Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.127 W Hopkins Ave.0024.2008.ASLUTHE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER PARCEL ID NUMBER PROJECTS ADDRESS PLANNER CASE DESCRIPTION REPRESENTATIVE DATE OF FINAL ACTION 0024.2008.ASLU 2735- 12 -4 -59 -702 127 W. HOPKINS AVE CHRIS BENDON INSUBSTANTIAL PUD AMENDMENT ASPEN SKING COMPANY 6/24/2008 CLOSED BY Angela Scorey on 03/05/2009 File Edit Record y! vIgae Form Reports Format Tab Help ISM Custom Fields .Fees Fee Summary IValuahon'Acfian c PermA Type PemiR U 0024.2008. ASLU Address 127 W HOPKINS AYE ]j ApVS A. Cdy ASPEN Slate CD - Z4 81611 p Mazle Pennit� Routing Queue aslu07 Appfed 0511Sj20o8 o ( Project Status perc1N Apgoved Description INSUBSTANTIAL PUD AMENDMENT FOR THE HOUDAYHOUSE AFFORDABLE Issued ) HOUSING PROJECT Final r- Si b itWd MARK VDGELE 9238759 Clock Running Days F0 Ew.. 0511012009 J jwner- Last Name ASPEN SKIING -COMPANY 2] Fesl Name HIGHLANDS PO 8DX 1248 ASPEN CD 81612 Phone P Owmi is Appicarl? Last Name ASPEN SKIING COMPANY J First Name HIGHLANDS POBOX 1248 ASPEN CO 81612 m Phe f- Cusl U 27952 J Last Nave rJ Fast Name 1 Phme F- b�ti .� Holiday House Development Order DEVELOPMENT ORDER of the City Aspen Community Development Department of the City of Aspen Attachment °G" Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order ", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders ", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights ", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site - specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three (3) -year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site - specific development plan as described below. Aspen Skiing Company; c/o Mark Vogele, Project Manager, PO Box 1248; Aspen, CO 81612; 970.923.8759; mvogele@aspensnowmass.com. Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property: Lots C, D, E, F, G and the east 7.5 feet of Lot B, Block 60, City and Townsite of Aspen. Parcel ID No. 2735- 124 -59 -702; 127 West Hopkins Avenue; also known as the Holiday House Affordable Housing project. The City Communi ty elo Devpment Director approved an Insubstantial Amendment to the Planned Unit Development and approved two variances to the Residential Design Standards to permit the reconstruction of the "Lodge" building of the Holiday House which was destroyed by fire. Land Use Approval Received and Dates: Administrative approval for Insubstantial PUD Amendment and variances to the Residential Design Standards, attached. Effective Date of Development Order: June 29, 2008. (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) Expiration Date of Development Order: June 29, 2011. (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this) th day of June 2008, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. Christopher J. Bendon, AICP Community Development Director City of Aspen JUL 1 6 2008 .,.._.:..u� Lo_"" _L,Ji,L71J 90692008 i PUBLIC NOTICE Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 127 West Hopkins Avenue, Parcel ID No. 2735- 124 -59- 702, also known as the Holiday House Affordable Housing project, owned by the Aspen Skiing Company, PO Box 1248; Aspen, CO 81612. The Applicant received approval of an Insubstantial Planned Unit Development Amendment and variances to the City's Residential Design Standards for the reconstruction of the "Lodge" building of the Holiday House which was destroyed by fire. For further information contact Chris Bendon, at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 429 -2765. s/ City of Aspen Published in The Aspen Times on June 29, 2008 JUL 1 6 2008 cc ....:.. , _.:r AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070, ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: at W. HoaKin S , Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, 00hhif, MiuhiAf rwa- (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.3006.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: t/ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Signature I The for n "Affidavit of Notic " was knowledged before me this &Iday of , 200 by PUBLIC NOTICE a DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL 5`0 1.1%^� Aspe^ !n All Time& WaeMy on June M WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: Notary ublic ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: I. /APPLICANTItas�smit cd t�lG an anon 11, 5 (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size. nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agues it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. S. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a dc(e�rn ination of applicatio completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of S/C�W which is for hours of Community Development staff time. and if actual recor ed costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of 5220.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. APPLICANT By: bravl p R ArLN 1 t Date: CITY OF ASPEN By: Chris Bendon Community Development Director g:\support \forms \agrpayas.d oc 11/30/04 Billing Address and Telephone Number: Rcauirerl pd /Z¢8 f cnn 8/UZ May 12, 2008 Mr. Chris Bendon, Director Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Permission to Represent Dear Mr. Bendon: Please consider this letter authorization for Sunny Vann of Vann Associates, LLC, Planning Consultants, to represent us in the processing of our application for an insubstantial PUD amendment for the Holiday House affordable housing project. Mr. Vann is hereby authorized to act on our behalf with respect to all matters reasonably pertaining to the aforementioned application. Should you have any questions, or if we can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Yours truly, ASPEN SKIING COMPANY owkaka- David G. Corbin Vice President, Planning and Development P.O. Box 1248 Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 925 -1220 d:Udc \bus\city.ltt \103108.cb I MEMORANDUM TO: Mark Vogele, Project Manager, Aspen Skiing Company Sunny Vann, Vann Associates FROM: Chris Bendon, Community Development Director COPY: Cindy Christensen, Aspen Pitkin County Housing Authority RE: Holiday House Reconstruction Insubstantial PUD Amendment Residential design Standards Variations DATE: June 18, 2008 0069200A SUMMARY: The Aspen Skiing Company has applied to the City to reconstruct the Holiday House to replace, in -kind, the structure lost to fire damage from a catastrophic fire last fall. The extent of reconstruction requires compliance with all modern building codes and, as such, there are minor modifications to the structure that will increase the height of the structure by approximately 19 inches as well as some minor changes to landscaping and the addition of an accessible ramp. The Holiday House is located at 127 West Hopkins Avenue and is legally described as Lots C, D, E, F, G and the east 7.5 feet of Lot B, Block 60, City and Townsite of Aspen. Parcel ID No. 2735- 124 -59 -702. Staff finds the reconstruction plan to be in conformance with the applicable criteria, namely an Insubstantial Amendment to the PUD and variances to the Residential Design Standards, and approves the reconstruction plan, with conditions. STANDARDS OF REVIEW - INSUBSTANTIAL PUD AMENDMENT: Section 26.445.100. Amendment of PUD Development Order. A. PUD Insubstantial Amendments. An insubstantial amendment to an approved development order for a final development plan may be authorized by the Community Development Director. The following shall not be considered an insubstantial amendment: 1. A change in the use or character of the development. Staff Finding — The existing (prior to the fire) use of the property is multi - family housing deed restricted to affordable housing. There are 26 units. The proposed reconstruction maintains multi - family housing deed restricted to affordable housing. The proposal is for-the affordable housing to be constructed as 25 units total. The character of the reconstruction is very similar to the existing (prior to the fire) development. The footprint of the new,6�l1'7 20L8 Holiday House Insubstantial PUD Amendment l 4 , ,.;;,; �;_,: „,, _:T D.,..o 7 00692008 is very similar to the existing building. The existing building's architecture is simple with shallow pitched roofs. The replacement structure is also simple with low pitched roofs. The landscaping changes are minor in nature and the new ramp is needed to provide an accessible path to the reconstructed units. Staff finds that the use and character of the proposed reconstruction is very similar to the existing use and character. Staff finds this criterion met. 2. An increase by greater than three percent (3 %) in the overall coverage of structures on the land Staff Finding — The existing "Lodge" building covers approximately 4,625 square feet or 29.37% of the parcel. The proposed replacement structure for the "Lodge" building covers 4,636 square feet or 29.43% of the parcel. There is an increase in building coverage of 9 square feet. This represents a .057% in coverage, well within the 3% limitation. Staff finds this criterion met. 3. Any amendment that substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed development or the demand for public facilities. Staff Finding — The proposed replacement structure is nearly identical to the existing structure. There is a reduction of 1 unit (26 to 25) and a reduction of one bathroom (26 to 25). There is a reduction of one bedroom (27 to 26) within the "Lodge" structure. With this slight reduction, staff does not expect any increase in the demand for public facilities or trip generation caused by the improvements on this property. Staff finds this criterion met. 4. A reduction by greater than three percent (3 %) of the approved open space. Staff Finding — The existing buildings provide approximately 28.1% of the property or approximately 4,433.5 square feet of Pedestrian Amenity space. (Open Space has been replacement by "Pedestrian Amenity" in the Land Use Code.) The proposed buildings provide approximately 4,394 square feet or 27.9% of the property as Pedestrian Amenity. The proposal provides more than the 25% Pedestrian Amenity requirement and is not requesting a variance. The change represents approximately 39.5 square feet or roughly 0.25 %, well within the 3% allowance. Staff finds this criterion met. 5. A reduction by greater than one percent (1 %) of the off - street parking and loading space. Staff Finding — The application does not propose any changes to the 12 off -street parking located along the alleyway. A few of these spaces look to be substandard in terms of depth, but are used on a regular basis and there is no change proposed to this situation. The slight reduction in units and bedrooms will lessen, by a very small degree, the parking cn f. There is no reduction in parking and staff finds this criterion met. I`' JUL 1 6 2008 Holiday House Insubstantial PUD Amendment 0069200 6. A reduction in required pavement widths or rights -of- -way for streets and easements. Staff Finding — The reconstruction proposal does not propose any changes to pavement widths or any changes to rights -of -way or easements. Staff finds this criterion met. 7. An increase of greater than two percent (2%) in the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial buildings. Staff Finding — There are no commercial buildings on this site and no changes proposed to the amount of gross leasable area (which is zero). Staff finds this criterion met. 8. An increase by greater than one percent (1%) in the approved residential density of the development Staff Finding — Density is defined by the City of Aspen as "the number of dwelling units or bedrooms per unit of land as permitted in the zone district." The proposed reconstruction reduces the number of units by one (from 26 to 25) and the number of bedrooms by one (from 27 to 26). There is no increase in the Density and the number of units an d bedrooms are within what is allowed in the Residential Multi - Family Zone District (which allows for unlimited Density). 9. Any change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project's original approval or which requires granting a variation from the project's approved use or dimensional requirements. Staff Finding — The original approvals are primarily focused on the annex building and no changes are proposed for that structure. The final development plan of the original approvals provided a variance to the Open Space requirements to permit a small courtyard to count towards the 35% requirement. As discussed above, the now applicable 25% Pedestrian Amenity requirement is met with this application. The "Lodge" building reconstruction expands the total FAR by about 107 square feet but does not require a variance as the project's FAR is within the zoning allowance. The height of the "Lodge" building increases by about 19 inches, to approximately 25 feet, but does not require a variance as it is still within the 32 -foot height limitation of this zone (assuming the proposed Density). No variations to the use of the building are proposed. Staff finds that the changes proposed to the PUD do not require granting of a variation to the approved use or dimensional requirements. The use and character of the reconstruction is very much the same as the existing (prior to the fire) use and character of the project. Staff has reviewed the original appro als and the , reconstruction is not inconsistent with the conditions or representation of the original approval. Staff finds this criterion met. JUL 1 G 2008 Holiday House Insubstantial PUD Amendment C� i 00692008 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS: The existing (prior to fire) "Lodge" building did not provide one street- oriented entrance for every four units. The building has a central entryway with internal circulation. Re- orienting the entrances from internal to external would likely cause a total re- design of the building and potentially no longer qualify the reconstruction as an "in- kind" reconstruction. The existing building also does not contain a first -story street - facing element of 20% of the building's overall width. The building was constructed long before this requirement was adopted. The level of re- design that would be needed to comply with this 20% standard would likely cause to "reconstruction" to no longer be considered a "reconstruction." The application demonstrates compliance with all other Residential Design Standards. STANDARDS OF REVIEW - RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS VARIANCES: Sec. 26.410.020. Procedures for review. D. Variances. I. Administrative variances. The applicant may seek an administrative variance for not more than three (3) of the individual requirements. An applicant who desires a variance from the residential design standards shall demonstrate, and the Community Development Director shall find that the variances, if granted, would: a. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the director may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting or a broader vicinity as the director feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted, or Staff Finding — The neighborhood pattern of development does not necessarily dictate variances from these two standards. Staff does not find the variance to be warranted according to this criterion. b. Be clearly necessary for reasons offairness related to unusual site - specific constraints. Staff Finding — The Residential Design Standards were not incorporated into the Land Use Code until after the building had been developed. The Land Use Code allows properties such as this to continue and come into conformance with the design standards at the time of substantial redevelopment. The existing approvals did not consider the variations to the design standards (because they didn't exist) but do represent a site - specific constraint — the property may only be developed according to the specific PUD approval. And, the property may only be reconstructed "in- kind" according to the specific PUD approval _ after a catastrophic event. So, requiring compliance with the design standards could f6rce changes inconsistent with the specific PUD approval. JUL 1 s zoos Holiday House Insubstantial PUD Amendment Dom-- A 0069200g In this case, the level of changes that would be required for the existing (prior to fire) building to come into conformance with the design standards would necessitate an entire redesign which would be inconsistent with the specific PUD approval. The property owner did, a few years ago, propose a substantial PUD amendment and found significant neighborhood resistance to making any changes to the building. As a result and after roughly a year of public hearings with no resolution, the property owner withdrew the application and started remodeling the building in a manner that did not represent changing the building. "Re- opening" the PUD approvals would likely experience the same level of resistance to changing the building and would not likely result in a timely resolution to the circumstance. In addition, the fire represents a circumstance that is unusual and unique to this property. Compliance with the standards is not required for existing buildings and compliance with the standards for reconstructing buildings after a catastrophic fire would cause the reconstruction to be inconsistent with the specific PUD approval. Staff believes this predicament represents what the drafters of the Land Use Code envisioned as a site - specific constraint for which variances are warranted as a matter of fairness. Staff finds these two variances to be warranted given the unusual site - specific constraints of this property, namely the PUD approvals and the limitations for reconstructing a building in- kind. Staff finds this criterion met. OTHER ISSUES: The relationship between the applicant and the neighbors is not as healthy as it could be. Staff has included a condition that the applicant considers ways to improve communication regarding this replacement and the disruption that construction entails. Staff is requesting a revised set of PUD Plans to document the condition of the property. Staff is recommending this occur prior to issuance of a certificate of Occupancy. Staff is also requesting a revised master deed restriction for the affordable housing units. The existing deed restriction history is confusing. APPROVAL: I hereby approve an insubstantial amendment to the Holiday House Planned Unit Development with the following conditions of approval. AV—.k — datJ Chris Bendon, AICP Community Development Director City of Aspen JUL 1 6 2008 Holiday House Insubstantial PUD Amendment CC i n___ c 00692008 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: I. The building permit application shall include a set of scaled plans and elevations of the existing (prior to the fire) structure as well as the proposed structure with a tabular summary of all before and after dimensions including number of units. bedrooms, Floor Area, net livable square footage, height, setbacks, open space, and pinking. Z A revised PUD Plan set shall be filed with the City of Aspen prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The PUD Plan set shall include /depict: A current improvement survey of the property showing the past redevelopment status of the property. An illustrative plan showing the building. landscape, parking, utilities, and other site improvements. Scaled plans for each level of the buildings showing unit layouts, common spaces, and net livable square footage for each toll and a table summarizing the project's net livable area. • Scaled plans for each level of the buildings showing Floor Area calculations along with a table summarizing the project's Floor Area. • A table of all project dimensions including number of units. bedrooms, Flour Area, net livable square footage, height, setbacks, open space, and parking. • Elevations of the structures showing architectural character, fenestration, and heights measured according to the City's height regulations. F The PUD Plan set shall cross- reference the recordation information of the ne x- master deed restriction. The administrative policy of requiring recordation of the PUD Plan set prior to acceptance of a building permit application is hereby waived. 3. The applicant shall develop a revised master affordable housing deed restiction with the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority and record the deed restriction with Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. A PUD Agreement shall he filed with the City of Aspen prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. -l. The applicant is encouraged to enhance communication with neighbors concerning redevelopment schedules and construction impacts on the neighborhood. Ac(: F.PTANCE OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Mark Vogele, Project A,ianager for the Aspen Skiing Company, herehy accept and agree to the conditions of this approval on behalf of the applicant, the Aspen Skiing Company. date' geshark Vogele, Project v4 a Aspen - - Skiing Company JUL 1 6 2008 Holiday House Insubstantial PUD Amendment Pages MEMORANDUM TO: Mark Vogele, Project Manager, Aspen Skiing Company Sunny Vann, Vann Associates FROM: Chris Bendon, Community Development Director COPY: Cindy Christensen, Aspen Pitkin County Housing Authority RE: Holiday House Reconstruction Insubstantial PUD Amendment Residential design Standards Variations DATE: June 18, 2008 SUMMARY: The Aspen Skiing Company has applied to the City to reconstruct the Holiday House to replace, in -kind, the structure lost to fire damage from a catastrophic fire last fall. The extent of reconstruction requires compliance with all modem building codes and, as such, there are minor modifications to the structure that will increase the height of the structure by approximately 19 inches as well as some minor changes to landscaping and the addition of an accessible ramp. The Holiday House is located at 127 West Hopkins Avenue and is legally described as Lots C, D, E, F, G and the east 7.5 feet of Lot B, Block 60, City and Townsite of Aspen. Parcel ID No. 2735- 124 -59 -702. Staff finds the reconstruction plan to be in conformance with the applicable criteria, namely an Insubstantial Amendment to the PUD and variances to the Residential Design Standards, and approves the reconstruction plan, with conditions. STANDARDS OF REVIEW - INSUBSTANTIAL PUD AMENDMENT: Section 26.445.100. Amendment of PUD Development Order. A. PUD Insubstantial Amendments. An insubstantial amendment to an approved development order for a final development plan may be authorized by the Community Development Director. The following shall not be considered an insubstantial amendment: 1. A change in the use or character of the development. Staff Finding — The existing (prior to the fire) use of the property is multi - family housing deed restricted to affordable housing. There are 26 units. The proposed reconstruction maintains multi - family housing deed restricted to affordable housing. The proposal is for the affordable housing to be constructed as 25 units total. The character of the reconstruction is very similar to the existing (prior to the fire) development. The footprint of the new building Holiday House Insubstantial PUD Amendment Page 1 � w is very similar to the existing building. The existing building's architecture is simple with shallow pitched roofs. The replacement structure is also simple with low pitched roofs. The landscaping changes are minor in nature and the new ramp is needed to provide an accessible path to the reconstructed units. Staff finds that the use and character of the proposed reconstruction is very similar to the existing use and character. Staff finds this criterion met. 2. An increase by greater than three percent (3%) in the overall coverage of structures on the land. Staff Finding — The existing "Lodge" building covers approximately 4,625 square feet or 29.37% of the parcel. The proposed replacement structure for the "Lodge" building covers 4,636 square feet or 29.43% of the parcel. There is an increase in building coverage of 9 square feet. This represents a .057% in coverage, well within the 3% limitation. Staff finds this criterion met. 3. Any amendment that substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed development or the demand for public facilities. Staff Finding — The proposed replacement structure is nearly identical to the existing structure. There is a reduction of 1 unit (26 to 25) and a reduction of one bathroom (26 to 25). There is a reduction of one bedroom (27 to 26) within the "Lodge" structure. With this slight reduction, staff does not expect any increase in the demand for public facilities or trip generation caused by the improvements on this property. Staff finds this criterion met. 4. A reduction by greater than three percent (3 %) of the approved open space. Staff Finding — The existing buildings provide approximately 28.1% of the property or approximately 4,433.5 square feet of Pedestrian Amenity space. (Open Space has been replacement by "Pedestrian Amenity" in the Land Use Code.) The proposed buildings provide approximately 4,394 square feet or 27.9% of the property as Pedestrian Amenity. The proposal provides more than the 25% Pedestrian Amenity requirement and is not requesting a variance. The change represents approximately 39.5 square feet or roughly 0.25 %, well within the 3% allowance. Staff finds this criterion met. 5. A reduction by greater than one percent (1%) of the off - street parking and loading space. Staff Finding — The application does not propose any changes to the 12 off - street parking located along the alleyway. A few of these spaces look to be substandard in terms of depth, but are used on a regular basis and there is no change proposed to this situation. The slight reduction in units and bedrooms will lessen, by a very small degree, the parking demand. There is no reduction in parking and staff finds this criterion met. Holiday House Insubstantial PUD Amendment Page 2 , 6. A reduction in required pavement widths or rights -of -way for streets and easements. Staff Finding — The reconstruction proposal does not propose any changes to pavement widths or any changes to rights -of -way or easements. Staff finds this criterion met. 7. An increase of greater than two percent (2%) in the approved gross leasable,Jloor area of commercial buildings. Staff Finding — There are no commercial buildings on this site and no changes proposed to the amount of gross leasable area (which is zero). Staff finds this criterion met. 8. An increase by greater than one percent (1 vo) in the approved residential density of the development. Staff Finding — Density is defined by the City of Aspen as "the number of dwelling units or bedrooms per unit of land as permitted in the zone district." The proposed reconstruction reduces the number of units by one (from 26 to 25) and the number of bedrooms by one (from 27 to 26). There is no increase in the Density and the number of units and bedrooms are within what is allowed in the Residential Multi- Family Zone District (which allows for unlimited Density). 9. Any change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project's original approval or which requires granting a variation from the project's approved use or dimensional requirements. Staff Finding — The original approvals are primarily focused on the annex building and no changes are proposed for that structure. The final development plan of the original approvals provided a variance to the Open Space requirements to permit a small courtyard to count towards the 35% requirement. As discussed above, the now applicable 25% Pedestrian Amenity requirement is met with this application. The "Lodge" building reconstruction expands the total FAR by about 107 square feet but does not require a variance as the project's FAR is within the zoning allowance. The height of the "Lodge" building increases by about 19 inches, to approximately 25 feet, but does not require a variance as it is still within the 32 -foot height limitation of this zone (assuming the proposed Density). No variations to the use of the building are proposed. Staff finds that the changes proposed to the PUD do not require granting of a variation to the approved use or dimensional requirements. The use and character of the reconstruction is very much the same as the existing (prior to the fire) use and character of the project. Staff has reviewed the original approvals and the reconstruction is not inconsistent with the conditions or representation of the original approval. Staff finds this criterion met. Holiday House Insubstantial PUD Amendment Page 3 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS: The existing (prior to fire) "Lodge" building did not provide one street - oriented entrance for every four units. The building has a central entryway with internal circulation. Re- orienting the entrances from internal to external would likely cause a total re- design of the building and potentially no longer qualify the reconstruction as an "in- kind" reconstruction. The existing building also does not contain a first -story street - facing element of 20% of the building's overall width. The building was constructed long before this requirement was adopted. The level of re- design that would be needed to comply with this 20% standard would likely cause to "reconstruction" to no longer be considered a "reconstruction." The application demonstrates compliance with all other Residential Design Standards. STANDARDS OF REVIEW - RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS VARIANCES: Sec. 26.410.020. Procedures for review. D. Variances. 1. Administrative variances. The applicant may seek an administrative variance for not more than three (3) of the individual requirements. An applicant who desires a variance from the residential design standards shall demonstrate, and the Community Development Director shall find that the variances, if granted, would: a. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the director may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting or a broader vicinity as the director feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted, or Staff Finding — The neighborhood pattern of development does not necessarily dictate variances from these two standards. Staff does not find the variance to be warranted according to this criterion. b. Be clearly necessaryfor reasons offairness related to unusual site - specific constraints. Staff Finding — The Residential Design Standards were not incorporated into the Land Use Code until after the building had been developed. The Land Use Code allows properties such as this to continue and come into conformance with the design standards at the time of substantial redevelopment. The existing approvals did not consider the variations to the design standards (because they didn't exist) but do represent a site - specific constraint — the property may only be developed according to the specific PUD approval. And, the property may only be reconstructed "in- kind" according to the specific PUD approval after a catastrophic event. So, requiring compliance with the design standards could force changes inconsistent with the specific PUD approval. Holiday House Insubstantial PUD Amendment Page 4 In this case, the level of changes that would be required for the existing (prior to fire) building to come into conformance with the design standards would necessitate an entire redesign which would be inconsistent with the specific PUD approval. The property owner did, a few years ago, propose a substantial PUD amendment and found significant neighborhood resistance to making any changes to the building. As a result and after roughly a year of public hearings with no resolution, the property owner withdrew the application and started remodeling the building in a manner that did not represent changing the building. "Re- opening" the PUD approvals would likely experience the same level of resistance to changing the building and would not likely result in a timely resolution to the circumstance. In addition, the fire represents a circumstance that is unusual and unique to this property. Compliance with the standards is not required for existing buildings and compliance with the standards for reconstructing buildings after a catastrophic fire would cause the reconstruction to be inconsistent with the specific PUD approval. Staff believes this predicament represents what the drafters of the Land Use Code envisioned as a site - specific constraint for which variances are warranted as a matter of fairness. Staff finds these two variances to be warranted given the unusual site - specific constraints of this property, namely the PUD approvals and the limitations for reconstructing a building in- kind. Staff finds this criterion met. OTHER ISSUES: The relationship between the applicant and the neighbors is not as healthy as it could be. Staff has included a condition that the applicant considers ways to improve communication regarding this replacement and the disruption that construction entails. Staff is requesting a revised set of PUD Plans to document the condition of the property. Staff is recommending this occur prior to issuance of a certificate of Occupancy. Staff is also requesting a revised master deed restriction for the affordable housing units. The existing deed restriction history is confusing. APPROVAL: I hereby approve an insubstantial amendment to the Holiday House Planned Unit Development with the following conditions of approval. I& — dat&- "No. Chris Bendon, AICP Community Development Director City of Aspen Holiday House Insubstantial PUD Amendment Page 5 e„. CONDITIONS OE APPROVAL: 1. The building permit application shall include a set of scaled plans and elevations of the existing (prior to the fire) structure as well as the proposed structure with a tabular summary of all before and after dimensions including number of units, be(rooms, Floor Area, net livable square footage. height, setbacks, open space, and parking. 2. A revised PUD Plan set shall be filed with the City of Aspen prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The PIT) Plan set shall include /depict: • A current improvement survey of the property showing the post redevelopment status of the property. • An illustrative plan showing the building, landscape, parking, utilities. and other site improvements. • Scaled plans for each level of the buildings showing unit layouts, common spaces. and net livable square footage for each unit and a table summarizing the project's net livable area. • Scaled plans for each level of the buildings showing Floor Area calculations along with a table summarizing the project's Floor Area. • A table of all project dimensions including number of [nits, bedrooms, Floor Area, net livable square footage, height, setbacks, open space, and parking. • Elevations of the structures showing architectural character, fenestration, and heights measured according to the City's height regulations. • The PUD Plan set shall cross- reference the recordation information of the new master deed restriction. The administrative policy of requiring recordation of the PUD Plan set prior to acceptance of a building permit application is hereby waived. 3. The applicant shall develop it revised master affordable housing deed restriction with the Aspen /Pitkin County Housing Authority and record the deed restriction with Pitkin Cowry Clerk and Recorder prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. A PUD Agreement shall be filed with the City of Aspen prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 4. The applicant is encouraged to enhance cormnunication with neighbors concerning redevelopment schedules and construction impacts on the neighborhood. ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS OE APPROVAL: 1, Mark Vogele, Project Manager for the Aspen Skiing Company, herchy accept and agree to the conditions of this approval on behalf of the applicant, the Aspen Skiing Company. j date LlCf' Mark Vogele, Project A a agcy Aspen Skiing Company Holiday House Insubstantial PUD Amendment Page 6 �r Date: May 16, 2008 07 THE CITY OF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number and name assigned to this property is 0024.2008.ASLU (Holiday House - Insubstantial PUD Amendment). The planner assigned to this case is Chris Bendon (chrisb@ci.aspen.co.us). ❑ Your Land Use Application is incomplete: We found that the application needs additional items to be submitted for it to be deemed complete and for us to begin reviewing it. We need the following additional submission contents for you application: 1. 2. 3. Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. Your Land Use Application is complete: If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429 -2759 if you have any questions. Thank You, Je 'fer Phel ,Deputy Director City of Aspen, Community Development Department C:\Documents and Settings \jennifep\Desktop \organized \G Drive \Templates\Land Use Cases \Completeness Letter Land Use.doc / Filed for record April 3, 1973 at 9:06 A.M. Rcception No. 158616 Peggy E. Miklich, Recorder , ° - t„ d "I FAGS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 LEAVES RESOLUTION N0. /� (Series of 19 WHEREAS, the streets in the Aspen commercial core area were originally designed for horse -drawn and pedestrian traffic, and are becoming increasingly congested by modern motor vehicular traffic; and WHEREAS, increasing numbers of residents of and visitors to the City of Aspen have suggested that portions of these core area streets be converted to pedestrian malls; and WHEREAS, a comprehensive City of Aspen transportation plan recently prepared and submitted by a private planning consultant recommends the creation of pedestrian malls in the downtown area; and WHEREAS, during its 1970 session the Colorado General Assembly determined that the creation of pedestrian malls in order to separate pedestrian traffic from vehicular traffic in retail shopping areas would serve to promote the public health, safety and welfare in Colorado cities, and accordingly QOI enacted the "public Mall Act of 197011, § §139 -89 -1 et seq, of 'I the 1963 Colorado Revised Statutes, as amended, authorizing the establishment of such pedestrian malls by the legislative bodies of cities and towns (including home rule cities) pursuant to the procedures set forth in the Act; and WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has determined that the establishment of a pedestrian mall in the Aspen commercial core area will ease motor vehicular traffic congestion and reduce air pollution in such area, provide a more attractive and relaxed shopping atmosphere, aid the economic prosperity of Aspen by increasing the exposure of goods and services of D�L., 1 i �. !' . � PAGIr �1? j RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ioo LEAVES local merchants, preserve the historic, cultural and natural aspects of the town's heritage and environment, and generally create safer and more healthful, productive, and aesthetically and culturally pleasing surroundings in such area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, THAT: 1. The Aspen City Council has determined and hereby declares that the public interest and convenience of the Aspen community require the establishment of a pedestrian mall, and that vehicular traffic will not be unduly inconvenienced thereby. 2. The Aspen City Council hereby declares its intention to establish a pedestrian mall in the City of Aspen, Colorado, pursuant to the authority and procedures contained in the Public Mall Act of 1970, § §139 -89 -1 et seq. of the 1963 Colorado Revised Statutes, as amended. 3. The following is a general description of those portions of the public streets within the City of Aspen which are to be established as a pedestrian mall: (a) That section of Hyman Avenue from Mill Street to Galena Street; (b) That section of Cooper Avenue from Mill Street to Galena Street; (c) That section of Mill Street from Hyman Avenue to the northerly right -of -way line (as extended) of the alley in Block 90; (d) That section of Galena Street from Cooper Avenue to the northerly right -of -way line (as extended) of the alley in Block 90. In addition, portions of the following- described street and /or alley intersections will be established as "mall intersections" and constitute part of the pedestrian mall, -2- RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ioo LEAVES The above - described pedestrian mall is graphically depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part of this Resolution by this reference, and on the larger version of such map on file in the office of the Aspen City Clerk. 4. It is the intention of the Aspen City Council to adopt an ordinance prohibiting all vehicular traffic on such pedestrian mall except fire fighting equipment, ambulances, police vehicles, and other forms of emergency vehicles, and with the possible further exception of service vehicular traffic to the alley in Block 89 through the malled portion of Mill Street lying northerly of such alley. 5. In the event damages are actually allowed or awarded to any property owner by reason of the establishment of the pedestrian mall, such damages shall be paid at the time the amount thereof is finally determined, whether by agreement of the parties or by a court of competent jurisdiction, and shall be payable out of the proceeds derived from the City of Aspen Sales Tax which goes into effect July 1, 1973, or from such other source or sources of funds available to the City as the City Council may from time to time deem to be appropriate. 6. Following the establishment of the pedestrian mall, improvements will be made from time to time to such mall. It is anticipated that these improvements will be accomplished either by City employees or by private contractors under agree- ment with the City, and that the same shall be paid for out of the proceeds of the City of Aspen Sales Tax which goes into effect July 1, 1973, or from such other source or sources of funds available to the City as the City Council may from time to time deem to be appropriate. -4- ASPENC SNOWMASS ASPEN SKIING GOMPANY Planning Department Transmittal: TO: Chris Bandon, Director, Community Development Department, The City of Aspen From Mark Vogele, Project Manager, Aspen Skiing Company CC: Dave Corbin, Sunny Vann, Ted Guy, File Date: May 15, 2008 Re: Application for an Insubstantial PUD Amendment and Residential Design Review for the Holiday House Affordable Housing Project Dear Chris: Attached for your review and use are three copies of the Application for an Insubstantial PUD Amendment and Residential Design Review for the Holiday House Affordable Housing project. Included with the three submittal books are; 1. the Initial Deposit check for $1,880, 2. the original "Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Fees" 3. and the original "Permission to Represent' letter from David Corbin regarding Vann Associates, LLC. Please do not hesitate to call me with any information needs or questions that you have. Sincerely, M/ k Vogele (% Project Manager Aspen Skiing Company P.O. Box 1248 Aspen, CO 81612 (970) 923 -8759 desk (970) 309 -5019 cell mvogele@aspensnowmass.com • Page 1 HOLIDAY HOUSE AFFORDABLE HOUSING INSUBSTANTIAL PUD AMENDMENT APPLICATION 0 AN APPLICATION FOR AN INSUBSTANTIAL PUD AMENDMENT AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW FOR THE HOLIDAY HOUSE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT Submitted by: Aspen Skiing Company P.O. Box 1248 Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 925 -1220 May 15, 2008 Prepared by: VANN ASSOCIATES, LLC Planning Consultants 230 East Hopkins Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 925 -6958 PROJECT CONSULTANTS PLANNER Sunny Vann, AICP Vann Associates, LLC 230 East Hopkins Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 925 -6958 ARCHITECT Theodore K Guy Theodore K Guy Associates, PC P.O. Box 1640 Basalt, CO 81621 (970) 927 -3167 i i ' CONTRACTOR Bill Boyd ModSystem Structures SB, Inc. P.O. Box 12377 Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 920 -2282 r r r a �A I I A i SURVEYOR Mark S. Beckler, L.S. Sopris Engineering, LLC 502 Main Street, Suite A3 Carbondale, CO 81623 (970) 704 -0311 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Section I. INTRODUCTION II. BACKGROUND III. PROJECT SITE IV. PROPOSED AMENDMENT V. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS A. Insubstantial PUD Amendment B. Residential Design Standards C. Code Interpretation D. Vested Property Rights APPENDIX A. Exhibit 1, Pre - Application Conference Summary Exhibit 2, Letter from David Bellack Exhibit 3, Permission to Represent Exhibit 4, Land Use Application Form Exhibit 5, Dimensional Requirements Form Exhibit 6, Application Fee Agreement B. Exhibit 1, Aspen Mountain Joint Venture Agreement ii Page 1 2 5 22 35 35 37 40 40 Section TABLE OF CONTENTS Page APPENDIX 1 Exhibit 2, Section VI, Little Nell Base Development SPA Agreement 3 Exhibit 3, 1986 Dedication of Real Property to Employee Housing Restrictions and Guidelines for the Holiday House Exhibit 4, 1986 Dedication of Real Property to Employee Housing Restrictions and Guidelines for the Holiday House Exhibit 5, Ordinance No. 50, Series of 1989 Exhibit 6, Community Development Department Case Disposition Summary Exhibit 7, Holiday House Final Plat Exhibit 8, Occupancy Deed Restriction and Agreement Holiday House Expansion Exhibit 9, 1993 Dedication of Real Property to Employee Housing Restrictions and Guidelines for the Holiday House C. Exhibit 1, Fire Investigation Report iii r INTRODUCTION The following application requests an insubstantial planned unit development ( "PUD ") amendment for the Holiday House, a thirty -five unit, multi - family affordable housing project which is located at 125 and 127 West Hopkins Avenue in the City of Aspen (see Pre - application Conference Summary, Exhibit 1, Appendix A, attached hereto). Two variances from the City's Residential Design Standards and a code interpretation are also requested. As the Pre - Application Conference Summary indicates, the requested approvals are administrative in nature, and will be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director. Vested property rights status is requested for all approvals granted pursuant to this application. The application is submitted pursuant to Sections 26.306.010.C., 26.445.100.A. and 26.410.13.1. of the Aspen Land Use Regulations (the "Regulations ") by the Aspen Skiing Company (hereinafter "Applicant "), the owner of the property (see Letter from David Bellack, Exhibit 2, Appendix A). Permission for Vann Associates, LLC, Planning Consultants, to represent the Applicant is attached as Exhibit 3, Appendix A. A land use application form, dimensional requirements form, and an application fee agreement are attached as Exhibit 4, 5 and 6, Appendix A, respectively. The application is divided into five sections. Section I provides a brief introduction to the application while Section II provides background information with respect to the prior deed restriction and development of the property. Section III describes the project site and its existing improvements while Section IV outlines the Applicant's proposed PUD amendment. Section IV of the application addresses the proposed amendment's compliance with the applicable review criteria of the Regulations. For the reviewer's convenience, all pertinent documents relating to the project (e.g., deed restrictions, etc.) are provided in the various appendices to the application. 1 r While the Applicant has attempted to address all relevant provisions of the Regulations, and to provide sufficient information to enable a thorough evaluation of the ' • lid , application, questions may arise which require futther information and /or clarificatioixf. - The Applicant will provide such additional informatiog as may �e required `in the course ' of the application's review. o. r II. BACKGROUND In December of 1980, the City and Hans Cantrup entered into an "Agreement in Settlement of Civil Claims" in which Mr. Cantrup agreed to deed restrict as affordable housing five lodge units which he had illegally constructed in the basement of the Holiday House Lodge. The units in question were located in the area of the former lodge which is presently configured as affordable housing Units 11, 12, 14, 16 and 17. While the agreement did not address the size and configuration of the units, or the number of employees to be housed, the settlement required that they be deed restricted for a period of fifty years to the City's low income guidelines. The deed restriction was executed in April of 1985 by Aspen Mountain Joint Venture, Mr. Cantrup's successor in interest, and recorded in Book 483 at Page 961 (see Exhibit 1, Appendix B). Seventeen additional lodge units were deed restricted as affordable housing units by the Applicant following their acquisition of the property from Aspen Mountain Joint Venture in December of 1985. The affordable housing units were required pursuant to Section VI of the "Little Nell Base Development SPA Agreement" (see Exhibit 2, Appendix B). The units were deed restricted in July of 1986 in two separate documents. Fifteen units (i.e., Units 5, 6, 7, 8, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 and 36) were deed restricted in the "Dedication of Real Property to Employee Housing Restrictions and Guidelines for the Holiday House" which is recorded in Book 580 at Page 119 as affordable housing mitigation for the Little Nell Hotel (see Exhibit 3, Appendix B). PA 3 y r w d w w The remaining two units (i.e., Units 9 and 10) were deed restricted in a similar document which is recorded in Book 580 at Page 230 (see Exhibit 4, Appendix B). These two units were required as mitigation for the Aspen Mountain gondola. The seventeen lodge rooms were deed restricted as low income rental units as provided for in the SPA agreement. Each unit was required to have a private bath and a small kitchen. Individual unit sizes were allowed to vary but an average of 172 square feet of net livable area per employee was required. The seventeen units were credited with housing two employees per unit for a total of thirty-four employees housed. Aspen Skiing Company employees were to be given first priority to occupy the units. In the event of vacancies, the Applicant was allowed to rent to other employees and to music students in accordance with the City's low income guidelines. A minimum lease period of thirty days, however, was permitted. In August of 1989, the City Council rezoned the Holiday House property from LP, Lodge Preservation, to R/MF(PUD), Residential /Multi - Family, Planned Unit Devel- opment pursuant to Ordinance No. 50, Series of 1989 (see Exhibit 5, Appendix B). The property was rezoned in connection with the Council's approval for the development of nine, one - bedroom affordable housing units (hereinafter referred to as the "Annex ") on two vacant lots located immediately east of the former Holiday House Lodge. As the attached Community Development Department "Case Disposition" summary indicates (see Exhibit 6, Appendix B), Ordinance 50 was approved subject to a number of condi- tions. Most significantly, the nine new units were to be deed restricted to the As- pen/Pitkin County Housing Authority's ( "APCHA ") moderate income rental guidelines, and all of the remaining free market units in the former Holiday House Lodge were required to be deed restricted as affordable housing. Free market "GMQS" reconstruc- tion credits for the deed restricted units were specifically prohibited. 3 i f .r The Case Disposition summary also notes that PUD approval was granted for a variation from the Regulations to permit the inclusion of a portion of the property in the calculation of the project's required open space that would otherwise not have been allowed. In addition, an amendment to the Little Nell SPA agreement was approved to permit the removal of the former Holiday House Lodge's swimming pool in exchange for the provision of bicycle racks. Finally, special review approval was granted to permit the payment of cash -in -lieu for nine parking spaces. Twelve parking spaces, however, were to be provided on -site, and the recordation of a final plat was required. A copy of the recorded plat is attached as Exhibit 7, Appendix B. An "Occupancy Deed Restriction and Agreement Holiday House Expansion" was recorded for the nine new units in Book 638 at Page 820 in January of 1991 (see Exhibit 8, Appendix B). The deed restriction states that the units each contained 422.6 square feet of net livable area, and that occupancy was limited to a maximum of two adults and related children. All tenants were to be qualified by APCHA and a six month minimum lease was required. The deed restriction also states that the units may be rented to any qualified employees the Aspen Skiing Company may choose, and that the Applicant has the right to approve any prospective tenant which APCHA may propose. In April of 1993, four additional units (i.e., Units 2, 4, 16 and 21) in the former Holiday House Lodge were deed restricted to the APCHA's low income rental guidelines. The "Dedication Of Real Property to Employee Housing Restrictions and Guidelines for the Holiday House" is recorded in Book 708 at Page 420 (see Exhibit 9, Appendix B). The deed restriction is essentially identical to the two earlier documents which were recorded to deed restrict the former lodge's initial seventeen units. The four units were apparently deed restricted to comply with the condition of the City's 1989 approval of the nine unit Annex which required all remaining units in the former lodge :! C '1 9 a r to be deed restricted. It appears, however, that Unit 16 was deed restricted twice, initially in 1985 by Aspen Mountain Joint Venture and again in 1993 by the Applicant. In summary, thirty -four of the thirty -five units in the Holiday House complex have been deed restricted to date. Units 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 and 36 in the former Holiday House Lodge were deed restricted in 1985, 1986 and 1993. The nine units in the Annex were deed restricted in 1991. Unit 15 in the former lodge building has apparently never been restricted. All of the units except the nine units in the Annex are deed restricted to APCHA's low income category. The Annex units are deed restricted to APCHA's moderate income category. It should be noted that only seventeen of the thirty -five units were required to be deed restricted for affordable housing mitigation purposes. The remaining seventeen units which have been deed restricted to date were voluntarily encumbered by the Applicant. As a result, the only affordable housing mitigation that must be provided on the Holiday House property is that which is required pursuant to the Little Nell SPA agreement. Pursuant to the agreement, thirty-four low income employees must be housed in a minimum of 172 square feet of net livable area per employee. Ill. PROJECT SITE As the Improvement Survey /Topographic Map on the following page illustrates, the Holiday House property is legally described as Lots C, D, E, F, G and the east 7.5 feet of Lot B, City and Townsite of Aspen. While the plat recorded in connection with the 1989 Annex approval depicts Lots F and G as a separate parcel, all of the lots were acquired by the Applicant in a single transaction, and are believed to constitute a single parcel pursuant to Section 26.480.020.E. of the Regulations. The property contains contain E E, 0 wx nn � O O F ° S ^ U U U d F Ell a W > � W E, a xF'�x w� v o zo am W H ern E. 00 C) v1 CO Zz O W U L� rt fIf/ / %�� ✓ � T OoUY 4S m.t V a�3 Y n N s +1/� �. R�Mf' �l T-✓� IItt,fr fl� m $ v nxgt °� �(�{ & m °°amn Op OL A 9m pp c� 6<66u3 EEq° a 5. e �S J„Yg �a5a a o,80 8 g�e ?9 pT°. ppV O >9�� m joOre �L 75 �o y�gg _ of g` &eg � 5S a gKe HIS EE � ibU m1z.fflp Sig' ®' ACC ° X Y Ma aaC ki `o 6L° beE tl 8 9 i '"_N °.. ...... �iy. °zy _oo_ue et2A y �NNNt"° 3 � m 6 t t Q'y F (KO W zwoo x a� Z vvF'it,�.t ► iiillllllIasi ��_�.� Illlnillllll� _= =::VII 1 Sig' ®' ACC ° X Y Ma aaC ki `o 6L° beE tl 8 9 i '"_N °.. ...... �iy. °zy _oo_ue et2A y �NNNt"° 3 yg t � k gg ®t$i,S$OG 9O O o.0 � m 6 t t Q'y F (KO W zwoo x a� Z vvF'it,�.t yg t � k gg ®t$i,S$OG 9O O o.0 s r .r 15,750 square feet of "Lot Area" as such term is defined in the Regulations, and is zoned R/MF(PUD), Residential /Multi - Family, Planned Unit Development Overlay. Existing improvements include the former Holiday House Lodge and the detached Annex, both of which are of wood frame construction. The former lodge building contains two storys and a full basement, a portion of which daylights at the rear of the structure. The Annex building is also a two story structure but does not contain a basement. Pedestrian access to the two buildings is provided from the Hopkins Street sidewalk and a gravel parking area located adjacent to the alley at the rear of the property. As the survey illustrates, the parking area is encumbered with an electric transformer that was apparently installed when existing utilities in the area were relocated underground, and is further constrained by the presence of a large tree. As a result, the parking area presently contains less than the twelve parking spaces that were required in connection with the 1989 approval of the Annex. On -site vegetation consists primarily of several large evergreens and various smaller aspen trees. Three large cottonwoods are also located in the public right -of -way adjacent to Hopkins Street. The former Holiday House Lodge building contains a total of twenty -six dwelling units and twenty-seven bedrooms. As the existing floor plans; elevations; and floor area, net livable area and open space tabulations on the following pages illustrate, the twenty - six units consist of sixteen studio units, nine 1- bedroom units and one 2- bedroom unit. The Annex building contains nine 1- bedroom units. Together, the two buildings contain a total of thirty -five dwelling units and thirty -six bedrooms. The total floor area of the two buildings is 15,217 square feet of which 10,757 square feet is located in the former lodge and 4,560 square feet is located in the Annex. The net livable area of the former lodge units ranges from 242 square feet for the smallest studio to 969 square feet for the 2- bedroom unit. The nine 1- bedroom units in the Annex each contain approximately 445 7 w tu g AW a btu aA H °2: 51 m tu � To °m 5 f m At LU �IL tu m �0 m z z i rJ � �► �'��l� Win mom MUM I I I ,J rain i f ■r.�.....1 mom -- aim IN sm to —�L7t� lu ell' YN I11W z � zoo 4� �4� �Dm Q�ii z z i rJ � �► �'��l� Win mom MUM I I I ,J rain i f ■r.�.....1 mom -- aim IN sm to —�L7t� lu ell' �1 OL w s� l -.SL (1XApX 1Ngd'.CH) AK ✓.V'C 1 EH -I I b-.S! (1XAiM 1WOtlW .O/5 4 -L4 .S-B4 4w � oS S 8 Bit' N Ml o P Y, n a 3 �I I mm z E • 1 bnnN� m� jfnry oNrry O � ��r� 55 IHMM 15M S. •app ss{ yhi n 'sa '��v qa E by ■ {isy$ ys s 3�i3 �5F 3. »5� .x`83, f,ngg �r3Di55r 3 »3 mm E . R K � e c b tse.g �e r F .. MNba �Nr Fnww wb ��n 'n ppprddpR R"`�- h $. Nm F�i 1� N� FN 4N, F, Fm�b Nmryp Wi S. •app ss{ yhi n 'sa '��v qa E by ■ {isy$ ys s 3�i3 �5F 3. »5� .x`83, f,ngg �r3Di55r 3 »3 &AMR. F- ,n aAmRLL n bz (1192H 1NOd W .WL b.6i mil A"A =�= 11 k Fla .L -.SL i i ' dw 8 i Si�� 2� 1► n bz (1192H 1NOd W .WL b.6i mil A"A =�= 11 k Fla .L -.SL i i �1 N <611 I of -1 ,, *2M iwodaw .v, L-= so ' + L I, t F1 t3 i I I I 3 i . 'l f 3 I .j �jz t ti Q f i A. 5Mimi'! i 70 HIM :1: SO, iINK`111, r eQAIlk Av- 1 WASWOUTAN U �Ip ►�tJ` \ �\ �SN�IQ �44110WI IVA&\ 1 "_` -- S�`�� 0hIIMEW: WAD I ANN 1 \ CV \ N` I or 0-01W._ MWI%1 rA\IN 1 mot wommo, 1 % %IMMMI \ toom %L I �� \\ ,\\ `010 ►\\\`OWN Ilk 14WN1 iil moai�m i • ` N a MOM OP ► i Ili E%1 \ ►`.�)n.R.IMONS L \ \M i`\V 1� \ \ \ \ \V 17��. 1�� \ \ \ \ \\ ::ice • 1 ! ._. V mow ja �`� \ \ \V [ 1 1... .1.1 i;iimilli any um 1111111 nm W1! IN IT -2 low uli nn i i nn pgi apu +i Irt z �z W m� °m w J s= L T- � J V- LL z LL LL LL LL. LL LL� LL LL LL LL LL LL LL� LL LL N �r � w J s= L T- � J V- LL z LL � LL� LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL. LL LL� LL LL LL LL LL LL LL� LL LL N �r � �j N (�yN�{ �N �yIN1� JI N Upl Nq NpD .NNp N N N Npp ,Npry NN yRN-I yNr� Cl RN � �(Nry (V �V fV ,Np N IV �'1 �ryry1 11� yN� N (mV �`! 111 N IY 1Y 11f Y tY`I T �I1 (m`I O •- N Y N� � M <'1 � h 1���11 C1 m m m �i ^ N N p 1- m P ��' � R8 Y� D3 °rc °; W � �� � �o �Q � �� �� �� ��'�G �� 4A�� '" Q �IIIIIII °� �� 8�i�� �s �� r ��� �� square feet of net livable area. Based on APCHA's housing standards (i.e., 1.25 employees /studio, 1.75 employees /1- bedroom unit and 2.25 employees /2- bedroom unit), the thirty -five units are credited with housing a total of 53.75 employees. With respect to height, the former lodge building measures 24.1 feet from natural grade to the midpoint of its roof at its highest point. The height of the roof's ridge at the highest point measures 25.9 feet. Similarly, the Annex measures 24.8 feet to the midpoint of its roof and 27.8 feet to the top of the roof ridge. The existing develop- ment's open space (a /k/a, pedestrian amenity space) totals 4,433 square feet, or approximately 28 percent, measured pursuant to current Regulations. The Holiday House property's existing development data is summarized in Table 1, below. Table 1 EXISTING DEVELOPMENT DATA Holiday House 1. Existing Units 35 Holiday House Lodge Building 26 Studios 16 Basement 6 Main Level 6 Second Level 4 One Bedroom �� b 9 Basement 2 Main Level 4 Second Level 3 Two Bedroom 1 Second Level 1 Annex Building 9 One Bedroom 9 Lower Level 4 Upper Level 5 20 2. Existing Floor Area (Sq. Ft.) 15,317 3. H Holiday House Lodge Building Basement Main Level Second Level Annex Building Lower Level Upper Level Existing Maximum Height (Feet)' Holiday House Lodge Building Annex Building Existing Pedestrian Amenity Space Square Feet Percent 10,757 1,488 4,626 4,643 4,560 2,130 2,430 24.1 24.8 4,433.5 28.1 f Measured vertically from natural grade to the mean height between the eave point and ridge of the roof. The property's existing floor area and height are significantly less than that which is presently permitted in the R/MF zone district. A floor area ratio of 1.5:1 is permitted for multi - family projects with a parcel density equal to or greater than one unit per 750 square feet of lot area. Based on the property's 15,750 square feet of lot area, the minimum required density is twenty -one units. As the existing development contains a total of thirty -five units, a maximum floor area of 23,625 square feet is allowed. The maximum allowable height for projects with a parcel density equal to or greater that one unit per 1,500 square feet of lot area is thirty-two feet. As the existing development contains more than the minimum required eleven units (i.e., 15,750 Sq. Ft. _ 1,500 Sq. Ft.), its maximum allowable height is thirty-two feet. The existing development complies with all applicable setbacks, and the property's pedestrian amenity space exceeds the Regulations' minimum 25 percent, or 3,938 square foot, requirement. 21 The former Holiday House Lodge building was substantially destroyed by fire in November of 2007. As the attached Fire Investigation Report prepared by the Aspen Fire Protection District's Deputy Fire Marshal indicates (see Exhibit 1, Appendix C), the fire was accidental in nature, and is believed to have resulted from plumbing repairs that were being undertaken at the time. A demolition permit for the former lodge building has been submitted to the City and the building is scheduled to be demolished in the near future. IV. PROPOSED AMENDMENT Upon demolition, the Applicant proposes to replace the former Holiday House Lodge building with a similarly sized and configured structure. No changes are proposed to the existing Annex building. As the proposed site plan; floor plans; elevations; and floor area, net livable area and open space tabulations on the following pages illustrate, the new building will essentially occupy the same footprint as the former structure, and will also contain two storys and a basement. The number and configuration of the building's units, however, has been revised to enhance their livability. The building's unit count has been reduced by one unit to twenty-five units, which will consist of sixteen studios, eight 1- bedroom units and one 2- bedroom unit. While the proposed unit mix is similar to the existing mix, the individual units have been enlarged and reconfigured where feasible to increase their size and functionality. The new building, which will be of modular construction, has also been designed to comply with current building code requirements. The resulting Holiday House development will comply with all applicable dimensional requirements of the R/MF zone district. The project meets or exceeds all required building setbacks; exceeds the district's minimum required pedestrian amenity space; contains significantly less that its maximum allowable floor area; and is below the 22 WQ� 50 QWR m � Y \\ W F Y� r '• ov / np b HCi \��� n I/ n / P / I / / W v U / m e Z !/ � 1 . J QW c V l"ev d � a r /m u V M 1`\ \ \J } 2 } 2 V0- E ` v d) lu� lu 4fl ol Will (23: ITS WE V " wr 0 -LL WL Vi lu -j lu , agEmj O IS ---------- 01 T 70 0 A 01 1 u 0 O 70A VOA0 01 0 t 0 .1 0 0 0 0 i L LL 6 A Ac Z-b A Ac IT .9/9 T.4E .e /l b Ier WE V " Va z Q� ' .. � tad tu 5 �1 Xf !.1 1 ..£-b OO!O .L /l 1-19 O OO ❑ ❑ 0 0 101 r O � N O m O .Sr9L .L/l 4.L1 .l-9L i N 11 -O L O -D__ O til I C m 1V m �� �O L;l w -Q O D O O 0 9 K, a C m O � n 0,0 110 0 q -- o - - -_ ___ _ o __ O o N N ❑ ❑ O � y s WD m w� 135 s F 4 ddm sui ZA TA- Z/l b RL .L /l bL9 Q p ry n N c� O � O ❑ O ❑ O,O O:O O:O ❑ O:O ZA Z✓L < .CV/l - t G-9L O O� O m c m Q ry ry O ? s4 m w < z ry 111 0 0 N O o o-,> ❑ ❑ N N p ry I I .9-4n ..L -b ..9-Ac O.£L ZA TA- r I 3 �0 1 LL 0 LL Ji L N ek uj LL J1 LU = Ji LL 0�en1 L �Nen t gN g� N Mm LL Y1 zz LL A LL N L, N R aQQ1 L �Nen 5 Il �Nn LL Ji r I 3 �0 1 LL 0 LL Ji L N LL. Ji LL J1 LL. J� = Ji LL 0�en1 L �Nen t gN L eNe LL Y1 LL tlggl LL A LL N L, N R aQQ1 L �Nen Y. �Nen Il �Nn LL Ji Il 0 IL J� Il 0 y yy t� 3 & |§ �| 4 % § } ( o � a , 9 . Lu Rim.) r +a 7 Y r C n v ON W g dV t� m J � W Z 0m �N tu w � y u vU c a _ m � Q l � V� nr J N N I If n I a WQQQ �d� � To LL7d J� 2p �� guNy, �prye�1 Z�Z%<%< a� 11'I�LLu .0. -.91 .0 -64 m -mllj—m—]— \ / I II \ / \ /11 II \ / \ /II fl\ / m lu o� LL u I� G1 lJ IV 1 q w i �� �Q lu oiFn QO O I Z q I I I I I I Y I I I m i co �o f0� A �ez \ \ ;t N W tll ��u q,o z Q j H I 4 b Ig O tit lJ O 4 �Im blg .F M III Ed n �o m I� �7 bl N maximum allowable height. The new building's floor area and height, however, are slightly greater than the former Holiday House Lodge structure which it replaces. The new building's floor area exceeds the former structure's floor area by approximately 107 square feet while the height of its east wing is nineteen inches, or approximately 1.6 feet, D higher. The increase in floor area is attributable to minor changes in the building's footprint. The height increase reflects an increase in the units' floor to ceiling height from seven to eight feet and the additional structure required to accommodate modular construction. Table 2, below, summarizes the proposed development data. Table 2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DATA Holiday House 1. Proposed Units 25/ New Building Studios 16 Basement 4 Main Level 5 Second Level 7 One Bedroom 8 Basement 2 Main Level 3 Second Level 3 Two Bedroom 1 Main Level 1 Annex Building 9 One Bedroom 9 Lower Level 4 y Upper Level 5 N 2. Minimum Lot Size (Sq. Ft.) 6,000 3. Existing Lot Size (Sq. Ft.) 15,750 32 i 1 9 1 l li I> w M r r r <r M �r ar 4. Minimum Required Lot Area /Dwelling No Requirement Unit (Sq. Ft.) 5. Minimum Required Lot Width (Feet) 60 6. Existing Lot Width (Feet) 157.5 7. Minimum Required Setbacks (Feet) Front Yard 5 Side Yards 5 Rear Yard 5 8. Proposed Setbacks (Feet)' Front Yard 9.5 East Side Yard 5.3 West Side Yard 5.4 Rear Yard 12.0 9. Maximum Allowable Height (Feet)z 32 10. Proposed Height (Feet)' 24.8 11. Minimum Required Distance Between No Requirement Buildings (Feet) 12. Minimum Required Public Amenity Space 3,938 @ 25 Percent (Sq. Ft.) 13. Proposed Public Amenity Space (Sq. Ft.) 4i3943 14. Maximum Allowable Floor Area (Sq. Ft.)° 23,625 15. Proposed Floor Area (Sq. Ft.) 15,424 ' Measured to the closest building face. 2 Based on a parcel density greater than one unit per 1,500 square feet of lot area. 3 Measured vertically from natural grade to the mean height between the eave point and ridge of the roof. Based on a parcel density greater than one unit per 750 square feet of lot area. 33 As the proposed Site Plan illustrates, various changes to the property's existing access walkways are proposed to comply with the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act ( "ADA "). Exterior ramps will provide access from the sidewalk and parking area to the new building's front entry. An enclosed lift will provide access from the main level to the basement level ADA accessible units and an adjacent laundry. Please note that the project's existing parking area has been reconfigured to accommodate the previously required twelve spaces. With the exception of various fenestration changes, the new building's elevations will appear essentially the same as the existing building, and similar materials will used in the new building's construction. Based on APCHA's housing standards (i.e., 1.25 employees /studio, 1.75 employees /1- bedroom unit and 2.25 employees /2- bedroom unit), the new building's twenty -five units will be credited with housing 36.25 employees, or 1.75 employees less than the former lodge structure. The nine unit Annex houses 15.75 employees for a total housing credit of fifty -two employees. This figure substantially exceeds the thirty-four employee housing requirement imposed in connection with the City's approval of the Little Nell SPA. As the Pre - Application Conference Summary indicates, a final PUD development plan and a PUD agreement will be prepared and recorded prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the new building. Given the multiple deed restrictions that presently govern both the former lodge building and the Annex, the Applicant proposes to record a new deed restriction(s) which will encumber all of the units. The new deed restriction(s) will be prepared with the assistance of the APCHA staff and will incorporate current APCHA requirements. The PUD agreement will specifically provide for the termination of all prior agreement and restrictions upon the recordation of the new deed restriction(s). 34 I V REVIEW REQUIREMENTS The replacement of the former Holiday House Lodge with a new building is subject to review as an Insubstantial PUD Amendment and to the City's Residential Design Standards. A code interpretation is also required. Each of these requirements is addressed in this section. A. Insubstantial PUD Amendment Pursuant to Section 26.445.100.A. of the Regulations, the Community Development Director may approve an insubstantial amendment to a final PUD development plan subject to certain requirements. The specific requirements, and the proposed amendment's compliance therewith, are summarized below. 1. The proposed amendment does not change the use or character of the development. The replacement of the former Holiday House Lodge building with a new structure containing twenty -five affordable housing units will not change the use or character of the development. 2. The proposed amendment does not increase overall coverage of structures on the land by greater than three (3) percent. The former Holiday House Lodge building and the Annex building have a combined footprint of approximately 6,890 square feet. The new building and the annex will have a combined footprint of approximately 6,997 square feet, an increase in site coverage of 107 square feet or approximately 1.6 percent. The proposed amendment, therefore, does not increase site coverage by more than three percent. 3. The proposed amendment does not substantially increase trip generation rates or the demand for public facilities. 35 As no additional affordable housing units are proposed, and the new building's unit mix remains essentially the same, no increase in trip generation rates or the demand for public facilities is anticipated. 4. The proposed amendment does not reduce the approved open space by greater than three (3) percent. The project open space will decrease from approximately 4,434 square feet to approximately 4,394 square feet, a reduction of 40 square feet or approximately one percent. The proposed amendment, therefore, does not reduce the project's open space by more than three percent. 5. The proposed amendment does not reduce the approved off - street parking and loading space by greater than one (1) percent. The project's parking area has been reconfigured so as to provide the previously required twelve parking spaces. No reduction, therefore, is proposed. 6. The proposed amendment does not reduce the required pavement widths or rights -of -way for streets and easements. No reductions in pavement widths or street rights -of -way are proposed. 7. The proposed amendment does not increase the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial buildings by greater than two (2) percent. This criteria is not applicable as the project does not contain commercial uses. 8. The proposed amendment does not increase the approved residential density of the development by greater than one (1) percent. No increase in the project's residential density as such is defined in the Regulations (i.e., units and bedrooms) is proposed. The project's total unit count will 36 decrease from thirty -five to thirty -five. Its bedroom count will decrease from thirty -six to thirty -four. 9. The proposed amendment does not involve changes which are inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project's original approval or which requires granting a variation from the project's approved use or dimensional requirements. The project site was designated PUD in connection with the City's 1989 approval of the Annex. Pursuant to Section 26.445.100.C. of the regulations, the 1 Annex's approved site plan, floor plans and elevations, and the as -built site plan, floor plans and elevations for the former Holiday House Lodge building, constitute the property's final PUD development plan for PUD amendment purposes. No changes are proposed to the Annex. As discussed previously, the floor area and height of the new building will be slightly greater than that which existed at the time of the 1989 approval. The building's floor area will increase by approximately 107 square feet, which can be attributed to minor changes in its footprint. The height of the building's east wing will increase by nineteen inches, or approximately 1.6 feet. This increase reflects an increase in the units' floor to ceiling height from seven to eight feet and the additional structure required to accommodate the new building's modular construction. B. Residential Design Standards Pursuant to Section 26.410.010.B. I. of the Regulations, all residential development requiring a building permit is subject to compliance with the City's Residential Design Standards. Multi- family housing, however, is subject only to certain specific review standards. Pursuant to Section 26.410.020.D., administrative variances from the standards may be approved by the Community Development Director if no more than three variances from the standards are requested. As the proposed development will require only two variances, they may be approved by the Community Development 37 p y y Director. The applicable Residential Design Standards, and the proposed development's compliance therewith, are summarized below 1. Section 26.410.040.A.1., Building Orientation. The front facades of all principal structures shall be parallel to the street. As the proposed Site Plan illustrates, the front elevations of both the Annex and the new building are parallel to the street. 2. Section 26.410.040.C.1.a., Parking, Garages and Carports. Parking, garages and carports shall be accessed from an alley or private road. The project does not contain a garage or carport. The project's surface parking, however, is accessed from the alley at the rear of the property. 3. Section 26.410.040.D.1.a., Street Oriented Entrance and Principal Window. Multi - family units shall have at least one street - oriented entrance for every four (4) units, and front units must have a street - facing principal window. The requirement for multiple entry doors cannot reasonably be met as the new building essentially occupies the same footprint as the former lodge building. As demolition and replacement is required as a result of an accidental fire, fairness and the property's site specific constraints warrant a variance from this standard. The new building's pro 0 entry �. a ` eight feet in height. ent door faces the street and measures less than 4. Section 26.410.040.D.1.b., Street Oriented Entrance and Principal Window. A covered entry porch of fifty or more square feet, with a minimum depth of six feet, shall be part of the front facade. Entry porches and canopies shall not '000"�J be more than one story in height. The new building complies with this standard as it includes a one -story, covered entry porch containing approximately 119 square feet with a depth of 9.75 feet. m 5. Section 26.410.040.D.1.c., Street Oriented Entrance and Principal Window. A street facing principal window requires that a significant window or group of windows face the street. The new building complies with this standard as a significant number of windows face the street. 6. Section 26.410.040.D.2., First Story Element. All residential buildings shall have a first -story, street facing element the width of which comprises at i �% least 20 percent of the building's overall width and the depth of which is at least six feet �i Sf`v from the wall the first -story element is projecting from. While the new building's covered entry constitutes a first story element, site constraints and the building's interior unit configuration necessitate a variance from the 20 percent overall width requirement. 7. Section 26.410.040.D.3.a., Windows. Street facing windows shall not span through the area where a second floor level would typically exist, which is between nine and twelve feet above the finished first floor. No street facing windows are proposed which span through the area of the new building where the second floor level exists. The new building, therefore, complies with this standard. 8. Section 26.410.040.D.3.b., Windows. No more than one non- orthogonal window shall be allowed on each facade of a building. This standard does not apply as the new building contains no non - orthogonal windows. 9. Section 26.410.040.D.4., Lightwells. All areaways, lightwells and /or stairwells on the street facing facades of a building shall be entirely recessed' behind the frontmost wall of the building. This standard does not apply as the new building does not contain lightwells on the street facing facade. Based on the above, the new building will require a variance from Residential Design review standards 26.410.040.D.1.a. (i.e., the multiple street facing 39 entry door requirement) and 26.410.040.D.2. (i.e., the first -story, street facing element width requirement). C. Code Interpretation Pursuant to Section 26.306.010. A., the Community Development Director is authorized to make all interpretations of the Regulations. In the event a project proposes to demolish or replace existing, deed restricted, multi - family affordable housing units, Section 26.470.070.5. of the Regulations permits the redevelopment to increase or decrease the number of units, bedrooms, or net livable area provided there is no decrease in the total number of employees housed by the existing units. As the Pre - Application Conference Summary indicates, the Community Development Director has indicated that this section of the Regulations contemplates the "willful" demolition of a structure. Inasmuch as the redevelopment activity outlined in this application involves the replacement of a existing affordable housing structure that was rendered uninhabitable as a result of a non - willful fire which necessitates its demolition, the Director has determined that this section of the Regulations does not apply. Formal confirmation of the Director's interpretation is requested as provided for in Section 26.306.010.A. D. Vested Property Rights In order to preserve the land use approvals which may be obtained as a result of this application, the Applicant hereby requests vested property rights status pursuant to the provisions of Section 26.308.010.A. of the Regulations. It is our understanding that the receipt of all required development approvals and the issuance of a Development Order by the Community Development Department is sufficient to confer a vested property right, and that no further actions on behalf of the Applicant are required. [9] I APPENDIX A EXHIBIT IS /s CITY OF ASPEN PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Chris Bendon, 429.2765 DATE: 5.8.08 PROJECT: Holiday House PUD Amendment REPRESENTATIVE: Sunny Vann, AICP OWNER: Aspen Skiing Company TYPE OF APPLICATION: Code interpretation —Administrative Insubstantial PUD Amendment —Administrative Residential Design Standards — Administrative DESCRIPTION: The Aspen Skiing Company would like to rebuild the Holiday House after fire damage last fall rendered the building unrecoverable. This was a non - willful demolition, an "act of God. The Replacement after Demolition Section of Growth Management contemplates willful demolition of a structure. Because this development activity is replacement after an act of God and not as a result of an intentional demolition, the Growth Management review does not apply. The applicant would like a conformation of staffs interpretation regarding this section. Because the replacement structure will be required to comply with the modem building code, a few slight changes to the building's aesthetics are necessary. The applicant intends to maintain the height of the building relative to the surrounding buildings, but may need to increase the height by approximately 7 to 19 inches — still within the overall limitation of the RMF Zone District. If this additional height cannot be accommodated by lowering the surrounding grade (in order to maintain the same relative height to surrounding properties) " the building's overall height will increase. Staff does not consider this a substantial amendment because the maximum height will still comply with the zone district requirements and will not require a variation from the project's approved variations. Staff does not support the creation of multiple window wells, which would require variances from Residential Design Standards, to accommodate a slight reduction in height. Staff will request a filing of PUD Plans for the property which document the new as -built condition, uses, FARs, etc. of the property as well as a reconciliation of units, deed restrictions, and any mitigation "credits." This PUD close -out document can be done by the time of Certificate of Occupancy if needed. �w Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Process 26.306 Interpretation of Title 26.445.100.A PUD Insubstantial Amendment 26.410 Residential Design Standards Review by: Staff. Public Hearing: No. Referral Agencies: APCHA Planning Fees: Planning Deposit, Minor ($I,470 for 6 hours of staff time) No additional charge for the interpretation. Referral Agency Fees: APCHA Major $410. Total Deposit: $1,880 (additional hours over 6 will be billed at a rate of $235/hour) To apply, submit the following information (applies only to Lot Split application): 1. Signed fee agreement. 2. Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant which states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 3. Total deposit for review of the application 4. 3 Copies of the complete application packet. 5. Additional materials as required by the specific review. 6. A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed amendment complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. Please include existing conditions as well as proposed. Notes: 1. Application should cover compliance with residential design standards and request any necessary variations. 2. The application should document the existing (pre -fire) units and deed restrictions as well as the proposed unit count and deed restriction schedule. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. .q g a/ SNOWMASS ASPEN MOUNTAIN ASPEN HIGHLANDS BUTTERMILK May 7, 2008 Building and Planning Department City of Aspen 130 Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Holiday House, 127 West Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado Dear Sir: ASPEN(�SNOWMASS. ASPEN SKIING COMPANY EXHIBIT I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Colorado. Aspen Skiing Company is the sole owner of the real property known as Holiday House. A title commitment further evidencing ASC's ownership of the referenced property is available for inspection in my office. There are no mortgages, deeds of trust or other pledges encumbering the subject property. I am also an authorized representative of Aspen Skiing Company and authorize Mark Vogele and David Corbin to file and prosecute all necessary and prudent applications for land use and building improvements for Holiday House. Sincerely, Davi e a cc: David Corbin Mark Vogele P.O. Box 1248 Aspen, CO 81612 -1248 970. 925.1220 www.asponsnowmass.com ®vmmmRm flow. EXHIBIT 9 May 12, 2008 Mr. Chris Bendon, Director Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Permission to Represent Dear Mr, Bendon: Please consider this letter authorization for Sunny Vann of Vann Associates, L.LC. Planning Consultants, to represent us in the processing of our application for all insubstantial PUD amendment for the Holiday House affordable housing project. Mr. Vann is hereby authorized io act on out behalf with respect to all matters reasonably pertaining to the aforen:ennoned application. Sbould you have any questions, or it we call be of any further assistance. please do not hesitate to call. Yours truly, ASPEN SKIING COMPANY David G. Corbin Vice President. Planning and Development P.O. Box 1248 Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 925 -1220 J sldc;t+usk AV, Witr53!os <:bl ' APPLICANT: Name: ) Location: - Parce/ 7D # RE REPRESENTATIVE Name: Address: Phone #: PROJECT: Name: Address: EXHIBIT LAND USE APPLICATION /ZC'� /z7 v✓ESr�jvs (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) LG .,r -,moo /ZZo TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that ❑ Conditional Use ❑ Special Review ❑ Design Review Appeal ❑ GMQS Allotment ❑ GMQS Exemption ❑ ESA — 8040 Greenline, Stream Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, Mountain View Plane ❑ Lot Split ❑ Lot Line Adjustment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description -41.ig rop� /aGV7 ❑ Conceptual PUD ❑ Conceptual Historic Devt. FR�Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ❑ Final Historic Development ❑ Conceptual SPA ❑ Minor Historic Devt. ❑ Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) ❑ Historic Demolition ❑ Subdivision ❑ Historic Designation ❑ Subdivision Exemption (includes ❑ Small Lodge Conversion/ condominiumization) Expansion ❑ Temporary Use [� Other: ❑ Text/Map Amendment of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) r7� %j0�r PROPOSAL: (description of 466 _400 �Gt_779W Hav you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ ie- Application Conference Summary Qchment #1, Signed Fee Agreement 4 sponse to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards EXHIBIT ATTACHMENT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project f/C- r�/��i%yfj�GY -bE /`S %'f/�jl•¢G /�Y% Applicant: ��/ S✓'S/ /i�/�7 GGU�/°/i' Location: Z S .VS Zone District: / Lot Size: %S 791b Lot Area: /< i -a (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing. ZG Proposed: 2 Number of bedrooms: Existing.•_Z;—;0' —Proposed: ZG Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Principal bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed. On -Site parking: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Rear Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed.• Combined F/R: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Proposed: Distance Between Existing Required: Proposed:_ Buildings Existing non - conformities or encroachments: /4�46 Variations requested: EXHIBIT CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT A, iccment ki Pa ymen I of City lifjA- pcti Devcln moot A Tip Iicimon I rea (I ?ereinalter APPLICANT'? AGRLL AS I'01-LOWS: 1. APPLICANT has uhmittl i to CITY, a r'ati0n Io �..� ✓� /� � (hereinafter, T-IB PROJ6Cl')" _. APPLICANT widCstands will agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of ' 3000 ) establishes a fee senor, for Lund Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a 'M condition precedent to a dctennination of application compLicness. 3- APPLICANT and CI TY ague [hat because o; the size. nature or scope of 0w proposed projem it is not possible w this tinle to ascertain the Tull extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY fender agree that it is in the imeresi of the parties that APPLICANT [Hake payment ofan initial deposit and to thereaRcr permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT oil a monthly basis- APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings andror approvals- APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon nouticition by the CI "iY when thoy are necessary as cost., are mcerted. CITY agrees it will be benetited tilroueh the greater certainty of recovering its full costs w process APPLICANT'S application. Billing Address and Telephone Number. g:>SnpparCtfunns \ agrpay:rz.dnc ��" ~ f ��� •' 111301Od h ar bs s +sr =1- CITY and APPLICANT further a Mee that it is impracticable for CITY staff ?o complete processing or prese+a sutTiciem infonn,ttion to the Phnning Commission:mdlur City Council to enable the ` Plain ing Commission andror City Cowed to nwke i d y required indices for project consideration_ ur,tess current Wilings are paid itn fill prior to decisimt- 5. hereforo_ APPLICANT aegrees that ht crosideration of the CITY's waiver of its ii6i io _ - collect Gdl lies prior to a d. e 1 n riot [ q 1 hemVoo completeness. APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit ut the a`11- of 5,-�� wlnc'o is for _ � hours of Community Development staff tone. and iI- noun( recor odd costs exccerl the inititd deposit_ APPLICANT shat' pay additional monthly " billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above. including post approve.t review al a rate of 5210.00 per planner hour over The initial deposit. Such periodic payments shell be made within 30 doys of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees drat nodule to pay such y 2ccrued Costs shall be g[ "Onnds for st.spension of processing. and !n no case will building permits be Issued until all costs associated n-ith case processing have been pzid. ICA CITY OF .ASPEN APPL� NT y tar: B)" 5 .yam+ . Chris Bendon v1 C., Community Development Director Date: L2--1_f Olt Billing Address and Telephone Number. g:>SnpparCtfunns \ agrpay:rz.dnc ��" ~ f ��� •' 111301Od h ar bs s +sr APPENDIX B EXHIBIT TNTS Mp te = n tc thio j- AIZ, "t rr C(140RADC f KIj a) AC3 en't ja t ;f Civil cuiqiv.'J3 JP - 7 f An d. no-C, 4 4 o ��--ItAeMenz, Aqrlfk%jt� 7 rix'XI, the 11-M I xv r, c� vp A a Mn 1161- 1A T.Ij OZY !:Aq UnkNA V, a - " Ey I 41a PTI . ' i ail _T-fty:] A", F, Ccyunt-v, Not id ay -loved _ Wt-b* 1 Sqttl �?mer' t A! �se7.',xi V� j At- Aptij , mpaw ra it , !Axt of tll�-_ cil n tr tu� e ,-b Y on the 4'01;�txt-j�nt no, tOr the deed car t Vie -a t 10, A- -e,A ­= ♦ lodoe un t; Oq tjhz'��j w�ch �a -i wor,� atlb'evt 6, t szl i 3 set: T- I'R�RFWQRR AGREgn! t�-) r i tq preo� and r'-Cord zn the Pitk.in CC'I3nt..4 rnat ProDerty records x petioa of fifty (50) par Y�Jrci' grou" n floor lodgjpg ,1711--Z 9bown and described on Exhibit ",j^ d (�.-_)rp0r.')te4 h, re•in tj , c� �., a �'e r e,, 0 and in- r -y Of 4W tD Ci- Len lbw 'nes and C.sl-ri­ion 2. does t hereb� aneous and v nurr tjI thF- 3 r-,str;o_ abov,�., CInc*11�Lior) and _ermi:jation or Went Of Civil 4M !;� tt 30, 40� and rec:or.-7 ,tj "_ n'� S� 1- ook at Page 347 of the Pitki.n Coun-,v r�_Lc(>ris, : .1. t be in, ur�lers'anji,jg 0,E U.-fe pauties t!IE..t the rauLua, f of sFil S�'t!�Icment Aq_ree,,n,-,rjt w 7 ne o th e terms ov u r 0 any lowl-c be .Ioproorj.,�tc- fo: or. ]owing tihe f­-Ording of '5ec"', STAV 01* CI'LCPAa.l ..0UNITY OF PITY1N The for,. - king.- instrument was acknowlt 1:d before MC- this Lj 0ay of I 19M by Charit.� T. Collir.s, Manor Pro '-Ve-M, ��nj Kathrym T. yoc!, r3 as itv ..Prk of the C' 7y of Aspan, Colorado. Witnesis my han3 and official Sea I My Comm; ;Sion expires: :1d 3V: ASPEN MOUN'T'AIN jGINT VENTURE, 3 Colorado joint venture BY: '70.1 Jr., Venturer By A�t W-f 7James M. Holbrook Ps 1his Attorney —in —Fact AND BY: Roberts Aspen Properties, Inc. a TeXa5 corporation, Ven 1"f By i�, STATF OF COU)PAjY) COUNTY OF PITKIN 'he for,-going instrument was acknowleicj.•d tck re me this day of 1 1965 by es -Pres-ilent: of Roberts Aspen Properties, Inc., ' , Texas corporation., one of sae Ven.urers_ in Aspen Mountain Joint Venture, a Colorado venture. t witness InY hang and offil'i.,11 Sell. My Colmn_,Ss!or expires: f, 's. CF COLOPATYO 1 zs. -Qf� 'TY OF 'ITYIN The fornpoing instrumant was beEore me this day_oE 19B5 Fy tames ;'j. liolbroo>. as httoOrnvvy in-Fact , for John H. Roberts, Jr., one or the vent❑ ce,,.; in Aspen Mountain joint Ve,tore, 5 Colnr,do joint YOntUrs, tKitriess my hand and oEfj.zjj seaj My commission expires: L Not j Punify i 1 ezulec described pr-�certy tt.at is dz l.i nceted ir; t:71c _icor plan below, The East '.5' of Lot s and all of Lots C, D, and E, G, Licck 60, City and Tc•wnsite of Aspen, Pitkin :o-,nty, .y Colorado. .r g1_Ct /L F F i t I Z�m td[� sC L • jtp �i'N t I� m �n i w c C ani s t ..t- I� m �n i w w w. vl w w w .w w. ._.., cam. -�: It is the express understanding of the parties procedure set forth in Section XI of this Agreement non - compliance shall not be required with respect enforcement and implementation of the financial assurances set forth herein and required by Section [20- 16(c)] of the Municipal Code. VI. EMPLOYEE HOUSING. As an inducement to approve the Precise Plan arid grant the Growth Management Allocations necessary for the Project, Owner has agreed. to and does hereby acknowledge its obligation to provide off -site employee housing for thirty -four (34) employees generated by the Project. Accordingly, Owner agrees to house thirty -four (34) employees by converting and deed restricting seventeen (17) rooms in the e.:isting Holiday House Lodge located at 127 West Hopkins Avenue. Employees shall be housed at two (2) employees per room. Each lodge room shall have a private bath and small kitchen. Lodge rooms may vary in sizes, but shall average 172 sq. ft. of net living space per employee. The lodge shall provide a swimming pool, two laundry rooms, ample storage closets and a small common 'Lobby as on -site amenities. On -site parking spaces shall be provided at the rear of the building off the alleyway to serve residents of the lodge. No less than twelve (12) park' spaces shall be provided. In a "dition to the improvements to the lodge - 15 - .wrl m. .M w .v already made by the Owner, which include painting and clean -up, and upgrading the mechanical systems, Owner agrees to add small kitchens to rooms currently without kitchens so that approximately eleven (11) new kitchens will be added to the lodge prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the hotel. All proposed improvements will be reviewed, itemized, and documented with the City Council or its housing designee. Two (2) rooms in the Holiday House shall be deed restricted at the time the gondola ¢es into operation. Fifteen (15) rooms of the Holiday House shall be deed restricted at the time of the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the Little Nell mil. Rent for the rooms o,. -..._ ....,._.. shall be deed restricted to the low- income rental guidelines in effect at the time of deed restriction, and may be adjusted annually according to the annually adopted City guidelines. Private lodge rooms vary in individual sizes, but in total the twenty -eight (2B) rooms in the lodge contain 5,658 sq. ft. of net living space. Rents for the herein restricted seventeen (17) rooms, housing up to thirty -four (34) employees, shall be calculated as follows: PHASE 1: Four employees (2 rooms) shall be restricted when the gondola goes into operation. Rental Formula: 4 (employees) X 172 (average sq. footage X .60 (low income per employeee) gu idelines) This figure may be amended as the low income rental guidelines are annually adjusted. PHASE II: Thirty employees (15 rooms) shall be restricted when a Certificate of Occupancy is issued for the hotel. Rental Formula: 30 (employees) X,172 (average sq. footage X .60 (low income per employee) guidelines) This figure may be amended as the low income rental guidelines are annually adjusted. Rents shall include all commonly metered or assessed utilities, management costs and taxes. Employees employed directly by Owner shall be given first priority to occupy the units. No rooms shall be rented for a period of less than thirty (30) days without the permission of the City Council or its housing designee. If vacancies occur, Owner shall be permitted to rent to other employees and music students in accordance with the low- income price and income guidelines adopted by the City. The City Council or its housing designee shall have the right to review rents and confirm employee status prior to and as a condition of employees occupancy for compliance with adopted City guidelines. The employee housing to be provided in accordance with this section shall comply with the housing size, type, income and - 17 - occupancy guidelines of the City of Aspen and the provisions of Section 24 -11.10 of the Municipal Code. The employee housing commitments described herein shall be performed in the following manner. Contemporaneously with the execution of this Agreement, Owner has signed, acknowledged and delivered into escrow with the Aspen City Clerk a "Dedication of Real Property to Employee Housing Restrictions and Guidelines" covering the Holiday House, which Dedication is to be held by the City Clerk subject to the following instructions: at the same time that the City issues and delivers to Owner a valid and effective Certificate of Occupancy for the Little Nell Hotel, the City Clerk shall and is hereby authorized, empowered and instructed to record in the Pitkin County, Colorado real property records the Dedication covering the fifteen (15) rooms in the Holiday House. At the time the gondola goes into operation, the City Clerk shall and is hereby authorized, empowered and instructed to record in the Pitkin County, Colorado real property records the Dedication covering the two (2) rooms in the Holiday House. Owner agrees to confirm to City the status of title to the above- cescribed employee housing property as follows: At the time that Owner applies for a Certificate of Occupancy for Hotel, Owner shall deliver to the City Attorney a current owners' and Encumbrancers' Report issued by a local title insura :.ce company covering the property, together with either - 16 - a release or a subordination of any monetary liens disclosed by such Reports as those liens may affect the subject Dedications. Finally, Owner covenants that from and after the date hereof any entities lending funds secured by such employee housing properties shall be given actual notice of the Dedication requirements contained in this Agreement. VII. PARKING. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the Little Nell Hotel, and as a condition precedent thereto, Owner shall construct 118 subsurface parking spaces for the Project. The forty -six (46) spaces required to be provided through approvals granted to the Aspen Mountain Ski Area Master Plan contained in Resolution No. 85 -44 of the Board of County Commissioners shall be in addition to the one hundred eighteen (118) spaces required on -site. Owner has expressed a willingness to consider providing additional parking spaces if a parking structure is built proximate to the ski lifts. VIII. SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 4, A. Owner shall and hereby agrees to accomplish the following improvements in the Project area. 1. Utility Plan. Owner shall relocate underground all electrical, telephone and cable television lines, and upgrade W 19 - i ) R @eoroed&JO -ILA o'Elod)�i. Rxeption No _ i i • c C•f1 SILVIA DAMS PMN COUNIY BECD M DEDICATION OF REAL FAOP1p?Y TO � ` EM.PLOYEE HOUSING RESTRICTIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR 711E HOLIDAY HOUSE THIS DEDICATION, made ar.A cntsrad into `_his _ da_• of l 1956, by ASPEN sr.IING CoNPANY, a Colorado gel.eral partnership (hereirAfter roierrcd to as "Owner "). I WITNESSETHI j U1AE1(&U, owner is the record owner o2 the following described real property and the improvements located thereon situate in the City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado, to wit: The Ebst 7.5 feet of Lot E, and all of Lots C. D, E r and G, Block 60, City and Townaite of Asper. • %HEBEAS, rursuant to the pruvieinne wf 'hat ecrtain SPA Agreement for Little Nt-11 base Cam, •npment recorded in dook • _ at payt."__I"i the. Pitkia County, Colorado real t property recorGo, Owner in rlmiuired at this time to dcdlcatd 1 said ne•li6ay th,uuv to spocifio nmptovee housing rvstrictirnls • isle yU SJe]ins•;:; <:nJ w111:11KA, ch.• t LLy Conned (A L11t City 01 Aspt•n 4311 Apr!! l4• J;J4. 110••nvcd the a.,- o, the Iloiiday Ilnuer I+,dy.•, vpw• the tiling el thn. k.-ill "tion nl:d n.cl.mat irn, tc ':..I i::•1 a " _ Received Time Apr. I 5:22PM EXHIBIT d 6""Re ��. J ceived Time"Apr. 3.' 5 :22P - tt7 1 - omp)vyte Musing rwgCirem+,:)ta of the Little s11 9ase ' Dwvnl4pmeht NrU3eot as reflected in no SPA i+9.' =4I :eat 1 thorocor recurcied In DoOk at pay. �; ,Yn the :eCords of the COUnty Clerk sad trauurder, Pittin a:ouhtp', Colorado, which • AVreemene is iicorporat" hared. by this= reforence. I i wi Eit£f+5, Mme:r represent: and warrants tLat it is the sole ownur o= the pzopor2„ with Cull nut!IOrlOaiien fron asy e and all persons, corporations or entitioa which in any way say have as .•ncumbrance, lien Or ether interwst in or with j regard to the prOpt•rty, :O ehtcr into this dedication and ' declaration. `re` ; NOW, 'f!iEkSL•'Oki, fw .+nd in cwnsidcratipr. Ci !bo wXecutien And rccol -c""d by thn C)ty of Atl�en, ColOardo of tnr • abovo refer i.oed SPA , +y.,•o•yoni fwr Li Ltla Nell n; sc w Dnwo lopgCRt, ud 'nr ocher tend amf vui u:,7)h+ ronaitie)Jt1o.`., �` the roaoipe and sci: )Cicnc� n[ whist• [e horvir}' .:ckn�w.a•acnd, Dw,:rr hereby Oovcnan is end a.; r..es uu for lne•n: , � ,. R.•tn:•t. S, 6. F, 3d, .5, 24, 31, 31 33, . 7111 0:: 1!,Own Un LhO oLlnell•'d 1,1:IU jr. the C,sti-q 1 Ilulitluy duos,: YMaI] Lo ,nu ,irr h••rW)' 1'e•Lti )rl cu Cx.•h:ni vely C.. uXt .:r rrn Lai nI•ly ,mirl <•_, -.- hnusily uaV.•) .Ind in •i";OL0..Jf!• wl Ln W-h Ctl•• P: /o +lr•n vmp;rfec• hnud)rl) U6v, a:d Pcnl+ri r11'idU11.IP::. .,:IU r,U.11111f•nl l•Itr. .14 m.Ii hr• in 0;11'(! Ld J1ri,.I i.:qL;• It,•I Ir'.• n ,,;u :illi•: -rl Ii+ Ihr• IHI.: •y', i.•. A 6""Re ��. J ceived Time"Apr. 3.' 5 :22P - I i 0 •'-'• IVVJ -U 1 t � y 1 Received Time Apr. 3. 5:22PM _. ,iti .is•� Rent for the ronas shall be deed restrictec to the ley- inuome rental guidelines in effcc. at the time Of .:ea :oetrictimt, and may bt 443ustcd annually according tv the ennmaily adoPtcd City guiGa iinre. Ports MAY vary smepg the individual rooms (employees), but Anal: not exceed the average rent of IS2 sq. ft_ net living space per erplen•ee times the IOU- incnmo rental guideline arid nunLor of les- ricted rooms. Rents shall incluae all cormohl:• Metered a Or assessed dtiliticF, management LUots and taxes. :- ployw -r employed diruetly by O.mcr shat: be givan iire prior: ty to occupy the unite. No rooms shall he ront.•a fO: a prriod Of less than thirty (701 days withuu: th,: pcmiasion of the Ci. Council dealgnte_ f.f vacancies occur, (honer shoal be yernittcd to rent umploye,,a .,hd musi- studei.tF in avcordance ulth the 11.- income pricy and ihcOmt 'nidelirca Adopted by tho City. Ti:. 0113 `Sruncil nr its I, designee shall have the, right r.0 review rants and con,arr V ` emOlmyec status priv.- to and as a condl time of .mployet, ` Oec-upancy fur enmpliana: with adoplcd ;ity- gnidel'.naA; provided, however that any emotoyeea of Ow-1vi may rostdt• I: the units as long At lou incolat qugdvlil.os nrr ivl :oven, . ^he 001illeyl`G hWFlllq 10 be prPfidod in Accordance W1111 L {F section shall ton-Ply with the housing size, type, inr,, .. r.e Occapancy Yuidclinna n; the City oi' Aapcn and ehr irnv ; -ticne Of 6uCt10n 24-11.10 of thr rullulp. -.1 %;otlr. Received Time Apr. 3. 5:22PM d i I 1 Wi n %. The dedication and co,cnants rnntaim >d hwrcin Shat: be deomed a bcrdun upor. and Io run -ith the title fu the Hoiiday House, shall br bind;leg upon the uwi:cr, its successors and assigns, and upon all persuns or entities having any right, title Or intureat in Or to the holiday Heuev or any part tnereof, ona sh..11 Inure to Lho cenefit ct end be specifically ar'arce,0'. ey lh„ City of Asper: It its dosignee by any app�cprlaea ltgal action incluc•ibc injunction, abatQM.'11L or eviction of non- cOrplyirg berebcioS, all for a perj,4 of fifi.5 (50) year: from the date ur: recording hereof in thu Pitkin county real property recaps. 3. Neither this dcdicgtlon nor any of tr:c uvenl Wit, contained herein shall be modified, rel.!aa,a or wei:atF. i,- our Suspect except by wriLten inntrument escrutee. =y iu.:h the Owner or its successors and assigns and tn,: f!.L1 of Colorado and duly recurdod in the Pirkin County real proporq rocorda_ A. The ASPLN GRIIN(; e(*IPANy herch:: warrants and rupresenta that any and al: i.rarsons, firms I entatjes haVirg any lion, rncumbea; roe ul iuturwur. in the Iloilday nouev Lave COn Senn In this dedientian and, :urther, tl -el :ilia dedic.,tion she:, be tec -rded in the o ;cl: ct the Pi U._;- Cimn Pi fork and r;, •. •,.rrb, �10411ut uortv,•,.1 of nI) : :n�1: ;n•raen. Received Time_Apr. 3._ 5:22PM F I r q i tCa IN WITNESS RMLYROP, the Owner has hereunto set its hand and scol a: of the day and year first .sieve written. 1 010 kyt: APPROVED AS TO FOAM: ASPEN SATING COMPANY, a Aspen City Attorney Colorado general partnership By �_ _ t'...___. _ BY Paul J. Taaduna APPROVED AS TO FORM: a ASPEN /PITRI(NCO 14O�USING AUTAOAITy ATV Nye `y`- _•w'a"'i s..v/ Direr WL sraxe OF coEDAADD '"e� 1 Be. COUNTY OF PITRIN ) The foregoing insuumunt was ackuowlodged before me ehle i f,;•��'g• +ef it ". i986, by�`lj•' as D. ASPEN] SRIIN CC OMPATIY• a CD oraoral : tartnnYShip_ •i WITNESS hand aid ottLricl ::chl- My Commission r ' My N1ss 5r1Di expires• • • Notary public �t tlePiy,tLi unl /,4•+ Received Time Apr. 3. 5:22PM m . . . . . . . . . . . . . . k: ....... -77� fn L. % t JN CGIPY Ii Received time Apr. 3, 5:22PM "Qft� H C NU. 1603 P. 12 Rece. i,ved Time Apr. 3. 5: 2 2 PM o POOR COPY ;w lw 1, w w, a✓ s +a+ lw r o Nrx. j.�uu� �aHm AsrLN 'P IN MYHuUSM NO. 1603 P. 13 x 0 N � Z J b ` N .w 7 �J R n W ' CGY Received Time Apr, 3. 5:22PM �1 U aox `o J aN v Y DEDICATION OF REAL PROPERTY TO EMPLOYEE hQUSING RSSTRICTICNP AND GUID °LINES FOR THE HOLIDAY HOUSE THIS DEDICATION, made and entered into this day or 1986, by ASPEN S.iING COMPANY, a Colorado general" partnership (hereinafter referred to as "Owner "). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Owner is the record owner of the following described real property and the improvements located thereon situate ir- tee City of Aspen, Pitki_n County, Colorado, to wit : z s.> r - - The East 7.5 feet of Lot B, and all of ' Lots C, D, E, F and G, Block 60, " City and Townsite of Aspen yy k WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of that certain SPA ; . P Agreement for Little Nell Base Development recorded in Book v °t» _ at Page ^/h`}-PL the P: t} -in County, Colorado real property records, Owner is required at this time to dedicate w - said Holiday House to specific employee housing restrictions . "` and guide!_ines; and - q WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Aspen on Fipril J I L 1986, approved the use of the Ho ?_iday House Lodge, upon _> the filing of this dedication and declaration, to satisfy . .•e i us t � r i M w , „r «r r.cm 580 P.16E _ employee housing requirements of the Little Nell Base Development Project as reflected in the SPA Agreement therefor recorded in Book -rI at Page``- t in the records of the County Clerk and Recorder, Pitkin CODUty, Colorado, which agreement is incorporated herein by this reference. WHEREAS, Owner represents and warrants that it is the sole owner of the property, with full authorization from any and all persons, corporations or entities which in any way may have an encumbrance, lien or other interest in or with regard to the property, to .enter into this dedication- and declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the execution and recording by the City of Aspen, Coloardo of the above referenced SPA Agreement for Little Nell Base Development, and for other good and valuable consideration, the. receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, owner hereby covenants and agrees as follows: 1. Rooms 9 arid 10 (as shown n the attached plat) in the existing Holiday House shall be and are hereby restricted exclusively to use as rental only employee housing under and in accordance with such City of Aspen employee housing use, and rental guidelines and qualifications as may be in effect and applicable from time to time, subject to the following restrictions: - 2 - A- i3 t .w v+, v► a w ,W a� ti. Rent for the rooms shall be deed restricted to the low- income rental guidelines in effect at the time of deed restriction, and may be adjusted annually according to the annually adopted City guidelines. Rents may vary among the individual rooms (employees), but shall not exceed the average rent of 172 -sq. ft, net living space per employee z times the low- income rental guideline and number of restricted rooms. Rents shall include all commonly metered - or assessed utilities, management costs and taxes. Employees employed directly by Owner shall be given first priority to occupy the units. No rooms shall be rented for a period of less than thirty (30) days without the permission of the City Council designee. If vacancies occur, Owner shall be permitted to rent to other employees and music students in accordance with the low- income price and income guidelines adopted by the City. The City - Council or its housing designee shall have the right to review rents and confirm � employee status prior to and as a condition of employees occupancy for compliance- with adopted. City guidelines; provided, however that any employees of Owner may reside in the units as long as low income guidelines are followed. The employee housing to be provided in accordance with this I section shall comply with the housing size, type, income and occupancy guidelines of the City of Aspen and the provisions of Sectic•n 24 -11.10 of the Municipal Code. i 3 - n r WFu- 4 u; �. Tb�2 dedication and covenants contained herein shall be deemed a burden, upon and to run with the title to the Holidav House, shall be binding upon the Owner, its successors and assigns, and upon all persons or entities having any right, title or interest in or to the Holiday House or any part thereof, and shall inure to the benefit of and be specifically enforceable by the City of Aspen or its designee by any appropriate legal action including injunction, abatement or eviction of non - complying tenancies, all for a period of fifty (50) years from the date of recording hereof in the Pitkin County real property records. z s 3. Neither this dedication nor any of the covenants - contained 'herein shall be modified, released or waived in any respect except by written instrument executed by both the Owner or its successors and assigns and the City of Aspen, a Colorado and duly recorded in the Pitkin. County real property records. t 4. The ASPEN SKIING COMPANY hereby warrants and represents that any and all persons, firms or entities having any lien, encumbrance or interest in the Holiday House Lodge - have consented to this dedication and, further, that this dedication shall not be recorded in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder without consent of any such person. 4 u; .' % ..2V+eta .��, t �— ±.5 - ^0 9" i . 'E_ 'S �vb 2— i4R.r -": ..v�+V'.f- '.>.q{LV ,e Yt�• -,�+ Al IN WIT E5'I:WHtREOF the Owner has nerennto set its hand I .Tl L... 1: lk, Pf()OR Co" 16- ► - f rM. d y ' r li �I (r r E i (1 J t. r 'O J Y y U r 4 t ' `�Lt1 S I ❑ 1 IL VIA I j d LA i . M 4 Ic d � s N 1 w r 1k I IID 4 cC c z �I 1 1k I IID 4 cC c z �I 1 EXHIBIT � S ORDINANCE NO. (Series of 1989) AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL REZONING THE EAST 7.5 FEET OF LOT B AND ALL OF LOTS C, D, E, F, AND G, BLOCK 60, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has sponsored a rezoning request for this project so that it not be subject to the semi- annual submission deadline for such application; and WHEREAS, the request is to rezone the above described property in order to provide a 100% affordable housing project; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission (hereinafter "Commission ") held a public hearing on July 11, 1989, and has recommended to the City Council that the above described property be rezoned to R /MF PUD; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the recommendation of the Commission, and has determined that the proposed rezoning conforms with adopted land use plans, and is compatible with the surrounding zone districts and land uses in the vicinity-of the project site. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: Section 1• That it does hereby rezone the East 7.5 feet of Lot B and all of Lots C, D, E, F and G, Block 60, City and Township of Aspen from Lodge Preservation to Residential /Multi - Family PUD Section 2• That the Zone District Map be and hereby is amended to reflect the zoning described in Section 1 and that the Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to amend said map to reflect the new zoning. Section 3• That the City Clerk be and hereby is directed, upon the adoption of this ordinance, to record a copy of this ordinance in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. Section 4: If any section. subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and 'independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5: Nothing in this ordinance shall be construed to affect any right, duty or liability under any ordinance in effect prior to the effective date of this ordinance, and the same shall be continued and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 6• A public hearing on the Ordinance shall be held on the / day of ltd 1989 at 5:00 P.M. in the City Council c Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing a public notice of the same shall be published once in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. , READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the day of 1989. ATTEST: l ✓ J Kathryn S Koch, City Clerk{ FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this day of J/GC�SI -% 1989. ° William L. Stirling, Mayor ATTEST: J Kathryn . Koch, City Clerk FXK:das - ccord.holiday a 3 CASE DISPOSITION TO: File FROM: Francis X. Krizmanich, Senior Planner RE: Holiday House Application to Build 9 Employee Units: Rezoning from LP to R /MF PUD, Conceptual and Final Plat DATE: September 19, 1989 On August 14, 1989, the City Council approved Ordinance No. 50, Series of 1989, rezoning the Holiday House property from LP to R /MF PUD subject to the following conditions: 1. The entire project, including the units contained in the addition and in the existing Holiday House, shall be deed restricted to 100% Affordable Housing pursuant to Article 5, Division 2, of the Land Use Code (as amended by Ordinance No. 47 (Series of 1988) prior to the issuance of a final Certificate of Occupancy. The Applicant shall not be given GMQS credit for any of the units. 2. A standard deed restriction shall be filed as required by the Housing Authority, restricting the use, occupancy, and rental price to those established by the Affordable Housing Guidelines adopted at the time of issuance of the building permit. The nine new units must be deed restricted to the Housing Authority's moderate income guidelines, however, the Applicant is permitted to rent these units for up to $450. per month with no increase, until such time as the moderate income guidelines rise to this level. At such time, rents may be increased in keeping with the moderate income guidelines and restrictions. 3. The Applicant shall supply the Housing Authority an exact calculation of the net livable square footage of each unit and plans for each of the units. If at any time the plans change with square footage, on any of Authority shall be notified, amended prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. 4. PUD from the respect tc the units, and deed net livable the Housing restrictions any temporary or final approval shall be granted to permit a variation the strict interpretation of the Code such that applicant can include courtyard space not visible from the public street to meet the 35% R /MF open space requirement. r 5. The Little Nell SPA agreement shall be amended to allow removal of the swimming pool in exchange for the applicant providing a park area and bicycle racks on- site acceptable to the Planning Office staff prior to the issuance of a Certificate ofv occupancy. 6. The East Hopkins Avenue frontage shall be planted with three 3 inch caliper cottonless cottonwoods consistent with the streetscape to the west. 7. A final plat shall be submitted prior to final approval which meets the Code standards as approved by the City Engineer. 8., Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall submit a stormwater design and facilities plan for the City Engineer's review and approval. 9. Prior to building permit issuance the Applicant shall reach agreement on sanitation fees with Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. 10. An automatic alarm and sprinkler system shall be provided as committed by the Applicant. 11. Pursuant to the Parking Special Review approval granted by the Planning Commission, the applicant shall pay cash -in -lieu for nine parking spaces or identify nine off -site spaces to be used by residents of this project. Increased management of the 1 PxL%Ujj a�.. site parking spaces shall be undertaken by the applicant. 12. The park development impact fee for this project is w-- waived by City Council. 13. The Council strongly encourages the Applicant to 'participate in community recycling efforts and to discourage private automobile use to reduce air pollution. 14. The Council may entertain a future request by the Applicant for the reduction or elimination of water tap fees for this project. casedisposition.holiday 2 QtnE �� W W6w ge LL ° s wy via 7 ¢ � =off �gkag §F��a w �I ag es`�ga¢ w �° 3 Y w S g:w_ gas "^goo ate_ 5.- a if n �g�m Raw W 3o NI to lg g help PPW ag sus g 21.2 as ew y§ t € t a¢ ._Y2_ `cs a.1 €� " s Ali a go s I'M °:y sF � � �' a e, €� C Y C 5 13 ell- ho s� € � € ass € ae a os Z- = 3 e p ° - °W -a a w € s ? 'sg o a . = 8¢ 6gs�SsiYg gs s C s - �g-gA -Ej egg g €94 RaoF �ag i-s W H � t� ¢ e N 7 0 ----------- X66 0L bi 6 i � B Mlmn � 9 1 i 1 N z • W W m _ _ i^ 1!m_.0 10 i o V • w 1 W '^ i ny xx m________________ L u w 3 �3- { N g V I i B m o LL W 3 F� ! g � n O x'IYn 0 vi a € 8g� Wei Sx- y � C e a� a io Y` 4Wx °em ri I �I [ 1 Yi a T W �o M le HIM €w CC 0 W ° •00'OOT 3 .6b .0L bT N' I �" .d . I $ I J W o „C r 3 Z: I 10 W 1” 'Q —i4' n ° t g9 r ��,3Q.. �k Ul tow 'R N I 13 (A g °d ME�� w � 1 — y BL F tN J 1 O \ U M le APR. 3.2008 11:29AM ASPEN PITKIN CNTY HOUSING N0. 1603 —P. 14 " G 82u 1 Rec j Silvi�aVis, Pitkin C nty Clerk, S-00 EXHIBIT OCCUPANCY DEED RESTRICTION AND AGREEMENT HOLIDAY HOUSE EXPANSION THIS AGREEMENT made i and entered into this �c' d day of 19991, by and between the Aspen Skiing Company of We City of Aspen and the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado (hereinafter referred to as "Owner ") whose address is P.O. Box 1248, Aspen, Colorado, 81612, and the ASPEN /PITRIN COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY, a multi- jurisdictional housing authority established pursuant to the AMENDED AND RESTATED INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT recorded in Book 605 at Page 751 of the records of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorders Office (hereinafter called "Authority "). WI- TNWSETH: WHEREAS, owner owns real property more specifically described as Lots F and G, Block 60, and the easterly 7.5 feet of Lot B, and Lots C, D, E, Block 60 ( "Real Property "), located at 125 West Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado which Real Property shall contain two structures of which one structure is known as the Holiday House Expansion which shall contain nine moderate 422.6 net livable square feet one bedroom units ( "Units "). The owner is permitted to rent the Units for up to $450.00 per month with no increase, until such time that the moderate income guidelines rise to this level. At such time rents may be increased in keeping with the moderate income guidelines and restrictions. For purposes of this agreement, the Units, the Real Property, and all the appurtenances, improvements and fixtures associated therewith shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Property "; and WHEREAS, this Agreement imposes certain covenants upon the Property which restrict the use and occupancy of the Units to residents and their families who are either employed by the Owner or who are residents of Pitkin County and fall within the Housing Authority moderate income qualifications guidelines established and indexed by the Authority on an annual basis. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, Owner hereby covenants and agrees as follows: I. Owner hereby covenants that the Units described above shall at all times remain rental units and shall not be condominiumized. 2. The use and occupandy of the Units, described above, shall henceforth be limited exclusively to hoffsing for individuals who are employed in Pitkin County and who " meet the definition of "qualified moderate' income residents "as that term is defined by the Housing Authority Guidelines established and indexed from time to ` time. owner shall have the right to lease the Units to a "qualified moderate income resident" of his own selection. f Received Time Apr. 3, 5:22 PM APR. 3.2008 11:29AM ASPEN PITKIN CNTY HOUSING N0. 1603 P. 15 z 3 B: 2 Rec $15.00 r 538 PG 821 Silvia \.vis, pitkin CntY Clerk, A'e�".Oo 3. Written verification of employment of persons proposed to reside in the Units shall be completed and filed with the Housing Authority Office by the owner of the Units prior to occupancy thereof, and such verification must be acceptable to the Housing Authority. If the Owner does not rent the Units to a "qualified moderate income resident" the unit shall be available for occupancy in accordance with the Housing Authority Guidelines, provided the owner shall have the right to approve any prospective tenant, which approval shall not be unreasonably delayed or withheld. 5. The Units shall not be vacant for any unreasonable period of time, which shall be defined as a maximum of forty - five (45) days, between leases. Approval for such additional time may be requested by Owner for repair and /or refurbishment of Units, which approval shall not be unreasonably delayed or withheld. 6. The Units are limited to occupancy by not more than two adults and related children. Resident adults must qualify as, and have been found by the Housing Authority to be, residents of the community and residents thereof as referred to above. 5. Lease agreements executed for occupancy of the Units shall provide for a rental term of not less than six (6) consecutive months. A signed and executed copy of�.ase� .shall,,_beeprovided to the Housing Authority within ;ten. '(10)`' "daysaoP approval of residents. 6. This agreement shall constitute covenants running with the Real Property as a burden thereon for the benefit of, and shall be specifically enforceable by, the Housing Authority, the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Pitkin, and the City of Aspen, their respective successors as applicable, by any appropriate legal action including, but not limited to, injunction, abatement, or eviction of,non-complying tenants, for the period of fifty years from the date of recording hereof in the Pitkin County real property records. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this instrument on the day and year above first written. OWNER (G): ident ing Company Received Time Apr. 3. 5:22PM APR. 3.2008 11:29AM ASPEN PITKIN CNTY HOUSING NO. 1603 P. 16 ##32989r 1/30/41 15:3= Rec $15.00 638 PG 822 Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc $.00 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1248 Aspen, Colorado 81612 STATE OF COLORADO ) SS. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was a� day of ^++, , 199L, by. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires; 7-14-17,3 ACCEPTANCE BY THE HOUSING AUTHORITY Zf-ya t-, rnls a .1 _a >' L7 7 W, 'O, The foregoing agreement and its terms are accepted by the Aspen /Pitkin County Housing Authority. HOUSIN t4AMA0&, AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF ASPEN AND PI IN COUNTY SOLO DO BY : . l/�(..( TITLE: Mailing Address: 39551 Highway 82 Aspen, Colorado 81611 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. " COUNTY OF PITKIN ) Ak The foregoing instrument was acknowleege before me this 23 day of 1991, by (1 (/N l uA 5 3Titness my hand and official seal. ay commission expires: Notary ' lic Received Time Apr. 3, 5:22PM APR. 3.2006 11:29AM- ASPEN PITKIN CNTV HOUSING__ _- _ NO. 16 EXHIBIT #3557,62 '12/93 11;13 Rec $35.00 Btk___09 PG 420 q G".via Dkr, s, Pitkin Cnty_Clerk,.Doc $.00. DEDICATION OF REAL PROPERTY TO ENPLOYEE HOUSING RESTRICTIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR THE HOLIDAY HOUSE THIS DEDICATION, made and entered into this L day of April, 1993, by and between the Aspen Skiing Company (hereinafter referred to as "Owner ") whose address is P.O. Box 1248, Aspen, Colorado, 81612, and the ASPEN /PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING 'AUTHORITY, a multi - jurisdictional housing authority established pursuant to the AMENDED AND RESTATED INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT recorded in Book 605 at Page 751 of the records of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorders Office (hereinafter called "Authority "). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS,-Owner is the record owner of the following described real property and the improvements located thereon situate in the City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado, to wit: The East 7.5 feet of Lot B, and all of Lots Co D, E, F and G, Block 60, City and Townsite of Aspen. WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of that certain SPA Agreement for Little Nell Base Development recorded in BookS1D Page of the Pitkin County, Colorado real property records, owner is required at this time to dedicate said Holiday House to specific employee housing restrictions and guidelines; and ' WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Aspen on April 14, 1986, approved the use of the Holiday House Lodge, upon the filing of this dedication and declaration, to satisfy employee housing requirements of the Little Nell Base Development Project as reflecte in the SPA Agreement therefore recorded in BookZZ(L at Page 14W in the records of the County Clerk and Recorder, Pitkin County, Colorado, which agreement is incorporated herein by this reference. WHEREAS, Owner represents and warrants that it is the sole owner of the property, with full authorization from any and all persons, corporations or entities which in any way may have an encumbrance, lien or other interest in or with regard to the property, to enter into this dedication and declaration. I NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the execution and recording by the City of Aspen, Colorado of the above referenced SPA Agreement for Little Nell Base Development, and for other good W and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Owner hereby covenants and agrees as follows: 1. Units 2, 4, 16 and 21 (as shown on the attached plat) in y the existing Holiday House shall be and are hereby restricted exclusively to use as rental only employee housing under and in Received Time Apr. 3. 5:22PM APR. 3. 2008 11: 29ANL..._._ASPEN PITKIN CNTY HOUSING NO. 1603., P. 18 0355762, '/12/93 11:13 Rec $35.00 '08 PG 421 Silvia D_4is, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, D0.00 accordance with such City of Aspen employee housing use, and rental guidelines and qualifications as may be in effect and applicable from time to time, subject to the following restrictions: Rent for the rooms shall be deed restricted to the low- income rental guidelines in effect at the time of deed restriction, and may be adjusted annually according to the annually adopted City guidelines. Rents may vary among the individual rooms (employees), but shall not exceed the average rent of 172 square foot net li*ving space per employee times the low - income rental guidelines and number of restricted rooms. Rents shall include all commonly metered or assessed utilities, management costs and taxes. Employees employed directly by owner shall be given first priority to occupy the units. No rooms shall be rented for a period of less than thirty (30) days without the permission of the Aspen /Pitkin County Housing Authority. if vacancies occur, owner shall be permitted to rent to other employees and music students in accordance with the low- income price and income guidelines adopted by the City. The Aspen /Pitkin County Housing Authority shall have the right to review rents and confirm employee status prior to and as a condition of employees occupancy for compliance with adopted City guidelines; provided, however, that any employees of owner may reside in the units as long as low income guidelines as followed. The employee housing to be provided in accordance with this section shall comply with the housing size, type, income and occupancy guidelines of the City of Aspen and the provisions of Section 24 -11.10 of the Municipal Code, and the Aspen /Pitkin County Housing Guidelines. 2. The dedication and covenants contained herein shall be deemed a burden upon and to run with the title to the Holiday House, shall be binding upon the owner, its successors and assigns, and** upon all persons or entities* hiving any* riglit, title or interest in or to the Holiday House or any part thereof, and shall inure to the benefit of and be specifically enforceable by the Aspen /Pitkin County Housing Authority by any appropriate legal w action, including injunction, abatement or eviction of non - complying tenancies, all for a period of fifty (50) years from the w date recording hereof in the Pitkin County real property records. 3. Neither this dedication nor any of the covenants contained herein shall be modified, released or waived in any respect except by written instrument executed by both the owner or its successors and assigns and the City of Aspen, Colorado and duly recorded in the Pitkin County real property records. 2 Received Time Apr. 3. 5:22PM APR. 3.2008 11:29AM ASPEN PITKIN CNTY HOUSING N0. 1603 P. 19 #355762 '12/93 11 :13 Rec $35.00 EK)B PG 422 Silvia D4-4s, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc 00 4. The ASPEN SKIING COMPANY hereby warrants and represents that any and all persons, firms or entities having any lien, encumbrance or interest in the Holiday House Lodge have consented to this dedication and, further, that this dedication shall not be recorded in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder without consent of any such person. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Owner has hereunto set its hand and seal as of the day and year first above written. OWNER: ASPEN SKIING COMPANY, a Coloradg-1general partnership th Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1248 Aspen, CO 81612 c�Fa� .• p'�_ STATE OF COLORADO ) ,� =� z ' sa. 9J •., 4 COUNTY OF PITKIN ) ., F, - .�- ._',.•'P4 r o The foregoing instrument was acknowledged befonme"£�his 7th day of April, 1993, by Fred Smith. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Sic 3 Received Time Apr. 3. 5:22PM APR. 3.2008 11 :29AM ASPEN PITKIN CNTY HOUSING - -_ NO. 1603 P. 20 • #7-55762. '12/93 11:13 Rec $35.04 BIB PG 423 Silvia Da�s, Pitkin .Cnty Clerk, Dac OO ACCEPTANCE BY THE HOUSING AUTHORITY The foregoing agreement and its terms are accepted by The Aspen / Pitkin County Housing Authority. ASPEN /PITKIN CQMY HOUSING BY: d Myler, Mailing Address: 530 East Main Street, Lower Level Aspen, Colorado 81611 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged be, iu , 7th day of April, 1993, by David Myler. V tl��rWitness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: �%��� -g� �a$Lt�r Not dry— Public A Received Time Apr. 3. 5:22PM APR. 3.2008 11:29AM— ..ASPEN PITKIN CNTY HOUSING NO. 1603 P. 21 #35576 14/12/93 11-13 Rea 135.00 708 Ps 424 silvia\—.i&yisj Pitk.in r-nt)( Clerk., bt✓$.00 Mil Received Time Apr. 3. 5:22PM orb I • %A V) 4 MMAM wa APR. 3.2008 11:29AM ASPEN PITKIN CNTY HOUSING N0. 1603 P. 22 _ 4355762 04. V9:i 11:13 Rec X35,00 BK 7 PG 425 Silvia Davis„_,' Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc 'b`..4 r ; A Cd � cn f ' CIS Received Time Apr. 3. 5:22PM APR. 3.2006 11:29AM ASPEN PITKIN CNTV HOUSING NO. 1603 P. 23 #3SS762 O� 2/93 11:13 Rec $35.00 $Y, \� P(3 426 Silvia Dal)s,'Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Dor x.00 �G s Received Time Apr. 3. 5:22PM ,1 APPENDIX C -fir l; t� Aspen Fire protection District 426 E Hopkins Ave. Aspen. CO 81623 Fire Marshal's FIRE INVESTIGATION REPORT Location: 127 W. Hopkins Ave., Aspen, CO 81611 (Holiday House) Narrative: 1, Orrin D. Moon, along with Fire Marshal Ed Van Walraven, conducted an Origin & Cause Investigation that started at approximately 0800 hours November 8, 2007. We conducted a scene investigation from the outside of the building to the believed area of origin, which was the basement level. At this time, the area of origin appeared to be in the area of the center halhnay in the basement Further investigation throughout the next week changed the apparent area of origin to the bathroom of Unit 12, which is located on the basement level. Low burn and v -patterns noted in the north wall in the toiletibathtub portion of the bathroom indicated that this was the area of origin. Upon further investigation we had found that plumbing and pipe sweating had been done in that area earlier that day, according to witness reports. We noted in that same area, where the domestic water pipes had been relocated, that there were also the remnants of sound board or fiber board located in the wall which could have smoldered and allowed for eventual Ignition of the wallboard, causing the fire. it is our belief that this fire was accidental in nature, and that no further investigation will be done unless information is brought forward that would warrant reopening the inv tion. O n D. Moon, Deputy Fire Marshal ;Q1�1 , 0 151 R:. e Location Type * EJ Street address 0 intersection Q In it of Q Rear of Q Adjacent to [1 Directions j] US National Grid ! I I c, 711711 t2�y t?�7j {D a 1 !O,OIQ10 ' 1 2 4) )Building fire E3 Ss« Month Day Year Hour ftRin 131 fa;es are the it ear�szmna .•+:. -4 Adw.srr ire +. :ecBiveO'eslv42a. ive _.. Aid Given or Received � _... ('� pone -- sa -.a a: farm: ,h1'.'o V'Otd 1 i 17 12 3 ! 12101017 Spec.! Gate ..cC.. r ,,mZ a.5 -.a re_ ,rn.r ..a,z J..aa rvt.r sa....d ^'__ ' 63 0 Military use 65 127 1_Yd f 1HOPKINS 1 LL �: F� I 1_i_E L_____j LkSPEN _J CIO I3, 11,611 11.1 1 ?Y= iav- erRccx.. 7y S�v? ,_PCa<::. iSoufh First Street e incident Type lE1 Dates and Times k"a-n; tis(n) Cr )Building fire 1 i Month Day Year Hour ftRin 131 fa;es are the it ear�szmna .•+:. -4 Adw.srr ire +. :ecBiveO'eslv42a. ive _.. Aid Given or Received � _... ('� pone -- sa -.a a: farm: Alarm i , s � 0 7 *i__� � 1 i 17 12 3 ! 12101017 Spec.! Gate 51trt`g oo stwy:'alee ❑ industrial use I Mutual aid received '- [f Auto. aid received .S [,j utuat aid giYOn 4 OlAuto. aid given i 0 OUter aid given F Actions Taken AP.P. :J =L rrzqu.eG. uKe'3 caf.�k9 GtV/! ntt Sri.p J 't�r71I1J�� 0 Arrival * LLJJ 10, 71 12 10 10 17 1 ,7 2 ,6 Sl,sk FEhO foe. ` CON ntC o wlpa. rr..en,- n'dd�(,sz Sm< „ql Q Controlled 11 1 1 10, 71 1210,017 1 IQ I 0 ,5 1 ! I I I I I 1 ` ❑ East Unit j 6sr ufa 1 d.Era'EU. ay.««! er�P; rnr nra :m r es Tft1i"'cs"t ""ndfr I Cleared 1 1 1 0 8 2 0 0 7 0 7 0 1 , 01 1Fre control or extinguishment. Primary Anion Taken 11 i 1 ; 2 1 Savage � overhaul S�atianaf Actor. Tien t2) 8.61 1 f ivestigate j Mortimer Aden Tat +.en 13l Completed Module! Fire -7 Structure Fire -3 civilian Fire cas. -4 ❑ Fire Service Cas. -5 EMS-6 HazMat -i Wiidiand Fire -9 Q Apparatus -9 O Personnel -10 EJ Arson -11 Resources ®Check this box and skip this blOtk a an Apps :atvs or Pe errmal ak Pule, m vseJ. Apparatus Personnel ppression 14, I r 1216, 1 EMS 10iii iQi i i i Other 13f 1 131 10 CIS; bos it reS.xrce.rr.r,quda atl :ecBiveO'eslv42a. 53 *Casualties ❑Nolte H3 Hazardous Deaths Injuries Fire Service 10, 1 1 01 Civilian 10, , 1 lot , — Re einul lor.4med rne, . t detector alerted occupants 2 Detector (lid not alert them U �. Unknown Property Use 13 None Structures r 131 ❑ Church, place of worship I 161 ❑ Restaurant or cafeteria 162 ❑ Barltavern or nightclub 1 213 ❑ Elementary school, kindergarten 215 ❑ High school, junior high 241 ❑ College, aduft education 311 El Nursing home 331 ❑ Hospital Outside 124 ❑ Playground or park 655 ❑ Crops or orchard 669 ❑ Forest (timberland) 807 ❑ Outdoor storage area 919 ❑ Dump or sanitary landfill 931 ❑ Oper, land or field Shifts and Alarms 2 10 _._I.MU; 1 1 I I tom: 01. Stara Alzmrs VW-. F et. Residential use CE3 Special Studies 53 Loc.tffep�� 5s 11 Business & residentiat Spec.! ❑ Office use 51trt`g oo stwy:'alee G2 Estimated Dollar Losses and Values LOSSES: op 1 t« ho;rfeesa Mrown None Property + 131010 ,000, 0, 1 ❑ Contents IL 0,10i 10-01 J 1 , 1 ❑ PRE4NCIDENT VALISE: o to,i Property $ 4 0 0 , 01010 , 0, 1 ❑ Contents $ 1� , V 1 11 :1 I i ❑X ©Natural gas: sirnv leak, no evacuation or HazNlat actions []Propane Vas; 121 -lb tank (as in home Sao grit) ❑Gasoline: whirla rue! tank or portable container ❑Kerosene: fuel twrnino equipment or portable storage ❑Diesel fueitfuel oil: v"a fuel lank pr poneble storage ❑Household solvents: n^melbrce $Dill, Cleanup only []Motor oil: from engine or portable container ❑Paint: from paint Cans totaling <55 gallons ❑other: special HazMat actions required M spit! > 55 gal iPlasse complete the HazMat kkort.) 341 [l Clinic, clinic -type infirmary 342 [j Doctoridentist office 361 © Prison or jail, not juvenile 419 0 1- or 2- family dwelling 429 ❑ Multifamily dwelling 439 ❑ Roomingiboarding house 449 ❑ Commercial hotel or motet 459 ❑ Residential, board and care 464 ❑ Dormitorylbarracks 519 ❑ Food and beverage sales 936 ❑ Vacant lot -- 938 ❑ Graded/cared for plot of land 946 ❑ Lake, river, stream 951 ❑ Railroad right- ofvway 960' ❑ Other street 961 ❑ Highway /divided highway 962 ❑ Residential stmei1driveway Property` Not mixed 10 j] Assembly use 20 [] Education use 33 ❑ Medical use 40 Residential use 51 Row of stores 53 [t Enclosed mail 5s 11 Business & residentiat 59 ❑ Office use 60 ❑ industrial use 63 0 Military use 65 ❑ Farm use 00 17 other mixed use 539 © Household goods, sales, repairs 571 ❑ Gas or service station 579 ❑ Motor vehicle /boat salesirepairs 599 ❑ Business office 615 ❑ Electric - generating plant 629 ❑ Laboratoiylsclence laboratory 700 ❑ Manufacturing plant 619 Livestockipoultry storage {barn) 682 ❑ Non - residential parking garage 891 ❑ Warehouse g81 ❑r�t Construction site t..2 984 Industrial plant yard I e0k tin arA aanr a ?<ceR+ nee Yanti Property Use i 4,6 0 rf J �=susdix mates c'_ B at :. =c z 1Benrt tofu -type ra idenc '�;: CYSV�crr AUFinWi.`'.oa� City 0 More people involved? Check this box and attach Supplements Forms (KFIRS -1S) as neCESSary. j 2 Owner S. a as P n � nUtetl7 The, emery nil xx a..z; {aspen Ski company } 9 7 0- 8 t 2 1 D-10 j 7 1 4 ,9 based on incident Type, as follows: _• £ _.r.,.. Y. SAS FV 3:'...._ '..iUU...! Loniku as `rciC,cni Vt., Ms., HZ F- t'fine ' iars' tl*'e ktI $•R`a L-L w -..5– Mr V'Z h, IDEAN Elf "ur4a .:< ;. FE.'•v. Strew: cs Hi3he:ay 6ilaei Type Sr4n Complete Foe or Wdland Module C3 special outside fire 161 -163 {ASPEN I _ Complete Fire or Vdidtand Module IPO.BUX12S77 AptJ5Wle4P.o8ri1 cdy i .- v..... —i j • -• ya mr..,r . •.,> 5!ree! cr 4fhwcy '�;: CYSV�crr AUFinWi.`'.oa� City 0 More people involved? Check this box and attach Supplements Forms (KFIRS -1S) as neCESSary. j 2 Owner S. a as P n � nUtetl7 The, emery nil xx a..z; {aspen Ski company } 9 7 0- 8 t 2 1 D-10 j 7 1 4 ,9 based on incident Type, as follows: o: 9usness N. (it Ps+de S) Area Code .:one Humtca rheci,hs wx rfyens 1 l - Loniku as `rciC,cni Vt., Ms., HZ F- t'fine ' iars' tl*'e ktI $•R`a Tccn skip the Mote aoctzieedd,esr 1601 IDEAN I I S I T i ;. rr'umtes Pref. Strew: cs Hi3he:ay 6ilaei Type Sr4n Complete Foe or Wdland Module C3 special outside fire 161 -163 {ASPEN I _ Complete Fire or Vdidtand Module Post CRw Box AptJ5Wle4P.o8ri1 cdy i j State LP Coda E Remarks: i u e[r„tbn was a sti udure 8re with heaw black smoke and flames inside. Oxupants had tried to - �nguish fire and was ITEMS WITH A * MUST ALWAYS BE COMPLETED! Fire Module Required? Check the box that applies and then complete the Fire Module based on incident Type, as follows: E3 Buildings 111 Complete Fire &. Structure Modules Q Special structure 112 Complete Fire Module & Section 1. Structure Module E3 Confined 113 -t 18 Basic Module Only Q Mobile properly 120 -123 Complete Fire & Structure Modules 0 Vehicle 130 -138 Complate Fire Module Q Vegetation 140 -143 Complete Fire or 9VOdland Module Q Outside rubbish firs 150 -155 Basic Module Onlif Q Special outside ire 160 Complete Foe or Wdland Module C3 special outside fire 161 -163 Complete Fire Module C3 Crop Tae 170 -173 Complete Fire or Vdidtand Module I © More remarks? Cheek this box And attach SupplGrental Forms i<,fiRS 43p as recessarj. m Authorization t i 018 i i t l!! i l LDepuA Chief Operations W LL LA I i �nr. -co; re.' %;: ^`isr.o charge lu S:.aar.. PcStia.F rarw P.s: ^y ^�s Y1 1% Day Year ------ t -IOapu File A4a sire Revention p i/ J "% ;ttx.lna rat ,.u.YsA AVFD all call page to apartment building on fire. Initial dispatch radio report was flames showing and possible civilians still inside. 611 was first arriving AVFD officer. Upon arrival fire had vented through 3rd floor windows upon initial size up. Action Taken: 611 established command and completed size up of involved structure and size up of exposures. Upon arrival of first arriving engines, instructed engines whereabouts of hvdrant for first water supply and directed first arriving ff \'s to start initial interior attack and search /rescue operation until I could determine definitively that all occupants were out of involved structure. Upon determination that all occupants were accounted for by APD, I instructed all interior operations to cease and went to a defensive mode due to possibility of building collapse due to the high volume and extremely fast proliferation of flames and smoke. I requested 1 Engine from Snowmass Fire as mutual aid to come to scene as back up in case of another call during this operation. Ithen instructed Truck 1 to ladder above the involved structure and to report status of roof. I was told that the roof had self ventilated. Upon this info I decided NOT to put ff \'s on the sloped metal roof for any additional vertical ventilation. I instructed all hand line crews to protect exposures on west, north and east of involved structure. The exposure on the east was attached to the involved structure via attached breezeway /roof structure. This tactic was successful in limiting the fire to the original building only. I instructed engine crews to direct monitor from Eng 6, Eng 5 and Truck 1, along with hand lines to direct master streams and hand lines through windows to cool down the fire until I felt it was safe for ff \'s to enter structure. At some time after defensive mode was initiated, a large portion of the 3rd floor concrete subfloer failed and caved in to the second floor and possibly through to the basement level. After getting fire under control at approx 19:30, directed hand line crews to ladder windows and continue attack as necessary from windows and to enter building as conditions permitted for interior mop up operation. I pulled all crews out of building for rehab and update for crews involved in attack. 610/611 did interior size up during this break. Upon size up I decided not to send any further crews inside and left one engine crew to stand by and to further mop up for the remainder of the night until AFPD Fire Marshal could start - investigation. Remaining engines and crews released back to station for cleanup and to put trucks back, into service. Rick Salentine Deputy Chief rf�fl= w i G ;t.t; t...tti ! t p r =i 10�C 0,0 2 U,s fi;d.v{ rlre 3 �raperty Esc >�iis £`r Site Materials r`l ,� �! rC- - � t. a a.J - h _rP- educis €s{NOrp <. as *,.. -...: e.-ah.�r+y. r>E.• ,.+r N. t..�- : -rrt ! i= t „ r .vx:ss _;.!; - l - a�n <,d on-Site Materials Storage Use {{{ ! 4 t I Net R*Sroeoxial - i Y n sulk storage C r w.rshGUrng .A 2... -.t;,r Package rt 6fiRf r!t- UI:: S ---. 0 Packaged geGds f.,r O Ueda- rrarser✓rcn gep4i, Un UO Unditerminad 2 12, avi{dk:gs not {nvoii ed ❑ 10 "k. storage or warGbousmg €' 3 .. k ? < ..t•. ) h h E 20 Processing or manufacturing 3 C Packtflsa goats for sale 6 400 asps :,.x €ervicc E.. Uo urawzarm3ttea f B3 i I E__! _i ❑ r €ore .. g f "J auks steraga or Warehousing 2a Pf"Kl9fr6rg Or manuia lUFny� Ave, uv fcl e,:es Less than oif'ef i 3❑ Packaged goons for seta Repair § 4 C! or"mict U Undeferndnaci Ignition Cause of Ignition human Factors Ll� r-{ChELk n::v i!a:3 : <eneyic>.ro r5rdrt W '-. r !3 Contributing o Ignition L. 1 f , g j Di 19 6 lConsttuctionirenovation area i i ❑ Intentional ;,���. �L'rx -fie eR aP�LmG.e boxe ®HbnE nr?aWfrr_orpn .lt. 2 ❑Unintentional [ i ❑Asleep 3 ❑ Failure of equipment or heat source 12 [1 Possibly impaired by Q2 8 i i Heat from direct flame, convecii 4 ❑ AM of nature i alcohol or dregs 5 ❑ Cause under investigation 3 ❑Unattended person tl ❑ Cause undetermined attar investigation i 4 ❑Possibly mentally disabled y y D3 I 1 U 1 15-tructut al component or f €ntsh. Factors Contributing to Ignition * []None i 5 ❑Physically disabled 2 6 []Multiple persons involved em mst gnesa i pc n �w ;, firs saaac"a ,a "°' _` cz^°-" of W' 7 []Age was a factor i i 2 lHeat source too dose to combust '.. D4 6, 5 11 Fiberboard. particleboard and h Farm teo tyrnwn ni Estimated age of r;-,.e or,r.ax €e5trgrrika ?e;;,o-ean _, a rem first Person involved �uitea:rsae is cr; fir. ::o i U PaUnt cormnwtg ro �gn:»n at f © Male Female - Fi Equipment Involved in Ignition F2 Equipment Power Source I G Fire Suppression Factors ©wane aa €(ayuidm hao nGi imoj aa, flop -to [jNa`—V �r.� ent Secri,nG [ I Enter up to tores ondes. CC [ Equp,sne Puea! sou:ca ! 4. Fro SUxassnn hCmr{!) I socxak» f . .° Equipment Portability ,.. I ! i i® Portable j 65Cdtt I I' 2 ❑ stationary FK2 YL °Rrt'L5 fe0fY[21 t, x i Senx! a � I P��e n rnmeik' c mites Gy r 1ba a piw ns eu ie be esssd ir. ! 1 '(�y. 1 { � , � M: rww l calimss. j InLLRI(�E aaEOns. an- r?:'irirci M loo; N rt152r.' rs,,tk Fi,c SWp25si5rt faGYX � f' t Mobile Property Involved ❑None EFZ Mobile Property Type and Make Local Use U Pro -Fire Plan Available 1 D Hof fnveWed in ignition, but burned j �� f Som :c €gMQV"%e!ian p:e;c aq i.. re<,cr.ma :t s � � � h nas63 �ifrn reG%rs f. ..brat zgarxhe: -. 2 Ej Involved in ignition, but did not burn hiob; or'=NW W_ s © involved in gn f on and bon ed / " [j Arson report attached -- 0 Police report attached ��_� ❑ Coroner report attached other reports attached € ! : Stn;cture rnz? Please ire sure tb compte9e i-.he slmcw a F m tarn : F UZfn6;.. ,.v5 E t OlEnclrsed tsuikifng y 2 D Occupied & operating i 2 s, poi"eDteimOuik, Structure 3 ❑ Idle, net routinely used i r 3 U,�'p pen structure —1 � 4 ❑r�; Under major renovatiw.l €4 4.r Air•suppoded structure 5 u Vacant and secured OR 5 ❑'tent 6 []Vacant and unsecured - fi Open Matter to !!!!!! ❑ p 'g" ", 7 [j Being demolished v! L,; y jam: I BY k t t t'1 Underground structure ! . ar:.a�) 6 0 Otter 8 j M �/+Sl iCu !Hr }Ill h:3S ' "G4 Connective structure ,<s. i - =e -r U ❑ Undetermined d ❑' Other type of structure rJ1 Fire Originry Number of Stories Damaged by Flame t . �{�,{ (`Alm rrti eoof zs yan d lia:+g!:esa:ery NtMber of %tones wlmirof dama�39 !. r .,eu:••; i!L' ;�l tS to )4-. flame damage) I((, Numbarof stories wisiguiacant damage J2 Fire Spread i��R-55 to 49 % flame damage) itl E'Voad.k .!»IiNed to o6fcCt of oigm w' of tTKr .t" (i2c(. RiIXk D3. rF<0.4Ari:Pi.l� Nu(nf!°(Of 510r1e51Tti1eaVr llanlegL 2 ❑Confined to room of origin ""` —`—' `5a to 74 %flame damage) 3 QConfined to floor of origin Nomber of stoidee wlexitreme damage - 4 ®Confined to building of origin. Ili t it' 75wtae% game damage! ` 5 Qlieyond building of origin I i Li Presence of Detectors - [t tin area of the Arel ii N ®Novo Present 1-7S 1p b I < _c�PO p I t t ❑ Present 111 U Q Undetermined L2 Defector Type y j t 0 Smoke 2 ❑ heat 3 Q Combination smoke and heat 4 ❑ Sprinkler, water flow detection 5 ❑ More than one type present 0 Q Other U ❑ Undetermined L3 Detector Power Supply I ❑ Battery only 2 Q hardwire only 3 ❑ Plug -in 4 ❑ hardwire With battery 5 Q Plug -in with battery 6 Q Mechanical 7 ❑ Multiple detectors & power supplies ti ❑ Other U ❑ Undetermined [4 Detector Operation t Q Fire too small to activate c =mw«< 2 Q 0 r d Bfack Ls 3 Q Failed to a rdtE ♦ GomptMe i Block L5 U Q Undetermined I Presence of Automatic Extinguishing System N None Present 1 Q Present eomptefe roaf of 2 [j Partial System Present sapionM i U U ndetermined 2 Type of Automatic Extinguishing System ^nayfired it file ivas wiNen d-Vg dmi,90 rJ a�5 I Q %Net�pipe sprinkler 2 ❑ Dry-pipe sprinkler 3 ❑ Other sprinkler system 4 ❑ Dry chemical system 5 ❑ Foam system 6 ❑ Halogen4ype system 7 [] Carbon dioxide (CO,) system i} ❑ Other special hazard system U D Undetermined Type of Material Contributing Most to Flame Spread h. -."ron sf'rad OR if am9 >0.'�d '9t i"t gr':etl rEKr<,}a Sk'y:.l_• litre R.,c�lef aR'.. uv A¢ :o C- 15s,A.:e. •---f SaeaRn L fit I I i. 7 1 ( Strucf oaf member or framing a<:n cxuriutnq r' smf ,,.spread K2 t R i Sawn wood indudin0 all finishe TyCes»mzmra!mnVlbulTq µrvib dig adiw nwslw nzme spread sc,rriGUwg ccAe rs OP Or 170. L5Detector Effectiveness [5 R¢aue<dLG+teciw opeta:ed. I Q Alerted occupants, occupants responded 2 Q Alerted occupants, occupants tailed j to respond 3 ❑ There were no occupants 4 Q Failed to alert occupants U Q Undetermined j L6 Detector Failure Reason Rarnared ildeir_lor i «kd to o {cTa1E 9 ❑ Power failure, shutoff, or disconnect 2 Q improper installation or placement 3 ❑ Defective 4 Q Lack of maintenance, includes not cleaning 5 ❑ Battery missing or disconnected 6 ❑ Battery discharged or dead it Q Other U ❑ Undetermined �3 Operation of Automatic Extinguishing System RB•}1i:Ed.1 fil. 2,' Ikl ]9riaV :AI' {t Q Operatedleffective (go to M41 2 Q operatedinot effective tgo a 13 ❑ Fire too small to activate 4 Failed to operate (go to 11051 Q H Other - U ❑ Undetermined M4 Number of Sprinkler Heads Operating R.1,1 41ed drr -r -:, rvemuee o: ej:mcie: ieeads otr!ainc Reason for Automatic 5 Extinguishing System Failure F<pmY it iystrcm og do5 It e5csvve 4)'1 1 Q System shut off 12 ❑ Not enough agent discharged 3 [j Agent discharged but did not reach fire 4 ❑ Wrong type of system 5 Q Fire not in area protected 6 ❑ System components damaged .7 © Lack of maintenance 8 Q Manual intervention 0 Q Other U Q Undetermined n €uidng Status S Sodding %air + F %nze Size Y a. 3 V fv r S , i n tfetghf i % e9 fill =x i ire } t t g g Under construction o rJ1 Fire Originry Number of Stories Damaged by Flame t . �{�,{ (`Alm rrti eoof zs yan d lia:+g!:esa:ery NtMber of %tones wlmirof dama�39 !. r .,eu:••; i!L' ;�l tS to )4-. flame damage) I((, Numbarof stories wisiguiacant damage J2 Fire Spread i��R-55 to 49 % flame damage) itl E'Voad.k .!»IiNed to o6fcCt of oigm w' of tTKr .t" (i2c(. RiIXk D3. rF<0.4Ari:Pi.l� Nu(nf!°(Of 510r1e51Tti1eaVr llanlegL 2 ❑Confined to room of origin ""` —`—' `5a to 74 %flame damage) 3 QConfined to floor of origin Nomber of stoidee wlexitreme damage - 4 ®Confined to building of origin. Ili t it' 75wtae% game damage! ` 5 Qlieyond building of origin I i Li Presence of Detectors - [t tin area of the Arel ii N ®Novo Present 1-7S 1p b I < _c�PO p I t t ❑ Present 111 U Q Undetermined L2 Defector Type y j t 0 Smoke 2 ❑ heat 3 Q Combination smoke and heat 4 ❑ Sprinkler, water flow detection 5 ❑ More than one type present 0 Q Other U ❑ Undetermined L3 Detector Power Supply I ❑ Battery only 2 Q hardwire only 3 ❑ Plug -in 4 ❑ hardwire With battery 5 Q Plug -in with battery 6 Q Mechanical 7 ❑ Multiple detectors & power supplies ti ❑ Other U ❑ Undetermined [4 Detector Operation t Q Fire too small to activate c =mw«< 2 Q 0 r d Bfack Ls 3 Q Failed to a rdtE ♦ GomptMe i Block L5 U Q Undetermined I Presence of Automatic Extinguishing System N None Present 1 Q Present eomptefe roaf of 2 [j Partial System Present sapionM i U U ndetermined 2 Type of Automatic Extinguishing System ^nayfired it file ivas wiNen d-Vg dmi,90 rJ a�5 I Q %Net�pipe sprinkler 2 ❑ Dry-pipe sprinkler 3 ❑ Other sprinkler system 4 ❑ Dry chemical system 5 ❑ Foam system 6 ❑ Halogen4ype system 7 [] Carbon dioxide (CO,) system i} ❑ Other special hazard system U D Undetermined Type of Material Contributing Most to Flame Spread h. -."ron sf'rad OR if am9 >0.'�d '9t i"t gr':etl rEKr<,}a Sk'y:.l_• litre R.,c�lef aR'.. uv A¢ :o C- 15s,A.:e. •---f SaeaRn L fit I I i. 7 1 ( Strucf oaf member or framing a<:n cxuriutnq r' smf ,,.spread K2 t R i Sawn wood indudin0 all finishe TyCes»mzmra!mnVlbulTq µrvib dig adiw nwslw nzme spread sc,rriGUwg ccAe rs OP Or 170. L5Detector Effectiveness [5 R¢aue<dLG+teciw opeta:ed. I Q Alerted occupants, occupants responded 2 Q Alerted occupants, occupants tailed j to respond 3 ❑ There were no occupants 4 Q Failed to alert occupants U Q Undetermined j L6 Detector Failure Reason Rarnared ildeir_lor i «kd to o {cTa1E 9 ❑ Power failure, shutoff, or disconnect 2 Q improper installation or placement 3 ❑ Defective 4 Q Lack of maintenance, includes not cleaning 5 ❑ Battery missing or disconnected 6 ❑ Battery discharged or dead it Q Other U ❑ Undetermined �3 Operation of Automatic Extinguishing System RB•}1i:Ed.1 fil. 2,' Ikl ]9riaV :AI' {t Q Operatedleffective (go to M41 2 Q operatedinot effective tgo a 13 ❑ Fire too small to activate 4 Failed to operate (go to 11051 Q H Other - U ❑ Undetermined M4 Number of Sprinkler Heads Operating R.1,1 41ed drr -r -:, rvemuee o: ej:mcie: ieeads otr!ainc Reason for Automatic 5 Extinguishing System Failure F<pmY it iystrcm og do5 It e5csvve 4)'1 1 Q System shut off 12 ❑ Not enough agent discharged 3 [j Agent discharged but did not reach fire 4 ❑ Wrong type of system 5 Q Fire not in area protected 6 ❑ System components damaged .7 © Lack of maintenance 8 Q Manual intervention 0 Q Other U Q Undetermined Li Presence of Detectors - [t tin area of the Arel ii N ®Novo Present 1-7S 1p b I < _c�PO p I t t ❑ Present 111 U Q Undetermined L2 Defector Type y j t 0 Smoke 2 ❑ heat 3 Q Combination smoke and heat 4 ❑ Sprinkler, water flow detection 5 ❑ More than one type present 0 Q Other U ❑ Undetermined L3 Detector Power Supply I ❑ Battery only 2 Q hardwire only 3 ❑ Plug -in 4 ❑ hardwire With battery 5 Q Plug -in with battery 6 Q Mechanical 7 ❑ Multiple detectors & power supplies ti ❑ Other U ❑ Undetermined [4 Detector Operation t Q Fire too small to activate c =mw«< 2 Q 0 r d Bfack Ls 3 Q Failed to a rdtE ♦ GomptMe i Block L5 U Q Undetermined I Presence of Automatic Extinguishing System N None Present 1 Q Present eomptefe roaf of 2 [j Partial System Present sapionM i U U ndetermined 2 Type of Automatic Extinguishing System ^nayfired it file ivas wiNen d-Vg dmi,90 rJ a�5 I Q %Net�pipe sprinkler 2 ❑ Dry-pipe sprinkler 3 ❑ Other sprinkler system 4 ❑ Dry chemical system 5 ❑ Foam system 6 ❑ Halogen4ype system 7 [] Carbon dioxide (CO,) system i} ❑ Other special hazard system U D Undetermined Type of Material Contributing Most to Flame Spread h. -."ron sf'rad OR if am9 >0.'�d '9t i"t gr':etl rEKr<,}a Sk'y:.l_• litre R.,c�lef aR'.. uv A¢ :o C- 15s,A.:e. •---f SaeaRn L fit I I i. 7 1 ( Strucf oaf member or framing a<:n cxuriutnq r' smf ,,.spread K2 t R i Sawn wood indudin0 all finishe TyCes»mzmra!mnVlbulTq µrvib dig adiw nwslw nzme spread sc,rriGUwg ccAe rs OP Or 170. L5Detector Effectiveness [5 R¢aue<dLG+teciw opeta:ed. I Q Alerted occupants, occupants responded 2 Q Alerted occupants, occupants tailed j to respond 3 ❑ There were no occupants 4 Q Failed to alert occupants U Q Undetermined j L6 Detector Failure Reason Rarnared ildeir_lor i «kd to o {cTa1E 9 ❑ Power failure, shutoff, or disconnect 2 Q improper installation or placement 3 ❑ Defective 4 Q Lack of maintenance, includes not cleaning 5 ❑ Battery missing or disconnected 6 ❑ Battery discharged or dead it Q Other U ❑ Undetermined �3 Operation of Automatic Extinguishing System RB•}1i:Ed.1 fil. 2,' Ikl ]9riaV :AI' {t Q Operatedleffective (go to M41 2 Q operatedinot effective tgo a 13 ❑ Fire too small to activate 4 Failed to operate (go to 11051 Q H Other - U ❑ Undetermined M4 Number of Sprinkler Heads Operating R.1,1 41ed drr -r -:, rvemuee o: ej:mcie: ieeads otr!ainc Reason for Automatic 5 Extinguishing System Failure F<pmY it iystrcm og do5 It e5csvve 4)'1 1 Q System shut off 12 ❑ Not enough agent discharged 3 [j Agent discharged but did not reach fire 4 ❑ Wrong type of system 5 Q Fire not in area protected 6 ❑ System components damaged .7 © Lack of maintenance 8 Q Manual intervention 0 Q Other U Q Undetermined t Q Fire too small to activate c =mw«< 2 Q 0 r d Bfack Ls 3 Q Failed to a rdtE ♦ GomptMe i Block L5 U Q Undetermined I Presence of Automatic Extinguishing System N None Present 1 Q Present eomptefe roaf of 2 [j Partial System Present sapionM i U U ndetermined 2 Type of Automatic Extinguishing System ^nayfired it file ivas wiNen d-Vg dmi,90 rJ a�5 I Q %Net�pipe sprinkler 2 ❑ Dry-pipe sprinkler 3 ❑ Other sprinkler system 4 ❑ Dry chemical system 5 ❑ Foam system 6 ❑ Halogen4ype system 7 [] Carbon dioxide (CO,) system i} ❑ Other special hazard system U D Undetermined Type of Material Contributing Most to Flame Spread h. -."ron sf'rad OR if am9 >0.'�d '9t i"t gr':etl rEKr<,}a Sk'y:.l_• litre R.,c�lef aR'.. uv A¢ :o C- 15s,A.:e. •---f SaeaRn L fit I I i. 7 1 ( Strucf oaf member or framing a<:n cxuriutnq r' smf ,,.spread K2 t R i Sawn wood indudin0 all finishe TyCes»mzmra!mnVlbulTq µrvib dig adiw nwslw nzme spread sc,rriGUwg ccAe rs OP Or 170. L5Detector Effectiveness [5 R¢aue<dLG+teciw opeta:ed. I Q Alerted occupants, occupants responded 2 Q Alerted occupants, occupants tailed j to respond 3 ❑ There were no occupants 4 Q Failed to alert occupants U Q Undetermined j L6 Detector Failure Reason Rarnared ildeir_lor i «kd to o {cTa1E 9 ❑ Power failure, shutoff, or disconnect 2 Q improper installation or placement 3 ❑ Defective 4 Q Lack of maintenance, includes not cleaning 5 ❑ Battery missing or disconnected 6 ❑ Battery discharged or dead it Q Other U ❑ Undetermined �3 Operation of Automatic Extinguishing System RB•}1i:Ed.1 fil. 2,' Ikl ]9riaV :AI' {t Q Operatedleffective (go to M41 2 Q operatedinot effective tgo a 13 ❑ Fire too small to activate 4 Failed to operate (go to 11051 Q H Other - U ❑ Undetermined M4 Number of Sprinkler Heads Operating R.1,1 41ed drr -r -:, rvemuee o: ej:mcie: ieeads otr!ainc Reason for Automatic 5 Extinguishing System Failure F<pmY it iystrcm og do5 It e5csvve 4)'1 1 Q System shut off 12 ❑ Not enough agent discharged 3 [j Agent discharged but did not reach fire 4 ❑ Wrong type of system 5 Q Fire not in area protected 6 ❑ System components damaged .7 © Lack of maintenance 8 Q Manual intervention 0 Q Other U Q Undetermined I Presence of Automatic Extinguishing System N None Present 1 Q Present eomptefe roaf of 2 [j Partial System Present sapionM i U U ndetermined 2 Type of Automatic Extinguishing System ^nayfired it file ivas wiNen d-Vg dmi,90 rJ a�5 I Q %Net�pipe sprinkler 2 ❑ Dry-pipe sprinkler 3 ❑ Other sprinkler system 4 ❑ Dry chemical system 5 ❑ Foam system 6 ❑ Halogen4ype system 7 [] Carbon dioxide (CO,) system i} ❑ Other special hazard system U D Undetermined Type of Material Contributing Most to Flame Spread h. -."ron sf'rad OR if am9 >0.'�d '9t i"t gr':etl rEKr<,}a Sk'y:.l_• litre R.,c�lef aR'.. uv A¢ :o C- 15s,A.:e. •---f SaeaRn L fit I I i. 7 1 ( Strucf oaf member or framing a<:n cxuriutnq r' smf ,,.spread K2 t R i Sawn wood indudin0 all finishe TyCes»mzmra!mnVlbulTq µrvib dig adiw nwslw nzme spread sc,rriGUwg ccAe rs OP Or 170. L5Detector Effectiveness [5 R¢aue<dLG+teciw opeta:ed. I Q Alerted occupants, occupants responded 2 Q Alerted occupants, occupants tailed j to respond 3 ❑ There were no occupants 4 Q Failed to alert occupants U Q Undetermined j L6 Detector Failure Reason Rarnared ildeir_lor i «kd to o {cTa1E 9 ❑ Power failure, shutoff, or disconnect 2 Q improper installation or placement 3 ❑ Defective 4 Q Lack of maintenance, includes not cleaning 5 ❑ Battery missing or disconnected 6 ❑ Battery discharged or dead it Q Other U ❑ Undetermined �3 Operation of Automatic Extinguishing System RB•}1i:Ed.1 fil. 2,' Ikl ]9riaV :AI' {t Q Operatedleffective (go to M41 2 Q operatedinot effective tgo a 13 ❑ Fire too small to activate 4 Failed to operate (go to 11051 Q H Other - U ❑ Undetermined M4 Number of Sprinkler Heads Operating R.1,1 41ed drr -r -:, rvemuee o: ej:mcie: ieeads otr!ainc Reason for Automatic 5 Extinguishing System Failure F<pmY it iystrcm og do5 It e5csvve 4)'1 1 Q System shut off 12 ❑ Not enough agent discharged 3 [j Agent discharged but did not reach fire 4 ❑ Wrong type of system 5 Q Fire not in area protected 6 ❑ System components damaged .7 © Lack of maintenance 8 Q Manual intervention 0 Q Other U Q Undetermined Reason for Automatic 5 Extinguishing System Failure F<pmY it iystrcm og do5 It e5csvve 4)'1 1 Q System shut off 12 ❑ Not enough agent discharged 3 [j Agent discharged but did not reach fire 4 ❑ Wrong type of system 5 Q Fire not in area protected 6 ❑ System components damaged .7 © Lack of maintenance 8 Q Manual intervention 0 Q Other U Q Undetermined x Y Ed ° -+ G zHi ;0l pia' LL11 2.0! =+;7' 'D o,vr 10,0,0,;0,2 0 Pt, FS -9 Resources B Apparatus or � Oates and Times ;n: :t, ry,ant � Num I App ratus u5c � ken ? � j` SCrt Taken ci Peso rces a . .' e..r ?S .vM e ; Of 1 - c+ i,z _ _......._.. t V� } People i ID } p, C, V, , ' Dispatch Q 1 1 , 1 6' 0 , 7' 2 0: 0, 7 1 ` 3 + Q + ' <_.i t � Suppression pp L € Arrival 01 J._ 1.i � �� f - ;� }�_.:... I_} i Ll EMS I iT Type 9 9 Clear M +, i t l a, i 7; 12,010,7 2,7 A .t i } D other t0 RA,R; i, f Dispatch 1_I iiS0,71 20,0,7 }? 's ❑ i }^! Q suppression 1 t U ".! Arrival [ 1, i.,.1 I (G:, i.} 2, 0, 0 7 i s a 5 ' I 1.J� .' � 0 EMS ![ 6 *Type 19,21 :sear Ej 1_1, 1 110, 71 2,0.0.7 120 44 � � Other } LJ u t ( 't3 j ID 6, 1 :0; } .Dispatch 11, 1! 10, 7 112,%0.71 ill a Q t �-'-`-i [+r Suppression i Arrive' [ I.IJ},0,7) 20,0.7 117 4 2 ❑ EMS ii Type 9 'L Clear E3 1 1, 1 } 6,7 J 2 0 0;7 2 4 ,i Other W u is ITI K, i t Dispatch [ 1 7 1.� 1� 2, 0 0 7 1 .7 Q 1 i [X� suppression W ; Arrival (� 1 ,1 10� 2 0, 0 7 7 1 ❑ EMS * 1 2 Clear 1.1,1.110 ,.71 2 0, 0 7 2d 3 ❑ Other Other 1 � � ! r l €,5 ID E 8 , Dispatch f 1 .1 110 17112101017 17 ,2 8 Q t + suppression � u {-Arrival jg 11, i 1 1 0, 7 1 MAW 11 7 ;11 Q EMS Type LLJj Clear 0 1 1, 1 1 1 0, 7 1 2 0,6 7 12A 4 d Q Other I m R 7 Despatch I 1110, 7 0 0,7 I 6 Q 7 L`'i"� [� Suppression i t t I t r t i�#6 Arrival [ It,l ita.7i 200,7 t b 0 (� EMS , Type } -L, IJ Clear 0 17_11 Ems 7112,0,0, 2,1 A d I Omer ,;� 01 r E, 5 Dispatch 1 , 1 110, 71 2, 0, 0..7 17 3 Q a, 1 Suppression 1 t£ Arrival i 1 0 7112A0,7 0,7 1,7 Q EMS t } ' Type i. LL,_Ij Clear 1 1 , t 11 0, 8 t_2 0,0-,7J 07 • Q Other u W I['� to , , , , Despatch 01 a t f } I I I © �} Q Suppression u u 1, Arrival Q }_TI W EMS Type �IJ Clear Q 1 , f 1 , 11_s_�_i_1 }�>� Q Other }i f ID , , Dispatch ❑ 1J_11_!_1 I-,�y S_iil r..y Q suppression E , Arrival [j 1 } 11 , ;J 1 , t 1 Q EMS Type { , } Clear 01 11 t „ 1 } I Q Other W , .. "} Apparatus or Resource Type Ground Fire Suppression 11 Engine } 12 Truck or aerial - ; 13 Quint 14 Tanker and pumper combination 16 Brush buck 17 ARFF (aircraft rescue and firefighting) 10 Ground fire suppression, other i !. Heavy Ground Equipment 21 Dozer or pt" 22 Tractor 24 Tanker or tender - 20 Heavy ground equipment, other Aircraft 41 Aircraft: fixed -wire tanker 42 Halitanker 43 Helicopter 40 Aesoraft, other Marine Equipment 51 Fireboat with pump 52 Boat, no pump 50 Marine equipment, other Support Equipment 61 Breathing apparatus support 62 Light and air unit 60 Support apparatus, other Medical and Rescue 71 Rescue unit 72 Urban search and resCUO unit 73 Highangle rescue Unit 7s BLS unit 7& ALS unit 70 Madiceal and rescue unit, other Dther 91 Mobile command post 92 Chief officer car 93 H=Mat unit 94 Type i hand crew 95 Type It hand crew g9 Privately owned vehicle 00 other apparatuslrescurces NN None UU Undetermined HFr.." Ren;uern,p: ,. 01A n- g 71 12 1,0 0 0 �o A 10 I C 20 n �� of I-L LL!j CL�, —�'2 — Apparitus or j Dates and Times Sent l Number Apparatus Use A--ticris Taker. me Eli, W,* 1P 1:1 E i. of ry, People ci: V. Di iD LE�Lji—v;—, J t Dispaich 10 LWJ LL71 12 0, 0 7 11,3 L Sent Suppression Arrival 01 il - 11 1 ❑ EMS *Type LI-L.2i t Clea, 0 LL.2j LLIj 12, 0:0, 7 124 411 1 ❑ Other Personnel y Name Rank or Attend Action Azficn Action Action ID Grade Taken Taken Taker. Taken ,-j Rick Balenurle Deputy Chi ❑ 1 8 0 j I Frank Bauer 1, i 91 1 f 1 1 1 Roya Bekilk 1 jb 41 1 1 1 1 I 1Bruce Bradshaw ❑ 4 - 1Blair Elliot I I I 1 Less Grolier ❑ ii I D pf(,Vl Dispatch I I LiLIJ 210t017 17 2 8 Sr" Suppression I, I t I I Arrival I 0 EMS M *Type 1 9 1 9 Clear M L LD 1 0, 7112, 0 , 0,7 120 A I D Other i Personnel Name Rank or Attend Action Action Action Action i ID Grade LX I Taken Taken Taken Taken 119191 I! f I Mike Haman 0 1 12 141 1 ; i i ;-j Roy Holloway ❑ I tl 19f i I I 1 1 J.Roger Hollowell 1 I jAmy Knight ❑ I-] Michael Lyons Crai Melville g ❑ I NOR= IP,OiVI I Dispatch [3LLj1Jj0,7j12,0,0-7 1117,2 a sent suppression Arrival 11 1 1 . 1 I I I ❑ 2 0, ❑ EMS *Type L9 L2j Clear 13 1 1, 1110.7 112i0jQ.7 121 ti ❑ Other Personnel Name Rank or Attend Action Action Action Action ID Grade rT Taken Taken Taker, Taken 11318, i i I Brian Nichols ❑ i i Chris Olson Firefighie ❑ 11111 161 1 1 1 1 1 I an Schubert ❑ - aa l 11 1 1 1 Michael Stricklen ❑ 1 - :11 15 1 1 1 $ I iMichael Tracey 0 iI 2 I 1 1! 1 Later Voorhees ❑ 14,4 D" Apparatus or Dates and Times Sent I Rombe. Apparatus Usc-. %r Acitons x, en Resources L20 I O�C:- 07 ✓ 'Person People -1 1 V".. wp lfl ReYe Iorw.V Apparatus or Dates and Times Sent I Rombe. Apparatus Usc-. %r Acitons x, en Resources Fill O�C:- 07 ✓ People V".. Dispatch "I La.?. 12,0,0,7 1i,7 .2 d Sent 0 suppression Arrive; I EMS if Type Lj-L2j Clear Ej LLdj LkLIJ 12, 0i0 7 124 .4 d D Other Personnel Name Rank or Attend Action Action Action Action ID I Grade r Taken I Taken Taken Taken Dave Walben 2_L71 I , David Watson 1[2] w MAR 1, Dispatch E111,1110,7112,0;017 11723 sent es suppresion s Arrival i t t 10, 711210,0, 7 [10 g U 0 EMS *Type 1 9, 21 Clear 1 1. 1110, 7112,0,0,7 124 A I I other her Personnel Name Rank or Attend Action Action Action Action 10 Grade [xj raken Taken Taken Taken 7 6 t Ed Van Walra-en Fire Marsh ID 16111o. I Dispatch J3LLjjj0.7112,0,M 11!7 i2 3 Sent suppreession Arrival 1110,7112,0,00 117 4 2 EMS *Type 19,21 Clear 11,1110.7112101017 l2g d Other Personnel Name Rank or I Attend Action Action Action Acton ID Grade FxI Taken Taken Taken Taken 7 16, j i Ed Van Walrave, IFire Marsh �jl wp lfl ReYe Iorw.V A —I! 112—t0ri Ii, LD —I"JI 0,0 Apparatus or Apparatus or T Datcs and Times Sent lNumber lApparatus Use - AWOTVS.Werl Arfic�,-,&W W, resources C j of I 0 EMS *-.ype I peogis D Other � Personnels Name Rank or Attend Action Action 4 j Dispatch ID LLLj Lq�7j 12,0,0j 11,7 ;2 Sent Suppression � ? t �J__; Taken Arrival 1,1 10 w318 Taken LIL_ ❑ EMS Greg Wisener Clear I I - I I LIO 12, O 0.7 12;1 j4 J I Gi Other Forsonnei Name Rank or Attend Action Action Action Action ID i Grade Taken Taken Taken 4 Taken Bill NcEnteer ❑ 11461, tt 7 F 1 Dispatch 13LLjJjQ,7l12,%0,7 110,10 sent ❑ suppression Arrival El LLjj 10, 7112 0,0, 7 118 J 5 ❑ 1 1 EMS n Clear 011,1110.711210,017 12; A i Other i,:51 ID jEj8j I I Dispatch 011,1110,7112,0A7 =173 suppression Arrival I � I I 10 : 711210,0,71 0 EMS *-.ype Clear 1, 11 L�LD 12,0,0,7 IN A i D Other I J Personnels Name Rank or Attend Action Action Action Action H) Grade o Taken Taken Taken Taken ttt I r I 1 4 1 i i 1 1 1 Greg Wisener ❑ 11461, tt 7 F 1 Dispatch 13LLjJjQ,7l12,%0,7 110,10 sent ❑ suppression Arrival El LLjj 10, 7112 0,0, 7 118 J 5 ❑ 1 1 EMS ;*Type LI-I Ij Clear 011,1110.711210,017 12; A i Other Personnel Name Rank or Attend Action Action Action Action ID Grade Ej Taken Taken Taken Taken i I joe Fredericks I f wMtA , —511 L12 LI Jr Apparatus o, Dates and Times Sent --paals U A,�tions Taken T Ap u " Resources of if 1 People jr, I E. F, Dispatch 1210 017 11 ,1,123 Sent Sures, I I pp -1 1 ,,7 Ll _7 2 Arrival 011, 1110, 7112M ❑ UL [_-) EMS _&j vpe Lj_, 'Lj .7 &JS Cleat E) 11,11 10, 8112,0,0,7 L2_ J other Personnel Name Rank or Attend Action Action Action r Action iD iii Grade Taken Taken Taken Taken -1 f4? 6, Michael Brands r Ker. Josse" 11 j4 1 1 1 j i-i Kevin SmiddY 1.12 18 j j I Marc Zachary J-771 Dispatch ❑ I I IJ f sent E ❑ Suppression Arrival 11, 11 11 III 1 I i n DEMS *--type i i Clear Ell 11 If ❑ other Personnel Name Rank or Attend Action Action Action Act-on Action Action Action ID Grade Taken n Taken 3a ken Taken Take, Taken U ❑ ID 1 Dispatch Sent D Suppression Arrival ❑ 1 1 t I, I t 1 I 0 EMS *Typ- I l i Clear [11 ❑ Other Ij Personnel Name Rank of Attend Action Action Action Action ID Grade Taken Taken Taken Taken t J1 13 it