HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.726 W Francis St.0082.2009.ASLUTHE CITY OF ASPEN
City of Aspen Community Development Department
CASE NUMBER
PARCEL ID NUMBER
PROJECTS ADDRESS
PLANNER
CASE DESCRIPTION
REPRESENTATIVE
DATE OF FINAL ACTION
0082.2009.ASLU
2735 12 408 801
726 W. FRANCIS STREET
DREW ALEXANDER
RENOVATION AND ADDITION
JOHN GALMOBOS
5.20.10
CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 5.26.10
2135 I "`� - CS-9 C--'
0 . A
Eile Edit @emrd Rotift Form Reports Format lab iLielp
it lump 1 : * "
a►
Permit Type aslu Aspen Lard Use Permit i 9.ASLU
Address 726 W FRANCIS J Aptf 5ute
Gty JASPEN State CO . zip 81611 t
Master Permit Rou" Queue aslu07 Applied I ili,2009 J
Project �— J Status erding Approved
Description SPECIAL REVIEW GMQS EXEMPTION - CONTINUAL USE - RENWATION AND Issued — J
ADDITION OF EXISTING FACILITY Fri
5htted oHNGALAw054291286 Cock F� Days F Ex" 11J25l2030 J
J Fist Name F
GLL A 3,36,LI-.00
r ivy ,
1
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306
ASPEN LAND USE CODE
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY:
Aspen, CO
si�
STATE OF COLORADO )
ss.
County of Pitkin )
1 . A J, S Cn(v —I (name, please print)
being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that
I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section
26.306010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner:
(/ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper
or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days
after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is
attached hereto.
Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper
or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after
an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto.
Signature
The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before methis Z5 day
of 2010, by eA `
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
My commission expires:
Notary Public
ATTACHMENTS:
COPY OF THE PUBLICATION
Published in The Aspen Times WehWY on May 23,
2010. [50520241
ATTACHMENT
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 72-& kW- - u --� , Aspen, CO
SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: lFe�w. g r G 200
STATE OF COLORADO )
) ss.
County of Pitkin )
I z'aly 6:W"V 5 (name, please print)
being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally
certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060
(E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner:
_✓ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official
paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15)
days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto.
/ Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the
Community Development Department, which was made of suitable,
waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty -two (22) inches wide
and twenty -six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not
less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen 15) days
prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the Z`1 ay of
.
204 , to and including the date and time of the public
hearing. A p :otograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto.
Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community
Development Department, which contains the information described in Section
26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to
the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage
prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the
property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of
property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they
appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A
copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto.
(continued on next page)
r_
Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in
any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision
of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such
revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use
regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other
sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and
addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall
be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public
inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days
prior to the public hearing on such amendments. / ��—���
�C.� —
nat e
The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this (9 day
Of ���r�n" 206 to, by �D kt1 cla`�tr�aoS
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
. ��NOir '
My commission expires: D ((P c2 D
y
4
Public
ATTACHMENTS:
COPY OF THE PUBLICATION
PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN)
LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED
BYMAIL
..
v� ; 7
;' _p ,
�� � \,i ±,, r � , ,
s ?' _
y,. _� 11' i .
,
� y � -
`'
G
I r
i I� li ,�, . �� 1 '�� "T _
i .�
f I ���
.. ��
_, f t ,� � fs . 1�� r
�. -. �. ,.. Y r � ... �.. 'fir
_� ' � F i 1 fir.. \,i
�°'� �� .
� �
i Y � �. � TM
�.r
,� j'
:�
• � ��. ..
�..
.....
_ ,
� � ��� � I i
•... r` � ' j .�
'� + i'�r: �: J
`� ��
��._ (�. i� a }I
� .... '
y !� /� �
.;y 1.
Easy Peel® Labels i ♦ Bend along line to i ❑
Use AveryO Template 5160 j Feed Paper p�RY® 6160
expose Pop -Up EdgeTM j ® ,
810 W SMUGGLER LLC 810 W SMUGGLER LLC AULD ROBERT H & CAROL C
C/O WALDEN CAPITAL CORP 411 E MAIN ST #208 -209 730 W SMUGGLER AVE
MIAMI, FL 33137
4040 2ND AVE #414 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611
,
BAKER WILLIAM BEATON CHRISTINA NESLUND BLANK ROBERT S & NANCY L
790 W HALLAM UNIT #1 BEATON GLENN K C/O WHITCOMB PARTNERS
ASPEN, CO 81611 19 HUNTWICK LN 375 PARK AVE RM 3800
CHERRY HILLLS VILLAGE, CO 80113 NEW YORK, NY 10152
BOSKO DANIEL A
PO BOX 9171
ASPEN, CO 81612
BOURKE MICHAEL & JANINE
2000 BRUSH ST STE 440
DETROIT, MI 48226 -229
BOWENSTANLEY PAMELA
29341/2 N BEVERLY GLEN CIR #482
LOS ANGELES, CA 90077
BOYE CAROL
2655 LAKE DR #4
SINGER ISLAND, FL 33404
DEMPSEY 1996 REV TRUST
C/O DEMPSEY BAY PTNRS
2882 SAND HILL RD #240
MENLA PARK, CA 94025
GIANNULLI MOSSIMO
1010 SANTA MONICA BLVD
LOS ANGELES, CA 90067
GRENNEY PETER
PO BOX BB
ASPEN, CO 81612
CHOUMAS JOHN JAMES & PATRICIA G
BLDG 300 BAYS 313 -314
1601 E OLYMPIC BLVD
LOS ANGELES, CA 90021
DEVONSHIRE CORPORATION
6100 N PENNSYLVANIA
OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73112
GOLDMAN RICHARD FAMILY LP
35 STONEWOOD DR
MORELAND HILLS, OH 44022
HERMAN LLOYD
420 W MAIN ST
ASPEN, CO 81611
CRITERION HOLDING CO LLC
790 W HALLAM ST #10
ASPEN, CO 81611
FOREST SERVICE ASPEN
HEADQUARTERS
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
PO BOX 948
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602
GORDMAN LINDA K
718 W HALLAM ST
ASPEN, CO 81611 -1146
KAFRISSEN FAMILY TRUST
310 N 6TH
ASPEN, CO 81611
KEELTY PATRICK J & DONNA V
3 0 BOX 5686
3NOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615
LOWREY E JAMES JR
5704 LONGMONT LN
HOUSTON, TX 77057
LRM LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
8540 SOUTHWEST 52ND AVE
MIAMI, FL 33143
NATKIN SALOISE
3 0 BOX 8644
>SPEN, CO 81612 -8644
BILLER ANN F
'15 W SMUGGLER ST
\SPEN, CO 81611
MICHAEL AMBER
PO BOX 7931
ASPEN, CO 81612
NIEBUR DEWAYNE E & JO ANN E
721 W FRANCIS
ASPEN, CO 81611
MICROPLAS MGMT CO
C/O EDWARD J CAWLEY
790 W HALLAM #10
ASPEN, CO 81611
OK SMUGGLER LLC
C/O KELLI CUPP
735 W SMUGGLER ST
ASPEN, CO 81611
Easy Peel® Labels
Use Avery® Template 5160
PARELMAN ALLEN G REV TRUST
734 W SMUGGLER
ASPEN, CO 81611
POWELL WILLIAM E & DANA D
11 LYNN BATTS LN #100
SAN ANTONIO, TX 78218
A Bend along line to
eed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTM '
PENINSULA LLC
729 NASKEAG RD
BROOKLIN, ME 04616 -3316
RITCHIE ROBERT
701 W FRANCIS ST
ASPEN, CO 81611
SHANE STEVEN DAVID & CLARE EVERT
SIMMONS W JUNE 55%
100 OLD POND WAY
BIXBY NEENA B 45%
SNOW MASS, CO 81654
4128 RHODES AVE
STUDIO CITY, CA 91604
TIERNEY JANE LOWREY
20 OAK MEADOW RD
LINCOLN, MA 01773
WATERS SOMERSET
" 131 MILLBROOK SCHOOL RD
MILLBROOK, NY 12545
AVERY® 5160®
1
PORTER HOUSE STAKE LLC
1111 RACE ST PHA
DENVER, CO 80206
RUTHERFORD MICHAEL G
5 E GREENWAY PLAZA #220
HOUSTON, TX 77046
SMUGGLER LLC
C/O SHELLY B DON
1044 OLIVE ST
DENVER, CO 80220
WEINGART JAMES B & PATRICIA L
55 GREENTREE
CHAGRIN FALLS, OH 44022
PUBLIC NOTICE
Of
DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development
plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the
City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the
following legally described property: Block 15, Lots K — M, First Baptist Church, City
and Townsite of Aspen, Aspen, Colorado 81611, the property commonly known as 726
W. Francis Street, Crossroads Church of Aspen, by order of the Aspen City Council on
May 10, 2010. Parcel Id # 2735- 124 -08 -801. The Applicant received Council approval
for Growth Management for an Essential Public Facility under Ordinance No. 11, Series
of 2010. Approvals granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission under Resolution
No. 6, Series of 2010 were for Dimensional Variance, Special Review for Parking, and
Conditional Use. The approvals were granted for an expansion to the church facility.
For further information contact Drew Alexander, at the City of Aspen Community
Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 429 -2739.
s/ City of Aspen
Publish in The Aspen Times on May 23, 2010
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
of the
City of Aspen
Community Development Department
This Development Order, hereinafter "Order ", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070,
"Development Orders ", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights ", of the City of Aspen
Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to
the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall
also be the initiation date of a three -year vested property right. The vested property right shall
expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building
permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension,
reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After
Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding
any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to
any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order.
This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific
development plan as described below.
Crossroads Church of Aspen, 726 W. Francis St., Aspen, CO 81611
Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address
Block 15, Lots K — M, First Baptist Church, City and Townsite of Aspen, 726 W. Francis Street
Description and Street Address of Subject Property
Approval of a 3,145 square foot expansion to the existing church facility
Written Description of the Site Specific Plan amUor Attachment Describing Plan
Approval by the City of Aspen City Council for Growth Management for an Essential Public
Facility under Ordinance No. 11, Series of 2010, approved May 10, 2010. Approval by the City
of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission for Dimensional Variance, Special Review for
Parking, and Conditional Use under Resolution No. 6, Series of 2010, approved February 16,
2010.
Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions)
May 23, 2010
Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.)
Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and
revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code)
Issued ys y/th"' day oyMay 2010, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director.
Development Director
.,✓
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 7 Z 4v.
F/z+ ncin
(dV5SQ0&c6 c fL gc-rl Aspen, CO
SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE:
ticMD �1f 104 PP,n , 20,0
STATE OF COLORADO )
) ss.
County of Pitkin )
I, „�Yt�4e CfA � 7�� `"
cCO / (name, please print)
being or repre3 an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally
certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060
(E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner:
Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official
paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15)
days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto.
Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the
Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof
materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty -six
(26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in
height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing
and was continuously visible from the day of ' 200, to
and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted
a� is attached hereto.
+!!!'ftfiigI**Wotice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community
Development Department, which contains the information described in Section
26.304.060�L)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to
the public baring, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage
. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the
ect to the development application. The names and addresses of
owner shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they
�$ a than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A
copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto.
(continued on next page)
n �
Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt
requested; to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to
the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of
development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those
on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions that
create more than one lot, Planned Unit Developments, Specially Planned Areas,
and COWAPs are subject to this notice requirement.
Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in
any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision
of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such
revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use
regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other
sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and
addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be
waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public
inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days
prior to the public hearing on such amendments.
Signature
The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was ackpwledged before this i i26 day
of Ap21/ , 20to, by OHO/ f /
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
My commission expires: q k,51M3
Notary Public
For further Information, contact Drew Alexander at
the City of Aspen Community Development De-
partmenG 130 S. Galena SL, Aspen CO 81611,
(9]0)429 -2]39, ft. tler6c
alMkhANC 1 I E Chat
Aspen City Council
Published in the ♦ pen Times Weekly on April
25th 2010 has IL
ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE:
THE PUBLICATION
RAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN)
THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGI
APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE
AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24- 65.5 -103.3
p C E
RE: CROS ROADS CHURCH OF ASPEN;
GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEW FOR
ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITY.
ORDINANCE NO. 11, SERIES OF 2010
AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL
APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEW FOR
AN ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITY FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 726
WEST FRANCIS, LOTS K, L, AND M, BLOCK 15, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF
ASPEN, CO, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO p
PARCEL NO. 2735-12-408-801. U
i c
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application N z
from Crossroads Church of Aspen, requesting approval of an increase in allowed floor co c
area from 4,774 square feet to 7,299 square feet through the Conditional Use process, to o c a
establish new off street parking requirements through Special Review, Dimensional
Variances, and a recommendation to City Council for the approval of Growth o
Management allotments for an Essential Public Facility; and, ,n g
z M o
WHEREAS, the Applicant, Crossroads Church of Aspen, serves an essential o [ a V
public purpose by serving the needs of the general public and Aspen community, and a v z
therefore is categorized as an Essential Public Facility, pursuant to Section 26.104.100; LU w
and, z o o
WHEREAS, the proposed land use requests do not intend to increase Church
programs or employment,
WHEREAS, a publicly noticed site visit with the Planning and Zoning
Commission was held on February 4, 2010, and;
WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on February 16, 2010, the
Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the application upon recommendation from the
Community Development Department and approved Resolution No. 6, Series of 2010, by a
( 5 - 0 ) vote, an increase in floor area from 4,774 square feet to 7,299 square feet through
the Conditional Use process, established off - street parking requirements through Special
Review, approved certain Dimensional Variances, and a recommendation to City Council
for the approval of Growth Management Review for an Essential Public Facility; and,
WHEREAS, once the land use approvals and recommendation of approval were
granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Applicant requested Growth
Management for an Essential Public Facility approval of the City Council; and,
WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the applicable code standards,
the Community Development Department recommended approval, with conditions, of the
proposed requests; and,
WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on May 10` 2010 the City
Council took public testimony, considered pertinent recommendations from the
Community Development Director, referral agencies, Planning and Zoning Commission,
and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal
Code as identified herein; and,
Ordinance 11, Series of 2010
Page I of 7
WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council finds that the development proposal meets or
exceeds all the applicable development standards and that the approval of the development
proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area
Community Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this ordinance furthers and is necessary for
the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1•
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal
Code, the City Council hereby approves Growth Management Review for an Essential
Public Facility by the Aspen City Council, based on the following conditions.
a) Employee Generation The Crossroads Church facility expansion is not expected
to generate additional employees and no employee mitigation is currently
required. However, an employee audit shall be required to demonstrate actual
employee needs and mitigation shall be provided for additional employees
directly attributable to the facility expansion. The applicant shall conduct and
submit to the Community Development Department an employee audit one (1)
year after issuance of C.O. for the expansion.
Prior to conducting the audit, the applicant and the Community Development
Department shall agree on the form and methodology of the audit, who shall
perform the audit, and the manner in which additional employees related to or
unrelated to the expansion will be determined. Also, prior to building permit
issuance, a baseline shall be established to reflect the amount of existing
employees that can then be compared with the data gathered from the audit.
The applicant shall provide employee mitigation for 60% of additional employees
found to be directly associated with the facility expansion at the Category 4 rate of
$134,079 per employee. The additional mitigation shall be payable in full within
one (1) year of the audit, unless otherwise agreed to by the applicant and the City
Council.
Section 2: Building Permit Aonlication
The building permit application shall include the following:
a) A copy of the final recorded Ordinance.
b) The conditions of approval printed on the cover page of the building permit set.
c) If required, a drainage plan, including an erosion control plan prepared by a
Colorado licensed Civil Engineer, which maintains sediment and debris on -site
Ordinance 11, Series of 2010
Page 2 of 7
during and after construction. Stormwater from impervious surfaces shall be
detained on site.
d) As applicable, an excavation stabilization plan, construction management plan
(CMP), top of bank and stability of hillside plan, tree protection plan and drainage
and soils reports pursuant to the Building Department's requirements. The
requirement for a tree protection plan is intended to solely address any trees and
their drip line areas that would be affected by construction activities, including
protection (such as designated construction routes and temporary fencing) that
will be necessary to minimize the impacts on existing trees from construction
traffic. The CMP plan shall address traffic management, construction staging,
and accurately represent proposed construction hours.
e) As applicable, a fugitive dust control plan to be reviewed and approved by the
Environmental Health Department.
f) As applicable, a detailed excavation plan that utilizes vertical soil stabilization
techniques, or other techniques, if appropriate and acceptable, for review and
approval by the City Engineer.
g) Accessibility and ADA requirements shall be addressed to satisfactorily meet
adopted building codes.
Section 3: Trash/Utility Service Area
The trash containers shall be wildlife proof and meet the Certificate of Appropriateness
regulations pertaining to size and security.
Section 4: En2ineerine/Draina ¢ e
a. Building permit submission shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen
Municipal Code, Title 21 and all construction and excavation standards published by
the engineering department.
b. The applicant shall submit plans showing drainage conveyance, sidewalk, curb, and
gutter which meet the City Engineer's standards and ADA requirements prior to
issuance of a Building Permit. Such improvements shall also be made prior to a
Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant must receive approval from the City
Engineer (and any other applicable departments) for structural improvements in the
public right -of -way, including the ADA access ramp along 7 Street and the
pavement work being completed along the Francis Street entrance.
Section 5: Water Department Requirements
The Applicant shall comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards, with Title
25, and with the applicable standards of Title 8 (Water conservation and Plumbing
Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code, as required by the City of Aspen Water
Department.
Ordinance 11, Series of 2010
Page 3 of 7
Section 6: Sanitation District Requirements
a. Service is contingent upon compliance with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation
District's (ACSD) rules, regulations, and specifications, which are on file at the
District office. ACSD will review the approved Drainage plans to assure that clear
water connections (roof, foundation, perimeter, patio drains) are not connected to the
sanitary sewer system.
b. On -site utility plans require approval by ACSD.
c. Landscaping plans will require approval by ACSD where soft and hard landscaping
may impact public ROW or easements to be dedicated to the district.
d. All ACSD fees must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit.
e. The glycol heating and snow melt system must be designed to prohibit the discharge
of glycol to any portion of the public and private sanitary sewer system. The glycol
storage areas must have approved containment facilities.
f. Soil Nails are not allowed in the public ROW above ASCD main sewer lines.
Section 7: Exterior Lighting
All exterior lighting shall meet the requirements of the City's Outdoor Lighting Code
pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.575.150, Outdoor Lighting.
Section 8: Parks Department/Landscaping
a. Excavations adjacent to the drip zones will be required to vertical excavation only.
Over digging is prohibited. Excavations will be soil stabilized in a manner that
prevents over excavation of the site. All foundation walls located in protection zones
shall have a one (1) sided pour. Utility connection will need to be designed and
shown on the plan in a manner that does not encroach into the tree protection zones.
b. Prior to the issuance of any demolition or building permits, a tree removal permit is
required for drip line excavation and will need to be approved by the Parks
Department. Mitigation for removals will be paid through cash -in -lieu or on site with
street trees.
c. A formal plan indicating the location of the tree protection will be required for the
building permit set.
d. Six (6") inches of mulch shall be placed and maintained within the zone of vegetation
protection.
e. Irrigation shall be provided to trees during the length of the project which is
appropriate for proper tree health. The edge of root cuttings shall receive additional
water and burlap coverings that should remain moist.
f. Access across or through the area of protection is prohibited at all times. Access
along designated walkways is allowed.
g. Roots two (2') inches or greater shall be professionally pruned with on -call tree
service. Root trenching will be required around all trees with excavation next to
Ordinance 11, Series of 2010
Page 4 of 7
and/or under the drip line. This can be accomplished by a contracted professional
tree service company or trained member of the contractor's team.
h. Where right -of -way improvements are required adjacent to protection zones, plans
shall be submitted prior to building permit submittal. These plans shall indicate the
structural program and materials of the improvements. Sidewalk, curb, and gutter
shall be implemented in a manner that does not threaten the health of the trees.
Section 9: Fire Mitigation
All codes adopted by the Aspen Fire Protection District shall be met. This includes but is
not limited to access (International Fire Code (IFC), 2003 Edition, Section 503),
approved fire sprinkler and fire alarm systems (IFC, as amended, Section 903 and 907).
The capacity of the water utilities shall be assessed to determine if there is adequate
volume for fire suppression.
Section 10: Vested Rights
The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site - specific development plan
vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order.
However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this
approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise
exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be
recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development
order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the
development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits).
Zoning that is not part of the approved site - specific development plan shall not result in
the creation of a vested property right.
No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary
to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be
published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the
City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific
development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice
shall be substantially in the following form:
Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific
development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three
(3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68,
Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 726 West
Francis, Lots K, L, AND M, Block 15, City and Townsite of Aspen, CO, Pitkin
County, Colorado.
Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews
and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances
or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with
this approval.
Ordinance 11, Series of 2010
Page 5 of 7
The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial
review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin
to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required
under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the
Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter.
Section 11: Vested Rights Extension
If the Applicant's capital campaign is unable to procure the funds for this site specific
development plan prior to the expiration of the three (3) year vested rights, City Council
will be willing to hear a request for a vested rights extension at that time.
Section 12•
All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or
documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are
hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied
with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity.
Section 13•
This Ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement
of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or
amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such
prior ordinances.
Section 14:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion
shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof.
{ Signatures on following page)
Ordinance 11, Series of 2010
Page 6 of 7
INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City
Council of the City of Aspen on the 26 day of April, 2010.
Attest:
athryn S. K h, City Clerk
Michael C. Ireland, Mayo
FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this A ny of , 2010.
Attest:
Kathryn S. , City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Ordinance 11, Series of 2010
Page 7 of 7
ATTACHMENT
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 4� (A 4�AP 1 S Aspen, CO
SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Mme/ 10 20{ (7
STATE OF COLORADO )
) ss.
County of Pitkin )
I, �y� (name, please print)
being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally
certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060
(E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner:
Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official
paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15)
days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto.
V Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the
Community Development Department, which was made of suitable,
waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide
and twenty -six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not
less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days
prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the 22 day of
A , �l 204 0 , to and including the date and time of the public
hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto.
Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community
Development Department, which contains the information described in Section
26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to
the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage
prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the
property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of
property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they
appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A
copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto.
(continued on next page)
Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in
any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision
of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such
revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use
regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other
sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and
addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall
be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public
inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days
prior to the public hearing on such am ndments.
��
Signa e
The fo egoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this Z6 day
of �P2l1 ,200- ,by JAS00 M Nc L
Zo�U
0410N M IR
Notary N bllo
I i
State of Colorado
My CommiWon Expires Mar 10, 2014
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
My co s' expires: 0 NAO— 20 i o
�
Notary ublic
ATTACHMENTS:
COPY OF THE PUBLICATION
PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN)
LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED
BYMAIL
r
R4 f� .v rC'y
tw1�
•
Cr
'' ^ -p #� �
t
r�*
y* p =it M ,.�
7 f
4 - ' f w9�
, �,,, , t- •
�",.', r � .� it.r r+ri .�. z " : "�`� Ns t� ,�.' � mss.-
aR.; ,..s � `14 Y", }P �a ., u Y
f�.i -h � F . .. � ..tl..: �.�9s+. *,`Ft1� � �
'•: .��
U
0 •
ti
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: CROSSROADS CHURCH OF ASPEN; GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEW FOR
ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITY.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Monday, May 10` 2010 at
a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen City Council, Council Chambers, City Hall,
130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application to remodel and construct an addition to the
Crossroads Church of Aspen. The application requires the following review: Growth
Management Review of an Essential Public Facility. The application was submitted by John
Galambos of Galambos Architects, INC., on behalf of the Crossroads Church of Aspen, 726 W.
Francis, Aspen, CO 81611. The subject property under review is legally described as Block: 15
Lot: K, L, and M, First Baptist Church, City and Townsite of Aspen, also known as 726 W.
Francis (commonly referred to as Crossroads Church of Aspen). The parcel number for the
subject property is 2735 -12- 408 -801.
For further information, contact Drew Alexander at the City of Aspen Community Development
Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen CO 81611, (970) 429 -2739,
drew.alexanderkci.aspen.co.us
s/Michael C. Ireland, Chair
Aspen City Council
Published in the Aspen Times on April 25th, 2010
City of Aspen Account
tw - - - -- ♦ Bend along line to
Easy Peel Labels i 9 ' , Q AVERYO 5160 i
Use AveryO Template 51600 j feed Paper expose Pop -Up EdgeT"'
810 W SMUGGLER LLC 810 W SMUGGLER LLC AULD ROBERT H & CAROL C
C/O WALDEN CAPITAL CORP 411 E MAIN ST #208 -209 730 W SMUGGLER AVE
4040 NE 2ND AVE #414 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611
MIAMI, FL 33137
BAKER WILLIAM
790 W HALLAM UNIT #1
ASPEN, CO 81611
BEATON CHRISTINA NESLUND
BEATON GLENN K
19 HUNTWICK LN
CHERRY HILLLS VILLAGE, CO 80113
BLANK ROBERT S & NANCY L
C/O WHITCOMB PARTNERS
375 PARK AVE RM 3800
NEW YORK, NY 10152
BOSKO DANIEL A
PO BOX 9171
ASPEN, CO 81612
BOYE CAROL
2655 LAKE DR #4
SINGER ISLAND, FL 33404
DEMPSEY 1996 REV TRUST
C/O DEMPSEY BAY PTNRS
2882 SAND HILL RD #240
MENLA PARK, CA 94025
GIANNULLI MOSSIMO
1010 SANTA MONICA BLVD
LOS ANGELES, CA 90067
GRENNEY PETER
PO BOX BS
ASPEN, CO 81612
KEELTY PATRICK J & DONNA V
PO BOX 5686
SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615
MATKIN SALOISE
PO BOX 8644
ASPEN, CO 81612 -8644
BOURKE MICHAEL & JANINE
2000 BRUSH ST STE 440
DETROIT, MI 48226 -229
CHOUMAS JOHN JAMES & PATRICIA G
BLDG 300 BAYS 313 -314
1601 E OLYMPIC BLVD
LOS ANGELES, CA 90021
DEVONSHIRE CORPORATION
6100 N PENNSYLVANIA
OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73112
GOLDMAN RICHARD FAMILY LP
35 STONEWOOD DR
MORELAND HILLS, OH 44022
HERMAN LLOYD
420 W MAIN ST
ASPEN, CO 81611
LOWREY E JAMES JR
5704 LONGMONT LN
HOUSTON, TX 77057
MICHAEL AMBER
PO BOX 7931
ASPEN, CO 81612
BOWEN - STANLEY PAMELA
29341/2 N BEVERLY GLEN CIR #482
LOS ANGELES, CA 90077
CRITERION HOLDING CO LLC
790 W HALLAM ST #10
ASPEN, CO 81611
FOREST SERVICE ASPEN
HEADQUARTERS
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
PO BOX 948
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602
GORDMAN LINDA K
718 W HALLAM ST
ASPEN, CO 81611 -1146
KAFRISSEN FAMILY TRUST
310 N 6TH
ASPEN, CO 81611
LRM LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
8540 SOUTHWEST 52ND AVE
MIAMI, FL 33143
MICROPLAS MGMT CO
C/O EDWARD J CAWLEY
790 W HALLAM #10
ASPEN, CO 81611
OK
MILLER ANN F NIEBUR DEWAYNE E & JO ANN E SMUGGLER LLC
C/
715 W SMUGGLER ST 721 W FRANCIS CIO
ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 AS W SMUGGLER ER ST
ASPEN, CO 81611
Easy Peel® Labels - I
U!e AVEryO Template 5160 j
PARELMAN ALLEN G REV TRUST
734 W SMUGGLER
ASPEN, CO 81611
POWELL WILLIAM E & DANA D
11 LYNN BATTS LN #100
SAN ANTONIO, TX 78218
SHANE STEVEN DAVID & CLARE EVERT
100 OLD POND WAY
SNOWMASS, CO 81654
TIERNEY JANE LOWREY
20 OAK MEADOW RD
LINCOLN, MA 01773
Bend along line to
r ,.- ,,Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTM
R .
PENINSULA LLC
729 NASKEAG RD
BROOKLIN, ME 04616 -3316
RITCHIE ROBERT
701 W FRANCIS ST
ASPEN, CO 81611
SIMMONS W JUNE 55%
BIXBY NEENA B 45%
4128 RHODES AVE
STUDIO CITY, CA 91604
WATERS SOMERSET
131 MILLBROOK SCHOOL RD
MILLBROOK, NY 12545
' AVERYO 5160®
PORTER HOUSE STAKE LLC
1111 RACE ST PHA
DENVER, CO 80206
RUTHERFORD MICHAEL G
5 E GREENWAY PLAZA #220
HOUSTON, TX 77046
SMUGGLER LLC
C/O SHELLY B DON
1044 OLIVE ST
DENVER, CO 80220
WEINGART JAMES B & PATRICIA L
55 GREENTREE
CHAGRIN FALLS, OH 44022
N
MEMORANDUM
'Vlll b
TO: Mayor Ireland and Aspen City Council
THRU: Chris Bendon, Community Development Directo�
FROM: Drew Alexander, Interim Zoning Officer ` p
RE: Crossroads Church (726 W. Francis) — Growth Management Review for an
Essential Public Facility — Ordinance No. 11, Series 2010 — Second Reading
MEETING
DATE: May 10 2010
APPLICANT /OWNER:
Crossroads Church of Aspen, 726 W
Francis, Aspen, CO 81611
REPRESENTATIVE:
John Galambos, John Galambos
Architects, 314 Suite D Aspen Business
Center, Aspen, CO 81611
LOCATION:
Block 15, Lots K — M, First Baptist
Church, City and Townsite of Aspen,
CO, commonly known as 726 W. Francis
Street.
CURRENT ZONING & USE
Located in R -6 (Medium - Density
Residential) Zone District.
PROPOSED LAND USE:
The existing land use will remain. The
proposal is for an expansion to the
Church facility to provide better
programming and operation.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval with conditions.
SUMMARY:
The Applicant requests of the City Council
approval for a Growth Management Review
request: Essential Public Facilities.
Photo of Crossroads Church
LAND USE REQUESTS AND REVIEW PROCEDURES:
The Applicant is requesting one (1) land use approval from the City Council. Planning and
Zoning provided approval for the reviews listed below and a recommendation for the GMQS
review for an Essential Public Facility:
Planning and Zoning
• Conditional Use Review —Church Approved by P &Z Resolution No. 6, Series of 2010.
• Special Review— Parkinl? —Approved by P &Z Resolution No. 6, Series of 2010
• Dimensional Variances (setbacks) —Approved by P &Z Resolution No. 6, Series of 2010
City Council
• Growth Management Review for Essential Public Facilities pursuant to Land Use Code
Section 26.470.090.4 (The City Council is the final review authority, who may approve,
approve with conditions, or deny the proposal after receiving a recommendation from the
P &Z).
BACKGROUND'
The Crossroads Church was originally built in 1964 and was at the time called First Baptist
Church. Throughout its history, the church has undergone several renovations, but nothing as
substantive as the current proposal. In 1977, a similar proposal for a church expansion was
approved', but the work was never completed. The most recent renovation occurred in 2003 and
2004.
PROJECT SUMMARY'
The Applicant, Crossroads Church of Aspen, has requested approval to construct an expansion to
the existing church facility. The expansion on the upper level (approximately 3,145 gross square
feet) would make the total gross square footage of the church approximately 11,568 sq. ft. This
expansion is intended to improve the internal programming of the church. Currently, there are
seven full and part-time employees that share four offices. The addition will create seven new
offices with one being used for both office and classroom purposes. The additional space also
allows for reconfiguration of the lower lever, including a realigned and larger sanctuary with 80
additional seats (increasing the total seating to 240).
The reconfiguration of the entry level would allow for functionality enhancements of the
entrances and provide for proper lobby /reception spaces. The proposal includes altering the 7
Street (west) entrance and enlarging its reception/lobby area. This entry level renovation also
includes improvements to bathrooms. ADA compliant bathrooms will be added to this level of
the church (none exist currently).
The existing church is nonconforming to the R -6 dimensional requirements for setbacks on the
side yards and rear yard. The combined side yard setback total should be 30 ft. based upon lot
size 2 , however the church has a 5.5 ft. setback on the west side yard and a 10.7 ft. east side yard
'No Ordinance/Resolution number on record for this approval
z Crossroads Church of Aspen is located on the corner of Francis Street and Seventh Street. Pursuant to R -6 zone
district standards for a 9,000 sq. ft. lot, the combined side yard setback should be 30'.
2
giving a total of 16.2 ft. The rear yard setback requirement is 10 ft., but the church currently has
a 5 ft. rear yard. The church conforms to front yard requirements.
The proposal obtained approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission for a variance on the
west portion of the building where the upper -level expansion approaches 7 Street. This area is
related to a gable above the west stairwell which would maintain the current nonconforming side
yard of 5.5 ft. All other portions of the expansion have been pulled back to meet all dimensional
requirements other than Combined Yard Setback.
Although there is additional square footage and an increased sanctuary size, the applicant has
stated that no additional parking is necessary. The church currently has four off -street parking
spaces along the alleyway. The remainder of parking is located along the right -of -way around
the Church perimeter and in the six spaces available on Sundays at the Forest Service lot. The
applicant has completed a traffic analysis for this proposal, as noted in Exhibit F. Planning and
Zoning approved the projects Special Review for Parking based on the minimal impacts to the
surrounding neighborhoods during peak church hours.
STAFF COMMENTS:
GROWTH MANAGEMENT REvIEW; ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES:
The Crossroads Church of Aspen is an Essential Public Facility, which requires a
recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission to City Council. The proposal to
increase floor area of the Church triggers this review; however the Church does not intend to
increase employees, community programs, or congregation membership. The sanctuary is larger
per this proposal, but there is no increase in number of services. No new affordable housing is
proposed with this application. The design proposal is consistent with the Aspen Area
Community Plan and the impact,on public infrastructure will be minimal due to upgrades where
applicable or required.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended through Resolution No. 6, Series of 2010
that the City Council establish criteria for an employee audit to take place no later than one (1)
year after issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to determine if new employees are a result of
this project.
Church membership numbers increase or decrease frequently over time. The applicant has stated
that normal church growth has required the addition of new staff in recent years. Staff
recommends that the City Council structure such audit so that it realistically reflects employee
growth directly related to this site specific development plan, not typical church growth.
Staff supports an employee audit, finds that the Growth Management criteria are met for an
Essential Public Facility, and recommends approval.
REFERRAL AGENCY COMMENTS:
• Parking Department — No need for additional parking as long as the use of the Forest
Service lot was preserved and all on -street and alley parking remained.
3
Eneineering Department — Curb, gutter, and sidewalk are required along 7 th Street and
Francis. Prior to Building permit submittal, the applicant shall submit plans showing
curb, gutter, and sidewalk locations and also a plan for drainage conveyance.
Where improvements are planned in the right -of -way (ADA access ramp, pavement
improvements), the applicant shall meet with the City Engineer and other applicable
departments to receive the necessary approvals and/or right -of -way agreements.
Parks Department — Plans must meet the requirements of the City Parks Department and
the City Forester. Where right -of -way improvements are required (curb, gutter,
sidewalk) the applicant shall provide plans that meet the regulations and requirements
provisioned in the Tree Protection Code.
Water/Fire Marshall — During the permitting process, the water utilities servicing the
Church shall be assessed to see if it capacity is adequate for water services and fire
suppression.
RECOMMENDATION:
In reviewing the proposal, Staff believes that the project is consistent with the goals of the AACP
as well as the applicable review standards in the City Land Use Code. Staff recommends
approval of the project.
RECOMMENDED MOTION (ALL MOTIONS ARE WORDED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE):
"I move to approve Ordinance No.11, Series of 2010, granting Growth Management for an
Essential Public Facility for Crossroads Church of Aspen."
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
ATTACHMENTS:
Ordinance No. 11, Series of 2010
Exhibit A
— Site Plan
Exhibit B
— GMQS Criteria
Exhibit C
— Traffic Analysis
Exhibit D
— P &Z Minutes from February 16
Exhibit E —
Application (Provided in First Reading Packet)
ORDINANCE NO. 11, SERIES OF 2010
AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL
APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEW FOR
AN ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITY FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 726
WEST FRANCIS, LOTS K, L, AND M, BLOCK 15, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF
ASPEN, CO, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
PARCEL NO. 2735-12-408-801.
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application
from Crossroads Church of Aspen, requesting approval of an increase in allowed floor
area from 4,774 square feet to 7,299 square feet through the Conditional Use process, to
establish new off street parking requirements through Special Review, Dimensional
Variances, and a recommendation to City Council for the approval of Growth
Management allotments for an Essential Public Facility; and,
WHEREAS, the Applicant, Crossroads Church of Aspen, serves an essential
public purpose by serving the needs of the general public and Aspen community, and
therefore is categorized as an Essential Public Facility, pursuant to Section 26.104.100;
and,
WHEREAS, the proposed land use requests do not intend to increase Church
programs, employment, or membership; and,
WHEREAS, a publicly noticed site visit with the Planning and Zoning
Commission was held on February 4, 2010, and;
WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on February 16, 2010, the
Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the application upon recommendation from the
Community Development Department and approved Resolution No. 6, Series of 2010, by a
( 5 - 0 ) vote, an increase in floor area from 4,774 square feet to 7,299 square feet through
the Conditional Use process, established off - street parking requirements through Special
Review, approved certain Dimensional Variances, and a recommendation to City Council
for the approval of Growth Management Review for an Essential Public Facility; and,
WHEREAS, once the land use approvals and recommendation of approval were
granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Applicant requested Growth
Management for an Essential Public Facility approval of the City Council; and,
WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the applicable code standards,
the Community Development Department recommended approval, with conditions, of the
proposed requests; and,
WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on May 10 , 2010 the City
Council took public testimony, considered pertinent recommendations from the
Community Development Director, referral agencies, Planning and Zoning Commission,
and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal
Code as identified herein; and,
Ordinance 11, Series of 2010
Page 1 of 7
WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council finds that the development proposal meets or
exceeds all the applicable development standards and that the approval of the development
proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area
Community Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this ordinance finthers and is necessary for
the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1-
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal
Code, the City Council hereby approves Growth Management Review for an Essential
Public Facility by the Aspen City Council, based on the following conditions.
a) Employee Generation The Crossroads Church facility expansion is not expected
to generate additional employees and no employee mitigation is currently
required. However, an employee audit shall be required to demonstrate actual
employee needs and mitigation shall be provided for additional employees
directly attributable to the facility expansion. The applicant shall conduct and
submit to the Community Development Department an employee audit one (1)
year after issuance of C.O. for the expansion.
Prior to conducting the audit, the applicant and the Community Development
Department shall agree on the form and methodology of the audit, who shall
perform the audit, and the manner in which additional employees related to or
unrelated to the expansion will be determined. Also, prior to building permit
issuance, a baseline shall be established to reflect the amount of existing
employees that can then be compared with the data gathered from the audit.
The applicant shall provide employee mitigation for 60% of additional employees
found to be directly associated with the facility expansion at the Category 4 rate of
$134,079 per employee. The additional mitigation shall be payable in full within
one (1) year of the audit, unless otherwise agreed to by the applicant and the City
Council.
Section 2: Buildine Permit Application
The building permit application shall include the following:
a) A copy of the final recorded Ordinance.
b) The conditions of approval printed on the cover page of the building permit set.
c) If required, a drainage plan, including an erosion control plan prepared by a
Colorado licensed Civil Engineer, which maintains sediment and debris on -site
Ordinance 11, Series of 2010
Page 2 of 7
during and after construction. Stormwater from impervious surfaces shall be
detained on site.
d) As applicable, an excavation stabilization plan, construction management plan
(CMP), top of bank and stability of hillside plan, tree protection plan and drainage
and soils reports pursuant to the Building Department's requirements. The
requirement for a tree protection plan is intended to solely address any trees and
their drip line areas that would be affected by construction activities, including
protection (such as designated construction routes and temporary fencing) that
will be necessary to minimize the impacts on existing trees from construction
traffic. The CMP plan shall address traffic management, construction staging,
and accurately represent proposed construction hours.
e) As applicable, a fugitive dust control plan to be reviewed and approved by the
Environmental Health Department.
f) As applicable, a detailed excavation plan that utilizes vertical soil stabilization
techniques, or other techniques, if appropriate and acceptable, for review and
approval by the City Engineer.
g) Accessibility and ADA requirements shall be addressed to satisfactorily meet
adopted building codes.
Section 3: Trash/Utility Service Area
The trash containers shall be wildlife proof and meet the Certificate of Appropriateness
regulations pertaining to size and security.
Section 4: Eneineerin&Drainaee
a. Building permit submission shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen
Municipal Code, Title 21 and all construction and excavation standards published by
the engineering department.
b. The applicant shall submit plans showing drainage conveyance, sidewalk, curb, and
gutter which meet the City Engineer's standards and ADA requirements prior to
issuance of a Building Permit. Such improvements shall also be made prior to a
Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant must receive approval from the City
Engineer (and any other applicable departments) for structural improvements in the
public right -of -way, including the ADA access ramp along 7 Street and the
pavement work being completed along the Francis Street entrance.
Section 5: Water Department Requirements
The Applicant shall comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards, with Title
25, and with the applicable standards of Title 8 (Water conservation and Plumbing
Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code, as required by the City of Aspen Water
Department.
Ordinance 11, Series of 2010
Page 3 of 7
Section 6: Sanitation District Requirements
a. Service is contingent upon compliance with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation
District's (ACSD) rules, regulations, and specifications, which are on file at the
District office. ACSD will review the approved Drainage plans to assure that clear
water connections (roof, foundation, perimeter, patio drains) are not connected to the
sanitary sewer system.
b. On -site utility plans require approval by ACSD.
c. Landscaping plans will require approval by ACSD where soft and hard landscaping
may impact public ROW or easements to be dedicated to the district.
d. All ACSD fees must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit.
e. The glycol heating and snow melt system must be designed to prohibit the discharge
of glycol to any portion of the public and private sanitary sewer system. The glycol
storage areas must have approved containment facilities.
f. Soil Nails are not allowed in the public ROW above ASCD main sewer lines.
Section 7: Exterior LiQhtine
All exterior lighting shall meet the requirements of the City's Outdoor Lighting Code
pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.575.150, Outdoor Lighting.
Section 8: Parks Deoartment/Landscaoing
a. Excavations adjacent to the drip zones will be required to vertical excavation only.
Over digging is prohibited. Excavations will be soil stabilized in a manner that
prevents over excavation of the site. All foundation walls located in protection zones
shall have a one (1) sided pour. Utility connection will need to be designed and
shown on the plan in a manner that does not encroach into the tree protection zones.
b. Prior to the issuance of any demolition or building permits, a tree removal permit is
required for drip line excavation and will need to be approved by the Parks
Department. Mitigation for removals will be paid through cash -in -lieu or on site with
street trees.
c. A formal plan indicating the location of the tree protection will be required for the
building permit set.
d. Six (6 ") inches of mulch shall be placed and maintained within the zone of vegetation
protection.
e. Irrigation shall be provided to trees during the length of the project which is
appropriate for proper tree health. The edge of root cuttings shall receive additional
water and burlap coverings that should remain moist.
f Access across or through the area of protection is prohibited at all times. Access
along designated walkways is allowed.
g. Roots two (2') inches or greater shall be professionally pruned with on -call tree
service. Root trenching will be required around all trees with excavation next to
Ordinance 11, Series of 2010
Page 4 of 7
and/or under the drip line. This can be accomplished by a contracted professional
tree service company or trained member of the contractor's team.
h. Where right -of -way improvements are required adjacent to protection zones, plans
shall be submitted prior to building permit submittal. These plans shall indicate the
structural program and materials of the improvements. Sidewalk, curb, and gutter
shall be implemented in a manner that does not threaten the health of the trees.
Section 9: Fire Mitieation
All codes adopted by the Aspen Fire Protection District shall be met. This includes but is
not limited to access (International Fire Code (IFC), 2003 Edition, Section 503),
approved fire sprinkler and fire alarm systems (IFC, as amended, Section 903 and 907).
The capacity of the water utilities shall be assessed to determine if there is adequate
volume for fire suppression.
Section 10: Vested Riehts
The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site - specific development plan
vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order.
However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this
approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise
exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be
recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development
order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the
development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits).
Zoning that is not part of the approved site - specific development plan shall not result in
the creation of a vested property right.
No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary
to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be
published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the
City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific
development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice
shall be substantially in the following form:
Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific
development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three
(3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68,
Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 726 West
Francis, Lots K, L, AND M, Block 15, City and Townsite of Aspen, CO, Pitkin
County, Colorado.
Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews
and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances
or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with
this approval.
Ordinance 11, Series of 2010
Page 5 of 7
The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial
review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin
to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required
under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the
Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter.
Section 11:
All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or
documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are
hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied
with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity.
Section 12:
This Ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement
of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or
amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such
prior ordinances.
Section 13:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion
shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof
(Signatures on following page)
Ordinance 11, Series of 2010
Page 6 of 7
I'll
INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City
Council of the City of Aspen on the 26 day of April, 2010.
Attest:
Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk Michael C. Ireland, Mayor
FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this day of , 2010.
Attest:
Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk Michael C. Ireland, Mayor
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
Ordinance 11, Series of 2010
Page 7 of 7
d
I
t
k
H
w
N
a V
K
LL
CL
J
W
W
J
W
a
a
0
W
0
O
a
O
K
a
,i
Z
5
IL
W
f
N
N
Z
N
f
M
K
W
G
k
0
m
5
u
3
3
m
m
a
P
Z
0
m
O
0
a
0
w �
W U
Nmi
U, a
um
Z -�
`a
LLa_
� m
w
3zs
N r
N W
n
U
N
N
Z
m
F
6
Q
2
N
Q
W
N
U
2_
U
C
Q
0
m
s
5
Q
U
m.,
EXHIBIT B
REVIEW CRITERIA AND STAFF FINDINGS
Pursuant to Section 26.470.090, Growth Management Review for Essential Public Facilities
a) The Community Development Director has determined the primary use and/or structure to
be an essential public facility (see definition). Accessory uses may also be part of an
essential publicfacilityproject.
Staff Response: The proposed project involves an addition to the existing Church structure.
Currently, the employees of the Church share offices and the limited classroom space. The
addition will do multiple things to improve the internal operations of the Church; entrances
will include ADA compliant access ramps, ADA compliant restrooms will be added to the
entry level, sanctuary space will be improved with additional seating and a general
reconfiguration, and a larger reception area will be created of the 7 Street entrance. All of
these improvements improve the Church's ability to operate as a facility which serves an
essential public purpose that is available for use or benefit of the general public and serves
the needs of the community. The Community Development Director has determined that
the primary use is an essential public facility based on the definition found in Land Use Code
Section 26.104.100, Definitions; Essential Public Facility: a facility which serves an
essential public purpose is available for use by or benefit of, the general public and serves
the needs of the community.
Staff finds this criterion met.
b) Upon a recommendation from the Community Development Director, the City Council may
assess, waive or partially waive affordable housing mitigation requirements as is deemed
appropriate and warranted for the purpose of promoting civic uses and in consideration of
broader community goals. The employee generation rates may be used as a guideline, but
each operation shall be analyzed for its unique employee needs, pursuant to Section
26470.100, Calculations.
Staff Response: The proposed project does not create any additional employees; therefore it
is appropriate that no affordable housing mitigation be required.
Staff finds this criterion met.
FELSBURG
� i H O LT &
ULLEVIG
engineering paths to transportation solutions
February 8, 2010
Mr. John Galambos
Galambos Architects, Inc.
314 AABC, Suite D
Aspen CO 81611
RE: Crossroads Church of Aspen Traffic Assessment
FHU Reference # 10 -012
Dear Mr. Galambos:
iT
Felsburg Holt & Ullevig (FHU) has prepared this letter to summarize the traffic impacts associated
with the proposed remodel and expansion of the Crossroads Church of Aspen on the northeast
corner of the North 7` Street/Francis Street intersection in the West End neighborhood. This letter
focuses on trip generation, traffic, parking and multimodal impacts associated with the additional
attendees that would result from the expansion.
Project Description
The Crossroads Church is located on the northeast corner of the North 7'" Street/Francis Street
intersection in Aspen's West End neighborhood (Figure 1). The Church is planning to remodel the
building and expand it by 3,145 SF to provide approximately 80 additional seats in the sanctuary.
As it does today, the church would continue to host small day and evening classes during the week
and hold three services on Sunday morning and one on Sunday evening.
Because of space constraints, a very limited number of parking spaces are provided on the site —
roughly 4 -5 spaces are available off the alley on the north side of the building —a condition that
would not change with the expansion. Approximately 10 angled parking spaces are located along
the Church frontage on 7` Street and an additional 6 angled spaces are located along the church
frontage on Francis, the latter of which are reserved for handicapped use during services.
Additional on- street parking spaces are provided in the form of parallel parking on both sides of the
street on all streets surrounding the site, all of which are subject to Zone D parking restrictions (i.e.,
2 hour parking only for non - permit holders, 8 am – 6 pm, Monday through Friday) of which there
are none on Sundays during services. The Church has an agreement with the Forest Service to
use their 10 space lot on the west side of Francis, where all of the spaces are generally available
for Sunday morning services. After the angled parking and Forest Service lot spaces fill up, church
attendees currently park along the streets in the neighborhood, where spaces are also generally
unused and available during Sunday morning services. No changes to these current parking
practices are proposed or anticipated with the church expansion.
6300 South $racuse Way, Suite 600 Centennial, CO 80111 tel 303.721.1440 fax 303.721.0832
%%WW. fl) Lie ng.com infoCthueng.com
February 8, 2010
Mr. John Galambos
Page 2
Existing Conditions
Traffic and parking observations were conducted at the site on Sunday morning, January 31, 2010,
which coincided with the last day of the X Games at Buttermilk Mountain, so traffic flow between
downtown and Buttermilk on SH 82 was higher than what would be typically expected on a Sunday
morning. Additional parking observations were conducted on Sunday morning, January 17 2010
and mirrored what was observed on the 31 s
On both observation days, parking demand peaked for the second Sunday morning service (which
starts at 9:30 am). During that peak, both sides of 7 Street between Hallam and Smuggler were
generally fully occupied with church patrons, as were both sides of Francis between 6' and 7 th
Street. 6 th Street between Hallam and Smuggler was around half occupied, with about half of
those vehicles church patrons, but church patron parking did not extend beyond those blocks. A
total of 69 vehicles were parked on the streets for the 9:30 service, with an additional 10 in the
Forest Service lot (79 total vehicles). The number of church attendees in each parked vehicle was
also collected during the January 31" observations, and indicated an average vehicle occupancy of
approximately 1.87 people per vehicle.
Church staff estimated an attendance of 160 people for the 9:30 service. Based on the parked
vehicle and average vehicle occupancy observations, it would appear that around 148 of those
arrived via vehicle, with the rest arriving via foot or transit. Only one group of four people was
observed walking to the bus stop at 8'" and Hallam during the observation period, so it is assumed
that the remaining patrons walked to church.
It should be noted that it was sunny and around 20 degrees during the observation period, with
packed snow covering the roads and sidewalks in the West End neighborhood. Such conditions
can be a detriment to walking and more or less preclude bicycling, so it might be expected that the
number of people electing to walk or bicycle to church would be somewhat higher outside of the
winter season, when the roads and sidewalks are snow -free. Considering this, Table 1 shows the
current winter mode splits (observed) and the estimated summer mode splits (with better walking
conditions) for the church.
Table 1. Crossroads Church Mode Splits
Mode
Winter
I Summer
Vehicle 1.87 people per vehicle
92.5%
87.5%
Walk
5%
10%
Transit
2.5%
2.5%
Projected Vehicle Trips Generated by the Crossroads Church Expansion
The number of weekday vehicle -trips generated by the church expansion was forecast based on
equations and procedures documented in Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers,
Eighth Edition, 2008. Table 1 shows the weekday and Sunday trip generation forecasts for the
complex. Based on the trip generation estimates, the church expansion is anticipated to generate
approximately 30 additional vehicle -trips per day during the week and 115 additional trips per day
on Sundays. It would add virtually no new traffic to the road during the morning and evening peak
hours during the week, and add 37 new trips to the road system during the church's peak hour on
Sunday morning.
February 8, 2010
Mr. John Galambos
Page 3
Table 2. Crossroads Church Trip Generation
Land Use
Size
Daily
Trips
1 AM Peak of Generator
In Out Total
PM Peak
In Out Total
Church - Weekday
3,145 SF
30
2
1
3
1
1
2
Church -Sunda
3,145 SF
115
19
18
37
0
0
0
Figure 2 shows the additional Sunday traffic generated by the church expansion distributed to the
surrounding road system.
Level of Service Analysis
Level of Service (LOS) is a qualitative measure of traffic operational conditions, based on roadway
capacity and vehicle delay. LOS is described by a letter designation ranging from A to F, with LOS
A representing almost free -flow travel, while LOS F represents congested conditions. For
unsignalized intersections, LOS is calculated for movements which must yield right -of -way to other
traffic movements.
Traffic operations are typically evaluated according to techniques documented in the Highway
Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, 2000), but such techniques are not capable of
analyzing the unique traffic control at the 7th Street/Hallam Street intersection (stop signs on the
west and north approaches). Therefore, the intersection was evaluated using the SimTraffic traffic
simulation software, which uses vehicle and driver operating parameters to project operations over
a specified period of time. For this analysis, the one hour peak time period on Sunday morning
was simulated, and both vehicle delay and queuing results have been presented.
Existing Conditions
Sunday morning traffic counts collected on January 31, 2010 were used as the basis for the traffic
analysis. Figure 3 shows the existing Sunday morning peak hour traffic volumes and levels of
service at the 7 Street/Hallam intersection near the site. As the figure indicates, while traffic flow
into and out of town on SH 82 was high due to the X Games at Buttermilk that morning, traffic
volumes are enerally low on 7' Street near the church. The eastbound left turn movement from
SH 82 onto 7' Street toward the church operates at LOS E during that period, but it is not
uncommon, for movements from driveways and side streets along higher volume roadways to
experience poor levels of service. As noted in Chapter 17 (Unsignalized Intersections) of the
Highway Capacity Manual (2000)
In evaluating the overall performance of two -way stop control intersections, it is
important to consider measures of effectiveness in addition to delay, such as
average queue lengths and 95 th percentile queue lengths. By focusing on a single
measure of effectiveness for the worst movement only, such as delay for the minor
street left turn, users may make less effective traffic control decisions.
The average queue length for the eastbound left turn movement was 50 feet (two vehicles) and the
95 percentile queue length was 110 feet (five vehicles), which appear reasonable given the
higher- than - typical volume conditions created by the X Games. Given this, and since all other
movements at the intersection operate at LOS C or better, no improvements would appear to be
necessary at that intersection.
February 8, 2010
Mr. John Galambos
Page 4
Conditions with Project
Figure 4 shows the projected traffic volumes and level of service at 7 th and Hallam with the
additional traffic from the church expansion. As the figures indicates, all levels of service are the
same with the project as without. Furthermore, the projected average queue and 95 percentile
queue are generally the same with the project as without, so the expansion has very little to no
impact on the capacity of the road system.
Arrival Mode Analysis
The vehicle occupancy and mode split information documented previously was used in conjunction
with the 80 additional seats included in the proposed expansion to forecast the increase in the
number of pedestrians, transit riders and vehicles that would park in the neighborhood during the
busiest Sunday morning service. Table 3 shows the projected additional vehicles, pedestrians and
transit riders for winter and summer conditions. As indicated, the expansion would generate 37 to
40 additional parked vehicles, four to eight additional pedestrian arrivals, and two additional transit
riders for the peak service.
Table 1. Projected Additional Attendees Due to Church Expansion, by Mode
Mode
Winter
Summer
Parked Vehicles
40
37
Pedestrians /Bic clists
4
8
Transit Riders
1 2
2
Figure 5 shows how the additional parked vehicles would impact on- street parking in the
neighborhood. As indicated, with the expansion, it is anticipated that, in addition to the blocks that
are currently fully occupied by church attendees, parking spaces would be fully occupied on 6th
Street between Hallam and Smuggler, as well as on Francis Street between 6 and 5 Some
additional church patrons may also park along Smuggler between 6 and 7 but it is anticipated
that church traffic would only occupy around half the spaces on those blocks. It should also be
noted that most West End residents have off - street parking in garages, so very few residential
vehicles park on the street on those blocks, especially on Sunday mornings when the Church
generates it's peak parking demand.
Quality of Service Discussion
Based on conversations with staff, in addition to the traffic and parking assessment above, the City
would like an assessment of the quality of service for pedestrians, bicyclists and transit service.
Pedestrians
As with most of the streets in the West End neighborhood, both 7 th Street and Francis Street have
sidewalks on both sides of the street, including along both of the Church's property frontages. The
sidewalks appear to be 5 -6 feet wide and are separated from the street by a 5 -6 foot tree lawn
(snow made it difficult to determine the precise width). All West End streets exhibit very low traffic
volumes that are typical of a grid system of local roads in a residential neighborhood, and on- street
parallel parking further separates pedestrians from traffic. In general, this creates a safe and
comfortable environment for pedestrians, although it should be noted that some sections of
unshoveled sidewalks and snow mounds created by street plowing force pedestrians into the street
M\
February 8, 2010
Mr. John Galambos
Page 5
during the winter months. In light of this, the church should maintain a clear sidewalk along both
street frontages to facilitate pedestrian movement on the property.
Striped pedestrian crosswalks are located on the north and east sides of the 7` Street/Hallam
Street intersection. Since those are the two low- volume approach legs of that intersection,
pedestrians have adequate gaps to cross and experience minimal delay. The north leg crossing
provides a connection between the Church and the RFTA transit stop at 8` and Hallam.
Bicyclists
No dedicated bike lanes or paths are provided within the West End neighborhood, including along
7th Street and Francis Street in front of the property. Bicyclists are anticipated to share the road
with vehicle traffic, which would appear to be a safe option given the low speeds and low traffic
volumes on the grid system of local roads in the neighborhood. Said grid system provides
adequate connections to all downtown locations, and roads are generally 36 feet wide to provide
ample room for parking, bicycles and traffic. Zero trucks or busses were observed on any of the
local roads in the vicinity of the site during the Sunday morning observations, so conflicts with
larger vehicles are expected to be minimal. All roads in the neighborhood are paved, but the
winter conditions made it difficult to determine the condition of the pavement. Based on the above,
in general, the area around the Church creates a good environment for bicyclists. To encourage
bicycling to church services during the non - winter months, the Church should consider installing
bike racks near the entrance to the building on Francis.
Transit Services
The nearest transit stop is located at 8` and Hallam, two blocks from the Church. Six RFTA routes
travel use that stop, providing service connections throughout town and down valley toward
Snowmass, etc. at headways that range from 7 to 30 minutes. Most routes begin operations on
Sunday morning between 6 and 7 AM and operate late into the evening, and therefore would be
available for church attendees at all four services. During the Sunday morning observations the
outbound busses toward Buttermilk were generally more than half full, likely with X Games
attendees, while inbound busses were around a quarter full, so adequate capacity was available in
both directions. The crosswalk along the north side of the 7 h Street/Hallam Street intersection
provides a safe pedestrian crossing between the church and the bus stop.
The Cross Town Shuttle also passes by Francis on 5` Street, two blocks east of the site, and
therefore would also present a transit option for church attendees. While the hours of operation for
that route have been reduced due to budget cuts, it still operates daily from 8 AM to 9 PM and
therefore would be in operation for all four Sunday services.
As noted previously, observations indicated that very few church attendees arrived and departed
via the transit system, and it seems unlikely that that mode share would increase during non - winter
months, but based on the above, it appears that RFTA provides very good transit service levels
during the four Sunday services should church attendees elect to use it.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Based upon the above analysis, the Aspen Community Church expansion would generate
approximately 115 more trips each Sunday than what the current church generates; that traffic
volumes on the surrounding road system are low; and that the increase in traffic that results from
the Center would have little to no impact on traffic operations at the 7' and Hallam intersection.
February 8, 2010
Mr. John Galambos
Page 6
Both the pedestrian facilities and the bicycling environment in the West End neighborhood around
the site are good and would not discourage church attendees from walking or bicycling to church if
they so choose. Providing bike racks near the church entrance on Francis and keeping the
sidewalks free of snow in front of the building along both the 7 t° Street and Francis Street may help
further encourage attendees to walk or ride to services. The bus stop on SH 82 at 8 th Street is only
two blocks west of the church and services six RFTA routes, and the Cross Town Shuttle passes
by Francis Street at 5 t° Avenue two blocks east of the church, so transit access and availability is
also very good for those who elect to use that mode to access church services.
Nevertheless, the vast majority of church attendees currently elect to drive to church because an
abundance of free on- street parking is available on the blocks around the church, and it is
anticipated that around 90 percent of the additional church attendees due to the expansion would
also drive to the site. These additional attendees would represent around 40 additional parked
vehicles during the busiest Sunday morning service, but enough on- street parking is available
within two blocks of the church to accommodate the additional parking demand. Since free and
available parking is perhaps the greatest obstacle to overcome when encouraging people to shift
modes, and removing parking opportunities from the neighborhood streets around the church is
more likely to discourage people from attending rather than shift modes (unlike work trips, church
attendance is an elective trip), it is unlikely that any TDM program implemented by the church
would create any dramatic shift to alternate modes, so none is recommended.
In summation, it would appear the existing pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities are adequate
and convenient for those who elect to use them, but that most of the additional church attendees
would elect to drive because of the availability of nearby free parking. However, the additional 40
vehicles created by the expansion would have minimal the traffic and parking impacts on the
surrounding area, so no further actions beyond those already identified above are recommended
for the site.
I trust this information will be of assistance to you as you continue the approval process for the
Church expansion. If you have any questions regarding the above information, or need any
additional information, please give me a call at (303) 721 -1440.
Sincerely,
FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG
Jeffrey M. Ream
Senior Transportation Engineer
^v
< r
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY:
'j Z ro W bra roc S , Aspen, CO
SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE:
STATE OF COLORADO )
) ss.
County of Pitkin )
1 � RA G' �C—Cyf C�J (name, please print)
being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally
certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060
(E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner:
Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official
paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15)
days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto.
Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the
Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof
materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty -six
(264.j s high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in
, pOW S� &mPtice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing
� fflX f ' �iusly visible from the _ day of 200 ; `an mclu W, X and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted
notice (sign) i.L attached hereto.
/Y{gzing cnQtice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community
partment, which contains the information described in Section
2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to
gp}a1 notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage
prepaid U.S.. ma all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the
property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of
property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they
appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A
copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto.
(continued on next page)
Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt
requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to
the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of
development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those
on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions that
create more than one lot, Planned Unit Developments, Specially Planned Areas,
and COWAPs are subject to this notice requirement.
Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in
any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision
of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such
revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use
regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other
sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and
addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be
waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public
inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days
prior to the public hearing on such amendments.
Signature
The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this I day
Of f440v- 2010, by Ahno snC4
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
My commission
' expires:
Notary Public
For further informabon, contact Drew Alexander at
'no City of Aspen Community Development De-
Pertinent "'S . Galena SL, Aspen CO 81611,
(9]0) 429 -2]39 tlrew alexanderOci
ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: *EO"s
'F THE PUBLICATION
'GRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN)
F7 THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED
Platen Gibbs L
. raspen.c°. us ri
Plata G and °nin9 Chair
Published ANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE
in the Aspen Tunas Weekly (05]661 ]J y on January ?UIRED BY CR.S. §24 -65.5 -103.3
Published
BLIC N TI E
RE: CROSSROADS CHURCH OF ASPEN;
CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW, SPECIAL E-
VIEW A PARJUNG, DIMENSIONAL VARIAN
AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEW FOR
ESSENTAL PUBLIC FACILITY.
RESOLUTION NO. 6, SERIES OF 2010
A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS AN AMENDMENT TO THE
CONDITIONAL USE TO INCREASE ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA ONSITE,
SPECIAL REVIEW TO ESTABLISH OFF - STREET PARKING
REQUIREMENTS, DIMENSIONAL VARIANCES, AND RECOMMENDING
CITY COUNCIL APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS GROWTH MANAGEMENT
REVIEW FOR AN ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITY FOR 726 WEST FRANCIS,
LOTS K, L, AND M, BLOCK 15, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, CO,
PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
PARCEL NO. 2735-12-408-801.
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application
from Crossroads Church of Aspen, requesting approval of an increase in allowed floor
area from 4,774 square feet to 7,299 square feet through the Conditional Use process, to
establish new off street parking requirements through Special Review, Dimensional
Variances, and a recommendation to City Council for. the approval of Growth
Management allotments for an Essential Public Facility; and,
WHEREAS, the Applicant, Crossroads Church of Aspen qualifies as a
Conditional Use, pursuant to Section 26.104.100 "arts, cultural, and civic use ", in the R -6
Medium Residential Zone District; and,
WHEREAS, the Applicant, Crossroads Church of Aspen, serves an essential
public purpose by serving the needs of the general public and Aspen community, and
therefore is categorized as an Essential Public Facility, pursuant to Section 26.104.100;
and,
WHEREAS, the subject property is zoned R -6 Medium Residential; and,
WHEftAS, the proposed land use requests do not intend to increase Church
programs, employment, or membership; and,
WHEREAS, a publicly noticed site visit was held on February 4, 2010, and;
WHEREAS, upon review of the application, and the applicable code standards,
the Community Development Department recommended approval with conditions, of the
proposed land use requests; and,
WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on February 16, 2010, the
Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the application upon recommendation from the
Community Development Department and approved Resolution No. 6, Series of 2010, by a
( 5 - 0 ) vote, an increase in floor area from 4,774 square feet to 7,299 square feet through
the Conditional Use process, established off - street parking requirements through Special
Review, approved certain Dimensional Variances, and a recommendation to City Council
for the approval of Growth Management Review for an Essential Public Facility located
on the property at 726 W. Francis, Lots K, L, and M, Block 15, City and Townsite of
Aspen, CO; and,
RECEPTION #: 567701, 03/16/2010 at
10:27:59 AM,
1 OF 9, R $46.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION P& Z_ Resolution 6, Series of 2010
Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Page 1 of 5
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and
considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code
as identified herein; and,
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the
development proposal meets all applicable development standards and that the approval of
the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the
Aspen Area Community Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution
furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: Conditional Use Approval and Associated Reviews
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the City of Aspen Municipal
Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves, with conditions,
Conditional Use and associated reviews which grant the following:
• An increase in allowable floor area from 4,744 to 7,299 square feet; and,
• Special Review for Parking and the approval of four (4) off - street spots; and,
• Dimensional Variance for Combined Side Yard and Minimum Side Yard setback;
and,
• Recommendation of approval for Growth Management for an Essential Public
Facility
Approvals are for the property located at Lots K, L, and M, Block 15, City and Townsite
of Aspen, CO. The approved dimensional standards are indicated in the chart below
under the heading, "Approved Development':
Table 1: The following dimensional variances are approved solely for the site
specific redevelopment.
Section 2: Trash/Utility Service Area
The trash containers shall be wildlife proof and meet the Certificate of Appropriateness
regulations pertaining to size and security.
P& Z Resolution 6, Series of 2010
Page 2 of 5
Existing Development
Approved
Development
West side yard setback (feet)
5.5
5.5
Combined Side Yard (feet)
16.2
16.2
Site coverage
52%
51%
Section 2: Trash/Utility Service Area
The trash containers shall be wildlife proof and meet the Certificate of Appropriateness
regulations pertaining to size and security.
P& Z Resolution 6, Series of 2010
Page 2 of 5
Section 3: Engineerinz/Drainaze
a. Building permit submission shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen
Municipal Code, Title 21 and all construction and excavation standards published by
the engineering department.
b. The applicant shall submit plans showing drainage conveyance, sidewalk, curb, and
gutter which meet the City Engineer's standards and ADA requirements prior to
issuance of a Building Permit. Such improvements shall also be made prior to a
Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant must receive approval from the City
Engineer (and any other applicable departments) for structural improvements in the
public right -of -way, including the ADA access ramp along 7` Street and the
pavement work being completed along the Francis Street entrance.
Section 4• Water Department Requirements
The Applicant shall comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards, with Title
25, and with the applicable standards of Title 8 (Water conservation and Plumbing
Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code, as required by the City of Aspen Water
Department.
Section 5• Sanitation District Requirements
a. Service is contingent upon compliance with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation
District's (ACSD) rules, regulations, and specifications, which are on file at the
District office. ACSD will review the approved Drainage plans to assure that clear
water connections (roof, foundation, perimeter, patio drains) are not connected to the
sanitary sewer system.
b. On -site utility plans require approval by ACSD.
c. Landscaping plans will require approval by ACSD where soft and hard landscaping
may impact public ROW or easements to be dedicated to the district.
d. All ACSD fees must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit.
e. The glycol heating and snow melt system must be designed to prohibit the discharge
of glycol to any portion of the public and private sanitary sewer system. The glycol
storage areas must have approved containment facilities.
f. Soil Nails are not allowed in the public ROW above ASCD main sewer lines.
Section 6: Exterior Lighting
All exterior lighting shall meet the requirements of the City's Outdoor Lighting Code
pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.575.150, Outdoor Lighting.
Section 7• Parks Department/Landscaping
a. Excavations adjacent to the drip zones will be required to vertical excavation only.
Over digging is prohibited. Excavations will be soil stabilized in a manner that
prevents over excavation of the site. All foundation walls located in protection zones
shall have a one (1) sided pour. Utility connection will need to be designed and
shown on the plan in a manner that does not encroach into the tree protection zones.
P& Z Resolution 6, Series of 2010
Page 3 of 5
b. Prior to the issuance of any demolition or building permits, a tree removal permit is
required for drip line excavation and will need to be approved by the Parks
Department. Mitigation for removals will be paid through cash -in -lieu or on site with
street trees.
c. A formal plan indicating the location of the tree protection will be required for the
building permit set.
d. Six (6 ") inches of mulch shall be placed and maintained within the zone of vegetation
protection.
e. Irrigation shall be provided to trees during the length of the project which is
appropriate for proper tree health. The edge of root cuttings shall receive additional
water and burlap coverings that should remain moist.
f Access across or through the area of protection is prohibited at all times. Access
along designated walkways is allowed.
g. Roots two (2') inches or greater shall be professionally pruned with on -call tree
service. Root trenching will be required around all trees with excavation next to
and/or under the drip line. This can be accomplished by a contracted professional
tree service company or trained member of the contractor's team.
h. Where right -of -way improvements are required adjacent to protection zones, plans
shall be submitted prior to building permit submittal. These plans shall indicate the
structural program and materials of the improvements. Sidewalk, curb, and gutter
shall be implemented in a manner that does not threaten the health of the trees.
Section 8: Fire Mitigation
All codes adopted by the Aspen Fire Protection District shall be met. This includes but is
not limited to access (International Fire Code (IFC), 2003 Edition, Section 503),
approved fire sprinkler and fire alarm systems (IFC, as amended, Section 903 and 907).
The capacity of the water utilities shall be assessed to determine if there is adequate
volume for fire suppression.
Section 9• Employee Generation
The number of employees generated is determined to be zero (0) for the approved Church
expansion. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends that the City Council
establish criteria for an employee audit to take place no later than one (1) year after
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to determine if new employees are a result of this
project.
Section 10:
All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or
documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are
hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied
with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity.
P& Z Resolution 6, Series of 2010
Page 4 of 5
C I1)
Section 11:
This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement
of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or
amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such
prior ordinances.
Section 12•
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion
shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof.
APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this le
day of February, 2010.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
James R. True, Special Counsel
ATTEST:
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION:�
Stan Gibbs, Chairman
P "ie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk
ATTACHMENTS:
EXHIBIT A — Architectural elevations
EXHIBIT B — Site plan (showing setbacks)
P& Z Resolution 6, Series of 2010
Page 5 of 5
En E-t la I - r
VA§MNC. ppL"&16 S'MW
77
IL
�iy
"I
FRo7omp Ako
)NT (FRANCIS STREET)
SO FEET
1R (ALLEY)
10 FEET
MBINED SIDE YARDS
30 FEET
IIMUM SIDE YARD
10 10 FEET
IIMUM SIDE YARD ( 7TH STREET)
FEET
,R
S
F
2
> W
W
N
ALLEY
EXISTING SITE PLAN
PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL PLAN
GALAMBOS ARCHITECTS INC.
Crossroads Church of Aspen
726 WEST FRANCIS STREET
November 16, 2009
314 SUITE D ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER I ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
WPTM `%WM —__
C } ♦ 6 16 1I I'll
I PHONE: 970.429.1286 1 WWW.GALAMBOSARCHITECTS. NEI'
�
f
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
THRU: Jennifer Phelan, Community Development Deputy Director
FROM: Drew Alexander, Interim Zoning Officer
RE: Crossroads Church (726 W. Francis) — Conditional Use Review, Special Review
for Parking, Dimensional Variance, and Growth Management Review for and
Essential Public Facility — Resolution No. _, Series 2010 — Public Hearing
MEETING
DATE: February 16 ", 2010
APPLICANT /OWNER:
Crossroads Church of Aspen, 726 W
Francis, Aspen, CO 81611
REPRESENTATIVE:
John Galambos, John Galambos
Architects, 314 Suite D Aspen Business
Center, Aspen, CO 81611
LOCATION:
Block 15, Lots K — M, First Baptist
Church, City and Townsite of Aspen,
CO, commonly known as 726 W. Francis
Street.
CURRENT ZONING &c USE
Located in R -6 (Medium- Density
Residential) Zone District.
PROPOSED LAND USE:
The existing land use will remain. The
proposal is for an expansion to the
Church facility to provide better
programming and operation.
location
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Planning and "Zoning
Commission approve the project, with conditions.
SUMMARY:
The Applicant requests of the Planning and
Zoning Commission approval of Conditional Use
Review, Special Review (Parking), Dimensional
Variance and a recommendation of approval for
Growth Management Review request: Essential
Public Facilities.
LAND USE REQUESTS AND REVIEW PROCEDURES:
The Applicant is requesting four (4) land use approvals from the Planning and Zoning
Commission (hereinafter P &Z) and City Council:
Planning and Zoning
Conditional Use Review pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.425 (The P &Z is the
final review authority, who shall by resolution approve, approve with conditions, or
disapprove a development application).
• Special Review — Parking pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.430.020 (The P &Z is
the final review authority, who shall by resolution approve, approve with condition, or
disapprove a development application).
Dimensional Variance (setback) — pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.314.020 (The
P &Z shall be the final review authority if the variance is part of a consolidated
application).
City Council
• Growth Management Review for Essential Public Facilities pursuant to Land Use Code
Section 26.470.090.4 (The City Council is the final review authority, who may approve,
approve with conditions, or deny the proposal after receiving a recommendation from the
P &Z).
BACKGROUND:
The Crossroads Church was originally built in 1964 and was at the time called First Baptist
Church. During its history, the church has undergone several renovations, but nothing as
substantive as the current proposal. In 1977, a similar proposal for a church expansion was
approved, but the work was never completed. The most recent renovation occurred in 2003 and
2004.
PROJECT SUMMARY:
The Applicant, Crossroads Church of Aspen, has requested approval to construct an expansion to
the existing church facility. The expansion on the upper level (approximately 3,145 gross square
feet) would make the total gross square footage of the church approximately 11,568 sq. ft. This
expansion is intended to improve the internal programming of the church. Currently, there are
seven full and part -time employees that share four offices. The addition will create seven new
offices with one being used for both office and classroom purposes. The additional space also
allows for reconfiguration of the lower lever, including a realigned and larger sanctuary with 80
additional seats.
The reconfiguration of the entry level would allow for functionality enhancements of the
entrances and provide for proper lobby /reception spaces. The proposal includes altering the 7`
Street (west) entrance and enlarging its reception/lobby area. This entry level renovation also
includes improvements to bathrooms. ADA (none exist currently) compliant bathrooms will be
added to this level of the church.
' No Ordinance /Resolution number on record for this approval
2
C 3
The existing church is nonconforming to the R -6 dimensional requirements for setbacks on the
side yards and rear yard. The combined side yard setback total should be 30 ft. based upon lot
size 2 , however the church has a 5.5 ft. setback on the west side yard and a 10.7 ft. east side yard
giving a total of 16.2 ft. The rear yard setback requirement is 10 ft., but the church currently has
a 5 ft. rear yard. The church conforms to front yard requirements.
The proposal requires a variance on the west portion of the building where the upper -level
expansion approaches 7` Street. This area is related to a gable above the west stairwell which
would maintain the current nonconforming side yard of 5.5 ft. All other portions of the
expansion have been pulled back to meet all dimensional requirements other than Combined
Yard Setback.
r
w
w
ri
r
r
Z
Z
w
8
FRANC'S STREET
PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL PLAN*'" „-
FIGURE 1: SITE PLAN WITH SETBACKS
' Crossroads Church of Aspen is located on the comer of Francis Street and Seventh Street. Pursuant to R -6 zone
district standards for a 9,000 sq. ft, lot, the combined side yard setback should be 30'. 3
Although there is additional square footage and an increased sanctuary size, the applicant has
stated that no additional parking is necessary. The church currently has four off - street parking
spaces along the alleyway. The remainder of parking is located along the right -of -way around
the Church perimeter and in the six spaces available on Sundays at the Forest Service lot. The
applicant has completed a traffic analysis for this proposal, as noted in Exhibit F.
STAFF COMMENTS:
CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW: A Conditional Use review is requested to increase the floor area of
the church with an addition to the upper level. This addition allows for an interior
reconfiguration of the church which provides offices for existing employees, improves lobby and
classroom spaces, and improves the sanctuary by adding additional seating and placing the stage
in a central location. This new design incorporates a prominent new entrance along 7`" Street
that would have a wheelchair accessible access ramp. Also, the additional space provides for the
ability to construct ADA compliant bathrooms on the entry level. Staff finds that the proposal
increases building efficiency and accessibility, and the design is compatible with the R -6 zone
district. Staff finds that the Conditional Use criteria are met and recommends that the Planning
and Zoning Commission approve the expansion for the church.
4
v Existing
Proposed
R -6 Zone District
Development
Development
Minimum Requirements
Lot Size (square
9,000
9,000
6,000
feet)
Front Yard Setback
14.9
14.9
10
(feet)
East Side Yard
10.7
10.7
10' (30' Combined)
Setback (feet)
West "alternate front
5.5
5.5
6.66 on corner lots (30
yard" Setback (feet)
combined
Rear Yard Setback
5.5
5.5 for lower, 10
10
(feet)
for upper level
Combined Sideyard
15.7
15.7
30
Setback (feet)
Height (feet)
24 measured to
No more than 25
25
1/3 point
Site coverage
52%
51%
maximum is 40%
Allowable Floor
4 '
7,299
3,660 for 1 detached dwelling on a
Area (square feet)
,774
9,000 square foot lot, 4,080 for
two detached dwellings or duplex
Off Street Parking
4
4
Established by Special
Review
STAFF COMMENTS:
CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW: A Conditional Use review is requested to increase the floor area of
the church with an addition to the upper level. This addition allows for an interior
reconfiguration of the church which provides offices for existing employees, improves lobby and
classroom spaces, and improves the sanctuary by adding additional seating and placing the stage
in a central location. This new design incorporates a prominent new entrance along 7`" Street
that would have a wheelchair accessible access ramp. Also, the additional space provides for the
ability to construct ADA compliant bathrooms on the entry level. Staff finds that the proposal
increases building efficiency and accessibility, and the design is compatible with the R -6 zone
district. Staff finds that the Conditional Use criteria are met and recommends that the Planning
and Zoning Commission approve the expansion for the church.
4
, y
SPECIAL REVIEW FOR PARKING:
The Aspen Municipal Code does not assign a parking requirement for churches in the R -6 zone
district. Civic uses must have their parking requirements established by a Special Review.
Parking at the church has been a topic of debate in previous land use applications. In 1977, when
a similar expansion was proposed, the Planning and Zoning Commission required a traffic study
to assess the church's requirement. The applicant has completed a similar traffic study for this
application that shows adequate parking during peak hours. Staff finds that the site has limited
opportunity for additional parking being that the majority of the site is built out. The applicant
has stated the addition will not generate more employees and the expanded sanctuary will not
create more trips during service hours. The Parking Department has also stated that as long as no
current spaces are removed, the Church and surrounding neighborhood has ample parking for its
needs.
With the current off - street parking, Forest Service lot, and recommendation from the Parking
Department, Staff finds that the church has sufficient parking for its needs. If the agreement with
the Forest Service ends, the Church shall investigate additional options, such as, but not limited
to: additional bike racks, awareness on the Church website for alternate transportation options,
and /or a shuttle service.
DIMENSIONAL VARIANCE:
The proposal requires the following variance: a side yard setback, five and a half feet (5.5') is
provided where 6.6' is required. Being that the church is located on a corner lot with a front yard
along Francis, the remaining yard with street frontage must be 2/3 the distance of the required
front yard setback. A front yard setback for a lot of this size in the R -6 zone district is ten feet
(10'). The variance would be for minimum side yard setback and combined side yard setback.
Staff finds that the variances are appropriate for the site, meet the criteria, and recommends
approval.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEW; ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES:
The Crossroads Church of Aspen is an Essential Public Facility, which requires a
recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission to City Council. The proposal to
increase floor area of the Church triggers this review; however the Church does not intend to
increase employees, community programs, or congregation membership. The sanctuary is larger
per this proposal, but there is no increase in number of services. No new affordable housing is
proposed with this application. The design proposal is consistent with the Aspen Area
Community Plan and the impact on public infrastructure will be minimal due to upgrades where
applicable or required.
Growth Management allotments for Essential Public Facilities are granted at the discretion of
City Council, based on a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission. Staff
finds that the Growth Management criteria are met for an Essential Public Facility and
recommends approval.
' Currently seven part and full -time employees
G
REFERRAL AGENCY COMMENTS:
• Parking Department — No need for additional parking as long as the use of the Forest
Service lot was preserved and all on- street and alley parking remained.
• Engineering Department — Curb, gutter, and sidewalk are required along 7` Street and
Francis. Prior to Building permit submittal, the applicant shall submit plans showing
curb, gutter, and sidewalk locations and also a plan for drainage conveyance.
Where improvements are planned in the right -of -way (ADA access ramp, pavement
improvements), the applicant shall meet with the City Engineer and other applicable
departments to receive the necessary approvals and/or right -of -way agreements.
• Parks Department — Plans must meet the requirements of the City Parks Department and
the City Forester. Where right -of -way improvements are required (curb, gutter,
sidewalk) the applicant shall provide plans that meet the regulations and requirements
provisioned in the Tree Protection Code.
• Water/Fire Marshall — During the permitting process, the water utilities servicing the
Church shall be assessed to see if it capacity is adequate for water services and fire
suppression.
RECOMMENDATION:
In reviewing the proposal, Staff believes that the project is consistent with the goals of the AACP
as well as the applicable review standards in the City Land Use Code. Staff recommends
approval of the project.
RECOMMENDED MOTION (ALL MOTIONS ARE WORDED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE):
"I move to approve Resolution No._, Series of 2010, approving with conditions, Conditional
Use Review and all associated land use reviews as indicated in Staff's memorandum which
provide for an increase in allowed floor area from 4,774 square feet to 7,299 square, and
recommending that City Council approve with conditions, Growth Management Review for an
Essential Public Facility."
ATTACHMENTS:
EXHIBIT A
— Conditional Use Criteria
EXHIBIT B
— Special Review Criteria
Exhibit C —
Dimensional Variance Criteria
Exhibit D —
Site Plan
Exhibit E —
GMQS Criteria
Exhibit F —
Traffic Analysis
Exhibit G - Application
2
� M N.0 Ua�
Stan Gibbs opened the public hearing for 726 West Francis Street conditional use
and land use reviews. Drew Alexander responded that Crossroads Church has
requested 4 approvals, 3 of which are final at Planning & Zoning; Conditional Use,
Special Review for parking and a Dimensional variance. The Growth
Management Quota System, for an essential public facility, which is a
recommendation from Planning & Zoning, which is finalized thereafter by City
Council. Alexander said the notice had been provided.
Alexander said that Crossroads Church was built in 1964 and it was called the First
Baptist Church at the time and has undergone several small renovations throughout
the years; the last in 2004. The Crossroads Church received a similar renovation
approval in 1977, which included an expansion for additional programming space
and offices; that application was approved but the work was never completed. The
current proposal consists of expansion primarily to the second floor, which would
change the overall floor area of the church from 4, 774 square feet to 7,299. The
upper level expansion would include offices for the current 7 employees who share
office space and classroom space; the expansion will also provide improvements to
programming, entrance and existing, re- orientated entrance; ADA compliant
access along 7`' Street and ADA compliant restrooms. The Special Review for
Parking for arts, cultural and civic uses; the church currently has approximately 15
spots on street parking, 4 off - street spots along the alleyway and a verbal
agreement between the church and the forest service where they use 6 spots in the
forest service lot on Sundays during service hours.
Alexander said the Dimensional Variance was for combined side yard setback and
minimum side yard setback being that the church is on a comer lot in the R -6 Zone
District there is a combined side yard setback requirement for a lot this size at 30
proposed with a west side yard of 5.5. The front
feet; currently there is 16.2 being
yard has been recorded along Francis Street; the yard along 7 h Street is able to
have a setback that is two -thirds of the distance of the required front yard setback
which is 6.6 feet; they are asking for a variance of 5.5 feet for an area that is a
g able l
stepped back so they are in compliance with the R setback q iremenits.ve been
Alexander said the programming has been enhanced and there was an additional 80
seats in the sanctuary but the plan doesn't include increasing services or
membership. Staff recommends the growth management review for the employee
housing be waived and recommends approval based upon the design of the
expansion. The applicant also completed a traffic an alysis for the special review
for parking. Alexander said on page 3 of the memo is an idea of how the proposed
3
w
City Plannine & Zoning Meeting — Minutes — February 16 2010
footprint aligns up with the existing. There has been a curb and gutter plan along
Francis Street from the engineering department and also curb and gutter be
installed along 7 and the curb and gutter and sidewalk would not conflict with the
significant trees, drip lines and root bases and possibly use alternate materials for
the sidewalk. The Fire Department asked that the water line be assessed during
building permit; the size of the pipe needs to be adequate for fire suppression and
the water utility to the church also recommended by the Water Department. Staff
recommends approval of all reviews.
Cliff Weiss asked if there was no new membership capacity proposed. Alexander
replied that was the intent but the membership capacity could increase but that was
not the intent to increase service hours or numbers of services on Sundays or
number of programs during the week. It was strictly to provide offices for their
employees and improve the ingress and egress on the lower level and add 80
additional seats to the sanctuary. Weiss asked if there weren't enough seats for
their membership now. Alexander explained that with this expansion there were
some roof form changes and a part of that is severing the sanctuary platform
coming away from the north end of the space and reconfiguring to the eastern in
the more centralized location and there was a gathering area on that level that was
being removed.
Bert Myrin asked the system in place for the City Community Development to
address that parking agreement with the neighbor; what if the neighbor changes the
agreement down the road. Alexander said there were a couple of things specific to
this site that help with the transportation needs; if they lose those 6 spaces there
were things that they could do like advertise on their web site for alternates like
RFTA, new additional bike racks, to coordinate with City Shuttle systems. Myrin
asked how this gets implemented; P &Z was making a land use decision based upon
those 6 spaces as part of their decision and if those go away at some point then
what happens. Jennifer Phelan responded that it could be a condition in the
resolution that if that agreement dissolves that it is the responsibility of the
applicant to notify the City.
John Galambos said that he was a member of Crossroads Church and the architect
preparing this application. Galambos stated that Crossroads Church has been there
a long time. Don said that it has been there since 1957. Galambos said in the
basement there was Sunday School and nursery, storage and a kitchen; there
currently was no second floor. Galambos said that by turning the sanctuary from
the traditional stage at the end of pews they are trying it at 90 degrees so there was
a little more intimate connection, which will enhance the experience in the
0
community. In moving the offices upstairs they are trying to create a better flow
and better connecting point and when the services end the people can discharge on
Francis and 7' Streets. Galambos said that the ADA bathrooms would be
addressed and handicap access on 7 th Street with a sloping walkway and an
elevator.
Galambos said they want to preserve the trees so there will be some negotiating
between Parks and Engineering on that and the trees were on the City right -of- -way.
Galambos said that they would be within the 25 foot height limit in the zone
district. Galambos said that he heard from 3 neighbors and received favorable
input from 2 and the third was sent the views from the back where she lived.
Galambos said there were between 425 to 475 people coming to church during
those 3 services. They were at about 80 to 85% capacity for the second 2 services.
In the summers the Music School uses their facility for some lectures The
weddings and funerals are packed.
Galambos asked Jeff Ream a traffic engineer to come up and they did a couple of
studies comparing the 3 west end churches Sunday mornings; asked all consider
everybody has to park on the street Sunday mornings,
the proposal without those 6 spaces at the forest service. Jeff Ream said that he
worked for a traffic and transportation consultation firm; churches and schools
create a unique challenge; everyone comes at the same time and leaves as soon as
it's done. Ream said that he came up on the weekend of January 31' during the X
Games and watched traffic and parking for the two busiest services 9:30 and the 11
o'clock and used the information collected from that to augment his traffic analysis
for this particular site. Ream said there were 4 spaces in the alley, 10 angled along
7 th Street and 6 along Francis. Everybody else just parks on the streets and was in
a two hour parking zone Monday through Friday 8 until 6. Ream utilized graphics
(figures 1 -5) that street occupancy at 85% full might mean there were 1 or 2 spaces
available; yellow means there were plenty of spaces available and you can find a
spot; green was less than 50% full which generally means that you can park
anywhere you want. Ream said the forest service o was full l on both i sides and they
all changed over; 7' between Hallam and Smuggler
Francis between 6 th and 7` was full. Ream said there were about 160 folks at the
9:30 service, the busiest service. Ream said there were about 5% walking; we can
assume that most of the people are driving to church; in the summer there might be
a few more people walking. Ream said the total traffic is about 115 trips on
Sunday morning created by the expansion and transit was good to the site.
Galambos said that they had an open house.
5
City Planning & Zoning Meeting — Minutes — February 16 2010
Mike Wampler said that during the walk through you stated that this may be a 5 or
possibly 10 year project with no money raised; why are you doing this now when
10 years down the whole game plan could be changed. Galambos replied that they
were asking for a 5 year vested rights instead of 3; he said that they did not want to
go into massive debt in order to do the project; it wasn't part of the philosophy of
the church.
Cliff Weiss said that he saw 12 streets in your grid, 240 spaces roughly. Ream said
that was for all 3 services. Galambos replied the second and third services had
kids programs; the second service being more heavily attended. Mike Wampler
said that people drove slow and sometimes had to park 2 blocks away. Weiss said
that he didn't see any letters from neighbors so he wasn't worried. Weiss asked
what was happening the rest of the week. Pastor Dan said that there was nothing
during the week for kids, it was only Sunday school. Pastor said that they were in
the office as a staff Monday through Friday; in the summer there was a lecture on
Fridays at lunch; the Music Associates use it; Thursday Mornings about 25 ladies
gather for a study; Wednesday Mornings there were about 8 men that gather for a
study; Monday nights about 10 -15 youths meet; Tuesday nights there is a band
rehearsal with the Theatre Company lead by David Ledingham about 8 people;
Wednesday nights they have 20 something that meets and a band practicing;
Thursday night there is another band rehearsal and another study that meets with 8
or 9 people. Pastor Dan said Friday and Saturday nights nothing happens; he said
that weddings happen about 5 times a year and maybe a couple of funerals a year;
there is no formal school just Sunday school. Pastor Dan said that one of the
Church statistics is when you get over 80% full people tend to not come; the
capacity was 180 so this expansion would be to make it a more workable facility.
Weiss asked about using the church for something else; if you were using this for
hundreds of people that would impact more days of the week than Sundays. Pastor
Dan said they do not want the burden of becoming a rental facility but want to
serve the community needs.
No public comments.
Commissioner Comments:
Cliff Weiss stated he was concerned about the parking and noise for the
neighborhood and renting out the facility for rock concerts but the pastor stated
that they were not interested in renting out the facility. Bert Myrin asked about the
employee audit for employee housing mitigation and if it was part of a
recommendation to City Council. Stan Gibbs said the 4 reviews are in the
0
resolution. Gibbs said the lack of concern by the neighbors lead him to believe it
wasn't a big issue. Brian Speck commended the applicant on the project.
MOTION: Bert Win moved to approve Resolution #006, 2010 with conditions
and the amendment to require an employee audit a year after the addition was
built and recommending the City Council approve this Resolution; MikeW bb pier
seconded. Roll call: Speck, yes; Myrin, yes; Weiss, y eP Yes;
yes; Approved 5 -0.
PUBLIC HEARING:
Miscellaneous Code Amendments
Stan Gibbs opened the public hearing. Notice was provided. Chris Bendon said
staff thought this was a simple amendment to the definition of artist studio, a
revised sign code and to touch on calculations and measurements.
Bendon said on page 5 of the packet the artist studio residence w as removed from
this definition and code. Bendon said the following would be added to the
proposed language: "An artist studio may include a teaching or instructional
component accessory to the primary use of a fine arts workshop ".
Cliff Weiss asked why we were allowing teaching or instructional components and
asked what is your intent. Bendon replied to allow accessory teaching or
instructional component so if someone has a ceramics studio and they want to do a
seminar on raku ceramics it would be part of their studio. Stan Gibbs asked if
there were other uses in the S /C11 zone that have instructional or educational
components of this language. Bendon replied that they used to for martial arts
studios and it was taken out.
Bert asked if artist studio included land use planners and architects. Bendon
replied it does not.
Weiss asked if it was reasonable to say that the Yellow Brick, Anderson Ranch and
parts of the Red Brick are exactly the locations where there are classroom artist
studios already. Bendon replied yes. Weiss said aren't we working on having
zoning to have more light industrial and S /C/I; he said that he leaned against this
because there were already are appropriate places for classrooms and artist studios
associated with classrooms.
Stan Gibbs said that given the artist studio is a use in the S /C/I he didn't have a
problem with adding the educational and Brian Speck agreed with Stan.
"n
y
Memorandum
Date: January 5, 2010
To: Drew Alexander, Planner
From: Brian Flynn, Parks Department
Re: 726 W Francis, Cross Roads Church, DRC review
Tree Protection Measures:
Roots: The applicant will need to contract with a tree service, and have them
on call in order to address all roots greater than 2 inches in diameter. Roots 2"
or greater shall be professionally pruned with the on -call tree service. Root
trenching will be required around all trees with excavation under the drip line
or next to the drip line This can be accomplished by an experienced tree
service company or trained member of the contractor's team.
Excavation: All excavations adjacent to the drip zones will be required to be
vertical excavation only, over digging is prohibited Excavations will be soil
stabilized in a manner that prevents over excavation of the site. This will
require a one sided pour for all foundation walls located within these
protection zones.
• Mulching: Six inches of mulch is required to be placed within the zone of
vegetation protection. The mulch shall be maintained at a level of 6 inches
during the entire project.
Irrigation: Irrigation of trees is required throughout the entire length of the
project. The Contractor will supply water to the trees at a rate which is
appropriate for proper health. Additional watering will take place along the
edge of the roots cutting. The contractor will be required to place a burlap
protection cover over the cut roots. The contractor will irrigate the burlap
with an appropriate amount of water in order to keep the burlap moist.
Access: Any access across or through the area of protection is prohibited at all
times. Access on designated walk ways (existing hard surfaces) is allowed.
All protection fences should be designed around these points of access.
"Access for excavation is a critical issue and needs to be addressed with
specific measures for protection on the ROW and tree root systems. A
mulched access road (heavy equipment staging area) will be required.
Applicant will be required to meet with the City Forester for details on the
proper installation of the mulched access.
Landscaping and Sidewalk landscaped area: Landscaping in the public right of way
will be subject to landscaping in the ROW requirements. Parks will need to meet with
the landscape architects and planners for a final review of the planting plan,
specifically the spacing of the street trees and species.
• ROW requirements require adequate irrigation pressure and coverage,
if a system is not in place one will need to be added.
An approved tree removal permit will be required before any demolition or access
infrastructure work takes place. Please contact the City Forester at 920 -5120. This permit
will be used to monitor the excavation under the drip line issues.
Tree protection fences must be in place and inspected by the city forester or his/her
designee (920 -5120) before any construction activities are to commence. Tree protection
fencing will be required on the West and South sides of the property line.
No excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction backfill, and storage of
equipment, foot or vehicle traffic allowed outside of the tree protection fencing. There
should be a location and standard for this fencing denoted on the plan.
Over digging into City property is prohibited, any excavation shall be vertical only, no
over digging will be allowed.
Utility Installation or upgrade:
Any new utility or improvement for an existing utility should avoid all tree protection
zones. Directional boring is allowed in order to access areas under tree protection zones.
Specific excavation techniques may be approved with approval of the Parks Department.
Date: January 7, 2010
Project: 276 W. Francis
City of Aspen
Engineering Department DRC Comments
These comments are not intended to be exclusive, but an initial response to the project packet
submitted for purpose of the DRC meeting.
Transportation
Traffic —1 am unable to determine if the application minimizes adverse affects on pedestrian
and vehicle circulation. A traffic impact study shall be conducted to determine impacts of
new development.
Drainage
General — Because the drainage system in this area has less than the 2 yr capacity, there is not
adequate public facilities to service the development. This may not be an issue for the
development unless they propose to increase the impervious area. Regardless a drainage
plan the meets the engineering department's standards, must be submitted with the building
permit application.
Stormwater Development Fee: A Stormwater System Development Fee of $2.88 per square
foot of impervious area shall be assessed against all properties at the time of development
or redevelopment of the property. The fee shall be assessed against the total impervious
area of the development, not simply the increased impervious area. This will include the
expansion along with the existing building
Construction Mana eg ment
General — A construction management plan must be submitted in conjunction with the building
permit application. The plan must include a planned sequence of construction that
minimizes construction impacts to the public. The plan shall describe mitigation for:
parking, staging/encroachments, truck traffic, noise, dust, and erosion /sediment pollution.
Miscellaneous
Utilities — All above ground structures shall be located outside the public rights -of -way.
Sidewalk Curb and Gutter— Sidewalk and curb and gutter is required around the perimeter of
the development.
Drew Alexander
From:
Andy Rossello
Sent:
Monday, January 04, 2010 10:22 AM
To:
Drew Alexander
Subject:
D.R.C. comments 7th and Francis
Drew,
These comments address the plans as viewed on 12/30/09, and do not represent a full review of engineered Utility
Plans, as fully engineered Utility Plans were not required at this stage of Development.
1. All Water Distribution standards shall be followed when redeveloping /remodeling the property.
2. Current tap does not appear to be of valid size for new construction. ECU count will need to be performed to
determine New tap sizing.
3. All City Electrical installation standards shall be followed when redeveloping /remodeling the property.
4. The transformer on site may need to be upsized due to increased loads created by the new construction.
5. The transformers location (or emergency exit) may need to be relocated so that people can safely escape in the
case of a fire.
6. A full Utility plan will be required, as well as fire flow analysis for the redeveloped property so that proper tap
sizing can be ensured.
If you have any questions or comments please feel free to E -mail or call
Andy Rossello
Utilities and Environmental Initiatives
Utilities Engineer
Direct (970) 429 -1999
Fax (970) 920 -5117
Exhibit A
ACSD Requirements- Crossroads Church of Aspen -726 W. Francis
Service is contingent upon compliance with the District's rules, regulations, and specifications, which
are on file at the District office.
ACSD will review the approved Drainage plans to assure that clear water connections (roof,
foundation, perimeter, patio drains) are not connected to the sanitary sewer system.
On -site utility plans require approval by ACSD.
Oil and Grease interceptors (NOT traps) are required for all food processing establishment. Locations
of food processing shall be identified prior to building permit.
Old service lines must be excavated and abandoned at the main sanitary sewer line according to
specific ACSD requirements.
Below grade development may require installation of a pumping system.
One tap is allowed for each building. Shared service line agreements may be required where more
than one unit is served by a single service line.
Permanent improvements are prohibited in sewer easements or right of ways. Landscaping plans will
require approval by ACSD where soft and hard landscaping may impact public ROW or easements to
be dedicated to the district.
All ACSD fees must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. Peg in our office can develop
an estimate for this project once detailed plans have been made available to the district.
The glycol heating and snow melt system must be designed to prohibit and discharge of glycol to any
portion of the public and private sanitary sewer system. The glycol storage areas must have approved
containment facilities.
Drew Alexander
From: Lee Cassin
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 9:11 AM
To: Drew Alexander
Cc: Tricia Aragon, lynnr @ci.aspen.co.us; Kim Peterson; April Barker
Subject: RE: DRC, Dec. 30th, Crossroads Church of Aspen
Drew, I will be out of town on the 30th, but here are the general issues for them to know
about. Using the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Rates trip generation rates
for churches, the addition of 3145 sq. ft. will generate an AVERAGE of 41 additional
trips /day. However, PM -10 levels are a concern based on peak day levels, not on yearly
average levels. The addition would generate 115 additional trips on a peak day, resulting in
an additional 16 grams of daily PM -10 emissions. These trip numbers, again from the ITE
manual, include not just direct church attendants, but all associated trips.
In order to meet the requirements of the land use code, environmental impacts can be
mitigated in various ways in the areas of air pollution, stormwater pollution, and greenhouse
gas emissions. I will address just the air pollution impacts.
To avoid significantly increasing the number of vehicle trips and resulting air pollution,
many of the trips will be carried by City of Aspen and RFTA mass transit, which will result
in increased demands on their services. Those increased demands need to be met by the
applicant, and not solely by the taxpayers. If the applicant does not pay a portion of those
costs, the taxpayers will have to pay more to avoid the added air pollution, which is
contrary to the requirements of the land use code.
In addition, the applicant will need to adopt commonly -used measures to reduce some of the
remaining trips not carried by mass transit. These include vanpools, paid parking, carpool
incentives and similar measures. We will be happy to meet with the applicant's
representatives, along with staff from the Engineering and Transportation Departments, to
discuss the most effective measures to prevent the addition from worsening air pollution
significantly.
Lee
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Drew Alexander
Sent: Fri 12/18/2009 12:35 PM
To: Development_Review_Committee
Subject: DRC, Dec. 30th, Crossroads Church of Aspen
DRC -
The DRC, scheduled for Dec. 30th at 1:30, is for an addition to the Crossroads Church of
Aspen, at 726 W. Francis.
Packets have been distributed to:
City Engineer
1
Parks
Aspen Fire Marshal
City Water
ACSD
Building Dept.
Environ. Health
Electric (City)
Streets
Transportation
Parking
If you feel you need a packet for this meeting let Com Dev know and one will be placed in
your mailbox (I will be out of town through the 28th). If you have received a packet for the
meeting and have no comments, please return it to Community Development.
Thanks,
Drew
Drew Alexander
City of Aspen I Planning Technician
Community Development Department
970 - 429 -2739 (Office)
drew.alexander(@ci.asoen.co.us
4
November 10, 2009
City of Aspen
Community Development Department
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, Co 81611
To whom it may concern:
We, the Deacon Team at Crossroads Church of Aspen, 726 W. Francis, 925 -7828
authorize John Galambos of Galambos Architects Inc, 314D AABC, 429 -1286 to act on
our behalf related to the City of Aspen's Land Use Approvals required for our renovation
and addition.
Thank You,
Deacon Team
Mark Kirch, Don Westerlind, John Fisher, Bob Brining, Dick Meeker and Rene Tornare
1
November 10, 2009
City of Aspen
Community Development Department
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, Co 81611
To whom it may concern:
Project: Crossroads Church of Aspen Renovation and Addition
Street Address: 726 W. Francis
Aspen, Colorado 81611
925 -7828
Legal Address: Lots K, L and M, Block 15
City of Aspen
e'
70
THE CITY OF ASPEN
Land Use Application
Determination of Completeness
Date: December 4, 2009
Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant,
j
We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number
and name assigned to this property is 0082.2009.ASLU —726 W. Francis Street. planner
assigned to this case is Drew Alexander
❑ Your Land Use Application is incomplete:
We found that the application needs additional items to be submitted for it to be deemed
complete and for us to begin reviewing it. We need the following additional submission
contents for you application:
Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing
your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed
above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the
land use application.
Your Land Use Application is complete:
If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete
to begin the land use review process.
Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by
the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429 -2759 if you have any
questions.
Thank You
nmfer e Deputy Director
City of Aspen, Community Development Department
C: \Documents and Settings \jennifep \My Documents \planning \Templates \Templates \Land Use Cases \Completeness
Letter Land Use.doc
RECEIVED
ATTACHMENT 2 —LAND USE APPLICATION 11UV 3 0 Z009
PROJECT:
Name: 6roKr*4S Qawck 0{ Ash ! OMMUNPDFUFlpp U €N'
Location: ?ZG W F�+«cis { �ot'c k� L AA odc4 15
Indicate street address, 16t & block number, legal description where appropriate
Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) Z 7 3 I ?Jf • 0 so, •o
APPLICANT:
Name: (1;ywo4 s CL., I a caw. N; yty— Moy 9(
Address: :7u, W. :F� e .% Agre � Cc $lG 1 /
Phone #:
REPRESENTATIVE:
Name:
Address: /9 7 31t AAb-- 5w4— 1) �o E lLl/
Phone #: 429 ' /Z$
TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply):
EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.)
J; r- Werr rsj - Ase4r ,V1icx, AffA,+ Eo
Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ JA3 t 4 • dJ
YPre- Application Conference Summary
Er Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement
['Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form
P esponse to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards
D Model for large project • ChvD 5 ' ,
All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text
(Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an
electronic 3 -D model. Your pre - application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3 -13 model.
GMQS Exemption
❑
Conceptual PUD
❑
Temporary Use
❑
GMQS Allotment
❑
Final PUD (& PUD Amendment)
❑
Text/Map Amendment
[]'
Special Review
❑
Subdivision
❑
Conceptual SPA
❑
ESA – 8040 Greenline, Stream
❑
Subdivision Exemption (includes
❑
Final SPA (& SPA
Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff,
condominiumization)
Amendment)
Mountain View Plane
❑
Commercial Design Review
❑
Lot Split
❑
Small Lodge Conversion/
Expansion
❑
Residential Design Variance
❑
Lot Line Adjustment
❑
Other:
/
Ly Conditional Use
EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.)
J; r- Werr rsj - Ase4r ,V1icx, AffA,+ Eo
Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ JA3 t 4 • dJ
YPre- Application Conference Summary
Er Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement
['Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form
P esponse to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards
D Model for large project • ChvD 5 ' ,
All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text
(Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an
electronic 3 -D model. Your pre - application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3 -13 model.
14
r
RECEIVED
CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTJ 0 2 009
Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development ApplicalivnFeea Ut HOrtN
CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and e!5 r P 64% ITY DEVELOPMENT
(hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. APPLICANT has subinitted_to CITY an
r
11"l
2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that the City of Aspen has an adopted fee structure for Land
Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application
completeness.
3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it
is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application.
APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an
initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis.
APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he
will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the
CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty
of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application.
4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete
processing or present sufficient information to the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning
Commission and/or City Council to enable the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning
Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings
are paid in full prior to decision.
5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect
full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the
amount of $ 164.00 which is for IZ hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual
recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse
the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $245.00
per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date.
APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and
in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid.
CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT
By;
Chris Bendon
Community Development Director
• r
Date: 3o ti.) acj 200 9
Billing Address and Telephone Number:
7 2Ca L,l'i, Tocwt
CJ
Easy Peel® Labels
Use Avery® Template 5160
810 W SMUGGLER LLC
C/O WALDEN CAPITAL CORP
4040 NE 2ND AVE #414
MIAMI, FL 33137
BAKER WILLIAM
790 W HALLAM UNIT #1
ASPEN, CO 81611
BOSKO DANIEL A
PO BOX 9171
ASPEN, CO 81612
BOYE CAROL
2655 LAKE DR #4
SINGER ISLAND, FL 33404
DEMPSEY 1996 REV TRUST
C/O DEMPSEY BAY PTNRS
2882 SAND HILL RD #240
MENLA PARK, CA 94025
GIANNULLI MOSSIMO
1010 SANTA MONICA BLVD
LOS ANGELES, CA 90067
GRENNEY PETER
PO BOX BB
ASPEN, CO 81612
KEELTY PATRICK J & DONNA V
PO BOX 5686
SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615
MATKIN SALOISE
PO BOX 8644
ASPEN, CO 81612 -8644
i ♦ Bend along line to i
j Feed Paper expose Pop-Up Edgers
810 W SMUGGLER LLC
411 E MAIN ST #208 -209
ASPEN, CO 81611
BEATON CHRISTINA NESLUND
BEATON GLENN K
19 HUNTWICK LN
CHERRY HILL-S VILLAGE, CO
BOURKE MICHAEL & JANINE
2000 BRUSH ST STE 440
DETROIT. MI 48226 -229
1
a AVERY® 5,66®
AULD ROBERT H & CAROL C
730 W SMUGGLER AVE
ASPEN, CO 81611
BLANK ROBERT S & NANCY L
C/O WHITCOMB PARTNERS
375 PARK AVE RM 3800
80113 NEW YORK, NY 10152
CHOUMAS JOHN JAMES & PATRICIA G
BLDG 300 BAYS 313 -314
1601 E OLYMPIC BLVD
LOS ANGELES, CA 90021
DEVONSHIRE CORPORATION
6100 N PENNSYLVANIA
OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73112
GOLDMAN RICHARD FAMILY LP
35 STONEWOOD DR
MORELAND HILLS, OH 44022
HERMAN LLOYD
420 W MAIN ST
ASPEN, CO 81611
LOWREY E JAMES JR
5704 LONGMONT LN
HOUSTON, TX 77057
MICHAEL AMBER
PO BOX 7931
ASPEN, CO 81612
BOWEN- STANLEY PAMELA
29341/2 N BEVERLY GLEN CIR #482
LOS ANGELES, CA 90077
CRITERION HOLDING CO LLC
790 W HALLAM ST #10
ASPEN, CO 81611
FOREST SERVICE ASPEN
HEADQUARTERS
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
PO BOX 948
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602
GORDMAN LINDA K
718 W HALLAM ST
ASPEN, CO 81611 -1146
KAFRISSEN FAMILY TRUST
310 N 6TH
ASPEN, CO 81611
LRM LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
8540 SOUTHWEST 52ND AVE
MIAMI, FL 33143
MICROPLAS MGMT CO
C/O EDWARD J CAWLEY
790 W HALLAM #10
ASPEN, CO 81611
MILLER ANN F NIEBUR DEWAYNE E & JO ANN E OK SMUGGLER LLC
715 W SMUGGLER ST 721 W FRANCIS GO KELLI
ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 AS W SMUGGLER ST
ASPEN, CO 81611
Easy Peel® Labels
Use Avery® Template 5160
PARELMAN ALLEN G REV TRUST
734 W SMUGGLER
ASPEN, CO 81611
POWELL WILLIAM E & DANA D
11 LYNN BATTS LN #100
SAN ANTONIO, TX 78218
feed Paper
4 Y
SHANE STEVEN DAVID & CLARE EVERT
100 OLD POND WAY
SNOWMASS, CO 81654
TIERNEY JANE LOWREY
20 OAK MEADOW RD
LINCOLN, MA 01 773
Bend along line to
expose Pop-Up Edge^ j
PENINSULA LLC
729 NASKEAG RD
BROOKLIN, ME 04616 -3316
RITCHIE ROBERT
701 W FRANCIS ST
ASPEN, CO 81611
SIMMONS W JUNE 55%
BIXBY NEENA B 45%
4128 RHODES AVE
STUDIO CITY, CA 91604
WATERS SOMERSET
131 MILLBROOK SCHOOL RD
MILLBROOK, NY 12545
D AVERY® 5160®
PORTER HOUSE STAKE LLC
1111 RACE ST PHA
DENVER, CO 80206
RUTHERFORD MICHAEL G
5 E GREENWAY PLAZA #220
HOUSTON, TX 77046
SMUGGLER LLC
C/O SHELLY B DON
1044 OLIVE ST
DENVER, CO 80220
WEINGART JAMES B & PATRICIA L
55 GREENTREE
CHAGRIN FALLS, OH 44022
r
L:
CITY OF ASPEN
PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
PLANNER: Jennifer Phelan, 429 -2759 DATE: 8/19/09
PROJECT: First Baptist Church, 726 W. Francis Street
REPRESENTATIVE: John Galambos
OWNER: Crossroads Church of Aspen
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Conditional Use
DESCRIPTION: The prospective applicant is interested in remodeling and expanding the existing
church by removing an existing deck facing Francis Street and replacing it with a
three story addition (one story being below grade) to the existing building. As part of
the remodel /expansion, the sanctuary is proposed to be remodeled to allow for
greater seating capacity.
The lot is located in the Medium - Density Residential (R -6) zone district. A church is
considered an Arts, Cultural, and Civic Use under the land use code and is
permitted as a Conditional Use in the R -6 zone district. Additionally, staff considers
the use of the property an Essential Public Facility under the Growth Management
Quota System chapter of the land use code. Both a Conditional Use review and a
Growth Management review are required to expand the building.
The property contains approximately 9,000 square feet of land and is located on a
comer lot. According to the building permit file associated with the property, the
church has used Francis Street as its front yard. As of the writing of this summary
the minimum setbacks for a principle building are: front - 10 feet, rear - 10 feet,
combined side yards - 30 feet, minimum side yard — 10 feet (although 6.6 feet is
allowed along 7'" Street). A setback variance(s) request may be necessary
depending on the design of the project. A variance request can be consolidated
with other land use requests and reviewed by the Planning Commission. Off- street
parking is established through Special Review by the Planning Commission.
In 1977, Conditional Use approval was granted for expansion of the existing church
(file name: Baptist church). Also in the building permit file and referenced in the
Planning Commission minutes from 8/16/77 is the need for a transportation plan. I
would recommend meeting with the City Engineer, Tricia Aragon, to see if a study is
necessary prior to submission of a land use application.
Land Use Code Section(s
26.304
Common Development Review Procedures
26.314
Variances (if necessary)
26.425
Conditional Use
26.470.090 4.
Essential Public Facilities
26.515
Off-Street Parking
26.430
Special Review (for establishing off - street parking requirements)
Review by:
- Staff for complete application
- Referral agencies for technical considerations
- P &Z for Variances, Conditional Use, Special Review (recommendation on Essential Public
Facilities)
- City Council for Essential Public Facilities
Public Hearing: Yes, at P & Z and City Council
Planning Fees: $2,940.00 Deposit for 12 hours of staff time (additional staff time required is billed at $245 per hour)
N
CITY OF ASPEN
PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
PLANNER: Jennifer Phelan, 429 -2759 DATE: 8/19/09
PROJECT: First Baptist Church, 726 W. Francis Street
REPRESENTATIVE: John Galambos
OWNER: Crossroads Church of Aspen
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Conditional Use
DESCRIPTION: The prospective applicant is interested in remodeling and expanding the existing
church by removing an existing deck facing Francis Street and replacing it with a
three story addition (one story being below grade) to the existing building. As part of
the remodel /expansion, the sanctuary is proposed to be remodeled to allow for
greater seating capacity.
The lot is located in the Medium - Density Residential (R -6) zone district. A church is
considered an Arts, Cultural, and Civic Use under the land use code and is
permitted as a Conditional Use in the R-6 zone district. Additionally, staff considers
the use of the property an Essential Public Facility under the Growth Management
Quota System chapter of the land use code. Both a Conditional Use review and a
Growth Management review are required to expand the building.
The property contains approximately 9,000 square feet of land and is located on a
comer lot. According to the building permit file associated with the property, the
church has used Francis Street as its front yard. As of the writing of this summary
the minimum setbacks for a principle building are: front - 10 feet, rear - 10 feet,
combined side yards - 30 feet, minimum side yard — 10 feet (although 6.6 feet is
allowed along P h Street). A setback variance(s) request may be necessary
depending on the design of the project. A variance request can be consolidated
with other land use requests and reviewed by the Planning Commission. Off- street
parking is established through Special Review by the Planning Commission.
In 1977, Conditional Use approval was granted for expansion of the existing church
(file name: Baptist church). Also in the building permit file and referenced in the
Planning Commission minutes from 8/16/77 is the need for a transportation plan. I
would recommend meeting with the City Engineer, Tricia Aragon, to see if a study is
necessary prior to submission of a land use application.
Land Use Code Sectionls
26.304
Common Development Review Procedures
26.314
Variances (if necessary)
26.425
Conditional Use
26.470.090 4.
Essential Public Facilities
26.515
Off-Street Parking
26.430
Special Review (for establishing off - street parking requirements)
Review by:
- Staff for complete application
- Referral agencies for technical considerations
- P &Z for Variances, Conditional Use, Special Review (recommendation on Essential Public
Facilities)
- City Council for Essential Public Facilities
Public Hearing: Yes, at P & Z and City Council
Planning Fees: $2,940.00 Deposit for 12 hours of staff time (additional staff time required is billed at $245 per hour)
Referral Fees: Engineering $212.00 & Parks $212.00
Total Deposit: $3,364.00
Total Number of Application Copies: 20 Copies (12 P &Zl8 Council)
To apply, submit the following information:
1. Total Deposit for review of application.
2. Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the
name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant.
3. Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a
current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing
the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements
affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application.
4. Completed Land Use Application.
5. Signed fee agreement.
6. Pre - application Conference Summary.
7. An 8112" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen.
8. Proof of ownership.
9. Existing and proposed elevation drawings and site plan that include proposed dimensional requirements as well as
landscaping plan.
10. A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed
development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. Please include existing
conditions as well as proposed.
11. All other materials required pursuant to the specific submittal requirements.
12. Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, including all easements
and vacated rights of way, of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado.
13. List of adjacent property owners within 300' for public hearing
14. Copies of prior approvals.
15. Applications shall be provided in paper format (number of copies noted above) as well as the text only on either of
the following digital formats. Compact Disk (CD)- preferred, Zip Disk or Floppy Disk. Microsoft Word format is
preferred. Text format easily convertible to Word is acceptable.
Disclaimer:
The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning,
which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary
does not create a legal or vested right.
November 18, 2009
City of Aspen
Community Development Department
Written Description of Proposed Development
Crossroads Church of Aspen seeks to better utilize our church facility to accommodate
our existing staff, programs and services. Originally built in 1964 as First Baptist
Church, the church has undergone several minor renovations over the years, the most
recent being in 2003 -04 where the offices were renovated and a new circulation/overflow
space was added. in 1977 the Church received a conditional use approval to expand the
existing sanctuary that was never acted upon. The sanctuary space has essentially
remained unchanged from the beginning.
Crossroads Church desires to remodel and expand the existing church by altering the
following areas:
1. Create a more intimate worship experience in the sanctuary by moving the stage
to the center of the space, changing the seating orientation, expanding the seating
capacity of the sanctuary by opening up the wall and gaining the space that was
previously circulation and overflow, and creating better exiting and flow.
2. Create a more functional entry during weekdays and more open gathering and
overflow space (Connecting Point) on Sundays by renovating the existing office
space, removing the existing deck on the corner of 7` and Francis and adding a
new lobby.
3. Currently there are three bathrooms available for public use on Sundays, none are
Accessible. The renovation would add two Handicap Accessible bathrooms on
the main level, two new bathrooms and a renovated bathroom on the lower level
and a new bathroom on the upper level.
4. Enhance our kid's programs by creating better classroom spaces, adding a
classroom and re- working the circulation on the lower level.
5. Creating office space by adding a second story addition along 7` street. This will
accommodate our current staff and adult classroom needs. Currently there are
seven full and part time staff and only four offices and one open work area. In the
proposed plan we would be creating seven offices with one having an adult
classroom as a shared use.
The church is considered an Arts, Cultural, and Civic Use under the land use code and is
permitted as a Conditional Use in the R -6 Zone district. It is also an Essential Public
Facility under Growth Management Quota system.
Variances 26.314
In order to accomplish the above goals, Crossroads Church is aski,g for a variance to the
dimension requirements of the Side Yard Setback along 7` street. Under the R -6 Zone
district the Front Yard setback is 10 feet, Rear Yard is 10 feet an! the combined Side
Yards is 30 feet, with the minimum being 10 feet on one side. Please see the attached
drawings to see how the existing building does not conform to the Rear Yard and Side
Yard dimensional requirements. The building is 5 feet off the Rear Property Line and the
combined Side Yards are 16.2 feet.
The proposed addition spaces will meet the 10 foot Rear Yard setback. The Side Yazd
setback along 7` street is proposed to be 10 feet for most of the new work with one
section being 5.5 feet, built on top of the existing foundation (See the attached drawings).
Per section 26.314.040 variances from dimensional requirements can be authorized if the
following three circumstances exist:
The grant of variance will be generally consistent with the purposes, goals,
objectives, and policies of the Aspen Area Community Plan and this Title;
a. Crossroads Church is an Essential Public Facility that is vitally important
to the fabric of Aspen's community. There are many themes woven into
the Aspen Area Community Plan that a church fosters. The church is
considered an Arts, Cultural, and Civic Use under the land use code. And
the stated intent in the AACP under Arts, Culture and Education is
"recognize the contribution of the arts, culture and education to the quality
of life in Aspen ". The AACP also states a desire to "nurture intellectual
and spiritual growth that enriches our lives while challenging our
imaginations ". A church falls under that category. Another goal of the
AACP is to "develop and cultivate local artists ". Some of Aspen's best
musicians have been developed their talents at our church.
More than the above comments, the theme of Community is throughout the
AACP. The Church's mission statement states that our goal is to "develop
a Christ centered community..." The church is the "flattest" community
that most people have encountered in this town. The Waiter sits next to
the Realtor and both are equal. The elderly are served by the youth. The
guy who lives at Burlingame consuls the guy who lives on Red Mountain.
Institutions like churches enhance a balanced permanent community,
foster families, and minister to every strata found in our community.
One of the main goals of this addition and renovation is to create a
generous space adjacent to the sanctuary that fosters the mingling of
community between services. We call that time "connecting point" for
good reason. It is the space where you connect with other people, engage
with their needs and struggles, and give encouragement. By moving the
offices up a level, and creating this space, we are greatly enhancing the
church life and community.
.s
2. The grant of variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the
reasonable use of the parcel, building or structure.
a. The applicant feels that the granting of this variance is the minimum that
is required to make reasonable use of the building. The 1977 approval
anticipated a much larger sanctuary with enough volume for balcony
seating. What we have found is that the sanctuary is really just one
weekly aspect of the facility's needs. As stated above there are many
other functions and programs related to meeting our Community's needs
that are currently unmet or under -met in our facility. We are asking that a
variance be granted because this would allow us reasonable use of our
building.
b. The existing building is already a non - conforming structure along 7`
street, being only 5.5 feet from the property line. In the design of new
addition on the main level and the second story, we have chosen to set it
back to be 10 feet from the property line for every area except the stairs
gable. This is the minimum we need in order to accomplish our program
goals. If we were to conform to a 19.3 setback for all new work, we
would not be able to meet our needs within that design constraint.
c. In the design of the second story, we purposefully designed the spaces to
appear as if they are in dormers in an overall gabled roof form. This is to
minimize the bulk of the form.
d. Although the Front Yard setback is 10 feet along Frances, the existing
trees give us an additional constraint. Planted in 1966, these trees
essentially create a 25 foot front yard setback.
e. The adjacent parcel along 7 street is the Forest Service parking lot. The
impact to the affected neighbor will be minimal.
Literal interpretation and enforcement of the terms and provisions of the Title
would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the
same zone district, and would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship or
practical difficulty. There are special conditions and circumstances which are
unique to this parcel, building or structure which are unique to this parcel,
structures or buildings in the same zone district.
a. Although the Front Yard setback is 10 feet along Frances, the existing
trees give us an additional constraint. Planted in 1966, these trees
essentially create a 25 foot front yard setback. This is unique to our parcel
and creates a hardship and practical difficulty.
b. The adjacent parcel along 7` street is the Forest Service parking lot. The
impact to the affected neighbor will be minimal. This is unique to our
parcel.
•-,
Conditional Use 26.425
Currently we are considered an Arts, Cultural and Civic Use under the land use code and
are permitted under the Conditional Use for the R -6 Zone District. We are adding
approximately 3,145 gross square feet to the existing 8,423 gross square foot building
and thus are amending our Conditional Use for this new size.
The following standards are to be considered:
1. the conditional use is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and
standards of the Aspen Area Community Plan, with the intent of the zone district
in which it is proposed to be located, and complies with all other applicable
requirements of this title
a. Please see the above comments on the AACP.
b. We currently are permitted under the Conditional use so we already
comply with the intent of the zone district. The Use is not changing, but
we are seeking to make the use more compatible with our current needs.
2. The conditional use is consistent and compatible with the character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and surrounding land
uses, or enhances the mixture of complimentary uses and activities in the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
a. The use is consistent and compatible with the character of the immediate
vicinity. The church has been at 7` and Francis for 45 years. The
neighborhood has changed and evolved over that time span, especially in
the past 10 years where we have seen the proliferation of renovated and
new homes that cater to second home owners.
b. The design of the addition is intended to be within the character of the
existing design and neighborhood and seeks to minimize the mass and
volume of the facility.
3. The locations, size, design and operating characteristics of the proposed
conditional use minimizes adverse effects, including visual impacts, impacts on
pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise,
vibrations and odor on the surrounding properties.
a. The new design seeks to preserves the trees on the site. These trees act as
screening to our development and we feel there will be minimal visual
impacts on the surroundingroperties.
b. The adjacent parcel along 79 street is the Forest Service parking lot. The
impact to the most affected neighbor will be minimal.
c. Trash, service delivery, vibrations and odor will remain unchanged.
d. For parking, see below.
4. There is adequate public facilities and services to serve the conditional use
including There but not limited to roads, potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks,
police, fire protection, emergency, medical services, hospital and medical
services, drainage systems, and schools
a. We are on all the above City of Aspen Services and our application will
not change any of these uses except that our water tap and sewer tap will
11
probably change based on our addition of bathrooms and the necessity of
installing a fire sprinkler system.
5. The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to meet the incremental need
for increased employees generated by the conditional use.
a. We are not increasing the number of employees based on this application.
Currently there are not enough offices for the current employees. So the
additional space for the offices is just supplying space for our current
condition.
Essential Public Facilities 26.470.090.4
Per the Pre - application Conference Summary staffs considers the use of the property as
and Essential Public Facility under the Growth Management Quota System. The Growth
Management review is required to expand the building. We are requesting the
designation of being an Essential Public Facility based on the code's definition as "being
a facility which serves an essential public purpose, is for use by, or benefit of, the general
public and serves the needs of the community ". And thus exempt from the Growth
Management review. We also request the waiving of any affordable housing mitigation
requirements.
26.515 and 26.430
Off street parking and special review.
The applicant is requesting waiving the off - street parking requirements based on the
following criteria:
1. The parking needs of the residents, customers, guests, and employees of the
project have been met, taking into account potential uses of the parcel, the
projected traffic generation of the project, any shared parking opportunities,
expected schedule of parking demands, the projected impacts onto the on- street
parking of the neighborhood, the proximity to mass transit routs and the
downtown area, and any special services, such as vans, provided for residents,
guests and employees.
a. The RFTA stop is two blocks away and some of our members use this
transportation.
b. We have a verbal understanding with the Forest Service to share up 6
spaces in their parking on Sunday mornings. There are no other
opportunities for shared parking nearby.
c. The schedule of parking demands is typically on Sundays where there is
little conflict with other parking demands.
An on -site parking solution meeting the requirement is practically difficult or
results in an undesirable development scenario.
a. There is no way to practically meet any off - street parking requirements for
this parcel. The nature of our use is to have heavy uses on Sundays and
special events.
Exiting or planned on -site or off -site parking facilities adequately serve the needs
of the development, including the availability of street parking.
a. Existing on -site and on- street parking adequately serves the needs of the
development. There are currently 4 parking spaces accessed from the
alley. All other parking has traditionally been on- street parking. There
are approximately 15 spaces along 7` and along Francis where cars
parallel park on the gravel area between the cribbing and the asphalt street.
Typically this meets all the parking needs of the church during the week.
On Sunday and special events people park on the street. Typically, 7 I '
street from Smuggler to Hallem (2 blocks) and on Francis to 6 (1 block)
are used with some parking on Smuggler and 6`
Thank you for considering our proposal.
12t' 1 + ubmitted,
John alambos
6l
VICtAwTy NMr
Wells Fargo sank West. NA -Aspe6 53724
CROSSROADS CHURCH OF ASPEN lies Mestnet
726 W. FRANCIS Aspen, Co 67611 -
ASPEN, CO 81611 '
23-7 / ,azo 1 111 8/2 009
PAY TO THE
ORDER OF City of Aspen Community Development Dept $ !'3,364.00
Three Thousand Three Hundred Sixty -Four and 00/ 100 fffff} R} b} fflfffllMNffWflfffffff }fffllff }}111f1H}Hf }ffHNifl
City of Aspen Community Development Dept
i
CdJ �ti�C�1�C� -ll�J A1.�C�•�X�
2 Slanebmas ReW M:
MEMO
11e0S372411e 1:1020000761:0289624S381ts
0
PA *04 or rs
I L
AL
;UNDAY 01.17.10- 10:15AM
76% -100% OCCUPIED
51% - 75% OCCUPIED
26% - 50% OCCUPIED
0% - 25% OCCUPIED
.� JI
J am-! *0 am dw
Aft Alk
NEEKDAY 01.20.10 - 12:30 PM
76% - 100% OCCUPIED
® 51% - 75% OCCUPIED
26% - 50% OCCUPIED
0% - 25% OCCUPIED
ME
1
4 0 a
r
NORTH STREET
(BETWEEN 5TH & 6TH)
NORTH STREET
(BETWEEN 4TH & 5TH)
STH STREET
(BETWEEN NORTH & SMUGGLER)
o °-)
I
CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF Ef Y G!I�
536 WEST NORTH STREET �(� ! Y ED
FEB 0 5 2010
0 CITY OF ASPEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT'
04 ®• p ; +S aI r e 'I
.7 {1 i. • i %A a its :0
a ft
, ff�•1 i/
� t+T a
NOR
'
'Ali 4 t
�r l O i �/ i•/ 1w Ip Al �Mt
rmfp
♦r r` A
LOCATION MAP
Crossroads Church of Aspen
726 WEST FRANCIS STREET
November 16, 2009
GALAMBOS ARCHITECTS INC. 314 SUITE D ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER I ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
PHONE: 970.429.1286 1 WWW.GALAM BOSARCH ITECTS. NET
STH STREET
(BETWEEN NORTH & GILLESPIE)
NORTH STREET
(BETWEEN 4TH & 5TH)
STH STREET
(BETWEEN NORTH & SMUGGLER)
STH STREET
(BETWEEN NORTH & GILLESPIE)
NORTH STREET
(BETWEEN 5TH & 6TH)
SUNDAY 01 . 17 . 1 0-10:00 AM
� 76% - 100% OCCUPIED
R 51% - 75% OCCUPIED
26% - 50% OCCUPIED
0% - 25% OCCUPIED
I
wI*
HEEKDAY 01.20.10 - 12:15 PM
76% -100% OCCUPIED
® 51% - 75% OCCUPIED
26% - 50% OCCUPIED
0% - 25% OCCUPIED
.. filftl
i s h 0
! 4L ' wij ar 'h't :
ICI• � 4 ' ® fffn ! ' on «
fpoirl
' f•
A
d j'!jT
• 4041
M ' , '"'. ' •0 & P :
I� 'Vil r Ir rr�,
Ar
fir` • ®A +4d � �,,'dyr,
! AC r s+� S
It •i7 t fir! . •
�il
LOCATION MAP
crossroads Church of Aspen
726 WEST FRANCIS STREET
November 16, 2009
GALAMBOS ARCHITECTS INC.
I 314 SUITE D ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER I ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
PHONE: 970.429.1286 1 WWW.GALAMBOSARCHITECTS.NET
7TH STREET
(BETWEEN FRANCIS & SMUGGLER)
FRANCIS STREET
(BETWEEN 6TH & 7TH)
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF ASPEN
726 WEST FRANCIS
40 1 , "Arirg
Ali
FRANCIS STREET
(OFF STREET PARKING)
7TH STREET
(BETWEEN FRANCIS & HALLAM)
7TH STREET
(BETWEEN FRANCIS & SMUGGLER)
FRANCIS STREET
(BETWEEN 6TH & 7TH)
FRANCIS STREET
(OFF STREET PARKING)
7TH STREET
(BETWEEN FRANCIS & HALLAM)
lw Pt
SUNDAY 01.17.10 - 10:30 AM
11111111176% - 100% OCCUPIED
51% - 75% OCCUPIED
26% - 50% OCCUPIED
0% - 25 OCCUPIED
M
1
-011 t �
IEEKDAY 01.20.10 - 12:45 PM
111111176% -100% OCCUPIED
1111111 51% - 75% OCCUPIED
26% - 50% OCCUPIED
0% - 25% OCCUPIED
M
ri
ASPEN COMMUNITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
200 EAST BLEEKER STREET
Il
4, 'ate q'
..' A4-va 1d[ `a
* s a mt 4 �� �� A � ray
.7vvi: ♦ . Ma /# tip �w,r 441, to
f �`H '►sir .►7.., �y�i�t f,• 'y
ty� I .4 'ate � y I �v p rp wA.
Aar ++ • �, bt y !. � a , f . , te
04;pijr J 4 - a ir*
�I,r'P •• Nea P �P �-
® art * -
oz
r,Aer v',� `'"w &r
fAT a; 40
L - - -
h
LOCATION MAP
Crossroads Church of Aspen --
726 WEST FRANCIS STREET
GALAMBOS ARCHITECTS INC. November 16, 2009
314 SUITE D ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER I ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PHONE: 970.429.1286 ( WWW.GALAM BOSARCHITECTS. NET
GARMISCH STREET
(BETWEEN BLEEKER & HALLAM)
SLEEKER STREET
(BETWEEN GARMISCH & ASPEN)
SLEEKER STREET
(BETWEEN GARMISCH & FIRST)
GARMISCH STREET
(BETWEEN BLEEKER & MAIN)
GARMISCH STREET
(BETWEEN BLEEKER & HALLAM)
SLEEKER STREET
(BETWEEN GARMISCH & ASPEN)
SLEEKER STREET
(BETWEEN GARMISCH & FIRST)
GARMISCH STREET
(BETWEEN BLEEKER & MAIN)
FEB 0 5 2010
CITY �F
CON�AINi►�
GALAMBOS ARCHITECTS INC.
Crossroads Church of Aspen
726 WEST FRANCIS STREET
November 16, 2009
314 SUITE D ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER ( ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
PHONE; 970.429.1286
W W W. GALAMBOSARCHITECTS. NET
AERIAL FROM WEST FRANCIS
I,
ALL.F-Y - O-OYK 15
o 5 K) A) 50 1 0 MfT
tw 15 - 0
� 0
Z!�
nr - — ---- ------------- — -----
JA-Mf3 F KC! ED
t-jom•
r'iTKJr-4 CO 11-r-. CAeF �,O. L_ VV,,e�
Ot5ffD IN THE FKZFAf�� OF714E�
UPDATE CE:KTlrl(:ATF
I,d&,✓ MIE51M -41EPECEI�PY7t�TCN
I n�152 � ll-�M=rcN 6 rnorm'n
6�HIQWI-4 1-40ZEON AND MUND 1-40 Cl-� rD�
A6 !!)� ��O �,� HDMON.
FRANCIS STREET
!0.0 w 11
ALPINE a-)fr,/fYt), Imo.
CATF-• - ---- - - --
ItTr• -
VICINITY MAP
Alpine Surveys, Inc.
P N OHIm Ow 1730
=
Colomft 81612 $2680
-vw m 2,0, gfrPV-T�r Titw
RVEY
K L A$-�D ),A 5� 15
C-1 Tr AiZ 7)A�I�FE CT A-)Ptt4,
Q7 -)-4T` ' coLo%-00
kb No 7(,-I2Z,
Cliat CAFr.E)T
cl-4-)fzr�
GALAMBOS ARCHITECTS INC
0 2 4 8 16 32 FEET
ENTRY LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - EXISTING
Crossroads Church of Aspen
726 WEST FRANCIS STREET
November 16, 2009
314 SUITE D ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER I ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
N tH
PHONE: 970.429.1286 1 WWW.GALAMBOSARCHITECTS.NET
LLJ
LU
LU
| ,� �
| / �U � � �
I
SETBACK
/ U
FRANCIS STREET
EXISTING SITE PLAN
GALAMBOS ARCHITECTS INC.
LU
CL
w
MINIMUM SETBACKS
NT (FRANCIS STREET)
10 FEET
R(ALLEy)
10 FEET
|BINED SIDE YARDS
PROPERTY LINE
—~
10 FEET
ALLEY
6.6 FEET
REAR YARD
SETBACK
EXISTING FOOTP!!j!
A UAL
' YARD
E
SIDE YARD
ACTUAL
EXISTING
SPRUCE
TREES
| ,� �
| / �U � � �
I
SETBACK
/ U
FRANCIS STREET
EXISTING SITE PLAN
GALAMBOS ARCHITECTS INC.
LU
CL
w
MINIMUM SETBACKS
NT (FRANCIS STREET)
10 FEET
R(ALLEy)
10 FEET
|BINED SIDE YARDS
30 FEET
[MUM SIDE YARD
10 FEET
[MUM SIDE YARD (7TH STREET)
6.6 FEET
At
oz^ o 16 32 FEET
Crossroads Church of Aspen
726 WEST FRANCIS STREET
November 16, JOOB
� ]14 SUITE P ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER | ASPEN, COLORADO 81511 PHONE: 970.429.1286 YVYYYK6&LAMBOSARCHlTE[TS.NET
w
0
N �H
0 2 4 8 16 32 FEET
LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - EXISTING
GALAMBOS ARCHITECTS INC.
Crossroads Church of Aspen
726 WEST FRANCIS STREET
November 16, 2009
314 SUITE D ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER I ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
PHONE: 970.429. 1286
WWW. GALAMBOSARCHITECTS. NET
GALAMBOS ARCHITECTS INC.
f1
0
0 2 4 8 16 32 FEET
LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED
Crossroads Church of Aspen
726 WEST FRANCIS STREET
November 16, 2009
314 SUITE D ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER I ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
N •H
PHONE: 970.429.1286
X
WWW,GALAMBOSARCHITECTS.NET
N
X
TRASH
SANCTUARY SEATING
259 SEATS SHOWN - 80 ADDITIONAL SEATS
H �H
GALAMBOS ARCHITECTS INC
ENTRY LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED
Crossroads Church of Aspen
726 WEST FRANCIS STREET
November 16, 2009
314 SUITE D ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER I ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
PHONE: 970.429.1286 1 WWW.GALAMBOSARCHITECTS.NET
L
0 2 4 8 16 32 FEET
A
GALAMBOS ARCHITECTS INC.
10' -0"
0
0
a
L � �
0 2 4 8 16 32 FEET
UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED
Crossroads Church of Aspen
726 WEST FRANCIS STREET
November 16, 2009
314 SUITE D ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER I ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
w
N 4tH
PHONE: 970.429.1286
WWW. GALA MBOSARCHITECTS.NET
5
VAIg t4co rVwLVAG15 STIc4" r 51064ATIOM
Crossroads Church of Aspen
726 WEST FRANCIS STREET
November 16, 2009
GALAMBOS ARCHITECTS INC.
314 SUITE D ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER I ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
ao io 5 0
PHONE: 970.429.1286
W W W. GALAM BOSARCHITECTS. NET
(
f�iapboso Arc %i. 4myl
Crossroads Church of Aspen
726 WEST FRANCIS STREET
November 16, 2009
GALAMBOS ARCHITECTS INC. 314 SUITE D ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER I ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
PHONE: 970.429.1286 1 WWW.GALAMBOSARCHITECTS.NET
d a a f
rowA nMap 50 O R114 e"Wr �a� o
Crossroads Church of Aspen
726 WEST FRANCIS STREET
November 16, 2009
GALAMBOS ARCHITECTS INC. ( 314 SUITE D ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER I ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PHONE: 970.429.1286 WWW.GALAMBOSARCHITECTS.NET
Crossroads Church of Aspen
726 WEST FRANCIS STREET
November 16, 2009
GALAMBOS ARCHITECTS INC. ( 314 SUITE D ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER I ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PHONE: 970.429.1286 WWW.GALAMBOSARCHITECTS.NET
WOTIM10 Al o w%, "Y ;,lAVATION
Crossroads Church of Aspen
726 WEST FRANCIS STREET
November 16, 2009
io 10 5 n
GALAMBOS ARCHITECTS INC. 1 314 SUITE D ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER I ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 1 PHONE: 970.429.1286 1 WWW.GALAMBOSARCHITECTS.NET
0 r 0
V�°sT 1�1� 16 70
p
Crossroads Church of Aspen
726 WEST FRANCIS STREET
November 16, 2009
GALAMBOS ARCHITECTS INC. 314 SUITE D ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER I ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PHONE: 970.429.1286
W W W. GALA BOSARCH ITECTS. NET