Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Land Use Case.1275 Ute Ave.0065.2010.ASLU
THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0065. 2010.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBER 2737 123 63 852 PROJECTS ADDRESS 1275 UTE AVENUE PLANNER JENNIFER PHELAN CASE DESCRIPTION 8040 GREENLINE EXEMPTION REPRESENTATIVE TED GUY DATE OF FINAL ACTION 12.17.10 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 04.07.11 DEVELOPMENT ORDER of the City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order ", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders ", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights ", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three -year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Clifton and Sheridan Morris, 1409 Indian Creek Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76107 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number Lot 2, Ute Park Subdivision commonly known as 1275 Ute Ave. Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Applicants received approval for 8040 Greenline Review Exemption to build a minor addition on the existing residence. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Administrative Approval, 11/24/10 Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) December 12, 2010 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) December 13, 2013 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 12 day of December 2010, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. V �j?V ris Bendon, Community Develop ent Dir; ctor elk Im " q " 4 i AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 Q, , ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: /V /� / 273 Lt' ' ' " , Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, Air` c ci, el S co R-` (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: • / V Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this /3 day of .p�.2 ink.A , 200, by _. 1c &ci. rei WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL Pt16Li NOTICE My commi of o expir:: 9 Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific deve right t rsuant 10 a I v t he Uae C ole e y of Aspe and Title Notary Publi 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: Lot 2. Ute Park Subdivision, commonly known as of the Co Ave., ty en, Colorado, 8161 T by ��" ..Y P �� tt 24mm10i he Applicants. fton & Sher dan - O � 1 be r Morris, 2010. The approval p �:: Re w received d to ll of in 80a0Oon 10 the ATTACHMENTS: .' • � f l f Review Exemption to build a minor addition the j %. 4 0 f existing residence. For furi information contact Development of St Aspen CORY J. Coloradof97 920 -5090. COPY OF THE PUBLICATION % % GARSKE S sr of m '�, 9' Published in The Aspen Times Weekly on ll �M1ii December 12,2010. [592077 1 ��tt" 1 My Commission Expires 0 5/ 92012 COTICE OF APPROVAL 3 For an 8040 Greenline Review Exemption 1275 Ute Ave. Lot 2, Ute Park Subdivision Parcel ID No.: 2737 - 184 -03 -002 APPLICANT: Clifton Morris, JR REPRESENTATIVE: Ted Guy, Theodore K. Guy Associates, PC SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1275 Ute Avenue Lot 2, Ute Park Subdivision REQUEST: 8040 Greenline Review Exemption SUMMARY: The applicant has requested an 8040 Greenline Review Exemption to permit the expansion of the single - family residence with additional habitable space. Specifically, the request is to enclose approximately 530 sq. ft., which calculates into 290 sq. ft., of Floor Area on the entry level. A property may be available for an 8040 Greenline Review Exemption if the proposed development: 1) does not add more than ten percent to the floor area of the existing structure or increase the total amount of square footage of areas of the structure which are exempt from floor area calculations by more than twenty -five percent; and, 2) does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit is required; and, 3) is not affected by geologic hazard; and 4) does not, over time, cumulatively go over the floor area limit. Standards 1 and 4 relate to floor area allowances and calculations. Current Floor Area calculations (Exhibit A) are provided by the applicant showing the existing Floor Area of the property to be 3,918.9 sq. ft. for habitable /enclosed space. No more than ten percent or 391.8 sq. ft. of Floor Area may be cumulatively added through an administrative exemption. The Applicant has provided evidence that two Greenline Review Exemption applications have been submitted in the past and approved administratively: 11/6/1996 and 2/26/1997. Both of these approvals permitted the construction of decks rather than enclosed habitable space; however, the approvals cumulatively added 162 sq. ft. towards Floor Area. The existing land use code permits deck/loggia/porch areas to be excluded from the calculation of Floor Area, unless the area is greater than 15 percent of the maximum allowable Floor Area for the lot. According to past staff memos, the maximum Allowable Floor Area for the Lot is 5,800 sq. ft., permitting a deck/loggia/porch exemption of 870 sq. ft. Page 1 of 2 Table 1: Past deck approvChat contribute towards Floor Area 0 Pre -1996 1996 Exemption 1997 Exemption (sq. ft.) Approval Approval (sq. ft.) (sq. ft.) Exempt deck/loggia/porch Floor 870 244 -11 Area Amount developed 626 255 151 Balance 244 -11 -162 Over a decade has passed since the previously mentioned applications were processed. Total deck/loggia/porch area today equals 1,309.13 however, 447.56 square feet of deck/loggia/porch area is being removed and enclosed as part of the proposed addition which will result in 861.57 sq. ft. of deck/loggia/porch area remaining (1,309.13 - 447.56 = 861.57). This is less than the permitted exemption and negates the past two exemptions that added Floor Area. Table 2: Cumulative Floor Area 1996 1997 2010 Deck 2010 Exemption Exemption Removal Enclosed Approval Approval Addition Floor Area Added 11 sq. ft. 151 sq. ft. -162 sq. ft. 290 sq. ft. Floor Area increase 2.8% 38.5% 0% 74% applicable to exemption* Note: A 10% increase in existing Floor Area equals 391.8 sq. ft. * Represented as a percentage of the permitted 391.8 sq. It. STAFF EVALUATION: Per the application, the request is to permit the addition of 290 sq. ft. of Floor Area on the entry level. The 290 sq. ft. of Floor Area is less than the ten percent or 391.8 sq, ft. permitted to be added to the existing structure via an administrative review. No tree is proposed to be removed, the addition is located within the Unconditional Envelope (outside of the boundaries of avalanche zones), and the cumulative total of changes over time does not exceed the exemption criteria as illustrated in Table 2. DECISION: The Community Development Director finds the administrative application for an 8040 Greenline Review Exemption as noted above to be consistent with the review criteria (Exhibit B) and thereby, APPROVES the request. APPROVED BY: A Allt... yetiviw Vz-htlzD 1 Fw Chris Beni %n D Community Development Director Attachments: Exhibit A: Floor Area Calculations Exhibit B: Review Criteria Exhibit C: Application Currently, the front entry porch (98.46 sq. ft.) is exempt from floor area and not counted in the 1,309.13 sq. ft. Page 2 of 2 un c 3 r z p r 0 -< m O IX _ 0 0 0o n � I go r M ° m nn w�W N +O cc on A w NA A ^* �� n m _, o > > a m ° Pr. m� D n. M mDO A X N m a r x ' a� D mOD o O o3 ^ � r a: nr o v D m r m °= �w 'M >� n m s ' � c � a wum w mso ao oa�o ) < v °mm °. ai l/1 < m . °n ° a moo ° o a omoomo.`4%.14 Mn m ..aJ o m D o p m mmm r C r x Z a X O 0 /� D - T `D1 00 r Z nD O I y N_ P> r p r r ° Dr z o owam.aW8000N0 000 MOM n o m� . mo o /� 0 0o ° o° ° mmy N Z o a DF n Cl _ Ro o 9 r D D v r0 a • • r_ • m D D • a j m m +N� 90 0 0 M m 0 0 co c o J 4 ' coo O o 0 'PO m T o�° X Z ma til 0 0 «< Z r w m rm �< n O X a nt C2 T. z o n � p an N, r p wWWWwWPNNNNNNN 1,4 444 70 r 2 Z % 1 m vl M ° O by T m y t . p I MM'''' 51 Z Nx ' a 0 x � a �' JMO N D 03 O 0 m D MO OM d 04 W M PO4w M OONONmPW O WwMA , 0 -1 , o "' I� m M M Omm0Ww:0 041J4MAJ oM0 m Z J MMOOPNON- AC4)00WNONO o Mc r 'M •' ° :m v Dow M y va o . J DT I/)1 n n s o o x r n_i A :97, < rn nD ( a 0 N Or w M+- D O 9 r T W wW F OwvOMP�P MIw ' �O D - i. m W m DT �wA Pm ?w OO P ONw r m O P NO m 0 iww 0 0 0 A A i+ m O N :� O 0<m o Au o D� ^ m MOOPNO c,04)00WN 0 M �nmJa mmD • + m 9 pis r mmaa o n „, o Ln rn mmm o <<< 0 rn rrr a0 z rn �x y ,m ' X b3 n w 87 AN TO ,Ln :PO O DON Ow'o � J t8 ,n O v M0 O w CO Moo 0 my Oa- ', Z xr- • r n> H �° D 5m 0 n D M O m W N c ',' 0 D Mn ' j w ow'o 'Dx 0 ''n T P < <0 m 0 n n m Om a 0 >X r. O O D p C C n › m x v D n g _ y a a 0 m Poo r m T n D m0 Z x 7p 9 OO P T a ., z m m s ''bo ° ° r m �m 0 p a n < ° ma > a< < 09 v, m a °< m -> m an r >m r m. mm mm m o ID c cm So 0 T 7 m 0 0 r— 9 9 ›. M n v ° O T-.. 1 m 2 0 4 5 .),.. _ Tum?1111, v ��Ex�e, a m o MORRIS D 0300 S RESIDENCE _ 5=� Zy _ y O . � m1m M K 11 I G o 3 C _v _ ; o� i F A r \r ∎ITI / \I.1 e_.. W off, r / 1 1 , 1 p 1 1 1 1 a 1 1 — � " — _____ __ - - - ' 1 1 v co i 1 , o \ 1 g I, \ 2. 1 - m co 2 ' 1 1 € 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 g- 1 1 1 , 1 to \ \ N 1 a \ 1 1 I 1 1_ 5 1 1 1 1 0 / r 1 1 1 T I 1 \ 0. 1 1 m 1 , m I h 1 W I I Lri 1 / 1a- 1` Z 1 / I I \ 1 I Ig I 1 / s c / �� 1 / 1 I 1 I 1 1 / N m 1 I I L 1 I u, 1 3 1 / I g. 1" I I 1 I 1 I w „A 1 I I I I I V i ° . I •p 1 11 O :113 \ .00 Ee�.�u�E N , w � � N ") . )7 ) 7 T D m r m m -.,., m r X w 1 z Z r, n m n o 2 0 m n z 0 r 2V O co 0 - ouvmo..nowrr E n -- b > n 0 C _ _ F r z o 1111j1111 a r O D m 111 11 1111111 5 m l 1IIII1 -mlll m > 11 x 11111)1(1111111111 1 f Ili 111111111111111111 - -111 111 1l )1,111 1,1 1 m a o O ORnN&5 ARE VM P7 Et HALF. —I 3. vxO O m t 2 = =8 g pX or,, A MORRIS RESIDENCE = - "x & O a mao — i y .. r . n v, `fi o,, z A 11 n ITI'1 w I �_ ,3l". glg 1 13 1 -- P 2 N _ r / Cril I ‘43 , i 2 F CO 3 3 '3.33 3I J m 1 1z I 0 1 1 1 J / . 1 i ,. I / 1 i .5 c°O 2 1 1 1 — , ;. it �.,ow�MOF 1 1 1 it .� 111111111111111 X CA n n o ° c _ 1 11 11 llllll 111111111111111111 n o H o m D 1 s Tl1111111111Tlllllllllll n n vg - < _ >•s illlil illllllll o 5 n A, x )lllilltil1illlllU lllllllll m m * 11l1l111lll1 11lIE1111111111111111 , _.o - k- 1111111tI11111111 k11111111/ o.11ill1` N k o v ' w N 1 1M w r 0 G. . m X N o N ri Z w / o m w z H e ND g.' 0 M M n `C^ O M c 1l1l(l1i[P 1[li11i, 3 iill0lill0lilili11;11 oo. �.....„ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 : 1 1 1 1 Z / j `p M m DRAWINGS E SL.LL BY HALF. T I g T 1 m m o -n O - q X MORRIS RESIDENCE ° __ z= ;IM -- a. _ � 5 . 5 . 3 o A P1P1i — r innI , FF F.=9 p _ ,.o 1 m 0 P m 0 C n a w , c c m r Z 0 a; n n m m n D < D m m D n D r' m u m D D Z y a all I - te ll N , ...,r.✓ 1 mI b n a c 3 n D a I _ ORMKGB ME Vs. F*7 BY HALF. C R ' 1 o o! MORRIS RESIDENCE ij hi x `a = - • .. n 9 5< _ z 1 A n ITI w 1 xn ! I VI c 1 r O 0 r is x v o D m ow A o D CO 72 1 Q pw 12,i,:, .. v141 + t ObmJP�nAwN m aa 2 2 ,` m ? 01 00 4:40 . T m o X !- /� r Dmn, a , r yi yin x ,� ( D , r 9 �O�D A m O D mmr d° , D .o o mo r m s H h l D O P m an P r m Ia ma >x V1 < m n r CO m , 0m x z r S mr o o� > oo r 0 N, r r 0 0 o wam � Ea�5� oaDO B oa n v o • D b Off m O PA NN w.n m0000 0<m , O mm a m P 00 A A y0000000 mmD V 1 Z 0 ra ›z. n 0 = 9 o D D a .. n 9 P P D D a a A A m m m O d O O b O T P IC O o A '100m v VI TIT 7D C ZO 0 T -0_1* c a <a • m mmr 17 1 rn O nm< Z r P O T a< 0 NEW/ REVISED WALLS a v a Sn sa ^ O — __... D m Ln c7 0 n 9 A�wwN�„ssa� o S nn .. NAw A WVP PDPDPDPDPDPD WV P M r mr7 = ; xN m N ( (''}yD'� Z 1 Z T -IA O X ,d N < D 03 � � T PO O ..AwAPmAwm000OP'„AVJ .„0.4000 a` 9.oti O Ombw d A D N 'OJmPmm mm 0 „m 'O D m , ,, m mmOOPNONA V AOOA�OwbwOP Dr >aa o an n nm v a 0 P A ' ':D Z nr m , x r 0o m m ° � < w a o D m nD� < N m r A w A , ,, ,,t m 00 O 0„PwJP00000000P , DO m an � p>Om w :0 Owdo000mJ0O000000000 'm<m 0 0 ' ,jz f l r > moo PNO V,o�ovw NJOOOOOOO OOA mD r + N NEW/ REVISED WALLS ci0 o (D1 D mmm O r m ° mm m p n o m 0 � un N - I-I n J mA om MO 3 ao lx � D o mm b 3 m an° A a °' x c Qyv mw D22 n 0. WO 0 0 Dom n OP-0 : O sl O i00 �n0 vaJ m m co, I� m mm DO c mD Py Op D C v� 0 ,''' D n ➢ Dr m Op W m mv.0 a n D m m D 0 0 0 0 0 '.> a O nm m zO m m Or o D r 9.0, n D n T r n y D D m y — 'x a 17 m n v •a s mm v m r”- m rn N D O m° x a 0o a T p Bran r o� 1 z : : m : ° aar m Cx o �° n < ma c a< < z oa c m to rn , < �a >ag < a an r c �a 0 mm P_ 90 17 m T S n so O mo n n °n m m Dm a N 00 • 'o x ( 1 ° m X' 0 0 0 o z a 4 `g 0 MNss ARE scum BY HALF. a r- r ; f, 1 a a; ,o T o " o3 fo MORRIS RESIDENCE _ _ nn 9 y P " O D O m F w r... r... ITI • 1 Fr. i.n '71; F _ P s s a1z F 3 N m U 8 I 0 S o N o `O m N �_ _ W _._W _. > 1 Q _.. ni T Fl 1 • o N N I D I I i I a I 7. oa 4 o p f o s L f P p 1 , P n' f o U g o s 7. N ra 0 —1 D J £ N I - F= D i 77- 7 E ` lFll l l / �,, „, CI v Q O O - N — ' ^---'—''--"---- N N ? Q n O C e� D P D P.D `�. � � - ^ o D r - Z y o 7 c-, o = o f > y D _ mo 1 , T l -we/l° N .. N N °ronawe._ Q , __ W w a oaa..oF m a. O @ N c o 0 5 O cc m k p O w T m O a l ll l l l l l l 1 p c i l l l l l l l I a 1111111111 pt lllllllllll ro �,. ° °,EM�E 1111111111 77 r o m Z ii o i _ wu u a carvss ARE sc m a BY HALF °� < 0 1 MORRIS RESIDENCE N ° c Exhibit B B. Exemption. The Community Development Director may exempt the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction of an existing 8040 Greenline development if the following standards are met: 1. The development does not add more than ten percent (10 %) to the floor area of the existing structure or increase the total amount of square footage of areas of the structure which are exempt from floor area calculations by more than twenty -five percent (25 %); and Staff Response: As noted in the staff memo, with this proposed change, 290 sq. ft. of Floor Area is being added which is less than the 10% or 391 sq. ft. permitted. Staff finds this criterion met. 2. The development does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit would be required pursuant to Section 15.04.450 or the applicant receives a permit pursuant to said Section; and Staff Response: The Applicant states that proposal does not require a tree permit. Staff finds this criterion met. 3. The development is located such that it is not affected by any geologic hazard and will not result in increased erosion and sedimentation. Staff Response: The addition is located within the Unconditional Envelope (outside of the boundaries of avalanche zones). Staff finds this criterion met. 4. All exemptions are cumulative. Once a development reaches the totals specified in Subsection 26.435.030.B.1, an 8040 Greenline review must be obtained pursuant to Subsection 26.435.030.C. Staff Response: Based on content of the memo, the approvals over time do not exceed the threshold requiring board review. Staff finds this criterion met. C � THEODORE K GcASSOCIATES PC `' 40„ ARCHITECTURE PLANNING I STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING common sense solutions October 27, 2010 Jessica Garrow City of Aspen Community Development 130 S Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: 1275 Ute Avenue 8040 Greenline Exemption Dear Jessica Attached is our application for an 8040 Greenline Exemption. The attached FAR calculation sheets show how have used the current measurement regulations to calculate the following. The allowable FAR is 5800 st The existing house contains 3918.9 sf of FAR. The FAR of the house with the proposed changes will result in a FAR of 4209.3 sf. This is a net increase in FAR of 290.4 sf is well below the 10% threshold for an 8040 Greenline Exemption. All of the proposed construction is within the building envelope and no trees will be removed as part of this proposal. Our proposal will enclose 83 sf of area under the upper level deck, will convert 183.1 sf of existing loggia into floor area, and will enclose 264.4 sf of existing terrace. The current code's FAR requirements exclude the area of decks and loggias until they exceed 15% of the allowable floor area or 870 sf. The area of porches and terraces are not counted or restricted. With the proposed changes the deck area will be 433.1 sf. The area of porches and terraces will become 428.5 sf, but they are not counted or restricted. At the time of the 8040 greenline Review exemption in 1996 and 1997, FAR was calculated by different rules. The greenline exemption in 1996 added 11 sf to the FAR because the total deck area was over the 15% of the 5800 sf of exempt deck FAR. In 1997 during the construction of the deck an additional 120 sf of deck was added. With the exclusion of porches from FAR deck calculations under today's rules, the proposed deck area is now 433.1 sf, significantly less than the allowable 870 sf. Therefore any FAR added in 1996 and 1997 no longer counts as FAR under the current regulations. We have attached copies of the 1996 and 1997 greenline exemption memos for your review. They confirm the allowable FAR of 5800 and confirm the approval of the deck in the conditional zone. Please do not hesitate to call. Sincere) Y. r firs Theodore ' uy, AIA, PE, President Theodore K Guy Associates PC TKG/tkg 101 18CoverLtrG reen IineExemption.docx n's Nig Box 1640 Basalt, CO 81621 o — u 970.927.3167 •• 1 ° tkga@tkga.net 1 tkga.net _1. ' .. RECEIVED nrT 2 7 ?010 ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION COMMUNITY DEVELOPME NT CITY Or V NT PROJECT: Name: 1215 L\ 1.F_ JV eNUF) &40 . t1,1I4E. 949 lEC Location: (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) ' 3 16'r0 a00.. APPLICANT: 11 Name: CLIP -CO%S k4 M,b -112 )12- Address: 14-09 \ne Creek- ) IJV4 WOIJ* ) -Ty 7Pp(07 Phone #: REPRESENTATIVE: Name: TED _Gin t.HenoDv-c_ K-- G-tjvi Ae2c2c (&ifs PG Address: (.240 6t (- t) e5liwQ4 Phone #: .,10 • Ctr2C1 • CCP+ TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): ❑ GMQS Exemption ❑ Conceptual PUD ❑ Temporary Use ❑ GMQS Allotment ❑ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ❑ Text/Map Amendment ❑ Speci. ' ,- 2 -- ❑ Subdivision ❑ Conceptual SPA VI ESA - 8040 Greenlin: Stream ❑ Subdivision Exemption (includes ❑ Final SPA (& SPA Marl - „ :r e Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane ❑ Commercial Design Review ❑ Lot Split ❑ Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion ❑ Residential Design Variance ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Other: ❑ Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) SIFSC -0U7_ FeeMILI & OE1,. PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) ADO tr rN aka-cc-010a ? 4 f a if w? EuLST I1 F-61C- ) AOD) 2 '1 g 6 ( E -tacJo ti-SC-1 X,K5 !C-r FAT `.1�, Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 75 , a) Pre- Application Conference Summary Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements - Including Written Responses to Review Standards 3 -D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3 -D model. Your pre - application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3 -D model. CITY OF ASPEN PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Jessica Garrow, 970.429.2780 DATE: 9/14/2010 PROJECT: 1275 Ute Ave REPRESENTATIVE: Ted Guy, tkga o(�tkga.net, 379.0967 TYPE OF APPLICATION: 8040 Greenline Exemption DESCRIPTION: The owner is interested in enclosing an existing porch to create a new kitchen for the property at 1275 Ute Ave. The property is zoned AH /PUD and is located in the Ute Park Subdivision. The property is located within 150 feet of the 8040 elevation line, and is therefore subject to an 8040 Greenline Review. A property can expand floor area by up to 10% or expand exempt space up to 25% and qualify for an 8040 Greenline exemption. These figures are cumulative — once exemptions have been received for a 10% increase in floor area or a 25% increase in exempt space, the property is subject to a regular 8040 Greenline Review with the P &Z. The applicant must provide documentation regarding the increase in square footage from any previous application to ensure it qualifies for the exemption process. In addition, the applicant must provide documentation regarding the allowable floor area for the parcel. Below is a link to the Land Use application Form for your convenience. http: //www.aspenpitkin.com /pdfs /depts /41 /landuseappform. pdf Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.435.030 Environmentally Sensitive Areas — 8040 Greenline Review Follow link below to view the City of Aspen Land Use Code http://www.aspenpitkin.com/depts/38/citvcode.cfm Follow the link below to view the City of Aspen Land Use Application http: / /www.aspen pitki n.com/ Portals /0 /docs /City /Comdev /Apps %20and %20Fees /land useappfor m. pdf Review by: Community Development Staff, Public Hearing: None, if the exemption thresholds are not triggered. Planning Fees: $735.00 for administrative review. Additional time over three (3) hours will be billed at $245 per hour. Referral Fees: None. Total Deposit: $735.00 Total Number of Application Copies: 2, 1 set of full size plans To apply, submit the following information: 0 Total Deposit for review of application. 0 Pre - application Conference Summary. 0 Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 0 Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 0 A site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the State of Colorado. 0 A site plan depicting the proposed layout and the project's physical relationship to the land and its surroundings. 0 Completed Land Use application and signed fee agreement. 0 An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcels within the City of Aspen. 2 copies of the complete application packet and maps. 0 A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how a proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application § 26.435.030.B, 8040 Greenline Review Exemption. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. ta- CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT %trcement for Payment of Clty of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and tli.f l ff ' oats k (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: r A L 3 a li submitted to CITY an application for (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that the City of Aspen has an adopted fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3, APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter pemrit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may acme following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect frill fees prior ermnation of applicat completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $_ I' which is for _ hours of Comuunity Development staff time, and if actual . recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $245.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 clays of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay sach accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT By:, By'XiA#411 Chris Benddn !!!////// Community Development Director Da e: / Billing Addresp and Telephone Number. • �- -�' 4,07 ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: 121 5 ( P Kuev\l. c Applicant: (,L.IrtovJ f A4 (2jd2 JR__ Location: 1918 (F 2149 L 'Z. � (f 9. f'tTJVL b 44t/CldY) Zone District: - POD Lot Size: 4 1.0 .A(,2E- Lot Area: ,)S, • (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: CSA Proposed: iC A, Number of residential units: Existing: / Proposed: / Number of bedrooms: Existing: el Proposed: 7 Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: 3V&.9Allowable: 5 3G 3 Proposed: 4 - (S5 .4 Principal bldg. height: Existing: 20 Allowable: 2 5 Proposed: 25 Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: On -Site parking: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Rear Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined F/R: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Proposed: Distance Between Existing Required: Proposed: Buildings Existing non - conformities or encroachments: ZL[oklE Variations requested: AitiJE LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY INVOICE NO. ASP -3144 Land title GUARANTEE COMPANY www.L,c<. COW TED GUY PO BOX 1640 BASALT, CO 81621 Owner: CLIFTON H. MORRIS JR. AND SHERIDAN C. MORRIS Address: 1275 UTE AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 Invoice Date: November 18, 2010 Order No. Q62003798 Invoice Charges TBD Report $100.00 - Amount Due - $10 Due and payable upon receipt. For Remittance please refer to Invoice No. ASP -3144 Please make checks payable to: Land Title Guarantee Company 5975 Greenwood Plaza Blvd. Suite 125 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 -9701 Land Title Guarantee Company CUSTOMER DISTRIBUTION Land Title GUARANTEE COMPANY wwwrro<.COM Date: 11 -18 -2010 Our Order Number: Q62003748 Property Address: 1275 UTE AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 If you have any inquiries or require further assistance, please contact one of the numbers below: For Title Assistance: Aspen Title Dept. 533 E HOPKINS #102 ASPEN, CO 81611 Phone: 970- 925 -1678 Fax: 970 - 925 -6243 TED GUY P. O. BOX 1640 BASALT. CO 81621 Phone: 970 -927 -3167 Copies: 1 EMail: tkga @tkga.net Linked Commitment Delivery \r LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY TBD Report Our Order No. Q62003748 TBD Report Fee $100.00 This report is neither a commitment to insure, nor an abstract of title. This product may not conform to the written requirements and /or exceptions ptions should underwriters full itle commitment be ordered in the future. The further The liability of the Company shall not exceed the charge paid by the applicant for this report, nor shall the Company be held liable to any party other than the applicant for this report. Certification Date: November 12, 2010 at 5:00 P.M. Address: 1275 UTE AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 Legal Description: LOT 2, UTE PARK SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF FILED 1983 IN PLAT BOOK 30 AT PAGE 86, AND FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE UTE PARK 22, SUBDIVISION RECORDED OCTOBER 24, 1995 IN PLAT BOOK 38 AT PAGE 39, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. Ownership: Recorded County Recording Date Reception Number Book/Pag_e PITKIN 07 -09 -2001 456280 The following will be required should the Company be requested to issue a future commitment to insure: 1. EVIDENCE SATISFACTORY TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE TOWN OF ASPEN COMPANY RANSFER TAX HAVE BEEN SATISFIE D. A ND D. 2 DEED FROM NC SUBJECT CT H. ORRIS JR. AND SHERIDAN C. MORRIS TO TO BE DETERMINED 4: Our Order No. Q62003748 TBD Report The folowine documents affect the ropert : RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED JUNE 17, 1949, IN BOOK 175 AT PAGE 246. 2. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED AUGUST 26, 1949, IN BOOK 175 AT PAGE 299. 3. EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE PLAT OF UTE PARK SUBDIVISION RECORDED FEBRUARY 22, 1993 IN PLAT BOOK 30 AT PAGE 86, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 354207. 4. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH AND GRANTED IN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 22, 1993 IN BOOK 704 AT PAGE 216. NOTE: THE GRANT OF TRAIL EASEMENT IS PART OF EXHIBIT 'F' ON PAGE #242. 5. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE, BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, HANDICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 17, 1994, IN BOOK 739 AT PAGE 20. 6. EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR FIRE TRUCK TURNAROUND, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1994 IN BOOK 762 AT PAGE 446. 7. EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE PLAT OF FIRST AMENDMENT OF UTE PARK SUBDIVISION RECORDED OCTOBER 24, 1995 IN PLAT BOOK 38 AT PAGE 39, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 386670. 8. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE #18, SERIES OF 1992 BY ASPEN CITY COUNCIL RECORDED AUGUST 04, 1995 IN BOOK 789 AT PAGE 131. THEODORE K WY ASSOCIATES PC ARCHITECTURE 1 PLANNING 'STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING common sense solutions Greenline Review Standards 1. The parcel on which the proposed development is to be located is suitable for development considering its slope, ground stability characteristics, including mine subsidence and the possibility of mudflow, rock falls and avalanche dangers. If the parcel is found to contain hazardous or toxic soils, the applicant shall stabilize and revegetate the soils or, where necessary, cause them to be removed from the site to a location acceptable to the City. Response: The parcel currently contains a single family residence constructed in 1993 with a small deck additions constructed in 1996. Both constructions were granted 8040 review approvals. The current proposal will construct a roof above an existing patio area and will not require new excavation outside of the original building area. 2. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the natural watershed, runoff, drainage, soil erosion or have consequent effects of water pollution. Response: The proposed development will maintain the existing area of impervious materials and will not create new areas of runoff. 3. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the air quality in the City. Response: The proposed development will not have a significant advers affect 011 the air quality in the city, no new bedrooms will be created by this proposal 4. The design and location of any proposed development, road or trail is compatible with the terrain on the parcel on which the proposed development is to be located. Response: The proposed development occurs within the current footprint of the existing residence. 5. Any grading will minimize, to the extent practicable, disturbance to the terrain, vegetation and natural land features. Response: The proposed construction will not create any disturbance to the terrain, vegetation, and natural land features because it will occur within the current footprint of the existing residential development constructed in 1993 6. The placement and clustering of structures will minimize the need for roads, limit cutting and grading, maintain open space and preserve the mountain as a scenic resource. Response: The proposed construction will not create any need for roads, cutting or grading, or encroach into open space because it will occur within the current footprint of the existing residential development constructed in 1993 7. Building height and bulk will be minimized and the structure will be designed to blend into the open character of the mountain. Response: The proposed construction will occur within the current footprint of the existing residential development constructed in 1993. The proposed roof over the existing patio is behind ••— Box 1640 Basalt, CO 81621 :::::::: 11-11 ■ + 970.927.3167 • "'" tkga@tkga.net 1 tkga.net THEODORE I< ASSOCIATES PC `� ARCHITECTURE 1 PLANNING 1 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING common sense solutions and uphill from the existing living room roof and does not exceed the height of the existing living room roof. 8. Sufficient water pressure and other utilities are available to service the proposed development. Response: The existing residential structure is currently served by utilities, no new utilities will be required. 9. Adequate roads are available to serve the proposed development and said roads can be properly maintained. Response: The existing residence is served by Ute Avenue and a shared private drive that are being properly maintained. 10. Adequate ingress and egress is available to the proposed development so as to ensure adequate access for fire protection and snow removal equipment. Response: The existing residence has fire sprinklers which will be extended into the new kitchen area. The subdivision also has an existing fire truck turn around which will not be altered. 11. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan: Parks/Recreation/Trails Plan are implemented in the proposed development, to the greatest extent practical. (Ord. No. 55- 2000, § 7 ) Response: The proposed develoment will not impact or alter the existing trail improvements constructed when the existing residence was constructed. :: _ Box 1640 Basalt, CO 81621 ■• ■ � 970.927.3167 MVO 11 tkga@tkga.net 1 tkga.net Clifton H. Morris, Jr. 1409 Indian Creek Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76107 October 22, 2010 City of Aspen, to whom it may concern, Please consider this letter as our authorization for Theodore K. Guy Associates to be our representative in the 8040 Greenline Review for our property at 1275 Ute Avenue in Aspen. Sincerely, € 0 . 4 ,4 4 , ; „ ) , Clifton -. Morris, Jr. or /L--44f/fig Sheridan C. Morris Vi: /1V,'s J'J( VV: 'tju 'J(tJ'J i:(.au1J II ILVIIJ1 ^:L H. •.iur .<.J_JIJ 1'a.LIL V2.' ^ln) lG 1?OG Sctd� rj.:.mt .accLr. .I<I +a l I,'I .. TO i i II /619l9 9 MEMORANDUM • I ! but Is: TO: St Clauson, Community Development Director I i • i I , FROM: : Suzanne Wolff 1 • RP.- • IWiitnermanJOudt 8010 Greenlinc Review Amcndtu . I I £?ATE: , • Nn'yember 6, 1996 • • !SUMMARY- The applicant is requesting approval of an insubstantial aznendu wit Lu�he 8040 • ■ drean ant line approval granted by the Planning and inning Connnissipn on June 1, 1994. The aisplicant;proposeaj to construct a deck within the "conditional" Witting envelof e, as dhlineated on the Fithal PUP plan. The application is attached as Exhibit A.. i • I : APPLICANT:: John & Lisa Oudt PRESENTATIVE: Jack Palomino, Ted Guy Associates LOCATION: to 2. Ute Park Subdivision ZONING: Abi1 /UD I . MACK' GROUND" The Lite Park Subdivision was approved by City Council ok Feb 19, 1993. The subdivision includes three free - market Lots and seven de&d- restric to' rtes. 8040 greenline, approval for Lot 2 was glinted by the Planning Commission On June 2 , , 1994, by : Resolution No. 94=14. At the time of the subdivision approval, Arthur Mearip. ovided an avalanche analsii that designated "red ", or high hazard, and "blue', or moderate Berard, avalanche zones on the property. Based on his analysis, both an `tiaconditional" build ng • envelope and a "conditional" building envelope were established fo✓ each 1ot.E the: ' "iinconditiorisl" envelopes are outside ofthc boundaries of the avalanche 'zones The " condidopal" envelopes are within the "blue" avalanche zones, and istructures opined within these envelopes wituld require site- specific design for avalanche fotices. The residencelon Lot 2 was subsequently constructed within the "unconditional" envelope. I i I I 1 S T AFF COMMENTS: The applicant proposes to construct a deck within the hcondi 'onai" envelope on the north side of the residence, which requires an amendment to 1h4 8040 reenline approval. • i 1 I I i • Sisction 26.52.060 allows the Community Development Dire to revi4w an a • fbr an exemptiost of development from the 8040 Greenline Review! t • I I I • j i Pest-' Fax N ote 7a7.1 NVA .- ---�,. _ . II L l , +l �: [ s' ,3' ' 3hcic.;PPtt ciin1Ai I O ' '!°i"!uzernmer PV , i caner. 1 et y I i f 1 then. I . P cii∎ } L e . 013 I Fats 12 — y r• J I i • ra i , • G V 1 I. • 02/10/1997 08:56 9709274813 THEODORE K GUY -4.530C PAGE 03 N3J -3am -1939 1.3: 36 r " "1 A3PENi' T. _Dm DEU TO 3 9274813 P.32 i Section 26.68.010 8040 Greenline Review Exemption: The exp tsion, rem®de1higjor reconstruction of an existing development shall be exempt from 80f 0 greenlinei review if the • • following standards are met: • • I • 1. • The development does not add more than ten (10) percent ri the floor area o%t4te existing sMtrea to a�r increase the rotal amount of square footage of eas alike structit les which are c±em from floor area calculations by more than rwen five (25); erceni; Viand Response: The proposed deck is approximately 255 squar 4feet. Deck arc excluded frOm the calculation of floor area, unless the area is greater an 15 percent'otthc • nnximten Towable floor area of'the building, which is 5,8 0 square fast. 6261square feet ofd patio space has been constructed; with the addi oval 255 ' sgttatelfel>t of deck space, the roject will be 11 square feet over the maximum low-able prettipi ilieck area of 87D.squi feet. This 11 square feet will increase the fie r area by less ththi i1 %. The existing areas which are exempt from floor area calculationns� total 1,073lsgtiare1feet; the • additional beck space will not increase that total by more t}tatt 25 %. A Iteet'vdrifying the ekisting'FAR is attached as Exhibit B. 1 : 1 2 • . The development does not require the removal of any tree fi'lr which a pkrmit &ould be requiredphrsuant to Section 15.04.450 or the applicant receives a permit pursuant to sdtd$ettIo and I 1 • Response:,, No uses larger than 6 inch diameter will be rem ; • 1 1 1 1 3: The development is located such that it is not affected by ardi geologic hazard and will • ngtrestdt 6: increased erosion and sedimentation. I � • ' Rlespeas The applicant has provided a report from Nicho as Lampit4, Cinivtllting Geologist ,Exhibit C). which notes that the deck may be au ject toperibdie avalanches and addreses design of the deck to withstand avalanche for s. The tiphill'side of the decksvill constructed on -grade and the downhill side will be on log piers. !Avalanches will be abllito flow over the deck, which will minimize the bossibility? cfnratdrials from the deck byling'knocked loose and endangering other structu }es below 'L of 2. Consttuctien of the deck will require minor grading on the tphill side :o'the dek. but • • • will create minimal disturbance. A drystack retaining vial of apptosi natel, hi feet will • be construed to retain the uphill, cut slope. A wall could be constructer to divert the flow to :the east of the deck, however, this would create mote disturbance to thhL slope. Since•the proposed structure consists of deck area and not lijting space, � l • mitigation Deems adequate. ! ! • !I Alignment of a notdic•trail easement across the property has been a I t outs • 1 , ` 'g iss>be' The I t I Nordic Council a windy cut a trail that did not correspond with e concep tied ilgnment i • :shown on the Fine Pict. This incorrect trail has been revegetated d John , thgcltrreit i owner of the prop rty; the City of Aspen Parks Department and the ordic Ce ticil hale staked and agreed on a n w location for the nordic trail easement (letters a cepting t.$ l ali�nt are . I • • 2 I1 I . i I I •j 02/10/1997 08:56 9709274813 THEODORE K GUY ASSOC PAGE 04 •Varon -110 1.d.d, 1-4441.1 tin LUFI L)) iU B - 32f4c+1 r_05 I • I iI I attached as 9xhibi D). Ordinance No. 18, Series of 1992, which a proved the subd and rezoning of the;p perty, requites the. City of Aspen to survey and mend the tat to snow the as- built trail *erne upon completion of the trail, 1 • R i ECOtWMEND TION: Staff r 'recommends approval of the requ st for exetajttionlfrbm 8040 Greenline Re to construct a deck within the "conditional" buil ing: L enveibge on t 2, Ute • Park,Subdivision, subject to the following conditions: • • 1 • • ' 1 • 1 I I. The heck Sall be designed to withstand avalanche rt he forces recomeitdedb{lltlicholas Lathyjrils 'ins report dated October 13, 1995 (attached).' ! � , i I 1: 2. The ILity or.Aspen Parks Department shall record an aritend d plat shgvying ' as•built ' alignment f the nordic •trail, upon completion of the tail; a required Ibis Orli ce No. ' 19, Series of 1992. . I . I : i hereby ap�riove Me exemption fiom 8040 Gteenline Review to co ct a dank %id( ' i the "conditioita!' 1$zilJling envelope on Lot 2, Utc Park Subdi%ision; su ject to the bondu ti ns noted above. ' • 1ttti.0 _ • v : Stan Cla 4r ' of tint a evelopment Director • Date P Eithibita: 1 0 13:6 1 ' N M u'<tii:Ctc i A. Application ` ** t ! ! B. FAR cal$ula ns ` G4 UM Glt't� • • 1 I : I • C. Report front Nicholas Lampiris, October 13, 1995 1 D. Lacers ftbm Jghn Oudt ind the Nordic Council E. Site Plat' : 1 1 , • i i 'I . i i I ., 1 . • 1 • 1 r . 3 1. i i 1 i i TorAL P.a3 02/10/1997 08:56 9709274813 THEODORE K GUY ASSOC PAGE 07 L�/�) iv cli s 4 3 r f rt 4 - ; _ - - 1- ;- C iga, Ja 1 '-'• -- 1 o I ` 1 L11 e e _ FN , ILL • • 1 1 il�i _ r A �p0�dd4U ___. 2 co N tale to _il ,i ,...,. ..., k, ...( I A._ t i . • I , I, . i . 3:11 1 3 i -.....-ils , , ii , . t I • 1/ 1 rl t- . ..... s ii 1 , f...„14 11t , `Z.`�1 , 4 ., vex m 11-4 � ilk : � y 9G � � N ` 2 - tiN ' - 4 1 114 t , , / x. 02/10/1997 08:56 9709274813 THEODORE K GUY ASSOC PAGE 08 THEODORE K GU PC 2AWI (V' /n ARCHITECTS AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS L 14,12s_ February 13, 1996 I /1'1 Suzanne Wolff Aspen /Pitkin Community Development Department 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Winnerman (Oudt) Residence Aspen, Colorado Subject: Winnerman 8040 Green Line Review Amendment Deck Addition Dear Suzanne: I am forwarding a copy of the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculations for the above mentioned residence to facilitate your analysis of the requested Amendment review. Since the initial submittal, Larry Winnerman has sold the residence. The new owners are John and Lisa Oudt. I will continue to refer to the Amendment review as the Winnerman Residence unless you think we should change the Owner's name to avoid confusion. I have been in contact with the Oudt's and they want to proceed with the Amendment review as submitted by the Winnermans. With respect to an 8040 Greenline Review, I believe we are exempt from such a review because we are proposing to add a deck of only two hundred fifty five (255) square feet. The property development allows a maximum of eight hundred seventy (870) square feet of exempt deck area, of which, six hundred twenty six (626) square feet of deck /patio space has been permitted and constructed. With the proposed addition of two hundred fifty five (255) square feet of deck we will be eleven (11) square feet over the maximum allowable exempt deck area. The eleven (11) square feet will increase the building FAR, but only by 2.7 %, which is less than the 10% maximum floor area Increase exempted from the Greenline review standards. The total proposed building FAR of 4,096 square feet will still be below the maximum allowable FAR of 5,800 square feet for the lot. All of the existing FAR information can be verified on the enclosed sheet "FAR ", dated 8/2 5/94. The Nordic Council and the Winnermans have reached an agreement as to a revised alignment for thr trail easement across the property. The present incorrect alignment of the trail has been revegetated and the revised alignment has been staked further uphill from the Building Envelope area for development at a future date. I hope this summary clarifies our request for an exemption from further 8040 Greenline Review Standards. Please call me if you have any questions or comments. Since o4"� Jack Palomino, AIA Enclosure cc: John and Lisa Oudt JP /jp 93172L37 23E80 STATE HIGHWAY 82 P.0. SOX 1840 BASALT. COLOAAOO a18.Z1 19701 927.3187 0212411997 09:58 9709274813 THEODORE K GUY ASSOC v PAGE 91 ; ' - eic' irn -- FACSIMILIE COVER SHEET lure Guy p� 72.0 - 5*3? ni bclriled's and Sbvcierel Enginaels AO. Box 1840 •.. try 222801iighway82 7e: etjini'". Basal t, Colorado 81621 W ,(y (' (970)9274187 W,� Fey(970)927-4813 SEND r0 - _. _ ti0 7 y leame I prile � 7�,., � ro Il �nce(crl� f Aaenlion ( ann ve<B Z1 � 7 pinclUiRter (u/ 514:1 7� f Phone Number _ — • . —. - 0 Urgent - i fl Reply ASAP ‘ease Comment .PJease Review 0 For your fulcrum Tolat pages. including cover sheet: 2 I / ,/J Min / »i G �r 7 �� �� SA( 4 + C7/"l /..SIC ? COMINEivr mecl --2/-24t/7 _ r 24 SOU. k— t deim i...... . � ... ran . I ,� ,°s '� .. f ..... ... ter a rib 041044.-- .... ... ... ............ (0% MAX. 4/e(It. Mt; Mr area . C1 02/10/1997 08:56 9709274813 THEODORE K GUYJ'iSSOC PAGE 05 i ' s fir • .............................. 4WD` / t 1 : ■ ∎ .lI i {P T.W. 00(0_ e • liellr 4111• • - , SI i'rn t- - / / . . 7 _ ratoik t it /sill \. ONDITIO • _! 1� ,� �i 15.0: Ivor Q „ 114:1:ri n DIN W I • fool1O •0 D• I e Y� ! te• �I / n i. j� Him oT/ .-Lr0i14. �� . ,is i r l' i r • O r--- itt41 . tr A aliSta: - . . I . na VPOW ''' - 1"=10 /�.t ' a rte �.: ` H ,,,, i . _ a, 111111411 40E7440 w a il-It is sf It 4 rig tha -II■ \.\ ' A p , �� r,, � /i � re Err iii � �; 111 A . . r MEMORANDUM TO: Stan Clauson, Community Development Director FROM: Suzanne Wolff, Planner RE: Winnerman/Oudt 8040 Greenline Review Amendment DATE: February 26, 1997 SUMMARY: An insubstantial amendment to the 8040 Greenline was approved on November 6, 1996, which allowed the applicant to construct a deck within the "conditional" building envelope, which is within the "blue" avalanche zone and, therefore, requires site specific design for avalanche forces. The applicant is now requesting to modify the approved deck design to add an additional 31 square feet on the south (uphill) side and an additional 120 square feet on the north (downhill) side. The approved and proposed decks are attached, as is a copy of the administrative approval. APPLICANTS: John & Lisa Oudt REPRESENTATIVE: Jack Palomino, Ted Guy Associates LOCATION: Lot 2, Ute Park Subdivision STAFF COMMENTS: Increasing the proposed deck by 151 square feet complies with the 8040 Greenline Review Exemption criteria in Section 26.68.010.B of the Land Use Code. 1. The additional deck area does not add more than 10% to the floor area of the existing structure and will not increase areas exempt from floor area calculations by more than 25 %. 2. No trees will be removed. 3. The additional 31 square feet of deck space on the uphill side of the' deck will create minimal additional disturbance to the slope. The uphill side of the deck will still be constructed on- grade, which will allow avalanches to flow over the deck. The applicant is required to design the deck to withstand avalanche forces as recommended by Nicholas Lampiris. As noted previously, since the proposed structure consists of deck area and not living space, structural mitigation seems adequate. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval to amend the 8040 Greenline Exemption to allow an additional 151 square feet of deck area, subject to the conditions of the previous administrative approval dated November 6, 1996, and the Planning and Zoning Commission's-Approval dated June 21, 1994. AF D BO \IE I hereby approve an amendment to the 8040 Greenline Exemption to allow an additional 31 square feet of deck area within the "conditional" building envelope on Lot 2, Ute 3a£lc ivision. r,d�lUI P OED Stan Clauso , ommunity Development Director Date 02/10/1997 08 :56 9709274813 THEODORE K GUY ASSOC PAGE 06 • • 11/4117 • fe c ,a — p 4 o a • Q . g has- r r ta Li- > n • , F st__ i^ 3k 3 ?)- 3° > > Z i ....11 I' color Q n n 0 • . • ei • i I z • Ll N g w • 111 -� � .. b ti T i t 5. . 4 . 4 O © a • o . .� _ 5•vmw�wr. manse 1 1 ,Q r . A ,_ _ _ , J g d 7 Oi . .C/t 0-, .1 1 9 a$3• . ._- //poirti s. r-n, i ''-' _ 1:),-_-t3 %F. r _ !;• 4.: t <7=r. tis varifin b. -----....—..,-..--._- ., z -TA i di-.-,:- t sa is i Sr & 3 4 - L- iro;5/ Z 111 I ii _k\ _. ze 4 ,. � 0 z El -t FTh i , __cc la '0.• a 3....) 7.1.., : 4 C) 3 ti4 S • .; ../ ? I a 1 ._ R - SI / i ! ,f q II 1/ // S k +ca 51. /� m • /J f 'vim � 1 N N ! /s Z ` fi V €C 7 aka 41-J �'4"' / / f y r/ / „ p:0 c , 1 s0 S. Galena ASPEN* PIT J COMMUNITY DEVELOPME& , DEPARTMENT General 4 Aspen, CO 81611 I se PERMIT APPLICATION Permit 970/920 -5090 920 -5448 Inspection line PITKIN COUNTY El CITY OF ASPEN R Applicant to complete numbered spaces only. `'— NO. 3 t JOB ADDRESS l'-" 1. 12.7/ S �' fh1 v D • LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT O ) T j R S - � UD � BN1510N 2. DESC. V u ?Pi , I ❑SEEATTACHEDSHEET) CO_ t � n � SJaDw'1 (CU DE OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP . ° 3 • tcx� Q Cu i 3 17- Lezt-9 , FD C ONTRACTOR _ MAIL ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO FN t 4. 6 M1 �.hA,5,. c. 1tiLIDS Coe &AtC 9'0 -/4' ARCHITECT OR EN NEER OF RECORD MAIL ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO M 5. r - 1ULi A SCCe4A - TCS ?; w� g Z'7-3I in MS be be 6 DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS PHONE UCENSE NO RF CLASS OF WORK ENERGY CODE FEE ef- USE TAX CENSUS CODE { 7. ❑ NEW %ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR ❑ OWL Or} 434,j US E OF BUILDING //' 72- PLAN CHECK FEE P ERMIT FEE Z ONING FEE tr. 8 • NYi Lr /" /t7 , r> I L rJ C Rc ob VALUATION OF WORK / SQUARE FOOTAGE Type o fCOnst n Occupancy cy Group Lot Are 9. $ 1)0 — 10. V _N 5 ex- - -1 11. Is there food service in this building ❑ YES ❑ NO Ra la ^rt.) No. of Stories Occ. Load 12. Is LPG used? ❑ YES ,2{ NO -7 ` ( d 4C k 1 NO. OF BEDROOMS Use Zone Fire Sprinklers Required? ❑Yes 0 N 13. Remarks 0 /170.,) OC ) 2 EXISTING A � � ,JG/ g-I Alarm System Required? ❑Yes 0 N V A 2 S0 C - � e 7 4(, 11F r No. of Dwelling Units OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES Covered Uncovered G 602 49-- 9-- ttil�C ,, O V � ' SPECIAL APPROVALS REQUIRED AUTHORIZED BY DAf / - lid �� ,r / I/ ,( s.M AIL/ I {/ 1) / / -L-- A ci C'/� nt .7, at IIVto ) H.P.G. � �� f` PARK DEDICATION PRESUBMIiTAL APPLCATION ACCEPTED PLANS CHECKED \ ENVIRO. HEALTH ATRROVED FOR ISSUANCE n ENGINEERING By e Y <. BY 7F- BY PARKS FIRE D A T E ft -1 " '/ DATE(S J 77 DATE ap_q_41./_ DATE a WATER MARSHAL WATER TAP • NOTICE ASPEN CONSOL SAN. DIST" SEPARATE - PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, OTHER VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION PAYMENT OF PITKIN COUNTY USE TAX OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. ❑ MONTHLY OR QUARTERLY RETURNS WILL BE SUBMITTED. • I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND ❑ DEPOSIT METHOD 3.5 % OF 25% OF THE PERMIT VALUATION PAID KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AT ISSUANCE. A FINAL REPORT ON TOTAL ACTUAL COST MUST AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED • BE FILED WITH IN 90 DAYS OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PRO- WORK AND / OR ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. VISIONS OF , Y OTH c STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE ' OR • • OF CONSTRUCTION. IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO ❑ EXEMPT EXEMPT ORGANIZATION REVIa . AP: - O D PLANS AND ANY • MENTS THAT E CONTAINED TH ' • • f AN 8." THAT THE STRUCT AND /OR PROD T I ' U ^ I 7 LT IN ❑ RESALE: STATE &PITKIN COUNTRY RESALE NO. ; 1 5 , t'•- A.CO �_ t . r Cq8 LE C•/J_"' / �'" I - " • (r'L__ ,I� - N f Z- ANYONE WHO USES AND /OR CONSUMES BUILDING MATERIALS AND FIXTURES IN 51GNATU: OF CONTRACTOR (DATE) PITKIN COUNTY 15 SUBJECT TO THE 3.5% USE TAX PROPERTY LIENS MAY BE PLACED ON THE OWNER'S AND /OR THE CON - SI 'IUREOFOWNERIIFOWNERBUILDERI (DATE) TRACTOR'S PROPERTY WHEN USE TM IS NOT PAID FORM IS A PERMIT t G THIS Energy Code Validation • an CheI, I iN datloo nIDATED WORK STARTED WITH O Validation Y OUT PERMIT WILL BE DOUBLE FEE i , V alidation G f D L%,� , I 6`zo r p X37 � ! 1 0 I lia 3 97 '� � WHITE -FILE COPY CANARY - APPLICANT PINK - BUILDING D PARTMENT G A ESSOR F gi7z ° ecrAnlaTAHT Nicholas Lampiris, Ph.D. 1 CONSULTING GEOLOGIST On J ]ll�� P.O. BOX t "' SILT, COLORADO 81652 OCT 1 7 I 3 (303) 876 -5400 (24 HOURS) THFOPORE K GUYASSOCIATES, P (a October 13, 1995 Jack Palomino Ted Guy & Associates 23280 Highway 82 Basalt CO 81621 RE: Avalanche Appraisal, Winnerman Deck Addition Dear Jack: I have visited the site of the proposed deck addition to the Winnerman home, and have reviewed the report of Art Mears on the avalanche hazard at the site. The deck, as proposed, will be on the Aspen side of the home well away from the more dangerous chute further along the slope. There is, however, the potential for small slides into the rear of the home, as detailed in the Mears report. These forces can be mitigated with proper design strengths. The deck is to be just below grade on the uphill side and therefore will be - subject from tine to time to avalanches and snow slides. Two factors enter into the design of the deck: one is that, depending on the type of railing around the deck, some snow will fall off the deck even if the rails are not over - topped; second, the forces will not act on the deck in a vertical sense as they would on a ten foot wall (total forces will be less). However, the deck must be designed to hold a significant load on its horizontal surfaces; this is different than the situation at a rear wall. The preceding applies to a deck without any mitigation such as a protective wall which could be designed to deflect snow to the east around the deck. Also, it is theoretically possible to restrict usage of the deck to times that avalanches are not likely or possible. This may not be practical. One last consideration is that if a deck is damaged, it is not likely to be very expensive to repair it. The important objective would be to minimize the potential for human injury on the deck but this potential is there, to a lesser extent perhaps, even if there is no deck. The parameters detailed in the Mears report should be utilized to most effectively design and build the deck. If there are further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, - 4A, Nicholas Lampiris Consulting Geologist .0- ...., , . w otiz a t i-73 t -1,--o '3 0 -2 - cOcoS • 7-0 to . totSc-c4 42 ,e2gunitsawaitv..” t 4 444 5 , . 4 4 Sfli,-4144.0410011tOrt.it,. irler.'.... .4**4444440,m.-4419144.,96 a-,441 - , 4 ..3.4144.1,4, El Fle Edi allaid Pegta Fr Refuis ForMat It 9 1 14 © 0( V 4111.1)10 1.),071;_ii 4 A 0 iligkill4 1 :401911 i $4144Fil i 4 tLiiicoillsos L bA, 9 4 ' p 'F eons at iftsatrax t410 pm intithrinackwidstn Ipiain , iostimpos tabby's Ps* 1 ___.__ 1 .... •pspenlandUse 11-2010ASLU I 275 UTEAVE .. I MEM= MI Earl I -- , ` I ' ''' 1 41 1 - itiiii_i ...„ ---to , "--*----- - , 1 ,,,, ---- %0I, -, , . , k ,, I 1 CAE UNEEXENPTIN iti.,,,t.iiii. ' 11: •(,, ,11: f1 .: 4,, l itt 1 , y , 4, .,:t a Guy vosn ai67 I s s cotEl Or 0 i*Imnsoaii -I '; . .=.' , , 1 1 i*ra IORR1S, JR -1 FiltnurelCUFT04111 1 4t19 NAN CREEK DR CRTFORTH D(76107 Mu 1(817)263-0898 1 Mies Il Wicatt i 12 Owl 40:ert? 0 Caizecta is egkel? i 1 1 :1_ , List met 4ORRIS. A .1 FrstnaLFIONH. 1 11251110 CRE13( DR i CRT FORTH TX 76107 ' y Moe 1(617)263-0898 1Custt 22924 ' I area \ ,h Lareer 4. ' Lague I . I Frstivinel I p4 4 Ftone 1( 1 - 1 Adiress 1 9 —th_ttette—t----------,======------ ---------- C( AV 13 5 -1.- (ID ÷ •IP ' V 4 -4-2 , V idkr - t 1% C. 15 --ind Cj- Clit \ i„\c' C_ e I \ \ .^-.. O 3 O. O c _2 o N (� V V t Q O O -U `� of a� p �_., N m 'd IS /\ R Nt : o / \ � SUN 0 / \ -e r- h 4� Ci / \ \\ ` .4 \ o �'-. o % 0 �\ ui 1 / / \ \ r J� � ` > c /1trVi Q ' G v \ / \ 0,,,.... °> / . \( J N k ti / \ � \1 (( / e 'fi 4' ) P. ,01 / / N. / � �. � .. t N. '� Co / a r ' \ /� / '\ 4m / k,. C ° // o� �! o u / s W /, m / W / , ' <N. ; C O O k . ..q O n i 0 a .°, ki co \ a N' m U /\ \'� ° as N 3 s Ey / \ �a S� $ ua a, 1 4 t \\ 104f11* 0O 10;1 O ��p n - i • $ S S $ S C $ i i S S al 1. 1 ``��" Pi \ �' "6. i / o i °s ). 4 $.� B c4 o,g SG 81'° t$ % $ Sa § S4 2 a�` \\ \ ' y � kE. S lini B a a l n` \ ••• ? ° f a - -, 1 I 8 E ° °� ° $ S y fl x ; se N o ,--1-1 4, fi3 �' 9 S a o I Iil 8$3 8 ° 1 \ \ I . 1 / o Hoag ,:R o 's flu N. s 8 $1K$ r....... A3 \\ � --s \\ / o .21 § i i Al As A A m !sa i6 : g$1: 'V \ o � \ / $ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 fS \ 6` ''% / ,�N fS E eSaT , d 9 �M V .�g, li�gt ,lam hy II '"bar @ s 6 •�' Py i 8' �.O awn. O� ' &®4 ' e 1/41....1 ttttyyyy ]y. . �v, 1:1 ¢CUY i /V�y��... \E / � v> �e 4 A��� �_� rwat,:w " s / \ \ �Qi v44 V Int4Q ,.2 11 E � 1 �. v A� . CO% aro/ Fla / aq 2e o' / \ Z L • , O �e " / \ / o Q< ♦�� �\ t\ \\ ° • u s r9� // V � V t V a ° � y / A _ �..� �i / ¢ o 4 41 o // \``sue,° \ y / / 4 cvc'o € / 'ti y � % 0 b ao N VN :2 Stat i N y a b y � d 01 , •....—.. I- ` � g z A o O 1 . $ hr 2 1 i VI ii ill OZW 1 3.00,*Qlo N (MVO ., sort _$ 4�ra !et 41 4-pacs 3 lzpottila-z\ Foe LA0,4 2! as C77 2r si 9L01 c c e ! Ii :! Y Y of V F z 1 1 .1 b i! ° WE I f r 1 .. Ft 2208 ' ,, lb I/ / cf 4. / / J 1 i ` I II) Iiii0 � 0 • Ili!! tilt �i�■ i d in i nii ter Y \NN AV LANG " tta � _ . � gI � r Si t - . I AV . !on F4y 4 IANCHE � �� F� Y ��;• , 1 SAO 511411kA ,r�l a, Y 1 . �� • � ie "�y a 11.� �� l• >�1' et lk `� _ ♦ � :� ,1 Np,;/ /a1 �1 . . + ' Il _ � k0 O'':11�11� .: 41 Ems 3 , ' l i1\; 1► Ism . 01 + Rn � �� VITA i. � ���. f. lip 11 F i lly �C A iiI Il nl \. J IIP -. , s „ 4, I o I — — - °DI rettr Ir t i " 4 ea ENE A i Se PS AA • -� rWasp a g --lit i et g g c91 i ii L / __. le :, i L. A. A - ii, N L . c " / . 7000' \ Till. et °43 11 - 3 11 0 •W ,' 3. •13AN 9NIQ11119 v \ 30 - �s FL e b t 4 o �x�x11 1 EEEEEE a a A 1 y ' I, F Y . € 9 " g. a>♦I 9 illi _ LL i A i } • c 11 11 s it @i i if i 5a 4 g S 6t [ 1 i 41 � R i . f i j ' 1J rJ 1, y i _ I § $$ r e 1 E aq 4 E R . 4 1P g air Y ipo v .. 6 ka YE$'10 S err., SL !9 itl@- 1 I E p. �a 1 E 8 § Q p 3 1 . ,1 1 ii ! i l ii !pint ! 4 1 1 d F I ii ! 1 $ iii l � , c = II N 0IL E Nm i I N w z j I El s� ,I, e 1 sir ° 1 u N I <61 njk u r . J' x N .1 4 N' L J it .. { o_ n 1q ° }° W a, 0 tu 9 .o-.9 4 .o-ll ��� . o-ot 1 �- jirel 9 0 q � :Iii Irons. i as © W. ° I I 1 .r_-I-I�I I Il i Ian 0 :It � } ea IJI 02 I 1 ir 1� 'f l 1 ow J ' W E : 0 I in . . _ rl —I_I C oro 0 I I �`_�� 0. A B e in�il ii • 1 6} 6p y �II� Y' N -Ill J � ppGG ---'7"-- I. °° • a R S 1 ♦ 1 ♦111 ag 1 " i s m C ' P. t/ ® m Z ug a % A da Q ' ds I- - ,r, 7m z A -434 11 • Iii . '1 O! traiinfrAtillitail / J C .o-.EC Friorciaal N ��1` � �/ / / !i / L � s .� _ ' s r , 010 o-. ° .ys -'; p . , di pi L• % 4 P•CA £3 C A elirAt6 ,-* P. . . . NMI .61 .6.LL • Al .L/t 9 -,B .L /l 5-.Et .O-.E9 ■ tg i E 1 c . k • _ . T t ki c 0 Oa ' 1; ,.., � N co . -1/4+ -c- a .E ez c. V J 1 7. j 1 _ c., ,5_, ., ... ______ _ . V ,,,_, „.., '..,,,ir . ----, _ . ?T. 11111 al CD - il ()L'' C "C * f , r . , i t i - zr: 0 ( -V- - 110 I -_____ t ,, Jo oL_________ i I , 7 i . 1 ill C a N _ yP • , r . 4-, 4 ni ■-allikesessai_ i it C . C a Va... • • • • r • • ; et I • # raft • "111'1 11 11 ft '\ Aks. • • \ J . j 7, „„ , 4 „, ? al .• \.k.. , • ., .' 1 \. v it ` T � Q , . - z - • . . . c r : - . k r. t i , . c-3 C Q 1 1 " H 1 Dr Sete . 1 � . . o t a . 1 . I - I L.. / - / 11) I Si 1 I 1 41- P i i 0 N. 0 ; z C , \ - 44 mal ' OIL • , \ a . . V ■ L i . • i ,,,,q 41 II A - � rL-'{ y 11:1041S ,_ - R rai : 111 py 1 : i 4 1 t 1 i 1 L2T ir 4_, 1 A I a� 1 LI 1 r