Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.715 W Meadows Rd.0070.2009.ASLUTHE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER PARCEL ID NUMBER PROJECTS ADDRESS PLANNER CASE DESCRIPTION REPRESENTATIVE DATE OF FINAL ACTION 0070.2009.ASLU 273512282002 715 W. MEADOWS JENNIFER PHELAN DESIGN REVIEW A MARTIN A ,~ s 12/10/2009 CLOSED BY Angela Scorey on 12/10/2009 r~ DEVELOPMENT ORDER of the City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafrer "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day afrer the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. Afrer Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Cecil M Hernandez & Noelle C Hernandez, PO Box 1045, Aspen, CO 81612 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address Lot 2 Pine Hollow Subdivision Aspen CO• commonly known as 715 W Meadows Rd Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Residential Design Standard Variances for windows in the 9-12 foot range and for door height to remodel an existing residence Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Apyroval by the City of Aspen Community Development Department for two Residential Design Standards Variances; received 11/12/09 and signed for approval 11/16/09 Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) November 21, 2009 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date ofpublication ofnodce of approval.) November 22, 2012 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the Ciry of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 16~h day of November, 2009, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. /1~ -, Chris Bendon, Community Development Director RECEPTION#: 564559, 1111712009 at 01:50:31 PM, 1 OF 6, R $31.00 Doc Code APPROVAL Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO .-. NOTICE OF APPROVAL ~iZeGC~' on ~ ~gy55°~ For Two Residential Design Standard Variances at 715 W Meadows, legally described as Lot 2, Pine Hollow Subdivision, Aspen, CO Parcel ID No. 2735 1228 2002 APPLICANT: Cecil M Hernandez & Noelle C Hernandez REPRESENTATIVE: Martin Mada SUBJECT & SITE OF AMENDMENT: Residential Design Standard Variance for Lot 2 Pine Hollow Subdivision, commonly known as 715 W Meadows Rd, involving the remodel of an existing house. SUMMARY: The Applicant has requested two Residential Design Standard Variances related to the remodel of an existing single family home. The home currently has multiple non- orthogonal windows on the front facade that span the 9-12 foot range where a second floor would typically exist. The home also has a fourteen (14) foot entry door. The applicant is requesting to remodel the house and eliminate the non-orthogonal windows and reduce the amount of space that the windows span the 9-12 foot area. In addition, the applicant is requesting to reduce the door height to nine feet eight inches (9'8"). The proposal would bring the residence closer to compliance with the residential design standards. The applicant is requesting a variance to the following code sections: "The entry door shall face the street and be no more than ten feet (10'0 ") back from the frontmost wall of the building. Entry doors shall not be taller than eight feet. "(.Section 26.410.040.D. La) "Street facing windows shall not spun through the area where a second ,poor would typically exist which is between nine (9) and twelve (12) eet above the finished floor. For interior staircases, this measurement will be made from the ,first landing if one exists. A transom window above the main entry is exempt from this standard. " (Section 16.410.040.D.3.a, Windows) STAFF EVALUATION: Staff supports the proposed variances for 715 W Meadows Rd. Currently the building does not meet the above cited code sections, in addition to section 26.410.040.D.3.6, Page '~° p,~~y fiw~ ~ ~l~-I55~ Non-Orthogonal Windows. The proposal will bring the building more into compliance with the standards. Staff finds that the variances are appropriate based on site constraints. The applicant is proposing to remodel an existing home, rather than tear it down and start over. In doing so, the applicant must address the existing built structure, which currently violates three (3) residential design standards. The building appears to be a single story from the street, but it is a split level home. The front porch is not located in relation to the first or second floor, so when the 9-12 foot window measurement is taken from the interior landing or finished floor it does not relate well to what is seen from the street. Similarly, the dimensions of the new entry door aze based on the existing porch configuration and mass. Staff also finds that the variances are appropriate given the neighborhood context, which includes other residential homes as well as the Aspen Meadows campus. This home is located in an area where many homes were constructed before the residential design standards were adopted, and the proposal is consistent with the existing context. DECISION: The Community Development Director finds the Residential Design Standard Variance remodel the home as noted above and on Exhibit `A' to be consistent with the review criteria (Exhibit B) and thereby, APPROVES the variance as specified below. The approved variance to 715 W Meadows Rd, allows for the construction of windows within the 9-12 foot "no window" zone and a front door that is nine feet eight inches (9'8") in height. APPROVED BY: Chris Bendon Community Development Director ~ ~~ ~~ Date Attachments: Exhibit A -Approved Plans Exhibit B - Review Standazds Pagel ~~~~ a .~ ~~, - 4 3 ~ 0 v ~3 g ~ ~hib~+R,~jy Residential Design Standards Variance: Administrative Variance, if granted, would: Exhibit B Review Criteria and Staff Findings Sec. 26.410.020.D /. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. The proposed variance is minimal in nature and will not negatively impact the surrounding context on the site. The proposal is consistent with the existing context 2. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints "the applicant is working with an existing home, which creates some site constraints. The proposed variances are minimal in nature. Page 5 ~~ ~ v. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I ~~~~ ~cr(-e.~ (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 2.6.3/06.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: V Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifreen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. . ,cj Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowled ed before me this2l~, day of N of evwLe~( , 200 `~' , by ~~- Sc November 222009. I0.305148~mes Weekty on WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commis ' expir ~" Notary Public ATTACHMENTS: ~ ;~ CORY J. COPY OF THE PUBLICATION GARSKE My Commiasion 5xeires 0510912012 Nv f A n -^, .. Jessica Garrow From: Martin Mata [matadesign@mac.com] Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 4:45 PM To: Jessica Garrow Subject: 715 Meadows Porch Measurements Hi Jessica, The existing porch is approximately 13ft wide x Eft deep = 78 s.f. The proposed porch is to be approximately 18ft wide x Eft deep=108 s.f. The proposed roof of the porch is to be 19ft wide x 7ft deep Thanks, let me know if you need anything else. Martin Mata 970-274-6011 1 ' e' oRIPURe ~'-, GRAgEL. -~ DRIVEWAY c_ \ \ ~. ~' e' n y ~ R[8AR k L.~t5947 7~ 00 ^ k 0 0 i 0 3 o~ -~ s o~ s ~- 0 s 0 3 0 -~ +~ 00 +~ 4- Q ~ '~ .'~ ..~ +~ +~ Q Q Q i +> 00 +~ O K ::: ~ 4 ----~ ~' M 4 -1-' 4' '~-~ .hu±~' . 7 O ~~.~ ,~ ~~ a ~ ., s .t ~p _ ~~,.,._ ~ ~.. M 1s~aall~eMw a ryy _ 1 ~ j. _... _.. _-.~ iF ~~Y. .~:. I i.f.::~ . w -~:~.~~_ ~,- ~+ ~~ !~~ ~ _ ~fi 0 fiT~ ~ - .-~,- ., i ,-r,. ~, --~= ~.~.~~ ~_..: a ~~ i r -.~P ~_ _ .R. l ,- . M 0 ~I fi ~ . 1, _ ~_ -- s TJ~~~T"x 7 f ~A "1`~t'~1"t ~' t ,. J^ v 1 S `~ T O Z ;~r ~. .~~~. N *~' ,!, ~ ~. ~.~' ~ N 'S 4 ~ N i 1 .~ N S O `/`I1 Y V L^`~ W ,~ ~/ 1 ~_ S -N O ~_ U ~ ~ LJ ..r ~` - c_ ~ O~ a ~ ~ o H J ~ ~ ~ Q ~ Ma~b"'~ CL~ ~ ~~~ ~L°c'~ o~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ro a> G~ ~~ ._ ~ r.-, K ~ ~ ~ Q~ ~ ~ h cti3 ac ~ P~~ o '>> _ yid Aue ~ Z ~ ~ f' m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~~~ ~ Ip~~y aj ~~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ^ erg,. ~ o ~ d 8~ Rim' ~C _ ~ 1S a?r~ ~ ~' pT~ ~ / ~a1/~ V ~;~ ~ i swei~~lM ~ ~~ ~~° to ~' ~ v C h Wro ~ ~ ~ 7S tnnl~A Pae ,~: ~ 3 ~ ~ C ~ ~~~~. ~ , i ~, ~ ~ • ~ 1saM P,e,. ~ ~. ~~ ~~~~`~ a~ : ~ ~-~' ~S ~9u1 fds Q J a ~ ~ / i' Red Mountain Rd. ~ ~ lS ~alrh o i ~ s f' '~ ~.~ •.,,. '~~~ns# o ~~ ~S eual~j ~ ~!711aN~- i ~ ~ ~ .•'•••• Q x1 lS1jrW ~ ^ ~ ~ 0 ~- 'p 4 ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ r,~~ ~ ' ~ -z ~u ua~Sb ~ cn a -. .c ~ ~ ~1S is ~ ~)Lre ~ ~ .od ~~ ~z ~ I ~ ~ ~ Q5Q 1W ~ ~a V~' • cacti , w ~ ~ fin' ..; . ~ - -_ Q t~ ~ ~ ~. ~ y '~` v do °° ~ ~ o ~° ~ ~v ~ 1S 4ls ~ :' o~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ z ~ ~ 2 ~~ 's'H ,•' n,~ ~S ~~ Q w ~ :' ~' ~ ~ ~va S~v~ yl~ a 7 • • Black J ~ ~leau ~ ~ °~Tg01 Birch Or. ~ ~ Rd. J+ c ~ _ teekOc. ~ ~ O v ~Rm ~% ; ~ ~ S ~ ~ 0 uap~oN ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~~ ~ ~~ ~ o °~ h ~ ~ ~s -~~ ~n ~c~` o~ ~e ~' Twin Ridge Rd. _,~ ~o l ~, " ' Y - Y )~ ~ f r ~°!. ., ~ ~ . ~P i. .r stpa ~ `~1. - .. . a"~ ~~~ ~~ ~~,~... >! : +n~ ii .,fig.. ,.~~ ri `t ; ` Szr .4 ,~.. } ~, "s ~~ y~ r; ~s. ~ ~ ~ 'F2 ~ '.~ T xi ~`.,. ~}~ fk~, is~ly' +C~F~~ t ~ C Y ~ ~~ ~~p~ .i ,~e~ 'y A l y ~y~na ~ ~' 6 ~~it ~~~a ___,,y~ ~( gi µ'Yn,~ M1~ 1r~~~h A .p RC t~ ~A~f } r .c -. ~ o 10-26-09 Jessica Garrow City Of Aspen Planning Department Re: Residential Design Standards Variance Parcel ID # 2735 1228 2002 715 Meadows Road, Aspen Lot 2 Pine Hollow Subdivision Applicant: Cecil and Noelle Hernandez P.O. Box 1045 Aspen, CO 81612 Representative: Martin Mata, Mato Design Company Jessica, The Applicants and owners of the property located at 715 Meadows Road are requesting variance from two sections within the Residential Design Standards: 26.410.040.D.1.a Entry Door Height (9'-8" where 8'-0" is allowed) 26.410.040.D.3.a Street Facing Windows in 9ft. to 12ft. Zone as shown on extels. Existing Property Conditions: The applicants recently purchased the property at 715 Meadows Rd. as their permanent home. They have been full-time Aspen residents for many years and have constructed several residential projects within the West End. Their most recent personal residence of 14 years is located just a few blocks away on Lake Street. Before the Lake St. residence they undertook a historic renovation for their personal home on Francis street as well as a 3rd Historic west end victorian project also on Francis Street. Photos of their past projects are attached. There is an existing residence at the subject property. The structure was built in 1993 and incorporates exterior design and massing elements popular at the time of construction but that are now discouraged or not allowed by the residential design standards. Additionally, the home is an untypical residence in that it is an up-side-down scheme where the living room, kitchen, dining and master bedroom are all located on the second floor. There is no direct access to the exterior grade from the second floor level. The existing entry porch is located on a landing between the first and second floors and is below the second floor living level. There is a full basement under the first floor. Since the main living spaces were located on the top floor of the house, the existing roof was designed with a concealed, clear-span, sloping roof structure. This roof design allowed large, uninterrupted volumes for the interior of the house but creates a challenge in balancing a new exterior fenestration that is sensitive in scale to the existing interior and exterior volumes while also accommodating the present residential design standards. The existing roof also incorporated several very small flat roof sections with internal drains and downspouts that are now problematic. A significant factor in the applicant's purchase of this particular home was that the existing floor plan, mechanical and electrical systems met their needs with relatively little modification. The 10/23/09 Hernandez RDS Variance p.1 o applicant's plans are for a cosmetic remodel of the interior of the home where very few walls or doors will need to be relocated. No interior structural modifications are contemplated. Neighborhood Context: There is minimal immediate neighbor context. Only one adjacent neighbor exists to the south at 705 Meadows. That existing adjacent residence is in two separate structures with the garage structure being closest to the applicant's property. The neighboring main house and garage structures are both situated on their site in such a way that both have their 'backs' to the applicant's home. There are no adjacent neighbors to the front (across the street), back or north side of the applicant's home. Two adjacent homes to the back and north were recently demolished along with a third house further north on Meadows Rd. It is our understanding that the neighboring lot owner's intent is to keep the three lots vacant as view preservation from his residence on Sneaky Lane below the applicant's property. While the applicant's property is relatively isolated from immediate neighbors, the neighborhood context is that this home is located on the busy access corridor to the Aspen Meadows development. This portion of Meadows Road is a transition zone from the predominantly traditional residential character, scale and massing of Aspen's West End neighborhood to the more modern commercial and multi-family aesthetic and scale of the Aspen Meadows campus. Proposed Design: The proposed design is a balance of accommodating the various parameters of the owner's needs for their new home, the condition of the existing building and requirements of the present residential design standards. The applicant's chose to change the overall exterior aesthetic. Even though we must work with the overall existing volume, changing the exterior aesthetic allows us an opportunity to bring the home closer to compliance with the intent of the residential design standards as well as eliminate the troublesome portions of the existing roof design. The proposed street-side elevation eliminates significant existing design features on the second floor that are no longer permitted by the present residential design standards... 1] The large round-top windows are replaced with orthogonal openings 2] The very tall (14ft of glass) existing entry is replaced with a more appropriately scaled entry element. Round-top windows that are visible from the street are also eliminated on the south and north elevations. The scale of the fenestration on the proposed street side elevation is the connection between the existing large interior volumes of the home and the requirements of reduced mass and pedestrian oriented scale required by the residential design standards. The new character of the home is an integration of very traditional residential forms and scale arranged in a contemporary manner. The proposed character serves as a transition from the traditional residential scale and aesthetic of the West End to the modern, commercial aesthetic of the Aspen Meadows development. On the technical side, all of the existing small flat roofs with internal gutters have been eliminated by adding small segments of sloping roofs in their place. These small portions of sloped roof also add a new eave depth that helps to reduce the scale of the existing exterior volume. In order to keep the interior scope of work to a cosmetic level, all of the proposed exterior roof changes are accomplished with minor over-framing of the existing roof structure so that we do not structurally alter the existing ceiling/roof assembly. 10/23/09 Hernandez RDS Variance p.2 Q The resulting design is a more serene exterior aesthetic with a smaller exterior scale that balances the contradictory parameters of the pedestrian-friendly massing goals of the residential design code with the existing interior and exterior volumes. The Purpose for a Variance from the Design Code: Entry Door Height: The entire proposed roof work is a function of the existing plate heights of the structure. The height of the small portions of sloped roof are dictated by the existing plate heights. The proposed entry porch roof is set just below the bottom of these roof overhangs, giving enough room for proper clearances. The entry door is under the new porch roof and its configuration is determined by the porch proportions which are in turn determined by the existing structure. The proposed door height achieves the appropriate balance of exterior scale with existing interior volume of the existing structure which is approximately 19 ft. Tall on the interior side. A continuous floor to porch ceiling entry door is much more appropriate to the contemporary exterior aesthetic. 9ft. To 12ft. No Window Zone: Even though there is no exterior grade access from the second floor living spaces, through the pre-application process staff has determined that the 'no window zone' is to be measured from the second floor. The effect of the 9ft. to 12ft. measurement of the no window zone from the second floor is that the zone causes an awkward relationship with existing dormers that face the street. Strict adherence to the no window zone on the second floor would afford less window fenestration opportunities since the existing dormer peaks and adjacent plate heights can not be lowered or raised to allow proper interior and exterior fenestration outside of the no window zone. Two existing dormers contain the home's principle street-facing windows. The overall goal of the exterior changes is to reduce the scale and mass impact to the exterior while maintaining an appropriate interior relationship to the volumes created by the existing structure. The proposed window fenestration achieves the balance necessary amongst the code requirements, existing conditions, interior impact and exterior impact. Furthermore, the proposed fenestration does not continue through the no window zone but projects into it slightly as indicated on the exterior elevations. The variances requested are small in nature but, as stated in the residential design standards variance criteria, are clearly necessary for fairness to the homeowner. Additionally, the variances are also necessary to achieve a level of street-side exterior fenestration and aesthetic appropriate to the context of this neighborhood and inseparably related to the structural constraints of the existing building. Please let me know if you have any questions or require andy additional information. Martin Mata Mato Design Company 1023/09 Hernandez RDS Variance p.3 Cecil and Noelle Hernandez YO Box ]lrib• Aspeq CO st(t72 Phone: 970-9'LO-:3`l i3 • Fax: 97o-544-9Y37 • E tilail:nchworld(~roEne[ Date: October 23, 2009 Jessica Carroty City of Aspen Planning Department Aspen, CO 8 ] 611 Re: Residential Design Standards Variance Parcel ID #2735 1228 2002 Dear Jessica and Committee: We, Cecil and Noelle Hernandez, recently purchased the above referenced property, 715 Meadows Road, for our new home. What started off as a home that needed a cosmetic update on the interior has turned into a project to include an extensive update of the exterior as well The existing roof has several flat areas and the use of internal gutters that are not an appropriate size are giving us water issues on the interior. To correct the issue of the water leakage we need to change the lines of the roof a bit for better drainage and to enable us to use external drains. We also have discovered some o£ the windows have broken seals and what not that are an issue also. In looking at the cost to do the roof and the need to fix the windows we started to look at updating the entire exterior of the home since we are looking at such a lazge section of it. Would this be the opportune time to correct all the water issues as well as the overall exterior look of the home? We asked the assistance of Martin Mata to help us look at updating the look while being sensitive to the neighborhood, the existing conditions of the exterior, as well as the existing interior conditions. As you are aware the schematic designs that we came up with that we would like to go forward with do not quite fit the current code requirements. The house in itself does not fit the typical layout of most houses in the area, which is why the new design is not working with the new code of no glass in the 9' to 12' zone. The ground level of the home, which we can walk out of from every door on that level, is set down from the view of Meadows Road a half of a flight of stairs thus making the upper level of the house appear the be the main floor which in reality it is the upper floor. We cannot walk out onto the street level from anywhere on this upper floor. Of course to add to the confusion we have an existing enormous entry door that lies right in between the two floors that gives the illusion that the first floor starts right on the level of the porch which in reality you need to walk up five steps or down five steps once you enter the home to get Pair '1 to either level of the house. If the home was typical and the upper floor was considered the upper floor we would not be needing to ask for a variance. With that all being said we ask for you consideration in granting the variance for the new windows to encroach in the 9'-12' zone and the new front door be taller than the 8' per code. The existing windows and entry door are already in those zones. Our proposed design will bring down the overall amount of glass and size in all areas. We need to keep close to the overall existing height because of how it affects the interior of the home. All of the upper level rooms have vaulted ceilings that follow the lines of the roof. Anything smaller would not fit the interior scale of the house. We are long time locals and as we said we plan to make this our home. We have over the years remodeled and built several homes in the west end The first and most important project we completed was the historic Hallett House at 432 W. Francis St. When we purchased this home, it was in severe disrepair. It was listed on the local and the National Historic Register We are proud of this project. It won several awards, one of which was Historic Renovation of the Year. This award was presented to us by the City of Aspen. We have completed 3 other projects in the west end, photos of which are attached. We have always taken care to be responsible, and sensitive in all oC our projects. I do believe our projects speak to this fact. In the four total projects we have completed since we have lived here we never asked for a variance before for any of them. It is our hope you will grant us this variance at the staff level as we feel the end product will be a great visual improvement. This property is an important visual element on the Meadows pedestrian path. Further, it is an important visual component as one of the last residences before entering the Meadows/ Institute Campus, by car or on foot. Granting the variance at the stal level will greatly help us in terms of timing and budget. We are at your disposal to review any materials, or answer any questions you or your staff may have. We thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Cecil and ~oetle Hernande~ v~ ~J Francis Street House Remodeled 2007 L J '`, ~J~j~~~~ y ~~~ ~:~, ^-~ :#r~ ~ far ,~~ : ~~y L °'~, r ` Vey 4._.. '+~~~ w _ F'~7W t'o`~~'~ u Francis Street House Remodeled 1990 L J 'r. • ~ ~ -.~`,= r~~:= r. '~ ~ -_ :.,~ dS ~.` ~~ ~ f +JY Y ~. ~~ :~. ~ ~ ~'ar~ 400/410 LAKE AVE '; ,.yy~gg~~~~" l1 T • N: - _ ~_r r 3 _ ~~ ~! '~1 * _ "r r i ~' ~,,~ P jt t~1~ 5 ~, ~~ d ~, ~', ~:~~ .a ~'r~. ~~. ~~. ~ , _' ~~ s ,a ~• ~ ~.~~`" ~ ~. ;- .,;~ ~. Lake Ave House Built 1997 Cecil and Noelle Hernandez PO Box I6tb• Aspen, CO Al(i l'L Phone: !l,o-J'1U-3313 • Tas: s7o-b-L-F-slss; ~ F: Mail:nchworldLruf:net llate: October 2f, 2009 Jessica Darrow City of Aspen Planning Department Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Residential Design Standards Variance Parcel ID #2735 1228 2002 DeazJessica and Committee: By means of this letter we authorize: Martin Mata Mata Design Company 4040 Crystal Bridge Drive Carbondale, CO 81623 to represent our interests in the above mentioned land use application. Sincerely, ~`~ 1 ~~~~, Cecil and Noelle Hernand~'z RECEIVE[ Residential Design Standards Variance ~~ I ~ d lllhy Parcel ID # 2735 1228 2002 715 Meadows Road, Aspen GI fY yr noruv Lot 2 Pine Hollow Subdivision COMMUNITY DE1lELOPMENT Applicant: Cecil and Noelle Hernandez P.O. Box 1045 Aspen, CO 81612 Representative: Martin Mata, Mata Design Company G„-ha~`~~Ae , ,LO, gll~z3 t~Y roil Conten s pplication: 1-Deposit for review of application 2 Copies of the following: Pre-Application Conference Memo Letter From Cecil and Noelle Hernandez, Property Owners Representative Authorization Proof of Ownership Land Use Application Fee Agreement Dimensional Requirements Form Vicinity Map and Neighborhood Information Written Description of Project Drawings: Civil Survey Architectural Site Plan Proposed Exterior Elevations Roof Plan Exterior Perspectives Existing Conditions Photos 10/23/09 Hernandez RDS Variance ,,.J d CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Jessica Garrow, 970.429.2780 DATE: 10/21/09 PROJECT: 715 Meadows Road REPRESENTATIVE: Martin Mata TYPE OF APPLICATION: Residential Design Standard Variance DESCRIPTION: The owner is interested in making some changes to the exterior of their existing residential home at 715 Meadows Road. Up to three (3) variances from the Residential Design Standards may be granted administratively. If the requested variances are not granted administratively, the owner can choose to go on to the Planning and Zoning Commission for review. Planning and Zoning Commission review will be required if four (4) or more variances are requested. Staff has determined that the 9-12 foot measurement for windows should be taken from the level of what the applicant has called the second floor. Below is a link to the Land Use application Form for your convenience. htto://www.asaenoitkin.com/odfs/deots/41 /landuseaaoform.adf Land Use Code Section(sl 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.4120 Residential Design Standards Follow link below to view the City of Aspen Land Use Code htto://www. aspen pitkin. com/depts/38/citycode. cfm Review by: Community Development Staff for complete application Community Development Staff for up to 3 administrative variances Public Hearing: None Planning Fees: $735.00 for administrative review of up to three (3) variances. This includes three (3) hours of staff review time. Additional time over three (3) hours will be billed at $245 per hour. (Note, if four (4) or more variances are required, a deposit of $1,470 will be required; if an administrative application is made and not granted and the owners wish to take the case to the Planning and Zoning Commission, an additional fee of $735 will be required.) Total Deposit: $735.00 Total Number of Application Copies: 2 To apply, submit the following information: ~ Total Deposit for review of application. ~~~ jr) ~7 Pre-application Conference Summary. (•'' ^' ./ ~°-~` [~] Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. [~7 Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 0 A site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the State of Colorado. ®A site plan depicting the proposed layout and the project's physical relationship to the land and its surroundings. ~J Completed Land Use application and signed fee agreement. An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcels within the City of Aspen. ~ 2 copies of the complete application packet and maps. A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how a proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application § 26.410.040, Residential Design Standards. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. ~ ~ RECEIVED ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION PxO.~ECr: UCT 2 8 Name: ~nde~ s; ~,nc,e {%17Y C)F ASPEN Location: IS M20.aow o Z '~~ Il~w ~ 'wi spot, Indicate street address, lot & block number, -e al descri lion where ro 'ate Parcel ID# UIRED 2 Z Z - 2 0 0 Avvr.rrsNT• Name: CL°G'~\ Noll-~ k~~~~~~~~-~-- Aaaress: . o. B o 0 5 ~ ~~ Phone #: °1 ~ ~ 3 Z ( 3 REPRFSENTATIVE• A n ,, ^ n Name: -~' Y\ Iv ` 0~~ Ivl +/c ~ o M nM1 Aaaress: v ~~ t~ sk~.,~ ~ ~; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r b ~d~ l ~ g l4 23 Phone #: `Z ~' ~ 6a ( \ TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): ^ GMQS Exemption ^ Conceptual PUD ^ Temporary Use ^ GMQS Allotment ^ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ^ Text/Map Amendment ^ Special Review ^ Subdivision ^ Conceptual SPA ^ ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream ^ Subdivision Exemption (includes ^ Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane ^ Commercial Design Review ^ Lot Split ^ Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion Residential Design Variance ^ Lot Line Adjustment ^ Other: ^ Conditional Use EXISTRVG COND[fIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) wlle ~\~ 1`'GSiclev.c~ PROPOSAL: (description of purposed buildings, uses, modifications, etcJ ~iX~,or Mod-~cw-k~.s Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: S (~ Pro-Application Conference Summary © Attachment # 1, Signed Fee Agreement Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards 3-D Model for large project All plans that sre larger than 8S" X 11^ most be folded. A disk with au electric copy of all written teat (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Iarge scale project should include an eleMronic 3-D model. Your pre-application oonfereece summary wiR indicate if you must submit a 3-D model CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEN~i ~~,1 ~~~- A~eement for Payment of City of Ascen Devebn1ment Aoolicatba Fees ~'~ T y ~ ~~~ CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and C 2 C' \ ``j N D ~\~ ~t2.1 ~ti d C ~--Uy/~o~'iyS jOO9 (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: '~lo~~~ 1. APPLICANT has ssuu¢¢miffed [o CITY an application for I ~ q F'Yl '-1-IS MPmdo,.~~ e.d '~ec<deek;,.l Des~ar S~'Mc~s~-ds Vov'te~~-cam. (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agees that the City of Aspen has an adopted fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possble at this time to accPrtnin the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its fiill costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission and/or City Comrcil to enable the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in considuation of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full foes prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of S~~i' 3 S, w which is for ? hours of Community Ikvelopmert staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mcatioced above, inchrding post approval review at a rate of 5245.00 per planner horn ova the initial deposit Swrlr periodic payments shall be m~e within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT finftra agrees that firihne b pay such aocnred costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in oo case will building permits be issued until all ~ associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN Chris Bendon Cammaaity Devebpmeat Director A~3NT~ /jam Date: ~y/Z 7 ~~ U Billing Address and Telephone Number: p.o~ ~o>'< io4s ~`rsn. LO .°~l(o1Z Project: Applicant: Location: Zone District: Lot Size: Lot Area: o~F~t~/~ ~~ (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steeyf slopes. Please refer to the defmition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing: Proposed: • Number of bedrooms: Existing: Proposed. Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: Allowable: Proposed.• ~ G ,~ Principal bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: oG ~ ~ Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed.• ~I fF' On-Site pazking: Existing: Required: Proposed: oG~nuU.gg . Site coverage: Existing: Required.• Proposed: 1J ~ G ~ncwvJ .~ Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed.• ~ G (n ~ . Front Setback: Existing. ~Required.• 2 S Proposed: O Gln,w~ e Reaz Setback: Ezisting:~~Required: ~ a Proposed: ~U G(~„~,J/e Combined F/R: Existing: ~~' Required.• Proposed.• u L Side Setback: Existing: ~ 0 Required:Proposed: ~1J Cud Side Setback: Existing: ~ 0 Required: 1y Proposed.• f.~o G e Combined Sides: Existing: ~ Required.• ~ Proposed.•~°~e . Distance Between Existing Buildings Required: Proposed.•~ ~ Existing non-conformities or encmachments:_ Variations requested: ATTACHMENT3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM r,. RECEPTIONr-: 563254, 09!29/2099 at 03:25:18 PM, f OF 3, R 516.08 DF id75.00 Dac Cage WD Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Documentary Fee S 475.00 WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, made September 30, 2D09, BeM/een LIBERTY BANK OF ARKANSAS. AN ARKANSAS BANKING CORppRATKNJ of tiro County of • State of ARKANSAS GRANTOR, AND CECIL M. HERNANDEZ and NOELLE C. HERNANDEZ. AS JOINT TENANTS, GRANTEE whose ~ address ~ of the County of .~.f /....- WITNESSETH, That for and ~ oonaider~Wn of tits sum often doeas and ~ goad ~ consideration. tiw recdpt artd sulfiraerrcY of wWdr is h~ 9~ sold and oonvefrea. and by ~~ P yeti and convey and c:orr8rrrr . THEIR heirs and assigte forever. aY tits r~l ProPeny t ~ °A~' . am. and bag ~ bea9 in the County a P81dn, Stets of COLORADO. deecr~ed ~ fellows: LOT 2, PINE HOLLOW SUnDMS10N, 78.1988 in Plat Book 18 at Page 93. Alxadirrg b tits Plat thereof re00rded Augrst TOGETHER with a8 and sigtrmr the heredimrrterrm attd ~ ~ ~andtlse ~1itle. oddest, daimdaim and MAaboevar of the 9ry!~ in tar or equlY• af, in and to Ste above bargaMred Premises. witit the Mledifatndim del appurmna ~T~ D TO HOLD tits said Pry above bargarted and desalted. `~ me ~P^O0S' THEIR Mfrs and asslgro forever. And 1M Grantor. for IT~LF. ITS heYs and assigns, does cotenant. grant. bdgaln, and agree m and wi8t Ore Grantee. THEIR heirs and a~ ~~~ ~ of these preaerrm, ffS is wa8 salad of 1M prarriaes , and indefeae8rle asmle of eird8artce, in taw. in tee serrPie, end Itaegood ri9hL 1L8 Pier dtd lawful au8tority to grant, bargain, sa8 and convey tid awns h mararer and form as aforesaid, and 1hW ti>e same are tree and dear from a8 former and adrerl ber9ahs. saks.tierw, mares. aeseasmerds. eneumbranrxs and reabictiore d whamver kind or '~ ~ Mel vM WARRANT 6d~h8.A. attadted hdeto and ittearporamd tkv'en ~ in the grie<wrd P POn of Ule ~~ NEVER 1)EFEND~~ a9 ~ ~ 181e s amgumrdaarwng ~wtwie a ~1' ~ - TM a~ ~~ shy rrcNtde 1M plum Pfurd gender stra8 be app8cabie b a8 gertdds. IN WITNESS WHEREOF tits 9T~°f has etcrd ttas dead. SIGNATURES ON PAGE 2 JA c 't?Ef h!Q• y~~~~ ,~- ~~~ i;1i~~ i::~ rt'%~ci4 H.=ti i T rT.1D DATE r~? NO. y~f/ 1 lug 3d 3 ~ - ____ - __ _ _ Q Q SIGNATURE PAGE TO WARRANTY DEED LIBERTY - A AN ARKANSAS BANKING CORPORA ION ,~ 9 r 6y- gy; HANCOCK, EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT O ARD HAMILTON, PRESIDENT STATE OF /~Y/l ~ ~ f~ ss COUNTY OF ~L/~MJ ~ The foregoing insttiment ryas admowledged before me this ~Y _day of _SEpTEMBER, 2~9. LIBERTY BANK OF ARKANSAS. AN~ARKANSAS ~~~' CORPORATION" T~O!N,,~[PRESIDENT OF WITNESS my hand and ofCx;ial seal R~,pivd~ ! rJ,CUv Notary Public my commission expires: ~i.ld•(0 PCT22617L3 OFFICIAL SEAL BRENDA KEITH i NOTARY PUBLIC -ARKANSAS BENTON COUNTY fey Commission Fames Apn71a, 2018 ; . _~ ~~ ~/ ~p~ ~~ ~l ~ ~^ ~ ~~ r j~ }~V CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED:- 05 92 DATE COMPLETE' //7- PROJECT NAME: F Project Address: Legal Address:_ PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. 2735-122-82-002 A22-92 STAFF MEMBER' KJ APPLICANT: Jay Weinberg Applicant Address: 111 N E 1st Street, Suite 600 Miami FL REPRESENTATIVE: Bruce SutheY Representative Address/Phone: Aspen CO 81611 PAID: YES NO AMOUNT: S N/C NO. OF COPIES RECEIVED 2 2 TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: ~ 2 STEP: P&Z Meeting Date Z~ PUBLIC HEARING: YE NO VESTED RIGHTS: CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO YES NO YES NO Planning Director Approval: Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: REFERRALS: City Attorney City Engineer Houaing Dir. Aspen water City Electric Envir.Hlth. Aspen Con.S.D Paid: Date: Mtn Bell Parks Dept. Holy Cross Fire Marshall Building Inspector Roaring Fork Energy Center School District Rocky Mtn NatGas State HwyDept(GW) State HWyDept(GJ) Other DATE REFERRED: ~~13'I~ INITIALS: ~_ ROUTING: DATE ROUTED '""`i" City Atty City Engineer -Zoning -Env. Health Housing ~ Other' FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: ~-L~ ~~-~-~ ,-~, 4 i r' . . RS80LIITION OF TH8 ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE ( APPROVAL FOR THE WSIN88RG CONDITIONAL OSE REVIEW FOR AN ATTACHED ACCE880RY DWELLING UNIT Resolution No. 92-~ WHEREAS, the Planning Office received an application for a Conditional Use for a single family residence with an accessory dwelling unit at 715 Meadows Road (Lot 2 of Pine Hollow Subdivision) from Jay Weinberg, represented by Bruce Sutherland; and WHEREAS, the 625 net livable square foot below-grade accessory dwelling unit is being provided in accordance with the housing mitigation requirements set forth in Ordinance 1, Series 1990; and WHEREAS, the Planning Office reviewed the proposal and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at a public hearing at a regular meeting on April 21, 1992 the Planning and Zoning Commission approved by a 6-0 vote the Conditional Use for an attached accessory dwelling unit, amending the conditions recommended by the Planning Office. NOW, THEREFORE HE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: That the Weinberg Conditional Use for a 625 s.f. basement level accessory dwelling unit is approved with the following conditions: 1. One of the five on-site parking spaces indicated on the site plan shall be designated for the accessory dwelling unit. 2. The door for the elevator equipment closet shall be redesigned to provide access from without the ADU. 3. The building permit plans must clearly indicate the accessory dwelling as a separate dwelling. Compliance with U.B.C. sound attenuation codes is required. 4. The owner shall submit appropriate deed restrictions to the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority for approval. The units shall be deed restricted to resident occupancy with minimum 6 month leases. Upon approval by the Housing Authority, the Owner shall record the deed restrictions with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office. 5. Prior to issuance of any building permits for the duplex, a copy of the recorded deed restrictions for the accessory dwelling units must be forwarded to the Planning Office. 6. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of -~ __., ,~ ,.-. _ ~, - ... approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on April 21, 1992. Attest: i 4 7 JaI Carney, De uty City Clerk P a and Soninq Commission: I~ u~,vt ~.r~-~+sl.+/ J m ne Tygre, Chair r~ MErtoRANDOM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Kim Johnson, Planning Office RE: Weinberg Conditional Use for an Attached Accessory Dwelling Unit DATE: April 21, 1992 ao=-xa~ao-=voe=v---oc~.-_~ ----^ -==mao---~ooc~eesma~c BIIMIQARY: Staff recommends approval of Conditional Usa for the Weinberg attached accessory dwelling unit with conditions. ApPLICAI~)T: Jay Weinberg, represented by Bruce Sutherland LOCATION: The parcel is at 715 Meadows Road, Lot 2 Pine Hollow Subdivision ZONING: R-15 APPLICANT'S RSQIISST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use approval to develop a basement level one-bedroom accessory dwelling unit in conjunction with the construction of a single family residence as required by Ordinance 1, the housing replacement ordinance. Net livable area of the unit will be 625 s.f. as pointed out in an addendum to the application. Please see Attachment "A" for floorplans and building elevations. BTAFF COMMENTB: The applicant plans to build a five bedroom 4,650 s.f. house. Ordinance 1 requires provision of a deed restricted accessory dwelling unit or cash-in-lieu for new home construction. The applicant is proposing development of an accessory dwelling unit deed restricted to resident occupancy. The Commission has the authority to review and approve development applications for conditional uses pursuant to the standards of Section 7-304: A. The conditional use is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and standards of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan, and with the intent of the Zone District in which it is proposed to be located. RESPONSE: As a resident-occupied deed restricted unit, this apartment will allow the property to house a local employees in a residential area, which complies with the zoning and Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan. B. The conditional use is consistent and compatible with the character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and surrounding land uses, or enhances the mixture of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. ~..~ RESPONSE: The accessory dwelling use is compatible with the other residential uses in the surrounding neighborhood. The unit will not be visible as a separate dwelling from the outside. C. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the proposed conditional use minimizes adverse effects, including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise, vibrations and odor on surrounding properties. RESPONSE: The proposed accessory unit will be completely contained within the single family residence. A parking space is not required by code for a studio accessory unit, but staff recommends that one space for the ADU be designated on the site. The unit will access the exterior through a stair to the west side of the house. Interior access is also shown on the plan. Planning is concerned that the elevator equipment and laundry facilities are shown to be accessed through the ADU. The doorways for these functions can be easily changed to other walls to exclude them from the ADU. This will allow true privacy for the ADU occupants. if an alternative laundry facility is available on the upper levels of the home for the principal residents, the proposed situation is satisfactory. This must be indicated on the building permit plans. No other significant impacts are anticipated. D. There are adequate public facilities and services to serve the conditional use including but not limited to roads, potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire protection, emergency medical services, hospital and medical services, drainage systems, and schools. RESPONSE: All public facilities are all ready in place for the existing home and neighborhood. Meadows Road will be relocated slightly to the east as approved by the Meadows SPA -Development Plan approved in June 1991. The driveway for the subject property must reflect the easement indicated on the Final Plat for the Meadows SPA. E. The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to meet the incremental need for increased employees generated by the conditional use. RESPONSE: The proposed deed restricted unit will satisfy Ord.l requirements. The applicant must file appropriate deed restrictions for resident occupancy, including 6 month minimum leases. Proof of recordation must be forwarded to the Planning Office prior to issuance of any building permits. F. The proposed conditional use complies with all additional standards imposed on it by the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and by all other applicable requirements of this chapter. 2 .~. __ _~__ :; RESPONSE: This use complies with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and any other applicable conditional use standards. Section 8-104 l.d. allows the Commission to approve accessory dwelling units to be exempt from growth management competition. This proposal qualifies upon approval of its conditional use review. BTAFP RBCOMMENDATIONSS The Planning Office recommends approval of Conditional IIses for the basement level attached accessory dwelling unit for the Weinberg residence with the following conditions: 1. One parking space shall be on-site for the accessory dwelling unit. tJl~a ~ ~ ~ ~ on "~ ~' 2. The door for the elevator equipment closet shall be redesigned ~ti~eeto provide access from without the ADU. °~'+"' ~ ~~ If there is not another laundry facility in the principal ~~ /residence, the doorway configuration to the washer/dryer in the basement shall be changed to provide access from without the ADU. 4. The owner shall submit appropriate deed restrictions to the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority for approval. The units shall be deed restricted to resident occupancy with minimum 6 month leases. Upon approval by the Housing Authority, the Owner shall record the deed restrictions with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office. 5. Prior to issuance of any building permits for the duplex, a copy of the recorded deed restrictions for the accessory dwelling units must be forwarded to the Planning Office. 6. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to approve the Conditional Use for a 625 s.f. basement level accessory dwelling unit within the proposed Weinberg residence at 715 Meadows Road with the six conditions recommended in the Planning Office memo dated 4/21/92. Attachments:"`~ "A" - Proposed Site Plan, Floorplans, and Elevations 3 .•, <. ,~, ~\ b r /~ \`. \~\^ ~.::v;.,.,,, :. h•}^~1 }~ I I ~M1 w-/s .~i rs L. ~.:..•.. ... _ .„,i ~w~,-_ 4~ ~~ II ' Si II u ~ i' .U L I I~ .I 1`/,,~ SITE PLAN TM i^• n' arte w*ES: I' ~ I ' ~« ~ .'^ r i ~..~~ P1. FliW 4. rn w trw rwe~ Amain p~j~I Ylr~ iC~W ~ IIJa WV wn0 rgvY •F•~ ._,~ ... ' ~~ oY>sYr Por •rt n •I siM1 rlP. •Y,rvl ~._ el,l. 1 rrY.cw ,rn aR. }~ ti r •w -- ~ •r .vlr •Yww. 1 '' ' I ~ rr.. t o.sNr.l . ` o.••'RY.- t• ' :.•.. ~ ~ 1 Yens.... •w., ~.YI ~ 'I ! Yw r. ••rfrw u. ~l . rlY•r /wYr rill II r,o~ l t ~ ~I I I ~ rwi - Y.O.•. ~ 1~ I I I ~k.w~.f e a..l w . ~ ~ ~- i 1P•. '~ . '1-!~.. y p~-Scald •f1. r _ _ 1 ~dmt/w. S YI•t r, v I~ '- ~y _ __ 1 .. Yinr. _ ri I i I ~I I I.0.[. •IllYS f•a K ~])^ . ~ i I • 1 ~ I RP} YIY wtP• 1 -__ / uy ~ • 1 R ~w ly t y~aes~/ ~_ ~_~ ;.• I _~ ~ _ .. I ~ 1 __ car f 1 ' f ~' i s•P.~.:w• 'Z ~P~ lr - car • c ~ 4 eeor+coa+® •~ fA :>rara•e P~ . V r ~ w• s. • . P+.ILM•O ~. w.n a. ' ~ ~ ~ G ~ li:: ~~cu• I ~~ II 1~ i ~ Lu li I 1 iIl I ~ ~ ~: •+(r I III L_. l i r _• 11 III ~ ~ I ' __~l! I i ~ I~ 1 III I ~ ~ I I ~Y I 1 I I P I I V I ~ I .~.__. , _.~.__ r'.! ~~_•• //~~ LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ____ , •u'•lo z 9 ~J a~ i ~a •I I -- III I ! I ~i~l, I ~ ~~I • ~ ~~ ~~; I I /-.- r- i i,-I I~ _ 7 I -~ I '~ -' i - ~ ' 'III I ! I ~ p I ~ ! I, IM ~ IIII I - ~~' ~r _ .i!I III I I .~ --n ~.. ____. r A:_ ` _. ! I I I I I I I I ! mot' ~~ !, i 7--C--_ _ -. ~~~ ~, ! I !III If* ~ ~ I ~ 1 ,- -- - $ `-- - I I I I " I --- - -- i I I I , I i,'~-~-•-•-- ~- 4 - -'I I' _ _ I I I I ' ' ----- g I I ~Ililil ) i ~, i -~ Ji !I III r- .,~G~ '. I !~ I i III I I I l i G '_ ~iri I ' II 1! . ~"- ! '! I I III I -~, a- I ~ -~c:=.:,I h ~I ~ --- i.li I -III I ~ :I~ Ii .'~ ~ ! _ , ~~;;~~ r II, I ~ I !. II `aO i ~ ~ ,. 111 1 .. ` •I~ ~ I ~I III I I III I II I I ~~~ ~~ I III.. i I III! ill ~' II,,IIII 1I 1 I I I ~ I Iil II ! I I ~$~ ~ a ~.~i I !.•. I I , II II EIII y I i, ~ I; I I! I I I j I I. ~~`` i. II III I ! III 111, =-~~ I ~ I I I I! I I I III ~ I I• I~ ~, I I I I I I; ~, ,~ . ; I II !I ,~•~I! II ~~I. I II ~ I ~~~ ~ 14 I ' l i I'! I! I I 'II I ~ I • I I ~ I ~ - ~_ _ -~-:; n J I ` ~ ~: t I~I~~~ I ~ II - ~ ~ I I .II I~' IIL r ~-..i uv~a+nu+r i ~ v~ ~~~ Weinb~ , 1) 1'cojoct Name ll'~~' C1 ~- ti 2) 13vjectIQCati,on 715 Meadows Road, Lot 2, Pine Hollow Subdivision, Cit of As en (indicate street address, lot 6 hiadc nmbei, legal desm-P'tru- wkr~ ~r'op~~) . 3) Present Zoning R15 4) IntSize 15,716 Sg. Ft. 5) Applicant's Name, Address ~ Saone 0 3av Weinbero ---- 111 N E 1st Street Suite 600 Miami~FL 33132 6) ~pmsentative's Name, Address & Saone ~ $' s thPr1 -nd Seth r~1 and Fallin, Inc., 1280 Ute Avenue, As en, CO 816.11 7) Type of Appliccatim (please diedc all that apply) : A _ /~ Oxriitiona]. Use ,_ SPl\ fiistnric Dev. 1 g~criew ~ Finm~l SPA Final ftistouc Dev. _ 8040 Cteenline ~ tual ~ .- Muior Historic Dev_ Stx!eam ~~ Final FUD `Historic Demolition Mountain View Plane _ S+bdivision ' Historic Desi~tion j~.mii~ation' _ ?~!~ Amers~t -- ~ p,]_],~ent ` Irk ~lit.>7~ Line _ Q7aS apt-ian, , Adj w~+t 8) Description of F,cictir,Q Uses •(nlmber and tyL~ of s appraoamate sq_ ft.; amber of bodrooms; a+y prevaous aPPL°`~~ 9~`~ P~i~X) - 5 Bedroom, 7 Bath Residence consistin of 9,650 S .Ft. U er and Lower Level 2 890 Sq Et Basement and 518 Sq Ft. Garaoe. 9) Description of pevelopmc3~t Application Accessory Dewllin unit in the Basement with Livia Room, Kitchenettel, Bedroom, Bath and Closets consistin of 712 S .Ft. ~u ~ n~ I ~~y ai1 f~,~~ 10) l4~ve you attadxjd t[ti folla.+ira~' ~~ ~ bV -- ~ Atta~t 2, Minimrtn 4+lT.i~lOn OGntlYltS /AW,~(~ jLeslipn.,e t0 Attadm~cn' t 3, Spocifle lmic_lm Omtc7lts ~/ )' -I//Vi to pttadlmerR 4, Review Standards for Your Application /M/~' ~v ~ `, b' ,\ „ v~ s ~ ,~ ~ ~, , ~ 2~ c ~~ To Gault a ~,~ . .~_ ~ 1 a 1;` e~ >: 4 6 {, e.nm~ Metme C MuNe Twn - ''; fj 1~ 1~ U i we.~ Mwb ta~od v~ -7is Mewdviceis ~o~ 'E.iGI.E E11: ~I:IPS xenai6 Lake ~. 'wM ~~ I ~ ~g~~ I~ MO°nt~n ,~ -~.~e4 NOt ell tllAle Of f0ade ale neme0 an mep~ Comirvotbn of etnnb ena roeae meY b 41 prop.eH In arteln ebu Aspen To ~~ SUTHERLAND, FALLIN, IN 1280 Ute Avenue ASPEN, COLORA00 81611 (303) 925-4252 FAX (303) 925-2639 70 Kim Johnson Asoen Planning Offi 130 S. Galena St. spen, CO ^ Plans WE ARE SENDING YOU ~cAttached ^ Under separate cover via Mai t the following items: ^ Shap drawings ^ Prints ^ Copy of letter ^ Change order COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 3/6/92 Review Standard; Development of Conditional Use THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ^ For approval ^ Approved as submitted ^ Resubmitwpies for approval ^ For your use ^ Approved as noted ^ Submit .copies for distribution > ^ As requested ^ Returned for corrections ^ Raturnrnrredad prints ment i d ^ com ew an ^ for rev ^ FOR BIDS DUE _19 ^ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS 15e ar Kim, -. Enclosed is our resp onse to the Review Standards for Conditional Use. Also the revised ne t square footage of the unit is 625 square feet in lieu of the gross square footage on the application. COPY YT.OA.IIWI ®4. 4aYn. lYY OII II SIGNED: I/ enclocuros ero not ee notsd, kinGly nobly u• et once. [~C~`~4(s~d OG~ ~1 G°3Qa~G~t7O44Q~ pA~'[ 3/6 92 Joe no. 92-04 .,.E„~o~ PE' Weinber Residence 715 Meadows Ro d Aspen, CO '~ J ^ Samples ^ Specifications ,e .. March 6, 1992 Aspen Planning Office Att: Kim Johnson 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Weinberg Residence. >< 92-04 715 Meadows Road Aspen, Colorado SUBJECT: Review Standards: Development of Conditional Use Dear Kim, The following is our response to the review standards: A. The proposed Accessory dwelling unit is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and standards of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan, and the R-15A District. B. The conditional use is consistent and compatible with the character of the immediate viclnity and surrounding land uses, and enhances the mixture of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate viclnihr. C. The Accessory dwelling unit is located in the lower level of the residence; therefore, the use minimized adverse effects, including visual impacts. The impacts on pedestrian and vehicular clrculation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise, vibrations and odor on surrounding properties is minimal for a unit this size. D. The public facll'Ities and services, such as roads, potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire protection, emergency medical services, hospital and medical services, drainage systems and schools are adequate to serve this dwelling unit. E. The applicant has corrxnitted to supply housing to meet the need generated by the new residence. S~']fi[~RI.~~~.~.I~1~~I~~. Bruce Salberland, President ~ Rio),ard FaUin, Vice President ° David Pan:co. Associate Architeclare 8t Punning °1280 Ule twenue ° L~aPen, Cio~orado 81611 303/925-4252 FAX 303/925-2Cz39 f-. _. Aspen Planning Office March 6, 1992 Page 2 F. The proposed conditional use complies with all addfional standards of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and by all other applicable requirements. Sincerely, z~....-,as. Bnx:e R. Sutherland, A.I.A. BRSPom Endosure UY258_ U9:Si 'fS10. .F, :H85 np,i7.9 13'17 $'a US-~"'S S6ES 103.E S~93 SR~OV 'QVUJ "Ova i y 25, 3992 _. r. R & ~~, .~1SFE~ ~,,, r. ~uu3 C R a v nsrcv ~-~ ~ ~~uus w • • . w+, r•• i P~w'fG~ ~z-~.4 Yj1- FACSI?tILE E U. 8 • PU-IL MAR - 51992 $rYCd Sytherl+lnd Suths~tlanA Fallin 1280 bts Avenua i~epe~, CO 11611 ge: j Lot a, pine xollov I sunaivision ~-r':~s ' ~ Aa - s5a -c.~o ~ Deos~Bcvvol Lea Replan, lymraby auC?lOTlie Jay Nainberq, Centraet pu2cnasec, of I, Lot ~4~ pih/ Kol1eV SubdSvitiOr to apgly for and Obtain a build ng pert C on cnia gropertr~ In tho event that Jay Weinbs2'qq xichoe to mndsiY GAe Pl~nssuehm abat ha! been ppreviouaL7 nppzovad by the tlulldittg DspartTen-. moditieettone would be at his expanse and veuld nct b4 ma4e to the ori$q~inal roYlar drawings, but to eepia repzod~lotlwls of tht osiginal myldr. I, ;sa Raplan, s11a11 b•ar no sxponce nor navs anY =ianenardilittes or lia illties purs~4nt to the modifiC44Lion oL these p :ut~ission to tha City of conatsl+etsen en the ptone~Y• sin `.rely, ~ ,~'~-~ yn::, itaplan pd and aCFa~?tod this ~ day of - - d:J7T,:j7us L':a ZSJu -,,,~; :9~5 C R h ~~~ .•4gFE`' v ~ d;ii. (~ Commonwealth, '} ~~ Land Title insurance Company i COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. E6a¢c.Li,v¢ date: 02/03/92 0 8:00 a.M. 2. Po~l.cy on. poQ.i..cie.e .to b¢ .i-edued: (alAlra Ownan.'.e Po.Q.i.cy-Fonm R-1970 (Rev. 10-17-70 E 10-17-84) O2 10/21/b7 PROPOSED ZNSURED: TAY N. b1ELkl3ERG (b)AL7A Loan. Po.Pi.cy, (REV. 10-21-87) PROPOSED INSURED; (e)A.eta Loan Con.exiur,cti.on, Pofi.ay, 1975 (Rev .. 10-17-84) • PROPOSED INSURED: Ca•a¢ No. PC7-6220 Amount $ 700,000.00 Pn,¢nilum $ 859.00 Amoiwt $ P~,¢m.u4m S Amotu~t $ Pn.¢m•ium S lax, Cant. $ 10.00 $, T,L.2e xo •th¢ FEE SIMPLE e/a#a-t¢ on. i.n.ton,vax .i.n, ~h.¢ Q.a.n.d dce:ntibzd o-c f~¢•6ana.ed .to .i.n, •t1ti.e Comm.ctman~ •v~ a.t xhe o.~jec.ti.u¢ date h¢n.eob v¢.e.t¢,d trt: LESTER M_ KAPLAN 4. 7h¢ 4.a•rt.d ~¢do~v~.¢d .to •v~..th.i.e Cornm.i.tm¢nt .i.e d¢,ecn,Lbed a~, 6ot••Co,uh: LOT 2, PINE HOLLOW SURD1uISION, aceo+cding Lo xh.a. PRat..th.vr.¢o6 ~.¢conded Augu,e#, 19, 1986 n.+t P22t sooh 18 at Page 43. COUNTY OF PLTKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. Counterh.i,gn¢d a.t: PLTKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. Sch¢duka A-PG.1 601 E. HOPKINS 7h.i.e Comm;.tment a,a .Ln.va~..t.d ASPEN, CO. 81611 un.E.a~a .ih¢ In.au~..i.n.g 303-925-1765 Ptiova.ea.on,t and Sche•du.2c.~ Faz 303-925-6527 A anal >? an.e az-t2cJs.ed. Au.thoni.zed oj6A-e'e+~~on agent r -~ Ate. kyl' J / • ~Q' it 1-~T ~..> THE CITY OF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: November 4, 2009 Deaz City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, .. We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number and name assigned to this property is 0070.2009.ASLU -715 W. Meadows. The planner assigned to this case is Ben Gagnon. ^ Your Land Use Application is incomplete: We found that the application needs additional items to be submitted for it to be deemed complete and for us to begin reviewing it. We need the following additional submission contents for you application: Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and aze to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. Your Land Use Application is complete: If there aze not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessazy by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. Th Yo , fifer P el ,Deputy Director City of Aspen, Community Development Department C:\Documents and Settings\jennifep\My Documents\planning\Templates\Templates\Land Use Cases\Completeness Letter Land Use.doc ~ ,..,. ~.- .,, ~.~~dZ~3r-12--2-g2~OZ D~~O•~~ • ASLL1 File Edit @e~ J~'igatB FQem Repass Forr~at Tab Help E ~ 0 DX P DJ j :r], ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~~ E ~1 ~ '~ ~ ~ ' .~ ]ump U . ~~ ~ E ~ ~ f l%]~~~~.r3 ~ l~M~~ J JR's nY ~ ~ ~~ ~P ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~Ro~ a Pemrit Type slu .Aspen Land Use Permit ,2009,AAU Address 15 W MEADOWS RD ~ Aptf Suite ~- Cdy ASPEN State CO . Zip 81611 ~ I I I -Perrdt Informatbn- ---- ---- - - -- -- -- - __ _---- ---- --- _ ------- Master perrrut 2I Routig Quave Iu07 Appied 1Of 28f 2009 I Project ~ 5tatus pending Approved ~-J ~ Desorption RESIDENTIAL DE4GN STANDARDS VARIANCE Issued I -J it Final ~J Submitted MARTIN MARTA 274 6011 Clods Rurnng Days ~ Exp~es IOf 23f 2010 J -Owner- -- --- _ I Last Name RNANDEZ CECIL M 8c NOE ~ Frst Name ~- PO BOX 1045 ASPEN CO 81612 Pf»ne ~- rOwner rs Applicant? Apdicant-- - -- _. ___ --_- ----- Last Name RNANDEZ CECIL M & NOE ~ First Name ~ PO BOX ID45 r ASPEN CO 81612 Pfmne I Crst ~ Z~ ' , tender- ----- __ _ - __ _ --- Last Name ~i~ F'vst Name ~- i Pfwne ~- --------------------------------- - - ----- -- ---- -..__-. Aspenf3ol~b) ', Add Record 1 of 1 c(G~ 2et~9' $ ?3S 'dD k~~ 26~ 23 ~~ ~~