HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.CU.100 E Bleeker St.A53-921�\ l
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen
DATE RECEIVED: 6
DATE COMPLETE: 1� 92 P 3� ODE NO
A53 -92
STAFF MEMBER: KJ
PROJECT NAME: Grossee Accessory Dwelling Unit
Project Address: 100 E. Bleeker, Aspen, CO 81611
Legal Address: Lot K. Block 65, Aspen
APPLICANT: Ed Grossee
Applicant Address: 100 E. Sleeker, Aspen, CO 81611
REPRESENTATIVE: Sven Alstrom. Architect
Representative Address /Phone: Box 551
Aspen. CO 81611 925 -1745
---------------------------------------------- - - - - -- -
FEES: PLANNING $ waived APPS RECEIVED 4
ENGINEER $ PLATS RECEIVED 4
HOUSING $
ENV. HEALTH $
TOTAL $ waived
PAID:(YES) NO AMOUNT: $ -0- NO. OF COPIES RECEIVED 4/4
TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: X 2 STEP:
P &Z Meeting Dat PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO
VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO
CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO
-- 214a VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO
Planning Director Approval: Paid:.
Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: Date:,
REFERRALS:
City Attorney
4 City Engineer
sue' Housing Dir.
Aspen Water
City Electric
Envir.Hlth.
Aspen Con.S.D.
DATE REFERRED
Mtn Bell School District
Parks Dept. Rocky Mtn NatGas
Holy Cross State HwyDept(GW)
Fire Marshall State HwyDept(GJ)
Bldg Inspector -
/
Roaring Fork _ Other
J /
Energy Center Clean Ai /
9a INITIALS: 19 — J gX6
--------- ------------- - --------- - - - - --
FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED - ; /Z '/ NITIAL :7
City Atty City Engineer Zoning / Env. Health
Housing Other.
FILE STATUS AND LOCATION:
ASPEN /PITHIN PLANNING OFFICE
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Phone 920 -5090 FAX 920 -5197
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Engineer*
Housing Director
Zoning Administration
FROM: Kim Johnson, Planning Office
RE: Grosse Conditional Use Review for Accessory Dwelling Unit
Parcel ID#
DATE: June 26, 1992
Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted by Ed Grosse
requesting approval of a Conditional Use Review for an Accessory Dwelling Unit.
Please return your comments to me no later than July 17, 1992. Thank you.
Development Review Committee is scheduled for July 2, 1992.
*What were the results of the encroachment application?
Ad--C4H fr ja-71-
70- • s •
7e-on.
ytt,t_e_ oe_t;)(.,
MEMORANDUM
To: Kim Johnson, Planning Office
From: Rob Thomson, Project Engineer
Date: July 13, 1992
Re: Grosse Conditional Use Review for Acessory Dwelling Unit
Having reviewed the above application, and having made a site inspection, the engineering
Department has the following comment:
Recommended Conditon of Approval
1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the engineering department must have on file
an executed, recorded copy of an encroachment permit for the fence.
cc: Chuck Roth, City Engineer
WCASEAAD92016
MESSAGE DISPLAY
TO Kim Johnson CC Rob Thomson
From: Chuck Roth
Postmark: Jul 08,92 1:01 PM
Subject: Grosse ADU
Message:
Please provide condition of approval that prior to issuance of a
building permit, an executed, recorded copy of an encroachment permit
for the fence must be provided to the engineering dept/
Thank you
X
A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR T VE
APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE FOR A DETACHED ACCESSORY DWELLING
UNIT ABOVE AN EXISTING GARAGE AT 100 E. BLEEKER (LOT K BLOCK 65)
IN THE NAME OF ED GROSSE
Resolution No. 92 -4
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5 -510 of the Aspen Land Use
Regulations Ordinance 60 (Series 1990) detached accessory dwelling
units may be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission as
conditional uses in conformance with the requirements of said
Section and Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning office received an application from Ed
Grosse for a Conditional Use review for a 392 s.f. one bedroom
accessory dwelling unit above the existing detached garage at his
residence; and
WHEREAS, the subject garage was denied an encroachment license
for the north and west boundaries of the parcel by the City
Engineer; and
WHEREAS, the proposed accessory dwelling addition was approved
by the Historic Preservation Committee on July 8, 1992, including
variations to building separation, height and sideyard setback; and
WHEREAS, the proposed unit is 100% above grade, therefore the
site is allowed an FAR bonus not to exceed one half of the area of
the accessory dwelling unit as allowed by Ordinance 1 (Series
1990); and
WHEREAS, the Housing Office and the Planning Office reviewed
the Conditional Use proposal and recommended approval with
conditions; and
WHEREAS, during a public hearing at a regular meeting on
August 4, 1992 the Planning and Zoning Commission approved by a
5 -0 vote the Conditional Use review for the Grosse accessory
dwelling unit with the conditions recommended by the Planning
Office.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission:
That the Grosse Conditional Use for a 392 s.f. net livable detached
above -grade accessory dwelling unit is approved with the following
conditions:
1. The owner shall submit the appropriate deed restriction to the
Aspen /Pitkin County Housing Office for approval. The
accessory dwelling unit shall be deed restricted to resident
occupancy with minimum 6 month leases. Upon approval by the
Housing Office, the Owner shall record the deed restriction
1
�a
with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office.
2. Prior to issuance of any building permits, a copy of the
recorded deed restriction for the accessory dwelling unit must
be forwarded to the Planning Office.
3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Engineering
Department must have on file an executed, recorded copy of an
encroachment permit for the fence in the N. Garmisch St.
right -of -way.
4. All material representations made by the applicant in the
application and during public meetings with the Planning and
Zoning Commission and Historic Preservation Committee shall
be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless
otherwise amended by other conditions.
APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on August 4,
1992.
Attes :
Jan rney, Depu City Clerk
Planning and Zonin commission:
Iyu��y CYO
Jasmine Tygre, ChA4r
2
E4:4w(*) Y;V
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Kim Johnson, Planner
RE: Grosse Conditional Use for a Detached Accessory Dwelling
Unit - Public Hearing
DATE: August 4, 1992
SUMMARY: The Planning Office recommends approval of the Grosse
Conditional Use for a 392 s.f. accessory dwelling unit to be
constructed above an existing detached garage with conditions.
APPLICANT: Ed Grosse, represented by Sven Alstrom
LOCATION: 100 East Sleeker, Lot K Block 65
ZONING: R -6
APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant requests Conditional Use for
the voluntary construction of an accessory dwelling unit as a new
second story to an existing garage. The site is also occupied by
a residence which is an historic landmark. The one bedroom
accessory dwelling unit will be approximately 392 s.f. Because
the ADU is 100% above grade the applicant is eligible for an FAR
bonus for the property. No changes to the main residence is
proposed at this time. The applicant has submitted floor plans and
elevation drawings. See Attachment "A ".
PROCESS: The Planning Commission shall make a determination on the
Conditional Use for the accessory dwelling unit.
REFERRAL COMMENTS: Complete referral memos are attached as Exhibit
"B"
Housing: The proposed unit must meet the requirements of Section
24 -5 -510 of the Aspen Municipal Code. It shall be between 300 and
700 square feet of net livable area, deed restricted to resident
occupancy, and have minimum lease periods of 6 months. The deed
restriction shall be approved by the Housing Office, recorded with
the County Clerk, and proof of recordation forwarded to the Housing
Office prior to issuance of any building permits for the site.
Engineering:
1) Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Engineering
Department must have on file an executed, recorded copy of an
encroachment permit for the fence in the N. Garmisch St.
right -of -way.
2 ) The encroachment review committee voted not to approve the
garage encroachments because the structure is being
substantially remodelled.
Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) - On July 8, the HPC approved
conceptual approval for the garage /ADU construction including the
variations to building separation (3' instead of 5 height (18'
rather that 16' required in the R -6 zone), and side yard setback
(0' instead of 5 The HPC also requested that the City Engineer
allow the encroachment to persist, finding that it was more
compatible with the historic residence. If the appeal is denied
by the Board of Adjustment, the applicant will revise his drawings
for Final HPC review.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The garage onto which the proposed ADU will be added encroaches
1.8' into the alley and 1.4' into the N. Garmisch St right -of -way.
An encroachment license application was reviewed by the Engineering
Department and a multi - disciplinary committee who voted to not
grant an encroachment license (see above Engineering comment) .
This means that the garage must be reconfigured so that the north
and west walls are completely within the property lines. The
applicant has applied to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for a
hearing in mid - August to seek relief from the City Engineer's
decision. The proposed second level ADU was designed to conform
to the north and west property lines, so the outcome of the Board
of Adjustment will not affect this unit.
Conditional Use Review Criteria: The Commission has the authority
to review and approve development applications for conditional uses
pursuant to the standards of Section 7 -304:
A. The conditional use is consistent with the purposes, goals,
objectives and standards of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan,
and with the intent of the Zone District in which it is
proposed to be located.
RESPONSE: This proposed unit will allow the property to house
local employees in a residential area, which complies with the
zoning and Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan.
B. The conditional use is consistent and compatible with the
character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development and surrounding land uses, or enhances the mixture
of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development.
RESPONSE: The accessory dwelling use is compatible with the other
residential uses in the surrounding neighborhood. The unit will
be an adaptive reuse of the garage structure.
C. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of
the proposed conditional use minimizes adverse effects,
including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular
circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise,
vibrations and odor on surrounding properties.
RESPONSE: The applicant is not proposing a new parking space on
site for the ADU because of the limited size of the lot. One
garage space is provided for the main residence. A parking space
is not required by code for a one bedroom accessory unit. Staff
believes that because of the proximity to the downtown core a
designated space for ADU parking is not necessary. The unit will
have ground access via a stairway inside the garage. There is no
other access to the main residence. No other significant impacts
are anticipated.
D. There are adequate public facilities and services to serve the
conditional use including but not limited to roads, potable
water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire protection,
emergency medical services, hospital and medical services,
drainage systems, and schools.
RESPONSE: All public facilities are all ready in place for the
existing home and neighborhood.
E. The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to meet the
incremental need for increased employees generated by the
conditional use.
RESPONSE: The applicant must file appropriate deed restrictions
for resident occupancy, including 6 month minimum leases. Proof
of recordation must be forwarded to the Planning Office and Housing
Office prior to issuance of any building permits.
F. The proposed conditional use complies with all additional
standards imposed on it by the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan
and by all other applicable requirements of this chapter.
RESPONSE: This use complies with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan
and any other applicable conditional use standards.
Detached ADU Review Criteria: Specific to detached ADU's the
following review criteria shall apply:
1. The proposed development is compatible and subordinate in
character with the primary residence located on the parcel and
with the development within the neighborhood.
RESPONSE: The Victorian character of the primary residence has been
considered and approved conceptually by the HPC. Reuse of the
alley outbuilding is in character with the neighborhood and intent
of the Cottage In -fill ordinance.
3
2. In the case where the proposed detached accessory dwelling
unit is located on a Landmark designated parcel, only HPC may
make dimensional variations pursuant to the standards of
Section 5 -508 B.
RESPONSE: As discussed in the HPC referral section above, this
project has received HPC approval to variations of height, side
yard setbacks, and building separation.
3. The Planning and Zoning Commission or the HPC may exempt
existing non - conforming structures, being converted to a
detached accessory dwelling unit, from Section 5 -508 B.2. (a-
g) provided that the non - conformity is not increased.
RESPONSE: This criteria does not apply as the HPC has approved the
design and dimensional variations.
Please Note: As this accessory dwelling unit is 100% above grade,
the main structure is eligible for floor area bonus not to exceed
one half of the floor area of the ADU as allowed by Ordinance 1.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Planning recommends approval of the Grosse
Conditional Use for an above -grade 392 s.f. detached accessory
dwelling unit with the following conditions:
1. The owner shall submit the appropriate deed restriction to the
Aspen / Pitkin County Housing Office for approval. The
accessory dwelling unit shall be deed restricted to resident
occupancy with minimum 6 month leases. Upon approval by the
Housing Office, the Owner shall record the deed restriction
with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office.
2. Prior to issuance of any building permits, a copy of the
recorded deed restriction for the accessory dwelling unit must
be forwarded to the Planning Office.
3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Engineering
Department must have on file an executed, recorded copy of an
encroachment permit for the fence in the N. Garmisch St.
right -of -way.
4. All material representations made by the applicant in the
application and during public meetings with the Planning and
Zoning Commission and Historic Preservation Committee shall
be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless
otherwise amended by other conditions.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move approve a Conditional Use for a 392
s.f. detached accessory dwelling unit above the existing garage at
4
the Grosse Residence at 100 East Sleeker with the conditions
recommended in the Planning Office memo dated 8/4/92.
G ) t61
Exhibits:
" A " - Proposed Site Plan, Floorplans, and Elevations
"B" - Complete Referral Memos
lull I
It
milli
-C
L) m M CA
t�LEA
9 Z (A
N 1 u
a
p X
o �N
_ EXISTING 10,1 1
6'(o P=
5E PARA N
AT GROUND
z
V-4 (A
r v
rn
0
Aft
C
0
r
I
3, 1 3.5
-G
m
C)
NA
A
r
� Z
�m
rn�
� rn�
m X
CP U
z
�. rn
cA U
mU
N
0
r
r
rn
m
0
fit
A
t A
y
r fit
1.8 ex1sY,Ns
A -T-
_T_NCD
D c A
rr m
Wind
I
Z
r n
L
vw
Q � �
0
_f L
I
( 1 1
A)
{
II
II --
F
II 'n
rN z
A
- I
�L
rnt
Q
ni
n
Now
\�J
N Ql
r
I�
f
�rn
N�
�U
om
n
0
N�
Ln
C (n
L
rn rn
N�
c
)-0
J1
oil)
Z-
ul b
D lA
-1 A
0
�
Amk
r
w
1
I mw
ON
ow
m i
w
=z
j (I�
N
A
0
N
(-
��
T11
rnN
Rl
Nv
c
=z
j (I�
N
A
0
PLANNI. & __ Z3;: =_ 14ISSION
EXHIBIT 1/ B // , I PPROVED r
19 BY P=7 -- "N
MESSAGE DISPLAY
TO Kathy Strickland
From:
Chuck Roth
Postmark:
Jul 06,92 2:54
Status:
Previously read
Subject:
Grosse Residence &
TO Kim Johnson
19th
Applications
Message:
Encroachment Review Committee concensus was not to approve
encroachment of garage because it is being substantially remodelled.
(This is for HPC info and P & Z.) If there are any questions, please
let me know. Thanks.
JUL 13
MEMORANDUM
To: Kim Johnson, Planning Office
From: Rob Thomson, Project EngineetF&C
Date: July 13, 1992
Re: Grosse Conditional Use Review for Acessory Dwelling Unit
Having reviewed the above application, and having made a site inspection, the engineering
Department has the following comment:
Recommended Conditon of Approval
1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the engineering department must have on file
an executed, recorded copy of an encroachment permit for the fence.
cc: Chuck Roth, City Engineer
rt/CASELOAD42.016
A.
MEMORANDUM .3
TO: Kim Johnson, City Planner
FROM: Tom Baker, APCHA Executive Directo
DATE: July 3, 1992
RE: GROSSE CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW FOR AN ACCESSORY DWELLING
UNIT; 100 EAST SLEEKER
After reviewing the above - referenced application, the Housing
Office approves the proposed attached accessory dwelling unit
pursuant to Chapter 24, Section 5 -510, of the City of Aspen
Municipal Code:
Accessory dwelling units shall contain not less than three hundred (300) square feet of
allowable floor area and not more than seven hundred (700) square feet of allowable floor area.
The unit shall be deed restricted, meeting the housing authority's guidelines for resident
occupied units and shall be limited to rental periods of not less than six (6) months in
duration. Owners of the principal residence shall have the right to place a qualified employee
or employees of his or her choosing in the accessory dwelling unit.
The floor area requirement is for net liveable square feet as
defined by the Housing Office below:
Net Liveable Square Footage is calculated on interior living area and is measured interior watt
to interior wall, including all interior partitions including, but not limited to, habitable
basements and interior storage areas, closets and laundry area. Exclusions include, but are
not Limited to, uninhabitable basements, mechanical areas, exterior storage, stairwells,
garages (either attached or detached), patios, decks and porches.
Per the applicant's calculations, the accessory dwelling unit is to
be 392 net liveable square feet, which meets the minimum Housing
Office guidelines. Prior to building permit approval, a signed and
recorded Deed Restriction must be completed. This process could
take from three to four days. The Housing Office must have the
recorded book and page number prior to building permit approval.
\word \work \grosse.ref
I
t
s�
�
-o
R
:
oO
on
B�
6r
sT
5�
9
s
d K
e L
E
a
Sg
i,
i
9
s
d K
e L
E
a
Sg
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: GROSSE CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW FOR AN ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on
Tuesday, August 4, 1992 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 pm before
the Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission, Pitkin County Library
Meeting Room, Basement Level, 120 North Mill Street, Aspen to
consider an application submitted by Ed Grosse, 100 East Bleeker
Street, Aspen, CO requesting approval of a Conditional Use Review
for a 392 square foot accessory dwelling unit above the existing
detached garage located at 100 East Bleeker Street, Lot 8, Block
65, City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact
Kim Johnson at the Aspen/ Pitkin Planning Office, 130 S. Galena
St., Aspen, CO 920 -5090.
J Jasmine Tvgre, Chairman
Planning and Zoning Commission
MESSAGE DISPLAY
TO Kim Johnson CC Rob Thomson
From: Chuck Roth
Postmark: Jul 08,92 1:01 PM
Subject: Grosse ADU
Message:
Please provide condition of approval that prior to issuance of a
building permit, an executed, recorded copy of an encroachment permit
for the fence must be provided to the engineering dept/
Thank you
MESSAGE DISPLAY
TO Kim Johnson
From: Chuck Roth
Postmark: Jul 06,92 4:25 PM
Status: Previously read
Subject: Reply to a reply: Grosse Residence & Applications
------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - --
Reply text:
From Chuck Roth:
for the fence, subject to removal at sale of property
Preceding message:
From Kim Johnson:
I thought your previous CEO said that Mr. Grosse in fact received an
encroachment approval. Did I misunderstand?
From Chuck Roth:
Encroachment Review Committee concensus was not to approve
encroachment of garage because it is being substantially remodelled.
(This is for HPC info and P & Z.) If there are any questions, please
let me know. Thanks.
PtG1l1 w & Fie
(�1 / p�-
Sven Erik Alstrom AIA ARCHITECTURE • INTERIOR DESIGN
June 16, 1992
KimJohnowff
ASPEN /PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado
RE: Ed Grosse Residence
100 East Bleeker
Lot K, Block 65, Aspen
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION /CONDITIONAL USE HEARING
For a detached Accessory Dwelling Unit under Ordinance No. 60, Series of 1990
"Cottage Infill Program"
Dear Kim,
Since our preapplication meeting of 5/21 /92 we have begun the following application /approval
processes:
1.) Mr. Grosse began an encroachment application with the Engineering Department on
6/7/92, following my meeting with Chuck Roth on 5/27/92.
2.) On June 12, 1992, 1 submitted a Conceptual Development Application to HPC for this
project. We are scheduled for public hearing on 7/8/92. We expect Final Development
approval on 7/22/92.
Enclosed is our current design, as presented to HPC.
This application is for the expansion of an existing non -deed restricted accessory dwelling unit. Addition
of a new second floor to the garage with a small stairway addition on the ground floor describes our
project. The net useable area of the ADU will be 392 square feet.
The Conditional Use Hearing requested, will be to review the following:
Deed Restriction and formal recording of the ADU.
2.)
3.)
A variation request under the Cottage Infill Program for a reduction in the minimum
distance between buildings from five (5) feet to three (3) feet.
A height variatioh allowing the mean height of the main roof to be 17' - 6 ", as shown,
which is l' - 6" above the 16'- 0" height restriction in the R-6 Zone Di.
2 -0
xis ��u 'l
Box 551 • Aspen, Colorado 81612 303 925 1745
Kim Johnson
June 16, 1992
Page 2
The proposed development is compatible and subordinate in character with the primary residence. The
roof pitch, materials, windows, scale and massing are derived from a similar approach as the original
Victorian residence.
The proposed ADU is on the alley and does not visually impact the neighborhood. This block has many
other alley structures and one secondary residence on the alley.
The scale of this ADU is very modest at 392 square feet and will match the architecture and colors of
the existing residence and be consistent with other carriage houses in the neighborhood. Using a A'- 0"
plate height for the main roof, we still need a height variation to 17' - 6" for the main roof, to be able to
provide this ADU.
The development plan meets the following Conditional Use Standards, "A" through "F ":
A.) The proposal is in accord with the goals of the Cottage Infill Program, to provide
additional resident housing.
B.) The proposal is a reuse of an existing structure.
C.) There is no change in the current location, character or use of the structure. No
significant visual change occurs which would adversely affect the neighborhood. No
additional parking is required.
D.) All required facilities currently exist on site.
E.) This application creates an affordable housing unit within the guidelines of the Cottage
Infill Program.
F.) This application complies with all Conditional Use requirements and standards.
Attached is a ZONING SUMMARY which reviews current R-6 data for this property.
If we may provide any additional information or answer any questions regarding this application, please
do not hesitate to contact us.
Sven Erik Alstrom, AIA
enclosures
Sven Erik Alstrom AIA ARCHITECTURE • INTERIOR DESIGN
ZONING
S U M M A R Y
Ed Grosse Residence
100 East Bleeker
Lot K, Block 65
Aspen, Colorado
R -6 Zone District
3001 sq. ft. Lot Area
Principal Building
front setback
15'- 0"
(Existing)
rear setback
23'- 0"
side setback (west)
0'-6"
side setback (east)
3'- 0"
Accessory Building
rear setback
0
(ADU)
(encroachment application pending @ 1 .8 ft.)
side setback
0
(encroachment application pending @ 1.4 ft.)
Allowable F.A.R.
2400 sq. ft.
Existing Principal Building
1342 sq. ft.
New ADU Second Floor
457 sq. ft.
Existing Garage
415 sq. ft.
Garage /Stair Addition
98 sq. ft.
T OT AL F.A.R. 2312 sq. ft.
Box 551 • Aspen, Colorado 81612 3039251745
WN • 10
1) project Name GROSSE RESIDENCE Cottage Infill Program ACCFSSORY D WELLING UNIT
2) Project Ioattion
(indicate street address, lot & block i=ber,.legal description ubere
appropriate)
3) Present Zoning R6 4) jot s ize 3001 sq. f t.
S) Applicants N Ad dress & pfo Ed Grosse
100 E. Bleeker
6) Representative's Name, Address & Phone #
Sven Erik Alstrom AIA, Architecture POB 551, 925 4576
7) Zppe of Application (Please check all that apply) :
X X%.X_X O onat Use Oonoeptual SPA cxceptual H3-st Derr.
special Review Final SPA _ Final Historic Dev-
8040 Green line Conceptual PUD _ Mirror Historic Dev.
Stream Margin Final POD _ Historic Demolition
Mnaltain View Plane Subdi vision _ Historic Desigmtim '
Rxdm i iniumiza tion Text/Map Ammx1ment G� Allotment
Jot Split/ of Line _ Q9S
A37ust�nt
8) Description of FSCistiix3 Uses (amber and type of existing structures;
p=a ate sq- ft-; nmb= of bedrooms: any previous approvals granted to the
Pr°P`rtT) - 'Existing Residence of 1342 sq. ft.
Existing Garage of 415 sq. ft.
TOTAL EXISTH8 1/j/ Sq. 16.
Existing number of badroomc TWO
Last remodel or addition 1982
9) Descripti of Development Application
Addition of second floor ADU to existing garage..
ADU net useable will be 392 sq. ft. with an additon of
457 to the FAR an 98 'to the ground floor FAR.
10) Have you attached the following?
Response to Att, t 2, Minimm Submiss 0ontents
u,esp� to Attachment 3, Specific Submiss Oxtents
Response to Attach 4, Review standards for Your Application
Existing FAR = 1342 New ADU FAR= 547 sq. ft.
TOTAL FAR = 1889 sq. ft.
FAR ALLOWABLE = 2400 sq. ft.
Sven Erik Alstrom AIA
ARCHITECTURE ■ INTERIOR DESIGN
June 12, 1992
Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservationist
ASPEN /PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado
RE: GROSSE RESIDENCE
100 East Bleeker
Cottage Infill /Accessory Dwelling Unit over Existing Garage
Dear Roxanne,
Attached to this letter is our development application, existing building photos, 114" scale xerox copies
of the existing building, site survey and drawings of the accessory dwelling unit /garage.
This application converts an existing garage into a two level structure with an accessory dwelling unit
over the existing garage. We are removing and lowering the existing garage roof structure and building
a new second level, within R-6 zone district requirements. The remodeled garage /accessory dwelling unit
will be much more compatible with the existing historic residence. We are using materials and colors
which will be essentially identical to the existing residence.
Regarding "Standard a, Attachment 4 "; this project is very compatible with the principal residence. We
applied for an encroachment license for the existing garage, with the Engineering Department, on June 7,
1992. From HPC, we need variations for existing side yard setbacks and overall setback variations.
We are below the site FAR total, allowable. The second floor addition to the garage is setback so as
not to increase any existing non-conformities or encroachments.
The ADU is located on the alley and consistent with other accessory buildings in the block, such as the
secondary residence at 127 West Hallam. This cottage infill /alley project is consistent with "Standard b,
Attachment 4" and parallels other alley structures within this block.
This addition greatly enhances the quality of the parcel in accordance with "Standard c" and is a major
improvement over the existing garage.
By it's location on the property and proper use of materials and overall building size, this proposal is
subordinate to the principal residence and adds to the quality of the property, responding to "Standard
d ".
This conceptual development plan is being tailored to both HPC and ADU requirements.
Sincerely,
Sven Erik Alstrom, AIA enclosures
Box 551 " Aspen, Colorado 81612 303 925 1745
e ll 91,44,
7ia/.axa�o 89699
.q.
�f� �rirtioeiZ�N6 SdE�� .��r
E GON 2�,7
GRnSSE, EDWIN J. & ADELINE M. 001 000521 STATUS:A 2735 124 37 005
23049 FARMINGTON ROAD
FARMINGTON, MICHIGAN 48336
----------'~`-----------------------------------------------------~------------
LOT K, BLOCK 65,
CITY AND TnWNSITE OF ASPEN
SINGLE FAM. RES. - LAND ACT 255000 ASD 36570 AC
SINGLE FAM RES-IMPROVEM ACT 133000 ASD 19070 AC
TOTAL VALUE $55,640
YEAR BUILT ADJUSTED YEAR BUILT
ASSESSED 03/17/92 LST CHANGE 01/23/92
\� ^
//\
�/
\ ,\
0"000 SF 0
0"000 SF o
.1
MESSAGE DISPLAY
TO Kim Johnson
From: Chuck Roth
Postmark: Jul 06,92 5:51 PM
Subject: Reply to a reply: Grosse Encroachment
------------------------------------------------------
Reply text:
From Chuck Roth:
satisfied - not happy
Preceding message:
From Kim Johnson:
If you're satisfied with the history on this, I guess it's ok with me.
From Chuck Roth:
Ed came in and dug through archives - old city council minutes. I
got copies of 4 different meetings after the first denial. It was
indeed finally approved, contingent on removal at time of sale.
FYI.
P.S. I will reiterate this in the current agreement so that it is
well documented in a recorded document.