HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.CU.1001 E Hyman Ave.A88-96 CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET - CITY OF ASPEN
DATE RECEIVED: 11/8/96 CASE # A8%-96
DATE COMPLETE: STAFF: Bob Nevins
PARCEL ID # 2737 - 182 -32 -001
PROJECT NAME: Tache A.D.U.
Project Address: 1001 E. Hyman Ave.
APPLICANT: Mark & Christin Tache
Address/Phone: 1101 E. Hyman Ave. Aspen 81611
REPRESENTATIVE: Al Beyer
Address/Phone: 410 N. Mill St. B -11 925 -8339
RESPONSIBLE PARTY: Representative Other Name/Address:
FEES DUE FEES RECEIVED
PLANNING $235 PLANNING $235. # APPS RECEIVED
ENGINEER $0 ENGINEER $ # PLATS RECEIVED
HOUSING $0 HOUSING $ GIS DISK RECEIVED:
ENV HEALTH $0 ENV HEALTH $ .
CLERK $0 CLERK $ TYPE OF APPLICATION
TOTAL $235. TOTAL RCVD $235. Staff Approval
lterios Body Aleeting Date Public Hearing'.'
P8r7 i7- a rpu :( 14, acres ❑No
CC EYes ❑No
CC (2nd reading) ❑Yes ❑No
REFERRALS:
❑ City Attorney ❑ Aspen Fire Marshal ❑ CDOT
- City Engineer ❑ City Water ❑ ACSD
❑ Zoning ❑ City Electric ❑ Holy Cross Electric
aTTousing ❑ Clean Air Board ❑ Rocky Mtn Natural Gas
❑ Environmental Health ❑ Open Space Board ❑ Aspen School District
[Parks ❑ Other: ❑ Other:
DATE REFERRED: ii 8 -6. 16 INITIALS: DATE DUE: I! • Z( i ii . ,
APPROVAL: Ordinanc //Resoluti)1 # c-1& _ ' 4 I Date: /Z . (' ' 17 ;
Staff Approv Date:
Plat Recorded: Book , Page
CLOSED/FILED DATE: INITIALS:
ROUTE TO:
RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
FOR THE APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE AND SPECIAL REVIEW
FOR AN ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT AT THE TACHE RESIDENCE
LOCATED AT 1001 EAST HYMAN AVENUE,
LOT A, BLOCK 34, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN
Resolution 96- 2-
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application
from Mark and Christen Tache, owners, for a Conditional Use and Special Review for a
partially below -grade studio Accessory Dwelling Unit having approximately 450 sf; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.40.090 of the Aspen Municipal Code,
Accessory Dwelling Units may be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission as
Conditional Uses in conformance with the requirements of said Section; and
WHEREAS, the off - street parking space for an Accessory Dwelling Unit may be
waived by Special Review in accordance with Section 26.64.040(A)(2); and
WHEREAS, a FAR Bonus equal to fifty (50) per cent of the Accessory Dwelling
Unit floor area (up to a maximum of 350 sf) shall be granted only if the ADU is •
registered with the Housing Office and available for rental to a qualified employee
working in Pitkin County; and
WHEREAS, the Housing Office, City Engineering, Parks Department and
Community Development Department reviewed the proposal and recommended approval
with conditions; and
WHEREAS, during a public hearing at a regular meeting on December 10, 1996,
the Planning and Zoning Commission approved by a 6 -0 vote the Conditional Use and
Special Review for the Tache Accessory Dwelling Unit with the conditions recommended
by the Community Development Department.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission:
That the Conditional Use and Special Review for a partially below - grade, studio
Accessory Dwelling Unit containing approximately 450 sf within the proposed
reconstructed Tache residence at 1001 East Hyman Avenue is approved with the
following conditions:
1. Prior to the issuance of any building permits the applicant shall:
a. verify with the Housing Office that the allowable floor area of the Accessory
Dwelling Unit contains approximately 450 sf as shown on the plans;
b. verify with the Housing Office that the ADU will contain a kitchen having a
minimum of a two - burner stove with oven, standard sink, and a 6 -cubic foot
refrigerator plus freezer;
c. provide the Housing Office with a signed and recorded Deed Restriction which
must be obtained from the Housing Office;
d. clearly identify the Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) on building permit plans
as a separate studio unit having a private, exterior entrance and being in
compliance with 1994 U.B.C. Sound Transmission Guidelines (Appendix
Chapter 12, Division II, Section 1208);
e. be granted a FAR bonus equal to 50% of the ADU floor area (up to a
maximum of 350 sf) only if the ADU is registered with the Housing Office and
available for rental to a qualified employee of Pitkin County.
f. be granted a waiver of one off - street parking space for the ADU as approved by
Special Review;
g. access the garage directly from the alley and not Cleveland Street, if the
existing single -car garage is relocated, demolished or a new garage is
built;
h. submit plans pursuant to Chapter 26.58, Residential Review Standards to
Community Development for review and approval;
i. show trash containment areas on final development plans. All utility meters
and any new utility pedestals must be installed on an easement provided by the
property owner and not located in the public rights -of -way. Building permit
drawings must indicate all utility meter locations. Meter locations must be
accessible for reading and may not be obstructed by trash storage. The
applicant may consider separate water service and meter, and wastewater
service line for the ADU;
j. show all existing and any new easements for utility services on the final
improvement plans that shall be recorded;
k. meet the run -off design standards of Section 26.88.040(C)(4)(f). The building
permit application must include a drainage mitigation plan and report signed
and stamped by an engineer registered in the state of Colorado;
1. replace any section of the curb and gutter currently in place and in need of
repair. The applicant shall construct sidewalks in accordance with the
plan resulting from a site visit with the applicant's representative prior to final
building inspection;
m. execute and record an agreement requiring the property owner to join any
future improvement districts which may be formed for the purpose of
constructing improvements in the public right -of -way; recording fees shall be
paid prior to final building inspection; and
n. apply for a tree removal permit two (2) weeks prior to the issuance of a
building permit if any trees are to be removed. The required mitigation for any
tree removal shall be as per Section 15.04.450 of the Municipal Code.
2. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy (CO) the applicant shall:
a. submit as -built drawings of the project showing property lines, building
footprint, easements, any encroachments, entry points for utilities entering the
property boundaries and any other improvements to the Aspen/Pitkin County
Data Processing Department in accordance with City GIS requirements; and
b. permit Community Development Department and Housing Office staff to
inspect the property to determine compliance with the conditions of approval.
3. The applicant shall consult with City departments regarding the following:
a. City Engineering for design of improvements, including landscaping, within
public rights -of -way;
b. Parks Department for tree removal, landscaping, and vegetative species;
c. City Streets Department for street and alley cuts; and shall obtain permits for
any work or development, including landscaping, within public rights -of -way.
4. All material representations made by the applicant in this application and during
public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and
considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions.
APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on December 10, 1996.
Attest: Planning and Zoning Commission:
, '&1'(:t°/1-Y
/ckie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk Sara Garton, Chairperson
AGENDA
ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 10, 1996, 4:30 PM
SISTER CITIES MEETING ROOM, CITY HALL
I. COMMENTS
A. Commissioners
B. Planning Staff
C. Public
II. MINUTES
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Farish Conditional Use for ADU / Hallam Lake ESA, Kim Johnson
B. Tache Conditional Use for ADU, Bob Nevins
C. Aspen Meadows Trustee Townhomes SPA Amendment, Amy Amidon
D. Commercial Lodge (CL) Text Amendment, Suzanne Wolff
E. Bonita Conditional Use for ADU, Suzanne Wolff
IV. ADJOURN
TTr
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Bob Nevins, City Planner
THRU: Mary Lackner, Acting Deputy Director
RE: Tache Accessory Dwelling Unit Conditional Use Review - Public Hearing
Waiver of Off - street Parking for the Accessory Dwelling Unit
Parcel ID No. 2737 - 182 -32 -001
DATE: December 10, 1996
SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to demolish an existing one -story, single - family
residence and then construct a new single- family house with an attached 450 sf Accessory
Dwelling Unit. The self- contained studio ADU is to be located partially below -grade
under the primary residence. It has a separate entry and there are no internal connections
to the main house.
The applicant also requests a waiver of the off - street parking requirement for the
Accessory Dwelling Unit. Two off - street parking spaces are provided for the single -
family residence. There is sufficient area for a third parking space with stacked parking.
Stacked parking spaces are permitted for residential uses. However, this space would not
be considered "legal" off - street parking because it would extend into the public right -of-
way of Cleveland Street. On- street parking in this neighborhood is by permit. The renter
of the ADU would be eligible to be issued a Permit C sticker by the City.
Community Development staff recommends that the conditional use for an Accessory
Dwelling Unit (ADU) at 1001 East Hyman Avenue, City of Aspen be approved with
conditions. Staff also recommends that the off- street parking requirement for the studio
ADU be waived. When a new garage is constructed, it shall be accessed from the alley
and not via Cleveland Street.
The Conditional Use Application is attached as Exhibit A; and referral comments from
Engineering, Housing and Parks are included as Exhibit B.
APPLICANT: Mark and Christin Tache as represented by Al Beyer of Al Beyer Design
LOCATION: 1001 East Hyman Avenue, Lot A, Block 34, City and Townsite of Aspen
ZONING: Residential/Multi - Family (R/MF)
LAND USE: Detached, single - family residence
LOT AREA: 3,000 sf
ALLOWABLE FAR: 2,400 sf
APPLICANT'S REQUEST: To construct an attached 450 sf studio Accessory Dwelling
Unit (ADU) and to waive the off - street parking space for the ADU.
REVIEW PROCESS: Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) require conditional use
approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission at a public hearing. It is a one -step
review that requires notification to be published, posted and mailed.
BACKGROUND: The existing detached, single - family residence is a one -story structure
situated on a 3,000 sf lot. There is also a small shed and a detached one -car garage along
the alley. The garage is accessed via Cleveland Street.
The applicant proposes to demolish the existing residence and shed and then construct a
new single - family home. The existing garage is to remain. The new residence includes a
totally separate, self- contained Accessory Dwelling Unit. The proposed ADU is a 450 sf
studio unit with a separated sleeping area, kitchen and full -bath. It is partially above
natural grade which allows the unit to have good views, natural light and ventilation.
Due to the narrow lot width, there is not sufficient area to provide an off - street parking
space for the ADU and still maintain a grassy backyard. Therefore, the applicant is
requesting that this requirement be waived.
REFERRAL COMMENTS: Attached as Exhibit B are the comments from City
Engineering, Parks Department and Housing Office.
STAFF COMMENTS: Pursuant to Section 26.60.040, a development application for a
conditional use approval shall meet the following standards:
A. The conditional use is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and standards
of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan, and with the intent of the zone district in which it
is proposed to be located;
RESPONSE: Included within the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan is the Housing
Action Plan which establishes a policy of promoting, marketing, and implementing the
Accessory Dwelling Unit program. The Residential/Multi - family (R/MF) zone district is
designated to provide areas for intensive long term residential purposes with customary
accessory uses. This conditional use request for the approval of an Accessory Dwelling
Unit within a single - family residence is consistent with the intent, philosophy, and
policies of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan, and complies with the intent of the
Residential/Multi - Family (R/MF) zone district.
2
B. The conditional use is consistent and compatible with the character of the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and surrounding land uses, or enhances
the mixture of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development;
RESPONSE: The proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) is a compatible use within
the East Aspen neighborhood. The immediate area surrounding the site contains a wide
variety of housing types, densities, and architectural styles. A considerable amount of
redevelopment has occurred in this section of town in recent years. The neighborhood used
to house a number of local residents /employees. To assist in off - setting this trend, the East
Hopkins Affordable Housing development was built.
The existing residence is an older, single -story structure that is owned and inhabited by a
local working couple. The proposal to construct a new, single - family home that includes an
attached studio Accessory Dwelling Units would be consistent and compatible with the land
uses and character of this neighborhood. It would also provide another opportunity for local
working residents to live in the area.
C. The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed conditional
use minimizes adverse effects, including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and
vehicular circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise, vibrations, and odor on
surrounding properties;
RESPONSE: The 450 sf studio Accessory Dwelling Unit is contained within the
footprint of the proposed new single - family residence. The unit is designed to have a
separate covered entry facing East Hyman Avenue. It is a totally self- contained ADU
with no interior connections to the primary residence. Parking for the unit could be
accommodated by either issuing a neighborhood on- street parking permit or allowing a
non -legal off - street, stacked parking space to satisfy the parking requirements.
The ADU should not create a significant visual impact from either East Hyman Avenue
or Cleveland Street nor should it adversely impact the adjacent properties. Automobile
trips should be minimized since the site is proximate to the RFTA bus routes that operate
along Cooper Avenue. The site is also within walking and biking distance of downtown,
community services, City Market, several parks and trails. The approval of an Accessory
Dwelling Unit within a newly constructed single - family residence should not adversely
impact the surrounding properties in terms of trash, service delivery, noise, vibrations
and /or odor.
D. There are adequate public facilities and services to serve the conditional use
including but not limited to roads, potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire
protection, emergency, hospital and medical services, drainage systems, and schools;
RESPONSE: There are adequate public facilities and services to serve the proposed
Accessory Dwelling Unit.
3
E. The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to meet the incremental need for
increased employees generated by the conditional use;
RESPONSE: The applicant is creating an ADU. in accordance with Section 26.40.090,
Accessory dwelling units. The unit shall be deed restricted, meet the Housing Authority's
guidelines for resident occupied units and shall be limited to rental periods of not less
than six (6) months in duration. Owners of the principal residence shall have the right to
place a qualified employee or employees of his or her choosing in the ADU. Pursuant to
Ordinance 38, Series of 1996, the applicants may receive a FAR Bonus of 50% of the
ADU floor area (up to a maximum of 350 sf), only if the ADU is registered with the
Housing Office and available for rental to an eligible working resident of Pitkin County.
F. The proposed conditional use complies with all additional standards imposed on it by
the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and by all applicable requirements of this title;
RESPONSE: The proposed conditional use for an Accessory Dwelling Unit within a new
single - family residence is in conformance with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan.
The conditional use application complies with all other applicable requirements if the
ADU parking requirement is waived by Special Review.
RECOMMENDATION: Community Development staff recommends that the
conditional use and the waiver of the parking requirement for the proposed Accessory
Dwelling Unit (ADU) at 1001 East Hyman Avenue in the City of Aspen be approved
with the following conditions:
1. Prior to the issuance of any building permits the applicant shall:
a. verify with the Housing Office that the allowable floor area of the Accessory
Dwelling Unit contains approximately 450 sf as shown on the plans;
b. verify with the Housing Office that the ADU will contain a kitchen having a
minimum of a two- burner stove with oven, standard sink, and a 6 -cubic foot
refrigerator plus freezer;
c. the applicant shall provide the Housing Office with a signed and recorded Deed
Restriction which must be obtained from the Housing Office;
d. clearly identify the Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) on building permit plans
as a separate studio unit having a private, exterior entrance and being in
compliance with 1994 U.B.C. Sound Transmission Guidelines (Appendix
Chapter 12, Division II, Section 1208);
e. a FAR bonus equal to 50% of the ADU floor area (up to a maximum of 350 sf)
4
shall be granted only if the ADU is registered with the Housing Office and
available for rental to a qualified employee of Pitkin County.
f. the off - street parking space for the ADU shall be waived by Special Review;
g. if the existing single -car garage is relocated, demolished or a new garage is
constructed, the garage shall be accessed directly from the alley and not
Cleveland Street;
h. submit plans pursuant to Chapter 26.58, Residential Review Standards to
Community Development for review and approval;
i. trash containment areas shall be shown on final development plans. All utility
meters and any new utility pedestals must be installed on an easement provided
by the property owner and not located in the public rights -of -way. Building
permit drawings must indicate all utility meter locations. Meter locations
must be accessible for reading and may not be obstructed by trash storage. The
applicant may consider separate water service and meter, and wastewater
service line for the ADU;
j. all existing and any new easements for utility services shall be shown on the
final improvement plans and recorded;
k. site development shall meet the run -off design standards of
Section 26.88.040(C)(4)(f). The building permit application must include a
drainage mitigation plan and report signed and stamped by an engineer
registered in the state of Colorado;
1. any section of the curb and gutter currently in place and in need of repair shall
be replaced. The applicant shall construct sidewalks in accordance with the
plan resulting from a site visit with the applicant's representative prior to final
building inspection;
m. an agreement shall be executed and recorded requiring the property owner to
join any future improvement districts which may be formed for the purpose of
constructing improvements in the public right -of -way; recording fees shall be
paid prior to final building inspection; and
n. apply for a tree removal permit two (2) weeks prior to the issuance of a
building permit if any trees are to be removed. The required mitigation for any
tree removal shall be as per Section 15.04.450 of the Municipal Code.
5
2. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy (CO):
a. submit as -built drawings of the project showing property lines, building
footprint, easements, any encroachments, entry points for utilities entering the
property boundaries and any other improvements to the Aspen/Pitkin County
Data Processing Department in accordance with City GIS requirements; and
b. Community Development Department and Housing Office staff shall inspect
the property to determine compliance with the conditions of approval.
3. The applicant shall consult with City departments regarding the following:
a. City Engineering for design of improvements, including landscaping, within
public rights -of -way;
b. Parks Department for tree removal, landscaping, and vegetative species;
c. City Streets Department for street and alley cuts; and shall obtain permits for
any work or development, including landscaping, within public rights -of -way.
4. All material representations made by the applicant in this application and during
public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and
considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions.
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS: Planning and Zoning Commission may
approve the conditions above, approve additional conditions or disapprove the
conditional use for the Accessory Dwelling Unit and the waiver of the ADU off- street
parking requirement.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the conditional use and the waiver of
off - street parking for the Accessory Dwelling Unit located at 1001 East Hyman Avenue
with the conditions outlined in the Community Development Department memo dated
December 10, 1996."
EXHIBITS: "A" - Conditional Use Application;
"B" - Referral Comments
6
\ F
MEMORANDUM
To: Bob Nevins, Planner
Thru: Nick Adeh, City Engineevit. t�
From: Chuck Roth, Project Engineer c�
Date: November 25, 1996
Re: Tache Accessory Dwelling Unit Conditional Use
(Parcel ID No. 2737 - 182 -32 -001 )
Having reviewed the above referenced application, and having made a site inspection. the
Engineering Department has the following comments:
1. Sidewalk. Cur and Gutter - Curb and gutter are in place. Any section in disrepair needs to be
replaced, and the applicant will have to construct sidewalk. prior to the final building inspection.
The submitted sidewalk plan resulted from a site visit with the applicant's representative.
2. Trash & Utilities - Show trash containment area on final development plans. All utility meters
and any new utility pedestals must be installed on the applicant's property and not in the public
right-of-way. For pedestals, easements must be provided. The building permit drawings must
indicate all utility meter locations. Meter locations must be accessible for reading and may not be
obstructed by trash storage. The applicant may consider separate water service and meter and
wastewater service line for the ADU.
3. Parkin° - On - street parking is limited in the area, and an on - site parking space should be
required for the ADU and shown on the building permit drawings.
4. Site Drainage - One of the infrastructure systems that is incapable of handling additional loads
is the City storm sewer and storm runoff system. The site development should meet runoff design
standards of Sec. 26.88.040.C.4.f, and the building permit application must include a drainage
mitigation plan and a report signed and stamped by an engineer registered in the State of Colorado.
•
1 •
•
Exhibit B
5. Improvement Districts - The applicant should be required to agree to join any improvement
districts that are formed for the purpose of constructing improvements in adjacent public rights -of-
way and to provide a signed and notarized agreement with recording fees prior to the final building
inspection.
6. Work in the Public Right -of -way - Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and
development in public rights -of -way adjacent to private property, we advise the applicant as
follows:
The applicant must receive approval from city engineering (920 -5080) for design of
improvements, including landscaping, within public rights -of -way, parks
department (920 -5120) for vegetation species, and streets department (920 -5130) for
street and alley cuts, and shall obtain permits for any work or development,
including landscaping, within public rights -of -way from the city community
development department.
M96.285
2
NOV 13 '96 11!47AM nSai HOUSING OFC P.1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bob Nevins, Community Development Dept.
FROM: Cindy Christensen, Housing Office
DATE November 13, 1996
RE: Tache.ADU Review
Parcel ID No. 2737 -18232 -001
issue The applicant is requesting to build an attached, approximately 450 square foot
ADU.
BACKGROUND: The size of the unit fails within the Code and is to be located garden
level with the entrance an the north side:
Accessory dwelling units shall contain not lees that three hundred (300) square ;eet of
aloe** floor area and not more than seven hundred (700) square feet of allowable moor
area. The unit shell he deed restricted, meeting Ufa housing authority's guidelines for
MOW occupied units and shalt be limited to rental periods of not lass than sox (8) months
in duration. Owners of the principal residence shall have the right to place a qualified
employee or employees of his or her choosing In the accessory dwelling unit
RECOAMIENDATION: The Housing Office would recommend approval of the request
with the following conditions:
1. The kitchen must be built to the following specifications:
____ _ For A ry Dweifng Units and Caretaker Dwelling Unita, a minimum of a two-
burner stove with oven, standard sink, and a 6 -cubic foot refrigerator plus freezer.
2. Before the applicant can receive building permit approval, the applicant must
provide to the Housing Office a signed and recorded Deed Restriction, which can
be obtained from the Housing Office,
3. Housing Office inspect the unit prior to approval on the Certificate of Occupancy.
rdenarnacheadu
• Exhibit B
NOV.19 '96 1O :61AM f'.i
Memorandum
TO: Bob Nevins, Community Development
FROM Rebecca Schickling, Parks Department
DATE: November 19, 1996
RE: Tache ADU - Conditional Use
We have reviewed the application for an ADI J for the Tache properly. The application
does not show the new building and therefore difficult to determine the impact to existing
trees on the property. Additionally, although trees are shown on the site survey, there is
no indication of size or species. However, no trees within the ROW are to be damaged by
the new construction A tree removal permit will be required for any trees proposed fir
removal, however, the new building construction should try to avoid the existing trees as
much as possible.
A IALI Mal J.
LAND USE APPLICATTCN Foal
_
1) Project Name T ' U
2) Project location LOO 1 e •)"t"(
ate CU. 34 (AT /\
(indicate street address, lot & blodc nmter, legal aesociptia, where • -
aPPropriate)
3) Present Zoning f Mf 4) Int Siva '3000 SA. 'f r
,A �,.�
• 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Phone # Mitr`kt ch#44r N - rAck i l 6
loot tMApN
6) Representative's Name, Address & Phone ? fats- ` as-
oll� N•MILta 3 -(I 1z
7) Type of Application (please made all that apply).
Conditional Use _ Conceptual SPA _ ODnoeptanai Historic Dev_
Special Review' _ Final SPA _ Final Historic Dec_
_ 8040 Greenl ine _ Ctxceptaaal POD _ Minor Historic Dev_
_ St-ram Margin _ Final RID _ historic DEmcolition
_ Mountain Vier Plane _ a _ Historic Designation
Cxdaminiumization _ Text/Map Amendment QiQs Allotment
Lot Split Tiro _ acts na aptitin
Adjustment _
8) Desr4.ption of aci t ng Uses (near and type of existing s zees;
aporcadnmte sq_ et .; number of bedrooms; any previous approvals granted to the
prcprt:✓) -
( .Gee SA I✓r Suss. , I too s. FT S 1 - Zoo den s t i Ar9,9ag
C2 OR.
9) Desc iptian of Development Application
t4PPltcasf is teimestilla ppvwa e frir an ,4 -frraeita O.U. auoi. parl avt?
ivarter •o✓- a gfendeb matt. TFa unt wit( be atfac(,ua( *14 poresasl
mu) re s ai i ce t,ul w41 / 12 a an rnxemAir , 456 9. t✓l eve a
10) have you attached the following?
ytS Response to Attadtnt 2, Minim>m Sit:missian Contents
y et Response to Attachment 3, Specific 9,F,niCCion Contents
yes Response to Attdment 4, Bevies: Standards for Your Application
Exhibit A
Mark and Christin Tache
1001 East Hyman
Aspen, CO 81611
(970) 920 -2533
To Whom it May Concern,
We, Mark and Christin Tache, owners of Block 34, Lot A, in Aspen
Colorado (1001 East Hyman) hereby designate Al Beyer, of Al Beyer
Design, 410 North Mill, B -11, Aspen, Colorado, 925 -8339, as the
representative authorized to act on our behalf in the development
application process.
Thank you,
2'' .
�,
Mark Tache Christin Tache
LTIC LTIC LTIC LTIC LTIC LTIC LTIC LTIC LTIC LTIC LTIC LTIC LTIC LTIC LTIC LTIC LTIC LTIC LTIC LTIC LTIC.. TIC LTIC LTIC LTIC LTIC LTIC TIC LTIC Lnr-rte
• Jpiyers]JtIe
Insurance Crporation
NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS
RICHMOND. VIRGINIA
Policy Number
85 -01- 0 9 7 9 7 4
SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND THE PROVISIONS OF
THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS HEREOF, LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION, a Virginia corporation.
herein called the Company, insures, as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the
amount of insurance stated in Schedule. A,. and, costs, attorneys"' fees and expenses which the Company may become
obligated to pay hereunder, sustained or incurred by the insured by :reason of:
1. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested otherwise than as stated therein;
2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on such title;
3. Lack of a right of access 'to and from the land or
4. Unmarketability of such title.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Company has caused this policy to be signed and sealed, to be valid when Schedule A is
countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of:the Company, all in accordance with its By -Laws.
Iawyers`Iide Ins a •rporation
By. N c 0� 0.µra61/
President
Attest: 6 0 1
1/3. 1 90 1 / 4411 1" rfi:
Secretary.
terminate n
te in regard to the matter or matters for which such prompt authorization of the Company.
lawyer
glide
Insurance @rporation
NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS
RICHMOND VIRGINIA
SCHEDULE A- 0[4NER'S POLICY
CASE NUMBER DATE OF POLICY AMOUNT OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER
PCT -3428 07/07/89 @ 1:45 P.M. $ 100,000.00 85 -01- 097974
1. NAME OF INSURED:.
MARK C. TACHE AND CHRISTEN COOPER TACHE
2. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREIN AND WHICH IS COVERED BY THIS POLICY IS:
IN FEE SIMPLE
3. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST REFERRED TO HEREIN IS AT DATE OF POLICY VESTED IN:
MARK C. TACHE AND CHRISTEN COOPER TACHE
4. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
LOT A, BLOCK 34, EAST ASPEN ADDITION TO THE CITY AND TO NSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF
PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC.
A- 0 - 1 2 As ANAL i 601 E. HOPKINS AVE.
_ Countersigned Authorized Agen ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
(303) 925 -1766
THE POLICY NUMBER SHOWN THIS SCHEDULE MUST AGREE WITH THE PREPRINTED NUMBER ON THE
COVER SHEET.
Form 100 Litho in U.S.A.
ms_n_inn_nnn1�
ri Li
„
i4 : i. ! _fi `
d t i j Lip ` 1 al l
3 a Y- tl[e a,' :dpi 11 a. i
1
�
x
i i
I t `
�• a /
1. L _ � /
/ 1 0
_ 5 C6,”
ii i
I 7-7.1v
5
i;ii
r - ----___ .
a
i n
ee i
J
•
1
RIMkN AVE7JUS ,
CURB
•
/JCONC 7933.1
/ ®
(-; t p7 SYEEL shit
1 5.32 / r 001. 5 75 ° 09'll'E 30.00' 1 AM
/ ` / 0
/ 7 p j . / 1 in
/ \ w / 4 i'
/ e 1
I STEPS
14.4 .) / 13.0 - - - 11.E 3
/ ° 7 936.2
N N
I 1
* _ 9.001- 7961.9
; I I
I 6.1
I '. I o
I HOUSE NI
r
1 I
I
0
\i O
—1.11, 0 4.5 J, 20.4 5
I °
O
I w
W I P \,L.i 9 •
P -q /, °C
u 1 ° 1� x A mt,
N I v m
8
m w
cc / P
U N
n•
-V_ v-
' ,' -. z
D I \ �� � j 0 SHED 1
-
J
V I .
I ti � 1 � 7 1
I ,S. It 12.5 5
I 1 \001 E. rt`{mw4
I / - NON-: 'n415 Is
/
Of AirSN 564.961 a idattA5
``,....•
I 7 ,��
I SuK9EY- 6cc a9KK sift)
` t$t OIL%61NM. Cpl &4A5
I Pw936+oe 1 )8 ° =1 wow{
I VET ■ C. 16 nit APP son or
O
1VE GA RAGE SLAB 7935.97 / 11f1$ p�E'
1 0
I
1 s.v
o
\ 1
1 NA N 75 ° 09'11 . 9 30.00' 1
. /
/
/ GRAVEL
\ \Hodsloric \ /.>r I m/
i , I ' ‘..>,, Park
tea pu to D
"Si
a
a1
;I g 4g10 4 , �
S 'C B ('-0 i 4 a mom, Roo d%
8 i K w'MR 4 R ry d ed e. 4, A
g .. > 1s \
i
, pt r '^4.4 µOmNm WewW q �pl , 'M P O 9 ltvvk�
•1 1 2¢ Bonn to .. 1 2 P I P R ood % RO t _/`
44 P (f 4a O srio 9unnY ? CI 3 p4O � �
{a a L9 Slerre B � d °/yYe ry Sy4$ O N. W . /N `.l\�
vs, P ID
4 ,v,* I Wen i Hun4r •. �/� V
1 3311 flaa e 4 e n
P E 9 g f , Cy i \od�Q
I Maek Ty Y
0 F cL S ' 5 Tent
cod ckt <n `'
,F 6f] a o R li311'Im T
l C � �C * t) INf b$ N0l allslrools or roads
, O
V{+ $ A � 1•' > 1 Po ACf S dk< 7 aro shown on mans or In
P } 1.2:. F GGII Courbe - e ° 'I R �^ s- r`. s eal. an Construction
rneY In
rT J .1 y S m Ye Sr Vlne Sr progress In certain J arses
4. •Y W \ W 17)5
W 4_4. � sa °/49 �� peii2
, _._ i ei 4
Maroon Lreek Rd S ], R11 sr 'g b G H Soolh AV co ,D
• . > Ci S.!w M/l/ 4Ye /n 3C._ Park e7�F I 4.'%y 4.. c d o c % r < e 0 7
8 w s S ti
r g 4 ^ 7. Al M a vh lass... CM� '�S I / 4a 3 — � V a
U 1, N Fr p 4
¢ IbSO , Uo / / / f / J Marti Fl...11.l.) ,]4 €I � Z % eA N p r ®I O I _
1� S F U Mamm Ct Pr ` / 1 � C ` N Ji.fryn ad
i t i J { 1 / M R NJ G 1113 Nn H y
I p � '' d Ob M M1k R 411 b 4 ". 1pents,
OM
Ye dla �r�4 MYOm .III ! 7 0 lT :. s i ,
1 T o nor Ot Q•� M SY { R6 161 ]
N 4 y p
Maroon Lake IiJ • cpl M.In I rHE `l ygg'e N 4 vl � < < 4 0'
�' OM l�WOlillk Cr0. II l�J M de. Rd 1.-('J a d' MIl Coa ' r
l JP 0/ 4 Dnw Dl.. FJ.3 MJI NA Il bt Q3 I n FMA G4? P rtg PE
„ .. I I ( ` p l c
0 aaa Qt4 Dement Al ua.M1 M1116 I
.CS J
G1lwwdp L) M h .. 6113 ail 0 T . I $ � Sf 4 yl � p* \ ^U
Ar ( IM1 II (l 4 SL C 46 Mountain V IT. C 3J (` ` I I w 9
4 1 Ire! re!Sn 6-7 M ICl U I2 Summl 51 a k s - W ♦r e4 C$ � S t � ._
n li I 117 Silva-CI GF] M Oak, M 113 p
'
i . All V 0. ... 1 33 C I E ` C 1 ey
(7 carman n rw.J n MI In ca] As J `C1 � p ����. a
I n,l L uN3 rn n .. cN liy NuM .. IJ< R Ih la be % 1 R^Y " / ` q 0'941414^ d /n:
I I Ha IIa 1Y .. Illl GIhnS GA R A Ilb `l .rS a C' 3
• Hamad t C .. GJ OII° 'i�ln
IIaYS . Gfi U 5 f .. .1 O rA I$ II.I.M1 R Je P' ..16.] ISUP < / r 4/ 4
1 II II G 11.3 O 1 ui4Dr .... 16 Roaring reek R d .I1 F15 (0 \9 4 '- C O
■ ■In 4R Flh I F1.5 Ileum 1'. 1 14 14 N G4 r /4k n
r Ilbl L (1-3 ( 1 I•n1 NJ 13 S 0 Ih DI M1 5 Mhn U E G 1 J M1
r � F' . 111 \S 4115.M1 IIJJ. I _ F4 W ... .. FIJ Lt F3 SI 4 - - 56
I11 M E 113 lI IT 1
llr 1 G3 Ilcp41 411J6 Aid M 0. ... ..0.L L C GJ S S S 113 0 .% ..• \ i
Cagle Creek rk .. Fl II dC 4 R4 t Po e Rd ... F ( -J S S i-111 T 1L1. a
C Ned NJ L t W.I,) Ilyma A 41NM1 Rr FaM1 163 SM1nb NU. Ill
Thalami 61 61 J
S .. 1643 Py,o.L M15 .CS tNJY fGf 1 1l �q
R Il I� fa S I 6 11 CM1
YY W SI R Tw 416 p ... LF -3. 6 1
('M1ar WMJ F'3 //J I ... 1.. y' , q ��� ,
Cl La. 1114.7 R. I ... (. 6 i s r a "
fk INS IIfi lit A ... F (iA R L ... (2 .3 LY t I V S f fi ii:: "WW
' Irt In. ... .11.E ... µlw ... I -n
C rml f E LI / Laurel In 11 -E RN Mw W. 11G J M1 R Genre Rd . 11 -6 A
0C JL G P R6 GSb RN Rd. DE µ M Rd Cllba W FewS
W
1 Ilr 11 -e R R 5 ILM1I S t s 11.3 0 . ...
Cry pt Nd. ..r .. 115 F .....E 6 Sm\ 1 14 . - aIr R dY 45 To Twin L.
W
Dem
1-4 RWt P1 Rd Y J DJ ri M1 Nd DOC CndCOGC
1% mSr..........._ .........1 :.....:...........ILJ men St G R'o GutleO .. ...... .GILS - M1 Smw guMY C4 1 P
n ,
ajo /sScmli II j a II II II n A:i'I IA MAPS II
0 1•4. 3
_.,. kmr. ':aew,y. ...� s.M19P •a -... �vp� +xY '4l negfl;c 1 n_ti .... .,.
' n�'Ytgn 4; 6kMAOIdJalJ 3 "sue PRf .. ..
i�
,.
4&
c r
k,' 03
How - t* Ateli ' f , roc ' ( '441° •
A f f ite kz ViDttO �W A . ATTACHMENT 4
/Ids applreh IS �✓ a o taint
N
K Wyk . Review tandards:' Development of Conditional Use
a IS ef- ap ^ I s alt i locahl :
when considering a Development Ap for a Conditional
Use, the Commission shall consider whether all of the following •
standards are met.
h MP A. The conditional use is . consistent with the purposes,
V goals, objectives and standards of the Aspen Area
Cv1Gcu
Comprehensive Plan, and with the intent of the Zone
i,p, .S District in which it is proposed to be located; and
B. The conditional use is consistent and compatible with
MIS P "�b ✓ . the character of the immediate yicinity of the parcel
r proposed for development and surrounding land uses, or
iS Controttab "✓ enhances the mixture of complimentary uses and ac-
, M. 204,.: 6Ut tivities in the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development; and
'ti(a s G�om1 . � ' scab
C. The location, size, design and operating characteris-
�le .�, tics of the proposed conditional use minimizes adverse
q ✓ effects, including visual impacts, impacts on pedes-
NtASS a^f r"aJ ' trian and vehicular circulation, parking, trash,
p a rk ;nq . w3Werma service delivery, noise, vibrations and odor on
oys ,bi i.ca i "ae 4 surrounding properties; and
E qu • P remover
co small to nN si4t w1 nt
hag a "" , it hmo l, f D. There are adequate public facilities and services to
I � . serve the conditional use including but not limited to
is Me "bk' roads, potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks,
i✓ police, fire protection, emergency medical services,
l ie, {tiEV<Ave..• 4 hospital and medical services, drainage systems, and
schools; and
E. The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to
ObVIMSI1,7eS V meet the incremental need for increased employees
generated by the conditional use; and
� F. The proposed conditional use complies with all addi-
- `3t.(Q•1''t-t»tit IbU .✓ tional standards imposed on it by the Aspen Area
Pry hail Comprehensive Plan and by all other applicable require-
ments of this chapter.
-eft •
!J �t 5 � t4_conditionaluse
A
' , tec use k4e R,4.6,('. ev`caurayi emplate. vow t a4 612ca4.(u %& eu3411 nor eon -lots* 1 *
is to iwthd >v\ 417ed it It remSovabl't Az thMke kia. ?Intl., ve1vwntieoili - fie. A.o tor
thI s Q`r°se& •
(.44 6101 bu3 IQM1 in 14 Is 1 . H^a"t Mt hauhifr an ,4 Au'
2. a S dh. o *4 ?3t1 dva cowrnuik6. ;,..a...‘ Aaavl�tic� bccaust 4
a J ∎•■NM) '1Q ?ati4A1 SP". U bfi Q b� SAW
a lack of hunt m a Ai+ , aL4 .
Dec. 5, 1996
PO t �^ '81612
a . .1249
Dear P and Z Board Members:
I am writing to address the request for a waiver of parking for
the ADU at the Tache property, 1000 E. Hyman.
The Board of Adjustment on Nov. 7, 1996, denied approval for "a
parking variance to maintain the current non - conforming existing parking
conditions on site until such time that the existing garage 1s replaced"
(see pg. 5 of Nov. 7 minutes). (The Tache's requested to retain the ex-
isting one car garage and park 2 cars on the Cleveland St. side of the
property.)
This would mean parking 2 cars partially on City property.
Please note Chuck Roth's comments on pg. 4 of the minutes who said "the
City does not want an encroachment for parking on that City owned land."
And also on pg. 4 Ron Erickson's comments, he "supported the City oppo-
sition to giving away public access by granting an easement across a
_public right of way and the number of bedrooms related to the number of
parking 'spaces as required by law ".
So far, I do not know what has happened to this situation,
except for the present request for a waiver for parking for the ADU.
With the tearing down of the present house, a 2 car garage with
entry from the alley (therefore a space for 4he ADU car) as almost every-
one else is required to do, should be included. There is plent of space
in the new plan (which includes several variances) and therefore no hard-
ship is apparent.
I heartily approve the basic concept of the new plan, but we
struggle all the time with parking on this cul de sac - it is truly a
very big problem - so I hope the P &.Z Board will take this into consider-
ation.
Yours tru ,
ra dine L. eyman
BOARD OF ADJUSTN, r AEMBER 7, 1996
DeLuca commented that when he made service calls in that area parking was
terrible. He said the board should not give the option of a variance and require
parking on private property.
MOTION: Erickson moved to approve a 4.5 foot side yard set-
back variance to allow a one story covered porch between the
house and the property line along Cleveland Street. This is in
addition to the 2.2 foot setback granted on 10/24/96 for a new
structure that would continue to maintain the proposed
nonconformance. The porch area within the setback shall not
exceed 150 square feet and shall not exceed seven feet in height to
the bottom of the beam. Martineau seconded. ALL IN FAVOR,
MOTION PASSED.
MOTION: Erickson moved to approve a 6 inch depth variance
for excavation within the 10 foot front yard variance set back on
Hyman Avenue with all representations made by the applicant
from the record. Martineau seconded. ALL IN FAVOR.
MOTION PASSED.
MOTION: Erickson moved to approve a parking variance to
maintain the current non - conforming existing parking conditions
on site until such time that the existing garage is replaced. If the
garage is replaced then the parking shall be brought up to
current code requirements. 3 AGAINST, 2 IN FAVOR.
MOTION DENIED.
Meeting adjourned at 5:25p.m.
Next regular scheduled meeting is December 12, 1996.
ackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk
5
BOARD OF ADJUSTtWICNT NOVEMBER 7. 1996
Erickson asked the definition of a parking space. Thomas said that the code read
8.5 ft. x 18 ft. per space paved or with gravel. They were required to have 2 off
street parking spaces.
Beyer stated that the building permit required an 18 ft. curb cut. He noted that
Chuck Roth, Engineering, walked the property with him and the City does not
i want an encroachment for parking on that city owned land.
Heyman said the garage should meet the same requirements as a new home. She
asked why tearing down the existing house, building a new larger house and
adding an ADU would not change the use of the property and add to the parking
problems. She said that forty years ago Grandma did not have three cars and in
later years she was house bound with few visitors. Heyman noted for the last ten
years she lived next door and only in the last three to four years have there been
many more cars. She said that the parking was horrible in that area and in the
winter you cannot park on the curb because then it doesn't get plowed.
Beyer said that this alley was not an ideal situation because the building across the
alley encroached and made it difficult to turn into their garage entrance.
I- Ieyman noted that the building across the alley was clearly in violation but had
nothing to do with his situation.
Iglehart said there was no problem with the parking or anything else with this
project. He stated that the Tache's have been there for a long time and the
monster next door had really encroached on their life style. He noted the parking
problems stem from the building next door and the bigger houses all around.
Martineau commented the problems had no easy solutions. He said parking was a
major problem in that part of town and this board should not be in the business of
making it worse. Martineau noted that the parking was not the same as it was
forty years ago and that was why the laws changed. He was in favor of off street
parking on private property.
Erickson supported the City opposition to giving away public access by granting i
an easement across a public right -of -way. He said the number of bedrooms
related to the number of parking spaces was required by law.
4
. BOARD OF ADJT r MENT a 'TOBER 24,1996
CASE #90 -10 714 SOUTH GALENA 1
CASE #96 -02 616 SOUTH GALENA 3
CASE # 96 -11 1001 EAST HYMAN 3
MINUTES 8
9
BAR
O D OF ADi +rMENT OCTOBER 24,1996
Ron Erickson called the meeting to order at 4:15 p.m. with Jim Iglehart, Howard
DeLuca, and Dan Martineau present. Rick Head, Charles Paterson and David
Schott were excused.
Erickson noted that since there were only four members present, all four had to
agree for any variance to be granted. He said that what they will do is close the
public portion of the meeting, have commissioners comments and then open it up
to the public. The Board will leave it up to the applicant to proceed or have it
tabled to another time. David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney, said that procedure
was fine.
PUBLIC HEARING:
CASE #90 -10
714 SOUTH GALENA
Ron Erickson said the applicant requested a variance for a covered entryway and
enclosed storage for trash cans which extended to the wall on the lot line.
Erickson asked for the affidavit of posting. David Hoefer, Assistant City
Attorney, stated for the record the affidavit for posting was in compliance with the
law and the Board had jurisdiction to proceed.
Erickson asked Robert Fritsch, Builder for Applicant, Michael Johns, why the
Board should grant these variances. Fritsch provided photographs and plans
showing the area where the variances were requested. He said that the retaining
wall was 7 - 8 feet in height which boxes in the front entrance. Fritsch said his
understanding was that the roof framework was installed by a contractor in 1991-
92. He noted that the Building Dept. "red tagged" it (which was as it should be)
because it was not in compliance. He was not the Contractor at that time. Fritsch
stated that Michael Johns called him to fix the problem. He applied for a building
permit and was rejected (as it should have been). Fritsch stated the problem
(which was unique with this front entrance) was the height of the walls
surrounding the entrance. He further noted the area was shaded and with snow
ice rink was created. Fritsch said the only place to put the trash cans was right in
the front and there was a bear in the area. He commented if the bear was at the
trash cans and a person walked out the front door, the bear would run him right
over. He said it was logical to cover the roof and enclose the trash cans.
1
BOARD OF ADJIJSYMENT OCTOBER 24,1996
Erickson asked how big the enclosure needed to be to enclose the trash cans.
Fritsch replied 6' long and 30" deep and was shown on the drawing. Erickson
said there were two closets now and asked what they were used for at this time.
Fritsch said they were for skis. Erickson commented that the applicant wanted to
put a roof on the beams to enclose the roof to where it ends on the top of the
retaining wall. Fritsch said the tails would be cut off so the roof would be directly
over the wall.
Howard DeLuca said the grade seemed to be subterranean. Fritsch replied that the
retaining wall right across from the entrance was about 5' and then it stepped up to
almost 8' high in the back.
Jim Iglehart said that they were supposed to grant the minimal variance to
accomplish the goal (if the board saw fit to do that). He asked if the two trash
cans were to have an enclosure built over the top of the cans which lifted up a lid
and drop the cans into the enclosure would accomplish the goal of keeping the
trash cans out of the bears way. Fritsch said he had seen that done in a lot of areas
and it doesn't slow the bears down. He noted that behind closed doors would be a
better enclosure.
Dan Martineau asked if there would be something done on the other side because
the Baker Fallin drawings show another new closet. Fritsch said that the closet
already exists.
No public comments.
DeLuca said that his main consideration was the severe difference in grade which
was about 5 feet. Martineau said he always had the same question: what kind of
hardship was this. Is there really a hardship? DeLuca stated there probably was
an ice build up that would be a danger and possibly create a hardship. Iglehart
said that it seemed that the request was for more than was needed and if they gave
up the ski locker for the trash cans, that would probably work. Erickson
commented the roof covering may be considered a safety issue therefore causing a
hardship and maybe give up one ski locker.
Erickson opened the public hearing.
2
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OCTOBER 24 1996
Erickson asked the applicant if he wanted to go ahead with the motion. Fritsch
said that he was willing to go ahead. Erickson said that he needed clarification for
the roof . There are 3 or 4 major stone pedestals that the roof would rest on and
they would be left open. He said that would be part of any variance that was
granted, just the shed roof and nothing more.
MOTION: Erickson moved to deny the request for a side yard setback
for the construction of a trash storage enclosure at 714 South Galena.
Martineau seconded. ALL IN FAVOR, 4 - 0. MOTION CARRIED.
MOTION: Erickson moved to grant a five (5') foot side yard setback
variance to allow a covered entryway at 714 South Galena as per
drawings. This is to be a shed roof and not a complete enclosure.
Martineau seconded. ALL IN FAVOR, 4 - 0. MOTION PASSED.
PUBLIC HEARING:
CASE #96 -02
616 SOU TH GAL ENA
David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney, said the applicant could not be here again
and he informed Patricia Kirianoff this was the last time for continuance. They
could reapply with a new application.
PUBLIC HEARING:
CASE #96 -11
1001 EAST HYMAN
Ron Erickson stated that the applicant, Mark and Christin Tache, requested a
1.) 2'2" side yard setback variance for a new structure on Cleveland Street which
would continue an existing non - conformance 2.) 6'7" setback on Cleveland for a
variance to add a covered front porch 3.) 10' variance for excavation on the
Hyman Avenue side to provide courtyard entrance to a garden level ADU which
may be up to 5' below grade 4.) a parking requirement variance to allow the
second of the required 2 off -site parking spaces be filled by existing gravel
parking space in front of the garage off Cleveland.
3
BOARD OF ADJUST MENT OCTOBER 24,1996
David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney, had received an affidavit of notice which
was properly posted and the board had jurisdiction to proceed.
Al Beyer, representative for applicant, Mark and Christin Tache, showed picture
of the parcel as it looks now. He stated that Grandma Tache owned the house
since 1962 and Mark and Christin want to build their own home and employee
housing for Mark's brother Mike. The lot is 3,000 non - conforming square feet.
He noted they were allowed to build 2,400 sf house and the garage on the back
was free if accessed from the alley, but they want to keep the garage on the back.
Beyer said the neighbors who are here tonight, live in the apartment building next
door and they probably feel today as Grandma Tache did when their building went
up. Beyer demonstrated the size of the house and lot with the existing apartment
building next door going 27' straight up and about 40' long. Beyer said the size of
the new house is 4.5 feet to the property line on the Cleveland side had been there
since about 1955.
Beyer said the hardship was a non - conforming lot of record, that had been down
zoned. Mark & Christin's goal was to build 1600 sf for themselves and 500 sf for
Mike. Erickson asked Beyer to come up and explain what they wanted to do on
the site plan. Beyer said that they want to leave the garage where it was and then
access the house from this side. He stated the ADU would be accessed from the
Hyman side and the ADU would drop down 5 feet.
Howard DeLuca asked the height of the peak. Beyer said the top peak was 30 - 31
feet from grade and that Ordinance 30 wanted higher peaks on roofs. Beyer said
the neighboring structure created more of a solar shadow than the peak of this
roof.
Beyer stated they asked for the current footprint of the existing structure which is
in a setback. The second thing they asked for was a covered porch and Ordinance
30 asked for covered porches. Erickson replied but not in setbacks. Beyer stated
again the hardship was an extra narrow lot. He said this drawing illustrated along
the set back they were allowed without variance to build a 6' high stone wall as a
fence. He also noted they weie allowed, without variance, to build a 30" high
deck to any amount within the setback. Beyer commented that they would like the
floor level at 4' so they asked for the deck 18" higher than it would be legally
allowed.
4
BOARD OF ADJUS i MENT OCTOBER 24,1996
Beyer said that the character of the neighbor hood benefits from this new house
and meets the goals of the Aspen Area Plan. If they were to place the structure
farther back on the lot the building would be seen by the apartment next door.
Beyer stated the 10' setback variance for excavation was needed because it was
more than the 30" currently allowed by code. He cited other instances of this
variance with neighboring properties.
Beyer said the last variance was about parking and not pushing the development
onto the street. He stated that from the site plan you can see where the cars park
now and straddle the property line. He noted the existing wide driveway allowed
an 18' curb cut with gravel all the way up to the garage. He said nothing in the
code prohibited parking on the access and all the cars would still park in the
driveway (as they always have). He further commented that they were taking the
car out of the garden.
Erickson asked for public comments and noted that Geraldine Heyman's letter will
become part of the record. Geraldine Heyman, Public, said the houses across the
street have a 10' setback. She stated the ADU entrance could be from the garden
instead of Hyman and could not see the hardship. She said the alley was not that
congested and the Tache's currently park on city property. Heyman stated that she
appreciated Beyer's concern with the viewplane from her building but did not see
any change in viewplane if the parking was changed.
Beyer asked if the neighborhood would benefit if the garage was made larger. He
felt the current garage was part of the old Aspen tradition and the parking space
had been there for 30 years of tradition on city property. Beyer stated that there
were 54 homeowners contacted and the area was very dense but felt this project
would not add density. Beyer and Heyman argued the parking issues of this off
season time of the year.
Dan Martineau asked what the objection was of making it a two car garage. Beyer
responded to preserve the garage as an old Aspen historic scale. He said the
exemption requested was to reduce the required parking spaces. Beyer said that
the cost of a new garage or larger garage would be hard on Mark and Christin.
Erick i on'stated that cost and aesthetics were not considered by this board. Beyer
said the entire process of energy lost would be hard to justify: how many trees
would it take was just not practical. He stated the alley entrance for the garage
would create a larger impact on the already crowded alley.
5
BO OF ADJ I�IENT OCTOBER 24 1996
Jim Iglehart asked how the garage was currently being used. Beyer said there was
a workbench on the side and currently there was not a car parked in it but the
garage door worked.
DeLuca asked if the stone wall could less impacting if it went up to floor level
then it would be less massive. He stated that it would cut down on the mass and
bulk (volume standard).
Erickson noted that the length of the fence and the width of the deck dimensions
were not on the plans. Stan Stevens, Public, said the 6'7" variance was very
confusing. He thought they were asking for a porch in the 4'5" present setback
from the property line to the present dwelling. Sara Thomas, Planner, said that
however the board grants the variances, design will be effected. She noted on the
entrance to the ADU they were required in the setback to have the minimum
egress allowed and a light well was allowed in the setback.
Beyer entered into the record the response to G.G. Heyman's letter from Mark
and Christin Tache with no hard feelings.
Erickson closed the public portion of the hearing for comments from the Board.
DeLuca asked if a multi- family, built to the lot lines, could be built and how many
people could live there. Thomas answered that they could not change the use
because it was a non - conforming lot, so they could not build a multi - family.
DeLuca addressed the Board with the fact that an ADU was not always a choice,
but either compelled to put in an ADU or pay CASH IN LIEU. DeLuca noted the
4 1/2 foot porch on the side of the house could be minimized. He said the ADU
entrance seemed fine where it was indicated and parking was a problem in that
neighborhood. Iglehart agreed with DeLuca.
Martineau stated that he was in favor of a, b & c. He said the City was right to
encourage building the porch. He said he saw no hardship for d., the parking was
a problem and cannot see the hardship for eliminating one parking space.
6
BOARD OF ADJUSVIENT OCTOBER 24,1996
Erickson stated that he was comfortable with the 2.2 foot setback because the lot
was small. He said that he would like to reduce mass and the 6.7 feet side yard
setback. He noted the application showed a Hyman Avenue address. Erickson
commented the ADU could be accessed on the South side of the building with the
light well which would eliminate the variance. Erickson agreed that Martineau
had a very good point about setting a precedent for parking on public property.
DeLuca said that there was no requirement for a garage but off street parking must
be provided.
Erickson complimented Beyer on his design for a small residence on a small lot.
He asked Beyer if he wanted to table his requests for the variances at this time.
Beyer said he would like to "take what he could get" and proceed. He said that he
understood that the board did not want to set a precedent with the parking. He
asked what the minimum amount of porch would be acceptable. DeLuca stated
that the stone wall was still a problem. Beyer asked if he could have a 4' setback
variance for a covered roof instead of a covered porch.
DeLuca noted agreement on what it should look like now but after the project is
built, it does not look like what was agreed upon. He said that he would rather see
the design on paper. Hoefer responded that a week delay would be the advisable
approach and would give the neighbors an opportunity to respond.
Erickson asked if they could grant the 2.2' setback variance today and reject or
table the rest of the requested variances. He stated the next special meeting would
be set for Thursday, November 7, 1996.
Erickson closed the public meeting.
MOTION: Martineau moved that a 2.2 foot setback variance on the
Cleveland Street side for a new structure that would continue to
maintain the proposed nonconformance. DeLuca seconded. ALL IN
FAVOR, MOTION PASSED.
MOTION: Erickson moved to table variance requests 2, 3, and 4 until
November 7, 1996. Martineau seconded. ALL IN FAVOR. MOTION
PASSED.
7
BOARD OF ADJUS"` MENT OCTOBER 24,1996
MINUTES
MOTION: Dan Martineau moved to approve the minutes of
September 12, 1996. Seconded by Jim Iglehart. ALL IN
FAVOR, MOTION PASSED.
The next regular meeting is scheduled for Thursday, December 12, 1996 at 4pm.
Meeting adjourned at 6:00 p.m.
ackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk
8
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Staff
John Ely, County Attorney
Susan Murphy, County Administration
John Worcester, City Attorney
Kathryn Koch, City Clerk
FROM: Rhonda Harris, Community Development Department
RE: Work Schedule -Memos Due Week of November 18, 1996
12/3 - ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING (All items to be tabled to 12/10 meeting)
Aspen Meadows Trustee Townhomes, Amy Amidon
Farish Conditional Use for ADU/Hallam ESA, Kim Johnson
Commercial Lodge (CL) Text Amendment, Suzanne Wolff
Tasche Conditional Use for ADU, Bob Nevins
12/3 - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMTSSIONFRS (Special Meeting)
Code Amendment Adding AFR -1 Zone District, Rick Magill
Moore Family PUD Detailed Submission, 1st Reading, Continued Discussion, Rick Magill
12/4 - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
10th Mountain Hut Special Review and 1041 Hazard Review, Ellen Sassano
Annual Review of Rural/Remote, Cindy Houben
Adoption of the New Pitkin County Zoning Maps, 1st Reading, Lance Clarke
Parker 1041 Hazard Review and General Submission, Lance Clarke
Jones Extension of Vested Rights, Francis Krizmanich
AH Overlay Code Amendment, 1st Reading, Lance Clarke
Basalt IGA, 2nd Reading, Cindy Houben
12/9 - CITY COUNCIL
Aspen Mountain PUD, 1st Reading, Stan Clauson
Open Space Text Amendment, 1st Reading, Amy Amidon
Historic Landmark Lot Split Text Amendment, 2nd Reading, Amy Amidon
Reso. State Rehabilitation Tax Credit, Amy Amidon
Winnerman Vested Rights Extension (cont. from 11/25), Kim Johnson
12/10 - ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING
Aspen Meadows Trustee Townhomes, Amy Amidon
Farish Conditional Use for ADU/Hallam ESA, Kim Johnson
Commercial Lodge (CL) Text Amendment, Suzanne Wolff
Tasche Conditional Use for ADU, Bob Nevins
BOCC RESOLUTIONS /ORDINANCES OUTSTANDING:
Cozy Point - 6/12/96 (FK)
Larsen - 7/10/96 (ES)
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: TACHE CONDITIONAL USE FOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, December 3, 1996
at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities
Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Mark
and Christin Tache, requesting Conditional Use approval to construct an approximately 450 square
foot Accessory Dwelling Unit contained within the proposed new residence. The applicant is also
requesting a parking waiver for the studio ADU. The property is located at 1001 E. Hyman, and is
described as Lot A, Block 34, East Aspen Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen. For further
information, contact Bob Nevins at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S.
Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920 -5102.
s /Sara Garton, Chair
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
(Ott! /--f .�^� T . v a tr,e4_F, ;. " i'; �;�•
% j i W j
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Engineering
Housing Office
Parks Department
FROM: Bob Nevins, City Planner
DATE: November 8, 1996
RE: Tache Accessory Dwelling Unit - Conditional Use
Parcel No. 2737-182-32-001
Project Review Schedule
Community Development has received a conditional use application for an accessory
dwelling unit (ADU) at 1001 East Hyman Avenue, City of Aspen.
The following schedule has been established for the review of this application:
November 14 (Thurs.) Design Review Committee (DRC) Meeting
November 21 (Thurs.) Referral and DRC Memos (Draft) to Bob Nevins
November 26 (Tues.) Referral and DRC Memos (Final) to Bob Nevins
November 27 (Wed.) Community Development Memorandum (Final)
November 27 (Wed.) Aspen Planning and Zoning Packets (Distribution)
December 3 (Tues.) Aspen Planning and Zoning Meeting (Public Hearing) Thviit,
la ic
Please contact me at Ext. 5102 or by CEO if you have any questions regarding this
application or review schedule.
V
Z
Ti
•
w 1 s »s ! w a P w � 's
g.. 1 a a ' wige a l w i -
o
i
2
1 0
Q. 1
F S
>-. t et p or..,,
m
1 sr` �!
1 a
I i Z •
I 'O
� 1 °° apt ® S o
• ` 3.0 ..05 . 11 y \ �� 2 a W m °
ir ` a_ n
tJ n
J
J
C
S £ 6 L
Si
b c z
z. •
aNifj; 437.
1'm
3TYS
/ 1-------------------
y
dz4e ?
o � •
Y`.FY
Mli
8 iii
x
p¢.o' -F
1■ AvENUS
CURB
/
II CONC 7933.1
/
/ RD
/ O SjEE- eP
X 5.32' / n 9 0i- S 75 °09' 11'E 30.00' 127p ^N .4 .r
/ e f
/ 1�‘. /
:I
/ w / O. %lV/
Q / Q I i
r /
STEPS
I 14.4 � 1 5.0
L /
I / -
- - - - \ 0 793623
I /
I /
I I s ROOF 796 1.9
I I�A�`
I 6.1
I
I P
I HO USE M
I N
I 0
N
I
I
O
\/
'1 ` 0 4.5 v 20.4
I 5.0
1 0
0
1-. I w 1 0
a \t,, , 0
,� i v — e,
1 2 , 14 A B
N I ° 3 3
m v
/� 0 / ;
o
]i . 0
� -•. , v Sd , � , \ i: r. U
I � 4r. u SHED
tkl 3 /
v •
I
I 1/1/4 P4=5
�i / , To E rf''(M't
I m / MTV, 7 415 IS PHeroCOP?
/ 0{s *5MNJ 5t4&S' tiga retrth
\9r,
I ' ,' in o M6,# �t Copy Why
Pv u3rta @ 90":-..1 wyicy
T
I OR1V GARAGE E� LI7 I � ppc�, 5�i9<¢ or
SLAB 7935.97 / ^*
CT) p
I
I
\ N 5.z
\\INI: N.
\ ° \h
1 N 75 ° 09 . 11'W 30.00' \
/ 1
/ GRAVEL
0
z
.s a ° j f3,ta
4Wv1 J a5 r §
3 3f a9. a 3 as '
v, $ -1 WW - . 3 as a o c D V4
g a $4 i .v' rII
i Aq Vi c• : g < ff v
o 4
40m.
M. 3 /
47 1 "!
X. i w • • . z 4 p ,,,.„
4, y -
, .tr
Z O
,
I 1 .3
rt ".1.. o ?o . p
oo or v°
3 . °.. o o.rr \ J m`
N
4
e
it s
T s R
1
qq ,�3y Oy". le -� 70 •
f'$a
0.41
e
/-'' .
t g t g'' 6
YY
°i s $ .2 §o
era
i ° lig!
e5 ;
erisss.
s till
�I . :ii
rrMAN AvEti
CURB
i
/ II
CONC 7933.1
/ R
/ , - - g1 ° - EI N
/ O901 O 127p MO a)
7 5.32 ' S 75 ° 09'll'E 30.00' /
""*R1 / Val/
/ w / ,
°, / O, ,
I / STEPS
14.4 a I sd
I - - -- o SO-L23 /
1 / N N 7936.
I /
cm
I I I RpO 796 1 . 9
I 1*
6.1
I
N
HO USE M
I N
I o
N
I
I
0
‘ St 4. 0
� // ` 0 4. s 20.4 5.0
a I I o
0
U.1 ' O
I
to 1 rn \�i,
I 2 1$ J A B
ut
N 1 ° ; .ac
3
I-l a
—
v I
I i p
S ilt61t' R S
_
I 9,4 o E • o rf^(Milif1
I 0 / Nom; *5 I s P HdTocap l
or / I
m !) ■
r — ) 517E) I 1 L 0r2.tAi#.w_ Coy t4/$6
/
I . Pit1n° a 9s w41cH
I E � I S t�Ixppa<. Sal at
I G O R PVE L - GARAGE NIS P 6E.
CO SLAB 7935.97 /
I
al o
I
i
` s. 2 ,
b \
\ \ Q
h
\ I
1 k4N° N 75 ° 09'11'W 30.00' I \\ISN) / 1 .
nD•vci