Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.315 E Dean St.0057.2007.ASLUTHE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER PARCEL ID NUMBER PROJECTS ADDRESS PLANNER CASE DESCRIPTION 0057.2007.ASLU 2737 18 285 033 315 E. DEAN STREET JESSICA GARROW ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW REPRESENTATIVE DATE OF FINAL ACTION BRETT 1/19/2008 CLOSED BY Angela Scorey on 07/30/2009 Page 1 of 1 Pitkin County Transaction #: 5459 Janice K. Vos Caudill Receipt #: 200800105 Clerk and Recorder Cashier Date:l/7/2008 1:32:19 PM 530 East Main Street (RKEITH) Aspen, CO 81611 (970)429-2707 ,,, -' - I~~III ~~I~I ~IIII ~I~~I ~III~ III I~~I Print Date: 1 /7/2008 1:32:20 PM W W W.11L11111~1Y1 ~.va6 Customer Information Transaction Information Payment Summary DateReceived: O1 /07/2008 Source Code: Mail Q Code: Mail (ASPCIT) ASPEN CITY OF Over the Total Fees $61.00 ATTN CITY CLERK Return Code:Counter Total Payments $61.00 Trans Type: Recording Agent Ref Num: 1 Payments $61.00 IPM CHECK 1184 1 Recorded Items BK/PG.• 0/0 Reception: 545541 Date:l/7/2008 R ~ ~NOTICI~ NOTICE 1:32:14 PM From: To: Recording @ $6 for lpg and $5 for 2 or more pgs 12 $61.00 Search Items 0 Miscellaneous Items file://C:\Program Files\RecordingModule\default.htm 1/7/2008 NOTICE OF APPROVAL To permit the addition of two (2) new wireless antennae to be located on the St. Regis Hotel, at 315 E. Dean St. ParcelID No.2737-182-85-033 APPLICANT: Sprint Nextel REPRESENTATIVE: Brett Pfleger, Pfleger Consulting, LLC SUBJECT OF Approval of new wireless devices, pursuant to APPROVAL: Section 26.575.130. of the Land Use Code SUMMARY: On behalf of Sprint Nextel, Brett Pfleger, has applied for approval to allow two (2) new wireless antennae to be placed on the St. Regis, 315 E. Dean St, pursuant to section 26.575.130 of the Land Use Code. Sprint Nextel currently has one (1) antenna on the St. Regis roof that extends five (5) above the roof line, and is requesting that two (2) new antennae be placed in the same location, extended five (5) above the roof line. The existing antenna is located in Sector 1 and the two (2) new antennae will be located in Sector 2 and Sector 3 and will match the existing Sector 1 antenna (see attached Exhibit B). REVIEW PROCEDURE: Wireless Telecommunication Service Facilities and Equipments: The Community Development Director may approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove an application pursuant to Section 26.575.130 of the Land Use Code. STAFF COMMENTS: Staff finds that all applicable review criteria have been met. See Exhibit A for Staff s full evaluation of the review criteria. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Community Development Director approve the Sprint Nextel wireless facilities for the roof of the St. Regis, 315 E. Dean St., with conditions. APPROVAL: The Community Development Director finds the requested wireless antennae to be consistent with the Wireless Communication Device review criteria L~~® thereby, APPROVES the amendment, with the following conditions: ~[~ C [ ~/ i,.~ :, s.. RECEPTION#: 545541, O1C07>2008 at 01:32:14 PM, CITY CF ASPEN 1 OF 12, R $61.00 Doc Code NOTICE t COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO .~. 1. A building permit shall be obtained by the applicant. A copy of this approval shall accompany the building permit application. 2. As previously approved, the service light shall only be on when the facilities are being serviced. 3. The applicant shall obtain an encroachment license if there is disturbance of the public right-of--way during construction. 4. The applicant shall obtain a temporary encroachment license during construction if the public right-of--way is to be used for construction storage. 5. The applicant shall submit a traffic control plan if there is an encroachment on the public right-of--way that affects the normal traffic flow. 6. The applicant shall paint the new antennae to match the existing antenna. APPROVED BY: Chris Bendon Community Development Director i~ i2~.~- Date ACCEPTANCE: I, as a person being or representing the applicant, do hereby agree to the conditions of this approval and certify the information provided in this application is correct to the best of my knowledge. v'~~' ' ~ Brett Pfleger, Heger Consulting, LLC z O£~ Date Attachments: Exhibit A -Review Criteria (seven pages) Exhibit B -Approved Application (three pages) •^°\ Exhibit A: Review Criteria Sec. 26.575.130. Wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment. F. Review standards. The following standards are designed to foster the City's safety and aesthetic interests without imposing unreasonable limitations on wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment.: 1. Setbacks. At a minimum, all wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall comply with the minimum setback requirements of the underlying zone district if the following requirements are more restrictive than those of the underlying zone district, the more restrictive standard shall apply. a. All facilities shall be located at [east fifty (50) feet from any property lines, except when roof-mounted (above the eave line of a building). Flat-roof mounted facilities visible from ground level within one-hundred (100) feet of said property shall be concealed to the extent possible within a compatible architectural element, such as a chimney or ventilation pipe or behind architectural skirting of the type generally used to conceal HI~AC equipment. Pitched-roof-mounted facilities shall always be concealed within a compatible architectural element, such as chimneys or ventilation pipes. The proposed antennas are proposed to be in the same location as it is today. Staff finds this criterion is met. b. Monopole towers shall be set back from any residentially zoned properties a distance of at least three (3) times the monopo[e's height (ie., a sixty (60) foot setback would be required for a twenty (20) foot monopole) and the setback from any public road, as measured from the right-of-way line, shall be at least equal to the height of the monopole. The proposed antennas are on the building. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. c. No wireless communication facility may be established within one-hundred (100) feet of any existing, legally established wireless communication facility except when located on the same building or structure. The proposed antennas are on the building. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. d. No portion of any antenna array shall extend beyond the property lines or into any front yard area. Guy wires shall not be anchored within any front yard area, but may be attached to the building. Exhibit A, Sprint Nextel Wireless Facilities Page 1 of 7 The proposed antenna is on the building and does not extend past a property line or into the front yard area. Staff finds this criterion is met. 2. Height. The following restrictions shall apply: a. Wireless telecommunication services facilities and/or equipment not attached to a building shall not exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height or the maximum permissible height of the given Zone District, whichever is more restrictive. The proposed antennas will be on the building. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. b. Whenever a wireless telecommunication services antenna is attached to a building roof, the antenna and support system for panel antennas shall not exceed five (5) feet above the highest portion of that roof, including parapet walls and the antenna and support system for whip antennas shall not exceed ten (i0) feet above the highest portion of that roof, including parapet walls. The proposed antennas will be on the building and will extend no more than five (5) feet above the highest portion of the roof. Staff finds this criterion is met. c. The Community Development Director may approve a taller antenna height than stipulated in b. above if it is his or her determination that it is suitably camouflaged, in which case an administrative approval may be granted. The proposed antennas comply with criterion 26.575.130.F.2.b, above. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. d. If the Community Development Director determines that an antenna taller than stipulated in b. above cannot be suitably camouflaged, then the additional height of the antenna shall be reviewed pursuant to the process and standards (in addition to the standards of this Section) of Chapter 26.430 (Special review). The proposed antennas comply with criterion 26.575.130.F.2.b, above. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. e. Support and/or switching equipment shall be located inside the building, unless it can be fully screened from view as provided in the "Screening" standards (26.475.]30 and 26.575.130.F.5) below. No change to the existing equipment area is proposed. Staff finds this criterion is met. 3. Architectural compatibility. Whether manned or unmanned, wireless telecommunication services facilities shall be consistent with the architectural style of Exhibit A, Sprint Nextel Wireless Facilities Page 2 of 7 ,~,. the surrounding architectural environment (planned or existing) considering exterior materials, roof form, scale, mass, color, texture and character. In addition: a. Ijsuch facility is accessory to an existing use, the facility shall be constructed out of materials that are equal to or of better quality than the materials ojthe principal use. The proposed antennas are not an accessory use. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. b. Wireless telecommunication services equipment shall be of the same color as the building or structure to which or on which such equipment is mounted or as required by the appropriate decision-making authority (Community Development Director, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, as applicable). There currently exists an identical antenna as is proposed in this application. The new antennas will be made to mach the existing antenna which matches the building. Staff finds this criterion is met. c. Whenever wireless telecommunication services equipment is mounted to the wall of a building or structure, the equipment shall be mounted in a configuration designed to blend with and be architecturally integrated into a building or other concealing structure, be as flush to the wall as technically possible and shall not project above the wall on which it is mounted. There currently exists an identical antenna as is proposed in this application. The new antennas will be made to mach the existing antenna which matches the building and extends no more than five (5) feet above the highest portion of the roof. Staff finds this criterion is met. d. Monopole support buildings, which house cellular switching devices and/or other equipment related to the use, operation or maintenance of the subject monopole, must be designed to match the architecture of adjacent buildings. Ij no recent and/or reasonable architectural theme is present, the Community Development Director may require a particular design that is deemed to be suitable to the subject location. The proposed antennas do not include monopole support buildings. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. e. All utilities associated with wireless communication facilities or equipment shall be underground (also see "Screening" below). No new utilities are required. Staff finds this criterion is met Exhibit A, Sprint Nextel Wireless Facilities Page 3 of 7 .~. \..J 4. Compatibility with the natural environment. Wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall be compatible with the surrounding natural environment considering land forms, topography and other natural features and shall not dominate the landscape or present a dominant silhouette on a ridge line. In addition: a. If a location at or near a mountain ridge line is selected, the applicant shall provide computerized, three-dimensional, visual simulations of the facility or equipment and other appropriate graphics to demonstrate the visual impact on the view of the affected ridges or ridge lines; an 8040 Greenline Review, pursuant to the provisions of Section 26.435.030, may also be required. The antennas will not be placed on or near a mountain ridge and does not require an 8040 Greenline review. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. b. Site disturbances shall be minimized and existing vegetation shall be preserved or improved to the extent possible, unless it can be demonstrated that such disturbance to vegetation and topography results in less visual impact to the surrounding area. No vegetation is impacted by the proposal. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. c. Surrounding view planes shall be preserved to the extent possible. There are no protected view planes impacted by this antenna. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. However, the applicant has provided visual simulations of the proposed antennas and Staff finds that the visual impact is minimal. d. All wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall comply with the Federal Communication Commission's regulations concerning maximum radio frequency and electromagnetic frequency emissions. The antennas will be in compliance with all FCC regulations. Staff finds this criterion is met. S. Screening. Roof-and-ground-mounted wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment, including accessory equipment, shall be screened from adjacent and nearby public rights-of--way and public or private properties by paint color selection, parapet walls, screen walls, fencing, landscaping and/or berming in a manner compatible with the building's and/or surrounding environment's design, color, materials, texture, land forms and/or topography, as appropriate or applicable. In addition: a. Whenever possible, if monopoles are necessary for the support of antennas, they shall be located near existing utility poles, trees or other similar objects; Exhibit A, Sprint Nextel Wireless Facilities Page 4 of 7 .~-. 4..+ ... consist of colors and materials that best blend with their background; and, have no individual antennas or climbing spikes on the pole other than those approved by the appropriate decision-making authority (Community Development Director, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, as applicable). The proposed antennas do not include monopole support buildings. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. b. For ground-mounted facilities, landscaping may be required to achieve a total screening effect at the base of such facilities or equipment in order to screen the mechanical characteristics; aheavy emphasis on coniferous plants for year-round screening may be required. Landscaping shall be of a type and variety capable of growing within one (1) year to a landscape screen which satisfactorily obscures the visibility of the facility. The proposed antennas do not include ground-mounted facilities. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. c. Unless otherwise expressly approved, all cables for a facility shall be fully concealed from view underground or inside of the screening or monopole structure supporting the antennas; any cables that cannot be buried or otherwise hidden from view shall be painted to match the color of the building or other existing structure. There are no visible cables proposed with this application. Staff finds this criterion is met. d. Chain link fencing shall be unacceptable to screen facilities, support structures or accessory and related equipment (including HVAC or mechanical equipment present on support buildings); fencing material, if used, shall be six (6) feet in height or less and shall consist of wood, masonry, stucco, stone or other acceptable materials that are opaque. Screening is not proposed. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. e. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the facility shall comply with all additional measures deemed necessary to mitigate the visual impact of the facility. Also, in lieu of these screening standards, the Community Development Director may allow use of an alternate detailed plan and specifications for landscape and screening, including plantings, fences, walls, sign and structural applications, manufactured devices and other features designed to screen, camouflage and buffer antennas, poles and accessory uses. For example, the antenna and supporting structure or monopole may be of such design and treated with an architectural material so that it is camouflaged to resemble a tree with a single Exhibit A, Sprint Nextel Wireless Facilities Page 5 of 7 ~-, <.: trunk and branches on its upper part. The plan should accomplish the same degree of screening achieved by meeting the standards outlined above. The proposed antennas meet all the above requirements relating to visual impacts. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. 6. Lighting and signage. In addition to other applicable sections of the code regulating signage or outdoor lighting, the following standards shall apply to wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment: a. The light source jor security lighting shall feature down-directional, sharp cut-off luminaries to direct, control, screen or shade in such a manner as to ensure that there is no spillage of illumination off-site. No light source is proposed. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. b. Light frxtures, whether free standing or tower-mounted, shall not exceed twelve (12) feet in height as measured from finished grade. No light source is proposed. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. c. The display of any sign or advertising device other than public safety warnings, certifuations or other required seals on any wireless communication device or structure is prohibited. No display is proposed. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. d. The telephone numbers to contact in an emergency shall be posted on each facility in conformance with the provisions of Chapter 26.510, Signs, of this Title. The telephone numbers are currently posted. Staff finds this criterion is met. 7. Access ways. In addition to ingress and egress requirements of the Building Code, access to and from wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall be regulated as follows: a. No wireless communication device or facility shall be located in a required parking, maneuvering or vehic[e/pedestrian circulation area such that it interferes with or in any way impairs, the intent or functionality of the original design. The antennas are not located in a parking area or facility. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. Exhibit A, Sprint Nextel Wireless Facilities Page 6 of 7 M, ,~ b. The facility must be secured from access by the general public but access for emergency services must be ensured. Access roads must be capable of supporting all potential emergency response vehicles and equipment The antennas aze located on the roof of the building, making access by the general public impossible. Emergency personnel shall have access as is required. Staff finds this criterion is met. c. The proposed easements for ingress and egress and for electrical and telephone shall be recorded at the County Clerk and Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building permits. The easements used will be the same as were previously established. These are currently on file with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. .Staff finds this criterion is met. Exhibit A, Sprint Nextel Wireless Facilities Page 7 of 7 €!w ; sty+~ i~.~ - ~ ^ ~, ~ BSI ~ ~I ~I ~: ziY ~i~~AE;' ~ ~ ~_ a ~ ~` ~ e ~ N U ly w l 0 m ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ V 2 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ¢ a _ X ~ Z o M H f- w z Z c/~ cn °' ~ O z ~ ~Q V ~ ~ Z S M Y ~~ a X N Z ~ _ Q ~ a O V W 7 O m d Q W 6 N Z 0 2 6 O ~ _ .F V ~ ~~ ~ b ' W W J~ W <NZ ~O ~ ~ ~ W 7 O U m~ {}{~~{ Y XQ ~ 'W-~rU K~Z h N d M m p a( ~ Z N 4 w w $G rc~ U a O 2 g ~~ m ~~ Z 0 ~_ u 0 O W W V ? o zm W o_ W~ N = 'o ]J a ~ Wf~ d m N r4 ~I m ~ ~ ~a~ is~ W o~OR i0~ wo = 41 a~ W fn; Z = W 6 ~ H _ U _~_7~7 a rp ~~~~~ ~ ~ No U ' zp U~ ~ ~ ~a< Wm « y~U ~ F ZW N ~ S $ Y ~ y w ¢N~~ x x N ~p~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ K ~ ~ ~ ~ ~O2K 00~+~ 1 ~ J~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p N ~~ ~eM A u ~ 6= ~ ~ ~~ O V ~ a N ~ Z ~ ~~~n~~x` mN N e7i W GLL ~ p¢ N l W~ ~ ~ N~~~ W~ LL Z ~_ F J W H W 3 `~_ ,` V Z u_~ W W Z _~F W O !~ i Z V ~S ~a ON z? u ~~ ~c W 0 Z Z ~~~ ~~~~ W~ W ? ~ ~ tl ~ ~ a ~ m m ~ O O, tO~ 1-<` ~R EC ~E~n $~~~ 4' t'~u s MBA rlw~ t '~+.,. o ~~ ~ 1 ~Ry J ~~ Ifl4f c e•., -r+, ,"±"-- ~ 4+~ .~ y ~° . ~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~g~ o _~~ z~ ~~~~~~ c y~ ®~~~ e' o 0 _ ~~ ova Z =~ ~~' ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ LL~~ ~ ~~ ~o ~ ~; u JJJ/ ~ ~ ~~ ~J ~o '-ry _. f ~ ~ L ~ ~'i ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ e ~~ \y ~N O ~~ ~~~~ /~~ ~®~~ o ~~~~8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s //~~ a~A~rr~ ~ 0 eE ~~ ~~ ~~~ o ~~,(S~ b Q~~~ e ~~ g ~o ®~ ®~~~ O O ® D ~ 0 ~~3 ~ ~ b 0 ~ 4 ir" ~ ~~ ~~ ~" g i.~k g r *~.es ;~ .C • ~ N ~';.:Y~~s~Ii~FYV ~ r ~ i ~ ~I ~5I ~ ~~ z+e~e°<4 ~ ~ ~4 n ~ ~ ~ ~ w M .. <e~ ~ ~~r3~~,~~~, ~ ~ p~~g~ ~~.Y-~~~ Y s it ~'f a II ~ f. U W G 4 ~° ~ ~„e ~ ~ ~t~L}~r?~~ ~ N k~~.Y ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ z zz &~ ~~ O ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ r1 T S ~~ m N W U ~ M ~.._ M ~ V W 0. W O V N O fH a 0 W Z ,~ V d ~~ .~ L ~/ / a w w UO OU ~~ Q Z ~ ~ UD Z m y 0 oa a u~ ~~ ~ z Cn ~ U ¢~ ~O O Q 0 ~ d ~ Z Z aw ¢ ° o Z ~''~ Y f- d x Z L L ~-+ F- O J w~ ~ aZ w ~ wa ? a U Z W C7 Q J Z Q J U F= C7 Q Z Y ° a ~ Z F z ° ~ c~ °~ o zcnw c~ c~i~~z ° w~a a NNE m m U 2 Z Z w U ~ Q Z d ~ a Q s=wap U'UZ?iU r Z ti ri d w N Z~pZ° rii ~ N _Z N O ~r~-w ~ >- w ~~~"5 °t3~w ~ ~J ~ W v j U Q C7 w Z Z Qt~ZU~ a'?O?~ ~ U ~ 0 a O LL Z W a O a W~~ rZcD p~o~ _ ^ O ~ U W Q Z ~ w ~n a tnmQ m } 0 w U a -° ~ J Q Y =Z ~ ~ a J O °' z W N Z ~ O Q Q ~ U ~ ~ ~ W W r a Q p i ~ v a d C7 Z U O p w vi Z ZU a zZW D J O W ~ ~j w? c~ O ~ ¢ m°O ~z 0 ~zz ` r (~ J ~ 0. ~ "ate O~° Z ~ ~~w O V~ oQa Q W cn a U ~ D rp `~z~ ~ ZFOp ~ w rum ~ ~w~ Z r ~~ ~ r O W rZ0 w (7 z u i` ~ ' oZ o~g ~ ~ 5 O ~ r J a W -~ ~ K ^W ~a ~ Z ~_~ O ° 0 J 0 }U Z O v Z H a Z 0 a W J W W 3 3 W Z _~ W f~ a Z V L a-+ ~_ rn ~L H ra v H N O_ W w ' m ~ ~ zw r ~ ~m ~ w W W ~U I1J r ° Z W ~ r W m m Z O ~ N U ~^° 3 ~ °CO °Z v w ~n - ~ > ~ o O r ~ w~ ~ M ~= v~ia a = ~ ~ H ~ m D ¢ z ~ °' to ~ = U Vl Cu ~ 2 Z rMj W M n ~ a0 N ~ ~ ~ m wrym~ ~ wm(~c~ w °~~. U W j~~. ~ F- m r_ ~~mww a ~ ww 2 ~ Z U O ~ Z_ ~c7~~~ (7 cUnC7~o~ Z ~ vri ~ U O who r ° ;p ~ o m m cn~o~:° d ~ O U Z Q Q N a ~u~wr° O1 ~ ~~uai0~ a t~mQU~ w w ~ >_ ~ O ~ ¢ r a F r W s 0 Z V 2 °D ~ W Z~O W >>o ~ c~oa°~ Z ~ ~~~ ~ a ZQ<n~a~ ~ ZUQO o~~ ~ ~zoa~~ ~ W ~O W UjO O'~ w ZZO ~t~U°' ~ Z r W~~z°o °n ~ ~voZO~~ u. ~O m ~ U~U~OMm Z as H> W ~(°,' z =~WZWZM Z kwZZw Z ~ ZZtt C70 a I~ra~Z ~~ ~ ~OZmwa~ v~ mwmmw aLL N Z O F W OC D a F Z V Z Z ~g wQ OZ ~ Z aw oa~p 'r rLL¢~ ~°o~g ~ ~ W O ~ LLpO~ zZZ~ °°~ r~~w rmm> 000 f-¢¢ z 0 a U J a a O z ° J o m LL °w _zo ~ Z V ~ ON Oi ~~~o ~~p~~ ~g~ ~ ~ n~ Z b ~ ~ a~?~~ p~~~~ ~ ~' ~ F ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~+ ~ W W a ~ 3 ~ ~o~cnw '_ J C7 ^ N Q a LL v ~ ~ m J d! ~ W ~ UNOQ(=jm~~ =ao v ~ N ~a W o~NW .. ~ a ~ H z w ~ W ~QW~B~~ Z ~Z~~ ~~z z °-J~~ ~~ ~~g~ m~ Q vwiu~~C~~°~~ a ~ € ~ § ~ W 4 0 i ~ ~WJ 'J W R' Q' Q Z o W~ W J Z ~ZaQ°p$ ~~~ Z ^~c~'JJ ~~~ x ~~ N~ m ~ z~ r- ~ m N~ ~~ °o ~s u1 F o~ ~ ~ m g ~ m Z o ~ ~ a g~ a ' ~ ~~ ~ °' N ~ ~ ~ ~~ _ ~ (A !D ! w a N zz - b '~ M `~ oZ zy% ~~~~ Nod zz zZ~ ~ ~o ~~~4~ ~m cana~a `4~,r, ~.. j i 9 ~~. W ~a~ LL Z~~~ ~za~ ~~a8 ~~C O O FZ Q m Q z r~r ~ ' ~0~4 ~LL~ C7z~W~ ~~~'~4 ril -~~~ o Q .I ~ ,, , ~ s m ~~ ~~ Vl ~ ? W ~~ ~ Z C9 ~n Q0 m ~ ~ 4' Z LL Z = x ~ Q W N N W ~ ~ ~ W a ~ ~,~~~~ yO~G~~S uwi ~ ~ ~a a G o~G~~y 5~°~~ ~Q G~~~P~~ 3 ~`~~~ `~~ Oyu ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~o~~,`o~a~~~ ~~ P J~~~l~ 5 ~~ ~ ~p,~~~Q.~F PLO ~~~5 ~`~~` ~ ~~ ~ ; 8~ ~ i z o w~ xyxU ~ W~ ~ U LL N ® Boa V ~o 0 ~O Zo z=~ a0°~ y z w z~~ a ~~N ~~~ Q O II :- a ~I I ~88 ~ ~~pp~ ~~~h- V ~ >I I I I I I Q i i G I I N ~ pd~~3 CC p~~a.~1L'a ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ U w DD t Y~ ~~ N gg~.1 ~n M c ~_ t~ 4~--~ i 1 i i W N H Z Z ~_ W H z axi %~ Z ~3 L C p/ ~L ~ ~~/Q/~ VJ p N W No o~ V m a ~J ~~ ~~ a 0 ~ W ~ F o6 ~ W 7 O LL Wo ~ K ~F oo ~ ~ ~> I I ~ c>>n Z M~ w~ ~' M ~ Z y qqfa/) ~ of ~ w ~ w W y W W ZZ 0 NQ N ~w n ~ o ~ wwa ,~~w CgzZw t=?w~ a u~v°"i¢~n ~ _ g ~ ~ ~ « ~ Y ~ ~y v € €€ QQ v e d ~ s _ ® ® z d ~No Z U Q ~ W ~ N f x ot W yy ~ W N ... e Z U O ~ o ~aw0 acncnr .!L ®~ o W aC Z J ~ W W ~ O ,k '~~ a O I ,+ ~ ~? O CA W ~~F-U~ ~azwJ o UtAQtAIL ~ L O J Z ~ J W W pp Z W Z ~ ZF-~y -?a 0 F U Xa > O wcnwx w o a _ z FAO U Q ~ W ~ ~ cif W 0 N = Z U OZOQ F ~aw0 av~cnf- (7 Nwz z z ~>~ a ~ ~ ~~ z O a J Q ? W u] Q ~~W Z~~W ~Z° > Xawm wu~v~a W 042 LL zwa (9 zF-~~ ~~~0 xa00 wrnw~ Z a W J W H W F' ~? o u N { Page 1 of 1 Jessica Garrow From: Jessica Garrow Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 5:29 PM To: 'brett.phleger@sprint.com' Cc: Angela Scorey Subject: St. Regis Wireless Follow Up Attachments: St. Regis Wireless Facilities Insubstantial Approval.doc; Exhibit A.doc Hi Brett- Today Chris Bendon, the Community Development Director, signed the administrative approval for the wireless antennae Sprint requested. We will be over-nighting the notice of approval to you tomorrow morning. Please sign the second page stating you agree with the conditions in the approval, and return the entire packet to me with a check for the recordation fee. The recordation fee will be $61, and you can make the check out to the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. I've also attached the approval to this email for your information. I will be publishing the notice of approval in the news paper on December 23ro. After the notice is published and the recordation is completed you will be able to submit your building permit application. When you submit the building permit application you will need to provide a copy of the approval. When you return the packet to me I will send you a copy back for your records. Let me know if you have any questions. I will be out of town through next Tuesday, so I will get back to you when I return. Cheers, Jessica Jessica Garrow, Long Range Planner Community Development Dept. City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 970.429.2780 www.aspenpitkin.com i i'~ q .,~~~~ CG~,il~1c;,~ . ., =Y~LOPMENT 12/12/2007 ~-, .~ CASE NIJMBER PARCEL ID # CASE NAME PROJECT ADDRESS PLANNER CASE TYPE OWNER/APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE DATE OF FINAL ACTION CITY COIJNCII. ACTION PZ ACTION AD111IlH ACTION BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED BY A031-00 2737-182-85001 St Regis Hotel 315 E. Dean St. James Lindt Telecom Installation Sprint Spectrum LLC Steve Miller 4/25/00 Approved w! Condition 6/30/00 J. Lindt ~~~'~ _ V" ,~ ^, - "", r^'* .~ -~, ~ DEVELOPMENT ORDER of the City of Aspen , Community Development Department This Development Older, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.07Q "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Righu", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the. provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be-the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the' third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.07, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property righu, this Order shall. remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotrnents granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendmenu to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number St. Regis Hotel; 315 E. Dean Street Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Telecommunication Facility Installation Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan. Administrative Decision, 4/25/00 Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) Mav 6 X000 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) 7 2003 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expu•ation and revocation may be pursued in accordance. with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 6~' day of May, 2000, by the City of Aspen Community Ann Woods, Community Development Director /^, ~ PUBLIC NOTICE Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, aad the creation of a vested property tight pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspea and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 31S E. Dean Street, St Regis Hotel, by administrative decision of the Community Development Director on April 25, 2000. For further information contact Julie Ann. Woods, at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St, Ashen, Colorado (970) 920-5090.. s/ City of Aspen Account Publish in The Aspen Times on May 6, 2000 ,~. MEMORANDUM TO: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Drector r~, THRU: Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Director FROM: James Lindt, Planning Technician RE: Sprint Telecommunication Facility - St. Regls Hotei, 315 E. Dean St. DATE: Apri124, 2000 SUMMARY: Sprint Spectrum LLC., represented by Steve Miller, has applied for the installation of telecommunication equipment to be installed on the roof of the building located at 315 E. Dean St. on behalf of Sprint PCS - a telecommunication service provider. The parcel is located outside of the Commercial Core Historic District and is not within any of the Mountain View Planes. ' The application proposes 6 panel antennas mounted to the side of the penthouse and 3 five foot tall antennas. that raise up within the 15-foot height requirement of the telecommunication equipment provisions of the Land Use Code. The application meets the standards for telecommunication equipment, pursuant to Section 26.575.130. Attached are the relevant criteria. Also attached is the application, containing a picture of the proposed equipment. Staff recommends The Community Development Director administrafively approve this application, with eight conditions. APPLICANT: Sprint PCS, owner. Represented by Prostar Wifeless Solutions on behalf of Sprint Spectrum LP. LOCATION: 315 E. Dean St. (Roof). ZONING: Lodge/Tourist Residential PUD (L/TR PUD) LOT SIZE: 121;626 Square Feet. CURRENT AND PROPOSED LAND USE: Mixed Use, Commercial and Lodging. ... .--, r-* ~. REVIEW PROCEDURE: Wireless Telecommunication Service Facilities: The Community Development Director may approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove an application pursuant to Section 26.575.130 of the Land Use Code. STAFF COMMENTS: Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit "A." Agency referral comments have been included as Exhibit "B." The application lies been included as Exhibit "C: ' RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Community Development Drector approve the Sprint Spectrum Wireless Telecommunication Service equipment proposed for the roof of St. Regis Hotel, 315 E. Dean St., with conditions: APPROVAL: I hereby approve the Sprint Wireless Telecommunication Service equipment proposed. for the roof of the St. Regis Hotel, 315 E. Dean St. with the following conditions: 1. A building permit shall be obtained by the applicant. A copy of this approval shall accompany die building permit application. 2. The service light shall only be on whenthe facilities are being serviced. 3. The applicant shall obtain aright-of--way permit if there is a disturbance of the public right- of-way during construction. 4. The applicant shall obtain a Temporary Encroachment License during construction if the public right-of--way is td be used for construction storage. 5. The applicant shall submit a traffic control plan if there is an encroachment on the public right- . of-way that aff~ts the normal traffic t]ow. 6. .All material representations made by the applicant in the application shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended. by other conditions 7. The applicant shall paint all antennas the same color as the building. 8. The applicant shall apply the same bric[c pattern to the panel antennas on the fagade of the building: {iP~. ~ r . ,date ~" 2 ~J 0(~, `~- Juli Ann Woods, AICP Community Development Director City of Aspen ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Comments Exhibit B -- Referral Agency Comments Exhibit C -- Development Application 2 Exhibit 1~ Telecom. Equipment F. Revfew Standards. The following, standards are designed to foster the City's safety and' aesthetic interests without imposing unreasonable limitations on wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment.: 1. Setbacks. At a minimum, all wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall comply with the minunum setback requirements of the underlying zone district; if the following requirements are more restrictive than those of the underlying zone district; the, more restrictive standazd shall apply, a. All facilities shall be located at least fifty (50) feet from any property lines, except when roof-mounted (above the eave line of a building). Flat-roof mounted facilities visible from ground level within one-hundred (100) feet of said property shall be concealed to the extent possible within a compatible azchitectural element, such as a chimney or ventilation pipe, or behind architectural skirting of the type generally used to conceal HVAC equipment. Pitched-roof mounted facilities shall always be concealed within a compatible architectural element, such as chimneys or ventilation pipes. b. ' Monopole towers shall be set back from any .residentially .zoned properties a distance of at least three (3) times 'the monopole's height (i:e, a sixty (60) foot setback would be required for a twenty (20) foot monopole), and the setback from any public road, as measured from the right-of--way line, shall be at least cyual'to the height of the monopole. o. No wireless communication facility maybe established within one- hundred (100) feet of any existing, legally. established wireless communication facility except when located on the same building or structure. d. No portion of any antenna array shall extend beyond the property lines or into any front yard area. Guy wires shall not be anchored within any front yazd area, but may be attached to the building. Staff Finding: The 3 proposed Sprint Antennas that will extend above the highest roof point will only extend 5 feet past the current height of the building. The proposed equipment platform will be fully screened from view. ^1 ~, !'~ 2. He'gkt. Wireless telecommunication services facilities and/or equipment shall not exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height or the maximum permissible height of the given zone district, whichever is more restrictive. In addition: a. Whenever a wireless telecommunication services antenna is attached to a building roof, the antenna and support system for panel antemtas shall not exceed five (5) feet above the highest portion of that roof; including parapet walls, and the antenna and support system-for whip antennas shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet above the highest portion of that roof, including parapet walls. b. If the building itself exceeds the height limitations of the zone, and such excess height was legally established (i.e., granted a variance, approved by PUD, etc.), then the combined height of the building and antenna shall not exceed the maximum height allowed by such approval unless determined by -the Community Development Duector to be suitably camouflaged. c. If the building is constructed at or above the zone district's height limit, or if combined height of the. building and the antenna would exceed the applicable height limit,. the additional height of the antenna must be reviewed pursuant to the process and standards (in addition to the standazds of this Section) of conditional use review, Sectioa 26.425.010, unless. determined by the Community Development Duector to be suitably camouflaged (in which' case an administrative approval may be granted). d. Support and/or switching equipment shall be located inside the building, unless it can be fully screened from view as provided in .the "Screening" standards (26.475.130(F)(5)) below. Staff Finding: The three antennas that extend five feet over the highest point of the building will be painted to blend into the building. The application proposes six additional panel antennas be installed on the sides of the penthouse. These panel antennas will also be painted to blend into the building. Staff believes the proposed. equipment meets these standazds given that they aze painted the same color as the building to camoflage them from sight. Staff also recommends that the panel antennas be painted with same brick pattern as the. original facade. ~. ~^, 3. Architectural Compatibility. Whether manned or »*+TM+A~ned, wireless telecommunicatioaservires facilities shall be consistent with the architectural-style of the smrounding architectural environment .(planned or existing) considering exterior materials, roof form, scale, mass, color, texture and character. In addition: a. If such facility is accessory to an existing use, the facility shall be constructed out of materials that are equal to or of better quality than the materials of the principal use. b. Wireless telecommunication services equipment shall be of the same color as the building or structure to which or on which such equipment is mounted, or as required by the appropriate decision- making authority (Community Development Director, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission, or City Council, as applicable). o. Whenever wireless telecommunication services, equipment is mounted to the wall of a building or structure, the equipment shall be mounted in a configuration designed to blend with and be architecturally integrated into a building or other concealing struchue, be as flush to the wall as technically possible, and shall not project above the. wall on which it is mounted. d. Monopole support buildings, which house cellular switching devices and/or other equipment related to the use, operation or rnaintenance of the subject monopole, must be designed to match the architecture of adjacent buildings. If no recent and/or reasonable azchitectural theme is present, the Community Development Director may require a particular design that is deemed to be suitable to the subject location. e. All utilities associated with wireless commurricatioa facilities or equipment shall be underground (also see "Screening" below). Staff Finding: To the extent practical, the antennas are compatible with the azchitecture of the building. No monopoles or significantly obtrusive equipment will be visible from the street and staff is not recommending mmy screening measures be implemented. The pane] antennas will be visible from the street. Staff recommends that the be painted the same color as the building and be given the same brick pattern as the building itself. 4. Compatibility With the Natural Environment. Wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall be compatible with the surrounding natural environment considering land forms, topography, and other natural features, and shall not dominate the landscape or present a dominant silhouette on a ridge fine. In addition: .-~ ~. a. If a location at or neaz a mountain ridge line is selected, the applicant. shall provide computerized, three dimensional, visual simulations of the facility or equipment and other appropriate graphics to demonstrate the" visual impact on the view of the affected ridge(s) or ridge line(s); an 8040 Greenline Review, pursuant to the provisions of Section 26.435.030, may also be required. b. Site disturbances shall be minimized, and existing vegetation shall be preserved or improved to the extent possible, unless it can be demonstrated that such disturbance to vegetation and topography results in less visual impact to the surrounding azea. c. Surrounding view planes shall be preserved to the extent possible. d. All wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall comply with the Federal Communication Commission's regulations concerning max;mum radio. frequency and electromagnetic frequency emissions. Staff Finding: The .proposed location is not affected by ridgeline, 8040, or mountain viewplane restrictions. The applicant has committed to meeting FCC regulations regarding the operation of wireless service facilities. 5. Screening. Roof and ground mounted wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment, including accessory equipment, shall be screened from adjacent and neazby public rights-of--way and public or private properties by paint color selection, pazapet walls, screen walls, fencing, landscaping, and/or benning in a manner compatible with the building's and/or surrounding environment's design, color, materials, texture, land forms and/or topography, as appropriate or applicable. ht addition: a. Whenever possible, if monopoles are necessary for the support of antennas, they shall be located neaz existing utility poles, trees, or other similar objects; consist of colors and materials that best blend with their background; and, have no individual antennas or climbing spikes on the pole other than those approved by the appropriate decision-making authority (Community Development Director, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission, or City Council, as applicable). b. For ground mounted. facilities, landscaping may be required to achieve a total screening effect at the base of such facilities or equipment in order to screen the mechanical chazacteristics; a heavy emphasis on coniferous plants for year-round screening may ~. be required. Landscaping shall be of a type and variety capable of growing within one (1) yeaz to a landscape screen which satisfactorily obscures the visibility of the facility. c. Unless otherwise expressly approved, all cables for a facility shall be fully concealed from view underground or inside of the screening or monopole structure supporting the antennas; any cables that cannot be buried or otherwise hidden from view shall be painted to match the color of the building or other existing structure. d. Chain link fencing shall be unacceptable to screen facilities, support structures, or accessory and related equipment (including HVAC or mechanical equipment present on support buildings); fencing. material, if used, shall be six (ti) feet in height or less and shall consist of wood, masonry, stucco, stone or other acceptable materials that are opaque. e. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the facility shall comply with all additional measures deemed necessary to mitigate. the visual impact of the facility. Also, in lieu of these screening standards, the Community Development Duector may allow use of an alternate detailed plan and specifications for landscape and screening, including plantings, fences, walls, sign and structural applications, manufactured devices and other features designed to screen, camouflage and buffer antennas, poles and accessory uses. For example, the antenna and supporting structure or monopole may be of such design and treated with an architectural material so that it is camouflaged to resemble a tree with a single trunk and. branches on its upper part. The plan should accomplish the same degree of screening achieved by meeting the standards outlined above. StaffFinding: The proposed support equipment platform will be fully screened from view. No additional screening is recommended. The antennas will be visible but shall be painted to blend into the building, 6. Li~htinu and SignaAe. In addition to other applicable sections of the code regulating signage or outdoor lighting, the following standards shall apply to wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment: a. The light source for security lighting shall feature down- . directional, sharp cut-off luminaries to direct, control, screen or shade in such a manner as to ensure that there is no spillage of .illumination off-site. ~ ^~ -,, ,--- b. Light fixtures, whether free-standing or tower-mounted, shall not exceed twelve. (12) feet in height as measured from finished grade. c. The display of any sign or advertising device other than public safety warning9, certifications or other required seals on any wireless corrununication device or structure is prohibited. d. The telephone number(s) to contact. in an emergency shall be posted on each facility in conformance with the provisions of .Chapter 26.510 of the Aspen Municipal Code. . Staff Finding: Two light fixtures have been proposed for service lighting. Staff recommends that the service light fixtures be placed in a manner in which they can not be seen from street level and they shall comply with the City. of Aspen Lighting Standards pursuant to section 26.575.150 of the City of Aspen Land Use Code: Staff also recommends that the lights shall be on only when servicing is necessary. 7. ~ Access Ways. In addition to ingress and egress requirements of the Building Code, access to and from wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall be regulated as follows: a. No wireless wmmunication device or facility shall be located in a required parking, maneuvering or vehicle/pedestrian circulation area such that it interferes with, or in any way impairs, the intent or functionality ofthebriginal design. b. The facility must be secured from access by the general public but access for emergency services must be ensured. Access roads must be capable- of supporting all potential emergency response vehicles and equipment. c. The proposed easement(s) for ingress and egress and for electrical and telephone shall be recorded at the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building permits. Staff Finding: The equipment is not proposed in an area requiring vehicular circulation. No new easements are required to be recorded to accommodate'this development. MEMORANDUM To: James Lindt, Planner From: Ben Ludlow,. Project Engineer Date: April 1'I, 2l)D0 Re: Sprint Telecom Facility installation 1. -The applicant will be required to obtain a ROW permit if there is disturbance of jhe public ROW during construction. 2. The applioantwill be required to obtain a Temporary Encroachment license during construction when the public ROW is used for consWction storage. 3. ConstruGion storage in the public ROW is to be maintained at a level that does not permit loose materials in the public ROW. 4. If necessary, a traffic control plan will be required if there is an encroachment on the public ROW. that affects normal traffic flow. Nar•21. 2000 4:OOPN ~'"~` ,.. _ ,_... ~. No.1690 P. 2 To; Mr. lames Liadt 23 Memlr 2000 AapetyPitkSn Comtauaity Development Department Fm: Rusty Humberson Protoster Wireless Solutions, LLC Director of Field Operations - Subject: Zoning Application for The St. Regis Hotel Mr. Lindt, I repreaeat Sprint Specnvm, LLC for Site Acquisition within the Colorado taerket. Per the application guidelines the fallowing explanations are provided for your review to assist in the processittg of our Zoning applicadoa: 1. Setbacks: Thrsetback requirem~ts are not applicable for this teecommuaications instaUatlon Sprint is positioning the Hase Station equipment oa the roof of The St. Regis Hotd between two stvctttres akeady designed on the rooftop, The antennas will be side mounted on the roof and also do net regaire setbacks. 2, The panel antennas will not exceed 5 feet above the highest portion of the rooftop and the support equipment (base station) will be fully screened from view and rsteet the "Screening" standards. 3. The: installation of this telecommunications site meets eadlor exceeds the requirements of the "architectural compatibility" by Painting the same color and blending the panel antennas is to the side of The St, Regis Hotel 4, The compatt'bility with the `atural Eavironntont is not applicable as this a co-location on a rooftop. Mr. Lindt please cell if you have any questions. Thank you in advance for your assistance Sincerely, --~.~,_ Rusty) a arson ... 678-428-6058 tt~i{ IWn her Qwk t{tJ„ SsM 20, 1. Q Nx 6119, Mob GlrMle gi40 O /7{~71Wf41 O Y7tWtS~iM! r-, .-, ANTENNA Fa~'*r~>TFC DATA SHEET SITE: NAME & ADDRESS: St Reins Hotel 315 E Dean Street Aacep: CO 81611 LICENSEE NAME: imprint Specatmt L P A DelawaraLimiud Partnustiip LICENSEE ADDRESS: e~u'1 ~*h^* T)rive Suite 100 P1Pasentoa CA 94588 PHONE: 925-468-7800 FAX: 9251168.7810 TYPE OF SERVICE: PCS - CDMA ~ CALL SIGN: N /A_ FREQUENCY: PCS "A" Baod TRANSMIT: 193125 - 1443 75 MHz RECEIVE: 1851.25-1863.75 MHz MAKE/MODEL OF QUANTITY:~_ DIMENSIONS: 30 x 30x60 PWR OUTPUT: MAKE/MODEL OF TRANSMIT ANTENNA: EMS Wireless ! RR65-18-06DP (Transmit & Receive] QUANTITY:, per sector (31 DIIvIENSIONS: (L x W x D 156in x 8inx 2.75in LINE DIA: N / A CLASS OF POWER AMP OPERATION N / A MODULATION CDMA MAKE/MODEL OF RECEIVE ANTENNA: No additional recaive antenna needed at this time QU?uv'17TY: N/A DIMENSIONSi N/A LINE DIA: N / A TYPE OF'CAVITII AND ISOLATOR: N / A POWER RECD: N / TOTAL CONSUMPTION (WATTS) TX N / A VAC: N / A STBY N/A PERSON OR SERVICE COMPANY RESPONSIBLE FOR 1TS OPERATION & MAINTENANCE: NA.'vfE; Natiopal OpeA~~n= r'^n~TM+l Center ADDRESS:, No Address. this is~ np n' ts' centralized ho ling 24 HOUR PHONE NO.:_ 1-888-859-1400 (option ope..Lucmt Westl PAGER NO.: N~_ ,,.., --, Mar.22. 2000 a.00PM r~ r1 No.1690 P• 1 O ~ 01 j sa Solutions ~ ` "~ ~~, . ' ~ P. Box 87 9 ' 108DYIap Bsever Crosk Blvd. f ~ ~ Suito46 ^~"r .: r~~ Ph n 7d D ' • . . , ~ et o t 97M 48AB21 mot Fs~c9>Di45.894Y TO: FROM: DATE: FAX ., f~ INCLUOINO ~UROENT OPOR REVIBW OPLEASE COMMENT ~PL2ASE REPLY NOTES t COMMi3N[S: 1' i is I~ I: Ij I. ~'_ I; ~; ~' .-. .-,. t'-, /^, MEMORANDUM TO: Plans were routed to those departments checked-off below: 9~ .......... City Engineer O ........... Zoning Officer O .......:... Housing Director O ........... Pazks Department O ......,.... Aspen Fire Marshal O ........... City Water O ........... Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District O ........... Building~Departrnent O ........... Environmental Health O ........... Electric Department O ........... Holy Cross Electric. 0 ........:.. City Attorney 0 ........... Streets Department O ......:.... Historic Preservation Officer O ........... Pitkin County Planning FROM: James Lindt, Planning Technician Community Development Department 130 So. Galena St.; Aspen, CO 81611 Phone-920.5104 Fax-920.5439 RE: Sprint Telecom Facility Installation St. Regis Hotel, 315 E. Dean St. Parcel ID.2737-182-85-001 DATE: Mazch 23, 2000 COMMENTS: Please return comments to me by Apri17, 2000 No DRC required unless other departments have concerns or engineering requests it. Thank You; James Lindt r^ Address: Phone.#: Q ~7 ~ - -•. 1 YPE'OF APPLICATIQN: (pleast ^ Conditional Use ^ Special Review ^ Design Review Appeal ^ GMQS Allotment ^ GMQS Exemption ^ ESA - 8040 Gteenline, Strcatn Margin,. Hallam Lake Blum Mountain View Plane ^ Lot Split ^ Lot Line Adjustment cx au roar appty~: ^ Conceptual PUD ^ .Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ^ Conceptual SPA ^ Final SPA (8t SPA Amendmem) ^ Subdivision ^ Subdivision Exemption (includes condominiumization) ^ Temporary Use ^ Other. EJrISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing boildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) PRDPOSAL: t• Have you attached the following? ^ Pre-Application Conference Summary Attachment #l, Signed Fce Agreement ~] .Response to Attachment #2, Dimensional. Requirements Form ~Q Response to Attachment #3, Minimum Submission Contents Response to Attachment #4, Specific Submission Contents Response to Attachment #S, Review Standards for Your Application ^ Conceptual Historic Devi ^ Final Historic Development ^ Minor Historic Devt. ^ Historic Demolition ^ Historic Designation ^ Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion FEES DuE: S ;~____3~13~6C i G5~`~ LAND U3E APPLICATION REPRESENTATIVE: Name:. -~-r~ F J~ M ~ ~ ~ -2 ~ , p A ~ ~~ Z gx4~ Oz~ e, p;pz S •~pe z ~ ~~3~ 3!e~8 ~p9 S~~ f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ °~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~sA}~~ ~~~~~ ~~a~~~ ~~~ = T 8i [~ Y 'p~~ e~~ Sa~IF 8 & ii{i & `s5 °5, f ~~ ; ~ ~~pt~ S S I I ! ~ ~~ ~ ~. g ~$°! n ~ o z ~!! ~ t! ~~~. m ; 5 ~ g { ~~ § ~ ~d A& d4 ~ e ~ J z D r N J O O c -v ~ ZH v ~ z w ~: . N ~ ~° ~ _ ~y ~ ~ O ~"~ 1'17 Z ~s y ~~~ ~ A$Y 3Z ~~CC 5((( y^ ~ a ~ I ~ ~gE "` ~ B 411, N ~ s~v° 4~ IRI ~+ ~ LLe b^ 7 0 m$~ ~~ 4 ~ ~. m ~ ~ew~ ~ ~~ 3 r,,'' s•2~ ~I b ~~99 q ~r. ja5p pp 99~~ qy} epo f eir5C~4 S9 C 3 :1 ~~3~B i £~ RE~S P 'l E ;b g 7FF; F p ~~Spbiii'gY+S,At O~~peC4 $~ '.d{{ R~ ¢ N ~Ap F~4PS"'CI345 R ~~ + ~~9 A£t i ! ~ ~~ F ;!sr~4 m ~ s~1~~iB A ~ ~e [~~ ~ ~' tl .dip}i: ~:°~ s~ rtij~`.i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~; ~ "z N ~ ¢e'~' re~p[+ Fi;ia 1~ ~~i~.~ ~ I,Ftl, w a.` t 11d T eb v9 Bit 7~ ~p~g~gi.~' ~ AAA A gA.A ~ ~~ ~; f F 1"ei't ~~ B a t j Gila An ~ v (' i 1~F4 ~! $ i~i `~~f 7 ~~ z ~~~ me AI`I` TT g ~ II '~a~I dW000llbl~ I Ilyl O T W,a O o ~ ~ ~, © o ffc a ~® ~~iQ ~~'~`~ ~~30 C mz 5 ~~ ~`~~ 191 m a` ~ ~~ `€ p~. 222 y Ill ~ y f ~~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ a~ u` ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~' u ~ ~: ~ ~ v o ~~~E. ~ ( ~~ ~ ~I aym I . e .• ~-~• .~ i O N gy8 Y N ~ ~~ W ado Fy(yo~ ly9y ~ ~€Z 1 ~-, ,/' S 9 9 ~' g i F ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ k +T 2 Y i=. s ~~ ~~d€ ~~~ ~~ - ^ Q p ~ p p p ® O~ O ^ OD O 23p aka ~'^ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~~ ~ ~~ p1 If{ # `~ ~~4 ~~ ~ ~ II g ~ ~m~ II 8 R Z ,-. N I~ e III9 ~~~ 0 to 0 O O s ea 8f ~~ e~ A: J ~~ F~Eggg ga48 ~~~~ aaa~ ~~ ~g ~~ 8._fi. ~ 4~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ P'q ~~ _J ~ ~ I! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s~v 4 ~ ~ ~~ d g ~ ~ ~~=aim ~~:~~ II A~mN II 8 Sprint Together with NEXTEL Sprint Nextel 333 Inverness Drive South Englewood, CO 80112 Office: (3031721-3400 Fax: (303) 721-3944 October 1 , 2007 City of Aspen Community Development Department Attn: Ben Gagnon 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Administrative Review for Cell Site Modification Dear Ben On Behalf of Sprint Nextel, I am pleased to submit the necessary documentation for the Administrative Review for raising two (2) antennas on the existing Building at 315 Easl Dean Street, Aspen CO, 81611 (St. Regis Hotel). Sprint Nextel leases space on the building from SLT Aspen Dean Street LLC. The legal description of the property is "CONDO: ASPEN RESIDENCE CLUB & HOTEL". This process would include raising two (2), five-foot (5') panel antennas, five-foot (5') above the penthouse structure to match the existing antenna mounted five-foot (5') above the penthouse. The antennas are currently painted to match the existing building and will maintain the stealth application of the site. This change will improve Sprint Nextel's coverage in the area and will not affect the visual impact of the site. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Brett R. Pfleger ~~~ . Pfleger Consulting, LLC Representing Sprint Nextel 333 Inverness Drive South Englewood, CO 80112 303-907-0844 DN33XC241/ST-REGIS HO"FEL ~. ~,.,r ... ATTACHMENTS DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: j~N33_kG2Hl ~ S7" ~~,`~s~ f~o`~-~.1 Applicant: $' r`in'd N~rt Location: 3 3 nv~rn~s r)vt~ S~~ N Zone District: i../ Lot Size: Lot Area: /U (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing: Proposed: Number of bedrooms: Existing: Proposed: Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Principal bldg. height: Existing: Allowable.• Proposed: Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: On-Site parking: Existing: Required: Proposed: Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: Required.• Proposed.• Rear Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined F/R: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Proposed: Distance Between Existing Buildings Required: Proposed:- Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Z Vaziations requested: v L w h Cp .Y c a o 'd v ~ x c ~ V « C O ,d b ~ O W a ~ W v b ~ ` ~ p ~ .°: W ~ E C h U N v O F .n Q g ~ U 7~ J ~ ~~ a=e W u o '[ U p ~ a Q'~-~ J .". LL E c D 7 ,O ~( C Rp ~t+ C ~ O Q O w .~+ ~ ~ U W " '° ~~°c 2 '~ o V ~v Q L y ~ '~ '> a_~ ~a.a L ""'~. w° E •11 d ~ N y •4~! a ~ N N N ~ G e o, dS aJ dJ v ~ °' L a o. e. a d f' $ O L ~ .. ~ v ~ U ~ U C y a O •E ~ ~ ~v W L Ns 7 7 E '~ u L M d u Q a d d O 'O ' Q~ ~ a E u ` o o N ` .. '~ a ~ W Z CL e .+ N e `~ N N o .ti 0 .~ 0 ~ 0 ~ o N e '+ N e ~+ e N °- N '- N a ~ o '~ N~ N e u N h e N d U w U ~ d ~ ~ o~ 5 c,~ W > 5 f r~ O 5 O N N U ~ ~v O y ~ C F , CG U d U ~ B U U '~ '~ ~ O '~a' F ~ '7d' U U o` v, N L ~ ~ N N N N ~ Z 7 ~ ~ ~ a c4 La I„ ~ ~ ~ E Or . m .: ¢ d1 a F' ~ F" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U U U U O O O ~~ ., ~ I~ a `-' p F Q ~' F o. a. a a. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cz ~ ~a ~ F ° ~ < ° z t~ U ~ U l~ d d ~" ~ ~ ~ CL a ~ x ~ 2 2 ~ ~ w .. 0 d 0 ~ N A d ~y L a O Q ~y S/ w ~ Q Z LL ey d , ~ ~~ U ,, M A a o °e „ ~ d 6 d ~ ' ~ 6 ~ w fi gz M g"= '~ V7 ~A e; M M N e~ e S M M d N .~ a$ (y~ ~ ~ ~Ni a w N N M a E C d e i 0 0 V! a Vl a o 0 0 0 O ~ .. ti •a° a .w ^~ N N N ° •a° e M M ~ N ~ ~ _ _ 6 ~ y 00 00 00 00 . -I . -I O~ 6 a N N r r Q~ a ..i M M ay r r r" n r r r r"~ r r r r ~ r n r" r"~ M c~ r ¢~ ., ., ,~ .. .. .. .~ .. e .. .. .. .. .. .. ..i ~ .r a .. .. .. p p ~ ~ z D 5 ~ 5 ~ ~ ~, ~ o F A N ~ z c z '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ °" p w z ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ ~ O z ~ ~ W ~ w ~ S ~ o ~ ~ ~ c~a o~ ~U ~ ~ > a Wz S' j ~ ~ O ~ ~ D ~ v~ ~ x ~ ~ w . z ~ ~ m ~ F O ~ , ~ A Z~ ~ W ~ o. °1 ~ ~ ~ a ~ °z ~ vo ~ ~ a c ~ ~Q ~~ o' $ a a U y O 3 O V ` o e ~ ~ j ~ ~ a ( j W U e p , i, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F ,-. ..r ~' F U U •~ o N ~ ~ U ~ ~ ,-, N d dS v y d1 ~' V a c. ~ U W o. ~°. U e ~ 3 ~ C ~ N ti ~ " e(~ A L N~ G C y, C .~ U a'! -,', 8 E E 'a ' °' ' 'a a 'd ~L°. N ~°- a ,~ ,`ems N °~ N /A N N N N T U a U w w o ~ 3 x F O p. ° Q U ~ (,7 Uq 'U,. C O p z z ~ ~ °z 6 ~ E a ~ ~ F ~ d U U ~ d ~ a1d N~ W ~F 1W 0. a ~i a Vz VO ~ ~ q q S~ d o?j ~ C~ C F ¢ N o iL d O o °~ W m dN a O o ~a u o ~ p o O g ~ ~~ Z~ q~qd ~° d q d ~ U 6 ~ q f~1 O~ M n ~ n n r n ~ d F Z F ' ~ ' ' p . _ ~ je F Z D ~ h V7 . , ~ ~ ~ r , a ` d C ~ z ~ ~ ~ Q a~ ~ Q A W `w~ a a p ~ z ~ a o; ~ u F w a . ~ z i u ~ d p 0 0 a 0 0 N U N a C O .ro a N 'J. c ro .~ 0 L .y a a v U 7 O U N .D b G 7 O y d L_ H 'J' d Y ~ ~a ro ~ ~ C 7 3 N y `y U ~ v U .n y ~ C O o •~ c .= a. • ° a ~ a ~ a '3 a 7 w .~ ~ a ~ U ¢ a ~ U M M h --. .^~, -tee ..~ ...% esml I IAL ne>t Applicant's name, address and klephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 2. The street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to ocwr. 3. A disclosure of ownership of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificak from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in [he Stale of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, end all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, wormers and agreemwts affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 4. An 8 1!2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the Ciry of Aspen. 5. A site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing [he curtent status of the parcel certified by s registered land surveyor, licensed in the State of Colorado. ('this requimmcnt, or any part thereof, may be waived by the Community Development Department if the project is dekrmined not to warrant a survey document) mean sea level) of the lowest floor, including basement, of all new or substantially improved stmctmes; a verification and recordation otthe actual elevation in relation to mean sea level to which any s[mclure is constmcted; a demonstration that all new construction or substantial improvements will be anchored m prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement of any strocturc m be constmcted or improved; a demonstration that the stmcturc will have the lowest floor, including basement. elevakd m at (cast two (2) feet above the base flood elevation, all as certified by a registered professional enginwr or arohikct. 13. A landscape plan that include native vegetative screening of no less than fifty (50) percent of the development as viewed from the rear (slope) of the paroel. All vegetative screening shall be maintained in perpetuity and shell be replaced with the same or wmpamble makrial should it die. 14. Site sections drawn by a registered archikct, landscape archiket, or engineer shall be submitted showing all existing and proposed sik elements, the rap of slope, and pertinent elevations above sea level. 15. Proposed elevations of the development. including any rofftop equipment and how it will be screened. system m me area m me proposes subdivision. Tho conknta of the plat shall be of sufficient derail m determine whether the proposed subdivision will meet the design standards pursuant m Land Use Code Section 26.460.060(3).20. Subdivision GIS Data. 21. A landscape plao showing location, siu, and type of proposed landscape features. 22. A subdivision plat which meets the terms of this chapter, and conforms m the requirements of this title indicating that no further subdivision may be granted for these lots nor will additional units be built without receipt of applicab]e approvals pursuant to this chapter and growth management allocation pursuant to Chaplet 26.470. 23. The precise wording of any proposed amendment 24. Site Plan or plans drawn m a scale of one (1") inch equals kn (10') feet or one (1") inch equals twenty (20') feet, including before and "after" photographs (simulations) specifying the location of antennas, support sfmcturu, transmission buildings and/or other accessory uses, access, parking, fences, signs, lighting, landscaped areas and all adjacent land uses within one-hundred fifty (160') feet. Such plans and drawings should demonstrate compliance with the Rcvicw Standards of [his Section. 6. A site plan depicting the proposed layout and [he project's physical relationship to the land and it's surroundings. 7. A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how a proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. 8. Plan with Existing and proposed grades at two-fwt wntours, with five-fwt intervals for grades over tw (10) percent. 9. Proposed elevations ofthe development 10. A description of proposed construction techniques tobeused. 11. A Plan with the 100-year floodplain line and the high water lint. 16. Proposed elevations of the development. including any rooftop equipment and how it will be screened. I7. A skekh plan othhe sik showing existing and proposed fwtures which art relevant m the review. I8. One (1) inch equals four hundred (400) feet scale city map showing the location of the proposed subdivision, all adjacent lands owned by or under option m the applicant, commonly known landmarks, and the zone district in which the proposed subdivision and adjacent properties are totaled. 19. A plat which reflects the layout of the lots, blocks and structures in the proposed subdivision. The plat shall be drawn at a scale of one (I) equals one hundred (100) feet or larger, Arehitwmral scales are not acceptable. Sheet size shall be twenty-tour (24) inches by thirty-six (36) inches. If it is nwessary to place the plat on more than a one (1) ahw4 an index shall be included on the first sheet. A vicinity map shall also appear on the first sheet showing the subdivision as it relates 25. FAA and FCC Coordination. Statemenfa regarding the regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). 26. Structural Integrity Report from a professional engineer licensed in [hc State of Colorado. 27. Evidence that an effort was made to locate on an existing wireless klecommunication services facility site including coverage/ inkrference analysis and capacity analysis and a brief statement as to other reasons for success or no success. 28. Neighborhood block plan at 1"=60' (available from City Engineering Department) Graphically show the front portions of all existing buildings on both sides of the block and their setback from the street in feet. ]dwtify parking and front entry for each building and locate any accessory dwelling units along the alley. (Continued on next page.) ~ .•. \/ 4../ Indicate whether any portions of the houses immediately adjacent to the subject parcel are one story (only one living level). 29. Roof Plan. 30. Photographic panorama. Show elevations of all buildings on both sides of the block, including present condition of the subject property. Label photos and mount on a presenm[ion board 31. A condominium subdivision exemption plat drawn with pmrianent ink on reproducible mylar. Sheet siu shall be twenty-four (24) inches by thirty-siz (36) inches with an unencumbered margin of one and one-half (1 12) inches on the left hand side of the sheet and aone-half (12) inch margin around the other three (3) sides of the sheet pursuant to land Use Code Section 26.480.090. 32. A description and site plan of the proposed development including a statement of [he objectives m be achieved by the PUD and a description of the proposed land uses, densities, natural features, traffic and pedestrian circulation, off-street parking, open space areas, infrastructure improvements, and site drainage. 33. An architectural character plan generally indicating the use, massing, scale, and orientation of the proposed buildings. 35. Exterior Lighting Plan. Show the location, height, type and luminous intensity of each above grade fixture. Estimate the site illumination as measured in foot candles and include minimum, maximum, and average illumination. Additionally, provide comparable examples already in the community that demonstrate twhnique, specification, and/ or light level if they exist. 34. A written description of the variance being requested. r+ ^~, ~., .,: ATTACHMENT5 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURE 1. Attend pre-application conference. During this one-on-one meeting, staff will determine the review process which applies to your development proposal and will identify the materials necessary to review your application. 2. Submit Development Application. Based on your pre-application meeting, you should respond to the application package and submit the requested number of copies of the complete application and the appropriate processing fee to the Community Development Department. 3. Determination of Completeness. Within five working days of the date of your submission, staff will review the application, and will notify you in writing whether the application is complete or if additional materials are required. Please be awaze that the purpose of the completeness review is to determine whether or not the information you have submitted is adequate to review the request, and not whether the information is sufficient to obtain approval. 4. Staff Review of Development Application. Once your application is deterrined to be complete, it will be reviewed by the staff for compliance with the applicable standazds of the Code. During the staff review stage, the application will be referred to other agencies for comments. The Planner assigned to your case or the agency may contact you if additional information is needed or if problems aze identified. A memo will be written by the staff member for signature by the Community Development Director. The memo will explain whether your application complies with the Code and will list any conditions which should apply if the application is to be approved. Final approval of any Development Application which amends a recorded document, such as a plat, agreement or deed restriction, will require the applicant to prepare an amended version of that document for review and approval by staff. Staff will provide the applicant with the applicable contents for the revised plat, while the City Attorney is normally in charge of the form for recorded agreements and deed restrictions. We suggest that you not go to the trouble or expense of preparing these documents until the staff has determined that your application is eligible for the requested amendment or exemption. 5. Board Review of Application. If a public hearing is required for the land use action that you aze requesting, then the Planning Staff will schedule a hearing date for the application upon determination that the Application is complete. The hearing(s) will be scheduled before the appropriate reviewing boazd(s). The Applicant will be required to mail notice (one copy provided by the Community Development Department) to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property and post notice (sign available at the Community Development Department) of the public heazing on the site at least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing date (please see Attachment 6 for instructions). The .~ ~ w Planning Staff will publish notice of the hearing in the paper for land use requests that require publication. The Planning Staff will then formulate a recommendation on the land use request and draft a memo to the reviewing board(s). Staff will supply the Applicant with a copy of the Planning Staff's memo approximately 5 days prior to the hearing. The public hearing(s) will take place before the appropriate review boazds. Public Hearings include a presentation by the Planning Staff, a presentation by the Applicant (optional), consideration of public comment, and the reviewing board's questions and decision. 6. Issuance of Development Order. If the land use review is approved, then the Planning Staff will issue a Development Order which allows the Applicant to proceed into Building Permit Application. 7. Receipt of Building Permit. Once you have received a copy of the signed staff approval, you may proceed to building pemut review. During this time, your project will be examined for its compliance with the Uniform Building Code. It will also be checked for compliance with applicable provisions of the Land Use Regulations which were not reviewed in detail during the one step review (this might include a check of floor azea ratios, setbacks, parking, open space and the like). Fees for water, sewer, pazks and employee housing will be collected if due. Any document required to be recorded, such as a plat, deed restriction or agreement, will need to be reviewed and recorded before a Building Permit is submitted. ,^'-, ATTACHMENT6 .-, .., PUBLIC HEARING NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Three forms of notice are required by the Aspen Land Use Regulations: publication in the newspaper, posting of the property, and mailing to surrounding landowners. Following is a summary of the notice requirements, including identification of who is responsible for completing the notice. 1. Publication -Publication of notice in a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen is to be done at least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. The legal notice will be written by the Community Development Department and we will place the notice in the paper within the appropriate deadline. 2. Posting -Posting of a sign in a conspicuous place on the property is to be done fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the sign from the Community Development Department, to fill it in correctly and to bring proof to the hearing that posting took place (use attached affidavit). 3. Mailing -Mailing of notice is to be made to all owners of property within 300 feet of the subject development pazcel by the applicant. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the notice from the Community Development Department, to mail it according to the following standards, and to bring proof to the hearing that the mailing took place (use attached affidavit). Notice to mineral Estate Owner. An Applicant for surface Development shall notify affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application for development. The applicant shall certify that the notice has been provided to the mineral estate owners. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeazed no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of public hearing. ~.i ...+ ATTACHMENT 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: __ ,Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: , 200_ STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the _ day of 200_, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accwate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the azea of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hows for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signatwe The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 200_, by WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: Notary Public ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE P UBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BYMAIL Parcel Detail ~ '"~ Page 1 of 3 Pitkin County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Assessor/Treas__urer Proper Search ~ Assessor Subset Query ~ Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder Reception Search Basic Bmldin~ C_ haract_erstics ~ Tax lnform~tion Parcel. Detail ~ Value Detail ~ Sales Detail ~ Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Land Detail ~ Photo rg antis Tax Area Account Number Parcel Number Milt Le 001 R019445 273718285033 32.99 Owner Name and Address SLT ASPEN DEAN STREET LLC C/O EPROPERTY TAX DEPT 206 PO BOX 4900 AZ 85261-4900 Legal Description CONDO: ASPEN RESIDENCE CLUB & HOTEL UNIT:HOTEL Location Ph sical Address: 315 E DEAN ST ASPEN Subdivision: ASPEN RESIDENCE CLUB & HOTEL Land Acres: 0 Land S Ft: 0 Property Tax Valuation Information Actual Value Assessed Value Land: ~ -~~- 0 Im rovements: 68,773,200 ~- 19,944,230 Total: 68, 773,200 19,944,23 0 Parcel Detail !^ '"'~ Page 2 of 3 ~~ Sale Date: Sale Price: Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential Buildin s: 0 Number of Comm/Ind Buildin s: 2 CommerciaUIndustrial Buildin Occurrence 1 Characteristics LODGE SECOND FLOOR: 26,891 LODGE FIRST FLOOR: 37,201 LODGE THIRD FLOOR: 26,891 LODGE FIFTH FLOOR: 21,320 LODGE FOURTH FLOOR: 26,441 LODGE UNDERGROUND PARKING: 88 022 ' LODGE BSMT: 52,887 Total Area: 279,653 Pro er Class: LODGING-IMPROVEMENTS Actual Year Built: 1992 Effective Year Built: 1995 Quali of Construction: VERY GOOD Exterior Wall: GOOD BASE Interior Wall: GOOD-BASE Nei bborhood: ASPEN LUXURY LODGE Tax Information Tax Year Transaction T e Amount 2005 Tax Amount $503,634.60 2005 Tax Payment: First Half ($251,817.30) 2005 Tax Payment: Second Half ($251,817.30) 2006 Tax Amount $531,690.60 2006 Tax Payment: Whole ($531,690.60) Top_of Page Assessor Database Search Options ~ Treasurer Database Search Options Pitkin Coun .Home Paee Parcel Detail ~ ~ Page 3 of 3 The Pitkin County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Pitkin County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright ©2004 - 2007 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns Software. ~ , `„, F. Review standazds. The following standazds are designed to foster the City's safety and aesthetic interests without imposing unreasonable limitations on wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment.: 1. Setbacks. At a minimum, all wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall comply with the minimum setback requirements of the underlying zone district; if the following requirements are more restrictive than those of the underlying zone district, the more restrictive standard shall apply. a. All facilities shall be located at least fifty (SO) feet from any property lines, except when roof-mounted (above the eave line of a building). Flat-roof mounted facilities visible from ground level within one-hundred (100) feet of said property shall be concealed to the extent possible within a compatible architectural element, such as a chimney or ventilation pipe or behind azchitectural skirting of the type generally used to conceal HVAC equipment. Pitched-roof-mounted facilities shall always be concealed within a compatible architectural element, such as chimneys or ventilation pipes. N/A, NOT CHANGING FACILITIES b. Monopole towers shall be set back from any residentially zoned properties a distance of at least three (3) times the monopole's height (i.e., a sixty (60) foot setback would be required for a twenty (20) foot monopole) and the setback from any public road, as measured from the right-of--way line, shall be at least equal to the height of the monopole. N/A, ON BUILDING a No wireless communication facility may be established within one-hundred (100) feet of any existing, legally established wireless communication facility except when located on the same building or structure. N/A, LOCATED ON BUILDING d. No portion of any antenna array shall extend beyond the property lines or into any front yard azea. Guy wires shall not be anchored within any front yazd area, but may be attached to the building. N/A 2. Height. The following restrictions shall apply: a. Wireless telecommunication services facilities and/or equipment not attached to a building shall not exceed thirty-five (3S) feet in height or the maximum permissible height of the given Zone District, whichever is more restrictive. N/A, ATTACHED TO BUILDING b. Whenever a wireless telecommunication services antenna is attached to a building roof, the antenna and support system for panel antennas shall not exceed five (S) feet above the highest portion of that roof, including parapet walls and the antenna and support system for whip antennas shall not exceed ten (10) feet above the highest portion of that roof, including pazapet walls. ANTENNA WII.L BE S' ABOVE PENTHOUSE c. The Community Development Director may approve a taller antenna height than stipulated in b. above if it is his or her determination that it is suitably camouflaged, in which case an administrative approval may be granted. N/A d. If the Community Development Director determines that an antenna taller than stipulated in b. above cannot be suitably camouflaged, then the additional height of the antenna shall be reviewed pursuant to the process and standards (in addition to the standards of this Section) of Chapter 26.430 (Special review). N/A .-~, ,.1 e. Support and/or switching equipment shall be located inside the building, unless it can be fully screened from view as provided in the "Screening" standazds (26.475.130 and 26.575.130.F.5) below. N/A, NO CHANGE TO EQUIPMENT AREA 3. Architectural compatibility. Whether manned or unmanned, wireless telecommunication services facilities shall be consistent with the architectural style of the surrounding architectural environment (planned or existing) considering exterior materials, roof form, scale, mass, color, texture and chazacter. In addition: a. If such facility is accessory to an existing use, the facility shall be constructed out of materials that are equal to or of better quality than the materials of the principal use. N/A b. Wireless telecommunication services equipment shall be of the same color as the building or structure to which or on which such equipment is mounted or as required by the appropriate decision-making authority (Community Development Director, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, as applicable). ALL ANTENNAS PAINTED TO MATCH THE BUILDING c. Whenever wireless telecommunication services equipment is mounted to the wall of a building or structure, the equipment shall be mounted in a configuration designed to blend with and be azchitecturally integrated into a building or other concealing structure, be as flush to the wall as technically possible and shall not project above the wall on which it is mounted. ONE ANTENNA WAS ORIGINALLY APPROVED AND IS EXTENDED 5' ABOVE PENTHOUSE, MOVING THREE UP TO MATCH THE EXISTING d. Monopole support buildings, which house cellular switching devices and/or other equipment related to the use, operation or maintenance of the subject monopole, must be designed to match the architecture of adjacent buildings. If no recent and/or reasonable architectural theme is present, the Community Development Director may require a particulaz design that is deemed to be suitable to the subject location. N/A e. All utilities associated with wireless communication facilities or equipment shall be underground (also see "Screening" below). N/A 4. Compatibility with the natural environment. Wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall be compatible with the surrounding natural environment considering land forms, topography and other natural features and shall not dominate the landscape or present a dominant silhouette on a ridge line. In addition: a. If a location at or near a mountain ridge line is selected, the applicant shall provide computerized, three-dimensional, visual simulations of the facility or equipment and other appropriate graphics to demonstrate the visual impact on the view of the affected ridges or ridge lines; an 8040 Greenline Review, pursuant to the provisions of Section 26.435.030, may also be required. N/A b. Site disturbances shall be minimized and existing vegetation shall be preserved or improved to the extent possible, unless it can be demonstrated that such disturbance to vegetation and topography results in less visual impact to the surrounding area. N/A a Surrounding view planes shall be preserved to the extent possible. EXISTING APPROVED ANTENNA MOUNTED 5' ABOVE, THE MODIFICATION WILL MATCH AND MAKE MORE EVEN `.s d. All wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall comply with the Federal Communication Commission's regulations concerning maximum radio frequency and electromagnetic frequency emissions. INCOMPLIANCE 5. Screening. Roof-and-ground-mounted wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment, including accessory equipment, shall be screened from adjacent and nearby public rights-of--way and public or private properties by paint color selection, parapet walls, screen walls, fencing landscaping and/or berming in a manner compatible with the building's and/or surrounding environment's design, color, materials, texture, land forms and/or topography, as appropriate or applicable. In addition: a. Whenever possible, if monopoles are necessary for the support of antennas, they shall be located near existing utility poles, trees or other similar objects; consist of colors and materials that best blend with their background; and, have no individual antennas or climbing spikes on the pole other than those approved by the appropriate decision-making authority (Community Development Director, Historic Preservafion Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, as applicable). N/A b. For ground-mounted facilities, landscaping may be required to achieve a total screening effect at the base of such facilities or equipment in order to screen the mechanical characteristics; aheavy emphasis on coniferous plants for year-round screening may be required. Landscaping shall be of a type and variety capable of growing within one (1) year to a landscape screen which satisfactorily obscures the visibility of the facility. N/A c. Unless otherwise expressly approved, all cables for a facility shall be fully concealed from view underground or inside of the screening or monopole structure supporting the antennas; any cables that cannot be buried or otherwise hidden from view shall be painted to match the color of the building or other existing structure. N/A d. Chain link fencing shall be unacceptable to screen facilities, support structures or accessory and related equipment (including HVAC or mechanical equipment present on support buildings); fencing material, if used, shall be six (6) feet in height or less and shall consist of wood, masonry, stucco, stone or other acceptable materials that are opaque. N/A e. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the facility shall comply with all additional measures deemed necessary to mitigate the visual impact of the facility. Also, in lieu of these screening standards, the Community Development Director may allow use of an alternate detailed plan and specifications for landscape and screening, including plantings, fences, walls, sign and structural applications, manufactured devices and other features designed to screen, camouflage and buffer antennas, poles and accessory uses. For example, the antenna and supporting structure or monopole may be of such design and treated with an architectural material so that it is camouflaged to resemble a tree with a single trunk and branches on its upper part. The plan should accomplish the same degree of screening achieved by meeting the standards outlined above. N/A 6. Lighting and signage. In addition to other applicable sections of the code regulating signage or outdoor lighting, the following standards shall apply to wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment: a. The light source far security lighting shall feature down-directional, sharp cut-off luminaries to direct, control, screen or shade in such a manner as to ensure that there is no spillage of illumination off-site. N/A ~~ b. Light fixtures, whether free standing or tower-mounted, shall not exceed twelve (12) feet in height as measured from finished grade. N/A c. The display of any sign or advertising device other than public safety warnings, certifications or other required seals on any wireless communication device or structure is prohibited. N/A d. The telephone numbers to contact in an emergency shall be posted on each facility in conformance with the provisions of Chapter 26.510, Signs, of this Title. POSTED 7. Access ways. In addition to ingress and egress requirements of the Building Code, access to and from wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall be regulated as follows: a. No wireless communication device or facility shall be located in a required parking, maneuvering or vehicle/pedestrian circulation area such that it interferes with or in any way impairs, the intent or functionality of the original design. N/A b. The facility must be secured from access by the general public but access for emergency services must be ensured. Access roads must be capable of supporting all potential emergency response vehicles and equipment. N/A c. The proposed easements for ingress and egress and for electrical and telephone shall be recorded at the County Clerk and Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building permits. (Ord. No. 1-2002 § 18; Ord. No. 52-2003, §§ 14, 15) N/A, EXISTING ~, ~~, i..,, , .. Apri15, 2005 St. Regis Resort Attn: David Twitchell, Director of Engineering 315 E. Dean Street Aspen, CO 81611 Deaz David, Please find enclose Site Drawings for Sprint Nextel planned modification on the existing Building at 315 East Dean Street, Aspen CO, 81611 (St. Regis Hotel). This modification would include raising two (2), five-foot (5') panel antennas, five-foot (5') above the penthouse structure to match the existing antenna mounted five-foot (5') above the penthouse. The antennas are currently painted to match the existing building and will maintain the stealth application of the site. This change will improve Sprint Nextel's coverage in the azea and will not affect the visual impact of the site. No additional antennas will be added to the site. Per the Lease Agreement dated September 13, 2000, Pazagraph 8(c) "Licensee shall construct and install its Antenna Facilities in accordance with the Plans, and any changes thereto shall be subject to Licensor's prior written approval." Would you please have the drawings and this letter signed and dated as written consent per the lease agreement and return them to me at the address below: Signature -r~ Title Date Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Brett R. Pfleger Sprint/Nextel Attn: Brett Pfleger 333 Inverness Drive South Englewood, CO 80112 303-907-0844 DN33XC241 / St Regis fL' ~ ~U? ~.., s 4 m m ~ Sze ~~ o ~ 0 0 w$~® ~® m~ f ~ $~ ~~ ~~ o ®ao s ~~ I ~``~ ~ Q~Z~~~~ a \~F ~{ D~n ~~ yy ~r~ n~~ ti~ s :m 4 c ~~ ~m$m ''§ ~ ~ e~ ,~ ~ _ ~~~ (~\\~~\\.Y~' J o 0 0 '~ e \\\\ ~ a I ~ ~ ~m~FFf $06 \\~W,..~ b~~ "e +~ ~b ~ S7~ ~~ II~ ~ mm e~ 4 ~~ggC~~~~~ s ~&& a~~ ~ l~ • 8 9 3 N a 8 ~ 4 ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~' ~g~ ~/ ` /~ u r ~~~~ m / ~ ~g i $~~" a €~~ 0 0 c O ~®~ ~~~~ i ~~ ~s=' z €~. ~ s ~~ ~~~ u o e 4 w V a -~ ®o~+ ~m g ~~~~~ ~~g~~s o ~~~~~~ a ~~~'~ ~ w F~ 3 o`L ~ S.. ^: ~F F~. ~m""gN" ~_~~~~$ ~ 9~e~~-hh~u ~Q AS a ~~~~"s ~ ~~'~ 6 ^sa § ww = ~ ,~~,~g~r~ ~ E ~4`""s c°' ~ n ~ i a p~, ~ ~1F 4 e~~~ ~g' `< ~~~y 9 ~ ~~~ po~ p A~ ~4u gi C .ti 0 ,,'~ V „~ ~ ~ W ~~ ~ I I A 4 "~ 9 P ~~~~~ 6 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ e e ~ , ~ ~ ~ -~, ~,~ ~~ w ~ 2 ~o m 'A O a 0 a s 0 ~£ ~~ .. ~ ; _ ~ e a $ ~7 4 ~~ i~~ps i ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ £ ~-~~ 1~ .,\\ ~', J V \ °s 8~ ~g ~~ A 4 ~~~ u a ~ € a ~~~~ Vie, o-~~~ ~~~~ s;~ ~B~Y z~P ~~ A ;K 9 P 0 'a m 0 z a "~ ~ xg ~~~ f ~~ ~ ,a ~s A ~ ~~~o~~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~C "' n w p~~~m a ° ~ ~ 'm$ F ~" ' Qi O c ~ py D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ " . SS ~ 8~ y~ ~ ~~ P ~ A m ~ SSS. 6 m9 ~ u~ ~ ~~~ ~W~ F w 9 RF~~ E 0 a 8 ~$5 ~~ ~~~ ~F~F~ ~'o= ~~ ~-~ %Fy ~~ ,~ , m X i i Gf G_ f a m -si 0 z i a mm ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ o °m ~ ~ g 2 ~, c yo ~ o T ~ ~~ om ~~n ~ ~s 8"~ ~ Fp €~ ~ ~~ $$ ~ ~ ~ g~ag~~ £~$~ R ~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~% ~ ~- ~ € ~:~ gnu ~~~ ~_~ " ~~ ~w 9 a m i 2 O A a 'o x a 0 9 m O 9 O t m ,~~, °s 'O 1 0 ~. 7 m S ~~ 2 X v ti x W Z ~ ~ ~Zti 0 ~ X 9 mw O O ~ ~ N~ D f ~ n~cN ~~ ~ N . .. p w r ~ m W 8 ~' T ~ye ~'~ti ~ 'f C ~ „~ a p ~ ~~ e$~l 'a~~? e a~0~1 't 33€ 8 z L F ", y e ry ' a~«~ q 5 S ,~„ .../ CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of Cih of Aspen Development Anulication Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS Fi THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees [hat City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and [he payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when [hey are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior [o decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees pro det~~nn~~ination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $CJt! which is for_ hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the C[TY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $235.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of [he billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN sy: Chris Bendon Community Development Dtrector to CITY an application for APPLICANT sy:_~r~~=t~ Date: ~i7 //~V 7 Bill To Mailing Address and Telephone Number: `nNd't- Ne~t-e ~ -, 3 33 S ~~~~ D,.•„~ -f~~ F11~uNo~d C~ ~jd1 ~ Z 303- 4d~-~a~r~l ~. ATTACHMENT 2-LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICANT: Name: r'rt"N~t ~~ - ~ Q h~ SL ~~ l~r.~~ sJr-~ Location: 3 S G• ~~'- S °n 6 I ses.._ ~ Indicate street address, lot & block number, le al descri tion where a ro riate ParcelID# RE UIRED 73? 1$2 0 REPRESENTATIVE: !~ /~ p~ Name: l5~ F'•t1 ~Y!' Address: 333 ToyerOcsa i~~'~~ ~r/l~cwao~ ~ ~0//Z Phone# .303- 967 -O°Y4 Pan.rF.rT: Name: UN X~---~1~7/ J Address: ~j l ~ ~~• Ju+K ~^r'~- / SO+'4 ~9 g ~~ /~ Phone #• q 7~' - 9 z-~ - 33~ TYPE of APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): ^ Conditional Use ^ Conceptual PUD ^ Conceptual Historic Devt. ^ Special Review ^ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ^ Final Historic Development ^ Design Review Appeal ^ Conceptual SPA ^ Minor Historic Devt. ^ GMQS Allotment ^ Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) ^ Historic Demolition ^ GMQS Exemption ^ Subdivision ^ Historic Designation ^ ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream ^ Subdivision Exemption (includes ^ Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane ^ Lot Split ^ Temporary Use ~ Other: Adw:i ~~vl~-t-~- ^ Lot Line Ad'ustment ^ Text/Ma Amendment EXISTING CONDIT'IONS' (description of existing buildings uses previous approvals etc.) i S*'`~e ~y(1 rf'f~ PROPOSAL• (description of proposed bul!ildings uses modifications etc.) ~R`sc ~:G~ 4nfiAA~ 7' ~ ~c~r 4.~`Sf/ry /'7YlJ""~'Q1TcN9f Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ ^ Pre-Application Conference Summary ®' Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement ® Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form ^ Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards All plans that are larger than 8.5" x 11" must be folded and a floppy disk with an electronic copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. ~. THE CITY OF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: November 6.2007 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number and name assigned to this property is 0057 2007 ASLU. 315 E. Dean -Wireless. The planner assigned to this case is Jessica Garrow. ^ Your Land Use Application is incomplete: We found that the application needs additional complete and for us to begin reviewing it. We contents for you application: 1. 2. 3. items to be submitted for it to be deemed need the following additional submission Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. Your Land Use Application is complete: f there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items maybe requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. Thank You, Jennifer Ph ,Deputy irector City of Aspen, Community Development Department C:\Documents and Settings\jennifepUvly Documents\Templates\Completeness Letter Land Use.doc ,,-, m THE CRY OF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: October 13.2007 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number and name assigned to this property is 0057 2007.ASLU. 315 E. Dean -Wireless. The planner assigned to this case is not assigned. Your Land Use Application is incomplete: We found that the application needs additional items to be submitted for it to be deemed complete and for us to begin reviewing it. We need the following additional submission contents for you application: 1. Proof that you have the right to apply/consent from property owner 2. Written Responses to the Review Criteria of Section 26.575.130 3. 4. Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. ^ Your Land Use Application is complete: If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. Thank You, ennifer a ,Deputy Director City of Aspen, Community Development Department C:\Documents and Settings\jennifepUvty Documents\Templates\Completeness Letter Land Use.doc ,,~ ., . 9r !dE 5®d NrMON Pem Repar[e Frt~ Lab yob ..... r~<~rXr~r/39~j _f!!®~usd• ',,N a a >iL7~~zam1 •~ ~Q t7 g.',. Men LWoAFptla ~~ Ifeq'iep6mvy IYaLUnm IPen# IBW ~a ILP~a ~N~Enu Higen -..... P~ni if9e Pemit )zam,nsLu pg}' p3jeu IS EOEfW St J Oyl/6ubr------ [jy FEN 6~sle~ Zp 1611 Pmlldvnwsn _ J c° Made PaW~---y Pu1i9U~elww~ FVF~ IOpS/3Wi J 0 Demplir~ MINSiR4iN4 flEVIEW I~I~~ FN ~J '. fiWbed B6Eii 3tt+90]181a Gbd flvnq Dqs~ Exqu Yi6lzaoe ,J _. _. _... D LedNm iA4ETl DFA4 SL LLC J FnINm~ OPEN CO 1fi11 PMp~- f/ Ora leMpkaM] ...___ __. _._ m }ASPEN DFAY Si LLC ~ FipNm~ OPEN [0816611 Phwe 19]019A3i0B Cudtl z]IS] ~~ leritlv _ __. __- _~_.._ ____._ .. __. _... LaNNm ~~ FrtNmr---~ Phme