Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.1460 Sierra Vista Dr.0056.2100.ASLU THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0056.2011.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2735 11 1 05 002 PROJECTS ADDRESS 1460 SIERRA VISTA DR PLANNER JEN PHELAN CASE DESCRIPTION RESIDENTIAL DESIGN VARIANCE REPRESENTATIVE SCOTT BROUGHTON DATE OF FINAL ACTION 10. 5.11 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 12.28.11 0 0 , vc 002_ pb�o-?011-Pa( -Vl :-..' I. JJ . , i. . ... ' - - .. g ei , t Tab Help p Reports _ Form _ Navigate po s File Edit Record g wJump1 , v Routing Status Fees Fee Summary Main Actions Attachments 1 Routing History 1 Valuation I Arch/Eng I Custom Fields I Sub Permits Permit type aslu Aspen Land U P ermit # 0056.2011 .ASLU I Apt /Suite Address 1460 SIERRA VISTA DR $ City ASPEN State CO Zip 81811_ ° i Permit Information Master permit Routing queue aslu07 Applied Sl 10f?011 o F I Project Status pending A pproved zl 0 y Description APPIC ",TIGN FGR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE 'dNNDO1N5 Issued • Closed /Final i 2 Clock Running Days � Expires 614!2012 Submitted SCOTT BROLGHTON 9_7 955_ Submitted via Owner ROB 500 HAVEN LN First name Last name COPITG GREAT FALLS VA 22066 Phone (703) 891 -8371 Address Applicant ❑ Owner is applicant? ❑ Contractor is applicant? B01i 6 409 09 Last name BROUGHTON ARCHITECTU1 First name SCOTT PO PO BOX 81611 Phone (970) 927-0552 Cust # 29091 Address Lender Last name First name Phone () - Address AspenGold5 (ser angelas 1 of 1 _..r.�: (_ ( 4 to ( Cry VZ's '-e- v. 30 $ \(, cA to 1/--;((( , - �►..0 col DEVELOPMENT ORDER of the City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order ", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders ", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights ", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development . plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three -year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and Telephone Number Robert Copito, 500 Haven Lane, Great Falls, VA 22060 Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Lot 37, Filing I, West Aspen Subdivision and commonly known as 1460 Sierra Vista Drive Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and /or Attachment Describing Plan Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission approved one variance from the Residential Design Standard subsection 26.410.030 (D) (3), Windows, to allow street facing windows to span through the area where a second floor would typically exist. An elevation is attached to the approved resolution. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) Resolution No. 19 (Series of 2011) Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) October 9, 2011 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) October 10, 2014 Iss •/ • is da • October 11, 2011, by the City of Aspen community Development Director. Chris Bendon, Director Community Development J AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: t 4 (,,C> S e-y vr.. VtS Vr.% lay.., Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. County of Pitkin / ) I, � Sc (name, please print) being or repres an Applicant to the City of spen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: ✓ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official Paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. c ool- .c C- c----` Signature . The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this / 7 day of pet , I..•� a .... _ PUBLIC NOTICE WITNESS MY HAND AND OF ICIAL SEAL Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL otice is hereby given to the g eneral public of the • pproval of a site specific de plan, antl the creation of a vested properly right pursuant to My commis- o e pires: ._ fi r he Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pert ain- ing to the following described property Lot 37, Fil- Mg 1, West Aspen Subdivision antl commonly • known as 1460 Sierra Vista Drive, Aspen, Colo- � „ rado, 8ss16ion 11, y order ber 4 01 the Planning e Applicant, Notary Public , an d Zoning Commi nb n Octo 2011. Th Robert Copito, received approval of a Residential Design Standard variance associated with the re- - `+�, model of the existing residence. For further infer- . mation contact Jennifer Phelan, at the City of As- ' e � • O� .. Pu 0, . t 0 pen Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena / x • . 1 , St, Aspen. Colorado 070) 920-5090 % • a f A 1 ATTACHMENTS: ( CDR" J. : S 16, 2011. 1 7110 Aa en Times Weekly on October COPY OF THE PUBLICATION ' ts, zon. p n oga4� _ - i GARSK 5 My Conw*alon Erpiroa 05/09/2012 • r Resolution No. 19 (SERIES OF 2011) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE AT LOT 37, FILING 1, WEST ASPEN SUBDIVISION, COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1460 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE, CITY OF ASPEP , PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 273511105002 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Robert Copito, requesting Variance approval from a Residential Design Standard for the remodeling of a single - family residence at 1460 Sierra Vista Drive; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the application for compliance with the Variance Review Standards; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application, the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval with conditions of the Variance request from one Residential Design Standards — 26.410.030 (D) (3), Windows; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing; October 4, 2011; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approves the noted Variance request at1460 Sierra Vista Drive, by a vote of five to zero (5 — 0), and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves a variance from the following Residential Design Standard: RECEPTION #: 583787, 10/24/2011 at 10:34:51 AM, page 1 of 3 1 OF 4, R $26.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO C L.U.C. Section 26.410.040 (D)(3), "Street facing windows shall not span through the area where a second level would typically exist, which is between nine (9) and twelve feet (12) above the finished first floor," as shown in the attached and incorporated exhibit. Section 2: The building permit application to develop the above - mentioned residence shall include a copy of the final P &Z Resolution and exhibit. All other requirements to develop a single family residence shall be submitted as part of the building permit application including but not limited to: adopted building and fire codes, relevant standards within the Aspen Municipal Code such as engineering and water system standards, Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District's rules and regulations, etcetera. Section 3: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5: • All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. APPROVED by the Commission at its meeting on October 4, 2011. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: im True, special Counsel Stan Gibbs, Chair ATTEST: Page 2 of 3 • .6 1 Jai' ie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk List of Exhibits Exhibit A: Elevation (representing approved variance from the window requirement) Page 3 of 3 lap/ A _ • �41 •' yr , bM • �1+ e8 o III - i�1$9 4 tk 1 C 6 (] r Z D � s l I.. CI ra Ell I I pfl n 0 s �,� _� — y —_ ;. Erg �y` ka_ -- ri 3 Faris_ tip 0 7 1 � I ��I _2/1,7 t _ O I 1 ,—r ®I p II 1 r u I f'1 rl( r i 1� ae l P ! 1 1 f Ms 1. r rig = 4 1 ; se 111111- Milit : vov ltgl1 I I 1 ® {. f� e' III e _ I - i 1 -, lu ,'' ��� LL � I � d� �qf , ,. r D f 1 4 1 t ° ILA E I �_ -TA { V,I s I ill i'IiIIR +, t € r O e l !I J- L+ � i [ �, E _ m I p �ti� � L ^ "'2d L. '� 1 1111 Ma l �{ i �- 1 1 1 1I kg. I - _ ill IIII, I ill! Ids- w =E g i ` {�" - - li_® lid i ll" !!IE Im 11.7 j1 Pil I & nli l '" = ' _ - l : t:p �I - a. =e e , 1 0 �� - III _ __ iir � __ p ,IN C IN k.1lr.— t--- { o _1 ° ' Mil. - --i I I I I m , - r _ ” t L T 3 D o O 5 e e .. ,, e q o p N t d t, [= : r= • €I 5 F . City of Aspen Planning & Zoning Meeting — Minutes October 04, 2011 Stan Gibbs opened the regular meeting October 04, 2011 of the Planning & Zoning Commission in Sister Cities at 4:30. Commissioners present were: Cliff Weiss, Bert Myrin, Jim DeFrancia, LJ Erspamer and Stan Gibbs. Commissioners excused were Michael Wampler and Jasmine Tygre. Staff in attendance: Jim True, Special Counsel; Jennifer Phelan, Community Development Deputy Director; Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk. Comments: Cliff Weiss asked if Waste Management gets a permit through the city and from which department. Jennifer Phelan asked to haul. Jennifer Phelan said they have to have a business license. Cliff asked how they were regulated. Jennifer replied that the department that deals with that is environmental health. Cliff said in his neighborhood there is a 13 hour window to pick up. Jennifer said for the site visit for Theatre Aspen Jessica wanted to see if we could do something closer to the meeting time versus 2pm on November 1 Jennifer said that staff would send an email to confirm. Jennifer said the Building Department was still researching options for the Mother Lode. Minutes: MOTION: Bert Myrin moved to approve the minutes from September 20 seconded by Cliff Weiss. All in favor APPROVED. Conflicts of Interest: None stated. PUBLIC HEARING: 1460 Sierra Vista Drive — Residential Design Standard Stan Gibbs opened the public hearing. Jennifer Phelan supplied the public notice for 1460 Sierra Vista Dr; a request for residential design standard variance from window standard. Jennifer said the owner of the property was Robert Capito and introduced the representative for the owner, Scot Broughton, local architect. Jennifer Phelan said the subject property was a single split level single family residence that is undergoing a remodel with a change in the roof and is changing a row of windows in the house on the street facing facade. The issue is the residential design standards do not permit windows in that 9 to 12 feet; the intent of the standard is to be able to differentiate between stories. There are 2 standards 2 City of Aspen Planning & Zoning Meeting — Minutes October 04, 2011 of the residential design standards that the applicant can meet one or the other; one is appropriate to the design considering the context of the neighborhood and the other be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site - specific constraints. Jennifer said staff recommended approval. Cliff Weiss said this isn't 2 stories. Jennifer replied that was correct one was sunken and it is a split level building and just doesn't read from the facade as a traditional 2 story building. Cliff asked if the 9 to 12 foot zone was essentially from grade. Jennifer replied that our code says when you deal with these sorts of buildings that have to come up and take it from the main level, measured 4 feet up. Bert Myrin asked if on page 3 both standards have to be met. Jennifer replied either or but not both. Bert said on next page it says that "b" is not met so were are down to "a" or what the comments speak to from the code; where can we find that in the code for "intent ". Jennifer responded the neighborhood shows a mix of patterns; there are intents in the residential design standards and you can go back to that to see what is the premise for this standard. Scot Broughton, an architect, said that Jennifer did the presentation very well. Scot utilized a drawing and a series of photographs to show the project and neighborhood. Scot said the intent was to modernize this 1970s house by just raising the front of the building; to raise that front wall about 41/2 to 5 feet, which kicks into the no window zone and they are setback 75 to 80 feet from the street. Scot said they were keeping the existing windows at the existing height; it is a very dark interior and was south facing and would like to get some natural light, views and solar into the space. Scot said because of decks we have glazing in the neighborhood on other houses which do have second stories. Scot said they were 41/2 feet above the ground with their first story so he was looking for commissioner support and approval. Cliff asked if the lower side of the roof was just being brought up to the 12 foot gable. Scot replied that it was on the back side of the house. LJ Erspamer asked if there were any comments from the neighbors. Jennifer Phelan replied there was one for the record that supported the request. Scot Broughton said he received a phone call supporting it. Stan Gibbs said there were not delineated stories and it seems like the intent was talking about delineated stories. Jennifer replied that was the technique of trying to apply standards across the board throughout the City; there is room for improvement to clean up the code. 3 c City of Aspen Planning & Zoning Meeting — Minutes October 04, 2011 Cliff Weiss said that he looked at a wall of glass on a house behind him and asked if that was legal. Jennifer responded that this standard was only for street facing windows, facades. Bert asked if P &Z had to consider the context and the purpose. Jennifer replied the design or pattern of the development concerning the context of which the development was proposed and the purpose of the particular development. Bert said the next sentence is the context. Jennifer replied yes. Jim True said that you are struggling with that aspect of the code with the intent aspect; the standards of statutory construction are for you to determine the intent of the legislators using the language of the code. Jim True said he wasn't sure which section of the code you were referring to for the intent. Cliff and Bert replied 26.410.020.D2. Jennifer said another way is the potential use in the zone district because you get something in the zone district that doesn't apply. No public comments. MOTION: Jim DeFrancia moved to approve Resolution #19, series of 2011 approving a window variance for 1460 Sierra Vista Drive, seconded by LJ Erspamer. Roll call vote: Cliff Weiss, yes; Bert Myrin, yes; LJErspamer, yes; Jim DeFrancia, yes; Stan Gibbs, yes. Approved 5 -0. Adjourned 5:15 pm. ckie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk 4 .. , . . ..... ..,, .,,, . . . • . 1111 ■ 0 _.......... Iiii . ... . . . _. ..... ... ......... .. . . . .4 .. . t_ i , ; , .• , _ . I . _ L : 1 1 I . i n 1 1 ...- r 1:1 . ■ 1 ,•- .■ X I ■ 0 0 Ill 1 4.. 1 I t I , i , •Ii , - - I 4.....1 ' 1....i r i 1 , 1 1 1 1 I 1 I f . , I , i ■ 1 t... 1 1 1 * I . ! ! ' , ■ . . IA :••• I " ■ .....t:j ' 464 . .... S.... i .....‘Li : . . .• e- ‘;.-- ... 4 • ' .•.-.. • • .- • - — 7 - • • ' 0 . .., • , . — - 1 1 .,. le ... .,,,...„- -, • I 4111i t tw , • , : & . I , .• -- • .. , ' - .. . ... .. , I -.,- . • T It • :4 I i • • L ., 1 . :- ... „ .. . . ._.., i i .r ./ , / • i . ,. .. ■ . I . ■ At s ! ■ ' 1 ' , l 1 41 I - s... . . -:. ow 41 i 1 P • , i . ... . at $. u.. . .... -... . .,,,,... 8. .• -, • t' , :: f .1 V • 4 •,V*, -- 4 , , 11 ! . 44e., . I! .. • ..:. ' f • 4...... . _ . , . .• • 'Vlit* ' 1. , . • .. , . . ''.- • ...3 .101IN . r8 . . . 'I ' 111 IPT :.... : .., ' 4 .1 ..., IT \--\ id,...-..* -- •- N \ ' .> I Cl 1 . . . . . . . w P1 MEMORANDUM • To: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Jennifer Phelan, Deputy Planning Director RE: 1460 Sierra Vista Drive- Residential Design Standards Variance, - Public Hearing DATE: October 4, 2011 Applicant: Robert Copito gig -- Representative: Scot Broughton Zoning: R -15 (Moderate- Density Residential) Land Use: Single - Family Residence _T ...--- ' i Request Summary: The Applicant is requesting i . !I „� ,,, one Variance from a Residential Design Standard. -e., = + �« --_��_ .. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the variance request. • . 1460 Sierra Vista LAND USE REQUESTS: * The Applicant is remodeling the subject property. The Applicant is requesting a variance from a residential design standard that does not permit street facing windows to span through the area typically between the first and second story of a building. Variance approval from the Residential Design Standards pursuant to Land Use Code (L.U.C.) Section 26.410.020 (D)(2)., Variances. The applicant is requesting a variance from L.U.C. Section 26.410.040 (D)(3), "Street facing windows shall not span through the area where a second level would typically exist, which is between nine (9) and twelve feet (12) above the finished first floor." REVIEW PROCEDURE: approved with A variance from the Residential Design Standards shall be approved, app conditions, or denied after review and consideration during a duly noticed public hearing by the Planning Commission under L.U.C. Section 26.410.020 D., Variances. Page 1 of 4 P2 0 Figure 1: Vicinity ma. R 1 ; � ' ` tr < - " i e , � 'A _ ' ,t " : ?5ll",,• FF54 ,1 • i�!!, `� F l ` ta t [ 1' r` F" S I i' ... .a. I b .., 7 , 14 'A , i� :y �v0, 1011141 '' _j i , � ,_.,: „,, . . ,c I i .a' t -.�+. - � � `fie- t �R c ` , . ,, y 1460 y 1 1 � ' `• ats �, $ 7 , a'` " •dam . � y(y, � RF _ . q . • '� f ± t *' of t " ' ... . .. 1 � ) �. �� \ as s c �� `f i . 144.5 } - . ' / �pb ' i ._ Subject ,,ys 1 1 't f • 4 ., r ° ,. a ,z ' \ `� „ ,.''. + / 4 IS Site . r ,� eD9 . ets.' y .. cavv. ICIt�!],itEalbbe •. * eia a.° ' 1 ; �' O's Y .. . - 1215 PROJECT SUMMARY: The Applicant is applying for a permit to remodel the existing residence. The residence is a split level building, with a partially below grade floor. The applicant is proposing to raise the roof height for a portion of the building (Figure 1) and incorporate a band of street facing windows that project into the 9 -12 foot' "no window area" as shown in Figure 2. Figure 1: Raised roof fro .osal 1 11 1 Al ® I I I � • OSED RAISED SHED RO 1 _ r m I LINE OR EX'S' \ei s,ke Rpm !!Lll� 011.2-..2..' ;:_. _ jI iiouuuii ininiIIInn uiIii I —71 I _Mill r = 4111■ ;IJI meow Iwo, 7 2 min ir DWI 1, ;� �;.� r- rr— -.rte ! cr-�4 =. ti nil �I i��� � - I 1 I EXISTING / F%N. GRADE I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 In a split level house the main floor level is the floor from which the measurement is taken. - Page 1 of 4 ( 0 P3 Figure 2: Proposed band of windows 1 i — - ; 1Y IYW11 1 ; — Iii iC� I nl��l� ■ �� 1 _ - ° m ;;yam 2 t . 1 f • . 1 III l - -� I I % ;; I ri , A � % � -� �a� a rms . I o�_ ,_ FIRSTFLOOR LEVEL �I�1011lll fllllll � =� 0 _ + r. +itl-�� II / i���■ ` ti — ,. � ._ � � . ra i�a7i mmi ■ t ENTRY FLOOR LEV ' ...P " - . I i I I I I l_ I RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCES: All new structures in the City of Aspen are required to meet the residential design standards or obtain a variance from the standards pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.410, Residential Design Standards. The purpose of the standards "is to preserve established neighborhood scale and character....ensure that neighborhoods are public places....that each , home...contribute to the streetscape." The subject property is undergoing an extensive remodel but is not being demolished. Due to the split level nature of the residence, the main level is 4.5 feet above grade. There are two review standards that the applicant may meet if the Commission is to grant a variance from the standard, Section 26.410.020 (D)(2): • a. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting or a broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or b. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site - specific constraints. Staff Comment: Residential Design Standards have been adopted to contribute to the streetscape, enhance the pedestrian environment and promote architectural elements that are important components to neighborhood character. The intent of the "no window area" is to Page 1 of 4 [P 0 provide human scale to the facade and reinforce local building traditions. Historically, windows did not span two stories, so a building read as two defined levels. Although there is no site specific constraint to meet the design standard, the purpose of the standard is not practically met with this split level building. A split level does not avail itself to easily read as two distinct floors. Requiring a "no window area" would not meet the intent of the standard Staff recommends that the variance be approved. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: In reviewing the proposal, Staff believes that the request does meet the variance review standards that are set forth in Land Use Code Section 26.410.020 D, Variances, for the window variance request. Staff recommends the Commission approve this application. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve Resolution No. )1 , Series of 2011, approving a variance request from the Residential Design Standards." ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A -- Review Criteria & Staff Findings Exhibit B — Public Comment Exhibit C — Application Page 1 of 4 r .." P5 Resolution No. _ (SERIES OF 2011) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE AT LOT 37, FILING 1, WEST ASPEN SUBDIVISION, COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1460 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 1273511105002 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Robert Copito, requesting Variance approval from a Residential Design Standard for the remodeling of a single - family residence at 1460 Sierra Vista Drive; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the application for compliance with the Variance Review Standards; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application, the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval with conditions of the Variance request from one Residential Design Standards — 26.410.030 (D) (3), Windows; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing; October 4, 2011; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approves the noted Variance request at1460 Sierra Vista Drive, by a vote of to ( — ), and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves a variance from the following Residential Design Standard: P 7 Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk List of Exhibits Exhibit A: Elevation (representing approved variance from the window requirement) '`. P9 From: John Barnes <elwoodbarnes @aol.com> Date: September 19, 2011 2:34:56 PM MDT To: scotscotbarchitects.com Subject: Copito house remodel, 1460 Sierra Vista Drive, Aspen Dear Scot, I received your letter and the attached drawings on the Copito remodel. After reviewing all the elevations, we are in favor of the proposed changes to the house. I think it will add to the character of the neighborhood in that it is different in style from so much of what has been built. As full time residents of the Cemetery Lane neighborhood, it is encouraging to see people upgrading their homes to keep our area nice in this difficult economic climate. If I can be of any further assistance in the P & Z process, please don't hesitate to call me. John & Sharon Barnes JSO Partners LLC. Email secured by Check Point CITY OF ASPEN PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Drew Alexander, 925.2739 DATE: 08.04.2011 PROJECT: 1460 Sierra Vista Dr. REPRESENTATIVE: Scot Broughton, 927.0552 OWNER: Robert Copito REQUEST: Residential Design Standard (RDS) Variance, Windows between 9' — 12' DESCRIPTION: The prospective applicant is preparing to submit a building permit for the purposes of remodeling an existing home at 1460 Sierra Vista Dr. During an initial zoning check of the building plans, it was revealed that one street- facing fagade of the home would not be compliant with a Residential Design Standard (RDS) regarding windows. Specifically: 26.410.040.D.3(a) — Street facing windows shall not span through the area where a second floor level would typically exist, which is between nine (9) and twelve feet (12) above the finished first floor. For interior staircases, this measurement will be made from the first landing if one exists. A transom window above the main entry is exempt from this standard. The applicant is requesting a variance from this RDS so that the original design can be implemented. Staff has determined that this review cannot be handled administratively and requires a Planning and Zoning Commission (P &Z) review. P&Z is a public hearing and will require noticing. Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: Land Use App: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/pdfs/depts/41/landuseappform.pdf Land Use Code: http: / /www. aspen p itki n.com /Depa rtments /Com m u n ity- Development/Plan n i nq- and -Zon i nq/Title -26- Land- Use -Code/ Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): 26.306 Common Development Review Procedures 26.410 Residential Design Standards 26.410.040.D.3 Windows Review by: Community Development for staff recommendation. Planning and Zoning Commission shall be the final review authority. Public Hearing: Required (15 days in advance to public hearing) Planning Fees: $1,470. This includes six (6) hours of staff time. Additional staff hours, if needed, will be billed at $245 per hour. Total Deposit: $1,470.00 To apply, submit the following information: Ci Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. 3 Conference Summary. p Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant which states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. li7 Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. Total deposit for review of the application. I( A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. IA Proposed elevations of the development E( Neighborhood block plan at 1" = 50' (available from City Engineering Department). Graphically show the front portions of the all existing buildings on both sides of block and their setback from the street in feet. Identify parking and front entry for each building and locate any accessory dwelling units along the alley. 'Photographic Photographic panorama. Show elevations of all buildings on both sides of the block, including present condition of the subject property, Label photos and mount on a presentation board. II 10 Copies of the complete application packet and, if applicable, associated drawings. ❑ An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. . ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: Name: fetettr / A ,1 l C("o S4 A Location: 46 'n Nite t - �. YF Lvie . � rbi F1614, 1 (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description wher appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 2 - 1* it 10 r APPLICANT: Name: til � / L , / /, Address: I 1 I lIISALC4 VAe 2 Z 2 fr4 9 Phone #: in ' e t l • 411 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: }� � I LLC Address: Z 1 i ca Shill Phone #: d irt ® '99t TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): ❑ GMQS Exemption ❑ Conceptual PUD ❑ Temporary Use ❑ GMQS Allotment ❑ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ❑ Text/Map Amendment ❑ Special Review ❑ Subdivision ❑ Conceptual SPA ❑ ESA — 8040 Greenline, Stream ❑ Subdivision Exemption (includes ❑ Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane ❑ Commercial Design Review ❑ Lot Split ❑ Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion Residential Design Variance ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Other: ❑ Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: description of buildings, uses, p revio s approvals etc.)) C PROPOSAL: description of pro osed buildings uses, modification , etc.) � '� Lt{ � e , a4 Care Lrv4r1- aJ �� • ve you a tttaac the following? FEES DUE: $ lo Pre - Application Conference Summary Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form ❑ Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards ❑ 3 -D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3 -1) model. Your pre - application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3 -1) model. ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: Corr u Applicant: ask- rzigipt,e41104. Location: ,g FoI __ • Jam. y �- Zone District: 1. Lot Size: 0 t CIO - 0 , Lot Area: (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing: [ {. AGI) Proposed: 1 {• 1 Number of bedrooms: Existing: , Proposed: Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): 44.. DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: Mt) Allowable: Proposed: JZ �7 I p I II I to Principal bldg. height: Existing: t i -Q Allowable: t 7 Proposed: ZS es Access. bld It g. height: Existin g: I B Allowable: 2 y � e � Proposed: 1_1( , On -Site parking: Existing: 'J Required: J Proposed: % Site coverage: Existing: Required: 1-1.4 Proposed: I, 0. % Open Space: Existing: • Required: 4.4. Proposed: 1 G Front Setback: Existing: Required: nj0 I Proposed: If Rear Setback: Existing :Required: I0 O' Proposed: *0 •(p t' .. 4 I u � J• Combined F/R: Existing: �L i�.t i'( 1D Required: �Y7 Proposed: �/ I �0 Side Setback: Existing: (7 14ll Required: 10 Proposed: 1 L1 I �• 1 J � g: '�' Cj Requi Side Setback: Existing: ' [4 1 .6 7 Proposed: �- CI Combined Sides: Existing: *lin Required: 1.0. 1‘ Proposed: 1 , 1 Distance Between Existing 4 d Required: tote � Proposed: A Buildings Existing qon- conformities or -ncroac ents: D � S I 'Pr 4� ^ � L �f (w el il 4 g� � ( Variations requested: (�.'t strltN 1.�eL - J l A do t ccJ� I • tee y � P 't ue n ° a _ L C w u E - N W " = E N N N N a L o a. LL a 04 04 v❑ N L a s a a CA d 4 L L L V too c 6 al 0 Q r O O o C [L . . U C .. .. F L oQ ° a c E c U Nn° . 'E 'E 'E U 04 T y y v d 7 'o p, :: at Z Y N Y OL L L L et O R W s 1 ° R o v ° O co, o o o co co o ` ` .i o c- ° ` o a ° + o p o. z p. ,. N N N N N N N N N N N Vl N W ,2 C X -0 Y a = n� m vc 3 -7 , Ua U LT4 W e o - w — z = 0 O F z V IX a .E > >W ❑, , N N L0 0 C z W d❑ si O a`i • i F.. N E a N N N N �' j �? 5 Y a a q ¢ pa Q F a o?j d p F a In F C' a' N 4' p, N z r E E�, a ¢ icila4aSa3 (JO aaUU ° ° ce 3. i°l3d Q= h V C a F - z F a a 0. 0. c I= F y ° 4 Z N 0.i W z .- a N Sr) E a z¢az Q °� Ooo CL F Viz° N N d d a .4 k 9 `�z Q F., a H n. ❑ 0 a ❑ ❑ ° U W �/� a ea a llod a d a CI d 0 E P n E o d a! . d t U == p 6 A 0. 0 0 ° -'' Z •a ti .0 "J ao m °y ° J 0 E = 6= G 0 V) 1 9 C in = y LL m id E dC M c 0 ° C a C E i n V) I C u X y id In In c M M N e C r. M M m ° ° er I- .E CK a� 70 .N-1 E . N N N O E o . < O C m a' M a E m ' O et _ to in ° O O V') ° V) • E m m In M -4 ' M M m N N N O1 `n 4 M .n � G M N - 4 C a. E o 0 0 0 co --i --� N ° ,: . ti M N ao ° " M H El F T 71 1 :2 ~ M V) ~ a° W 70 N N N � N t d N V) Z a) Y 00 ww 00 — . -1 e d = — — N N r- .--1 O \ .i o ,y M M UJ a.rd a r rr r rrrrR rt. Ir l�v e' r 1 C O r d .-1 .-I .-I .-1 .--1 H ti .� o 0 H .--I .—I L 0 Q Lo cd 1-Nw 0 0�� A CZ • '- > wE > x . r`n x o G s) z 0 N x 0 z z ii • �= w g m a w z 4 F w o ° ¢ o cr Q y r j z W A W a > p > `a p; w¢ o a N E ..' 0, z i4 a z z 0 = o m e wF x w `a ¢w A z O °u 3 w z '��' a Z F u m 0. Z O d w Aa v,¢vl a c ``' i, c. ��y 0 c� �� a a ° F A A� a g a d a „; A a C7 C ¢¢ o U vl X 0 c U I w V R3� ° o�H �a w 3E `� 0 ❑ U N oo vi ¢ C4 0 O L . cd T co cA z VI c. e toe S / N ) t ! ) » 4 / ) \ \ O. \ \ \ ON uw - _ Ta 'E °`t k E eu 7 ] t ) 7 < < m \ ',- <= § \ a, \ 0 d \ u Z e ! 0. §_ § \ \ \ \, Q ( 25\ u/ / # ® I k /) § } \: p� w4 K uz4�z ; 2» } \ /« <2N{ \ ct cc ® »,=z /cm \ /Ek= \ %! §/ /2 ®@£)0 ) \\\ � k § \ 0 0 0 0 .0 cii - \ \ • � \ \ ` E- \ § ) / cc: \ _ \ o z j ) / \ \\)\ \ jZ \ \ x { \\ \ ° st7 0 0 ; { { / - 7 ® ! z 5 _ C/: u 2 ` a 0f ATTACHMENT 4- CONT'D- SUBMITTAL KEY / 1 Land Use Application with 12. Accurate elevations (in relation to system in the area of the proposed • pplicant's name, address and telephone mean sea level) of the lowest floor, subdivision. The contents of the plat shall number, contained within a letter signed including basement, of all new or be of sufficient detail to determine by the applicant stating the name. address, substantially improved structures: a whether the proposed subdivision will and telephone number of the verification and recordation of the actual meet the design standards pursuant to representative authorized to act on behalf elevation in relation to mean sea level to Land Use Code Section 26.480.060(3).20. of the applicant. which any structure is constructed: a Subdivision GIS Data. demonstration that all new construction or The street address and legal substantial improvements will be 21. A landscape plan showing location, escription of the parcel on which anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or size. and type of proposed landscape development is proposed to occur. lateral movement of any structure to be features. ® constructed or improved; a demonstration A disclosure of ownership of the that the structure will have the lowest 22. A subdivision plat which meets the parcel on which development is proposed floor, including basement, elevated to at terms of this chapter, and conforms to the to occur, consisting of a current certificate least two (2) feet above the base flood requirements of this title indicating that no from a title insurance company, or elevation, all as certified by a registered further subdivision may be granted for attorney licensed to practice in the State of professional engineer or architect. these lots nor will additional units be built Colorado, listing the names of all owners without receipt of applicable approvals of the property, and all mortgages, 13. A landscape plan that includes pursuant to this chapter and growth judgments. liens, easements, contracts and native vegetative screening of no less than management allocation pursuant to agreements affecting the parcel, and fifty (50) percent of the development as Chapter 26.470. demonstrating the owner's right to apply viewed from the rear (slope) of the parcel. for the Development Application. All vegetative screening shall be 23. The precise wording of any maintained in perpetuity and shall be proposed amendment. ()An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating replaced with the same or comparable the subject parcel within the City of material should it die. 24. Site Plan or plans drawn to a scale of Aspen. one (1 ") inch equals ten (10') feet or one 14. Site sections drawn by a registered (1 ") inch equals twenty (20') feet, A site improvement survey including architect, landscape architect, or including before and "after" photographs opography and vegetation showing the engineer shall be submitted showing all (simulations) specifying the location of current status of the parcel certified by a existing and proposed site elements, the antennas, support structures, transmission registered land surveyor, licensed in the top of slope, and pertinent elevations buildings and/or other accessory uses, State of Colorado. (This requirement, or above sea level. access, parking, fences, signs, lighting, any part thereof, may be waived by the landscaped areas and all adjacent land Community Development Department if 15. Proposed elevations of the uses within one - hundred fifty (150') feet. the project is determined not to warrant a development, including any rooftop Such plans and drawings should survey document.) equipment and how it will be screened. demonstrate compliance with the Review / Standards of this Section. A site plan depicting the proposed 16. Proposed elevations of the ayout and the project's physical development, including any rooftop 25. FAA and FCC Coordination. relationship to the land and it's equipment and how it will be screened. Statements regarding the regulations of surroundings. the Federal Aviation Administration / 17. A sketch plan of the site showing (FAA) and the Federal Communications 7. A written description of the existing and proposed features which are Commission (FCC). proposal and a written explanation of relevant to the review. how a proposed development complies 26. Structural Integrity Report from a with the review standards relevant to the 18. One (1) inch equals four hundred professional engineer licensed in the development application. (400) feet scale city map showing the State of Colorado. location of the proposed subdivision, all 8. Plan with Existing and proposed adjacent lands owned by or under option 27. Evidence that an effort was made to grades at two -foot contours, with five -foot to the applicant, commonly known locate on an existing wireless intervals for grades over ten (10) percent. landmarks, and the zone district in which telecommunication services facility the proposed subdivision and adjacent site including coverage/ interference 9 Proposed elevations of the development properties are located. analysis and capacity analysis and a brief statement as to other reasons for 10. A description of proposed 19. A plat which retlects the layout of success or no success. construction techniques to be used. the lots, blocks and structures in the proposed subdivision. The plat shall . Neighborhood block plan at I I. A Plan with the 100 -year Iloodplain be drawn at a scale of one (I) equals one I =50' (available from City Engineering line and the high water line. hundred (100) feet or larger. Architectural Department) Graphically show the front scales are not acceptable. Sheet size shall portions of all existing buildings on both be twenty -four (24) inches by thirty-six sides of the block and their setback from (36) inches. If it is necessary to place the the street in feet. Identify parking and plat on more than a one (I) sheet, an index front entry for each building and locate shall be included on the first sheet. A any accessory dwelling units along the vicinity map shall also appear on the first alley. (Continued on next page.) sheet showing the subdivision as it relates to the rest of the city and the street � r Indicate whether any portions or the 35. Exterior Lighting Plan. Show the houses immediately adjacent to the location, height, type and luminous subject parcel are one story (only one intensity of each above grade fixture. living level). Estimate the site illumination as measured in foot candles and include minimum, Roof Plan. maximum, and average illumination. / Additionally, provide comparable 9 30 Photographic panorama. Show examples already in the community that e evations of all buildings on both sides of demonstrate technique, specification, and/ the block, including present condition of or light level if they exist. the subject property. Label photos and mount on a presentation board 31. A condominium subdivision exemption plat drawn with permanent ink on reproducible mylar. Sheet size shall he twenty-four (24) inches by thirty -six (36) inches with an unencumbered margin of one and one -half (1 1/2) inches on the left hand side of the sheet and a one -half (12) inch margin around the other three (3) sides of the sheet pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.480.090. 32. A description and site plan of the proposed development including a statement of the objectives to be achieved by the PUD and a description of the proposed land uses, densities, natural features, traffic and pedestrian circulation, off - street parking, open space areas, infrastructure improvements, and site drainage. 33. An architectural character plan generally indicating the use, massing, scale, and orientation of the proposed buildings. 34. A written description of the variance being requested. • ✓ CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and 'edst (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: f eet c14214 I. A )dei I ANT has submitted t CITY an al icat6 l-e ) om , _I , „„ (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that the City of Aspen has an adopted fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior t a determination of applic tion completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $_ 10 which is for hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $245.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT By: By: Chris Bendon C • ✓ • 1 Community Development Director Date: 0 7 l Billing Address and Telephone Number: tri l'0 1Z7- Sh t/ +r OWNERS AUTHORIZATION Robert Copito ( "Owner") is the current owner of the premises, commonly referred to as 1460 Sierra Vista Drive, Aspen, Colorado, ( "Property"). The owner does hereby authorize Scot Broughton of Scot Broughton Architects and his associates to act as our representative in matters concerning work to said property. Authorization may include, without limitation, or objection adjustment applications for variances, development applications, building permits, and other similar and related plans and permits. Robert Copito 500 Haven Lane Great Falls VA 22066 T�Ih 7 j 7A[/ Date Representative Scot Broughton Scot Broughton Architects, LLC PO Box 4096 Basalt, CO 81621 970 - 927 -0552 4. WRIGHT & LASAr r F , r r P 715 West Main Street, Suite 201 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Telephone: (970) 925 -5625 Facsimile: (970) 925 -5663 August 8, 2011 City of Aspen 130 Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Lot 37, FILING 1, WEST ASPEN SUBDIVISION a/k /a 1460 Sierra Vista Drive Aspen, CO 81611 The undersigned is an attorney, duly Licensed to practice law in the State of Colorado since 1973. This is to certify that according to the records of RUM County, the following individual is the owner in fee simple of the above referenced property: Robert Copito 500 Haven Lane Great Falls, VA 22060 Sincerely, Wright 'Salle, LLP By: Ali � . /"ohn D. LaSalle www.wrightl asalle.com SCOT BROUGHTON Architects , LL( August 9, 2011 City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission 130 S. Galena Street; 2 " Floor Aspen Co. 81611 RE: Residential Design Standard (RDS) Variance, Windows between 9' —12' 1460 Sierra Vista Drive; Dear Commission Members, This application comes before you for consideration of our request to allow glazing on the street front elevation of the residence remodel at the above - mentioned address. The current residence constructed in 1971 is a split level home with the main entry at existing grade level, the first level is 4' -6" above existing grade, and the lower level is 4'- 6" below existing grade. The existing roof is a low- pitched slope of 2 to 12. It is our intent to maintain the low- pitched roof, but change the existing gable roof form to a more contemporary shed roof. As proposed the roof slope would pitch up toward the street elevation to take advantage of views toward Aspen Mountain, and Shadow Mountain. It was typical construction practices in the 1970's to place small openings at 6' -8" above respective floor levels. Our proposal is to maintain these lower openings, but provide a higher band of windows to take advantage of the mentioned views. The intent is not to propose a full wall of glass, but maintain a solid strip of wall between glazing bands to provide scale to the street elevation. However, due to the split level construction the proposed higher windows fall within the 9' -0" to 12' -0" area as defined as a no- window zone pursuant to regulation 26.410.040.D.3(a) — as defined in the City of Aspen Land Use Code. It is our request to be granted approval to place a band of windows within this 9'- 0" to 12' -0" range from the first floor level. Within the Sierra Vista neighborhood there exists a wide variety of architectural styles from original 1970's one level ranch style homes, modern mountain style homes, and contemporary homes. Several homes have been designed with street facing second level balconies with access provided by glass doors and adjacent windows that fall within the restricted 9' -0" to 12' -0" no- window zone. We feel that our proposal does not deviate from similar conditions in the neighborhood, and fits within the variety of existing styles. The portion of the street facing elevation with the higher band of proposed windows is setback + 75' -0" from the street edge, thus we fell presents very little impact to street users, and adjacent neighbors. Thank you for your review and consideration of this request. Scot Broughton Principal s PO Box 4096 / 23280 Two Rivers Rd., Unit 3 / Basalt, Co 81621 s [t] 970/927 -0552 / [f] 970/927 -0554 / [e] srot@scotharchilerts.com "' Y j t- s � 1 ",,,4,0.,,_ ,r,� f � V r� ,� s . r !'� w • ~` 4 '-• 4 it ' " wl • a P 9- hie: � A'. " f aV a v S — i ^--,..5�h7EAQ Ra m , _, '. j ' i ' e -v+r 1 • rtsi . ' b + .(g . e 1 1 . + t� Fgsq �� 33 '� ,.'¢'�C► �++, w __ � � ` � . � r..Y ":f ,� #ice° '''tiu'A' L ` F6 vir to aR� J ¢ . o � x o�cy � '. 1 i r ,� \ 9 rteeR" r 13 � . X0 21bN g rate meel 9f1�3 i s ro � '� 7 766{;,„_ _ ' v im . l 4 e .t y CrL�e it b 9e rfirlan } i . I r- q Kr N1 NNfls 4 lest I , ° .fib p s • i .. wow y x L O ! 1 , it 8 1 , 4 �'y f / ��b ` ` � 4t' . �� Rau p a b d rtt F b s a i i 1 ( k " ..:J �� �5� Raun -w r il+ i I ,� . 11 . . � -, k � to y, - p bb t f t J �/E7. • • k Y in �. f I• ' f 8 Q f ` U 2 007 » t a i / J [n CC V7 '" f' �j y / ' ``� Y o T /��q to X11 _ . 1 7: i r * ,..,,,\ ,,,i:4"ettile:c.„ A",<T7*. 74:cat N, , e -,. V 4 ...e.„. _,.„._. , . ^ p i" 7_, y. A.4." , g, , " . > . • - I._ , ,' . e t — l . 74c."- \'' 9 " - CY • ' i 7 .0: ' . \ - c < N., • 1 '4, •. , .i ..* -,' A c eN -. _si 8Z/ .. - 9. — -- 4 —` ' ."' ". , Ve i 1.„ AS N •• g / - t. , S %- • Se ' ' ,, I z 4-- - • \ 14.. / 'k c4t ., ,e • §.„, .•,, 0001" i 4 ''',/ s• si \SC . - 45 ‘ )" r g`v 4 4•! if ° rsTh- 41/2. ' `•.: I '' ..., ' ' ` . — ....,_ - il t -- -„,g ,.. • As r-s. „...," ,•:= 4 \ ././.."- '" S 4 "1/ _A 4 , ‘ Zi 42 ...." hry / 5 4 A ve SA, . \ „ "•■•• 4 : 4° %/ / —‘, 4., ' AA /.... i ...„ ' J.. 7, .. N _.2. • . a , ik . C / 0.1 , - . ..„ , , cs . 4. '• [ - 2' 't „/F 9, . ,.... , esit : . ,2-- N ? --, \ ix , k -, . .-, / ” . o a 1 '''' 1 , s k • . . . . - . . _ - - - Pi , • : - Z ( -C\9, 1s eci- ..± : -,, '.. \e' 4 . -''' ' ' . ' _ _ .\ , :I I, . • ,,,, g,,,, _,./ . , 51,. \ _ e y et . ,.."- --- soc.,,,,, - g , . , „ _, . ........ s /- 7 _ , -,/ Z NI a ' a' a a' • ■"" e s 4 ' ./.:\ , A sk, se k . ' 44 -.- 'a 3 a t - , , ' 4 . • _ 3 - — - .<-/\ ' -'k- - . v _ .„.., 1 - . I , - i * - ‘..-- ,,,,,,----) --' \1. . , . --- --ties w '' • A. " - .--' . . ., 7,..T2 .;..- ,..: ,kv t.: - • ,--. • , - -. - .. -‘,70- , - as 1..■■,- 1 . P i l h in 1 .., . \•- '`i•-. •' r . • v: 1 „--w- -- _ . - - .i.- 1. ., E __-.„-- rr -- , i \ 1 - ' ,/ <i w --_,. -_______._---__ ...../ ..." / . r / . ......---. — "f" --- ,, .----- I .__-- L...." .. . _ Copito ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER 1460 Sierra Vista Drive MAILING LIST Aspen, CO LOT ASESSOR OWNER ADDRESS LOT St STREET ADDRESS R018449 350 PARTNERS LLC PYRAMID PEAK Unit: B 1470 SIERRA VISTA DR 1470 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 8161/1045 R018448 SA RICK JORDAN L & SHEREEN C PYRANIID PEAK Unit: A 1472 SIERRA VISTA DR 1472 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 -1045 R004673 CONNER CLAUDE M & IRENE ATRUST WEST ASPEN Lot: 34 AND:- Lot: 35 FILING 1 PO BOX 345 1480 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81612 R004764 STOLLER JONATHAN W REV TRUST WEST ASPEN Lot: 33 FILING 1 1475 SIERRA VISTA DR 1475 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 R004841 DICKER INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD HOPKINS CONDOS Unit: 1 & 2 5 HIGHGATE HILL 1465 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN TOORAK MELBOURNE AUSTRALIA 3142 R009472 BICKERT CARL VON EISEN & E SUSAN SIERRA VISTA DUPLEX Unit: A DESC: AKA UNIT 2 395 DEXTER ST 1445 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN DENVER, CO 80202 R019166 SCHWARTZ RICHARD C WEST ASPEN Lot: 30 FILING 1 1435 SIERRA VISTA DR 1435 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 R009141 ODONNELL JOHN & ADRIENNE SIERRA VISTA Unit: B 4083 CUERVO AVE 1425 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN SANTA BARBARA, CA 93110 R009140 WALBERT DAVID & ELLEN SIERRA VISTA Unit: A 1425 SIERRA VISTA DR 1425 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 R010840 MCLELLAN DAVID R & KATHERINE V GRACE PAUL Unit: SOUTH 1417 SIERRA VISTA DR 1417 9 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 -1044 R020918 GRACE PAUL CONDO ASSOC GRACE PAUL DESC: COMMON AREA COMMON AREA 1417 5 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN 1417 5 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN, CO 81611 R009817 SPASCO LTD RENAISSANCE ESTATE Unit 8 109 N POST OAK LN #550 857 BONITA DR ASPEN HOUSTON, TX 77024 R009816 CRS ALPINE LLC RENAISSANCE ESTATE Unit: C/ O MICHAEL 0 HARTZ KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENM 855 BONITA DR ASPEN 525 W MONROE ST CHICAGO, IL 60661 12004781 SEVERY BE I I Y K TRUSTEE WEST ASPEN Lot: 41 FILING 1 1390 SIERRA VISTA DR 1390 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 R1105561 SIMPSON ELEANOR P REV TRST 25% WEST ASPEN Lot: 2 FILING 2 PO BOX 25425 1935 SILVER KING DR ASPEN DALLAS, TX 75225 -1425 R005491 DUCHESS CORPORATION WEST ASPEN Lot: 3 FILING 2 C/O NANCY PAVELL 1455 SILVER KING DR ASPEN 11603 GLOWING SUNSET LN LAS VEGAS, NV 89135-1659 R010448 PHILLIPS DAVID &ALEXANDRA WEST ASPEN Lot: 40 FILING 1 UNIT 1 PO BOX 11499 1910 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81612 R009957 HIGHLANDS PARTNERSHIP LLP WEST ASPEN Lot: 40 FILING 1, UNIT 2 901 IVANIIOE ST 1912 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN DENVER, CO 80220 R020725 1430 SIERRA VISTA LLC 1430 SIERRA VISTA Unit: B 1435 SIERRA VISTA 1430 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 R009120 DUBLIN LEONARD & ADELE GOLF COURSE TOWNHOUSES Unit: A 1450 SIERRA VISTA DR 1450 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 R014295 CITY OF ASPEN ASPEN GOLF COURSE Lot: 1 GOLF COURSE ATTN FINANCE DEPT 39551 HWY 82 ASPEN 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81611 r 7 � / • - . W w 1 I1 I P ..SI .50 .45 5 I • 10L ° f j f, )'1 I r ■ ° !. W ts. 000 7 "= 1 I ``: � 7 j ' s , o: ,:I 6 - .+ .00 /c 0o rd ♦I CY 01 .a it 0 4 A .51 .40 —... _ _— , ' i 2 Z i i : j ''\ 1 J t ncn • . 5 s 0 _ N .. f 1. •N N / Z � / � ate A t, O < .. n Lt � n 0 _ i t Z 1.. _ . __.. c .5Y M -.. :� �- Z FYI •- _ a q . 1 3 c �w 4. W ' ^ I �- I r a W 1,/, W ajt- - .00'S01_ —_ —'� / ° q 0 n 00' WO. de 2sd - i = in _ - f6 ' 021- - -.. 1. e • 000'0// 1 Z 7 • 1 .�,. \ l2 Y a \ot . in /1 - -.11t vAr - O .3. 0 b )Q,11J/ • '0 A. < aw .. w "N / r 4 e _ s T• / ._ _ „ on -. a) V Bi rsr-bo Fs y s. • r! ° su / 0 • P b N <1 - ______ - . „ „, --- \ 1.4. " il ■ . l SS.Gf.fIN ■ / t� O y , , V. e ` VJ i - 1 r ' a . . 9a1 y r< u I • W Z b ` ,5 / t% 0 4 M <`I t ' 04 1 4 � -. -2L 0t/ t ' II - - J° 4" 5` arf /_.. I/ f L/ "L r 41 :2 , i � 0 ' S` N 0 y tai t � — . , , �, /� 0 ♦ o ,E, ,0 a Dfr ' fLS.y ' ` N '� ¢ 4 ' • m A) N of a / /5 / O' / d S l P' .� s t . 4SV 5 • O% _ p .061 - S r ' / Dt, _ ` \ . °y t M ii / 60 . `t�L S .Y 2 6 1 I kilfil 4 1 „, a • • { '4, tyy fJ I _ dV 94' � � I , ate- ; ...' ‘S-4- Vie . s L v S J U / • oa/ 400 r <s �' ae ° -'� I / r tl -4‘,. k 4 , o • T � I r 1 ip 3• 1!f ! ti Jt 1I p Q, �� E ° , 4.1. r» K .y r d0 < I � 4 $ . � 9 r , n . 5 ,4 4 n L 1 ° i r yy`v r f :l nb > 1- y `c,- _ "" a �.. ,. O w °g Vol 6 v 5 W U 51 p Z -eg Lr a a z � . 5 a „l e o o o r '. – w ° yj F N w z ` �� 'Se x ._ 0 w °e " S : t (s) n. , 1 W e ! ,r a . A < U w r �J Cl*" . .:'g e l N 1 M* s � . � • :��' v a a Q .. a VQ WW `e . Z w = . ". s�vw\ o 1 : Vif hit! 41 E \% li s rs Z Cl Ws _ s L d c a Vw /� W °: itl M ; s ° t g ..- 3 g a x,14 e I a v8 ' �--- a • 0 ® • o e } i ll \s _ -II „f, ... I $ U Wm I I I t I o w I ✓ V I \1/ ~ y ' L -LLI 3.50. S . 1 . \ \ \ A.il // \\‘L /2 1 1101003 Al Ill in 5 1 . ��!p_- i // ' \//7 — _ 5 �_ awn ' h n r " , j b s' �1 ,jV t AA � a . ", g -toil 4 dft-i, g i -••;', wo i., , ,,,,, h.... o I l W • 3tNYle = � . . . Nllknae.,--, 'y g hCT it 1 \ 1111 ----'s ' —it—I— \ . bi g s 1 P ?f / i \ y l te L y // • ! 5 � '.15 .s . \ - 2 ..‘a €:,"..”, i ,,, t2 i a a ;:s! LI . to 1 Y:5 N % I ' W j �\\ 6 sY I \ w e. \ J ' 5 1 I r o th w P 9 1 w — _ i4TJ � stop f J p / ,.zo M.00 :85 9 d o 3 IM „ ( H , o W o L \ I III \ ` lJ L }� } R a �; ,,- ,\ 4 r i -IT \ kii 1 hill! ill _S L ,___ L _' - 1 — < 1 .,'. j .._� X I a I f ill I I o� \j„/ - a I I I ' I , 0 q p 1 _.. - __ I N I 1 1 V w F j �� �� __ ?1 I j j )_ � a it 'y ! w - c �� A o 0 DT a 1 1 ( p 1 __ L 1 - I r _ jc i il s9 w I - r , may N��I _ -. " ' ° '\ 1 E� IIU//' 1 � 11 F I r-::--_- � ' � 1 n I ■ a■/ I I =1 k _ A- o y�o/ V� ' ✓/ / 1A� W w 0 b // ,,„,,,, „., , . D y:L j1 4 I _ m / L I I N W i1 0 � ' 0 ii 47, t ❑ W I Sj� 1 " r f H 1 - — F1 to i vr,s, p v_l ivQ O P . i 1' I 6: W C Aib06 l i , 0 ' I 0 � —au III 1 ''� 1�3M35V3 A11"IIln,0 .._ q 7Z\\ ri L , p9V9135 .c' 1 in v N r i,/�\ .OL'ZOL g 3.0099.99 N ` V p a Lo Z m� 1 0 A& 2 “Y 0 ra o u M gi E I— tti O ?'d c) Ov, fi 1 (I r 1 N Q Li I IFiFvaaa s COG NM MI -- iI 1 11 1 —1 ' c S F I N z • Q II I S z — L7. h� A z E�� O f 1 tic — —� W ! I � ��yE _ I I -1 l7 Dill 1 10 1 LLI ._.— ..____ —_ -- __— vow I Q a 1ylI" qj ...: a .o„ 0 O 4JiI Ella � i 3 p m Y S O ` - • p 1 e r 1 2 tE I 11 Ttil \ ,� a £ 5 II I I j 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 j 1 I I j • OTh III J f 7 T fT i l 1111111111- -.1 Lij r a I Z I *2 -j- -0 L ! iV I j j w <70. I I O L c,'-'5L39 I iN ilot 1 ,j o- a „a-, I 1 w L m 1 o E I I 1 :lc_ Pt • Z I ! — — — — _ _ _ O e-e 0 q -_I_ _. 1 __ - 1 m cc b rvc 1 j I 1- 2 4 r /II II , \ (� (j In IF, NMI V V S V 0° wan v N e - ;r m _ 11'1 I I `T Z 4_ hi. dLI!I z' ti - O z O Q _ in - -, •e o __ _ ! W Q ' ti ill — , c J H _._ W W - W tI Il1111114,.$,-;.21-.1. i41 - W i- III _ _ 111 ' a ••• O fr r Z CO o w . J f- ® J N .3i „W git % Y�' Q ...... 5 < W y , *'2£«' F i:Uitii 4 i ‘111111111111111111011111111111c:1 d 3S� ' "3. `�}} - - Q 5 1' 1 II 1 1111 '. 1 % 6` l 'r �{ „ 1111 = - w"'v O Y it ,. R . - o g 6 °c �' 1 1 1 1 = I aI f .. O 5 3 � I I1111i 7 1111dddlllldl i lili o 1 11 yyyy4y 111111111 I I 11 W't = x £rl ,. t� pII _ •�III111IiLI11 -- I . i "'' R _I d 11 1111 1 1 / � 1q1111 !� I� 'd iFF i x111 = 1 1 4444 -' k - A I I I 111 III Ill 11 !9t F 1 yy44 x fa t 11 117111 T 11 I I F F EI' e = - IIhT11.Iz II p � I I I II 11111111111 p `,a a �i t 1 11111111'11 Ik ° 1 � ''��rI� j �� ry II I I I �{ = 1=1= I h = 41E �!E� III 1 K IIIII II III 1 11,1,1,,1 �.Ii 1 III ' 11 {1{ 1 1{111 {1111 I '1'1'1''FI E IIII I� Ill l ikih {. F II 11 !' ‚ ll » 11111 4 1 14' { {� {{ S k iJ H iJ i JiJ a,E1 1 i :1 • t: { 111 1 1 I 41 1. , I I III II : I � {{ . I :•i — = 1111 II 1 1 X- 1 I= l L 1 „ ,, ,_ ' 111 0 � .... 1 111 E un P 4 1 1 11 F , 1 1�1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1111111 � a I�h1l�llll II�� I IIII I I I I I I iilil�tititi .�� i 41 I ; 111 { 1111 { {{ i1 1 ii1 i1i l il Si i 9 1111 ' 1I I { I ' 1 1 ilikl I J 1 = 1 11 1 �' III IIIII III IIII {�41 I :1111111141 , ' t 1 1! !1 ii1: Iit III 1 > �; �; 51�l b li 1 1� 1 11 III 1If ii411111411 �» 1 _ ...1;1; 1�1 III 1 �I 1 1,14,1, ,1,11I 111 �� 11, < r I � ' ;:114 o , ' ? p I I I �I I I _ 1' w I ~I II q l �: I � ' I ' I ' l i {1 { _ — _ 1 .1$ 1111'111 1 ` w e I IIIIII { IIII 1111,11111111 i , hi si 1:6 • ` ' ' � � l l l l l i'41I I { 1141 { I,14 1 � 1111111111111 a = , , , , III 11111'! �� Cd r .q c { { 11,1 1 114{ r ,1,11111, ' 1 111 11 111 I 1111111 1 � +) 1F�s 111111 - 1 I 1 �fY 1 = J�h11l11111� 1 III, 111111111111 1,1,1NI 1 2 a r • P � . i111 P I 1111�111�1111 1 { — ! 1 1 11 1 1�1 111111111 1.1.1.1.1.1 1 I III 1 s , 3, r " ' a E, Ii_LL� 1 1 111 1 4 4 =I `'` I III �IIIIIIJJII• r 1 1111 ?➢ 1 1--- - _ 1,,,,, "' 4 # W i .11 �I. a r _1 - - 'i' L I 11 III I ,to7 1 1 i 111;1. • a 11 Illi 1 1 I'I I 11 imp s ec V,∎ r ■ I -- , ; , i , y, i , 1 x . 11 411 P 4 1 ;1; , 1 41111111 1 1 111111 , 1 ,1111 1'1 'I',,,11 1 ,y 1 , 1,1 , 1 , 1 5 s L =1 _ 11!;1 l, 1 1 h,� 1 yhh 414 w r 1 } ': 1 I 14 M 14 1 i' - 1 1 9 1 1 11 ! h 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 !, 1 1 1Th 1 1 ”- t rr it 1 bill ( -i 14lu 1 i 1 y 11 IM' Iui 1 I. - - - L I I $ IIi 1 S ''.a*, . 111 iIf 4 ,h �1i1 • M 11 e S+ I 1 , 1 , 111 1 9 1, 1 y 1 ,11, 1 1 1 y 4 1 , 1 , 11 1 1 1 1,1,1,1 I1. 1 - x I 1 11 11 1 1 1 I 11 ,I ,1. , 4 i ' 1 �,� 1t 'I , I, � Y IIII h IIIhl1 1 111�1 1 1 1 111114 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! r 1 = —_ I ° la 1 1 L L1. 1 .1.1.1.1. . .. 1 . r r1 I LI1 111- 1 1 I 4 , f 11 IIII 1� I:IIIIII,1,11 LLLLIJ !1 r t, daa' I IIIIII !t!'t!4 G . I' /Lb' _= IIIIM : IIIII II !11!1! 4, 1 41 1 1 1 111 11 s ! 1141¢1 11 it 41 Il I (IIFi 1411!1!14!1 1.1.1!1!1 1 I I II I I 1 1 1 11/1 1 II 1 .1 I VI — ,1'11111i N�Hp- -- i 111111111;7: nk� I1 1 b 11I' I {1111141 1111111111111 N e I 11 1 � l �� .y i11111111'I' 1, ! "= - .!I �,e' III _ - llt �1 ! 4x — 1114141 ` ! ` 1� . 1 1 14 1 1444 I iS' ,,* 1 !!!- 11 ' 11111111411 J AVI � ;—'W7- H” 4 IIIWIWIi . a r .,.,vi I 1 �� W u 1 i I 0 do- 11t4 1 I i 11' =E I IIiI19 1 1I III lire- W 111! I= f - 1 O I _ v a a � ' '' o 1 � r-- ■ I� F F �� y. y f 1 �� c � II g ' w S : s, O r n Z 1 I a O _ o we c ■ i 0 �Qo P 1141I!l1111TII S s & 5� f „ U 1 ■ -- ® 1 - U o r Q L , _ o E ; 1 III ° � l i 11!1! II! II:", 0 Iya 111111 II I 1 • C d1 11 3* III _ m "` O gs u ale, cm s7,- i ji a Jr - t s i 5 t ^ � • O Q 0 £ 1t VI .4,, 1/4 I a) W �, s W Iffril n �I ^- - :_Y I o '—'---- ! � ' — _ _ es =M En ill LEI _ �� ' , Ella _,�ipir '$ S� SIN i�l��ll I Illh ;h ' = _ MI =n 11�i1,1 _11'°1 1111 1 1 1 re.,, ' p .I' � I . i - mi l� l l��! 1 ' £a J' l * L 1!' � I II' o f l pit 1111x LL _� cc i ligt fli 1 m il 1Il�'1111�11� , lath I IL II id i — i � � � p..„,,,„, . LL,, . !a ___ � i � '• ' z 1ra1 f1111 . tliSl "�I, e } 601, I m�d ����c iii i; 4 ® ALAW' 'i .∎ III ∎ =. N . .. I V 1 n ;l i l l TIME n 0 C i _ :m ®i �'1 I 0 s m_ Idaltilrill ' , T I J l . of 1L nila o n ®. ® = =' N o I 1 EL .41..71A71 Ina I nZ p NIA /. -- -- Nl uu�l..u. i O a o- ni 0 ! j 0 � • ! �� „ _, . ! e u t el ( Irli <> i ii NM 0 PI P i i m 'Mil U - - -- - - -- N g.2 a- - -`! t - - 1 • 1 .. s - - , � - - II -- - "k ion �. ‘ ..J AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: I 4fsn Sterm. V e\ra 1>t , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC u HEAIVNGDATE: tore & 4 ©- 0 , 2 04 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. County of Pitkin ) An ° i4° co- (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the i y of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that 1 have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty -six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not Less than one inch in height.. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and \ Vas continuously visible from the _ day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (Continued on next page) 0 Rezoning or text amendment: Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments: Sure The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this /f day of / f , 20j6 by A-v\olefrt RE: 1460 SIERRA TA DRIVE, RESIDENTIAL WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL DESIGN STAND D VARIANCE LAND USE REQUEST NOTICE I S HER Y public hearing � � ' ` will be held on Tuesday, day, October October 4, 2011, at a My commission expires: 64//i D meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m, before the Aspen consider Cit an application by pe Robert Cop a 500 Haven Lent/, , s Grraeet t t , Falls, VA 22060. The Vari song a Resroenrrar Design �Y Standards windows, from subsection 26.410.030 elk) blic A (0) (3), windows, to allow street facing windows to span through the area where a second floor would ,.... typic exist. The proZy is I ally descri bed as Lot Pii West pe Aspen S to and _•� opmmon fif known Phelan a. t he Nrty of information, n, Commu. j JAChIE `1 tact Jennifer Phelan at the City of Aspen Commu- nity Development Department, 130 S. Galena Sr., LOTHIAN Aspen, CO (910) 429.2 T69, Jennde Ph I pn ' i O As Plae ning 1 1 1 J'j. aPO Aspen l entl Zoning Commission ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: f'Il 6 Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on Septem- OF C °e"0'p °00539" )F THE PUBLICATION �'�'" * PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) * LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENT AGENGIES NOTIED BY MAIL * APPLICANT CERTICICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24- 65.5 -103.3 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE AD 'MESS OF PROPERT e MO e ltd 12A. V Lerrd t 24 , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: ( 3 t r,b* 42.. 4 , 200 11 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, �'t'm� (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) day prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. - 4 tin 15471-AA-tv-e . ✓ Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the l - /• �' day of G . , 200 11 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. / Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) i4 4. Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions that create more than one lot, Planned Unit Developments, Specially Planned Areas, and COWAPs are subject to this notice requirement. NIA Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Sign. e The fo egoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowled ed before me th 12 day of 34Gm1 , 20(3<L, by SCert Ouo t"OV1 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: L4 1201 ({ 16,01)44g.— e rz , Notary Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: • COPY OF THE PUBLICATION • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24- 65.5 -103.3 • 1430 SIERRA VISTA LLC ASPEN GOLF PRO SHOP BICKERT CARL VON EISEN & E SUSAN 1435 SIERRA VISTA 0/0 551 VENTURE LLC 395 DEXTER ST ASPEN, CO 81611 299 MILWAUKEE ST #502 DENVER, CO 80202 DENVER, CO 80206 -5045 CITY OF ASPEN BORDEN NANCY S 25% ATTN FINANCE DEPT CONNER CLAUDE M & IRENE A TRUST PO BOX 25425 PO BOX 345 DALLAS, TX 75225 -1425 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 DICKER INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD DUCHESS CORPORATION DUBLIN LEONARD & ADELE 5 HIGHGATE HILL C/O NANCY PAVELL 1450 SIERRA VISTA DR TOORAK MELBOURNE ASPEN, CO 81611 11603 GLOWING SUNSET LN AUSTRALIA 3142, LAS VEGAS, NV 89135 -1659 GRYNBERG MIRIAM ZELA TRUST GRYNBERG STEPHAN MARK TRUST HAMSHER JOHN HERBERT 3600 S YOSEMITE ST STE 900 5000 S QUEBEC STE 500 1475 SIERRA VISTA DR DENVER, CO 80237 DENVER, CO 80237 ASPEN, CO 81611 HIGHLANDS PARTNERSHIP LLP JSO PARTNERS LLC MACKEY EILEEN S REV TRST 25% 401 IVANHOE ST 1470 SIERRA VISTA DR PO BOX 25425 DENVER, CO 80220 ASPEN, CO 816111045 DALLAS, TX 75225 -1425 MCLELLAN DAVID R & KATHERINE V ODONNELL JOHN & ADRIENNE PHILLIPS DAVID & ALEXANDRA 1417 SIERRA VISTA DR 4083 CUERVO AVE PO BOX 11449 ASPEN, CO 81611 -1044 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93110 ASPEN, CO 81612 RED MTN GRILL REDNOR JORDAN H ROARING FORK PTNR LTD 25% 1000 TRUSCOTT PL 405 EAST 56TH ST #A PO BOX 25425 ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10022 DALLAS, TX 75225 -1425 SARICK JORDAN L & SHEREEN C SCHNEIDER ELIZABETH P SCHWARTZ RICHARD C 1472 SIERRA VISTA DR 6 LODGE RD 1435 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN, CO 81611 -1045 GREAT NECK, NY 11021 ASPEN, CO 81611 SEVERY BETTY K TRUSTEE SIMPSON ELEANOR P REV TRST 25% STOLLER JONATHAN W REV TRUST 1390 SIERRA VISTA DR PO BOX 25425 1475 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN, CO 81611 DALLAS, TX 75225 -1425 ASPEN, CO 81611 URIS JILL P VANDERLIP HENRIK N WALBERT DAVID & ELLEN 1415 SIERRA VISTA DR 27 BALDWIN FARMS S 1425 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN, CO 81611 GREENWICH, CT 068313308 ASPEN, CO 81611 WEST ASPEN LOT 40 1480 SILVER KING ASPEN, CO 81611 l' • 13C! ui 1 J r 4: droll ' • 0 4 S C O T • B R O I G H T O N A r c h i t e c t s , L L C September 8, 2011 SAMPLE RE: 1460 Sierra Vista Drive — Window Variance Dear Adjacent property Owner. My name is Scot Broughton. I am an architect representing Rob and Debbie Copito, owners of the above - mentioned property, in which they have enlisted my firm to redesign their existing house. The approach we have chosen is one that we feel will fit within the varying context of the Sierra Vista neighborhood, and compliment the direction of new construction within the greater community. The intent is to modernize the existing house, built in 1970's, by selective altering existing rooflines to take advantage of views to Aspen Mountain and Shadow Mountain, and incorporate benefits of the southern exposure on the property. A regulation exists in the Aspen Municipal Code that limits glass within a specific range on street facing elevations so as not convey a two -story living space. Our situation is a unique case in that the existing house is a split -level arrangement that establishes the main level of the house at +/- 5' -0" above the exterior grade level. Consequently, in order to take advantage of the views and exposure, we have proposed window units that fall within this range limited by the Municipal Code. Attached are a few images that indicate the area of the Window Variance request. As seen in the elevation drawings - we have indicated by the shaded locations the limits as imposed by the Municipal Code. In turn we have also indicated the window locations that we are seeking a variance on for this redesign, as well as, the condition that would result in a denial of the Window Variance. We would greatly appreciate your support on this approach, and acceptance of the window variance request on the street facing elevation. If there is further information that I can provide, please do not hesitate to contact me directly for further explanation. Sincerely, Scot Broughton Principal s' PO Box 4096 / 23280 Two Rivers Rd., Unit 3 / Basalt, (a 81621 B 1 970/927-0552 f 970/927-0554 [e] scot @scolharchitects ram A PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 1460 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANADRD VARIANCE LAND USE REQUEST NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, October 4, 2011, at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sisters City Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Robert Copito, 500 Haven Lane, Great Falls, VA 22060. The applicant is requesting a Residential Design Standards Variance from subsection 26.410.030 (D) (3), Windows, to allow street facing windows to span through the area where a second floor would typically exist. The property is legally described as Lot 37, Filing 1, West Aspen Subdivision and commonly known as 1460 Sierra Vista Drive. For further information, contact Jennifer Phelan at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2759, Jennifer.Phelan@ci.aspen.co.us. s /Stan Gibbs, Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission rn A I 0r x rn I N 00A 1 I r AoO O A p -1 >d A Z> I m A r Otl P I � � ` \ II T II �� II_—� N pal `�\ \ \V .es _ _ L a i � / u ill st II Irmo O r—! 1. 1 111 IJ 1—J wri O N Ir �'� d 11 111II 4 i I- -iii EN " l a II � �III����III 1 �' o Ewa _II .� 1111 1 � ! III 1 r IIIiiII II� l l ® . I ■ m Iir1 I� i l: - - -_ - r — — — — 11111EmiM Mi -1 1 1 1 1 4 r ���r 9 A N � � 1 I' �II � = ®1 .T 7 71 C r x 1 11 1 1 II U = 1111 I� MI N I I I I • i Mil D A mai __-_-,TT Z kip III 109 ._ 71— n - 1 !boa I 1� 1 10 `IIII � -- 0 Z N Z x i. . . I 4' -11' , 9' -O" • IM 1 N Z = Y x rn 1 LP -I -1 0 -1 - Z 0 ta N i z I A A = z y 0 r 00 ta C ' i 1 z ■" IJ 4 IJ : ;; i_ I 1 N I o o 111 C) NEE N rn r iii. Ill II � I ■` III �= 1!'..; D 1�'�� ■lliila 1 s 1 � I �It : - ' m A ul(P 161 II 4 r �I iHh IIiIiii po a F�; j I i ul r7 I nisi I � r ■I m 1 IH ii 1111il �i�l1111`�i�'' = �il�. i1 �i ■■■i. II i -- 011111111= -I- t hlIN I 11 MI 11 611 11 NU , . Fri • o = II 1 N rn " N A < ! i ii ilI _______ �7 H _ it ..1 m 10 ■ CI ri 1 - -- l I IIIIII -- I 11.11 �-' - iiiiiNgal Almon 1.11 111 Nrn �,�......�i a- p. 11 III 10 2._Q.. a 1 . X m A > ;c r I 1161 0 N = r A • \ z ,y I . I _ 11 o. Z Il MI it ' ;1111 I ■ $ & : C e F * t. 0 IC) 1 iiii •.,. _ C :1 — i - u N 1■ I.I 11j 1 ' 1 _• . o rn 6 10 r air li Pik. I O r t .a0 al 1011 '� ■��/�IIIn 1 1h Ill a5: : A. m E3E .+. xae7 —� P in Illiftsna- 111141 111 mosor'''' -- AIN t 111 - - 1 1 _ 0 -i r � � ' I. i iiiiii u i i IIiI! _ S 11 1/11 1 110 IIH I - _ 1 . 1 1 � ,III►III ilitine ---=-7.cris: IS Lis sa ,,,,,,,1 › 0 thilEI-1= mai 11 C I 111 = III �'� - �: � m _ ■ A rn c 'El III I �I � 0®1 0 si II 0 11 `ME �� Wig C N -, p I '� l/I o d 11 le ______ � - ��I'I � � � e _1 Al Z . I �: .--I j 1 I II LOA . -111_ l ` .∎ �VS= m ai -a 1 111191111= 1 111111 smil=111 -I- -J Z N Z ���ai�i�n N 6 D E a THE CITY OF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: August 12, 2011 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number and name assigned to this property is 0056.2011.ASLU - 1460 Sierra Vista Drive. The planner assigned to this case is myself. ❑ Your Land Use Application is incomplete: We found that the application needs additional items to be submitted for it to be deemed complete and for us to begin reviewing it. We need the following additional submission contents for you application: Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. Your Land Use Application is complete: If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429 -2759 if you have any questions. Th.. 1 ou, I \ Jennifer Ph;, Deputy Director City of Aspen, Community Development Department For Office Use Only: Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required SPA PUD COWOP Yes Nos Subdivision (creating more than 1 additional lot) GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing Yes No* Commercial E.P.F.