The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.218 S 3rd St.0052.2007.ASLU. ~. .- THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0052.2007.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBER 2735-124-64-009 PROJECT ADDRESS 218 S. 3`d St. PLANNER Jessica Garrow CASE DESCRIPTION New Single Family Home REPRESENTATIVE Al Beyer ~ t1AA.-+~ DATE OF FINAL ACTION 12/2/07 CLOSED BY Amy DeVault ._ .. Z RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~ v APPROVING ONE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS VARIANCE FOR B J « 218 SOUTH THIRD ST, SOUTH HALF OF LOTS A & B, BLOCK 46, CITY AND ~ o ~ TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, CO, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO r w v PARCEL N0.2735-124-64-009 o ~ c ~ W Y a Resolution #31, Series 2007 ti o c WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application ~ °o, ~ from Bob and Sue Kendig, represented by Al Beyer, requesting approval of one (1) a Residential Design Standards Variance to construct a new single-family home at 218 o a w j South Third Street; and, a n ~ m WHEREAS, the subject property is zoned R-6 (Medium Density Residential); ' N w ~ o .q and, ~ ~ ~ ~ WHEREAS, upon review of the application, and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended denial, of the proposed land use request; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on November 20, 2007, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 31, Series of 2007, by a three to one (3 - 1) vote, approving one Residential Design Standards Variances for the development of asingle-family home on the property located at 218 South Third Street, Block 46, South half of Lots A & B, City and Townsite of Aspen, CO; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission fords that the development proposal meets the applicable development standazds and that approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Section 26 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves one (1) Variance from the Residential Design Standards from Secondary Mass (Land Use Code Section 26.410.040.B.1), for the development of asingle-family home on the property located at 218 South Third Street, Block 46, South half of Lots A & B, City and Townsite of Aspen, CO. The variance is from the following language, as stated in Land Use Code Section 26.410.040.B.1 in effect on November 20, 2007: "Secondary mass. All new single-family and duplex structures shall locate at least ten percent (10%) of their total squaze footage above grade in a mass which is completely detached from the principal building or linked to it by a subordinate connecting element. This standazd shall only apply to parcels within the Aspen infill azea pursuant to Subsection 26.410.O10.B.2. Accessory buildings such as gazages, sheds and accessory dwelling units are examples of appropriate uses for the secondary mass. A subordinate linking element for the purposes of secondary mass shall be defined as an element not more than ten (10) feet in width and ten (10) feet in length with a plate height of not more than nine (9) feet. Linked pavilions six (6) feet in width and ten (10) feet in length shall be exempt from Subsection 26.575.020.A.8." Section 2: Vested Rights The development approvals granted pursuant to this Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution shall be vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of the development order. Section 3• All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal appmvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 4: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 5• If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 20`" day of November, 2007. APPROVED AS TO FORM: ity Attorney ATTEST: kie Lothian, De y City Clerk :\cityUessica\Cases\218 S Third\P&Z\218sThirdPZ Reso_l l 20 07.doc .-. Y / ~~ DEVELOPMENT ORDER of the City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Bob and Sue Kendig, 218 S. Third St., Aspen, CO 81611 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number Block 46 South half of Lots A & B City and Townsite of Asgen, CO, parcel ID 2735-124-64-009 Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property The applicant has received a Residential Design Standard Vaziance from the secondary mass standard. Written Description of the Site SpeciTic Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan City of Ashen Plannine and Zoning Commission Resolution 31, Series 2007 (attachedl, Residential Design Standard Variance. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) December 2.2007 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) December 3, 2010 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this~~y ofof De~ 07, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. Chris Bendo C mmunity Development Director ~.. ~., Section 18: Vested Property Rights The development approvals granted herein shall constitute asite-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) yeazs from the date of issuance of a development order. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundazies of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 218 S. Third St., City of Aspen, by Residential Design Standard Variances approval by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission. PUBLIC NOTICE Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 218 South Third Street, Parcel ID 2735-124-60-09, by Residential Design Standard Variance by the Planning and Zoning Commission on November 20, 2007. The Applicant received approval of a Residential Design Variance from the secondary mass standazd. For further information contact Jessica Garrow, at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 429-2780. s/ City of Aspen Publish in The Aspen Times on December 2, 2007 PUBLIC NOTICE a DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL s/ City of Aspen Publisbetl In Ibe Aspen Times Weakly on Decem Der 2, 2001. (911 ]4~ ~~ io+ `V '6 +' MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Jessica Garrow, Planner ~~~ THRU: Jennifer Phelan, Community Development Deputy Director, MEETING DATE: November 20, 2007 RE: 218 South Third -Residential Design Guideline Variances - Resolution No~, Series 2007 -Public Hearine (Parce12735- 124-60-09) APPLICANT /OWNER: Bob and Sue Kendig REPRESENTATIVE: Al Beyer LOCATION: South Half of Lots A & B, Block 46, City of Aspen, CO, commonly known as 218 South Third St. CURRENT ZONING Bc USE Vacant lot in the R-6 zone district. PROPOSED LAND USE: The Applicant is requesting to redevelop the vacant lot with a new single-family home. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the requested vaziance. SUMMARY: The Applicant requests of the Planning and Zoning Commission approval one (1) variance from the Residential Design Standazds to construct a new single-family home. LAND USE REQUESTS AND REVIEW PROCEDURES: The Applicant is requesting the following land use approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission: • Residential Design Standazds Variance from the Secondary Mass standard to construct a new single family home on a vacant lot within the City of Aspen pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.410. PROJECT SUMMARY: The Applicant, Bob and Sue Kendig, represented by A] Beyer, has requested a vaziance from the Secondary Mass standard to construct a new home at 218 South Third St. The property is located in the Medium-Density Residential (R-6) zone district. As outlined in Table 1 below, the proposed development meets the dimensional requirements of the R-6 zone district. The property is located across the alley from the St. Moritz, and adjacent to other residential structures. The lot is 3,000 squaze feet with dimensions measuring fifty (50) feet by sixty (60) feet, with access off Third St and an alley. Page 1 of 4 ,,,". ,~ <.. ... Table 1: Comnazison Of PI'ODOSed vR_ Renttired Tlimencinnal Rr miiram Antc Dimensionsi Proposed llirlsensianal U>uder2yiu~ Moderate Tleissty-)Ptential rents R 'nirements ~~} one District lte+gn Minimum Lot Size Approximaftly 3,000 6,000 sq. ft., 3,000 sq. 8. for historic lot split Minimum Lot Width 60 fr. 60 ft. Minimum Lot Approximately 4,500 sq. ft. for detached unit Area/Dwelling 3,000 sq. ft. 3,000 for detached unit on historic properties Minimum Front Yazd 10 ft 10 fr. for principal building Setback . 15 ft. for accessory buildings Minimum Side Yazd Setback 5 fr. 5 ft. each side, total of 10 fr. 10 ft. for principal Minimum Rear Yard building, 5 fr. for 10 fr. for principal buildings, 5 fr. for accessory Setback portion of principal buildings and portion of principal building used building used as solely for a garage gara e Maximum Site Coverage N/A 0-5,999 sq. ft. lot size: No limit Maximum Height 25 ft. 25 ft, Minimum Distance between Buildings on Lot N/A 5 ft Pedestrian Amenity Space N/A No Requirement External Floor Area Ratio 2 400 sq. ft. 3,000 sq. fr. lot size: 2,400 sq. ft. (FAR) for one Duplex , This property was subject to a court ordered subdivision in 1984. The City Council accepted the subdivision at their August 27, 1984 meeting. The minutes from this meeting explain why the lot was divided in half: "A couple, who jointly owned the property, got a divorce; as part of the decree each person got one detached single family dwelling. The Code says a subdivision created by a court order is exempt from subdivision. However, the judge divided the property the wrong way." In a typical subdivision the property would be divided so that one party receives Lot A, and the other receives Lot B. The division on the Kendig's property was not done in this way. Instead, each party received half of lots A and B. (See illustration below) Typical Subdivision Kendig Subdivision All I All Lot A Lot B Half i Half Lot A ~ Lot B Half : Half Lot A Lot B Page 2 of 4 .•. ~,~ As noted in Table 1 above, the permitted minimum lot size for a historic lot that has undergone a historic lot split is 3,000 sq. ft. For all other properties the minimum lot size is 6,000 sq. ft. The vacant lot at 218 S. Third Street is 3,000 sq. fr. due to the court ordered subdivision in 1984. This means this is anon-conforming lot in terms of lot area. Asingle-family home and associated accessory buildings are permitted on anon-conforming lot of record (like 218 S. Third), pursuant to section 26.312.050, Non-conforming lots of record. STAFF COMMENTS' RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS REVIEW: As part of the land use review, the Applicant is requesting approval of a Residential Design Standard variance from the Secondary Mass Standard for the proposed single-family home. The intent of the Residential Design Standazds is to "preserve established neighborhood scale and character" and require "that each home, while serving the needs of its owner, contribute to the streetscape." Further, the design standards encourage "secondary structures and accessory dwelling units, located along the alleys and inspired by the tradition of outbuildings in Aspen." The Secondazy Mass standard, which is part of the "Building Form" section in the Residential Design Standards chapter, reflects this intent. The intent of this section is to "respect the scale of Aspen's historical homes by creating new homes, which are more similaz in their massing, by promoting the development of accessory units off of the city alleys..." The proposed design fails to meet the intent of the design standards, as it does not cleazly differentiate between the mass along the alley and the mass of the primary residence. The Secondazy Mass standard is only applicable to properties within the Infill Area (the areas East and South of the rivers). This property is located in the Shadow Mountain neighborhood, where the standard is applicable because of the desire (and code requirement) to respect Aspen's history and local building traditions in newer construction. Staff finds that the neighborhood character is one that includes many historic homes and is an area where new construction, built after the design standards were adopted, generally meet the secondary mass standard. The Applicant states that the lot suffers a unique hazdship because of its size (50 feet by 60 feet) and because of its proximity to the St. Moritz Lodge. Staff does not find that a hardship exists, and that the standard could be met. The lot is vacant and is similaz to 3,000 sq. ft. historic lot split lots in the R-6 zone district which aze also required to meet this standrsd. Staff also does not find that being adjacent to a Lodge represents a hazdship or constraint on the lot that would warrant a vaziance from the standard. Staff recommends against the requested variance for Secondary Mass. Staff does not find there are significant constraints on the lot which would dictate this variance. The lot is vacant, and therefore should be able to meet the standard Further, the proposed design does not meet the intent of the standard, and does not provide an "appropriate design "given the development pattern in the Shadow Mountain neighborhood. RECOMMENDATION: In reviewing the proposal, Staff finds the project fails to meet the vaziance criteria for the Residential Design Standards. Staff recommends denying the requested Secondary Mass vaziance based on the findings contained within Exhibit A. Page 3 of 4 ,--. ,.~„ ~~.~ ... RECOMMENDED MOTION (ALL MO IONS ARE WORDED IN THE AFFIRMITIVE~: "I move to approve Resolution No~ ~, Series of 2007, approving, a variance from the Secondary Mass Residential Design Standard to construct asingle-family home on the property located at 218 S. Third St.." ATTACHMENTS: EXHIBIT A -Review Criteria and Staff Findings EXHIBIT B -Application with Site Plans Page 4 of 4 ,,,, RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING ONE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS VARIANCE FOR 218 SOUTH THIRD ST, SOUTH HALF OF LOTS A & B, BLOCK 46, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, CO, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO PARCEL NO. 2735-124-64-009 Resolution #3, Series 2007 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Bob and Sue Kendig, represented by AI Beyer, requesting approval of one (1) Residential Design Standards Variance to construct a new single-family home at 218 South Third Street; and, WHEREAS, the subject property is zoned R-6 (Medium Density Residential); and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application, and the applicable code standazds, the Community Development Department recommended denial, of the proposed land use request; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on November 20, 2007, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 31 ,Series of 2007, by a to _ ~ - ~ vote, approving one Residential Design Standards Variances for the development of asingle-family home on the property located at 218 South Third Street, Block 46, South half of Lots A & B, City and Townsite of Aspen, CO; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets the applicable development standazds and that approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfaze. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Section 26 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves one (1) Variance from the Residential Design Standards from Secondazy Mass (Land Use Code Section 26.410.040.B.1), for the development of asingle-family home on the property located at 218 South Third Street, Block 46, South half of Lots A & B, City and Townsite of Aspen, CO. The variance is from the following language, as stated in Land Use Code Section 26.410.040.B.1 in effect on November 20, 2007: "Secondary mass. All new single-family and duplex structures shall locate at least ten percent (10%) of their total squaze footage above grade in a mass which is completely detached from the principal building or linked to it by a subordinate connecting element. `~ ... This standard shall only apply to parcels within the Aspen infill azea pursuant to Subsection 26.410.O10.B.2. Accessory buildings such as gazages, sheds and accessory dwelling units are examples of appropriate uses for the secondary mass. A subordinate linking element for the purposes of secondary mass shall be defined as an element not less than ten (10) feet in width and ten (10) feet in length with a plate height of not more than nine (9) feet. Linked pavilions six (6) feet in width and ten (10) feet in length shall be exempt from Subsection 26.575.020.A.8." Section 2: Vested Riehts The development approvals granted pursuant to this Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution shall be vested for a period of three (3) yeazs from the date of issuance of the development order. Section 3: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 4• This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a sepazate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this _day of , 2007. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: City Attorney Dylan Johns, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk .. r.. EXHIBIT A: REVIEW CRITERIA tic STAFF FINDINGS The Planning and Zoning Commission may grant variances from the Residential Design Standazds if the proposed application meets the following: a) Provides an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or, b) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. The following are Staffs findings in regards to the variances being requested by the Applicant. Variance Requested 1. Secondary mass. All new single-family and duplex structures shall locate at least ten percent (]0%) of their total square footage above grade in a mass which is completely detached from the principal building or ~' w linked to it by a subordinate connecting element. This ~ r ~~ standard shall only apply to parcels within the Aspen ~ ' ~ ,~~ infill area pursuant to Subsection 26.410.O10.B.2. ~'>--~~ Accessory buildings such as garages, sheds and accessory dwelling units are examples of appropriate uses for the secondary mass. A subordinate linking element for the purposes of secondary mass shall be defined as an element not less than ten (10) feet in width and ten (10) feet in length with a plate height of not more than nine (9) feet. Linked pavilions six (6) feet in width and ten (10) feet in length shall be exempt from Subsection 26.575.020.A.8. a) Provides an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and purpose of the particular standard In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or, Staff Finding: The proposed development is located in the Shadow Mountain neighborhood, where secondary mass is common and required by code. The lot is adjacent to the St. Moritz, which is much larger in scale than the proposed house. A residential structure should be smaller in scale than a lodge, and providing secondazy mass helps to cleazly differentiate between the single family use and the lodge use. Further, there aze a number of historic Exhibit A, Staff findings for 218 S. Third St, Page 1 homes in the azea which are of the same lot size and are able to meet the standazd. Staff recommends against the variance. b) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Staff Findin¢: The applicant states the lot is constrained because it measures fifty (50) feet by sixty (60) feet, for a total of 3,000 sq. fr. in lot azea. Staff does not find this constitutes asite- specific constraint requiring a variance. The lot is 3,000 sq. ft., which is a typical size for lots that have undergone a historic lot split (all other lots have a minimum lot size of 6,000 sq. ft.). Because the lot is 3,000 sq. ft. and is not the result of a historic lot split, it is considered anon-conforming lot of record. A single family home, as is proposed in this application, is permitted to be constructed on non-conforming lots of record. Staff does not find asite-specific constraint because there are a number of lots in the R-6 zone district which are 3,000 squaze feet. Further, this is a vacant lot that Staff believes is able to meet all code requirements. Staff finds this criterion is not met. Exhibit A, Staff findings for 218 S. Third St, Page 2 O O s 0 s Z ._ 3 0 3 0 r L .~ d N N t0 L v d M C m E a a a 0 m 0 0 0 0 ,.,, ..... BOB & SUE KENDIG VARIANCE REQUEST 218 SOUTH 3~ STREET ~f Farhd~rh art at I~2o Y+~ ~Y ~ ~i ~:1, i 1~' N ~ i Y k . ~ (Y; lr. 3 °s ~'?t"rte ~ 1~( 1 ,~ . `'lie's . f~ ~ ~ rte, ~ ~, N4~;.. ,~. .._. ~t`r.~., ~''~ , . . . ~ ~ ~`~, s ~~'. `:.t ~~ ~'1' tr-- -`' ~ ~ ~~ ~ _- ti ~ r~ 4 ~3.. I~~ ..1. 's, I 1 / ,~~y,.(i} k ~,}>4 17R~., ... ~ terry ~~~' ~~ y ,~` :t %li -~' :'~ ~ . ~.~ ~~ ~ ,~ ~~J ~j t' 1 ! ~.}' ~~, 1 , J .~ / L 0 Q l~ a~ ~~~y :;"s ;~.:. -,.. s -; ~ ~~~~:f ( T '` ~ ~ i c r~~~ n 'i ~ r ,nn f .'. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Yd ~ ~i1 , ~k n~' z , } t r z ` ' rf, T ;r. y~+ ~f ,y ~ ~~1 ~ Vy J l! ~ ~a~ 9 .'_ A r .. 3 t ~ ` '.: ~t+ vV ~- ~.v .: ~k ~l , y: f{<. t+ ~ G • 1 L q Rfi ~ ~ .u 4 ~ • ~~. ~' ~ f~ i ~ P f • it ~ ~ ~ S4TKST 1, - ~ ~i ( S ~ ~ ~ ~~ fi S N ~ $ T vv ~ WWW . '+. y ~ ~ _ /_~J~( !mow 7 "1J V ~~ ~ ~~ • W- y .i g it ~t'1 !o ~- ~~ .~Y: -~ ~~ ;7 . ~. 9 r T~ _': 'F ._ ~'. r` f.5'VF'~.~__ l~ w '~`~ ~. ~ ~~ ~~ ~, ~, ,~ ~~~ u ~ ~? .~_ / z ~°~/ Q ~ a ~ I ~ J a /`~ 'Y ~ ~ -4f~~.,,., N6 ~,_I' Q ~ ~ ~~ ~ a ~ ~~ C~ ~ ~ ~ C • ~ a Q. • a ~G ~~ a C - ~3 ~- ~ o . ~ ~ ~~ • ~ '• ^ o ,~r~~j a / '~ ~ N4Ty V ~ ~ f J Q ~ ~aY}a~ ~d'~y,'~lf?+r as Of~~.~t~ ,LrJ i$'a t h' 3 y ~~ y~~ ~ v rl.l .rc ai .~ _~ j / ""1I jJ~ z l t, s L ~ .5 C /~ ~ ~ ~gt~ #~J; . f i~.]~s .•- r c ~ ~ 4 t ! ~~ ~. X. 1~i~ .~ ~ . °'~' •°."' ac+... -~ *~r.1 _~~. • I t l ' .a " t ~} } ~ • Q _ ~~ s: ~ ~a ~ : ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ - .: ^,, ~ ~ _ ~' V J F~ a ~ yy~ '~~~ ~ {~ ~ST ~ i.t~ ;", 4~r `?_ 1 ~ tad ', +.._~-~~ . ~~~e~' ry ~~ i t'7 qq ~~ { " ~.~ \h~~ 1 'Fr ~ e ~ • -~~. h i.~ ~ 4 y7~ ~~ y~7 ~ _ L'F.~•~{ t ~~~.~fi3~~+~~.ir (~~,f,,c ~~.Gy'P I ~: t ~ ,~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ --~ ~~ ~, ~ ~ J "~~ ~. ,- . rQ E~ ~~ ~~ ~~, ~ o ~ ~o /~~~ 'z«,` ~ ~ o~i ~~,~ ~, io ~• \// ~~ ~' a rt''`e I i~ ~~~ 0 IR \~}~ 3 ~~k }, ~~, r ~ ~f ~~ i ~,, ~~,. .~' A`.. f f / ~ ~ ~ `C ~ ~~~~~ J//J ~ 4 V. i ~ ~'~yI . ~ 1L b E; / s4~rsr. ~ `j ~ q W l i ~~ !~ F; ~/ ~ ~ (x ~ % _C ' ~ ~ ~~ , s L t~ ~ ~ ~ ~~. .~ ~~t ~ F`~ill s3RDSr ~C ~;` • ~ '~ r ~ ~~~ ~ ~~. ,~i,ull a . ~ ~ 4~ ~ ~xa~~~ ra ~ ~ 1 .~ :. n;'~es ~e. ~ t ao.~! 4 r r~ 4 ~G t ; :~, SW~° y C ~ I ,,. of 4 `"i ®o ~. ~NDSr ~-~ a a l ~"~ i~~ ~, ~ ~~~ ., e ,, y ~~ t ~ lr' ~^c ~ i+A s ~4 ~ ~`; 4. ,A , a '~~ '!: ~` ~ t ~ ~ _~ ~ I C~ C 0 a -~ c~ a ~/~ ~~ ~ ~ is ~• ~~ ~~ ~i ~~ .~ ~ ;~ ~~ :' ~-~~lr +~t'.: f: . ;,~,, ~ a ~, ~ ~` ' 7 ~~tll~ ~ '' i ;, -', i f ~'e --'',~ ~ ,~ „ - ~• ~ `~.~,,~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ a r~ _~ ~~ ,; R~ „: ~ l x~ s Y ~ ~ ,~ v i:c. -d., ;., „ Sj ~~ vet r ~ r;; ., t y [) f~ 0 ~~~ p d~ .\ L n Z~ . ~ • 3 Q ~ . . ~ ~t~~ .~~~ C, ? ~ 1~ ~ /~ 1 r/ `~'~, ~ ~ ~-,;, .. i CITY OF ASPEN 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81611 AI Beyer Design Inc. 410 North Mill Street • B-11 Aspen, Colorado 81611 'cl6iii~19Ci? CG~:~i II..I..„Il,il,~~„11,,,11,,,111,1„11,,,,,1,1..I1.I1.„I..I.1 ~.., ATTACHMENT? AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: Z I ~ GJdv'I!E Tt{tRD ST • , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: ~O~(E7~~XclZ ,. ZO , 2001 --i STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, ~ J V (name, please print) being or re esenting a Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: / Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. v Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (LS) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the ~j0~~ay of ~~1•;<Q , 200, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) ofthe Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) .~ -. iJA Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The forgoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this /~~day of ~{~JpwN~ ,200~3;by ,!// ~~ a~~wnuw~pa ``~~o~~Sl NEU?~'%'a ,~ ..,ly ; ~~ NoT,aay ` N,'.. pUBLIG ,:O 9t' P '~ Of COQ- ~~`~ ~'''~~~min~~u~"° ATTACHMENTS: COPYOF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL r ^. .. ~.. AJAX APARTMENTS LLC ALLAN ANDREW S 402 MIDLAND PARK PL 154 MARION ST ASPEN, CO 81611 DENVER, CO 80218 BARYON META PACKARD 4475 N OCEAN BLVD APT 43A DELRAY BEACH, FL 33483 BEHRENDT MICHAEL H 334 W HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 BOOKBINDER FISHDANCE & DELANEY LLC 164 LITTLE PARK RD GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81503 CHAMBERS PETE C/O DOUGLAS PRICE PO BOX 8589 ASPEN, CO 81611 CLICK JANE 333 W MAIN ST #2A ASPEN. CO 81611 CRETE ASSOCIATES LP C/O UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO PO BOX 1524 BRYN MAW R, PA 19010 DEROSE V F 1209 N 14TH AVE MELROSE PARK, IL 60160 DONATELLI ROBERT A & SUSAN J 1234 WASHINGTON DR CENTERPORT, NY 11721 GOLD RANDAL S EPSTEIN GILBERT AND MOLLIE PO BOX 9813 ASPEN, CO 81612 BRAFMAN STUART & LOTTA BEA TRST 5630 WISCONSIN AVE #401 CHEVY CHASE, MD 20815 CITY OF ASPEN 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81611 COLORADO MTN NEWS MEDIA 500 DOUBLE EAGLE CT RENO, NV 89511 CRETE ASSOCIATES LP 3418 SANSON ST PHILADELPHIA, PA 19104 DEROSE VINCENT 1209 N 14TH AVE MELROSE PARK, IL 60160 FISERV ISS & CO FBO ROBERTA N LOWENSTEIN PO BOX 173859 DENVER, CO 80217-3859 GOLDENBERG STEPHEN R & CHERYL J 430 W HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION A COLD NON PROFIT CORPORATION 311 W MAIN ST ASPEN, CO 81611 BLONIARZ JOHN W R DONNA L 1839 N ORLEANS ST CHICAGO, IL 60614 BROWDE DAVID A 604 QUAKER RD CHAPPAQUA, NY 10514 CLEARY THOMAS P REV TRST 70 N STEVENS ST RHINELANDER, WI 54501 CONNER WILLIAM E II TRUST 264 VILLAGE BLVD STE 104 INCLINE VILLAGE, NV 89451 CROWLEY SUE MITCHELL 409 S GREENWOOD AVE COLUMBIA, MO 65203 DHM INVESTMENTS LP 90% 15 INMAN CIR NE ATLANTA, GA 30309 FRANKEL KATHY TRUST 299 1ST AVE S NAPLES, FL 34102-5959 GUNNING RALPH PO BOX 11912 ASPEN, CO 81612 HAVENS THERESA A HOWELL DANIEL B & MARY H JACOBY FAMILY LP PO BOX 1890 3701 PALMA CEIA CT 1402 DUVAL DR CARBONDALE, CO 81623 TAMPA, FL 33629 GODFREY, IL 62035 ..~ ~. JBG SECOND QPRT JEWISH RESOURCE CENTER CHABAD JOHNSTON FAMILY TRUST -C/0 GILDENHORN JOSEPH B OF ASPEN 2018 PHALAROPE 2030 24TH ST NW PO BOX 12099 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 WASHINGTON, DC 20008 ASPEN, CO 81612 KARP MICHAEL KASPAR THERESA D 90% KENDIG ROBERT 8 SUE 3418 SANSOM ST PO BOX 1637 PO BOX 4649 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19102 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 KUHNE 2004 FAMILY TRUST LORENTZEN AMYL MARTEN RANDOLPH 79935 DOUBLE EAGLE WY 409 PARK CIRCLE #3 129 MARTEN ST LA QUINTA, CA 92253 ASPEN, CO 81611 MONDOVI, WI 54755 PRICE DOUGLAS REEDER LYLE D 75% RICKEL DAVID PO BOX 8589 PO BOX 4859 3928 DOVE CIRCLE ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 HUNTINGTON VALLEY, PA 19006 ROSENTHAL DIANNE SAMIOS CAROLE 8 NICHOLAS A SCOTT MARY HUGH PO BOX 10043 PO BOX 867 RUSSELL SCOTT III & CO LLC ASPEN, CO 81612-7311 WESTMINSTER, MD 21158 5420 S QUEBEC ST #200 GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111 SCRUGGS DAVID C & PHYLLIS R SHADOW MTN HOMEOWNER ASSOC SHEEHAN WILLIAM J AND 365 RIVERBLUFF PL 232 W HYMAN AVE SHEEHAN NANCY E MEMPHIS, TN 38103 ASPEN, CO 81611 10 GOLF VIEW LN FRANKFORT, IL 60423 SHERWIN MARK 50% SILVERSTEIN PHILIP SOUTH CASTLE INVESTMENT LTD 1714 VISTA ST SILVERSTEIN ROSALYN 202 N CURRY ST #100 DURHAM, NC 27701 25 KNOLLS CRESCENT CARSON CITY, NV 89703 BRONX, NY 10463 STASPEN LLP SWISS CHALET/KITZBUHEL TAD PROPERTIES LTD LIABILITY CO C/O JOHN STATON PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 9978 1180 PEACHTREE ST NE 1286 SNOWBUNNY LN ASPEN, CO 81612 ATLANTA, GA 30309-3521 ASPEN, CO 81611 TAD PROPERTIES LTD LLC TEMPKINS ALAN TEMPKINS HARRY & VIVIAN TOWNE CENTRE PROPERTIES LLC q20 LINCOLN RD #244 420 LINCOLN RD STE 244 323 W MAIN ST #301 MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 ASPEN, CO 81611 THE ASPEN CONDOS TORNARE RENE TORNARE RENE R SYLVIA COMMON AREA 308 W HOPKINS AVE 308 W HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 VERNER DANIEL A & MERYLE YOUNG PAUL III FAMILY TRUST 2577 NW 59TH ST 413 W. HOPKINS BOCA RATON, FL 33496 ASPEN, CO 81611-1603 ;' _ - .. ;~ •~ ~` ~ > ~ ~~ i~ '~ 'o '! ~~ ~ s -i 3 Q ~ "~ ~~ ~~ x t a ~ c~ rn , rn m ~ i i ~ " ~ ~ ~ ? m j ~ '__ W i - ` ~ ~ x ~ f~ x ~~, I se. 3 ti $ ~ s 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ .y.f TiA » s L f` it ~t i { 4 ? ~ ~ b ~. N ~ i ~ ~ t` 7~ f. ;' ., h ~ ~ I v I ~r 6. S ? _ A ~.~. _ . u, a,. ..°~. ~ - - ., a x> .t~ `' x .~ ". ~ ~~ rw ~ ~!~ :Vi R. ~~ ~. fi , , ---. ~, ""•q ; ~. ~~~~ 3 v Y t~Y .~,r •,~, . ' r ~ -- t° ~1" a ., ~6~~^'- - i ,~ i! ~~1i ;~ia~~ iii ~~ ~('` i ;1% ~i~1 r It~ili ~~,~. ~ ~~li ~ ~~ ~~~ j~; v ~ ~~._i~ 111 ~~ ~, ~~F :~~ ATTACHMENT 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: ~ ~ ~ • ~ I c Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 200 STATE OF COLOR4D0 ) ss. County of Pitlan ) I, ~!L \J ~ (LiC L / ,y Y U~J (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner.. Publication of notice: By the publication in the Iegal notice section of an official paper ar a payer of general circulation iu the City of. aspen at Ieast ufteen (15) days prior to the~public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which farm was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the _ day of 200_, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (I ~) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shaIl be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (1 ~) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. /~ .~ ~ / Signature ~~ / ,, The foregoing "davit of Notice" was cknowledged bfy #ore me this (~ day ,. nfa,I~nr., .,_m,,~ _~200~,bY~~SSICIL C~Q~N'Ql~C~ PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 218 SOUTH THIRD -RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS 'V'1'1"11~j;SS 'Nl Y' riAivL AJ~i'~ CJFriCIt~L SEAL My commission expires: Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on Novem ber 4, 2007. (817717) ATTACFIlYIENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION W . ~. - ,-. . ,, o , ~; . PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE.OWNERS AI~'D GOVERNMEI~'TAL AGENCIES NOTICED BPMAIL s/Dylan Johns, Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission ncy uini pyCCl. 111y HupCJl l.1 Gy l.V Utll:11 NUgUS'L L/, 1ytf4 I Councilman K~ .t moved to adopt Ordinance #25, Series 1984, on first reading; seconded ~ by Councilman 3lomguist. ~ i Ms. Penne pointed out this parcel has been completed considered in terms of rezoning criteria at the time of the L-3 rezoning. ~ Roll call vote; Councilmemhers Walls, aye; Collins, nay; Knecht, aye; Blomquist, aye; ~' Mayor Stirling, aye. - Nugget Lodge Colette Penne, planning office, told Council this is an L-3 lodge; it is below the permitted FAR at .53:1. The intent of condominiumizing lodges is to maintain the units in the short term rental market; there is evidence of compliance with this in the condominium declara- tions. The Nugget Lodge has provided an 520 square foot employee housing unit; this application is providing a 584 square foot unit, which will supply two pillows of employee ' housing. Ms. Penne said the Code requires a minimum of two employee pillows or the amount of employee housing provided for the last three years. Gideon Kaufman, representing the applicant, said the housing office's condition addresses the verification and qualification of the employees for this housing. Raufman said rather than have the employee qualified by the housing office, these units may be rented to seasonal employees, like maids. Kaufman said they are willing to charge the low income as long as they can rent to seasonal employees. Kaufman said the intent is to make sure the employees of the lodge have a place to stay. Councilman Blomquist said the lodge owner should be free to make the choice of who stays in the unit; it might be a higher income employee, like manager. Kaufman said the intent of the lodge condominiumization ordinance was to have full-time employees living on site. Mayor Stirling said he would like to hear from the housing authority on this issue and whether this should be low or middle income guidelines. Councilman Blomquist said the committee's intent was that the housing in the lodge be for employees of the lodge. Councilwoman Wa11s said the housing office feels low income housing is what is needed. Mayor Stirling suggested leaving condition #6 in and getting a report from Jim Adamski , at second reading of the ordinance. Mayor Stirling asked why there is no parking condition. Ms. Penne explained the Nugget is not requesting any new units. Kaufman pointed out there are 22 spaces in the city's right-of-way because this street is twice as wide as other streets. Kaufman said he has been discussing vacation of the alley with staff. The alley is vacated on the map but there is no formal proof of vacation. The engineering department has requested information on utility locations, etc. Ms. Penne brought up a condition added by P & Z. There is a Code section which states subdivisions should not be named similarly to other subdivisions. The name chosen for this is "Hotel Aspen" and P & Z suggested the name be changed because Aspen is used a lot with other inns and lodges and is a source of confusion for visitors. ' Also the name connotes a full hotel, which this is not. Mayor Stirling said he thoroughly ~!' agrees but does not feel the Council has any real jurisdiction over things like this; it is the applicant's choice. Kaufman said the Code addresses recorded subdivision plats i and it is stretching to use this section of the Code. Kaufman said the Secretary of State has granted permission to use this name. Councilman Blomquist suggested P & Z look at the sign code to see if this problem could be addressed in the sign code. Mayor Stirling moved to delete condition #7; seconded by Councilman Knecht. Councilmembers Collins, Knecht and Mayor Stirling in favor; Councilmembers Walls and Blomquist opposed. Motion carried. Councilman Knecht moved to approve the subdivision exception for the purpose of condominium- izing the Nugget Lodge, dropping condition #7 and waiting for a report from the housing j authority on condition #6; seconded by Mayor Stirling. All in favor, with the exception i of Councilwoman Walls. Motion carried. SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION - Mary Karen Euler City Attorney Taddune said this is a court order decree that this lot be exempt from the definition of subdivision regulations. Taddune said he takes exception because he was not given notice of proceedings. Lennie Oates, representing the applicant, said these lots R and B are adjacent to one and other. A couple, who jointly owned the property, got a divorce; as part of the decree each person got one detached single family dwelling. The Code says a subdivision created by a court order is exempt from subdivision. However, the judge divided the property the wrong way. Taddune said the court should not order a decree without giving him an opportunity to comment on the ramifications. Taddune said he is comfortable with this if he has a statement of subdivision exemption and the planning office reviews the maps. Councilman Blomquist moved tc grant the exemption for the southerly half of lots A and B subject to a statement approved by the attorney's office and maps approved by the planning office; seconded by Councilman Knecht. Taddune said he would like a Code amendment that the city be provided with notice and an opportunity to be heard in Court cases regarding land use. All in favor, motion carried. ~ RESOLUTION #24, SERIES OF 1984 - Denying Smuggler Mountain Annexation Petition ~~ Mayor Stirling pointed out there is a letter from the owner of the Centennial project who would like to know the ramifications of annexation before he commits to being part of the annexation. City Attorney Taddune said there was a petition in opposition to the petition for annexation election. A representative of that group is present to discuss this position. Mick Ireland said he felt the city ought to annex Silverking and Centennial areas as these areas are part of the city. Ireland said he apposed the annexation because that was not the proper tool to stop Centennial, and the people behind the annexation petition were motivated for other reasons than annexation. Ireland said he would withdraw Letter of Transmittal Date ~ D ~ l ~ ~ o ~ Project KP-~1G~4~ ~S. Attention J25S1~a c~a~'~"o~-~J To ~ c{e~/ JC~SSiLd ~ Remarks _ ~ e~ a h e-~Ai l eA~ 1 dew wc_ _ In~,ve v~ev ~~( ~. de ~n ~I.r~ a h ~ fi ~ s ~,tJ~e. ~ l ~ -~,.e. ~.o~ off- w'i.~~.~>.~, ~. ~~ a-;~ ~ ~~e~t~ ~- o~J' ~s~ . I~ ~ v ~~~~ ~~~w ~ru ~.l__ ~1-(yes `~ s stow d Su~~~,w•>z.- -~1n.~-~ Go ~ ~-~l ~ e,e~. A n d~rr~ w~i~~~''~ fi1 v~. ~.V~Y~.J ~, --~~ ',nr-etjl~l ~, awe~ovv~. - 1~ '~~ ire w~ U~ ~2 ~~e. o+~ - -- _,_n _ _ ~a`a'~.S ~, ~ ~~-- Copy to Copy to AI Beyer Design Inc. 410 North Mill Street B-1 1 Aspen, Colorado 8161 1 970-925-8339 Fax 970-925-8392 ~ Q y En~~ ~ Robert E. and M. Sue Kendig ~ - V~~~C'~ P.O. Box 4649 ~P~~~ ~' Aspen, CO. ~ ~, ~ ~~.y~,ty~,i, S S «?L- 81612 Jessica Garrow City of Aspen Community Development Re: 218 So. Third St. Request for Variance from Residential Design Standards Jessica, Enclosed is a check for $705 which I understand is required to begin the variance process for our request for a variance from the residential design standard relating to secondary mass. Al Beyer indicated that if we got this to you today that we could assure a slot on the agenda at the November 6 P&Z. meeting. I understand that Al has or will be communicating with you about any other requirements but if there is anything we can do directly, please don't hesitate to contact us. Thank„you. ~~ / f r ~% erf~ ndig 970-922-7150 Chagos@comcast.net ~~,;} ~o~~Z,~oo~. c~sly CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and _~ (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: an aoolication for 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a Fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings andlor approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a termination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ "! OS "' which is for _ ~ hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $235.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN By: Chris Bendon Community Development Director APPLICANT By:~ ~~e~ Date: - °! • 14 • o ~ Bill To Mailing Address and Telephone Number: APPLICANT: 0 ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION Name: Location: 5, ~ ,,qt OFD ; (Indicate street address, lot & block number, le ai descri lion where a ro riate) Parcel 1D # RE U[RED s REPRESENTATIVE' Name: L p,~~Q Address: Phone #: Name: Address: (please ~2 2 - ~ 150 ^ Conditional Use ^ Conceptual PUD ^ Conceptual Historic Devt. ^ Special Review ^ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ^ Final Historic Development ^ Design Review Appeal ^ Conceptual SPA ^ Minor Historic Devt. ^ GMQS Allotment ^ Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) ^ Historic Demolition ^ GMQS Exemption ^ Subdivision ^ Historic Designation ^ ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream ^ Subdivision Exemption (includes ^ Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane ^ Lot Split ^ Temporary Use [~ Other: Lot Line Ad~ustment ^ Text/Ma Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS• (description of existing buildings, uses previous approvals, etc.) ~~T Lod' PROPOSAL: descri lion of ro osed buildin s, uses, modifications, etc. 5t~16~-4.E lcy 410E - Hay~e you attached the following? FEES DUE: $] ~ (~' Pre-Application Conference Summary ^ Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement ^ Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form ^ Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards All plans that are larger than 8.5" x 11" must be folded and a floppy disk with an electronic copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. 0 0 ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: Applicant: Location: Zone District: Lot Size: Lot Area: (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for ar within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: O Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing: y Proposed: 1 Number of bedrooms: Existing: 7 Proposed: ~ Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): rv IO l~at CrsT [.csr~ DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: Allowable: 2.'00 Proposed: 'Lg'Oo Principal bldg. height: Existing.• Allowable:2Sr- {~Proposed.• L~13~ tilA Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: 2 ~~ - ~ .Proposed: ~ ~ rt/- On-Site parking: Existing: Required: 2 Proposed: 2 Site coverage: Existing: Required.• NQ Proposed.• Open Space: Existing: Required: N l4 Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: < < Required.• ld Proposed.• lC~ Rear Setback: Existing: < < Required: ~ Proposed: ~ Combined F/R: Existing: Required: Proposed.• Side Setback: Existing: Required: S Proposed: `~ Side Setback: Existing: Required: ~ Proposed: S~ Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Proposed: Distance Between Eri.rting Required: Proposed• Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: A~ bIJ ~ Variations requested: ~~Pl1RATtO~J Ur ~~a+~-~11R`1 ~AS~ ~~ pv`e.. ~ ~~~1 ~ c d ~'ib -~ ~A~1-~',~ ° c'e. Sv rn wt a~~ ~i ~Pt+i, ~p ~i~, i ~~ ~ ~: ~~~ S ~ ~joh fi Sve ~Qvto~~~" , OW ~e.r5 D 1Fni~~y„ tt~lltiYit~T' a14~,, ~~?7l 11®-:~ ~fPQI F'~ra~a:.D~ii~ ~mt~aodr ~.gii¢i..m..¢~..w~ T+~ l~,ll r ~Iri,~..m~t~ °~25-833R ~ ,b~rula~tect' $ Dw~~- i~~e~a~..{-~u~NC. viii ~ -•- w ~e',~a.~O7L~~ u~e$~ll~a ~.a3'~SA, ~1.~i111fikP~' ~Il~ ®$ ~~eBIl ~'asmmlmtm~{~ ®eavelLOpnent _ Proom: ~Il Beyer (nman.lto: ahdlsapria .net dent: ~8'hansudayr, ~ept~er 13, 2®®7 1Il:41 B:~ '~: ,Berries Carr~r ~: fob Ong; fob ~endag; Sue ~endaay; sc®tt slogan subject: Be: 218 ~ third st ,Berries, 5~e have done sans redesign of the project at 2Il~ ~ '8'hird and ~aald like to subma~.t a formal request for ~inistrative ~Tariance on the secondary mAass standard. 6~e feel like ere have a spceat solution erhich resets the intent of the standards and good reasons for our request of variation. ode hope to receive a variance in the ~eost efficietst wanner so ere can continue along in our des iglu process . I assume printed draerings, pictures and text are the best fosiaat for you or erould you prefer electronic files only? ite have ~2) 24"x36" sheets of information at the moment. is there a checklist of information required for submittal? ~i11 ft be possible to submit to you on Prfday for reviser asap? Do ere submit erith you or just drop off the inf® erith a check to the front desk? Thanks! Al Beyer Page 1 of 1 0 0 Robert E. and M. Sue Kendig P.O. Box 4649 Aspen, CO 81612 970-922-7150 9/13/2007 Community Development Aspen, CO Re: Southerly one-half of Lots A and B Block 46 City and Townsite of Aspen Also known as 218 So. 'T'hird Street This is to confirm that Al Beyer of Al Beyer Design, Inc., 410 N. Mill St., Aspen, CO, 970-925-8339, is authorized to pursue a variance on our behalf from aspects of the Residential Design Standards impacting our Property described above. This is also to advise that I, Robert Kendig, am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Colorado and that I and my wife are the only owners of the referenced property and that there are no mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts or agreements affecting the parcel. We are the only persons having any right to apply for a Development Application with respect to the Property described above. In addition, attached is a Memorandum of Ownership with respect to the above described property supplied by Pitkin County Title dated J my 10, 2006 and there has been no activity since the date of that Memorandum impacting the ownership of the Property. M. Sue Kendig 0 MEMORANDUM OF OWNERSHIP-ACCOMMODATION NO LIABILITY PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC., A DULY LICENSED TITLE INSURANCE AGENT IN THE STATE OF COLORADO. BY EXAMINATION OF THE RECORDS OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, DISCLOSES THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE IN THE LAST INSTRUMENT OF CONVEYANCE ROBERT E. KENDIG AND MARILYN SUE KENDIG LEGAL DESCRIPTION SOUTHERLY ONE-HALF (112) OF LOTS A AND B, BLOCK 46, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN DEED OF TRUST APPARENTLY UNRELEASED NONE LIENS AND JUDGMENTS (AGAINST LAST GRANTEE) APPARENTLY UNRELEASED NONE THIS INFORMATION IS FOR YOUR SOLE USE AND BENEFIT AND IS FURNISHED AS AN ACCOMMODATION. THE INFORMATION HAS BEEN TAKEN FROM THE PUBLIC RECORDS, WITHOUT REFERENCE TO, OR EXAMINATION OF, INSTRUMENTS WHICH PURPORTS TO AFFECT THE REAL PROPERTY. THE INFORMATION IS NEITHER GUARANTEED NOR CERTIFIED, AND IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, OPINION OF TITLE, NOR A GUARANTY OF TITLE, AND OUR LIABILITY IS LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT CHARGED FOR THIS REPORT. EFFECTIVE DATE: July 10, 2006 PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. BY: Authorized Officer JOB NO: 2267 . r,. 'i, Y•: 1RM~r1:'efar n;fl•tr1'M•••+'rl'~.~tw w\s~q •nua•'N.H M'N'•M INrJy>MMJ~+RV M/tr1:171141~\~irYM 'NrF'w 'Z1~'Wi tv V ar l~ • DlXZId m ;wr,,. t 1 I~ ., vsrsnlr OQl10rr~ 'NALW(J ? . p. Y ` • . ~x~e•o <r 't~'yl ~'.• •'r Mkt CL wry' agdr~ uo~sgwmo~ ,t~ , ,.... I ,~ run ru^I ,nr .,y,ti,N • a3zr~ su~av~r xsv>i .4t1 Y1 a\If a1,y.11 IvXl+,y q.4yro' v~N IaaN nn Wt OvnJalt9 .•V 1 RI:i1I d r• l'nn..7 lNi\'IM 17i IJ 'RI'11 \•1~ i .I ..._~..~..-- ---~.. .~--- .,__._--____._ . ,{ ~lr' Maevx Agvrt '~ ~~ I~ •"' Vr' 41Jty N+.V'r ~`W fa' l,ap ayl pavl ~ •.., ., y wJ.., n {M r.. Il ~ IM' alrn 1SiN.l IM '.1 ~' fIN}ld~ki M~[A'IHlla IINV LNI~MabN Ilrw ;alz qry. l,7n,AfrlX 'hw.+fll lnvl (..a nr ap.yw ay{ IMxr • ..r M, Itnnllvl, t~fe4,m1 ,M, J.W a~awlatl .fJ.w IMII'palwlrlA •u7lw lmr,naq lTr4(7 t,taalm•ul.,yrl.uan,..w,.,.l•14a.,nwl lair lmnh!y1•,. •..an4.,ltl pawrAry ar,ga alp .Ir f I ~ 6~ardoad val a 'opraolo~ `Jt.lu•)c;, ui~(aTd 1~ rP:roau ', I 4~ lc 95709 'uN uoT~draa~ ra 91, r8vd au 6C1 gong uT prp~uari ~I .• oaFrulroy u:\dry o> >pa~ra to pruFeluoo rr ^uoT~vnxrrry Ta~ruFlr pur ruuT~dr.x3 !~ I pue ta~3raaH9a pue S86i uT ~TgrJtod '~r~;se»y~ pur hggT ao~ raxu~ 7u,lruas .Ia.,~a ~ ~~ 'Jat.,tr. amtnu •t Mrl Jawrrl.n p, vxl,y luau ImX •,anrJyn:n.aa •.w.eu,w_,,.. •~ml •wap •,a{n •,u+rdJUy •,IUeJa Jayat Ivr Jd,l»,y lp: u•ul rrq „~. ~ ,tut vs aues aVl tnp pua'pr.,.w,r: v IuJ,q tva Jauwal w slur, .,yi G,w~ • rut pa.'mrln>• ~wu><nl (I,w,ytlw pur JNtl\I 11x1 •lyKu Ixs~d S ry .. !' plan •atJul,. aal ul •n.el u, 'aaln:waym b+ alel+a apll,c,b`ruf rylt ,yi Rw~r 'I.~y~rol 'Lfla 'p.4'd ,ry y +1.+414 a : nyr..a,egtaal ayl )n Tarr>. ~ 1~ B a 8 't)nY_ul..eal { Alat ie du1 rwya . , • i F 1{ I K' INrM I • 'N ~' Jsuy aVs lr tap •aM~,r rnr ,J4,1t ~rPlta•I.I.•.,wnAoylylt~a pupm JUlMe lar•uir.;Jry'IUrJa•\wnla«t, BatT'cN!NMa,.V,Ivp~111nLtillw,>tay lilt rJF~ Sal{ J.q y'Uulufu:i ay{lnly Jx.. ,ty,ullne I~ pFR,Aro; j~alra '1,~,.,yuaplaylnPon•,aweuvaXlJr.,yiryu•1,arl.sy,pln•p,,w.Al~lau,ye.wilyvJpnaVfq•I[IH4AlUAlY3~1Y111)1 ~ ~ a+.vRUaeJaJJn pun .IU.ru~roty.,4+y .,yl Vlie •,.wrn~wl r~,glr7fJry auyn ~ 1 Imt m •p. •(4rdti, J•. nry. m Jayva \• tRxucJll i r ay) xt Ja~al„ryrytM 1'u^X~I` r~ Ilnela •ewatul 'qNl •nplll -.lel,a aqt trif pYe 'ff,.Y WI ,4pud pYE v.N•N cl.l`r ',)1,IIr114.. t9n Iapufru'.u 'aw,l,Jaw ,' pW ealtJa L .,yl IMSe '114,WC}.llfll :IaA.(4- MI hr •~e11dY„ ~\t ~gvalp ,a.vruaallaL/r l,Yf! .tyi;tne:tlralafl fys rtl.rtul. IY r Ur ylr• M31LI3:IU1 ~ r f. II opeaoToO 'uadey 'aaaa~g PsF4Z '6 8TZ vJay,u4npur4wn,yuwwy.,y. . E' 1 ... ....: ........... , ~: ,... ~, ,)...........Si it r,:r~; ,~ riz:: ,; ~ opeaojc0 ;o aYr7g 'uT>f7Td Fo .i3uno0 1; 3dJ I.o.'i,i,~~lrS[li 3:YtS udary 3o a7Fevnoy pue 6~F0 .. '4h X~ol'8 •t tg P~ y r3o'1 30 (Z/T) FTrtt_auo JSlaay~nog K1nJ1`6U M' Arts NI M.LI d p, (a+a,~ a41 r• 8uf r a:W i :' xl lam- I'all'Jllh '~Yr ,te ~ •VUw1aw,I,IW~ yrym JagVdtn '.iK`Jtud Irv .y{ ir• •~a.v,y w.Vit,r l,ur ,aay 3Ta'y7 'tVa.YlraJil xp n,on •uu9sA,.+lwe •.L+,u., ytr 'uroarJrt 1 •IwJX rat TauavuJ arayl.ty ryn paia.uc,. pue pl.f. ltrlrlralxy•pnw_.IT Best'p.~ilul.suo y:•'.ly Vay,l llvya !n ' itrro!y M~ rnr Idt.~w Mtr •ya~:l~__r___~_uoT~asapFruoo atgrnien pur poo8 aayto pur 100'OIS1 S)Tb"190Q N3,L ~n w+lu:aprwn w pue u9 T,y.,wrli aye Iryl'Nl iSS:ia;11M t,w,r,r~9 vy,euyu~ luary daAU2Q Iu.ieumtJ putt !S~}~ ~1!" a ~ .~'. ¢ W = . 1,° ~_ L~ O a x ~. (t. C L: ~ Y >; ._ /_ ~.~ V L.::~ ~' N V~ ~~ n. ~ j , OZZ08 opvao~o~ '.ranua0 'aa3xa0 ti£b ,~,•.Irr~Rr.Ia,tat„ l^ ~? ~~ J 9IaN3r 3115 NE'iINYII Par ~ r; ~IaNax axaeoa ~, ~ a A -a '11 ruc K lx,auJ! 'tywrNl) ht .yrn . D +? NIM.LId ,t, ~+uMv ?' in ,vr Iv ~ C7'O 1~1 f'I n G. 7B 4l .~~ .. .._ ~~. ..s,arr., ~, . 113tIp3 N31I'1')i xllYfi naaslta4 ~ Q Isn6rly a'+ar 3sT£ 'y'•'~rv'Q33QS[H.L ~- rI3~Q A.LNNN1tV11 ~".-. rye wmJ.vag 1 ~' C~~ l I ATTACHMENT 2-LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICANT: Name: Location: ~, '~: ~ rtN OFLd4~ ; Indicate street address, lot & block number, le al descri tion where a ro riate Parcel ID # REQUIRED) 5 REPRESENTATIVE' Name: L "~j~E>z Address: ~ 1.1 NI [i.L. ~'[ Ulo CC tom' ~ Phone #: PROJECT: Name: {,gyp 1QL.ESI~EIJ Address: 2 ~ $ S ~ ?J ~ S ~• Phone #: ~~- ~ - ~ (50 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that aoolv): ^ Conditional Use ^ Conceptual PUD ^ Conceptual Historic Devt. ^ Special Review ^ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ^ Final Historic Development ^ Design Review Appeal ^ Conceptual SPA ^ Minor Historic Devt. ^ GMQS Allotment ^ Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) ^ Historic Demolition ^ GMQS Exemption ^ Subdivision ^ Historic Designation ^ ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream ^ Subdivision Exemption (includes ^ Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff; condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane ^ Lot Split ^ Temporary Use [~ Other. ^ Lot Line Ad'ustment ^ Text/Ma Amendment PROPOSAL: descri tion of ro sed buildin s, uses, modifications, etc. SlIJ6.l.E ~~ ~ lcy 4~o,yVE Have-you attached the following? FEES DuE: S ~ D 0' Pre-Application Conference Summary ^ Attachment #l, Signed Fee Agreement ^ Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form ^ Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- [ncluding Written Responses to Review Standards Al! plans that are larger than 8.5" x 11" must be folded and a floppy disk with an electronic copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and ~ (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: (hereinafter, an aanlication for 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be bil{ed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission andlor City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a etermination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ '(OS which is for _ ? hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $235.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN Chris Sendon Community Development Director APPLICANT gy:~~ ~8-~1e-~ Date: l• ~ 4• d 1 Sill To Mailing Address and Telephone Number: 0 0 nl Cuslom F~d& I Vdualson I Pnceja I3ctn~su I Fee n't Type aslu ~jAspen Lard Use \ddress 216 5 TH6lD -~~~ f„i(y (ASPEN Maste, J Fes1 . ;~ J ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: Applicant: Location: Zone District: Lot Size: Lot Area: (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: O Proposed.- ~~ Number of residential units: Existing: C7 Proposed.- 1 Number of bedrooms: Existing: 7 Proposed: ~ Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): N ~ ~ LAr e+~~" l dry? DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: Allowable: 2"00 Proposed.- 2~~ Principal bldg. height: Existing: r ~ t A!lowa6te:2S - ~Proposed.• ~ _l3>~ ~lA Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: 2 5, - Proposed: ~ ~J~t/- On-Site parking: Existing: Required: 2 Proposed: 2 Site coverage: Existing: Required: ~~t Proposed.~ Open Space: Existing: Required: N ~ Proposed.~ Front Setback: Existing.' Required: ~(~ ~ Proposed: ~t~ Rear Setback: Existing: Required: ~ ~ Proposed: ~ ~ Combined F/R: Existing: Required.- Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required.- ~.~~ Proposed: ~~ Side Setback: Existing: Required: ~ Proposed: S~ Combined Sides: Existing: Required.- Proposed: Distance Between Existing Required.- Proposed.~ Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: 1Jbhla/ Variations requested: ~~~~. RAC ~ pU car- ~ccol.-6~J~ t? y MAs~ -1 pre. -~~pip~; c a'~"ib h Coy ~~ ~+i, ~p X41, ~Jb7y ~:~t RfiAI ~ R~: ~~ S t~ii~t1~ S~ ~b fi See ke~d~~ , OwwerS DEC IRrii¢~~y,, ~~ttt' ]l4~„ 7/ ~.®::~ A~(P41 ~roMh:.Di¢~a ~i¢~~i~m..¢ta~.w~ °~25-$3~ 1___ grcti;~ecF ~ Owv~r' ~~eSe~.{~t~ ~ --- ~~~~~~ ~iity ®$ l~pen ~'~nen r ~ ®evel~t ~t ~T®. 42g _ 2710® ls`romo: ~. Beyer ~~mailtocabdlsa~pris..~ Sent: ~'haarsdagr, 13, 200T 11:41 ~ '41~: ~Sessica ~abro6s ~c: Blob Eendig; nob sCendig; Sine $emdig; scoff slogan Subject: ~: 21B S third st Jessica, 3se hears dens some redesign of the project at 21S S 7C8aird and aaoaald lilts subIDOit a formeal request for 1~dministrative variance on the secondary nags standard, ise feel like we have a great solution ashich mueets the enfant of the standards and good reasons for our request ®f variation. i~ hope to receive a variance in the most efficient manner so ass can continue along fn ~r design process. I assuse printed drawings, pictures and teact are the best format for you or would you prefer electronic files only? We have ~2~ 24"at3~" sheets of information at the moment. Is there a checklist of information required f®r submittal? ]sill it be possible to submit to you on Friday for review asap? Do we submit with you or just drop off the fnf® with a check to the front desk? Thanks! Al Beyer Page 1 of 1 Robert E. and M. Sue Kendig P.O. Box 4649 Aspen, CO 81612 970-922-7150 9/13/2007 Community Development Aspen, CO Re: Southerly one-half of Lots A and B Block 46 City and Townsite of Aspen Also known as 21$ So. Third Street This is to confirm that Al Beyer of Al Beyer Design, Inc., 410 N. Mill St., Aspen, CO, 970-925-$339, is authorized to pursue a variance on our behalf from aspects of the Residential Design Standards impacting our Property described above. This is also to advise that I, Robert Kendig, am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Coloxado and that I and my wife are the only owners of the referenced property and that there are no mortgages, judgments, fiens, easements, contracts or agreements affecting the parcel. We are the only persons having any right to apply for a Development Application with respect to the Property described above. In addition, attached is a Memorandum of Ownership with respect to the above described property supplied by Pitkin County Title dated July 10, 2006 and there has been no activity since the date of that Memorandum impacting the ownership of the Property. /IL ~ ~ L M. Sue Kendig ~' MEMORANDUM OF OWNERSHIP-ACCOMMODATION NO LIABILITY PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC., A DULY LICENSED TITLE INSURANCE AGENT IN THE STATE OF COLORADO. BY EXAMINATION OF THE RECORDS OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, DISCLOSES THE FOLLOWING: t3RANTEE IN THE LAST INSTRUMENT OF CONVEYANCE ROBERT E. KENDIG AND MARILYN SUE KENDIG LEGAL DESCRIPTION SOUTHERLY ONE-HALF (112) OF LOTS A AND B, BLOCK 46, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN DEED OF TRUST APPARENTLY UNRELEASED NONE LIENS AND JUDGMENTS (AGAINST LAST QRANTEE) APPARENTLY UNRELEASED NONE THIS INFORMATION IS FOR YOUR SOLE USE AND BENEFIT AND IS FURNISHED AS AN ACCOMMODATION. THE INFORMATION HAS BEEN TAKEN FROM THI` PUBLIC RECORDS, WITHOUT REFERENCE TO, OR EXAMINATION OF, INSTRUMENTS WHICH PURPORTS TO AFFECT 7HE REAL PROPERTY. THE INFORMATION IS NEITHER GUARANTEED NOR CERTIFIED, AND IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, OPINION OF TITLE, NOR A GUARANTY OF TITLE, AND OUR LIABILITY IS LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT CHARGED FOR THIS REPORT. EFFECTIVE OATE:.luly 10, 2006 PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, iNC. BY: Authorized Oi~ficer JOB NO: 2267 '. Wired >t ~, ~~,ac actadet. . . ~YAlIRANTY UEFD ~ :. i1l1.S DEED, Illa,-etn°. 3ist ,taw August . rl gp ~ xQ N ' O , hnreen MARY KABEN iY11L6R s- n ~ N ' •~ sj n's ^'s ~ dda~ aftM ~ '*i> 13 a 44~ ~ C.atnlstw PITlf2li .51ata'.JCawr.aJn.Rr+laxylasl ro -~- c~ a ^ C"" U R08S VKEg NAkIL 1JE KE s n1 r '~' C ~ ~ DIG aaa YN 3 NDTG p ; ~- ~ ' V ,aM,cl~t.laJJr..~• 434 Dexter, Denver, Colerad0 80220 p,x ~~ . g ~ ~ ! , ~ 00 jl „~ u, C 1 ty and c,~n .,1 Denver rr~lr w c„uK,m,. ~r,.ua.,>: WITYFSS~TH. TAN 1110 ~rrwm.- an anJ u, anaxirati,n d TEN DOLLA88 ($10.00) and other good end valuable eoneideratioa--"""'""'• ar mxyn aed Wii,•a^tcr.i rA-#wRnbpaia~ak.l}asl.lae R~saJ.bMoiant.~•plmda~mnN. uRJ hplAerrrye.eraa Ju e^ pa-. . lyptn. xfl. a^ancx. ant a^rtlinn. aoa, tM palrnY.f, ihelr Ihr..+nas a..ipw 4,n+n..dl Ar nvl pnM+Yts: u>~i rvf~ iaMmnrrsentw ~ Jan} ^rtw1e. Nup awllKntyt.a tar Gwl~ d PIThIN . fialr.wfn4>radn. ~: Jr',eriNC.1 , . A.p ., . ~ ~ ~. Southerly one-half (1/2) ~f Lots A and B, :, 81ock 46, City snd Townsite of Asepn ;~ StAtf SJSdGF!!1'~"! ft; E County of Pitkin, State of Colorado t7 ~~ ~~1~t~ i it~•i' K j I 9•. .M.tmrnMwn,anJwnnlaYa• 218 9. Third Street, Asyen, Colorado If b. i 7O1:L1'IIFR rtth dl ~ tt .enp~lat rA Ityevkxo w.:mA grokn~.•e. 9rwr. laiaw}ieE..r in ,~riw ,rper`~iawp, mJ Ys: Ynn+ln ad la^Haar<a, Ir.Rnrller nl-1 ..^p.IM.~!^. tJ^,. n.taS mal ppMil.. t-'tq,i. Nd rtl 14e e.L^la-. rilAu, IMk. tilANa^t• rl,ial arl akMYUJ r1YYwpeer d 1At ' paws!.! eiY,x in Yar .w epfq..d..n aaJ r tllr dart hwyalpa^I Iwmi•ew rRi, r6r hw^Iturrrr• rnJ ~earw•r•. ( T(Y 11A~E AND ih Ht)IA1 dr wal paYOesa. aMrr emtMyienl aal Ja'•aY14n1 r wY Aa• arprartanoe.. uM+wk patYhi.). their :ec, sial ( i ;i w^gpa ir+rs AdIllefpnYYIA KY her •rlf, her (air. oat pcr,nrou rclaraathtirrw .4,ea a1,alrnnN. pam. harymin.ad ~. apaewaM rttltl4 trantaYl.ttOdlr Mnn:wJa.aipp.Yw niheliarcrV'dv ax.tdirytadddH•YY aaflhe+r lit ema. a}le is wdl 1 .' uu W a,Y tt9r rren.nr, uMr: a•+la~rd. Rn ~.rJ. ww. rctFe.Y. a+.d qr awt mJch~a.Wr earaoe ul utbenun.~. a Iw. l0 1'tr u,apk. rrnl :~ lu a prd rg6r. Ertl pNwar anJ anYrty a, Krw. hs~aln. at0 anu..m ~ >a• ..na in nsunsr,nd Mu n+uwe^iJ. nud dot IMe an,e rls fiat 1, ,rm . ba. h.n ap f+par.bJ.rY t pant.. Wi>tM...~Ja+. Wm. ann. w.c..eret.. rsri0raurr.. mt rctirt,nn+.Y Irh+evrr -1W ar selnne xwtier. i. 1 tatalK arnernt taxes for 1984 and tltereaftar, payab.tc in 1985 and thereaFCer; and l~ (' Elcceprinna and Hineral Raaervacions as contained in Patent to Aeprn ToNnaite ~~ recorded in Hnok 139 Rt Paga 'l6 as Reeaptioa Mo. 60!56 ~C the rent property .1 1, racarda or Pttkln ':awi1•y, Colorado. i• i rw,he rhar larplnalts.•me..-..i..h~yaM asJ tav.e,Fk•prww+n.A llle panlert.l thaiY rrn+.wlr•,IpM.~lannl AlaW axy pewatw i( IaY`.rl. IartlnN a~Inx~,rR n r• . 4pn. tae rd~k ,r a„ ~. prt iFtrt•N. RraM,aty •KYx rw r7n a+xa.lNr ANIY Flan:41911?IM~.NU ~1 1': W I INI:tiC W IR.NI I N . ' x It[ r wr.., 6 r ra:•~s.tJ thn Arrl .n Na~ d,Rt •rl 1'nrtlt rArv. ' .1 iI ._. .______._ ~1f.L.K `d_r ~la`~~ .. ~. .1 • 1[ . :rue: t,r ein,ts.uxl ,~ 1 r t I a~~•1'r PITi.LY Ylk' brayaspt tmnu aest r.n a,knn. k•JR.+11~6Mt me to tllr '+ cnu~Rnno rht. -~+ s+' MARY KARFIr e:1LER . ..• th ... uw^•ao C•pn. WtIR•~ tnr euM.od,dlk 'r•l ~-p.MM77, 18M • :• ~~,_o. o. na'IWt, Glor'adp1DZ2? ~• L .• P! •,• . '?r c ~• ~I 1 r•"'"~'r PITIL7A .wtte .i r~ -~ •l _ r~ lv~l it ti ~... f-~~~~ ate. t~.~.a:c~ ~: Na wll: Ro. a.sl. tuxe.a~ n nrcn t-ir nrwr.r~le sera w..a.a swnaw. ~a w .a ~,r . t.....r. r u,e.. . a+.:u.Mn. i :•f: ~.. THE CITY OF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination Of Completeness Date: September 18, 2007 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number, name, and property identification number assigned to this property are 0052.2007.ASLU, 218 South Third and 2735-124-64-009, respectively. I will be handling this case. ^ Your Land Use Application is incomplete: We found that the application needs additional items to be submitted for it to be deemed complete and for us to begin reviewing it. We need the following additional submission contents for you application: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. ~ Your Land Use Application is complete: If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2780 if you have any questions. Think You, _d Jessica Garrow, Planner City of Aspen, Community Development Department G:\cityUessica\Cases1218 S ThirdlCompletenessLetter_218sThird.doc