Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.CU.625 E Hopkins Ave.A63-94 CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: a 0 / - 23/94 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. DATE COMPLETE: T' 2737- 182 -12 -001 A63 -94 �( STAFF MEMBER: KJ PROJECT NAME: San Serrano Conditional Use Review Q^ Ws. I Project Address: 625 E. Hopkins Legal Address: /0/3 G - &k - ` el cf 7 y W' Apar Mike Lobdell Applicant Address: Box 12009. Aspen. 920 -9312 AWP.R xo'w/IrZIZ. i same -- f o coo-J f &nn ? i — Representative Address /Phone: /$/ //(o< Aspen. CO 81611- FEES: PLANNING $ 978 # APPS RECEIVED ENGINEER $ 96 1/ PLATS RECEIVED HOUSING $ ENV. HEALTH $ 60 TOTAL $ 1134 TYPE OF APPLICATION: STAFF APPROVAL: 1 STEP: X 2 STEP: // P &Z Meeting Date "I1k PUBLIC HEARING: NO VESTED RIGHTS: NO CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO DRC Meeting Date 1 REFERRALS: + i City Attorney Parks Dept. School District RE City Engineer Bldg Inspector Rocky Mtn NatGas '1\11 Housing Dir. Fire Marshal CDOT 11 Aspen Water Holy Cross Clean Air Board rn City Electric Mtn. Bell Open Space Board 1� Envir.Hlth. ACSD Energy Center Other 1 1 Zoning s ` Other DATE REFERRED: c6k2 I �j INITIALS: 9�/ DUE: "/ n 1 FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: //�lf INITIAL: City Atty City Engineer _Zoning _Env. Health Housing Open Space Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: ASPEN /PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and MIKE- t,o €0 61 (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for 49N SC. ZG s4 (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 77 (Series of 1992) establishes a fee structure for Planning Office applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties to allow APPLICANT to make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and /or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and /or City Council to make legally required findings for project approval, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ which is for hours of Planning Office time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT .,� '• By: By: k.ri.: Diane Moore Mailing Address: City Planning Director VC 136 aon 9 Aeeo4 W 3(6(2 Date: AWs • 2 08 - 27 - 94 12:00 PM FROM SUNRAYER LODGE FUQ2 30RIVER I91619- 739 -0098 AUG 1,j94 9:43 No.001 P.03 ivci' `7 August 24, 1994 Mr. Mika LOPde11 c/o Carol Dopkin Real Estate 210 last Hyman Avenue, Suite 201 Aspen. CO 81611 Re: 625 Mast Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado Dear Mr. Lobdell: This letter is to confirm that I have no objection to your changing the aas of the above referenced 'Commercial space from a hair salon to a re taurant. you will, of course, need to obtain all opriate .overnnental agency approvals. Si� -1y / rs cc: Cindy, Carol napkin's Office fn. Mn 300 1409.1,.1. { .:,(an, lam • is 1,19.;.4 1(1.)i 1 ii x /.19 Y I" II(PIK tIPS /Pc, \:'1.i(,,,I,ii1.0..1M y Y gnu k.4- 779. -nnnP ne -4 -84 10..44 AV P003 08/27/94 13:00 TX /RX NO.0660 P.002 tM (S�� f7.;up RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE DENIAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE FOR A RESTAURANT IN A C -1 ZONE DISTRICT FOR THE SAN SERRANO RESTAURANT AT 625 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE Resolution No. 94-41 WHEREAS, a restaurant in a C -1 commercial zone is a conditional use and must be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission pursuant to the review criteria in Section 24 -7 -304 of the Aspen Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, Mike Lobdell, Terrance McGuire and John Hoffman submitted an application for conditional use for a 465 square foot restaurant to the Planning Office; and WHEREAS, the application was reviewed by the Environmental Health Department, Engineering Office, Zoning Officer and the Housing Office and referral comments were submitted; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the referral comments and the small size of the proposed restaurant, the Planning Office forwarded a recommendation to approve the conditional use with nine conditions intended to limit adverse impacts of the use to the surrounding residential properties in the neighborhood; and WHEREAS, at the public hearing on September 20, 1994, the Planning and Zoning Commission heard input from residential neighbors in opposition to the restaurant request; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the staff's comments and the public input, the Commission voted 6 -0 to deny the restaurant request because it failed to meet all of the review criteria even if conditioned as suggested by the Planning Office. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission that it denies the request for the San Serrano restaurant in a C -1 commercial zone district at 625 East Hopkins Avenue because the proposal failed to meet the following conditional use review criteria: 1) The proposed conditional use is not consistent or compatible with the character of the immediate vicinity, and does not enhance the mixture of complimentary uses and activities int he immediate vicinity of the parcel. 2) The location and operating characteristics of the proposed conditional use do not minimize adverse impacts including pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise and odor on surrounding properties. W. Bruce Kerr, Chairman Jan Carney, Deputy City Clerk PUBLIC NOTICE RE: SAN SERRANO CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW FOR A RESTAURANT IN THE C- 1 ZONE DISTRICT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, September 20, 1994 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 pm before the Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission, 2nd Floor Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena, Aspen to consider an application submitted by John Bogaert, Bogaert Family Trust, P.O. Box 1166, Aspen, CO, requesting approval of a Conditional Use Review for a restaurant in the C -1 Zone District. The property is located at 625 E. Hopkins; Lots F -G, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact Kim Johnson at the Aspen /Pitkin Planning Office, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 920 -5100. s /Bruce Kerr, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission MVO ( / MEMORANDUM I r / 4e 0 TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission UV i a�� � = + FROM: Kim Johnson, Planner O l5 14 ' i 1 Nom' RE: San Serrano Conditional Use 1 41^4-e DA E :/�,�,,, ,� S�ptember 2 0 , 1 � • 4 4-7D, W ►�- Q'U,� �/� vim\ % % ,,' lA+ s -s -- r�- a - -� -` ,- -� .•c�cim SUMMARY: The Planni Office recommends ap• •va of this conditional use with nine conditions. APPLICANT: Mike Lobdell, Terrance McGuire and John Hoffman LOCATION: 625 E. Hopkins Ave. The property is zoned Commercial C -1 APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicants wish to operate a restaurant in the 465 s.f. victorian currently occupied by the John Wyman beauty salon. They portray the business as serving local, walk - in customers with business hours of Sam to lOpm, seven days per week. Included in the shop will be a stove, grill (and exhaust hood), prep station, sixteen table seats, a counter for standing which will accommodate up to 5 persons, a triple sink and one bathroom. Please refer to Exhibit "A" for application information and sketches. REFERRAL COMMENTS: Complete referral memos are attached as Exhibit "B ". Summaries are as follows: Engineering: The existing dumpster encroaches into the alley by a couple of feet. A new concrete pad should be installed on private property to provide a more usable trash area in the winter and to facilitate cleaning of the dumpster area. A letter from BFI must be submitted with the building permit application stating what the appropriate dumpster size will be, that the new pad will accommodate the dumpster, and how often trash pick up will be. Environmental Health: Adequate pollution control devices are necessary if any char - broiler device will be used. There are no specific noise concerns with this project, but the applicants should take precaution to prevent noise. A plan review must be done by this department and a pre- opening inspection approved before Food Service License is issued. Separate sex toilet facilities will be required if more than 15 seats are provided, which is shown by the application. In a further conversation with Lee Cassin, she indicated that the location of the toilet does not comply with regulations. It must be relocated to a place which is not behind the food prep counter. C)°:(16 1 jpjj 0 * r 1/WA Regarding odors, Lee mentioned that a charcoal filter system I •n the vent will reduce odors, but no method is available to completely eliminate exhaust smells. Housing: The application states that the business will employ no more than 5 persons at this restaurant, which is the current employment of the hair salon. No food prep work shall be done at this site to reduce prep personnel, and there shall be no wait service allowed. If more than five persons are employed by this store including delivery staff, the employee mitigation issue must be readdressed. Zoning: A separate sign permit is required for this business. There shall be no outdoor seating without prior Special Review approval and amendment of this conditional use. STAFF COMMENTS: A restaurant is allowed in the C -1 zone upon conditional use approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The review criteria for conditional uses are as follows: A. The conditional use is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and standards of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan, and with the intent of the Zone District in which it is proposed to be located; and Response: The applicants are attempting to create an affordable eatery geared towards the local working class. The AACP does not address site specific locations, but does support and seek to enhance locally oriented businesses. The C -1 zone district is intended to provide "for the establishment of commercial uses which are not primarily oriented towards serving the tourist population ". The C -1 zone is located between the CC Commercial Core zone and the I 0 of,' e zone to the east. A. The conditional use is consistent and compatible with %►,� the character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel C te'd proposed for development and surrounding land uses, or enhances the mixture of complimentary uses and ac- tivities in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. \% / � r esponse: The property to the east is a single family residence. To the west is Susie's Consignment Shop and townhomes. To the li South is the commercial block containing Sandy's Office Supply C 1. among other general commercial uses. Across Hopkins Ave. is a mix of commercial and multi- family uses. This mixed use neighborhood is a transition area from downtown to the east side residential area. The operation's menu /pricing will target the walk -in traffic from the neighboring commercial core where affordable dining is limited. B. The location, size, design and operating characteristics i 2 3(6 4 . o the proposed conditional use minimizes adverse effects, including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise, vibrations and odor on surrounding properties. Response: The proposed restaurant will not be changing the exterior of the small victorian it seeks to occupy. It's size will limit high volumes of customers. Per the Environmental Health report, the restaurant may only seat 15 persons (including patrons at the "standing counter ") because of the single restroom. In order to limit odors as much as technically possible, a condition has been included which requires charcoal filters on the exhaust system in addition to standard particulate filters required by Environmental Health. Delivery must take place from the alley to eliminate any truck congestion on Hopkins. Per the application, BFI will pick up trash 2 or 3 times per week. Engineering requires that a new dumpster pad be poured so that it does not encroach 2' into the alley as it currently does. Staff has conditioned the application to require the new pad as well as verification from BFI that the new location is suitable to them. Zoning must issue a sign permit for this location There is no on -site parking dedicated to this lease space. Diagonal parking is situated on East Hopkins in front of the building. Pedestrian and vehicular circulation will not be impacted. The applicant offers that the hours of operation will be Sam to 10pm, seven days a week. Because of its proximity to residential properties, staff believes that the business should not be open until lunch, around 11 am. C. There are adequate public facilities and services to serve the conditional use including but not limited to roads, potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire protection, emergency medical services, hospital and medical services, drainage systems, and schools. Response: The site is currently served by all public utility functions. D. The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to meet the incremental need for increased employees generated by the conditional use; and Response: The applicant commits that food preparation will take place at the Johnny McGuire's location (of which this application is a "subsidiary "). The Housing Office accepts the applicants' position that no more than five persons will be employed at this location. If more than five are employed, the applicants' must � r,, 3 L c 1 v a r`f �f Q (.� m io ) fO 5.25 Z G rf . �� 3 Z o fd c _ 4 5 ( O poo come back to the Planning Commission to review mitigation requirements. F. The proposed conditional use complies with all addi- tional standards imposed on it by the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and by all other applicable require- ments of this chapter. Response: There are no other anticipated requirements imposed by the AACP or the zoning regulations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the San Serrano conditional use for a restaurant at 625 E. Hopkins Ave. with the following conditions: 1) A new concrete pad shall be installed on private property to provide a more usable trash area in the winter and to facilitate cleaning of the dumpster area. A letter from BFI must be submitted with the building permit application stating what the appropriate dumpster size will be, that the new pad will accommodate the dumpster, and how often trash pick up will be. 2) The toilets must be relocated to a place which is not behind the food prep counter. Separate sex toilet facilities will be required if more than 15 seats are provided. The standing counter shall be included for the purpose calculating number of seats. 3) A charcoal filter shall be included in the exhaust system to reduce odors as completely as technically possible. 4) No more than five persons (including delivery staff) shall be employed by this business. If more than five persons are employed by this store, the employee mitigation issue must be readdressed. No food prep work shall be done at this site to reduce prep personnel, and there shall be no wait service allowed. 5) A separate sign permit is required for this business. 6) There shall be no outdoor seating without prior Special Review approval and amendment of this conditional use. 7) All deliveries shall be made from the alley. Truck parking on E. Hopkins Avenue is prohibited. 8) The restaurant may be open for lunch and dinner only, with hours not to exceed 11 am to 10pm. 4 9) All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the San Serrano conditional use for a restaurant located at 625 E. Hopkins Ave. in the C -1 zone district with the nine conditions in the Planning Office memo dated September 20, 1994." Exhibits: "A" - Application Information "B" - Referral Comments 5 1 rbi ( __ _ _ __ _ _____ ....7 ___. .„ ........ 14 , I A * - 1 E. 1 4*•Iv\J r - , , 4 7 ty... r b25 2 o.- 4 S.vot'Kl 1 li t - -I �i-vb �l(otl j ‘, k4QQ1 PITK T e-, rn61NSZ - 44 G, lir N s, eLtSrgeA ST -rata t- 44,19M... -CQ -,TEM : ms s �:_ kA- c , E.•uockzcK - . .. \ . , . . . .. . , , , . /:( ,, . ,. . \ „ ,,. 9,,,,o„,,,, ,,„,!‹.,w_. . \ ,.. _ S‘Oc., _ =.1•••••■•••■•■•was,,,•••■•• oL 1L. ___ c- stcrtN,I-401 "� 7 ` 181 +j Litc-.2.;,..,‘,..4 5c1Lt ` 1,tv0 COt (;Qt`s,. LtL M \ r..,±: ';,k..T 1 , abr? t ....9 000 i L_----______ 41 , 7 i,..icilA.„:7_,Li..tii_v. I . 7 1 1 pRD2F�C\/ �} 1 -+-f6 �J Fi.-1 1 Qv C.01. -DR az& C.,<.. I � ' ----fkr. , .:v \? f1 VUtAPS C' LOCATIC ALI_J --- Th I ' l im,. 4 __Lv,Q ,‘ 4 L.,:r.r. , T i 1 ATT.fCH -1MEN T ONG 1 ,u1.49 USE actic4a'CtoH FORM b 9)w ',CRQtNQ 625 GlScr 11OP1!0•1S a W(-.kI , CQ. 431 bl I 0 [C -1 cL000 (XQc RE)5 SQt l)Qa MW LOG° at fCCOC26.4CC MC @uPC, Q(-(q 1.4C • �N 720 COOPER cY Qcw,CQ, 2tbt2 '111 LOQQCLL (QQ C3QX 0409 EcSQ ;N, CO- 'tb l2 • '920-93(2 CQN(7IT(Ot hL LAC; t c; S RICTuQC-,S = ok►E @arUQQQM O (TQI(ItT \11TOr? PREY (OuS QPP0O` O(.S GRINTCO = 70NG.0 G-1 / gApQT• SOLo (ari,'S■Ablp) e f\ SMALL cu2 t tT \tom! CTIa 4 MCt`iU CQL1 VSTIN(s _QE C2chSQIc).(3Ly R2ICn I<QQQ POP (COCt !Cs OL1 QQ8)ISGS wt�u LLM\ T -O SC iTIN@ 0140 CAC› -Q / (r ie sEnF") .QUt. STraE wtLL CO tStST OE LC? CXL. gcctoG -tTS ■UllU 06QT OF luc STl�t =r tQ 1SJSTIL.f, OC C(20G 1T Co_QLiS OC 30Mtst t OEU) TUB Cg)60(IV Cr 0F9F- ca cGQ0 Qt ?CP i2©l - (C ; S1n _ utzt41T Td Q 020.) /C-AT2 C2ocs t7 1� CLOD G t, OFG. cG6cct,L, QYc Q ThO / TUC cu2f OEM4 S / CQPGQi) (2s Q JOL \Nty 'tv- CLt tt2C1 DCU -7 0 r-_ Cc 7GQ, ). , CO. - ( IU(sw tQ CCUS �GUs LQCt_ U- \IMPS E SucCCCC cL LOLL (?c5 ibt-SD314 T 2R U LICE t?GMc i (- OQ -114C YC2c M \5 -S � FCCZ i 0 WAEi. uL OLL opocc wow scr RC? P q V1t C COC2 k1 QGC S(6-N1CDis i _SSu2 uCtUtA; M 7001•1-05z CGi2EuT C.�c'CF5PlQC2 RkLU FQ12 (2E !0611Qtd vNt* Co i Sc T QF Yh1iThNC7 4 Tuc cj 2; oe CAQQCNT 1�1.tC� sCP NLI : 9&&! &% StrVC +L CO14StST OE G G (16t-i(3(i's Sc*I \ QQU)CCO O€4 ( ST► �L gc L 0606 OCtJ1 E Ca5G0 C3q 1kAi \1 9(“ a tuC P3°On� 5th wAL- e (1LL Q _ (-phi? 11NC T I.Q(OC2 ' L � V 6 U Ott t S Qu1Lt4GC7 k4 OL/\_1.1 1 (AT LCUtA WELOPNIEWT UP cor+C)lttoNAt. U5. ® LQC_/5\ ot-1 of WoeeGCQ Qt5T4tlRbt•lT 1.5 4.1tTLIN rllc c n+\MC^ -?4pL Cot bF 'SUE alt/ L.lKtCS of McE1.t � c c rUK 46:t-tclitm•T ‘t - to ?r .it0 . Q 3 Q1ot3Lc SO - to 1, 6,00) lw R R l4eNTS 4 y tSlroe s bF P`_PS.N en-4 VF,a RoLlN9 G1 - ® G nGir.-e De. 4 1Mt4CQteCE VtCtkt'y of Eaoex1-'70 teES•!k,tiku4L •5 t tto- /CQtkt EIZ- M F147 - 11 -trat 5 UOLK,t' -9 eFo-cb(2IL`I 1k PEQ-toO VIGCo?tD clauccuRec %1M1& (10 99 Q-"C t StR CCURES, CPgUmi gS;VtttEc wabLA 11Vcu,06 'Ws C A LQ‘at4 WL'P 1c t� M49 Ftx'M St,101QRN6 WORK 1 ;90QLS IN 'M,N-1 ENS ( rux PeLJ)C .Q pcTlvtctES, L� VI:L,iL I1JO/L \NILS. €t ktt9 TO rA caltAt�' wool) SUtM To C NUt4& tW F e ttt OCN6 'l 41gv - 1 AL Ff 'tt:k.. Qae iPati is 1 t StZr . po14 ‘„MU<. GRr-cr x) PPCVApoSL' Eta tUt4 PuRPae.t . !-` LoWvi 1QN F£c -CRAW (L"co G vaQ QGUtiP$taR) l5 PC2OtOeIG ?Q DM LoefiltsN lµ T D!.! E / 2t~uttNQ FL`'$(s Ct(.o; &s•eztsci pp2S Vito. 0,* tAD N\c bE2 SIMUt-& to A CZ TO b uec SMALL RDC2 fc7 l,.Ar tt•t toWN (t.r, Jo1rkN MtcCsutRES tai L) FCOt) L-./ Sat 'k3S o f 1 t)tZAta1 ay XtsttNit, tl2ov.(AL NotSl t56 ' QT VY.itN TQ Net &Ciot2< WC:LA C c Ct p Recx. PWR <_ if-Rv10E1bAjt_toeCj • SoLlo wc5 .; p s ttt&L 4Th 6 /4 Q QU Meur. v . S9 ? Tt x A : T . ,N W *IN C3F1 calV t�aS , PaEKtt,113 tS cuRRa&r[bf P lawunL CA-1 E.1.1aFkcMs gut gL KI fe65Rlct10No eta 1 ks44 SLO(!L 9 La p @tbe1.r+tLy wMLsu -1M E5 QLrLINEO 1N O. Of CURRENT 11/41UMeC42 OF PF.0QL' E.N\PLD4E0 4■/ JDI�K WVMtpN ub1R ,S &o is 5 (yt'a) . PRoPb Eo CZE bit g4 Xt 1t3EA+-tSE Ct ttz Tt F:'Q9 -TtcN DF Mt'X EtiD5 szr, 6oNC �T 9 ; 9E Qy 'tpe a G ZNGRE. a(0 • I 00 ` 4 euQNGe GO, Clove F I. DC.) ... • ?Rica '- _ Fb1" too (11,L • • 1 Wf oCte/ 1 MAALL41 14000 AeovE c�a Q.VgtGF-gfSic9 MCK6. 4%11 °14 12120.-f e 4AP 4 insai cowl. el. r - YQ►,I _ is A. 7 '. • 00 • crAl o i 1;.C2 r y O -CI auE QUWE X1 a(1 bcJ1i MEMORANDUM to t' To: Kim Johnson, Planning Office From: Chuck Roth, Engineering Department ac Date: September 2, 1994 Re: San Serrano Conditional Use Review for Restaurant in C -1 Zone Having reviewed the above referenced application, and having made a site inspection, the Engineering Department has the following comments: 1. Encroachments - There is a wooden walkway ramp that encroached about two feet into the alley. There is a short railroad tie crib wall that encroaches into the alley about two feet. These encroachments are not problems at this time. If improvements are constructed on the property adjacent to the alley right -of -way, the encroachments must be removed. 2. Trash dumpster - The dumpster encroaches into the alley the same approximate two feet as the encroachments discussed above. It may be advisable to require the applicant to construct a concrete pad for the dumpster. This would facilitate ensuring that the j't t dumpster remains outside of the usable alley during the winter. It may also improve the e-{k C ability to clean the dumpster area. The City typically experiences problems with the C. cleanliness of food service trash dumpster areas. 3. Sidewalk - The sidewalk in front of the building is spalled to some extent, and there ''` ' is some cracking. However the conditions are not classified as a hazardous sidewalk, and the appearance of the sidewalk seems reasonable. 4. Work in the Public Right-of-way - Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and development in public rights -of -way adjacent to private property, we advise the applicant as follows: The applicant shall consult city engineering (920 -5080) for design considerations of development within public rights -of -way, parks department (920 -5120) for vegetation species, and shall obtain permits for any work or development, including landscaping, within public rights -of -way from city streets department (920 - 5130). cc: Cris Caruso M9<.322 Oct ASPEN!.PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL. HEALTH DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM • To: Kim Johnson, Planning Office From: Chris Chiola, Environmental Health Department LI Through: Lee Cassin, Senior Environmental Health Officer Date: August 29, 1994 Re: San Serrano Conditional Use Review for Restaurant in C -1 Zone Parcel ID # 2737 - 182 -12 -001 ' The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department has reviewed the San Serrano land use submittal under authority of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen, and has the following comments. SEWAGE TREATMENT AND COLLECTION: Section 11 -1.7 It sham be no awkd for dos owner or occupant o any bdding used for residssce or business purpose within the city to manna or reconstruct an on-site sewage disposal device' The plans to provide wastewater disposal for this project through the central collection lines present on -site of the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District (ACSD) meet the requirements of this Department. ADEOUATE PROVISIONS FOR WATER NEEDS: Section 23 -55 'AU buidhup, atrratsres. facilities, pars. or the hie within the city limb which toe water shall be connoted to the municipal water utility system.' The provision of potable water from the City of Aspen system is consistent with Environmental Health policies ensuring the supply of safe water. WATER QUALITY IMPACTS: Section 11 -1.3 Ter the puspoee of msiut•ioin ad protecting its municipal water supply fmm t municipal water supplies � di of five (5) and miles above Me points bom munh 1 net supplies ared and over all weam+and sources mmsi�^B This application is not expected to impact down stream water quality. AIR QUALITY: Sections 11 -2.1 it is the purpose of (the air quality wale of the Mimdpai wee) to achieve the mavmum practical degree of air purity possible by requiring the use of all available practical methods and technique to connol, prevent and reduce air pofution throughout the sty..' Ile land Use Regulations seek to `lessen congestion' and 'avoid transportation demands that cannot be net' as well as to speovide Wean air by protecting the natural air sheds and reducing polesms'. To meet the air quality ordinances of the City of Aspen, adequate pollution control devices are necessary if any char - broiler type device is to be used l in the restaurant. 1 130 South Galena Street Aspen. Colorado 81611 303/912O -6070 'X `1R a CONFORMANCE WITH OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LAWS: NOISE ABATEMENT: Section 16 -1 -me airy round finds and declares that nose k a significant noun of environment& pollution that sepnsem • reamt and inerrant threat to the public peace and to the broth, safety and welfare of the snide= of the City of Aspen and k trs visitor• —Accordingly, ngly, t is the policy of council to provide standards for permissible noise levels in various antes and manners and at various time and to prohibit noise in as of tMe levels.' There are no concerns with noise for this application. The applicant should be aware of any excessive noise created by the restaurant and take precautions to prevent such noise. FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENTS: Any restaurant establishment in the State of Colorado must obtain a Food Service Licence. To do this, the applicant must have a plan review done by the Environmental Health Department. Once this is completed, and a pre - opening inspection is conducted, a licence may be issued if all requirements are met. A restaurant of this type would require commercial type equipment in the kitchen. Floor, wall, and ceiling materials must be smooth, durable, and easily cleanable. Depending on the menu and types of food prepared, either a Type I or a Type II ventilation hood may be required. In regards to the toilet facilities on the site, the rules and regulations state, "Separate toilet facilities shall be required for each sex in establishments with seating capacity in excess of 15 patrons or more than 15 employees...Employees and patrons may use the same toilet facility provided that patrons have access to them without entering the food preparation, food storage, or dishwashing or utensil storage areas of the establishment." In the application the is shown seating for 16 patrons and only one toilet. This does not meet the requirements for a food service establishment. This must be corrected before approval is given by this Department or a building permit can be issued. ...v:wr:IAN usE:SAN.SERRlwo.RESr 2 SEP 06 '94 11:51AM ASPEN HOUSING OFC P.1 MEMORANDUM TO: TO: Rim Johnson, planning Office FROM: Cindy Christensen, Housing Office DATE: September 6, 1994 RE: SAN SERRANO CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW FOR A RESTAURANT ISSUE: The applicant is requesting to place a small restaurant into an existing beauty salon. The applicant states that he will have no more than five (5) employees, the number presently employed in the beauty salon. RECOMMENDATION: After review of this application, the Housing Office approves this request with the condition that no preparation work be done on site to eliminate additional personnel and that this stay as a sandwich shop with no wait service. Should this restaurant be expanded and additional personnel added, this would have to be readdressed as to possible employee mitigation. .\ C MEMORANDUM TO: Kim Johnson r FROM: Bill Druedin RE: San Serrano Conditional Use Review DATE: September 1, 1994 1. Any sign will require a separate sign permit per Section 5- 403. A sign is not part of this Conditional Use Review. 2. Identify any future outdoor seating in their open space, which would require a review. 3. Outline the location of the dumpster to verify that it is not encroaching into the alley. 4. Is the fence existing? PUBLIC NOTICE RE: SAN SERRANO CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW FOR A RESTAURANT IN THE 0- 1 ZONE DISTRICT NOTICE I8 HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, September 20, 1994 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 pm before the Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission, 2nd Floor Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena, Aspen to consider an application submitted by John Bogaert, Bogaert Family Trust, P.O. Box 1166, Aspen, CO, requesting approval of a Conditional Use Review for a restaurant in the C -1 Zone District. The property is located at 625 E. Hopkins; Lots F -G, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact Kim Johnson at the Aspen /Pitkin Planning Office, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 920 -5100. s /Bruce Kerr. Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission 7 buLk d 0,6062XL c / ° l T - n ... P 130 South Galena Street 1 Aspen, Colorado 81611 t t V j Gr (303) 920 -5090 (30 G LAND USE APPLICATION FEES al / 3 2 / C 2 / l F CITY: / - 63250 -134 GMP /Conceptual - 5 - 63270 -136 GMP /Final m G n -63280 -137 SUB /Conceptual - 6 - 63300 -139 SUB /Final - - 63310 -140 All -2 Step Applications _ J i obi -63320-141 All 1 Step Applications = 1 - 63330 -150 Staff Approval -63432-157 Zoning Plan Check 6 -634.32-157 Sign Permit . -MR011 Use Tax for Sign Permits • - , HISTORIC PRESERVATION: -63335-151 Exemption -63336 -152 Minor "C; -) _ -63337 -153 Major Devel. -83W38 -154 Signif. Devel. - 63339 -155 Demolition • �1 -i CH COUNTY: C / - ; j -63160 -126 GMP /General -63170 -127 GMP /Detailed - 63180 -128 GMP /Final - 63190 -129 SUB /General (/ -63200 -130 SUB /Detailed t . V -63210 -131 SUB /Final -63220-132 All 2 Step Applications 4 - 63230 -133 All 1 Step Applications / - 63240 -149 Staff Approval V -63450 -146 Board of Adjustment - 63235 -148 Zoning Plan Check h 9 REFERRAL FEES: -63360 -143 Engineering - County p`7 ,. , �' ✓ q� 00115 -63340 -163 Engineering - City fD ' �=� , . . m ;P 00123 -63340-190 Housing • 00125 -63340 -205 Environmental Health ill -. _/ PLANNING OFFICE SALES: C - 63080 -122 County Code — ' 5 -69000-145 Other (Copy Fees) / d TOTAL /Li'� J� l,k j \ , I ` N ame: )fl y rTt2- Phone: 7 j z . 1� r /1 - •e:sn Addresse .> '.o -' r �" . . , Projec' . _ q ,1 Ch eck S: Data: No of Copies: — 4. (: ?) • s l