HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.215 Garmisch St.0046.2008.ASLU~..,
-•,.
THE CITY OF ASPEN
City of Aspen Community Development Department
CASE NUMBER
PARCEL ID NUMBER
PROJECT ADDRESS
PLANNER
CASE DESCRIPTION
REPRESENTATIVE
DATE OF FINAL ACTION
0046.2008.ASLU
2735-12-4-36-850
215 GARMISCH ST.
JENNIFER PHELAN
INSUBSTANTIAL PUD AMEND.
SCOTT CHRISIM
11/12/2008
CLOSED BY Angela Scorey
^„~ D t?~~~. fo , 2005 • p<5 Ll~l
1..r I.Q-3- s
aO ({. (v
Eib Edit gecord Navgate Fgm Reports Format Tab Help
0~-a N ~~~ ~I ;~r~' 1J J > rJ ~ ~~~
Permit Type aslu ~ Aspen Land Use Permit A 00962008.AAU
Address 2l5 N GARMISCH ST J AptJSuite
City ASPEN State CO Z4 1611 J
Perm't lnfarmatcn.
Master Pernik-~ Routing Queue edu07 AppYed 10)10)2008 J
Project J Status pending Approved ~J
Desalptlon YELLOWBRICK PARK SHADE SHELTER -FINAL PUD (& INSUBSTANTIAL PUD Iswed ~J
AMENDMENT) Fmd
Su6ntlt[ed SCOTT CHRISIM Chck unNng pays ~ 0 Exp'res 10)05)2009 J
-
-Owner .
Last Name CITY OF ASPEIJ J First Name ~ l30 5 GALENA ST
Ptlarle (970) 920-5000 ASPEN CO 81611
f7 Owner Is Applkant?
Applicant _ _
Las[ Name CITY OF ASPEN J FYS[ Name C[TY PARKS 130 5 GALENA 5T
Phone ~ CustN 28120 ASPEN CO 81611
Lender
Last Name ~ J First Name
Phone
the marvel pdmA nmtKr
~~
,a', `
~~
~ n .
~~. - V
~~_~ ~_~
AA,
Record 1 al 7
~Ra+t~q tlstory '~.
(•
PROJECT:
ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION
Name: ~` //i7/~/R,~/~./L P/y2/~ fjE/A'Q~ rj/f~L7f~
Location: 2 ~ ~ /Vo~~ ~~S~GIf 5'T~f~i -
(Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate)
Parcel ID #
APPI JCANT:
2~-351 y- 368 ya
Name: li /~~ f15PE/y ~i'F~l~`~... b ./,~.F/yl~
Address:
Phone #~ 9~ -~20 • y2(J ~
REPRESENTATIVE:
Name:
Address:
Phone #: v cw v-
TYPE oP APPLICATION: (please check all that apply .
^ GMQS Exemption ^ Conceptual PUD/i/~iuSffAN~l/YL ^ Temporary Use
^ GMQS Allotment ~ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ^ Text/Map Amendment
^ Special Review ^ Subdivision ^ Conceptual SPA
^ ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream ^ Subdivision Exemption (includes ^ Final SPA (& SPA
Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment)
Mountain View Plane
^ Commercial Design Review ^ Lot Split ^ Small Lodge Conversion/
Expansion
^ Residential Design Variance ^ Lot Line Adjustment ^ Other:
^ Conditional Use
EXISTING CONDITIONS: (descri tion of existin buildin s, uses, revious a royals, etc.
r~-~„4~(~-' Pr9Ff~ ui/~s ~/y~ua~y //V 2-~9~ cu!>t1 A put/yc~a A~Hf' ~uK g Pr~ivi~
PROPOSAL: (descri tion of ro sed buildin s, uses, modifications, etc.)
p_,~~ [ev~~trc,~7on/ a~' k P/IRK P/~.yl~ 5Hi6L?FR W/TH A 3!S• 4 5. F fzodF
/r~• 5/f~~ u/iw Ns;'/.~ acv ~vES.
Have you attached the following! rr:ES liuE: a
® Pre-Application Conference Summary
Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement
Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form
® Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards
^ 3-D Model for large project
All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text
(Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an
electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model.
~'
~-
CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Aereement for Payment of Citv of Aspen Development Application Fees
CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and
(hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS F~
1. APPLICANT has submi ed to CITY an application for
(hereinafter, THE PROJECT).
2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that the City of Aspen has an adopted fee structure for Land
Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application
completeness.
3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it
is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application.
APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an
initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis.
APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their heazings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he
will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the
CITY when they aze necessary as costs aze incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty
of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application.
4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete
processing or present sufficient information to the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning
Commission and/or City Council to enable the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning
Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings
are paid in full prior to decision.
5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect
full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the
amount of $ which is for hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual
recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse
the C[TY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $235.00
per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date.
APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and
in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid.
CITY OF ASPEN
Chris Bendon
Community Development Director
APPLICANT
By: C~~--
Date: 7' Z2' ta~j
Billing Address and Telephone Number:
/3~ SatlTH 6AZ~„NR sT
A-~l/, ~o B/~//
9~n-429'- 2d79
.-..
ATTACHMENT3
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM
Project:
Applicant:
Location:
Zone District:
Lot Size:
Lot Area:
(for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas
within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the
definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.)
Commercial net leasable: Existing.• Proposed. //A-
Number of residential units: Existing: Proposed: Nf1-
Number of bedrooms: Existing.• Proposed: //~_
Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only):
,~.
DIMENSIONS:
Floor Area: Existing: ~ Allowable: Proposed.• 3 S.~
Principal bldg. height:
Existing:
d Allowable: ~ t o
Proposed.• ~?9'~~~~ /2-0
Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed:
On-Site pazking: Existing.• Required: Proposed:
Site coverage: Existing. • ~ ~a Required: Proposed: D, ( a
Open Space: Existing:
Front Setback: Existing:
Required: Proposed.
Required.•
Proposed.•
Reaz Setback: Existing:
Required:
Proposed.•
Combined F/R: Existing.• Required: Proposed:-
Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed:-
Side Setback: Existing.• Required: Proposed.•_
Combined Sides: Existing.• Required: Proposed:-
Distance Between Existing Required: Proposed.
Buildings
Existing non-conformities or encroachments: tt~d/li~
Variations requested:
~~
a7
7
.-.
L N
w° ~
~ ~
ro ~
as
o¢
y T
~ X '~
Z y v
W y U
W o a
_~ v a~i
«.
~ a~
a;~
~ o •~
Z y a-Oi
~ ~ E
Q 7 ~
U ~
a
J y ~
Q ~" ^
W C
j ~ ~
N
Q O ~
Y
Q ~ 3
J ~ H
h
LL ~
0.5 'c
X Y
a '~ O
C ~ 'w
C ~ U
~ .~
~ ~ a
C t3
W~,~-d
2 ~ o
w...
Uwe
~.5
Q
~:: ~
U ~
U
'~ •a h
~ 'o s
c °'
~ C pq
.ro o ~
~° ~
a ~; ~
~ = ~
~•
w° ~ ~
.~
.~
a
3 ..
m
~ N Ea
a N N N ~
~
w
a!
~3
aS a
d ~"
° al
~ QI
~ ^
^ QI
U
O ~ ° ..
w°. U e
0
a • c c c
~ (~ N
d a b ~ ~ ~ °~
~,
L v
O
C
C
C~ ,
,
~
6 u
~ o `o `o `o N ~
'^° a
~
Z Pr O
.w
N ""
N
N O
.- O
.w O
.~ O
.+ 0
N 0
.~
N 0
.w 0
N ~""
N ~"
N O
~ ""
N~
N O d
N V] O
N
a
3 m 3 '~ 3 '~ U w
~ U
,w, w~ v w v a U
~W ~
E' ~
~ ~ ~r~ A N N U ~z
~O w ~Uqq
u a+ U U ~" V U °~ °~ ~ F NZ U
F
~
~
~
O
F
O ,y
N~ e
N q
v~ ~ e ~
" ~ ~ ~ ~ M O O a F W a
V o P. F ~ ~ Pr P. Pr ?. q a~ ~ i~ L1 ~i ~i N F`' W ~ d Pr N
~•- ~ a ~ e ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ,~ oz
O ~ ~
~' ' ~
o ~. Q c ~ U ~ C.7 ~ ~ Pr ~ ~ P.
_
Fy„ C ~ Q ~ W
~ va
q ~ q Ir
~
6
L N q~ a QI al ~ V
W Ca 0. 0
N u J O
6 Y_
a
W 9 Vl 9 b'i
d ~ ; M ~ ~
V1 ~A o S M M N e a
v M M .N a ri .-i ~O 'h o
ap, ~ ~ aw N N N O .Ec
O w .. .. V7 M a v O O M M a u Iry
•y ~ M "'~ .-i M M °1 y N N N O~ N W M
6 M M ~
O ~
O 7 ~O ~£ O~ Qi 7 N ~ ~ M
0 0 O ~--i .~-~ l~ a ,~, ~--i ~. M N 00 ._ ~ M
y ~--~ ~--~ ~ ""~ M Vi ~ 9 ~ 00 00 N N N ~ N ~ u
` N M
~ 00 00 00 00 .-i .ti ~ Q e wr .-I N N [~ rl O~ Q
e ~ M M
a~ ~ ~ r r ~ ~ ~ ~~ r r r r" fi r"" ~ ~ r ~'+ ~ r
a~ ti rl ti H .-I ti rl d o '~ rl ti ff rl ti ti rl H e ri ti rl
3 ° 3 ° ~' ~ ~
'w'
~
~
w
O F
w
H
~
`~ a
x z
O
w
~~ LL
w a p W ~' F w ~ w ~ H ~
, ~ w y
O '
'
Z N ~ ~ ~ z F ~
w w ~ w ~ 3 Q ~
v
~ >~ a ~
~ a
~ w z ~ ~ ~ C ~ ' ~ qq,
9 w ~ F ~ w ~ z ~ j >
W z ~ ~ ~ q v~ W F ~ A ~ w ~ P. m
3 ~ S ~ w ,~ ~
~ ~ a z ~ ~ a ' ° w ~'A Q~ d ~ a
d 7
C ~a o 0. V p
o W
a a ~ O U v~ W 0 ~ F ~ ~ Q
0 0 ~ „
E W
w •~ ~ "~ r
W U
m oo rn d O
H
Z
.~
p
L° U
U
~u
.
.
N
G
U
u
N ,a .. N
dj v Pd. a~J l~+' a~i
a
M1. V V1 F1r L d
w W
V C
u~
w
i+
o
.r '~ W
W o
N o
ti td
~
o U L
N '-°
c
c
~ y
'c
~E U a! ;', ~E E E
~ L
u
N L
v. n' F w w
~yy
-
N `4 N VI N N N N O.
U a U w ~ 3
~
0~ ~ U
U U w
~ a
o o z
w c
a V
N~ ~ F a~ e F N U N
Nw aN °~~
~ ~o ~~
a e
P
P p
O
a
n
x F g
q
~
N ~
. ~
p .
•~
a
5 w
'
°Q~
°g . ~ e
P
ao~
,~ w
o
z . ~ Ca P.
A w ~'
w '
~', w
~ ~',
~ ~ w O
~
de v ~ ¢~F
~' ~
M
a1 7
M
r I r r r r r r
~ z
r`~ W
La
~
~
~ ~~
/7
C
~'~ w
~ ° r ~ `~
~ a~
, ~ a 3 a
~
~ a~ W~ c A N a
a ~ ~ a `~ z~
: ~ w F O O
a u z
~ d A
.~.
0
rn
O
O
N
U
C.
li
O
.Y
U
a
ro
v
~n
a
.~
7
0
.+
0
L
a
v
0
b
0
U
N
N "U
C 7
O
y
N
L 4.
C ~
O' C
w ~
~ P.
~ ro
L U
~'. C
~ 3 i
" °~ w
C
O
A y c1
~ G O
° ~~;
~ o •°
L4 •„ R
~ U ~
a °~'
'3 a
= ~ ro
;; =
~ a o
U Q s
µ U
iF iF Vi
.-,,
.~.
,~ ~+
A l l AIrFiMtN 1 4-(:UN I "U-
1. Land Use Application with
Applicant's name, address and telephone
number, contained within a letter signed
by the applicant stating the name, address,
and telephone number of the
representative authorized to act on behalf
of [he applicant.
2. The street address and legal
description of [he parcel on which
development is proposed [o oceur.
3. A disclosure of ownership of [he
parcel on which development is proposed
[o occur, consisting of a torten[ certificaze
from a titte insurance company, or
attorney licensed to prx[ice in the S[ffie of
Colorado, listing the names of all owners
of the property, and all mortgages,
judgments, liens, easements, contracts and
agreements affecting the parcel, and
demonsttffiing ttre owner's right [o apply
for the Development Application.
4. An 8 1/2" x ll" vicinity map locating
the subject parcel within the City of
Aspen.
5. A site improvement survey including
topography and vegetation showing [he
torten[ status of the parcel certified by a
registered land surveyor, licensed in me
State of Colorado. (This requirement, or
any part [hereof, may be waived by [he
Community Development Department if
the project is de[ennined no[ [o warrant a
survey documem.)
IZ. Accurate e10Va[tnns (rn relailOn [0
mean sea level of the lowest floor,
including basemen[, of all new or
substantially improved structures; a
verification and recordffiion of the actual
elevation in relation to mean sea level to
which any sWCture is consUUC[ed; a
demonsttazion Iha[ all new consauaion or
substantial improvements will be
anchored to prevent flomfion, collapse or
lateral movement of any sWCmre [o be
conswcted or improved; a demonstrazion
[hat the swcmre will have the lowest
floor, including basement, elevated to at
least two (2) feet above the lase flood
elevation, all as certified by a registered
professional engineer or architect.
13. A landscape plan that includes
native vegetative screening of no less thm
fifty (50) percem of the developmental
viewed from the rear (slope) of the pacel.
All vegetative screening shall be
maintained in perpetuity and shall be
replaced with the same or corr>parable
material should it die.
14. Site sections drawn by a registered
architect, landscape architect, or
engineer shall be submitted showing all
existing and proposed site elements, the
top of slope, and pertinent elevations
above sea level.
I5. Proposed elevations of the
development, including any rooftop
equipment and how i[ will be screened.
6. A site plan depi cling the proposed 16. Proposed elevationsofthe
layout and the project's physical development, including any rooftop
relationship to the land and it's equipment and how it will be screened.
surtoundings.
7. A written description of [he
proposal and a written explanffiion of
how a proposed development complies
with the review standards relevant [o [he
development appl icffiion.
8. Plan with Existing and proposed
grades at two-foot contours, with five-foot
intervals for grades over [en (10) percent.
9. Proposed elevations of the development
10. A description of proposed
consmucfion techniques [o be used.
11. A Plan with the 100-year floodplain
line and the high water line.
17. A sketch plan ofthe site showing
existing and proposed features which arc
relevant to the review.
18. One (1) inch equals four hundred
(400) feet scale city map showing the
location of the proposed subdivision, all
adjacent lands owned by or under option
to the applicant, commonly known
landmarks, and the zone district in which
[he proposed subdivision and adjacent
properties are located
19. A plat which reflects the layout of
the lots, blocks and swcmres in the
proposed subdivision. The plffi shall
be drawn at a scale of one (1) equals one
hundred (100) feet or larger. Architectural
scales are no[ acceptable. Sheet size shall
be twenty-four (24) inches by thirty-siz
(36) inches. If it is necessary to place the
plat on more than a one (1) sheet, an index
shall be included on the first sheet. A
vicinity map shall also appear on the firs[
sheet showingthe subdivision as it relates
KtY
system m the area of the proposed
subdivision. The contents of the plat shall
be of sufficient derail ro determine
whether the proposed subdivision will
meet the design standards pursuant to
Land Use Code Section 26.480.060(3).20.
Subdivision GIS Datu.
21. A landscape plan showing location,
size, and type of proposed landscape
features.
22. A subdivision plat which meets the
[ertns of this chapter, and conforms m [he
requirements of this title indicating that no
mrther subdivision may be granted for
these lots nor will additional units be built
without receipt of applicable approvals
pursuant [o this chapter and growth
management allocation pursuant to
Chapter 26.470.
23. The precise wording of any
proposed amendment.
24. Site Plan or plans drawn m a scale of
one (I") inch equals [en (10') feet or one
(1") inch equals twenty (20') fee[,
including before and "after" photographs
(simulations) specifying the location of
amm~nas, support sWCtures, transmission
buildings and/or other accessory uses,
access, parking, fences, signs, lighting,
landscaped areas and all adjacent land
uses within one-hundred fifty (150') fee[.
Such plans and drawings should
demonsVffie compliance with [he Review
Standards of this Section.
25. FAA and FCC Coordination.
Statements r egarding the regulations of
the Federal Aviation AdminisW[ion
(FAA) and the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC).
26. Structural Integrity Report from a
professional engineer licensedin the
State of Colorado.
27. Evidence that an effort was made [o
locate on an existing wireless
telecommunication services fxility
site including coverage/ interference
analysis and capacity analysis and a
brief statement as to other reasons for
success or no success.
28. Neighborhood block plan a[
1"=50' (available from City Engiteering
Depanment) Graphically show the front
portions of all existing buildings on both
sides of the block and their setback from
the street in feet. Identify parking and
front entry for each building and locate
any accessory dwelling units along the
alley. (Continued on next page.)
`per At',~r~Yl7or~ Can' ;~v~ ~u~~y ~~
• Scott Chism
From: Amy Guthrie
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 10:52 AM
To: Scott Chism
Subject: RE: Yellowbrick Park: proposed picnic shelter
Attachments: 2007 Land Use application.doc
Hi Scott- the picnic shelter needs an Insubstantial PUD amendment, because the property is zoned Public and has a PUD
overlay.
I'm attaching a land use application. Scan through it to find a matrix that tells you what has to be submitted.
This is a sign off by Chris eendon. Here is the relevant section of the land use code. Scroll down to Section
26.445.100.A, which briefly describes the work that would NOT be eligible for the staff sign off. I think you qualify.
http•//www aspenpitkin com/pdfs/depts/38/coaspent26-400 pdf
The Yellow Brick has been identified as a "Potential Historic Resource" and is subject to what's called Ordinance #48.
Staff can allow work that does not affect the significance of the structure to go forward. Please include something in
your application that requests an exemption from Ordinance #48 and we'll take care of it.
Let me know any further questions.
From: Scott Chism
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 3:16 PM
To: Jennifer Phelan; Jessica Garrow; Errin Evans; Amy Guthrie
Subject: Yellowbrick Park: proposed picnic shelter
Jennifer, Jessica, Errin, Amy-
The Parks Department is proposing a picnic shelter structure at the Yellowbrick Park near the existing basketball court.
The covered area would be 324.6 square feet. The maximum height of the structure will be approximately 12' from
finish surface of concrete paving. We intend to submit for a building permit as soon as the structural drawing is
complete.
Is there anything from when the property transferred to City ownership that would preclude the creation of a small
picnic shelter?
Amy: Yellowbrick Park was developed in 2001. Does the Yellowbrick building have any landmark designation? Again,
anything that would affect this proposed structure? I don't recall encountering anything when we developed the park,
but I'm double checking.
Scott Chism
Parks Department
429-2029
~.
W
Scott Chism
City of Aspen Parks Department
September 22nd, 2008
Ms. Jennifer Phelan
City of Aspen Community Development Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Fax: (970) 920-5439
Re: Yellowbrick Pazk Shade Shelter
Dear Jennifer,
THE CITY OF ASPEN
The City of Asp~h Parks Department seeks to develop a shade shelter at t)le Yellowbrick Park, adjacent
to the Yellowbrick Building at 215 North Garmisch Street. Yellowbrick Park was developed in 2001 as
part of a comprehensive parks and open space bond issue passed to build public park and recreational
facilities.
The proposed shade shelter is located at the existing slab of concrete located north adjacent to the
basketball court within Yellowbrick Park. The location currently has a picnic table set for public use.
The addition of the shade shelter will allow the existing picnic table and a possible second picnic table to
be protected from sun and precipitation, making the picnic area more usable to the public.
The proposed shade shelter will be constructed of weathering steel, similar to other small park structures
like the ballfield backstops and portable toilia enclosures located around the Moore/Iselin and Rotary
Playing Fields managed by the City of Aspen Parks Department. The shelter has a 318.4 s.f. roof area
and is proposed to be a free standing, open sided structure within the pazk. The structure would not be
attached to the existing Yellowbrick Building. The existing area that comprises Yellowbrick Park is
47,672 s.f, The space required for the shade shelter equates to 0.6% of the total ark azea, which is less
than the 3% in overall coverage of structures on the land identified in Sec. 26.445.100 of the spen and
Use Regulations. Also, t ~s propose saes a ter would be built within a public park at an existing area
already designated as a picnic seating area, which is not a change in the use or character of the park.
As a result of the relatively small size of the proposed structure within the park, the City of Aspen Parks
Department is requesting an insubstantial PUD amendment and review by the Community Development
Director in order to allow the submittal for a building permit.
The Yellowbrick Building (former elementary school) and Park are located on Block 57, Lots A-S + the
vacated alley, in the City and Township of Aspen. The parcel is a square block within the West End
Neighborhood and is owned by the City of Aspen. A disclosure of ownership has not been included in
this package, but documentation can be provided by the City Attorney proving City ownership of the
Yellowbrick Building and,Park if necessary.
130 Sou're Gn~eNe STrsEeT ~ Asrev, Comanoo 8161k-1975 ~ PeoNe 970.920.5000 ~ Fax 970.920.5197
www. aspengo¢com
Premed on Reryded Paper
A 1"=20' scale site plan has been included in this package which reflects the built layout of Yellowbrick
Park. A subsequent survey following construction of the park in 2001 has not been completed. The City
of Aspen Parks Department is requesting a waiver to the submission of a park survey since the proposed
structure will fit within existing paved areas within the park.
Please contact me directly at 429-2029 with any questions or comments regarding this proposed project
at Yellowbrick Park. Thank you for your time to review this submission.
Sincerely,
Scott Chism, LLA CO#222
Project Manager/Parks Planner
City of Aspen Parks and Recreation Department
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070, ASPEN LAND USE CODE
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 2 ~ I~f -(j anon sc~ Sr
Aspen, CO
STATE OF COLORADO )
ss.
County of Pitkin )
I ~~~ .~iln Sc ~-e~ (name, please print)
being or repre enting an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that
I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section
26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner:
Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper
or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days
after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is
attached hereto.
Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper
or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after
an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto.
Signatu
The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this t ~ day
of ~\~o /~eF.l~lh~t/ > 200 8, by ~ ~r1c,211c. ~lr~-~~I
WITNESS MY HAND AND~O~/FFICIAL SEAL
My commission expires: D~ l `b (~
Notary Public
ATTACHMENTS:
COPY OF THE PUBLICATION i ~~~
MEYER
pF coy-°`'
My Commission Expires 0811012010
~ slcmmA~"
Pu~listte0 in tae Aspen Times Weakly on Novem
oa~ia. zoos. (zsaseaa~
- OO792C~Q
NOTICE OF APPROVAL
For An Insubstantial Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment to the Yellow
Brick School, Block 57, Lots A-S + the vacated alley, at 215 N. Garmisch St.
Parcel ID No.2735-124-36-850
APPLICANT: City of Aspen, City Parks Department
REPRESENTATIVE: Scott Chism.
SUBJECT & SITE OF AMENDMENT: Insubstantial PUD Amendment for Block
57, Lots A-S + the vacated alley, commonly known as Yellow Brick School, at 215 N.
Garmisch St., involving the installation of a park shade shelter.
SUMMARY:
The Applicant has requested an Insubstantial PUD Amendment relating to construction
within the exterior space of the PUD lot, Yellowbrick Park. The request is to allow the
installation of a 314.8 sq. ft. park shade shelter adjacent to the existing basketball courts.
There is an existing concrete pad where the shelter will be located, therefore there will
not be any ground breaking. All construction. will take place on top of the existing pad.
The structure is to be constructed with weathering steel, similar to other pazk structures,
such as the ball field backstops and portable toilet enclosures located azound the
Moore/Iselin and Rotary Playing Fields. The height of the shelter ranges from a low at 9'
to a peak at 12'. The park shelter will allow the existing picnic areas to be more usable
by the public due to protection from sun and precipitation.
In 1998 the City of Aspen purchased the Yellow Brick School. In 1999 the City
Recreation Department applied to rezone the former school site from Medium Density
Residential (R-6) to Public (PUB). This allowed for more flexibility and additional uses
within the Yellow Brick School (i.e. child care centers and non-profit organizations). In
2000 City Council approved rezoning with Ordinance 2000.42. At the time, the shade
shelter was in the approved PUD document; however the shelter was never installed.
STAFF EVALUATION:
Staff supports the proposed changes to the Yellow Brick School PUD. The changes will
create a more user-friendly atmosphere in the picnic area and provide shelter from sun
and precipitation, and was anticipated as part of the pazk in the 2000 PUD site plan.
Also, the proposed structure meets the review criteria pursuant to Sec. 26.445.100
(Exhibit C) of the Aspen Land Use Code regarding Insubstantial PUD Amend e s.
~~~~
RECEPT{ONit: 554282, 11!13;2008 at NOS ~'3 208
11:40:58 AM, ~~,,~.~
1 OF 5, R S26.00 Doc Code APPROVAL
Janice K. Vas Caudif{. Pitkin County, CO Page loft ~ f
.. ~ 0 0 7 9 r U ~,~ ;;
Ordinance 48, 2007 regulates certain buildings of potential historic value. The
Yellowbrick is one of the structures on the Ord. 48 list. Staff believes that this request
does not harm the historical value of the Yellowbrick and Yellowbrick Pazk.
DECISION:
The Community Development Director finds the Insubstantial PUD Amendment to
build the proposed structure as noted above and on Exhibit `A' and `B' to be
consistent with the review criteria (Exhibit C) and thereby, APPROVES the
amendment as specified below.
The approved amendment to Yellowbrick Park, allows for the construction of a
318.4 sq. ft. picnic shade shelter on the existing concrete pad adjacent to the park's
basketball courts.
APPROVED BY:
Chris Bendon
Community Development Director
Attachments:
Exhibit A -Site Plan
Exhibit B -Site Elevation
Exhibit C - Review Standazds
~' ~--?~~
Date
APPROVED
OCT :' ~~ 2008
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
CITY OF ASPEN
~ClVEp
NOV 0 ~ 2008
Page 2of 2 ~S('~
ate. ~~
oo~s 20~~ A.
A-..
a
r
rt
rt
~~
I I I I IIP I ~~~'
I.r
a
YELLOW BRICK PARK
SHADE SHELTER
§I.
4
N
P~~
Aspan, Colorado
L
n
r
r
D
3
Q
~~ ~ ~
a
~ ~,
~r ~ i
SCOttChlSm THE CITY OF ASPEN
City of Aspen Parks Department
September 29th, 2008
Ms. Jennifer Phelan
City of Aspen Community Development Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Fax: (970)920-5439
Re: Yellowbrick Park Shade Shelter
Dear Jennifer,
I've reviewed criteria #1-9 of Sec. 26.445.100.A of the Aspen Land Use Regulations and I believe the
proposed Yellowbrick Park Shade Shelter does not meet any of the criteria # 1-9:
1. A change in the use or character of the development: The proposed project contributes to the
public use of the existing public park use adjacent to the public uses of the building. The
proposed project does not change the use or character of Yellowbrick Park.
2. An increase by greater than three percent (3%) in the overall coverage of structures on the land:
The proposed project has a 318.4 s.f. roof area. The existing area that comprises Yellowbrick
Park is 47,672 s.f. The space required for the shade shelter equates to 0.6% of the total park
area, which is less than 3% of the park area.
3. Any amendment that substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed development
or the demand for public facilities. The addition of the proposed shade shelter at an existing
picnic area within an existing public park will likely increase the public use of the picnic area.
However, that use will likely result primarily from users already at the park. The intended
purpose of the shade shelter is to increase the comfort of the existing picnic table area. Some
use of the proposed shade shelter may result that is exclusive of other park uses, although it is
unlikely that trip generation to Yellowbrick Park will substantially increase.
4. A reduction by greater than three percent (3%) of the approved open space. As stated above, the
proposed project has a 318.4 s.f roof area within the park area of 47,672 s.f., which equates to
0.6% of the park area. The shade shelter is proposed to be a free standing, open sided structure
within the park, unattached to the Yellowbrick Building.
5. A reductiott.by greater than one percent (1 %) of the off-street parking and loading space.• Off-
street parking does not currently exist at the Yellowbrick Building or Yellowbrick Park. The
proposed project has no effect to the existing off-street or on-street parking or loading space
associated with the Yellowbrick Building or Park.
6. A reduction in required pavement widths or rights-of--way for streets and easements: The
proposed project will be built in the middle of an existing park. No reduction to pavement,
right-of--way or easements tivill occur
7. An increase of greater than two percent (2%) in the approved gross leasable floor area of
commercial buildings: The proposed project does not increase the area of the Yellowbrick
13O SOUTH GAIENA STREET ~ ASPEV~COLORA00816~1-~9~5 ~ PHONE 97O.920.5000~ FA%970.92O.J197
www. a~pengo¢com
PriNed nn Reryded Paper -
,-.,
Building by more than 2%. The shade shelter is not attached to the existing Yellowbrick
Building and will not be leasable floor area.
8. An increase by greater than one percent (1 %) in the approved residential density of the
development. The proposed project is not a residential use and the Yellowbrick Building does
not have residential use, so therefore the residential density is not affected.
9. Any change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project's original
approval or which requires granting a variation from the project's approved use or
dimensional requirements: Yellowbrick Park was developed from a former asphalt play yard
that was associated with the Yellowbrick Building when it was an elementary school. The
proposed project is an enhancement to the existing public picnic area within the existing park.
The project is not inconsistent with the public park use on the land.
Per your request, a structure elevation and a structure section has been included in this submittal
package.
You have requested a $735.00 land use application fee. Generally, fees between city departments for the
review of city projects are waived, which is why a payment was not included in the submittal package. I
would request that the Community Development Department waive the $735 land use application fee, as
the building permit application fee will be waived.
Please contact me directly at 429-2029 with any questions or comments regarding this proposed project
at Yellowbrick Park. Thanks again for your time to review this submission.
Sincerely,
C ~G~~
Chism, LLA CO#222
Project Manager/Parks Planner
City of Aspen Parks and Recreation Department
~;
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
of the
City of Aspen
Community Development Department
This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070,
"Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen
Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to
the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall
also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall
expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building
permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension,
reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After
Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding
any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to
any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order.
This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific
development plan as described below.
City of Aspen CitxParks Department 585 Cemeter~Lane Aspen CO 81611 (9701 920 - 5 120
Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number
Block 57 Lots A S + the vacated alley,. Cit~and Townsite of Asnen 215 N. Garmisch St,
Yellow Brick School PUD
Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property
Approval of an Insubstantial PUD Amendment request to install a nark shade shelter on an
existine concrete pad adiacent to the Yellowbrick Pazk's basketball courts
Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan
Administrative Insubstantial PUD Amendment, October 30, 2008
Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions)
November 16 2008
Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.)
November 17 2011
Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and
revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.)
Issued this 16th day of November, 2008, by the City of Aspen Community
Develonment Director.
Chris Bendon, Community Development Director
,-,. ,~.
NOTICE OF APPROVAL
For An Insubstantial Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment to the Yellow
Brick School, Block 57, Lots A-S + the vacated alley, at 215 N. Garmisch St.
Parcel ID No. 2735-124-36-850
APPLICANT: City of Aspen, City Parks
REPRESENTATIVE: Scott Chism.
SUBJECT & SITE OF AMENDMENT: Insubstantial PUD Amendment for Block
57, Lots A-S + the vacated alley, commonly known as Yellow Brick School, at 215 N.
Garmisch St., involving the installation of a park shade shelter.
SUMMARY:
The Applicant has requested an Insubstantial PUD Amendment relating to construction
within the exterior space of the PUD lot, Yellowbrick Park. The request is to allow the
installation of a 314.8 sq. ft. park shade shelter adjacent to the existing basketball courts.
There is an existing concrete pad where the shelter will be located, therefore there will
not be any ground breaking. All construction will take place on top of the existing pad.
The structure is to be constructed with weathering steel, similar to other park structures,
such as the ball field backstops and portable toilet enclosures located around the
Moore/Iselin and Rotary Playing Fields. The height of the shelter ranges from a low at 9'
to a peak at 12'. The park shelter will allow the existing picnic areas to be more usable
by the public due to protection from sun and precipitation.
In 1998 the City of Aspen purchased the Yellow Brick School. In 1999 the City
Recreation Department applied to rezone the former school site from Medium Density
Residential (R-6) to Public (PUB). This allowed for more flexibility and additional uses
within the Yellow Brick School (i.e. child care centers and non-profit organizations). In
2000 City Council approved rezoning with Ordinance 2000.42. At the time, the shade
shelter was in the approved PUD document; however the shelter was never installed.
STAFF EVALUATION:
Staff supports the proposed changes to the Yellow Brick School PUD. The changes will
create a more user-friendly atmosphere in the picnic area and provide shelter from sun
and precipitation, and was anticipated as part of the park in the 2000 PUD site plan.
Also, the proposed structure meets the review criteria pursuant to Sec. 26.445.100
(Exhibit C) of the Aspen Land Use Code regarding Insubstantial PUD Amendments.
Page loft
Ordinance 48, 2007 regulates certain buildings of potential historic value. The
Yellowbrick is one of the structures on the Ord. 48 list. Staff believes that this request
does not harm the historical value of the Yellowbrick and Yellowbrick Pazk.
DECISION:
The Community Development Director finds the Insubstantial PUD Amendment to
build the proposed structure as noted above and on Exhibit `A' and `B' to be
consistent with the review criteria (Exhibit C) and thereby, APPROVES the
amendment as specified below.
The approved amendment to Yellowbrick Park, allows for the construction of a
318.4 sq. ft. picnic shade shelter on the existing concrete pad adjacent to the park's
basketball courts.
APPROVED BY:
Chris Bendon Date
Community Development Director
Attachments:
Exhibit A -Site Plan
Exhibit B -Site Elevation
Exhibit C - Review Standazds
Exhibit D - Application
v _~o. og
Page 2of 2
~._
~ ~ 33 ~ ... ope~o~o~'uetlay
~~~g€~ 213113HS 34`dHS
~~ )IZl~dd ~i~RlB MOll3A
Q
J
J
Q
i ~-,
~~
€~ 1 ~6~~~~~~~~~
~ 1 ~~~~~~~~~~
o~
IWI I w
Y ~ N
i'~
r,:
Y
ll
L
J
n
J
~~
~ ~~ ~
~ ~
b p
®~~~~FS~
U ~O~
...,,
' ~ opa~oloyua0ay
213113H5 3aVH5
N21b'd ~~IZIB MO~l3A I~~
.~.
~~ Tip JJJ ~~ , M
~ ~O~~~~~~~ a t ~' f ~
~ i-I I I I I I I I I + I s
~:3
- --~` i ~
--~
i
i
0
x~
s
~~
P
~~~
n
. -~
4
r
'.
Exhibit C
Review Criteria and Staff Findings
PUD Insubstantial Amendments: Sec. 26.445.100.A
1. A change in the use or character of the development.
The proposed project does not change the use or chazacter of Yellowbrick Park. It
contributes to the existing public use adjacent to the Yellow Brick School public uses.
2. An increase by greater than three (3) percent in the overall coverage of structures on
the land.
The shade shelter comprises a total of 318.4 sq. ft. Yellowbrick Pazk has a total of
46,672 sq. ft. The shade shelter will only account for a change of 0.6% to overall
coverage.
3. Any amendment that substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed
development or the demand for public facilities.
The shelter will likely not increase trip generation to the park; however it is likely that
the usage of the picnic area will increase my users that are already present. It is
unlikely that trip generation will substantially increase.
4. A reduction by greater than three (3) percent of the approved open space.
Open space is not reduced by this proposal.
5. A reduction by greater than one (1) percent of the off-street parking and loading
space.
There is currently no off-street parking at Yellowbrick Park, so there is no impact.
6. A reduction in required pavement widths or rights-of--way for streets and easements.
The shade shelter is in the middle of the pazk. No adjustments will be made to
pavement widths or rights-of way.
7. An increase of greater than hvo (2) percent in the approved gross leasable floor area
of commercial buildings.
The shelter is not attached to the Yellowbrick School and will not contain leasable
floor azea. No change in gross leasable floor area.
8. An increase by greater than one (1) percent in the approved residential density of the
development.
The proposed project will not have a residential use and the Yellowbrick School
building has no residential use, so no effect.
9. Any change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project's
original approval or which requires granting a variation from the project's approved
use or dimensional requirements.
Yellowbrick Park was initially an asphalt play yard. This projects serves as an
enhancement to the to the existing public picnic area, and has no inconsistencies.
Page Sof 2
,~ ~,
Jennifer Phelan
From: Jennifer Phelan
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 11:56 AM
To: Scott Chism
Subject: RE: yellow Brick
Scott: Sorry in my delay getting back to you but I had a couple of questions to resolve prior responding to your email. I
do need some additional information for the application. I need:
1) Elevations of the gazebo. Only a site plan was included.
2) Aland use application fee of $735.00
3) Responses to the specific review criteria for an Insubstantial PUD. You touched on them in a cover letter. Please
respond to the individual criteria.
J f~helan, AICP
Deputy Director
Community Development Department
City of Aspen
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
PH: 970.429.2759
FAX: 970.920.5439
www.asoenpitkin.com
From: Scott Chism
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 1:57 PM
To: Jennifer Phelan
Subject:
Jennifer-
This is the extent of the written text associated with this project submittal besides the actual application and drawing.
Let me know if anything else is necessary for the review.
Scott Chism
Parks Department
429-2029
• o
;~~
` ~~
~~ ~ ~3
;~
a. ~
. ~Y~
V~_
kF a r}.
\\ ._~
_ 1\ ~ a
yy~
~ , `~.
I~ $•)
~I' ~t~
l
d
`; •~~f
`a
c `
~rM l
c
i'f~~
e.
`~
:~
z~
~~...
~'
\~~,,
'~~~
~~
-,~,~ ~~
~ •~.k ~
;~-~~
r J
{ ~ ~y
]1 1
y
~~~ ~
`.
~~
~~
~'~,
~~ o
~.~~ ~h
~~
,~
>>~ -°~`~
. ~~~
~4 `l \~il
`\ ` ~,
1 ~
' ` ~,\~
~~ ~
0
n
~~
~~ ~
~~
"" -d
~-
U
~ ~ ~~
~ ~
oo~s2ooe g
r-- - - ~.
i
i
~~-- -
V
~A~ ~'
`'S P
~ ~-----
r
---„
~.~
1
,~~ L'1jL~D1`~k' it {~}~~~. y~Nyj 'IVr <
~~~~ T~ ~ i~ ~~
r
~~"~~ r~~l ~~ ~ ~~ ~
~~, ~~ ~4
~ '^~ ~~ ~
_._ 4
___ _-_ ~,
'
____ LQR'll°.. _
~ S
` ~
~~.
~ ~
~
~
p~p ~~
~
S!
a
w
m
It! V ~,
WS,F'Fr~s
~f 1!S.!)!~ -JEA4RTN~~~
r mp 11" ~~~~~~~~~I~ I
W I ZA ~I
j~sl YELLOW BRICK PARK
e RHAl1F CWFI TFI?
AapOn, Colando
€ I$~~
~~~ ~~
~~
oo~s Zoos C
Exhibit C
Review Criteria and Staff Findings
PUD Insubstantial Amendments: Sec. 26.445.100.A
1. A change in the use or character of the development.
The proposed project does not change the use or character of Yellowbrick Pazk. It
contributes to the existing public use adjacent to the Yellow Brick School public uses.
2. An increase by greater than three (3) percent in the overall coverage of structures on
the land.
The shade shelter comprises a total of 318.4 sq. ft. Yellowbrick Park has a total of
46,672 sq. ft. The shade shelter will only account for a change of 0.6% to overall
coverage.
3. Any amendment that substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed
development or the demand for public facilities.
The shelter will likely not increase trip generation to the pazk; however it is likely that
the usage of the picnic azea will increase ~ty users that are already present. It is
unlikely that trip generation will substantially increase.
4. A reduction by greater than three (3) percent of the approved open space.
Open space is not reduced by this proposal.
S. A reduction by greater than one (1) percent of the off-street parking and loading
space.
There is currently no off-street parking at Yellowbrick Park, so there is no impact.
6. A reduction in required pavement widths or rights-of--way for streets and easements.
The shade shelter is in the middle of the park. No adjustments will be made to
pavement widths or rights-of way.
7. An increase of greater than two (2) percent in the approved gross leasable floor area
of commercial buildings.
The shelter is not attached to the Yellowbrick School and will not contain leasable
floor azea. No change in gross leasable floor azea.
8. An increase by greater than one (1) percent in the approved residential density of the
development.
The proposed project will not have a residential use and the Yellowbrick School
building has no residential use, so no effect.
9. Any change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation oft, ~r,~~`
original approval or which requires granting a variation from the project ~ a f1~7
use or dimensional requirements.
Yellowbrick Park was initially an asphalt play yard. This projects serve~l~ ~t3 ZQ08
enhancement to the to the existing public picnic area, and has no inconsistencies.~;~~
;PJEPRR'ffl~Ep~
Page Sof~
f r ' ._-'--~ _,
,~ ',~, . ~ / ~~ ~ G°; <~na M:UL~ry Trail
~I~
_ ~,., ,
~ \' t ~'~-=' l ter ~p ~`~ a\ ' l
\\\' ~ (`-1 Hun
5 ® ! I ~~ ! ~
1~
® ~ r ~
®~ I ,~;
1
i ~ ~.
!~
F°rK 9dC~ade ° ~ ~ce~``e~~ , 1f
\ o°~ Tai ` 0° \
c
\~ e~ _ ~ \ Smuggler Mountai
Benedict •vt ~ ~ j ~aD (a
Music Tent N r ~ ~ 0/
e
e
- 7 j ,ZJ 'Q `` p
Lone p/n \ m
• e9 \
~F ;' r a r
North Gd\et_---~ ~-J~~W ~ <
As en~Art us ~ park C~rc/e
hn alr ~ ~ ~~",. rMn
~~~~ ~ ~u; Sm
Smug 1 r ~~ ~ "F
^ ~ ~ ^ Aspen Center for p0 Mollie
Environmental Studies 'bpY G} E
Franca Mid Denver ~
Sa ry o~ ,
~l R eation ~ ypa ~ ~ `,
Hana ~ L~I C er \ o k
~a ~ ~ ~
,-; o Ma$bgt
aleek '~ ~' m King -.
Piikin
Hote! -'Cou Library ,.~+~ ~
Mai tree pe" /ero ~ ~ '. rris
~/ t^\
~n a m` n ~ v ~ CI !p r COM Q ~
'~ "ry Hal! R00 ~ ru\
W Ha 'na o
W Hopkfis Bikaway \, ! ~ -~- L wn ter ~ c ~ F _
\ s en I Garde Hyman '4 Ope House .o a ~
Li d "~.~ cooper ~ ~ ~ = w o ~ ~ eddi 1 rI ~,
~gn~d~i
o ~;, ~ ow own
~T~s ~ - ~ Durant ~ ~ I~ Pe trian I'l ~nderSOn
(~~f+ b u
r
y'i ~~~. ~~ Ru ~y Park ~'° penM Cain
x'S'"x ~~ Ilou9 Y 1 1 0 '~ m
~*~~~ ~ ",~ ~ / ~ ole
t ,..
8 ~~ -v ~, ~
~~ c~a~. ~ -Lift 1 ark ~ % "`-~ ' ~ eq~ ~ ,-,
, ~~ r
_ ~'~, rL--- ! ~~ as „` /
s ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~i o C
~- «~~ ~ `
-` ~ =
I'1 _ ~--j-.~ ~~ _~ ~ + "' _
._ , r -_ 4.. _ _
F~' °. _.