Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.sm.Gordon exemption 273501307017.90A-89,.~, ~.~ CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 9 14 89 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. 2735-013-07-017 90A-89 STAFF MEMBER-- ('zz_ PROJECT NAME: Gordon Exem tion from Stream Mar in Review Project Address: 1100 Black Birch Drive Legal Address: I. t 10. Black Birch Estates APPLICANT: Sheldon Gordon Applicant Address: REPRESENTATIVE: Stan Mathis Representative Address/Phone: P. O. Box 1984 Aspen. CO 81612 0-1434 PAID: YES NO AMOIINT: X50.00 NO. OF COPIES RECEIVED: 1 -~ sefS TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: /+~~5 2 STEP: P&Z Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO Planning Director Approval: ~' Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: Date: S~J REFERRALS: - City Attorney City Engineer Housing Dir. Aspen Water City Electric Envir. Hlth. Aspen Consol. S.D. DATE REFERRED: Mtn. Bell Parks Dept. Holy Cross Fire Marshall Building Inspector Roaring Fork Energy Center INITIALS: School District Rocky Mtn Nat Gas State Hwy Dept(GW) State Hwy Dept(GJ) Other FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED--~INITIAL:~ City Atty ~ City Engineer ~.ZOning Env. Health Housing Other: FILE STATUS AND IACATION:_ ~~v /C~JCw~-1"`~ MEMORANDUM TO: Bill Drueding, Zoning Officer FROM: Leslie Lamont, Planner RE: Gordon Stream Margin Exemption DATE: September 29, 1989 SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to build an entryway at the front door of a single family home. The home is within 100 feet of the 100 year flood line. The applicant has applied for a Stream Margin Exemption. Staff recommends denial of the exemption. The applicant must submit an application for Stream Margin Review. REFERRAL COMMENTS: Please see attached comments from the Engineering Department. FINDINGS: Pursuant to Section 7-504 the following standards apply for Stream Margin Exemption: 1. The development does not add more than ten percent (10~j to the floor area of the existing structure or increase the amount of building area exempt from floor area calculations by more than twenty-five percent (25%). RESPONSE: The proposed entry is approximately 176 square feet which is approximately 4$ of the existing floor area. 2. The development does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit would be required pursuant to Section 13-76 or the applicant receives a permit pursuant to said subsection. RESPONSE: No trees shall be removed for the entry. 3. The development is located such that no portion of the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction will be any closer to the high water line than is the existing development. RESPONSE: The addition is proposed for the northern side of the house which is perpendicular to Castle Creek. It is no closer to the high water line than the existing development. 4. The development does not fall outside of an approved building envelope, if one has been designated through a prior review. RESPONSE: The entry will extend beyond the existing residence. 5. The development is located completely outside of the Special Flood Hazard Area and more than one hundred feet (100') measured horizontally, from the high water line of the Roaring Fork River and its tributary streams or the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction will cause no increase to the amount of ground coverage of structures within the Special Flood Hazard Area. RESPONSE: The addition will increase the ground coverage by approximately 90 feet. According to the FEMA map the flood plain extends up into the parcel and goes right through the middle of the home. Because of this discrepancy between the applicant's map and the actual FEMA map, the applicant must submit a map that shows the relation of the proposed addition to the flood plain and must determine whether the addition will change the base flood elevation. it is recommended that the applicant submit an application for a complete Stream Margin Review. in addition, there are two hot tubs that were built on site, without Stream Margin Review, that are well within the flood plain. One of the tubs is over the property line. The applicant has agreed to remove those tubs as a condition of Stream Margin Approval. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Director deny the Stream Margin Exemption. It is necessary for a Stream Margin Review application to be submitted showing the true 100 year flood plain, a base flood elevation certificate, and an elevation of the proposed entry so review can determine if the entry will increase the base flood elevation. 2 hereby deny the above Stream Margin Exemption with conditions, pursuant to Section 7-504 A. of the Aspen Land Use Code. Am Mar a um, Planning Di for 11/gordonsm 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Leslie Lamont, Planning Office FROM: Jim Gibbard, Engineering Department DATE: September 29, 1989 RE: Gordon Exemption from Stream Margin Review The Engineering Department recommends against granting an exemption because this development is within the floodplain boundary not outside as the applicant has indicated. jg/Gordon cc: Chuck Roth Bob Gish CASEIAAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 9/14/89 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. 2735-013-07-017 90A-89 STAFF MEMBER• a-~ PROJECT NAME: Gordon Exemption from Stream Margin Review Project Address. 1100 Black Birch Drive Legal Address: Lot 10 Black Birch Estates ' APPLICANT: Sheldon Gordon '' Applicant Address: REPRESENTATIVE: Stan Mathis Representative Address/Phone: P. O. Box 1984 Ashen. CO 81612 0-1434 PAID: YES NO AMOUNT: S50.00 NO. OF COPIES RECEIVED: 1 -'~ seas ~++~5 TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: P&Z Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO Planning Director Approval: a' Paid: S6~"~ Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: Date: REFERRALS: ---- -- --- -- _ -_ City Attorney Mtn. Bell School District City Engineer Parks Dept. Rocky Mtn Nat Gas Housing Dir. Holy Cross State Hwy Dept(GW) Aspen Water Fire Marshall State Hwy Dept(GJ) City Electric Building Inspector Envir. Hlth. Roaring Fork Other Aspen Consol. Energy Center S.D. -~r,Q' DATE REFERRED: ~"~ ~/ ~ INITIALS: FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED• INITIAL: - - City Atty City Engineer Zoning Env. Health - Housing Other: FILE STATUS AND IACATION: MEMORANDUM TO: City Engineer FROM: Leslie Lamont, Planning Office ~~ Gordon Exemption from Stream Margin Review DATE: September 25, 1989 Attached for your review and comments is an application from Stan Mathis for Exemption from Stream Margin Review. Please review this material and return your comments to me as soon as you can. This is an internal staff review. Thank you. ~... September 14, 1989 City of Aspen Planning & Zoning Dept 201 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 Attn: Leslie Lamont Dear Leslie, "~ SEP 14 Please accept this application for a stream margin review exemption for the entry addition to Sheldon Cordon's house @ 1100 Black Birch Drive, City of Aspen. As you can see the entry addition meets the requirements of the City of Aspen zoning code Sec 7-504 (B) for exemption from stream margin review. Attached are the architectural floor plans (2) showing the proposed entry (circled in red), a check for $50.00, and 2 copies of the survey of the subject property. Please call it you have any questions. Th Stan Mathis 5T.1\ hi9~fIIS aRCHIT~;CTI'RE ~1D PI.:41NI.~C Post Office Box 1984 Aspen Colorado 81612 303/920-1434 ATTACfII~SENT 4 Review Standards: Development Application for Exemption from Stream Margin Review The expansion, remodeling or reconstruction of an existing development shall be exempt from stream margin review if the following standards are met: 1. The development does not add more than ten percent (l0$) to the floor area of the existing structure or increase the amount of building area exempt from floor area calculaitons by m re han twent fiv~ pert ~~ r ((g%j/'/nVL+yc 'l'_~r°~i5 1~ Q~~~ S. W idt~ ~~ o o p CbV 2. The d velopment does of re re the removal of any tree for which a permit would be required pursuant to Section 13-76 or the applicant receives a permit pu~~rsu~~aly~nt to said s~u~bs~ec~-tion; and+ NQ'('(L~ (C~'~/ui m~ 3. Th~e~d velnt~is~ l~oc~ated such that no P portion of the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction will be any closer to the high wat ine thgn is the-~((~~exist'n deve pment;lf,,and.'(~}~~~dw W~t~ ~ ~GfFPG~~ 4. The evelopment oes not fall outside of an approved building envelope, i on has been esigna t7h~rough a priore ' ew;o and .~~U~op+wt.~ (S ~'Ny+^Q4~p~V' 5. The development is located completely outside of the one hundred (100) year floodplain or the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction will cause no increase to the amount of 1gLrou pgr/erage o~~ $truct~res witytin the floodplain.. AI'L' ~ gyp„, a.J~ SAS G / ~ ~O. L o~ v»~r~+dl QoUC~i~~(~pp rr~~tt~~'1~rf w~f( i~W`/~~ wf" A~rrAa~arr 1 ~ usE c~orr ~ ~ w 1) Project Name ~ •+ WOK ~• Q 2) Project - (indicate street address, of & lock rnmber, legal chi-r-;z ion mete ammiri at0) !~ 3) Present Zonin4 ~'~ J 4) IDt Size `/Q_~~ ~ 5) A~ I~t' t /~ ~ A '~aa.....,.,. & Pkwile ~ ~~QIO.{4 ~ 6f v (,) Representative's Name, Aririnxc & Alone 7) Z~+pe of Appli t~i n (Please d~ec]c all t2~at apply) : Oonditional Use SPA ~ Fii-storic Dev. Special Review Final SPA Final Hictnric Dev. 88040 c;reenline Cbayoeptual A]D Mimr Historic Dev. V S-tc,eam Maigin Final AlD Hi ctnri c D~lition Nfamtain .View Plane _ Subdivision Historic Desiccation (~iniimi~atioR _ 'i1e]ct/MaP.AID~I~t Q"1.~ Allotment Iot Spl it/Iat IaIle ~~ °n ~ncl-~m*+h g) nxcriTr+r; on of FSci ct; r~r Uses (nmbPr aryl type of Asti ct; n~ str~res: amnooomate so. ft. ; n~bPS' of bechvoms; any pRevlous apprcwals granted to the 9) 10) Hav~ you attac3yad the following? R~0[LSe t0 AttdChment 2, Minimim Sy~l-misel.Q1 OorIteIlts to Attac3m~ent 3, Specific ~~>~iscion Cmtents Response to Attadment 4, Review Standazds for Your Application September 1, 1989 City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, ,CO 8161,1 Pitkin County Planning Office To Whom Zt May Concern: I hereby authorize Stan Mathis to speak to you on my behalf regarding the cordon subdivision, at 1105 Black Birch Drive. ~~ ~~ ~rdon ;: 11611 San Vi412 EasSti59th St New York, NYi10022 9 20 2?593-006313-826-7800 MEMORANDUM TO: City Engineer FROM: Leslie Lamont, Planning Office RE: Gordon Exemption from Stream Margin Review DATE: September 25, 1989 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Attached for your review and comments is an application from Stan Mathis for Exemption from Stream Margin Review. Please review this material and return your comments to me as soon as you can. This is an internal staff review. Thank you.