Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.CU.830 E Durant Ave.A09-94 CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 0 08 4 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. DATE COMPLET 2737 -182 38 -025 A09-94 634.1A4eaTAFF MEMBER: LL PROJECT NAME: O'Block DurantAAccesS'dtY Dwelling Units Project Address: 830, 834, 838, & 844 E. Durant Legal Address:, APPLICANT: Chuck Bellock Applicant Address: 1400 28th St., Ste. 1 Boulder, CO 80302 REPRESENTATIVE: Theodore Guy Associates Representative Address /Phone: Box 1640 Basalt, CO 81621 FEES: PLANNING $ 0 # APPS RECEIVED 5 ENGINEER $ # PLATS RECEIVED 5 HOUSING $ ENV. HEALTH $ TOTAL $ 0 TYPE OF APPLICATION: STAF AP'•OVAL:_ 1 STEP: 2 STEP: P &Z Meeting Date 3 - e eI PUBLIC HEARING: NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO DRC Meeting Date REFERRALS: W ( ;Sh�rexe otCrermirth? City Attorney Parks Dept School District - City Engineer x Bldg inspeor Rocky Mtn NatGas /Stli Housing Dir. Fire Marshal CDOT Aspen Water Holy Cross Clean Air Board City Electric Mtn. Bell Open Space Board Envir.Hlth. ACSD Other Zoning Energy Center Other DATE REFERRED: z115 INITIALS: FO DUE: ✓J 51 FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: / / / / >*/t7 T INITIAL:721UJ+ City Atty City Engineer Zoning _Env. Health Housing _ Open Space Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: MEMORANDUM TO: Bill Drueding, Zoning Officer FROM: Leslie Lamont, Interim Planning Director RE: Insubstantial Amendment to the Subdivision Agreement for the Enclave at the Little Nell DATE: July 11, 1994 SUMMARY: The applicant seeks to amend the subdivision agreement for the Enclave at Little Nell to change the condition of approval regarding the large, 40 foot, spruce tree on the property that was required to be relocated. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant received an approval for the development of ten townhomes at Lots D -I and N -S, Block 112, Aspen Colorado. As part the development approval, the applicant was required to relocate the tall spruce tree at the southwest corner of the property, bond the survival of the tree for five years, and, if it did not survive, replace the tree with vegetation of equal value. The applicant has worked for approximately two years to find a contractor that would relocate the tree and guarantee its survival. The applicant has not been successful and now requests an amendment to the subdivision agreement to enable the removal of the tree with equal value replacement on -site. The applicant has been working with the Parks Department to develop a replacement plan. The City Council has also been apprised of this amendment to the subdivision approval. REVIEW: Pursuant to Section 24 -7 -1006 an insubstantial amendment to an approved plat may be authorized by the Planning Director. An insubstantial amendment shall be limited to technical or engineering considerations first discovered during actual development which could not reasonably be anticipated during the approval process, or any other minor change to a plat which the planning director finds has no effect on the conditions and representations limiting the approved plat. RESPONSE: As the Interim Planning Director, I find that the proposed change to the subdivision agreement is a technical consideration which could not reasonably be anticipated during the approval process. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the insubstantial amendment to the subdivision agreement for the Enclave at Little Nell for the removal of the large, 40 foot, spruce tree at the southwest end of the property with the following conditions: (. ■ 1. A 40 foot replacement spruce tree shall be planted on -site and shall survive for a minimum of two years after planting. 2. In the event the replacement spruce does not survive the minimum two years, it shall be replaced with equal value in a location to be determined by the Parks Department. 3. Eight to ten, 8 foot to 12 foot, evergreens shall be planted on -site as noted in the landscape plan dated 6/7/93 and attached to the tree removal permit. I hereby approve of the insubstantial amendment to the subdivision agreement for the Enclave a - Little Nell •ursuant to Section 24 -7 -1006 of the Municip: Code. eslie Lamo -, Interim Planning Director 2 JUN 15 '94 15:41 THEODORE K GUY ASSOC PC R P.2 • THEODORE K 014" 'ASSOCIATES PC AIwHITecTa AND 944, JCTUNAL ENOINEeae • MEMORANDUM( TO: Rebecca Bakery FROM: Ted Guy �`�'�/ DATE: June 13, 1994 RE: Endave at Litth Na We have tried for the last nine months to find someone to move the 45 foot Colorado Spruce tree that is within the building envelope of Unit Six of the Enclave at Little Net We contacted the firms recommended by George Robinson and found they we out of business. We haw attempted to find other companies throughout the country and have been unsuccessful. �D In late April we communicated our lack of success to George and he agreed we were on the right track and recommended wa get a photo of the replacement tree before he could issue a tree removal permit so long as we replaced it with the equivalents valued at 56075.00. We proposed to accomplsh the replacement as follows: 1. We will plant one 40 foot Englenian Spruce from Big Tree Movers of Denver. The executed contract and photo of the tree are attached to this memorandum. The value of this replacement tree is 54,000. 2. Five (5) twelve foot high Colorado Blue Spruce added to the prenfously approved Landscaping Plan for the Project. The value of these five trees Is 5 x 12 ff x 535/if • $2100. We will use the following placement schedule for these trees. It is too late in the summer season to successfully transplant the 40 foot replacement tree. We will plant the five 12' trees with the landscaping of Phase One, (Units 1,24 3). This work is scheduled to ocax by the end of July of this year. The 40 foot tree will be moved in the fall of 1994 and two of the Five trees will be relocated to the side of Unit 6. Please let us know what other Information is required so we can obtain the removal permit within the next week. • cc: Leslie Lamont Dave Blair Chuck Bellock TKG/tkg 93181141 • 13.Z80 YTATe FMa1WAV SU P. SOX 1840 BASALT. COLORS00 51•41 13031 557.3167 f1 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Leslie Lamont, Senior Planner RE: Oblock Accessory Dwelling Units - Conditional Use Review DATE: April 19, 1994 SUMMARY: The applicant, Chuck Bellock, proposes to voluntarily add four accessory dwelling units to four of the ten Oblock Townhomes. The application was not heard at the March 22, 1994 meeting, as the applicant failed to properly notice the public hearing. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use for the accessory dwelling units. The applicant has amended the plan of the units between the March 22 meeting and the April 19 meeting. A second window was added to the front of the ADU. APPLICANT: Chuck Bellock LOCATION: 830, 834, 838, 844 East Durant, Aspen ZONING: R /MF APPLICANT'S REQUEST: To voluntarily provide attached studio accessory dwelling units in the Oblock Townhomes (Enclave at Little Nell). REFERRAL COMMENTS: Please see attached referral comments from the Housing Office. STAFF COMMENTS: Project Description - The ten townhomes at the Enclave are being developed pursuant to one replacement development right and nine transfer development rights. The Commission and Council reviewed and approved that subdivision in 1990 and approved the substantial amendment to the subdivision plan in 1993. At the time the applicant volunteered to provide four accessory dwelling units which were also approved. Currently, the applicant seeks to add four more accessory dwelling units in the project. The units are proposed to be 412 square feet below grade. Conditional Use Review - Pursuant to Section 7 -304 the criteria for a conditional use review are as follows: A. The conditional use is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and standards of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan, and with the intent of the Zone District in which it is proposed to be located; and RESPONSE: The proposed accessory dwelling units are below grade. The size of the units are approximately 412 square feet. The AACP encourages employee housing within the City and the zone district where Oblock is located is a multi - family zone district (R /MF). The net liveable square footage of the units should be verified by the Housing Authority. The units must comply with the Housing Guidelines for ADUs and shall be deed restricted as resident occupied units for working residents of Pitkin County. The units are below grade. The applicant has amended the original plans that were submitted. In addition to the double wide window next to the front door, a second window has been added. According to the application 32.6 square feet of glass areas and 37.3 feet of vent area is being providing per ADU. The UBC requires 29.3 square feet and 14.7 square feet respectively. B. The conditional use is consistent and compatible with the character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and surrounding land uses, or enhances the mixture of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; and RESPONSE: The surrounding neighborhood is a multi - family area with high density development. The application states that the provision of dwelling units will be for caretakers of the free market units. The Enclave is a ten unit townhome development that has been condominiumized and establishes a homeowner's association. It has been staff's experience with the River Park development that the deed restricted ADUs in that townhome complex are superfluous. Several prospective buyer's have questioned staff about eliminating the units as they do not need a caretaker in a complex of this kind. Staff believes this is a similar situation with the Enclave. Although staff approved four ADUs in 1990 for this project, staff and the Commission have begun to review ADDS with a higher level of scrutiny. Staff is concerned that the units will add density and impacts (i.e. a parking space is not required to be provided with ADUs and the applicant does not propose to provide one) without being used for what the program is intended. C. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the proposed conditional use minimizes adverse effects, including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise, vibrations and odor on surrounding properties; and 2 n/ V • RESPONSE: The attached accessory dwelling units are accessed off of the alley. The primary residence contains three bedrooms and three parking spaces appear to be provided on the property. For multi - family development stacking of parking spaces is not permitted. The applicant has amended the original plans to meet the UBC requirements for natural light and air for a separate dwelling unit. However, it is still unclear from the plans whether or not snow will shed into the courtyard and front entrances of the ADUs. D. There are adequate public facilities and services to serve the conditional use including but not limited to roads, potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire protection, emergency medical services, hospital and medical services, drainage systems, and schools; and RESPONSE: No new services will be required for the provisions of the four ADUs. E. The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to meet the incremental need for increased employees generated by the conditional use; and RESPONSE: The proposal includes a four studio accessory dwelling units for employees of Pitkin County. An increase in employees is not expected by the provision of an accessory dwelling unit. F. The proposed conditional use complies with all additional standards imposed on it by the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and by all other applicable requirements of this chapter. RESPONSE: The conditional use meets the requirements of the Aspen Area Community Plan and other requirements of this chapter by attempting to integrate a community housing need into the redevelopment of the property. RECOMMENDATION: A. Staff recommends approval of the four attached accessory dwelling units with the following conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of any building permits: a. the applicant shall, upon approval of the deed restriction by the Housing Authority, record the deed restriction with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office with proof of recordation to the Planning Department. The deed restriction shall state that the accessory unit meets the housing guidelines for such units, meets the definition of Resident Occupied Unit, and if rented, shall be rented for periods of six months or longer. 3 3 b. floor plans of the ADU shall be submitted to APCHA for review on net liveable calculations and kitchen appliances. 2. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. 3. The applicant shall agree to join any future improvement districts which may be formed for the purpose of constructing improvements in the public right -of -way. 4. The ADU shall be clearly identified as a separate dwelling unit on building permit plans and shall comply with U.B.C. Chapter 35 sound attenuation requirements. 5. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy the Planning Department shall inspect the unit to determine compliance with the conditions of approval. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the accessory dwelling units proposed for the Enclave at Little Nell finding in units 830, 834, 838, and 844 East Durant Avenue with the conditions outlined in Planning Office memo dated April 19, 1994." ATTACHMENTS: A. Referral Comments B. Site Plan 4 EXHIBIT A MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Cindy Christensen, Housing Office DATE: March 8, 1994 RE: O'Block Durant Review for Accessory Dwelling Units Parcel ID No. 2737 - 182 -38 -025 The Housing Office recommends approval for the requested accessory dwelling units based on the following conditions: Accessory dwelling units shall contain not less than three hundred (300) square feet of allowable floor area and not more than seven hundred (700) square feet of allowable floor area. The unit shall be deed restricted, meeting the housing authority's guidelines for resident occupied units and shall be limited to rental periods of not less than six (6) months In duration. Owners of the principal residence shall have the right to place a qualified employee or employees of his or her choosing in the accessory dwelling unit. The applicant states that the unit is to be 414 square feet of living space. The Housing Office will need the net liveable square footage calculated for the deed restriction. Net liveable is described below: Net Liveable Square Footage is calculated on interior living area and is measured interior wall to interior wall, including all interior partitions including, but not limited to, habitable basements and interior storage areas, closets and laundry area. Exclusions include, but are not limited to, uninhabitable basements, mechanical areas, exterior storage, stairwells, garages (either attached or detached), patios, decks and porches. The kitchen must also be built to the following specifications: Kitchen must contain a minimum of a two - burner stove with oven, standard sink, and a 6 -cubic foot refrigerator plus freezer. If these units were to be used for mitigation purposes, they would not be acceptable to the Housing Office, as above -grade units are preferred. Since these units are not for mitigation purposes, they are acceptable with the Housing Office and will only help in the housing shortage being felt, if the units are used properly. Before the applicant can receive building permit approval, the applicant must provide to the Housing Office actual floor plans of the proposed accessory dwelling unit containing net liveable square footage, and a signed and recorded Deed Restriction, which can be obtained from the Housing Office. The Housing Office must have the recorded book and page number prior to building permit approval. \word \referral \oblock.adu WAVTIe — d 4 - s O j 3 m e I II ° a © n. — > ` • fi v ,,,V v3 m v la PM ti ..7` h N j�l con 9 I I O a Dr O c� Z O y s i IiJt ! .. ' i n P 14/7 , WT zd O O O O O O CD W .r s R 0 1C PY 4 TY cur PVT G e 5 WOCO %E / 4 / �B � I S PLATE .. • _ _ � ` . - - iMRVrPERI1IV2 _ n .n I-3 V2 r ryll_p 1111 11� iii == H F PLY MU Won �B _ SVK+L 5 _ r. nYVIPERLE + 6V V2 ,II ;Ir. _ = 111 / I A = III I - rnrrxm LEVEL nY ENTRY LEVEL ?,- -. wr - - — ��� r. nr __ __ PLLY MMNLEVEL .4 - _ - _ = _ r - w _ 5U. Ca6E •—S '_ - -_ y STONE 13M0 Ira r- 1 P6FG0.5. I� �- 1 [ T SLAB L SINEW" c • II ' 1 _ M R LA2L W S Lr “: L _ b0 r APPLIED 0E516.1 TO —� MH£NR UNIT ONG UNIT TWO ELEVATION FROM ALLEY IIM fl SIO PL IMln. 5MN. OPMSIIE IWO NONET 1••••2 • 9/4•. 1r -0• • It C 0 OR 154' "Itt RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION APRIL 19, 1994 Chairman Bruce Kerr called meeting to order at 4:30 P.M. O'BLOCK /DURANT CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS Public notice was presented. (attached in record) Leslie: Made presentation as attached in record. Bruce opened the public hearing. Sara: Why do they want 4 additional ADUs? Jim Cook, representative for applicant: The owners and the people they have been selling these units to feel that the additional employee housing unit/caretakerunit is a beneficial thing. Andy Hecht, Attorney for applicant: We have one contract for a unit that is not one of the ADU units and I think that consistently people interested expressed an interest in having the possibility of having an ADU unit so he doesn't need a car, it is 2 blocks from town. And they think it is absolutely necessary to offer that as Aspen becomes a tougher place to live and find employees. So from our point of view it is necessary. Sara: Is the Planning Office at all concerned about increase density? Leslie: I am not so concerned about the increased density as I am concerned about increasing the density without an additional parking space. This is the RMF Zone District. So that was not really the issue for me as much as the increase in density without the parking space and without the fact that we think these units are being used or not being used. When the River Park townhomes over on Original Curve were originally approved there was about 3 or 4 units that had accessory dwelling units also included in those units. And these units were starting to sell. I got quite a few calls from potential buyers asking if they lift the deed restriction on the unit. They did not want an accessory dwelling unit. They have a condominium association that takes care of every- thing there and they didn't feel it was important or necessary to have a caretaker unit within their Sara: I would continue to raise that. Hecht: There is a condominium association but as to River Park I think initially there was that concern of some of the buyers. But I think that as far as they become more familiar with the difficulties that they have finding employees here that it becomes more important for them to have that unit. In fact in some units at River Park have not sold because the ADU unit is not available. So you may have some who �✓ 3 have this already. You may have others who won't buy it without it. And I think from the City's standpoint to have units available 2 blocks from town voluntarily - -we are not asking for anything in exchange- - is a pretty good situation. Leslie: These units are completely within the existing pre- approved subdivision, the design and up to building. There is no floor area increase attached to these units. Bruce: Is it taking floor area away from the free market units? Leslie: It doesn't take the floor area because the unit is below grade. But it takes away from the previously approved living space. David: What is that space now? Cook: 414 square feet for the ADUs. David: Is it currently a mud room? Cook: It is a study. David: So the only real difference here is adding a kitchenette. Leslie: Right. Cook: And adding additional bathroom. David: And the parking space for the bedroom. Leslie: Right. David: And so the bathroom wouldn't be that important. What would be would be the kitchen. Because there is a kitchen allowed per dwelling unit. Leslie: And this kitchen has to meet requirements of the Housing Authority. We are not going to get a wetbar /sink. And the UBC requirements for light, air and ventilation will be calculated based on just the accessory dwelling unit. David: I would share Sara's concern about the parking. I don't have any problems with the additional density. I think that an additional ADU would be a good idea here. The only concern I have would be the parking and that might be mitigated by the fact that it is within walking distance. Hecht: We have 3 parking spaces for these 3 bedroom units. And 3 parking spaces for the 2. And I can't imagine that the people who own them will have 3 cars. If they have 2, that makes one available for the employee. David: So just the proximity to town, bus service and with the implementation of on- street parking restrictions I think that will go 2 PZM4.19.94 C 3 a long way to assuring any occupant of this unit to "keep their car on a leash" so to speak. Bruce asked for public comments. There were none and he closed the public portion of the hearing. Bruce asked if the applicant had any problems with the conditions of approval. Hecht: No problems. MOTION Roger Hunt: I move to approve the accessory dwelling units proposed for the Enclave at Little Nell finding in units 830, 834, 838 and 844 East Durant Avenue with the conditions #1 through #5 as outlined in Planning Office memo dated April 19, 1994. David seconded the motion. Sara: I will approve this because it is within all the conditions. But I have to tell Andy and Jim I am very suspicious that we are just approving more luxurious guest rooms. Bruce: I have to say I share some of the same concerns just looking at that floor plan layout. That bottom level just appears to me that this is just a part of a bigger house and I note that there is separate entry - -does the entry come in from the garage to the main unit? Cook: Yes. Bruce: And everybody comes outside for the ADUs. Cook: There is no access to the ADUs from mumble Bruce: It looks like there is a hall door situation there. I can envision what we don't want it to be used as and could very easily be used as. Everyone then voted in favor of the motion. 3 PZM4.19.94 APR I 1 994 �t •L 2.7 1994 PUBLIC NOTICE THEODORE KGUyq� RE: O'BLOCK DURANT CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW FOR ACCESSORY D UNITS P, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, April 19, 1994 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 pm before the Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission, 2nd Floor Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena, Aspen to consider an application submitted by Chuck Bellock, 1400 28th St., Suite 1, Boulder, CO, requesting approval of a Conditional Use Review for four 415 square foot accessory dwelling units on the lower level of each of four proposed townhouses. The townhouses are located at 830, 834, 838 and 844 E. Durant Ave.; Lots D, E, F, G, H, I, and N, 0, P, Q, R and S, Block 112, City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact Leslie Lamont at the Aspen /Pitkin Planning Office, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 920 -5101. s /Bruce Kerr, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission y /q /qy p ze as .a A Itsula t epi kr+ A sanivi utmAk d Th- lel 'too % btatkaZt awl V t , C1w y 30� `18128 tt s P.1/4k. .l,e S CA- 1 • Nfri 491 ea astiffr 1 THEODORE K GLIC,ASSOCIATES PC ARCHITECTS AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS January 18, 1994 s City of Aspen Planning 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Attention: Leslie Lamont RE: Oblock Durant 830, 834, 838 and 844 East Durant Aspen, Colorado Legal Description: Lots D, E, F, G, H, I, and N, 0, P, Q, R, and S and Block 112 City and Township of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado Dear Leslie: The following is a description of the proposed townhouses and a request for approval to develop an accessory dwelling unit within each townhouse. The proposed townhouse consists of a 3,800 SF two story structure with a finished garden level, three bedrooms, and a two car garage. The architecture is patterned after the Classic Aspen style prevalent throughout town, with steep roofs, tall glass windows and dormers. The townhouses will be built within an existing residential neighborhood and will not adversely affect existing visual, pedestrian, access, noise, or trash service conditions. Parking is provided on site, and impact to existing traffic pattems will be minimal. Public services in place will be adequate to handle all new construction proposed. The proposed accessory dwelling units will be located on the garden level with a private entrance. The unit spaces include one bedroom, kitchen, closet, and bath. The dwelling unit offers on -site housing for a caretaker and addresses a growing need to provide such housing within the Aspen city limits. Please contact us immediately if any other items are required. li, incerely, 1 . 1 t5 M • C vls Jams M. Cook, Project Architect THE II 'ORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC TM /nw 93181 1. 1 23260 STATE HIGHWAY 02 P 0 BOX 1640 BASALT. COLORADO 81821 (3031927 -3167 AflAUThll2Ir 1 • - • rD USE APPLICATION FORT 1) Project Narm ObJ.ock Townhouses 2) Project location 830, 834, 838, and 844 East Durant • Aspen, Colorado (indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) 3) Present Zoning R -MF 4) Lot Size 100' x 180' 5) Applicant's Naar, Addre & Phone # Chuck Bellock 1400 28th Street, Suite 1, Boulder, Colorado 80302 - (303) 442 -2299 6) Representative's Name, Address & Phone # Theodore K Guy Associates, PC PO Box 1640, Basalt, Colorado 81621 - (303) 927 -3167 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): X Conditional Use _ Conceptual SPA Conceptual Historic Dev. __ Special Review _ Final SPA _ Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greeiline _. COndeptual lCD __ Minor. Historic Dev. Stream Margin _ Final PUD _ Historic.Demolition • Mauitain View Plane ___ Subdivision . _ Historic Designation Condaniniund2ation _ Text Map Amendment_ _ ai Allotment _ Lot Split/Lot Line CI4 Exem ption Adjustment 8) Description of Existing Uses ( number. and' type of existing struct'mis7 approximate mate sq. ft.; 1amber of bedrooms; 'any previous approvals granted b) the property). 4 - Two story free market townhouses. 3800 square feet of livino area and garage. 9) Description of. Development Application Request to develop one Arcessnry ewer li r& Unit t l n cprh lower level of the new townhouses, Final units to comply with Ordinance t`1 10) Have you attadbed the following? Response to Attachment 2, Minimum Submission Contents Response to Attachment 3, Specific Submission Contents X Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards .for Your Application ( / _ • . 'w.0, , ✓ Park fE> R n6rrn / N . 1..... ilk y ° ^r.. o s yP S/413- � 4 .i 4 tl - 4a w � G D l b F }` Hama Haw Or I. < ry4 P \ '- wm n A .+10) \I, r P g 8 n } Aaoan ° 3J' a w� wa 2 '7 13°11 13°11 d t ne a L 1 hY1 4 Hallam Not every street or road Is I ) ` t4' 1 Ten dOft. 5r Lake ° road named on maps or listed In • + C 1 �, � "a' l� f sheet guides. Construction of {�io° streets and roads may Win W C * 1 � 3'^ � 1j ® N d progress In certain areas. N. V • % ! 41,...- t © '' We p6damgd Aspen empn m ' e �1 Hl _:___te . w Ra. -s, take P v (/'Prtecb 51 C i... 0 -J-1 itre 1 Odca .........___ -3 Meadow od Dr...-11..0241.2 ..... a ^ i f �!t i y lanapvr I OlbIo@ hSL..__ 0.11 -5-6 Mad F.0. 8 • 1, }'• ` i t 1 Gibson Av ......_..G -163.5 Meadows Rd F.0.3 ' SY r ' h St r v i 9 6 OIUc. pet S....._..........._..........H4 M 11151 Av 31-6-7 0- -t ] 4 „p N. G F1-5 Hallam St C.._... .... .._....._0 -J1 M .3.5 Mill St- 0 -1.1 n• 1 F1 Wa Ar f l . r.7.Y.p" re N. 041-5 Ilallam Monarch SL........_...._.._. CI Fl S {d , 0-6 Heather Lv__..... ......._._. 0 H -2 Mounwn Yew Dr E -2 3 �y ti srd 0- Hill 5t 14-5 Ml Dual Cl .., J8 g et Wvar"'rf 1 Bench Rd..._ E +3 Homouke R. .. 0-2 Me laurel Dr IH 6 } 1I A, A . a W h y 1kh Dr t �y ..._ E -P -2 -3 Hopkins Av 041-3-6 Neal Av F 1 < . , ` � E -3 Hunter St. H -3 Noah Sr F.34 1 A 4 S 2 n Deck R d..._...._. F -3 huma Av G -H 6E6 Oiginst erlook Dr E - Regent St 1 3 }E-6 -6 °r' _R Oak 0.d Od 044-3 Hyman AV.. ... ...._...._...._+6 Overlook 6 Regent SL......L..._..._......_... 16 ... N. ry La D-0.2-3 lute Si ........ 11-4-5 Park Av H4 Ridge Rd I E -3 Soow Bunny '- Sib River Dr 1 E-3 South Av.....__..._. ......_.....G -6 . R S Id Clr....._...._....__......1 -62 King .... 11 -6 Perk Ct. 0.113 -6 in Rd 11.6 Lake S i. 51. 1 F-04 Pearl St. F-3 R D I. -6 -6 Spring Si W Sr— .._..._...._ 4-5 Lake /-1-a F -Gd Placer Placer Ln. P3 Riverside Dr 1 1 1-6 Spruce mi 5l G 6 rL H 1-7 Pu _ 11-2 Power se Path F-0-3 R oaring eor I 1-7 Vine SC. 0-6 IN I<te 0.d 14 .p pine 4 Rd -5 1 .8 Pupp Smith 0 -3 Roaring Fork It 1-7 W St. 0-6 - 11 - II6116....xxxxxx nif cr 1 Puppy Smith St 0- I Soaring Fork R F E -2 Walnut St. y L _ _ ............._.Il g .iu Si Rd 04 Quer 51 F -I SageCi 1 BQ Wan 1-6 k_ � 3 Maiv 51 Od1 -S -3 Quern 51 H�6 Salvation Cir I E - West End SC......._.._._._......_..H - 04 Silver Kin Dr.1....._.._.._.._..._E -2 Wcstview Dr . . 1-7-8 & b___. 1 ._.._ ... 1-5- Maroon Creek Rd........._....G- 11.1-1 Race 51 8 • *1Rd _......_. ... - If -3.6 Merman Dr F Red Moun tain Dr D -E -5 -3 Smuggler F -O Mourk 04 WI Rb W___._..._ E -F -YS II ad Rd.._.__... ... ._.__.1 -7 Mdkimming Rd il -I -7 Red .........._..._.... MouWn Rd D -O -S . b Smuggler MoudWn Rd Gb Wright ...._._..Wht .._ ....._...._..._.�_.E -S IrMe nde Pea ti Willoughby To of /� dry i n1.PI IA MAPS it To A croft a 3.0 THEODORE K G UY ASSOCIATES PC I SHEET vy w19 ARCHITECTS AND STRUCTURAL ENOINEERB DRAWN P.O. BOX 1940 ...,,r.,.ar, BASALT. COLORADO B9 S21 OF JAN 3 1 1994 BASS CAHN PROPERTIES P.O. BOX 5078 __ . ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 TNEO00REK GUY AS6pCIATTA January 26, 1994 Theodore K. Guy, AIA, PE Theodore K. Guy Associates, PC P.O. Box 1640 Basalt, CO 81621 Re: The Enclave at Little Nell Dear Ted: By the execution hereof, the undersigned, Harris A. Cahn and Howard Bass, owners of the parcel of land on which the proposed townhouse units 6 -10 of "The Enclave at Little Nell" are to be constructed, (formerly known as Lots N, 0, P, Q, R & S, Block 112), which parcel has received land use approvals evidenced by (i) Ordinance No. 14 (series of 1990); (ii) Ordinance No. 28 (Series of 1993); and (iii) Subdivision Agreement recorded at Book 631 at Page 504, do hereby grant permission to Theodore K. Guy Associates, PC to make application to The City of Aspen for four (4) additional Accessory Dwelling Units ( "ADU's) to be located in units 6,7,8 & 9. HARRIS A. C -N H 0 'A TeatM r o 0 2S-0' T (� law 90 647 / , VP 6' -0V2 ID'JE0 Ntlfl*$ 132 A__ 6 N � t III W f.14 1 0 r 1 =a - t'` BEDROO '1 1. dal , BATA s SITTING . %I lil Is, b• 1111.1 " I, C, fl::;l , , I ]4W T i'Ij1 Cl s,a 1 1 ' Loser � % ON i l � 1 - -- 1 1, l . 5F�(.y�� UP C � il ;!� S1WRp t51 �I 1 , . ya 111 'mg 1 h W„1 1 I O f N .1 maim h LO$ET ,�rw:rsi.vihroHrwim �, Hrr ' � , �"_- „- 31 ili 4s' ;1 1 � _ - r 1 �:ev2''� T -z vVT re lr - 1_ p. � � if s SITTING . 1 nil i MEI i1'% / 11 1: MASTER BEDROOM Y I l t i s t .. ' - i J / 6 -0 vz' / 2 -nv2• 6 - I V ? P6 '-5 6 -7 b 0 28O SUMMARY OP SQUARE POOrMES: MAIN FLOOR PLAN - DURANT 57. ❑ 1 194 2 ai1e13 ❑ Lq„� LtveL 1610 1-1-2 NORTH 1 /a "• 1' -0' ❑ MAIN LEVEL 1305 FT ❑ Urrn¢ LEVEL_ 1034 rr ❑ TOTAL 4061 P12 . 273-U 6' cr / / 4'-1112' &-0V2 5'-61 � 6-0 1/2' Ffi -- 0 1 1 � 0 KITCHEN SITTING ROOM re t A ; ° b 1 1 ru. 1 =�1 R I" 1e jl 0 1 r YR �",i h to II 4 ; II ibis ■� OPEN II d 1 1 DINING ■ 0 ' OEM ela �� r i 0 y I ; , 1 11, , ; y LIVING '� k• ' 1 S ri I ■ 16 10 7 VW I ; %' 2 -6• • 0' 2 -9 6' -0V2 �� i l " ' lllil!!I� 4 a 0 i i t \ UPPER FLOOR. PLAN - PURANT ST. 9 1054 FT N CRTN 1/4••.1' - 0• 1 -25-94 93101 2 N 1 1 I / L IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII � "111116111111111 1 1!I I I! O - - - IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1!n111111 11111 1111 1111 11111 U I ' I1111111111111111I16, ilim a111111n11 !1!1!1 m11 111 _ NI', a I 111 11 g . I ..1.. I i =� �l I lii I - =j�� Es Sea �III''' L III =_ �� m P1I ^ 11111111111I111111111111 iIllIll1111 11111111 11111I111111111111111111111111111111111111111I11111I111111111I I - I E 111111 11111111111111111111 1111111111111 II11111111111111111111111IIIIIIII111 F g N ■ ■ ■■ 1 _ IIIIIIIIII 11111111 1111 1111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111 ' IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlIIII1 1111111111111111111111111111 I'I'' ==11'I�'i111111 � �11 1 S 11111 II' 111 II Z H IIH I1 I',11 I Q Eh! I!ii!14!i!i i! J O nnmm�numm � olgim i n iummunnn 01 v 6 nnnn n m mn Imil i6nmmm6n IIhlilnummn 1 ). 4 r il 1 1 .! ! i Z r • • N? is_ D re . 0 0 K • it t L� Y N 11 - X�X 1 1 0 1161 1111111 C I 11111:11 O _ 0 _ =minimum IIl ijili,i,ililij IIIIII11111111111IIIl . Ililili1111111111111111111111111111I ' J i:a i€ INI C i Ii ae S€ cc El i Nl i ri 1 5 aL ■ 1 11111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IIII11111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111111IIIIIII111 I IIIIIIII I I I I I III I 1� .I = _: 1,11 111111 ;1 1 1111111111111 11111111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 iiiiiiLLL O _ _ IIIIIi11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1 } 1O IIII1111111111IIIIIII11ll1111 1111111 111111111111101111111111111111111 11111i1i1 i� I = 1 111 i1i111 a A 2 1 1 1 1 11 I A ms 11 I Z �II'i 11 ?a e2 0 8 a2 i 22 E2 a 1111lI g 2g ` 3 1 1 1 111111 J oL , 1111111111;1 1;1; m �IEE I lIlIlIlIlIlIll 111x1-: IIIIIIIIIIIlIIIIIIIlIIIlIIIill�ilili ,i,i�ill 0 1. O - - , I1ii 1I-IIIIII IOIIIIIIIII = 1 : 111= Z e _— � I I I � 1 _ `- L • \ III 1 1 I O §e t. ! 0 / 4-2 / .WIG-.0 -e- Mt 9 i I ?� I 1 ,1 y 1 to "' N m i0 s- ws1g��1�a ' O , II_..IIIIIIIIIIIIIII ��= O= IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILIIillll1111 11ii1111111 - -- -- =1Pi1i1ilili�ili I I I . i' i i i I TI"' ��`' j1111111111 1 1 I I I I I l ,11 1 111 1 11 I I 1 1�I I 1 1 l 111.11 I I II ,, I I I l - 11111111111111IIIIm11JII1i01 ,111111111111 - -- - -- Il�il i � li i 1 , _ 1 I „ lo „i 1 i,11 1�1 0 111 il,l ■ —! E 7' ui pL 11111111 = 1 I I e > = MI.1111616 I ' il -- }-- -- m — IIIIIIIIIIIIIII =:a ;; nnumnunlniunnn11111 !!I!!!!!II��� _ Ill ttt Q 1i? a • I1 i I 11 '1 iI II a 1 1 I I 11 I I 1! 5 1 1 II III. II I 8 Y I I 1 1 I� •e 1 i it e 1 i = � . r i it a il 0! F a ? 8 'iI i L. —I 1 • J : LERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP J Pitkin County Title, Inc., a duly licensed Title Insurance Agent in the State of Colorado hereby certifies that HOWARD BASS AND HARRIS A. CAHN are the owner's in fee simple of the following described property: A PORTION OF OBLOCK TOWNHOUSES SUBDIVISION, according to the Amendment No.lto Final Plat of the Oblock Townhouses Subdivision, recorded in Plat Book 32 at Page 24. CONSISTING OF LOTS N, 0, P, Q, R AND S, BLOCK 112, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. ENCUMBRANCES: D of Trust from : Howard Bass and Harris A. Cahn to the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin for the use of : Aspen Mountain Park II, a Colorado Limited Partnership to secure : $800,000.00 dated : March 22, 1993 recorded : March 30, 1993 in Book 707 at Page 207 reception no. : 355306 The beneficial interest of the above Deed of Trust was assigned to Pitkin County Bank & Trust Company by instrument recorded in Book 714 at Page 203. Subject to easements and rights of way of record. This certificate is not to be construed to be a guarantee of title and is furnished for informational purposes only. PITKD COUNT iI 1E, INC. I I BY: Ld AA. _ SAM authoriz'i' gnature CERTIFIED TO: t s UARY 1, 1994 @ 8:30 A.M.