~LQUIREED FORFULL SHOT-GRETE 'C C . .0 0 0 0 0 r I - - PALL BRATE STABILIZATION Pâ€¢IALL. h IT IS THEE UNDERSTAN[Â»,8 OF â„¢EARCHrrECr Al,] ENGINEER TM,T T} E GEPERAL - NO STÂ·01â‚¬5 GAP ~-/3 , ... / Di*fEL-L BELOK eUILDIhb HEIGHT: 1463-3' - SHILL FURNISH ~AL WORK REQUIRE FOR PROFERCOMPLETION OF DE / eRADE 610* ALLOMED =20'-0' WORK AND TMAT./WaRK SHALL I. 0/SOUND./ QUALrrY CONSTRUCTION I ~ i mr-- ~ +4 ;97-7 1---f~/196- j~_ m.' ~!1.-48Â£ ~ D,eED. PROPOSED = Iq'-10. ACCORDANCE vm,1 -n.MS'IND....0.....FACTURERS SPECIFICATO'MTRUCTIONS,./WARRANTY REQUIRE-EN. \- DECK AREA: PROPOBED =2243 SF. ALLOWED =135 5.F. (15% OF FAW T}E CONn,WCTOR. 1~SED ON THE FOREGONG. SHALL PREPARE FOR OW,ER REEVIEW A -4 -Â· Â·Â· I REALISTIC 8UDGET <...UNE OF PRICES EASED ON ASSlÂ».FTIONS OF SCOPE OF \ r----- -Â·Â·Â· Â«rÂ·- - + T '~ 9 -- 7 - 7 -1'-3 -Â· Â·110/ r, 1 WORKANDC~A'ERPRODUCISELECTICÂ»E 322*MT,0 /: - C ~ t i FARKINe REGUIREMENTS: f 1 / - 0 ~~ ~ ~:~~:Â·~1Â¢-G 1,41 .. HEATED DRIVEMAY ' â€¢ISIBLEFORIEL/fll...GALLIGST'Â«3 COND,noNS, CONSâ„¢UCT,0,d DOCUAE,01 STRUCUFWI- DOCLIA,e,r13, Al~,SPAL TRENOH DRAIN '9 1, 1 1 REQUIRED = 2 SPACES CONGRETE SLAB PROPOSED - 3 SPACES RE: CIVIL [Â»169. ' ,~ltil I Â· . . COLORED Â¢ TEXTURED 23 ENGIIEEER1NG, DESIGN, SPECIFK~JOIS AND DRAWâ„¢GS AS REQUIRED FOR SUIU~ING -| ' ~ LOT 1424\4 ,~ ~ L....i.L-LITI. li. uvu=1 IU~- ::(:': F : -~49' 1 ~ ---; .... '' Â· ~ ~~ J ~~ ~ TRENO; DRA PER,g"t N/PPWN/ /C,NRERNEZ~,3/EQ L-- -*.- - ~ . -EjE- FAR. CALCULATIONS: . EN ~~ 1/U. CONC. = ' ~ 2 1 ' I RE: DIVIL 3%5. _ *-- 7943\ ill i i UNEXPOSED %: 15.1 96 ymie94* 1 1 jif=if jz OI, .-p--- -- - *r ':'r Â·Â·1Â· ..~ Â·, . DRAIN PAN - 47 BASEMENT FAR: 461 5.F. LOPER LEVEL: 3,038 5.F. GENERAL NOTES: RETAININS WALL - 2 gl. 1 SEE CIVIL 2 - BO\}U)529 ~EIA\MtÂ¥b J ~ , / --/ Qq MRNLEVE\_Â· 225-1 S.F. Dy*6. rfP ~ 53.0 1 DRAWINGSARENCTINTE~EDEDIC}BESCALE), Do NALL. . M -,2 -4 NOT ICALEDRAW'GE. * 4~* 1 1 .1 4 2 4 0- 2 VE,/F"LL D//8/10/4 CO//0*nONS A/O LrrUrr LOCATIO~S ON RETAINING MAIL - 4 eARABE: 605 5.F. 7,Â£.OBSrTE-ORTOBEON-GUrfm-CR0~E~40 m MAmRIMUL NOTFYARCHITECTOFAN'fCO~FLCSOR BOULDERs STACI<ED 1 Els Jmdrl-,r-4 (0 ~ ~ STAIR OPENINS -4-1 5.F .......8 1,1 n. COCLmENTS ........ OVER 5HOT-GRETE -/ 2=11 1C 7944- 1 2 eARAGE ALLOPIANCDE: -315 9.F. MA\N LEVEL PAR: 2,343 S.F. STABILIZATION WALL ' S OF CO-UCTS OR DISCREPANCES 1.15- BE FULY REBOL.. wrâ„¢,-ne,-pa~&mo*T= -_tx:~ 1 9 - .'l-.S I m..E...11 k 23 4 PLAN 0â€žBeloNS *RETD FACE OF ST-OR FACEOF CONCRETE . SEEE.EIE~ 4 < . (NOT TO EXCEED = 2832 5.F) 945Â«_ ~ 2 TOTAL FAR: 12,860 5.Fl 1.23 LOO,T-~CL=--NOTLI~ETOCE--0. 74 Â»/ 6 : 6 -#--==2=..... , 8 GROSS AREA SUMMARY: Â¢*WETm. COUNTER,OPS, 8... CLOSET RODS.1-mA,-S. 7946-- < AND TIMBER BE-~ O - -- 1 louD. - .Â£/Â£:J -i--r-- / 47 , 6@, De~0-000- RE;TRIOnooRPLANSFOR-OR ~ ' LOINER LEVEL: 3021 5.F. vocKrD,8. [x]ORH~RUWARETo~=ELEÂ£:Tm},row,ER~ -1Â«- - --- (9-02 ~ EXISTINe \-EXISTING CONTOURS MAIN LEVEL: 2086 5.F. 7 0 =9==W--6= ' DRTS X 2 \ Rei GIVIL DRArlINES. '~- 24-FEEPN CONTOLR5 3 - TOTAL LIVINe AREA: 5,loU S.F. U 6. C -7947 -31 PERMANENT EXCAVATION i ~ STABILIZATION P*!L BELO~1 6ARAeE: 540 6.7. 8 COORDI-TE ALL mECrRKLAL.0 -ECH-:CAL Forru~S TO FIT ~9,4....0-.41--DI FINISHED GRADE 5HOP{ht AF,O,rECTÂ¥,ENDAERT,1@FROMDRAW,IGS~ DASHED. PVAL-1- BY 01}Â·ERS. ' ...e.err...EmoK.....]RGUIDANCE'NEEDED EXISTible eeDE BYT~Ecol~ACT""'Â¤NY"FECT'OF g T}ms panEN.,E SH,11 11.ED,JELY NOTF, T,â‚¬ ARC,InECT. 1 ~Eg .-To..LE,Â«7â„¢E -00 ~a.*~*)~ECT oF PROPOSED eRAPE L EXTENT~â€¢411. ROOF AND NALBAT FROM DRIVBNAÂ¥ TO FIRE PROTECTION NEVI CONRETE SIDDNALK ROOF OVER}iÂ»~ SHOHN ENTRM PATIO. EXISTIND CURB 4 6UTTER NITH STEP5 AMP 10 THE 005,ALCOP,mACTOR S,t~U.mE RE-ONS-E FO. S,1.TISFYÂ»NG ALL ~PUC~LE CODES NO 0~ANNG X MIDLAND AVENUE 501_IDLY HATCHED.~kIDGE - 6% -2 1. FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM: PE-~SumROVaWCTIS NEN ClED 4 arrTER HANDRAIL- OVERHANeS 5HALL NOT --7949\ AUTOMATIC SPR]NKLER & ALARM SYSTEM GCNERNED '/ THE IC .03 COOE COaFLWICE 18 COLORED Â¢ TEXT1*ED. R.O.W. WIDTH UNPLATTED EXTEND MORE THAN 18' AS REOD BY â„¢E CITY OF ASPEN .9 g = M.NOATORY T,E CONSTRUCTION DOCU,em, I'.UN'r FE-~,Mm*0-=efV-T PIPE METAL RAIL_Ibb TO tâ‚¬ET BEYOND ALL REQUIRED CCXCES ~Kl~NG R. 20Â©S....LOC,k.0 ~GIC~Â£ GODE REQUIRMENTS FOR 5ETBACK LIT[35. 1-HR FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY: A -Z 3 PUBL-IC STAIR HANDRAILS FIRE RESISTENCE DESIGN MANUAL 10TH ADD. 11 ./ Ge~ULCONTRACTOR.. SUBcowr,~CTORm SHâ€¢,LL FIELD NO. FC-5108, ORAPPROVEDALTERNATE. 0 COORDIN........PP~VALFROMT,â‚¬A,Â©~ECr/ 3 Mic ENG,25: BER,nE AN. IG, NCTC.,GOR CFR-Â»,G OF ANY 1+IR WALL ASSEMBLY: CAST--PLACE CONCRET'.STES- FRU... OR ANY IT}'m FIRE RESISTENCE DESIGN MANUAL 10TH ADD. ST,E,CrLâ€žAL aae,13 -1101 MAY AFFECT'DE STRUCTURAL ~.AIONS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY THE ARCHITECT FOR THIS PRNECT ARE NO. WP-3510, ORAPPROVED ALTERNATE. CD â€žrEGIr-,OFT,EBULD,a INSTRUMENTS OF THE ARCHIECTS SERVICE FOR USE SOLELY WrrH RESPECT TO â„¢E PR/ECT AND. UNLESS 12 WSm TIONS OF'EQU,L- PRCUUCTE; WU BE ACCEPTABLE OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN WRITING. THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE AUTHOR OF THESE < .4".A 0,i'VITDIO~NEATB,APPaOVAL *IQUESFE-E~ DOCUMENTS AND SHALL RETAIN, WCHOUT UMITATION, ALL RIGHTS, Wa.UDING THE COPYRIGHT HEREOF. NO PERSON, PROJECT NORTH C.1 rra,ISAF.I...Al:Qu,Uâ„¢WIECIFICA.nol... WHETHER HAVING COME RIGHTLY INTO POSSESSION HEREOF OR OTHERWISE, SHALL EMPLOY THESE DOCUMENTS ON ANY OTHER PRCUECT, NOR FOR ADDmONS TO THIS PRNECT NOR FOR THE COMPLETION OF THIS PROjECT HY , :[%1:5:4/::r#".~~=-e-AM ~~~INO~m~E R~P~O~ ~'rt,ZF~'DCOINS~R9~P~MKTra:%2=1. JIC#O~~AcÂ·T ZU:'C:rrZ::i:?J':%5[~tTL~$& ~Z ~ LIGHTING LEGEND *WLS. nW,SPORTATKÂ»L SUPPL~, Eal,1&Â«ENT. ETC. To [DOCUMENTS. OBTAIN A CO,rLE,E .108 -THINTIE FtECOG,gZED STÂ»{11*RDS M EXPRESSLY CLAIMS ALL PROPRIETARY RIGHTS IN THE MATERLAL WHICH IS ISSUED IN CONFIDENCE FOR DEIGN MÂ¥rY. AND/OR CONSTRUCnON PURPOSES OF THIS PRNECT AS NOTED. THESE MATERIALS MAY NOT BE COPIED, MODIFIED, .6 51.EFACE MOUNTED LIGHT NOR EMPLOYED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE SPECIFIC PRIOR WRFTEN CONSENT AND PENISSION OF THE ARCHITECT. *A FIXTURE 3 Â·~, PALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE 6 ~~ SITE PLAN .ag- REC,ESSED IN STAIR - 4 6 LIeHT FIXTURE SCALE: 1/8"=1'-n" Sheet Number Stamp John G. Martin, Architect LLC Consultants: Revisions: Issue Date: LOOZ-90-Z L ll,4836 9018 16Â§0-81[-0lb gnu@AVS LY j 'uodgy 'uo!Â§!AwqnS Lolu@mold't 101 BENCHMARK NOTE: nE SITE PLAN IS BASED FROM SEVEr PROVIDED Err OPNER. 11Â·E SURVEY, INGL.LIDINS BE,Â¤*iARK IN=ORMATION, 15 REFEREFâ‚¬ED RROM: IMPROVEVENT TOPOGRAPHIC SI'RVEY Lar 4. eLOCK , PMONCÂ»,TORY 9-1-C,4. ,CCCINgÂ«; 10 BE PLE TIE~~ ~IX~ED Meâ‚¬.0 4 1*I l PL. 90Â©K .........TY COUC-00. ~*~~~NEERS. INC. FHC~/FAX (.70) 0-3018 a 2406â‚¬ 1 U '3 7941 *4 / 5> -- N 01046'14TE 112.86' 7931 , /4-Â«-1 --Â«-------------2-7--------r - -IJ - I / 111! 1-~6: Â·~ 3/rri-i??EPPO<***9**9114279>itt. Â»Â»px>top*p~~**~~*~RO*RRRPÂ®**39*3~~gg*j~ Â· 2,4 ' + ' 1 11, 11( rr f .,2404?496*c****0<>00Â©*XÂ«Â«Â»35:>Â»%>*xx>*c,<>frwriuA,r .........X XXX.X.yx. j POILI,11* 4 \ L - - air*air<44%-FL%*Fir--r*ut e~~~ON ~f~ 7943Â·Â·Â· / XXX X'X '' XXX.~ XW.W.WXY.XXXX::X'..~'4 52 il /...h'................%11/ ' 711 1 24 1.,411,1/12 Â£9*23#188% 88)48**B ,i ~ U im /11 iff! 1 t / / ,f'hooc~,>"x-x-x-Ix-"k-k-X.-X.X %-i-ly hx-,iÂ·xyÂ·x-x-xxyx-x-xxx-Â·x-.-Â·x--xx-xy,xyx-,Â¥-xx-xx, : 7944- -~0 - 8 1 /, 1 1 1 .5 ' N '- 4 1 , /2 1 A 1 f E . 12 i = F m 1 42 ~V//4/11<14*Â«V Aa\\\\ 2 --1245 - 2 2 1.1 - 2 0 x x x x w, I . i *9<Â«AA . 6. e 1Â·Â·Â· ' - ~ --4--- -7946- - -*I-:-, 10'-0. ~ 2-16.m77-r- 1 MPA XY 4 / 1 1 1--:1.3~3-EL----I-_ - - 1 \ / N - 7947 4.-i--- J-- // If \ /1N'Fr-% i.. - \ 1 ----- .-- (4) EXIST-INe MATURE - 4948.- - - TREES TO BE REMOVED. \ Ab 1 (3) EXISTINe MATURE - ~ ~ MIDLAND AVENUE .494_ EXISTINe BOULDER R.O.W. WIDTH UNPLATTED \ Â»NALL TO BIZ M TREES TO REMAIN AND -- ..- REMOVED. TO BE PROTECTED DURINe CONSTRUCTION. â‚¬= . 32 BASEMENT EXCAVATION . -O EXCAVATION GENERAL AREA SHOWN HATCHED. 4.11 RE: CIVIL ENGINEERING DRWGS AND SOIL STABILIZATION ENGINEERING. 3 82(1 rh DEMOLITION PLAN 11 1 ~ ' /1/8" =1'-0" :01,(I anssI :SUO!9!AOH :swelinsuo) dttlelS SIOJ OUIOH 4!med-OIBU!Â§ mo loqumN 10@49 LOOZ--90-2 L 1IMI3d 9018 2690Â·82[*L6 :000+d < 7943/ 4â€¢0â‚¬f Â£54Â·8 Â· anualÂ¥ SUÂ®HA t. ty 00 'uadsv 'uo!Â§!MPqns LIolu@mold 4 JOI 83-7 1'-4. ,-1. 14'-0' 9'-4' 10'-0' 6 13'-0= 13'-0 ,2'-1. , 10'-6' 6 1-3 f , 5,-0. ' ' : b ' ' , 5.-r 5'-3' . 7'-0' , 7'-0' . , , I . . ' rh /24*r KN!/ â„¢IN-CUT STONE VENEER TO ~- Lizuc---~~ 7 /11 GASPLIANGE ~ %2*~~,>-RQC:malâ€žeia~. FIREPLAGE: 'VERMONT GASTINeS PVT44IN - 1 1 DIRECT VENT. ty VENT AT RIM JOIST TO '~,6UUA,mAsz~~~=8:mEzz~20 â€¢ EXTERIOR kNALL. y I. .1 6,Â· 3 I izzlit=qlM*331 Â· -tst-/7-i'-16& ' 0'-Â©-WINDOW WELL - - i 'Â° I E I. f I . 7 2 |217- MECHANICAL CHASE TO r EGRESS * I r~~5 EGRESS CHIMNEY A8OVE 5-raE veâ‚¬ER ANI:Pk~-374 *|||| 4.-~ 1'-111.-1 . AIR-INTAKE Â»D BUILT-1 -Â· - TO INCLUDE FRESH ,!' .. 0 1 STONE HEARTH AT R \1& 11 -,5. 12'-1. 10'-41. .2 Â·Â· EXHAUST AS REOD BY 20 - P\REPLAGE - MECH/ %. HVAG SYSTEM. 71 1 - . CONTRACTOR TO 0 STORAGE .. DETERMINE FIRE-RATINe ~ BEDROOM EXERCISE k~ ~ coNÂ·nk-roR To DETERMINE :.. METIOND OF CHASE- 14 ~| i M SIZE AND LOCATION OF I 1 6 1 +41614-EFFICIE,LÂ¥ BOILERS. 1 1 1-4 1 / ./At#li --in 10 ~__11 -_1_FAMILY/REC_ _-_e-__ 0 / - AND CONSTPeCTION U 13'-3~ i ' Â£ ' ROOM e BATH 4 11 - C 4 11 INE-Â«71 0 644 m CLOSET 3 2 H CLOSET 4 . 1 /112 E 1 HALL ,STAL - 21 %3 - / h 11 '91*nL- I L-7. f.~t~fâ€ž ~ 56 /1 9 '7 Â· -ES S; Si M 4/ CLOSET 2 2. 40-0' . 8'-2 t.:'-11. 9 % JI M fi 11 1- U=) b /2~'~L-~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ STAIR5 - - - - - -3.-134Ii~ O-1 Iq/32 / 12'-0 [29 0 -7 *~ ~ BEDROOM 3 : 1 CLOSET 5 M -32- HAIâ‚¬)RAILS PER 2003 IRC. b j 2 4 00 4'-10. 1 4'-4' 10-lot 1.Â»6--1=~ 41 â‚¬-1 8 1 32 52 -2 C':5 0 0 -- =1- 1 331~~~~~-24 [441]><EP'F - Q,90 In n .3. 1~14 2 It. / = Fip 1 RIA t.f-171â€¢11.f=r=li~ FINAL DESIGN I I POWDERU L) , , b ..1,1 , 123 1 TED ~ A Â»-1 / 14'-1. 1 hui ill sTOR r BEDROOM 2 2111 04 1 1 =T,EeRESS ~ /~| ~ BEDROOM 5 : n i ~2. SUITED ANIJ>001 02!.1- NOTE: - Mh~....0 43>c BATH 2 1. ' 3 1 aLT::=mle.*CM 7'E...-F A+IO ~ ~ - !1 T 1 - 1 1. Â·.MIN. cLEARANSE k EXERIOR. DRAINS TO ~1~1 - - g~ZUrl*CIZE 'i M'=r 11 /1 1 r--7 1- *1<7 CODE L 7 CIVIL ENSINEERING DRMSS). 12'--5 / <,~ 12'-0' -* 1 NU m eRAVEL TO FIll TO 12" . , nlur F f- BELOM HINI>OA SILL. e . â€ž-1-,4.1.r,1.-40â€ž7='.1-â€ž.--- . L.,i~]4_j Qiâ€že~~~-O-~~~ :~1.~----.Â·.~ -. SETBACK - - - ~- - 7 -- - -<1 --- - . - 1 - r Ill--- All /1\ ily,f v , 3 7. 9'-6' 10'-6" 22'-T 17-5. 18'-0= , 4'-6 H , . ' 1 ' 82 -6' FLOOR PLAN LEGEND @ IKPICATES SMOKE DETECTOR GEILINe INDICATES YVINDOW LOCATION LOCATION RE: IRG 2003 (CURRENT ~ SEE WINDO}N SOHEDULE CODE AbO LOCAL ..LRISDICTION FOR SIZE AND DATA. REGUIREMENTS) /3-\ INDICATES DOOR LOCATION Â© INDICATES EXHAUST CEILING FAN L/ SEE DOOR MHEDULE LOCATION RE: LOCAL GODE FOR SIZE AND DATA. REGUIREMENTS OR DESIRED LOCATION INDICATES HOSE BIB Ib[DIGATES FLOOR DRAIN LOCATION. -1--HB- LOCATION. Â® LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN N 1/4" = 1'-0" 0 :ole(I onssI :suo!Â§!Aoli joqumN12246 LOOZ-90-Z L :LIMN)d 0018 .f- Â£ 3- 29\ Of dmels ag amoH 4!m44945 moigno v i~m;u~mgaimvL,s ~0 01 'uadsv 'uoisM!PqnS Xiojwmoid 4 107 1 /3\ Â£255, /Th te 1 830-7' V 13'-O 6Â·-gr -3 14'-4' , 10.-53. 24'-Or / '' ' 1 5-7; 3'-91 Â·':,toMIUTezE .2': wo~:ALIzE Â·1'-11!: ,0.112'sz~ Â·~' Â·Â·-] 5,-8- : 6'-62' 53%,~:4' 5'-6' 11'rlli, 5'-6~ 71*.. 50-0 : 50-51. ., 2.-101... 13'-4. ;vi'INAL SIZE NOMINAL SIZE. SETBACK LINE - | \49' MELH, OHASE METER GLOâ‚¬Â£n ROOF OVERHAIkaÂ·-~~ i -----1---1-- /7\ _ _ _ <39~8*E~ieke E~Â·999*~~L 1 7-~/R#j,-7 7 LlhE \\ 1.-1 lEt 1 1 1.4**=1. 1 ...1-- 1 .W ..1-1--1--=mil=i""" ... 111 "'--i- "' --- - =,1 --_- th - I iv[ k 4 4 / 3 15 Beâ‚¬H / amles I , Il ~ Â· -t~-R - 1 | I -:v'I- ~ ~ | I , .O '' ~ I \%12....91*41 7Â¥CNE- ' rfÂ·' >-,LUM Frl , i j 1% | \ ./ . 1 - 1/ 1 1 169 1/ 1 -LL-Â·04 A 1 -1.44 A 1 -dkg:~ r= :r-2 KI-|~HEN Â·CL - L_ MUD7 ~ 4721 : Q l -1 1 09 12 92 8 1 7-tâ‚¬44 - 2.1.i,f- T p4 < 80)Hfe>-h=i (78 -74-*[ ,n ~ ~ ~~ ~ 42E~ / w - 11 1, / 5.~59 - , . 12' MIDE SLEWEDOORS @ -_ __chJv- --:j 4'_9=J . A'~.' -7~~<~-~- : u24-J( - - - 2-CARÂ»- - - - -- ~ 2%. ' STONE VEhEER AND STONE , fr Â£ , 1 1 GARAGE ~ 6 -4 - , - HEARTH AT FIREPLAGE 1 9 9 ((DAS INSERT) ema 43. FINAL CABINEET -,r-----~~~IM=m=--r _â€ž0~ 1 1 r CN DESIa AND â€¢ / -- lo'XIO. - LAYOUT Er OTHERS T BU 1--IN 1 1 1 rbININ(il COUJMN-K- --8--_-Fammi// -â€¢GARAGE LEVEL=110'-0' I I E--GARAW E\/dl=log'-6-4 1 I / Â·o, 2- f 00 = =PrrCONE~-74,7-0 1 2 frCE.-7943-8.7 1 ~.-L r I Si= F:NAJ ROD AND , /] 1 1-A , H RE 1- SHELF/CABINET \ i M Nt/ 2 22 N C)/516N AND 2 m~-1 .5, 1 L-i--4 ~ ~ le 6 BREAKFAST BAR LAYOUT BY OT+ERS (i: MASTER fll*PLAGE: â€¢HEN.! 2 r N t- LIVING - - 6AS AgiANLE,-Â»2-9 6 4 M TO. F.F. = 7946'-0" VENT TO -) ,/ W EN let . 7.-0. 1, 4.-9. 41Â§ 1 ~ ABOVE 3 JI 1/ -1 i - â‚¬<i -(07 I .--1, Â£444'4* 11 K* Â® 2--ME -/I-=WN-ING. 4 -. . eAS APR_I~tf~I ](~~~t J f-~Â· ~ - I TMBER, MALL AND 3'-C" HIGH RAILINe -) . ''21-0.1.1-403=~~ 9-6~. @], ~ 7-8. d NO I TIMBER BEAM~ 1 9 MINIXÂ»5 -i -r,5, 7 P(INDOWS ABOVE --1 ~ 2 19'-4- 1 456 1 13'-4. 51=-Â· 4.--.. *'94'-f,NE PLL't--33~4 f 5'-7|' 1'-1|pi 37 17'-Â·~6~ ABOVE VfEL 1% I FIREPLAGE: VERMONT ,-1 ~ 0 2 20 CASTINGS DVTÂ¥IN T~29 gA'/41-----ir-i**~#gle-=-7 =-~r 10"XIO. i MASTER . 2- - 2 4 2 14 2 BEDROOM i Z 1 Q*24. 1- 1 <--1 POWDER1 1 ly- fri iÂ«44# L J Z 7 12 :IKill' <2.~~~)' lie 1 - .--,-il ' f* 1 - m _Â® O/ u (19 &19 -11 Â¥ - 1~!1 1 MASTER OIl k .1 . re\ . 11 1, 1 . . 71 : 1 -<E)<EQI 41(# P il BATH -â€¢~ - . ~~*052~9,9.42",ozr u i. 2/1--~-47741 Â©EETF-LE.3 =12~1 04=,~9~ ,/ T 49 . I 2----- - -L - --2=P'-4--- . 1 .. 0 â‚¬= C 44: q. a = 1 --,Â·â€¢Li<=1â€ž0-9--2-2-2/1-8 $}- _-~-.1{2fj f .*-1--- _,j~1?Â· Â® 0 eL Â® e--5- h. S .t -,- ~ 29 29 = 04 7'-10' 45/ ,. 40-8~' , 4'-8. ., 5'-51~ ., 11'-4, 5'-8- . 7'-41Â» 4'-4, /2. 4. 6 40 2 4- - EASÂ¥ OPEN AT LADIPER MINDOW WFI I ARATES 1 CONC. = 7945'-9" , 37-87 - LOCATION MYP). -9 -= 2 AI2' :2 -M =9 L , ' ' NOMINAL- SIZE ' ' NOMINAL SIZE ' 1 NOMINAL SIZE ~ ' ' POMINAL SIZE ' 20'-0' 13'-gil :4. 16'-10' 18'-0' , 4.-r , 9 w E ' 1 82'-6. STAINED CONORETE -1 1 1 5 5 g SLAB ON GRADE FLOOR PLAN LEGEND WPATTERN TBD. Â¥ All V Â® INDIGATES SMOKE DETECTOR, GEILINe -, INDICATES WINDOW LOCATION LOCATION RE: IRS 2003 (CURRENT 289 SEE ~INDoM SCHEDULE < 41 C-1 CODE AND LOCAL JJRISDICTION FOR 912 AND DATA. REGUIREPENTS) ~ INDICATES DOOR LOCATION Â® IMPICATES EÂ»IAUST CEILING FAN SEE DOOR SCHEDLILE LOCATION RE: LOCAL CODE FOR SIZE AND DATA REQUIREMENTS OR DESIRED LOCATION INDICATES HOSE BIB Â© INDIGATES FLOOR DRAIN LOCATION. -1--HB- LOCATION. 1 0 1 1 - Â© MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ~2 1/4" = 1'-0" glec onsSI :SUOISIAOH :SiumInsuoo 1*~IUrIN 1091[g LOOZ-90-Z L UIAN3 d 9018 , ,, -~|WN|W~N 00 'uadsv 'uo!,su!~~nS Lojugmoid 4 101 01 4% EV E rip. 0 \..1/ F 1'-0 1 19 3-0' 1 - 7 4 --------- U ------- -- -- r--------- -11 | 1 1 11 1 - 1 1 I -- m 1 --- 1 1 91-0. 1 1 1 1 --1 1'-5' 1 . 1 Ct 1 111 111 Â¢ 1 E 1 q 5% 4% 1 1 le - E Ill I I 1 *f\ S 1 3 *5 %3 __1_L_ 1 1 ~m; 0 1 V I 9 1 i U-*6 ~~ ~ ~ FLATROOF || a 3/4' PEER FT ~ 1 k Ma d|| 3/4â€¢PER FT il __ 68 2 4 '~ 1 11 11 1 1 1 3-2 ~ 1 1 4 U | 2'-8" 0 '_5 L_------Ill- 0 -1 9 1 ~ m '2 E BOWED ARCH ROOF I 21 1, 5 -- miL 4 -1 1 la; 6 3/4' PER FT 611 _- --1 1 1- 3---- - --~ --0. -- r 11'-7Â» 1 B *1. 1 I th|-1 1 4. 1 1'-0' 11-4 ~ ----- ------------ 1 1'1 ---h R E 3 1 1 I I k.. 7 SLOPE I 11 1/49~FT 1 3/4' PER FT * ; ~ if 1 ji j 1 1 5. Â¥ 11 1 1 1 - - - 1 111- 1 - - - 1 %%~k @%%&@E Â« 1 F- M 9 mw 2 Sl,EXA 5 10_4 2. id 1.22 :*4]0 meads I %3 di i 5 1111 0 i lit 1 Mal @14# 11 1 01 5- C Ng-*19 UE EN, Ht- &9 Pr 1 11 1 - im 11 1 9 1 ~ L. I a IN' Â§% 6 I c, 3/01-g: FT ~ 1 1-1 5E ip Ill f Il- --- - - - ~4 AER --1 1 fLLE - -~-------------~----------- 1 U i 9 2'-0. -7 -4_______-_-______________ _ 9. 2- 2'-0Â» 1.-0- 1 2 -- 90Â» - ~ALK~ --- ~ Sheet Number A Custom Single-Family Home for: Stamp John G. Martin, Arclutect, LLC Consultants: Revisions: Issue Date: P.O.BOI 4701 Phone: 970-328-0592 BLDG PERMIT: 12-05-2007 1215 East Hopkins Avenue john.marÂ®@centurytel.net Lot 4, PromentJ Subdivision, As en, CO -00 com AINNJVIHO FLAT ROOF NV-Id =10023 --- \ 882Â¤ZEQQE[t/2.DriIEt' GITÂ¥ OF AyiEN HEIeHT CUSTOM ENTRY DOOR H/ - \ STANDINS SEAM COPPER OVER LIMIT LINE AT 25-0 SIDELITES SEECTIoN Err - WATERPROOF MEM3RANE OVER ABOVE EXISTING GRADE. 0,+ER - - ROOF SHEATHING OVER CURVED 6/28/iZM/ber-,QNS/,<lout. JOISTS. STOME VEIEER W CAT-sTONE - CAP R*D ARC,ED 01~3~R. FLAT ROOF CONDTRUCTIONL SHROLD AIO EPPM ROOFINB tÂ·EMBRANE [8~16.C43?el~k2121~ E 1 -OvER- PLâ„¢000 -OVER - SLOPE) SHADING SGREEN FLP. MDeRA,E TO LAP A11 rn PAINT-LOIC MTL. FLA94ING OVER Aq 2 ROOF JOISTS WITH 850 91=RAY FOAM COETRUSTION 2 IELATION OR 8189 lhEULATION /27 29<6 FASGIA BD. OVER 2X12 A!0 SUB-FASGIA BO. 515184 - CONIRACTOR TO PROVIDE DETAILING AND SPEGS. - fj 1 HEIGHT BENCHMARK 4 ----- 2 mE 0 1 --- - ------ -- ----------- ------ - ----MAX HACHT 2-7963-6 1, - 2*2 MOD HEADER AND 1 did- - 1 1 11 2*2 TRIM - -- ,+ *1~2 23 2 25 AIB ~ 4 14 18 110 ~ 112 42.43 * k - VERT. Te S[DING (1><4) 59*eED NE) C.OLORED CONCRETE PATIO 1 Eli 1 / b- 1 - 1 2 A13 - 2EIL.C,Q82IEKJQ& 20 ~| 8 ----- - -- - -- - -- Â® 6%6 Tie CEDAR 90FET 4 11 13. 15 , - - - F 21 - . 27- - 39 I VENTS â€¢TH INBEGT SCREENS - - - A I.IAIN =11 '-O] ~ ~ T.0. FIN. = 7946 -0' 4. = - <-~ ~~ 33 35 -_ ------ - - ~ -- 73 _ - - T.O. PLY = 7945 -9 â‚¬= A13 - 1 F- - -1 1 . 1 - - | - -t- ----------t---- ~-- - FIN. GRADE = 7943 -6 1 .9- U H IGHT N HMARK WK=74 4- 1 -9 LE. -5 1 1 T.O. AN - 11 1 lib k \ 0 61829*IELM..22Â£k i " 8 22Â£.t1614=-MAFL. | 1 ~ _10 _ CUT-STOIE GAP - CpLO. al.FF EQQa!21&16â‚¬all 1 --4 --1 1 4 6 o (= 3XIO STONE HEADER 1 .14 OR GAST STORE ~pF COLOW 6'WJMNALl7*CIRECTAIWSWI-~Ati. ~ 12â€¢REVERSE BD AND BATT 1-- 1 1 - 4 3 EXISTIN6 GRADEE 4xS STONE GILL (SLOPED CUT Â° 'UTH SLOPED TO [*AIN TCP. ASHLAR TE-LINDE GOLD VENEER ~ W 1 1/2' REVEAL OVER I L-2 1 1 -ti i | OVER TERMAL AND AIR (SHOP+1 DASHED) = :2 -0 10 ON SIL.O 0 TIERMAL AIR INFILTRATION I Â·~+ 1 1 22~ BASE CON5TkIGnON IIFILTRATION BARRIER OVER - 1 1 STD, VEMER OVBR | f PLâ„¢ODD SHEATHINS BARRIER (LAPPED TO DRAIN,1 ---1 _ I I 4 = | KATERPROOF ME19RA,E NER F,IALL SHEATHING 1 - 11 41 2 OVER STUD AND PLIâ„¢1009 1 1 It ~ 11 -1 lili'' FRAPE- 1 111 M NT = T.O. CONC. = 7934 -0 </0~ WHI-----22===LE=~=22=22=22=22=2===~=22=====---- - /~h EAST ELEVATION l1114".1-0:' :ole(I onssI :sUOISTAOH :SluelInsuoo amoH 4 ed-aIBUIS molsno v ioqumN 1004S LOOZ-90-Z L :1IAbl3d 9018 Â£690Â·BIE-OLB xed 00'ua gv,uo!Â§ WqnS owomold 4 101 inu.AV Nuntdo ---2 -71 s- L 6117 oF= ASPEN HEIBHT --- -/ LIMIT LINE AT 25'-0' 53 3% ABOVE E)<15T]N6 GRADE. 2 1 1 14-1/2 All AIO Aq N. 0 ch HEIGHT BENCHMARK Â£ f ------------------------ ~3'-6 - FIREPLACE FULE VENT - AIO 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 HEAT TAPE ROOF BELOR 1111111111111111111111111 / & //J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1| l ili 1 1 Ill 1 1 1 1 1 Il l I 57 56 43*49 '| 5 8 - aITTER. AND DOVIEPOUT, E FGFI L-&22-1 71 | <762 1 ~ (772 ~ 7 79 0 1 FiEX~ 86 89.92 - HEAT TAPE AS NEEDED A.= 613 2KDIE[INNIMS,iJLL 12' CONCRETE MALL FVSTONE 70 82 85 I i51.91 VEhEER - RE: SITE PLAN / 1 1.-SM 39 81~ || 11 | S'rRUSnEAL - EaIL.INÂ©-QQ//51131"62//631 - 6.84 2*2 SLOPE) TOP PEat)6HT IRON P0ST5 01/ ~~~ 69 3 CABLEBALLIETERS 0 0 0 1 2x:2 BOTTOM RAILS Â¢ 87.90 f - - 1 1 MAIN L L=112-0' . Â·Â· --- T.0. FIN. - 7946 -OL- Â·-- , Â· ...~~ N - - - 5-9 477-I ------.......,%.-W.-W----- r -- 1 I 1 -- ---- ---- ----- - 1 1 .11 DIGCHARSE DOPIVSPOUT ~~1[-3-ICâ‚¬ 1 1 TO DAYLIGHT METER CLOSET | 1 158 4 11 1 I 1 11 .71 . P 11 11 1 1 1 11 STUC<DO VEMEER , 11 al Ill 11 ~ 11 0 11 m 4 10 -1 w 12' HORIZONTAL GEDAR 91[PINe 1 1 11 1 1 1 11 OVER T~ERMAL AIR INFILTRATION ~ I 11 1 1 111 OVER PfAL-1.9Â·EATHINe. t I -Z 3 BARRIER (LAPPED TO ORAII, 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 11 + 1- -- -/ 8A,5Eâ€¢ENT LEVEL = 1 QQ'.... aL - â‚¬1 5 9/TO. CONC. = 7934r-Or r r 3 820 1-J FUL-JU~~------12----------------------- i U= (7 WEST EL;EVATION il M'.--.- :mea onssI SUOISIAOH :sluelinsuoo 1!tplv 'UBIUM 'DIR'Of :ioJ amoH 4!uIed-JIZU!Â§ mo loqumN WIS LOOZ-GO-Z L 110183d 9018 Pu'lÂ®muoo@uttrem'uqo[ on=AV sumdoH Joulley O!q(loG Lot 4, Promento Subdivision, As en, CO Li -- --Ii- - W~Ill -- -- -- A -- - GITY OF ASPEN HEIÂ®HT P LIMIT LINE AT 25:-0' ABOVE EXISTINe DRAPE. -1,2 MAX. HEIGHT = 7963'-6 1 STUCCO VENEER. 62. 63 16%4 TIPBER HEADER 40 EXTERIOR LIGHT 01 19 - - FIXTURE - rrP. 1 1 RAMWN [FVEL=112'-O' _ /--97fyâ„¢-= 7946.-0. 10 1 - _ _ -*Wit; E-Gs==ir - 1 - ------N77.0. PLY=-7945-9 . 1 - 53 .23 - . - - 4- ------ - ------ ------ - 1 LLU____~ - - i-- L- - - I rAL=10961-,1- 1 -1 1 1 VT,0. PLY - 7943-6 11 1 71 1 \1 6 GUSTOM 6/RAer DOOR EXISTING 6RAPEE: . 0. 1 1. i EE P\-1; 1 C.1 1 WITH SHEMGOFFE APPROX- LOCATION - b 1 7 a..AppiNS | 1 SHOr* DASHED. - 1 1$ 1 APPROXIMATE LOGATION OF Fal,NDAnON MALL5 9.10,+1 ____11 - -_1_- _-....pemERI Z~~ZE~~b~_ _ __~ 1 DASHED - RE: STEJOTURAL M NT T.0. CONC. = 7934 -0 ---- DE122233322-211- 211 229 2-2~221LI _-_1--_J /~h NORTH ELEVATION < 1 1M'-19 / .W 2 CITY' OF ASPEN HEIeHT LIMIT LINE AT 25'-0" Aq A ABOVE EXISTINe eRADE. ii ~9/ MAX. HEIGHT = 7963'- - - 1 6%6 TIME3EER KNE BRACE I 11 1 - - - ~. 100 1Â° Efyl ~ 95 1 <98/1 1 lilli 8%23 TIMBER POST ANGLED exe TIMBER POST ON STONE PER 1 - -- 1 - M b 1 - - 28 . - STAMPED AND COLORED 72 CONORETE STAIRS VE 93 1 el - 2- - - -- FINISH BRADEE, -- ~ 101.19.26 - --< SLOPE TO DRAIN AFIAY = B FROM BUILDING PERIMETER- - _ _ _ MAIN LEVEL=112-0. A _ 92 T.0. FIN.,= 7946 -07 ~ Â¤ lE -> --------- - - -1 Â£ -0 PLY = 7945 -9' -1 7 4.9 - -1 - - 2 1 1 6 WOCA ---- 1 1 1 - 7aa 1 1 1 1 es m 1 11 APPROXIMATU LOCATION AND I 1 Il a 1 -il B 1 2:Â·=TfÂ¥%23= 3.-Llig 1 D+INes 1 - i----ill rl 1 1 1 11 11. 11 11 1 - (.1 1 1 I 1 1 1 jr--- -- 1 1 1 11 I | 1 NT =1 -~ T.O. CONC. = 7934 -0 ---1--t-=unzz_*--4--1 00 C -~)SOUTH ELEVAION 1 2 M.---Ill C - /1/4"=1'-0" Olea onssI :SUO!Â§!AOM :SJUBJInSUO) OTI'PM!1101Â¥'U.imK'Dul[Of dums -31 ms molsnj V I3qIUrIN19046 LOOE-90-2 1 119NH3d 0018 I6*N[flb ouoqd |ODION'0'd 1}1 9Nn130 1H 0NOI30 Â£690-Ft[Â·OM xed I[9I8OÂ»[ pu'FAugo v sup~doH 16 Int 4, Promento Subdivision, As en, CO . HAAS LAND PLANNING, LLC 0 14 9 9/7- crok C ~ of ~â‚¬kfiin ~0; 12 4 July 24,2006 1 1 1 ti rÂ·Â·Â·~ a / 01 17 -rrot.: r 1 1 r. Mr. Stephen Rattner ID , 4101 k 2467 Provence Circle 2-.270/)/ Weston, FL 33327 I C RE: Development Potential Analysis for 1215 East Hopkins Avenue (Lot 4, Promontory Subdivision) Dear Stephen: As per your request, I have analyzed the available records pertinent to the above described property, including without limitation the Commitment for Title Insurance provided by Pitkin County Title, Inc. as Case No. PCT20608L dated April 24,2006, the City of Aspen zoning and land use codes, the Pitkin County Assessor's records for the property, the City of Aspen Building Department file, and the Improvement Survey prepared by Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc. as Job No. 24084B dated November, 2005. In addition, documents identified in the Title Policy exceptions were reviewed for their affects on land use and development potential. This report is intended to provide a review of the applicable City of Aspen land use regulations, and a discussion of the subject sites likely future development potential. This report does not assert any legal opinions or interpretations as to the affects of the Promontory Subdivision, the Warranty Deed identified in the title exceptions or anything else of a legal nature for that matter. For such opinions or interpretations, legal counsel should be sought separately. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The subject property is legally described as Lot 4, Block 1, Promontory Subdivision, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Ditch Book 2A at Page 240. The street address is 1215 East Hopkins Avenue and the Parcel Identification Number is 2737- 181-07-001. The property has an area of 6.170 square feet and is located on the southwest corner of East Hopkins and Midland Avenues. The Promontory Subdivision Plat was approved by the Pitkin County Board of County Comniissioners in 1957. 111 1962. the property was annexed into the City of Aspen as part of the so-called Riverside Addition Annexation (Ordinance No. 11, Series of 1962 recorded in Book 201 at Page 142; Riverside Annex Plat recorded in Ditch Book 2A at Page 284). The properly, today, is zoned Medium-Density Residential (R-6). â€¢ 201 N. MILL STREET, SUITE 108 â€¢ ASPEN, CO 81611 Â· (970) 925-7819 â€¢ FAX (970) 925-7395 â€¢ â€¢ PAGE loF16â€¢ ZoninE, Measurements, Floor Area & Conformitv The subject property is zoned R-6, Medium-Density Residential. The "Purpose" of the R-6 zone district is '-to provide areas for long term residential purposes with customary accessory uses. Lands in the ... zone district are generally limited to the original Aspen Townsite, contain relatively dense settlements of predominantly detached and duplex residences, and are within walking distance of the center of the City." This "Purpose" statement provides a degree of regulation on R-6 zoned properties inasmuch as the phrase "long term' is defined in the Aspen Land Use Code (hereinafter "the Code") as follows: The occupancy of a dwelling unit for residential purposes for a time period not less than six (6) consecutive months and shall include rental occupancies, except that two shorter rental occupancies may be allowed per dwelling unit per yean Historically, this definition has been construed by the Aspen Community Development Department to mean that homes in the R-6 zone district can be rented out on a short term basis only twice per year. Of course, many homes in the zone district are rented out on a short term basis much more frequently than allowed under this interpretation, largely because this "zoning provision" is enforced only on a complaint basis. That is, if nobody complains about the frequency of short term rentals, the provision does not get enforced. Nevertheless, the regulation exists and also applies to the subject property. The list of "Permitted Uses" in the R-6 zone district includes, in relevant part, detached residential dwellings, duplexes, two detached residential dwellings, home occupations, accessory buildings and uses, and accessory dwelling units and carriage houses meeting the provisions of Section 26.520. None of the listed "Conditional Uses" (uses allowed subject to approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission at a public hearing) appear to be of any interest in the context of this report. Per the Improvement Survey, the lot has an area of 6,170 square feet. The survey , does not include any topographic information. However, field observations reveal that while the site is essentially flat, there are areas that appear to have slopes in excess of 20%. In addition, there is a triangle-shaped access easement with an area of approximatelf 40 square feet over the property's southeast corner. The amount of FAR floor area that can be developed on the subject property will be a function of the amount of land area within access easements or encumbered by slopes in excess of 20%. Section 26.575.020(C) of the Code provides that areas with slopes of 0-20% be counted at one-to-one (100%), areas with slopes of 20-30% be counted at one half-to-one (50%), and areas with slopes of greater than 30% not be counted at all (0%). Said Section also requires that areas with a right-of-way or access - 201 N. MILL STREET, SUITE 108 â€¢ ASPEN, CO 81611 â€¢ (970)925-7819 â€¢ FAx (970) 925-7395 Â· â€¢ PAGE 2 OF 16â€¢ . 4 easement be netted out of the Lot Size when calculating the effective Lot Area. It is not possible to determine the amount of the subject site falling into each ofthese slope ranges without an accurate topographic survey; however, irrespective of the total applicable lot area reductions, the allowable FAR floor area for any given property cannot be reduced by more than 25%. As such, since the maximum allowable FAR ftoor area for a single- family detached residence on a 6,170 square foot lot is 3,264 square feet, the Code does not allow for this development potential to be reduced by more than 25%, or below 2,448 square feet. The existing conditions and dimensional requirements of/for the subject property, as dictated by the R-6 zone district are as follows: â€¢ Minimum Lot Size: - R-6 Zoning.' 6,000 square feet. - Existing Condition: 6,170 square feet. â€¢ Minimum Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit: - R-6 Zoning. 1. For detached residential dwellings: 4,500 square feet; 2. For duplexes: 4,500 square feet per unit. - Existing Condition: lot Area reductions due to slopes and the access easement have not been calculated. â€¢ Minimum Lot Width: - R-6 Zoning, 60 feet. - Existing Condition: 54.74 feet. â€¢ Minimum Front Yard: - R-6 Zoning: 10 feet for principal buildings; 15 feet for accessory buildings. - Existing Condition-. approximately 5.8 feet. â€¢ Minimum Rear Yard: - R-6 Zoning: 10 feet for principal buildings, but only 5 feet for that portion of a principal building used solely as a garage (if applicable); 5 feet for accessory buildings. - Existing Condition: approximately 65 feet. â€¢ Minimum Side Yard: - R-6 Zoning-- 5 feet; and, the two side yards must combine to provide a sum o f at least 15 feet. - Existing Condition: approximately 2.7 feet on the west side of the residence. approximately 10.5 feet on the east side of the residence, and combined side yard setbacks of approximately 13.2 feet. Â· 201 N. MILL STREET. SUITE 108 Â· ASPEN. CO 81611 â€¢ (970) 925-7819 â€¢ FAx (970)9257395 Â· â€¢ PAGE 3 OF 16Â· â€¢ Maximum Site Coverage: - R-6 Zoning: 50% 0,085 square feet). - Existing Condition-. less than 50%. â€¢ Maximum Height: - R-6 Zoning: 25 feet*. - Existing Condition: Not Measured. â€¢ Minimum Distance between Detached Buildings on the Lot: - R-6 Zoning: 5 feet. - Existing Condition: Not Applicable. â€¢ External Floor Area Ratio (FAR): - R-6 Zoning: 3,264 square feet for a 6,170 square feet of Lot Area. - Existing Condition: Not determined (1,368 square feet based on the Assessor's records**). * = The Warranty Deed (recorded December 19, 1957 in Book 183 at Page 38 as Reception Number 105869) running with the subject property states that, "No structure on this lot shall exceed twenty feet in height (chinineys exchided) measured vertically from the lowest point of intersection of said stnicture with the natural grade of the land to the highest point of roof ridge: The Warranty Deed also prohibits unpainted metal roofs, and limits development of the subject property to "not more than one detached single- family dwelling and outbuildings pertaining thereto." It would be necessary to consult with an attorney to determine if/how the restrictions on the Warranty Deed can be eliminated. At any rate, the terms o f the Warranty Deed represent private restrictions, the beneficiary of which remains unknown; the City of Aspen will not enforce these restrictions opting instead for their adopted zoning provisions, height limits (25 feet), rules for calculating height measurements, and Residential Design Standards. ** == The County Assessor's records typically do not reflect accurate FAR floor area measurements as calculated pursuant to the Aspen Land Use Code. That is, the Assessor's measurements do not in any way correlate with the way in which the City of Aspen measures FAR floor area. The Assessor's records often provide an indication of the gross floor area, not the FAR floor area. To obtain an accurate account of the existing FAR floor area/square footage, an architect or surveyor would need to be hired to prepare floor plans and area calculations as measured pursuant to the current Land Use Code. Throughout this report, the term "FAR floor area" is and has been used to account for the fact that the Code provides many exemptions from the calculation of FAR, including but not limited to exemptions for garages, subgrade spaces, porches, and decks, balconies, ratios and the similar (see Section 26.570.020, Calculations and Measurements, of the Land Use Code); thus, gross floor area is typically larger than FAR â€¢ 201 N. MILL_STREET. SUITE 108 â€¢ ASPEN. CO 81611 â€¢(970) 9257819â€¢FAX(970)925-7395 â€¢ â€¢ PAGE 4 OF 16â€¢ floor area. In other words, the actual amount or gross floor area developed on a property is typically more than the FAR floor area counted by the City. For instance, when calculating FAR floor area for garages or carports, the first 250 square feet do not count, the next 250 square feet count at 50%, and any square footage over 500 counts at 100%. Therefore, a 525 square foot garage would count as 150 square feet of FAR floor area. Garages of any size must comply with the setback and other dimensional requirements of the underlying zone district as well as with the applicable portions of the Residential Design Standards. For subgrade spaces (i.e., basements), the amount of floor area that counts toward the allowable FAR is proportional to the amount ofwall space that is exposed. That is, if 10% of the walls of the total subgrade area are exposed (i.e., visible from outside), then 10% of the subgrade floor area counts toward the allowable FAR floor area. In development of basement space, it should be understood that the Building Codes may require egress windows which will result in exposed wall surfaces and, thus, floor area that counts toward the allowable FAR for the site. FAR exemptions can be doubled-up, so to speak; for instance, a garage located below grade can benefit from the garage exemption and the subgrade space exemption. It is typical for 10-20% ofbasement space to count as FAR noor area. Decks, balconies, loggias and exterior stairways are exempt from the calculation of FAR floor area up to 15% of the total FAR. floor area allowed on the property. For example, on a lot that allows 3.240 square feet of FAR floor area, 486 square feet of decks. balconies, loggias and exterior stairways can be developed on the property before their square footage would start counting towards the allowable FAR floor area of the property. Porches do not count toward allowable FAR floor area at all. The Code defines a porch as, '-an un-insulated, unheated area under a roof enclosed on at least one side by an exterior wall of a living space, and open on at least two sides to the outdoors, with or without screens P Similarly, uncovered porches, slabs, patios, walks, retaining walls, steps and similar structures, which do not exceed thirty (30) inches above or below natural grade, are allowed to project into the yard setback areas without restriction; projections may exceed 30 inches below grade i f determined to be required by Building Code for window egress. In lay terms, flagstone, concrete or similar patios built within 30 inches of natural grade can be placed anywhere on a property and do not count toward the allowable FAR floor area. The term "nonconforming," is generally understood to mean that the lot, structure, and/or use was developed legally given the regulations or lack thereof in effect at the time of its creation, but which does not comply with subsequently adopted or amended regulations that are currently in effect. If the structure, by virtue of its height, placement or density, does not comply with the current regulations, it is called a "nonconforming Â· 201 N. MILL STREET, SUITE 108 â€¢ ASPEN. CO 81611 â€¢ (970) 925-7819 â€¢ FAX (970) 925-7395 â€¢ Â· PAGE 5 OF 16â€¢ structure." If a platted lot does not comply with the regulations by virtue of its size or width, it is called a "nonconforming lot of record." If the use of the property is no longer permitted in the zone district. it is called a "nonconforming use." The existing single-family residential use of the subject property is in conformance with the permitted uses of the R-6 zone. Given the above-described dimensional requirements, it seems the existing lot meets the minimum lot size but not the minimum lot width requirement, making it a nonconforming lot of record. The residence is also conforming with regard to the density requirement of at least 4,500 square feet of lot area per detached residential dwelling. The existing improvements appear to conform to the height and site coverage requirements of the R-6 zone district; however, it appears that the combined side yard setbacks and the west side yard setback are nonconforming, making the stnicture a "nonconforming structure.-' Should any structure prove to be a nonconforn-ling structure devoted to a use permitted in the zone district in which it is located, such structure may be continued to exist in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 26.312 of the Aspen Land Use Code. However, a nonconforming structure is not permitted to be extended by an enlargement or expansion that increases the nonconformity, unless a variance is granted by a Board or Commission with the expressed authority to do so. For instance, if a structure is nonconforming with regard to the minimum side yard setback, it cannot be expanded or enlarged in any way that would result in a smaller side yard setback than currently existing, nor can it be expanded or enlarged (i.e., increased in height or along the regulated plane) in the area of nonconformity. Variances from these requirements can be granted at a public hearing by the Board ofAdjustment. Any nonconforming structure which is purposefully demolished or destroyed may be replaced with a different structure only if the replacement structure complies with the applicable dimensional requirements of the underlying zone district. A detached single- family dwelling and customary accessory buildings may be developed on a nonconforming lot of record, provided such lot of record is in separate ownership and not contiguous to lots in the same ownership. Consequently, if purchase of any contiguous lot is to be contemplated, the purchase should be completed and title should be taken under a different name/by a different entity. Existing Improvements To some degree, the existing improvements are described in the preceding discitssions about both the consistency with dimensional requirements and the Pitkin County Assessor's records. In addition, all existing site improvements are graphically depicted on the Improvement Survey (the Survey) prepared by Aspen Survey Engineers. The Survey should be referenced for an understanding of existing improvements and their locations on the site. â€¢ 201 N. MILL STREET, SUITE 108 â€¢ ASPEN, CO 81611 â€¢ (970) 925-7819 â€¢ FAx (970) 925-7395 â€¢ - PAGE 6OF16â€¢ The Assessors records and the City Building Department file indicate that the existing residence was built in 1958. The residence is served by City water, Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District (ACSD) sewer, and overhead utilities (likely electric, telephone and cable) spanning from the roof of the house to a pole on the east side of Midland Avenue. There are several very large conifers and aspen along the East Hopkins and Midland Avenue frontages (within the first 15-20 feet of the property). The side and rear yards are mostly fenced in, but it is not clear whether these fences were built by the owner of the subject property and/or the owners of the adjacent properties. The fence along the west side property line does not follow the surveyed lot line and sits within the adjacent lot. Since the fences do not encroach into your property, they do not seem to present an issue for you but could be an issue for your neighbor (i.e., potential for an adverse possession claim aginst them). THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT QUOTA SYSTEM (GMQS): Overview The City of Aspen has had a Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) in effect since the early 1970s. The purpose of the GMQS is: (1) to implement the Aspen Area Community Plan goals and policies; (2) to ensure than new growth occurs in an orderly and efficient manner in the City ofAspen and the Aspen Metro Area; (3) to ensure sufficient public facilities to accommodate new growth and development; (4) to ensure that new growth and development is designed and constructed to maintain the character and ambiance of the City and the Metro Area; (5) to ensure an adequate supply of housing, businesses and events that serve the local. permanent community and the area's tourist base; and, (6) to ensure that growth does not over-extend the community's ability to provide support services, including employee housing, traffic control and parking. The GMQS Chapter of the City of Aspen Land Use Code applies to all development within the city limits. It establishes annual limits on new residential and commercial development. The GMQS establishes four development categories: exempt development, development requiri ng administrative growth management review, development requiring Planning & Zoning Coinmission (P&Z) growth management review, and development requiring City Council growth management review. Described in very simple terms, the GMQS establishes a system whereby all new residential development and/or redevelopment must either have or obtain "development allotments." One allotment is needed for each and every new dwelling unit, and credit is given for existing units. Generally speaking, all legally created, residential lots begin with one development allocation, subject to requirements for use of the allotment (i.e., construction of a single family home on an existing lot must be accompanied by development of an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) or provide cash-in-lieu of the ADU). Creation of a new developable lot with its own development rights via subdivision or a â€¢ 201 N. MILL STREET, SUITE 108 â€¢ ASPEN. CO 81611 â€¢ (970) 9257819 Â· FAx (970)925-7395 â€¢ â€¢ PAGE 7 OF 16Â· subdivision exemption (i.e., making two or more lots where only one previously existed) requires receipt of an allocation. Implications ofthe GMOS for the Subject Propertv The existing development on the property consumes all of the property-s inherent development allotments. While having a Lot Size of 6,170 square feet, the subject property is merely one lot with a single-family residence on it. There appears to be remaining potential for adding floor area as exempt development. It is not possible lo add any additional units of density (dwelling units) on the property under the R-6 zoning provisions or given the applicable deed restrictions. Adding floor area to the existing unit would not require any allotments. ADU (Accessory Dwelling Units, as further described below) and Carriage Houses are not counted as units of density nor do they count as or against residential development allotments. Basically, there is not any type of development permitted on the 6,170 square foot, R-6 zoned, 1215 East Hopkins Avenue property that would require P&Z or City Council growth management review. Given the effective zoning and the Lot Area (after reductions for slopes and the access easement), the following types of "Exempt Development" are possible: â€¢ Remodeling or expansion of the existing single-family residence is exempt from growth management; however, when "demolition" occurs, administrative growth management review is required for replacement. "Demolition" is defined as "10 raze. disassemble, tear down. or destroy forty percent (40%) or more of an existing structure (prior to commencing development) as measured by the surRIce of all exterior wall and roof area above finished grade and associated assembly and components necessaryfor the structural integrity ofsuch wall and roof area." â€¢ The other types of potentially applicable Exempt Development are probably not of particular interest, but include development of temporary uses and structures, and voluntary development ofADU or Carriage Houses. Given the effective zoning and the Lot Area, the following types of development requ\]Ang Administrative Growth Management Review are possible: â€¢ The replacement after demolition of an existing single-family dwelling unit; replacement of a single-family dwelling after demolition is not subject to the development ceiling levels established in the GMQS. In order to qualify for a single-family approval, the developer has the five following options: a) Providing an above grade, detached Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) or a Carriage House pursuant to Section 26.520; or, â€¢ 201 N. MILL STREET. SUITE 108 â€¢ ASPEN, CO 81611 â€¢ (970) 925-7819 â€¢ FAx (970)925-7395 â€¢ â€¢ PAGE 8 OF 16â€¢ b) Providing an Accessory Dwelling Unit, or a Carriage House, authorized through Special Review to be attached and/or partially or fully subgrade, pursuant to Section 26.520; or, c) Providing and off-site Affordable Housing Unit within the Aspen 1nfill Area accepted by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority and deed restricted in accordance with the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines, as amended; or, d) Paying the applicable affordable housing impact fee pursuant to the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines, as amended; or e) Recording a resident-occupancy (RO) deed restriction on the single-family dwelling unit being constructed. Standards for development of an ADU or Carriage House are described in the ensuing section of this report, below Options 'c" and "e" above are essentially 6'non-options" as neither will ever make much financial sense. Option "d" allows for payment of cash-in-lieu of the ADU. The cash-in-lieu formula is based on the net increase of FAR floor area: for example, if a house with 1,700 square feet of FAR floor area is demolished for replacement with a home of 3,242 square feet of FAR floor area, the applicable cash-in-lieu fee will be based on the net increase of 1,542 square feet. The current cash-in-lieu fee is set at $68.36 per square foot of new FAR floor area; therefore, in the above example, the cash-in-lieu of an ADU requirement would be $105,411.12 (1,542 x $68.36). If considering paying the cash-in-lieu fee of an ADU, it is critical that existing conditions floor plans and FAR floor area calculations be prepared and then be approved by the City Zoning Officer prior to demolition. Without doing this, it will be impossible to verify the correct "credit" for the demolished FAR floor area, and the burden of proof for applying such a credit lies with the developer. â€¢ The remaining development types permitted under Administrative Growth Management review are either not of interest or are inapplicable. For instance, duplex residential development is not possible on the subject site; the administrative growth management review applicable to historic landmark properties cannot be used; and, commercial, lodge and mixed-use development are not allowed in the R- 6 zone. DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL: The subject property has a relatively limited development potential. It basically has just three options, namely: 1) a simple expansion/addition with or without remodel work (Exempt from Growth Management); 2) demolition of the existing residence and replacement with a new home pursuant to R-6 zoning (subject Administrative Growth Management Review and the replacement after den-~olition requirements explained above); and, 3) voluntary development of a standard or "For Sale" ADU or Carriage â€¢ 201 N. MILL STREET, SUITE 108 â€¢ ASPEN, CO 81611 â€¢ (970)925-7819 â€¢ FAX (970)9257395 â€¢ Â· PAGE 9 OF 16Â· House (Exempt from Growth Management Review). These three options are not necessarily mutually exclusive; that is, there is potential to pursue options one and three j ointly. An Addition/Expansion The subject property appears to maintain unused FAR floor area that could be used to accomplish an addition. That is, the R-6 zoning allows more FAR floor area than is currently built on the subject site. As explained above, based in the somewhat unreliable records of the Pitkin County Assessor, there appears to be approximately 1,370 square feet of FAR floor area already in existence on the property, which would leave some 1,850 or so square feet remaining (give-or-take since lot area reductions have not been calculated). Furthermore, the existing residence is not believed to have any basement space. It is important to reiterate that the Assessor's records typically do not reflect accurate FAR floor area measurements as calculated pursuant to the Aspen Land Use Code. That is, the Assessor's measurements do not correlate with the way in which the City of Aspen measures FAR floor area. The Assessor's records often provide an indication of the gross floor area, not the FAR floor area. To obtain an accurate account of the existing FAR floor area/square footage, an architect or surveyor would need to be hired to prepare floor plans and area calculations as measured pursuant to the current Aspen Land Use Code. Those plans and calculations would then need to be approved by the City Zoning Officen ADUs and Carriage Houses The City of Aspen maintains an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) and Carriage House program that provides an option for additional development potential. The Code identically defines a "Carriage House" and an 'Accessory Dwelling Unit" as, ".4 deed restricted dwelling unit attached to or detachedfrom a principal residence situated on the same lot or parcel, and which meets the occupancy. dimensional and other requirements set forth in Section 26.520 of [the Code], and the requirements set forth in the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Guidelines." Typically, development of an ADU is done to gain an Administrative Growth Management approval to add a dwelling unit or to demolish and reconstruct a dwelling unit. In such cases, the City offers the five options outlined above for gaining the single- family approval. In addition, ADUs and Carriage Houses can be developed "voluntarily" (i.eâ€ž without being in response to the need for a Growth Management approval) and are, themselves, considered exempt development. An ADU or Carriage House is not considered a unit of density (meaning they do not count against the minimum lot area per dwelling unit requirement of the underlying zone district). For instance. a lot with a â€¢ 201 N. MIt_LSTREET. SUITE 108 â€¢ ASPEN,CO 81611 â€¢(970)925-7819â€¢FAX (970)925-7395 â€¢ â€¢ PAGE 1OOF 16 â€¢ single-family home and an ADU is considered to have only one dwelling unit for purposes of maximuni allowable densities under the given zone district regulations. As an aside, it is worth noting that the R-6 zone district has a maximum site coverage requirement, meaning that the combined footprints of all structures located on the lot cannot exceed the total allowed for a lot of a given size. "Site coverage' is calculated based on exterior walls of a structure at ground level. This does not preclude basement space under more than of the site than allowed to be "covered." As implied by the definition cited above, development of an ADU or Carriage House is subject to compliance with a set of design standards enumerated in Section 26.520.050 of the Code. Applications for development of an ADU or Carriage House are reviewed and approved administratively by staff of the Aspen Community Development Department, provided the ADU(s) complies with the design standards of Section 26.520.050 of the Land Use Code; any variance(s) from these standards requires Special Review approval from the P&Z at a public hearing. While the referenced Code section (26.520.050) should be specifically reviewed prior to designing an ADU or Carriage House, it is worth noting the following highlights of the standards: â€¢ All ADUs must contain between 300 and 800 net livable square feet, at least 10% of which must be closet or storage area. A Carriage House must contain between 800 and 1,200 net livable square feet, 10% of which must be closet or storage area (Note that calculation of net livable area differs slightly from the calculation of FAR floor area inasmuch as net livable area measures the interior dimensions of the unit); â€¢ All ADUs or Caniage Houses must be capable of functioning as independent dwelling units (this requires an exterior entrance with no direct interior connections to the primary residence); â€¢ All ADUs or Carriage Houses must have separately accessible utilities (although shared services are pennitted); â€¢ All ADUs or Carriage Houses must have their own kitchen and bathroom, and at least one unobstructed on-site parking space devoted exclusively to the .ADU or Carriage House; â€¢ The finished floor height of an ADU or Carriage House must be entirely above natural or finished grade (whichever is higher) on all sides of the structure; â€¢ All ADUs or Carriage Houses must be detached from the primary residence but may be located above a detached garage or storage area that is accessory to the primary residence; â€¢ ADUs and Carriage Houses must comply with the dimensional requirements of the zone district: Â· 201 N. MILL STREET, SUITE 108 â€¢ASPEN. CO 81611 â€¢ (970)925-7819 â€¢ FAx (970)925-7395 â€¢ â€¢ PAGE 11 OF 16â€¢ â€¢ Design must include a means of preventing snow and ice from shedding upon the entrance to an ADU or Carriage House and/or from accumulating on any stairs that provide access to the ADU or Carriage House; â€¢ All ADUs and Carriage Houses must comply with all rules of general applicability (i.e., building codes, fire codes, plumbing codes, electrical codes, etc.), and this standard is not subject to variance; and, â€¢ All ADUs and Carriage Houses must be registered with the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority (APCHA) and the property must be deed restricted in accordance with Section 26.520.070 (this standard cannot be varied). ADUs and Carriage Houses are either for rent or for sale. At a minimum, all ADUs and Carriage Houses must be deed restricted and registered with the APCHA. Any lessee of an ADU or Carriage House must qualify as a local working resident in accordance with the current APCHA Guidelines. All rental ADUs and Carriage Houses must be restricted to lease periods of not less than six months in duration, or as may be otherwise required by the APCHA Guidelines. ADU or Carriage House leases must be recorded with the APCHA, but the owner retains the right to select a qualified renter. There are no provisions prohibiting an ADU or Carriage House from remaining vacant/un-rented/un-leased. The FAR floor area of a "for rent" ADU or Carriage House is counted against the allowable limit for the property. The FAR floor area of an ADU or Carriage House that is detached from the primary residence and deed restricted as a "For Sale" affordable housing unit is one- hundred percent (100%) exempt from the allowable FAR limit o f the property. "For sale" affordable housing units must be transferred to a qualified purchaser in accordance with the APCHA Guidelines. In addition, the FAR floor area of a parcel containing a single- family residence and a permanently affordable "For Sale" ADU or Carriage House located on the same parcel shall be awarded an ;'Affordable Housing Floor Area Bonus" equal to 50% of the FAR floor area of the associated ADU or Carriage House up to a maximum bonus of 600 square feet. To explain this by way o f example, i f a hypothetical property had an FAR floor area limit of 1,000 square feet and that limit was already built, the property owner could still develop an ADU or Carriage House as a detached and permanently affordable "For Sale" unit. If the same property owner developed a 1,200 net livable square foot detached "For Sale" Carriage House, the allowable FAR floor area on the parcel would be increased to 1,600 square feet (1000 + [1,200 x 50%]), exclusive of the Carriage House's floor area. In the case of a "For Sale" detached ADU or Carriage House. not only does the unit itself have value, but the "Affordable Housing Floor Area Bonus" carries significant value as well. As for the value of the "For Sale" detached ADU or Carriage House. the Code allows for the following deed rest-rictions: â€¢ ADUs from 300 to 500 net livable square feet: Category 3 or lower; â€¢ 201 N. MILL STREET. SUITE 108 â€¢ ASPEN. CO 81611 â€¢ (970) 925-7819 â€¢ FAX (970) 925-7395 Â· Â· PAGE 12OF=16â€¢ â€¢ ADUs from 501 to 800 net livable square feet: Category 4 or lower; â€¢ Carriage Houses from 801 to 1,000 net livable square feet: Category 5 or lower; â€¢ Carriage Houses from 1,001 to 1,200 net livable square feet: Category 6 or lower; Pursuant to the current APCHA Guidelines, which tend to be amended yearly, the maximum unit sales prices by Category are as follows: 1 - Unit Type Cat 1 Cat. 2 Â·x Cat. 3 . Cat. 4 i Cat/' Cat. 6 Studio Â· - $35,000 $79,000 $132,000 $224,000 $313,000 $349,000 1-BdrmÂ·.-i $44,000 $95,000 S 145,000 1 $239,000 $339,000 $375,000 2-Bdrm j $53,000 $117,000 $172,000 $266,000 $366,000 $402,000 Given the unit sizes allowed for ADUs and Carriage Houses and the associated Categories respectively allowed, the prices allowed for the most likely unit types and associated categories are highlighted in bold type. The initial developer of a "For Sale" detached ADU or Carriage House may select the first qualified purchaser of the unit. Subsequent conveyances must be done according to the lottery sales procedures specified in the APCHA Guidelines, as may be amended from time to time. Maximum resale prices are controlled by the Deed Restriction covering the unit executed by the initial purchaser upon closing of the initial purchase. Typically, appreciation rates are capped at 3%-4% per annum. The larger the unit, the higher the initial sale price can be and the bigger the "Affordable Housing Floor Area Bonus.' Sale of an ADU, Carriage House, and/or second free market dwelling unit on a property can be accomplished separately from the sale of the other portions of the development/property. This is done by filing and recording a condominium plat (with or without covenants, codes and restrictions -- declarations) that separately describes the various elements and ownership interests of the development. Condominiumization is best done after all improvements are completed and involves a relatively simple process whereby a sun,eyor prepares the condominium plat for administrative review and approval by the City prior to recordation. The Warranty Deed running with the subject property limits development to "not more than one detached single-family dwelling and outbuildings pertaining thereto." h would be necessary to consult with an attorney to determine if/how the restrictions on the Warranty Deed can be eliminated. It is worth considering whether development of an ADU or Carriage House would represent a violation of this restriction. If a rental unit, it could certainly be said that the ADU or Carriage House is an outbuilding pertaining to the single-family residence. If a "For Sale" unit, that argument would likely be more difficult to make. At any rate, the terms of the Warranty Deed represent private restrictions, the beneficiary of which remains unknown; the City of Aspen will not enforce these restrictions opting instead for their adopted zoning provisions. â€¢ 201 N. MILL STREET, SUITE 108 â€¢ ASPEN, CO 81611 â€¢ (970) 925-7819 â€¢ FAX (970) 925-7395 â€¢ Â· PAGE 13 OF 16 â€¢ If . OTHER POTENTIALLY IMPORTANT INFORMATION: 1. Trees and Tree Removal Chapter 13.20, Tree Removal Permits, of the Aspen Municipal Code is intended "to preserve to the fullest extent possible existing trees considered desirable by the Manager of Parks and Recreation or his designee." Said Chapter regulates and reqfires the issuance of permits for the damage, relocation, and removal of deciduous trees having a trunk diameter (measured as close to 4.5 feet above ground as possible) of six inches or more; gamble oak, rocky mountain maple, serviceberry, and chokecherry with a trunk diameter of three inches or more; and, coniferous trees having a trunk diameter of four inches or more. Several such regulated trees exist on the subject property. Should you desire to redevelop the subject property, it will be important to review Chapter 13.20 of the Aspen Municipal Code and consult with the Parks Department about which trees are diseased or dangerous, which can be removed, which can be relocated, which must be preserved, and what mitigation costs will be involved. A preliminary site visit was conducted with the City Forester, at which time it was confirmed that none of the existing trees would be preemptively precluded from removal. Several of the trees located along the Midland Avenue frontage appear to be small enough in caliper measurement for their removal to be unregulated (i.e., no permits required for their removal). The Parks Department decision to allow tree removals will be a function of actual development plans, and any regulated trees to be removed will have to be mitigated by either replacement plantings or cash-in-lieu. Pruning of trees (i.e., removing limns from bottom upward) located on private property is allowed without a permit, but trees may not be "topped" without a permit. The Aspen City Forester is available for consulting on tree permit requirements and proper pruning practices; he can be reached at (970) 429-2026. The Parks Department will work with a property owner to find reasonable solutions for the construction and development needs particular to the specific property Removal of trees is typically permitted upon adequate demonstration of need. 2. Residential Design Standards Chapter 26.410, Residential Design Standards, of the Code should be reviewed in its entirety before beginning to design any additions to or remodeling plans for the existing structure(s), or designs for a replacement structure(s). The Residential Design Standards address such topics as building orientation. fences, building forms, parking, garages and carports, entrance and window designs and placement, location of lightwells, use of materials, and inflection to adjacent one-story structures (where applicable). All of the Residential Design Standards need to be either complied with or varied by a Board/Commission with the authority to do so. â€¢ 201 N. MuSTREET. SUITE 108 Â· ASPEN, CO 81611 â€¢ (970)925-7819 â€¢ FAX (970)9257395 Â· â€¢ PAGE 14 OF 16â€¢ â‚¬ 3. Outdoor Lighting The City has adopted a set of outdoor lighting standards applicable to all residential development; see Section 26.575.150 of the Land Use Code. 4. Impact Fees The City maintains requirements for Park Development Impact Fees, which are assessed on all development that creates additional bedrooms iii residential dwellings within the City ofAspen. The fees are based on net increases in the number of bedrooms on a property For a one bedroom unit, the fee is $2,120.00; for a two-bedroom unit, the fee is $2,725.00; for a three-or-more bedroom unit, the fee is $3,634.00. For development which increases the size of a unit between the types listed, the fee is assessed by calculating the difference in the cost between the unit types. Ill the case of demolition and replacement of a single-family residence, the fee is assessed only on the increase in number of bedrooms between the demolished residence and the replacement residence. To maintain a credit for the number of demolished bedrooms, the City Zoning Officer must sign-off on the number o f existing bedrooms prior to demolition. The City has a set of school land dedication standards applicable to all new subdivisions which contain residential dwelling units. Since it is not possible to subdivide the subject property, the school land dedication standards and cash-in-lieu fees will not be applicable. The City often requires other impact fees in association with (as conditions of) any land use approvals. Most commonly, a developer is required to pay road impact fees for wear to public roads during construction. These are based on a review by the City Engineer, but no formula is readily available to estimate potential costs/amounts. 5. Sidewalks, Curbs and Gutters It has been confirmed that the south side of East Hopkins Avenue between Park and Midland Avenues is within a curb and gutter improvement district. Sidewalks on this stretch of road will be required only on the north side, but redevelopment ofproperties on the south side of thb street (i. e., the subject site) will require installation of curb and gutter improvements only. Sidewalk, curb and gutter improvement requirements on the Midland Avenue side of the property are not clear at this time as Aspen is currently without an official City Engineer. 6. Moratoria and Code Amendments The City of Aspen currently has a development and land use application moratorium in effect; however, this does not effect additions, remodels or redevelopment of properties in the R-6 zone district. While the moratorium is in place, the City is â€¢ 201 N. MILL STREET, SUITE 108 â€¢ ASPEN. CO 81611 â€¢ (970) 9257819 â€¢ FAX (970) 925-7395 Â· â€¢ PAGE 150F 16Â· planning to amend several provisions in rhe existing regulations. There has been some discussion about amending the requirements associated with rearing down and replacing existing single-family liomes but what, if anything, will actually be amended relative to redevelopment of single-family homes remains unknown. The moratorium is set to expire on October 31, 2006. The foregoing analysis is based on a review of the available facts and regulations pertinent to the property in question The City's land use regulations are highly subjective, and interpretations of relevant provisions of the Aspen Land Use Code rnay vary over time or with changes in staff or elected and appointed officials. Consequently. no warranty of facts, opinions, or interpretations contained herein is either expressed or implied by Haas Land Planning, L.LC. This report has been prepared for the specific use and benefit of Stephen Rattner only and is not to be transferred to or used by any third parties without the prior written consent of Haas Land Planning. LLC. If you should have any questions, or if I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at the numbers or address provided below or via email at mhaas@sopris.net. Yours traly, Haas Land Planning. LLC 04Â» ,/VÂ» r L-3 Mitc~Haas. AICP Owner.;Manager cc: Michael Hoffman, Esq. c:/Mv Documents/Duc Diligence/CiaÂ·, Railner-12 [ 5 E. 1 T, >pldns./ 1215 2 1--1.jpl:ins â€¢ 201 N. MILLSTREET. SUITE 108 â€¢ ASPEN, CO 81611 Â· (970) 925-7819â€¢FAX. (970) 925-7395 â€¢ â€¢ PAGE 16 OF 16â€¢ John Q Martin, Architect LLC RO. Box 4701 Phone: 970-328-0592 4140081631 Fax: 970-328-0593 WWW.jâ‚¬~ Application for Administrative Variance - Garage Location To Whom It May Concern: Adam Rothberg (Project Manager and Owner Representative) and John G. Martin (Architect of project) representing the owner Stephen Rattner, met with James Lindt and Todd Grange, City of Aspen ('ommunity Development Department Planners, for a pre-application conference at 10:00 am November 6,2()()6. We discussed the new-construction development project of a single-family home at the property located at 1215 East Hopkins Avenue (Lot 4, Promentory Subdivision). As a result of issues discussed at that meeting, we respectfully submit this request for Administrative Variance - Garage Location. The following is an excerpt from 26.410.040 - Residential Design Standards - City of Aspen Land Use Code: C. PARKING, GARAGES AND CARPORTS. l'he intent of the following parking, garages, and carport standards is to minimize the potential for conflicts between pedestrian and automobile traftic by placing parking, garages, and carports on alleys, or to minimize the presence ofgarages and carports as a lifeless part of the streetscape where alleys do not exist. 2. For all residential uses that have access only from a public street, thefollowing standards shall apply: a. On the streetfacing,facade(s), the width ofthe living area on the first,floor shall be at least Jive (5)feet greater than the width of the garage or carport. b. Thefrontfacade of the garage or the front most supporting column of a carport shall be set back at least ten feet (10' 01,) jurtherfront the street than the Font most wall of the house. The following is an excerpt from 26.410.020 Procedures for Review - Residential Design Standards - City of Aspen Land Use Code: C. Appeal of Adverse Determination. If an application is found to be inconsistent with any item of the Re.sidential Design Standards, the applicant may either amend the application or seek a variance as set forth below D. Variances. 1. Administrative Variances. The applicant may seek an administrative variance for not more 1han three (3) of the individual requirements. An applicant who desires a variance Ji om the Residential Design Standards shall demonstrate, and the Community Developinent Director shall find that the variances, ifgranted, would: a. Provide an appropriate design or pattern ofdevelopment considering t:he context in which the development is proposed and the purpose Of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the director may consider the relationship of'the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity as the directorjeels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or, b. Be clearly necessary for reasons offairness related to unt,sual site-specific constraints. Rationale for granting an Administrative Variance - Garage Location 7'he garage and driveway location chosen for the specific house design at 1215 liast Hopkins Avenue is the most logical site location for this small, narrow lot located at the southwest corner of East I Iopkins and Midland Avenues Â·and canbe Â·argued both in terms of "a. neighborhood context" and "b. unusual site-specific constraints " A. Neighborhood Context: The lot is longer in the north-south direction along Midland Avenue and shorter in the east-west direction along East Hopkins Avenue. It is the fourth lot of similar shape and size in the west-to-east direction of the southerly side of East Hopkins Avenue. All four houses on East IIopkins Avenue (including the existing structure of this .9 01.-'..3, I -d 1 NOV 0 8 2006 BUiLD: 'C ANT C lot) have driveways and/or entrances which face East I Iopkins Avenue. Also all three houses along the north side of Hopkins Avenue have garage entrances to this street. Midland Avenue, on the other hand, has very few driveway entrances. Only mid-block houses with no other alternative have garage and driveways which face this street. All the ollier houses along Midland in both directions have their garages oriented to the feeder streets, not directly from Midland Avenue. Therefore there is a noticeable contextual Hopkins block and wider Midland Avenue neighborhood precedence and pattern for putting our garage on the north short side of the lot facing East IIopkins Avenue. B. Unusual Site Specific Constraints: The other reason that that the chosen garage location makes logical design sense is both the size of the lot and the terrain of the site, The lot is small and actually non-conforming in the minimum lot width requirement. Also the Town of Aspeii planners have already determined and agreed that the Front Setback line faces East Hopkins Avenue while the Alternative Front Setback line faces Midland Avenue. Again, if we put the garage at the logical location of facing the Front Setback line, the non-conforming width of this lot line proves to be a hardship in meeting the strict Merpretation of the design criteria: "a. On the street facing Jacade(s), the width of t he living area oil the first,floor shall be at least Jive (5) feet greater than the width of the garage or carport. b. Thefront facade Ofthe garage or thefront most supporting column Of a carport shall be set back at least ten feel (10' 0") further from the street than the front most walloj the house. " There simply is noroom to make it work. The terrain of the site conspires to niake the garage location proposed, the logical location. East Hopkiiis Avenue, and specifically the location for a driveway entrance to the lot, is a flat area adjacent to a relatively flat spot on the relatively flat East Hopkins Avenue and is in fact the location for the current gravel driveway. Once East Hopkins reaches the corner with Midland Avenue the grades start to rise. The grades rise even more as you travel south on Midland Avenue from the corner, but the grades drop quickly into the lot right at the lot line. To access a driveway from any point along Midland Avenue would literally put the driveway and garage three to six feet above existing grades within the lot. Such a "garage in the air" would seem very out-of-place in the context of surrounding neighborhood and indeed the design guidelines. Therefore, we respectfully request that a variance from the strict interpretation of the Residential Design Standards as it applies to the garage location on this particular site, be granted. Sincerely, 90642/; John G. Martin - - ..4- â€ž. /4 F.â„¢ â€ž-1 â€¢ Page 2 NOV 0 8 2006 - 6-1 LY-f,2. - -~. â‚¬ 1 2 1 41 rA.' r h John G Martin, Architect LLC PO. Box 4701 Phone: 970-328-0592 &440081631 Fax: 970-328-0593 Application for Administrative Variance - Street Facing Windows To Whom It May Concern: Adam Rothberg (Project Manager and Owner Representative) and John G. Martin (Architect of project) representing the owner Stephen Rattner, met with James Lindt and lodd Grange, City of Aspen Community Development Department Planners, for apre-application conference at 10:00 am November 6,2()06. We discussed the new-construction development project of a single-family home at the property located at 1215 liast Hopkins Avenue (Lot 4, Promentory Subdivision). As a result of issues discussed at that meeting, we respectfully submit this request for Administrative Variance - Street Facing Windows. The Yollowing is an excerpt from 26.410.040 - Residential Design Standards - City of Aspen Land Use Code: D. BUILDING ELEMENTS. The intent ofthe following building elements standards is to ensure that each residential bitilding has street-facing architectural details and elements which provide human scale to the facade, enhance the walking experience, and reinforce local building traditions. 3. Windows. a. Street Jacing windows shall not span through the area where a second floor level would typically exist, which is between nine (9) and twelve feet (12) above the jinishedfirst.floor. For interior staircases, this measurement will be made from the first landing ifone exists. A transom window above the main entry is exempt from this standard. The following is an excerpt from 26.410.020 Procedures for Review - Residential Design Standards - City of Aspen Land Use Code: C. Appeal of Adverse Deterinination. Ifan application is found to be inconsistent with any item of' the Residential Design Standards, the applicant may either amend the application or seek a variance as set forth below. D. Variances. 1. Administrative Variances. The applicant may seek an administrative variance for not more than three (3) of the individual requirements. An applicant who desires a variance Fom the Residential Design Standards shall demonstrate, and the Community Developinent Director shalltind that the variances, if granted, would: a. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the comext as it is used iii the criteria, the director may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity as the director feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted, or, b. Be clearly necessary for reasons offairness related to i.initsital site-specific constraints. Rationale for granting an Administrative Variance - Street Facing Windows Design. The Living Room and ])ining Room vaulted areas on the upper level of the house as designed have high plate heights and high windows which are worthy of both the internal use and external views from this part of the house and site. A strict application ofthe design criteria "Street.facing windows shall not span through the area where a second Jloor level would typically exist, which is between nine (9) and twelve feet (12) above the ,finished first floor." would be detrimental to the design both in terms of internal use and external aesthetics. The rationale for granting an administrative variance to this design criteria can be justified both in terms of "a. neighborhood context" and "b. unusual site-specific constraints" A. Neighborhood Context: The rationale behind this particular design criteria is that from the street a two-story house should appear to be a two-story house. Even if a room with vaulted plate lieights is located behind the street facing fagade, the windows should still demonstrate"rim-joist" structure at the location of the second story and therefore tile 1 NOV 0 8 2006 -17 witidows should have a "break" between the 9 foot and 12 foot dimensions above the finished first floor. But what happens when the room with vaulted areas is located on the second floor? Typically this rule does not apply. Second floor vaulted rooms are allowed to have windows spanning between the 9 foot and 12 foot location. And what about ranch-style homes that have only one floor? We have been informed by planners that this window rule has been waived in this instance on a case-by-case basis because it does not make sense to demonstrate a second tloor in the window design when in fact no second floor exists. In the context of this neighborhood, we feel that we can demonstrate the same rationale when it comes to the street facing window rule. If you look atthe Front Setback sideofourlot where the garage faces E ast Hopkins the look from the street is in fact a two-story favade with the garage doors on the first story and the Master Bedroom on the second story. (}arage doors and windows around the corner from the garage doors meet the intention of this particular design constraint. Windows in the Master Bedroom above can span between the 9' and 12' area because the vaulted area is actually on the second tloor. This would be in keeping with all the other two-story facades facing the street on this block of Ilopkins Avenue. But what about the Midland Avenue side of the lot? Because the grades on Midland Avenue rise quickly along this side of the lot and because the front door emrance faces this alternative f~Ollt setback side of the lot and the front door is actually accessing the second floor level relatively even with the grades at Midland Avenue, the second story of the house actually appears to be the first story from this Midland Avenue vantage point C with no Story above it such as a ranch house), Thus when we want to have window groupings within the vaulted areas of the living room and dining rooin facing the Midland Avenue, we can use the same reasoning that it is in fact a second level appearing to be a first level ranch style and a strict enforcement of the street facing window rule would be detrimental to the design of the faâ„¢le both inside and outside. B. Unusual Site Specific Constraints: As already mentioned, the unique and unusual terrain of this lot, along with the location as a corner lot, conspire to make the second story appear to be a first story from the vantage point of Midland Avenue and creates an unusual hardship from the point of view that the street-facing window criteria be applied both to the first story and the second story at the same time. Surely most. if not all, the Other houses in this immediate neighborhood and indeed Aspen in general do not have the criteria applied this way. Because of unusual site specific constraints we would ask that this particular design criteria be applied to our first story only, which would be the garage level facing East IIopkins Avenue. Therefore, we respectfully request that a variance from the strict interpretation of the Residential Design Standards as it applies to the street-facing window design along the second level facing Hopkins Avenue. Sincerely, John G. Martin râ€¢n -râ€ž 04. -- .9 r ,-M --1 â€¢ Page 2 94, 1 NOV 0 8 2006 A â‚¬*-- pl '9 1 John G Martin, Architect LLC RO. Box 4701 Phone: 970-328-0592 b.le,Co:1631 Fax: 970-328-0593 W.,4. e Pre-Application Conference Summary - Rattner Residence fo Whom It May Concern: Adam Rothberg (Project Manager and Owner Representative) and John G. Martin (Architect of project) met with James Lindt and Todd Grange, City of Aspen ('ommunity Development Department Planners, for a pre- applicationconferenceat 10:00 am November 6,2()()6. We discussed the development project for the property located at 1215 East Hopkins Avenue (Lot 4, Promentory Subdivision). The owner is Stephen Rattner. The project consists of the demolition of an existing small house at the site and the development of a single-family home of approximately 2,940 sq. ft. FAR in it's place. Theproperty is z<med Medium Density Residential (R- 6). We discussed the design of house in the context of the complex zoning regulations and residential design standards as applied to this site. In short, the house as designed and presented meets all the criteria except for four items. The items are described as follows, with a description of how we intend to address each. 1. The garage as designed does not meet the following design consideration as quoted from the Residential Design Standards: C. PARKING, GARAGES AND CARPORTS. The intent ofthefollowing parking, garages, ancl carport standards is to ininimize the potentialfor conflicts between pedestrian and automobile traflic by placing parking, garages, and carports on alleys, or to minintize the presence of garages and carports as a lifeless part of the streetscape where alleys do not exist. 2. For all residential uses that have access only from a public street, the following standards shall apply: a. On the street facing facade(.s),the width of the living area on thefirst.floor shall be at least live (5)feet greater than the width of the garage or carport. b. The,front facade ofthe garage or thefront most supporting collimn ofa carport shall be set back at least ten feet (10' 0"j Jurtherfrom the street than the Font most wall ofthe house. - We will be askin for a staff-approval variance based on site context hardships and neighborhood conformity. 2. The window design for the upper level, determined to be the street level, does not meet the following design consideration as quoted from the Residential Design Standards. D. BUILDING ELEMENTS. The intent of thefollowing building elements standards is to ensure that each residential building has street-facing architectural details and elements which provide human scale to the facade, enhance the walking experience, and reinfbrce local building traditions. 3. Windows. a. Street facing windows shall not spaii through the area where a second floor level would typically exist, which is between nine (9) and twelve Jeet (12) above the Anished first floor. For interior staircases, this measurement will be madetrom thefirst landing ifone exists. A transoin window above the main entry is exempt froin this standard. - We will be asking for a staff-approval variance based on precedence which allows exemption from this item when a second story does not actually exist (second story from street level). The design of the house will suffer if this standard is applied. 3. The house location on the site does not meet the following design consideration as quoted from the Residential Design Standards: A. SITE DESIGN. The intent of these design standards is to encourage residential buildings that address the street in a manner which creates a consistent "facade line" and defines the public and semi-public realms. 2. Build-to lines. Ou parcels or lots of less than 15,000 squarefeet, at least 60% of the Font facade shall be within 5 feet of the minimum front yard setback line. On corner lots, this standard shall be met oil thefrontage with the longest block length. F~Â·9~ 7- #7 - 4 7, M " - 9 .18 1 NOV 0 8 2006 ASPEN 1'3111, n,bÂ·n "rr,nTÂ·,ANT FiTTET.,Mir-'Ii"Ii...Ii...Ii...Ii"Ii"Ii"Ii"Ii"Ii'Im"TFT,FAr'M Porches may be used meet the 60% standard. - We need only to move the house 2'-9" closer to the street and lengthen the porch by a few feet (in the direction of the Master Bedroom) to meet this design criteria. This is easily achievable and does not compromise the house as designed. 4. In counting F.A.R. (Floor Area Ratio), the outside face of wall is interpreted to mean the outside face of veneer. 1 have not been counting the stone veneer in my F.A.R diagrams and therefore my F.A.R. numbers are incorrect. - We will need to count a 6" veneer into my F.A.R. calculations on the upper floors which means we will need to shave off approximately 4 inches from all 4 sides of the building at every level. We have another option to pursue, however, before we start shrinking the building. We will be submitting for a staff interpretation to the reduction of site area due to 20% grades and steeper. We will be asking them to review a site plan with interpolated grade lines which would put the grades closer to where they naturally would have been before the lot was leveled for the existing structure. They have indicated that this type of interpretation has been successfully argued in the past. The rest of the meeting was a description of the application materials. James Lindt surmised that the (2) request for variances would probably be approved at staff level. The request for grade interpolation interpretation would be discussed at the next available staff meeting. Sincerely, John, â€¢ Page 2 U LI... 'P NOV 0 8 2006 A C 3- rM r. 4- i ' .Â· Â¢ U BUILD: NG DR,Â· .1 .'. ..:i 1 , ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: Lifil ~TADIL (2. Pi* 0 1 5,> F LICE Applicant: ,Â»\7,"64 12.01-54 fEE:Â·.,49-CA 1.ocarion: 1 61'5- 15.- B.' Â·'.5.c:,~â€ž~it~h 5 AVE f 1/'.- 9 1- Â· 'Ir,Â·..KiNV.j 3,1.417,1,5,0 *3) , Zone District: .61 1..' f)t UU :Â·: p )5,7-% Arc",oy Â«rE .1,i- . 1.8 -4 4 Lot Size: Ce , 1-tf) 51 +t, Lot Area: 4.1 / 17(1. 1 4.4. /94:10,0<Wrip FiN fl rit: v Â¢'; *f'Ar,41 1, .Ag.U' FA.<,Pfi'*E 41,) (for the purposes oicalculating Floor Area, 1,01 Area may be recluced for areas within the higli water mark, easements. and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in tile Municipal Code,) Commercial net leasable: Existing: - -4-4- Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing.Â· _ L._ ProposedÂ· 1 Number of bedrooms Existing.Â· 2 Proposed: 4- Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only):___19.6.- - DIMENSIONS: <4.- Floor Area: Exis/ing.' 1 1,Â·Jo*Allr,wable,' 714.0 Proposed. 5940 4. ic.) E'Â·0211\1(,Â·l:'9Ht O Principal bldg. height: Existin,g: -_jio_ ible: 25 _ Prc>pojed: _11__ 1 2 f -AliowÂ¢ Access. bldg. height: Exixting. RA .Allowable. Proposed: On-Site parking: Existing: 40Â·3_ Requireci. 2 69 5 Proposed: 9 0/72% 5 * J % Site coveraile: Axi.5/big: 1 0.4, Required. 5-0 X Proposed: 90 / G /221,- e f % Open Space: Existing: - V /. . Required: tuÂ·' it, Proposed: /0 4 Required: _ -10 --_ - _Proposed: 10 Front Setback: Existing' 13.Â£- Â· t Rear Setback: .Existing; 9 .0 Required. /O ' Proposed: i D Coinbined F/}4: Axi,ling,Â· Lt Required: Â·~20 Proposed: 7 1 ' Side Saback. Existing: 9 4,_ _Required. 4. ,3 Proposed: 4 ./ Side Sel back: Exi.iting._11.f_. . -Required.0 5._._ -_ ._ Proposed, 4 ' Combined Sides: Existing:_ BLE -__Required. /17 ---- Proposed. 11 , 1 Distance Between Existing A/.4. Required. Proposed: Buildings Existing non-conformizies or encroaellments *FU{ E: 9.2 4 15 0 1 0,2 VA>,A.)Â¥07, fc,CL, FoÂ¢ l j /9 ViA !?pr # 5.Â· 54 i 5 Ak) A \: - d" ip '~tfc)%*rÂ·Â¢ s p ;4 9.Â·F <'t s KA /50"t, VariatioIls requested: 1. (~,/'ttefAL,i Vi Â· fi//542 kji Prk{ 2 *I 4,4644> r -- f 5.f-7 BActz 2-' 97 eff'' i 600 4 k# 7,~ Â¤7&.2.0 -/0 58,: r-J 'fÂ· t i , E- , 0 0: b ../ 11 ' , NOV 0 8 2006 I '31 r,~ , BIlli r , PTNE'.13 ATTACHMENT 4- MATRIX OF LAND USE APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For applic:ition requirementh. refer to the litinibers in tlie in second column. 11iese numbers conespond to the kn on page 9. For : multiple reviews, do not duplicate information. All application materials must be coinplete and submitted in collated packets. Type of Review 1 App. Submission Requirements Proces. Type (See Process Number of Required Submittal (See key on page 9.) Uesc.ription iii Att.3).-___.____.-... Packets 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW , 1-7,8-11),35 P & Z 10 . .... i 8040 (;12[:I:N],INF EUMPT]ON 1-7,8-1{), 35 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2 S'IRMM MAR{:IN RF.VIEW 1-7,8,10,11,12,35 P & 7, C)It A DMINISTRATIVE (Based 2 for 0 Admin.. 10 for P &7 on Location) >401 RI.:,Al MARGIN Exr,w noN_ 1 -7, 8, 1 0, 1 1, 12,35 ADMINISTRUIVE REVIEW 2 ilA[.I.AM LAI<12 Bli].1 lt[.vil:iv 1-7,13,14,35 P & Z 10 MOI NTAIN VIEW PLANE 11-7115,16,35 P & Z to CONDrnONAL USE , 1-7,9,17 e. 7 10 I LW L SPECIAL REVIE" * 1-7, Additional Submi,Nion Req. depend 1' s z 10 01} natinÂ·cof tlic Special Revien' Rrqurst. I SUBD]VISION 1-7,18,19,20,21,35 P & Z. AND CI I Â¥ COUNCIL 20 EXEMPT St BDIVISION 1-7,18,19,20,21,35 ' CIn' CCOUNCIL 10 1,0 1 LINEADJUNTMENT 1.-7,22 ADMIN[51]LATI#'E REVIEW 2 Lo ] spi,1-1- 1-7, 22 CITY (:01 Nal. 10 ComfAMBOMENT 1-4,7,23 P & Z.AND CITY COUNCIL 20 *litrl.EN,5 1 ELECOM. 1-7,16,24,25,26,27,35 ADMIN. OR P&Z 2 for Admin.. 10 fur P& Z SATELITE DIN[ OVER 24" IN 1-7 ADMIN. OR P&Z 2 for Admin., 10 forÂ· 1' & Z DIA~!ETER * RES. DrsIGN STANDARDS '' 1-7,9,28,29,30 .~3 P & ZOR DRAC 10 VARIANC E GMQS EXEMPTION* 1-7, Adilitiotial Submission Rici. depend ADMIN..OR P & Z, AND/OR IC 2 for Admin., 10 for P & Z, 20 for P on naturc of the Ercniption Request. (BASEDON E\EMI'l[(14 '1 J'PI) & Z and CC CONDO' liN IliM ]7.ATION 1,31 ADM]NISTRATIVE 2 pl:I) 1-7,32,33,35 CON< El'-1 E,iI,-1' & Z, AND CC 20 for P&Z and CC (Stibmit FINAL - 1' & Z, AND CC Separately for Final PUD Re,iew) LOD(:E l'RESERVATION PED 1-7,35 P & Z, AND CC 20 9002 8 0 AON L. W.- ~ P[ID AMENDMENT 1-7 ADMIN..OR P& Z, AND/OR CC 2 for Admin.,10 for P & Z, 20 for P (BAS].1) ON AMEN[)MF,NT 71 PE) & Z:ind (C= SPECLU,LY PLANNED AREA 1-7,35 CONCEPTUAL- P & Z, AND CC 20 for P&Z and CC (Submit (SPA) FINAL- P & 7, AND CC Separately for Final SPA) AMENDMENTTO SPA 1-7 ADMIN., ORP & Z,\NI) CC 2 for Admin., 20 frnÂ· P & Z and CC : (B:\SED ON SIGNIFIC'AN< E 01 1 AMENDMENT) 7 EMPORARY LNE 1-7 ADMIN. OR CC (BASED ON 2 for Adminâ€ž 10 for City Council i 1)URATION TIME) ACCESSORÂ¥ DWEIA.INC; 1]311 1-7,9 ADMIN OR P &Z(11Â£\SED ON IF 2 for Administrative kevin, THE PROPOSAL MEETS REVIEW NTANDARDS) R F./.c).NIA(; 1-7 P & ZAND FC 20 Di~,LASIONAL REQUIRE.MEN'Irs 1-7,34 BOARD 012 ADJUSTMENT 9 VARIAM. F * Consult with a Platitier about submittal requirements. ** A pre-application conference with a Planner should be cimducted prior tos.ibmitting any land lise application. Please call 920-5090 to scliciltile a pre-application conference. t 7 6 4 NildGV 9002 8 0 AON John G. Martin, Architect, LLC Eagle, CO 81631 Fax: 970-328-0593 RO. Box 4701 Phone: 970-328-0592 w-johngmrbn.com john.martin@centurytel.net - Rattner Residence - ILL I Site Photos . ..L 4'. Location: 1215 East Hopkins Avenue _ 44 - L 1 . .2. 3 .41 Aspen ... .. 4 I ----1 â‚¬42 9 *M- f.l - I. ..: 14.9, 1, . -1 4-1- Â¥ *,4* I . r 41 I -4-3.1 *. 9 471.-1 .A"Â« .9 21 . - *Â· =4* - 4 - 4.I t. - /t ' Â«==27 * f e ~ _ ..1- E ... r.- 9 Te@= --- m=ge. -4 . 403 -7 7* :I F- - . . S '93 7 1 . I 1 ,- 21 $ Ye . --U- P. 4 4 . -1,52~---- k --0 - i I =Â·ti - ,Â£Â«12 . Â·-r- t . --C.-----i--r- t i --- - *2. .=0 - r L _, . --r - -Â·: . - '.1 .. ././.-,-a, 51 lf., r Â· Â·Â· =1 -4Â»~ - / 4 40% 53 4 L 4.. -27 ' 34 - O.Â·Â·#ti] ,. 1.11* '' John G. Martin, Architect, LLC Eagle, CO 81631 Far 970-328-0593 RO. Box 4701 Phone: 970-328-0592 www.johogunrtin.com john.martin*enturytel.net Â· Â·1 Rattner Residence - - Hopkins Ave. Photos 4 r. 5 -4~ Lit . Location: 1215 East Hopkins Avenue E'y ..er... .Wg. L Aspen .6.4 . 4 4 A v 4 . . Â» "99Â¥34-- V J .. . I .- Â»1 1 . - t li :u 4 2 1/#12 jâ‚¬k= 4 7 . k B. hel + r,7 1 - 1 4 11 2 22.3 2 -- IC_ ' - - 23 f 2Â»O6IL- -1 '*45 - - - . r I'*' I . .1 1 1,1. . dIA . $ '11 1,1.1111 11 Dill lili 111 , . 1 ' 1 I. 1- - I 0 ' - I 0 0 ..42* . *1,4!; , 1- 4 ... . .1 A - - .. di Â· Â·--. I Â·- . , / . 4. 41'.=.*frwr ...7 -J - tyetÂ·1Â¥4,0 1.-f ge- - t.i. 4/1/~240 t. .3 1 .i .t 5 I. 2,1 .* 7.. 3 ~ Â¢ 43. 1-:4 AL, 1. . - -.U-&- I 7-+-- .- 4 6're. f. i - .uÂ· I ./ r ...' < 1.2. Â·-1 11 1 .~. 4 - +=>,'.4. . tÂ· *W732, f v p A . 1 96Â·eu p , ./ 3 9 ,- .%3 ->,1 19% + r - 1 *: - - 41 .. * I. - - - -111. - //~ir :-I.E 1, .12, ' 4 - 7 Â¥2* h . . A 4-' . . .tâ‚¬ # , .*- i' 4. â‚¬ . 3 /5 -'0'.i.3 - 0 9 .....a-'"~6- - 'llht- 4~. ./.rk'll/"0 -9 - 4.- -â‚¬n 391-i...Se...i.,1...4 - : .1,Â·> 1 9 - ':1- P ...41 '- ! _-4,16'. Â·, =. - 03247#*7., - f>t~Â·. + Â· p f Â· ' _'sie'â€¢109?~,%Â·2,>,i"' 4 .5 -ct 1 '4 11-VE:,1 74 2?12~-3,4-9,32~' /2.' f. 'Ii/'416:- 2. -r. 75' $2 ./.- - 1. : 4, ' ,//' ---0- = 42, r ' f. P. - P- 15 - E. 2 4% 40Â£ Ah 11 1. '.. ... .1,f.#-L 7.1- 2 f .6 7 1 --. - . 4 1 , - .... F N# 9 t.*, 1 * . -1, *4*Z?-22:63.*fÂ·, -0.-4-41'*Al ,, -*. t.- 1/.: / . 4, . '- -' 4 4 /7 t 4, tfut,â€¢440'llp k i. i .5 1!*: adA -2.4. 0-1 -p-. f 21 . I.Illp : I ..LIN ..=2 11 - 1 J 1* *1 - -. I . .hy,Â¢*%: - 2 --A'* 4- ..' 4**J 4/' 154 4:+ i in,â‚¬.ff""960*/â€¢r . -el , :4% 4. 'lk W. - Â« T - jr-ts.13,=W-,63,16 4 4 Sy*Pl... 220#9'4%41#, 4 ty 1- J=Â£'F:0-95.A# f 14 *1 1;j=ri,â€¢~...,ci .~,Ir:-4. erua=..Â·~ 1 -'. ,Â¢A tk- .â€ž . -.$*Ag)/Fifi.3+6Â£Â·1 334Â»i ~ i71: u;* EJ, 0 , i. -1*'btâ€¢f'**~ rt IT- - - u & -0/ ilâ€¢ .-2. 'm=h-~r~-2iu 16*4*-M 12* 34?12&'4-V -1 4 I rr 1....... I. ATTACHMENT 5 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURE 1. Attend pre-application conference. During this one-on-one mecting, staff will determine the review process which applies to your development proposal and will identify the materials necessary to review your application, 2. Submit Development Application. Based on your pre-application meeting. you should respond to the application package and submit the requested number of copies of the complete application and the appropriate processing fee to the Community Development Department. 3. Determination of Completeness. Within five working days of the date of your submission. staff will review the application. and will notify you in writing whether the application is complete or if additional niaterials are required. Please be aware that the purpose ofthe completeness review is to delermine whether or not the inforniation you haiÂ·e submitted is adequate to review the request. and not whether the inforniation is sufficient to obtaiti approval. 4. Staff Re~ ien of Development Application. Once your application is determined to be complete. it will be reviewed by the staff for compliance with the applicable standards of the Code. During the Staff review staile. the application will be referred to other agencies for comments. The Planner assigned to your case or the agency may contact you if additional information is needed or if problems are identified. A memo will be wiitten by the staff mcinber for signature by the Commutlity Development Director. 01 he memo will explain whether your application complies with the Code and will list any conditions which should apply if the application is to be approved. Final approval of any Development Application which amends a recorded document. such as a plat. agreement or deed restriction, will require the applicant to prepare an I .- amended version of that document for review and approval by staff. Staff will provide the applicant Mith the applicable contents for the revised plat. while the City Attorney is normally in charge of the form for recorded aureements and deed restrictions. We suguest that you not go to the trouble or expense of preparing these documents until the staff has determined thal your application is eligible for the requested amendment or exemption. 5. Board Review of Applicathn. If a public hearing is required for the land use action that you are requesting. then the Planning Staff will schedule a hearing date for the application upon determination that the Application is complete. The hearing(s) will be scheduled before the appropriate reviewing board(s). The Applicant will be required to mail notice (one copy provided by the Community Development Department) to property owners within 300 feet of the Subject properly lind post nolice (sign available at the Community Development Department) of the public hearing on the site at least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing date (please see Attachment 6 for instructions). The 4 - 1- 2 / 77-2 NOV 0 8 2006 ..1, .,1 - ASPEN Planning Staff will publish notice of the hearine in the paper for land use requests that require publication. The Planning Staff uill then formulate a recommendation on the land use request and draft a memo to the reviewing board(s). Staff will supply the Applicant with a copy of the Planning Stafrs memo approximately 5 days prior to the hearing. The public hearing(s) will take place before the appropriate review boards. Public Hearings include a presentation by the }Mannine Staff. a presentation by the Applicant (optional), consideration of public comment. and the reviewing board's questions and decision. 6. Iss.:ince of Development Order. if the land use review is approved. then the Planning Staff will issue a Development Order which allows the Applicant to proceed into Building Permit Application. 7 ,. Receipt of Building Permit. Once you have received a copy of the signed stall approval. you ma> proceed to building permit review. 1)urine this time. your project will be examined for its compliance with the Uniform Building Code. It will also be checked for compliance with applicable provisions of the Land Use Regulations which were not reviewed in detail during the one step revie,4 (this might include a check of floor area ratios. selbacks, parking. open space and the like). Fees for water. sewer. parks and emplo> ee housing will be collected il due. An> document required to he recorded, such as a plat. deed restriction or agreement. will need to be reviewed and recorded before a Building Permit is submitted. -4 NOV 0 8 2006 ATTACHMENT 4-CONT'D- SUBMITTAL KEY 4 I L :ind l'.lÂ· Application with 12 Accurate ele) utions (in relation to system in the area of the proposed Applicarit's name. address and telephone mean sea level) ofthe k>Rest iloor, subdhia.ion Thecontent< ofthe plat shall number. contained within u lett:T bl,gned including bascment. ofall nes, or be of sufficient detail to determine by the applic= stating the tiarrle: address. subitatiliall) improved stluctures, a whether the proposed >lihdivmon ull] and telephone number of the venlication und recordatten of'the actit:11 Inect the design standards pur.ualit to repres:ntative authorized to act un behal!â„¢ elevation m relati<m to mean sea level to Lind lise Code Section 26 480 060(3120 of the app theiril which any sln,cture is constructed. a Subdiusion 01% Data. demen:tration that all ne.5 conctruetion or V 2 111. st,Â·ect addrÂ·e,% and legal obstantial improvement& Will be 21 A landscape plan dll)wing location, descriptiom of '.he parcel on Bhich anchored to prevent flotation. collapse or size. and nÂ·pe of proposed lai,dscape devclopment 11 propt,4rd to occur lateral inovement of any structure to be frattlrÂ¢5. C<)11,1:rl icted or improved. a demonqtration 1 3 4,1 disclowre (11 Ii.inerÂ·jhip of the thai the structure will have the kni'est 22 A subdivision plat which incet, the b parcel on which derÂ·elopment ib proposed Floor. inchiding. basement. elevated to at terms of this chapter. mid confoims to the 10 Ovell!. consistlng 01 0 curreill Cernficale least two (2} feet abi,vc the base Ilot,d requirements (,f this title indicat'ng that no ttom u title 11-Isulance Company. w :Imation aH as certified by a reg~btered turther fitbdi,ision nia)Â· he gramed for attorner licensed to placticÂ¢ in lic State o[' prolessiona] engiricer or architect these lots nor will additional units be built Colorado, listing the names o! all ownerS 1,Ithout receipt of appheable anprovals of theÂ· properbÂ·, and all mortgages. 13 A linidscapc plan thal includes pursuxil to this chapter and growth Judginents. liells. eakilit.:1115, contracts and int'.lic ve#:tutiu scrcemng 01 110 less :han mariageinmt allucatton purhuum le agrecmctils affecting the â€žincel, and fift\' 150) peleent ollile devek]11111(nt ab Chaptct 26.470, demonstrat:ny the owner'. nilit to applv viewed fwin the leal (skipe) 01'the parcel for tile 1-}cvelopment Application Al! i:xclative screening shall be 23 1-he precise w{}rding (,f any mailitanicd m perpituity and shall be proposed amendment. ~ 4. An H I.Â·2" A ]1" vieinitr map locating replaced with the same or comparable ihc subject pal 'Cl witi,in the C ity id material :hould 11 dic. 24 Site Plan or plan: drawn to a scale of ~ Aspen one ( 1"1 mch equals teri (103 teel or one 14 Site heitic),13 drawn b>Â·aictistered ( 1 ') tnell equals t,#1110 (20') teet. ~ 5. A file impro,ement survey including archirect, landscape mellirect, or incluiling before and - after" photographi 41â€žgraphyÂ· 2111(1 Ve.yetation sll,j\\Â·ing the inguicer sliall be submitted showing Hli (simulations) specifying the location of 1 (Unent status 01 the parce| cerlificd by 21 exubting and proposed Site elements. the antennas. support structures, transmiSGion i registcred land sun,e>.or, licensed m the top of slope. mid pertinent elevations buildings andy'or other accessory uses. 1 State 01 Colorado. (This requirement. or above sea lekel. access, parking. fences. signs. lighting, ! alty part thereof. may be waived by tile 1,111*cared area: and all adjacent land Comiliumly f)evelopment ])cpaltment 11 15. Propo,id rtrv:ititinN of the uses within one-hundred fifty (1 50') feet 11]e project is delerinined riu. to warant a JCE:loplncilt. 111(lild ny any iooftop Such plans and drawings should sllive) document.) equipment mid how it will be screened demon,trate Conipliance â€ž Rh the I-a iew Standards ofthis Section 4 1 6. A site plan dup:cline the proposed 16 Proposed elevations ot the I 1,0 Out al}d U1e ptl).ject S physical develorimmt. including ally iooftop 25. F.\A and FCC Courdination, iciationshÂ·* to the hind and it's :equipment a:id hew It will lie screened Statements regarding the regulations of burround},IKS il) c Federal Aviatioil Adminislration 1 7 A sketch plan 01 the site showmg (i-'AA) and Ihe Federal Communications A written description of the existing and 1,100:sed leatures which are Commi.sion (}Â·CL) propuhal and .1 w! itten explanation o j releunt tc) the Injew. how a Flopesed devel.lpillent complies 26 Structurnl Inteurit> Report from a wid, the r.Â·view staildtli-A relevant to the 18 One (11 inch Cquals four hundred piofessional engineer licensed in thc lic, Clopment application (400, t:et scale city map showing Inc State of Colorado location of the proposed subdivision. all 8 VIHIi ilitli 1.tist,nit :ind propt,bed ddjauent lands owned by or under option 27 Evidence that an effort uas made to gr:ide, at two-foot entouls. uith five-foot to the applicant, commonly known locate on an existine wirelesS m.:rial, Ibr 12:Â·ade. oper ten i 1 (1 ) peiÂ·cum land,mu k:, and] thiÂ· zontÂ· district in which telecommunication senÂ·ices tacility the proposed subdivision und adjacent sit- inchiding coverage.'; interference V~ 9. Proposed clevalions oftlie development pioperties tire located anal>Â·sis and capacity anal)'sis and a brle f Stittement as to other reasons for 10 A dewiptÂ·ion i )f pri i[*ned 19 4 A plat which reflects the layout of success or no succcÂ« cotistruction teeltitiques to be used. the lots. blocks ana structurc< in the proposed subdivision. The plat 410]1 428 Nei?.IiI)orhood block plan at 11 A FINn ..illithr ]011-year 110<id[)1:,in 41 dravn at a scale of oric A l) equals one I"-50' laiÂ·ailable from Cir) 1 n,glnecring , line and the high â€žatei ;ine. hundred (100) fect or larger. Architectuial Department) Graphicall> show thi front scales are not acceptable. Sheet size .shall portons of ail .Aisting buildne un both bc tuÂ·enty- four (24) inchn b; thirt, -six sides of the block and their setback from (36) inches If it 16 necessairto place the the street m ket IdentihÂ· pitrking and plat on more than a one (1) sheet, an index ftont entry fer cach building und locate m shall be included on thL. first shect A an, acces.or, ilipillint. linit, 11]ong the I vicinity map shaN also appear on the fint alle, . (Contiltued on next parte.) ~ sheet showing the subdivisionas t rclateb to the rebt uj the citiÂ· and the st,eet 0.9 r. 11 ' â€¢ NOV 0 8 2006 1 Indicate ishclher anv portions of the 35. E.UeriorÂ· 1.ighting Plan .F]}(84 the houses immediately 21*acent W tile location, height, tvpe and |timinous subject parcel are on: sion {Unly ime intensity of oneil above glade fixzure. hving level'}. Estimate tile :ile illumination as measured in foot can<fit< and indiide mininimn / 29 Roofl'lan. marimurn, and average illuminafton. Additionally. provide c{:mmrable 4 30. Photographic panorama. Show examples already in the community that clevations ofall bulldmgs on both sides of demonstrate technique. specification. and, the block. including present condition 01 ul light le, 91 11'tile\ exist the wbject propcit). 1.abel photos and mount on a presentation board ji. A condominittin sul,diviNion exemption plat diawn with perinanent ink on fept;Ju.,ble mylal Sheet size blm}| 'tle twenty-four (24) miles b> thirt>.six (36) inches with an wiencumbered margin 01 1% a,id one-half ( 1 1 2) zi-tches on the left hand side of h e x hect and none-h.ill (1Â·2) inch margin around the other three (3 : sides of theÂ· sheet pt:!suant w Land Use Code Section 26 480090. ~ 32 A deNCription andsite plan ofthe I proposed development licluding a statement 4,1 the objectivei to be achieved b> the PLT) and a descriptic,n of the Â· pr:,posed land uses. densiticb. natural I features traffic and pedestrian circulation, I off-street parking. open space areas. infrastructure improvements. and site drainage. 33. An vichitecturn] character plan generall) indicating the use, massing, . scale. and orientation of the proposed : buldings 34. A written debc,Â·iption of the varianc: being requested t R 11 ./ NOV 0 8 2006 ATTACHMENT 6 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Three forms of notice are required by the Aspen Land Use Regulations: publication in the newspaper, posting oftlle property, and mailing to surrounding landowners. Fc,]louing is a summary of the 11otice requirements. including identification of H.ho is responsible for completing the notice. 1. Publication - Publication of notice in a paper of general Circulation in the City of Aspen is to be done at least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. The legal notice will be written by the Conimunity Development Department and we will place the notice in the paper within the appropriate deadline. 2. Posting - Posting of a sign in a conspicuous place on the properly is to be done fifteen ( 15) days prior to the hearing. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the sign from the Community Deve]Opment Department. to fill it in correctly and to brine proof to the hearing thar posting zook place (use attached affidavit). 3. Mailing - Mailing of notice is to be made to all owners ofproperly within 300 feet of the subject de,elopinent parcel by the applicant. Il is the applicanfs responsibility to obtain a copy of the notice from the Community Development Department. to mail it according to the following standards, and to bring proof to the hearing that the mailing took place (use attached aftidavit). Notice to nlineral }istate Owner. An Applicant for surface Development shall notify affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for tile initial public hearing on the application for dej elopment. The applicant shall certify that the notice has been prouded to the mineral estate owners. The names and addresses of properly owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of public henrin u. j 62.. L NOV 0 8 2006 A recrel 1 \1 31/1! ry,Â· John G. Martin, Architect, LLC RO. Box 4701 Phone: 970-328-0592 Eagle, CO 81631 I;ax: 970-328-0593 www.johngunrhoom john.martin*enturytelnet Rattner Residence - Location Map Date: 11/7/2006 - . L . 1.4 . Location: 1215 East Hopkins Avenue A r i. 4% I :Ii $44 (Lot 4, Promentory Subdivision) ak .7 Aspen .4 .... 4 4 . 04 ..9 I = 4 317# 1-* ' -3= - , "-31Â£T i.l 3=15~ - 7 : & i S . 45 - , flfi~'~6 . AddjA'8'~=1-~,_23 - -i & . - f 31341. . a. , 4. 12.W m rM?,9- 3 7 io ~_4Gd,1 lEi- V j 4 Â», 320 .. 2= .7 .6 - Al 1 311,_, .15 f Â¥4'*pr 1/./- '*/ Â£221 1,14,10'2%, 1 60929Ibl Ah RiÂ·arside .Addlion -- - ' |~23/ 1/li 436 0 4~ 1-8'k..9.,~*9 Htil Le,1 -SÂ·,111 - - --r .i*/6..illi - 2. --: * .4 - t*f = 1211 " L .1 1 71\t ,= - 4 -,- - ' - tr :312 1.~ 2 4,28-4 12/~* * -d- __ h. - -*1; Age<. 4 - Ju kati 26*_ - 1 -70444 - 0 .12 :YE H , PKINS AVE 1203 1 .-- ... . 1207. 1211//1215B ..-- .r 9 ~ 4-/ Â· Â· ~p< *~ / 1 =.1 9- f t 'll.: 95% 253.d-#14. -- r,3. 1 1' & Part-Dale Â£ 2 -E -t . 1 3 E.ny<le, Park PO\~|~ -3 Â·-inÂ·in,m11,321 - -45*V,9 --/cy - 'EFCA -1 214 ,-:U -, 1,3.1 1 - 5 - .*ha,1 J 'ers, 1 1;~i-=Vi /--- 4 7 CA. e f . Â»AVE=2*. X 211 -~-f.~ 1 w~ f E I 2 I + e I - 10) >17- --V Lk . 23 -. -~ :201 *- r -- . - 1-1Dt~â€¢Â»0 - &131Â»84& &145 6:n pi 1, 4 - - 125*~ i. - 42 ... % 1 Nâ€¢ I 430cre~ned'â€¢771A-c~VS Ccr,mgÂ· *Cr 1932 X05[5@Rth: 1 4 7 '71/' 73Â·e ..0 . 1 ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION APP[IC.ANT: Name: 5 TeÂ° F>+1 9 hi Â¢2Â»= frj Er I.l)Calion: /2.PET E- 1-frlf>#Â£9'~1 6 A\42. / 1,DT Â£1, flikâ€ž* â€¢ -i r:4Â»r' 0. 'Â·Rif-2 , 11~ jet. 1 3 (Indicate street address. lot & block number. legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID = (REQUIRED) 3-7 37 - 10' - 07 -001 REPRESENTATIZ'E: Name: ./1 3, 4 127ft.Â·\ 2,1 *31% Address: 1 7; R,> <R .4 K:UiÂ©k-k) Py , 1/s. : AS, Â¥EAS . co 334441 & Phone #: 970)144 -fÂ»f *46 /,/1 PROJECT: Vallie: 12#-'"fri /E P ty Ch.-. r, in Address: 10 4%6 6,1,{AETA Atairrjosr., D-C- - ffi~'(* 470\ FEALL/,Co 9,)kcgi Phone #: (37 01 3 2 0 -.rpc, 0. -2 L. , G TYPE OF Apl)1,[CA [ ION: (please check al! that apply) Ed Conditional Use U Conceptual PUD I Conceptual Historic Devt. L Special Review' U Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) 2 Final Historic Development 3@1 Desien Review Appeal L] Conceptual SPA U Minor I listoric Devt. Ld GMQS Allotment E Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) 2 Historic Demolition U GMOS Exemption U Subdis ision Â£ Historic Designation U ESA - 8040 Greentine. Stream D Subdi& ision Exemption (includes L] Small ].odge Conversion, Martin. Hallam Lake Bluff. c 01 1 dom hi i u n 1 i zat i 0,1 ) Expansion Mountain View Plane E Lot Split U Temporary Use 0 other: 2 Lot ].ine .Adjustment U Text/Map Amendment EXISTING CONDI'FIONA: (description of existing buildings. uses, previous approvals. etc.) 3-1.40 1=)Eupsy,3-Of }-44 /\01 '44â‚¬.FA OF (2..P76) coi c , A & 1 0 1_rf>,2 rr (1 iÂ»1 ' 7-0 .t- CO,.4 R Â· r Dr #50Â£401. e t.* ST +iftv 6 1<fi >*-1 6 ,h,1 55 ft,3< 1 Pi.Ar.*, A. '. Â» t 5 A SMALL /Â»1043â‚¬ CuÂ£*fr,rety (j,40Â£61Â¥,eIE'07 fifTS O,i..) THE doÂ¥*rk< Et.10> 29~F 77,(fr. LO-T 1 PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings. uses. modifications. elc.) --54,1 ,Exi â‚¬ f-~4)Â£., f>Tki,Â©71/ity k.,41,Â·A.- 25-Flb>El#'f #5 +1Â·639 )46â€¢1:,A M t.:AN trfe:,*4. 5-;pd,n r Â· t<&6"/#, 'r | Â· '*trtÂ·Â·per.ZE 04; /47'Feck 2 4%27 54.;7 FAK . 62 9 01Â£'FAA )00: 45-2014 crkA/3 /Aji f."ffÂ«:ELY,-.,flk) 07 13* r,tz:t): f.' PAR C25 IS *StÂ»Ct '42..I ate}E~51'â‚¬22. Have you attached the following 7 FrÂ·re nurÂ· â‚¬ /._el 07 00 E Pre-Application Conference Summary M' Attachment # 1. Signed Fee Agreement Â® Response to Attachment #3. Diniensional Requirements Fonii Â® Response to Attachment #4. Subinittit[ Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards Al| plans that itÂ·elarger than 8.5" x 11" must be folded and a tloppy disk with an electronic copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must bc submitted as part of the application. -. #7 .3,= 7 1 4/2/ RETAIN FOR PERMANENT RECORD NOV 0 8 2006 ASPEN J 'TAMENT 0 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement luz Pavment 01 Cit, of Aspen De, elor)mcÂ·nt Am,licalion Fees 1 1 CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and >~.9 AP ~04 ~'2/ ' f /9272>01 1~ %~ (liereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for 1 /2/5- 6% /9,20Â«.7 (hercinafter, THE PROJECT). 2 APPLICAN'! understands und agrees thal City of Aspen Ordinatice No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fbe structure for Land Use applications und the plivment of all processine fi'cs is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness s. APPLICANT and CITY agree thal because of the size. nature or scope of the proposed pr-0.lect. 11 12 not possible at this lirne to ascerlain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the tipplication APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the intel-est ofthe parties that APPLICANT make payment o fan initial deposit and to thereÂ·after permit additional costs lo be billed k, APPLICANT on a monthl> basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and:'or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining treater cash liquidity and will make - additional payinents upon notification by the C]TY when 1 hc)Â· are necessary as costs are incurred, CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its l'till costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4 CITY and APPLICAN 1 further agree that it is impracticable for C l I Y staff to complete processing or pre.sent sufficient inforination to the Planning Commission anctor City Council to enable the Planning Commission andior City Council to make legally required rindings for prolect con:ideration, unless current billings are paid iii full prior to decision. 5 Therefore, APPLICANT aerees that in consideration ofilic Cl 1 Y -s waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of' applicati,)]i completeness. APPI.!CANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of S which is for -- hours of Community Development staff i time, and if actual recorded costs erceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional morithl> billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above. including post approval revic:% at a rate of S220,00 per planner hour uier the initial deposit, Such periodic payments shall be made uÂ·ithin 30 days of tile billing date. APP[.It.'ANT further agrees that failure to pa> such accrued costs sliall be grounds for suspension ofprocessing. and in no case will building peililits be issued until all costs associated with case procesqing have been paid. CrrY OF ASPEN A P [}L 1 (. A.N.11.-10Â« By: By:, Julie Ann Woods Community Development 1)irector Date: 4 -ll (9 ~CLO ililli{12 Addi-cs; and Telephone Noinber: Rd'<itij red / 7 ( Pi u<) 6-6 Â·09 /1 ' A>*ea (0 1 1 62/1 94 1 -EX/ g O g:,support\forms *:,grpayas.(loc 11/30/{14 r- 1 -D NOV 0 8 2006 RETAIN FOR PERMANENT RECORD ASPEN Pf Ii! r"- r - 0-*..... -7 0 -IN- I - 1 1 I I 1 1 i j I 1 LAT 7 l SLOPES 20-30% = 356 sq. ft. 2' 20% t r...il ~ , ASEI JOB , 21| 50% | SHED NO. 13060 IC)' SLOPES > 30% = 1,014 sq. ft. 1 N 01046'14"E 112.86' CALCULATg FRO),1 11&~pRD Basis oF BEARINGS 01-8" 7..,wi,dwivvâ€žj. _ --012**, 293*4, WODD RETAININ . L --- -- -41;YLLA~~ 1 ------ 0 -- --~-- --',.~ 22*es U:Sl*27 ~ /45 ~' ESgrc:EP/~=,4â€¢oe,z~* I .74*#F Fl / SIDE SETBACK ~ 14\ 111/11: PARKING \ 0/ 1 , _ _ 27_22' 2-rn-,1- 1-- - .1,~~2/-2-L-- MVEL j 1::4: 3: e . - --- - - BOULDE *Lf / F ..' .41 ~1 AREA OF ACCESS EASEMENT = 49 sq. ft. '~'~9 Â». '. BOULDER i>99 BOUL~Ry , 1///*1 0\F r / / 2 23 0 Â® -' EXISTING HOUSE TO / 30. 4/ ' 1 1-'11 5.1,1 1 14**48#$4 BE DEMOLISHED ~.= 4 E /08 -9 .Vf Â·21:l.~1(Mq,d,97~mE(<Â·900Â·~~w)9 10 *: 3 x.~--- ~â€ž h 1 9 26.575-020 Colculot;ons and measurements. 2 - V *.44*du~p# 0~*cilowÂ·Â·,imil M:; .;c E .$;MOOM.Â¢ ...~- 1/ C. Lot Area, 4 ,/ M 9 -E /, 448&-Whwr~: i.'~~ ' .1~~) '11'~ ~ ;Alil~w:~1/ 4 10. '.1. It N . v FlifilkW~iBFU 8 2 when calculating floor oreo ratio, lot oreos shall ~ 1 - - include only areas with o slope of less than 20%. /- // In addition, half (.50) of lot areas With o slope of -~ Al \/ U) M se N E EXISTING GRADE / 4 20-30* may be counted towards floor oreo rot;o, LINES. TYP. ~'f \ 2 Areas With slopes of greater thon 30% shall be 0 4 9 -4 1 1 --- 4 2 1 - excluded. The total reduction in FAR attributable to E & 51 Â£0 1 --- 6 0 22 slope reduction for o given site shall not exceed ,/ /2 42 25% R' 'i .' 1 .1 : M! !10 :: : ~t ,It~ t!'11~!111.!(114- ~ "'O 62:W .. I -*= ,/ 123 4 Also excluded from total lot area ... Is that oreo ...Within an existing or proposed dedicoted EXISITING BOULDER Â© I ' 10 - right-of-Way or surface easement, I :.. 13 RETAINING WALLS U> 0\ b 8 .il. .- - - LOT AREA = 6,170 SQ. FT. LO ~' /1\ T'.'2...1.91 .LI' jÂ©V 6< 11 5 8 06 ... /*Hb Â«10 . A BOULDER - eec SUBTRACT AREAS: 7946 ~~/'~*~08888/~8/ (SHALL NOT EXCEED 25% = 1,542.5 50. FT.1 â‚¬ 3 f -1 (S 03037' 80 47' __ __ ~ 02 .R \ AREAS BETWEEN 20% AND 30% SLOPES \ 356 SO. FT. (50% COUNTED) = 178 SQ. FT. 6 00 EXISTING LARGE _ EXISTING EDGE OF \I TREES, TYP. ~ PAVEMENT - -- AREAS EXCEEDING 30% SLOPES = 1,014 SQ. FT, + - 7948 AREAS OF ACCESS FASFUENT = 49 SQ. FT, 9 ==4 tz (92 MIDLAND AVENUE 3 5 LOT AREA TOTAL (FOR FAR) =| 4,929 SQ. FT. ROW. WIDTH UNPLATTED r./12 (7 EXISTING CONDITIONS - SITE PLAN CD [1 1 @lea onSSI :SUOISIA@}i :91101[ns{[00 201 @moH 41 loquinN }09[[S 900Z-Â£10- 1 1 :dolaAec] u&.52(] N 752* -*54-81') 096Z IMPqns Â£[ojugmoid 't JOI r . -1 I --I... -- 1 -7 1 1 i j 1 1 GRADE INTERPOLATION NOTE: ~ THE ARCHITECT HAS PROPOSED THE INTERPOLATION OF Fer.91 GRADE LINES TO SHOW WHAT THE CONTOURS WOULD , 02*41 SLOPES 20-30% = 290 sq. ft. 2'~ 20% -- HAVE LOOKED LIKE HAD THE SITE NOT BEEN SCRAPED , ~ teÂ·<Â°41 10 I FLAT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE EXISTING HOUSE. SLOPES > 30% = 135 sq ft. THE INTERPOLATED LOT LINES CONNECT TO THE EXISTING GRADE LINES AT THE PROPERTY LINES, BUT LOT 3 HAVE A MORE NATURAL AND GENTLE SLOPE WHICH 6.6. CLOSELY MATCHES THE SLOPE OF THE STREET. # , ASEI JOB , NO. 13060 1 SHED 1 N 01046'14"E 112.86' CALCULAIEDâ€žFROM RECpRD BASIS OF BEARINGS WOOD RETAININGL - - - - - -.,~~~~~~~~~~~~~- - ~~~~~~~ ------ -ru --~-@ESP;%2=2~ */4\27Â»~Â«UG:=P 1 17'liN *4&9' / AREA OF ACCESS EASEMENT = 49 sq. ft PARKING \ / ' -I Y) -----1~- ---1 i ' ~'I-i::2-:"",31=i: '1196> BOUL ~~~~ BOULDER;' ~ , 3, / 1 u 0 52 , 1 90 \ / / ' ac -3 8 21 ' 1 - 902 m \ \ / / g 1 - -- ---- 26.575.020 Calculations and measurements. \\ / N '' . o C, Lot Area, 12 â€žif ~; When calculating floor areo ratio. lot areas shall .Â¥ 1 1 Mi /\-\ 1---- \\\ 1 , -V} include only areas With a slope of less than 205. 24 In addition, half (.50) of lot areas with a slope of .S l - .9 j \ 1 2 0 20-30% may be counted towards floor orea ratio. 19 - -i f 1 / \/ \ 7 0/ Areas With slopes of greater than 30K shall be Â£ 1 / If 1 8 excluded. The total reduction in FAR attributable to /0 j ~ ~ ~/ slope reduction for o given site shall not exceed 4 25% -@ g 2 2// / \ 1 2 11 l / AM EXISTING GRADE c Also excluded from total lot area ... is that area - M :2 lf) = Â· ...Within an existing or proposed dedicated CONTOUR LINES, 11 3 1 Mp- /:/, 0 44 right-of-Way or surface easement, R '94 / PROPOSED NUN / 13 INTERPOLATED / GRADE LINES, LOT AREA = 6,170 SQ. FT. 1 1 \ ul 0\ SUETRACT AREAS; L . 1 40 j (SHALL NOT EXCEED 25% = 1,542,5 SQ, FT.) = â€ž* -- 11 111 | ALT. FVNT SE-1-akcK k BOULDEBR -- AREAS BET*EEN 20% AND 30% SLOPES - 2. U 1 Â·2 - - 146 290 SO, FT, (50% COUNTED) = 145 SQ, FT. 20 4-S 4Â»\/Ne\:le'lol U 1 16Â«4Â«347 L-6-1/ 1 \~.....~.E.....~ -Ir - - Brjoims-r -2-=41-- Â«21_ - - - AREAS EXCEEDING 30% SLOPES = 135 SQ, FT. -0 2 \ -1 a.= \ AREAS OF ACCFSS FASFUENT = 49 SO. FT, .- 1% LOT AREA TOTAL (FOR FAR) =~ 5,841 SO. F-T. 1 2 22 7948 U U MIDI..AND AVENIYE C,1 R.O.W, WIDTH UNPLATTED 0 EXISTING SITE PLAN WITH INTERPOLATED GRADES 1 C.4 1/16* = 1.-0. E C.) 900Z-80- L 1 :dolaA@Q ublsaa 0 ra #nssI SUOISIA@H :Sluminsuoo ETBACK 096L ____ 'u IMPqnS itoluamold 't }01 -*---- 1 1 ! i 1 1 1 (,T :1 / t~ SLOPES 20-30% = 356 sq. ft. 21~-20% kyÂ«\31 10' , ASEI JOB , NO. 13060 ~ SHED ~ SLOPES > 30% == 1.014 sq, ft. 2 ~= - pa N 01046'14"E 112.86' CALCULATED,FROM IKEgpRD BASIS OF BEARINGS g u 1 ~ SIDE SETBACK ,,* PARKING \// ~ 3 BOULDER#:Sits##N-- *, --*~I=. 56 --***--:Lr--------- -/ \,-/ * 138%*1 AREA OF ACCESS EASEMENT = 49 sq. H. I - /2/21 I , / 1 / Al. 2 4%3 M EXISTING HOUSE TO ~ 27# \/ -/ -0 BE DE~OLISHED = :% 22 * E -'Â·~*, 5",~11â€ž',fyUM'!Me:40'1T.-'Â·~'Â·1':Â·1Â·; : 6,1,it;,ii,i:i i.i:,d K J 44%1~Ili<'1,11 4:4 Mi:)111[ix. b 'I '*:Ii.,9,h':~ L,1:[:1;! 01.,01:,i, \ ~ 4 0 26.575.020 Calculations ond measurements. -4 4 C, Lot Area, / ~/ ~ 2 When calculating floor areo ratio, lot areas shall - ms= i & 5/ \ ' ' include only areas With o slope of less than 201 .S -14- â€¢==c: 2!EE-rE'EEE!59 i 1 6 40 al / / / In addition, half (.50) of lot areas With o slope of rv-Â·Â·Â·wirâ€¢Rrt-1- -1=.*trttkRkt.7*~T---/- EXISTING GRADE ; 20-30% may be counted towards floor area ratio, LINES, TYP. , i X Areas with slopes of greater thorn 30% shall be 0 + e .2. 4 7 m# 2 2 \ . excluded. The total reduction in FAR attributable to -m "3 slope reduction for o given site sholl not exceed 7944 25%. 'll- R 1 2-55! !655522;51522;522; ''' / 64 Also excluded from total lot oreo ... is that oreo â€ž.Within an existing or proposed dedicated -:\ f/, lk- : 0 10 - right-of-way or surface easement, EXISITING BOULDER RETAINING WALLS _-J it - 6 // L -1-Â»- -- - s - . LOT AREA = 6,170 SQ. FT. 1671 1\ Â»off) a< 4. BOULDER A ~ GO:9 , e ~ 0 ' SUBTRACT AREAS: = mit 7946 (SHALL NOT EXCEED 25% = 1,542.5 SQ. FT,1 / 1 10.-o. _1 (S 03037 80.47')1 =--/ 4.32 1 \ AREAS BETWEEN 20% AND 30% SLOPES - 0 356 SO. FT. (50% COUNTED) = 178 SO. FT. EXISTING EDGE OF 0 -~ f~ ~0 TREES, TYP. ~PAVEMENT --- AREAS EXCEEDING 30% SLOPES = 1,014 SQ. FT, .821 P.-1 1* EXISTING LARGE - 7948 AREAS OF ACCFSS FASEMENT = 49 SQ. FT. 0 -- - MIDLAND AVENUE U S LOT AREA TOTAL (FOR FAR) = 4,929 SO. FT. 5 92 R.O.W, WIDTH UNPLATTED ~ EXISTING CONDITIONS - SITE PLAN ~ ~ 1/16" - 1'-0* gle([ onssI SUOISIA@}[ 9002-80- 1 1 -doleAaa uoisao 0) 'uodsÂ¥ 'uo!Â§!1!PqnS A.Iojugm04[ 4 301 096Â£____ 0 r A -1 , I %-Il i I. --Il- 1 ---- I-- .... 1 n ! j 1 1 GRADE INTERPOLATION NOTE: THE ARCHITECT HAS PROPOSED THE INTERPOLATION OF 6=35371 GRADE LINES TO SHOW WHAT THE CONTOURS WOULD # riZed SLOPES 20-30% = 290 sq. ft 2'| 2096 - HAVE LOOKED LIKE HAD THE SITE NOT BEEN SCRAPED , AXÂ·41 10' FLAT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE EXISTING HOUSE. EXISTING GRADE LINES AT THE PROPERTY LINES, BUT ~ ~ SLOPES > 30% = 135 sq. ft. THE INTERPOLATED LOT LINES CONNECT TO THE , 11)1' 3 HAVE A MORE NATURAL AND GENTLE SLOPE WHICH mili CLOSELY MATCHES THE SLOPE OF THE STREET. 1 , ASEI JOB , NO. 13060 6'-Bâ€¢ 1 SHED 1 N 01046'14"E 112.86' CALCULA-1*,FROU REE)RD BASIS OF BEARINGS WOOD RETAININGeÂ· L -- - - .rM717-..W/Anw,40,# - -9#&2(68 2&*,3,24 --- 19 49 . SETBACK /0 ~%&~3~~~ - - 1 / ~ AREA OF ACCESS EASEMENT = 49 sq. ft. 449 *MA-<=49 ; zEL_>2Btr,A..3-_ _.1~~-_-1.-7171-1 -a\ r9La / PARKING \ 0 / / Ii/ " . .2 BOULOCR,1 , ~ - -_- -~ ~ C.-> s: SR 24 --3 5,~ i , , / 0 12 33 3 'Â· r' 2 26.575.020 Calculations and measurements. .22 E ST \\ = a C. Lot Area. 128 \ \ \ N' / 3 t= ,70 5 When calculating floor areo ratio, lot areas shall f V \ \ \ : // -10 include only areas with o slope of less than 201. In addition, half (.50) of lot areas With a slope of , 4 f li --\ \ 1 1/ Areas with slopes of greater than 30% shall be 3 - ii 4 9 20-30% may be counted towards floor area ratio. 5/ \ / \ L e If - e slope reduction for o given site shall not exceed c excludedÂ· The total reduction in FAR attributable to . 9 251 \11 ~ Ex\STING GRADE f < & 1 7 Also excluded from total lot area - Is that area ..Within on existing or proposed ded;cated CONTOUR LINES. &4& - W 1 TYP. | right-of-Way or surface easement, / 1% 794 R 9 / PROPOSED | ,/ 1% / 12 INTERPOLATED 0 / GRADE LINES, | IC' to- u 0 TYP. \ LOT AREA = 6,170 SQ. FT. . 0 2 2 6 L--1$---..-1-4--1- 42\ SUBTRACT AREAS. m â‚¬ 0 3 --- \ (SHALL NOT EXCEED 25% = 1,542.5 SQ, FT.1 =â€ž*04 1 // 1 ALT, Ff~ONT 5ETB~4614 - 7946 LOT~ 1\~14 - AREAS BETWEEN 20% AND 30% SLOPES - 3 29 < .0: I KNAÂ«\ x f 6. BJULDERS M.*44 3 _ Py693>3iho, I ~ 290 SO. FT. (50% COUNTED) = 145 SQ, FT. -Â§ 190 .m 1 , -- ir - - BOOLDERS- - _ -7 - f -â‚¬ 1 -9 10'-0. 5 (S 03037'W 80.47 - AREAS EXCEEDING 30% SLOPES = 135 so, FT, \ 46 a Â£ \ AREAS OF ACCFSS_FASFMENT = 49 SO. FT, a -CO .% 1 LOT AREA TOTAL (FOR FAR) = 5,841 SQ. FT. 3 #ex 0 == 1 = 092 - 7948 C./11 AnDLAND AVENUE R.O.W. WIDTH UNPLATTED ~ 1/16. = 1'-0. , 23 EXISTING SITE PLAN WITH INTERPOLATED GRADES goor-80- 1 1 :dol@Aeo u6:saa 10 tr~ d 0 EC onssi SUOISIA@H SluelInsuoi 41 O 6 A.[0 ju@mog 4 401 096Â£ ---~ AloPK INS 50. R O,W. SCALED V - NO.5 RE-BA e 3.8 (8 25.06.6 (238 74 ' }' GRA L PA ING 0 4F DL 54 DL 7' 41~ 4"F DL 5 RED 3317 8'D DL It' 7946,97 t 2â€¢7-F 9 DL 5 Â¢ 4 5.D f Â·S DL 9 0 SILL 7943.65 DL 7 9 . 4, 0 \ E \ HOUSE -- 'OF DL 6 2 64 OL 7 34-&*/01 .0 / 1,0 Â® Ul -#-1-W-* 2 LINES Â· - 1 2.7 7 ---k-- *-i.*.I-I Â« DL 12'- b / a ~17 4 2~ 0 - NABLE TO SET DL 8' 2 - \20 4 -- OOSE BOULDRES 111 117 0 DL 8 \ LU 9-F â€¢ DL 6' T G 90* 1 / DL-6 &5 f.//2 0 24 RTABLE SPA ,* 0 2â€¢67 DL 12' DL 8 -4- 9 \ 6-D DL 8 BOULDER ,- j 25;f / 4 f j. 16-F 4 3 OL 7' E kz 946 2â€¢7'D - DL 10' 7 R 1 0 /// 1 .: 2 0 W 0 ' BOULDER .D - L 7 I ~1~.4 6 ) ~-*Â«El UN---Â»A 9â‚¬0 2 DL 7'9,21(4AZW 1/2 DIA. PIPE ACCESS EASEMENT RED 9018 0.3' EAST REC. NO. 105869 1 LLOW 16842 3â€¢7.D / Â©46 DL 10 9 h.41.8/,) 64 SPIKE OYELLOW CAP BELOW PAVEMEI 15.5' WC ON SOUTH BOUND, LOT 5 ASEI JOB kIA 09 30 86' CAL ECORD BASIS OF BEAR+NG6 7942 C S 02'55 *4 ~ ~ 0311Â¥ldNA Hia IM *M-0-8 ~94449/ , ANHAY GNVUG IPY .Z 09 John Q Martin, Architect, LLC RO. Box 4701 Phone: 970-328-0592 Eagle, CO 81631 Fax: 970-328-0593 www.johngmartin.oom john.martin@centurytel.net Request for staff interpretation - Interpolated Site Contours To Whom It May Concern: Adam Rothberg (Project Manager and Owner Representative) and John G. Martin (Architect of project) representing the owner Stephen Rattner, met with James Lindt and Todd Grange, City of Aspen Community Development Department Planners, for a pre-application conference at 10:00 am November 6,2006. We discussed the new-construction development project ofa single-family home at the property located at 1215 East Hopkins Avenue (Lot 4, Promentory Subdivision). As a result of issues discussed at that meeting, we respectfully submit this request for staff interpretation regarding existing contour grades at the subject property. The following is an excerpt from 26.104.100 - Calculations and Measurements - City of Aspen Land Use Code: C. Lot Area. Except in the Rl 5-B zone district, when calculating.floor area ratio, lot areas shall include only areas with a slope of less than 20%. In addition, half (.50) of lot areas with a slope of 20-30% may be counted towards jloor area ratio, areas with slopes of greater than 30% shall be excluded. The total reduction in FAR attributable to slope reduction for a given site shall not exceed 25%. Also excluded from total lot area for the purpose offloor area calculations in all zone districts is that area beneath the high water line of a body ofwater and that area within a vacated right-0.Away, or within an existing or proposed dedicated right-of-way or surface easement. Lot area shall include any lands dedicated to the City of Aspen or Pitkin County for the public trail system, any open irrigation ditch, or any lands subject to an above ground or below ground surface easement such as utilities that do not coincide with road easements. When calculating density, lot area shall have the same exclusions and inclusions as for calculating floor area ratio exceptfor exclusion ofareas of greater than 20% slope. Rationale for granting contour interpolation: The corner lot is small and actually non-conforming in Minimum Lot Width in R-6 Zoning. The contours have been scraped in an un-natural way to create a flat area for the existing house on the lot. Since the lot has been flattened on the northern side, the contours are very steep as they climb back up to meet the natural grade ofthe street along Midland Avenue. This creates an unnatural bowl effect in the lot which is made worse by the use of a steep and tall non-conforming boulder wall along a good portion of lot edge near the corner of Midland and Hopkins Avenues. The unnatural man-made grading is causing a large reduction in the amount of lot area that we can use for F.A.R calculations. This is causing what we determine to be an unfair reduction of F.A.R. based on arbitrary grade lines which do not reflect the actual gentle slopes that would have been present on this lot prior to the previous development. We feel that if we could have the grades interpolated to match what would have been a more natural and gradual grading of the site, we would have F.A.R. available to us that would more closely match the other lots on this street and the neighborhood in general. The architect has provided two existing site plans as reference for this argument. The existing site plan shows the existing contours and hatching representing a large area of grades over 20%. The existing site plan with interpolated grades still shows some areas ofhatching representing grades over 20%, but there is not nearly as much allowing us to increase, in a equitable way, the F.A.R. that should be associated with this lot. The grades are shown as more natural and sloping gently, matching the slopes of the street. Therefore, we respectfully request that an approval regarding contour interpolation as it applies to the unnatural and arbitrary grading of the previous development on this particular site, be granted. Sincerely, John G. Martin NOV 0 8 2006 John G. Martin, Architect, LLC RO. Box 4701 Phone: 970-328-0592 Eagle, CO 81631 Fax: 970-328-0593 www.johngnurtin.com john.martin@centurytel.net Request for staff interpretation - Interpolated Site Contours To Whom It May Concern: Adam Rothberg (Project Manager and Owner Representative) and John G. Martin (Architect of project) representing the owner Stephen Rattner, met with James Lindt and Todd Grange, City of Aspen Community Development Department Planners, for a pre-application conference at 10:00 am November 6,2006. We discussed the new-construction development project of a single-family home at the property located at 1215 East Hopkins Avenue (Lot 4. Promentory Subdivision). As a result of issues discussed at that meeting, we respectfully submit this request for staff interpretation regarding existing contour grades at the subject property. The following is an excerpt from 26.104.100 - Calculations and Measurements - City ofAspen Land Use Code: C. Lot Area. Except in the Rl 5-B zone district, u'hen calculating floor area ratio, lot areas shall include only areas with a slope ofless than 20%. In addition, half (.50) oflot areas with a slope of 20-30% may be counted towards floor area ratio; areas with slopes of greater than 30% shall be excluded. The total reduction in FAR attributable to slope reduction for a given site shall not exceed 25% Also excluded.from total lot areafor the purpose of.floor area calculations in all zone districts is that area beneath the high water line of a body of water and that area within a vacated right-oAway, or within an existing or proposed dedicated right-of-way or surface easement. Lot area shall include any lands dedicated to the City of Aspen or Pitkin County for the public trail system, any open irrigation ditch, or any lands subject to an above ground or below ground surface easement such as utilities that do not coincide with road easements. When calculating density, lot area shall have the same exclusions and inclusiotis as.for calculating.floor area ratio exceptfor exclusion of areas of greater than 20% slope. Rationale for granting contour interpolation: The corner lot is small and actually non-conforming in Minimum Lot Width in R-6 Zoning. The contours have been scraped in an un-natural way to create a flat area for the existing house on the lot. Since the lot has been flattened on the northern side, the contours are very steep as they climb back up to meet the natural grade of the street along Midland Avenue. This creates an unnatural bowl effect in the lot which is made worse by the use of a steep and tall non-conforming boulder wall along a good portion of lot edge near the corner of Midland and Hopkins Avenues. The unnatural man-made grading is causing a large reduction in the amount of lot area that we can use for F.A.R calculations. This is causing what we determine to be an unfair reduction of F.A.R. based on arbitrary grade lines which do not reflect the actual gentle slopes that would have been present on this lot prior to the previous development. We feel that i f we could have the grades intel-polated to match what would have been a more natural and gradual grading of the site, we would have F.A.R. available to us that would more closely match the other lots on this street and the neighborhood in general. The architect has provided two existing site plans as reference for this argument. The existing site plan shows the existing contours and hatching representing a large area of grades over 20%. The existing site plan with interpolated grades still shows some areas of hatching representing grades over 20%, but there is not nearly as much allowing us to increase, in a equitable way, the F.A.R. that should be associated with this lot. The grades are shown as more natural and sloping gently, matching the slopes of the street. Therefore, we respectfully request that an approval regarding contour interpolation as it applies to the unnatural and arbitrary grading of the previous development on this particular site, be granted. Sincerely, 9â‚¬0 L Affi NOV C K 2033 John G. Martin 1 l ; .2 u u: ..2 I.. ~I '*,3~*'f'*f'.4:1Â£~~.;':.LA~~ M -..4 ~~- 3Â·,-~~~-~-'~,,~~~~.~IRI>~iy '~ , 1 -'t- ...ir.147'Figjr,7fc.. 4. / ~ # . i . S- ... k ...44/6 .-'Â·:Â· : 1 Clll E, C},flo'Als loT *5 I .r . U h . % SHEPLAN/ROOFPLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT- 3 8L OCK 1 PmOMONTORY SU BDIVISION 1 HOPKNG AVINUE CITY ON ASPEN, COLORADO EX--40 ONÂ·Â·arm n.=.49 ... 2 f CONSULTANTS II-â‚¬I. IMT 1 1 -' / 1 ..9.1.0 ......1.C,4 -4.L < ~ 00â‚¬ST KOLLAR ENGIVEels WC Â©WrY/'&. *e~~â‚¬K F M// Bâ„¢EET C.UPâ€¢â‚¬*A CO.0~23 -1. 070 /663223 - MO /13-//1 COK'â€¢cm mRÂ»â€¢E 1.,LLâ€¢. --,BL-gA .0.- w.<WAY -0 --6- $ 040,Â¥,AW=.*: X 2 \ I 90-â€¢CES .C -..Cr... O.04 C....... (CLE \ CÂ·4â‚¬0â€¢â‚¬*E. CON. ~ -*70 pes-Â£71* CONTIC-r -12- 000-ON - i . lili .APR-8 897 i 62 6-2 i - â€¢N-â€¢ck,-r 't -ret'_fl | LJ N- i i: c 1 â€¢~STI,Â«9 -rue /101/r --1 -191.2 A*MLY C~â€¢~1.L.~G ,-r- b 1 Â»fi -CÂ»,3.6 1.74 , i ~~1~CK 6Dlr 11 Ul-- m<Â·000 ...D _ 74 . \ il /V ' 14 1 A, >12: '41. \% t h j C- ~'IL Y - -%: & 1 /,1 - 1 6 1 1 11> - 2. / / R ' fÂ¥.ect \ \ i C6ffey Residence J Remodel , ... Sheet tki <P TITLE SHEET, SITE PLAN .. ' ' Sc.kÂ· . *ED ' - Al=t alleÂ· Shâ€¢et //â€žb*r \ ' .7,9-1 U 1 A-1 68.00 4 ' ...fl'*I...'. N Wâ€¢ 54Â· EXP 1 109 -1- 11 - 1 11 11] ':1. 1 1 7 1 12; 9 lili 1 , 1 1 11 / 1~ 1 --Â» 11 1 1 0.1 11 / 11 / 111, I 1 11 / 1 1,1,1 1 E 10-- 1 R' 4 1'. 1 ' 11 / 1 11 11 4 11/ n \1 -5 H i. 11 11 Al- 0000 1--7 -- -. '14 - - -L 111 t 11 111 11 1 11 111 . ll - 1 . 1 B 11 11 -,21/1 - 111 11 111 .- -= '~1 1 1 11 - -- 4 1 , 1.1 , r ---1, b.' ,Â·4 4 D-, 1 k----1 I 11 11 U ' i V- . 11 U 4---- Â· 1 -L 11 lili 4., '. - -1 Sheet Number A Custom Single-Family Home for: . ohn G. Martin, Architect, LLC Consultants: Revisions: Issue Date: P.O.Box 4701 Phone: 97~32â€¢591 Design Develop: 11 -06-2005 Steve and Debbie Rattner Eagle,Co 81631 Pax: 97Â©28-0593 = 1215 East Hopkins Avenue john,martin*enturytel.net Lot 4, Promentory Subdivision, Aspen, CO www.johngmartm,com 1 1 1 1 I .OT 3 ASEI JOB ; NO. 13060 SHED N 01046'147 112,86' CALCULATE~ FROM RECORD BASIS OF BEARINGS 0/ WOOD RETAININGx ALL -- -1 - 5. 126-r 19 - - - - /' Â»Â»v=Lze.71*1*Emf.R./4 .92 \93 ZZ ~ -3948 j - -33 - 49 4 SIDE SETBACK / <~~ -- 0 0. \ - -0Â»:- --f-- ~VO-< 1 1- -- \ 1 r /Il M Il LE/ BARRING 1// =-1\ j - 4__ 1 Boul.[,~Dx-_----_ -Ji ---66-0-COE J- h, 3 \ 1 .f=J=-. , ---/*.-- 4 - *-_- â‚¬ , BOULD / -----7-------------------- - 742.6,Â· -: ' ''~<34-2'-0'3441'-8" 7442'26,7-n ~25%) ,/ Ill 7442'-6. 1 0 \N\ ,/ * SECOND LEVEL (111'-1 3/49 - , T.O. F.F,Z 7453'-I 3/4" r --,\ I-1/1 ;. 7 \*FIRST,CEVEL (100'-09 _ - Ir-----------Â«-- 1 /5, \ \ \ ter Â« = -Iq42'-O" /5. .1, BASEMENT LEVEL (58'-7 1/4") \\\ F-39.42-0' ~ 1943'-011 3 \ 1(5296) VT.O. CONG> 14.90'-7 I/4" ~ / U 1 --6-- 3 4 1 / -0- h \ 1 \ . \ 1 6 7442'-0" 1 / / 7 / 6.'11 4 :1 MI . V %. If. ' lq41 1 0 I / 1442' . i / 4 1443'-6" A l' 0 / -N 9 1- \ /1 1 a U 3 5%21r c G 211 -1 /7-\ 9 r- E .* 1 0 11 1 -4 0 l 1 / = 2 11 11 / ./ 1 -1 1 - / /0 4 --0 . 22 - O W 1 - 1 11 i 4, 4 1944 - 12 8 B / L.--J ' 11 - 11 \ // 1 lu 11 11 \Ii 111 1 .L---_-1 L--- / 0 2 0 IPX-10 1 , 4, 1 - 1 li 02 (0 ~*' 1(153'-0" 1 - ..a:, 6 32 -2 / Iii [8_- ~1 34--i--- -- --J I - 'o i.*- \G . - .-/ 1, r / h # .-/ 42\ . 6 /4.3/ - 1 ?/ /7 W *VAA# LOT 41 ~ ALT. ONT SETS K 9 : 7450'-6" - : ULDERS -.93// -- - BRIDeE ' -1944 - 12 1 - 7946 - -r#/r. - H -- -I 10'-O' \ **48* a (S 03037'w 86.47)1 - .-. 1 -il$ 1 , - 41 ~,1 7 1 2 70I50'-0" \ 59 - M MALK - 62 /7444'-0" - - 7948 - L' MIDLAND AVENUE - R.O.W. WIDTH UNPLATTED 11" = 10'-0" SITE DIAGRAM 1< 2 r- EZ ,'alr(I angl :SUO!9!low 1!IP'V 4uBJEW '9 uqof LIOJ OmoH 4.!umr@Iiu!Â§ molsno V 9001-go- 1 1 :dole/aa u6!saa .QU}}91 0!qqKI pUU OAMS 0) Guadsy 'uoISIMpqnS A.Ioluomog 4 101 096l /3.h L-1 ) NOv /9 ~337 62'-0. ., 5'-0' , ~2'-0, i 17'-C 28'-0' 5Â·-6' , . I + 4, i.. il 1 //// 1 1 ),1,-1 1.. C /h> ' ,Â¥' l.mow \ 0 --â€¢,-ee--ete;eâ€¢IMm|| IF I 11 1 N . . ..1 .u EGRESS }NINDOM L------~~ L-.m.--JI 1| UNEN /1 -21. 1. 1- A. . / WINDOW 11 1 6-2 EeRESS 4=1 E-1 E-l | A~ 9 1. 9/1 1 -% 2] 44. \ 1 . 0 ~ IBATH #3 ~ 49 | 5 1 V 10 - 1-0 E 1 = - 4 F=dwY - â„¢ LI I- -3 h >944 BEDROOM # ~ BATH #2 2 BEDROOM #2 Â· 6 f 1 1*1 *FF,$111 1 - C_~ Fl CLOSET a 40 ~ .lar 2 2--H 1 t u 6--- -S b J- HALL j ju 41- 1 1 .==3 1/ 18 1 -=9 1 FIRST LEVEL 1 ; gz 1. r- V T.O.SUBFLOOR= 100'-O= \ 22# 0- A . 29 MECE & | 1 1 l. 0- STORAGE DEN _~Â£ a j /7-*~==1 : - 6 8 7- A 0 14!9/ 4 ~ U rdgi- i - - - - - ti k BEDROOM #1 MATH #1 , \4!9/ = 1 II Z L . 14'-1' 1-61 A , N | 0 . 'Sh ID - 10 -4. , 15'-5, -- c ----~ ~1~ 0 Ab 1 || ~ EGRESS WINDOW ~~1 LAUNDRY 249 I , ~1 1/ . - 1 1 .IlEI =11 L..9 g'r-------71 i; I 1 1 WÂ»4DOW WELL 11 1 . a -- 11 0 211 l'- l# 1 Un -I ..... i li 'l~ Â· 7,177, .. . 1 /1 1 I 0 STORAGE 0 1 1 / $ A- I 1 \ />4\ 1 . 1 1 // A .*~ 1 1- .-== 1 11 // 1 BASEMnNT LEVEL -1 r------~------ 1 4,9 1867.33 SF --------1 -0 -S . - r., 17'-0. , 11'-10. 17'-8' -C ' 1 '' , 21'-0~ = â‚¬= ***+ 2 b 0 BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ~ c..41 1/8* - 1'-0~ u << & 'ole(1 3116Â§1 :SUO!9!1311 900Z-90- 1 1 :dola.00 ufisao 011 'PO)!Iply 'UWEW 09 uqo[ :ioj QuIoH 4!unI-JI&ms moisno V 11101'uq.muluqol'Maa 01'uadsÂ¥'UOISIMpqnS A.Io,ugmog't)01 lauÂ·~*muoj@uweuruqo anualÂ¥ H WE[ 5 lil , 6746' 5.-0. 12'-0= L 17-0 , 5.-4 21'-Â¢ , 5.-6. ./ I .4 4 4 Ny + 9 9 2-*rl FELL -' /7 7------- b. 1 WN[DOPV VELL 1~T . h I EELOW I 0 .'Â· .41 . 11- I . -'Elii-ID h Â«1 - 7-~7 e L -9 -f Ir/1 1 l_CLOSE T~E~ Ir-- --. 1 I 1 L==1 BATH #4 91 1 1 Al BEDROOM #4 4 71 6 (JR SJIT0 lilic- 11 09 Â· 1 \ 6===91 - ~-\ \ 4--Â» MUD /~1 LOE 1 /1 1 /1 --1 ROOM I L --1 - \ it#' V 96-* 7/--=...././W~ I ~ti -- ---- -____i___i- E 1-- - - -- # '44 .-r-T 1 FIRST 1 EVEL *PT.O.SURFLOOR =100'-0' 2 lum -1=1 Â£=zz~--- ENTERTAINMENT 2- -IULII 2-CAR <6-0-7 1 ROOM ---m GARAGE < 1 L.Â¥- - 244 i * 4 -Et 8 -2- a - POWDER 1 4,- Â»tr iIi i cad- - 1 'IA- U -2 M = 21,4 1 -- - 11 LA 61 - x 8 i , TABLE 11 L____ 1- 3-92 . 1 1-/ C N 10, WORKBENCH : W VX4442>~12 1, , 6 c.5 1 --- *T BAR z e lr-0 10'-r f ~-lj. 1 1 1 ~ â„¢ 1 0 - 1 ~~mk...It ENDOW ZLL 6 =4\1 , 11] ' , . I . I. .... /7..... b:.a i b/Â«J / .\ 1 ...0 .lilli 1 % 0 HIâ‚¬,1 WINDOWS , Â·1 4.-- F O I J=52 , ---- 0 .. - zz IL I 1 19 .-71. 111 - 1 111 - / 11. 1 M t / 19,Â·.:Â·I / 1.14 i Ii. 1 1 0 HleH FNINPUrb , 1 GARAGE h 6 1 1 -- X- 51 1 i- 81Â£0 U 0 â‚¬e 1, 1 - 1 1 // r-------r----1 1 = Ct FIRSTLEVEL 1. 422 -----JiÂ· '-9-7-: I . b O 1 1330.33 SF 0 1* 64 6 u 72 9 * 1 Â¢ a V ' , 170-0' 11'-10. 8'-6' 9'-2Â« 21'-0' 1 . U 1.,IJ 0 FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN (9 1/8~ = 1'-0~ :ole(I anssI :SUO!91011 SluelInguo) Aqmns 1334% 9002-90- 1 1 :dol@Aaa uf~saa ![9 80)914 pile JA01Â§ anUOA I[!IdoH lsEEI 5[ZI 00 'uadsÂ¥'uo!Â§!MpqnS Â£101[[amog't )01 /13 ill /31 ria 7233 VE Fr . V 62'-0' 5'-0*, 12'-0' 6 17'-0' 28'-0' 4 1 1 1 11/ 1 1 11111 27 6 ~ r--1 L -JU- 14,- J L 1 1 ~ -1- J 10-or 04 l- i S - laTOFEN 0 , , - BM-DECK - U. CLOSET r - -~ 11=====.2=FLDDD _Pill [Â®-111\ 1 Â·< 62-126 i, i, 1 [- -11[]tF-Etl~ENE'T[GWIFTI < MASTE* ~ J -| /1 BATH { 1-3 r' r 4,ri - I ' .i- lili---1--lo 1 1 -2- 1 2 a . 1, l r e cir -11 - /. r r Â· - - L 1--1 1-~L==1 01 , 'h O A, SEOND LEVEL | ~ ~ ~ ~ 9/ T.O.SUBFLOOR=111'-1 3/4' MASTER M Mi N 7 ENTRY Â· ID> - - BEDRO03~--- - (3~ .1 1 Â¢ f. e MUUM 1- T- rt - L_~ M .2 r - VIE,49 = 2 N e i 16'-0. f , : / 1 - , 52 3 = 3.- c DINING[_- f - zÂ«LEE 17 1 1. Â· 7-1 11 b - 0% ROOM 2 --- 11 21 V '% -2 2- \ ri DI>-17-0' ~L- 2 11'-7' / 1 n g= = - j#-M .5 1 1 -2 ZE P-- -Fi ----------I- 0 22222--El ' = 7 -"~ ~ - ' 7/1/0//3 - 1 9-1 ~ '1 ~ Ha] 4 ' 111 0 El $\ Â»11---JL ZE E 5 b f ENTRY PbRCH Â»4 k 0 U -Câ€¢ 0 / b @ 14 Z = 1 1 1 1 le SECON|D LEVEL - --------------- ~ 6 -st 1725~51 SF 7,9 = 1 3 20 1 11 i Â© fets 17'-0' , 12'-6' 170-0' 16'-6' C..el ' 1 , , t - 0 12 SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN L-,3 1/8* - 1'-0" J ~olea ons@I :SUO!9!21011 ;SlurlInguo) 9002-90- 1 1 :doiaza ufisao 10'-64 00 'uodsv 'uo!Â§!Mpqns A.lojugmog 4 JOI 1 I r--1 --7 1 --LZE I] i 3 L--J ---1 2: 10:12 10:12 /52/ 0 ~ 0--7 /5. /0, , 1 .5. I /21 rr T 11 r- . . 4--- f 1 1 C 1 1 1 1 1 11 I i| 10:12 - +A PO m 1-7 ----- -1 ---Fi------ 2 413 1 i 81 l ili I :: 1 11 , 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 r -- 1 1 1 rh 1 /3 EAVE POINT - DINING DORMER ~/(7968-6 1/41=126 6 1/4" -1 i>la 11 trL 10.12 10:12 \1 'IN -- 3-2 - 1 L-_________ 1 1 1~2'-0' , bo , 1 1 1, , I 1 N - - 1 99 U- a 1 r-- ' 221 k [7 0* rE --2 1-9 la :: 0 - r------ 4 95 1 1 41 8 1 0< 01 r *3 big ,> 1-1 I 4:12 :: 48 20 4,1-1 -L - -- 1 m -m -0 1 1 1 \-01 1 1 1 ' 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 11 1 1 1 1 1 i 10.12 1 I | 1 ~ ~ 4:12I 11 1 4 - 1 1 1 23 1 ' , -1 Kg I 1 1 8 1 =& 1 1 1 1 50 1 Gl -0 ! 0 IIi I 10-12 ~I I 0- - - -- - --k- -- i 1 - 1 1 1 -9 1 1 ---t--J 13 1 I '| 11= 1. 1 \ Ch \ = 1 \ 1 1 1 1 I. 1 L -- , IHI 10:12 1 10:12 'Â£*i'_0. , Al l -1 r . I A A Sheet Number A Custom Single-Family Home for: ohn G. Martin, Architect, LLC Consultants: Revisions: Issue Date: P,O.Box 4701 Phone: 970-32&Â·0592 Design Develop: 11 -06-2006 Steve and Debbie Rattner Eagle,Co 81611 Fax: 970-321-0593 = A5 1213 East Hopkins Avenue john.martin*enturytel.net Lot 4, Promentory Subdivision, Aspen, CO www.]ohngmartm.com Lttj 0883*3 mojoutwelukqot'Maa 00 'umisv 'uo!Â§!MpqnS Aiojugmold 4 101 pu'p#,nuum@uweu['u,o[ anuakÂ¥ supldoH Jsg 5[ZI 99 Â£650-KIPOU IN 101:00. ,mullull 3!qqo(I pUU OAMS 9OOZ-90- J I :dola@Aaa ub:saa t6PE[1)Lb :juou [0Ltxog.O'd :ale(I GnssI :SUO!Â§!AOM :Slue~Insuo) in'Poill[)1Â¥'UWEW'990 :ioJ omoH 4!Ined-DISmS moisnj Â¥ 1@quinN 13049 1/-,/ 6 + .E)-.kÂ·V .1-,U; /4 3,-1 .r,Un Â»01-,6 tif-,i .1-.01 .1-,6 .11 -,It .1,-,11 2 47-1 21 ' An qtr, h *1% 12 . -1.91 6 9 . 3 1*" 028 3Â© 26 V 1- u 51* B Z Ng tug -J A 9:5 te i: - fil- 1 g Â£3 05 u. 0192 /2 <14-2 Z N.w * 25 :.4 8% : JU?3% :3Â§0 Uk E?2 04 9 0 < 1; 9 43 le I 215,8 aW * 5 4 1*m L f W J 1 1 imit LU 1 49233Â»32 412311+23Â« 44 1 1-1 NOMT r U) S 1-=z--2-=z-=2-=zz=Z]=LXIy >=3-F 1. - '+11 L ['9 1 1- 1 4, t. 2 9 \1 / /// 1 Â«fÂ»+J U i. Â¥ m Â£ c = < F-*~s gl -7 - n 1031,114~nit -,- 10'JIA' 1 -- U . 1/ \11 ' 8 -Â·-Â·i n[- wi '.11 v >= Ll' 1 166 - - - - --2-1 1 '' 4.. - ,~f~4--J&L ~ rtil~_1 111-1-,_ --ir--11 Irrl 1111, Ir-7-- ~ - -- -- - - -- -- -- - --- - m Hil 1Â¥4394*2 - I p .:E:/ 31*h.1.1 - m17 1 1 Cli? &3*nim EER --------- - 12 . 41.1...l EF~ 1 1.12-11 E= 1 2Â§ 1 L 222-22-2-922221212 41411 lin- 1-1 91'- 10 -_U. 1 2 4 0 11 1 .lif1654*Â£0*4*42 500 11 1 1 _/ --2-01-22/zÂ«/L _fli - ZE-2--2.--2-_I-_I-_IR#, 2/ ; -_Iill-Â« 1 u-kin-Ii-IT-227//AZZLE==k L_JL_~-_JI _ ]1 NIZE=ZE==ZE-=20004-2=-43\ 2 ~ 1.11 7 / rll,-zi--14 k , --mij;YU i E-LE-ilial_1--3_ryÂ»En ' - p rig*-u 112%Â» / 2-Eitf~- tric=<=r Ell - 'Â·<Â·Â·Â·. HI -- 1 =-I----' _ _r-21 1.-L T --1 t - - - 'Me-Â¢24. . I =LI111[1'1, Ead=ZE==3==U-lizzizz=Flum I I rlillt=L_,17, = 17%1Â»f{Iffri~effae= B.- - = 1. UF, Al' 1 L 2------- --- 1:=TIE?1'-1 Traill_r :, =Etuz. ~ CH +33331Ill ru -ELEr OVELE +[I] 1 ol u' Vil ioomic H I 1 22 j q 9414 1 1 20* 1 ,/12Â¢ di U \ 'lill @1~ & 5 ei o v 1 Lilli i' 1 1 Ill jil 1 11 1 11 ~1 ill I 1 1 1 i 11 NI . '.r.,/1IEN/221 1,aÂ·,EK@ve 3/\31 152# lili 11 1 1 1 In H I i i J f ~4 3 I i \1\1 4- ., 4\ 1 1 1 1+ m EliTI , 0 \\ 4 ~1~1 Att-1 1 -1~1 - 14.Â¥rr,41 1 .41 '1 1,1~i~i-1 ' 1\Â»=305914 6 1 K\Â» Â»REELLE- - -- 444 0 -,f,1Â»LE, 1 \ 1 EKÂ» i \ ; 1 J==41=11 le'l_J '1\ I \ 7 L.1 1 19 111-\\ \\k---- [ 1 ~put__ â€ž 17}Efo -Â» 1 Â»9714 r - -111 - - 21-X ./.' -9141 ' \4 - 21% 2 'r- _ 1 1 1 ' EvtÂ« ==fir== 1 250-2-Gri 1 14- 2//414 0/14-=t==32=tz iI 1- J O I L .1 f 1 (3 ill \ 4,34 Ill-lai -/1 - U i 3 q Z a ' }th[F Â©-0=22-- 9 9 D G 86 M & *: 3 m 2, + *1Â¥8 3-32Â¤ 0 Â» k 1 '1 & b hâ€¢ Â§ Mi;~ .1 b % I i iiI 1 M: 229 * 86 36 i ~1 1 ZE= 9' k 18 1* . 22 :22 1 .f .2 ir-ir i., , 73'-01 9'-10' f 271.-, 1 4 1 4 .9 10'-1. 1 \\ Sheet Number A Custom Single-Family Home for: ohn G. Martin, Architect, LLC Consultants: Revisions: Issue Date: P.O.Box 4701 Phone: 970-]210592 Design Develop: 11 -06-2006 Steve and Debbie Rattner Eagle,Co 816]1 Fax: 97~328-0593 = A7 1215 East Hopkins Avenue john.martin@centllr~tel,net Lot 4, Promentory Subdivision, Aspen, CO www.]ohngmartm.com AF'~CEA Bxl,2 TIMBER*IIÂ»ES NOI.IYA313 (39Â¥hIVO) HlbIO Â·9311-1 %Â¥19 N i i il I 1 1 - 1 J 1 N i fl 1 I 1 || I Ill 1 0244129*U 29/6 i / 1 fill -- ------ --1 11-1 -~-1* 4 2--2<kt- - 1-L -1 il ;0 1 /1-1 - - - - - - - -=AF m -- - r fft~_~ 1 6 I. i 1 1.-- -- -- -- -- -- 1 Aan-z=-2-- - p- -- F Apt E=1 1- \1 3221~il~ii=cikiI - 1 ----Ew T--~~ - - ~~~~~~~- ' 4<4~jiF 11 11 1 1 a-L- 1\\41Â«23222- - LN ~ **tigri 1 & U 1 1 4< F. 2 ~tZ ' 44499 1 P 11/4--m i -/.12.:..66 11 ///12-21*1573--1 1 - I ' 1====111__ //--2--E--RLMi L- _2-_2-_2 2- #--TU~ 7--1-7-- 7 1 11&8 % 1 1... '11 - 4%% i i INE 1111 : - - &/AMMEabli,-=.,â€ž ,ii*_~___ -- _ _ _- 2- - - $0%2 1 11 kEEEWI'lim'"14/IR VIC=_-2-1-2-=--Iii=LAP -=2--2-=23/2- S:A ' -0 -f= 0 1- 2 -- n anrn . . 1 , 111 li 11 I e 14 1 4 0 66 lei g b 1 :12 r H rn, 121 2 -4 m rn '48 26 1 , W= C @ -1 1 '1: 0 2 9 ~ 4 36 4 6 k 11'-4 11'-lt ,- 4 5 9.-1. 73'-0Â· 7 '' 10* Trk . 9'-10' ~ f T.-f 1 Sheet Number A Custom Single-Family Home for: ohn G. Martin, Architect, LLC Consultants: Revisions: Issue Date: P.O.Box 4701 Phone: 970-32&4592 Des;gn Develop. 11 -06-2006 Steve and Debbie Rattner Eagle,Co 81631 Pax: 97&1284593 - 121; East Hopkins Avenue john.martin*enturytel,net Lot 4, Promentory Subdivision, Aspen, CO www.lohngmartin,com LA:k = lq29-A/4 IHIVI l IN H i I Ill Ill il ~ 1 1 1 11 94Â»944% 9 ~~im I 1 \\1 - 1 -11-1 1 + -\444 Â«91 + ./=~IET/Elt 1 1 .1 7 -- -Â·+ -'- 1 99<41 Tor-1-11.,r Â«-199 1 H, =+ Â£23:ju2*1+40> 1 1 11 -- / N 1 11 \ ltÂ« , L- li 2Â»Â»LI--- Â«2/JAImIE i r- 6 8 -TE E 1 ~ li _MÂ©~~22*323Â«Â«=3% 1 r --1[rm-~ _ f ~~c-n ' 0 - LL't-L ., 9 1 Ir \ 1 11 / 11 f "04* 0 -1 16 81 6% 1 EB 22 , AF 13% N :2 1 IN -1 91 r m i m i rn 242 20 &= 1 R' 6 0 Â·Â·- 4 WQ Â£"6 WL I3 , g'- r 33'-0' . 1 ' Sheet Number A Custom Single-Family Home for: ohn G. Martin, Architect, LLC Consultants: Revisions: Issue Date: 7,0.Box4701 Phone: 97042~0591 Des;gn Develop: 11 -06-2006 Steve and Debbie Rattner Eagle,Co 81631 fax: 910-328-0593 - 1215 East Hopkins Avenue john.mar6*entur#el.net Lot 4, Promentory Subdivision, Aspen, CO www.Iohngmartin,com NO11Â¥A313 n 11 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 11 U 1 11 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 . # 111 .1 1111, 9 ~__ - *Ihirm,Trnitin,114Â·rinn,Tmr,miTY,MITT,fnnt,miTinÂ»%< >411 1 T 2. 1 Z -1 31 9 2 I m 1 . r z / 49Â«9 1 [1'1: - E-JU=f L O -1 ok 10 0 1 1 - m 1. IZ 2 31{~JÂ©14-~~J --1 d C\Â» / 1 -1 Â· L_/1 Il~~IH '1'31 P B */ =% 1,11 1~4 AT 4]pfri,4 ~4420'1. 1149' 18 . /, 4 +F99 d~ 2 / i 2: . .. .. ~ ~ li)- -'Ii<*tht,"5 52/ 0 C- 0 2 m I 0 6 0 11 11 1 - 1 1 1'7,--~~~ l iT........1.1- 1 1 ! 11 131 - 5241 C--41 1 /In, 1 Â·l' 11 11 \ 1 11 1 1 0 // I : 1 lili 1 1 9 / 11 1 1 11 1 I \.f- I ~ 'Â· ~":~ +~Â· .-.<~~~-1,*..3,,t...w..1 40*LI -rfÂ¢Mfm Y (*X!)-==Q~- - 40 22 Wnwf Â·nr,rmÂ¥mrmÂ·AmrmrmÂ· L.=-Â·.â€¢'i nnirtny Wh,rn,rm,rrin ninirm,un,Trh,Trn,rm,Irh -.t.1-Tff 'M,~M â€¢ - 1Â· 1 0 3 iN I All' 1 -1 0 il lili 1 : 1 04 1 11 Sheet Number A Custom Single-Family Home for: John G. Martin, Architect, LLC Consultants: Revisions: Issue Date: P.0.Box4701 Phone: 970-]2&0591 Design Develop: 11 -06-2006 Steve and Debbie Rattner dgle,Co 81631 F.: 97(328-0593 - A10 1215 East Hopkins Avenue john,martin*enturytel.net Lot 4, Promentory Subdivision, Aspen, CO www.iohngmartm,com Â£# HiV 61019/H03IN --r - - -3 NOI103S ONIaling 1 Ir....................,1 77 -12# MW----dâ€ž 1 11 -./.-----------'4 u I - ZONING 8TAT18TIC8 h./1/...:I=~I.......~.0.1--- i 1 LOT ..A â€¢ 6,1-10 W. = 1 ALLOFID â€¢ 5005 SF 82 LOT * - 1 7-AL@-1-1 " 1 'Te coveâ€¢M. 11 .7 ......0 â€¢ l... 6. ,~ -, F't fiGOR ,â‚¬AflnO; i 11 - 111 li , --- , ARLE ALLO/,0 â€¢ 249 6â€¢ PROPOMP â€¢ 2.fle e. 0 /1=:04.11% PLBID #1/fr L 1-mENUE-311 --- , ALLOAOâ€¢ 25/7 . 1 .%/O%/â€¢ 24'-10- 11 1 / 11 1 1 1_ AL-LorED â€¢135 M. (9 OF PA PeÂ©K * i -Opete â€¢310 9. :1 : .V ====2 i O 1 11 1 : 111 11 1 : 1-wl A -oPOMP â€¢ 2 -Ace, / kAtv= 7 . i : / 16 FAR CALCULATIONa 1 F i. - 4 4 ~' i . ' : b ~*PUSE LEVEL 1 -11 ................. -11 1-1 ~_ L. - - ic=It==1 11 - - - 1 : 1 BASEMENT LEVEL, 1,061 S.F. L.-~---- 1, UNEXPOSED %: lA% 11 BASEMENT FAR: 138 S.F. 11 11 SITE COVERAGE IR 1 4 -~~~~~~~,~--- J . FIRST LEVEL: 1,330 S.F. BASEMENTLEVELAREA LEE=zzzz--Jr------------1 FIRST LEVEL TOTAL: 1,581 9.F. I eARAGE, 561 SJ: UNEXPOSED %, 163% E?m =1=f-=r- FIRST LEVEL FAR, 4435 S.F. Aa-g. N .100, le= of 11. Ir.(11. Or .,09 ROOF PLAN BARAE BON.6, -315 SF. BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR PLAN FIRST LEVEL FAR, 1060 S.F. PO~Cl-, 10014 / -coily O.-theâ€¢gs, cont*,/ld D.AA,Â»m.M =W *lor liat-, Il-*W *ecuy 0- ge,do vel b~ 0.0â€ž4* 1-â€¢ mo~1Â¥~,n elÂ»*obiI Â£' CO~'g' C.'.'Ili,/'. SEAND LEVEL: 1,125 SF. TOTAL FAR, 2923 5.F. MOT TO EXCEED . 2,432 5.F) Y 4 r r-J ' - ' -. IL . 1-1. 11, fl' Ul TOTAL MOSS: 4,472 9.F. g B --l (eARA>E NOT 1%LUDED) 2 (NOT TO EXGEED = 5000 SF) - am t 1.32= ' ' I --- ...=== . 9 - : &1 1%;7 < e t>Â§ *~ ~~ 73 7 htlty?L, : Id 11 1 iLkfÂ©t#*PKSRM/trilil=:E//==-========# F ri./ST/Iififili, d 5" 1 1 ..2 E ~%2, <a 3 1 11 U 11 1 . 1 --il--- 11 1 . . 1 ---4 ---- 1 Xi Im -lin L-- ..10 11 It 11 1 11 n 1 11 ----*a='40 [1â€ž e. EL-7----4=gm=*G~ UPPER LEVEL AREA FIRST LEVEL AREA " - GARAGE AREA la,1 , -1, ./17/ 6 uÂ© 70 9 = SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 20 -C=, t: t: 02 S 0 PLANS FOR F.A.R. CALCS Z 1/16~ - 1'-0* Â®Ca onssi :SUORIAOH :sluel[nsuoj 1 Pol 9002-90- L L :dol@Aea u&,saa anUOA 9LV 0 LumisÂ¥,uomA,!pqn5 Alojugmog 't 101 [Em ----I. .ele=Fm =,22=- 1 2.1 1- -1411 .. 'Li - IE=....m 0-- 1Â®...1 - - -~ -9 ~Al I - - WALL,~~FACE -- - ~ ITT 1 i b -4-~ WALL,~~F,~~~~,~ .1.1 1 EXPOSE~~RFACE Â· 1 I 41 91 M , EXPOS~~pF~ ~--=-- 111 ' .......4 ------ -- - 1======== === === === ==== === = ==== = === ==- ==== = 1== = - 1 1 2 ILL -_--i 22-2 2 -dp ' f- //I-2// 1 1 1 L Lk J J J n 1 WALL SURFACE ~ ~ ~ WAL.L~~FACE ; | ~~ 6 *.SLOSJâ€¢KEâ€¢ogj 1 1 1 i El 9 gal g EXPOSE'.SURFACE 11 :1 1 11 12/z_ _ 1 1 : 111 1 ------------ , '11 .--------61 -----------------0 ., 4-4 SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION OID -==, - -Ii- - ... - 9 4 - Ill .3 3 9 LE 4 --- -- -9 1 1 64' C./.=O--. C.3 - 00 - 2, =-.... -- --- =51.937Â¤79=311@~-r 1Â¥== - WALL~~FACE EXPOSE~uRFACE i - - -1 k T - 1 1 - .-- - -- 61 - â‚¬1 4 M WAL.L,~~FACE -- : . W 1.1 - - 11 -0 bl. 1 1 1 â€ž44- 1 1 EXPOS~~.IRFACE ~ , 1 1 1.[1 - -1, ======I T ., r.~- 4==L= = ==== ========== ==== = ====7 11 1@8688~8888888Nm 11 ---- .. WALL,~~FACE .1 -,1 . -]11 / r ....-.....; ~ WALL ~Â¥~FACE 1 1 I HIL 11 -1, 11 1~11 / 1 1 1 11 - 11 'IMT 11 'll--1,1 %-4-I=d:,::1 1 i,Â· 1 1 ; 314 4 1 1 EXPOSED SURFACE 1, 1 11 - 11 11 11 - 11 ,- , 1 .=. 1 1 1 1 4 EXPOSE~*RFACE ~ 1 11 - 11 11-11 1 1 1 ~ 1 111 111 1 1 1 1 1 ~=---------quiv~~X-09Â¥=-=~~ --- ------ --------------- -- --- â€¢ - ----------------- --------------- WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION 9 49 1 3 0 2 tre= Cur lEERSTLEVELil > cotuÂ»,N 1- -O. - 40-,4 C,-j J TOTAL WALL SURFACE = 2054 S,F. M O 006,1 Ini-- (1/5) 0~ li~ â‚¬~10- ve TOTAL EXPOSED SURFACE=1569 S.F IMI, 1~ eVI pohl lo IAI &*M 11wi 00 r:~11* 1- 4 ...1.4 0-I PERCENTAGE - EXPOSED /WALL= 76.3% ----- BASEMENT LEVEL: TOTAL WALL SURFACE= 2082 S.F. TOTAL EXPOSED SURFACE = 156 S.F. PERCENTAGE - EXPOSED /WALL = 2% ~) ELEVATIONS FOR F.A. R. CALCS Z20':30.2:T 66. 1 -W [ 1 -i./.A.~I- Ble(I OnssI :SUOIS!/22[ :sluel[nsuoj oH 4 UIBI-@#U!Â§ molsno v 10qumN1Â®45 9002-90- & 1 :doreAaa uf~se anualy supidoH 9LV 00 u 9 uo!Â§!Alpqns olugul041 t 101 HOPKINS LEGEND AND NOTES O SURVEY MONUMENT, RE-BAR WITH CAP AS DESCRIBED 0 UTILITIES A A SURVEY CONTROL N 6-----0 FENCE TITLE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY: P J THIN COUNTY T 1 TLE INC. NUMBER: PCT 20608M ' DATED: APRIL 24, 2006 CALLS IN C ) RECORD POSTED ADDRESS -1215- 1--10 0 UTILITY POLE 6.7 SLANTED TEXT DENOTES BUILDING TO PROPERTY TIE 0 10 20 YELOW 19598 - - OVERHEAD UT ILITIES A SPt KE TBM 7943.10 2 FOOT CONTOURS NO PLATTED SETBACKS (81.0,) 10'F TREE CLAIPER (D-DECIDUOUS, F-CONIFER, DL-DRIPLINE) DL 7 EAST WATER VALVE {54.77) ELEVATIONS BASED ON GPS MONUMENT NO. 4 ELEV. - 7920.20 (1929 NGVD) 50' AVENUE R.O.W. SCALED (42.3 ) NO.5 RE-BA 1 S 75*06 ' E 3.8 SETBACKS (238 GRA L 0 4'F ZONNING SETBACKS PA ING 44) 9. P DL 54 1- 4-F 01 7 DL 5 RED 3317 8-D 7946.97 DL il LL 2â€¢7-F 0 9 DL 5 7Â·1: 5-D 4 OL 6 - -- DL 9 U) '.0 g SILL 7943.65 2 LOT 2 6-D - DL 7 ' ASEI JOB 2 J 0 NO. 6265A a HOUSE o SLOPE LEGEND 0 10-F --- DL 6 01 DL 7 20 7 Â® 8 + W 30 LAYER (30) SLOPES P--S--R--C < C. O 2 LINES . --1 *----- al/ SLOPES 21-30% (131-2-0-40) 135 SF ./- .7 1 -F DL 12- - 10 00 --* 1 IF N . ~ Z. QF 0 - NABLE TO SET . DL 8 - 4 4 - OOSE BOULDRES 0 . 11.F - 0 IAAA/1 SLOPES 30-40% (137-2-0-12) 355 SF +/- DL 8 9.F 2222 LOT 3 Dld_ ~ Â¤HI ASEI JOB 3 1 Zi V// /A SLOPES > 40% (134-2-0-14) 796 SF â€¢/- 0 NO 13060 12-F - < DL 9 .4. Lal RTABLE SPA 10.D 2â€¢6*F 2 00 DL 8 1 12. . 0 6Â·D DL 8 2â€¢5-F BOULDER DL 5 4 16-F 4 V 946 2â€¢7-0 - DL 10' 7 VICINITY MAP 1--500 2 1 L.- 57 I 0 1 '~ PliligN 2 d#29,3.Ft.t....21=w-' 4 1 0 CERTIFICATION 65*A:2*.. 5 Â·1940 0 24'Ktrft?,"h U Ull q.1 ge THE UNDERS IGNED STATES THAT ~ ~ROPERTY DESCR I 8ED HEREON WAS of ' , 434* j g 'Â· ._0 ~opnt - 5 0 BASED ON THE FIELD EV I DENCE AS SHOWN AND l'HAT THERE ARE NO FIELD SURVEYED DURINC 2006 AND IS ACCURATE , 1 13 Â¢Â§3 DISCREPANCIES oF RECORD BOUNDARY LIAE CONFL I CTS ENCROACHMENTS 0 EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF *AY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME ' re *9 - b 2 EXCEPT A Sr-NEREON SHOWN . UNDERGROUND UT ILITIES WITH NO ABOVEÂ¢ROUND fwisyriff*50 9231 00. 6-F APPURTEN#MLGES'#(*ke DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPL I ED TO THE A 1 00 6 DL 7 SURVE*aRGA**Â£â‚¬FPED Â· TH I S SURVEY I S VO I D UNLESS WET STAMPED e 'A, 0 1/2- DIA. PIPE ACCESS EASEMENT 22-91Â·*Â·-r.'=401â‚¬A W l TKNE#Fwit*3*5 SURVEYOR BELOW. 8255-9, - -9>0 0 a O RED 9018 0.3' EAST REC. NO. 105869 LLOW 16842 DA1$#C'* i \ 1lr-L, 40-,va *O/45$35Â» . 1 94 Â· .0 0 3â€¢7-D DL 10- %2N#00>Mt N 9 JOI~ HOWORTH P.422 25947 1 1 0 32 tf ~" A . S /jâ€¢ 04.a~. t-9.0-1 . ~ f i (5*~I TE'Zii#<0--SIT b-%0 8- cf~4 '' 0/~rn r". SPIKE 1#6612Â£% 0 90Abj (8 2*W 1 . */fAL LA\3/ . 61. 0,1 *Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â°.49 17*2*1; c r O 0-te'*gow .Â°,/O - OYELLOW CAP BELOW PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENT TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 15.5 WC ON SOUTH BOUNDARY OF 2/$1# ff- 6 b 9, 061!foid, 73 'lop. tb LOT 4 BLOCK I PROMONTORY SUBDIVISION ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED f6g 9 A b ~ th~ R 0 0, CITY OF ASPEN NOVEMIER 4, 1957 IN PLAT BOOK 2A AT PAdE 240, PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO. 4990 -_-I, ,,Ill, A~ COUNTY OFPITKIN Avak ok Â¥ ,LA/ . 0 (PA A.# A V'.Id:btw 1 STATE oF COLORADO LOT 5 CONTAINING: 6,170 SQ. FT. â€¢/- ASEI JOB PREPARED BY NO. 9239 ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS INC. 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT ON THIS PLAT WITHIN THREE YEARS PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. THE CERTIFICATION IS VOID IF NOT WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE DATE JOB SURVEYOR. 8/06 24084C 7942 CS 02-55 A LEGEND AND NOTES O SURVEY MONUMENT, RE-BAR WITH CAP AS DESCRIBED O UTILITIES A . SURVEY CONTROL M -e FENCE TITLE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY: P I TK IN COUNTY TITLE, INC. NUMBER: PCT20608M DATED: APRIL 24, 2006 CALLS IN ( ) RECORD POSTED ADDRESS -1215- 1--10 UTILITY POLE 0 6.7 SLANTED TEXT DENOTES BUILDING TO PROPERTY TIE 0 10 20 YELOW 19598 - Â· - OVERHEAD UTILITIES NO PLATTED SETBACKS (81.0-1 (54.7.) (42.3') (54.74 EAST HOP R.O.W. SCALED NO.5 RE-BAR 23 8 li 49 119.06 6 424 4 GRAVEL PARKING 1 RED 3317 r \1 2 21 8 9 1.5 2 --- 0 0 Z 0 . - N U) LOT 2 w - = 54 - .O 5 0 S +1 f \ ASEI JOB a NO. 6265A HOUSE O m - 1 9 -/ I 2 LINES ' 2.7 , ---- ---- 0 *0 ---- ---- UNABLE TO SET LOOSE BOULDRES ... . . 0 . LOT 3 09 ASEI JOB . 0 N= 13060 -- Z PORTABLE I Z. 0 0 SPA LOT 4 1 1. CERTIFICATION THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON WAS FIELD SURVEYED DURING M.D 2006 AND IS ACCURATE BASED ON THE F I ELD EV I DENCE AS' SHOWN AND THAT THERE ARE NO D I SCREPANC I ES OF RECORD BOUNDARY L I ME CONFL I CTS ENCROACHMENTS, EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF WAY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVEGROUND APPURTENAÂ®EW/**ID DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPL I ED TO THE SURV,0*-386(E)REFIED. TH IS SURVEY IS VOID UNLESS WET STAMPED 1/2- DIA. PIPE ACCESS EASEMENT WIT{*1Â»EOSEK-:44'3.rÂ® SURVEYOR BELOW. 9018 0.3' EAST REC. NO. 105869 .-9 23;41@Â· â€¢,wi.n...,<# t 9\40 9 N 75;06.* JOHN,Â¥. iffOWD#fH PA)*#. 25947 LP* de..33Â·21 ~54. 4 , 6006 ~~0~9< """"~<'<~6~ 1 049# 0 OYELLOW CAP BELOW PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENT SURVEY 15.5' WC ON SOUTH BOUNDARY OF ' LOT 4 BLOCK I PROMONTORY SUBDIVISION ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED NOVEM#ER 4, 1957 IN PLAT BOOK 2A AT PAdE 240, PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO. CITY OF ASPEN COUNTY OF PITKIN STATE OF COLORADO LOT 5 CONTAt NING: 6,170 SO. FT. â€¢/- ASEI JOB PREPARED BY NO. 9239 ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS INC. 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET NOT I CE: ACCORD I NG TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT ON THIS PLAT WITHIN THREE YEARS PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. THE CERTIFICATION IS VOID IF NOT WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE DATE JOB SURVEYOR. 5/06 240848 01'46 -14-E 112.86' CALCULA BASIS OF BEARINGS E 32.56 ' )~ 01008 0311VldNA HlaIM ~ANBIAV GNVTG IM C.Zk'09 M. ZE.Â£0 S) l SHE~_J WOOD RETAINING WALL I Â· .. .. 4 .. .. .. .. 1 34 .. .. Alun to#-Aper,3