HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.CU.585 Cemetery Ln.1976-CU-5 MEMO
A � ,
TO CITY MANAGE I' ' `
CITY MANAGER C
FROM: CLAYTON H. MEYRING
CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR
DATE: April 14, 1976
RE: PARKS & RECREATION MAINTENANCE BUILDING
I have reviewed the plans submitted for the Parks and
Recreation Maintenance shops. The plans as submitted
are very inadequate and no permit should be issued for
the following reasons:
1) The plans should reflect the conditions imposed
by the Planning and Zoning Commission when they
gave Conditional Use approval. This would mean
a site plan showing landscaping, berms, roadways,
etc.
2) A survey of that part of the property is required
by Sec 301(b) of the Building Code as amended,
which should. include:
a) Type of monuments set on property corners.
b) The location and dimensions of any ease-
ments or rights -of -way of record or in
evidence on said property.
c) The location of any existing improvements
on said property or on rights -of - way on
easements.
Lou Buettner is working on this survey but has
not completed it yet.
3) The Building Code requires a one hour occupancy
separation between the office greenhouse area and
the repair garage and one hour separation between
storage and repair garage. All openings between
these areas must be protected by a one hour fire
assembly. The plans do not reflect what the walls
are constructed of or what the openings are.
4) Two exits are required from the repair garage and
the required doors must swing in the direction of
egress.
5) Plans do not reflect whether the windows are operable
to meet ventilation requirements of the building code.
6) No details have been given for construction of
greenhouse windows type of glazing or ventilation
requirements.
MEMO-PARKS & REC BLDG.
Page 2
7) There are no details given for block walls around
the yard area and building to support the earth
berm. Those walls must be designed as retaining
walls to meet the requirements of the Building Code.
8) The plans show no provision of how the building is
heated, therefore, it is difficult to determine
whether the heating system will conform with
applicable codes.
9) The steel beam and its supporting columns has not
been designed, sized nor detailed to show that it
will support the loads imposed.
The above must be corrected and in addition any other
discrepencies that might come to light when a more pro-
fessional study is given the proposed project inorder that
the city can be reasonably assured that the finished product
will comply with all applicable codes and ordinances.
cc: Bill Kane
--- \ \\__________/,- \ ; 4.4
• \‘... ---)'' / , k6
k m -.0";- � ' .
l tis
<.9ns m3,�ao
. \ \ \, .L‘ \ s„.\• „a ' .•';,F I
Y i .0
v� �Y \
0 c
r '�; - ,.:.,
; ' i o 0
O� C ..... ...,...
x ,
..„......„ • „..... e.... . _
, .. .
..,,,, a ,. . ‘444 ,1/4.
__<— \ .... ,k. 0
- :-. 3 " --- \ \\ to ° T, 7 _ 44 Hp.r l i .. ,
is i .
., ;Nita., 4 „ te. , eft 0 . ,
3 S i d
. _\ 0 0 . . .. .,
v s' ).'C % ;o ea -""rIF lL .___�. 0.
0 -- - Ilk .A.:‘,40 tn \ S , - I d Ofir A k . 11010 e
. si- Lll,:i " ,
4 0 ! Iv..
/// i c °'3 / . ?
F lol , ~ " s � Z lv , � 1 M \ au
; 7 ' i ,YI D g 1 1 c x d' Z . e, 1 m .
` � I 1 y
' t ode
cl I--
/ a \ �
•
..,- 1,.....„R„L
V j r I Y
•T.IO O.t9 V V4 -,,,,_
S ".-4 ' : .1 C) . . :: rd . . . i ' ' '': - - 7 1 : ;;, ,t.' ; t , ' . . . . -- 44/ ' ,
tt-' „%::::._—.)
'Al g y� 1'.0 j 1 L Y�1. r , 4 t a
� xtl 1. .°
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves
/ORM C HOrrkr tBO .E L. I0. ___ _ LLL __
Regular Meeting Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission February 17, 1976
Meeting was called to order by Chairman Jack Jenkins at 5:15 p.m. with members
Roger Hunt, Allison Downing, Patrick Dobie, Danny Abbott, and Chic Collins
present. Unexcused was Bryan Johnson. Also present was City Attorney Stuller,
and Hal Clark and John Stanford both from the Planning Department.
Conditional Use Clark mentioned that officially the public hearing was
Parks Maintenance closed on the parks maintenance building. Armstrong presentc
to the Planning and Zoning Commission a more detailed map
of the landscaping for the Parks Maintenance Building.
What was included in the plans was a new proposed fairway
for the golf course. The road at the entrance for the
Plum Tree will not be effective and will be closed. The
only people that will be using the bicycle path will be those
going to the Open Door and those who will be using the
parks building. Armstrong also presented drawings of what
the building with the landscaping will look like. The
' reason for not placing the building behind the Plum Tree
was because the tennis courts will be placed directly behind
the Plum Tree. Therefore, the only place they could get
sewage would•be to either pump it 800 feet up to the Plum
Tree or go down to the cul -de - sac where Metro is connected.
The only access would be off of highway 82 and they can't
drive the vehicles across the fairways.
Motion Abbott made a motion to approve the Parks Maintenance
Building granting conditional use; also further that when
the building is completed that the storage shed will be
moved or come down and not be on the golf course; further
stated that the landscaping will be completed before final
(occupancy permit) and if Open Door moves the parking for
Open Door and that building will be moved and the parking
will be eliminated for that particular site. If these
buildings are removed, it will be compatible with the land
use in that area.
Hunt made an amendment to the motion furthering conditioned
upon items 1, 2, and 4 of the Planning staff letter of
15 January 1976 and further conditioned that no parking
or no storage will be allowed outside the compound area.
Downing made a second to the motion. All in favor, motion
carried. f
Park Circle Hunt made a motion to postpone the Park Circle Conceptual
Subdivision until the next regular secheduled meeting;
seconded by Abbott. All in favor, Jenkins abstained.
Motion carried.
Subdivision Mr. Jordon was present to represent the Hallam Addition.
Exemption The surveyor made an error and stated that the property
Hallam Addition was 18,000 square feet; however, the actual square footage
(Bill Martin) of the property is 11,500 square feet. Therefore, it would
be creating a non - conforming lot if he was allowed to
be able to split just the two fee title lots. The planning
department is recommending that a condominiumiZati,on he
done where an agreement be drawn having the property in
common ownership. Condominiumizing the property so it
would have two owners.
Jordon mentioned that they would like the opportunity to
either condominiumize or use a use maintenance agreement.
A use maintenance agreement would provide that two people
could each own an undivided one -half interest in the lots
subject to the maintenance use agreements contained in the
agreement. 1u i s s imilaj iscondominium declaration, but
doesn't come wit'bi.si the purview of the condominium net.
1-
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves
Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission January 27, 1976
Meeting was called to order by Chairman Jack Jenkins at 5:10 p.m. with members
Roger Hunt, Bryan Johnson, Patrick Dobie, Chic Collins, Danny Abbott and
Allison Downing present. Also present was City Attorney Stuller and City/
County Planner Kane.
Approval of Minutes Hunt made a motion to approve the minutes of January 20,
1976, with the following corrections: on page 3, fourth
paragraph insert after the word residents -- outside the
Cc and C -1 zone. On page 4, fifth paragraph insert
after Callahan the word project. Seconded by Dobie.
All in favor, motion carried.
New Business Kane brought the Planning and Zoning up to date on
Council's most recent decision on the Trueman Property.
At the January 26 Council Meeting Council approved a
35,000 sq.ft. building consisting of a 20,000 sq.ft.
grocery store; 5,000 sq.ft. accessory neighborhood
commercial; 10,000 sq.ft. housing. The developers may
resubmitt an additional 10,000 sq.ft. for office space.
The Council may decide on a 45,000 sq.ft. building.
Jenkins introduced the two new members which Council
appointed at their January 26, 1976 meeting. The members
are Bryan Johnson and Allison Downing.
Collins acknowledged the memo which City Attorney Stuller
had written up. The memo was in reference to the function
of the Planning Department, the Planning Commission and
the City Council.
City Attorney Stuller told the Commission the only way
they are going to learn about Ordinance #87, Series of
1975, which is in reference to the quasi - judicial hearinc
is through practice. However, the most important thing
would be is for the Commission to remember that when a
motion is made to incorporate their findings and con-
clusions and rationale for the action. If they can't,
City Attorney Stuller suggested they postpone the findinc
and conclusions and she will draft them. If there is
a complex question and takes time to formulate and
articua'te a position, the Commission is free to consider
a resolution and at the next meeting itemizing it. The
Courts have looked and said the Boards have to spell out
for the applicants their reasons for their .actions. Tie
Court cannot be asked to anticipate or second -guess what
the Board is doing and why. If the Board does it, they
will get the benefit of the doubt and is a nice benefit
to have when appealing the matter.
(Conditional Use Jenkins felt the Parks.Maintenance Building fit into the
Parks Maintenance code legally; however, after listening to the people
speak at the public hearing, was questioning whether
the building from an appearance standpoint will fit into
the proposed location.
City Attorney Stuller mentioned to the new members that
because the next three items were public hearings at
the January 20 meeting; they are not allowed to vote.
Jenkins read into the record a letter from Walter B. Mil
protesting the Parks Maintenance shed because the area i
heavily travelled and a possibility of heavier equipment .
moving into the area in the future.
-1-
•
•
Planning and Zoning Commission January 27, 1976
- Parks Maintenance Jenkins asked Kane to include in the Planning Office
(cont'd) recommendations the following: 1) the employee parking
and all equipment and supplies incidental to the
operation would park inside the bermed area; 2) they have
a detailed landscaping plan; 3) a bike path alternative;
4) an isometric sketch plan.
Hunt moved to table the Parks Maintenance Building until
the next Planning and Zoning Meeting; seconded by Dobie.
All in favor, motion carried.
Record Shop Kane mentioned the planning and zoning commission moved
to include the record shop as a conditional use in the
Durant Mall. The Planning Office is recommending approv
Hunt was concerned about the heavy impact of parking in
the area due to the parking from City Market and parking
already coming into the Durant Mall. Collins didn't
feel it was an appropriate neighborhood commercial use;
It is on the periphery of the CC and C -1 and would have
a bad effect on the commercial area.
Motion Dobie moved to approve the record shop as a conditional
use in the Neighborhood Commerical zone. Jenkins said
that it already is a conditional use in the N/C zone.
Abbott made a second to the motion because he felt a
store like this is needed because music lessons will be
given.
City Attorney Stuller asked Dobie if he made that motion
because he feels that it is appropritate because it is
compatible with the surrounding land uses and uses in
the area. Dobie replied that he did. City Attorney
Stuller said that Abbott's second is irrelevant because
a needed use in the community is irrelevant and cannot
qualify someone's motion by adding an additional reason.
Abbott withdrew his second.
The motion died for a lack of a second.
Abbott made a motion to approve the record shop because
there are not stores in town, particularly a neighborhoo
use for music students or somebody who wants to play a
guitar or other instruments and we don't have anyone in
town who sells a wide range of musical instruments and
this will only be half of his business and it would be a
neighborhood use because a tourist isn't going to come
in and take a week of music lessons and leave, this is
for a conditional use and a good idea; seconded by Dobie
All in favor of the motion were Jenkins, Abbott, and
Dobie. Opposed were Hunt and Collins. Motion Carried.
Bread and Pastry Kane presented floor plans which the applicant had
Shop prepared a specific detailed breakdown of how the use of
the space will be. The Planning office recommends
approval of the plan with the conditions there not be
a high tourist turn -over kind of retailing practice.
Motion Hunt moved to approve the conditional use of a retail
bread and pastry shop in the Victorian Square Building
conditioned upon: 1) no snack bar, cafe -type food is
prepared; 2) no provisions be allowed for customer
consumption of food on the premises. Reasons for those
conditions is we don't want a food service to go into
the space, it is to be strictly retail bread and pastry
shop as presented by the applicant's presentation. The
bread and pastry shop activity appears a desirable use
in the area; seconded by Abbott.
Hunt added an amendment which was the type of food is
to also include drink; seconded by Abbott. All in favor
motion carried.
-9-
C 3
January 27, 1976
HAND DELIVERED
Mr. Jack Jenkins, Chairman
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of Aspen
Re: City Request for Approval of Conditional Use
Golf Maintenance Sheds
Dear Mr. Jenkins:
In recapping your public hearing on the "City Request for Approval of
Conditional Use- Golf Maintenance Sheds," I wish to reaffirm my
opposition to said use at its proposed location because of the follow-
ing information brought forth at the hearing:
The original golf course plan done by experts called for a location
more centrally located to serve the maintenance of the course. A
central location is necessary for economy of operation and for control.
It seems that the main reason the location has been chosen is because
of availability of sewer and water. This is a poor excuse to further
congestion in an area that is already heavily travelled and more,and
heavier equipment movement in the area is a future prospect. Certainly,
provision for sewer and water (if even needed) can be made at a better
location. There is no argument that maintenance facilities are desire -
able, but to intrude into an area that is residential when other loca-
tions on the golf course are more desireable is a breach of faith with
the open space acquisition. If a warehouse now, why not a heavy equip-
ment shed, work shops, garages, ad infinitium, at a later date?
To allow this construction is contrary to the stated goals of the Coun-
sel - to provide less confusion and pollution for Aspen.
Sincerely,
Walter B. Milts
WM:jm
-2 Planning and Zoning Dmmission January 20, 1
Urban Mass Transit alternatives analysis stage, they will proceed on a furth.
Report (cont'd) study on all the parts of new engineering data coming in;
then an election by the people of the community will be
held and UMTA will decide on the vote choice. The
summer will shift into preliminary engineering, the final
EIS; and shipping completed. The construction will
start in 1977 and the opening will be in the fall of 1977
The problems are: where should it go in downtown Aspen- -
the Planning and Zoning play an important part in
deciding that; the right -of -way costs on the Midland
are high; and the importance of the City and the County
being side -by -side.
Parks Maintenance Jenkins opened the public hearing. Jenkins read into the
Public Hearing minutes a telegram from Pasquinelli Construction Company
protesting the construction of a parks maintenance
building in that area.
City Manager Mahoney explained the reasons as to why the
City would like to build a parks maintenance building
in the proposed area. There is congestion down at the
City shops, the area should be cleaned up. The people
have to come down from the water department and ride
the mowers into town, putting wear and tear on the
equipment. It is awkward to maintain the golf course
and the parks department from that location. The four
alternative places to be able to store this equipment
are: 1) leave the equipment at the water department;
2) the Rio Grande property; 3) the site available west of
the golf course but would not be located centrally for
parks maintenance; 4) the corner of Castle Creek,
highway 82 area where the building is being proposed to
be placed. The building would be 12 feet high. The
first 8 feet would be landscaped and only 4 feet of the
building would be seen.
ARmstrong mentioned they are storing $60,000 to $80,000
worth of equipment outside, they would like to cut down
the wear and tear on the equipment, and to have a buildir
in which they could maintain the existing equipment to
keep it running as long as possible. Large eqipment will
not be kept there. The building will be completely
enclosed so people will not be able to see it and the
opening of the building will be facing the golf course.
Kane read the obligations of the Planning Commission as
to what needs to be ascertained at a conditional use
hearing those being: 1) decide whether the proposed use
otherwise complies with all therequirements imposed by
the zoning code, 2) whether the proposed use is consistei
with the objectives and purposes with the zoning code,
3) if the proposed uses are designed to be compatible
with the surrounding land uses and uses in the area.
The public were concerned with where the mowers would be,
if they would be visable from Cemetary lane, how many
people would be using the facility, where would the
employees park, the square footage of the building,
it was suggested to have the maintenance shed closer to
the golf course, it was also suggested to have the shed
near the Plum Tree Inn, the possibility of the shed
in the future storing larger equipment, the traffic whic
it may generate.
City Manager Mahoney decided to look at the possiblities
of putting the maintenance shed closer to the Plum Tree
Inn.
Jenkins closed the Publid hearing.
Jenkins mentioned that the use does comply with the
requirements of the zoning code and it is consistent wit
-2-
•
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves
Fox' x C F. HO[CXEL O. e.. L. ca -
Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission January 20, 1976
_ Maintenance Shed the zoning code in the applicable district; but is it
(cont'd) compatible with the surrounding land use and uses in the
area.
City Manager Mahoney reassured the Commisison there will
not be junk or equipment hanging around the outside area
of the shed.
Public Hearing Kane explained that this is a conditonal use hearing for
Record Shop a proposed record and music accessory shop in the Durant
Mall. There was a vote by the Planning Commission to
include record shops as a permitted conditional use in
the N/C zone. Kane felt the request should be approved
because it represents what the applicant spoke about
at the last meeting and meets the criteria of the
•
conditional use provision. It will also be.a conditiona
use if there is an application to put a record shop
in the Trueman property building.
Collins was against putting the record shop in the
Durant Mall. Collins felt by putting businesses for
local residents that -the commercial core will deterioate
and tourist type shops will be the only kind in the mall.
Herb Klien, representing the applicant, summarized as to
why a record shop should be a use in the Durant Mall.
The business is oriented towards the local resident;
it fits in the N/C zoning district; it provides for one -
stop type shopping for local residents; a record shop
would fulfill frequent buying needs; wide variety of
muscial services will be offered. Klien presented a floc
plan of the music shop which indicated a variety of
services that will be offered.
Jenkins closed the public hearing.
Public Hearing Jenkins opened the public hearing on the bread and pasty
Bread and Pastry shop. Jenkins read into the record a letter from Don
Shop Lemos expressing his support for the bread and pastry
shop.
Hunt asked if Kalin intended to prepare and sell sandwic
and hot or cold drinks on the premises for consumption.
Kalin replied they would not be. Kalin explained there
will be no baking or any food preparation on the premise
All the goods sold will he shipped in from outside of
the City every morning. The purpose of the bakery will
be to provide just a retail outlet for the items to be
brought in. The total retail area is 450 -500 square fee
Jenkins asked for a better floor plan.
Jenkins closed the public hearing.
Callahan Subdivision Jenkins opened the public hearing.
Kane explained the separate actions which the Planning
and Zoning Commission had to take. They are the Final
Planned Unit Development Plan; a Conditional Use
determination forthe recreational facility; a Stream
Margin review; and a revision of the preliminary plat.
Kane mentioned Clark had looked at the flood plain maps,
and the buildings are situated above the 100 year flood
plain and do not affect the Roaring Fork River. The
Planning Department is recommending Stream Margin Review
ASPEN/PITK �t ; : ! ing Department
1 3 0 s o
street
aspen, ` - 81 61 1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: Planning Staff (HC)
RE: Conditional Use - Park Maintenance Building
DATE: January 15, 1976
This is a public hearing to consider the conditional use of a Park
Maintenance Building to be located on the Aspen City Golf Course
behind the Open Door facility, with access to be from Cemetary Lane.
Notice of this hearing has been published in the Aspen Times and sent
to property owners within 300 feet of the entire golf course property.
Ted Armstrong of the City Parks and Recreation Department, and Mick
Mahoney, the Aspen City Manager, will be present at your meeting to
present the proposal.
The Planning Office recommends approval of the application, with the
following comments and conditions:
1. We are impressed by the need for such a facility at the
golf course to foster efficient maintenance of the golf
course property.
2. The site location as proposed appears preferable to locating
such facility off of Chatfiord Road, in that truck traffic
through the surrounding subdivision will be eliminated.
3. We agree with the comments of Josephine Mann, that a detailed
landscaping plan should be developed for the site, reviewed
by the Planning Office and inspected for compliance before
building occupancy. We feel this to be necessary due to the
need for lessening the visual impacts of such a facility in
an established residential area of Aspen.
4. We have reviewed the building plans as drawn by architect
Gregory Cole and are pleased with the design elements, i.e.,
the rearrangement of the interior road access; the low pro-
file of the building; the south orientation of the structure; and
the use of berms to screen the building structure and storage
areas, etc.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Staff (HC)
RE: Conditional Use - Park Maintenance Building
DATE: February 12, 1976
This is a renewal by the City of Aspen of their request for con-
ditional use approval of a Park Maintenance Building to be located
at the Aspen Golf Course. The project was considered by the P & Z
at a public hearing held on January 20, 1976, and again on January
27, 1976, at which time it was tabled. The minutes of these two
minutes are attached for your convenience.
Mick Mahoney and Ted Armstrong will be present at the meeting to
present additional information on the request. As of this time
we have been unable to arrange a meeting with the Planning Office
to review the additional information. We enclose our original
memorandum on this proposal for your review.
F
1 ,1)( /, , �/C k./07/1
/'iyr`i( /%75.-pr, 1f't /f /1(E' 1-s i f / A4 it
C C'i,an. >c i se - S
/r al /1/2 ,s hei 2 /af'w T/7
G( Q r 1/ //t /t /a-G eif/Z se % z ,/ di-t2
s , ,w1/42 - A y 2c /99,6 al s/vo,45-, /h, 7 CC' 7y.
CP4 -WC,/ Gh t eons /i'fa et C'e) v0 /Tio� i /
1/se of a_ P7777/{ .' /�-TP�il gy, /d /µ6 Ial , 'P
cor) sr n /7c,7? O ,8'7 T (77j of 45'&' c•v T/A
p t / t ; COL e t o y r � . s e Tv a g e 7)--cc i ' - 1 2 e ' .
C P�PTt° 2 y L-/fiA .,p Cde ere 6 4p. la gP -C4y
Tv r/,'e A-1 i n777 oil= Tom- &f '& Oc)v z /' /L, Ty,
5"Ce por Ol 77/e p AV ab9-C t), y 2 e P-r ,,,: eO / w .
774 ,iii/2-7 le v/' /74e ( /,A ti,- g1. ,+-P•c.. c ✓/ii- -
ytia1 zg. -C c0 GL ✓'/ /,-uJ
7 / _7 / 71 /1/2,7-77 .
ii / y
CU / r /'
.'/ oC /f - (6 ''e(fS . ' Nerr
/4 1
c'E£tZ 6 / / "� /
Z- / e (ciwj Cr CO
E ry ii *i P S,
LEGAL NOTICE
Public Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be
held on January 20, 1976, at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council
Chambers to consider a Conditional Use of a Park Maintenance
Building to be constructed by the City of Aspen on the Aspen
Golf Course to be accessed from Cemetery Lane and located
generally to the North of the "Open Door" facility. A copy
of the proposal may be examined in the office of the City/
County Planner during normal working hours.
/s/ Kathryn S. Hauter -
City Clerk
Published in the Aspen Times January 1, 1976.
a
•
•
q
Jack:
I received a telephone telegram stating the
following:
Strong protest on construction of park
maintenance building.
Pasquinelli Construction Company
Bruno Pasquinelli
Lansing, I11.
1 -20 -76
4:40 P.M.
Received by Barbara E. Knight, Planning Secretary
1550 Homestake
Aspen, Colorado
January 10, 1976
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Aspen, Colorado
Dear Members:
Since I will not be able to attend the January 20
public hearing, I am writing my response to the proposed
Park Maintenance Building on the Aspen Golf Course.
The plans and the location appear to be satis-
factory to me. However, I would like to have two condi-
tions attached to your approval:
1. no vehicles, equipment, or supplies should
be parked or stored outside of the building,
2. attractive landscaping and plantings should
be installed, in keeping with the residential
and recreational character of the neighborhood.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Jo 2 192t
phi a S. Mann
A ttiIi
NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300 FT. OF EXISTING REQUEST
Notice is hereby given that the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
shall hold a public hearing on January 20, 1976, 5:00 P.M., Council
Chambers, City Hall, Aspen, Colorado; to consider a Conditional Use
of a Park Maintenance Building to be constructed by the City of Aspen
on the Aspen Golf Course to be accessed from Cemetery Lane and
located generally to the North of the "Open Door" facility. A copy
of the proposal may be examined in the office of the City /County
Planner during regular business hours.
L .CA REPORT #76-01-03
t,
A SPEN TITLE CO��IPANY
A TITLE LNYVR .NCE AGE.ti icy
POST OFFICE BOX 27
ASPEN, COLORADO 81811
(303) 925 -4:444
We have examined the records of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County,
Colorado, for record ownership of property within 300 feet of:
Golf Course Parcel 16, as shown on Annexation Map of City of Aspen,
and find:
WEST ASPEN SUBDIVISION, FILING NO. 1 / "K Gt /i3t()
Wih eact, — '01 S, Litm,�- ,� Sf - C,y iLL.obd t
Lot 9 A}8rr- &- Masan-- merann ---
Lot 10 Wava Turner ' ,662.52 6 ?"7.g &,a lc/
Lot 15 Julius & Melanie Kolis — ,e, /‘/-43'41.687-6-n 4.
Lot 16 Richard & Connie McCrudden —' /0 67/
Lot 17 Charles & Billie Brinkman /267 c,o_fo
Lot 18 Hans Schwarz -- v /5
Lot 19 Michael Annan - , Slh-/ 3 / . 3
,,.s. ljcu , c[ci o
Lot 20 C xr - - tr n,L}*- Tee -i uc ( � Int) & T Int)
Lot 21 John & Alice Carter - 7.9&4 ,6b(
taC IAY)7 62Ce/ C,- 92(ov/
Lot 23 Peter Brinkman - sr 3 ?
Lot 24 George & Barbara Nelson — A!Lv+L
Lot 25 Raymond & Mary Lynne Law — '36- / /s//
Lot 26 Maxwell & Elizabeth Marolt Ez /6/3
Lot 27 Richard & Mary Lee — 5 2
Lot 28 Donald & Linda Helmich — /3 ..3/3'
Lot 29 Donald & Sandra Simpson — 4 509V
&Of/ 5/S
>J Lot 30 Jean Greiner (1 Int) & William & Constance Owen (1 Int)
Lot 31 Charles & Pamalyn Hopkins — 0_06 = h
Lot 32 Charles & Pamalyn Hopkins 1C S'
Lot 33 R.P. & Sally Fitzgerald /?96
Lot 34 Claudine Connor — ?VS
Lot 35 Claudine Connor 3c1 - -
1 actiwo c/4/ - malt,
Lot 36 Aiexan:- . i. - - --
Lot 37 John Huebinger, Jr.
Lot 38 Richard Holahan — -175? 77626 (Z - /� -%�G -f Je 7 (-3 vn CJ(cr7L<C
Lot 39 Gary Thurnau - lr &7 C
Lot 40 Larry Melnick 7P/ o7- C17ezzynL '& ("2 (i n , % 2C) D
Lot 41 Rusudan Gabliani -- ( 3 O O T( y S c" ,42 d e - ( � 4 L{ 7 )c y ' 6
Lot 42 Edward & Marion Nichols - /CO
Lot 43 Anthos & Susan Jordan / /c9/6;
ASPEN TITLE COMPANY
A TITLE C' SURA_iCE AGENCY
POST OFFICE BOX 27
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
(303) 925 -4444
- 2 -
i
WEST ASPEN SUBDIVISION, FILING NO. 1 -A
� Lot 1 James & Vicki Patterson -'
Lot 2 Harold & Harriett Sams �/o L<E2tNda_ y � /[ "� �
.5.2a9 "411- jaAtialth 4/-617E") rites( .x e toms - S�
Lot 3 Joseph & Judith Zanin - / y(
Lot 4 Joachim & Renate Weimann ( IInt) & Sue Chesnut ( Int) /96'
Lot 5 Lawrence & Marie Bowman — /
Lot 6 Robert Logfeil "- C2ct
Lot 7 T H J L t' KL' EL/I Su.,,Cac' (J . _
Lot 8 Urs & Barbara Zangger ( Int) & Frank & Marilyn Beer ( Int) —/ /
Lot 22 Robertg Robert Taylor & Wynn Binger - (0 7475 Gecfr �t
yjj z� t c¢Ldv " G >t�
5Syae
WEST ASPEN SUBDIVISION, FILING NO. 2
Lot 1 Ruth Ziets - / 37/x( , , ta '�' ,g//4/06 Fcur� li du_ ) vo9
5 Lot 2O� William Wesson
Lot 3 Po�ob a4' ge Inc. - 7/05 Cc L zA fuse! d�u ( arlt 3 3;v/
Lot 4 Frank & Isabella Segl /y�9't Y'
Lot 5 Christian & Ilse Bruehsel 3a S �``'�
,,,a-w a ur . o to a 3
Lots 6 - 12 Part of Golf Course - Lot 13 - West Aspen Co.
Q 5ALw � u . 'o zner Ilc�
l` ` dot 14 C- =
��
- Lo 5 Ca Yvin"'B'r.on�hove x ' tL k - `'21-4°41-37&14 L 4 . 1 t , a91 0 ?1C4-( 7>
x,c Lot 16 Charles & Francis Dibrell
Lot 17 Robert F. Stifter — /c9 5 /e) S S;10 u a 1 Pa-lea-a 'e- 7 °0 rel,
Lot 18 Jo Ann Valley yr &
Lot 19 Floyd & Josephine Mann — 9�
(:)9/0 Lot 20 Herbert Frensley -?/16-6(-0701) e i t*-
' -a ,- n 72CD
• Lot 21 Reese & Betty Henry '?
Lot 22 Alfred C. Nicholson — '30'9 7
Lot 23 Alfred C. Nicholson - 3 `r7
Lot 24 M.A. DiSabatino, Jr. & G.C. DiSabatino L/6
--
Lot 25 Richard & Muriel Taylor. - 1 7 7
7\� Lot 26 Stanley & Carol Karpelowitz
�;i,c, ' Lot 27 Richard Meeker & Alfred Nicholson
{ I ASPEN TITLE COMPANY
A TITLE. INSURANCE AGENCY
POST OFFICE BOX 27
ASPEN, COLORADO 81811
(303) 9254444
- 3 -
WEST ASPEN SUBDIVISION, FILING NO. 2 (Cant'd)
Lot 28 Joseph & Brigit Luciani / /S
Lot 39 Johnny & Alleyne Mitchell ` c2/5 CLLuriCltcc 71 / cct t.I /07) 7 70 - y
Lot 40 Robert & Elizabeth Gile eta a 5
Lot 41 James & Lila Gibbons 3 y gS
Lot 42 Eleanor Marlow — j 5, 9
Lot 43 Paul & Hanna Wirth — 59
Lot 44 Paul & Hanna Wirth -59'
WEST ASPEN SUBDIVISION, FILING NO. 3
Lot 1 Harold & Constance Harvey — / 99
Lot 2 Alfred & Elizabeth Nicholson ` 307
Lot 3 Allen Whitaker - .7fo '7 C -' L'
{
Lot 4 Irma Prodinger — �O
Lot 5 Sallie & Bruno Pasguinelli — 4 5o3 Atita c " n(f , 1t 6 CC! 3
SNOWBUNNY SUBDIVISION - BLOCK 2 — / /6W
Lot 15 Yvan & Marie Tache / 3 - -
Lot 17 Harry Heuer —
Lot 18 Jack & Eleanor Jenkins — ! Sag C a-
ASPEN TENNIS CLUB ie r^
Lot 1 Bryant f Inc. —27a &/ d Lt• 4-0-z- 3O
(urn --- e n e
Lot 11 C•karl.es-- .Baertdess - // D/
CASTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION -
� �,
Lot 1 Sarah Gulick ,7 / /In/ s/-5/ CznGea v qA 9 Pc; ,)/
Lot 2 Martha Grewal 3/ , ?/
Lot 3 Donald .& Patsy Newbury / `ice
Lot 4 Gale & Eleanor Spence -- 7 3/
Lct 5 Ron & Anne Austin //O 3
Lot 10 Franees - Ow- -, • , _ -- i-no Finch
fro City., c-t M { , a 1\5\ w ,QA - St-cut /Etc i/ S, Vic, fa�c
ASPEN TITLE COMPANY
A TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY
POST OFFICE BOX 27
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
(303) 925 1111
_ d _
CASTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION (Cent I d)
. -
Lot 11 Thomas & Donna Iacono mac! /P>
Lot 12 John & Cynthia Callahan - - 71 )
Lot 13 Warner & Anne Heineman -- L/57 C` p Cey1 kr/
e A 900024/
Lot 14 Kenneth & Martha Sterling
/3 2&
(25.2„t.....erj
(
V /
d26'-°-7, K:t-j2—e
n n I, , ,
• REPORT #76 -01 -03
ASPEN TITLE COMPANY
A TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY
POST OFFICE BOX 27
ASPEN, COLORADO 81011
(303) 925 -4444
- 5 -
POMEGRANATE EAST APARTMENTS
Unit 1 Walhart Realty Co.
Unit 1B Pomegranate Development Co.
Unit 2 Gary & Katherine Levitz
Unit 3 Jon & Carolyn Mann
Unit 4 Ted & Cynthia Bartholow
Unit 5 Marcelle Payton
Unit 6 George & Marianne Hartnett
Unit 7 Robert & Mary Furman
Unit 8 Carl Williams
Unit 9 Margaret & Elbridge Vance
Unit 10 Robert Christensen, Robert Luedeking, & Gunther Piepers
Unit 11 Thomas Blake
Unit 12 Donald & Carol Hubner
Unit 13 P.C. Miller Associates, Inc., Jon Hedrich, & Arthur Henkel
Unit 14 M.A.R. Haviland
Unit 15 David Jr. & Virginia Thomas
Unit 16 Jack Courshon
Unit 17 Sarah Martindale
j
ASPEN TITLE COMPANY
A TITLE LNSVRANCE AGENCY
POST OFFICE BOX 27
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
(303) 925 -4444
- 6 -
CLASEN - PECJAK SUBDIVISION
Lots 1 & 2 Trista Conger & Jeanne Reeve
ISELIN SUBDIVISION
Lots 1 & 2 Daniel Wardwell
M &B DESCRIPTION IN SECTIONS 11 and 12 -10 -85
James L. Hall
Walter B. & Bonnie R. Mills
Oscar & Wilma Cerise
Montgomery H.W. Ritchie
Holy Cross Electric Association, Inc.
Estate of Michael Christopher Marolt
Joseph T. Zoline
Zoline Foundation
James E. & Alberta Moore
Rocky Mountain Mennonite Conference
Benjamin W. Jayne & Robert T. McBride as Trustees under Trust Agreement
dated February 25, 1970
Samuel J. & Joy N. Caudill
191
Regular Meeting Aspen City Council December 22, 1975
I
ORDINANCE #89
I (Series of 1975)
n' l I Ord. 89 • AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING THE STITZER RESIDENCE (LOTS K, L, AND M, BLOCK
.�J Historic 81) VAN HOEVENBERGH RESIDENCE (LOTS M, AND N, BLOCK 71) AND THE COWENHOVEN
Designation- BUILDING (LOTS A, B, C, AND D, BLOCK 95) WITHIN THE CITY OF ASPEN AS
HISTORIC STRUCTURES AND SITES PURSUANT TO ARTICLE IX OF CHAPTER 24 OF
THE ASPEN MUNICIPAL CODE was read by the deputy city clerk.
Councilwoman Pedersen moved to adopt Ordinance #89, Series of 1975, on second reading;
seconded by Councilwoman Johnston. Roll call vote, Councilmembers Behrendt, aye;
Johnston, aye; Parry, aye; Pedersen, aye; Wishart, aye; Mayor Standley, aye. Motion
carried.
ORDINANCE #90, SERIES OF 1975 Maintenance building in P, park zone
Mayor Standley opened the public hearing. Mayor Standley asked City Manager Mahoney if
he wanted to make a presentation. City attorney Stuller explained that all this
Ord. 90 ordinance does is to change the building code to allow maintenance sheds as a conditional
Maintenance use in the park zone. Before a conditional use is approved it must go before P & Z
sheds in after notice to all the adjacent land owners.
park zone -
Mayor Standley closed the public hearing.. .
Councilman Wishart moved to read Ordinance #90, Series of 1975; seconded by Councilwoman
Pedersen. All in favor, motion carried.
ORDINANCE #90
(Series of 1975)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ASPEN ZONING CODE PROVIDING FOR THE DESIGNATION
OF PARK MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS AS CONDITIONAL USES IN THE «P) PARK DISTRICT
AND FURTHER DEFINING PARK MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS AS THOSE CONTAINING
OFFICE, GARAGE, VEHICLE AND TOOL STORAGE, GREENHOUSE, AND SIMILAR USES
PROVIDED ALL ARE LIMITED TO PARK OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES was
read by the deputy city clerk.
Councilwoman Pedersen moved to adopt Ordinance #90, Series of 1975, on second reading;
seconded by Councilman Parry. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Johnston; aye;
Pedersen, aye; Behrendt, aye; Wishart, aye; Parry, aye; Mayor Standley, aye. All
IN I in favor, motion carried. -
I i ; ORDINANCE #93, SERIES OF 1975 City Manager Waive Parking Requirements
`! - Mayor Standley opened the public hearing.
Ord. 93, Ken Senn, resident on the corner of South Spring and Main, explained that when he first
City Manage moved into the house there were no parking signs. Later the City put up a two hour
Waive parking sign, and he received a parking permit from the City Manager's office. When
Parking he went to have the parking permit renewed, he found that he could not renew it. Senn
requirement felt that by placing the two hour parking requirement in front of his house that it
would be defeating the City's intention of de- emphasizing the use of the automobile
because he will be moving his two automobiles every two hours in order to keep from
paying the City $6.00 per day to park the automobiles. Councilman Behrendt suggested
that Senn park his vehicle down in the Rio Grande property. Senn replied that he didn't
care to leave his vehicle unattended every day because of the items that he keeps in
his vehicle. City Manager Mahoney asked City Council to pass Ordinance #93, Series of
1975; but that he would lift the parking signs in front of Senn's home for 2 -3 months.
•
Mayor Standley closed the public hearing.
Councilman Parry moved to read Ordinance #93, Series of 1975; seconded by Councilwoman
Johnston. All in favor, motion carried.
ORDINANCE #93
(Series of 1975)
I AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT, AMBULANCES, POLICE
VEHICLES, OTHER EMERGENCY VEHICLES, PUBLIC, AND PUBLIC UTILITY VEHICLES
TO ENTER AND PARK IN THE PEDESTRIAN MALL; FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO PERMIT, ON CONDITION, SERVICE AND DELIVERY VEHICLES TO ENTER
AND PARK IN THE MALL; AND, FINALLY, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
PERMIT SERVICE AND DELIVERY VEHICLES TO PARK IN LEGAL PARKINGS AREAS
IN EXCESS OF ANY TIME LIMITATIONS THEREIN WHEN NECESSARY TO RENDER
SERVICES OR DELIVER MERCHANDISE was read by the deputy city clerk.
Councilwoman Pedersen moved to adopt Ordinance #93, Series of 1975, on second reading;
seconded by Councilwoman Johnston. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Parry, aye;
.-,. Johnston, aye; Pedersen, aye; Behrendt, aye; Wishart, aye; Mayor Standley, aye.
All in favor, motion carried.
POWER RATE INCREASE
1. e
City Manager Mahoney explained that - a group from the Public Service Company'came and
Public - said that they would make an application to the Federal Power Commission for a 39
Service per cent increase of the price of power that they sell to the City of Aspen. This
Company would be on top of a 20 per cent increase they got approximately a year and a half ago.
power rate On top of that 20 per cent increase, they have a 27 per cent increase in the fuel
increase cost adjustment. They now want a 39 per cent increase to give latitude; adding
percentages comes to a total 86 per cent increase. There are a lot of things that
we need to address. City Manager Mahoney mentioned that he has been in touch with
•
it
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves
ORDINANCE NO. ( ID
(Series of 1975)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ASPEN ZONING CODE PROVIDING FOR THE
DESIGNATION OF PARK MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS AS CONDITIONAL USES
IN THE (P) PARK DISTRICT AND FURTHER DEFINING PARK MAINTENANCE
BUILDINGS AS THOSE CONTAINING OFFICE, GARAGE, VEHICLE AND TOOL
STORAGE, GREENHOUSE, AND SIMILAR,USES PROVIDED ALL ARE LIMITED
TO PARK OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES
WHEREAS, upon recommendation of the Aspen Planning
and Zoning Commission the City Council has determined to expand
the conditional uses within the (P) Park Zone District such as
to, on review, permit construction of park maintenance build-
ings, and
WHEREAS, the City Council feels it necessary to
further amend the code by defining the phrase "park maintenance
building" in terms of the permissable uses of such facility,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO:
Section 1 '
That Section 24 -3.2 of the Municipal Code of the City
of Aspen, Colorado, hs hereby amended by the addition of Park
Maintenance Building to the list of CONDITIONAL USES within the
(P) Park Zone District.
Section 2
That Section 24 -3.1 of the Municipal Code of the City
of Aspen, Colorado, is hereby amended by the addition of subsection
(CC) thereto which said subsection reads as follows:
"(CC) Park Maintenance Building A building
within park land used to store and repair
vehicles and equipment and also usable for
greenhouse and office purposes, provided
all uses are limited 1D park operation and
maintenance purposes."
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves
Section 3
If any provision of this ordinance or the application
thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such
invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of
the ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid pro-
visions or applications, and to this end the provisions or applic-
ations of this ordinance are declared to be severable.
Section 3
That a public hearing be held on this ordinance on
et"/ , 1975, at 5:00 P.M. in City Council Chambers,
City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which
hearing public notice of the same shall be published once in a
newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen.
INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED published as provided by
law by the City Council of the City of Aspen, at its regular
meeting held e�rc ( u 11 / 1975.
A Al le
ATTEST: / / STACY S'ANDLEY III, MAYOR
/ l�C.fiL-/L�{,li ,,, ) Yom'' / ^-"" clef o
KATHRYN SJ HAUTER, CITY CLERK .
FINALLY ADOPTED AND APPROVED ON r
1975.
ATTEST: STACY STANDLEY III, MAYOR
KATHRYN S. TAUTER, CITY CLERK
/ .
1902
•
Re•ular Meetin• Aspen Cit Council November 24, 1975
seconded by Councilman De Gregorio. • -
All in favor, motion carried.
ORDINANCE #90, SERIES OF 1975, MAINTENANCE SHEDS
I Maintenance
Councilwoman Pedersen moved to read Ordinance #90, Series of 1975, seconded by Councilman 1 Sheds
De Gregorio. All in favor, motion carried.
ORDINANCE #90
Series of 1975
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ASPEN ZONING CODE PROVIDING FOR THE DE-
SIGNATION OF PARK MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS AS CONDITIONAL USES IN THE
(P) PARK DISTRICT AND FURTHER DEFINING PARK MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS
AS THOSE CONTAINING OFFICE, GARAGE, VEHICLE AND TOOL STORAGE, GREEN-
HOUSE AND SIMILAR USES PROVIDED ALL ARE LIMITED TO PARK OPERATION
AND MAINTENANCE PUTPOSES
was read by Mayor Standley
Councilwoman Johnston said there was a problem with the office in the park zone;
she did not object to a building for maintenance, but did not like the office.
Councilman Behrendt moved to remove the designation of office from the Ordinance;
seconded by Councilwoman Johnston. Councilmembers Johnston and Behrendt for the
motion; Councilmembers Pedersen, Parry, De Gregorio, Mayor Standley, opposed.
Motion NOT carried
Roll call vote; Councilmembers Pedersen, aye; Parry, aye; Johnston, aye; De Gregorio,
aye; Behrendt, aye; Mayor Standley, aye. Motion carried.
Councilman De Gregorio moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:10 p.m.; seconded by Council-
woman Pedersen. All in favor, motion carried. /
• I/
is _
athryn S. Hauter, City Clerk P
•
Regular Meeting Aspen City Council December 8, 1975
Mayor Standley called the meeting to order at 5:08 p.m. with Councilmembers Behrendt,
De Gregorio, Johnston, Parry, Pedersen, Wishart, City Manager Mahoney, and City Attor-
ney Stuller present.
MINUTES
Councilwoman Johnston moved to approve the minutes of the November 17, 1975, special Minutes
.Council meeting; seconded by Councilman Wishart. All in favor, motion carried.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
Councilman De Gregorio moved to approve Account
4 ierove the accounts payable; seconded by Councilman Payable
Parry. All in favor, motion carried.
CITIZEN PARTICIPATIO!
1. Kiefer Menri ,n 11 told Council at the last meeting he had questioned Council's
Kiefer
constituency in uupport of the mall expansion and suggested there was no meaningful / Mall Commiss mmissi i.
support. Council's response was to spend $15,000 to go forward with it. Mendenhall
stated when the City discovered they could not raise the amount of money needed for the
mall, they decided to do with half as much in order to accomplish the same thing.
Mendenhall told Council that his group now includes a majority of the City Council which
created the mall; two out of three former chairmen of the Mall Commission. Mendenhall
suggested the City look very carefully at the mall expansion; there are other priorities
such as parking and employee housing.
2. Cam Johnson told Council she had had a problem with the building department. When a Popcorn Wagon
she gave them a survey for her new location of the Popcorn Wagon, the building department . Survey
told her it was too old and not certified. Various Councilmembers told Ms. Johnson
that the same thing had happened to them; a recent, certified survey was a code require-
ment. e
COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS
•
1. Councilwoman Johnston told Council the RBH building walkway was building up with ice I RBH Building
and becoming very dangerous. Council instructed City Manager Mahoney to take care of the! walkway
I problem.
•
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves
raw w C. I. HOCCKEL e. B. • L. CO.
Regular Meeting Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission February 17, 197E
Meeting was called to order by Chairman Jack Jenkins at 5:15 p.m. with members
Roger Hunt, Allison Downing, Patrick Dobie, Danny Abbott, and Chic Collins
present. Unexcused was Bryan Johnson. Also present was City Attorney Stuller,
and Hal Clark and John Stanford both from the Planning Department.
Conditional Use Clark mentioned that officially the public hearing was
Parks.Maintenance closed on the parks maintenance building. Armstrong present
to the Planning and Zoning Commission a more detailed map
of the landscaping for the Parks Maintenance Building.
What was included in the plans was a new proposed fairway
for the golf course. The road at the entrance for the
Plum Tree will not be effective and will be closed. The
only people that will be using the bicycle path will be those
going to the Open Door and those who will be using the
parks building. Armstrong also presented drawings of what
the building with the landscaping will look like. The
reason for not placing the building behind the Plum Tree
was because the tennis courts will be placed directly behinc
the Plum Tree. Therefore, the only place they could get
sewage would be to either pump it 800 feet up to the Plum
Tree or go down to the cul -de -sac where Metro is connected.
The only access would be off of highway 82 and they can't
drive the vehicles across the fairways.
Motion Abbott made a motion to approve the Parks Maintenance
Building granting conditional use; also further that when
the building is completed that the storage shed will be
moved or come down and not be on the golf course; further
stated that the landscaping will be completed before final
(occupancy permit) and if Open Door moves the parking for
Open Door and that building will be moved and the parking
will be eliminated for that particular site. If these
buildings are removed, it will be compatible with the land
use in that area.
Hunt made an amendment to the motion furthering conditioned
upon items 1, 2, and 4 of the Planning staff letter of
15 January 1976 and further conditioned that no parking
or no storage will be allowed outside the compound area.
Downing made a second to the motion. All in favor, motion
carried.
a
I Park Circle Hunt made a motion to postpone the Park Circle Conceptual
Subdivision until the next regular secheduled meeting;
{ seconded by Abbott. All in favor, Jenkins abstained.
Motion carried.
Subdivision Mr. Jordon was present to represent the Hallam Addition.
Exemption The surveyor made an error and stated that the property
Hallam Addition was 18,000 square feet; however, the actual square footage
(Bill Martin) of the property is 11,500 square feet. Therefore, it would
be creating a non - conforming lot if he was allowed to
be able to split just the two fee title lots. The planning
department is recommending that a condominiumization be
done where an agreement be drawn having the property in
common ownership. Condominiumizing the property so it
would have two owners.
Jordon mentioned that they would like the opportunity to
either condominiumize or use a use maintenance agreement.
A use maintenance agreement would provide that two people
could each own an undivic'ed one -half interest in the lots
■ subject to the maintenance use agreements contained in the
agreement. It is similarrcondominium declaration, but
■
doesn't come within the purview of the condominium act.
-1-
i•
1
1
1 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves
row a C. r. MO€CKEL • • • L. CO -
Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission January 27, 1976
Meeting was called to order by Chairman Jack Jenkins at 5:10 p.m. with members
Roger Hunt, Bryan Johnson, Patrick Dobie, Chic Collins, Danny Abbott and
Allison Downing present. Also present was City Attorney Stuller and City/
County Planner Kane.
Approval of Minutes Hunt made a motion to approve the minutes of January 20,
1976, with the following corrections: on page 3, fourth
paragraph insert after the word residents -- outside the
Cc and C -1 zone. On page 4, fifth paragraph insert
after Callahan the word project. Seconded by Dobie.
All in favor, motion carried.
New Business Kane brought the Planning and Zoning up to date on
Council's most recent decision on the Trueman Property.
At the January 26 Council Meeting Council approved a
35,000 sq.ft. building consisting of a 20,000 sq.ft.
grocery store; 5,000 sq.ft. accessory neighborhood
commercial; 10,000 sq.ft. housing. The developers may
resubmitt an additional 10,000 sq.ft. for office space.
The Council may decide on a 45,000 sq.ft. building.
Jenkins introduced the two new members which Council
appointed at their January 26, 1976 meeting. The member.
are Bryan Johnson and Allison Downing.
Collins acknowledged the memo which City Attorney Stulle:
had written up. The memo was in reference to the functioi
of the Planning Department, the Planning Commission and
• the City Council.
City Attorney Stuller told the Commission the only way
they are going to learn about Ordinance #87, Series of
1975, which is in reference to the quasi- judicial hearing
is through practice. However, the most important thing
would be is for the Commission to remember that when a
'motion is made to incorporate their findings and con-
clusions and rationale for the action. If they can't,
City Attorney Stuller suggested they postpone the findin
and conclusions and she will draft them. If there is
a complex question and takes time to formulate and
articuaite a position, the Commission is free to consider
a resolution and at the next meeting itemizing it. ' The
Courts have looked and said the Boards have to spell out
for the applicants their reasons for their actions. Tte
Court cannot be asked to anticipate or second -guess what
the Board is doing and why. If the Board does it, they
will get the benefit of the doubt and is a nice benefit
to have when appealing the matter.
Conditional Use Jenkins felt the Parks Maintenance Building fit into the
Parks Maintenance code legally; however, after listening to the people
speak at the public hearing, was questioning whether
the building from an appearance standpoint will fit into
the proposed location.
City Attorney Stuller mentioned to the new members that
because the next three items were public hearings at
the January 20 meeting; they are not allowed to vote.
Jenkins read into the record a letter from Walter B. Mil
protesting the Parks Maintenance shed because the area i
heavily travelled and a possibility of heavier equipment
moving into the area in the future.
-1-
Planning and Zoning Commission January 27, 1976
Parks Maintenance Jenkins asked Kane to include in the Planning Office
(cont'd) recommendations the following: 1) the employee parking
and all equipment and supplies incidental to the
operation would park inside the bermed area; 2) they have
a detailed landscaping plan; 3) a bike path alternative;
4) an isometric sketch plan.
Hunt moved to table the Parks Maintenance Building until
the next Planning and Zoning Meeting; seconded by Dobie.
All in favor, motion carried.
Record Shop Kane mentioned the planning and zoning commission moved
to include the record shop as a conditional use in the
Durant Mall. The Planning Office is recommending approval
Hunt was concerned about the heavy impact of parking in
the area due to the parking from City Market and parking
already coming into the Durant Mall. Collins didn't
feel it was an appropriate neighborhood commercial use;
It is on the periphery of the CC and C -1 and would have
a bad effect on the commercial area.
Motion Dobie moved to approve the record shop as a conditional
use in the Neighborhood Commerical zone. Jenkins said
that it already is a conditional use in the N/C zone..
Abbott made a second to the motion because he felt a
store like this is needed because music lessons will be
given. -
City Attorney Stuller asked Dobie if he made that motion
because he feels that it is appropritate because it is
compatible with the surrounding land uses and uses in
the area. Dobie replied that he did. City Attorney
Stuller said that Abbott's second is irrelevant because
a needed use in the community is irrelevant and cannot
qualify someone's motion by adding an additional reason.
Abbott withdrew his second.
The motion died for a lack of a second.
Abbott made a motion to approve the record shop because
there are not stores in town, particularly a neighborhood
use for music students or somebody who wants to play a
guitar or other instruments and we don't have anyone in
town who sells a wide range of musical instruments and
this will only be half of his business and it would be a
neighborhood use because a tourist isn't going to come
in and take a week of music lessons and leave, this is
for a conditional use and a good idea; seconded by Dobie.
All in favor of the motion were Jenkins, Abbott, and
Dobie. Opposed were Hunt and Collins. Motion Carried.
Bread and Pastry Kane presented floor plans which the applicant had
Shop prepared a specific detailed breakdown of how the use of
the space will be. The Planning office recommends
approval of the plan with the conditions there not be
a high tourist turn -over kind of retailing practice.
Motion Hunt moved to approve the conditional use of a retail
bread and pastry shop in the Victorian Square Building
conditioned upon: 1) no snack bar, cafe -type food is
prepared; 2) no provisions be allowed for customer
consumption of food on the premises. Reasons for those
conditions is we don't want a food service to go into
the space, it is to be strictly retail bread and pastry
shop as presented by the applicant's presentation. The
bread and pastry shop activity appears a desirable use
in the area; seconded by Abbott.
Hunt added an amendment which was the type of food is
to also include drink; seconded by Abbott. All in favor,
motion carried.
Aspen Planning and 'coning Commission. November 15, 197
Use Determination commercial use as defined or as anticipated by the NC
Durant Mall (cont'd) zoning district. Clark read the intent of the N/C
zone.
Leonard Oates, Attorney representing the above listed
businesses mentioned that in regard to a coffee, tea,
and spice shop that would be classified as food. As
far as the Roaring Fork Operation; it is a type of busine
which is oriented towards the residents of the neigh-
borhood and not tourist oriented. The Pitkin Tack and
Leather Shop could be classified as a hardware operation;
also tourists would not be interested in purchasing
bridles and saddles.
City Attorney Stuller explained that the agreement
provided that if during the length of Ordinance #19,
Series of 1973, that if they were to make whole committ-
ments to uses, that they were to be in harmony with the
uses listed. The leases do conform to that agreement.
Motion moved to include the three stores to be under the
definition of permitted use in neighborhood commercial
zoning; seconded by Dobie.
Collins questioned if these uses set the stage for them
• to be in other neighborhood commercial areas. City
Attorney Stuller replied, no. City Attorney. Stuller read
from the Code; and explained that unless the Planning and
Zoning made a change to the code specifically itemizing
these uses, people with similar or the uses of variation
on this they will have to come back to the Planning
and Zoning for a determination each time. City Attorney
Stuller felt that at times they will have to make a
change to the code to accommodate. She felt that a code
change would not be necessary because in a N/C neigh -
borhood it would be acceptable; however, maybe in a
N/C residential it would not be.
withdrew his motion. Hunt moved that the Planning
and Zoning find that the three uses are compatible
uses __ _____ _ -____ within the designation of
N/C for purposes of this application; seconded by Dobie.
All in favor, motion carried.
Stream Margin Clark introduced the application stating that this is on
Review Sneaky Lane below Castle Creek Bridge. He wishes to
Bob Stardoy construct a garage at this location. Shows 32' from
the center of the stream. I looked at the property
and there is about a 12 to 15 foot bank that protects
the building from the stream. We recommend approval
of the stream margin request because it is within
100' of the stream.
Motion Abbott made a motion to approve the stream margin
review for Bob Stardoy; seconded by Hunt. All in favor,
motion carried.
Public Hearing Jenkins opened the public hearing. Kane explained that
Maintenance Shed the Parks and Recreation Department are looking for a
new place for their maintenance shed. Their present loca
tion, they feel is cumbersome, inconvenient, and
expensive as a basis for operation for storing machinery
and getting to the golf course. One of the major
obsticles to the applicant is that park zone doesn't
allow for maintenance sheds. They are appearing
before the Planning and Zoning for request and amendment
of the park zone to allow for maintenance sheds to be
used by right.
•
Jenkins mentioned that since this is a public hearing
if anyone in the audience would like to speak. There
was no one in the audience who wanted to discuss the
maintenance sheds.
-2-
t
1 tej
•
- RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves
O W • C. /,MO(CR(L V. ,.• L. CO.
Regular Meeting Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission November 18,197
Maintenance Sheds Armstrong, Director of Parks and Recreation Department,
(cont'd} feels that it would not be less of a nusciance if they
Public Hearing were able to put the Maintenance Sheds at that location
due to the fact that at present they are taking the
vehicles and maintenance machinery through all the
residential areas to and from highway 82 on the south-
east point of the golf course clear to the northwest
corner of the golf course.
Greg Cole, who is the architect of the building, explaine
that it will include an office for Ed Hicks, a greenhouse
which will have clippings for gardenias, there will be
areas for planting of evergreen trees, and it has good
irrigation for those purposes. Cole explained that
they will be berming up to the building so from Cemetary
Lane they will see only a berm and white plastic coming
up to the surface with the building has behind it. Cole
mentioned that the building will take up about 6,000 sq.f
Hunt mentioned that he is willing to move that maintenanc
shed be included as conditional use in P -park. But he
has a problem as to whether the public in that area
understands the impact. City Attorney Stuller mentioned
that there are two steps to this project - -it has to
go through full council adoption as an Ordinance then
notice must be given to adjacent land owners and this
specific proposal must come back for review. Kane
I • explained that there will be a specific conditional use
hearing. What has to be done is that it be a conditional
use hearing and the Planning and Zoning recommends that
the code be adopted and amend it to include this condtior
i use and once the code is amended they will have to come
back and consider this building in a special conditional
use hearing.
City Attorney Stuller questioned if the office would be
accessory only to the maintenance or if it is the office
space for the park complex. Armstrong replied that it
would be for park complex. Armstong mentioned that they
don't have a park large enough to buy enough equipment
to operate the golf course and the parks and that there
rj will be no snowplows up there. City Attorney Stuller
felt that there would be alot of integration of the
whole park system working out of that office; and felt
that within a definition of maintenance shed that is
quite an enlargement of that concept and suggested that
they extract the definition of maintenance shed and
include those concepts, but they ought to be articulated
early.
City Attorney Stuller asked that it means that you would
define maintenance shed to include the maintenance
storage, garaging of vehicles, and in addition greenhouse
and office space as long as it is a function of the
maintenance aspect of both the parks and the vehicles
you want that full definitiion within maintenance sheds.
{ Motion Abbott made a motion to approve the structure for park
maintenance as a conditional use; seconded by Hunt. All
in favor, motion carried.
Teen Center A . Clark introduced the teen center. It is a public hearinc
-� , to consider the teen center located above Whale of a
Wash on Main Street. The City did notification to
Q )J y 1 people within 300' of the Whale of Wash. Jenkins opened
;
�' ,,S �� � oiv the public hearing on the teen center. Jenkins asked
N or if anyone in the audience wanted to comment. No comment
SLEMON, MAZZA & LASALLE, P. C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
404 EAST COOPER AVENUE
POST OFFICE BOX 3219
DAVID R. SLEMON ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 AREA CODE 303
ANTHONY J. MAZZA TELEPHONE 925 -2043
JOHN D. LASALLE
September 20, 1976
HAND DELIVERY
Sandra Stuller, Esq.
City Attorney
City of Aspen
Re: Golf course maintenance building currently
under construction
Dear Sandy:
This firm has been approached by a representative of a sig-
nificant number of homeowners in the area where the above
referenced construction is currently under way.
At this point, the homeowners have merely requested that I
present you with the enclosed petitions reflecting their
desire that the construction be halted immediately pending
their having an opportunity to explore the possibility of
a rehearing with respect to the variance which the City must
have been granted in order to commence this construction in
a residential area. According to some of these homeowners
they were never given any notice of any hearings which I
assume took place in connection with the City obtaining a
variance and thus were not afforded the opportunity to make
their objections known.
At this time our office has not been formally retained by the
homeowners, nor have we been instructed to take any specific
legal action. However, I have been advised that the homeowners
are in the process of organizing themselves and that it is
their desire to do whatever is necessary to stop what they
consider to be a serious infringement upon their rights as
property owners.
Until we have been formally retained and instructed to proceed,
I can hardly expect you to take any action on this matter; I
believe the homeowners' main concern is that there be a documented
date on which the City was put on notice of their objections.
,Vey trly yours,
Jon D. LaSalle
f.r SLEMON, MAZZA & LaSALLE, P.C.
SHERPA CH co
SPORTS c 4
LIMITED , Ce e •
505 EAST HYMAN ST. V
ASPEN, COLO. 81611 /�
303 925-1977 U
1 ` l Q Cut. o s
cant-.di 49 J - rFt.,Q./Lt ( ,l 1. Gad' 580
aC C CL -k-
\w w- a ctuiuz- la& t!A
Cain c-fi 94A- uscul t `kL 7\ 1 o-- ✓ -
`, q L
'1/4t
subk.,e, ukz4
0- v\ Xc ft e y t.a.uk - i - eAtt, ci c c c
ct ruGDALAt Let 3_ ek,
covAitouc akcas (4, --ukt 3 00 ce>tuoi, ama
o u-;c. U ZCT-vt 1� ibuc -% a_,(
c ?,00k /$* , o GL ek �s . .
&ks v-LA v.Gt i ct e • Fze
for the finest in esoteric equipment for bicycling, backpacking, mountaineering, and cross country skiing
cfrLe-a_ .tk , 1
SHERPA 1G,
• ,
SPORTS cL .
LIMITED ti
505 EAST HYMAN ST. .0 coc "' ^' 4_
',
ASPEN, COLO. 81611 r )
303 925 -1977 r'? �, 'LL) to G e � c 4A..�lA. 1 c (_'k
9V1. • II- `� O�J. is 1-r� L0. c
Lets Lot u cA ct - �f a- -�-
,k � , Q u d .A..cAt k d C -u s - uk chi ouL, c,--
tLoj cattici crcikC .
ac
c ) bfr vi- ukiLy.A._ t i
`..
for the finest in esoteric equipment for bicycling, backpacking, mountaineering, and cross country skiing
Aspen, Colorado 81611
•
Date
Sly(
I, as owner of improved and /or unimproved property in the vicinity
of the construction of the city maintenance building under construc-
tion on Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
the variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
said construction. I am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
taw
Sig'atur.e /
NAME S tIL Ve0aM
(Print) ,I
ADDRESS 1355 M , V'PW PR
A3felS Colo
TELEPHONE cry, S - 753 4
Aspen, Colorado 81611
r
Date m 7
1, as owner of improved and /or unimproved property in the vicinity
of the construction of the city maintenance building under eonstrue --
tion on Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
the variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
• said construction. 1 am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
. ,
7 d7 " ---n(H er-tel77 ---- e y' r<-4.7"7
- i C
S ' ature '
NAME AO. - Z 244 X/
(Print)
ADDRESS 7 r 7s c 5. 11 2 4 as /iy /-
TELEPHONE ko2 S c7?7 7
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Date /17/6
T, as owner of improved and /or unimproved property in the vicinity
of the construction of the city maintenance building under construc-
tion on Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
the variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
• said construction. 1 am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
•
e
Signa re C
NAME 1 i C 9
(Print)
ADDRESS ��s it /nrt I� /tTicz � //[
4) / 67v rtit ;5 - i‘iV
TELEPHONE 2'0. S - 7 tC7K
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Date 7774
I, as owner of improved and /or unimproved property in the vicinity
of the construction of the city maintenance building under construc-
tion on-Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
the variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
said construction. I am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
•
4
Signat re
NAME ' Kate
(Print)
ADDRESS • At/
r —4 x s
TELEPHONE
Aspen, Col ado 1611
Date
I, as owner of improved and /or unimproved property in the vicinity
• of the construction of the city maintenance building under construc-
tion on Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
the variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
said construction. I am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
O
e
f
t w
j
e .. a
W .�w.'.
4
''. 6.44,,
.... tea
, ,/
Signa l e
NAME C. K
(Print)
ADDRESS 3
tr- Air 1060
TELEPHONE + , P
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Date zetlt f' /f74
I, as owner of improved and /or unimproved property in the vicinity
of the construction of the city maintenance building under construc-
tion on Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
the variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
said construction. I am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
A
Signature
a
NAME Ire's L 1 / E AA t ... MP
(P ADDRESS .0 Or r.
TELEPHONE S' , 7C(2
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Date �k- !fo.
I, as owner of improved and /or unimproved property in the vicinity
of the construction of the city maintenance building under construc-
tion on Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
the variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
said construction. I am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
•
_ Cola' .
Signature
NAME
(Print)
ADDRESS l Lk
(As p��, ectA 1(0 11
TELEPHONE 9 J S 33SC1
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Date
I, as owner of improved and /or unimproved property in the vicinity
of the construction of the city maintenance building under construc-
tion on Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
the variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
said construction. I am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
Signature
NAME 4./ 4 ,t! - L/ irF S
(Print)
ADDRESS /PVC / LIT/ /'cc.1 #02
/ C'p z-
TELEPHONE fps — 3".5
•
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Date! 6/ 74
I, as owner of improved and /or unimproved property in the vicinity
of the construction of the city maintenance building under construc-
tion on Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
the variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
• said construction. I am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
•
iC I7
Si nature
NAME P+cmal._ R.% AuSc -H
(Print)
ADDRESS \a1Ca MT kJ FJ < \ \JZ
TELEPHONE qa S - 3 \ ■
•
Aspen, Colorado 81611
• Date 4 7 - /(0 - 7(0
•
I, as owner of improved and /or unimproved property in the vicinity
• of the construction of the city maintenance building under construc-
tion on Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
the variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
said construction. I am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
S=ignature //JJ
NAME PAUL /T _ 1 'AuSC//
(Print)
ADDRESS /30 x '8794
PE.v g/, //
TELEPHONE 9,2 — 3 //0
•
•
•
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Date .drry l✓✓ (r7C
I, as owner of improved - . - .- property in the vicinity
• of the construetion of the city maintenance building under construc-
tion on Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
the variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
said construction. I am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
0
W •rct. £t -14 .C-..� � ,�i- v�a6c> "� an. , e
t (_ -w t In K i -� vii �- Y ^ 2 41.3-44..c.,
17 (C
Signature t )
NAME � IS . �- I L e j ,IL .
(Print)
ADDRESS 14 LL, ell_ ICik) _a)(L(t.JG
TELEPHONE • j,1S - •S 1 A S
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Date ' / )cp( 1 1 ! 6
I, as owner of improved and /or unimproved property in the vicinity
of the construction of the city maintenance building under construc-
tion on Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
the variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
said construction. I am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
(;-I) R JAA)
IF JRAI � ,�, 00-41- 4/ .
Signa re
NAME I frE{e ki { S FC
(Print) �7
ADDRESS Caf . (-f 6,61 N`zq14 et , 614;(5 6
id aw woaq-
TELEPHONE 9 Z J . 3 c
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Date
1, as owner of improved and /or unimproved property in the vicinity
of the construction of the city maintenance building under construc-
tion on Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
the variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
• said construction. I am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
Signature
NAME X7 K�
(Print)
ADDRESS /4 ,h ( ?r////'
TELEPHONE
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Date 9)4' /I- 274
I, as owner of improved and /or unimproved property in the vicinity
of the construction of the city maintenance building under construc-
tion on Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
the variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
said construction. I am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
` C
Sign ture [((
NAME ,/ T. l/i f
(Print) '//
ADDRESS 4G J (P icrtt
/ y
TELEPHONE 92 2 7
Aspen, Colorado 81611 /�
Date 2—e://77
e, /6 / -1 7(
I, as owner of improved and /or unimproved property in the vicinity
of the construction of the city maintenance building under construc-
tion on Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
the variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
said construction. I am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
2
Signature (�
NAME R e^ -A, a .) 4i c' »ur!IPpt
(Print) _
ADDRESS /39) )j e PV1 V S > - 1 1/% ///
S /'e , (a /0 e/6 //
TELEPHONE V/) S - t / 3 6
•
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Date — /2? f�
I, as owner of improved and/or unimproved property in the vicinity
• of the construction of the city maintenance building under construc-
tion on Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
the variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
said construction. I am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
Signature /� �/
NAME rCR RE 7- R ���-17 / /(Y_ 1
(Print)
ADZ 38 ( 77 0 ( .- TF y //('
:.
TELEPHONE 2 - 5 9
Aspen, Colorado 81611 G
Date // /477,
I, as owner of improved and /or unimproved property in the vicinity
of the construction of the city maintenance building under construc-
tion on Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
the variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
said construction. I am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
•
R -94 5 A-0-(1
S ignature 1
NAME h C t , I nc? JL
(Print) / I
ADDRESS C FI 0 C e L,v e. T a I
111<A r
TELEPHONE C/ ? 5 - 35 (y-
Aspen, Colorado 81611
//
Date /7
I, as owner of improved and /or unimproved property in the vicinity
of the construction of the city maintenance building under construc-
tion on Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
the variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
said construction. I am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
•
£ /4;il
Signature
NAME C /. ' i
(Print) // _
ADDRESS / s �'� S >(77,4 41S'
TELEPHONE 72,- 7-7/0-i
Aspen, Colorado 81611,
Date J
I, as owner of improved and /or unimproved property in the vicinity
of the construction of the city maintenance building under construc-
tion on Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
the variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
said construction. 1 am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
Signetur:
NAD1E A/9 C d /1/C C ZA
(Print) , �7 / / 1
ADDRESS /d g /c'.e'efii ,11 r`
co/d
TELEPTIONE / � %� }P —
v .y
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Date 90
I, as owner of improved and /or unimproved property in the vicinity
of the construction of the city maintenance building under construc-
tion on Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
the variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
said construction. I am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
I am adamantly opposed to this structure being placed
in a distinctly residential area. I feel that property values
in the area will be jeopardized and that my rights as a homeowner
and citzen were violated by not being notified of this action.
Sign- ure
•NE J / -7,77 awie
(Print) � f7
ADDRESS � ?,S /1",cf/ ,4iee ar ✓G
�I O / <l / r/% 4„i ah
TELEPHONE 30 $ - J` 2..r p 72 7
•
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Date r / /iJ 7 6
I, as owner of improved and /or unimproved property in the vicinity
of the construction of the city maintenance building under construc-
tion on Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
the variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
• said construction. I am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
e -ce —44 ' e- de. 4 — ✓
, /A $ eer
?" 5 z - e-I- e--7
Signat re
NAME J. $terlinp gqi tib$
(Print) $ox C z.a
ADDRESS *Open, Colo. $2 ate
TELEPHONE
,-.
Aspen, Col / rad ^� 81611
Date = ( (y /4
I, as owner of improved and/or unimproved property in the vicinity
of the construction of the city maintenance building under construc-
tion on Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
the variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
said construction. I am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
r
1 et--?C9 LUt Lad kt
;fir i r � i
\ ��
61)- • , ,, / d pi
4 ,,,,,L , 0L.,_.2..p.,,_ ,Q__ .: Cam_ 6-4/td r C/, �� Ck
Signature
/
NAME 6 A tr ,S
1 E C—
(Print)
ADDRESS 700 C4-s / to C Fk Th
,. .A A/ r---C__ - o 1,61/
TELEPHONE 9. ¶ ? 3 5 5
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Date ) h
I, as owner of improved and /or unimproved property in the vicinity
• of the construction of the city maintenance building under construc-
tion on Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
the variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
said construction. I am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
� »9 ISO /��07 /C j, 7 7 /e '' re- 4 ,�/>79/e /UNG --
0k- 4 /"Mf} /N TEN fJN cL Y/ /L4/N N A S F-M/<
/�IUEu /v 74-7C15---41 /`/ cP/N /;N 7f//-S /S • CAr
c w /A/ /f - , /Q /S /-// /le 7,ce G t/1- -4 /, ,
LZtLze
Signature
NAME '<I )( /Fic
(Print) �
ADDRESS 7iuu CC/467 t€ e //PPS_
AVIAI
TELEPHONE � — WV?
Aspen, Co�iorr 81611
Date /�f 'X� / j )t
1, as owner of improved and /or unimproved property in the vicinity
of the construction of the city maintenance building under construc-
tion on Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
the variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
• said construction. 1 am opposed to this installation and request
that it he halted.
e - es;en. tit; satin_«- - lArnt- 4
-? o-- &f - (e� .) ,tip- e 6 e , m4-1- "ea 6.14..)
G ti 4.j c �1� '` Q. .
,/- 4.tHia..4 0...,„... t t.re t e....i f nfre..... a.....„., etizestt „
&44"9%-, (LC-4--t-l-i—,Jej;a ‘ZA--C-41;-- , y4,___ ),,
pp
14.---10 I - , i.e.,,4 tit Ole- X . -e...c 7��c.. -41. ■a fr.- a d- _
,L •
Signature ^n --
NAME /
(Print) , t n+#e CAIt
ADDRESS #2 rYA /T
/"BFI D B ASprN
TELEPHONE 924 ut4
titchie
ifez 37
Larkspur, Colorado 30118
September '1, 1176
City Council
City of As'en
Aspen, Colorado
Re: Golf Course Maintenance Building Under construction
Gentlemen:
It hap; rep nt?y core to my atterttivntna; a golf ;our3e maintenance buildin; i3 bri ng
constoucted in extremely close : •oxiiity to pr.;_rty 'shish ' own in Aspen. -
both my property and the maintenance building under construction areciesriy in a
residential section, I assume ti,ct it *a: necessary for th.. City tooetain a var—
iance in orderto be.inthia construction. I received no notice t::at such a var—
iince waa under consideration and as a result was unable to voice my extremely
strong opposition to th construction of 31.1c a boiiding.
It seems to ns a more appropriate end less conspicuous location on City land
adjacent to the Jolf Course pro shop and supervisor;; facilities should be used.
Such a. 1 c teon would have no detreimental impact on private property views values
and aesthetics guaranteed nrootcirty .owners on Cemetery Lane by zoning rries which
doubtless attracted them Co this area The City should be aware that the eon..
stru.tion of t`3.s service or industrial type building betrays thoserho purchased
;,roperty in good faith in an area zoned for sesidential type bolding only.
ky opposition to this type of installation is so strong that if 1 am not granted
the opportunity to express my opposition at a review of to vn m os t whip w a s
�; I ould seriously consider takin.� court action' Jo y o hx v erse —
1 ,tu property owners against the City or taking whatever other steps may
be appropriate to halt the current objectionable construction.
tours very truly
•
i ?hni t
Asper olorado 81611
AO
Date e
1, as owner of improved and /or unimproved property in the vicinity
of the construction of the city maintenance building under construc-
tion on Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
the variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
said construction. I am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
/ 1/(14 1L,
AV
L ak J2IL40 PLA----
i c I I
by
# Ilj '
A1.4 2- 7 / / 7
No v . . .
„r, ,
, A 7
. ‘ Citill
_ ' IA 6 ezo,r
Signature
i
NAME iAlo AU, ■ - e t / L__
(Print) At —
ADDRESS ' ,.,.[ C AI � j ,(
a,
TELEPHONE 7
K7-3 /26/,
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Date Sent. 16, 1976
I, as owner of improved and /or unimproved property in the vicinity
of the construction of the city maintenance bui]_ding under construc-
tion on 'Come tery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
the variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
said construction. I am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
— the l ocation of tie bu..laiu,; in a residential area l_ ; - 1 advi sad-.
It v1.11 adver e1 a2'ect t_e re. ident I s saft ev and :welfare to
have a co:: ercial building s, close to hones.
-the traffic on Cemetery hane is already so heavy and a build -ny>,
of i:_?i -s nature 71-11 only add to the , n °oule2,
-' e received notice of this; ,ro - oosal a]r,-o iinately one year ago •
and 'G the bin.° were told t: at :c could n r oi.'c st (i= if we ved
i'tLin 300 feet o" the 'aamilaint_;.
-In my opinion :ace ri.-e many other nit s nuch `more .".- -t wale to
a but lc 011 ._aba:re.
S g • Tre
NAME Throes s Tarn ?()
(Print)
ADDRESS 770 Cemot orY Lane
Arlen, Colorado 81611
TELEPHONE 92 -3780
Aspen, Colorado 8161.1
Date _42i / x.4
1, as owner of improved and /or unimproved property in the vicinity
of the construction of the city maintenance building under construc-
tion on Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
the variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
• said construction. I am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
\,hle vJ@Lk nC cktza_ or e dean ago ct b 3. Hinc
+ - re,\a e C y, sr csNL\I tt . - e CQ
S ou e, P°S °c ld k
�r� •
car,l-\ a \\ems CG,-F. L,0c.s \d a n
yvAot aZ e
Cis , ai� 0 CQ LO-1
QU‘o_ubl \do ka a1/43 WW
`orl owt.oci b(}\
} LA r\
i Car ;r a more SuA'ccn( \ oc�
k__J/
Signature u
NAME 1 )cY111'A .—L f4C04\ h
(Print)
ADDRESS rV16 CE rna �ZJ� La r.32._
ADDRESS
Rsp. , Cd\o , g llo I I
TELEPHONE aa5 3F-Iv)
Aspen, Colorado 81611 h
Date C t — a�
1, r.s owner of improved and/or unimprovei property in the vicinity
of the construction of the city mai:,tenaace building under construc-
tion on Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
tke variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
said construction.. I am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
C C l4-y or -. P \ Cxn n trg 4- Lon i r3
ocd
Signature
n
NAME .c orbstinL R • U 3ckotI L
_
(Print)
ADDRESS S
Aspen, Lob man Rtkt
TELEPHONE G aS lc0
•
Aspen, Coloradoo 81611
Date $74:, i4 .C �'T �� �� L
J. as owner of improved and /or ..:rimprove9 property in the vicinity
of construction of the city maintenance building under construc-
tion : n Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
t_e .variance greeted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
said construction. T am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
a a_Aiy Eit tP
. 0
LJ
@
Signature
NAME C1e0.Ylo ( Yax k LA)
(Print) / L
ADDRESS /�I S O $ \ ■ec' r\\'(\ \ ,
TELEP.-[ONE �� S-3z_/) _
•
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Date �1 -Z 1l
1, as owner of improved and /or unimproved property in the vicinity
of the construction of the city mairten:nce building under construc-
tion Ja Cemetery Lane do hereby req',1est the City Council to review
t`e_ variance granted by the Plarui; .; and Zonin- Board covering
said construction. 1 am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
•
o a. C
Signature
NAME r = — �!`/ A, L 7--
(Print)
ADDRESS 1 Sta0.1/4)30i0ti'7 Li%)�
f,J , X1(0//
TELEPHONE 30, ra s - a '7 •
Aspen, Colorado S1G11
Date 9(27/?'
1, as owner of improved and /or unimproved property in the vicinity
of tic construction of the city maintenance building under construe- -
tion on Cemetery Lane do hereby request the City Council to review
the variance granted by the Planning and Zoning Board covering
• sal):; construction. I am opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
`ignaturre c
NAME )/m/t5%n S'✓kr,v- rll
(Print) /
ADDRESS / ;IL) S ¶oerrc l/
fir ( 0/
TELEPHONE 7 2 5 Z J—cy
w.. s
Aspen, Colorcdo 81611
Date 47z 7 - 76
1, as oedier of improved and /or unimproved property in the vicinity
of the construction of the city maintena-iee building under construc-
tion on Cemetery Lane d hereby request the City Council to review
t`i v granted by the Planning add Zoning Board covering
m
said construction. 1 a opposed to this installation and request
that it be halted.
Litt aide 30:1 i ilkatidarc:a4-4:4 cii-eluc. &IAA-
e
•
•
d i r m a a di, 414.45,
Signature
•
NA?IF 1)04)AL 0 L . Si M PS0,c )
• (Print)
ADDRESS / 5/62R14 L/(7-/A t3
• As Co. '/6
TELEP,[ONE 926
' 2 5 2 / /
•