HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.845 Meadows Rd.0003.2010.ASLU THE CITY OF ASPEN
City of Aspen Community Development Department
CASE NUMBER 0003.2010.ASLU
PARCEL ID NUMBER 2735 121 1 29 008
PROJECTS ADDRESS 845 MEADOWS ROAD
PLANNER CHRIS BENDON
CASE DESCRIPTION STREAM MARGIN EXEMPTION
REPRESENTATIVE JIM CURTIS
DATE OF FINAL ACTION 3.11.10
CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 5.26.10
1 — ‘ — Z9 --°°
__..
File Edit Record Navigate Form Reports Format Tab Help ----
Afilumpl ,4/1 0101
o 3 - Z010 - AS1-14
:___J111131111
11 Main Valuation Custom Fields Actions Fees Parcels 'Fee Summary, ISub eermits lAttachrnentS 1Roiting Status Routing History
0 r) .
Permit Type aslu Aspen Land Use Permit # i0003,2010.A5LU
Address 895 MEADOWS RD Apt/Suite
o City 'ASPEN State !CO J Zip 81611 A
& ,
;= Permit Information i
i --
• Master Permit Routing Queue as1007 Applied 1-72 7 2 0 1 0 3 •
Project I - . Li Status pending Approved A
• Description STREAM MARGIN REVIEW EXEMPTION APPLICATION Issued -Thi I
Final
Submitted JIM CURTIS 920 1395 Clock Running Days 0 Expires 01/28/2011
II Owner
Last Name 'ASPEN INSTITUTE -A Mrst Name I 1000 N THIRD ST
ASPEN CO 81611
Phone (970) 925-7010
ol
..e Owner Is Applicant?
Applicant
1
Last Name Ar=SPEN INSTITUTE First Name i 1000 N THIRD ST
j I ASPEN CO 81611
Phone OM 925-7010 Cust *125366
Lender
Last Name I j First Nan* I
i • " Phone I I
E
Permit lenders full address _ AspenGold(b) Record 1 of 1
-_--...
CV 4* 49'1-'2 ___
1 C V A AALAAAV 5 9 47 ' cc°
ct6 2 2,7li2
s2.),..)
C\ 13c3j , ..2_. ._ ce,
(b\\
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
of the
City of Aspen
Community Development Department
This Development Order, hereinafter "Order ", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070,
"Development Orders ", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights ", of the City of Aspen
Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to
the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall
also be the initiation date of a three -year vested property right. The vested property right shall
expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building
permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension,
reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After
Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding
any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to
any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order.
This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific
development plan as described below.
The Aspen Institute, 1000 North Third Street, Aspen, CO 81611
Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address
Aspen Meadows Subdivision, Lot 1 -A, 845 Meadows Road, Aspen, CO 81611
Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property
Approval for minor surface and drainage improvements to the Kresge Building Terrace.
Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and /or Attachment Describing Plan
Approval by the City of Aspen Community Development Department for Stream Margin Review
Exemption and issued on March 8 2010.
Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions)
March 8 2010
Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.)
March 9 2013
Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and
revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.)
Issued this 8 day of March, 2010 by the City of Aspen Community Development
Director.. 41,ilLa
Chris Bendon, Community Development Director
NOTICE OF APPROVAL
FOR STREAM MARGIN EXEMPTION PERTAINING TO IMPROVEMENTS
OF THE KRESGE BUILDING TERRACE LOCATED OFF OF THE HINES
ROOM AT THE ASPEN INSTITUTE, LOT 1 -A OF THE ASPEN MEADOWS
SUBDIVISION, LOCATED AT 845 MEADOWS ROAD.
Parcel ID 2735- 12 -1 -29 -008
APPLICANT: The Aspen Institute
c/o Amy Margerum
REPRESENTATIVE: Jim Curtis
SUBJECT & SITE OF APPROVAL: Kresge Building Terrace, located off of the
Hines Room, Aspen Meadows Subdivision Lot 1 -A, at 845 Meadows Rd., involving the
approval of Stream Margin Exemption for improvement work on the terrace.
SUMMARY:
The Kresge Building and Terrace were originally constructed in the 1970's. The
structure and terrace were then completely reconstructed in 1992. The Institute is
planning a renovation of the Hines Room within the Kresge Building - the room that the
terrace is accessed through. Part of the renovation includes surface and drainage
improvements to the terrace.
STAFF EVALUATION:
The proposed renovation meets the standards set forth in the Land Use Code Section
26.435.040.B, Stream Margin Review Exemptions. The renovation of the terrace does
not include any area or size increases and is strictly for surface and drainage
improvements.
The Parks and Engineering Departments have reviewed the application and have no
major concerns. Engineering Department has made the following recommendations:
a. A site visit is completed after snowmelt to reassess the drainage solution,
particularly to determine a less impactful a less impacting and more natural
outfall.
The Parks Department has made the following recommendations:
a. No activity off of the existing footprint expect for installation of approved
drainage system.
b. Excavation outside of the terrace footprint shall be accomplished by hand -
digging only.
Page lof4
c. Use of heavy equipment is prohibited unless a special tree removal /excavation
under the drip line permit is approved and specific construction techniques are
followed.
d. Tree removal, trimming, branch removal trimming or cutting is prohibited
e. Cutting of roots greater than 2 inches is prohibited and will require a site visit
from the parks department.
Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit "A." A site plan has
been included as Exhibit "B."
DECISION:
Staff finds that the Stream Margin Exemption application provided by the
Applicant, The Aspen Institute (represented by Jim Curtis) meets the applicable
criteria and is appropriate for approval. The Applicant shall meet those
requirements made by the Parks Department and revisit the drainage solution with
the Engineering Department once snow on the site has melted. The Application
presented reputable information regarding the standards in 26.435.040.B, Stream
Margin Review Exemption.
APP •11 VED BY:
Higrk b. lig
Ch s Bendon Date
Community Development Director
Attachments:
Exhibit A — Stream Margin Exemption Review Criteria
Exhibit B — Site Plan
Page 2of 4
EXHIBIT A
Aspen Institute, Stream Margin Exemption
REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS:
26.435.040.13: Stream Margin Review Exemption —
The Community Development Director may exempt the following types of development
within the Stream Margin Review area:
3. The expansion, remodeling, or reconstruction of an existing development
provided the following standards have been met:
a. The development does not add more than ten (10) percent to the floor
area of the existing structure or increase the amount of building
area exempt from floor area calculations by more than twenty-five
(25) percent. All stream margin exemptions are cumulative. Once a
development reaches these totals, a Stream Margin Review by the
Planning and Zoning Commission is required; and,
Staff Finding: The improvements to the terrace do not add any floor area. Staff
• finds this criterion met. •
b. The development does not require the removal of any tree for which
a permit would be required pursuant to Chapter 13.20 of this Code;
and
Staff Finding: The Parks Department has reviewed the plans and completed a site
visit to assess field conditions. The proposed drainage system will not require the
removal of any existing trees. Staff finds this criterion met.
c. The development is located such that no portion of the expansion,
remodeling or reconstruction will be any closer to the high water line
than is the existing development;
Staff Finding: The development will not infringe upon the high water line any
more than the existing conditions. The terrace currently extends beyond the top
of slope, but there is no plan to expand the terrace. Staff finds this criterion met.
d. The development does not fall outside of an approved building
envelope if one has been designated through a prior review; and
Staff Finding: There is not an applicable building envelope for the Kresge
Building in the Aspen Meadows Subdivision. Staff finds this criterion met.
Page 3of 4
r^
e. The expansion, remodeling or reconstruction will cause no increase
to the amount of ground coverage of structures within the 100 year
flood plain
Staff Finding: Being that there is no increase in surface area through approved
terrace improvements, ground coverage will remain the same as existing
conditions. Staff finds this criterion met.
Page 4of 4
,.....,
•
8
18,2e OZ4
,a a 8 VA: (i+t1
! : L' 1, is
\ 1
\ W
vwA� via h
7\ \
e � y , mi l_ 1
o ,g --4 zit -cti
i'jpC pip, F ` "c HI
N �a a 1111: fit 1'
$ Y \ 4th F
Rd
v Rd � - '�
g9g g .. \� \ � i t 1S g §s
g a:1 1
1 �. a r y \ r- 7 4 a p.
d 1 sg p 0 1.
a q 4 I (•
c m a x; li 1 Il \ ;i..,; at iiii§ii g
' € .:; Il
{
o q d ! d i e `4 in • \ m 3 E - e !' 3 %
ta 6$ 4 f � ° ,& ft p o 01
fo -1 744, , r � j .. l t
g g F ° f :
F a ,- �i * �v�� a uJ :§i - e ets v /
_10 ; rpr it V §S° \;::.••::;i,: \\ \ \\ .° °v .4 I C /j
ra j§ " i 4 � t 4- 171 Lit 1r ;
nm t
a ?
I
/ §
g g°p@9 r -
4.7 1 4
tdd e II 8 x a 35 l 1
147 a � 42 I p A €fi a4 t
A NI . la :s t a� ddd
CR
C , �U � aa ret' l' §R
Y „ F� a91 t .
g t
O - ?_
1d 1 1 ! at Flo a igi; F t1
n H e g - z $ t g • a8 4 � itb a 1 1
` a - BQ a IA 1 d itdit 411t00ei"
§ C _ I gg 'k 6 fi e` d t au
ag ea t at , -, r fe: a }ty$EE e
8 •t ;. t'' � . "a s t t$A� tt4it `,
2k i
t G - gxtvm- ii i` a
I I
E x TM1Va
W
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
of the
City of Aspen
Community Development Department
This Development Order, hereinafter "Order ", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070,
"Development Orders ", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights ", of the City of Aspen
Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to
the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall
also be the initiation date of a three -year vested property right. The vested property right shall
expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building
permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension,
reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After
Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding
any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to
any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order.
This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific
development plan as described below.
The Aspen Institute, 1000 North Third Street, Aspen, CO 81611
Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address
Aspen Meadows Subdivision, Lot 1 -A, 845 Meadows Road, Aspen, CO 81611
Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property
Approval for minor surface and drainage improvements to the Kresge Building Terrace.
Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and /or Attachment Describing Plan
Approval by the City of Aspen Community Development Department for Stream Margin Review
Exemption and issued on March 8 2010.
Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions)
March 8 2010
Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.)
March 9 2013
Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and
revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.)
Issued this 8 day of March, 2010 by the City of Aspen Community Development
Director.
I , 4
Chris Bendon, Community Development Director
w_✓
NOTICE OF APPROVAL
FOR STREAM MARGIN EXEMPTION PERTAINING TO IMPROVEMENTS
OF THE KRESGE BUILDING TERRACE LOCATED OFF OF THE HINES
ROOM AT THE ASPEN INSTITUTE, LOT 1 -A OF THE ASPEN MEADOWS
SUBDIVISION, LOCATED AT 845 MEADOWS ROAD.
Parcel ID 2735- 12 -1 -29 -008
APPLICANT: The Aspen Institute
c/o Amy Margerum
REPRESENTATIVE: Jim Curtis
SUBJECT & SITE OF APPROVAL: Kresge Building Terrace, located off of the
Hines Room, Aspen Meadows Subdivision Lot 1 -A, at 845 Meadows Rd., involving the
approval of Stream Margin Exemption for improvement work on the terrace.
SUMMARY:
The Kresge Building and Terrace were originally constructed in the 1970's. The
structure and terrace were then completely reconstructed in 1992. The Institute is
planning a renovation of the Hines Room within the Kresge Building - the room that the
terrace is accessed through. Part of the renovation includes surface and drainage
improvements to the terrace.
STAFF EVALUATION:
The proposed renovation meets the standards set forth in the Land Use Code Section
26.435.040.B, Stream Margin Review Exemptions. The renovation of the terrace does
not include any area or size increases and is strictly for surface and drainage
improvements.
The Parks and Engineering Departments have reviewed the application and have no
major concerns. Engineering Department has made the following recommendations:
a. A site visit is completed after snowmelt to reassess the drainage solution,
particularly to determine a less impactful a less impacting and more natural
outfall.
The Parks Department has made the following recommendations:
a. No activity off of the existing footprint expect for installation of approved
drainage system.
b. Excavation outside of the terrace footprint shall be accomplished by hand -
digging only.
Page 1 of4
c. Use of heavy equipment is prohibited unless a special tree removal /excavation
under the drip line permit is approved and specific construction techniques are
followed.
d. Tree removal, trimming, branch removal trimming or cutting is prohibited
e. Cutting of roots greater than 2 inches is prohibited and will require a site visit
from the parks department.
Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit "A." A site plan has
been included as Exhibit "B."
DECISION:
Staff finds that the Stream Margin Exemption application provided by the
Applicant, The Aspen Institute (represented by Jim Curtis) meets the applicable
criteria and is appropriate for approval. The Applicant shall meet those
requirements made by the Parks Department and revisit the drainage solution with
the Engineering Department once snow on the site has melted. The Application
presented reputable information regarding the standards in 26.435.040.B, Stream
Margin Review Exemption.
APP 18 VED BY:
fitterAN b. leir
C 's Bendon Date
Community Development Director
Attachments:
Exhibit A — Stream Margin Exemption Review Criteria
Exhibit B — Site Plan
Page 2of 4
Yy
4 r
ExII BIT A
Aspen Institute, Stream Margin Exemption
REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS:
26.435.040.B: Stream Margin Review Exemption —
The Community Development Director may exempt the following types of development
within the Stream Margin Review area:
3. The expansion, remodeling, or reconstruction of an existing development
provided the following standards have been met:
a. The development does not add more than ten (10) percent to the floor
area of the existing structure or increase the amount of building
area exempt from floor area calculations by more than twenty -five
(25) percent. All stream margin exemptions are cumulative. Once a
development reaches these totals, a Stream Margin Review by the
Planning and Zoning Commission is required; and,
Staff Finding: The improvements to the terrace do not add any floor area. Staff
• finds this criterion met. •
b. The development does not require the removal of any tree for which
a permit would be required pursuant to Chapter 13.20 of this Code;
and
Staff Finding: The Parks Department has reviewed the plans and completed a site
visit to assess field conditions. The proposed drainage system will not require the
removal of any existing trees. Staff finds this criterion met.
c. The development is located such that no portion of the expansion,
remodeling or reconstruction will be any closer to the high water line
than is the existing development;
Staff Finding: The development will not infringe upon the high water line any
more than the existing conditions. The terrace currently extends beyond the top
of slope, but there is no plan to expand the terrace. Staff finds this criterion met.
d. The development does not fall outside of an approved building
envelope if one has been designated through a prior review; and
Staff Finding: There is not an applicable building envelope for the Kresge
Building in the Aspen Meadows Subdivision. Staff finds this criterion met.
Page 3 o 4
rr
e. The expansion, remodeling or reconstruction will cause no increase
to the amount of ground coverage of structures within the 100 year
flood plain
Staff Finding: Being that there is no increase in surface area through approved
terrace improvements, ground coverage will remain the same as existing
conditions. Staff finds this criterion met.
Page 4of 4
A
.C 74 t* '\ B t T 13
ti"
me w...-.s.Aw -n..v..n a.. A. wr.... ix a \\ t
• C ry
l \
s `x .r j,Z f V(n
r p.
g o N a I -ty
a• 0 _. ms s ' p$ IF t t - $3: t
084, — Al
i 1,E2f10 22 a qt t o
4" AO3 nEn it
• 01:I§ r,� \ I st4 I, 99 u 3g
Will
I n il _J
b m c I A 1 C e§ T PPP) I� ' a'
b Ai d 1.
R. y x k s ld :: _ Y 'a fi n i IM
c. y
1E a s a$ , � / :.. liti .
23 x S
?Fd 1 4- � " „ a it, il I)! F F 4 ;� ! t /r x£5
11. s
3
4 ^ ' E l
�'� t 4 a ,£ A
@ g : is J1 '$ s:
6;
A �' f2s a S 3 U a '
T s
p
a
13
gka PX33 ` »
a 5J III`I Z 3£ 3 riltRr3a €a k§
0 h i $ 8 LL a1 $$ fit £ § P; $ n
a i¢
mm m w 4
x .. a Aa ke A 1 0 Ra 1
a �4
n t e1 a 5t. ek a� $ I e 4 c $ g
�` a $ g • I I $ E K P £ A R 4'd a a NBOBI60
4 1 l £ R,` = €S AC 1p $ RI ' a': t i f 3 A
o 'b s 4.k.;� + r \ " ' ?'= gs $ le 1 d � A a A 11 i r a
g k . s'a a " ± s_ f PP a £ d R g €:t 1 Ra I t t i 3
3 A. p A .
Drew Alexander
From: April Barker
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 3:12 PM
To: Drew Alexander
Subject: RE: Hines Rm. Terrace Drainage Plan
Do you want me to hang on to this plan set? Or should I bring it over to you?
Original Message
From: Jim Curtis [mailto:jcurtis @sopris.net]
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 3:42 PM
To: Drew Alexander
Cc: April Barker
Subject: Hines Rm. Terrace Drainage Plan
I did a site visit with the SGM eng. this morning & we discussed how to potentially simplify
the drainage plan to eliminate digging on the downhill slope at the big lodgpole pine tree.
Until the snow is gone, it is not possible to see what options are feasible & /or better.
Therefore, please complete the Stream Margin Review based on the drainage plan submitted &
when the snow is gone, I, SGM eng. & April Barker will do site visit to see if we
collectively can come -up with a simpler better plan. Thanks.
1
Drew Alexander
From: Drew Alexander
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 10:11 AM
To: Brian Flynn
Subject: RE: Stream Margin Review Application for Aspen Institute
Attachments: image001.jpg
Thanks Brian.
1)rew Alexander
Planning "technician
Coronuniit■ Development Department
('.itc of Aspen
From: Brian Flynn
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 4:21 PM
To: Drew Alexander
Subject: Stream Margin Review Application for Aspen Institute
Drew, please include in your packet of information:
1. No activity allowed outside of the existing patio foot print, except that to install appropriate drainage
features.
2. Excavation outside of the patio foot print shall be required to be accomplished with hand digging only.
3. Use of heavy equipment is prohibited unless a special tree removal /excavation under the drip line
permit is approved and specific construction techniques are followed.
4. Tree removal, trimming, branch removal trimming or cutting is prohibited
5. Cutting of roots greater than 2 inches is prohibited and will require a site visit from the parks
department.
Brian Flynn
Open Space and Special Projects Manager
(P)970 -429 -2035
(F)970- 920 -5128
tI A S PEN
RKS T
1
ASPEN INSTITUTE PROPERTY
HINES MEETING ROOM AND TERRACE RENOVATION
STREAM MARGIN REVIEW EXEMPTION APPLICATION
Aspen Institute Property
845 Meadows Road
Lot 1 -A, Aspen Meadows Subdivision
Parcel # 2735 -121 -29008
Submitted To: Drew Alexander
City of Aspen Community Development Office
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
970 - 920 -5095
Owner /Applicant: The Aspen Institute
c/o Amy Margerum
Executive Vice - President
1000 North Third Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
970 -544 -7906
Architect: n/a
Planner: Mr. Jim Curtis
Curtis & Associates
300 East Hyman Avenue
Aspen, Colorado 81611
970 - 920 -1395
Date: February 1, 2010
APPLICATION SUMMARY
This application is for Stream Margin Review Exemption under Section
26.435.040(B)(3) of the Code. The Aspen Institute wishes to renovate the Hines Meeting
Room and Terrace which is located on the lower level of the Kresge Building as shown
on the attached drawings. The Kresge Building and Terrace was originally constructed in
the 1970's and then fully reconstructed in approximately 1992. The Hines Meeting Room
and Terrace is used as general meeting space for the Aspen Institute and Aspen
Meadows. Most notably, The Aspen Rotary Club meets weekly in the room. The room is
approximately 2,700 sq. ft. and the Terrace is approximately 1,200 sq. ft. No renovation
work is being done outside the existing footprint of the building or terrace. No floor area
is being added by the renovation.
STREAM MARGIN REVIEW EXEMPTION
SECTION 26.435.040(8)(3)
The Terrace sits at the edge of the Top of Slope and falls within the 15 ft. setback
from Top of Slope as shown on the attached drawings. The Terrace is proposed to be
reworked (but not expanded) to remove cracked concrete and improve its drainage.
Preliminary plans for the rework of the Terrace are attached. The Aspen Institute requests
a Stream Margin Review Exemption under Section 26.435.040(B)(3) as follows:
B. Exemptions. The Community Development Director may exempt the following
types of development within the stream margin review area:
3. The expansion, remodeling or reconstruction of an existing development
provided the following standards are met:
a. The development does not add more than ten percent (10 %) to the floor
area of the existing structure or increase the amount of building area
exempt from floor area calculations by more than twenty-five percent
(25 %). All stream margin exemptions are cumulative. Once a development
reaches these totals, a stream margin review by the Planning and Zoning
Commission is required; and
Neither the existing terrace nor meeting room is being expanded. No floor
area is being added by the renovation.
HinesStreamMarginRevApp01190 1
b. The development does not require the removal of any tree for which a
permit would be required pursuant to Chapter 13.20 of this Code;
The renovation does not require the removal of any trees. Only approved
drainage & building code work is being done outside the existing footprint
of the terrace or building.
c. The development is located such that no portion of the expansion,
remodeling or reconstruction will be any closer to the high water line than
is the existing development;
No portion of the remodeling will be any closer to the high water line than
the existing development.
d. The development does not fall outside of an approved building envelope if
one has been designated through a prior review; and
Only approved drainage & building code work is being done outside the
existing footprint of the terrace or building. The 1992 reconstruction of the
terrace and building was approved under the Aspen Meadows Specially
Planned Area.
e. The expansion, remodeling or reconstruction will cause no increase to the
amount of ground coverage of structures within the 100 year floodplain.
Only approved drainage & building code work is being done outside the
existing footprint of the terrace or building and; moreover, the terrace &
building are far outside the 100 -year floodplain. The remodeling will not
increase the ground coverage of structures.
HinesStreamMarginRevApp 2
CITY OF ASPEN
PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
PLANNER: Drew Alexander, 970.429.2739 ECEDAT_E: 1/25/10
PROJECT: Aspen Institute/Terrace Repair and Drainage I ED
OWNER:
ENTATIYE: Aspen Institute is @sopris.net C' B v2 ?olg
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Stream Margin Exemption cqo r a F ASp
DESCRIPTION:
The Aspen Institute is proposing work on the terrace adjacent to the Hines Room. An interior remodel plan has
been drafted for the Hines Room, and being that the terrace has direct access, the Institute plans to upgrade the
terrace and install new drainage that would direct water away from top of slope (TOS).
The terrace was constructed within the buffer that includes Stream Margin Review, an area designated by the
Land Use Code as an Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA). The existing terrace is well within the ESA and a
portion even extends beyond TOS. Typically, development within the area of Stream Margin must receive
approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission. However, since the terrace is existing and no expansion is
planned, the Aspen Institute is seeking approval for Stream Margin Review Exemption.
Stream Margin Review Exemption is an administrative review by Community Development Staff. A Parks referral
would be included with the review fee. No public notice is required. Com Dev Staff recommends that the
applicant present the scope of work/plans to Sara Adams (429 -2778) or Amy Guthrie (429 -2758) for a courtesy
Historic Preservation Review. Below is a link to the Land Use application Form for your convenience.
http: / /www. aspenpitki n. com /Departments /Comma n ity- Development /Pla n n i na- and- Zoninq/Title -26-
Land- Use -Code/
Land Use Code Section(s)
26.304 Common Development Review Procedures
26.435.040.B Stream Margin Review, Exemption
Review by: Community Development Staff for complete application
Public Hearing: Not required
Planning Fees: $735 for Community Development Administrative Review. This includes
three (3) hours of staff review time. Additional time over three (3) hours
will be billed at $245 per hour
Referral Fees: $212 for Parks Minor Review.
Total Deposit: $947
Total Number of Application Copies: 3 Copies
Includes appropriate drawing for board review (HPC = 12; PZ = 10; CC = 7; Referral Agencies = 1 /ea.;
Planning Staff = 2)
RECEIVED
2 2010
ATTACHMENT 2 —LAND USE APPLICATION FEB CITY (7 0 0 ASP
i
APPLICANT': i . � NAP MEW
Name: g& S a I !/T ; ��I
it 1 /.
Location:
(Indicate street address, lot & bloc ( number, legal descri.tion here a..ro.riate)
Parcel ID # (REIM:RED) • al MOM I
REPRESENTATIVE:
Name: / �� f v •7 II i .�. % �.
�� i
Address: �, �v �uL����� n J/ lfJ. �
Phone #: ��Vi
,
/� /,�,
PROJECT: f �1lltr , / lC/ , / '
Name: Oir IPI: W
Address: rt . r� , ,/Fir /
Phone*:
TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply):
❑ Conceptual PUD ❑ Conceptual Historic Devt.
❑ SpecialRe
❑ Spndal Re view Use ❑ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) 0 Final Historic Development
SPA ❑
Minor Historic Devt.
S
❑ Design Review Appeal 0 Conceptual Historic Demolition
❑ GMQS Allotment Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) ❑
Historic Designation
❑ Subdivision
i ESA— Exemption (includes ❑ Small Lodge Conversion/
1�� ESA — 8040 Greenline, Stream ❑ Subdivision (
Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumizahon) Expansion
Mountain View Plane ❑ Other:
❑ Lot Split ❑ Temporary Use
❑ Text/Ma • Amendment
Lot Line Adjustment ❑
EXIST I CONDIT ONS: (descri.tion of existin. buildin_ , uses, .revious a , ovals, e
r w1 vr\ � a' 12 10 WI , 'rf • P ,
0 ' - i le/
in•s,us: ,modifications, et .)
PROPOSAL: (de� � f pro • osed b 4
FEES DUE: S
Hav you attached the following?
( ;e- Application Conference Summary
u�/ chment #1, Signed Fee Agreement
Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form
Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements - Including Written Responses to Review Standards
All plans that are larger than 8.5" x 11" must be folded and a floppy disk with an electronic copy of all written
text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application.
RECEIVED
FEB 0 2 2010
ATTACHMENT 3
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM �;
COMMUNITY TY OF EN
Project: 1140 ' 1 e . 4 ��{ {/ o 1Loo
Applicant: ll��s� �7Lalin
Location: % Ar 11' a 0 P.A.WA
Zone District: 1'L'' �rr� wit
Lot Size: V1 i`,
Lot Area: C
(for the purposes f calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas
within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the
definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.)
Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed: V)
Number of residential units: Existing: Proposed: In el
Number of bedrooms: Existing: Proposed: y) h
Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): Vh/ , -
DIMENSIONS:
Floor Area: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: VIA
Principal bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Y►l"f
Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: YiA
On -Site parking: Existing: Required: Proposed: V►1Gl
% Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: VIf%
% Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed: I
Front Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: 'Vl1l
Rear Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: %l
Combined F/R: Existing: Required: Proposed: 1
Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: 11 G1
Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: V S
Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Proposed: _.
Distance Between Existing Required: Proposed: a
Buildings
.y� tv�/� n• �(f V
Exi i I 10 n I'✓ iti ncr acQ� f—
Variations reguesi •: di ,r /7,....• I � r fir -- 6VI In
p/ ,A
CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
RECEIVED
eement for Pa ment of Ci of As en Devel nt milication Fees FEB 0 2 2010
,{� t t V/ CITY OF ASPEN
C ITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and Yt�f/ COMWII/NI I Y D �OpNT
(hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1 . .. LICA • "has ubmi ITY ' li ation
A (' WI IY164 10 :' lea' ' ft
(hereinafter, T 1 PROJECT).
2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that Cit of Aspen
ll processing ina fees o is a condition p of 2000)
est a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment
to a determination of application completeness.
3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it
is Pot LIC A N possible at this time to ascertain and CITY further agree that it is in full
the extent of
of the parties that APPLICANT payment of an
APPAT
initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional.. costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis.
APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he
will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the
CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty
of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application.
4. CITY and APPLI further the Planning agree Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning
processg or Commission and/or City Council information
make l egally r to the required findings for project consideration, unless current billings
snd/or ty Counl tke legally P J
are paid in full prior to decision.
5, Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect
the
full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT Develop meat an initial it d actual
amount of $ which is for _ hours of Community P
recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse
the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned abov lupea made re review at the billin 0.
per p hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic paym n
• APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and
in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid.
CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT
^ r ^
By W3 �/ � I t'&
By: cj5 IS
Chris Bendon Date: 1 _tl
Community Development Director
Mailing Address:
,19 141141141 ha 1 Vert.
g:lsupport\forms \agrpay as.doc
1/10/01
r--
. %.,,. -
RE CEIVED
FEB 0 2 2010
CITY OF ASisEN
UNITY DEVELOPMENT
December 22, 2009
Letter of Approval
Hines Room Remodel
The Aspen Institute, Owner
To City of Aspen,
I hereby consent to the filing of the Hines Room Remodel plans for
Municipal Code approval. Jim Curtis & Jeffery Berkus are authorized to
represent the application.
i
Amy : r -rum I
Execu�� Vice- President
The Aspen Institute
CITY OF ASPEN
PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
PLANNER: Drew Alexander, 970.429.2739 DATE: 1/25/10
PROJECT: Aspen Institute/Terrace Repair and Drainage
REPRESENTATIVE: Jim Curtis, jcurtis a(� sopris.net
OWNER: Aspen Institute
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Stream Margin Exemption
DESCRIPTION:
The Aspen Institute is proposing work on the terrace adjacent to the Hines Room. An interior remodel plan has
been drafted for the Hines Room, and being that the terrace has direct access, the Institute plans to upgrade the
terrace and install new drainage that would direct water away from top of slope (TOS).
The terrace was constructed within the buffer that includes Stream Margin Review, an area designated by the
Land Use Code as an Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA). The existing terrace is well within the ESA and a
portion even extends beyond TOS. Typically, development within the area of Stream Margin must receive
approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission. However, since the terrace is existing and no expansion is
planned, the Aspen Institute is seeking approval for Stream Margin Review Exemption.
Stream Margin Review Exemption is an administrative review by Community Development Staff. A Parks referral
would be included with the review fee. No public notice is required. Com Dev Staff recommends that the
applicant present the scope of work/plans to Sara Adams (429 -2778) or Amy Guthrie (429 -2758) for a courtesy
Historic Preservation Review. Below is a link to the Land Use application Form for your convenience.
http: / /www.asPenpitkin.com /Departments/ Community - Development /Pla and- Zonin -26-
Land- Use -Code/
Land Use Code Section(s)
26.304 Common Development Review Procedures
26.435.040.B Stream Margin Review, Exemption
Review by: Community Development Staff for complete application
Public Hearing: Not required
Planning Fees: $735 for Community Development Administrative Review. This includes
three (3) hours of staff review time. Additional time over three (3) hours
will be billed at $245 per hour
Referral Fees: $212 for Parks Minor Review.
Total Deposit: $ 947
Total Number of Application Copies: 3 Copies
Includes appropriate drawing for board review (HPC = 12; PZ = 10; CC = 7; Referral Agencies = 1/ea.;
Planning Staff = 2)