HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.CU.200 W Gillespie St.A1-96CAST" )AD SUMMARY SHEET - CITY OF tSPEN
DATE RECEIVED: 1/1/96 CASE # Al -96
DATE COMPLETE: STAFF: Dave Michaelsor
PARCELID# 2735- 121 -21 -001
PROJECT NAME:
Hernandez Conditional Use Review for ADU
Project Address:
200 W. Gillespie
APPLICANT:
Noelle & Cecil Hernandez
Address/Phone:
Box 1045, Aspen
REPRESENTATIVE: Lipkin Warner
Address/Phone:
400W. Main St., #100, Aspen 920 -1142
FEES: PLANNING
$235
ENGINEER
$0
HOUSING
$0
ENV HEALTH
$0
TOTAL
$235
# APPS RECEIVED 3
# PLATS RECEIVED
TYPE OF APPLICATION:
One Step
❑ City Attorney
'K City Engineer
❑ Zoning
Housing
❑ Environmental Health
❑ Parks
/ 11
DATE REFERRED
❑ Aspen Fire Marshal
❑ City Water
❑ City Electric
❑ Clean Air Board
❑ Open Space Board
❑ Other:
INITIALS: S ki)
❑ CDOT
❑ ACSD
❑ Holy Cross Electric
❑ Rocky Mtn Natural Gas
❑ Aspen School District
❑ Other:
DATE DUE: 2 ii
APPROVAL: Ordinance ,§ # Date:
Staff Approva Date:
Plat Recorded: Book
CLOSED/FILED
ROUTE TO:
DATE: ; & INITIALS: '
02. zo.9
Page
s,,
RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE
APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE FOR TWO (2) ATTACHED ACCESSORY DWELLING
UNITS FOR TWO (2) SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS AT THE HERNANDEZ
RESIDENCE, LOTS 1 AND 2 AND SOUTH 1/2 OF LOT 3, BLOCK 1, OKLAHOMA FLATS
ADDITION, A.K.A. THE MOORE LOT SPLIT
Resolution No. 96 -A_
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5 -510 of the Aspen Land Use Regulations accessory dwelling
units may be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission as conditional uses in conformance with
the requirements of said Section; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Office received an application from Noelle and Cecil Hernandez for
Conditional Use review for a 478 s.f below -grade and a 500 s.f. above -grade accessory dwelling unit on
Lots A and B of the Moore Lot Split; and
WHEREAS, the proposed unit are not 100% above grade, therefore the site is eligible for an FAR
bonus pursuant to the definition of Floor Area "Accessory Dwelling Unit ", Section 3 -101 of the Aspen Land
Use Code; and
WHEREAS, the Housing Office and the Planning Office reviewed the proposal and recommended
approval with conditions; and
WHEREAS, during a public hearing at a regular meeting on February 6, 1996 the Planning and
Zoning Commission approved by a 5 -1 vote the Conditional Use review for the accessory dwelling units,
with the conditions recommended by the Planning Office.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission:
Pursuant to Section 24 -3 -101 of the Aspen Municipal Code The Hernandez Conditional Use for two (2)
ADUs (478 s.f. below -grade and 500 s.f. above - grade) are approved with the following conditions:
1. Prior to issuance of any building permits the applicant shall comply with the following:
a. The owner shall submit the appropriate deed restrictions to the Aspen/Pitkin County
Housing Office for approval. Upon approval of the deed restrictions by the Housing
Office, the applicant shall record the deed restrictions with the Pitkin County Clerk and
Recorders Office with proof of recordation to the Planning Department. The deed
restriction shall state that the accessory units meets the housing guidelines for such units,
meets the definition of Resident Occupied Units, and if rented, shall be rented for periods
of six months or longer;
b. kitchen plans shall be verified by the Housing Office to ensure compliance with the
specifications for kitchens in ADUs; and
1
2. The ADUs shall be clearly identified as a separate dwelling unit on building plans and shall comply
with U.B.C. chapter 35 sound attenuation requirements.
3. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Planning Department shall inspect the unit to
ensure compliance with the conditions of approval.
4. All new surface utility needs and pedestals must be installed on -site.
5. The applicant shall consult the City Engineer for design considerations of development within
public rights -of -way, and the Parks Department for vegetation species, and shall obtain permits for
any work or development, including landscaping, within public rights -of -way from the City Streets
Department.
6. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, a tree removal and mitigation plan shall be submitted
for review and approval by the Parks Department. Tree removal permits shall be required for the
removal or relocation of any tree greater than 6" on caliper.
7. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings
before the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of
approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions.
APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on February 6, 1996.
Attest: Planning and Zoning Commission:
ta 2 &< &-W
W-el" Vicki 41vka, Deputy City Clerk Sara Garton, Chair
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
THRU: Dave Michaelson, Deputy Community Development Director
RE: Hernandez Conditional Use Review For an two Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) -
Public Hearing
DATE: February 6th, 1996
SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting conditional use approval to construct two ADUs located with a
main house and guest house on two separate legal parcels. The main house ADU is a below -grade unit of
approximately 478 square feet, and the guest house ADU is approximately 500 square feet on the ground
floor. The application packet is attached as Exhibit A. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use
for an accessory dwelling unit with conditions.
APPLICANT: Noelle and Cecil Hernandez, represented by Lipkin -Warner Design Partnership
LOCATION: 220 West Gillespie (Lots 35, 36 and 37, Block 90, Hallams Addition to the City
and Townsite of Aspen)
ZONING: R-6
LOT SIZE: Lot A (Main House) = 24,089 s.f.
Lot B (Guest House) = 9,975 s.f.
FAR: Lot A Lot B
Allowed = 4,269 s.f. Allowed = 3,282 s.f.
Proposed= 4,122 s.f. Proposed = 2,150 s.f.
BACKGROUND: The Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the project several times including
a lot split ( "Moore Lot Split ") and most recently a Stream Margin Review for both houses. In addition, the
design component of both structures have been approved per Ordinance 30.
REFERRAL COMMENTS: Please see comments from the Parks Department, the Housing Office, and
the Engineering Department (See Exhibit B).
Parks Department: Parks Department staff had previously commented on the Stream Margin Review.
Comments included conditions that any removal of trees will require a tree removal/relocation permit. In
addition, conditions of approval required that all remaining trees must be protected during construction with
no encroachinent of the driplines during excavation.
Engineering Department: Engineering requested that final development plans must show easements to
ensure no encroachments. In addition, parking spaces should be required for the ADUs due to the on- street
parking problems in the West End. The driveway design must be modified to meet City Code.
Housing Office: The Housing Office has reviewed the project, and had the following comments:
(1) The unit in the Guest House is supported in terms of size and location.
(2) The unit in the Main House is recommended for denial based on the location of window wells for
available light.
Since the initial referral, the applicant has revised the lightwells and entrance design to address the Housing
Office concerns. Cindy Christensen's memo approving these revisions are attached as Exhibit C. Revised
design for the Main House unit is attached as Exhibit D.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Conditional Use Review - Pursuant to Section 247 -304, the criteria for a conditional use review are as
follows:
A. The conditional use is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and standards of the Aspen
Area Comprehensive Plan, and with the intent of the Zone District in which it is purposed to be
located;
RESPONSE: A fundamental goal of the Aspen Area Community Plan is to "Create housing opportunities
for 60% of the workforce to live up- valley of the Aspen Village Trailer Park". A short -term goal with the
Housing Action Plan was to develop "650 new affordable housing units, including employee- occupied
ADUs to achieve the identified current unmet need to sustain a critical mass of residents". Staff notes that
an additional goal included the revision of the ADU program to require registration and deed restrictions of
all ADUs. The ADUs, as depicted, exceeds the minimum net livable requirement of 300 square feet. The
unit must comply with the Housing Guidelines and shall be deed restricted as a resident occupied unit for
working residents of Pitkin County.
The property is zoned R -6 (medium density residential). Lands in the R -6 zone are generally limited to the
original Aspen Townsite, contain relatively dense development patterns, and are within walking distance to
the central core.
B. The conditional use is consistent and compatible with the character of the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development and surrounding land uses, or enhances the mixture of
complimentary uses and activities in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development;
RESPONSE: The R -6 zone is a relatively dense zone district, which is appropriate for the development of
ADUs. In staff s opinion, the proposed ADUs do not represent an incompatible use, and the location in the
vicinity of the downtown core are consistent with long -term policies of community revitalization.
C. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the proposed conditional use minimizes
adverse effects, including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking,
trash, service delivery, noise, vibrations and odor on surrounding properties;
RESPONSE:. Based on the revisions requested by the Housing Office, both units meet the overall
objective of livability. The main unit has been significantly improved with the addition of north and south
sources of light, and is now accessed by a covered descending stairwell. The guest house unit is an above -
grade unit with an exclusive entry (see p. 14 of application) Parking for each unit is provided by driveway
aprons in front of each garage, as well as head -in parking adjacent to the guest house.
D. There are adequate public facilities and services to serve the conditional use including but not
limited to roads, potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire protection, emergency
medical services, hospital and medical services, drainage systems, and schools;
RESPONSE: No additional infrastructure is required for the ADUs above and beyond what is in place for
the existing neighborhood.
E. The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to meet the incremental need for increased
employees generated by the conditional use;
RESPONSE: The ADUs must be deed restricted for resident occupancy. If the units are rented, they must
be used to house a qualified working resident of Pitkin County.
F. The proposed conditional use complies with all additional standards imposed on it by the Aspen
Area Comprehensive Plan and by all other applicable requirements of this chapter.
RESPONSE: The proposed units are required by Ordinance 1, and must be deed restricted.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of both ADUs with the following
conditions:
1. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall comply with the following:
A. The owner shall submit the appropriate deed restrictions to the Aspen/Pitkin County
Housing Office for approval. Upon approval of the deed restrictions by the Housing
Office, the applicant shall record the deed restrictions with the Pitkin County Clerk and
Recorders Office with proof of recordation to the Planning Department. The deed
restriction shall state that the accessory units meets the housing guidelines for such units,
meets the definition of Resident Occupied Unit, and if rented, shall he rented for periods of
six months or longer; and
B. Kitchen plans shall be verified by the Housing Office to ensure compliance with
specifications for kitchens in ADUs.
2. The ADU shall be clearly identified as a separate dwelling Unit on building permit plans and shall
V.B.C. comply with 25 sound attenuation requirements.
3. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Planning Department shall inspect the unit to
ensure compliance with the conditions of approval.
i
4. All new surface utility needs and pedestals must be installed on -site.
5. The applicant shall consult the City Engineer for design considerations of development within
public rights -of -way, and the Parks Department for vegetation species, and shall obtain permits for
any work or development, including landscaping, within public rights -of -way from the City Streets''
Department.
6. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, a tree removal and mitigation plan shall be submitted
for review and approval by the Parks Department. Tree removal permits shall be required for the
removal or relocation of any tree greater than 6" caliper.
All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings
with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of
approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the conditional use for two ADUs at 200 West
Gillespie with the conditions as outlined in the Planning Office Memo dated February 6, 1996 ".
Exhibits:
"A" - Application Packet
"B" - Referral Comments
"C" - Revised Comments from Housing
"D" - Modified Plans for Main House ADU
......_.._ ...
p - A17AONDU 1
Wo USE'`PVTXQ`T"O" >OFM Exhibit A
1) P.- rojOc:t ttaa+c
E IERN� 1 DEZEs1ENGa r.
2) ' Project Location Zbp V✓ GIt- I.ESPIF -
5E� aTTA�41Eb tad -A-l. 'bESGt=._I PTtot�l
(irxiicate street add><ess, lot & hloc3c number, legal
appropriate) (� �7Q�f
3) Present. Zoturxl 1� .4) Lot Size � L •M y • 1 U 4 ^c,",
s) Applicant's flame, Address & Phone A
p t 1D+Z; AsreN , ('0 51W70
LIPKIW •
6) Representative's name, Address & �>✓ t SVi I00
s 16r�i 'PA•fZ _N69SN I P 0+)0 W• !qA 4-4, `17b 9zo 1/ Z x 17
7) Type of Application (please ch&- -k all that apply): AvYsk
Conditional Use 3al SPA apt,. =1
Historic Dav_
— special itevie�-r — Final SPA Final Historic Dev-
_ 8040 Qcliline _ rw t'ul H70 Miinr HisYAric I x/.
Final PUD Historic Demolition
_ Stream Margin —
_ yjomtain Vie+ Plane _ Subdivision historic Des)-g)atia2
A'.v»ndm^ t G`Y,(S A11ot.�nt
_ Ctiy�dcmjni.� �*; i za lion' _ 'Ih�ct/t`aP .
aQ5 Orion. -
Tat split/Zot Lire
Adjustment
8) Deson of Existi Uses '(n-=ber and type Of eS q c�3 to the
the
appr�yate sq_ ft:: nm�bes of om5; aT7Y �evi� app
property)-
yAewAN '590 PNg!
9) Das4=ptron of Develc mc[tt Application
A t2
I>•! N'lA /N NOUSl; � C ��6T �ovs� -
f
10) attached the fOlOr� d Hinimm sx t. sjcn Contents
I3�is �
ote to Attat z. V
IZc�sposc to Attactrm� 3. SpcCific a r- .,,�c: ion Cbntcsits
�/ Fuse to Attad»nent 4, Revl° -' Standards for Your AppliC-tion
ATTACHMENT 2
Minimum submission Contents for All Development Applications
All Development Applications shall include, at a minimum,
the following information and materials_
V 1. The applicant's name, address and telephone
number, contained within a letter signed by the
applicant stating the name, address, and telephone
number of the representative authorized to act on
behalf of the applicant.
2. The street address and legal description of the
parcel on which the development is proposed to
occur.
3. A disclosure of ownership of the parcel on which
the development is proposed to occur, consisting
of a current certificate from a title insurance
company, or attorney licensed to practice in the
State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners
of the property, and all mortgages, judgments,
liens, easements, contracts and agreements
affecting the parcel, and demonstrating -the
owner's right to apply for the Development
Application.
4_ An 8 1/2"x 11" vicinity map locating the subject
parcel within the City of Aspen_
5. A written description of the proposal and an
explanation in written, graphic or model form of
how the proposed development complies with the
review standards relevant to the Development
Application.
attach2_applications
?.UL
1313 z
HERNANDEZ RESIDENCE
Applicant's Authorization Letter
Noelle and Cecil Hernandez
P.O. Box 1015
Aspen, Colorado 81612
12111!95
Aspen/ Pitkin Planning Department
130 S. Galena St.
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Hernandez Residence
Lake and Gillespie
Aspen, Colorado
To whom it may concern,
By means of this letter we authorize Lipkin Warner Design Partnership to act on our
behalf in obtaining the necessary development approvals for our proposed residence at
Lake and Gillespie Streets.
0
d®
HERNANDEZ RESIDENCE
Legal Description:
Ta AT f' i of 7HE `l�U(� Ic%�5T Giti-- �:UnRTEFZOF T*i =1�OZ 1 I =r�`�T
oN - c�Ur,�TER of 5ECTCtA 19� T0e/r:5A1f' 10
W 5T OF ( _ &TH PM (INCa.!.JD�� T ,EZIN LOI D �5 T3 37/
/ -T � i 16LOCK ii THE C!T� OF
ASPEN, Pn2T O. LOT-5 3 YJ O/ 6l}CK 2/ r,5ffEN CO�./l'A,'i~
a)bD1v1f)1 '- / AND r,,ART Or LA <E AJZ) GILT F5pi Ay�NL S
AGLJACENT), A5 FOLI DY,5
6cvINNl 1G AT THE "OJ HWEST C09NEF, OF C: U K 010 OF HnL AVI
ADOITIGN/
WHENCE THE EA-57 GNE -(k �i u2 CGr�N OF 11' 10
ScCTiON
12 (195 + 6zA`r� CAF) f5EAK5 5OUT'H C402--)1-'L4- En'�T,
91 .1 FOCI CALL !',,
%4-1At i7 A-5T� 5 FEE
I)�
T'r.E1C=
NOF,1 H 8`I'52 C0° 'Va
I x.50 FEE
THE--r-c
Nom'
nFi�C F
) �1 52'00" E, ,5
I /,,.L FE Ti
I—,, E 1E
NGrZT~ 5.91 FEET]
T-=_!k E
tiO�r 8%'Gi'GO" Ei��T,
U 35 > Lr
THENCE
1�JF�H U9 °55'00° Er'ST/
&b.07 Fc "ET-/
I FECl/-
c'.j
q 2 FEET
- "�0
00" EAST G I
11.46 =t ET/
T'r,E10E
NO�i r �i' 521 CO° V /Eti
^ 1.30 FEET,,
II L.60 FEET;,
T E DICE
! �. 3,'0�' OG" L�,S
37. `�; FEET,
`0011 W =S.,
�C.22 "rc =!,
F.-
C^-� CO
Tr FLINT O � i.-�. �llli ivy
E = '=
``,(�.- —r',' �:<; iU�ti I riu2�f/ '.F !',`i� L�i`iC �P• I I r. I rCtJc
LDF
T--:E- ST—"Ti UTGP.( Gt iS ,tiC ��EG
;�E';.- G = "� .; G ° lid t.'Y��!` -�', -v i+. 7 ^�,_ �.CI, =.�✓ �[. _�,?�
G
QA
HERNANDEZ RESIDENCE
Disclosure Of Ownership:
t6i�3EAT 3. KL.EN
Y;U, nD 1. Z1YET
ccu F x usu
W;ON RCSCHKV
•1915'.13 -T C:ilmii
]Aspen /Pitkir Cuu[muni,71
Development Office
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
VW ORrc�s OF
HE fiE ZT S. iQ ELNI
FfG e.�:uuL C:N�Cfi? 1'.tir
.51 .,c.-n FIYL Staff
s��i c ro
?- `?E1.OGLOR4ro t�ir!
Wo 7. D
Decer,her 12, 1995
tF's;�rcyti
FGi_.
T Lu.4:_E
(sXli$SSa1
T1ECCVt-R P71 7-r: is
P Cec11 and .,��11 Sc_ac :3 _ - Disclosure c: C- ,m-erchin
The a ndersigne(. i_ an at"crney licensed to prar_tice in t 2
State cE Ccicrado and hereby certifies as follov.s:
Title to Lots A & B, Moores Lot Split according to the Plat
thereof recorded Febraaxy 10, 1995 in Plat Book 35 at Page 99, is
rested in Cecil M. Hernandez and Noelle C. Hernandez. Mr, and Mrs.
Hernandez acYlired title pursuant to a Warranty Deed recorded on
Junes 23, 1995, in Bock 784, Page 292 of the records of Pitkin
Co -lrty.
Title is subject to a patent reservation recorded in Book 55
at Page 2, a waterline easement recorded is Pco2< 531 at Page 965
(said e-asement being fire fASt in wLdth)i and a' -1 easements and
rights- cf --av and ct_ er maters disclosed on t - Plat of the
prcnerty referred to above.
Hr. a.d Mrs. Hernandez have the rig -ht, as cwr ers of the
prcpe -ty, tz! app-'y for the development approvals contemplated by
t5is annlicaticn.
Please feel free to call me if you have auy further questions.
Very traly yours,
3ER32RT S. K11E7N PROFESS --ONr!
COR9CPIATICN
Hv :
Herbert S. Klein
s
a�
HERNANDEZ RESIDENCE
Vicinity Map
0
The Hernandez Residence:
Written Description of Proposal:
2 - story, stucco, glass curtain wall and wood, single- family residence with a guest house
of similar composition.
Written Description of Compliance With Development Standards:
A' - Consistency with the Aspen Area Plan and with the intent of the R -6 Zone district.
This project is a single family residence with a guest house which will be used year -round as a permanent
home for the owners. The project will also contain (and is the subject of this application) two (2) registered
and deed restricted accessory dwelling units (ADU). Both of which contribute to the overall goal of
enhancing the permanent community.
'B' - Effect on the character of the immediate vicinity:
The residential character of the existing neighborhood will be strengthened by the addition of permanent -
year round - residences.
`C' - Effect on the surrounding properties:
The immediate surrounding properties are all of residential use and will not be adversely effected by these
ADU's.
`D' - Public Facilities
All public facilities are presently available on the site.
`E' - Affordable Housing
This application is to provide two 'affordable housing' units.
'F' - Additional Aspen Area Plan Standards.
One of the primary policies of the Housing action plan is to promote the use of accessory dwelling unit
programs.
R" }
ATTACIO ENT 3
Specific Submission Contents: Development Application
for Conditional Use
The Development Application for .a_,cond". ional use shall
include the following.
A sketch plan of the site showing existing and proposed
features which are relevant to the review of the
conditional use application; and
B. If the application involves development of a new
structure c_ expansion or exterior remodeling of an
existing structure, proposed elevations of the struc-
ture.
�� O
LLI
C-N
Iz
<
Iz
cv
120 I
SITE PLAN
P8Z LAND. USE
REVIEW
t CI
0 �
J c
L_
® V X1..1.\1
Q—)
Z
LLI
® W
LLI :D
® flLO.1s
LLI
°Q
1z
HI
Iz
nnnn
III IIiII I
I
0'I
I W.
FLOOR PLAN
I ADU-
PSZ GOOD. U5E
P.E�9EV1
I
P•L°
c
J
w
U
Z
w
Lsw
w�
�o
N =N=
wZ1<
Q
Q �
Z
t�L
_ I
j�
SOUTH ELEVA710N !!
ADU-
P&Z COND. U5E
� RE \9EW
I
f -k1
EH
ONE
L: 1
E� EH
e
LL
O
Z
O
f—
U
O
J
K
2
Y
p
�1
!3
9
eR
Psi
LU
Z
W
r_n^ Iw^
WZ <"
e
nQ
Q�
z
w
i
NOUO!'C) 'IEW
R�Z
z
Q
J
J
W
W
J
H
Z
W
W
N
G
m
< „a
.a s
o
I =-
y
iJ
III
I
U I
Z
'W
Lu
ILz
N w
I QZ�J<i
z
�w
�II
I �
I
1:20
8T5EMENT FL�R
PLTN
TDU-
P&ZCAND.USE
REVIEW �
P-13
<ZE550RY OWELLIP
i $
G rvq
IJ
i
I
Z
Q W
I
W I
i)z
LAJY d
Q WJ
G
I z
I
I
i
i
FLOOR PLAN
nDU-
PRZ COND. U5`c
REVIEW'
P-`�
a
� a
I�I
III
u
I
J
III
Z
W
W O
=
I
N
LLu < I
W
z
Q
z
II ��
I
i
va• = r -o'
WEST ELEVATION
PBZ COND. USE I
REVIEW �
F..�i
W
0
1 . `co
n?
I3 Yo gal
IIII I.
III
❑I ❑I
FE TIE 11
Z
I;
0
w
i Nom"
^ J N
Q
III
IIII
ill l
'❑
III
III ❑ ❑I
�I
III
NORTH ELEVATION
ADU-
1 . `co
n?
I3 Yo gal
9 X
Z
W
ins
w
i Nom"
^ J N
Q
LLI
�I
NORTH ELEVATION
ADU-
iPPZ COND. U5E
t REVIEW
1 . `co
P.2
DEC.14 '95 4:29PM Exhibit B
MEMORANDUM
TO. Dave Michaelson, Community Development
FROM: Rebecca Baker, Parks Department
DATE: December 13, 1995
RE: Hernandez Residence - Hallum Lake Bluff FSA Review
I have reviewed the application submitted by Lipkin Warner on behalf of the ilemandez
residence development The submitted landscape plan does not show the size or species
of trees to be removed or relocated. While this information is not required u% a condition
of approval for this application, it is sometimes helpful to the property owner to know the
process of a tree removal permit in the planting stages. All oonifcrous trees over 4
inches in diameter or deciduous trees over 6 inches in diameter (both measured 4 1I2 feet
above grade) require a tree removal or relocation permil prior to issuance ura building
permit. If the permit is granted for the removal or relocation of trees then those trees are
required to be mitigated at comparable vaiuc.
The only other comment in relation to the plan is amt ail remaining trees must be
protected during construction to include no excavation within the driplinc of the trees.
particularly, those spnrce trees along the• driveway on the west and the spruce to the north
of the guest house should have snow fencing phued around them to ensure their
protection during construction.
Ike dzdm
JAN 30 '% 10 :08AM ASPEN HOUSING OFC
TO: Dave Michaelson, Planning Office
P.1
FROM: Cindy Christensen, Housing Office
DATE: January 30, 1996
RE: HERNANDEZ REVIEW FOR AN ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT
parcel ID No. 2735- 121 -21 -001
TBSUE: The applicant is asking for ipproval for two proposed
accessory dwelling units -- one to be located in the main residence
and one in the guest house.
BACKGROUMt According to the plans, th unit located in the main
house is to be approximately 439 square feet and be in the basement
of the main house. The other unit in the guest house is to be
approximately 500 square feet and is to be located on the ground
floor.
REeMOCKWATTON: There is no problem with the unit located in the
guest house. This is a nice sized unit 4nd is on the ground floor.
The Housing Office would recommend approval of this unit.
The unit located in the main house as to be located in the
basement. The applicant proposes two light wells, one on the north
side of the house and the other on the south side of the house.
Although the light well on the south side will provide light, it is
to be covered by a grate and will have the porch covering part of
it. There needs to be more natural light to this unit. The north
light well could help if it is done move like a garden window as
well as the south light well. Because-:of the above, the Housing
office would recommend denial of this unit has it is proposed
today.
Both kitchens must also consist of a minimum two - burner stove with
oven, standard sink, and a 6 -cubic foot refrigerator plus freezer.
It is hard to tell by the plans if the kitchen falls under this
definition.
Should the units be approved, deed restrictions must be recorded
before building permit approval. Thin deed restriction can be
obtained in the Housing Office.
\refs rft1 \hernAnd.adu
r
a
MEMORANDUM
To: Dave Michaelson, Planning Office
From: Chuck Roth, Engineering Department e
Date: January 28, 1996
Re: Hernandez Conditional Use Review for Two Accessory Dwelling Units
(400 W. Main St.; Lots 3 -8, Block 2, Aspen Company Subdivision, aka Lots A & B, Moores Lot
Split; Parcel ID No. - not provided)
Having reviewed the above referenced application, and having made a site visit, the Engineering
Department has the following comments:
1. Legal Description - Note that state statute requires that a legal description contain the name of
the individual who prepared the legal description.
2. Easements - The application makes references to easements on the property, but the drawings
do not show the easements for confirmation that no construction is proposed on the easements. If
the application is approved, final development plans must indicate the locations of the easements
with no construction on the easements.
3. Parking - The application does not fully discuss parking spaces nor request parking space
waivers for the ADU's. The Engineering Department recommends that parking spaces be required
for the ADU's because on- street parking in the West End continues to be a problem both for
quantity and for snow removal. It is preferable to have an unused parking space on site rather than
not to provide for parking on site and have development parking needs being met on West End
streets.
4. Drainage - The approvals of the Moores Lot Split provided the condition that storm runoff
design meet the requirements of Section 24- 7- 1004.C.4(f) of the City Code.
5. Utiliflea - Any new surface utility needs for pedestals or other equipment must be installed on an
easement provided by the applicant and not in the public right -of -way.
r
6. Driveway - The property frontage along public right -of -way is a length of about fifty -three feet
(53'). The City Code permits a maximum driveway width of 10' for frontages of 60' or less. The
final development plan must indicate a driveway design meeting City Code.
7. Landscaping in the Public Right -of- -way - The final development plan must indicate proposed
landscaping in the public right -of -way which must conform with City Code as discussed below.
8. Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter - The site is located in the West End where the Pedestrian Plan
does not call for sidewalks. Due to snow conditions, the extent of curb and gutter in the area is
unknown at this time. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, curb and gutter must be
constructed if appropriate and an agreement entered to construct sidewalk if required by the City in
the future. The final development plans must indicate a five foot wide pedestrian usable space in
the public right -of -way adjacent to the property.
9. Previous Approvals - Note that the approvals of the Moores Lot Split required that ADU's be
provided on each parcel and that development be subject to ESA review.
10. Work in the Public Right -of -way - Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and
development in public rights -of -way adjacent to private property, we advise the applicant as
follows:
The applicant must receive approval from city engineering (920 -5088) for design of
improvements, including landscaping, within public rights -of -way, parks
department (920 -5120) for vegetation species, and streets department (920 -5130) for
street and alley cuts, and shall obtain permits for any work or development,
including landscaping, within public rights -of -way from the city community
development department.
cc: Nick Adeh, City Engineer
Lipkin Warner Design Partnership, 400 W. Main St., Suite 100, Aspen
M96.24
2
FEB 01 '96 0B:51AM ASPEN HOUSING OFC
TO: Dave Michaelson, Planning Office
SROM: Cindy Christensen, Housing office
DATE: February 1, 1996
RE: HERWANDEZ REVIEW FOR AN ACCESS DRY UwELLING UNIT
Parcel ID No. 2735 - 121 -21 -001.
P.2
Exhibit C
in my previous memo dated January 30, 19915, I recommended denial of
the unit located in the main house. ,The architect, Lipkin &
Warner, have provided me with new drawings of this specific unit.
This is a much better floor plan and allows for more natural light
to eater into the unit- Therefore, T would recommend approval of
architectural drawings.
this unit also.
Again, both kitchens must also consist of a minimum two- burner
stove with oven, standard sink, and a 6-cubic if the kitchen falls
plus freezer. It is hard to tell by the plans
under this definition.
Should the units be approved, deed restrictions must be recorded
before building permit approval. This deed restriction can be
obtained in the Housing Office.
�ree.rrai�lx.=ana .a9u
FEB 01 '96 09:51AM A$" HOUSING OFC
�Lwj "Ca
W.
P.3
Exh i ZD�
2f
NzqR
<
LU
PLAN
ADU -
FUCONP. UDE
9EYMY
t
'I.-1
P.3
Exh i ZD�
2f
NzqR
<
LU
PLAN
ADU -
FUCONP. UDE
9EYMY
FEB 01 '% 08 :52AM ASPEN HOUSING OFC
P.d
Q
Z
w
r
4
3$ g�
W
U
Z
w
a LU
LU
0
NZ M
wz_ =�
°zQ
Zji
z
u
w
rw YYw+r
PRR WCMYNMtlM
p1Y
RQ,1
snag = r -a
19T f�k PLhN
ADII
P82 WIM, 115E
r�wEw
FEB 01 '% 06 :52AM RSPF,N HOUSING OFC
N///
CUM
u
LLI
C�
a
g
DQL
W
0
ors
m
P.5
r
W �
z N
d Y
z
Lu
Cs LIA
us o
NC) � 8
WZ �
Ch
Q:E
IIz
Iu LLI
c
FEF{5PEL77YEB
AW-
PdLLOH0.115E
CENfN
FEB 01 '96 00 :53AM RSPFN HOUSING OFC
i
i
0
0
0
J
J
P.6
K
yC p ¢a 4
pile � Gdk
p F
K p ^ 5
1 ♦S
W�
F Lu
uj
ua
L '
N= "
2:
U1
�
o
Q
u-
Z
91
/ftl�61WlIMf
EMI
PERSPECfIYE6
AOU-
P62CAMR W^E
REV1E'N
G
FEB 01 '% 08 :53RM RSPFN HOUSING OFC
I[
x
0
Gd
0
x
W
W
U
r
Q
W
P.7
x �
r -
< ys
ill
U
z
w
own
( )Qj
wO�
�T 9 8
, iz_5�
n
:2
^Z^`
Tw
1
�..
i
/
El
n
x�
. PFrwwrNP.?
AOU-
pdZLOND. U9E
REVIEW
400 West Main Street, Suite 100 r 97 1142
LIPKIN WARNER DESIGN TNERSHIP Aspen, Colorado 81611 r 97o qzo 3816
2/6/96
Dave Michaelson
City Of Aspen Planning Office
Re: Hernandez Residence, Lake & Gillespe Streets, Aspen, Colorado
Dave,
Enclosed are the following:
1. Photograph of posted sign on property
2. Adjacent ownership certificate from Aspen Title Corporation
Please consider these as an affidavit of posting and mailing as required by the
City Of Aspen for the above referenced project.
Thanks
�P u
COPY
•,,.1 • . A
ASPEN TITLE CORPORATICK, a Carporcation organized and existing under and by
virtue of the laws of the State of Colorado,
That it has made a careful and diligent search of the records in the office
of the Clerk and Recorder for Pitkm County, Colorado, and has determined
that those persons, firms or entities set forth on the Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and by this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof,
reflect the apparent owners of lots, tracts, parcels and condondxium units
lying within 300 feet of the real property situate, lying and being in the,
County of Pitkin , State of Colorado, to wit:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION SET FORTH ON THE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED
HERETO AND BY THIS -a E'a w INCORPORATED HEREIN AND AD*
A PART HE O
This Certificate has been prepared for the use aryl benefit of the above named
applicant and the City of Aspen in the County Of Pitkin, State of Colorado.
THE IjMILITY OF CCMPANY HERaMER IS EXPRESSLY LDaTED TO THE AM ;NT TP OF THE
FEE PAID FOR THIS CERTIFICATE PLUS 5250.00 -
(SEAL)
DATE: 12/18/95
ASPEN TITLE CORPORATION,
a
1w
%4.r
t
i
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: VICTORIANS AT BLEEKER CONCEPTUAL/FINAL PUD AND AMENDMENT
TO THE OFFICIAL ZONE DISTRICT MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, March 5, 1996 at a
meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities
Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Larry
Saliterman, requesting Conceptual and Final PUD approval to demolish the existing fourplex and to
replace it with a single structure containing 2 free market units, 2 resident occupied (RO) units, and
3 category 4 studio affordable housing units; and requesting to rezone the property from R -6 to
AHl/PUD. The property is located at 101 E. Bleeker St., and is described as Lots A and B, Block
66, City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact Dave Michaelson at the
Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920-
5100.
s/Sara Garton. Chair
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Published in the Aspen Times on February 17, 1995
City of Aspen Account
qe-1 °
Vt
0
l
-rrt 1 c
��st D6NcE
�NT�d.r►�E
C-r C,l�tisT
'PAt�KI rt C•>c
NoF�Tt-�
'QF�fLi���iJt � S l'LFi f C./4t� �az5.l06
III= o'- oil
400 West Vain Street, Suite loo T 970 910 tt«
LIPKIN WARNER DESIGN PARTNERSHIP Aspen, Colorado Stitt p 970 920 38x5
JAN- 29 -19% 14:35
LIPKIN WARNER DE
FROM UPKIN WARNER TO
!° v
—'���• po wacMmnSmG, suite loc T 970
fIGN PARTTIE RSISIP Aspen, Cobra&Iliki F quo
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
DATE ZI J`` +
Td. V Alai C_ Mtn, "Q.L�
FAX# ll
11 AA IU' PJI3o 1
FROM: 0WA� Ko `A� X (Ir
9205439 P.01
COMPANY: C1-f`j d� XSA&t J
No. of pages including this one
JOB. 4" wpvq,—
Memo:
Wo c.E
�-r .►sti
Z $ 2
215'0
_ .................... ...... .
JAN -10 -1996 16:15 FROM LIP'KIN WARNER TO 9205439 P.01
LIPKIN WARNER DESIGE° f TNERSHIP A pcx4C Loin yLeec,Suitc coa
i t
Aapeu,CvLondo 8i6n p
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
DATE:10 30-, '1 �&
FAX#: °tZo 5`03 °1
FROM: M k'i pr
-.. I
ao
COMPANY: Ci a Ara
No. of pages including this one
JOB:
Memo:
ttE�.� A4E `(1•t�
o u 1z. QaG .t s
��-
Ik
a two: Aep G k-rt
Wkt
4 A tb
' GOL44
`\
60,E jvk.enk-
►7�ue5'T �S� �:r�.Db.
�s{� �acu��
aln
°S r OVOLA T tao
a;
%CJ 5A
p 5 : �u ILO,+ I&,+
o+, OrJ-. *3 (a a
re.cGty u�, 0.11 t7 ,L-, tw�
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: HERNANDEZ CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW FOR TWO ACCESSORY
DWELLING UNITS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, February 6, 1996 at
a meeting to begin at 4:30 pm before the Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission, Sister Cities
Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena, Aspen to consider an application submitted by Noelle and
Cecil Hernandez, Aspen, CO, requesting approval of a Conditional Use Review for two Accessory
Dwelling Units - one within the main residence and one within the guest house. The property is
located at 200 W. Gillespie, and is described as that part of the SEI /4 NEl /4 of Section 12,
Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th P.M., including therein Lots 35 to 37, Block 90,
Hallam's Addition, part of Lots 3 to 8, Block 2, Aspen Company Subdivision, and part of Lake and
Gillespie Avenues adjacent. For further information, contact Dave Michaelson at the Aspen/Pitkin
Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 920 -5100.
s/Sara Garton, Chair
Planning and Zoning Commission
ASPEN/PITKIN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Phone (970) 920 -5090 FAX (970) 920 -5439
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Engineer
Housing Director
FROM: Dave Michaelson, Planner
RE: Hernandez Conditional Use Review for an Accessory Dwelling Unit
Parcel ID No. 2735- 121 -21 -001
DATE: January 8, 1996
Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted by Noelle & Cecil Hernandez.
Please return your comments to me no later than January 26.
Thank you.
ASPEN/PITKIN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(970) 920 -5090 FAX# (970) 920 -5439
January 8, 1996
Michael Lipkin
Lipkin Warner
400 W. Main St., #100
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Hernandez Conditional Use Review for an Accessory Dwelling Unit
Case Al -96
Dear Michael,
The Community Development Department has completed its preliminary review of the captioned
application. We have determined that this application is complete.
We have scheduled this application for review by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission at a
Public Hearing to be held on Tuesday, February 6, 1996 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. Should
this date be inconvenient for you please contact me within 3 working days of the date of this letter.
After that the agenda date will be considered final and changes to the schedule or tabling of the
application will only be allowed for unavoidable technical problems. The Friday before the
meeting date, we will call to inform you that a copy of the memo pertaining to the application is
available at the Community Development Department.
Please note that it is your responsibility to mail notice to property owners within 300' and to post
the subject property with a sign at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing. Please submit a
photograph of the posted sign as proof of posting and an affidavit as proof of mailing prior to the
public hearing.
If you have any questions, please call Dave Michaelson, the planner assigned to your case, at 920-
5100.
Sincerely,
1
Suzanne L. Wolff
Administrative Assistant
-r't