Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.312 S Hunter St.0062.2008.ASLUTHE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER PARCEL ID NUMBER PROJECTS ADDRESS PLANNER CASE DESCRIPTION REPRESENTATIVE DATE OF FINAL ACTION 0062.2008.ASLU 2737 18 220 523 312 S HUNTER ST JENNIFER PHELAN COMM DESIGN REVIEW LINDA WONG 2.18.2009 CLOSED BY Angela Scorey on 07/30/2009 ~,,.` '°~ 'r. -~ DEVELOPMENT ORDER of the City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Revolution Partners, LLC, P.O. Box 1247, Aspen, Colorado, 81612 -~ Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number w.: ~... Part of Lots K, L, & M, Block 100, Cites and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, more commonly known as Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property The Applicant received approval to remodel the facade of the building and add an access ramp through Commercial Design Review subject to the approved conditions. See attached elevation drawing Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Grant of a an approval of Commercial Design Review by the Planning and Zoning Commission and associated approvals via Resolution No. 5, Series of 2009, February 17, 2009. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) March 12009 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 2nd day of March, 2009, by the City of Aspen Community Chris Bendon, Community Development Director ~.. _.. Qoszn~~ 2~3?ISZa~i z3 File €dit gecord ~avlgate Form Reports Format Tab Help ppiJ-°w~~ ~~d' w J ~ w33o~tl~ el©' ®~i~®®~•if3 ~®~~ h ~-t~ Main Valuation Custom Flelds ~8ctions IFeef, Parce(S Fee Summary Sub permitsAttachments ~Roytirp Status Routing 4 - II PermR Type aslu .Aspen Land Use Permit Y 0062.2006,ASLU Address 3l2 5 HUNTER ST J AptJSuite City ASPEN State CO Zip 81611 J PermR Information::: - Master PermR ~ Routing Queue aslu07 Applied 12J18J2006 J Project J Status Pending Approved ~J RTH Iswed ~ J ', Description L D D MA FACADES OF BUADING AND ACCESSIBILIT Y RAMP TO IN ENTERANCE Final ~~I Submated LINDA WONG 3108266222 Clock RunNng Days ~ Expires 12J33J2009 ~ ,'I Owner -:::: "...... _.. ~. '. Last Name REVOLUTION PARTNERS J First Name LOWELL MEYER 321 5 HUNTER STREER .I~ ASPEN CO 81611 ll Phone ~ ,i i r Owner Is Applcant? Applicant _ i Last Name PERSE J First Name ]AMES 8401 MELROSE PL ~I Phone (323)213-4250 Cush 28491 ~ LOS ANGELES CA 90069 tender .... _ ~ Last Name ~ J First Name Phone ~ I. 'i Is--- __ _.- - _rl _..... _.... --- -_ AspenGdd[bl ~'.. Record: 1 of 1 C fit- ~ 7°~ I~ S CfG ~; v~`a^^~ "7P RECEPTION#: 556913, 03/05/2009 at 02:40:59 PM, 1 OF 3, R 516.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Resolution No. 5 (SERIES OF 2009) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROYING COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW FOR THE PURPOSED OF REMODELLING THE FALrADE OF THE BUILDING LOCATED AT 312 SOUTH HUNTER STREET, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO AND LEGALLY KNOWN AS PART OF LOTS K, L, AND M, BLOCK 100, TOWNSITE AND CITY OF ASPEN. Parcel Identification Number - 2737-182-25-023 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Marmol Radziner and Associates, 12201 Nebraska Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, 90025, on behalf of James Perse Enterprises, 3311 East Slauson Avenue, Los Angeles, CA with permission from the building owner, Revolution Partners, LLC of Box 1247, Aspen, Colorado, requesting Commercial Design Review approval to remodel the facade of the building located at 3 ] 2 South Hunter Street; and, WHEREAS, as part of land use review, the Applicant is requesting Commercial Design Review approval for the proposed remodel of the fagade of the building; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended approval of the application as presented because it does meet the policies of the Commercial, Lodging, and Historic District Objectives and Guidelines; and, WHEREAS, Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the application considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standazds and that the approval and recommendation of approval of the land use requests is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission grants approval of the Commercial Design Review request; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS: section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standazds set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves Commercial Design Review to permit the remodel of the fapade of the building located at 312 S Hunter Street conditioned on retaining the existing service door along the alley. Section 2• All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, aze hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 3: This resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4• If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitufronal in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of day of A~ttgast-2996 by a 6 to 0 vote. ~ebtUa+~ a~~ ~~t Attest: kie Lothian, eputy City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM 1'c-'----'---• ames R. Tnae, Special Counsel Aspen on this 19'~ 1 ~~ c:i' ~7G Stan Gibbs, Vic hair Exhibits Exhibit 1: Approved West and North Elevations (with conditions) -.._ _-__ ~Fxki Q~ T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~g ~~ 0 v 0 m v. z O x m r 0 z v 0 -v 0 rn v m r m a 0 z ~~ ~ ~~ ~ r K 9 $'yg H ~ '~~~ ~~~~ „~.,~.~ ~~ II a,2.ov> ,,~,. ``. RECEIVED UtC 17 2008 >y ~l~,r,+u~i ~ ~r"ELOPMENT December 15, 2008 ~X~1 ~~\T ~ MARI~L RADZINER AND ASSOCIATES AIA architecture 12210 Nebraska Avenue 310 826 6222 phone construction Los Angeles California 90025 310 826 6226 fax landscape ma i I;a marmot-radziner.com www.marmol-ra tlzi necmm CITY OF ASPEN -COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Project James Perse Store -Facade Remodel at 312 S Hunter Street Aspen Address and Legal Information Physical Address: Assessor Parcel #: Legal Description: Lot Area: Building Department: Existing Building Description Height: Year Built: Existing Floor: Existing Cladding Existing Roof: 312 S. Hunter Street, Aspen, CO 57611 273718225023 Subdivision of the City and Townsite of Aspen, Block 100, Part of Lots K, L and M. 2,205 sf Building Division, Department of Community Development, City of Aspen. Single storey commercial building 1954 / 1985 (as per Assessor's records) Elevated concrete slab and foundation Metal siding Metal standing seam roofing Zoning Summary Zone: Land Use: Street Front Setback: Street Side Setback: Maximum Height: Allowable Floor Area Ratio: C-1 (Commercial) Retail Store 0'-0" 0'-0" 28'-0" 1.5:1 1 MAR~~L RADZINER A'ND ASSOCIATES AIA architecture 12210 Nebraska Avenue 310 826 6222 phone eonseru<tlon Los Angeles California 90025 310 826 6226 fax landscape maf I@marmol-radzinercom www.marmol-radziner com Description of Proposal 1. Existing Building and Use The property is located on the corner of Hunter Street and Alley Block 100, in the commercial zone of the City of Aspen. The existing building is a single storey commercial unit currently operating as a retail store. The existing building footprint abuts to the alley on the North. Access into the building is via a set of stairs and a single entry door facing Hunter Street. The building does not currently provide a wheelchair accessible entrance, and it is not located in the Historical Overlay District. 2. Description of Project The scope of the proposed project is to remodel and upgrade the Hunter Street and Alley elevations, and renovate the Hunter Street elevation in order to accommodate wheelchair accessibility. The mercantile occupancy use for the building will be maintained as a retail clothing store for the designer James Perse. 3. Compliance with Review Standards As per Section 26.710.150 of Title 26, the purpose of the Commercial (C-1) Zone District is to provide for the establishments of mixed-use buildings with commercial uses on the ground floor with the opportunity for residential units to be developed above ground level. We have addressed the section 26.412.060 Commercial Design Standards as follows: Public Amenity Space Per Section 26.575.0306, this property is exempt from being required [o provide public amenity space, as the proposed project is an upgrade of the existing building within existing building footprint. As the existing building occupies the maximum lot area, there is no available opportunity to create public amenity space. The flexibility of the interior space as a retail store will be maintained in the proposed remodel. 2 MAR~~L RADZINER AND ASSOCIATES AIA architecture 12210 Nebraska Avenue 370 826 6222 phone construction Los Angeles California 90025 370 826 6226 fax landscape ma i I;9lmarmol-tad Zinercom www.marmol-radz inec<om However, the proposal improves the public amenity of the building in several ways. Firstly, the proposed remodel helps to engage the public street by improving access into the building by installing a wheelchair accessible ramp. The current building does not provide wheelchair access to the interior, and the existing floor level is approximately 30" above the sidewalk level at its highest point, making access into the building virtually impossible for wheelchair bound visitors. Secondly, the proposed design will be a significant upgrade to the existing condition df the building. The current metal cladding, plaster finish, trim and awnings are in need of repair/replacement due to age and condition. The proposed design includes an integral plaster finish on the Hunter Street elevation with an area of display windows and operable shutters. This is intended to increase visual interest from street level, improve the existing streetscape and encourage pedestrian traffic and interaction. The design also includes the replacement of the existing metal cladding on the North elevation (alley side) with painted tongue and groove wood siding to match the plaster finish. The color palette is designed to both complement and reflect the existing landscape and adjacent structures. The single storey proportional and height of building will be maintained. • Trash and Utilitv Space As the existing building footprint encompasses the entire lot, there is no opportunity to provide an onsite trash /utility /recycling area. Currently the incoming utilities are located on the North elevation of the building (facing the alley), and there is no plan to move these utilities from their current location. To address this design standard, we note that the operations of the business that this proposal relates to will not require a large trash recycling area, and the existing retail space in the building also does not have a dedicated trash and recycling area. The trash /recycling functions will therefore be maintained under the existing conditions. The proposed mechanical system will be located on the roof of the existing building, where the current mechanical system is located. This location has the least visual impact from the street. If required a screen 3 ,.. <~ MAR~,;DL RADZINER AND ASSOCIATES AIA architecture 12210 Nebraska Avenue 310 826 6222 phone constru<tlon Los Angeles California 90025 310 826 6226 fax lantlscape mailb)ma rmol-rad zinercom www.marmol-rad z inecmm can be built around the new unit to minimize visibility from street level. However, there is currently no screening provided around the existing unit. • Design Elements In keeping with the Section 26.510.130D, the proposed signage has been designed in compliance with the requirements for signage in a Commercial Zone. As shown in the proposed elevations, the Hunter St. elevation signage will consist of a single wall sign, approximately 1'-0" by 9'-0" in dimension. The area of the sign is less than both the tOsf maximum area for a wall sign and the 12sf maximum aggregate area for this facade length. Illumination of the building and the signage will be architecturally sensitive and in keeping with the objectives of the Commercial Design Standards. No additional exterior lighting is proposed apart from lighting required for exiting on the ramp. Additional architectural design elements in this proposal are detailed in the 'Public Amenity' description above. • Parking Per Section 26.515.0108, the existing property does not have the facility for off-street parking, and this proposal is exempt from providing additional parking, being a redevelopment of an existing building. a ,... MARP~L RADZINER AND ASSOCIATES AIA architecture 12210 Nebraska Avenue 370 826 6222 phone construttlon Los Angeles California 90025 370 826 6226 fax landscape ma i I;a ma rmol-ratlzinercom www.marmol-radz inecmm 4. Summary As detailed above, this proposed development will be a remodel to an existing building that will greatly improve the building appearance, streetscape and the building's handicapped accessibility. We also feel that the aesthetic of the remodel are in accordance with the goals and objectives of the developed review standards set out in the Land Use Regulations of the City of Aspen. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or comments regarding this application. Yours Linda Wong LEED AP, Project Manager [p] 310.526.6222 [e] linda@marmol-radziner.com 5 12%05/2008 18:41 13236539021 JAMES PERSE INC PAGE 02/02 '""~ , / CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) a (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS 1. PR07EC'C). has submitted to CITY an appplication for dF_l.- 312 S, i4 ~NTf Pi 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that the City of Aspen has an adopted fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of al] processing Fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the siu, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree [hat ii is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial :deposit and to thereafter pemtit additiooal costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurzed. CITY agrees it will be beeefited through the greater certaitriy of recovering its full costs m process APPLICANT' S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable fnr CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission and/or City Councit to enable the Historic Preservation Commission, Pletming and Zoning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior m decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ r, ~ which is for .6 hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed The initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mrntioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $235.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Sucb periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costsshall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permiu be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN By: Chris Bandon Commnnity Development Director APPLICANT BY~ Date: /Zf//~ZODf3 Billing Address and Telephone Nnmber: r u~c irn/f,.~Rc ~ a. 9D~9 ~/ PROJECT: ATTACHMENT 2-LAND USE APPLICATION Name: ~J~UPr U~ (~W10 AFL -.?-/~"Y-') S P~f~.S.~ STO(Z, Location: 312 SavTN ~iUNT(;12 57~7r A-SP~N~ GO fl (b!~ _ (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) ~ 7 37 18 zz 5 o x~ APPLICANT: Name: J-R'Wl~i P~QS~ $IJTE{l~p(ZIStiiS, iNG . Address: $' y-0 6 Wi{iLt<?0~ PL.>~CiE 1 LDS A-h1G ~ l~-S G~ ~006~ Phone #: ~3 23 ~ 2I 3 [.} 2S o REPRESENTATIVE: Name: YVI~FIYYW L- (2-'~'t~21F/~ Y /~'SSoc f1~'T~iS < ~A-T't"~J • Lfht~i f~' tNbIJC-r- Address: '1-2WI~' N~BR~'SK~r ~~, 6DS -lhFlfa~E/r-~ ~ ~vPZ~ Phone #: / ~ !0 •` fs'~7--b' 6 "L22 Y TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that anplvl: ^ GMQS Exemption ^ GMQS Allotment ^ Special Review ^ ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, Mountain View Plane Commercial Design Review ^ Residential Design Variance ^ Conditional Use ^ Conceptual PUD ^ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ^ Subdivision ^ Subdivision Exemption (includes condominiumization) ^ Lot Split ^ Lot Line Adjustment ^ Temporary Use ^ TexUMap Amendment ^ Conceptual SPA ^ Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) ^ Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion ^ Other: EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals etc.) ~X66T1 N QyI~DtN~ - clN~, L,~ ~~-roR-~~} carv~n~i~-~". sk-~- ~l ~~o ~3 ~- f~T~-IE~. 5'~n lt;r . PROPOSAL: L ~ ~/ 1'~'~F~~ ! QI IriTa~ j'Z{~'>'v1 P Tt7 yF4`c I N ~W'Cf~F~JG~ , ~7~€L, t.t S ~ Ta k-~-rt+Mt-ll f Hay~Pyou attached the following? FEES DUE: $ f -Z D ~ ~Qg y -f ~~~ re-Application Conference Summary [~] gttachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement ~N~l' ~Ikesponse to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form © Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards ^ 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. .~ -. \.r v. Project ATTACHMENT3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: Location: Zone District: Lot Size: 2t 2O5 S f Lot Area: 4 it (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for azeas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: 2 ~ S ~ roposed: r 9 7Q S Number of residential units: Existing.~~Proposed. N L} Number of bedrooms: Existing: ~t(~Proposed. N f I~} Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: Z r P ;~ Allowable: 31 3~ $SlcProposed: Z?7S S~ Principal bldg. height: Existing. 16!'`~r~ Allowable: 2$r~ D~Proposed: !7`-b" Access. bldg. height: Existing: ~l~>~ Allowable: ~r~Proposed: N;l ~' On-Site parking: Existing: O Required. " Proposed: O Site coverage: Existing: l d LJ °,lo Required: ~ Proposed:~£j Open Space: Existing: 0 °f•, Required: - Proposed: cJ °fo Front Setback: Existing: ~ Required.' O Proposed: (~ Rear Setback: Existing: © Required: rJ Proposed: EJ Combined F/R: Existing: © Required: ~ Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: fJ Required. ~ Proposed: O Side Setback: Existing: ~ Required: ~ Proposed: fa Combined Sides: Existing: o Required: O Proposed: U Distance Between Existing ~ Required: ~ Proposed.' O Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: S O~~i~ Sf(0 Variations requested: N 0 Vf~72ifr(td Nun' ""(0 ~k tS'rl NC,-~ i F€o NC-' .- ~A7.A'Y)F ~2i/WIO~fF.I. Ta W~.~'f A~.M, h10t2Tf-? t^~l,F~']S~TtoN:C''~- ~. ,. ~ `..~ r,+ CITY OF ASPEN PRE•APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Errin Evans, 429-2745 DATE: 11.24.08 PROJECT: 312 S. Hunter, Fagade Remodel REPRESENTATIVE: Jackie Goldklang, Chris Shanley Marmol Radziner Tel: 310.826.6222 DESCRIPTION: The applicant is proposing the following: demolition of a portion of the front of the building, an exterior face lift including new windows, a new door, and exterior materials and remodeling the interior. The demolition will not result in an increase of net leasable area. The applicant will be required to apply for Consolidated Commercial Design Review to achieve this request. The applicant will also be required to apply for a building permit after the Commercial Design Review is approved. Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): 26.412 Commercial Design Review 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures Commercial, Lodging, and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines http:llwww.aspenpitkin.com/pdfsldeptsl4llLow Res Aspen.pdf http:l/www.aspenpitkin.comldeptsl38lcitycode.cfm Review by: - Staff for complete application - Referral agencies for technical considerations - Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing: Yes, at P&Z For all public hearings, the Community Development Department is responsible for publishing the legal notice in the newspaper. The Applicant is responsible for posting the property and for the mailing of legal notices, at least 15 days prior to the hearing, to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property. The GIS department can provide this list on mailing labels for a fee. The applicants are responsible for filing an affidavit of mailing and posting with the Community Development Department 15 days prior to the public hearing. (Include a copy of your mailing labels before using to submit with your affidavit.) Planning Fees: $1,470 Deposit for 6 hours of staff time (additional staff time required is billed at $245 per hour) Total Deposit: $1,470 Total number of application copies: 10 Copies To apply, submit the following information: 1. Total Deposit for review. of application. 2. Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 3. Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 4. Completed Lantl Use Application. 5. Signed fee agreement ,-• ~~, 6. Pre-application Conference Summary. 7. An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. 8. Proof of ownership. 9. Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, including all easements and vacated rights of way, of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado. (This requirement, or any part thereof, may be waived by the Community Development Department if the project is determined not to warrant a survey document.) 10. A site improvement survey that includes all existing natural and man-made site features. 11. A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. Please include existing conditions as well as proposed. 12. List of adjacent property owners within 300' for public hearing 13. Copies of prior approvals. 14. All other materials required pursuant to the specific submittal requirements. 15. Applicants are advised that building plans will be required to meet the International Building Cotle as adopted by the City of Aspen, the Federal Fair Housing Act, and CRS 9.5.112. Please make sure that your application submittal addresses these building-related and accessibility regulations. You may contact the Building Department at 920-5090 for additional information. 16. Applications shall be provided in paper format (number of copies noted above) as well as the text only on either of the following digital formats. Compact Disk (CD)-preferred, Zip Disk or Floppy Disk. Microsoft Word format is preferred. Text format easily convertible to Word is acceptable. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. ~.': ~ ~1 LOWELL FqX N0. 9709259094 ^ ~~ ^ REVOLUTION PARTNERS Lowell Meyer, Manager Post Office Box 1247 Aspen, Colorado 81612 December 11, 2008 Marmot Radzner & Associates 12201 Nebraska Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90025 Gentlemen: Dec. 11 2008 03:13PM P1 Peter Mavrldis, Vice President James Perse Los Angeles 8401 Melrose Place, 2nd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90069 This letter shall authorize you to submit the attached plans to the City of Aspen for a building permit. As owner and landlord of 312 South Hunter Street, I hereby authorize this submittal. In the event there are significant changes made to these plans, I would need to approve those as well. If you need additional information or the City of Aspen has any questions, please feel free to contact me. Yours very truly, REVOLUTION PARTNERS, LLC ey: ~1,tsL9~,_~ Lowell Meyer, Its Manager ____._ ~'?5. 2^e~ ~.~. ~? ~2.~hF tire- Corporate Offce 3311 East Slauson avenue Vernon CA 90058 Telephone 323 588 2226 Fax 323 588 2227 JamesPerse.com ~o WhOm it m2y ooncern: _Hi~t_s TERSE z~`~a ~i PAGE 52r'DL ~~~~b~~~~ ~~~~~ L~s~~~~ i authorize Marmot Radziner and l~ssociates 40 act on behalf of .Mmes Persc Enterprises, 9nc. ("l'enant") in obtaining planning and building approvals for the Tenant improvement project looated at 312 S. hiunter Strec-C, P~spen, ~E~ 81611. TBae resign and modiricstic,~s to the existing conditions have been presented to me and meet with my ~ pprovaC. Sincerely, -°~~, Crc:4c,~ G~d4vaiidi~ V.~. L~ea~ E~tafic~ ~c~vc-d®~raoc,tv4 .~- ~,~. ~X~~~ ~iisuranee o~a,~i;~on ALTA Commitment For Title Insurance American Land Title Assoclatton (1986) AUTHORIZED AGENT: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS AVE. 3~FLOOR ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970-925-1766-PHONE 970-925-6527-FAX 877-217-3158-TOLL FREE E-MAIL ADDRESS: TITLE MATTERS: CLOSING MATTERS: TJ Davis-tjd@sopris.net Tom Twitchell-tomt@sopris.net Joy Hlgens joy@sopris.net Brands Jepson-brands@sopris.net (Closing & Titie Assistance) Samantha Sweeney-sams@sopris.net (general office assistance) Issued BY rs'~tlejnsuai-ce(oFP~~4~4 Home Oftiee: 5000 Cox Road Olen Allen, Va. 23000 B 1004-268 w COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: October 8, 2008 at 8:00 AM Case No. PCT22272L 2. Policy or Policies to be Issued: (a) ALTA Owner's Policy-(6!17106) Amount$ 3,568,840.00 Premlum$ 3,107.00 Proposed Insured: Rate: Re-Issue JAMES PERSE ENTERPRISES, INC. (b) ALTA Loan Policy-(6(17/06) Amount$ 0.00 Premlum$ 0.00 Proposedlnsured: Rale: (c) ALTA Loan Policy-(6/17!08) Proposed Insured: Amount$ Premlum$ Rate: 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or Interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment Is at the effective date hereot vested in: REVOLUTION PARTNERS, LLC 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated In the County of PITKIN State of COLORADO and is described as follows: See Attached Exhibit °A" PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS, ASPEN, CO.81611 970-9251766 Phone/970-925-6527 Fax 877-217-3168 Toll Free Schedule A-PG.1 This Commitment is Invalid unless the Insuring Provisions and Schedules A and B are attached. AUTHORIZED AGENT Countersigned: ,.. EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION A LEASEHOLD INTEREST IN AND TO: Part of Lots K, L, and M, Block 100, City and Townsite of Aspen Described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot K; thence S 75°09'11" E, 62.44 feet along the North line of Lots K, L, and M to the center of a masonry wall; thence S 14°50'49" W, 32.24 feet along the center of said wall; thence N 75°09'11" W, 16.30 feat along the center of said masonry wall; thanes S 14'50'49" W, 4.16 feet along the center of said wall; thence N 75°09'11" W, 46.14 feet along the center of said wall to a point on the Westerly Ilne of said Lot K; thence N 14°50'49" E, 36.40 feet to the point of beginning. As set forth in the Lease and the Memorandum of Lease rewrded _, 2008 as Reception No. SCt1EDULE B • SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS The following are the requirements to be compiled with: ITEM (a) Payment to or for the axount of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be Insured. ITEM (b) Proper Instrument(s) creating the estate or Interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record to-wit: 1. Copy of the Reglstretlon duly stamped by the Secretary of State of the State of Colorado evidencing registration of Revolution Partners, LLC end Statement of Authority and a copy of the Operating Agreement of Revolution Partners, LLC evidencing the names and addresses of the Members and/or Managers authorized to act on behalf of said Limited Liability Company. 2. Evidence satisfactory to the Company that James Perse Enterprises, Inc. Is a duly existing and vaild corporation existing pursuant to the laws of the State of ,must be delivered to and approved by the Company. 3. Duly acknowledged Lease from REVOLUTION PARTNERS, LLC TO JAMES PERSE ENTERPRISES, INC. .~ -'"'•, `~ ~+ SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satlsfactlon of the Company: 1. Rights or clalms of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or clalms of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. DlscrepanGes, conflicts In boundary Imes, shortage in area, encroachments, any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would dlaclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any Ilen, or right to a Ilan, for serv[ces, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, Imposed by law and not shown bythe public records. 5. Defects, (lens, encumbrances, adverse clalms or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attach(ng subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment, charge or Ilen imposed for water or sewer service or for any other spacial taxing district. 7. Reservations and exceptions as set forth in the Deed from the City of Aspen recorded In Book 59 ai Page 236 providing as follows: 'That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to anyvalid mining claim or possession held under existing laws". 8. Minerals and mineral rights as confained in Deeds recorded June 13, 1899 In Book 98 at Paga 520 and October 15,1891 In Book 105 at Page 216. 9. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Party Wall Agreement recorded April 13, 1983 In Book 443 at Page 332. 10. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth In Memorandum of Lease recorded `, 2008 as Reception No. 11. Deed of Trust from To the Public Trust For the use of Original Amount Dated Recorded Reception No. REVOLUTION PARTNERS, LLC ;e of the County of PITKIN FIRST COLORADO NATIONAL BANK $2,429,077.61 :April 2, 2008 April 3, 2008 :548052 Assignment Rents given In connection with the above Deed of Trusi recorded April 3, 2008 as Reception No. 546053. .-. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DISCLOSURES The Owner's Policy to be tssued, if any shall contain the following items in addftlon to the ones set forth above: (1) The Deed of Trust, if any, required under Schedule B-Section 1. (2) Water rights, Gaims or title to water. (NOTE: THIS EXCEPTION WILL APPEAR ON THE OWNER'S AND MORTGAGE POLICY TO BE ISSUED HEREUNDER) Pursuant to Insurance Regulation 89-2 NOTE: Each title entity shall notlty In writing every prospective Insured in an owner's title Insumnce policy for a single family residence (Including a condominium or townhouse unit) (I) of that title entity's general requirements for the deletion of an exception or exclusion to coverage relating to unflled mechanics or matedalmens liens, except when Bald coverage or Insurance is extended to the insured under the terms of the policy. A satisfactory affidavit and agreement Indemnifying the Company against unflled mechanics' and/or Materialmen's Liens executed by fhe persons Indicated In the attached copy of said affidavit must be furnished to the Company. Upon receipt of these Items and any others requirements to be specified by the Company upon request, Pre-printed item Number 4 may be deleted from the Owner's policy when issued. Please contact the Company for further Information. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing contained in th(s Paragraph shall be deemed to Impose any requirement upon any title insurer to provide mechanics or materlalmens lien coverage. NOTE: If the Company conducts the owners or loan closing under circumstances where tl is responsible for the recording or filing of legal documents from said trensactlon, the Company will be deemed to have provided "Gap Coverage". Pursuant to Senate Bill g1-14 (CRS 10.11-122) (a) The Subject Reai Property may be located In a Special Taxing District; (b) A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing Judsdlction may be obtained form the County treasurer of the County Treasurer's Authorized Agent; (c) Informa8on regarding Special Districts and the boundades of such distdcts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. NOTE: A tax Certificate or other apprdpdate research will be ordered from the County Treasurer/Assessor by the Company and the costs thereof charged to the proposed Insured unless written Instruction to the contrary are received by the company prior to the Issuance of the TIUe Policy anticipated by this Commitment. Pursuant to House Bi1101-1088 (CRS 10-11-123) If Schedule B of your commitment for an Owner's Title Policy reflects an exception for mineral Interests or leases, pursuant to CRS 10-11-123 (H8 01-1088), this is to advise: (a) There is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in o(I, gas, other minerals or geothermal energy In the property and (b) That such m(nerai estate may Include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owners' permission. NOTE: The policy(s) of insurance may contain a clause permitting arbitration of claims at the request of either the Insured or the Company. Upon request, the Company will provide a copy of this clause and the accompanying arbitration rules prior to the closing of the transaction. NOTICE REGARDING CONSTRUC710N FINANCING: If it is not disclosed to the company that the loan to be Insured hereunder Is In fact a construction loan, any coverage given under the final policy regarding mechanic or matedalmen's liens shall be deemed void and of no effect. 4 SKIERS LP 1108 NORFLEET DR NASHVILLE, TN 37220 521 EAST HYMAN HOLDINGS LLC C/O EDWARD DINGILIAN 160 W 225TH ST BRONX, NY 10463 633 SPRING LLC C/O GARFIELD 8 HECHT PC 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ADESSO LLC 6.31 614 E DURANT AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ANDERSON ROBERT M & LOUISE E 1021 23RD ST CHETEK, WI 54728 ASPEN GROVE ASSOCIATES LLP C/0 CAPMARK FINANCE INC 200 WITMER RD HORSHAM, PA 19044-6657 ASPEN SQUARE VENTURES LLP C/0 M & W PROPERTIES 205 S MILL ST STE 301A ASPEN, CO 81611 .-.. BARBATA KATHLEEN ANDERSON 1/3 C/O CHARLES SKIPSEY PO BOX 2045 RANCHO SANTE FE, CA 92067 BATTLE GERALD LIVING TRUST HIXON BURT LIVING TRUST PO BOX 2847 NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92659 517 EAST HYMAN HOLDINGS LLC 520 EAST COOPER PTNRS LLC 517 E HYMAN AVE 402 MIDLAND PARK ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 610 EAST HYMAN LLC 633 SPRING II LLC C/O CHARLES CUNNIFFE p0 BOX 1709 610 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ABRAMSON JEFFREY W& HEIDI A B ADAM P T C/O PACIFIC UNION HOMES p0 BOX 9066 675 HARTZ AVE ASPEN, CO 81612 DANVILLE, CA 94526 AJAX MOUNTAIN ASSOCIATES LLC ANDERSON COMMERCIAL PROP LLC 520 E DURANT ST #207 74.34% ASPEN, CO 81611 614 E DURANT AVE ASPEN. CO 81611 ARCADES ASSOCIATES LTD LLC AREP ASPEN SQUARE 406 LLC C/0 KRUGER & CO PO BOX 1546 400 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN KOEPPEL LLC ASPEN SQUARE 410 LP 3551 ST GARDENS RD 1407 YONGE ST #200 COCONUT GROVE, FL 33133 TORONTO ONTARIO M4T IY7 CANADA, AVH MEADOWS LLC 20% INT BAISCH BARBARA D 601 E HYMAN AVE PO BOX 2127 ASPEN, CO 81611 LA JOLLA, CA 92038 BARBATA LAURA ANDERSON 1/3 BARGE RENE C/O JUDY NORMAN 408 31ST ST 2040 FRANKLIN ST #507 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 SAN FRANSISCO, CA 94109 BECKER ERNEST & KATHLEEN TRUST BELL MTN QUAL RES CONDO ASSOC 50 S JONES BLVD #100 LLC LAS VEGAS, NV 89107 320 S SPRING ST ASPEN, CO 81611 BERSCH BLANCHE C BISCHOFF JOHN C BONCZEK ROBERT R TRUSTEE OF BERSCH TRUST 502 S VIA GOLONDRINA PO BOX 3854 9642 YOAKUM DR TUCSON, AZ 85716-5843 CHAPEL HILL, NC 27515-3854 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 r^ v BOOGIES BUILDING OF ASPEN LLC gORGIOTTI CLAUDIO C/0 LEONARD WEINGLASS 9610 SYMPHONY MEADOW LN 534 E COOPER AVE VIENNA, VA 22192 ASPEN, CO 81611 CALGI RAYMOND D CARAS STACY TRUST 134 TEWKESBURY RD PO BOX 266 SCARSDALE, NY 10583 PALOS VERDES ESTATES, CA 90274 CAVES KAREN W CHATEAU ASPEN CONDO ASSOC 1 BARRENGER CT 630 E COOPER AVE NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 ASPEN, CO 81611 CHERAMIE ALAN A 1122 INT CHERAMIE CAPITAL HOLDINGS LLC 139 CHERAMIE LN 21/22 GOLDEN MEADOW LA 70357 143 CHERAMIE LN , GOLDEN MEADOW, LA 70357 CMMM INVESTMENTS LLC COOPER SPRINGS LLC 4937 NEARBY ST #B 393 N COLUMBIA AVE METAIRIE, LA 70001 COLUMBUS, OH 43209 COX JAMES E & NANCY CRAFT LESTER R JR 3284 SURMONT 2026 VETERAN AVE LAFAYETTE,CA 94549 LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-5722 DIBRELL CHARLES G JR & FRANCES DONOVAN CAROL SMITH 24 ADLER CIR 800 N MICHIGAN AVE #3603 GALVESTON, TX 77551-5828 CHICAGO, IL 60611 ELLERON CHEMICALS CORP ERGAS VENESSA BLAIR 8 CLAUDE 720 NORTH POST RD #230 14902 VALLEY VISTA BLVD HOUSTON, TX 77024 SHERMAN OAKS, CA 91403 EXELCEDAR INC 20% FEHR EDITH B REVOCABLE TRUST 534 E HYMAN AVE C/0 DAVID FEHR ASPEN, CO 81611 543 FOX RUN DR CARBONDALE, CO 81623-8502 FITZGERALD FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LTD FLY MARIE N C/O PITKIN COUNTY DRY GOODS LLC 7447 PEBBLE POINTE 520 E COOPER W BLOOMFIELD, MI 48322 ASPEN, CO 81611 ~~ BRADLEY MARK A PO BOX 1938 BASALT. CO 8162 CARVER RUTH A & MARTIN G 10 BYRON LN MUSCATINE, IA 52761 CHATEAU ASPEN UNIT 21-A LLC BLDG 421-G AABC ASPEN, CO 81611 CLIFFORD MRS MARGARET JOAN 146 WILD TIGER RD BOULDER, CO 80302 CORNELISSEN TOM 4753 N SHORE DR MOUND, MN 55364-9607 DALY CAROL CENTER 155 LONE PINE RD C-11 ASPEN, CO 81611 ECCHYMOSIS LLC 4802E 2ND ST STE 2 LONG BEACH, CA 90803 ESPOSITO VINCENT A 8 JANET M TRUSTEES 6276 VIA CANADA RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA 90275 FERRY JAMES H III BOX 167 GLENCOE, IL 60022-0167 FURNGULFLTD A COLD JOINT VENTURE 616 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 .~,. GABERMAN RICHARD M & PAVA GELD LLC JEREMY TRUSTEE C/O LOWELL MEYER 380 UNION ST STE 300 PO BOX 1247 WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA 01089 ASPEN, CO 81612-1247 GLUCK SANFORD 0 TRUST 50% GODBOLD EDMUND O GLUCK CAROLE A TRUST 50% C/0 ADAH G PHELPS 176E 71ST ST 2424 N GREENWOOD ST NEW YORK, NY 10021 PUEBLO, CO 81003-3648 GOLDEN PANTHERS LLC GONE WEST LLC C/O LINO MARTIRE C/0 MILLAR MIKE 60 S MARKET ST #1400 401 W CENTER SAN JOSE, CA 95113-2396 SEARCY, AK 72145-1406 GREENWAY COMPANY INC GUILBEAU CAPITAL HOLDINGS LLC 666 TRAVIS ST #100 151 CHERAMIE LN SHREVEPORT, LA 71101 GOLDEN MEADOW, LA 70357 HECHT CHILDRENS TRUST II 4.83% HEMP SUZANNE LIV TRUST 500 STANTON CHRISTIANA RD 15470 POMONA RD NEWARK, DE 19713-2107 BROOKFIELD, WI 53005 HUGHES CONSTANCE L HUNKE CARLTON J LVG TRST 5580 LAJOLLA BLVD #511 4410 TIMBERLINE DR SW LAJOLLA, CA 92037 FARGO, ND 58103 HURWIN DUFFY & RON REV TRUST HYMAN STREET BROWNSTONES LLC 558 TONAYA DR BOB BOWDEN TIBURON, CA 94920 PO BOX 381 WRIGHTVILLE BEACH, NC 28480 JALILI MAHIR & MARGARET A JENNE LLP 55 BAYBROOK LN C/O PERRY & CO PC OAK BROOK, IL 60523 PO BOX 1790 BELLAIRE,TX 77402-1790 JS COOPER STREET LLC 33.34% K L 77 CO INVESTMENTS LP C/O KATIE REED MGNT C/0 HARDING AND CARBONE INC 418 E COOPER AVE 3903 BELLAIRE BLVD ASPEN, CO 81611 HOUSTON, TX 77025 KLEIMAN SCOTT G KOEPPEL KEVIN F TRUST 1216 TIMBERLAND DR C/O NEWMARK S M TRUSTEE MARIETTA, GA 30067 3551 ST GAUDENS RD COCONUT GROVE, FL 33133 GILBERT GARY 1556 ROYAL BLVD GLENDALE. CA 91207 GOFEN ETHEL CARD TRUSTEE 455 CITY FRONT PLAZA CHICAGO, IL 60611 GOODING SEAN A 80% & RICHARD L 20% C/O PARAGON RANCH INC 620 E HYMAN AVE #1 E ASPEN, CO 81611 HAROLD GRINSPOON CHILDRENS FAMILY TRST 380 UNION ST WEST SPRINGFIELD. MA 01089 HENDRICKS SIDNEY J HENDRICKS YOLANDE EVERHARD 6614 LAKEVILLE RD PETALUMA, CA 94954-9256 HUNTER PLAZA ASSOCIATES LLP C/O CAPMARK FINANCE INC 200 WITMER RD HORSHAM, PA 19044-6657 ISRAEL FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LTD 263 OCEAN BLVD GOLDEN BEACH, FL 33160 JOYCE EDWARD 11 S LA SALLE ST #1600 CHICAGO, IL 60603-1211 KEENAN MICHAEL 8 NOLA 1075 DUVAL ST C-21 PMB 238 KEY WEST, FL 33040 KRAJIAN RON 617 E COOPER AVE #114 ASPEN, CO 81611 r- ~,, KUTINSKY BRIAN LANDL KARL G 8 EDELTRAUD I LCT LP 7381 MOHANSIC DR 6 W RIDGE AVE TENNESSEE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48301 PROSPECT HEIGHTS, IL 60070 PO BOX 101444 NASHVILLE, TN 37224-1444 LONG GERALD P & PATRICIA D MARCUS STEPHEN J 20% INT MASON & MORSE INC TRUSTEES 601 E HYMAN AVE 514 E HYMAN AVE 490 WILLIAMS ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 DENVER, CO 80218 MAVROVIC ERNA MCGARRY ALEJANDRA ANDERSON 1/3 MCKENZIE MILTON & ARETA 2003 REV 530E 72ND ST APT 15-C C/0 MARY DIANE ANDERSON TRUST NEW YORK, NY 10021 PO BOX 1959 14860 MONTFORT #209 ASPEN, CO 81612 DALLAS, KS 75254 MCMURRAY WILLIAM & HELEN MCOUOWN ENTERPRISES LP MIAO SANDRA 29 MIDDLE HEAD RD 19330 CARRIGER RD 9610 SYMPHONY MEADOW LN MOSMAN NSW 2088 SONOMA, CA 95476 VIENNA, VA 22182 AUSTRAILIA, MJM AMENDED & RESTATED TRUST MOEN DONNE P & ELIZABETH A MORRIS ROBERT P 1776 S LANE 8 CABALLEROS RD 600 E HOPKINS AVE STE 304 NORTHBROOK, IL 60062 ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 ASPEN, CO 81611 N S N ASSOCIATES INC NATTERER HELEN NEUMANN MICHAEL 11051 W ADDISON ST 67 BAYPOINT CRES 7381 MOHASNIC DR FRANKLIN PARK, IL 60131 OTTAWA BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48301 ONTARIO CANADA, K2G6R1 NH COOPER STREET LLC 11.515% NIELSON COL STEVE & CAROL D OLITSKY TAMAR & STEPHEN 601 E HYMAN AVE 501 S FAIRFAX PO BOX 514 ASPEN, CO 81611 ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 GWYNEDD VALLEY, PA 19437 OLITSKY TAMAR G 8 STEPHEN L OPAL HOLDINGS LLC 52.978% P & L PROPERTIES LLC 2127 HAINES WY 8101 E PRENTICE AVE #400 101 SOUTH 3RD ST #360 LANSDALE, PA 19446 GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81501 PACIFIC WEST INVESTMENTS LLC PATIO BUILDING COMPANY LLC PEARSON REBECCA J 7115 ORCHARD LAKE RD STE 220 PO BOX 1066 1610 JOHNSON DR WEST BLOOMFIELD, MI 48322 ASPEN, CO 81612 STILLWATER, MN 55082 PERRYTON HOLDINGS LLC 19.08% PETERSON CHRISPY & JAMES E PITKIN CENTER CONDO OWNERS 8101 E PRENTICE AVE #400 867 HAVEN CREST CT NORTH ASSOC GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 517 W NORTH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 PITKIN COUNTY BANK 80% 534 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 PRADA USA CORP C/O GIORGION RIGHETTI, CFO 610 W EST 52 ST NEW YORK, NY 10019 RAHLEK LTD AT BANK OF AMERICA HARDING & CARBONE INC 3903 BELLAIRE BLVD HOUSTON, TX 77025 REICH MELVIN L TRUST 80% 4609 SEASHORE DR NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 ROGENESS FAMILY TRUST 3046 COLONY DR SAN ANTONIO, TX 78230 RUBENSTEIN ALAN B & CAROL S 57 OLDFIELD DR SHERBORN, MA 01770 S & S REALTY PARTNERS LLC 1040 FIFTH AVE #2C NEW YORK, NY 10028 SCHEUERMAN JOANNE E 200 LOCUST ST #23A PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106 SEGUIN MARY E TRUST 2404 CORING ST #155 SAN DIEGO, CA 92109-2347 w POINDEXTER WILLIAM M & JANI JENNIFER 1040 AVONOAK AVE GLENDALE, CA 91206 QUINLAN HOLDINGS LLC 12.34% 614 E DURANT AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 RED FLOWER PROP CO PTNSHP 14 E 60TH ST STE 1200 NEW YORK, NY 10022-7114 RG COOPER ST 4.83°/a C/O RONALD GARFIELD 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN. CO 81611 ROSS JOHN F 7600 CLAYTON RD ST LOUIS, MO 63117 RUBY RICHARD L TRUST 30150 TELEGRAPH RD STE 300 GINGHAM FARMS, MI 48025-4519 S A CO INC DAY WILLIAM A JR 3511 S 105TH ST OMAHA, NE 68124-3605 SCHNITZER KENNETH L R LISA L 2100 MCKINNEY AVE #1760 DALLAS. TX 75201 SHUMATEMARK 1695 RIVERSIDE RD ROSWELL, GA 30076 PORTEBROOKE 3520 PADDOCK RD WESTON, FL 33331-3521 R 8 R INVESTMENTS 15238 OAK VALLEY RD RAMONA, CA 92065 REICH DANIEL S TRUST 20% 6 RINCON ST IRVINE, CA 92702 RIEDEL JOYCE L TRUST PO BOX 3006 EDWARDS. CO 81632-3006 ROSS LUCIANNA G 33 PORTLAND PL ST LOUIS, MO 63108 RUTLEDGE REYNIE 51 COUNTRY CLUB CIR SEARCY.AR 72143 SANDIFER C W JR TRUST 50% SANDIFER DICKSIE L TRUST 50°/a 240 LINDEN DR BOULDER, CO 80304 SEGUIN JEFF W & MADALYN B PO BOX 8852 ASPEN, CO 81612 SILVER DIP EQUITY VENTURE LLC 2100 MCKINNEY STE 1760 DALLAS, TX 75201 SJA ASSOCIATES LLC 60% SNOWMASS CORPORATION SODERLING RONALD E TRUSTEE C/O STEPHEN J MARCUS CIO KATIE REED MGMT LLC C/O RESCO PO BOX 1709 210 B SOUTH MONARCH ST 901 DOVE ST STE 270 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-3038 r-~ . ~,,,,, SOPRIS VENTURES LLC STEIN BUILDING LLC 23.112% PO BOX 572 C/0 ANDREW V HECHT PAUMA VALLEY, CA 92061 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 STUDENT ISAAC & NECHAMA UND 1/2 INT PO BOX 457 ASPEN, CO 81612 SWEARINGEN WILLIAM F 105 BLACKLAND RD ATLANTA, GA 30342 TENNESSEE THREE PO BOX 101444 NASHVILLE, TN 37224-1444 TIGRAN INVESTMENTS LLC C/O EDWARD G DINGILIAN 160 W 225 ST BRONX, NY 10463 TREUER CHRISTIN L 981 E BRIARWOOD CIR N LITTLETON, CO 80122 VARADY LOTHAR 8 CHERYL TRUST 5036 MAUNALANI CIR HONOLULU, HI 96816 VOLK PLAZA LLC C/O FLEISHER COMPY 995 COWEN DR UNIT 201 CARBONDALE.CO 81623-1657 WALLING REBECCA 350 BLANCA AVE TAMPA, FL 33606 WEIDEL LAWRENCE W PO BOX 1007 MONROE, GA 30655 TENNESSEE THREE RENTALS C/O J H COBLE 5033 OLD HICKORY BLVD NASHVILLE, TN 37218020 TOMKINS DOUGLAS S 520 E COOPER AVE #209 ASPEN, CO 81611 UNCAPHER BILL PO BOX 2127 LA JOLLA, CA 92038 VAUSE FAMILY TRUST 3020 PLAZA DE MONTE LAS VEGAS, NV 89102 VOLK RICHARD W TRUSTEE C/O RICHARD W VOLK MANAGER 2327 MIMOSA DR HOUSTON, TX 77019 WARNKEN MARK G 1610 JOHNSON DR STILLWATER, MN 55082 WEIGAND BROTHERS LLC 150 N MARKET WICHITA, KS 67202 STERLING TRUST COMP C/O BERG ALAN M 110 STONE CANYON RD LOS ANGELES, CA 90077 TAYLOR FAMILY INVESTMENTS CO 602 E HYMAN #201 ASPEN. CO 81611 TERMINELLO DENNIS J 8 KERRY L 656 RIDGEWAY WHITE PLAINS, NY 10605-4323 TOMPKINS DOUGLAS S 708 B ELVIRA AVE REDONDO BEACH, CA 90277 V M W TRUST OF 1991 301 N LAKE AVE STE 900 PASADENA, CA 91101 VICTORIAN SQUARE LLC C/0 KATIE REED MGT 418 E COOPER AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 WALLEN-OSTERAA REV LIVING TRUST 36 OCEAN VISTA NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 WAVO PROPERTIES LP 512 1/2 E GRAND AVE #200 DES MOINES, IA 50309-1942 WELLS KATHERINE G 33 PORTLAND PL ST LOUIS, MO 63108 WELLS RICHARD A & SUSAN T WELLS RICHARD A & SUSAN T TRUST WELSCH SUSAN FLEET TRUST PO BOX 4867 C/O MOORE & VAN ALLEN/ THOMAS 10 UTE PLACE ASPEN, CO 81612 OBANNON ASPEN, CO 81611 100 N TRYON ST 47TH FLR CHARLOTTE, NC 28202 WEST ULLA CHRISTINA 3042 TOLKIEN LN LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97034 WILLIAMS CRAIG & LEE FAMILY PTNRSHP 8990 HEMPSTEAD HWY #200 HOUSTON, TX 77008 WISE JOSEPH 1320 HODGES ST RALEIGH, NC 27604-1414 ~-. .. WHITE WINDOWS LLC 7.01% 614 E DURANT AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 WILSHIRE COMPANY PO BOX 828 ORINDA, CA 94563 WOLF LAWRENCE G TRUSTEE 22750 WOODWARD AVE #204 FERNDALE, MI 48220 WHITMAN WAYNE & FRAN UND 1/2 INT PO BOX 457 CLEARWATER, FL 33757-0457 WINE RICHARD A 2233 MYRTLE POINT WAY HENDERSON, NV 89052-7153 WOODS FRANK J III 205 S MILL ST#301A ASPEN. CO 81611 WRIGHT CHRISTOPHER N YERAMIAN CHARLES ZENSEN ROGER 13 BRAMLEY RD PO BOX 12347 313 FRANCES THACKER LONDON W10 6SP, UK ASPEN, CO 81612 WILLIAMSBURG, VA 23185 .., M, :.~ ,. rr ~._ ls'B ,y / .:.. r~ cDn A --. -.~ ~ - ~O 4 _ i. .. t~ ~_ m ~ _ m f s~. ~, _~,~ O v7 i 77t s r O ~ ~~~~ `I I `~ / s~o' ~sa,~~ .. b' I/ 1 sr m r - cr`--:~D~ll~j ~~~. fn A m s G°'~Mr ~ M1 ~ `/ ~l `~i-. OR ~HSr~fJj(~f/~!~/ g ~7 RI ` ,~~ a ~°~"~ I j~M Rak1f~~Sr t LLLLllll~~`"` ner~L ~ mks, -~ ti ~,r , .~ w ~~ s fs C I~Ji ~ ml .-~VFRSrp .-. E ~~L~~ ~~ z''L'9 sr~ j ~ ~i it !1 fl 4sr ~ ~ ~~°~ ~o ~3r ~~ ``~ i Q~ ~~ M cpRttyG S7 r~~ z ~ ~Rr"+G 3 r _~ ~ ~ _ ~ { fi WALrvUT .ST 1~1` y ~fvF~~Ab~~ ~~ ~~fEACESYn - sy ~,5 SPRUCE cry r TITLE: VICINITY MAP MARMOLRADZINER+ASSOCIATES SCALE: NTS DATE: 12.11.08 12210 NEBRASKA AVE. LOS ANGELES, CA 90025 VM.01 PROJECT #: 28082 PROJECT: JP ASPEN TEL 310-826-6222, FAX 310-826-6226 9ZZ8-8Z8-06£ X</d `ZZZB-828-06£ l31 N3dSV df 3WVN 1O3fO2id Z808Z # 1O3fO2Jd ~~.~ 4Z006V0'S3l3JNVSOI'3~VV~SV2i83N06ZZ6 80'06'26 31V0 ~~0-.6=..8/6 3lVOS S31ViO0SSV + 2i3NIZON?J lOW2it/W N3dSV '133211S 2131Nf1H 'S Z6£ - NVId iiOOld ONIISIX3 31111 w J J Q 1~~2~1S 2~~1Nf1H U Z ¢ K € 5 ~ ~'~~ a F s~^ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~i ~ ~86 p 2 ~ ~+~ ~ 3 ~~~ R Fp 00pe ~i $$ !i ~ 9 ~ 8 ~ ~b~ S S~B ~: gg ~ C ~ ~888A8a ~ a SS E ~ ~ R ~~ a Qi ~' p~p CRSFSkX 8 g 48 a p EM fd 11 a 8 Eo ~ E~ R~ :~ E v_~ '~ Ed :~ 2 Ch A ti ~ ~ aw.,,„~ . ~ 4 ti ~ a J Ch N ~ s ~ ~a g ti ~~ E „ ~ ~ N N ~ ~~ Q' ~ p r' ~ ,1 ~ ~ ~'~ s ~ E ~ ,~ ~ s ~ W pa ~ 5~ ~ ~ yy p6 `off ~E `~~~~is" ~~sNnX ~. W ~ ~~ n ~ ~ S~• e ZO' ~ natlaNnoa 9ZZ9-9Z8-06E Xtld 'ZZZB-9Z8-OlE X31 SZ006 tlO ' S3~3JNtl SO"1 '3ntl tlNStl2183N 0 6ZZ L S31tlIO0SStl + 2i3NIZdtla lOW?JtlW ,~avaNnoe 311s Z O Q W J W F- w c~ z ~_ X w N3dStl df 3WVN 1O3fOiid Z808Z # 1O3fOild 80'OL'Z6 31tld „0-,L =,.8/L 3ltlOS N3dStl'1332i1S2i31NnH'SZIE-SNOI1tl~313ONI1SIX3 31111 ~a~ Z O Q w J W H O z z ~_ X w 9ZZ9-9Z8-04£ Xt/~ 'ZZZ9-9Z8-04£ l31 N3dSd df ~3WdN 103f02id Z808Z ~# 1~3f021d Z~•Zd 52006 d~ `S3l3JNV SOl '3Ad `s~lSdaS3N 04ZZ4 80'9l'ZL ~31`d0 ..0-.4 = .,814 ~3l'dOS S31t1100SSV + 2i3NIZa~i ~OW2it/W N3dSb' `1332i1S d31Nf1H 'S ZL£ - SNOIl'dA3~3 03SOdOad 31111 AavaNnoa 31 ALIVONf10B 311S Aavolunoe GIs z_ ww ~m o~ N u. w J w~ w= ~ ~ Z ~ -w C7 > z~ ~O J C7 O ~. O a= ~~ o~ O Z J 0 z0 z_ ~~ ~ W w~ Ow Q J Z W to O w a z W w U H ~ Z aQ ~_ z gam W J J J ma ~~ wo UO cn Z O W J W F- (n W 0 w O O Z O w J W H O z 0 w O a. O 9ZZS-9Z8-OL£ Xtlj 'ZZZS-SZH-Ol£'131 N3dStl df ~3WVN 1O3fO21d Z808Z ~# 1O3fOLld ~.O Zb 5Z006tlO'S3l3JNtlSOI'3ntld)IStl2193NOLZZ6 80'S6'Zl ~31tl0 „0-,L=„8/L ~3~tlOS S31tlIO0SStl+213NIZOtl2ilOW21tlW N3dStl'133LI1S2l31Nf1H'SZIE-NVld43SOdO2id 31111 w J J Q U ~ _ J H F D J W I-- ~ J J J > c>a o0 4¢ o¢ a o: cn = z J U Z J_ Q] Z H X W ZO 3 ~avalvno9 92006 VO'S3l3JNV SOl'3nV V>iS'd2i93N OlZZ6 S3IVIOOSSV +a3NIZ0`dii IOWa'dW ,~avaNnoa 311s Z O Q w w ~- w t~ z X W 3dSV df 3WtlN 1JdrlJa° 0- ~ . 8/l 80'Ol'Zl ~31VO N3dSd'133211S 2i31NnH 'S Z6E - SNOIlVn3l3 JNIlSIX3 iav ~# 3lVOS 31111 Z O Q w w F- 0 z z ~- X W ~~\P~1 MAR. COL RADZINER AND ASSOCIATES AIA architecture 12210 Nebraska Avenue 310 826 6222 phone constru<tlon Los Angeles California 90025 310 826 6226 fax ,,, landscape mail;amarmol-radziner.com www.marmol-radzin ercom January 5`h, 2009 CITY OF ASPEN -COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Project James Perse Store -Facade Remodel at 312 S. Hunter Street, Aspen Addendum -Commercial Character Area In addition to the Commercial Design Review Application Document dated December 15, 2008 for the above named project, the review of the proposed design with respect to the Commercial Character Area requirements as set forth in the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines (Final Draft June 2007) is as follows: • Street & Allev Svstem With respect to the Street and Alley infrastructure in place in the Commercial Area, the proposed project fulfills these criteria by orienting the public access to the building towards Hunter Street per requirement 1.1. As the project is located within the existing ~.~ footprint of the building, there is no change to the public access available along Hunter Street or the alley way per requirement 1.2. The existing fa4ade of the building facing the alley is metal cladding, in average condition. Per requirement 1.4, the proposed project will greatly enhance the aesthetic appeal of the corner of the building visible from Hunter Street and the alley way, by conceptually wrapping the solid plaster clad form of the street facade around the corner of the building. The balance of the alley facade cladding is proposed to be wide vertical tongue and groove wood boards, a material which recalls the traditional use of large wood members in alpine lodges. • Parkin Due to the existing building being located on the property lines, there is no existing or proposed on-site parking as part of this project. • Public_Amenity Space As the existing building occupies the maximum lot area, and the lot area being small in square footage, there is no available opportunity to create on-site or communal space. ,,~,- However, the proposed remodel will add to public amenity and better engage the ~„ public street by improving access into the building with the installation of a wheelchair 1 MAR~~IOL RADZINER AND ASSOCIATES AIA architecture 12210 Nebraska Avenue 370 826 6222 phone eonstruttlon Los Angeles California 90025 310 826 6226 fax landscape maila~marmol-rad zineccom www.marmol-radzineccom accessible ramp. The existing building does not provide wheelchair access to the interior, and the existing floor level is approximately 30" above the sidewalk level at its highest point, making access into the building virtually impossible for wheelchair bound visitors. The accessible ramp is aesthetically integrated into the street facade of the proposed remodel. • Building Placement The project is located on a corner lot at Hunter Street and an alley way. The definition and aesthetic appeal of the corner view of the building will be enhanced, as per the description for the Street & Alley system requirements above. The building will have a unified design concept, rather than a store front facade being visually incongruous with the alley way facade. In keeping with requirements 1.18 and 1.20, the street facing facade of the building, inclusive of the roof soffit and the side of the accessible ramp is located on the sidewalk property line. This is to maintain the alignment of facades at the sidewalk, oriented parallel to the street and the alley way. • Building Height Mass and Scale The existing building is bordered by double storey buildings on both south and east boundaries. As the proposal aims to retain the existing structure, the single storey building will be in scale with the pedestrian environment and will maintain the diversity of heights and scales of buildings encouraged in the Height Variation guidelines 1.22 through 1.24. Additionally, the proposed remodel maintains the existing height and scale of the building, and is respectful to the scale of historic structures in the adjacent vicinity. • Building Design & Articulation As per [he proposed elevations, the combination of a well proportioned facade form and innovative use of a traditional material addresses Key Design Objective No. 3 for the Commercial Character Area by promoting creative, contemporary design. With respect to guidelines 1.32 and 1.37, the single storey street facade is conceptually divided into 3 levels -the top of the ramp wall located at the property line, [he glazed store front set back from the street, and then the roof soffit extending out to the property line. This simple manipulation of the mass of the facade is aesthetic but also functional, as it provides space for the accessible wheelchair ramp and a protective roof 2 - MAR, COL RADZINER AND ASSOCIATES AIA architecture 12210 Nebraska Avenue 310 826 6222 phone construction Los Angeles California 90025 310 826 6226 fax landscape mai Iamarmol-radzineccom www.marmol-radz inecmm overhang for the ramp on the exterior of the building and the west facing store front glazing. The ramp addresses the accessibility issues with the existing retail entrance as per requirement 1.38, and the full wall of store front windows facing the street maintains transparency and addresses requirement 1.40. Requirement 1.42 is addressed through the combination of a well proportioned, yet simple treatment of the fagade detailing. As the proposed project is a refurbishment of an existing commercial single storey structure, the facade articulation is restrained and contemporary. Along the alley way fagade, the existing butterfly root of the building will be maintained, accentuating the elevation and complementing the choice of cladding materials. As shown in the proposed elevations, the Hunter St. elevation signage will consist of a single wall sign. The area of the sign is less than both the lOsf maximum area for a wall sign and the 12sf maximum aggregate area for this fagade length, in keeping with the requirements of the Land Use Code Section 26.510.130D. The aesthetic intent of the signage is in keeping with the proposed fagade remodel and the Commercial Character Area design objectives. With respect to Roofscape design, the existing building has a visible package mechanical unit located on the roof. To address the requirement 1.45, the proposed remodel will improve the existing condition by replacing the existing unit with a new roof top package unit, and locate the unit in a visually unobtrusive location. A rooftop mechanical enclosure /screen will be designed around the mechanical unit. Architectural Materials As per requirements 1.46 through 1.49, the selection of the exterior materials and colors palette has be carefully considered in relation to the traditional materials used in Aspen construction, and selected for their climate suitability and durability. As described in the Street & Alley System section above, the exterior cladding material palette includes cement plaster and wide vertical tongue and groove wood boards. The dark neutral colors and materials proposed for the remodel are taken from the surrounding character of the natural and built environment, complimenting rather than contrasting the existing streetscape. 3 ~ MAR. COL RADZINER AND ASSOCIATES AIA architecture 72270 Nebraska Avenue 310 826 6222 phone construction Los Angeles California 90025 310 826 6226 fax landscape mail a)marmol-radzineccom www.marmol-radzi ner.com • Paving & Landscaping As the existing building is built to the property boundaries, there is no opportunity to provide additional paving or landscaped areas in the scope of this project. • Summa As detailed above, this proposed development will be a remodel to an existing building that will greatly improve the building appearance, streetscape and the building's handicapped accessibility. We also feel that the aesthetic of the remodel are in accordance with the Key Design Objectives for the Commercial Character Area requirements. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or comments regarding this application. Yours sincerely, Linda Wong LEED AP, Project Manager [p] 310.826.6222 [e] linda@marmol-radziner.com a __ ___ _ __ _4_.. ~a'1~11Bt'('~ V % MAF~IOL RADZINER AND ASSOCIATES AIA architecture 12210 Nebraska Avenue 310 826 6222 phone construction Los Angeles California 90025 310 826 6226 fax landscape mail@marmol-radzinectom www.marmol-ratlzineccom January 29`h, 2009 CITY OF ASPEN -COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Project James Perse Store -Facade Remodel at 312 S. Hunter Street, Aspen Addendum 2 -Response to Development Review Committee Comments In response to the DRC Comments received in our meeting at the City of Aspen on January 21• 2009, we emphasize that this proposal is a remodel of an existing 1960s commercial building, not a ground up construction project. There are significant existing structural and building constraints which our proposal is responding to, while also fulfilling the requirements of the Commercial Design Standards and Commercial Character Guidelines. The Land Use Code Section 26.412.050 Review Criteria, paragraph A states that unique site constraints can justify a deviation from the standards. Paragraph B states that for a proposed development converting an existing structure to commercial use, the development shall meet the commercial design standards to the greatest extent practical. In the context of the project being an existing building remodel, making significant changes to the existing building structure or floor slab would be cost prohibitive for a retail space remodel. The objective of this addendum and the subsequent changes made to the proposed design of the Hunter Street facade is to balance the Building Code accessibility requirements and the Commercial Character Guidelines set forth by the City of Aspen. We strongly believe that our proposal satisfies both of these criteria. With respect to specific comments made by the Planning and Zoning Department at the DRC Meeting, please find our responses below: • First Floor Character -Commercial Character Guidelines 1.37 Section 1.37 states that the first floor facade should be designed to concentrate interest at the street level. We have included a 3D rendering and revised colored elevations to demonstrate that the focus of the facade is at the street level, and that though the accessibility ramp is located exterior to the store, it has been designed to be as visually unobtrusive as possible. The current design shows a ramp side wall that is only as high as required to meet the existing floor level, with a simple metal handrail attached above. ,., The design of the handrail is simple and open, so as to allow as much visibility and ,,W„ transparency to the glazed store front and merchandise displays inside the store. 1 ~ MARt~10L RADZINER AND ASSOCIATES AIA architecture 12270 Nebraska Avenue 310 826 6222 phone construction Los Angeles California 90025 370 826 6226 fax landscape ma i I;~marmol-radzinercom www.marmol-radzinercom • Retail Entrance Guideline 1.38 -Entrance at Sidewalk Level Guideline 1.38 states the retail entrance should be at sidewalk level and that on a sloping site the retail frontage should be as close to a level entrance as possible. The guideline also states that the entrance shall be ADA compliant. In order to satisfy the wheelchair accessibility requirements, we believe that locating the ramp on the exterior of the building is the appropriate design solution, given that we are dealing with an existing structure. The existing floor level is approximately 30" above the adjacent sidewalk at the highest point, in the north corner of the property. Given the constraints of [he existing building, the difference in the level of the sidewalk and the existing interior floor level, it would be a disruptive and expensive exercise to locate the retail entrance at the sidewalk level, and interiorize the accessibility ramp. We have included a supplementary exhibit showing three different plan locations for the accessibility ramp -our preferred option running north-south on the Hunter Street boundary, and two other interior locations that would both entail significant additional cost, demolition and construction to achieve in the existing building. There is also the concern that changes required to the existing structure and slab to interiorize the ramp would potentially affect the neighboring building's foundations. In addition to our design studies into the location of the ramp, we have consulted with Denis Murray at the Building Department on the preferred location of the ramp. We understand from the Building Department that this property has been remodeled several times before, but the incorporation of the accessibility ramp was not able to be achieved in previous projects. We strongly believe that the added amenity of the ramp is very valuable and will provide equal access to the store, previously inaccessible by wheelchair bound visitors. • Retail Entrance Guideline 1.39 -Airlock Entrv Our interpretation of the Commercial Character Guidelines is that including an airlock in the design was a requirement for new buildings only. It is challenging to incorporate an accessible airlock entry in the proposed design without taking away a significant amount of floor area for the retail interior space. MAR1~10L RADZINER AND ASSOCIATES AIA architecture 12210 Nebraska Avenue 310 826 6222 phone construction Los Angeles California 90025 310 826 6226 fax .,w landscape mail@marmol-ratlzineccom www.ma rmol-radzinercom To address the airlock guideline, we propose either providing an air curtain over the entry door, which blows warm air down over the doorway when it is opened keeping the interior space isolated from the exterior environment, or positively pressurizing the interior space with warm air. Typically a mechanically ventilated space is neutral (same amount of air supplied as returned), but if [here is more warm supply air than return air, the excess air will be push out of the space as the door is opened and that will prevent infiltration of cold air. We have reviewed both of these systems with our Mechanical Engineer and either system would provide a similar air separation to an airlock entry without taking up valuable interior floor space. • Transoarencv Guidelines 140 and 141 -Window Area and Street Level Retail Frontage Per guideline 1.40 and the revised colored elevations, our proposal provides approximately 65% window area facing Hunter Street. Guideline 1.41 states a building shall be designed to maintain the character and transparency of the traditional street level retail frontage, where appropriate. To best explain our proposal, we have included an image of the existing building and the street level frontage, plus a 3-D rendering of the proposed design. From these before and after images, it is clear the proposed design provides a significant amount more glazed storefront than the existing building, plus the alignment of the storefront sill with the adjacent building storefront glazing is maintained. Taking into account the constraints of the existing building floor level, the proposed design maximizes the available height and area of the facade for storefront glazing, and significantly increases the area of the storefront from the existing building storefront area. The proposal achieves the objective of creating an immediate relationship between the public realm and the internal display, which provides the interest and attraction desired in the Commercial Character Guidelines. The other comments received from other city departments at the DRC Meeting related to Engineering and City Parks. We understand from City Engineering that there is a change in level in the sidewalk directly outside of the property that will need to be corrected for accessibility. This remedial work will be carried out by the Building Owner. The comments by City Parks pertained to planting additional street trees in the sidewalk. In the DRC meeting, it was confirmed by City Parks that the requirement for the additional street trees would only be triggered if a significant demolition of the sidewalk was required by the Engineering Department. We believe that the remedial work to the sidewalk can be complete in a localized ~' area, without the need for significant replacement of the sidewalk, curb or gutter. `~~ MARNIOL RADZINER AND ASSOCIATES AIA architecture 12210 Nebraska Avenue 370 826 6222 phone construction Los Angeles Galifomia 90025 310 826 6226 tax a.„.., landscape ma i I;oamarmol-radziner.com www.marmoi-radz iner.com • Sianaae Illumination We are also clarifying that the exterior signage in this proposal will be illuminated according to the requirements set out in Section 26.510.070 of the Land Use Code, with the source being shielded so as not be visible from the public right-of-way. • Summary The intent of this Addendum is to address specific City of Aspen comments on the proposed design, and clarify how the intent of the Commercial Character Guidelines have been met with the proposed remodel. To support this case, we've provided additional drawings and renderings to highlight the existing condition and the changes that are being proposed. In response to City comments, the design team has revisited key aspects of the design to demonstrate the commitment we have to satisfying the requirements of the Commercial Design Review. Bearing in mind the physical constraints of the existing building, this proposal provides significant added amenity by providing a wheelchair accessible ramp as the main access into the building. The remodel also aims to significantly improve the visual appearance and thermal efficiency of an older commercial building. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or comments regarding this application. Yours sincerely, Linda Wong LEED AP, Project [p] 310.826.6222 [e] linda@marmol-radziner.com 4 V Z~.Z V accy-yGli-OLE Xd3 'ZZZ9-9Z8-Ol£ l31 C. C. 52006 dO 'S3~3ONt/ SOl '3nb' b7iS`d~193N OIZZI S31t/IOOSSt/ + a3N12abN ~nw>.INw ~ ~ M N i .~.~}} ~ ~ c0 W ~ ~ Z O C~ w ~ Z¢' ~ ^dZ O J F' O ~ ~ Q LL O Z ~ J o LL w C7 W ~ _Z ~ Q ~ F C~ ~,avaNnc c~ z 0 _J AaV4Nf109 3115 xavaNnoa ails ~_ ~~ ~w _Z S c~ ~' H ~ Z W O~ ~~ W O ~ O O>~ ~ ? a Z ~ Q Z ~ ~ i W Z J ~ LL (n O W F- g d t- Z W W U ~_ a J J Z m Q (q 2 ~ J UH Q ~ Z O W _..I W F-- f1~ W D W (n O O 80"8Z"Z L J 1O3fOLld Z808Z ~# 1~3fOad 2131Nf1H "S ZLE - SNnI Idna~~ n~enan~,~ •~-,. ~. Z O W J W I- Z W (n O 0 <~ ._-f,, ~~ , "1 I h ~~: ~~r~. Q Q v C u; Q Z Q J d~ -~ l~ N ~ a `„ ~~ a E c' m m ~~ N N A C7 A ~ d~d ~~~ 55e 600Z'6Z tienuer ,V~ ,9 .Z ,o 3JH1OO3 3aenOS 3l8HSn 30 SSOI 1NVO131NOIS • l3/~3l aOOI~ aOla3lNl JNIlSIX3 4Nb' NldM3aIS N33M138 3oN3a3~31^ 1H`JI3H 03Stf3aONl Ol 3n0 H1NJ3l dW11a Q3SH3aONl • a H'j 43Sb'3aoNl • llyM `JNINIH13a O3alnO3a 4Nd NOIlN/~b'OX3 1NtJOI~INJIS 8b'lS lt/anlonalS `JNIlSIX3 30 OW3a 1Nt~o131NJIS • lldM H1aON ~0 3otf3 aOla3lNl ONOIV a3alnoad dwva unrelss3ooe..o-,v . ii ai I i ~I II I o 3Ot/1OO3 3atJnOS 318t/Sn ~O SSOI 1NtfOI~IN`JIS • Nwrnoo ldanlonals _ _ _ _ _ _ S.'JNIQllnB JNIaO8HJ13N ~O NOllt/oOl O13nO.1111181S1/~.1a1N3 aOOd • f I NOllb'4NnO3 S,JNIOlinB I JNIaO8HJ13N 4Nb'NOI1bY1HOX3 dwda ~o ~llwlxoad o13na s3nssl NOIlHONnO3 lb'nalonalS lt/I1N31Od • l l yM `JNINIt/13a 03a1nO3a ONt/NOI1VAb'OX3 1NVO131NJIS '8b'lS lHanlonalS JNIlSIX3 30 OW3O1NHO131NJIS • a3alno3a oNlloo~ aNdSNWnlOOlb'anlonalSM3N • I IIHM H1nOS ~O 3oF/~ aOla3lNl `JNOIH a3olnoad dwea unlelss3~od,.o-,v • I Nwnioo DNIHDy0aDN3 `JNI1 SIx3 ~ ~ naiN3 (-~ 3avaoNo YS lZ6LT I NwnioD oNllslx3 d o NoIlvDOi3a o n z ~ ~ ~ 30YOVd 03SDd0ad d03Nll 3NIl 1.1a3d0ad -~-~ ~10 IZfi1 NOllb'OOl dWb'N 432i2~3~32~d c 8'd1S lb'anlonalS ONIISIX3 Ol SNOIlb'a31lV1Nb'O131NJIS ON • aOla31X3 Ol 03N13NOO - - - - - - - - - NOllt//~t/oX3 ONV OW3~ llF1 • I a3alnO3a NaOM ~ I NOllt!/~t/OX3ONb'OW3OlHWINIW • I' 3OVOb'3133a1S a31NnH ~0 3OH~ aOla31X3 LJNOlt1 a301A0ad dWt/a ,1111181SS30OtJ,.O-,4 • ll`dM H12i0N NO dWb'2i - £ NOIld0 NWnlOD `JNIH070a0N3 ® JNIISIX3 ~I ----------------- B I ('dell Nwnioo oNllslx3 0 13n31 a0 ol! I m II N ~NI1SI%3 ~ I b ® B CZ61~ rl y ~ 3avDVd a3sodoad '( - do 3Nli +--- 30YOVd - ~ ~ -1SIx3 jD 3NIl 3NI l -- - _ --_~- ~ ~- G1a3d0ad Ad1N3 - ~ ~nbd`.e NO .0 .£f ~ llt/M H1f10S NO dWdb - Z NOIld0 ~ .o sz ~ O 0 0 0 0 O 13n31 tlooli oNllslx3 8 EZ6L~ 13n31 aooli oNllslx3 e fL61~ ~.o,a Nwrnoo oNIHDVOaoN3 c oNllslx3 ~ ~ )fi1Y I 3 N11 E--- tila3doad 0 m a 30VDtlj ~Q3SDd0ad d0 3N1~ Aa1N? 3avDV, ~islx3 ~0 3NI I ~lo IL61 c Z m x c 2 m A c z rn m Re¢ular Meetine ~ Aspen Plannin¢ and ZoninL ~"`~ February 17.2009 Comments ...............................................................................2 Declarations of Conflicts of interest .................................................2 312 S~Hw~tter =Commercial Design Review,~ ......................................2 1490 Ute Avenue, Jewish Community Center, SPA Amendment ...............3 ,~ Stan Gibbs opened the regular meeting at 4:30 pm in Sister Cities Meeting Room. LJ Erspamer and Brian Speck were excused. Commissioners present were Bert Myrin, Mike Wampler, Cliff Weiss, Dina Bloom, Jim DeFrancia and Stan Gibbs. Staff in attendance were Jim True, Special Counsel; Jennifer Phelan, Errin Evans, Jason Lasser, Community Development; Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk. Comments Stan Gibbs noted there was a special meeting on February 24`h; he asked if an AACP Draft will be distributed. Jennifer Phelan responded that she would get back to the commission after Jessica Garrow provides City Council with the work session. Declarations of Conflict of Interest Cliff Weiss noted that he skied with Mendal Mintz's nephew. Public Hearing: 312 South Hunter -Commercial Design Review Stan Gibbs opened the public hearing for 312 South Hunter, Commercial Design Review. Errin Evans, Community Development, stated that before the commission was an application for commercial design review. Evans said that currently the building located at 312 South Hunter is occupied by Polar Revolution, a retail sports and clothing store. Evans said the applicant was James Perse Enterprises Inc represented by Linda Wong. They want to remodel the fagade to allow better access to the front entrance. The applicants are required to meet the requirements of the commercial lodging and historic district design; in this case the building has some existing features that don't meet the policies; however staff feels that the remodel would create improvements to the existing building and provide access for IBC Standards. Staff recommends approval of this application. Denis Murray is present from the building department to answer questions. Evans proposed a revision to the 3`d whereas in the resolution to read "upon review of the application and the applicable code standards, the community development department recommend approval of the application as presented because it meets the policies of the international building code in regards to access and existing non- conforming elements that do not meet the commercial lodging and historic district objectives and guidelines are not required to be amended at this time". 2 „~ Regular Meetine ^~'~ Asaen Plannine and Zonine ~ February 17 2009 Bert Myrin asked about the airlock for new structures not being met. Jennifer Phelan responded that they were remodeling and were proposing the airlock; she stated that guideline did not have to be applied. Mike Wampler asked Denis Murray if he approved of everything that was proposed. Denis Murray replied yes and they worked with engineering as well but might have to adjust the grade of the sidewalk and that would help them gain the elevation to make the ramp work out. Gideon Kaufman provided the affidavits for posting and mailing to Mr. True. Kaufman said that they have worked together with staff and took suggestions and modified the plan to meet with the approval. Linda Wong explained the airlock and how it worked. Stan Gibbs noted that the drawing of the remodeled building doesn't really show the delivery access on the side; does that move. Linda Wong replied the current building had delivery access and she said that she believed that would be retained. Gibbs said that he just wanted to make sure that alley access was retained because it was required for deliveries. Jim DeFrancia asked if this commission was the final authority on the application. Phelan replied that they were. Public Comments: Jeffrey Halferty, public, said that he worked on that building when it was Ozzie's and thought that this was a great proposal. MOTION.• Jim DeFrancia moved to approve Resolution #5, series 2009, ' approving the request for commercial design review for 312 South Hunter conditioned on retaining the existing delivery door along the alley and delete the word "not"; Cliff Weiss seconded. Roll call vote: Wampler, yes; Bloom, yes; Myrin, yes; Weiss, yes; DeFrancia, yes; Gibbs, yes. APPROVED 6-0. Continued Public Hearing: 1490 Ute Avenue -Jewish Community Center. SPA Amendment Stan Gibbs opened the continued public hearing for 1490 Ute Avenue, Jewish Community Center, SPA Amendment. Jennifer Phelan asked Jim True to speak on covenants; she asked for clarification on the role of covenants with regard to public hearing and the criteria that the planning and zoning commission uses in reviewing an application. Jim True stated that it was really very simple and had explained this before. The City of Aspen is not in a position to enforce private covenants. What the P&Z must do is consider this pursuant to the City's Landuse Code and the terms and conditions of the Landuse Code. Private covenants are a separate issue that are individually enforced; the history in this situation is (as he understands it) the covenants were in place and there was a lot of discussion at the last meeting about the covenants. If the applicant wishes to request to have time to address covenant issues that's up to them but it is not P&Z's place to review, interrupt, make determinations as to what the covenants do or do not say. True recommended that P&Z simply address what's in the Landuse Code and not address representations regarding what the covenants say this; it is not P&Z's position to make determinations for what private covenants do or do not say. Jim DeFrancia said that he appreciated that advice and should we ignore covenants that have to do with building restrictions. True said that it is not P&Z's position to make determinations as to whether it does or doesn't comply with private covenants. True noted that was a whole array of legal issues for a judge to determine and not P&Z. True said that there are certainly issues that the homeowners can bring up that are related to your consideration; he did not say not to consider homeowner's concerns but keep it in the context of the Landuse Code and not enforcing private covenants. Jason Lasser, special project planner with the City of Aspen, said this was a continuation for the Aspen Jewish Community Center at Silver Lining Ranch, consolidated SPA amendment application and growth management review. Lasser sated questions from the last P&Z meeting were who runs the crosstown shuttle, is the fire hydrant placement okay with the fire department, how does the city treat private gates and additional information for the avalanche study. Some answers to those questions were provided in the packet as well as new additional information, exhibit M (letters from homeowners, neighbors and interested public). That was handed out today. Staff recommends approval of this application. Bert Myrin asked about the employee housing mitigation from the January 20`" memo page 6 says that the employee housing mitigation was 60% of the 9 employees; P&Z is just determining the number of employees. Lasser replied that was included because the applicant was now requesting a waiver and they were 4 .r. Planning and Zoning Commission MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: THRU: DATE OF MEMO: MEETING DATE: RE: APPLICANT /OWNER: James Perse Enterprises Inc / Revolution Partners Errin Evans, Current Planner Jennifer Phelan, Deputy Community Development Directo~~ January 21", 2009 February 17`n, 2009 312 S Hunter Street -Commercial Design Review REPRESENTATIVE: Linda Wong, Marmol Radziner and Associates LOCATION: Civic Address - 312 S Hunter Street; Legal Description -Part of Lots K, L and M, Block 100, City and Townsite of Aspen; Pazcel Identification Number - 2737- 182-25-023 CURRENT ZONING tSr USE The existing building is located in the Commercial (C-1) zone district. Currently there is a retail use on site. PROPOSED LAND USE: The Applicant is requesting to continue the retail use. They plan to operate a retail clothing store and would like to give the fagade and the wall facing the alley a remodel. ~0. the Planning and Zoning application for Commercial SUMMARY: The Applicant requests of the Planning and Zoning Commission to approve to Council the application for Commercial Design Review for the fagade remodel of the existing building located on 312 S Hunter Street. - -I Photo of the subject property STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Commission approve the Design review as submitted. P1 ~r BACKGROUND: The existing building located at 312 S Hunter Street is currently occupied by -~. Polar Revolution, a retail sports and clothing store. James Perse Enterprises, Inc would like to move into that location and remodel the facade to allow better access to the front entrance. Currently, the building is accessible only by stairs and the remodel of the fapade includes a ramp to bring the building up to International Building Code (IBC) compliance. To construct a remodel to the facade, applicants shall meet the policies of the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines. In this application, the applicant proposes to remodel an existing building that does not currently meet the design guidelines. In their proposal, they have not proposed to amend the non-conformity in design but have created an accessible entrance. To meet the guidelines, the applicant would need to do a more extensive remodel than the one that they have proposed. LAND USE REQUEST AND REVIEW PROCEDURES: The applicant is requesting the following land use approvals from the Planning and Zoning Commission: • Commercial Design Review -Commercial Chazacter Area pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.412.050. An application for Commercial Design Review requires the Planning and Zoning Commission, at a public hearing, to approve, approve with conditions or disapprove of the Commercial Design Review. COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW: This application is required to undergo review under Commercial Design Review because it is ,~, located in the Commercial Chazacter Area of the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District ~' Design Objectives and Guidelines. It can be difficult for an applicant to incorporate all of the guidelines and objectives when working with a building -with existing non-conforming conditions. The Planning and Zoning Commission should apply the guidelines as appropriate. The Code states that "Although these standazds and guidelines aze relatively comprehensive, there may be circumstances where alternative ways of meeting the intent of the policy objectives might be identified. In this case, the City must determine that the intent of the guideline is still met, albeit through alternative means." Existing Conditions The entrance to the existing building consists of a set of five (5) stairs and does not meet the IBC standazds for accessibility. The building also does not conform to some of the design policies adopted in the design guidelines such as not having an airlock entry or having an entry that is elevated. Both of these existing conditions contradict guidelines in the First Floor Chazacter section of the Design Objectives and Guidelines document that state that storefronts should be level with the sidewalk and use an airlock. The Proposed Remodel In the applicant's proposed remodel, a new exterior finish along the primary street fapade and the alley fagade will be installed. This change will entail removal of the existing bay windows and the stairway. The Applicant intends to include an air curtain as an alternative to an airlock. New lazge windows will replace the bay windows and a ramp will run the length of the street frontage ~ ., .,r P2 .~. ... ,,,~, on the building. The exterior finish consists of tongue and groove, vertical wood siding along the alley and concrete with a stucco finish along the street facade. When the application was first submitted (Exhibit C), the ramp was enclosed with a solid concrete wall. Staff felt that this created a visual barrier between the building and the sidewalk and detracted from the fagade. The applicant has since altered the application, as shown in Figure 1 and Exhibit D, so that the ramp is now bordered by an open railing and reduced the overall rise of the ramp. As a result the concrete is now 30 inches high next to the sidewalk, reduced from 72 inches. This will provide more transparency between the storefront and the sidewalk than the original proposal. '~.,,. Figure 1: Proposed Elevations Although Staff would prefer that the ramp be located inside the building so that the front facade of the building is adjacent to the sidewalk and property line, it is recognized that this is an existing building that is being renovated and that the store will be accessible. The Code states that "The purpose of the Commercial Design Review is to preserve and foster proper commercial scale and character, and to ensure that Aspen's commercial and streetscapes aze public spaces conducive to walking." The applicant has indicated that relocating the ramp inside the building is a lazger project than intended for the scope of this remodel. P3 MARMOL RADZ~NER w• 1w~ww~ NND I~SSOCIRTES e1O Staff Comments '""` The proposed remodel will create an improvement to the existing building. The proposed materials of wood create diversity along that street frontage and complement the sun•ounding brick structures. Currently, the building is only accessible by a set of five stairs. The applicant intends to add a ramp and make the building comply with IBC standazds. The location of the ramp however, does not comply with the policies of the Commercial, Lodging, and Historic District Objectives and Guidelines. The First Floor Chazacter section in the Commercial Chazacter area states that a building should avoid the use of elevated or sunken floors; however, the finished floor of the building is quite a bit above grade and the Applicant has worked hazd to achieve the best possible design with the site constraints. The following guidelines indicate where the remodel does or does not meet certain guidelines. Guidelines that are met Guideline 1.1 Orient a primary entrance towazd the street. . Guideline 1.20 Building facades shall be pazallel to the facing street(s) and primary entrances shall be oriented towazd the street. Guideline 1.40 Window area along the first floor shall be a minimum of 60% of exterior street fagade area when facing a principal(s) street. Guidelines that aze not met: Guideline 1.18 Maintain the alignment of facades at the sidewalk's edge Guideline 1.38 The retail entrance should be at the sidewalk level (all entrances shall be ADA compliant) Guideline 1.39 Incorporate an airlock entry into the plan for all new structures. RECOMMENDATION: Community Development Department staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the request for Commercial Design Review. RECOMMENDED MOTION: If the Planning and Zoning Commission chooses to recommend approval for the request, they may use this motion "I move to make a recommendation to approve the request for the commercial design review for 312 S. Hunter Street." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Staff findings Exhibit B - Application dated December 15, 2008 Exhibit C - Addendum to the application dated January 5, 2009 Exhibit D - Addendum to the application dated January 29, 2009 ~, y P4 r^ u r.. Resolution No. _ 9,. (SERIES OF 2009) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW FOR THE PURPOSED OF REMODELLING THE FAlrADE OF THE BUILDING LOCATED AT 312 SOUTH HUNTER STREET, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO AND LEGALLY KNOWN AS PART OF LOTS K, L, AND M, BLOCK 100, TOWNSITE AND CITY OF ASPEN. Parcel Identification Number - 2737-182-25-023 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Marmol Radziner and Associates, 12201 Nebraska Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, 90025, on behalf of James Perse Enterprises, 3311 East Slauson Avenue, Los Angeles, CA with permission from the building owner, Revolution Partners, LLC of Box 1247, Aspen, Colorado, requesting Commercial Design Review approval to remodel the fagade of the building located at 312 South Hunter Street; and, WHEREAS, as part of land use review, the Applicant is requesting Commercial Design Review approval for the proposed remodel of the fagade of the building; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the applicable code standazds, the Community Development Departrnent recommended approval of the application as presented because it does.not meet the policies of the Commercial, Lodging, and Historic District Objectives and Guidelines; and, WHEREAS, Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the application considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Duector, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval and recommendation of approval of the land use requests is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission grants approval of the Commercial Design Review request; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfaze. ,,,,, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS: P5 Section 1• Pwsuant to the procedwes and standazds set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves Commercial Design Review to permit the remodel of the fapade of the building located at 312 S Hunter Street. Section 2• All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pwsuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awazded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, aze hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 3• This resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a wort of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 15~' day of August, 2006 by a _ to _ vote. Attest: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM James R. True, Special Counsel LJ Erspamer, Chairperson Eatribits Exhibit 1: Approved West and North Elevations P6 EXHIBIT A An application for submitted for Commercial Design Review may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied by to the Planning and Zoning Commission, based on the following criteria: A. The proposed development meets the requirements of Section 26.412.060, Commercial Design Standazds or any deviation from the Standards provides a more appealing pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particulaz standazd. Unique site constraints can justify a deviation from the standazds. Compliance with Section 26.412.070, Suggested design elements, is not required but may be used to justify a deviation from the standazds. Stafl'Comments Section 26.412.060 -Commercial Design Standards Public Amenity Space -This does not apply in this case. The applicant intends to update and remodel the facade of the building only. No new public amenity space is required at this time. The applicant will be required to upgrade the curb, gutter and sidewalk to City Engineering standards. This is required regardless of this application. The property owner was sent a nottfcation regarding updates to the public right-of--way prior to the submittal of this application. Staff finds this criterion to be met. Utility, Delivery and Trash Service Provision -This does not apply in this case. The existing services are adequate and will not be altered as a result of this application. The applicant intends to improve the visual impacts of the mechanical roof equipment. Staff finds this criterion to be met. B. For proposed development converting an existing structure to commercial use, the proposed development meets the requirements of Section 26.412.060, Commercial design standazds, to the greatest extent practical. Changes to the fagade of the building may be required to comply with this Section. Staff Comments Please see the section above. This building is not being converted to a commercial use. It is currently a commercial use. C. The application shall comply with the guidelines within the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines as determined by the appropriate Commission. The guidelines set forth design review criteria, standazds and guidelines that aTe to be used in making determinations of appropriateness. The City shall determine when a proposal is in compliance with the criteria, standazds and guidelines. Although these criteria, standards and guidelines are relatively comprehensive, there may be circumstances where alternative ways of meeting the intent of the policy objectives might be identified. In such a case, the City must determine that the intent of the `~` guideline is still met, albeit through alternative means. P7 © ~` Staff Comments °"~ Guidelines that aze met Guideline 1.1 Orient a primary entrance towazd the street. Guideline 1.20 Building facades shall be pazallel to the facing street(s) and primary entrances shall be oriented towazd the street. Guideline 1.40 Window azea along the first floor shall be a minimum of 60% of exterior street fagade azea when facing a principal(s) street. The storefront design incorporates large windows and depth. The first floor meets the objectives for street level design with regard to height and transparency. The height of the ramp enclosure has been reduced from 72 inches to 30" using the railing creating more transparency. Guidelines that aze not met: Guideline 1.18 Maintain the alignment of facades at the sidewalk's edge Guideline 1.38 The retail entrance should be at the sidewalk level (all entrances shall be ADA compliant) Guideline 1.39 Incorporate an airlock entry into the plan for all new structures. The applicant intends to install an airlock curtain in the entry way to meet the airlock requirements. The curtain consists of a mechanical device that blows hot air straight down in the doorway. The proposal does not meet the objectives for level retail entrances in terms of height The storefront design incorporates large windows and depth. ..r, P8 -~ ~... ,;r: = ~ E'i '' .~~,.. :;i_- 1 ~J 7 dC.O• ,~ 9ZZ9-9Z SL006 V0'S3"13JNY S31b10 8-OL£ X`dd 'ZZLB-9Z9-OL£ 131 SOl ~3~V ~ISV2193N OILZI 0SSV * 2i3NIZOtlii lOW2iVW N3d BO N3d Sd df 3W 'BL~LI SV'133211 VN 1 S LI3 03fOild 1808E ~31V0 .PAL =.8lL 1Nf1H 'S ZL£ - SNOIlVA3l3 03SOdO2fd =# l03fO21d ~3lVOS '31111 ~U w N Q~ ~ W ~ ~jR C7 W ? 4 d' 2 v U O i ~a LL 0 O W ie W ? J Np ~avowioe 31~s C7 ) 2 O J m i__ __..~._ .._ r 2 ~ ..; X W LL ____ __ _. _.. -.. ~._. _ _ v ~ _._____ .. - AtlYRI(1093116 _ _ -- ~ ~ Z -__ _ -_ _ ._-__ _ ~ N ~ .-__~______ : a _ - ui a opp . I . Z f Z i ~ - _ ~. ~ O O 3 _. _,~..... ~ ' ~ X W W U ab ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ , i 'J I W I ~ - -_-- -- ---i-~ - _. ~ k - f- I .~-, H q ~ ~ G ~ I - p , j ~ ._ z #; _ ~ __ W W W i' ~ ~, I ~ i f ~ ~ ___ _ ~ __J ~. ~ N ~...__. -____-'~'1 WYd11081t15 W _ ___._ ~~ 1 ~ W I Z j S S y F' F~ o~ ~Y ~~ ~ y ~~ g W .o-.~ ~ O J ~ W W U~ J d m ~~11 W Z ~ 8 ~ W a u~i5 in0 U Q~ 0 C '. f ~; c py ._ --IIIIII~[ ~' L ~6t lllf~ A'i r 1 :~~D ~' ~~ y %7"~C '1 a r a: , A ~ f j E i . .!t' _ k3 ,~.,. . ;" ~ _ ~~ ~., ' - ~. i I t - ~i,, i ~ ' I r {i ~ ~~ ... '''' It if, i•~}` .a~.' '~~ 9 4- _'. 9 I - Ilfii:i.~ I ~i~r- t a ~, > ti, y ' L. . Y ~Y ~j o ~~ ~'K . .. r. ' ~ilr A. '15. ~ ^~~1 S ~ 1 k 3~~ ~'}~ ~~ ~,~ A ~ ~ . I S2W Y'+ ~ ck' ~. v ~ I . Z~ I f~ J t111 ~ ti V .. ' A 1 >4 X~ 1~~ ~~~ QJ . ~ t 1 ~ ~ ~ P ' I - r ~ ~~ .. ~ r _ , r 1~:k~ "511 ~' ,~ ';: `~ ~,~.. .~,y ~~' . ,~ ,,.. ~. f }:~ ~` fib. r ~~~, ~ .l 1 VA ~ ~' a s t ~ -' ~ ~4- l T M ,1~~ - ~ ,;S ~ _ ,~'. t p,e S ' `~~' y ~~ ~ f , ~, ~,•ra ~'',, ,`1 ,i +~ ~' ~ . ,, ; T 1~ ~S~ ~ y.~. _ _ ~~' ~y .... ,, THE C~ITV (1F AGFFN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: December 22, 2008 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number and name assigned to this property is 0062.2008.ASLU, 312 S. Hunter. ~, Your Land Use Application is incomplete: We found that the application needs additional items to be submitted for it to be deemed complete and for us to begin reviewing it. We need the following additional submission contents for you application: The application does not address the Commercial Lodging, and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines available online at: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/pdfs/depts/41/Low Res_Aspen.pdf 2. 3. Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. ^ Your Land Use Application is complete: If there are not missing items listed above, there your application has been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. Thank You, 0 ennifer P n, Deputy Director City of Aspen, Community Development Department C:\Documents and Settings\jennifep\My Documents\organized\G Drive\Templates\Land Use Cases\Completeness Letter Land Use.doc ;? --~ . ~. .., , _, THE CITY OF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: January 12, 2009 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number and name assigned to this property is 00062.2008.ASLU, 312 Hunter-Commercial Design Review .The planner assigned to this case is Errin Evans. She will be in contact with you shortly to verify whether the variance can be granted administratively. ^ Your Land Use Application is incomplete: We found that the application needs additional items to be submitted for it to be deemed complete and for us to begin reviewing it. We need the following additional submission contents for you application: 1. 2. 3. Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. ~vYour Land Use Application is complete: // If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. Th t'You, + nnifer Ph an, Deputy Director City of Asp ommunity Development Department C:\Documents and Settings\jennifep\My Documents\organized\G Drive\Templates\Land Use Cases\Completeness Letter Land Use.doc ~. -- ~,~// 4 / MEMORANDUM TO: Plans were routed to those departments checked-off below: .....X.. . City Engineer ........ . Community Development Engineer ......... . Police Department .....X.. ..Zoning Officer ......... . Housing Director .....X.. . Parks Department ' .....X.. . Aspen Fire Marshal ''!`:' .......... . City Water ~. .....X.. . Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District .....X.. . Building Department .......... . Environmental Health ......... .. Electric Department .......... . Holy Cross Electric ......... .. City Attorney ......... .. Streets Department ......... .. Historic Preservation Officer ....... ..City Parking Manager ......... .. Pitkin County Planning FROM: Errin Evans, Current Planner Community Development Department 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611 Phone: 429-2745 Fax: 920-5439 RE: Commercial Building - Fagade Remodel (312 S. Hunter Street) - Commercial Design Review Parcel ID #2737-182-25-023 DATE: Monday January 12, 2009 COMMENTS: Please review the attached application for a fagade remodel on a commercial building on 312 S Hunter Street. The applicant intends to change the front of the building. The remodel would consist of removing the existing stairway and creating an ADA ramp. A DRC meeting will be held on January 21 s`, 2009. Please have your comments returned by January 30, 2009. Please return your application if you do not want to hold onto it once the review is finished. DRC Meeting: January 21, 2009 Thank You, Errin Evans sir: .., .,, ~ . , .,;+ :, '~~' Date: January 21912008 7('roj~ct: I~ti~ade Remodel (312 S. Hunter Street) City of Aspen Engineering Department DRC Comments 21.12.370 Excavation under existing curb and gutter and sidewalk "If any excavation occurs under existing curb, gutter or sidewalk, that curb gutter and sidewalk shall be removed and replaced. The replacement shall be from the nearest concrete joint." o The applicant will need to replace any concrete sidewalk `stones' adjacent to the property that are disturbed by construction of these improvements. From the nature of the improvements sidewalk replacement would occur across the entire front of the applicants building. 21.16.080 Responsibility to repair sidewalks, driveways, and gutters "When notified that any sidewalk, driveway, curb, gutter or and combination thereof, in front of or abutting upon or servicing any premises shall be in need ofrepair the city engineer shall cause notice to be served upon the~owner or other person in charge of or having the control anc~ sup~~vision of the premises, to repair such sidewalk, driveway, curb or gutter within thirty (30) days. It shall be unlawful for any person to fail or refuse to comply with such notice to repair." o Sidewalk and Curb and Gutter adjacent to this applicants building is deficient due to a vertical displacement of greater than'/4" and spalling and crumbling concrete. The applicant is required to replace the deficient Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk. 21.16.90 Definition of sidewalk in need of repair "For the purpose of this chapter, a `sidewalk in need of repair' shall mean a sidewalk in any of the following conditions: a) concrete that is spalling or crumbling b) vertical displacement of the adjoining sidewalk section is in excess ofthree-quarters (3/4)inch, or c) Lateral Displacement of adjoining sidewalk sections is in excess of one. (1) inch, or d) The sidewalk his a transverse slope in excess of one (1) inch pgr foot or t*he combination of transverse or longitudirial,gide is insufficient for adequate drainage of the sidewalk causing accumulation of water and ice. Miscellaneous Permanent Encroachment License - A permanent,encroachment license will be required if any permanent infrastructure such as a awning, extents past the property ... DRC January 20, 2009 City Parks Department Requirements Property: 312 S Hunter Street Sidewalk landscaped azea .... ..: Landscaping in the public right of way will be subject to landscaping in the ROW requirements. There shall be no plantings with the City ROW which are not approved first by the city parks department. Sidewalks shall be designed and build in a manner that reduces the impact to existing trees and roots systems. All sidewalks located within the drip line of trees to be saved shall be built on grade in a manner that allows for the sub-grade prep and sidewalk to float over the roots preventing any excavation in to the soil. All work in protection zone is to be accomplished without machines, handwork only. ROW requirements require adequate irrigation pressure and coverage, if a system is not in place one will need to be added. New street trees are required; species, location and tree trench preparation are subject to approval from the City Forester, 920-5120. A plan is required for review and approval. The plan should detail spacing, species and irrigation. YY)o~la ~,.~ ... ....... _. __. ..............._._. . ~- W C~ ~ _~~ ~z ~~ ~~ U~ cn w ~ ~ ~ ~~° `~ m o ~ ~ ~ ~: Z ~ ~~ ~O ~w ~~ ~~ ~~ ®~ ~~ ~~ _~ ~/ N !-~ 0 z O Z ~ wU Uw ~~ V / O ~ L~ `U^- ~ zz U z _~ {"t y W 0 7 - ~-~-~ w 'ten n ~ v0 ~ ~U 0 Q 0 /1~1 1\1-1 ~` ~~ . , °' ..9-.Z vo °~. v. ~ d ~ ~p~ a vo ~ o ° ~ ~ a a ~ p~ v D °. D ° . .o~ .. ~ a p °~ ~ o ... .p v p Q v do a~ a o p °p': d °. p a v ~ 'd '~QO . p V p a v p' a.O ` v a 'p .'°.. Q p v ~ ~ ~ p ' o ' ~ .v ~. ~ a ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ a o p °. p v ° 0 p. ° ° o p ~ ~ p a ~ ~ ~ a ~ . .. ~~ ~ p.v ° p ° p d - W d a. a. ~ a dpp° ~ .. a. o Z v ~ .v :. v .p ~ .. W ~ a °. C ~~ . ~a ~ p ~ p ~ .~q ° a Q ~ . v Q o. W ~ ~ p d V ~ .. ~ p o . V . . ° p . `a Z p a.. oc.Q V .a. Q.. a pQp a p ~ ~ ~ Q p ~ ~ p ... . °.. .o a 'Q d p a N ° p o°. do a p. , , o r V ° p Q ° a w . p pv .. ° p ° ~ . °.p v o ~ ~ ~ °.~ ° 0 ' $ Q'. V ~ '~ n .a. ~ ~ .8 v v p d . v a o a . o p ° g . ° p o D v a ~ $ a v t p _. p C d ~I p _J N Q UJ~ ~ ~ W ~Q ~F ~ W uo~a ~3~0 U?3~ F 7 i- Q W F F ~~ Q~ ~y~ ~~ W 0 a ~• '~1 V L~ From: Errin Evans ent: Friday, January 16, 2009 11:12 AM '°~fo: 'Linda Wong' Subject: 312 S Hunter Attachments: image003.jpg Hello Linda: I will give you a paper copy of the sign when you arrive next week. So far no one from the Development Review Committee has had any major concerns; however I took your case to the Community Development staff meeting today and there were some issues with the Commercial Design Standards for the Commercial Character Area. For the most part they like the design and think it will be a great project. I have outlined the commercial design criteria that they didn't feel your design met: In the Facade Articulation section on page 29, the guidelines refer to human scale and continuity. The staff feel that the large amount of concrete that encloses the ramp is not appropriate for human scale. The concrete is too high next to the sidewalk. On page 30, street level character guidelines refer to glass and that the front fa4ade at street level should be predominantly glass. Your design meets the minimum required arhount of 60%; however, it is supposed to be designed to use glass for the full height of the storefront. There should be a close relationship between the level of the shop frontage and the entrance with the public. The location of4he ramp makes this a challenge. vastly, in reference to first floor character on page 32, elevated or sunken entrances shall be avoided. The entrance ,could be at ground level. Also I am not sure by looking at the floor plans, an airlock should be incorporated. There should be a transparency with the public and the storefront window area and the immediate relationship. We realize the stairs are an existing condition, but we wondered if it would be possible to locate the ramp on the interior of the building to allow the windows to go full length. It seems that the concrete is very high on the lower level of the ramp from the pedestrian perspective. We have some other examples around town, where the ramp is located just within the building so that the front appearance seems to be at street level. Call me if you would like to further discuss this, Thanks, Errin Evans Current Planner Community Development -• 3~` City of Aspen ~ ' T ~- 130 S Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 phone: 970-429-2745 ax: 970-920-5439 .~. SIDEWALK REPAIR NOTICE ~E CITY OF ASPEN To the owners of the property located at: From: The City of Aspen Engineering Department. Dated: One or more areas of sidewalk adjoining the above property have been determined to be a public tripping hazard, in accordance with City Municipal Code, ordinance number 21.16.090, the sidewalk in front of or abutting upon the premises of the above address has been declared in need of repair. The following notice is served upon the owner or person in charge of said property is per City Municipal Code, ordinance number 21.16.1080. Deficient sidewalk stones are to be repaired within 90 days of the issuance of this notice. Unsafe stones have one or more of the following features: (a) Vertical Displacement of the adjoining sidewalk section is in excess of three-quarters (3/4) inch, or (b) Lateral displacement of adjoining sidewalk section is in excess of one (1) inch, or (c) The sidewalk has a transverse slope in excess of one (1) inch per foot, or the combination of transverse or longitudinal grade is insufficient for adequate drainage of the sidewalk causing accumulation of water and ice. Please be aware that Ordinance number 21.16.010 states, that any construction of new sidewalk must be in accordance with the Engineering Department's Construction Standards and Design Standards. A licensed, bonded contractor in your employ needs to complete the City of Aspen's Right of Way permit application available from the Engineering Department prior to commencement of work. The Right of Way permit application fee of $343.00 will be waived for this project. These documents can be found on the department website at www.asoenpitkin.com or may be picked up at the Department office, 517 E. Hopkins Avenue, Aspen. If, after the period of 90 days, the repairs to sidewalk are incomplete, the City may construct the above improvements and owner shall reimburse the City for all costs of such construction. Reimbursement shall be made to the City within ninety (90) days after receipt of invoice. In the event of failure to pay, the cost shall be placed as a lien against the property to run with the land. Should you have any questions or concerns regarding this notice, please contact the Engineering Department: 970-920-5080 .... ~r AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 3 ~ ~, s' ~-~.~.v~~ed' S~ ,Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: ~,,,~.,d «~ ~-~b 1~ P 4-'. 0O o vY-, , 200 9 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I ~~~~ Sip.(-ems (name, please print) being or repr enes ting an Applicant to the ity of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: / Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached Ixereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less thazi one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) daps prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the _ day of , 200_, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to .the public heazing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeazed no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and goverrzmerztal agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions that create more than one lot, Planned Unit Developments, Specially Planned Areas, and COWAPs aze subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the azea of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. ,,~,~~ Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this Z day of ~-e-h , 200, by _~_P~, ~GV~f -2.~~ PUBLIC NO CE yIEW TO REMODEL RE' 312 S. HUNTER STR DING ALOONG HUNT- COMMERCIPL DESIGN THE FACADE OF TME A ACENT ALLEY WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My corn €¢sion er fires: S °t o~01 Notary Public ~~ CORY J. GARSKE ATTACHIVIENTS AS APPLICABLE: ?PUBLICATION KOFTHEPOSTEDNOTICE(SIGIU) MVCo~*rcis;i^^ LlJT OF THE OWNERSAND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED 0510912012 BYMAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OFMINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIREDBYC.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 -n iFtapamaL CM1ai'^Naq Commission .~ ~.. ATTACHMENT? AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: ~/ ~ Z ^~ ~ k N ~ ~~~ ,Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: ~/!7~ , 200 ~' STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. Couuty of Pitkin ) I,lJ'~-e u.C V~ 3 •~ i e-c (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15~days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the Z9 a of .~t.s.a,w.. 200 to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A otograph of~ posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy. of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) ~^ ~. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning disfrict map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this~~ay of J~ , 200 ~[, by ~~t yr ,e?es~ tC~o- WITNESS MY HAND AND/OFFICIAL SEAL ~ p~ ~ My commission expires: ty -~y ao~oL f, sor a cowndo ~~~ Nota lic ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BYMAIL Nc~+~ ~ , ~"y*~i^ A ~ dsr~~'g ~~~ f~ t' ~ .~- ~~.~~. i''~/ .d~'t'~ iF~''Y' ,yy ..,,f;..,~' 1 { any) a~ 5 K ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ a~M, 'a§ ~~,, ~~~ ¢~ ' n'~~ r~ M '^gAYp ~~fk ^ i Y i ~ = .,~ ~~~ ~. ~~a" ~~ r r, ~;:~ "K,A ,. ~ ~~ 1. ,'<' ~~; 4 ~l S' „ ~#a y ~ ~;~, ~ z ~~ v ~ '~vkp ~y ~"^ kr~ ~>~.:. x ~~ ~ s ~ ~ ~~~v x z ax S . ~". #~~,; ~A~'~ ~E~RUN~~~ ~~ ~i~~? SISTER CITIES ~4EE~'IN+~ R~4. ~'~AC~ C1TY HA~,L 13(~ ~ (a~t~ ~A ~~~~g~~ THE,~PPLICAti+ iS .__ PRaP4Sl`G Ta REI`~~a~'E THE E:~ISTING STAIR EPl~T RA~iCE ,~!~D A?rl !;CAA R~~1~~1r~ AhJD CIiA^~~E T~~E __.,~ Frt.-a:C~E "~F T~~E E}6?5TN`~~ ~'al~r~.aERi;IAL QU~LC~INC~ ~ ~aR h~aRE 1-.~,~~,R~~~ATIJN CC~t^lyar~~T ~P~tIN E;`''~`;S AT i HE_~(T'~'' uF r~SPEI'~ _,... ~_ 1197;: '~~ er~~c a~.~a ~~_t~ /'t+f t~'~TMli Iht Cl'M A'?Ir~ri fONT~~:T TN dire ppF~ ~~r« r~~~%~s. ar r~et~ebrP 1x~! :AIEKk3T I3f4NCb liT1':!t211rNt! .~ .. ~.. ATTACHMENT 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 31.2 s • '~'I V f ~ r~s~Y~ , Aspeo, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: L'1TM ~EI314~}( , 200 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. Couuty of Pitkin ) I, Y10t"1l~.~t ~ '~l(A..~~.I ill e.-" (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Departrnent, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the _ day of 200_, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. _~ Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (IS) days prior to the public heazing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) ~. .. ~. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all basin ss hours for fifreen (IS) days prior to the public heazing on such amendments. ~ l The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 30day of Jam uO..l , 200_, by ~i v r.~c.~1 ~ ~1 c!._Sl z t tiF // HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL DEBRA LEE LANE jyly Or ' Commission # 1632047 ia lif µ '- _ orn Notary Public - Ca _. ~ Los Angeles County My Comm. Expires Jan 1, 2010 NOt~ ATTACHMENTS: COP Y O F THE P UBL l CATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN I , X010 LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BYMAIL .-., ,, AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070, ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY:) I Z- S Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) -(-(-~,t,nreN S~'~ee,(~ I ~~ ~ A J C crF~~ (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered.~A,,c~op~y~of t/ze publication is attached hereto. .7~ ` ;7 ~ ~ ~~) Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 2- day of Ma.rtt~, , 2008, by Sccs! UBLIC NOTICE a DEVELOPMENT APPgOVAL Notice of me ~, and ant to approval is only permitted for the submitted~eleva Lion plan. For further information contact Errin Evans, at the City of Aspan Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St, gspen, Colorado X9]0) 429-2]<5. "~' sr Ciry of Aspen Publishetl in the Aspen Times Weekly on March 1, <..r zoos. t3osasst) WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commi ~ n expi s: «V Notary Pu li ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION d CORY J. i GARSKE ~+y Canmiesion Expire- 0510p12012