The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.501 Sneaky Ln.0027.2006 THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER PARCEL ID NUMBER PROJECTS ADDRESS PLANNER CASE DESCRIPTION REPRESENTATIVE DATE OF FINAL ACTION 0027.2006.ASLU 2735-12-2-20-002 501 SNEAKY LANE JENNIFER PHELAN STREAM MARGIN REVIEW MICHAEL B. WERNER 5/7/07 (APPLICATION WITHDRAWN) CLOSED BY Angela Scorey on 05/06/2009 ~~ G~.E~S~d ~07~0 7 {~-,PP w/d-~u,~-,~ n~'t•i2.2' Zo '002 Sat ~r~c=~~`~ ~~c=, ~~~~e c~~e-~ ~,~ ~~V~v~V`~ ~ ~xk~~~ ~~ ~~ -~~ b~c~~ ~~~~~~~ ~'~ ~t5 ~~ h( ~ ~. ~ . ~D~ ~-h ~ ~~-e~~~~. ~e~-s ~ ~~- o~'~ _ ~5~ ~ fl~ o~-~. ~~ risk .e~ice~.g~ -~ ~ ~ -~~ ~~1~ ~6~~ ~~ - __._ Owner's Name Contact Person Address G ~~ Legal Description Zone District ~_ PLANNING APPROVALS: HPC: Design Review: Stream Margin: GMQS: Bd of Adjustment: j Permit # ~ ~ ~~ , Z~ Phone # RESOLUTION/ORDINANCE #: Conditional Use: 8040 Greenline: ,~5~ ~ -zGY'~iew Plane: Special Review: ADU Deed Restriction: Reception # Tree Permit: ~~~ TYPE OF WORK: ~ New Construction emodel/Addition ~ Demolition/Relocation ~ngle-Family ~ Duplex ~ Accessory Structure ~ Commercial ~ Multi-Family - # of units ~ Employee Housing - # of units LOT SIZE: ~T~'~~p LOT AREA: 77 ~ -1-_~- ~ q ~~G~~S 6iIQ~ LOF~~~-4-~~~t~ ¢Iq~~[y~~~5 SETBACKS: Allowed (PrincipaUAccessory) Proposed (Principal/Accessory) Front Side _ Rear Combined FrontlReaz Distance btw buildings. Comer Lot: HEIGHT (Principal/Accessory): FLOOR AREA: Exempt Space (s.£): Garage 3,~~ADU NET LEASABLE SF: Existing OPEN SPACE %: Required: BEDROOMS: Existing: SITE COVERAGE: Allowed: ON-SITE PARKING: Required: Allowed: ~j ~ Propose Allowed: Z ~ ~ ~P{ropose _~1ubgrade ___~~~%~f- _ Pro~p`os"ed- Proposed Proposed: Proposed: Proposed: N~ ~ a~-1~ Deck 6 ~~f °p°s~.d o c,~ f~ FEES: Pazk Dedication: Cash-in-Lieu: r ZONING CHECKLIST Survey: ~Im-,-,n ~ n ~ ~ ems ~ ~~f 1(~' _~-- { y m ~'' ~ ® ~' ~On'R 1 OCIYyTC) ~ I`EadSV ~ NGS1NCiC6 .L'I`JHd 1/~ I ,u ~~ J ~'sa ~a s g ~:, ~~N3Q1~~ 77'7 ~i=1 'th~13d3N~ I~ - N ~ °,` _x. r~ ~ a~~a°, ~ ~9$g ~~~~~ ~ -- al.- 4Nou:tava/ - y Q~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ a E 1-~?a~ ~~ levtd - S A ~ S7 g ~i~ ~S k ~t III+•t~x _~ ~~ it i ' ;,^; t F ., ~~ ^ u g ~ oQV1O)OJ ' N9d~iJ ' N~161N~Yr Iyi1Vd L L°~ c ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 § 7 ~ s 3 £ x EE ~~~N~alv-nr ~-r7 ~Nb`1 l~~lb^~N5 ios ~ ~ ~e ~ ~ w~~~i ~ 01 SNOi.L1O6Y - ~ ~ ~ o~~~ a ~g ~ ~:~ ~ ~ ~ ~°~ ~~°LLE ~ ~ ~ ~ Nv~d ~l~s ~ A 5 m CJ =~_ `~ ~~ "o -- ~ ~' 1 5 0 S o ~~?~ i^ c~3 '~~ ~ J h ~ ~~a- Uu~p` I-Q~ j 4 U O ~ > N F NV7 d °~ Off' -~ /~ s° ~i' p ,C ~~' ~~~ ~~ F SW 7 L ~;} .~° i ;~ Ji (~ q; ±-~-~ ~ ~,~ ~ g ~~ 1 \ '~ 7~ V l r~ s - it I~ ~/ V // 1 ~~ K~ uI ~~ N -~~ ~ y \ \ f. lV ~ \ ~ ^'}.'f o ~ ~~\ ~~~ / ~n ~ 1 j /I ~~ /~ ~ /,, I ` /, ~ ~~ 4\- T T - --~ ~, ~ ~ L :_~ ~~" ~ IM. of 1. / \ _1N'd1Y3SV~--AlOll~ --- ~ ~/ J1 __------- -~,~ ~ ,_~ ~> ~~ \~U 8. ~, \ ~ JJ(~ C' N C' ~ w ~ %. ~nn~ ~ ~r V c'am` ~ ~ ~ / ~ J ti v ~~ ~~ ~ ,~ ., ~ \ ~ ~ ~ 1 / ~ ~ ~, _ _ ~- -~r ~ - ~ ~ A, ~ ~~ ~ / / . Y~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~ z~.l ~~ ~a ~~ ~~ ~~~~ ,j ~ ~ ~ [3 A n ~ F z~ ~ U, >--~ -~ I ~' 3v J N ' N _ .~ _ _ _.. __..w...~_ ;~ I I i v; . {I yy'~ G ~ W' ~~ ~ I N ~~ ^ kkU E~ y~~ W ~ S~ 7 W ~ ~ i W _ EI _ ~ u > W ~W T r. s I ~ is ~ da &2 a~i~ z g O N z Y~ ~ 3 :, i O ~ cY 3 t H F C7 B < S ~°.•• Y W < CJ S S .: ~ ~ _ _ w ~ W >3 ry"I W 3 ~ ~ p.. E I ~~ ~ aG W .~ .. ~ a €ss. k _ '. I \ ~ nti ~ o o i V s.. I 1 ~ '~' 1 ~ - '.Y931M /v f'xi L I .._.VYIVN JeaM0. O II ~ 0 . ~. Y ~ ~ ~7 I ' _ ~~,.. C I~ ~ ;., ~ ~ V 1 - N i N _ ~ ~ r ~ ~ i ~~~ a / ...~SY i __- -----__ -~ /' - ~ ~~~ .SU'NI ~3. W.EE.G04 ~ ~~ ]I lG/I1I 4VVtY3JTlllll -_~ ~~G~n~ ~~ I v 3I V.IY. 03.1YY ~„~~~//// ' 3HV, ,~xvaNS ~~ ~~ po,l I -- - of gE ~ s ~ ~.i I I ~y as ~ '~_ ~ {~ ' ~ I - - ~ _~ I a' R ~ 1-_'.L~i' ~ _ I I a8 s ~' ~ /j' ~ ,,., r ~ / 11J /' I' ~ 4 IC G I W l 0 1/; a ,u`y' I 8fG^ ' I ~ 35 I ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ q ~ i ~~y - ~~ ti j I ~i 3s G~xQ •r ~~+- ~ ~ 43 H I- y- - - ~ - b: =,~ o \p I IU . ~ ~ ,RE.NaIE \IIE. \ / ~ ~ ~~C1._~ \ d EYfERMI Gd OvF.1E.- GCI 3E;U9 vg lY ~ s ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ V4' ~~ T.~ ~ ~ N W /~ ~' a~ '', ~ \~ \ nil3~ ~~ ' ~ ~i/ ~~ \ \ i \ \ ! \ \ - - I , ,e 9[tt2F y{ a F - ~ w - _ ~. i! F- e ~ ~ ~ z ~ 6 ~ ~ z~ - ~ ~~. ,'"a~aw- ~' i li ~.„.. i.. '~ I I ~I ~I i ~w I~' i :. 4~ I Ir: a.oo. es.sox~~~ _a~_ b~ . ~ ~ s~3 °3 ~iiv ~n ~n' ~. ainne axv sanrv arvn ne aeue O Y _ 3xv7 ~xvaHS ~~ ,~ d _ - _-1 -i 7 ~-- -- -- °° ~ I ° II ~ y P /y, //~/"~ .t ..h ! ti t F' 2 d §e Z ~~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ E~ o ~ ~ V g € .2.^ w ~ - .. W 5 gg m ~ 's 3 `s W ~ ~ w ~ a oG g ` ~ ~ w ~ I „ s > gg ~q .. _ g ~ 0 0 !', ` I I ~ 'I ~ ..e,a..e JU_. -: a~o+c ~o Joa: .y. _ ' w ~ -~atvm ia. ssaa ~; I ~ ~~ I ~ Q - _- vuvn..aa asax- ~ . F ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ 4 ~ N ~ ' S I ~W~ w I .€~ ~.~~ SS d ~ -gig:: ad, ~ ~'~ I a5 I~ ~ ~I~ 5 q .y. as se e d~ e ~ I ~ ~ -~ '. I I - /' ~„~ - - uu seievwae iixas ® I a a - aix ens~axs sas ovEn~ \ c~~Fi_ yy \ ~~ ~~ /j \ . ~ \~ \ V~ N S ~ j/. lv: \ ~ S4~ ~ j 3 / /, j~. ,, ,~ =a~,~ j ~', `~ ~ ~ ~ ~,_ / ~ ~ ~; ~ ~ a ~~ ' e R A ~ g ~ W ~ i . W g u~g i~ W se a 1 w~ ~ tl ~ ~ ~ as ~. >~a~ : , ~ 1 ' 1 4 ; j y z ~ w OL p F t7 e: < ~~ ~ \ P/y whs. ~~' b Vey ~~~~ j. .. .. _ ^ y 1 .- ~.N -. ~ d~ CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Aereement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and /y %~y ~ ~ / /3• ~~r.~ r / (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has subr~ fitted to CITY an application for (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee stmcture for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafrer permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs aze incurred. CITY agees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or Ciry Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right [o collect full fees prior to a detemunation of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $G9 5- which is for '~ hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $225.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT Chris Beudon Community Development Director g:\support\forms\agrp ayas.doc 2/01/2006 /,~y ryo Date: $ -//-~ ~ 9~o-'a7-S'393 'I~~ - 'PS 3~ F++r May I1 2006 12:13PM li~Q MIfl MRY-10-2806 14=34 ib~t752 2949 "'"*~531-101'] p.l '~ 1212 752 2949 P.01~01 Michael & Rraraer 1111 Y.LaeoLr Road, Spite 400 Miami Beoeh, IP'loeitle 33139 A[Ree Phenc.30S-530->i54lCe~tlar' 305804-'1S'i'3 . jj:305.631-1017' . ~. VIA FACSIMI[.E 9970-5<4-06'74 May 10, 2006 Re: SOl Sneaky lane Tn Wlam It Msy Concern: 1 hereby sutht)ria David l.ar116ert Cau~ractitm to act p ray agent for tha shuarD mar6el revia~. The coou~cc u IAvid lBatbert Construction is Alan Attwld-Project Manages, POS 1727. Barak, CO, St621, Lis phone9970-34-0691. Sitrwely; BY:~Michae! 8. Wanes >ty: SO t Snesky I,aite, uC. mTa P. Rt ., ,~ ° .' ~ - .~ _ = m i _ ~ ~. $ae4 ^ ~~ , L . , > ~ . _. ., j ~ ~ c ~~i.0 O y '!i cnl ' A m c f _ - `_ Sna.~.b¢ ~; to `c'S _ ~ ~~ e 5¢rta i~ dA~ 4 i $ r v i ao s5 c'P ~ _ ~OC~i/ioy o .v. _ <€ ¢5a~ G _ _ 3 _ ' $$ X41 F! ~.. ~F° ' ¢~e GY._:J'~`--'S c ~ s, _ ,~ ' ~y _ - - - ~ •= ' _ ~ e _ -- ~ ~ md~u~~ e y.. e ~~! ~ 9~ _ _ _ c A~ _ ~ ~ '.Pe ~ { ~~ C( N ~~~ ~~ ~. i ~ g m ~ ...:J ~ _ 5. n tn % / ~ ~ £ titt V L . u / VI ' cC O _ A'SCRd ~4d` ~" A ~ eas6 ~~ 6 - fi~ ~~ ='4i C( by+.ow~& VmMla ViNfpt Cuc~ia L•aksywN ~. - 4 ~ - 3 V` ~ i s _ ~P~ _ _-~ ~ _ . L_i ,~ , ~ _ __.. - -~ ~ u \/ 5-5-2006 Todd Grange This is a copy of the resolution allowing the addition of the decks to 501 Sneaky Lane I believe this was for permit 1171 of 2002. All work being applied for at this time is inside the boundary of the 2002 resolution. This may be of help in our current application. I would like to ask for exemption of construction and silt fencing of the building envelope. Our proposed scope of work is so small that I feel the act of fencing would create more damage than the actual construction. L~ ol~ a~2%c./~ - I~ ~ 486547 Recorded the ~ia..W of Page: 1 of 1 _m. ~ 08/06/2003 10:S7R_ Rec Lion 0 Record[ SILVTR DgVtS PITKIN GDIMTY CO R 8.00 D 0.gg TN1S DEED, Nade this day of ~ ~ ~ D~~~ , between MICHAEL NSRNBR ,~~ t'~c.r-OS~~ Grontor, for the Consideration of ~" TEN DOLLARS AND OTNER GOCD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION +~* in hand paid, hereby sells and quitclaiRS to 501 SNSARY LAMB, LLC, A COLORADO r~TMTTR^ LIABILITY CONPANY Grantee, whose street address is 1111 LINCOLN RD City of NIAMI BEACH ,Lamy of ,State of 8lorida ,the following real property in the Canty of YITICIN erd State of Colorado, to wit: LOT 2, PARRY SDHDIVISION, ACCORDIDIG TO THS NAP THBRBOP RECORDED .7DNB 28, 1976 1'N PLAT HOO& 6 AT PAGE 124 CODNTY OF PITRIIi, STATB OP COLORADO. also krwun as street and rsarloer 501 SNBA&Y LAMB, ASPEN, CO 61611 TOGETHER with all its eppurtenerxes. The singular rxarher shall include the plural, the plural the singular, and the use of arty gender shall be applicable to all gerwlers. Signed as of the day arc)-Year first above wri ttm. NICHABL 8. NBRNBR---- - State of Plorida ) 55. County of p4~'?/ ) The foregoing instruaent was ackrowledged before aN• this day of by MICHAEL 8. ~VSRNI3R Witra:ss ay hand and official seal. My canmission expires O~niiCC9®Iq ~ 170•~ ~ ~ 4 / (~ "`~ Notary Wllt When recorded return to: MICHAEL B. YERNER Reaolntioa No.11 (SERIES OF 200 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZOTiII'jG CpMIVIISSION APPROVII'iG A STREAM NITA~RO ~ ~ P~~ COU~ER QU~R~O. AT 501 SNEAKY LANE, Parcel No.2735-122-20-002 WHEREAS, the Commwtity Developeat Department received as application firm 501 Sneaky Lane LLC, represented by Alan Richman Plamvng Services, requesting Stream Margia Review approval fora 836 square foot addition on property located at 501 -Sneaky Lane in the City of Aspen. WHEREAS, the applicant's property is a 47,466 sq. ft. lot located in the R-30 PUD Zone District and in an Enviroameutelly Sensitive Area as defined by the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Depatvttent Staff reviewed the Application for compliance with the Stream Margin Review Standards;-and, WHEREAS, the Ciry Engineer, the Parks Department, and the City Fire Department reviewed the developm~t proposal for SDl Sneaky Lane and provided written referral comments as a resort of the Development Review Committee meeting; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application, referral comments, site visits, and the applicable Land Use Code standards, dte Community Development Director recommended approval of the Steam Margin Review with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recomm®dadoi- of the ComnwnitY Developm~t Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public wmar~t at a public heating and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning attd Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development Proposal, with moons, is consistent with the goals and elements ofthe Aspen Area Community Plan; and, ~~RFAC, the Planning and. Zotttttg Commtsstou approves the Stream Margin - Re~~iew request, by a vote of five ib zero (5 - D), and, E00' d GJO °C.0 90/6Z/t,0__-_ ~~ LZ6 uL6 ~-- uo! i~,+ulsucJ i.la~l P! ^ea C ~~ ' WHEREAS, the City of Asper Planning and 7~sing Commission finds that this r for the of public health, safety, sod welfaze. t Resolution furthers and is nesxssary pOn NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: Section 1 Munici Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Pal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission ~ bad a deck addition~at SOl Sneaky~Lane request for two additions totaling 836 square with the following conditions: 1) The Applicant shall"provide upla~lme.Pr°-- ~i 1 Fencing around the ~ use o -all _vegetetion to be moved on site wi the boil ' s7iell call the City Forested ran inspection of this fencing before any construction activities begin. No excavation, storage of materials, pr any other use will occur within this zone during constriction activities. "~ 2) The Applicant s~sall -plar~ construction and silt protection fencing along the " Stream Margin area for protection of the Casfle Creek corridor ore any The A tabell submit a detailed i construction activities are to begin. ,____pPl~ _ •-- _ ._ ._, ~_ ~,......t,o ,; runt to the must be caged for as activities begin.- ~3) The Applicant shall submit a plat prior to recordation at the Pitkin County Clerk ~~ and Recorder indicting ~ proposed building envelope for review and approval by the Comtriunity Development Director and City Engineer. 4) The Applicant shall submit an outdoor lighting plan and exterior lighting cuts sheets that demonstrate compliance with the City of Aspen Lighting ordinance at the tune of Building Permit Submittal. Section 2 as an abatement This resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as heseiri provided, and the same shall be condsicted and co~luded under such prior ordinances. . Section 3 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, please, or portion of this Resohnion is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, s!~h pomon shall be deemed a ~paraze, distinct and independent Provision and shall not afferx the validity of the remaining p thereof Z00'd tl90~G0 90/6Z/40 'bb90 !JG 0G6 uo!i~isuoJ 1-ia~l P!^eQ ..0 ^~ ~'. C Section ~ made ~, ~ Applicant pursuarrt to the All material representations and t~mmitments whedter ~ public hearing or development Proposal aPPt'o`~ as herein a dan Commission, are hereby documentation presented before the Planning incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if lolly set fords herein, unless amended by an audro~ized entity. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on March 14, 2002_ APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney PLA~tNING AND ZONING COMIVII.SSYON: Jasmine Tygre, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk b00'd y90~G0 9pJ6ZJb0 'bla'J0 LZ6 0L6 uo11~35uaJ 1.lagwel Pll+ap ATTACHMENT 2~-LAND USE APPLICATION 4PPLICANr: ~ H %++.: f3 r, ~ t F/ 3 j / 3 s Name: /y r c ~/ ~ e Location: 5 ° / S.vc~ .< /!`~ -~ e % ii /~•• vr. s: f e!r v : s (Indicate street address, lot & block number legal description where appmp ~ te) REPRESENTATIVE: Name: qvi~/ ~9 6~// C°N S/rst/%°H Address: ~ ~X / 7 ~ ~ ~'t s, / % ~ ~~~ ~'~ Phone #: °} 7 0 - ~! ~ 7 ^ 5~' 9 3 ~ . .~ Name: H%o4 Address: ro/ Sg t~ /f ~.~ ~f~ rd ,~ 9' 7 ° - 9 .Z 7 - ~ 3 9 ~j 5 YW O 6 S / F /9/i. /Y.+~- /.~ .. ,.,.,. ..•...,.,. h.ta.,~o rhPrk all that annlvl: 1 Trc Vl' a~rra.,a.r+uv... u,......... _~~_ - U -- --r ^ r ., Conceptual PUD ^ Conceptual Historic De~rt. ^ se Conditional i ^ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ^ Final Historic Development ^ ^ ew Special Rev Design Review Appeal ^ Conceptual SPA ^ Minor Historic DevL ^ GMQS Allotment ^ Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) ^ Historic Demolition ^ GMQS Exemption ^ Subdivision ^ Historic Designation ^ ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream ^ Subdivision Exemption (includes ^ .Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane ^ ~~ ^ Lot Split ^ Temporary Use ^ Lot Line Ad~ustment ^ Text/Ma Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (des ~ Gon of existin buildin ,uses, revious va]s, etc.) S ,S/ Ff., ~ r~r;o/y~r 5/rte r,~t's ~cli• y_/.. ?.aa1, PRO/PIOSAL: (descri tion of roposed buildin ,uses, modifications, etc.) If t we e S w~ /c ~r gs / / {fit y 'v~is 4 4r~.~ /~ 5 rs !f %- /~ W r/f c Have you attached the following? ~~ Dom' $ Pre-Application Conference Summary ® Attachment #1, Signed-Fee Agreement ^ Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form ^ Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards All plans that are larger than 85" z 11" must be folded and a floppy disk with an electronic copy of all written tent (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. .~ J - ATTACHMENT 4-CONT'D-SUBMITTAL KEY d ~ 1. Iand Use ApPfiatba wiPo 12. Accnnte deatioas (in rdauon b floor, ean sea Ievd) of the I sys[w in. the era of the propose subdivisicn. The mmwrs of dre plat shall i Applicant's name, address and tdephme wrnained witltin a Idter signed number ~ m iucluding basrment, ne be of suP5dwt ddail m ddvm whether the proposed svbdivkim will , by the appflaot smmg the namq address, ~ subslmtia0y improvd strrrchaes: a ifiatim end rrxmdatim of [he amml med the design ate Prnsrraot to and telephone number of Poe resentative authorized m ad m behalf re ver devatim m niatim W man sa level m ~~."k Gm b I18m. 26.4gp.060(3)20. p of the appfiant. - - which my atnrcme k wnsfraeted; demonstatim that eU new waswctim or e plan showing bating A laedsn 21 2. 77re street address and legal hich subsmntial improvemwis wrll be anchored m preveal flotation, collapse m p . siu, and type of propoarxl laodsape -deaeriptiou of the pared on w lateral movemwt of wy sWclure m be fatines. devdopmwt k ProP08ed m occur. consurrcted a impoved; a demonstmtim _ t m 3. A disdrrsnre of ownership of the that the slnrdure will havedevated m at inclding bas®wt, fl wdor~ tom the chap[rr, aod terms of this ' .pfimd m which devdopmwt k proposrd oe, ast two (2) fed above the bass flood l ~~ of this tCle indieatm8 Poet m rWu f to occur, emsistin8 of s crmwt cvtificate e all es eenified by a registered tion v l or further whdrvisim may be)yamrd fl w or from a title insurance rnPanY, attorney licwsed m practice in Poe State of , e a e fessiooal wgtneer or architect Pro t these bts nor will additiaoal amts be bo withom recdpt of applicable approvak Cabado, listing the names of all owners A laridsape plan that vrcludes 13 and growth ~aOt m of the and all rmngages, judgorwts~lieos~, emwts, wntracis and . native vegeatve screwing of m lass than t as aflocatim pursant m raoagemwt . CbeP[Q 26.470. agreemwis affecting Poe pared. and of the devdopmw fitty (50) perewt iewed 5om the rar (sbpe) of the pareeL dwroasuating Poe owner s right m apply ti v All vegetative screwing shall be ~_ 7be predse wordusg of ary rra for the I)evebpmem Applia maintained io papemiry and shall be proposed amwdm®t- ,:4~ An g 12" x ll^ vidatry map bating replaced with the same or coayaable Site Plan or plans drawn m a scale of 24 `itie subject pared within Poc £iry of material should it die . one (I„) inrL ~~ im (]0') feet m erne ~~' - . ~ . ~ ~ • '. - ~ °. . '. ". '. 14. Site secitorrs drown by a regrsleed r (1'7 inch Wank twenty (20') red. iochrding before and "after" photographs l • 5. A site improvwrwt survey including th in Imdsape architect, er archrteQ shall be submiSed showing aU ineer en (rtimrrlatims) specrfyrng tbe bahm of i i e g toW8aPhY and vegdatim s)nw currwt status of the pared evtified by a g existing and proposed -site demwts, Poe rxtinwt elevations and l f on ss transm amwoas, roPPon surrch¢a, buildings audlm oPoer aceessory t>ses, licwsed in the registered land surveyor, p ope, s cop o - esa level b access, parking, ferrtts, sign, luting, State of Cobado. (This raquiremwt, m . ov a kads<.ap~ eras and all adjacent lead my part Poerwf, may be waived by the if osed devatbos of Poe Pro I5 user within oue-hmdred fiil)' (150') fat. N Community Devdopmwt Departmem m a p . including my rmflop development Srrch P~ and dawings shorr w i R the project is ddermined riot m wana . equipmwt and how it will be screwed. ev e w with the S~ p1Pbe°oa survey locum®t.) ~ 6. - A site plea depicting the proposed l i ' 16. Proposed elevations of the including wy rooftop mw[ devdo 25. FAA and FCC Coordtrutioo. f ca s phys -layom .and the Project d it' p , mwt and how it will be screwed. ui Stateorents regarding Poe regulatroas o ti i i s relationship m the land an p W on stra n Poe Federal Aviatim Adm srraormdings. A akde<cL plan ofthe site showing 17 (FAA) and the Federal Commmiatiom ~ A writiw description of the 7 . existing and PrnP~d faDnes which are Corrmussion (FCC). . proposal and a writtw explaoatim of relevantto the review. 26. Structural lntegdry Repoct Soma how a proposed devdopmwt ce~Ges h torn hundred aa:h (l Gne 1 professional mgtneer licwsed in Poe - e with the review standards [elevmt m t i ~ ~ ~ ary ~p sbowng the State ofCoknado. on. devdopmem applicat toter m of Poe proposed sulydivisioq a i ll _ _ 2 ~Om on 8. Plan with Eriafing erect Proposed adjacnt lauds owned by k~ opt ~~~ existing wireless wrnmonly pliant t w Poe a f , p oo gads at two-four cmtmrrs. wiPo 5ve- and the wne distiicl m which telem®uniatim services facility landmarks intutals for grades over tw (10) perewt. , the proposed subdivisim and adjacwt site imhrding wvrragd mler&xwce aoalysk and capacity analysis and a 9. Proposed dmtioos of the devek~wt pmpemes are totaled brief sintemmt as m other reasons for A deseription of proposed ]0 19. A plat which reflects the layom of success m m success. . anstrudion techniques m be used the lots, blocks a~ slruchrres in the proposed subdivkioa "Ibe plat shall 28. Ndghborhood bock plan at m m F au g ag l 1. A Plan with the 100-yar Ooodplain ba dawn at a scale of one (1) Wrrsk me 1"=50' (available 5om City hundred (100) fed or large. Arehitectmal Departm®t) Graphically show the front fine and Poe high watt ling .,.°~, ons of all existing bmldings m boPo Caies are n0[ eCCeptablE. Shed alrC shalt portr S be twwry-Four (24) inchrs by Poirty-six sides of the block and then sdbadr from (36) inches. If it k necessary to place the Poe stred in fed Identify parking and plat on more than a me (1) shed, m index fiom wtry for each building and bate dwelling units abng the sso ry shall be included m the fast shat. A eny acce (Continued on Wert page.) t alle h f ir e vicinity map sha0 ako appear m t y. s shed showing the suldivkim as it relates to Poe rest of Poe ci and Poe sued _,, .~ 8. Sufficient water pressure and other utilities are available to service the proposed i ---_; development. 9. Adequate roads are available to serve the proposed development, and said roads can be properly maintained. 10. Adequate ingress and egress is available to the proposed development so as to ensure adequate access for fire protection and snow removal equipment. 11. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan: Pazks/Recreationlfraiis Plan are implemented in the proposed developmenk to the greatest extent practical. (Ord. No. 55-2000, § 7) 26.435.040 Stream Margin Review. A. ApplicabIIity. The provisions of the Stream Mazgin Review shall mater line of development within one hundred (100) feet, measured horizontally, from the high the Roaring Fork River and its tributary streams, and to all development within the Flood Hazard Area, also known as the 100-Year flood plain. B. Exemptions. Tlie Community Development Director may exempt the following types of development within tlfe Stream Mazgin Review area: ("``t L Construction of pedestrian or automobile bridges, public trails, or structures for imgation, drainage, flood control or water diversion, bank stabilization, provided plans and specifications aze submitted to the City Engineer demonstrating ~ flows~antd the engineered to prevent blockage of drainage channels during p Community Development Duector determines the proposed structure complies, to the . extent practical, with the Stream Mazgin Review Standazds. 2. Construction of improvements essential for public health and safety which cannot be reasonably accommodated outside of the "no development azea" prescribed by this ~$ection including, but not limited to, potable water systems, sanitary sewer, utilities, and fire suppression systems provided the Community Development Director determines the development complies, to the extent practical, with the Stream Mazgin Review Standards. 3. ;The expansion, remodeling, or reconstruction of an existing development provided the following standards are met: a. The development does not add more than ten (10) percent to the floor azea of the existing structure or increase the amount of building area exempt from floor area calculafions by more than twenty-five (25) percent. All stream mazgin exemptions are cumulative. Once a development reaches these totals, a Stream Margin Review by the Planning and Zoning Commission is required; and, City of Aspen Land Use Code. June, 2005. Part 400, Page 67 ...~ ~~ b. The development does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit would be required pursuant to Chapter 13.20 of this Code. c. The development is located such that no portion of the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction will be any closer to the high water line than is the existing development; '~ d. The development does not fall outside of an approved building envelope if one has been designated through a prior review; and e. "The expansion, remodeling or reconstruction will cause no increase to the amount of ground coverage of structures within the 100-year flood plan. C. Stream Margin Review Standards. No development shall be permitted within the Stream Margin of the Roaring Fork River. unless the Community Development Director makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below: 1. It can be demonstrated that any proposed development which is in the Special Flood Hazazd Area will not increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepazed by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State of Colorado which shows that the base flood elevation will not be raised, including, but not limited to, proposing mitigation techniques on or off-site which compensate for any base flood elevation increase caused ~':.' `' by the development; and _.. 2. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan: Parks/Recreation/Open Space/Trails Plan and the Roaring Fork River Greenway Plan are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable. Areas of historic public use or access shall be dedicated via a recorded easement for public use. A fisherman's easement granting public fishing access within the high water boundaries of the river course shall be granted via a recorded "Fisherman's Easement;" and 3. There is no vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes (cut or fill) made outside of a specifically defined building envelope. A building envelope shall be designated by this review and said envelope shall be designated by this review and said envelope shall be recorded on a plat pursuant to Section 26.435.040(F)(1); and 4. The proposed development does not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary, including erosion and/or sedimentation during construction. Increased on-site drainage shall be accommodated within the pazcel to prevent entry into the river or onto its banks. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained outside of the designated building envelope; and S. Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Boazd prior to any alteration or relocation of a water course, and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal [~. Emergency Management Agency; and City of Aspen Land Use Code. June, 2005. Part 400, Page 68 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Aureement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and /t7 %~y ~ < ~ ~3• ~<<' h ~ / (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has sub~r9~itted to CITY an application for (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee structwe for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining Beater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally requved fmdings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full Fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ G 9 S which is for '~ hows of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimbwse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $225.00 per planner how over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failwe to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT Chris Bendon Community Development Director g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doc 2/01/2006 /q y ~' 4a Dale: S -~~'O ~ 13-x i ~ z ~ i3, s, ~T ^.. gig xi 970- 727_x'393 7.~7 - ~8 3~ F*+t May 11 2006 12:13PM 1 } MIH aw~531-1017 p.l hWY-10-2006 1a=34 1`2x1+2 752 2949 __ 1212 75Z 2449 P.01iB1 Misi,ad a warner 3136 Liacaha Anna. sa~ita soB Miami Bemh, Florida 33339 Q[!le ~e•31KS4311-'~•yr:305-80~-75't3. ~. vlq FwCSI1VQ[.E 9979-Sts-o61o May 19, 2006 Re: S01 Snaky Lane Te Wlwm [t Msy Concern: 1 hmcby nutlaria I?svid 1.aro6r+t Caa~tractioa b ad as my agent fos tip satuivD mar6et revie.V. 7t,e comtarx at David lambe+t Cons~tioa is Alan Ataold- W1+mBar. POg 1727. Bwk, CO 61621, Lic phone11910-Stt-0691. Sincerely; BY:~lrl;cl~! a. wesna By: 501 SacskY I ai~g I.L.C. mra P.R7 Receptiart#e Recortk I WIII ~.,I,II ~I ~ ~I, ~~ III ~III~~Il 088/8652003 10:57R~ SILVIR DPVIB PITKIN COUNTY CO R 6.00 D 0.00 - THIS DEED, Made this day of 1 - ~ D ~~ between MICHAEL TfBRNER ~~ " v~ `Ti~+~OSy~~ Grantor, for the consideration of *" TEN DOLLARS AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION •t4 in hand paid, hereby sells and qui teleiaa: to 501 SNHAICY LANE, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITBD LIABILITY COMPANY Grantee, whose street address is 1111 LINCOLN RD City of MIAMI BSACH ,County of ,State of 8loxida the following reel property in the Casty of PITRIN end State of Colorado, to wit: LOT 2, PARRY SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THS MAP TAHRSOP RBCORDSD JUNE 28, 1978 ]N PLAT BOOR 6 AT PAGB 124 COIINTY OF PITRIN, STATE OP COLORADO. also knoxn as street and rsRber 501 SNEAKY LAMB, ASPEN, CO 61611 TOGETHER with all its appurtenances. The singular nuaber shell fnclude the plural, the plural the singular, and the use of arty gender shall be applicable to all genders. Signed as of the day and year first above written. MICNASL H. N8RN8R State of Plorida ) s~ ~ ~ ) ss. County of ,~J ) The foregoing instruomt was acknowledged before sN• this day of by MICHABL H. WHRNBR Witness ary hand and official seal. ~/la~'l/ '~ 1~.~~- Ry conmission expir¢s v~a~~~~~~~~ Notary ublic ~asft111a `~ Baellsf• b~~~ ~ HatllY 4. is When recorded return to: NICIUEL B. WERNER 5-8-2006 City of Aspen Application for exemption from stream mazgin review per 26.435.040 Stream Mazgin Review section B, item 3, a through e. 3 a. Total FAR is 5426 sq ft, used FAR is 5372 sq ft, unused is 54 sq ft. Propose deck addition of 105 sq ft is 2% of existing building azea Total existing deck azea is 1469 sq ft. Proposed deck addition of 105 sq ft is 7% of existing deck azea New total deck azea is 1574 sq ft. This is 29 % of the allowed FAR. 3 b. No trees are to be removed. 3 c. No portion is closer to the high water line than existing. 3 d. The development is with in the building envelope. 3 e. The development is not in the 100 yeaz flood plane. -~, ~' ~~ Nan^amFl ~ a ~ a ; ~°eq ^ E SuPe flE n irba oya ~ k - aye 3 y ~ ~ n b B` PD o ya g \lencn>r fl ~ 00 Saler}~ a U N ` o 2 ¢ Fw^.5ti ~ eR ~4e0 R1ouVam View p; $ ° ~ a 0. o Conamvaatl Cir A Snm Munny(n °a h O,- c5 pp n Bumyp 4- ~ ~. e'e fa' ~. ~i 4 v f~ S° - , `` ` ' ~7 tea 8 5 L , f~ AY _ e 4 ~ y~^Rh °< 6icespie 5l F _ .•S hbry St z 2 ® ' l °' m S"ePSrersl !'7~ ~ > ^Bep a ~ a ,. ... S...« 21^eia.yl e g Moron GeekflE a ~*°~ hfa%•a St ~. f ea'Slf' r .• +` o a°5 ~htip C\ Hnnkna Av o g e °c m g ~D £ ~• ~' ~ c ^ ° pyyin t ~ M un\ein _ ~patr Pl to l~ tbs Clq~~Tr ~ u AVSGPe P~ ° s`o. ^ ^ - Sievers Cv F gF pwiga.Gs - Greya a\ueMn~t.Tr _ o° Wau; P\ ,. Gn^ 0~ ~n Ct (amN In M ` pa Csscaae ln~tipw ~' N Th~ q ~ ~ ~~~~Pa ea ^ ~f ~v A 4 ° a vY YNSC v ya' St nWeY ^' W HS~en ? ~ ^ acnase o. slee m 5 m~,^w" highlands - 2- ' gF Fa. a ~ ~ ~ y ". ® i MAP KEY _I ~~~ ~a s-s-zoo6 Todd Change This is a copy of the resolution allowing the addition of the decks to s01 Sneaky Lane . I believe this was for permit 1171 of 2002. All work being applied for at this time is inside the boundary of the 2002 resolution. This may be of help in out current application. I would like to ask for exemption of construction and silt fencing of the building envelope. Our proposed scope of work is so small that I feel the act of fencing would create more damage than the actual construction. AG~ olGa/2i./~ i J Resolution No. 11 (SERIES OF 2002) RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLAN,VING AND ZONING COMMISSION AT 501 SNEAKY LANE, CIMTY OF ASP PITKIN CO NTY, OLLORADTO. Parcel No, 2735.12?r20-002 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from 501 Sneaky Lane LLCroreal for at836 y care f o addition on Pmperiy located at SOg Stream Margin Review app ~1 Sneaky Lane in the City of Aspen. WHEREAS, the applicant's property is a 47,466 sq. R. lot located in the R-30 PUD Zone District and in an Environmentally Sensitive Area as defined by the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the ,Application for compliance with the Stream Margin Revrew Standazds;.and, WHEREAS, the City Engineer, the Parks Department, a~ui the City Fire Department reviewed the development proposal for 501 Sneaky Lane and provided written referral comments as a result of the Development Review Committee meeting; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application, referral comments, site visits, and the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval of the Steam Mazgin Review with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public cornmeal at a public hearing; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistern with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Cotnmissiou approves the Stream b4argin Review request, by a vote of five to zero (5 - 0), and, bb90 LZ6 0L6 uoia~aasuo9 a.aagwe~ prep E00'd H90 ~L0 90/6Z/40 WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and "Loving Commission fords that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the pramotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: Section 1 Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the Stream Margin Review request for two additions totaling 836 square feet and a deck addition at 501 Sneaky Lane with the following conditions: 1) The Applicant shall~provide upland tree protecfi~n-fFncxng +n h ~ n__f~~l Fencing amend the me o all vegetation to be saved on site wrthi et of the buildingerrvelspe-TTie Applicant shall call the City Forester or an inspection of this fencing before any construction activities begin. No excavation, storage of materials, or any other use will occur writhin this zone during construction activities. 2j The Applicant spell ~laEe construction and silt .protection fencing along the Stream Margin area for protection of the Castle Creek corridor~e~ore any construction activities are to begin. The A li nt;;hall submit a detailed n fencing plan detailing_.the.p_rotected area along the_riveili _.___prior_tothe^ - •- - app rcatiott of building pemuts.,C~-ity~o;ester_must be called for an inspection e ore any construction .activities begin. ~ ~3) Tho Applicant shall submit a plat prior to recordation at the Pitkin County Clerk -~`- and Recorder indicating the proposed building envelope for review and approval by the Comttiuttity Development Director and City Engineer. 4) The Rpplicant shall submit an outdoor lighting plan and exterior lightitg cuts sheets that demonstrate compliance with the Citp of Aspen Lighting ordinance at the time of Building Permit Subrnittal. Section 2 This resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repeated or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 3 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of dris Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Z00'd H90~L0 90J6ZJb0 bb90 LZ6 0L6 uoii~n.llsuo~ l.iagwe~ pineQ Section 4 All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on March 19, 2002. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND 7.ONING COMMISSION: City Attorney 'ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerlc b00'd Fi90 ~G0 90/9Z1b0 Jasmine Tygre, Chair bb90 GZ6 0G6 uo i a~aa suo~ l.aagwel p i neQ