Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.sm.Molny Eubank.1983ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 87691 (303) 925-2020 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES City 00113 - 63721 - 47331 - 52100 GMP/CONCEPTUAL 63722 - v1332 - 52100 GMPIPRELIMINARY 63723 - 47333 - 52100 GMPIFINAL 63724 - 47341 - 52100 SUB/CONCEPTUAL fi3725 - 47342 - 52100 SUB/PRELIMINARY 63726 - 47343 - 52100 SUBIFINAL 63727 - 47350 - 52700 EXCEPTIEXEMPTION 63728 - 47350 - 52100 REZONING -, 63729 - 47360 - 52100 SPECIAL REVIEW SUB-TOTAL County GMP/GENERAL 00113 - 63711 - 47331 - 52200 63712 - 47332 - 52200 GMPIDETAILEO 63713 - 47333 - 52200 GMPIFINAL 63714 - 47341 - 52200 SUB/GENERAL 63715 - 47342 - 52200 SUBIOETAILED 63716 - 47343 - 52200 SUBIFINAL 63717 - 47350 - 52200 SPECIAL REVIEW 63718 - 47350 - 52200 REZONING 63719 - 47360 - 52200 SPECIAL APPROVAL SUB-TOTAL PLANNING OFFICE SALES 00113 - 63061 - 09000 - 52200 COUNTY CODE 63063 - 09000 - 52200 ALMANAC 63062 - 09000 - 00000 GMP 63066 - 09000 - 00000 COOPEREES 63069 - 09000 - SUB-TOTAL TOTAL Phone: Name: _ Project: __ Address: ~ ~ ':~ Oate: Check No. No. of Rours: Additional billing: ~~11 EDWIN WOODRICH ASSOCIATES ARO HITE CTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING September 26, 1983 Planning and Zoning Commission City of Aspen 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611. Honorable Commissioners: 6've request a five (>) foot easterly extension and an appror_imate sever. (7) foot northerly extension to an already existing deck at a residence at 102?_ East Hyman. This is in compliance with Article Six, Section 24-6.3 of the Zoning Code of the City of Aspen. The existing structure is within one hundred (100) feet of the 100 year flood plain as shown on the attached MOLNY/EUBANK SUBDIVISION Plat. The Proposed Deck Extension however is approximately twenty two (22) feet above the existing grade as shown on Section B sheet A-1. and since the construction is of cantilever nature, all work will be accomplished from the existing deck. All existing trees and shrubs as shown on the Subdivision Plat are clear of the proposed construction and therefore no damage or removal of trees or shrubs is contemplated. May we hope for your favorable decision at your earliest convenience. Respectfully yours, \~ Edwin B. Woodrich, A.I.A. 31A SOUTH MILL STREET ASPEN COLORADO 0161 903925303] MEMORANDUM TO: Colette Penne, Planning Office FROM: Chuck Roth, Engineering Department Clc-- DATE: October 31, 1983 RE: Molny/Eubank Stream Margin Review ------------------------------------------------------------ Having reviewed the above application and having made a site inspection, the Engineering Department has the following commments 1. Stream margin review requirements are contained in Section 24-6.3 of the Aspen Municipal Code. 2. The site inspection revealed that the course of the river has changed a great deal; perhaps as much as 30' to the west, from what is shown on the development plan. The development plan does not indicate when the survey was performed, but because the course of the river is so greatly different from that shown, we will have to have a current survey. 3. The 10' trail easement citations do not appear to be correct. See Book 288, pages 142-145. 4. Contour lines must be shown for 2' intervals (5' intervals for grades over 108.) 5. Existing trees and shrubs must be shown. 6. Section 24-6.3(b)(9) requires a statement of°construction procedure to be used." The following note should be on the development plan: NOTE: The construction procedure to be used will in no way impact the stream. There will be no change 'in the stream channel or its capacity, and there will be no activity which will increase stream sedimentation and suspension load. CR/co cc: Dan Jay Molny/EUbank Stream Margin Review November 8, 1983 Page Two The City Attorney's office had no comments. Chuck Roth of the City Engineer's office had a concerns with the submission. Chuck felt that was not as precise as it could have been. How that the construction procedure proposed would stream. The Engineering Department's complete for your review. number of technical the development plan giver, Chuck agreed in no way impact the comments are attached The Planning Office recommends approval of the Molny/Eubank Stream Margin Review subject to the following conditions: ~;j: 1. The extension of 'the existing deck shall be no more than five feet (5') in the easterly direction and seven feet (7') in the northerly direction. 2. The construction of both decks shall be of a cantilever nature with all work accomplished from the existing deck. 3. The construction procedure to be used will in no way impact the grade level, the stream bank, the stream itself or its capacity. 4. The applicant shall prepare a development plan which must be approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit for either of the deck extensions. The plan will include all items requested in Chuck R~tl~'.s,memo- randum of October 31, 1983 ~J~'% - ~ ~ ~ f„fir ~ ' n- e>r_ "Y _ .. ~; .. .~C~r, t 1 ~ is J ~ ~~~ i ~~ _ { - ti~~~l ~~ t CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET. City of Aspen No. SI-8 3 Staff: C~ rc ~C PROJECT NAME: gds, ~~ ~ ~ 'n_~... VIA ~.,1 . Phone: _~-- APPLICANT: ~-i"~"^ - Q Phone: REPRESENTATIVE: (Fee) TYPE OF APPLICATION: I. GMP/SUBDIVISION/PUD (4 step) ($1,840) 1. Conceptual Submission ($1,120) 2, Preliminary Plat ($ 560) 3, Final Plat II. SUBDIVISION/PUD (4 step) 1. Conceptual Submission .($1,290) ($ 830) 2. Preliminary Plat ($ 560) 3, Final Plat XCEPTION/EXEMPTION/REZONING (2 step) ($1,010) III.E `/ J~ IV. SPECIAL REVIEW (1 step) ($ 465) 1. Special Review 2. Use Determination 3, Conditional Use Date Referred: nrrrnolll C• _ ~( _Attorney ~( _Engineering-Dept. Housing Water City Electric Sanitation District Mountain Bell Parks Holy .Cross Electric Fire Marshall/Building Dept School District Rocky Mtn. Nat.Gas State Hgwy. Dept. Fire Chief Other runt RnIITING: Date Routed: Attorney Building Engineering Other ~ l•. }• ; ' _5 ~ _ .. t r ~ ;. ~, ; . r t x ,< ,, ` " . Ordinance No. ~: CITY P&Z ,REVIEW: r i 4 ~J y ~' 1 CITY-COUNCIL REVIEW: ., - ,, ,: .'~ .Ordinance No. ,: ,, ;. . ~,. . _ ~` ,; m'~ - x r. .. ~ xi W ~ '.. S ~v } wa 3s g K , ~'~} ~i~ f ~xd ~ % ~ r ,, b x92 e~ ~ xi _ i ~ ~ ti ~t~~ l~w'r w q~ } t S~'d ~ 1 7"3'`. ~~~~ E ~ y b i ~ 1 J W'P~~ f1Nf.~ '~ ~ ~ i Y ~t d _ _ _ s. b+...4 ' 1 ~ F f v~ V~ ~ 1 Approved by the P&Z ,11/8/83 with the following conditions: 1. The extension of the existing deck shall be no more than five feet (5') in the easterly direction and seven feet (7') in the northerly direction. 2. The construction of both decks shall be of a cantilever nature with all work accomplished from the existing deck. 3. The construction procedure to be used will in no way impact the grade level, the stream bank, the stream itself or its capacity. 4. The applicant shall prepare a development plan which must be approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit for either of the deck extensions. The plan will include all items requested in Chuck Roth's memorandum of October 31, 1983, with the exception of conditions #4 and #2 from said memo which may be amended to allow measuring by the architect rather than a surveyor. 5. The applicant will draft a new Trail Easement to the satisfaction of the City Attorney and will record that document, indicating that the representation of the river location is inaccurate on the recorded Final Plat. f ^ ti MEMORANDUM T0: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Richard Grice, Planning Office RE: Molny/EUbank - Stream Margin Review DATE: November 8, 1983 'fir ~r/ The attached letter of application from Edwin Woodrich requests Stream Alargin review approval for the extension of decks on an existing house. The requested cantilevered 5 foot easterly extension and 7 foot northerly extension of decks will be constructed 22 feet above grade. The catilevered extensions will in no way impact existing vegetation, stream bank or the flood plain since there will be no improvements at grade. According to Section 24-6.3 of the City Code, the intention of the Stream Margin regulation is "to guide development and encourage appropriate use land in proximity to designated natural water courses, to promote safety from flooding, to prevent impediment of natural water flow, and to insure provisions for adequate protection and pre- servation of the designated natural water courses as important natural features." This application is before you because of the fact that the air space extension lies within 100 feet measured horizontally from the high water line of the Roaring Fork River. The City Code also establishes the following review criteria for the consideration of Stream Margin applications: "1. No building shall be located so as to be within a flood hazard area designated by the U.S. Corp. of Engineers Flood Plain Report for the Roaring Fork River. 2. In the event there is a trail designated by an approved trail plan within the development site, such trail shall be designated for public use. 3. All attempts should be made to implement the recommenda- tions of the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan prepared by the Roaring Fork Greenway Committee. 4. Vegetation shall not be removed nor any slope grade changes made that may produce erosion of the stream bank. 5. There shall be permitted no changes to the stream channel or its capacity, and no activity shall be allowed which will increase stream sedimentation and suspension loads. 6. All efforts must be made to reduce stream pollution and interference with the natural changes of the stream, and to enhance the value of the stream as an important natural feature." Tom Dunlop, Director of the Environmental Health Department commented as follows: "There appear to be no adverse environmental impacts associated with an approval of this request to the extent an existing deck by the dimensions described in the submittal." ~~ ~. ~..~ ~ ,. MEMORANDUM TO: Colette Penne, Planning Office FROM: Chuck Roth, Engineering Department Ci~ DATE: October 26, 1983 RE: Molny/EUbank Stream Margin Review ------------------------------------------ Having reviewed the above application and having made a site inspection, the Engineering Department has the following commments 1. Stream margin review requirements are contained in Section 24-6.3 of the Aspen Municipal Code. 2. The development plan as submitted is unacceptable. The course of the river on October 17, 1983, is not at all as indicated on the plat. The development plan must show the river in its current state with the high water line of the river drawn and labeled. ("High water line" is defined as the line which the water impresses on the soil by covering it for sufficient periods to deprive it of upland vegetation.) This line may cross the 100-year flood plain line. It is suggested that the 100 year flood plain be further defined by adding the following language: "per Army Corps of Engineers study, June 1973." 3. The 10' trail easement citations do not appear to be correct. See Book 288, pages 142-145. 4. Contour lines must be shown for 2' intervals (5' intervals for grades over 10~.) 5. Existing trees and shrubs must be shown. 6. Section 24-6.3(b)(4) requires a statement of°construction procedure to be used." The following note should be on the development plan: NOTE: The construction procedure to be used will in no way impact the stream. There will be no change in the stream channel or its capacity, and there will be no activity which will increase stream sedimentation and suspension load. 7. The development plan will need to be certified/recertified by a registered land surveyor. CR/co cc: Dan Jay ASPEN~PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM T0: Colette Penne Planning Office FROM: Thomas S. Dunlop, Director ~D Environmental Health Department DATE: October 6, 1983 RE: Molny/Eubank Stream Margin Review --------------------------------------------------------- There appear to be no adverse environmental impacts associated with an approval of this request to extend an existing deck by the demensions described in the submittal. TSD/co -~ - s,-, i~! It _ _ C„ + G , 7331 L' ~ r;~Pf"R1 ~ ;.,i~>r~ SCI '130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado B'161'1 303/925-2020 .^~ ,.. MEMORANDUM TO: City Engineering City Attorney City Environmental Health FROM: Colette Penne, Planning Office RE: Molny/Eubank Stream Margin Review DATE: October 3, 1983 Attached is an application for stream margin review submitted by Molny/Eubank. Molny/Eubank proposal requests stream margin review in order to extend an existing deck. Please review the material provided and return your comments to the Planning Office by October 25, 1983, so that we may prepare for its presentation at the November 8, 1983 meeting before the Aspen City Planning and Zoning Commission. Thank You. r^, E W 11 EDWIN WOODRICH ASSOCIATES ARG HITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING September 26, 1983 Planning and Zoning Commission City of Aspen 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Honorable Commissioners: We request a five (5) foot easterly seven (7) foot northerly extension at a residence at 1022 East Hyman. Article Six, Section 24-6.3 of the Aspen. ... extension and an approximate to an already existing deck This is in compliance with Zoning Code of the City of The existing structure is within one hundred (100) feet of the 100 year flood plain as shown on the attached MOLNY/EUBANK SUBDIVISION Plat. The Proposed Deck Extension however is approximately twenty two (22) feet above the existing grade as shown on Section B sheet A-1. and since the construction is of cantilever nature, all work will be accomplished from the existing deck. All existing trees and shrubs as shown on the Subdivision Plat are clear of the proposed construction and therefore no damage or removal of trees or shrubs is contemplated. May we hope for your favorable decision at your earliest convenience. Re tfully yours, Edwin B. Woodrich, A.I.A. 314 SOUTH MILL STREET ASPEN COLORADO 81611 303 9253037 \- ' MEMORANDUM TO: City Engineering City Attorney City Environmental Health FROM: Colette Penne, Planning Office RE: Molny/Eubank Stream Margin Review DATE: October 3, 1983 +°A, \u/ t~ Attached is an application for stream margin review submitted by Molny/Eubank. Molny/Eubank proposal requests stream margin review in order to extend an existing deck. Please review the material provided and return your comments to the Planning Office by October 25, 1983, so that we may prepare for its presentation at the November 8, 1983 meeting before the Aspen City Planning and Zoning Commission. Thank You. Oct. 20 Colette: No comments on this one. There was a question early about whether the matter had to be reviewed at all. It was my opinion that it had to be reviewed because of the "land and Air space" requirement of the ordinance. This opinion is reinforced by the relevant renresen~tations that will go on the record, i.e. all contruction will take place from the existing deck, no vertical supports, no disturbance or removal of vegetation, confirmation of existing trail easement, etc. C~ J .~ , ~ ~. ~ r ' BOOK~p~j PAGE~96 EXIfIDIT "A" A parcel of land being part of Lots R and S, Dlock 33, East Aspen Addition and part of Lots G and 7, Block 5, Riverside Addition. Said parcel is more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point (being the Northwest corner of said Lot R); thence 5.75°09'11"F,. 104.00 feet aleng the Northerly line of said 7.ot R, S, G and 7 to the center line of the Roaring Fork River; thence S.8°15'57" E. 70.53 feet along the center line of the Roaring I'o.*.k River; thence N.G3°49'08" t4. 73.11 feet; thence N.75°69'11" W. 60.00 feet to the westerly line of said Lot R; thence N.14°50'49" E. 50.50 feet along the i,]esterly line of said Lot R to tl~e point of beginning. Said parcel contains 6,267 square feet more or less. Together with non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress over and across the easterly fourteen (14) feet of Lot Q, Block 33, East Aspen Addition, City of Aspen, to and from Hyman Avenue from and to the alley located in said Block 33. Upkeep, maintenance and snow removal shall be the joint and mutual responsibility of the parties hereto, their heirs, executors, administrators and assigns. Such ease- ment shall be accessible and open at all times. ~ r + -'~ f~ tt K Recorded nt.........',._..0........._o clocl....P......-1•, ....... P.X 11....1.7.. ... .........._..................dOOK~VU ' !~('_~~V 797 ...--...Peggy Mikli.ch tA~ Reception No...__ ..:... ............... .._......_ ...................... .,................Recorder. THIS DEED, 1lfadc this 16th day of April , 1974 between Patricia Williams Card of the County of P i t ki n and Slate of Colorado, of the first palt, and Dale Eubank, P.O. Box 3678, Aspen, Co. 81611 of the - County of P i t k i n and State of Colorado, of the second part: 5:; :: - ~ - '':~ FEE ANK i '7 19.14 WI1'NESSETH, That the said party of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of Th it t y- four Thousand Five Hundred and n0~100-----------------------DOLLARS to the said party of the first part in hand paid by said party of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby confessed and acknowledged, hnS granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm, unto the said party of the second pnrt,hiS heirs and assigns for- ever, all the following described ]otg or parcel S of land, situate, lying and being in the County of pi t k i ^ and State of Colorado, to wit: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN. TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the said patt y of the first part, either in law oz equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditnments and appurtenances. TO IIAVF, AND TO IIOLD the said premises above bargained and described with the appurtenances, unto the said part y of the second part,h iS heirs tend assigns forever. And the said party of the first part, for her self hE'r heirs, executors, and administrators, do eS covenant, grant, bargain, and agree to and with the said party of the second part, h iS heirs ]md assigns, that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these presents, She iS well seized of the premises above conveyed, as of good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and hn5 good right, full power and lawful authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form as aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from nl] former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, assessments and encumbrances of whatever kind or nature soever, except reservations as contained in United States Patent recorded in Book 180 at page 454 and ill Book 175 at page 246, pitkii County, Colorado, records, and the lien for general taxes for the year 1974. and the above bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the said party of the second part, h 1 S heirs and assigns against all and every person or persons lnwf'ully claiming or to claim the whole or any port thereof, the said party of the first part shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said patty of the first part haS hereunto set her hand and seal the day and year first above written. I \ ~r l_- i +.:-,.::J ~~~~: ,~„ . +;.)(SEAL) _ ..... .. .......... ...........__ _. _....__...._... Patricia Williams Card ..._...... .....(SEAL) 19 STATE OF COLORADO, ss. County of P i t Ft i n The foregoing instrument wm: acknowledged before me this 74 ,by Patricia Williams Card \ly commission expires My Comm?sslon Expires dune 8,1977 16th ^~l,', 19 .._......_.._._._..._ ...........................(SEAL) ' j1•',0-100 ~~~" ~~ !; ~ y ~-. `~. ,.. ..-.... J say of _ A 9r ii1 ~ ,a ,... 1 <in ~~. r "' ~ 't .Witness my hptidpfi• ol'fici~l S~eaLt ~ , ~..~. .. ~ ra : ~r: - •w,terrJVbp~~. - (D(c~- T~~.:_ ~ ~ ~~ ~ NO. 935. WARRANTY DEED.-For Fhoto¢nphlc Record.-nrndlord Fubli hin¢ Co., 182d-48 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado-8.7¢ . ~ ~ in o ['• ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ o ~ ° ..~ I . y , n, . . ~ n I O ~I pC I 3 7i x t ., ~ ~ ~. n p y v ',1 ' ~ ~ 0- 6' u ~ I ~ '. I ~' ~ ~ ~ n Y ~' ~ H m: ~ ~ .~ C'] I ~ 3 q -~ ~ i .. ~ n ~ 'Y G :. ' '~ ~ o , -~. 4~ ~° G- P i ~ ~ ~ ~ I n b - - t •, - ~~ O r . l o t ~ I ~ ~ b a ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ z ,~ ~ ~~ ~ a~ o ~ . ~ o ,~ i ire ~ O. bi g o ~ ~' ~ F m I i a'. ~ ~, 8: d: 6 a d ~ M ~-~- ., \ ~l n' ~ ~ A (R~_ ~ ~~ j ~ 1 I r. ( ~a ~ 1 L1 C\ ~,'~' ~ ,! 1 i { ~i `_ i ~ o t\' ~_ n C ] `~ r I , w .: y 0 C~7 d z ' Recorded nt......._' 'D.......... ~'clock....$......Ilf., .......A >;il...l2.,...' '4 ............. .. ~ P. . ............. [ ' Reception No........i.Y.~797 Peggy Miklich 4~OK ~U ..................................................... R e c o r d s r. l-ri~t~~5 Tff1S DEED, )\fadc this 16th day of April , 1974 betH•een Patricia Williams Card ~i~:: ':.:. ..'_':~ fEE NNK 1 '7 1974 Dr the )'~. '~ i~.._Sv .._.. ~~ County of P1 1R and State of Colorado, of the first part, and Dale Eubank, P.O. Box 3678, Aspen, Co. 81611 of the County of P i t k i n and State of Colorado, of the second part: WITNESSETH, That the said party of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of Th lr t y- four Thousand Five Hundred and no/100-----------------------DOLhARS to the said party of the first part in hand paid by said party of the second part, the receipt w}tereof is hereby confessed and acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm, unto the said party of the second pnrt,hlS heirs and assigns for- ever, all the following described lots or parcel S of land, situate, lying and being in the County of p 1 t k i n and State of Colorado, to wit: r~~j~ 7~~'._ ~~~~< SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN, TOGETIIF.R with all and singular the hereditamenta and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the said part y of the first part, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditsments and appurtenances. TO IIAVF, AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described with the appurtenances, unto the said part Y of the second part,hl5 heirs and assigns forever. And the said party of the first part, for her self her heirs, executors, and administrators, do eS covenant, grant, bargain, and agree to and with the said party of the second part, h15 heirs and assigns, that at the time of the caseating and delivery of these presents, S h@ 15 well seized oY the premises above conveyed, as of good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and has good right, full power and lawful authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form as aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, tuxes, assessments and encumbrances of whatever kind or nature soever, except reservations as contained in United States Patent recox•ded in Book 180 at page 454 and in Book 175 at page 246, pitki County, Colorado, x•ecox•ds, and the lien for general taxes for the year 1974. and [he above bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the said party of the second part, h 1 S heirs and assigns against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming or to claim the whole or any part thereof, the said party of the first part shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEL'END. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said party of the first part has hereunto sether hand and seal the day and year first above written. ~~ ~i i~ iJJ ~~\ .,, i a..(SEAL) .....__....i_?._, _....._ ..__......... _........ patricia W>_1liams Card ...._..... ._ ........................_._.......---_..................._....................... (SEAL) __ __... ......._.___.. ........_. ....__.......... ~ EAL STATE OF COLORADO, ~ ~;0~10~"••, County of P i t k i n } ~,r ~' • ~ ,rte •` 1'he foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 16th day of ~~ A px' lih "i •. -,J ]9 74 ,by Patricia Williams Card :,.-' `-' 1~!,~ ••r ' :' \ty connnission expires 19 .Witness my la.}trid•gf•,` ol"4ici~l S(YeaL a My Comm?sslonExplres June 8,7977 .}, "- ~(]r~ _._ ...__ ............ ..... _..._....__..____r......... '• ~% ...~ ...............r-.~.. •'>yJArv]hiL~~' ~ S3.1~4 NO. 932. WARRANTY DRRD. For Photo¢nphie RecorJ.--Bradford Publivhia¢ Co., H24-46 Stout Strret. Denver, Coloredo-3-73 s - ' ' ' 1800K2C7~ ~PAGE~~Ij i;JaIIDIi "A' A parcel of land being part of Lots R and S, Dlock 33, 1;a>t Aspen Addition and part of Lots G and 7, Dlock 5, Riverside Addition. Said parcel is more. fully desoribed as follo~.as: Deginning at a point (being the Northwest corner of said Lot R); thence 5.75°09'11"P. 104.00 feet clenq the A:ortherly line of said Lot R, S, G and 7 to L-he center line of the Roaring Fork River; thence S.8°15'57" E. 70.53 feet along the center line of the Roaring Fork River; thence N.G3°49'08" W. '13.11 feet; thence N.75°69'11" W. 60.00 feet to the [+lesterly line of said Lot R; thence N.14°50'49" E. 50.50 feet along the l7esterly lino of said Lot R to the point of beginning. Said parcel contains 6,267 square feet more or less. Together with non-e}:elusive easement for ingress and egress over and across the easterly fourteen (14) feet of Lot Q, Block 33, East Aspen Addition, City of Aspen, to and from I{yman Avenue from and to the alley located in said Block 33. Upkeep, maintenance and snow removal shall be the joint and mutua]. responsibility of the parties hereto, their heirs, executors, administrators and assigns. Such ease- ment shall be accessible and open at all times.