Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.485 Rio Grande Pl.0044.2008.ASLU-, THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER PARCEL ID NUMBER PROJECTS ADDRESS PLANNER CASE DESCRIPTION REPRESENTATIVE DATE OF FINAL ACTION 0044.2008.ASLU 273707347851 485 RIO GRANDE ERRIN EVANS FINAL SPA JODI SMITH PITKIN COUNTY 4.15.09 CLOSED BY Angela Scorey on 10/29/2009 --, ~. DEVELOPMENT ORDER of the City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pwsuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pwsuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-yeaz vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pwsuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Pitkin County, 485 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, Colorado, 81611 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number Lots 1 and 5, Pitkin County Center, Asaen, Colorado, more commonly known as Pitkin County Jail 485 Rio Grande Place. Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property The Aaalicant received approval to allow fora 324 square feet addition to house critical data equipment and computer servers located on the north side of the building_ Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Grant of an approval of a Specially Planned Area amendment and Growth Mana¢ement Review by the City Council and associated approvals via Ordinance No 5. Series of 2009. April 13 2009. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) April 26. 2009 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) Anril 26, 2012 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 27th day of April, 2009, by the City of Aspen Community Development Chris Bendon, Community Development Director '/ l"'n a~3fio~3~+~$51 File Edit Record Navigate Form Reports Format Tab Help ,, j D`1~ D P.,P ~ ~ _ 'J ~ •~ ~-' ~ ~ i; a a r1 ~ ~ Jump 1 .r' ? Maim Custom Fields ~ Fees Fee Summary ~j Valuation ~I Actions l Routing History ~l Conditions (~ Parcels ~) Sub Permits 0 a '. Permit Type Permit # 0044.2008.ASLU y ~ ', Address 485 RIO GRADE ~ AptlSuite °-~ i City ASPEN State CO = Zrp 81611 Y .........................~..........._ ._..~._• --•_-. --~ _ Permit Information.- -- ----~ - - - - - A ~. i MaskerPermit~u ~ RoufingQueue aslu07 Applied 10~06~20i o Project ~ Status pending ~ Approved `~ ~' Description FINAL 6PA Issued ~~ Final Submitted JDDI SMITH 920-5396 Clack' Running Days i ~ Exprces 10/01~20i Owner Last Name PITKIN COUNTY ~ First Name 506 E MAIN ST Phone ~~~! ASPEN CO 81611 ~ OwnerlsAppficant? A~lica Last Name PITKIN COUNTY ~ First Name 506 E MAIN ST (~ Phone ( Cust # ASPEN CD 81611 23497 ends Last Name ~ Fust Name Phone ~~ _ _..m......... _._ E) nter t he permit tvoe code ~~ ~~ a~„o.,ra,wrtit -C- ' ~~ ~av~~\S~ ~~ ~ b, MEMORANDUM TO• Mayor Ireland and Aspen City Council FROM: Errin Evans, Current Planner' ~/~jJ~~ THRU: Chris Bendon, Community Development Director(.~~/r' DATE OF MEMO: MEETING DATE: January 28`h, 2009 February 23rd, 2009 RE; Pitkin County Jail - 485 Rio Grande Place -Specially Planned Area Amendment and Growth Management Review First Reading of Ordinance No. ~ Series of 2009 APPLICANT/OWNER: STAFFt\C.COMMENDATION: Jodi Smith, Pitkin County Facilities Staff recommends that the Mayor and City Council Manager /Pitkin County approve the request to construct an addition to the County Jail Building with conditions. REPRESENTATIVE: Stan Clauson Associates, Inc. LOCATION: Pitkin County Jail - 485 Rio Grande Place; Legal Description - Pitkin County Center Lot 1 and Lot 5 of the Rio Grande Subdivision; Parcel Identification Number - 2735-182-19-002 CURRENT ZONING & USE Located in the Public (PUB) zone district with a Specially Planned Area (SPA) overlay containing public buildings such as the County Court House and the County Jail. PROPOSED LAND USE: The Applicant is requesting to construct an addition to house servers. SUMMARY: The Applicant requests of the Council to approve the SPA Amendment and Growth Management review in order to build an addition on the site. Revised 1/30/2009 Page 1 of 11 Photo of the subject property '~,,, /"A ~/ BACKGROUND: Currently, some of the City and County servers and other data equipment are stored in the County Jail Building. The space where the equipment is housed is not large enough. The County would like to construct an addition to accommodate the equipment and future expansions of the equipment. The applicant proposes to add an addition to the Pitkin County Jail Building at 485 Rio Grande Place to accommodate data equipment and computer servers (See Application -Exhibit D). The subject property has a Specially Planned Area (SPA) overlay upon it and the SPA needs to be amended to incorporate the addition. On December 16`h and January 6a' the Planning and Zoning Commission approved resolutions to make a recommendation to Council to approve the SPA Amendment and the Growth Management Review respectively. LAND USE REQUEST AND REVIEW PROCEDURES: The applicant is requesting the following land use approvals from the City Council: SPA Amendment pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.440.050 A. This application does not qualify for an administrative amendment. All modifications shall be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and Council. This proposal does qualify For Consolidated Review. In this case, the conceptual and final plans may be combined based on the scope of the project. The Planning and Zoning Commission, at a public Revised 1/30/2009 Page 2 of 11 Figure 1: Vicinity Map ~, ~w/ f•'i hearing, may make a recommendation to the City Council for. approval, approval with conditions or disapproval of the SPA amendment. The City Council is the final authority. • Growth Management Ouota System -Essential Public Facilities pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.470.090 4. Any development to an essential public facility requires the Planning and Zoning Commission, at a public hearing, to make a recommendation to the City Council for approval, approval with conditions or disapproval of the Growth Management Review. The City Council is the final authority. PROJECT SUMMARY: The project consists of adding apre-fabricated structure to the north side of the County Jail building. The facade of the structure will be covered with a brick treatment to match the existing building. The structure is approximately 10 feet high and 324 square feet (see Figure 2). SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA AMENDMENT REVIEW: Since the original Specially Planned Area, known as the Rio Grande SPA Plan, was approved in 1977, many amendments and changes to approvals have occurred on this site (see Exhibit C for a Revised 1/30/2009 Page 3 of 11 Figure 2.• The new addition in relation to the existing buuatng. ~ "a ~/ list). The SPA approval was not very detailed at that time. The property was designated for County use; however items that would now be required to be documented in a current SPA plan were not accounted for. Building elevations, allowable floor area, open space and other dimensional standards that may be customized to accommodate the needs of an SPA were not outlined in the original approvals for this SPA. Later in 1993, the Rio Grande Master Plan was approved. That plan was designed to guide land use patterns for undeveloped land in the Rio Grande area. The County Jail parcel is located just outside the scope of that plan. Ordinance No. 10 of Series of 1993 does indicate that the property north of the County building is intended for future additions to the County Jail. Since then, the Civic Master Plan was adopted, replacing the Rio Grande Master Plan. The Civic Master Plan was created to implement goals and principles around the Civic Core, including Galena Plaza and the Rio Grande Park. The County Jail Building is located in the Civic Core; however this plan does not provide for specific building dimensions. Recently, a process was initiated to create the Zupancas-Galena Master Plan that includes the County buildings, but it does not appear that the plan will be finalized in the near future. None of the past plans or ordinances outline future details for additions to the County Jail, with one exception, Ordinance 10 of Series 1993. That Ordinance does make accommodations for future additions, though it is unclear whether or not those additions were the intended to be for the substantial construction that was approved in 1995. Staff Comments There are few items to review for this proposed addition because the current SPA is vague and does not define any future plans for buildings on the site. The underlying zone district for this SPA is the Public zone district. The dimensional requirements in this zone district are set by the adoption of the final development plan; however no dimensional requirements were set in any of the final plans or amendments to the plans. The building is proposed to be located over a lot line between Lot 1 and Lot 5. This is not permitted by the building code. If approved, the applicant will be required to apply for a lot line adjustment prior to applying for a building permit. This can be done administratively. Also the applicant will be required to work with the Parks Department to achieve an approved landscaping plan. The proposed addition will not require any mitigation for growth management. The addition will not create any new employees or create new net leasable space. Staff would prefer to see a master plan that encompasses the long term future goals and needs of the County buildings. Regardless, the Planning and Zoning Commission decided to recommend approval to Council. It is preferable to see an addition that relates to the building and integrates into the location. Based on the information that was submitted with the application, it appears that the applicant has attempted to reduce the visual impacts that the addition may have on the surrounding properties. The applicant has added a matching roof line and added more landscaping to integrate the addition into the existing structure more effectively. Revised 1/30/2009 Page 4 of 11 ~ .~-, ~.,,, ,.: GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEW: The Planning and Zoning Commission adopted a resolution to recommend to Council to approve this application on January 6th for Growth Management Review. This addition will be used to store technical computer equipment. There will be no employees working in the unit except for routine equipment checks nor will the addition generate new employees. There will be no new net leasable commercial or office space created as defined by the Land Use Code: "Net leasable commercial and office space: Those areas within a commercial or office building which aze, or which are designed to be, leased to a tenant and occupied for commercial or office purposes, exclusive of any area including, but not necessarily limited to, azeas dedicated to bathrooms, stairways, circulation corridors, mechanical staging areas and storage azeas provided, however, that these azeas are used solely by tenants on the site." Staff Comments This application is required to undergo review under Growth Management because it is an addition to an essential public facility. Since no new net leasable area is created, there are no reguirements for growth management mitigation. RECOMMENDATION: While reviewing the proposal, staff believes that the application is generally minor in nature. It appears to be consistent with the final development approvals of the vazious amendments to the SPA. It does not substantially change the exterior of the building and the same materials will be used on the faFade and the roof features will match the existing building. Staff prefers to see a Master Plan that addresses the long term needs for this site. Community Development Department staff recommends that the City Council approve the amendment to the SPA and approve the Growth Management Review. If the Council decides to approve the addition, it is advised that they do so with the following conditions: 1) The applicant will be required to apply for a lot line adjustment or otherwise remedy the building location proposed to be over a lot line. The Building Code does not permit buildings to span lot lines. 2) The applicant is required to remove snow or store accumulated snow on site. Snow is not permitted to be relocated to the Rio Grande Pazk to limit damage to the sprinkler heads. 3) The landscaping rocks must be removed from the right-of--way. 4) The building permit shall include a landscaping plan that provides for: tree protection, plant spacing, seed mix and irrigation, and weed management. CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS: Revised 1/30/2009 Page5of11 .~. ..- ,-~. RECOMMENDED MOTION: If the City Council chooses to approve the proposed amendment and rowth management review, they may use this motion "I move to adopt Ordinance No. ~ ,Series of 2009 upon first reading." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -Staff Findings Exhibit B -List of prior plans and approvals Exhibit C -SPA from 1977 Exhibit D -Application Revised 1/30/2009 Page 6 of 11 ~, r •a.i CITY COUNCIL AGENDA February 23, 2009 5:00 P.M. I) Call to Order II) Roll Call III) Scheduled Public Appearances Outstanding Employee Bonus Awards IV) Citizens Comments 8~ Petitions (Time for any citizen to address Council on issues NOT on the agenda. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes) V) Special Orders of the Day a) Mayor's Comments b) Councilmembers' Comments c) City Manager's Comments d) Board Reports VI) Consent Calendar (These matters maybe adopted together by a single motion) a) Minutes -February 9, 2009 b) Resolution #12, 2009 -Contract- Castle Creek Hydroelectric Environmental Study c) Request for Food & Wine Banners on Main Street Light Poles VII) First Reading of Ordinances a) Ordinance #4, 2009 -Approving an SPA Amendment for Aspen Institute P.H. 319 b) Ordinance #5, 2009 -SPA Amendment Pitkin County Jail c) Ordinance #6, 2009 -Growth Management Aspen Ambulance District VIII) Public Hearings a) Ordinance #3, 2009 -Adopting Instant Runoff Voting Procedures b) Ordinance #2, 2009 - Buckhorn Lodge Deed Restriction IX) Action Items a) Resolution #13, 2009 - SIA Amendment -Hannah Dustin Building X) Information Items XI) Adjournment Next Regular Meeting March 9. 2009 COUNCIL SCHEDULES A 15 MINUTE DINNER BREAK APPROXIMATELY 7 P.M. ,,~„ , Ordinance No. ~ (SERIES OF 2009) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, TO APPROVE A SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA AMENDMENT AND A GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEW FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING AN ADDITION TO THE PITKIN COUNTY JAIL BUILDING LOCATED AT 485 RIO GRANDE PLACE, LEGALLY KNOWN AS LOTS 1 AND 5, PITKIN COUNTY CENTER, CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO Parcel Identification Number 2737-073-47-851 & 2737-073-06-855 WHEREAS, Stan Clauson Associates, Inc. located at 412 North Mill Street, Aspen, Colorado on behalf of Pitkin County, 530 E. Main Street, Aspen, Colorado, submitted a request for a Specially Planned Area Amendment dated October 6th, 2008 to the Community Development Department; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located at 485 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, the pazcels aze identified as parcel numbers 2737-073-47-851 & 2737-073-06-855, and the legal description of the property is: Pitkin County Center, Lot 1 and 5, City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado; and WHEREAS, the Specially Planned Area approval for the Property was originally approved by the Aspen City Council in 1977 and again for the Rio Grande Master Plan in Ordinance No. 10 Series of 1993; and WHEREAS, the current request is to receive approval from the City Council for a Specially Planned Area amendment to amend the SPA and Growth Management Review to permit the construction of a 324 squaze feet addition to allow for storage of data equipment and computer servers; and .-. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and considered the application for a Specially Planned Area Amendment Review and Growth Management Review, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on December 16th, 2008 and January 6'~, 2009 respectively. The Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 36 of Series 2008 and Resolution No. 1 of Series 2009 to recommend that the City Council approve the application; and, WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed and considered the application for a Specially Planned Area Amendment Review pursuant to Code section 26.440.050 under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein and Growth Management Review as pursuant to Code section 26.470.090, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director and the Planning and Zoning Commission, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on December 16th, 2008; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended approval of the request; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO IN REGULAR MEETING ASSEMBLED, THAT: Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the City Council hereby approves the of the Specially Planned Area Amendment and Growth Management review as requested for the Property. The recommendation of approval granted herein is conditioned on the following: 1. The applicant is required to remove snow or store accumulated snow on site. Snow is not permitted to be relocated to the Rio Grande Park to limit damage to the sprinkler heads. z ,~* 2. 3. 4. The applicant will be required to apply for a lot line adjustment or otherwise remedy the building location proposed to be over a lot line. The Building Code does not permit buildings to span lot lines. Remove the landscaping rocks from the right-of--way as per the Engineering Department. The Parks Department requires a landscaping plan be provided with the building permit that provides for: a. Tree Protection: A vegetation protection fence shall be erected at the drip line of each individual tree or groupings of trees remaining on site and their represented drip lines. A fonnal plan indicating the location of the tree protection will be required for the bldg permit set. No excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction backfill, and storage of equipment, foot or vehicle traffic allowed within the drip line of any tree remaining on site. This fence must be inspected by the city forester or his/her designee before any construction activities are to commence. b. Plant Spacing: Appropriate spacing will be required for all new plantings. Coniferous Trees will require adequate spacing between trees and distance from buildings or structures to allow for mature growth. Deciduous Trees will require adequate spacing from structures to accommodate mature growth in height. c. Seed Mix and Irrigation: Applicant shall use the City of Aspen approved native seed mix and a temporary or permanent irrigation system will be required for establishment. d. Weed Management: Applicant shall detail and define how it will manage noxious weeds during the seed establishment period. Section 3: This Ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 5: A public hearing on this ordinance shall be held the 23rd day of March, 2009, in the City Council Chambers, 130 S. Galena, 15 days prior to which public notice shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. 3 r .~ .-~, INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the _ day of , 2009. Michael C. Ireland, Mayor Attest: Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk FINALLY adopted, passed and approved this _ day of , 2009. Michael C. Ireland, Mayor Attest: Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk Approved as to form: John P. Worcester, City Attorney ~* '"' ~~,, t .; EXHIBIT A 26 440 050 Review Standards for development in a Specially Planned Area In the review of a development application for a conceptual development plan and a final development plan, the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council must consider the following: 1. Whether the proposed development is compatible with or enhances the mix of development in the immediate vicinity of the parcel in terms of land use, density, height, bulk, architecture, landscaping and open space. The addition to the County Jail is a fairly small structure, measuring 324 square feet and approximately 10 feet high. It is a pre fabricated structure that will be placed in the rear of the building facing Obermeyer Place and the Rio Grande Park. The addition will have a brick treatment to match the existing Jail Building and the roofline will be altered to match the existing building. The existing building is shown below in Figure A. The addition is proposed to be located where the picnic table is now sitting. Figure A -The existing building. The location was chosen because the County Buildings seem to be a stable use in the downtown campus area. The future of some other considered locations may change and require removal of the equipment. The equipment cannot be housed within the Court House, City Hall or other buildings for several reasons: the older buildings are not climate controlled, the wiring systems are too dated and the structures are not able to support the weight. The SPA should be amended to reflect long term plans for the site prior to the approval of future additions. It is more eff cient to look at the entire SPA site and determine how the long term needs could be met. The original SPA was created in 1977 and could now Revised 1/30/2009 Page 7 of 11 r+ ,~° ~~ be amended to meet needs that may have changed since that time. Staff fnds this criterion to be met. 2. Whether sufficient public facilities and roads exist to service the proposed development. The addition will be used to house data equipment and computer servers. There will not be any plumbing or new staff created as a result. No increased impacts on the public facilities or roads are predicted. Stafffands this criterion to be met. 3. Whether the pace! proposed for development is generally suitable for development, considering the slope, ground instability and the possibility of mud flow, rock falls, avalanche dangers and flood hazards. The parcel is suitable for development. It is mostly level. There are no environmental constraints that would limit the location of the addition. The parcel is not located in the jloodplain area or an area that is particularly steep. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 4. Whether the proposed development creatively employs land planning techniques to preserve significant view planes, avoid adverse enviromnental impacts and provide open space, trails and similar amenities for the users of the project and the public space. The proposed development consists of a prefabricated square unit that will be finished with an exterior treatment and roofline to match the existing building. The addition is located in the view plane from the pedestrian court at Obermeyer Place and the historically designated cabins located on the adjacent to the County Center parcel. Figure B below shows a 3-D view of the addition as it would appear from the pedestrian court at Obermeyer Place. With a creative landscaping plan the visual impacts from the surrounding properties is predicted to be minimal. It does not create significant adverse environmental impacts; however it does reduce the amount of open space that is currently on County Center. When the last.amendment to the County Jail was approved in 1995, the applicant was required to replace any open space that was removed as a result of the addition. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 5. Whether the proposed development is in compliance with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan does not specifically address the County Jail Building or this addition. This proposal is relatively minor in nature; however staff emphasizes the need to have long term plans to address future needs for each public service facility. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 6. Whether the proposed development will require the expenditure of excessive public funds to provide public facilities for the parcel, or the surrounding neighborhood. This project is relatively small and not expected to require excessive public funds for the project dtself or facilities for the parcel; however, the cost of the addition will come from public funds. Staff finds this criterion to be met. Revised 1/30!2009 Page 8 of 11 .-. ..~ ,..-. 7. Whether proposed development on slopes in excess of twenty percent meet the slope reduction and density requirements of Section 26.445.040 (B)(2). There are no slopes in excess of twenty percent where the addition is to be located. Density will not be affected by the addition. Staff finds this criterion met. 8. Whether there are sufficient GMQS allotments for the proposed development. No new net leasable area will be created as a result of this project. No new employees will be required. This project will not require growth management mitigation. Staff finds this criterion met. Revised 1/30/2009 Page 9 of 11 .~. ~..~ EXHIBIT A 26 470 090 Review Standards for Development of Essential Public Facilities The development of an essential public facility, upon a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission, shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied by the City Council based on the following criteria: a. The Community Development Director has determined the primary use and/or structure to be an essential public facility (see definition). Accessory uses may also be part of an essential public facility project. The proposed addition is an accessory use to the County Jail and other County and City services. It will be used to facilitate a more efficient network and computer server system. Currently, dhe existing facilities are inadequate and the new addition will accommodate all the current needs for space and allow for more growth of future computer equipment. Staff finds this criterion to be met. b. Upon a recommendation from the Community Development Director, the City Council may assess, waive or partially waive affordable housing mitigation requirements as is deemed appropriate or warranted for the purpose of promoting civic uses and in consideration of broader community goals. The employee generation rates may be used as a guideline, but each operation shall be analyzed for its unique employee needs, pursuant to Section 26.470.100, Calculations. The addition will be used to house data equipment and computer servers. There will not be any new net leasable commercial or office space created. There will not be any new staff generated as a result. No growth management mitigation is required for this proposed addition. Staff finds this criterion to be met. Revised 1/30/2009 Page 10 of 11 EXHIBIT B List of Prior Aaarovals affectine the Rio Grande Area 1977 -The Rio Grande Interim SPA plan was approved 1981 -The relocated the snow dump and set aside an unspecified parcel for a Performing Arts and Culture Center 1982 -The City and County exchanged the Aspen One, Oden and stable properties 1988 - A conceptual SPA Master Plan was approved that included the parking garage, the library, the Spring Street extension, the snow melt azea, and an arts usage area 1989 - A final SPA plan was approved for the County Library and the parking gazage 1991- A final SPA plan was approved for the Youth Center 1992 -Ordinance 26 of 2002 is SPA Amendment to install park spaces and landscaping. Snow storage must be on site and is not permitted on the r/w or on the path. 1992 -Intergovernmental Agreement for Resolution 29 of Series 1992 approving land exchanges and easements for the library, the pazking garage, land north of the jail, trail and transit easements, and the youth center building. 1993 -Ordinance 10 of Series 1993 approved the Rio Grande Master Plan and specified that Lot 5 should be used for future expansions to the County Jail. (The Ordinance is included in the application) 1995 -SPA Review for an expansion to the County Jail 2006 -Civic Master Plan was approved Revised 1/30/2009 Page 11 of 11 RESOLUTION No.~ (SERIES OF 2008) A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, MAKING A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL TO COUNCIL FOR A SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA AMENDMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING AN ADDITION TO THE PITKIN COUNTY JAIL BUILDING LOCATED AT 485 RIO GRANDE PLACE, LEGALLY KNOWN AS LOTS 1 AND 5, PITKIN COUNTY CENTER, CITY OF ASPEN Parcel Identification Number 2737-073-47-851 & 2737-073-06-855 WHEREAS, Stan Clauson Associates, Inc. located at 412 North Mill Street, Aspen, Colorado on behalf of Pitkin County, 530 E. Bleeker Street, Aspen, Colorado, submitted a request for a Specially Planned Area Amendment dated October 6th, 2008 to the Planning and Zoning Commission; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located at 485 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, the parcels are identified as pazcel numbers 2737-073-47-851 & 2737-073-06-855, and the legal description of the property is: Pitkin County Center, Lot 1 and 5, City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado; and WHEREAS, the Specially Planned Area approval for the Property was originally approved by the Aspen City Council in 1977 and again for the Rio Grande Master Plan in Ordinance No. 10 Series of 1993; and WHEREAS, the current request is to receive a recommendation for approval to the City Council for a Specially Planned Area amendment to amend the SPA to permit the construction of a 324 squaze feet addition to allow for storage of data equipment and computer servers; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and considered the application for a Specially Planned Area Amendment Review pursuant to Code section 26.440.050 under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on December 16th, 2008; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the applicable code standazds, the Community Development Department recommended denial of the request; and, WHEREAS, the Ciry of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfaze. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO IN REGULAR MEETING ASSEMBLED, THAT: Section 1• Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends approval to the City Council of the Specially Planned Area Amendment as requested for the Property. The recommendation of approval granted herein is conditioned on the following: 1. The applicant is required to remove snow or store accumulated snow on site. Snow is not permitted to be relocated to the Rio Grande Pazk to limit damage to the sprinkler heads. 2. The applicant will be required to apply for a lot line adjustment or otherwise remedy the building location proposed to be over a lot line. The Building Code does not permit buildings to belocated on lot lines. 3. Remove the landscaping rocks from the right-of--way as per the Engineering Department. 4. The Pazks Department requires a landscaping plan that provides for: a. Tree Protection: A vegetation protection fence shall be erected at the drip line of each individual tree or groupings of trees remaining on site and their represented drip lines. A formal plan indicating the location of the tree protection will be required for the bldg permit set. No excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction backfill, and storage of equipment, foot or vehicle traffic allowed within the drip line of any tree remaining on site. This fence must be inspected by the city forester or his/her designee before any construction activities aze to commence. b. Plant Spacing: Appropriate spacing will be required for all new plantings. Coniferous Trees will require adequate spacing between trees and distance from z r~ ~~ ~.... ... buildings or structures to allow for mature growth. Deciduous Trees will require adequate spacing from structures to accommodate mature growth in height. c. Seed Mix and Imgation: Applicant shall use the City of Aspen approved native seed mix and a temporary or permanent irrigation system will be required for establishment. d. Weed Management: Applicant shall detail and define how it will manage noxious weeds during the seed establishment period. Section 3• This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5• All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, aze hereby incorporated in such approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. INTRODUCED, READ AND ADOPTED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on the 16th day of December 2008. ~ / I Attest: _/ ackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk L rspame Chairperson APPROVED AS TO FORM -=~ ames R. True, Special Counsel ~.~ s MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Ireland and Aspen City Council FROM: Errin Evans, Current Planner THRU: Chris Bendon, Community Development Director DATE OF MEMO: MEETING DATE: March 16, 2009 March 23rd, 2009 RE: Pitkin County Jail - 485 Rio Grande Place -Specially Planned Area Amendment and Growth Management Review Second Reading and Public Hearing of Ordinance No. 5, Series of 2009 APPLICANT /OWNER: Jodi Smith, Pitkin County REPRESENTATIVE: Stan Clauson Associates, Inc. LOCATION: Pitkin County Jail - 485 Rio Grande Place; Legal Description -Pitkin County Center Lot 1 and Lot 5 of the Rio Grande Subdivision; Parcel Identification Number - 2735- 182-19-002 CURRENT ZONING 8: USE Located in the Public (PUB) zone district with a Specially Planned Area (SPA) overlay containing public buildings such as the County Court House and the County Jail. PROPOSED LAND USE: The Applicant is requesting to construct a 324 s.f. addition to the north side of the Jail to house computer servers. This project is funded by Pitkin County. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Mayor and City Council approve the request to construct an addition to the County Jail Building with conditions. SUMMARY: The Applicant requests of the Council to approve the SPA Amendment and Growth Management review in order to build an addition on the site. Revised 3/16/2009 Page 1 of 11 Photo of the subject property ~,, ,'~• `.. , r BACKGROUND: Currently, some of the City and County servers and other data equipment are stored in the County Jail Building. The space where the equipment is housed is not lazge enough. The County would like to construct an addition to accommodate the equipment and future expansions of the equipment. The applicant proposes to add an addition to the Pitkin County Jail Building at 485 Rio Grande Place to accommodate data equipment and computer servers (See Application -Exhibit D). The subject property has a Specially Planned Area (SPA) overlay upon it and the SPA needs to be amended to incorporate the addition. On December 16`h and January 6`h the Planning and Zoning Commission approved resolutions to make a recommendation to Council to approve the SPA Amendment and the Growth Management Review respectively. LAND USE REQUEST AND REVIEW PROCEDURES: The applicant is requesting the following land use approvals from the City Council: SPA Amendment pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.440.050 A. This application does not qualify for an administrative amendment. All modifications shall be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and Council. This proposal does qualify for Consolidated Review. In this case, the conceptual and final plans may be combined based on the scope of the project. The Planning and Zoning Commission, at a public Revised 3/16/2009 Page 2 of 11 Figure 1: Vicinity Map .~ hearing, may make a recommendation to the City Council for approval, approval with conditions or disapproval of the SPA amendment. The City Council is the final authority. • Growth Management Ouota Stem -Essential Public Facilities pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.470.090 4. Any development to an essential public facility requires the Planning and Zoning Commission, at a public hearing, to make a recommendation to the City Council for approval, approval with conditions or disapproval of the Growth Management Review. The City Council is the final authority. PROJECT SUMMARY: The project consists of adding apre-fabricated structure to the north side of the County Jail building. The fagade of the structure will be covered with a brick treatment to match the existing building. The structure is approximately 10 feet high and 324 square feet (see Figure 2). SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA AMENDMENT REVIEW: Since the original Specially Planned Area, known as the Rio Grande SPA Plan, was approved in 1977, many amendments and changes to approvals have occurred on this site (see Exhibit C for a Revised 3/16/2009 Page 3 of 11 /'"~ ~ ,,, U list). The SPA approval was not very detailed at that time. The property was designated for County use; however items that would now be required to be documented in a current SPA plan were not accounted for. Building elevations, allowable floor area, open space and other dimensional standards that may be customized to accommodate the needs of an SPA were not outlined in the original approvals for this SPA. Later in 1993, the Rio Grande Master Plan was approved. That plan was designed to guide land use patterns for undeveloped land in the Rio Grande area. The County Jail parcel is located just outside the scope of that plan. Ordinance No. 10 of Series of 1993 does indicate that the property north of the County building is intended for future additions to the County Jail. Since then, the Civic Master Plan was adopted, replacing the Rio Grande Master Plan. The Civic Master Plan was created to implement goals and principles around the Civic Core, including Galena Plaza and the Rio Grande Park. The County Jail Building is located in the Civic Core; however this plan does not provide for specific building dimensions. None of the past plans or ordinances outline future details for additions to the County Jail, with one exception, Ordinance 10 of Series 1993. That Ordinance does make accommodations for future additions, though it is unclear whether or not those additions were the intended to be for the substantial construction that was approved in 1995. Staff Comments There are few items to review for this proposed addition because the current SPA is vague and does not define any future plans for buildings on the site. The underlying zone district for this SPA is the Public zone district. The dimensional requirements in this zone district are set by the adoption of the f nal development plan; however no dimensional requirements were set in any of the final plans or amendments to the plans. The building is proposed to be located over a lot line between Lot 1 and Lot 5. This is not permitted by the building code. If approved, the applicant will be required to apply for a lot line adjustment prior to applying for a building permit. This can be done administratively. Also the applicant will be required to work with the Parks Department to achieve an approved landscaping plan. The proposed addition will not require any mitigation for growth management. The addition will not create any new employees or create new net leasable space. Staff would prefer to see a master plan that encompasses the long term future goals and needs of the County buildings. Regardless, the Planning and Zoning Commission decided to recommend approval to Council. It is preferable to see an addition that relates to the building and integrates into the location. Based on the information that was submitted with the application, it appears that the applicant has attempted to reduce the visual impacts that the addition may have on the surrounding properties. The applicant has added a matching roof line and added more landscaping to integrate the addition into the existing structure more effectively. Revised 3/16/2009 Page 4 of 11 ../ ~ \ s GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEW: The Planning and Zoning Commission adopted a resolution to recommend to Council to approve this application on January 6th for Growth Management Review. This addition will be used to store technical computer equipment. There will be no employees working in the unit except for routine equipment checks nor will the addition generate new employees. There will be no new net leasable commercial or office space created as defined by the Land Use Code: "Net leasable commercial and office space: Those areas within a commercial or office building which are, or which are designed to be, leased to a tenant and occupied for commercial or office purposes, exclusive of any area including, but not necessarily limited to, areas dedicated to bathrooms, stairways, circulation corridors, mechanical staging azeas and storage areas provided, however, that these areas are used solely by tenants on the site." Staff Comments This application is required to undergo review under Growth Management because it is an addition to an essential public facility. Since no new net leasable area is created, there are no requirements for growth management mitigation. RECOMMENDATION: While reviewing the proposal, staff believes that the application is generally minor in nature. It appears to be consistent with the final development approvals of the various amendments to the SPA. It does not substantially change the exterior of the building and the same materials will be used on the facade and the roof features will match the existing building. Staff prefers to see a Master Plan that addresses the long term needs for this site. Community Development Department staff recommends that the City Council approve the amendment to the SPA and approve the Growth Management Review. If the Council decides to approve the addition, it is advised that they do so with the following conditions: 1) The applicant will be required to apply for a lot line adjustment or otherwise remedy the building location proposed to be over a lot line. The Building Code does not permit buildings to span lot lines. 2) The applicant is required to remove snow or store accumulated snow on site. Snow is not permitted to be relocated to the Rio Grande Pazk to limit damage to the sprinkler heads. 3) The landscaping rocks must be removed from the right-of--way. 4) The building permit shall include a landscaping plan that provides for: tree protection, plant spacing, seed mix and irrigation, and weed management. MANAGER'S COMMEN"1 ~: ~ e _ ' p~ i...~ i ~ ` it ~ -r~' ~t~S, `t~i7' ,sue e _ ~ . _~....~ n" .Q ~c,_..y ~Y- l/... ~--d~! /J'lth.et~4J .fle SZ1 ~ ,,~io~3.cl~'- ~~~ (,' Ly ~ ~- ~`~ `-l- (~cc. 4'" .C~-Ct1.. " c.~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~~ Revised 37 1 612 009 ~(U '~'S,f~y- ~~~,~ ~0-~- 0. li Page 5 of 11 RECOMMENDED MOTION: If the City Council chooses to approve the proposed amendment and growth management review, they may use this motion "I move to adopt Ordinance No. 5, Series of 2009 upon second reading." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -Staff Findings Exhibit B -List of prior plans and approvals Exhibit C -SPA from 1977 Exhibit D -Application (packet for first reading -February 23`d, 2009) Revised 3/12/2009 Page 6 of 11 ~ `° ,~, ~ . Ordinance No. 5 (SERIES OF 2009) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, TO APPROVE A SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA AMENDMENT AND A GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEW FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING AN ADDITION TO THE PITHIN COUNTY JAIL BUILDING LOCATED AT 485 RIO GRANDE PLACE, LEGALLY KNOWN AS LOTS 1 AND 5, PITHIN COUNTY CENTER, CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO Parcel Identification Number 2737-073-47-851 & 2737-073-06-855 WHEREAS, Stan Clauson Associates, Inc. located at 412 North Mill Street, Aspen, Colorado on behalf of Pitkin County, 530 E. Main Street, Aspen, Colorado, submitted a request for a Specially Planned Area Amendment dated October 6th, 2008 to the Community Development Department; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located at 485 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, the pazcels aze identified as pazcel numbers 2737-073-47-851 & 2737-073-06-855, and the legal description of the property is: Pitkin County Center, Lot 1 and 5, City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado; and WHEREAS, the Specially Planned Area approval for the Property was originally approved by the Aspen City Council in 1977 and again for the Rio Grande Master Plan in Ordinance No. 10 Series of 1993; and WHEREAS, the current request is to receive approval from the City Council for a Specially Planned Area amendment to amend the SPA and Growth Management Review to permit the construction of a 324 square feet addition to allow for storage of data equipment and computer servers; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and considered the application for a Specially Plazmed Area Amendment Review and Growth Management Review, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public heazing on December 16th, 2008 and January 6`h, 2009 respectively. The Planning and Zoning Cormmission approved Resolution No. 36 of Series 2008 and Resolution No. 1 of Series 2009 to recommend that the City Council approve the application; and, WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed and considered the application for a Specially Planned Area Amendment Review pursuant to Code section 26.440.050 under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein and Grow[h Management Review as pursuant to Code section 26.470.090, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director and the Planning and Zoning Commission, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on December 16th, 2008; and, .. ,.~ WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended approval of the request; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfaze. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO IN REGULAR MEETING ASSEMBLED, THAT: Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the City Council hereby approves the of the Specially Planned Area Amendment and Growth Management review as requested for the Property. The recommendation of approval granted herein is conditioned on the following: 1. The applicant is required to remove snow or store accumulated snow on site. Snow is not permitted to be relocated to the Rio Grande Park to limit damage to the sprinkler heads. 2. The applicant will be required to apply for a lot line adjustment or otherwise remedy the building location proposed to be over a lot line. The Building Code does not permit buildings to span lot lines. 3. The Parks Department requires a landscaping plan be provided with the building permit that provides for: a. Tree Protection: A vegetation protection fence shall be erected at the drip line of each individual tree or groupings of trees remaining on site and their represented drip lines. A formal plan indicating the location of the tree protection will be required for the bldg permit set. No excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction backfill, and storage of equipment, foot or vehicle traffic allowed within the drip line of any tree remaining on site. This fence must be inspected by the city forester or his/her designee before any construction activities aze to commence. b. Plant Spacing: Appropriate spacing will be required for all new plantings. Coniferous Trees will require adequate spacing between trees and distance from buildings or structures to allow for mature growth. Deciduous Trees will require adequate spacing from structures to accommodate mature growth in height. c. Seed Mix and Irrigation: Applicant shall use the City of Aspen approved native seed mix and a temporary or permanent irrigation system will be required for establishment. d. Weed Management: Applicant shall detail and define how it will manage noxious weeds during the seed establishment period. Section 3: This Ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended z r"'~ `~ ~,., , as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a sepazate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the approvals as herein awarded, whether in public heating or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, aze hereby incorporated in such approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 5• A public hearing on this ordinance shall be held the 23`d day of March, 2009, in the City Council Chambers, 130 S. Galena, 15 days prior to which public notice shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 23`d day of February, 2009. Michael C. Ireland, Mayor Attest: Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk FINALLY adopted, passed and approved this _ day of , 2009. Michael C. Ireland, Mayor Attest: Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk Approved as to form: John P. Worcester, City Attorney ,~ ,~ EXHIBIT A . 26 440 050 Review Standards for development in a Specially Planned Area In the review of a development application for a conceptual development plan and a final development plan, the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council must consider the following: 1. Whether the proposed development is compatible with or enhances the mix of development in the immediate vicinity of the parcel in terms of land use, density, height, bulk, architecture, landscaping and open space. The addition to the County Jail is a fairly small structure, measuring 324 square feet and approximately 10 feet high. It is a pre fabricated structure that will be placed in the rear of the building facing Obermeyer Place and the Rio Grande Park. The addition will have a brick treatment to match the existing Jail Building and the roofline will be altered to match the existing building. The existing building is shown below in Figure A. The addition is proposed to be located where the picnic table is now sitting. Figure A -The existing building. The location was chosen because the County Buildings seem to be a stable use in the downtown campus area. The future of some other considered locations may change and require removal of the equipment. The equipment cannot be housed within the Court House, City Hall or other buildings for several reasons: the older buildings are not climate controlled, the wiring systems are too dated and the structures are not able to support the weight. The SPA should be amended to reflect long term plans for the site prior to the approval of future additions. It is more efficient to look at the entire SPA site and determine how the long term needs could be met. The original SPA was created in 1977 and could now Revised 3/12/2009 Page 7 of 11 ,-, `"° be amended to meet needs that may have changed since that time. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. Whether sufficient public facilities and roads exist to service the proposed development. The addition will be used to house data equipment and computer servers. There will not be any plumbing or new staff created as a result. No increased impacts on the public facilities or roads are predicted. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 3. Whether the parcel proposed for development is generally suitable for development, considering the slope, ground instability and the possibility of mud flow, rock falls, avalanche dangers and flood hazards. The parcel is suitable for development. It is mostly level. There are no environmental constraints that would limit the location of the addition. The parcel is not located in the Jloodplain area or an area that is particularly steep. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 4. Whether the proposed development creatively employs land planning techniques to preserve significant view planes, avoid adverse environmental impacts and provide open space, trails and similar amenities for the users of the project and the public space. The proposed development consists of a prefabricated square unit that will be finished with an exterior treatment and roofline to match the existing building. The addition is located in the view plane from the pedestrian court at Obermeyer Place and the historically designated cabins located on the adjacent to the County Center parcel. Figure B below shows a 3-D view of the addition as it would appear from the pedestrian court at Obermeyer Place. With a creative landscaping plan the visual impacts from the surrounding properties is predicted to be minimal. It does not create significant adverse environmental impacts; however it does reduce the amount of open space that is currently on County Center. When the last amendment to the County Jail was approved in 1995, the applicant was required to replace any open space that was removed as a result of the addition. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 5. Whether the proposed development is in compliance with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan does nol specifically address the County Jail Building or this addition. This proposal is relatively minor in nature; however staff emphasizes the need to have long term plans to address future needs for each public service facility. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 6. Whether the proposed development will require the expenditure of excessive public funds to provide public facilities for the parcel, or the surrounding neighborhood. This project is relatively small and not expected to require excessive public funds for the project itself or facilities for the parcel; however, the cost of the addition will come from public funds. Stafffands this criterion to be met. Revised 3/12/2009 Page 8 of 11 r °""` '~, ,~, 7. Whether proposed development on slopes in excess of twenty percent meet the slope reduction and density requirements of Section 26.445.040 (B)(2). There are no slopes in excess of twenty percent where the addition is to be located. Density will not be affected by the addition. Staff finds this criterion met. 8. Whether there aze sufficient GMQS allotments for the proposed development. No new net leasable area will be created as a result of this project. No new employees will be required. This project will not require growth management mitigation. Staff finds this criterion met. Revised 3!12/2009 Page 9 of 11 ~~ ~" /' \ 4 .. EXHIBIT A 26 470 090 Review Standards for Development of Essential Public Facilities The development of an essential public facility, upon a recommendarion from the Planning and Zoning Commission, shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied by the City Council based on the following criteria: a. The CommuniTy Development Director has determined the primary use and/or structure to be an essential public facility (see definition). Accessory uses may also be part of an essential public facility project. The proposed addition is an accessory use to the County Jail and other County and Ciry services. It will be used to facilitate a more efficient network and computer server system. Currently, the existing facilities are inadequate and the new addition will accommodate all the current needs for space and allow for more growth of future computer equipment. Staff finds this criterion to be met. b. Upon a recommendation from the Community Development Director, the City Council may assess, waive or partially waive affordable housing mitigation requirements as is deemed appropriate or warranted for the purpose of promoting civic uses and in consideration of broader community goals. The employee generation rates may be used as a guideline, but each operation shall be analyzed for its unique employee needs, pursuant to Section 26.470.100, Calculations. The addition will be used to house data equipment and computer servers. There will not be any new net leasable commercial or office space created. There will not be any new staff generated as a result. No growth management mitigation is required for this proposed addition. Staff finds this criterion to be met. Revised 3/12/2009 Page 10 of 11 ~, ~~ ~,., ~.l EXHIBIT B List of Prior Approvals affectin¢ the Rio Grande Area 1977 -The Rio Grande Interim SPA plan was approved 1981 -The relocated the snow dump and set aside an unspecified pazcel for a Performing Arts and Culture Center 1982 -The City and County exchanged the Aspen One, Oden and stable properties 1988 - A conceptual SPA Master Plan was approved that included the parking gaaage, the library, the Spring Street extension, the snow melt azea, and an arts usage azea 1989 - A final SPA plan was approved for the County Librazy and the parking garage 1991- A final SPA plan was approved for the Youth Center 1992 -Ordinance 26 of 2002 is SPA Amendment to install park spaces and landscaping. Snow storage must be on site and is not permitted on the r/w or on the path. 1992 -Intergovernmental Agreement for Resolution 29 of Series 1992 approving land exchanges and easements for the library, the pazking garage, land north of the jail, trail and transit easements, and the youth center building. 1993 -Ordinance 10 of Series 1993 approved the Rio Grande Master Plan and specified that Lot 5 should be used for future expansions to the County Jail. (The Ordinance is included in the application) 1995 -SPA Review for an expansion to the County Jail 2006 -Civic Master Plan was approved Revised 3/12/2009 Page 11 of 11 ~,1 STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATES iNc landscape architecture. planning. reso rt design qtz Nor[h MIII Street Aspen, Colorado Bi6u r. 97o/9z5-z3z3 f•97oI9zo-~6z8 info®scaplanning.com www.scaplanning.com Memo To: Randy Ready, City of Aspen Gc: Phyllis MaHlce 8 Jodi Smffh, Pitkin County From: Stan Clawson Date: 16 March 2009 Re: Proposed Piikin County Data Cenler- Envlronmental and Financial Impacts Responding to your request for supplementary information regarding environmental and financial impacts of the proposed Piikin County Data Center facility, we are providing this memo as well as attached financial information from the Piikin County Facilities Management Department. This memo outlines the sustainable qualities and environmental impacts of the Oidcasile Precast modular building and accessories as proposed for the Pitkin County Data Center currently under review by the City of Aspen. The information provided here was generated from material provided by the manufacturer. General Information: The proposed building will house IT equipment which Is currently stored in various unsuitable locations. Moving the equipment to a consolidated purpose-built data center will reduce the demand o tems'Ing multiple locations and increase the efficiency of the existing cooling sy The proposed data center is a precast concrete modular building with a thin brick fagade and roofing material intended to match the existing Pitkin County Jail structure. The 12' x 27' floor plan will have Thermax Heavy Duty Insulation and two external wail mounted HVAC units on its rear wall. Thermax Heavy Duty Insulation: I Thermax Heavy Duty Insulation consists of glass fiber-reinforced poly- i isocyanurate foam core with white acrylic coated aluminum on one side and embossed aluminum on the other. Thermax Heavy Duty insulation offers an R- Value of 11.4. The facers help prevent water intrusions into the foam and allow the foam to stabilize at a higher R-value. I .`.~~. y`I /° •,_ `r ~~j Piikin Gounty Data Center 6 March 2009 Page 2 Thermax Heavy Duty Insulation is manufactured with hydrocarbon blowing agents, which have no ozone depletion potential. Wall-Mount Air Conditioner: The Bard Wall-Mount Air Conditioner is oself-contained energy-efficient system designed to offer appropriate indoor climate control at a minimal cost. Specific engineered features provide maximum efficiency. The aluminum finned copper coils and enhanced lowered fin create maxmum heat transfer and energy efficiency. Twin blowers move air quietly and come equipped with a motor overload protection system. The scrod compressors are designed for increased efficiency, quieter operation, and improved reliability for longer life. Electrical heat scrips have an automatic limit and thermal cutoff for safely and efficiency. The Bard Wall-Mount units are designed to mapmize air quality. The standard ventilation package includes the Barometric fresh air damper which allows outside ventilation air up to 25% of the total airflow rating of the unit. The damper opens during blower operation and closes when the blower is off. An optional "Economizer has been added to the Data Center air conditioning units to provide "free cooling" when outside air conditions are coot and dry enough to salisfy cooling requirements. The Economizer will provide lower operating costs, while increasing energy efficiency and extending the life of the compressor. Diesel Sinndby Generator. Oldcastle Precast also quoted a 60 t:W, Cummins, Diesel standby generator. The generator wlil meet all EPA emissions, diesel containment, and monitoring regulations and standards. The diesel generator uses a dual wall tank intended to contain possible leaks. The standby generator features a turbocharger and an affer-cooler, which function to control and maintain emissions within US EPA and California emission regulations. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Non-road Tier 2 Regulations limits Particulate Matter to 0.30 Grams per Hp-Hour and the Califomia Air resources Board Risk Maosede eneratordonly prodaurtc'es 0.10 Grams to 0.15 Grams per HP-hour. The prop g per HP-Hour of Particulate Matter. C Both City and County staff have identified that there is an urgent need for the new data center. Pitkin County intends to move forward with the project upon approval of the Land Use Application. The County has appropriated $200K of the funding and allocated an additional 200K in the County's Tech Pool fund in order to fully fund the project. In that this facility will function as part of the City/County network infrastructure, the County is anticipating the City fund 50% of the project. There is no current funding budgeted within the City's 2009 budget. However, the City Asset Management Plan for Information Technology has budgeted $588,000 in the 2010. The County is hoping the City Council will allocated 50% ofthe full project in 2009 as a joint effort to complete this critical need for a combined data center which benefits both entities. County staff has estimated that construction the Data Center in 2009 be completed for under $SOOK, which is less than what the city planned on spending for the construction in 2010. This network project is critical to advance due to the inability to provide adequate cooling, back-up power service, and a controlled environment (without risk of water, dirt, unauthorized access) in the current locations of City Hall, County Courthouse, Jail basement. Benefits to consider for doing the project in 2009 are: • Reduced risk to network equipment (i.e.: recent experience of damaged equipment due to heat, falling ice, and water leaks) • Self contained cooling system with heat sensor alarms • Security increased; own access • Power back-up generator, current systems are at risk with no generator back-up • Adequate space for growth, reduces cost of adding more cooling to other buildings • Stafftime and procurement is aheady completed; shovel ready project. The estimated cost of the data center construction approximately $307,000: „___..,:_...~,...o.......,:.,.. Cost Estimates rre-ravncu,cu „w,.,,,. $216 464 Cost Base Bid Add: HVAC Economizer Ener Savin s $3 083 Add: Electronic E ui ment Irate ration-Alternate Racks $14 811 Electrical Connection to Jail $30,000 Landsca a $15,000 Permits $2 000 County Construction Pro'ect Mana ement $3,000 Contin enc Funds 10% $25,000 Total Building Cost Estimate: $306 358 Pitkin County Facilities Management, 485 Rio Grande Place, Unit iot, Aspen, CO 8i6xx 970-920-5396.970-920-5285 Fax or email: jodis@co.pitkin.co.us DATA CENTERFINANCIALBUDGET IMPACTS: Data Center Equipment & Relocations Cost will not be available for 4-6 weeks. Once the Data Center receives land use approval staffwill procure a consultant to determine a list of priorities and ell associated costs of the move. IT staff have estimated that costs for this part of the project will be approximately $175,000. Costs for operation of the Data Center once in operations will be established through an amendment of the current Intergovernmental Agreement between the City and the County for Technology. It is anticipated that the costs will be equally shared by the City and County as all other technology infrastructure. This will include power, insurance, and costs for snow removal needed due to the County losing the existing snow storage area where the Data Center is being placed. (This loss of snow storage space will require that the County hire a snow removal service to plow and haul the snow away as there is no place on-site to store it on site. The County is estimating that the average cost will be approximately $9,000 to $12,000 per year). Pitkin County Facilities Management, 485 Rio Grande Place, Unit ror, Aspen, CO 8i6ii 970-920-5396> 970-920-5285 Fax or email: jodis@co.pitldn.co.us MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: THRU: DATE OF MEMO: v«~~ Mayor Ireland and Aspen City Council Errin Evans, Current Planner Chris Bendon, Community Development Director April b, 2009 MEETING DATE: April 13, 2009 RE; Pitkin County Jail - 485 Rio Grande Place -Specially Planned Area Amendment and Growth Management Review Continued -Second Reading and Public Hearing of Ordinance No. 5, Series of 2009 APPLICANT /OWNER: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Jodi Smith, Pitkin County Staff recommends that the Mayor and City Council approve the request to construct an addition to the REPRESENTATIVE: County Jail Building with conditions. Stan Clauson Associates, Inc. SUMMARY: LOCATION: The Applicant requests of the Council to approve the Pitkin County Jail - 485 Rio Grande SPA Amendment and Growth Management review Place; Legal Description -Pitkin County in order to build an addition on the site. Center Lot 1 and Lot 5 of the Rio Grande Subdivision; Parcel Identification Number-2735- 182-19-002 CURRENT ZONING B: USE Located in the Public (PUB) zone district with a Specially Planned Area (SPA) overlay containing public buildings such as the County Court House and the County Jail. PROPOSED LAND USE: The Applicant is requesting to construct a 324 s.f. addition to the north side of the Jail to house computer servers. This is funded by Pitkin Revised 4/6/2009 Page 1 of 2 Photo of the subject property ~ ~ .... STAFF COMMENTS: Because of issues with the public noticing requirements, this land use case is continued from the Mazch 23rd Aspen City Council meeting. Please refer to the packet that was provided for the meeting on Mazch 23`d for more information. CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS: RECOMMENDED MOTION: If the City Council chooses to approve the proposed amendment and growth management review, they may use this motion "I move to adopt Ordinance No. 5, Series of 2009 upon second reading." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -Staff Findings (provided in packet from March 23`d, 2009) Exhibit B -List of prior plans and approvals (provided in packet from Mazch 23`d, 2009) Exhibit C -SPA from 1977 (provided in packet from March 23`d, 2009) Exhibit D -Application (packet for first reading -February 23`d, 2009) Revised 4/6/2009 Page 2 of 2 .-~. ~~ ' MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commiss~iGo~n FROM: Errin Evans, Current Plannerv' THRU: Jennifer Phelan, Deputy Community Development Director DATE OF MEMO: December 19th, 2008 MEETING DATE: January 6th, 2008 RE: 485 Rio Grande Place -Growth Management Quota System Review APPLICANT /OWNER: Jodi Smith, Pitkin County Faculties Manager /Pitkin County REPRESENTATIVE: Stan Clauson Associates, Inc. LOCATION: Civic Address - 485 Rio Grande Place; Legal Description -Pitkin County Center Lot 1 and Lot 5 of the Rio Grande Subdivision; Parcel Identification Number - 2735-182-19-002 CURRENT ZONING & USE Located in the Public zone district with a SPA overlay containing essential public buildings such as the County Court House and the County Jail. PROPOSED LAND USE: The Applicant is requesting to construct an addition to house computer servers. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that Council approve the request for a Growth Management Quota System exemption to construct an addition to the County Jail Building. SUMMARY: The Applicant requests of the Planning and Zoning Commission to approve the request for exemptions for growth management mitigation. Revised 12/30/2008 Page 1 of 4 Photo of the subject property .-, ,.. BACKGROUND: On December 16, 2008, the Planning and Zoning Commission made a recommendation to Council to approve an amendment to the Rio Grande Specially Planned Area (SPA) for an addition to the County Jail. The Rio Grande SPA encompasses several properties including the two properties owned by the County. The two properties will be the location of the new addition. In addition to the SPA amendment, the application is also required to undergo Growth Management Review. When the application was first submitted, there was some confusion whether or not the review was required because no new net leasable azeas will be created. The Planning and Zoning Commission is now requested to make another recommendation to Council to approve, approve with conditions or deny the review for growth management. LAND USE REQUEST AND REVIEW PROCEDURES: The applicant is requesting the following land use approvals from the Planning and,Zoning Commission: • Growth Management Ouota Svstem -Essential Public Facilities pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.470.090 4. Any development to an essential public facility requires the Planning and Zoning Commission, at a public heazing, to make a recommendation to the City Council for approval, approval with conditions or disapproval of the Growth Management Review. The City Council is the final authority. GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEW: The Planning and Zoning Commission first saw this application on December 16th to review the SPA amendment. This application also requires growth management review. This addition will be used to store technical computer equipment. There will be no employees working in the unit except for routine equipment checks nor will the addition generate new employees. There will be no new net leasable commercial or office space created as defined by the Land Use Code: "Net leasable commercial and office space: Those azeas within a commercial or office building which aze, or which are designed to be, leased to a tenant and occupied for commercial or office purposes, exclusive of any area including, but not necessarily limited to, azeas dedicated to bathrooms, stairways, circulation corridors, mechanical staging areas and stotage areas provided, however, that these areas aze used solely by tenants on the site." Staff Comments This application is required to undergo review under Growth Management because it is an addition to an essential public facility. Since no new net leasable area is created, there are no requirements for growth management mitigation. RECOMMENDATION: Community Development Depaztment staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Council approve the request for Growth Management Review. Revised 12/30/2008 Page 2 of 4 RECOMMENDED MOTION: If the Planning and Zoning Commission chooses to recommend approval for the request, they may use this motion "I move to make a recommendation to City Council to approve the request for the exemption for growth management mitigation." ~, ;-: ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -Staff findings Exhibit B -Application Revised 12/30/2008 Page 3 of 4 ~ ~ `.s .J RESOLUTION NO. ~O I (SERIES 2009) A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CTTY OF ASPEN, MAKING A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL TO COUNCIL FOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEW FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING AN ADDITION TO THE PITKIN COUNTY JAIL BUILDING LOCATED AT 485 RIO GRANDE PLACE, LEGALLY KNOWN AS LOTS 1 AND 5, PITKIN COUNTY CENTER, CITY OF ASPEN Parcel Identification Number 2737-073-47-851 & 2737-073-06-855 WHEREAS, Stan Clauson Associates, Inc. located at 412 North Mill Street, Aspen, Colorado on behalf of Pitkin County, 530 E. Bleeker Street, Aspen, Colorado, submitted a request for a Specially Planned Area Amendment dated October 6th, 2008 to the Planning and Zoning Commission; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located at d85 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, the pazcels aze identified as pazcel numbers 2737-073-47-851,& 2737 073-06-855, and the legal description of the property is: Pitkin County Center, Lot 1 and 5, City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado; and WHEREAS, upon review of the application, and the applicable code standazds, the Community Development Department determined mitigation for growth management was not applicable as the proposal is for storage of computer infrastructure and does not generate net leasable area; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on December 16~', the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 36 Series of 2008, making recommendation to Council to approve an SPA Amendment for the construction of an addition to the County Jail; and, ~-' ,,,~, ~,,,; WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on January 6, 2009, the Planning and Zoning Commission made a recommendation to Council to approve the request for Growth Management Review; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Plarming and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfaze. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Section 26 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the request for exemptions for growth management mitigation. This proposal does not generate new employees or create new net leasable commercial or office space. This addition is proposed to be used for the storage of computer equipment. If this use was to change iri the future, growth management mitigation may be required. - Section 2• All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awazded, whether in public heazing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, aze hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 3: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4• If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a sepazate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. ~ •. ,-. ,,,,1 APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 6`" day of January, 2009 with a _ - _ vote. Attest: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk LJ Erspamer, Chairperson APPROVED AS TO FORM James R. True, Special Counsel w~ EXHIBIT A 26.470.090 Review Standards for Develoament of Essential Public Facilities The development of an essential public facility, upon a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission, shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied by the City Council based on the following criteria: a. The Community Development Director has determined the primary use and/or structure to be an essential public facility (see definition). Accessory uses may also be part of an essential public facility project. The proposed addition is an accessory use to the County Jail and other County and City services. It will be used to facilitate a more efficient nehvork and computer server system. Currently, the existing facilities are inadequate and the new addition will accommodate all the current needs for space and allow for more growth of future computer equipment. Stafffrnds this criterion to be met. b. Upon a recommendation from the Community Development Director, the City Council may assess, waive or partially waive affordable housing mitigation requirements as is deemed appropriate or warranted for the purpose of promoting civic uses and in consideration of broader community goals. The employee generation rates may be used as a guideline, but each operation shall be analyzed for its unique employee needs, pursuant to Section 26.470.100, Calculations. The addition will be used to house data equipment and computer servers. There will not be any new net leasable commercial or office space created. There will not be any new staff generated as a result. No growth management mitigation is required for this proposed addition. Staff finds this criterion to be met. ;: Revised 12/30/2008 Page 4 of 4 ~~ STAN CLAUSON ASSOGIATESjNC; landscape architecture-planning resort design Giz North Mill Street Aspen, Colorado Si6i't t. g7o/gz5-z3z3 f.97o/9zo-i6z8 info@scaplanning.com wwwscaplanning.com Memo To: Errin Evans, City of Aspen Community Development Dept From: Stan Clawson, AICP, ASLA Cc: Jodi Smith, Pitkin County Facilities Manager Date: 24 December 2008 Re: Pitkin County Data Center, responses to Sec. 26,470.090 Pursuant to our application for an SPA Amendment for a modular structure adjacent to the Pitkin County Jail to house data processing equipment, we are submitting this supplementary information responding to the "Essential Public Facilities" section of the City of Aspen Land Use Code. After we had submitted our application and provided public notice for the Planning & Zoning Commission hearing of 16 December 2008, City staff determined that it would be necessary to respond to this code section. Accordingly, public notice has been provided for a second Planning & Zoning commission hearing on 6 January 2009 and this supplementary memorandum is provided in response to the aforementioned code section. Sec. 26.470.090. City Council applications. The following types of development shall be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the City Council, pursuant to Section 26.470.110, Procedures for review, and the criteria for each type of development described below. Except as noted, all growth management applications shall comply with the general requirements of Section 26.470.050. Except as noted, all City Council growth management approvals shall be deducted from the respective annual development allotments and development ceiling levels. 4. Essential public facilities. The development of an essential public facility, upon a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission, shall be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the City Council based on the following criteria: a. The Community Development Director has determined the primary use and/or structure to be an essential public facility (see definition). Accessory uses may also be part of an essential public facility project. Errin Evans, Cif Aspen Community Development Department 24 December 2008 Page Two ;,. ,;, {, Response: The Community Development Director has determined that the proposed addffion to the Pitkin County Jail for a structure to house City and County data processing facilities is an essential public facility and subject to the provisions of this section. b. Upon a recommendation from the Community Development Director, the City Council may assess, waive or partially waive affordable housing mitigation requirements as is deemed appropriate and warranted for the purpose of promoting civic uses and in consideration of broader community goals. The employee generation rates may be used as a guideline, but each operation shall be analyzed for its unique employee needs, pursuant to Section 26.470.100, Calculations. Response: The proposed data center will consolidate data processing equipment currently housed with an unacceptable level of security in equipment closets of various city and County buildings. It will provide a greater level of security for this equipment, while meeting the foreseeable expansion needs for additional equipment. The consolidation of this equipment will provide for enhanced security and maintenance efficiency, thereby supporting community goals. This new facility will not generate any new employees. Moreover, the spaces being vacated by the relocation of this equipment are not likely to support additional employment generation. {, ,.-_ n ,~ ;~r,, s b MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Errin Evans, Current Planner THRU: Jennifer Phelan, Deputy Community Development Director DATE OF MEMO: November 18th, 2008 MEETING DATE: December 16th, 2008 ~; 485 Rio Grande Place -Specially Planned Area Amendment APPLICANT /OWNER: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Jodi Smith, Pitkin County Facilities Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Manager /Pitkin County Commission approve the request to construct an addition to the County Jail Building with conditions. REPRESENTATIVE: Stan Clauson Associates, Inc. LOCATION: Civic Address - 485 Rio Grande Place; Legal Description -Pitkin County Center Lot 1 and Lot 5 of the Rio Grande Subdivision; Parcel Identification Number - 2735-182-19-002 CURRENT ZONING & USE Located in the Public (PUB) zone district with a Specially Planned Area (SPA) overlay containing public buildings such as the County Court House and the County Jail. PROPOSED LAND USE: The Applicant is requesting to construct an addition to house SUMMARY: The Applicant requests of the Planning and Zoning Commission to approve the SPA Amendment building an addition on the site. Photo of the Revised 12/11/2008 Page 1 of 9 r, _~ ~,~,; r -- Figure 1: Vicinity Map BACKGROUND: Currently, some of the City and County servers and other data equipment are stored in the County Jail Building. The space where the equipment is housed is not large enough. The County would like to construct an addition to accommodate the equipment and future expansions of the equipment. The applicant proposes to add an addition to the Pitkin County Jail Building at 485 Rio Grande Place to accommodate data equipment and computer servers (See Application -Exhibit D). The subject properly has a Specially Planned Area (SPA) overlay upon it and the SPA needs to be amended to incorporate tl~e addition. 5 LAND USE REQUEST AND REVIEW PROCEDURES: The applicant is requesting the following land use approvals from the Planning and Zoning Commission: SPA Amendment pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.440.050 A. This application does not qualify for an administrative amendment. All modifications shall be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and Council. This proposal does qualify for Consolidated Review. In this case, the conceptual and final plans may be combined based on the scope of the project. The Planning and Zoning Commission, at a public hearing, may make a recommendation to the City Council for approval, approval with conditions or disapproval of the SPA amendment. The City Council is the final authority. Revised 12/11/2008 Page 2 of 9 ... ~' ,- - PROJECT SUMMARY: ,,,~,. The project consists of adding apre-fabricated structure to the north side of the County Jail building. The fagade of the structure will be covered with a brick treatment to match the existing building. The structure is approximately 10 feet high and 324 square feet (see Figure 2). SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA AMENDMENT REVIEW: Since the original Specially Planned Area, known as the Rio Grande SPA Plan, was approved in 1977, many amendments and changes to approvals have occurred on this site (see Exhibit C for a list). The SPA approval was not very detailed at that time. The property was designated for County use; however items that would now be required to be documented in a current SPA plan were not accounted for. Building elevations, al~wable floor azea, open space and other dimensional standards that may be customized to ~6commodate the needs of an SPA were not outlined in the original approvals for this SPA. Later in 1993, the Rio Grande Master Plan was approved. That plan was designed to guide land use patterns for undeveloped land in the Rio Grande azea. The County Jail pazcel is located just outside the scope of that plan. Ordinance No. 10 of Series of 1993 does indicate that the property north of the County building is intended for future additions to the County Jail. ""~ Revised 12/11/2008 Page 3 of 9 Figure 2: The new addition in relation to the existing ouuuing. ~,,, .... °"~ Since then, the Civic Master Plan was created. The Civic Master Plan was created to implement +~ goals and principles around the Civic Core, including Galena Plaza and the Rio Grande Pazk. The County Jail Building is located in the Civic Core; however this plan does not address the County buildings. Recently, a process was initiated to create the Zupancas-Galena Master Plan that includes the County buildings, but it does not appeaz that the plan will be finalized in the neaz future. ,~ None of the past plans or ordinances outline future-details for additions to the County Jail, with one exception, Ordinance 10 of Series 1993. That Ordinance does make accommodations for future additions, though it is unclear whether or not those additions were the intended to be for the substantial construction that was approved in 1995. Staff Comments There are few items to review for this proposed addition because the current SPA is vague and does not define any future plans for buildings on the site. The underlying zone district for this SPA is the Public zone district. The dimensional requirements in this zone district are set by the adoption of the final development plan; however no dimensional requirements were set in any of the final plans or amendments to the plans. In a previous approval for an addition to the jail, the applicant was required to replace open space that was displaced as a result. In this application, the applicant has not proposed to replace the open space that will be displaced with this addition. Staff would prefer to minimize the visual impacts to the Rio Grande Park as much as possible. The building is proposed to be located over a lot line between Lot 1 and Lot 5. This is not permitted by the building code. If approved, the applicant will be required to apply for a lot line adjustment prior to applying for a building permit.'Also the applicant will be required to work with the Parks Department to achieve an approved landscaping plan. The proposed addition will not require any mitigation for growth management. The addition will not create any new employees or create new net leasable space. Staff would prefer to see a master plan that encompasses the long term future goals and needs of the County buildings. If the Planning and Zoning Commission decides to recommend approval to Council, it would be preferable to see an addition that relates to the building and integrates into the location. Based on the information that was submitted with the application, it appears that the applicant has attempted to reduce the visual impacts that the addition may have on the surrounding properties. The applicant has added a matching roof line and added more landscaping to integrate the addition into the existing structure more effectively. RECOMMENDATION: While reviewing the proposal, staff believes that the application is generally minor in nature. It appeazs to be consistent with the final development approvals of the vazious amendments to the SPA. It does not substantially change the exterior of the building and the same materials will be used on the fapade and the roof features will match the existing ~,r building. Staff prefers to see a Master Plan thatt dddresses the long term needs for this site. Revised 12/11/2008 Page 4 of 9 ,~, Community Development Department staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the amendment to the City Council. If the Commission decides to recommend approval of the addition to the Council, it is advised that they do so with the following conditions: 1) The applicant will be required to apply for a lot line adjustment or otherwise remedy the building location proposed to be over a lot line. The Building Code does not permit buildings to be located on lot lines. 2) The applicant is required to remove snow or store accumulated snow on site. Snow is not permitted to be relocated to the Rio Grande Park to limit damage to the sprinkler heads. 3) As per the Engineering Department, the landscaping rocks must be removed from the right-of--way. 4) The Parks Department requires a landscaping,p)an that provides for: tree protection, plant spacing, seed mix and irrigation, and weed management. RECOMMENDED MOTION: If the Planning and Zoning Commission chooses to recommend approval for the proposed amendment, they may use this motion "I move to make a recommendation to City Council to approve the consolidated development plan for a SPA amendment with conditions." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -Staff Findings Exhibit B -List of prior plans and approvals Exhibit C -SPA from 1977 Exhibit D -Application ~- Revised 12/11/2008 Page 5 of 9 RESOLUTION No. _ (SERIES OF 2008) A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, MAKING A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL TO COUNCIL FOR A SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA AMENDMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING AN ADDITION TO THE PITKIN COUNTY JAIL BUILDING LOCATED AT 485 RIO GRANDE PLACE, LEGALLY KNOWN AS LOTS 1 AND 5, PITKIN COUNTY CENTER, CITY OF ASPEN Parcel Identification Number 2737-073-47-851 & 2737-073-06-855 WHEREAS, Stan Clauson Associates, Inc. located at 412 North Mill Street, Aspen, Colorado on behalf of Pitkin County, 530 E. Bleeker Street, Aspen, Colorado, submitted a request for a Specially Planned Area Amendment dated October 6th, 2008 to the Planning and Zoning Commission; and e. WHEREAS, the subject property is located,at 485 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, the pazcels aze identified as pazcel numbers 2737-073-47-851 & 2737-073-06-855, and the legal description of the property is: Pitkin County Center, Lot 1 and 5, City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado; and WHEREAS, the Specially Planned Area approval for the Property was originally approved by the Aspen City Council in 1977 and again for the Rio Grande Master Plan in Ordinance No. 10 Series of 1993; and WHEREAS, the current request is to receive a recommendation for approval to the City Council for a Specially Planned Area amendment to amend the SPA to permit the construction of a 324 squaze feet addition to allow for storage of data equipment and computer servers; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and considered the application for a Specially Planned Area Amendment Review pursuant to Code section 26.440.050 ~^ ~^, ~., under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on December 16th, 2008; and, ti., WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended denial of the request; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfaze. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO IN REGULAR MEETING ASSEMBLED, THAT: Section 1• Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends approval to the City Council of the Specially Planned Area Amendment as requested for the Property. The recommendation of approval granted herein is 'conditioned on the following: 1. The applicant is required to remove snow or store accumulated snow on site. Snow is not permitted to be relocated to the Rio Grande Park to limit damage to the sprinkler heads. 2. The applicant will be required to apply for a lot line adjustment or otherwise remedy the building location proposed to be over a lot line. The Building Code does not permit buildings to belocated on lot lines. 3. Remove the landscaping rocks from the right-of--way as per the Engineering Department. 4. The Parks Department requires a landscaping plan that provides for: a. Tree Protection: A vegetation protection fence shall be erected at the drip line of each individual tree or groupings of trees remaining on site and their represented drip lines. A formal plan indicating the location of the tree protection will be required for the bldg permit set. No excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction backfill, and storage of equipment, foot or vehicle traffic allowed within the drip line of any tree remaining on site. This fence must be inspected by the city forester or his/her designee before any construction activities are to commence. b. Plant Spacing: Appropriate spacing: will be required for all new plantings. Coniferous Trees will require adequate spacing between trees and distance from z buildings or structures to allow for mature growth. Deciduous Trees will require ~, adequate spacing from structures to accommodate mature growth in height. c. Seed Mix and Irrigation: Applicant shall use the City of Aspen approved native seed mix and a temporary or permanent irrigation system will be required for establishment. d. Weed Management: Applicant shall detail and define how it will manage noxious weeds during the seed establishment period. Section 3: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4• If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the approvals as herein awazded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. INTRODUCED, READ AND ADOPTED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on the 16th day of December 2008. Attest: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk LJ Erspamer, Chairperson APPROVED AS TO FORM James R. True, Special Counsel EXHIBIT A ~ 26 440 050 Review Standards for development in a SAecially Planned Area In the review of a development application for a conceptual development plan and a final development plan, the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council must consider the following: 1. Whether the proposed development is compatible with or enhances the mix of development in the immediate vicinity of the parcel in terms of land use, density, height, bulk, architecture, landscaping and open space. The addition to the County Jail is a fairly small structure, measuring 324 square feet and approximately 10 feet high. It is a pre fabricated structure that will be placed in the rear of the building facing Obermeyer Place and the Rio Grande Park. The addition will have a brick treatment to match the existing Jail Building and the roofline will be altered to match the existing building. The existing building is shown below in Figure A. The addition is proposed to be located where the picnic table is now sitting. Figure A -The existing building. The location was chosen because the County Buildings seem to be a stable use in the downtown campus area. The future of some other considered locations may change and reguire removal of the equipment. The equipment cannot be housed within the Court House, City Hall or other buildings for several reasons: the older buildings are not climate controlled, the wiring systems are too dated and the structures are not able to support the weight. The SPA should be amended to reflect long term plans for the site prior to the approval of future additions. It is more efftcient to look at the entire SPA site and determine how the long term needs could be met. The original SPA was created in 1977 and could now Revised 12/11/2008 Page 6 of 9 ~. ~ ~` be amended to meet needs that may have changed since that time. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. Whether sufficient public facilities and roads exist to service the proposed development. The addition will be used to house data equipment and computer servers. There will not be any plumbing or new staff created as a 'result. No increased impacts on the public facilities or roads are predicted. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 3. Whether the pacel proposed for development is generally suitable for development, considering the slope, ground instability and the possibility of mud flow, rock falls, avalanche dangers and flood hazazds. The parcel is suitable for development. It is mostly level. There are no environmental constraints that would limit the location of the addition. The parcel is not located in the floodplain area or an area that is particularly steep. Stafffnds this criterion to be met. 4. Whether the proposed development creatively employs land planning techniques to preserve significant view planes, avoid adverse environmental impacts and provide open space, trails and similaz amenities for the users of the project and the public space. The proposed development consists of a prefabricated square unit that will be finished with an exterior treatment and roofline to match the existing building. The addition is located in the view plane from the pedestrian court at Obermeyer Place and the historically designated cabins located on the adjacent to the County Center parcel. Figure B below shows a 3-D view of the addition as it would appear from the pedestrian court at Obermeyer Place. ~~'` With a creative landscaping plan the visual impacts from the surrounding properties is predicted to be minimal. It does not create significant adverse environmental impacts; however it does reduce the amount of open space that is currently on County Center. When the last amendment to the County Jail was approved in 1995, the applicant was required to replace any open space that was removed as a result of the addition. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 5. Whether the proposed development is in compliance with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan does not specifically address the County Jail Building or this addition. This proposal is relatively minor in nature; however staff emphasizes the need to have long term plans to address future needs for each public service facility. Stafffands this criterion to be met. 6. Whether the proposed development will require the expenditure of excessive public funds to provide public facilities for the parcel, or the surrounding neighborhood. This project is relatively small and not expected to require excessive public funds for the project itself or facilities for the parcel; however, the cost of the addition will come from public funds. Staff finds this criterion to be met. w° Revised 12/11/2008 Page 7 of 9 ~, w ..,,~. 7. Whether proposed development on slopes in excess of twenty percent meet the slope reduction and density requirements of Section 26.445.040 (B)(2). There are no slopes in excess of twenty percent where the addition is to be located. Density will not be affected by the addition. Staff finds this criterion met. 8. Whether there are sufficient GMQS allotments for the proposed development. No new net leasable area will be created as a result of this project. No new employees will be required. This project will not require growth management mitigation. Staff finds this criterion met. Revised 12/11/2008 Page 8 of 9 n o.,. ..: EXHIBIT B ~+.+ List of Prior Aaprovals affeetin2 the Rio Grande Area 1977 -The Rio Grande Interim SPA plan was approved 1981 -The relocated the snow dump and set aside an unspecified pazcel for a Performing Arts and Culture Center 1982 -The City and County exchanged the Aspen One, Oden and stable properties 1988 - A conceptual SPA Master Plan was approved that included the parking garage, the library, the Spring Street extension, the snow melt area, and an arts usage azea 1989 - A final SPA plan was approved for the County Library and the parking garage 1991- A final SPA plan was approved for the Youth Center 1992 -Ordinance 26 of 2002 is SPA Amendment to install pazk spaces and landscaping. Snow storage must be on site and is not permitted on the r/w or on the path. 1992 -Intergovernmental Agreement for Resolution 29 of Series 1992 approving land exchanges and easements for the library, the pazking garage, land north of the jail, trail and transit easements, and the youth center building. 1993 -Ordinance 10 of Series 1993 approved the Rio Grande Master Plan and specified that Lot 5 should be used for future expansions to the County Jail. (The Ordinance is included in the application) 1995 -SPA Review for an expansion to the County Jail 2006 -Civic Master Plan was approved Revised 12/11/2008 Page 9 of 9 ~ ~~ ~ s ~_ - -> . .. .._ 2 - w C ~ ~ - s~,~~ 4 ~ Zi~ 'Y° ^g '~'~~{ ~-- Tg c e `! r ~ ~ ~~.y! ~-y i j V J~~ ~a~ A ~ . r ~ ;~ ~__ ~ ~ ~ ~, I,,~-, ~~ :~ ~. ~ r ~ ~, ~' .~ 1 ++~ J LL `~ I - - - _. ~- { ~ 133tl15 pl• ~' ~ ~ ~,r 00 m z Z' °i A ~ .~ ° C/ F ~ ~ ~ o~; ~° ~'+ o~caa ~ s ~~; ~ i I ~ v v v a oo (, i ¢ i c7 C7 U N c ~ '1' ~ ~, I i F `+'+~~~~.~ ~. 1. \ ~ -fit ~ ~,~ ; ~ ~~ .~ , ~:•~ 7 // J ~ 1 ~ ~ ~; j ~ ~ ~:\ I 'i WQ ~~ •.~~ ii' 0 0- - ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 t ~ ~ p rte` ~I I a ~ ~~ , , ~ o ~ >-~ ,, ~ ~ ~ , ~~a;~~ j 1. ~ ~ ~. 1 I W ~ x ~~ ~ s ~ ~~ 1 p 1-- r 1 ~, ti r l.~ ~.. __ _ _ ~ `/ I ~ ~ - oo _, r ~~ L Liu 7n -LPL '.. _ j _ -_ •-7 0 __ -- t ~- ~'-- ~~ ~. t ~~ ~~ , ~, ~ ``~,_''~\ ~ ~f: ~ ~ ~ I / ~'~ j r ~~..~ J -.AA"~ ~1 LF`. ~_~..~.- `^~y' ~ '~ Y U Q o _ N ;; o+ O L ` j e0 c(, 7 LL J k ~ a 6• ~ - N ~ OI ~ 7 . ~ i~ 7 ti30i 1: ~ ~i pN111d5 R 6 i ~' Ha °, ~ - ~ U LL u ~ N a F ~ ~, R ~ ~, ;o ; _ _ __ ~ r a c c `_.. I __ ~ j ~ c(V m c .// J s Y e a• ~ii ' B 0 3 I .. '~ a • ~ ~,~ .. ~ I ii c y I / ~ N l.h', '~ l\~ e ~i ~ ~. ~s 1 0 xs t,.,, 1 `\ ' ~ 9 4 ~ C/~R J a V ~ ~ `v ~ ~ vNiwr > > a ~ :~ II ~LL ~ c . a U S U~ N~ W ~ w« I I tI _.~ / I `I LL .'~ iC `_ ~J#~_ _. U `~I 1 ~, ,,.,, r \r re~ APPLICATION Pitkin County Jail Data Center Addition .. ~. r >~ r w SPA Amendment 2 October 2008 .~ln~ 61'~ L Applicant: Pitkin County c/o Jodi Smith; Pitkin County Facilities Manager 485 Rio Grande Place, Unit101 Aspen, CO 81611 Location: Pitkin County Jail 485 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 PID 273707347851 and 273707306855 Zone: Public (PUB) with SPA Overlay An application for SPA Amendment to provide for a new Data Centerbuilding located to the north of the Pitkin County Jail building, and create an improved landscaped area. Represented by: i!~` - / • 1 STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATESiNc i landscape architecture. planning. resort design qaa North Mill Street Aspen, Colorado 8t6u tg7o/gas-agz; Eg7o/9zo-n6a8 l info~scaplanning.com wwwscaplanning.com ~.~ ..~ ~,, `' l ~4 ~ ,~ " STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATESiNc - - landscape architecture. planning. resort design e `~-. 4iz North Mill Street Aspen, Colorado 8i6ii t.97o/9z5-z3z3 f.97o/9zo-ibz8 .•:~ ;~,'~ info®scaplanning.com wwwscaplanning.com ~ 2 October 2008 "-- Ms. Andrea Hingley, Planner City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 " RE: SPA Amendment for Data Processing Facility " Dear Andrea: " On behalf of our client, Jodi Smith, Pitkin County Facilities Manager, I am submitting this application requesting that the City of Aspen conduct the necessary reviews to provide for an SPA Amendment for the Rio Grande SPA and Subdivision, more specifically the Pitkin County Jail property, located at 485 Rio Grande Place in Aspen. The purpose of the ' ' Amendment is to provide for a small accessory building to the north of the Pitkin County Jail building to house critical data processing equipment and computer servers. The proposed 12-foot by 27-foot prefabricated building is approximately 324 s.f. in floor area. The building would contain computer equipment, as well as the HVAC systems necessary for maintaining temperature control. No offices are intended for the proposed location, nor will ' ' there be any increase in staffing. The proposed structure will receive a brick fagade that closely matches the abutting jail building. There is also a landscape plan proposed to ensure that the building will blend with the local environment. Some additional landscaping and a ' ' boulder wall to establish a level grade for the building are provided along City of Aspen public right-of-way. ' " The Pitkin County Information Technology Manager has been advised that housing this equipment in a separate structure will best ensure that these essential public facilities are protected from any environmental or intrusion hazards. On behalf of Pitkin County, we look ' ' forward to an opportunity to present our application in the hearing process, and remain .. ready to answer any questions that you or the review boards may have regarding the application. ... ry Yo Stn ~I ICP, ASLA "" STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATES, Inc. ~IA~ Encl: Land Use Application in 20 copies .~ Land Use Application Fee in the amount of $2,940 ,.. TM r ~aA ~. r r .. r .. w r w w r TABLE OF CONTENTS - 1. Code Response 2. Land Use Application Form GMQS Memo 3. Dimensional Requirements Form 4. Fee Agreement 5. Authorization Letter 6. Proof of ownership 7. 8'/z" x 11"vicinity map 8. Legal Description 9. Site, Grading and Landscape Plan 10. Photo Simulations 11. Building Plan 12. Previous Approvals 13.Adjacent Property Owners within 300' 14.Pre-application Summary ~% Project Overview ATTACHMENTI ~~ This application seeks approval to construct and install a small accessory building to the north of °• the Pitkin County Centerjail building to house data equipment. The proposal requires an amendment to the Specially Planned Area (SPA) as a iwo-ste~p review process before the '"' Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. ,~ Previously, Ordinance 26. Series of 2002 approved an amendment to the Rio Grande Specially ~. Planned Area on 26 August 2002. The ordinance granted approval to install four parking spaces, ~ landscaping, and a new curb cut off of East Bleeker Street on Lot 5 of the Rio Grande Subdivision/Spa. The proposed building is 12 feet by 27 feet, containing approximately 324 sq. ft: of floor area. The data center will house City and Count data processing computer servers, as well as a small generator and the HVAC system necessary for power and cooling. The building would contain computer equipment, as well as the HVAC systems necessary for maintaining temperature .~ confrol. No offices are intended for the proposed location, nor would there be any increase in staffing. The proposed structure will receive a brick facade that closely matches the abutting jail ~- building. There is also a landscape plan proposed to ensure that the building will blend with the local environment. Some additional landscaping and a boulder wall to establish a level grade .. for the building are provided along City of Aspen public right-of-way. This Essential Public Facility is required because the Pitkin County Information Technology Manager has been advised that housing this equipment in a separate structure will best ensure that these essential public facilities are protected from any environmental or intrusion hazards. r. The data centerwill not contain offices or require additional staff. The prefabricated building will receive a brick fagade to match the existing surrounding buildings. The proposed landscape '- plan will complement the current plantings and local environment. The proposed location for the small accessory building is located the in the PUB zone district with „„, a SPA overlay. The applicant hopes to begin construction in the fall of 2008 and conclude construction in the spring of 2009. The building is located among public city and county °" buildings with access to public facilities. Since the building will only be 324 sq. ft. and not contain county offices or require additional staff, it will not have a significant affect on public ~, facilities. The new structure complies with all of the applicable sections of the City of Aspen Land Use "' Code. Following are responses to the relevant code sections and statements from the applicant ,~ on final material selection and finishes. r w r ,an r r SPA Amendment +~ 2 October 2008 Page 1 i f "~ \,:a r -~ Land Use Code Standards Applicable sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code are addressed below: Chapter 26.440..090. Amendment to development order ~, ,,,, Sec. 26.440.090. Amendment to development order. A. An insubstantial amendment to an approved development order for a final development plan may be authorized by the Community Development Director. The following shall not be considered an insubstantial amendment: 1. A change in the use or character of the development. ,,, 2. An increase by greater than three percent (390) in the overall coverage of structures on the land. -- 3. Any amendment that substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed development or the demand for public facilities. °" 4. A reduction by greater than three percent (390) of the approved open space. ,.,,, 5. A reduction by greater than one percent (1 ~) of the off-street parking and loading space. 6. A reduction in required pavement widths or rights-of-way for streets and easements. d- 7. An increase of greater than two percent (2%) in the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial buildings. `~ 8. An increase by greater than one percent (190) in the approved residential density of the „~ development. 9. Any change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project's original ~° approval or which requires granting of a further variation from the project's approved use or dimensional requirements. ,,.., The proposed applicaflon has been determined by Clfy staff as a two-step review process before the Planning and Zoning commission as well as City Council. Although, It meets many of •-° the above criteria, staff has determined that this Is not an insubstantial amendment to the approved SPA development. If can be considered an Essential Public Facility because of its function with respect to critical data processing requirements. B. All other modifications shall be approved pursuant to the terms and procedures of the final "' Development Plan, provided that the proposed change is consistent with or an enhancement of the approved. final plan. If the proposed change is not consistent with the approved Final ' Development Plan, the amendment shall be subject to both conceptual and the final ... development review and approval. '°" C. During the review of the proposed amendment, the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council may require such conditions of approval as are necessary to insure that the .. development will be compatible with current community conditions. This shall include, but not .. be limited to, applying to the portions of the development which have not obtained building permits or are proposed to be amended to any new community policies or regulations which have been implemented since the original approval or taking into consideration changing _ community circumstances as they affect the project's original representations and commitments. The applicant may withdraw the proposed amendment at any time during the +.. review process. *^ The applicant will comply with condffions of approval that are necessary to Insure that the development will be compatible wffh current community eondiHons. The proposed landscape plan Is Intended fo mitigate any visual impacts of the proposed building. i SPA Amendment Page 2 2 October 2008 aa/ r Chapter 26.440.040 Procedures for Review. ~~ ,,,y B. Consolidated review. ,.,. i. Conceptual and final development plan. An applicant may request and the Community Development Director may determine that because of the limited extent of the issues involved in 1d' a proposed Specially Planned Area i(SPA) in relation to these review procedures and standards or because of a significant community interest which the project would serve, it is appropriate to "° consolidate conceptual and final development plan review. The Community Development ~+^. Director shall consider whether the full four (4j step review would be redundant and serve no public purpose and inform the applicant during the reapplication stage whether consolidation ~ will be permitted. An application which is determined to be eligible for consolidation shall be .. processed pursuant to the terms and procedures of final development plan review. The Planning and Zoning Commission or the City Council may, during review, determine that the application should be subject to both conceptual and final plan review, in which case consolidated review shall not occur. .. the application can be consoUdofed fo a conceptual and final development plan review because of the limited extent of the issues involved with the proposed SPA amendment. The Community Development Director 1s requested to approve a consolidated review for this application. „~ 2.Other development review applications. An applicant may request and the Community Development Director may determine that an application for development within a Specially ..~ Planned Area (SPA) may be consolidated at the third step with a development application for conditional use, special review, ESA review, subdivision review, text amendment, rezoning "' and/or for certain GMQS exemptions. However, if the applicant requests consideration of a Code text amendment or rezoning, these applications may be considered at the conceptual w.. steps, subject to final review at steps three (3) and four (4). .Y This provision does not apply. .. r ew r s a +~ r SPA Amendment ,,. 2 October 2008 Page 3 ~ ,.,,~ .. ~. .~ „~ Chapter 26.440.050 Review standards for development ,,, A. General. In the review of a development application for a conceptual development plan and a final development plan, the Planning and Zoning Commission and Cify Council shall "' consider the following: 1. Whether the proposed development is compatible with or enhances ~ the mix of development in the immediate vicinity of the parcel in terms of land use, density, height, bulk, architecture, landscaping, and open space. ~w The proposed building will be signiNcanfly smaller and have a brick fagade that matches the ^+ surrounding buildings. The proposed landscape writ beHer blend with the sununding „~ environment. nw 2. Whether sufficient public facilities and roads exist to service the proposed development. ~ the proposed development will not house any ofTices or require extra employees. It Is located ~ near a main road and will not affect public facilities. 3. Whether the parcel proposed for development is generally suitable for development, considering the slope, ground instability and the possibility of mudflow, rock falls, avalanche "' dangers and flood hazards. r The parcel is suitable for development and surrounded by development. 4. Whether the proposed development creatively employs land planning techniques to preserve "" significant view planes, avoid adverse environmental impacts and provide open space, trails ,,,,, and similar amenities for the users of the project and the public at large. ~- the proposed building will preserve view planes, and avoid environmental Impacts. '" 5. Whether the proposed development is in compliance with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan. ~- the proposed development is incompliance with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan. 6. Whether the proposed development will require the expenditure of excessive public funds to provide public facilities for the parcel or the surrounding neighborhood. •- The proposed development will not require additional public facllrties or an upgrade to current public facilities. 7. Whether proposed development on slopes in excess of twenty percent (20%~ meet the slope reduction and density requirements of Subsection 26.445.040.8.2. The proposed building location will not contain slopes in excess of twenty percent (20%). .,.,, 8. Whether there are sufficient GMQS allotments for the proposed development. The burden shall rest upon an applicant to demonstrate the general reasonableness and "' suitability of the proposed development and its conformity to the standards and procedures of this Chapter and Section; provided, however, that in the review of the conceptual development '° plan, consideration will be given only to the general concept for the development, while during SPA Amendment Page 4 2 October 2008 r ,~-.. ~. W,, the review of the final development plan, detailed evaluation of the specific aspects of the ~~ development will be accomplished. The proposed structure is solely Intended to provide a secure housing for data processing ""' equipment. It 1s an Essential Pub11e Fac116y that will not generate any addrfional employees or have growth managementlmplications. r« wr B. Variations permitted. The final development plan shall comply with the requirements of the underlying zone district; provided, however, that variations from those requirements may be ~ allowed based on the standards of this Section. Variations may be allowed for the following W, requirements: open space, minimum distance between buildings, maximum height, minimum front yard, minimum rear yard, minimum side yard, minimum lot width, minimum lot area, trash ., access area, internal floor area ratio, number of off-street parking spaces and uses and design standards of Chapter 26.410 for streets and related improvements. Any variations allowed shall be specified in the SPA agreement and shown on the final development plan. '~" The proposed structure Is located within PUB zone with an SPA overlay. Section 26.710.250 states r that the dimensional requirements shall be set by the adoption of the conceptual and final development p-an. No variations to the zone district requirements will be requested. .. .. .. ~, .. r r r r "' SPA Amendment Page 5 2 October 2008 ~~, i~. Chapter 26.440.060 Final Development Plan B. Final Development Plan. 1. Contents of application. The contents of a development application for a Final Development '"' Plan shall include the following: a. The general application information required in Chapter 26.304. ~ ,+ ~~+ b. A precise plan of the proposed development including but not limited to proposed land uses, densities, landscaping, internal traffic circulation and access ways. The precise plan shall be in ~ sufficient detail to enable evaluation of the architectural, landscaping and design features of ~ the proposed development. It shall show the location and floor area of all existing and proposed buildings and other improvements including heights, dwelling unit types and nonresidential ., facilities. "' A precise plan of the proposed development is attached, the SPA Sife Plan. ~ c. A statement specifying the underlying zone district on the parcel and, if variations are •. proposed, a statement of how the variations comply with the standards of Subsection 26.440.040.6. Y„ The project overview states the underlying zone district as PUB wrfh a SPA overlay. No variations are proposed. d. A statement outlining a development schedule specifying the date construction is proposed "' to be initiated and completed. ~., the proposed construction will be iniflafed fall of 2008 and completed spring of 2009. e. A statement specifying the public facilities that will be needed to accommodate the "'" proposed development and what specific assurances will be made to ensure that public ,,,_ facilities will be available to accommodate the proposed development. •~~ No addrfional public facilities will be required to support this essential public facility. "" f. A statement of the reasonable conformance of the final development plan with the approval „,,, granted to the conceptual development plan and with the original intent of the City Council in designating the parcel Specially Planned Area (SPA). City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission adopted the Rlo Grande MasferPlan in "" 1993 that includes the subject properties. Lot 1 was intended for the PNkin County Jall Facflr7y .. and Lot 5 was intended (or future expansion of fhe Pitkin County Jail The proposed facility represents an expansion of fhe Jall and Communications Center to house equipment which may -~ be at risk In the existing building. r g. A plat which depicts the applicable information required by Subsection 26.480.O60.A.3. ~ the proposed site plan and landscape drawing shall be recorded as an amendment to the SPA. r h. A proposed SPA agreement which conforms to Section 26.440.070 below. ,r. The minimal nature of the proposed facility should not require revision to the SPA Agreement. SPA Amendment Page 6 2 October 2008 .. r '" ~ LAND USE APPLICATION.^,~ _ ~..~ ~` PROJECT: ~. ~~. IW ~.~ rM ~~ w~ W r w r .. W .. .., ~~ ., it ATTACHMENT2 Name: Pitkin County Center SPA Amendment Location: Pitkin County Center Lotl, 485 Rio Grande; & Lot 5 485 Rio Grande Aspen, CO Pazcel ID #: Lotl: 273707347851; Lots: 273707306855 APPLICANT: Name: Jodi Smith, Pitkin County Faculties Manager Address: 485 Rio Grande Place, Unit 101, Aspen, CO 81611 Phone #: 970-920-5396 Fax #: 970-920-5285 E-mail: Jodi.smith@co.pitkin.co.us REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Stan Clauson Associates, Inc. Address: 412 N. Mill St., Aspen, CO 81611 Phone#: 970-925-2323 Fax#:970-920-1628 E-mail: info@scaplanning.com ~ rrt yr r~rrucw i wn: tpiease cnecx att that apptyl: ^ Conditional Use ^ Conceptual PUD ^ Conceptual Historic Devt. ^ Special Review ^ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ^ Final Historic Development ^ Design Review Appeal ® Conceptual SPA ^ Minor Historic Devt. ^ GMQS Allotment ® Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) ^ Historic Demolition ® GMQS Exemption ^ Subdivision ^ Historic Designation ^ ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream ^ Subdivision Exemption (includes ^ Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane ^ Lot Split ^ Temporary Use ^ Other: ^ Lot Line Adjustment ^ Text/Map Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) Lot 1 has a previously approved landscape treatment; Lot 5 has a previously approved pazking lot; a walkway intersects both lots. The Jail is located on Lot 1. rROPOSwu taescnpnon or proposea buuamgs, uses, moatncanons, etc. The applicant would like to install a 324 Sq. Ft. accessory building to the north of the Jail building to house critical data equipment and computer servers. No staff offices would be housed here. The facade of the one story building would be brick to match existing azchitecture. hnproved landscape treatments to screen the building and enhance existing conditions, including improved walkway circulation would also be included. .. Have you attached the following? ® Pre-Application Conference Summary ®Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement ^- ®Response to Attachment #2, Dimensional Requirements Form FEES DuE: $2940.00 ,. ~, ® Response to Attachment ~"`tinunum Submission Contents `"' ® Response to Attachment #4Specific Submission Contents „, ® Response to Attachment #5, Review Standazds for Your Application ~.W ~,w I.aO YM YY Y !O~ L1~ r r r ».. .~, ~. o. ~, t"'~ ~... STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATESjNc landscape architecture. planning. resort design ~ -... ~At, qiz North Mill Street Aspen, Colorado 8i6u t. 97o/9z5-z3z3 f.97o/9zoa6z8 info®scaplanning.com www.scaplanning.com r A .. .. ... r .., .. .w. r Memo To: Errin Evans, Ctty of Aspen Community Development Dept. From: Stan Clawson, AICP, ASLA Cc: Jodi Smith, Pitkin County Facilities Manager Date: 24 December 2008 Re: Pitkin County Data Center, responses to Sec. 26,470.090 Pursuant to our application for an SPA Amendment for a modular structure adjacent to the Pitkin County Jail to house data processing equipment, we are submitting this supplementary information responding to the "Essential Public Facilities" section of the City of Aspen Land Use Code. After we had submitted our application and provided public notice for the Planning & Zoning Commission hearing of 16 December 2008, City staff determined that it would be necessary to respond to this code section. Accordingly, public notice has been provided for a second Planning & Zoning commission hearing on 6 January 2009 and this supplementary memorandum is provided in response to the aforementioned code section. Sec. 26.470.090. City Council applications. The following types of development shall be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the City Council, pursuant to Section 26.470.110, Procedures for review, and the criteria for each type of development described below. Except as noted, all growth management applications shall comply with the general requirements of Section 26.470.050. Except as noted, all City Council growth management approvals shall be deducted from the respective annual development allotments and development ceiling levels. 4. Essential public facilities. The development of an essential public facility, upon a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission, shall be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the City Council based on the following criteria: a. The Community Development Director has determined the primary use and/or structure to be an essential public facility (see definition). Accessory uses may also be part of an essential public facility project. ., ~.. Errivans, City of Aspen Community Development Department 24 December 2008 Page Two ~~ `' Response: The Community Development Director has determined that the ~' proposed addition to the Pitkin County Jail for a structure to house City and ~ County data processing facilities is an essential public facility and subject to the provisions of this section. rr b. Upon a recommendation from the Community Development Director, the City °'~ ~ Council may assess, waive or partially waive affordable housing mitigation requirements as is deemed appropriate and warranted for the purpose of "~ ~ promoting civic uses and in consideration of broader community goals. The wr I employee generation rates may be used as a guideline, but each operation shall be analyzed for its unigue employee needs, pursuant to Section 26.470.100, '~ j Calculations. i r Response: The proposed data center will consolidate data processing ~- j equipment currently housed with an unacceptable level of security in equipment closets of various city and County buildings. R will provide a greater level of security for this equipment, while meeting fhe foreseeable expansion ~, ~ needs for additional equipment. The consolidation of this equipment will provide for enhanced security and maintenance eificiency, thereby supporting ~ community goals. This new facility will not generate any new employees. Moreover, the spaces being vacated by the relocation of this equipment are "" .. «.. i „. not likely to support addtional employment generation. ... ,.w i ,. i i i A i ~ i w r ~ r .. ~. ATTACHMENTS DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM .. Project: Pitkin County Center SPA Ammendment ,, Applicant: Jodi Smith Facilities Manager Pitkin County Location: 485 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO "" Zone District: Public with SPA overlay ~~. Lot Size: Lot 1:62 290.8 Sq. Ft. + Lot 5: 5, 241 Sq.Ft. = 67,531.8 Lot Area: '~ (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas ~~ within the high water mazk, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Public net leasable: Existing: Proposed ail sq. ft. +324sq.ft. Number of residential units: Existing: n/a Proposed: _ n/a Number of bedrooms: Existing: _ n/a Proposed.• n/a r „„ Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): n1a DIMENSIONS: " F1oorArea: Existing:_n Principal bldg. height: Existing: 1a Allowable:_n/a Proposed:_n Allowable: Proposed: /a Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: '- On-Site parking: Existing: Required.• Proposed: Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed.• Open Space: Existing: Required.• Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed.• Reaz Setback: Existing: Required.• Proposed: '°~ Combined F/R: Existing: Required: Proposed: "' Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: °- Side Setback: Existing: Required.• Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing.• Required: Proposed: ., Existing non-confomtties or encroachments: no non-conformities or encroachments are present on site. ~. Variations requested: _none ., ,,. ~" *'"~ ` ~ ATTACHMENT 4 .., CTl'Y OF ASPEN COMM[JNPI'Y DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT . .. A t fo Payme t of C+tv~@5pen Development plication Fees -~ CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter QTY) and ,Jodi Smith Pitkin Counri Facilities Manaeer (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: r+ 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY as appfitation for A,n n mnnt t he iar develonment order (SPAT (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). u* 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 48 (Series of 2006) establishes ,u~ a fee structure for Laced Use applications and the payment ofall processing fees is a condition precedent m a determination of appBcaton completeness. +in 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not r possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs iawlved in processing the applitatioa APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it h in the interest o£ tbe parties that APPLICANT make ... payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT oa a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may acmue following their hearings and/or .„ aPProvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash Bquidity and will make additional payments upon aotifiration by the CITYwhea they aze necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process ~' APPLICANT°S application. r 4 CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff m complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning aw Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, ss .r current billings are paid ia-full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that is considemton of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect Cull fees prior ~ to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit is the amount of $2940.00 which is for 13 hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the r initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CTT7 for tine processing of the application mentioned above, iaduding post approval review at a cote of $245.00 per planner ew hour over the initial deposit Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and is no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. ~ _ CFfY OFASPEN APPLICe~NI' .. By Br `` °"' Chris Bendon Jodi S h; Pitkia County Facilities Manager Community Development Department Date: October 1. 2008 .. _ Billing Address and Telephone Number. ,«. g~,,;.et 506 Ens[ Main St, Aspen. CO 81611 ~ 970.920.5396 u. ... 0 aw• r s W ~. r ~~ p~ w .. >_ w .., r i w .., . ATTACHMENT S 530 E Main Street Aspen, September 4, 2008 City of Aspen Community Development Deputy City Director 130 5. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 , To Whom It May Concern: 81611-1948 The County intends to apply for a SPA Amendment for the Rio Grande Specially Planned Area (SPA) and Subdivision Project. The application will be to complete an SPA Amendment to make,a change to the north side of the jail with a 12'x27' self contained, pre-fabricated building (Data Center) to house city and county servers as well as a small generator and HVAC systems necessary for power and coolirig. No offices are intended for-the proposed location, nor any increase in staff. The proposed building will receive a brick facade to match the existing building and surrounding area, as well as well as landscape changes to better. blend with th'e local environment. Stan Clausen Associates, LLC, 412 N. MiIIs Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611 {970) 925-2323, is authorized_to act on behalf of the County during this process. Sincerely, ~attice Phy Internal Services Director (970)920-5200 pm/Jlf Adminisvation w Sufte 301 (970)920.5200 ~" fax 920-5198 County Commissioners 'County Attorney Finance and Use Tax Suite 301 Suite 302 Suite 201 (970) 920.5200 - (970) 920.5190 ~ (970) 920-5220 fax 920-5198 fax 920.5198 fax 920-5230 gp~p,~.~~~ur~~~u~~ rN~ 463171 Page: 1 of 3 01/25/2002 10: D 0.00 ATTACHMENT 6 QUIT CLAIM DEED .m THIS DEED, made this ~ 0 ~ day of ~T~~--~ , 2002 between the City of Aspen, Colorado, a home rule municipal corporation, whose legal address is 130 . South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, 81611 Grantor, and the Boazd of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado, a body corporate and politic, whose legal address is 530 East Main Street, Third Floor, Aspen, Colorado 81611, County of Pitkin, Grantee. ,~, ~. .., r .. r WITNESSETH that the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN DOLLARS and NO/100 ($10.00) has remised, released, sold, conveyed and QUIT CLAIMED, and by these presents does remise, release, sell, convey and QUIT CLAIM unto the Grantee, its heirs and. assignees forever, all the right, title interest, claim and demand which the Grantor has in and to the following described real estate situate, lying and being iil the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, to wit: Lots 5 of the Rio Grande Subdivision. Apart of the Southwest one-quarter of Section 7, Township 10 South, Range 84 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, City of Aspen, Colorado according the Plat thereof recorded in Plat book 32 at Page 83 in the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office, reserving however, that certain 25-foot trail and transit easement and that certain water service easement as shown on the Rio Grande Subdivision Plat for Lot 5 recorded in Plat Book 32 at Page 84. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same, together with all and singular the appurtenances and privileges thereunto belonging, or in anywise thereunto appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behalf of the Grantee, its heirs and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said parties have executed this and on the date set forth above. >> ~~~~ lie a derud, Mayor City of Aspen STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 10~ day of ~lLlY1 u n r V , 2002 by Helen Kalin Klanderud as Mayor City of Aspen. -~ fficial seal I~ l5 , 2.0~ :a :~ ,o Ndtary Public youth cntr.doc 01/10/2002 1 1 1 1 1 e i~ i~ (~ I ~~ !ti' ~, ATTACHMENT 7 T v .C1 9 ~, ~ ~ ~~ ~g ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ 5~~a °° 6 g -~ ~ ` a A Il,. ~ Q6 u ~', ~C Fi H t 4 6 . E ~ a ~ ~i ~Ti ran C. a xr' n ~ O` € ~ }. C ~~' ~ ~ u UV a¢~.'. ~~i » ~tF ~6 r ~ G ~~ ~~J ~- C s ~i ~ ~ ~7 ~ `~ ~ ~ ti o ~ ~ w ~ C. ~ ~ ~ U o T b [[~~ U b ~;~ ~'y 'lU VUyyr7, Y..Y~~J.yy~ v~`r3 °- '~ ~ _ •r S ~ z ~ ~ ~. a ~ ~ ~' A ~ R •~~ ~ QU ¢. G g u u e ~y ~~ b ~ ~~ az a . a5 x.~ d~ ~~ ~. F 1 ~,w a C O 1.,~~ V PG ~~ r ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 11 ~`s NiV ~ r' z ~ ~'~ ~ a°i ~ ~ .a ~ ~ u° •. ~ ~:, _f ~~. ,w .~. ,» ~y 1w ~.~ em .. .. .. .-; _. .. r w .., Parcel Detail ,~ w, r".,, ATTACHMENT 8 Pitkin County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Assessor/'I'reasurer Property Search ~ Assessor Subset Query ~ Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder Reception Search Basic Building Characteristics ~ Tax Information Parcel Detail ~ Value Detail ~ Sales Detail ~ Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Land Detail ~ Photoeraohs Tax Area Account Number Parcel Number 2007 Mill Levy 001 R014338 273707347851 29.317 Owner Name and Address PITKIN COUNTY 530 E MAIN ST #302 ASPEN, CO 81611 Legal Description SUB:PITICIN COUNTY CENTER LOT:1 DESC: COURTHOUSE AND JAIL Location Physical Address: 485 RIO GRANDE ASPEN Subdivision: PITKIN COUNTY CENTER Land Acres: 1.43 Land Sq Ft: 0 2008 Property Tax Valuation Information Actual Value Assessed Value Land: 5,803,300 1,682,960 Improvements: 7,850,000 2,276,500 . Totat: 13,653,300 3,959,460 http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumbei=R014338 Ol-Oct-08 "' Parcel Detail ,r•~, •.;~ Sale Date: Sale Price: Basic Building Characteristics ~~ Ip111 uur r ... \~ W. r r r Number of Residential 0 Buildings: Number of CommQnd 0 Buildiugs: ~,. No Building Records Found Tax Information No Tax Records Found Ton of Page Assessor Database Search Options ~ Treasurer Database Search Options Pitkin County Home Page Page 2 of 2 The Pitkin County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Pitkin County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright ©2008 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Tums Software. http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R014338 Ol-Oct-08 .. R w. ,~ ~~ HA W M Y ^. r ,. r s .. r .. r Parcel Detail ~ Page 1 of 2 Pitkin County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Assessor/Treasurer ProQerty Search ~ Assessor Subset Query ~ Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder Reception Search Basic Building Characteristics ~ Tax Information Parcel Detail ~ Value Detail ~ Sales Detail ~ ResidentiaUCommercial Improvement Detail Land Detail ~ Photoeranhs Tax Area Account Number Parcel Number 2007 Mill Levy 001 R014332 273707306855 29.317 Owner Name and Address PITKIN COUNTY 530 E MAIN ST #302 ASPEN, CO 81611 Legal Description SUB:RIO GRANDE LOTS DESC: VACANT LAND ADJACENT TO THE OLD YOUTH CENTER BELOW THE JAIL Location Physical Address: E BLEEKER ST ASPEN Subdivision: RIO GRANDE Land Acres: 0 Land Sq Ft: 5,241 2008 Properly Tax Valuation Information Actual Value Assessed Value Land: 524,100 151,990 Improvements: 0 0 Total: 524,100 151,990 http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber-R014332 Ol-Oct-08 «« .~ .. .,, r .., ... r r Parcel Detail No Building Records Found Tax Information No Tax Records Found Page 2 of 2 Top of Paee Assessor Database Search Options ~ Treasurer Database Search Options Pitkin County Home Page The Pitkin County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Tums Softwaze and the Pitkin County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright ©2008 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns Software. http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber=RO 4332 r, Sale Date: Sale Price: Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 0 Buildings: Number of Comm/Ind 0 Buildings: O1-Oct-08 O~ H Z W V I-- Q 75~A9 Pa~haU~ NW:A9 UMCJQ O~ qua _rs~ (~ ~mr u~uun [~'MMM mor t,~uut~enspoiu~ - Atgt•etefaLR •~ i[£r.St6fD~6y k- ' • sooz •a~o t u~1d a~?,S' ~dS .,ca~ua,~ ~~~~ fi~uno,~ u2.y~2d fgtp opetelq uaesy unnS II!YI Vt,et1 r[e ~NI ~~° , "''S 331C1~OS5tl NOSfId~~ NV`13 W o Y f ~ ~ !' [ 3 K o +9 w c c I 3 ~ v ~ ~ 8~ y `D `D v°tl, c •o c `c `0 9a cg z ~ a =_ o v ~~ v c v K S g $ °eD O D 9 J aY 6 ~ oa 8 e ~ v u Ycy c a a 6 6 ~ O 2 C V1 ~ ~ O L ~ S C C o, a _ 4 -° ~ cg ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ fl C ~ ~ J F7 ~ € N s ~ ~ Z ° C Y ~ ~ ~ ~ g 4 h v E y a ~ ~ .~ r-, W 7 ~ r a ~` n ~ o ~ ~ .e ? V ~ 1 ~ C C r X 2 ~ S - ~ E-i ~ s ~ a o E. SLEEKER ST. yylp7H OF PUBLIC RIGHT-CF-WAY VAR16 J ~ .,. ~ ~ ~/ w Z ~ ;~. Q~ ~~ m O ~ N I.Y e, • ~P ~h Q ~ J ~~ b f J~# o ~ "~ m a mw ul p y jU ~~ ~N w~ 4I S _~ ~ ~ QZ ~~ ~~ ~~ ..? F Y oa w Y_ E o ~,d / ~ ~ ~ ~ / "~ ~ ~, 2 0 ~~ 1 ~. v _o°o~ I N~~ a ~ U 2 w w T V ~ J Y ..a 4 N mF~ ~ Q porn ~K ~ _~ ~ ~S° J ~ Z m F ~ o ~ ~Z j 2~ r~~ Q 2 W v 2 ~ _J m 2 L Z F O i U ,~j Z G4g11 a z ~i ~~ ~ .... w n_~ m ~ rn q q ~ry ~"i m 4 g ~~ o 0 N b ~I O w U N O N H Z W W OC d W Q U V1 Z a 0 z 3 C9 z 0 m cc W H Z W U a a z O w m w U w O~ O w ~ O = y N x ~ Z "~ U C/J W .. ~ ~ U ~Q c € W V C - H O O ~ ° a Q "'o z U€ a Qe ~ , ~ o: a-~ : a ~ o °a 2 ~ Q W cn _ ~ ~ _~ s Zo ~~' ~ ~ ~: U$ ~ ~v ~a _ v J i ~~^ ~ ~ O i_~: . 0 z W V Q F- H Q d ~, g N = m o w ~ U ? z ~ d m ~ ~ R ~ Q U ~ O ~ ya A ~ Y U ~ c` ~ !. y° k R s O ~ .` O ter, z ~'~ -J° ~ RF Z (~ ~ P Q~ ~ y ~ U r f~~~ ., w ,~ ''~ ~ ~~ ; .. H Z U c~ z X W O w m w V w 0 0 - ~ v e° N ?c U y w Z_ W .~. _ 8 ~ ~'. ~~ _ x w cq Q p E Y ~ U ~- ae ~ E p o~ f.x6 Q Q~ ~'~ p n ~$ ~ ~ cn i . ° a : y Q ~o ~ 4 .,J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V y v r ~ ~ ~d '~ s r1 i m 0 ;, ~ _ ~° e U y~ Z~ w :' Q w _ ~ ~ o`= ~ Q~ o 4 U z 4' '~ ~ % ~: cd r °~~ tno ~ Q W ~~ eg ZS Win` x ~F p~ ~g ~ ^~ ~~_ ~~ 6 ~Y g= ~C a u r-~ ~ a 3 U: v~ ._ % ~d "s ~ 'y :~°i. - O H 1-- Z CW G W Q DG w a. a U N 0 Z a 0 z 3 C9 z 0 m 0 ° c.a e N =n U H o Z W ~ ~ ~+ E _ ~- (n Qm _ e LU O u c°q ' ~ V c o ma~ O z= s v~ od ~ ~E rn ~ - o c~~ ~ 2 ~~ s a ~< r =ff p x ~ ~ U ~ s ~ Q ~ Gv ~ a ¢ ~ 4 _ ~ s~ rlfjlTl' Z o .+.. ~ h f- Z W W OC a 3 t~ z v m o o ~ e =t W ~~' N U Z Q~ __ 5 L) w~ G - t~ 9 ~'. F eq a ` ~ .mo a Q (~ S x d r z > o~ K _ O fn (n~ rn -- ~~ c _M S ~ Z __. '^ ~ - ~' O ~ ~~ ~'~ g~ "' /ifr~,~ a s ~ N ~~ MI} ,~ ~. r A r r.. r r A A r „~. .,.,~ Xp Q Wm -~,, ATTACHMENT 11 m ~~ ~~ [l) %A ~* c~ E r[ Y~ ~4. N ~~d a+ ° ~~ a ,~ o N ' UO 3 y Noy ~~ ~= O O ~< O O O C z- n CN m W . r M G N e v j ~ o O ~ ~ G x_ _ ~se~ ° u yo ~.+ z ~ ~ • L ~Q.W~~g " •-. u ~ ~ '$ N • ~ ~ = Wm G s 6 ~ ~ W ~_ r •~ - ~, --~ ATTACHMENT 12 ~~ ORDINANCE N0.26 (SERIES OF 2002) 'r AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CTl'I' OF ASPEN, ,~ COLORADO, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE RIO GRANDE SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA TO INSTALL FOUR PARHING SPACES, '~ LANDSCAPING, AND A NEW CURB CUT OFF OF EAST BLEEKER STREET ON LOT 5, RIO GRANDE SUBDIVISION/SPA, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY,COLORADO. Parcel No. 2737-073-06-555 .. WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application "- from Pitkin County for an amendment to the Rio Grande Specially Planned Area to r install four parking spaces, landscaping, and a new curb cut off of East Bleeker Street on Lot 5, Rio Grande Subdivision/SPA; and, WHEREAS, City Council Resolution No. 42, Series of 1993 approved the Rio "' Grande Master Plan; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the Rio Grande Master Plan and applicable provisions ,,, of the Municipal Code, development review for site specific projects for the Rio Grande parcels shall be reviewed through the Specially Planned Area development review; and, WHEREAS, City Council Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1993 granting the Subdivision of the Rio Grande Property, indicated that Lot 5, Rio Grande Subdivision is ,,; intended for the future expansion of the Pitkin County Jail; and, ~, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.440 of the Land Use Code, City Council may approve a Specially Planned Area Review during a duly noticed public hearing after considering a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission made at a ,,,,, duly noticed public hearing, comments from the general public, a recommendation from the Community Development Director, and recommendations from relevant referral "' agencies; and, "' WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on July 2, 2002, the Planning ,~ and Zoning Commission recommended, by a four to one (4-1) vote, approval of an amendment to the Rio Grande Specially Planned Area to install four pazking spaces and a new curb cut to access the parking spaces off of East Bleeker Street, with the conditions contained herein; and, ~ WHEREAS, the Community Development Department reviewed the Project and recommended approval with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has „~ reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and "" considered public comment at a public hearing; and, r w. r .. .~. .~. .. r WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, '~ with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community ~ Plan; and, ,. WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. ~ '" BE TT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY THEREFORE NOW +r , , OF ASPEN, COLORADO, THAT: +~ Section 1 An amendment to the Rio Grande Specially Planned Area to install four pazking spaces, landscaping, and a new curb cut off of East Bleeker Street, is approved with the following conditions: 1. The Applicant shall submit a detailed drainage plan to the Community Development Engineer for approval prior to commencing construction. 2. The Community Development Director may approve minor site plan "~ amendments that aze required to accommodate changes in the existing ~- vehicular access and lot configuration that may come about as a result of the Obermeyer COWOP Application. -~ 3. The Applicant shall erect a construction fence between the trail and the azea of excavation during construction. The Applicant shall also erect ~' warning signs along the trail at both ends of the project during '~' construction. 4. A11 finished landscaping shall be placed no closer to the trail than 2 feet "~ for user safety. 5. The Applicant shall submit the ingredients of the proposed landscaping "' seed mixes to the Pazks Department for approval prior to planting. 6. A detailed irrigation plan shall be provided to the Parks Department for '~ approval prior to commencing construction. 7. The Applicant shall not platrt any landscaping that covers up the building "' mounted fire hydrant connection. S. The depth cover for the fire hydrant line shall not be reduced by more ~ than one foot as a result of the grading at the entrance to the parking area. _ 9. Snow storage shall be on-site and not within the public right-of--way or the pedestrian bike trail i ~. ~, .~. ., .~ ,., 10. The Applicant is aware that amendments to the pazlcing site plan on Lot 5 may be required to accommodate the land swap that is proposed in the Obermeyer COWOP ap lication (if approvved) to relocate' the na^st Bl~ Stree't t M~ Section 2: "ti.G',~' e'°'"""^'~ ~" °~"1 r. All material representations and commitmerns made by the applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or "' documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are r hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 3: This Ordinance shall not effect any eaasting litigation and shall not operate as an abatement -' of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and cora;luded under such prior ordinances. ~- Section 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any ~'~ rea~n held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion ~- shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the ,~ validity of the remaining portions thereof. '~ Section 5: A duly noticed public hearing on this Ordinance was held on the 26th day of August, 20002 at 5:00 in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLLSHED as provided by law, ,,,,, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 22°a day of July, 2002. r "^ Attest: Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk r Helen Kahn Klanderud, Mayor a ,,~ ,~ .r ~ FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this 26 day of August, 2002. r. - Helen Kahn Klanderud, Mayor .. Attest: .. r ».. Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk - '"' Approved as to form: - _ John P. R'orcester, City Attorney .. W - - - .. - - - 1 ' .j 1 ~ ~ 3 ~ l 'l ? f.~ +y N . sy ak ~k g~'g `~ a .. .~ .I ...I c 4 :. ~ kk'eky 0 ° f o ~ ,, 8,. LIB' '' 5y1. 4yp ' i •f g ~. f J ~ ~ .n dif~l Y1 SPfl ING.ST. ~ ~r + ~ k5. y___.._. ;FFf= \.J m.. ~n..~. s r . S j ~' ee: /y a icidi '1.1.. _ e~ I: B - f kEyaE. SPRING -ST. fe(pf~r - - 1 Nl0'1B YS;i' - fdi•• ' . I . • . ~: ~ f$$tE~ 6 4 R+ N $Ftd ,.... I ~A~ F .. 1}. Eaej:^e Ab $jaa +SL r Q; i f -$s ~ fj z ,, ~ - ~ - : a '` ~~~; o ~ ~:. f '~. rc o ,;' ,. i.5 b ~ ~ N: "~. ~e• +^+~ 1111 A,111~. - wN :a fI:§ yp ~~'r:0 ENA'ST. , AS 6$ j . r ~ ° i lq 3 ~ i ' to i°k' ~ 'J., t~ t 3 ` .a . _ ii Fi . I///~" 1 S ` • nt ~ 1 ~j ~jf'i z b i 7 ' • ~ it S a - ~ ~ ijpe - . y -.....7 F' ..•o a°'• f ...r Aj~3133N13 y IIIW. nln LL +,_~~ W Z~ ~_ (Y- U~ N 1 # t5 O ~ qqq 6 ~qp q~ F 4 ~ ~ ~~ ~ p z --~--~ --~ o - < ~ ~ d p ~ ~ ~ ~. . ~_ '` ~ ~ ~--~ o_ N N /, i I \ G ~~~ V~` G ~ ~~ Q_ V• i°~ ~~ ii ~~ . !~ a ao .~ w o ,. ` \ ~, a I ~ ~ \ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ \ ~ /i I I~~\ ~•---~ ~ m r ~ / N ~~ / e~ !~ q/ W N w ~ z o a~ . r, cci a ~d ~ ~ ctf ~ r-, ~ G-. D •~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~b ~a O r, cd o ~~ y ti ~ U Ir x ."-0 q W d ~w~~ ~8~~; ~~ ~~ ~~i ~a+9 vd ~°~.3~ =3 m x~~ o~~ ~~~~~ ' ~ ~~~~ ~ i I I j.1p9 ~~~~~ ~ \ _ ~~. 4J s: ~` f.;ii l,~ ~7~ Ty` ~~ ~ 1 '.~',~pS ~fi~,~s ;.;,.s Ea:i-dt"d~ 5M,F:CSVaI _ ~~~~ 5:.. ~y ~i k^ t ~~ys n.~ "'~t':l1aJ.~i ~i _ Q C ~ . 2 J a H 2 Q 7 a'~. f?::PF: 44 ~s.,. ~jx 3ry;~ ~: K~ l., ~~W ~~ A' ~}~~~ 3 a ~_ I ~~ _~ E 0 a ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~_ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ' ~~ ~~ ~~ R 0„E R E ~~ ~ x K • d M 8g$$g•7°ns lOFP~3SR~8 @666C~pg~~ 6 g6c ~ N W U Q W 0 U t~ ~ Z e ~~~ W g ? ~i (7 § W } ~ I ~ ~ ~ n ~°, tl ,. `~-~ City Council Exhibi Approved r 19 - By Ordinance ~ ORDINANCE 10 SERIES OF 1993 ~ r ~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COiJNCIL GRANTING SIIHDIVISION FOR THE RIO GRANDE PROPERTY LOCATED BETWEEN THE ROARING FORK RISER, AND THE ~. PITRIN COIINTY COIIRTHOUSE AND THE ALLEY IN BLOCK 86, ASPEN, COLORADO. rr WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 24-7-1004 C.1., of the Aspen r Municipal Code the applicant, the City of Aspen, has submitted an ~' application for subdivision of the Rio Grande property; and ~ WHEREAS, the City has deemed it necessary to subdivide the Rio Grande property in order to convey to Pitkin County the "library r parcel" and the property north of Pitkin County Jail for future ,,,, expansion of the Jail, to accept from Pitkin County property upon ... which the municipal parking facility has been constructed and the portion of land within the County Courthouse Subdivision upon .. which the Youth Center has been constructed; and' r` WHEREAS, certain City-owned land area of the Rio Grande parcel ~ is being used ,for parking by the tenants of the Bass/Obermeyer ~. buildings and the City may wish to either exchange, sell or lease the property; and AHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the Aspen i Planning and Zoning Commission (hereinafter "Commission") on ~ February 2, 1993; to consider the subdivision; and „~ WHEREAS, the Commission having reviewed the application and ~ considered the representations and commitments made by .the applicant found that the subdivision complied with Section 24-7- r 1004 and is not in conflict with any applicable portions of Chapter 24 or the draft Rio Grande SPA master plan; and r. . WHEREAS, the Commission has recommended approval to the City .. r~ s ~. .. r .n ri r I rl: r~ ~' '~. '? r .-. ~., Council of the subdivision for the Rio Grande property; and WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council, having considered the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendations, does wish to grant subdivision with conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY TBE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: Section i• That it does hereby grant subdivision of the Rio Grande property,•such subdivision to be called the Rio Grande Subdivision consisting of 10 lots aid further identified by the draft plat attached hereto and incorporated herein. as Exhibit A1, with the following conditions: 1. A subdivision agreement and plat con roved bW1thetEngineering granted herein shall be reviewed and app Y and Planning Departments. 'County Clerk and Recorder within1180sdays of flieal approvalPitkin 3. Any future development of the newly created parcels shall be reviewed and approved by the Commission and Council. 4. Monumentation of the property shall be completed liy Spring of 1993. Section 2: If any section; subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this. Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion' shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Sect~3 This. Ordinance shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or .proceeding now. pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. .. ,~., ~.~ , ~ Section 4: A public hearing on the Ordinance shall be held on the day of ~~`a ~e._ 1993 at 5:00 in the City Council Chambers, "' Aspen City Ha11, AA-s~p=en Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which " hearing a public notice of the same shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of.Aspen. INTRODIICED, READ AND ORDERED PSJBLISHED as provided by law, ~ b the City Council~of the City of Aspen on the ~ ~- day of n ~/t_~ 19 9 3 . w ~ ~~- John Bennett] Mayor Atte . t: ~ !rte r /' „~ Kathryn Roch, City Clerk -- FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this ~~ day of ~ 1993. .. ~3>..- r John B nnett, Mayor '~ Att st: r ~~d~ 1 ~ // n /J A Rathrya~. Roch, City Clerk r .. r ',i r .. a rr .- .. MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director FROM: James Lindt, Planner ,,,. RE: Rio Grande Specially Planned Area Amendment, Pitlin County Jail Parking ~ Expansion - 2°s Reading of Ordinance No. 26, Series of 2002-Public Hearing r w. r i r ,. .. DATE: August 26, 2002 SUMMARY: The proposal is to construct four pazking spaces to be accessed offof E. Bleeker Street on the parcel directly north of the Pitkin County Jail. Additional landscaping is proposed to screen the az ' aces. APPLICANT: Pitkia County REPRESENTATIVE: Stan Gleason, Stan Clauson Associates, LLC LOCATION: Lot 5, Rio Grande Subdivision/SPA ZONING: Public, Specially Planned Area Overlay LOT SIZE: 5,186 Square Feet LOT AREA: 2,881 Square Feet (Excludes 2,305 square feet of Right-of--Way for Bike BACKGROUND: Pitkin County, ("Applicant"), represented by Stan Clauson, is proposing to create four parking spaces, plant additional trees and shrubs, and add a new curb cut for delivery service on Lot 5, of the ]tio Grande Subdivision/SPA, that is located directly to the north of the existing Pitkin County Jail. Additionally, the Applicant is proposing to construct a new door in the north wall of the Jail to easily access the proposed parking spaces. The proposed 1 ~~ " entrance to the Jail is primarily for use by maintenance workers that have moved their facilities +~ into the basement azea of the Jail. Deliveries will also utilize the proposed entrance. Vehicular access to the new pazking area is proposed off of East Bleeker Street. ~ REVIEW PROCEDURE: w Final Specially Planned Area (SPA Review: This two step process requires approval of a development plan by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, with public '~ hearings occurring at both. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall recommend approval, ~, approval with conditions, or disapproval to the City Council. The Rio Grande master plan ' was developed as a conceptual SPA Plan. Following its adoption, new development or ~ significant aherations must be consistent with this conceptual SPA plan and be reviewed ~, pursuant to the final SPA development review process. ~ STAFF COAIMErrrS: .. The Applicant is requesting approval of an amendment to the Rio Grande Specially Planned ~ Area to construct four pazking spaces for the use of the Pitkin County Jail on Lot 5, of the Rio Grande Subdivision. City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission adopted the +~ Rio Grande Master Plan in 1993 that includes Lot 5, of the Rio Grande Subdivision. ~„~ Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1993 that subdivided the Rio Grande Property, indicates that Lot 5 is to be used for the future expansion of the Pitkin Count' Jail. Staff believes that the proposal to construct four pazking spaces on the subject parcel is in keeping with the aforementioned vision set forth for the site in the original subdivision ordinance. Additionally, Staff does not feel that the proposal is in conflict with the Civic ~ Center Master Plan that is currently being formulated for the Civic Center Area. The Civic Center Master Plan is currently envisioning the future development of community facilities on '~ the subject pazcel. Staff does not believe that the proposal for parking spaces will prohibit ~ future development of community facilities on the site. The subject parcel is also included in the area that has been delineated as part of the ~ Obermeyer COWOP Application that is currently in the design stages. Staff does not believe ,~ that the design of the Obermeyer COWOP project will necessarily conflict with the proposed addition of pazking spaces north of the Pitkin County Jail The Obermeyer COWOP Task Force initially envisioned that East Bleeker Street would be relocated adjacent to the subject ,,,, parcel and that the current Rio Grande Place Right-of--Way may be vacated. Additionally, the ~ Obermeyer COWOP Task Force conceptually envisioned that Lot 5 of the Rio Grande Subdivision might be subject to changes in its configuration as a result of relocating the surrounding right-of--way. However, the initial Obermeyer COWOP plan has been subject to recent changes. As a result of the COWOP Application, Staff believes that there may be a need for minor ,~ changes to the proposed pazking site plan on Lot 5, if and when the Obermeyer COWOP plans are finalized. Therefore, Staff has proposed a condition of approval that would allow the Community Development Director to approve minor amendments to the site-specific ,,,,, development plan on Lot 5. In addition, Staff has proposed a condition of approval that acknowledges that the County is aware that amendments may need to be made to the parking '" site plan as a result of the Obermeyer COWOP application in the event that the City were to r 2 r ~.w ~. propose a land swap with the County involving Lot 5 as was originally envisioned by the r Obermeyer COWOP Task Force. Staff does not feel that the current proposal to develop pazking spaces will hamper future development plans on the site or within the surrounding .. azea The future vision for the subject pazcel established in the Rio Grande Master Plan is to ~ accommodate the development of a community facility (jail expansion). Staff believes that the 'r current proposal will not prohibit the aforementioned vision from occurring in the future. The m Pitkin Cou~y Jail has no immediate plans or need to expand at this time. Therefore, Staff believes that the subject pazcel can be used in the short term for the proposed pazking spaces • that will serve the existing community facilities. Staff feels that proposed application meets the ,~, SPA review standards and recommends that City Council approve the proposed ordinance. ~ PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CONCERNS: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended by a vote of four to one that City Council approve the proposed SPA Amendment with the conditions set forth in the proposed ordinance. However, the Planning and Zoning Commission did express concerns that any amendment requested to the pazking site plan to be approved by the Community Development Director must be consistent with the site plan presented to them in regazds to the proposed .. landscaping. Staff believes that the Commission's concerns aze addressed in the review standards for an insubstantial SPA amendment. To approve an insubstantial amendment to an ~, SPA development plan, the Community Development Director must find that the proposal does not change the use or the chazacter of the development. Therefore, any amendment to the existing pazking site plan would have to show similar landscape screening to the current r proposal PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: .~ The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends that City Council approve the proposed amendment to the Rio Grande Specially Planned Area to install four parking spaces, landscaping, and a new curb cut off of East Bleeker Street on Lot 5, ~ of the Rio Grande Subdivision with the conditions set forth in the proposed ordinance. ' STAFF RECOMMENDATION: ,,,,, Staff recommends that City Council approve, with conditions, the proposed amendment to the Rio Grande Specially Planned Area to install four parking i spaces, landscaping, and a new curb cut off of East Bleeker Street on Lot 5, of the ... Rio Grande Subdivision. r RECOMMENDED MOTION: ,. "I move to approve Ordinance No._, Series of 2002, approving with conditions, the ~ proposed amendment to the Rio Grande Specially Planned Area to allow for the development of four pazking spaces on Lot 5, of the Rio Grande Subdivision/SPA." m r r # ' ~~ aal WYW a ar ATTACHMENTS: Exlvbit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Findings "' Exhibit B -- Referral Comments +. Exhibit C -- Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 23, Series of 2002 ~ C:~bome~nickMctive Caaes~Rio Greed SPA Skateboard Park AmendmentVtio Grande SPA Ava:ndment.doc ,. r w ar aa1 ar ar r• r a r +. r i w r aw i a~ 4 _ ~, ~. , ., r w _ ExHIBIT A RIO GRANDE SPA AMENDMENT ,r REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS '~ 26.440.050. Review standards for development in a Specially Planned Area (SPA). r, In the review of a development application for a conceptual development plan and a final development plan, the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council shall consider the "' following: +r 1. Whether the proposed development is compatible with or enhances the miz "'~ of development in the immediate vicinity of the parcel in terms of land use, density, ~ height, bulk, architecture, landscaping and open space. StaffFindine "' Staff believes that the proposed landscaping enhances the aesthetics of the area. Additionally, _ the proposed use of the pacel is compatible with and enhances the land uses in the immediate vicinity. The current mix of uses am the immediate area include governmental facilities, '~ pazking garage facilities, and service oriented businesses. The govenvnental facilities, _ including the Pitkin County Jail, are in demand of additional parking in close proximity to the existing facilities. .-. Staff feels that the proposal will help alleviate some of the existing parking issues that are _ present in the parking lot behind the Courthouse and Plaza 1 building. Staff also believes that proposed development is consistent with the Rio Grande Master Plan and conceptual review ~- approval. Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1993 indicated that the subject pazcel was eanvarked ~ for the future expansion of the Pitkin County Jail. Currently, the County has no immediate plans to expand the jail. Instead, immediate parking concerns exist that this proposal would help alleviate. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. Whether sufficient public facilities and roads exist to service the proposed "' development Staff Findin¢ The Applicant is proposing a new curb cut to access the proposed parking area off of East Bleeker Street. Currently, sufficient roads do exist to access the proposed pazking facility. However, the future development plans of the Obermeyer COWOP Application may change '" the configuration of both the East Bleeker Street and Rio Grande Place right-of--ways and Lot "` 5. Staff believes that regazdless of the outcome of the Obermeyer Application, that a means _ of vehicular access to the proposed parking facility will be maintained. Staff has proposed a condition of approval that allows the Community Development Duector to approve minor "' amendments to the site plan that may be required as a result of the Obermeyer COWOP Application. In addition, Staff has proposed a condition of approval that acknowledges that the County is aware that amendments may need to be made to the pazking site plan as a result ~ of the Obermeyer COWOP application in the event that a land swap involving Lot 5 were to take place. Staff finds this criterion to be met. r „~,. ..,, ' 3. Whether the parcel proposed for development is generally suitable for ~ development, considering the slope, ground instability and the possibility of mud flow, rock falls, avalanche dangers and f food hazards. Staff Findine ~ The pacel generally slopes at a grade of 11% towards Rio Grande Park. However, a bench area exists to sufficiently provide a level azea for the proposed parking and entrance off of 'r East Bieeker Street. New curb pans are to be installed as part of the proposal to ~„ accommodate drainage. Staff has proposed a condition of approval that requires the ~ Applicant to submit a detailed drainage plan for approval prior to construction to insure that the proposal will not increase the off-site drainage flows. There are no mud flow, rock fall, or avalanche dangers in the area. Staff finds this criterion to be met. r 4. Whether the proposed development creatively employs land planning techniques to preserve significant view planes, avoid adverse environmental ,~ impacts and provide open space, trails and similar amenities for the users of the project and the public at large. ^ ,. StaffFindine The Applicant is proposing landscaping and site contouring to screen the proposed parking "" azea from Rio Grande Place and the adjacent bike path that runs along the western edge of the ..~ property. There aze no designated view planes that will be effected by the pmposaL The site is intended for expansion of the Jail and is not intended to provide open space, trails, or other '~ public amenities. The Applicant's proposal respects the existing trail easement on the western r portion of the property. Staff has proposed a condition of approval that requires the Applicant not to landscape within two (2) feet of the existing trail for the purposes of trail ^ user safety. Staff finds this criterion to be met. ,~, 5. Whether the proposed development is in compliance with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan. Staff Findine The Aspen Area Community Plan's future land use map envisions the subject parcel to be ` used for the development of Community Facilities. The proposed development of pazking s spaces on the site for the use of the surrounding community facilities will not prevent the future expansion of the Pitkin County Jail on the site when it is needed. Staff feels as if the proposal is in keeping with the land use vision of the property. r The proposal does not interfere with the bike path that is adjacent to the property to the west. By not interfering with the b$ce path access, the proposal does not conflict with the Pazks, Open Space, and Environment goal of improving access to pazks and recreational facilities. ., Additionally, the landscaping being proposed on the site will enhance the natural environment surrounding the existing bike path; which is in keeping with the intent statement of the Parks, '~ Open Space, and Environment Section of the AACP to "Preserve, enhance and restore the .. natural beauty of the environment of the Aspen azea". Staff finds this criterion to be met. ,. 6 r m ~., .. r 6. Whether the proposed development will require the expenditure of excessive public funds to provide public facilities for the parcel, or the surrounding neighborhood StaffFindine Staff does not believe the proposed development will require the expenditure of excessive public funds to provide public facilities for the pazcel, or the sunrounding neighborhood. The proposal represents a budgeted expenditure by the County and wdl not require excessive public expenditures. However, Staff has proposed a condition of approval that acknowledges that the County is awaze that amendments may be needed to the parking site plan to accommodate the Obermeyer COWOP application in the event that the ]and swap occurs as was originally envisioned by the Obermeyer COWOP Task Force. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 7. Whether proposed development on slopes in excess of twenty (20) percent meet the slope reduction and density requirements of Section 2b.445.040(B)(2). ~- StaffFindine There aze no slopes on the subject pazcel that aze in excess of 20%. Staff finds that this criterion is not applicable. ,., 8. Whether there are sufficient GMQS allotments for the proposed development .. Staff Findine No GMQS allotments are required for the proposal Staff finds that this criterion is not '~ applicable. .. r w. r r r 7 ~~ ~~, ATTACHMENT 14 .~ *~ CITY OF ASPEN ,,, PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY '" PLANNER: Andrea Hingley, 429-2797 DATE: 7131108 .~ PROJECT: Pitkin County Center SPA Amendment REPRESENTATIVE: Jodi Smith, Pitkin County Facilities Manager Tel: 920-5396 w DESCRIPTION '~ The applicant would like to buildlacquire a small accessory building to the north of the Pitkin County Center "' jail building to house data equipment. The proposed building is approximately 324 sq. ft. The building would _ contain computers, as well as the HVAC systems necessary for cooling. No offices are intended for the proposed location, nor any increase in staffing. The proposed structure will receive a fapade that closely ° matches the neighboring building to better blend with the local environment. This proposal requires an ,,, amendment to the development order (SPA) as a two-step review process before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. r .. Community Development encourages any department or agency head with space needs to become familiar with the Zupancis-Galena Master Plan, which is currently going through public process review with the City Planning `~ and Zoning Commission and City Council. Staff encourages departments with space needs to ensure that their anticipated needs are met in this larger and more comprehensive plan is being considered, such smaller plans ~„ may not be well received at this time. A- Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.440.090 Specially Planned Area (sections applicable to this application include) ,.. 26.440.040 B. Consolidated Review 26.440.050 Review standards for development in a Specially Planned Area 26.440.060 B. Final Development Plan http•Ilwww asgenpitkin comldepts1381citvcode.cfm Review by: -Staff for complete application -Referral agencies for technical considerations ,,, - P&Z review and recommendation to City Council at a public hearing ~, -Council review at a public hearing r Planning Fees: $2940.00 Deposit for 12 hours of Staff time (additional planning hours over deposit " amount are billed at a rate of $2451hour) .. Total Deposit: $2940.00 ~ To apply, submit the following information: 1. Total deposit for review of the application. 2. Proof of ownership. 3. Completed Land Use Application Form. 4. Signed fee agreement. W 0 0 5. Completed Dimensional Requirements Form. +. 6. Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant, which states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the "" applicant. 7. Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the ~` State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply ,~ for the Development Application. 8. An 8112" by 11"vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. 9. Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, ,! including all easements and vacated rights of way, of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado. This must be current (within one year) and signed by a surveyor. ` 10. A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how ... the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. Please include existing conditions as well as proposed. Please provide a written response to all applicable r criteria. 11. List of adjacent property owners within 300' for public hearing. Contact GIS Dept. at 920.5453. ,„ 12. Copies of prior approvals. 13. Additional application material as required for each specific review. (See application packet and land use code) ,.. 14. 20 Copies of the complete application packet and maps. HPC = 12; PZ =10; CC = 7; Referral Agencies = 11ea.; Planning Staff =1 .. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based "" on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or ~- may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. ..~ .. .. r ~. City Planning & Zoning Meeting -Minutes - Janua~i~v 06, 2009 the 15' top of slope strip. The applicant is working with the parks department who has approved the proposal with the idea it will be refined. Lasser said staff would like landscaping around the temporary port-a-potties. In the winter both the tent and port-a-potties will be gone. Lasser reiterated the Board approved the concept of limiting the use of the pavilion to 8 events. The Aspen Ideas Festival, which is one week long, would be considered 1 event. Lasser said the resolution of approval has 8 conditions, one of which is limiting the number of events. Staff recommends approval; the changes have improved the application. Gibbs brought up Section 5, fire mitigation, and the width of the road. In the winter when there is no tent, fire trucks would have no reason to go out there. Gibbs suggested eliminating the sentence that states, be careful plowing to not rip out the pavers. Lasser agreed that could be eliminated. Myrin asked if there is a concern, under essential public facilities review, if there are employees generated. Lasser said that is one of the reviews of the Board. The applicant provided an employee mitigation analysis and staff put a condition into the resolution that an audit should be done in 2 years to see if that is still the case. Myrin said his concern is going beyond 2 years and what happens and will employee mitigation be addressed. Jennifer Phelan, community development department, pointed out the applicants would have to apply for an SPA amendment to have more than 8 events. Myrin said his concern is that things grow over time and tents turn into permanent structures. Wampler asked about each event being 10 days long and that would take up almost the entire summer season and asked should this be limited to a number of days rather than a number of events. Lasser said the applicant requests an event counted as a week long; there needs to be some flexibility to develop new events or to phase out old events. Jim Curtis, representing the Aspen Institute, told P&Z the applicants have tried to respond to all the concerns heard from the Board. Curtis noted page 2, item 3, the Institute is fine with the number of events. Curtis said from 2005 to 2008 events at the Institute, the Aspen Ideas Festival is a 7 day event and every event thereafter is a one day event, an afternoon lecture. Curtis said "events" seems a more straightforward way to define what is allowed at the tent. Curtis said the applicant agrees with limiting the number of events and the prohibition against private parties. Curtis told the Board that in 2008, the Institute spent, for 4 events, $104,000 for shuttles, bikes and transportation mitigation. Curtis said the 4 be used to store computer equipment. Evans said that storage space is not considered net leasable area. There will not be any employees working in the addition except for routine maintenance and no new employees will be generated. Staff requested approval of this addition as an essential public facility and does not create any need for growth management mitigation. Bert Myrin asked if other offices wanted to use this as storage and would that be the same. Jennifer Phelan replied that if there was a front desk then there would be an employee there and would require employee mitigation; this was just purely containing the necessary mechanical for the City/County IT. Myrin asked if the spaces that were vacated by the storage in City Hall, The County Buildings or the Wheeler and placed in this storage area would those other vacated storage spaces be used for employees. Evans said they would have to mitigate at that time and there was a disclaimer in the resolution. Kristin VanHess, Stan Clauson and Associates, said she was representing Jodi Smith from the County and this should be considered an essential public facility. Jodi Smith clarified that it was a server equipment room that will keep the City/County operations going. Smith said the existing closets that they were vacating equipment were located in the basement of City Hall, Jail, Courthouse and Courthouse Plaza basement and could not be used for office spaces and there would be some equipment remaining in those spaces. MOTION: CI~Weiss moved to approve Resolution #001-09 and recommend City Council approve the request for the exemption of growth management mitigation for 485 Rio Grande Place; seconded by Mike Wampler. Roll call vote: Myrin, yes; Gibbs, yes; Bloom, yes; Weiss, yes; Wampler, yes; Erspamer, yes. APPROVED 6-0. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: ASPEN INSTITUTE GREENWALD PAVILION SPA AMENDMENT Erspamer opened the continued public hearing on the Aspen Institute Greenwald Pavilion. Jason Lasser, community development department, told the Commission there have been changes since the last public hearing. Lasser noted that the tent cannot be located on the utilities and pointed out where the utilities run. The tent is now north of the utilities. Another change is to reduce the width of the asphalt; there is a 6' wide asphalt cart path and a 16' gravel service truck area. Lasser said this reduces the amount of asphalt on the property. The cart path has been moved from 3 ~.J LJ Erspamer opened the regular meeting in Council Chambers at 4:30pm. Commissioners present were Bert Myrin, Mike Wampler, Cliff Weiss, Stan Gibbs, LJ Erspamer and Dina Bloom. Jim DeFrancia and Brian Speck were excused. Staff present were Jim True, Special Counsel; Jennifer Phelan, Errin Evans, Jason Lasser, Drew Alexander, Community Development; Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk. COMMENTS Jennifer Phelan said the next regular meeting will have the Aspen Jewish Community Center and the Aspen Valley Hospital District Ambulance requesting a year round permit for the tent cover for the ambulance. Phelan noted on February 3`d will be a joint P&Z and Council Meeting to work on the AACP and February 17`h there were some land use cases; after that it will be AACP meetings until April. LJ Erspamer said that there was a Rocky Mountain Land Use Seminar coming up. Jennifer Phelan replied that Com Dev has to check the budget so she will get back to P&Z on the Seminar. Cliff Weiss thanked staff for putting the entire packet on the WEB. Jennifer Phelan introduced Drew Alexander, planner technician, who will be representing a case tonight. MINUTES MOTION.• Bert Myrin moved to approve the November 18, December 2 and December 16, 2008 minutes. LJErspamer made a correction to the 12/16/08 minutes page 4 regarding the roof height as corrected from the parapet; seconded by Mike Wampler; all in favor, APPROVED. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST LJ Erspamer said that he was still working at the Pitkin County Airport as a seasonal part-time. PUBLIC HEARING: PITKIN COUNTY JAIL GROWTH MANAGEMENT LJ Erspamer opened the public hearing. Errin Evans stated that the Planning & Zoning Commission saw the SPA Amendment for this addition to the county jail and now the review before P&Z is the growth management under essential public facilities and no mitigation is required at this time because the new structure will 2 - Minutes -Ian COMMENTS ...........................................................................2 MINUTES ...............................................................................2 CONFLICTS OF INTEREST .......................................................2 F3'IN EOUNTY'JAt~ROWTH MANAGEMENT .......................2 ASPEN INSTITUTE GREENWALD PAVILION SPA AMENDMENT ...2 ELECTION OF CHAIRPERSON AND VICE-CHAIRPERSON.8 ~~ i~ ~, ,~. --~ r.. ..f STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATESiNC; landscape architecture. planning. resort destign qcz North Mill Street Aspen, Colorado Si6u t.g7o/9z5-z3z3 f.97o/9zo~i6z8 info~scaplanning.com wwwscaplanning.com Memo To: Errin Evans, City of Aspen Community Development Dept. From: Stan Clawson, AICP, ASLA Cc: Jodi Smith, Pitkin County Facilities Manager Date: 24 December 2008 Re: Pitkin County Data Center, responses to Sec. 26,470.090 Pursuant to our application for an SPA Amendment for a modular structure adjacent to the Pitkin County Jail to house data processing equipment, we are submitting this supplementary information responding to the "Essential Public Facilities" section of the City of Aspan Land Use Code. After we had submitted our application and provided public notice for the Planning & Zoning Commission hearing of 16 December 2008, City staff determined that it would be necessary to respond to this code section. Accordingly, public notice has been provided for a second Planning & Zoning commission hearing on 6 January 2009 and this supplementary memorandum is provided in response to the aforementioned code section. Sec. 26.470.090. City Council applications. The following types of development shall be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the City Council, pursuant to Section 26.470. I10, Procedures for review, and the criteria for each type of development described below. Except as noted, all growth management applications shall comply with the general requirements of Section 26.470.050. Except as noted, all City Council growth management approvals shall be deducted from the respective annual development allodments and development ceiling levels. 4. Essential public facilities. The development of an essential public facility, upon a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission, shall be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the City Council based on the following criteria: a. The Community Development Di>:ector has determined the primary use and/or structure to be an essential public~acility (see definition). Accessory uses may also be part of an essential public facility project. s~ Errin Evans, G~y of Aspen Community Development Department 24 December 2008 Page Two ,,~ , Response: The Community Development Director has determined that the proposed addition to the Pitkin County Jail for a structure to house City and County data processing facilities is an essential public facility and subject to the provisions of this section. b. Upon a recommendation from the Community Development Director, the City Council may assess, waive or partially waive affordable housing mitigation requirements as is deemed appropriate and warranted for the purpose of promoting civic uses and in consideration of broader community goals. The employee generation rates may be used as a guideline, but each operation shall be analyzed for its unique employee needs, pursuant to Section 26.470.100, Calculations. Response: The proposed data center will consolidate data processing equipment currently housed with an unacceptable level of security in equipment closets of various city and County buildings. It will provide a greater level of security for this equipment, while meeting the foreseeable expansion needs for additional equipment. The consolidation of this equipment will provide for enhanced security and maintenance efficiency, thereby supporting community goals. This new fUeillty will not generate any new employees. Moreover, the spaces being vacated by the relocation of this equipment are not Ilkely to support additional employment generation. STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATES iNc landscape architecture, planning. resort design ya North MIII Street Aspen, Colorado gtbu t.97o(gz5-z9z3 f.97o/9zoabz8 Info®scaplanning.com www.scaplanning.com Memo To: Randy Ready, City of Aspen Cc: Phyllis Maltice & Jodi SmOh, PRkln County From: Stan Clawson Date: 76 March 2009 Re: Proposed PRldn County Data Center- Environmental and Financial Impacts Responding to your request for supplementary information regarding environmental and financial impacts of the proposed Pitkin County Data Center facility, we are providing this memo as well as attached financial information from the Pitkin County Facilities Management Department. This memo outlines the sustainable qualities and environmental Impacts of the Oldcastle Precast modular building and accessories as proposed for the Pitkin County Data Center currently under review by the City of Aspen. The information provided here was generated from material provided by the manufacturer. General Information: The proposed building will house IT equipment which (s currently stored in various unsuitable locations. Moving the equipment to a consolidated purpose-built data center will reduce the demand on cooling multiple locations and increase the efficiency of the existing cooling systems. The proposed dota center is a precast concrete modular building with a thin brick fagade and roofing material intended to match the existing Pitkin County Jail structure. The 12' x 27' floor plan will have Thermax Heavy Duly Insulation and two external wall mounted HVAC units on its rear wall. Thermax Heavy Duly Insulation: Thermax Heavy Duty Insulation consists of glass fiber-reinforced poly- isocyanurate foam core with white acrylic coated aluminum on one side and embossed aluminum on the other. Thermax Heavy Duty insulation offers an R- Value of 11.4. The facers help prevent water intrusions into the foam and allow the foam to stabilize at a higher R-value. ~sl~ ~.. "` -~. ,+ Pitkin County Data Center ,r4 6 March 2009 K ` Page 2 ~ ~ ,,; - Thermax Heavy Duty Insulation is manufactured with hydrocarbon blowing ^.„'~ . '- agents, which have no ozone depletion potential. ~~ • Wall-Mount Air CondiMoner: '~' '' ~ ~ The Bard Wall-Mount Air Conditioner is aself-contained energy-efficient system "~ " r~. designed to offer appropriate indoor climate confrol at a minimal cost. Specific engineered features provide maximum efficiency. The aluminum ! finned copper coils and enhanced lowered fin create maximum heat transfer and energy efficiency. Twin blowers move air quietly and come equipped with a motor overload protection system. The scroll compressors are designed for increased efficiency, quieter operation, and Improved reliability for longer life. i ElecMcal heat scrips have an automatic limit and thermal cut-off for safely and i efficiency. ~ The Bard Wall-Mount units are designed to maximize air quality. The standard ventilation package includes the Barometric fresh a'v damper which allows outside ventilation air up to 259 of the total alrfiow rating of the unit. The damper opens during blower operation and closes when the blower is off. An optional "Economizer" has been added to the Data Center air conditioning units to provide "free cooling" when outside air conditions are cool and dry enough to satisfy cooling requirements. The Economizer will provide lower operating costs, while increasing energy efficiency and extending the life of the compressor. Diesel Standby Generator. Oldcastle Precast also quoted a 60 KW, Cummins, Diesel standby generator. The generator will meet ail EPA emissions, diesel containment, and monitoring regulations and standards. The diesel generator uses a dual wall tank intended to contain possible leaks. The standby generator features a turbocharger and an affer-cooler, which function to control and maintain emissions w(thin US EPA and California emission regulations. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Non-road T'ier2 Regulations limits Particulate Matter to 0.30 Grams per Hp-Hour and the Califomia A(r resources Board Risk Management Guide limits Particulate Matter to 0.15 Grams per HP-hour. The proposed generator only produces 0.10 Grams per HP-Hour of Particulate Matter. ,.++. r ... Both City and County staff have identified that there is an urgent need for the new data center. Pitkin County intends to move forward with the project upon approval of the Land Use Application. The County has appropriated $200K of the funding and allocated an additional 200K in the County's Tech Pool fund in order to fully fund the project. 1n that this facility will function as part of the City/County network in&astmcture, the County is anticipating the City fund 50% of the project. There is no current funding budgeted within the City's 2009 budget. However, the City Asset Management Plan for Information Technology has budgeted $588,000 in the 2010. The County is hoping the City Council will allocated 50% of the full project in 2009 as a joint effort to complete this critical need for a combined data center which benefits both entities. County staff has estimated that construction the Data Center in 2009 be completed for under $SOOK, which is less than what the city planned on spending for the constmction in 2010. This network project is critical to advance due to the inability to provide adequate cooling, back-up power service, and a controlled environment (without risk of water, dirt, unauthorized access) in the current locations of City Hall, County Courthouse, Jail basement. Benefits to consider for doing the project in 2009 are: • Reduced risk to network equipment (i.e.: recent experience of damaged equipment due to heat, falling ice, and water leaks) • Self contained cooling system with heat sensor alarms • Security increased; own access • Power back-up generator, current systems are at risk with no generator back-up • Adequate space for growth, reduces cost of adding more cooling to other buildings • Stafftime and procurement is already completed; shovel ready project. The estimated cost of the data center construction approximately $307,000: „___...:__ n,...e.......~:.... Cost Estimates rre-raorrcazeu Dw.o... .-~••~•..•~••~•• $216 464 Cost Base Bid Add: HVAC Economizer ner Savin s $3 083 Add: Electronic E ui ment Irate ation-Alternate Racks $14 811 Electrical Connection to Jail $30,000 Landsca a $15,000 Permits $2 000 Count Construction Pro'ect Mana ement $3,000 Contin enc Funds 10% $25,000 Total Buildin Cost Estimate: $306,358 Pitkin County Facilities Management, 485 Rio Grande Place, Unit ior, Aspen, CO 8i6ii .,_ 97o-g2o-5396, 970-920-5285 Fax or email: jodis@co.pitkin.co.us DATA CENTER FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACTS: Data Center Equipment & Relocations Cost will not be available for 4-6 weeks. Once the Data Center receives land use approval staffwill procure a consultant to determine a list of priorities and all associated costs of the move. IT staff have estimated that costs for this part ofthe project will be approximately $175,000. Costs for operation of the Data Cemer once in operations will be established through an amendment of the current Intergovernmental Agreemem between the City and the County for Technology. It is anticipated that the vests will be equally shared by the City and County as all other technology infrastructure. This will include power, insurance, and costs for snow removal needed due to the County losing the existing snow storage area where the Data Center is being placed. (This loss of snow storage space will require that the County hire a snow removal service to plow and haul the snow away as there is no place on-site to store it on site. The County is estimating that the average cost will be approximately $9,000 to $12,000 per year). Pitkin County Facilities Management, 485 Rio Grande Place, Unit ioi, Aspen, CO 8i6ii , 970-920-5396, 970-920-5285 Fax or email: jodis@co.pitkin.co.us n "w' r^~. PUBLIC NOTICE ""~' RE: 485 RIO GRANDE PLACE, SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA AMENDMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, December 16, 2008, at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, in the Sister Cifies Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Stan Clauson Associates, 412 North Mill Street, Aspen, CO, 81611 on behalf of Pitkin County, 485 Rio Grande Place, Unit 101, Aspen, CO, 81611 who aze the owners of the subject building. The applicant is proposing to add an addition to the County Jail building to accommodate critical data equipment and computer servers. The applicant is requesting the following development approval: Specially Planned Area Amendment. The properties aze legally described as Lots 1 and 5, Pitkin County Center, Aspen, Colorado, 81611. For further information, contact Errin Evans at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2745, errine@ci.aspen.co.us. s/LJ Ersnamer, Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times on November 30, 2008 City of Aspen Account REDEiVED DEC ~ 1 2008 ;~ i r OF ASPEN ;OMMUNIIY DEVELOPMENT ,~. ""' AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE '~""' REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC KEARING DATE: ~ u~-co~da..~-~ Mrc~ •'c~~ , 200 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) ~ ~~ C~`G~/.pM (name, please print) I> ,. ersonall being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby p Y certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of rzofice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproo~~ materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six X\ (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch ul height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the _ day of , 200_, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public heazing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (~00) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeazed no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners mzd governnzerztal agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) © ',~„~, Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a m;n;mun7, Subdivisions that create more than one ]ot, Planned Unit Developments, Specially Planned Areas, and COWAPs aze subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the azea of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signs e The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledge~ before me this `h day of ~~G~'i 200 y by _~/to/Pi/~i/ ~o%l f 18, 2009 • Aspen Times Weekly PUBLIC NOTICE RE: <SS RIO GRANDE PLACE, SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA AMENDMENT AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT QUOTA SYSTEM REVIEW WITNESS MY HAND AND Oc~FFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: ~ U 1 U a Q ~~ Notary Public _, LAURA MEYER Publlshetl in the Aspen Times Weekly on March 8, 2009.1309]186) ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: Pi1BLICATION FIOF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN My Commission Expires 0811012010 OWNERSAND GOVERNMENTALAGENCIESNOTICED CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE n~ <..,r„~REDBYC.RS. §24-65.5-103.3 NM'chael C Irelantl Mayor Aspen CRy Council ~! ~. ATTACHMENT 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 485 Rio Grande Place. Aspen Co SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 13 April. 2009 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, F. L. (Stan) Clauson (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: X Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. X Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the 26th day of March, 2009, to and including the date and time of the public heazing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. X Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental orquasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) ® o Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amender ts. ~ Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this, day of .~atT.h , 200 mil, by ~-Vc~_-~~ S WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL ~~~:..,....•,.•y~ ~_ •NtJTARy':~cn -e- cn~•. PUBLIC ••~ My Commission Expires 08/25/2012 My commission expires: ~~~i2_ ..v~~ Notary Publi ATTACHMENTS: COPYOF THEPUBLICAI PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL A~ BYMAIL .-. ...,, `i PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 485 RIO GRANDE PLACE, SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA AMENDMENT AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT QUOTA SYSTEM REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Monday, April 13, 2009, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen City Council, in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Stan Clauson Associates, 412 North Mill Street, Aspen, CO, 81611 on behalf of Pitkin County, 485 Rio Grande Place, Unit 101, Aspen, CO, 81611 who are the owners of the subject building. The applicant is proposing to add an addition to the County Jail building to accommodate critical data equipment and computer servers. The applicant is requesting an Amendment to the Specially Planned Area (SPA) and growth management review for Essential Public Facilities. The properties are legally described as Lots 1 and 5, Pitkin County Center, Aspen, Colorado, 81611. For further information, contact Errin Evans at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2745, errine@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Michael S. Ireland. Mayor Aspen City Council Published in the Aspen Times on March 8, 2009 City of Aspen Account AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070, ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, J't-^r.~ e~p~ C~GCS.1 'e-~/~ (name, please print) being or representing azi Applicant to the City of Aspen; Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. ~~~ ~~.-~ •Signatur The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 2 7 day of ~ri I , 2005, by ~,¢.(~~.-` WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL the as nenomem m allow for a 324 square b accommotlafe computer servers tlafa equipment on the north sitl~ builtling The approval is only nern My commz i n exp' es: Notary Public ATTACHMENTS: ^r ..ere~uymem oepr. 13U 5. Galena Sf. Aspen, Coloratlo (9]0) 4292]45. sl Giry of Aspen Publish in The Aspen Times Weekly on April 26th, zoos. ~32sss]~ COPY OF THE P UBLICATION ~ CORY J. d, GARSKE My Commission Expires 051pQ/201Y ,, ..a AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE •-- REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 485 Rio Grande Place (Lots 1 and 5, Pitkin County Center), SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 6 Jaourarv 2009 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, Stan Clauson (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: x Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. x Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the 19 day of December, 2008_, to and including the date and time of the public heazing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. x Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class, postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application, and, at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signa The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" as acknowled d before me this 19 day of _December , 2008 , by ~ >'~ _1~ ~/~5 c~ ~ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL <,1 ~` . ~ , ~, i a ~.. c,~: PU~LiC ~~ irf Kra,; • . • . `•c~ t. ¢ ~~ •CC1t-~¢~ ~ ~ My commission expires: 8 (25 ~Zo~2 ~~ Notary Pu lic TTACHMENTS: )F THE PUBLICATION 1F THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) D GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BYMAIL PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 485 RIO GRANDE PLACE, GROWTH MANAGEMENT QUOTA SYSTEM REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, January 6, 2009, at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, in the Sister Cities Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Stan Clauson Associates, 412 North Mill Street, Aspen, CO, 81611 on behalf of Pitkin County, 485 Rio Grande Place, Unit 101, Aspen, CO, 81611 who are the owners of the subject building. The applicant is proposing to add an addition to the County Jail building to accommodate critical data equipment and computer servers. The applicant is requesting growth management review for Essential Public Facilities. The properties are legally described as Lots 1 and 5, Pitkin County Center, Aspen, Colorado, 8161 1. For further information, contact Errin Evans at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 5. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2745, errine@ci. aspen. co.us. s/LJ Erspamer, Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times on December 21, 2008 City of Aspen Account 0 3 ~4~F~ ST ^ N MI(t ST ~_.1 , ~~ ~~ ~ , r Q~ t~. c~!o 1 D ~7 °cJml 7'N. N ,'~ tx i / 1 ~RiNG ST ~~. S MI<< ST ~ O r `~zm __ v':~cn N GALENA ST _O z~ ~, ~ ZD ~ ~ O 0 0 ~m I_, `, / I ~, ~~~ ~_ I ~ ~ ~ n~ _ .. ~ ~ C ~ ~ 02 ~ ~_ ~~ ~~ a>> i I i ~~~~ ~ O c D (> i 7l \ s N -~° > r m i ~ l - ~ ~ _ !j -a J ~ ~, -,: i ,,I S r I f 111 % '.. l ' 1 1, J ~ ~ r' !n a 1 4 r_~ 1 I~~' ~_11 ., m ~I h r ' +i~ , p, _ r + ~/m ~: _/~+ ' ~-1,.. 1, ... f~ mom/ ~ Fr '' _a'17h7 m ~~ ~ /~~ a r (~ ' ~,] r m ti~ '~~ A ~~ m ~, H I D ~ ~ ~' _..~ ~ t ~ r'~, ~ ~ __ j ,Y _.__ _ z v~ i d ~' c ri ~ o ~~ o ~ ~ E n ~ N ~ a 6 o;m m ~ > > N ~ -fi ~ ~ d ~ ~ N ~ ~ w 3 ~~ m o m3~m co ~~nvi y cQ c~i a °' o ~ ~ ~ ~ m Z ~ ~ ~~ _°'~ 0 3 ~ ~ w o ~ E ~ na m~ ~ ~z ~ ~ m m m o~ m ~ ~ m ~ ~ d c .~ .,r,, AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 485 Rio Grande Place (Lots 1 and 5 Pitkin County Centerl. SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 16 December , 2008 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, Stan Clauson (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: x Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. x Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the 26 day of November, 2008_, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. x Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class, postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application, and, at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public heazing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) °+,.. Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minunum, Subdivisions that create more than one lot, Planned Unit Developments, Specially Planned Areas, and COWAPs aze subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of narnes and addresses of owners of real property in the azea of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. igna e The foregoin¢ "" `" of 'r vit of Notice" was acknowledg~~s~~ _, 200 8, by Psv~~ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My co 'on expire : `~ ~ ~~ Notary Public ~~Y pVei. CORY J. GARSKE ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: OPYOFTHEPUBLICATION ~y CommissM PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN LIST OF THE OWNERSAND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED 0510912012 BYMAIL APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIREDBYC.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 ,~ AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC 1!'OTICE ~'" REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ` ESS OF PROPERTYn o~irGynn~ 'f ~u ~ , Aspeu, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, ~-/~ ~~ ~~ ~ (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publicatio~x is attached ]xereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide andtwenty-si (26) inches high, and which was cornposed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the _ day of , 200_, to and including the date and time of the public heazing. A photograph of t)xe posted notice (sign) is attached ]xereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and go»ernrxzental agencies so noticed is attadxed hereto. (continued on next page) v.r `.~ AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.06© (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: ~ g5 SCIIEDULED PUBLIC REARING DATE: -~,~sr~a.~-~ Pow JJ~~4~ orn ,2ooS STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) Aspen, CO ~ [ ~~, ~ (name, please print) I ~°l~~ ~ being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearuig. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Cormmunity Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing azid was continuously visible from the _ day of , 200_, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attadzed hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (1 ~) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners arzd governmental agencies so noticed is attadied hereto. ~` ~-- (continued on next page) ~- Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt ~' requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions that create more than one lot, Planned Unit Developments, Specially Planned Areas, and COWAPs aze subject to ties notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during al] business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public heazing on such amendments. £~/y'^l Sign tore '~ The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 15Tday of ~EC.~1.a13E ~ , 2000, by ~~~ ~crl ~ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commissi_o~n~exp~ires: Notary P bl' ~~~~ ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: %THEPUBLICATION Pu0lishetl in the Aspen Tmes Weekly on Novem- iRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN ber 30, 2008. (2824542) ' THE OWNERSAND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE ON'NERSNOTICE AS REQUIRED BYC.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 „~ sN Erspamer, Chair Aspen Planning antl Zoning Commission ,., ~ ~.., 100 NORTH SPRING STREET LLC 311 ASPEN LLC PO BOX L3 C/O BEAU VINTON iEN, CO 81612 WILM NGTON,LDEN19 06E A STAR RANCH FUND 1 LLC AARON ROGER S & VIRGINIA A 89 VAGNEUR LANE 45 BIRCHALL DR BASALT, CO 81621 SCARSDALE, NY 10583-0000 ALLEN CARROL A REV TRUST ALH HOLDING COMPANY INC ALLEN RONALD W REV TRUST 435 E MAIN ST 50 SW 137TH AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 BEAVERTON, OR 97006 ALPINE BANK ASPEN ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER ATTN ERIC GARDEY SAINT MARYS PO BOX 10000 1300 S STEELE ST GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 DENVER, CO 80210 ASPEN EXTREME LLC 3375 CRYSTAL CT COCONUT GROVE, FL 33133 ASPEN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 420 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ~a.,. ASPEN MAIN STREET PROPERTIES LP 14881 QUORUM DR #200 DALLAS, TX 75254 AUSTIN LAWRENCE CONNER LLC 532 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 RAYLESS GRANT J 6864 PEPPERTREE CT LONGMONT, CO 80503-7252 BERG KRISTOFOR 102 FOUNDERS PL#202 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN PCU 010 HOLDINGS LLC PO BOX 11600 ASPEN, CO 81612 BANKERS MORTGAGE CORP 1616 ORCHARD AVE GRAND JUNCTION, CO 8150' BECKWITH DAVID E QPRT 3520 N RACKETY AVE MILWAUKEE, WI 53211 BERLIN JAMES & MADELINE L 1795 BROOKWOOD DR AKRON, OH 44313-5070 530 HOPKINS LLC 800 E HOPKINS AVE #B-5 ASPEN, CO 61611 ALEXANDER JUDY 1894 HWY 50 EAST #4 PMB 207 CARSON CITY, NV 89701 ALLEN LEONARD A III PO BOX 8316 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASHTON JONATHAN G PO BOX 26 JAMES TOWN, CO 80455 ASPEN LEGACY LLC 17740 E HINSDALE AVE FOXFIELD, CO 80016 ATWOODSTANFORD H JR & PAMELA S LIVING TRUST 16125 GREENWOOD LN MONTE SERENO, CA 95030 BARNETT JERALD M JR 500 PRESIDENT CLINTON AVE LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 BECKWITH NATALIE B QPRT C/O FOLEY & LARDNER 777 E WISCONSIN AVE MILWAUKEE, WI 53202 BIEHL GERALD M 1201 GALAPAGOS DENVER, CO 80201 ''""`E PINTO LLC BOHNETT MARSHA ANN TRUST BOMBA LAURIE A REV TRUST hrrCLARK TREDER 5411 KILAUEA PL 5601 HIGH DR 101 N SPRING ST #3205 HONOLULU, HI 96816 MISSION HILLS, KS 66208 ASPEN, CO 81611 .~, ,-, ,~.. BOOHER ANDREA LYNN BORCHERTS HOLDE H TRUSTEE BRANDON BETH 709 E MAIN STREET #303 1555 WASHTENAW 101 N SPRING ST #107 A,~PEN, CO 81611 ANN ARBOR, MI 48104 ASPEN, CO 81611 BROUGH STEVE B BRYANT CAROLINA H BULKELEY RICHARD C & JULIE J BROUGH DEBORAH A PO BOX 5217 PO BOX 450 599 TROUT LK DR SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 RED OAK, IA 51566 BANGER, CA 93657 BURSTEN GABRIELLA CALCOTT JOHN R CALDWELL CHARLES & DEBRA PO BOX 2061 WIKE KAREN S 514 E BRYAN ST ASPEN, CO 81612 600 E MAIN ST #301 SAVANAH, GA 31401 ASPEN, CO 81611 CALHOON THOMAS C CARVER JOHN & MARCIA L CICUREL CARY 315 LAVACA ST PO BOX 991 2615 N LAKEWOOD AUSTIN, TX 78701 RAPIDS CITY, IL 61278 CHICAGO, IL 60614 CIPOLLINO NICHOLAS CITY OF ASPEN CLANCY J ANTHONY 8 DEBORAH 300 QUAIL RD ATTN FINANCE DEPT 3605 TUXEDO CT MERRITT, NC 28556-9641 130 S GALENA ST ATLANTA, GA 30305 ASPEN, CO 81611 ,,,, COHEN NANCY C REV TRUST 85% INT COLORADO MTN NEWS MEDIA COMMUNITY BANKS OF COLORADO 2026 N MOHAWK 500 DOUBLE EAGLE CT 127 W 4TH ST CHICAGO, IL 60614 RENO, NV 89511 PUEBLO, CO 81003 COMMUNITY BANKS OF COLORADO CONCEPT 600 LLC COPPOCK RICHARD P 210 N MILL ST PO BOX 2914 PO BOX 44 ASPEN, CO 81611 BASALT, CO 81621 DEXTER, MI 48130 COWART TRENT E CRAIG BARTON J & SHELLIE E CROSS JUDITH 3206 CALIENTE CT #6458 100 OBERMEYER PL #104 PO BOX 3388 ARLINGTON, TX 76017 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 CROUSEN GUINN D TRUST DIXIE DOG VENTURES LLC DONAHUE ELIZABETH 4326 COCHRAN CHAPEL CIR 1690 HOMESTAKE DR 102 FOUNDERS PLACE #2302 DALLAS, TX 75209 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ' '',AIS GREGORY SCOTT DORAN RALPH DRESNER MILTON H REV LVG TRST ra.rL MOLLY O 2600 WOODWARD WAY 28777 NORTHWESTERN HWY PO BOX 588 ATLANTA, GA 30305 SOUTHFIELD, MI 48034 ASPEN, CO 81612 _,, ~..., EDWARDS CHARLES N 189 BEVENUE ST W~LLSLEY, MA 02482 EMPHASYS SERVICE COMPANY 1925 BRICKELL AVE BLDG D PENTHOUSE1ID MIAMI, FL 33129 EISENSTAT ALBERT & CONSTANCE 358 WALSH RD ATHERTON,CA 94027 FARRELL SCOTT W PO BOX 9656 ASPEN, CO 81612 ~-, . ,.. ELDEN RICHARD & GAIL M 2430 LAKEVIEW AVE - #115 CHICAGO, IL 60614 FELDMANJONATHAN 101 N SPRING ST #104 ASPEN, CO 81611 FIRST 415 RIO GRANDE PLACE TRST FORTIER TIMOTHY FICKE CLARK SECOND 415 RIO GRANDE PLACE TRST 465 N MILL ST 15 W ARRELLAGA ST #3 PO BOX 8982 CO 81611 ASPEN SANTA BARBARA, CA 93101 ASPEN, CO 81612 , FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES G 8 G CORPORATE OFFICES LLC GAGNON BEN 700 E BLEEKER AVE 2520 S GRAND AVE PO BOX 4381 ASPEN, CO 81611 GLENWOOD SPGS, CO 81601 ASPEN, CO 81612 GILKERSON LINDA GALANTER YALE & ELYSE GERSHMAN JOEL & ELAINE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO 525 S ANDREWS AVE 120 N SPRING ST 5640 ELLIS AVE FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 ASPEN, CO 81611 CHICAGO, IL 60637 GITLITZ GRANTOR LLLP 11.5% GLATHAR KIMBERLY J GLAUSER STEVEN JERRY & BARBARA 73 SIPPRELLE DR PO BOX 12197 460 ST PAUL ST PARACHUTE, CO 81635 ASPEN, CO 81612 DENVER, CO 80206 GOLDFEIN MICHAEL 85% GRABOW KENNETH REV FAMILY TRUST GODIVA HOLDINGS LLC GOLDFEIN PAMELA J 15 /° p0 BOX 1006 435 E MAIN ST 1724 BRAESIDE LN CO 81612 ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 NORTHBROOK, IL 60062 , GRAHAM NARELDA GREENBERG DEAN GRILL NEXT DOOR 101 N SPRING ST #203 PO BOX 129 455 RIO GRANDE PL ASPEN, CO 81611 NEWPORT, MN 55055 ASPEN, CO 81611 GRW RIO GRANDE PROPERTY LLC GURHOLT CHARLES J & VERNE GWM PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 4491 N5999 GURHOLT RD PO BOX 4146 ASPEN, CO 81612 SCANDINAVIA, WI 54977 ASPEN, CO 81612 HENDERSON JAMES C SEN CANTINA LLC 15.72% HAUSER MARY JANE KUCK KATHERINE M f'C7'BOX 9343 1540 BOHNS POINT RD 4880 HARLEM RD ASPEN, CO 81612 WAYZATA, MN 55391 GALENA, OH 43021 ~.. ~-, .W,. ,.,. HESSELSCHWERDT BILL 8 TRISH HEXNER MICHAEL T TRUSTEE HEYS MARIE L TRUSTEE PO BOX 1266 JUSTIS KAREN L TRUSTEE 2495 ADARE P SALT, CO 81621 2555 UNION ST ANN ARBOR, MI 48104 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94123-3832 HIPPEAU ERIC HOLLAND AND HART HICKS GILBERT W 8 PATSY K C/0 SOFTBANK CAPITAL PTNRS ATTN BRYAN DOWER 3674 WOODLAWN TERRACE PL 461 FIFTH AVE 15TH FLR PO BOX 8749 HONOLULU, HI 96822 NEW YORK, NY 10017 DENVER, CO 80201 HOLTZ ABEL & FANA HOPKINS ST VENTURE HORNBECK KIMBERLY E 420 LINCOLN RD STE 220 C/O TED MULARZ 102 FOUNDERS PL #2101 MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 PO BOX 1328 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASPEN, CO 81611 HOULIHAN MICHAEL P HUNTER ALEXANDER HUNTER SQUARE LLC 90% 2270 JUNIPER CT PO BOX 1638 2900 LOS BALLINAS AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401-9107 ASPEN, CO 81612 SAN RAFAEL, CA 94903 HURST FERN K JARDEN CORPORATION JONES MICHAEL C 1060 5TH AVE 2381 EXECUTIVE CENTER DR PO BOX 7966 NEW YORK CITY, NY 10128 BOCA RATON, FL 33431 ASPEN, CO 81612 JOSA LLC JURINE LLC 10% K & J ENTERPRISES LLC PO BOX 10147 2900 LOS BALLINAS AVE 601 RIO GRANDE PL #119A ASPEN, CO 81612 SAN RAFAEL, CA 94903-1417 ASPEN, CO 81611 KALLENBERG JEFFREY D J 8 SANDRA L 401 MARKET ST #500 SHREVEPORT, LA 71101 KESSLER SEPP H TRUST 50% KESSLER ANNA J TRUST 50% 600 E MAIN ST #210 ASPEN, CO 81611 KLEIN JAMES J & SALLIE R PO BOX 12022 ASPEN, CO 81612 LAMB DON O JR UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO 5640 ELLIS AVE CHICAGO, IL 60637 LAZAR FAMILY TRUST 5342 ALDER AVE ENCINO, CA 91316 LANE TAMMIE BRUNSWOLD KIRK 601 RIO GRANDE PL #118 ASPEN, CO 81611 LEE GREGORY K 8 DEBBIE L 9777 W CORNELL PL LAKEWOOD, CO 80227 CARSON KARL G 8 MARIA M PO BOX 8207 ASPEN, CO 81612 LESTER JIM 395 SOUTH END AVE #29N NEW YORK, NY 10280 +~.T,~OWITZ EDWARD LINDENAU SCOTT LINK LYNN B PO BOX 1811 501 RIO GRANDE PL #104 PO BOX 7942 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ~. ~.,, .., LITTLE RIVER HOUSE LLLP LUCKYSTAR LLC LUNDGREN WIEDINMYER DONNA TRST C/O DENICE C REICH p0 BOX 7755 PO BOX 6700 1873 S BELLAIRE ST#700 ASPEN, CO 81612 SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 '""'VVER, CO 80222 MAIN & MILL LLC 34.28% MAESTRANZI BART MAHONEY SHARON A C/O LOWELL MEYER 1736 PARK RIDGE POINTE PO BOX 11694 PO BOX 1247 PARK RIDGE, IL 60068 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 MARASC O EMILY A AK MEYER EMILYA MANN KATHLEEN A 99% MARASCO BERNARD R 11.0446% 11.0446 /o PO BOX 2057 320 DAKOTA DR 21701 FLAMENCO ASPEN, CO 81612 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92692 MARASCO FAMILY TRUST 33.4331% MARCHETTI FAMILY LLC MCCUTCHIN GENE P 653 26 1/2 RD 1526 FOREST DR 14833 MIDWAY RD GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 GLENVIEW, IL 60025 ADDISON, TX 75001 MCDONALD FRANCIS B MCGAFFEY FAMILY 8 CO NO C LLC MCGUIRE JOSEPH B PO BOX 4671 12852 NW SHORELAND DR PO BOX 120 ASPEN, CO 81612 MEQUON, WI 53097 ASPEN, CO 81612-0120 ~. MCNANIE TRUST MHT LLC MILESI MITCHELL TRUST 14915 RANCHO REAL PO BOX 25318 325 SE ST LUCIE BLVD DEL MAR, CA 92014 ST CROIX VIRGIN ISLANDS, 00824 STUART, FL 34996 MILLENNIUM PLAZA LLC MILNE SHEILA MILL & MAIN LLC C/O MEYER LOWELL PO BOX 8286 2900 OCEAN BLVD PO BOX 1247 CO 81612 ASPEN CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92625 ASPEN, CO 81612 , MMWCRB#2 7.57% MOORE GARY C & DEBRA J MOORE KIMBERLY K 595 S BROADWAY #200 233 N SPRING ST PO BOX 11919 DENVER, CO 80209 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 MOSCOE THOMAS D MOYER ROGER I MURPHY GEORGE W 14700 ROCKSBOROUGH RD PO BOX 2013 PO BOX 4146 MINNETONKA, MN 55345 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 /LON LLC NGS LLC NIBLACK SCOTT Ud DANFORTH 85 SAGEBRUSH LN PO BOX 10869 PO BOX 1863 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ~.~, NIILER BENJAMIN P OBERMEYER KLAUS JR 100 OBERMEYER PLACE DR #4101 106 S MILL ST #203 9SpEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 OBP LLC OLITSKY TAMAR & STEPHEN 101 FOUNDERS PL #104 PO BOX 514 ASPEN, CO 81611 GWYNEDD VALLEY, PA 19437 ORIGINAL CURVE CONDO #310 LLC pATTERSON VICKI C/O LAURA PIETRZAK p0 BOX 8523 1796 E SOPRIS CREEK RD ASPEN, CO 81612 BASALT, CO 81621 PINKOS DANNY & ANNA PITKIN COUNTY PO BOX 6581 530 E MAIN ST #302 SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 ASPEN, CO 81611 RAMOS WALTHER & MARJORIE RAYTON RENEE 133 TALL TREES DR PO BOX 12104 BALA CYNWYD, PA 19004 ASPEN, CO 81612 REINGOLD ROBERT B INC RIO GRANDE PARTNERS 88 LLC 1187 COAST VILLAGE RD STE 1-116 1008 E HOPKINS AVE MONTECITO, CA 93108 ASPEN, CO 81611 RKJR PROPERTIES LTD ROARING FORK LLC 5934 ROYAL LN #250 PO BOX 12345 DALLAS, TX 75230 ASPEN, CO 81612 ROSS NEIL ROSSI ELAYNE R TRUST 100 S SPRING ST 700 S UTE AVE #709 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ,~._ ~...~ OBERMEYER MARGARET H 95% C/O SPORT OBERMEYER 115 ASPEN BUSINESS CENTER ASPEN. CO 81611 ONE ONE SEVEN LLC 810 W SMUGGLER ASPEN, CO 81611 PFEIFER ASPEN HOUSE TRUST 16300 CANTRELL RD LITTLE ROCK, AR 72223 RAINER EWALD 409 E COOPER AVE #4 ASPEN, CO 81611 REDSTONE SUSAN B 120E 90TH ST #11 B NEW YORK, NY 10128 RIVER PARK IN ASPEN CONDO ASSOC 730 E DURANT ASPEN, CO 81611 ROSENFIELD LYNNE CARYN 709 E MAIN ST #203 ASPEN, CO 81611-2059 ROTHBLUM PHILIP & MARCIA 624 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 RUHNAU DAVID F & SHARON ENGEL SALET PHILIP S REV TRUST ~ ~ NORTH SPRNG ST #3204 PO BOX 7209 PO BOX 4897 RANCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ILOSSER BRADLEY F 8 KIMBERLY K SCHWAB ROBERT SEAMAN ANGELA 1~0~9 ELTON LN LEITCH B BRYAN III & JORGENSEN TED p0 BOX 10363 AUSTIN, TX 78703-3215 E ASPEN, CO 81612 906 SANTIAGO TR WYLIE, TX 75098 SEID MEL SEYFFERT STEVEN J 1104 DALE AVE PO BOX 9662 ~#,SiPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 SHERMAN CAPITAL COMPANY SHOAF JEFFREY S 5840 E JOSHUA TREE LN PO BOX 3123 PARADISE VALLEY, AZ 85253 ASPEN, CO 81612 SMITH H W III SMITH JAMES F R N LINDSAY PO BOX 10914 600 E MAIN ST #302 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 --. ..~ SPRING STREET LLC STARMER MARY JOSEPHINE 11.0446°/a C/O BAXTER 12738 W 84TH DR PO BOX 1112 ARVADA, CO 80001 CRESTED BUTTE, CO 81224 STEWART TITLE CO TEL 1999 GST EXEMPT TRST FBO C/O JENNIFER SCHUMACHER C/O BURKE AND NICKEL PO BOX 133 3336E 32ND ST #217 GYPSUM, CO 81637 TULSA, OK 74135 TREDER CAROLE A TSE HOLDINGS LLC 101 N SPRING ST BOX 3205 601 RIO GRANDE PL #120 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 UNIT 103 OBERMEYER PLACE LLC UNIT 109 OP LLC 601 RIO GRANDE PL #119 106 S MILL ST #203 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 VAN WALRAVEN EDWARD C 1% VANWOERKOM LAURIE PO BOX 4913 PO BOX 341 ASPEN, CO 81612 WOODY CREEK, CO 81656 VRANA MALEKA W STORAGE PLUS LLC PO BOX 4535 4040 NE 2ND AVE #414 ASPEN. CO 81612 MIAMI, FL 33137 iAR RICH WASKOW SUSAN A DMC RICH WAGAR ASSOC LLC p0 BOX 4975 100 S SPRING ST #3 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 SHAPIRO FREDERIC M 8 SUSAN 101 N SPRING ST #3108 ASPEN, CO 81611 SMITH GAILEN B 8 PAMELA WENDI PO BOX 241 SNOWMASS, CO 81654 SOUTHDALE ANESTHESIOLOGY PROFIT SHARING TRUST FBO ROY G BRYAN 5836 LONG BRAKE TRAIL RD EDINA, MN 55439 STEEL PARTNERS LTD 590 MADISON AVE NEW YORK, NY 10022 TRAVIS SHELBY J 208E 28TH ST -APT 2G NEW YORK, NY 10016 TUSCANALLC 501 RIO GRANDE PL STE 105 ASPEN, CO 81611 VAN DEUSEN EDWARD BENJAMIN TRUSTEE VAN DEUSEN DIANA JEAN TRUSTEE 233 N SPRING ST ASPEN, CO 81611 VECTOR ENTERPRISES LLC 0490 ASPEN OAK DR ASPEN. CO 81611 WACHMEISTER EDWARD C A REV TRUST 6223 WHITEHALL FARM LN WARRENTON, VA 20187 WEEKS ROBIN 526 RIDGEWAY DRIVE METAIRIE, LA 70001 WELLS FARGO BANK C/0 THOMSON PROPERTY TAX SERVICES "" BOX 2609 ,,,w,.RLSBAD, CA 92018 <, WEUVE CHAD PO BOX 7783 ASPEN, CO 81612 .._, ~> WHITEHILL STEPHEN LANE 5320 W HARBOR VILLAGE DR #201 VERO BEACH, FL 32967 WHITNEY FAMILY TRUST WILSON STACE S WOODSON TOM PO BOX 5950 PO BOX 5217 101 NORTH SPRING ST #106 SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 ASPEN, CO 81611 ro ~ Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such ame dn~nts. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 28 day of November , 2008 , by ~jt15-hfl~s~fl ~e ~ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: ~? S) _01 _ Notary Public -ATTACHMENTS: OF THE PUBLICATION OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) ~~~ VA!t~ y((~ J'.J Y - ~- -- . cna•. ~'vEsLIC •' o . ~,~ My Commission [.xQires 08;2512012 VD GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED B Y MAIL ~. 0 0... F m:. dr N N I' ~` S MiLC ST NMILL ST ~~ S ~ALE~A sr N GgLENA ST xn ~, ~ - - ~n ~~~ ' d '~ N n c d WnC) ~~ o ~' ' NNE ~ ~ / ~o S S SP~~NG S T / r Q O ~~ m~ i ~~-~ fly ~ N ~ r[n= maw Z ~Oc a~° - O ~cz -. N m e m ~ ~ %-d. ~ ~ ~~~ ~ p vm m ~ a ~~ ~N ~ -~ m Q ~Z vm w ~ D m/~ z m a 2` i~ ' _~( , , 1 ~ ~.~iJ ~ ~ I l m m ~ ~~ ~ N ~ N~ ,~.. --~ y __~ y - -_ ~ z /, o ~ --- ~ ~ ~. ~ , ~ D O 0 m ~ a m a n °~m°- p °. (D d p 7 „p,. ~j f T n, ° o ° `O ° cn 3 ? m 3 d ° m ~~ m o ~~~~ ca ~ a 01 cn 0 ~ mc~~ ° ~ F ° ~ ~ p) ~ ,~ O +n ~ n N~ ~ ~mmm ~'2 o~ ~ ~ °°-~ m ~, 0 -i -___ r~1V' ,w SPY ~i~ O ,~~ y -r~ y z x ~L g ~` _~ ~ ,. ~ - .\ Fl. ~ F ~.. ~ A, ~i .A.~.j~. d ~ ~ ~ ~ .% ~ ~ ~~ ~.. .a. A rk ".~ ~' E i v ``t. ~ ~ I - : ~~ d A F .."~ 01 9 ! O r.. I ~ . it J ~a ~ , ~ ~ ~~ I Y ~ ~~ I a i I i _ ~ +' ~ F LL _ '~ ~ 133tl15 ~ ~ n~ ~f u~. ~ ~; i' ~ f .. ~ 9NItld5 1 ,r ~ ® ~~~ g ~' ( • ~_ 10 !- 6 ~ F.~wj /) ' O m 3 3 ~ ~ O cif' n :~. _ I it y c c c c L' q~. Ems;. ~~~ji~ 3,+~~~~ ~~ s~"~ ,,yam.. ~ i~ ~.~ ~~ I ~~ ,~ ~ .~ ~~ I 1. , ~ ,. ~. 1 ' ~ ~~ r' , , tom. r. :. N T S ~ l J( C G k ' f ~~, . F ~ i ~ ~ ," ~ r ~` v ~ . \ ~ / / p .., . ..; - __ _ I i ~~ ~ ~ ~l r; - - -- k a _.... ~ .~N". a ~ ~ ~~~ ~9 ~ ~~ ~~_~ ~ F ~'° ~ ~~~. ',~~ gd ~ ` ..~~ \ R .~~..~ ~\ ~, ~~ J ~ ' ~ ~~~ U ~ ~ 1 Q o © c c :: ~ Y ~ ' ~ ~ LL J ~ n - , a ~( y _ ,a - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~g ~ 1d3M15 y ~ ; ~ ly s ~JNIHdS ~.. y ~. ~' LL ~ ~ b ~ y ~ ~ ` LL (~~QQ/ ~ T 0 a 6 D / ..~.. ' I j .. C_1 ~ C J • Y e A ' ~ i ~ ~~.. i ;`o ~ ~ i '. v ~ ~ ~ i~ '. AD~RC J s ~ ~m V a \ 3 ~ ~`~ y ~Cy1 ~ Q o C ~ v ~ CLL ga ~_r ~ Q j Q I~ F a y ~% ..__~-~£ b ~_-_ -- ~- -- -- ' ---_ r e 131H:. a vNarv^ p a. ... ..~-__. f- ~ a N~ U i I Parcel Detail ~,,,, ~ `..i Pitkin County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Page 1 of 2 Assessor/Treasurer Proper Search ~ Assessor Subset Ouery ~ Assessor Sales Search ___ Clerk & Recorder Rece t~ ion Search Basic Building Characteristics ~ Tax Information Parcel Detail ~ Value Detail ~ Sales Detail ~ Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Land Detail ~ Photographs Tax Area 001 Account Number Parcel Number 2007 Mill Levy R014332 273707306855 29.317 Owner Name and Address PITKIN COUNTY 530 E MAIN ST #302 ASPEN, CO 81611 Legal Description SUB:RIO GRANDE LOTS DESC: VACANT LAND ADJACENT TO THE OLD YOUTH CENTER BELOW THE JAIL Location Physical Address: E BLEEKER ST ASPEN Subdivision: RIO GRANDE Land Acres: 0 Land Sq Ft: 5,241 2008 Property Tax Valuation Information +..> Actual Value Assessed Value Land: 524,100 151,990 Improvements: 0 0 Tota I: 524,100 151,990 httn://www.nitkinassessor.org/assessor/pazcel.asp?PazcelNumber=273707306855 11 / 18/2008 Parcel Detail ~„~ ~ Page 2 of 2 Sale Date: Sale Price: Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 0 Buildings: Number of Comm/Ind 0 Buildings: No Building Records Found Tax Information No Tax Records Found Top of Page Assessor Database Search O lions ~ Treasurer Database Search Options Pitkin. County_Home Pale The Pitkin County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Pitkin County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright ©2008 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns Software. ~.. ww http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=273707306855 11 / 18/2008 Parcel Detail „~„ ,,,,~ Page 1 of 2 4~ ~1 ~, Pitkin County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Assessor/Treasurer_Property Search ~ Assessor Subset Query ~ Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder Reception Search Basic Building Characteristics ~ Tax Information Parcel Detail ~ Value Detail ~ Sales Detail ~ Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Land_Detal ~ Photographs Tax Area Account Number Parcel Number 2007 Mill Levy 001 R014338 273707347851 29.317 Owner Name and Address PITKIN COUNTY 530 E MAIN ST #302 ASPEN, CO 81611 Legal Description SUB:PITKIN COUNTY CENTER LOT:1 DESC: COURTHOUSE AND JAIL Location Physical Address: 485 RIO GRANDE ASPEN Subdivision: PITKIN COUNTY CENTER Land Acres: 1.43 Land Sq Ft: 0 2008 Property Tax Valuation Information ~.... Actual Value Assessed Value Land: 5,803,300 1,682,960 Improvements: 7,850,000 2,276,500 Total: 13,653,300 3,959,460 http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=273707347851 11 /18/2008 Parcel Detail Sale Date: Sale Price: Page 2 of 2 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 0 Buildings: Number of Comm/Ind 0 Buildings: No Building Records Found Tax Information No Tax Records Found Top of Page Assessor Database Search Options ~ Treasurer Database Search Options Pitkin County Home Page The Pitkin County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Pitkin County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. ... Copyright ©2008 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns Software. .+~~ w..,. .,r http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel. asp?ParcelNumber=273707347851 11 /18/2008 „~. MEMORANDUM TO: Plans were routed to those departments checked-off below: .....X... City Engineer ......... Community Development Engineer ....X... Police Department .....X... Zoning Officer ........... Housing Director .....X... Pazks Department ........... Aspen Fire Marshal .....X... City Water ........... Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District .....X... Building Department ........... Environmental Health ........... Electric Department ........... Holy Cross Electric ........... City Attorney ........... Streets Department ........... Historic Preservation Officer .........City Parking Manager ........... Pitkin County Planning FROM: Errin Evans, Current Planner ,„ Community Development Department 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611 Phone: 429-2745 Fax: 920-5439 RE: Addition to Pitkin County Jail (485 Rio Grande Place) -SPA Amendment ParcelID #2737-073-47-851 & 2737-073-06-855 DATE: Tuesday, November 4, 2008 COMMENTS: Please review the attached application for an SPA Amendment to the Pitkin County Jail building for an addition to accommodate computer equipment. A DRC meeting will be held on November 19th, 2008. Please have your comments returned by November 18th, 2008. Please return your application if you do not want to hold onto it once the review is finished. DRC Meeting: November 19th, 2008 -Council Chambers Thank You, Errin Evans ,,... ~, DRC "~~"' November 13, 2008 City Parks Department Requirements Property: Pit Co Data Center Conditions of Approval: 1) Tree Protection: A vegetation protection fence shall be erected at the drip line of each individual tree or groupings of trees remaining on site and their represented drip lines. A formal plan indicating the location of the tree protection will be required for the bldg permit set. No excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction backfill, and storage of equipment, foot or vehicle traffic allowed within the drip line of any tree remaining on site. This fence must be inspected by the city forester or his/her designee (920-5120) before any construction activities are to commence. 2) Plant Spacing: Appropriate spacing will be required for all new plantings. Coniferous Trees will require adequate spacing between trees and distance from buildings or structures to allow for mature growth. Deciduous Trees will require adequate spacing from structures to accommodate mature growth in height. 3) Seed Mix and Irri atg ion: Applicant shall use the City of Aspen approved native seed mix and a temporary or permanent irrigation system will be required for establishment. 4) Weed Manasement: Applicant shall detail and define how it will manage noxious weeds during the seed establishment period. c~ ti~ J ~ NSF ~ ~~ r i ~w n° ~o ~~~ ~ I N ~ ~` TRAIL & TRANSIT ,~~' u' h ry / Jam, ~ ~ Ski 6~ 0 3 ~ 01~ acres ~ o° i~ ~. ~ .,~ / ~ ~ / /~h•~~ - ~ ~ ~`=- CL 15.0' WAT~1 .p' ,~ ~ SERVICE EASEME ;S1i1o'h o° ' PER PLAT ~ /~ ' ° i CL 15.0'~ TEi o a~? SERVICE EASEI~E 638'24"W~ PER BOOK 690 PAC ~" ~ 7.77 o r » r ~-) S6r4T21"w 95.26' ' II ss1•aTz1"w 19.44' CL 8.0' WATER ~ERVICE EASEMENT PER PLAT CL 15.0' WATER SERVICE EASEMENT PER BOOK 690 PAGE 313 ~ ~•64~ i~ 0 ' 550'36'46"W 2.91' ,{,~, ~ h -~ o eo • ~'¢0 1 oy~ moo, ~s~ A \ qG,~ ,2. \ s i '7~0 O C~ ~~ b~ t~~ r / n t~ -. \ LoT s RIO GRANDE SUEDIT~ISION `~ ~. \ \ ~ - ~ - \\ /R p•~~KER ~' AS'r B REC. S#4996 _ _ _ ~ 7. . a, i> LOT > A~IENDE'D PITKIN COUNTY CE'NTE'R i SUBDI VISON 56, 033 sq. ft. 1.286 acres - ----~ \~~ NC • '~, ~' ~QQ4 MU • ~~0 ~~ do ~A PUB ~ '~ SPA • s~4 ~h _ w.~`~ GAO , ,~ P• B ~~ ~~ PUB • UD SPA SCI ~`-~~_ • ` ~A~ /- - W • ~ PUB ~Q `'~~ Z ~ E MAIN ST c A ' ~ C-1 • • ~ s.. ii