HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.co.605 W Main St.73A-89 w <J
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen
DATE RECEIVED: 7 14 89
DATE COMPLETE:_9'/S /gg PARCEL ID AND CASE NO.
�� � '/ , STAFF MEMBER: 73A -89
PROJECT NAME: Shadow Mou tai Oc —
GMOS EX,_p__n Bull Condominiumization and
Project Address: 61 W. Main Street
Legal Address: Lots H and I Block 25
APPLICANT: Shadow Mountain Associates
Applicant Address: 201 S. Galena Suite 201
REPRESENTATIVE: Rick Knezevich Oates Huthes
Representative Address /phone: 533 East Ho kins & Knezevich
As en CO 81611 ) --
PAID: YES NO AMOUNT: 1 530. NO. OF COPIES RECEIVED:
TYPE OF APPLICATION: 7
1 STEP: 2 STEP: ✓
P &Z Meeting Date 0 / f s:
PUBLIC HEARING: YES (�
VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO%
CC Meeting Date _ 0 1437iii 0
PUBLIC HEARING: YES �NO,
VESTED RIGHTS: YES /N
Planning Director Approval: (— id
Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: Paid:
_ Date:
REFERRALS -- ------ - -- __
City Attorney Mtn.
__y__ City Engineer p De School District
Dept.
Housing Dir. Holy Cross Rtate Hw y Nat Gas Dept(GW)
Aspen Water Fire Marshall State Hw
City Electric Building Inspector State Hwy Dept(GJ)
Envir. Hlth. Roaring Fork
Aspen Consol. Other
Energy Center
S.D. __
DATE REFERREe: 94
- I NITIALS: }7
FIN L ROUTING: r _
DATE ROUTED: - -- - -- -
-- INITIAL
Housing ! G _ • ■ ' 1 ? an g Env. Health
FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: � ;.
U
Parcel Multiple Search Results
Page 1 of 2
Pitkin County Assessor
Search Results
Assessor Property Sear 1 Assessor Subset Ouery I Assessor Sales Search
Clerk & Recorder Rece hon Search I Treasurer Tax Search Search
Legal Description: Subdivision Search
The following parcels were selected. The records are sorted by Parcel Number.
To display detail information for a selected parcel, click on the respective Account Number.
Account Number Parcel Number
Owner Name
Physical Address Legal Description
R013440 273512451003 RENO ASPEN PROPERTIES LLC
605 W MAIN ST ASPEN
Subdivision: SMB Unit: 2 & 3
R013442 273512451005
605 W MAIN ST ASPEN REVA LLC
Subdivision: SMB Unit: 4
R013443 273512451006 RUFUS CAMI CAMI LLC
605 W MAIN ST ASPEN
Subdivision: SMB Unit: A
R013444 273512451007
605 W MAIN ST ASPEN GORDON LETICIA
Subdivision: SMB Unit: B
R013445 273512451008 CHAKERES REAL ESTATE LLC
605 W MAIN ST ASPEN
Subdivision: SMB Unit: 101
R013446 273512451009 CHAKERES REAL ESTATE LLC
605 W MAIN ST ASPEN
Subdivision: SMB Unit: 102
R013447 273512451010 VIEIRA LINDA 50% INTEREST
605 W MAIN ST ASPEN
Subdivision: SMB Unit: 103
R013448 273512451011 VIEIRA LINDA 50% INTEREST
605 W MAIN ST ASPEN
Subdivision: SMB Unit: 104
R019410 273512451012 RUFUS CAMI CAMI LLC
605 W MAIN ST ASPEN
Subdivision: SMB Unit: OOIA DESC:
STORAGE
R019411 273512451013
605 W MAIN ST ASPEN GORDON LETICIA
Subdivision: SMB Unit: 00IB DESC:
STORAGE
R013438 273512451701 RODRIGUEZ JOANN
http: / /www.pitkinassessor.org /assessor /ParcelMultipleResults.asp mrylin
i . % J/\ q i ��j�i l • /,f ` ! • 1 'NI, • 7. • , S T 4. • . \ \ \Q�.
J „ trattr nrf (err
�tpan
• i
ASPENOIPITKIN
i
I. REGIONAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT I , •
, ,Y
1 l {t t { i
% • t i J
This Certificate issued pursuant to the requirements of Section 307
I. u }
� . µ > J , of the 1 979 Edition of the Uniform Building Code It certifies that at the date of P , •
\
• ' � 1 issuance, the structure as described below was in compliance with the various resolutions
and ordinances regulating building construction and use in this jurisdiction. ° 1 ,i 1,6 iiii li „
'• • L'seClassificationProf. offic- F -_ M. Housing Units '100
' - & • . • Bldg Permit 228 , ` ..
c. ~` fr Legal Description Lots H & I Blk. 25 As.en townsite ` "
i t • Building Address 605 W. Main St. A e CO
r. tr t Owner of Building _ Mrn rain Rt tld'n q n �h'•�
•n .. 1 Owner Address 60 W. Main St. As.en C0 81611 • �' '� ;:
3
Group B -2 /R -1 •
• ,• r/ w-
—Type Construction V -N f /'•'% `
•
"T� fi ii ai
---- _L'se Zone nffi ra •
i \\!..
� �` �! Description _Main Tevel-rn n n a �— /� '\.0
a d 1 19 ha Yh A S ff � � \;;. Y
t /s~ V,
/ Basement Level Mec R �
: /z m.1
Two eo ee a.artment units and 2 • '
Pe nthouses. • ri
Y•
•3k R 7,610 s.. %
� • ft . iip r /'
'S •i /�_ t/ / t E
• � _ .6
1 ,
4
I Comments & Restrictions ^•
v
:SV 41
• v
C
kWt ��
y' 0 a • _ Cam' i {IS 1t,3 Ifilit
.;� a� / .� Date / r. •
"N• • .'fii:� adding Official `
'' +g Note: Any alteration or use change of these described premises or portion thereof without `
the written approval of the Budding Official shall negate this C.O. and subject it to s a
, • , , revocation.
vrt,,.
`' '�� POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE �:
iii • i Y, `pi. 1 • •
d� 'r/„ ,s;, Ct?V / ^ lam \ \ \�/// /. • \WM7� Y • • � � • ,,may • • u ta. • ''MM g � , ur� \ .1�� ,it .;'
'F. `,aeiir,l / / %C P:4 :a.. }, \ A / 1 7t ' ' \NU`°�'r �° ® ''. mob -t �yt3
r ru6'S 7 a �• `n\ \li ..� :yA,a
SUMMARY CLOSE -OUT FOR
SHADOW MOUNTAIN C ONDOMINUMIZATION AND
GMQS EXEMPTION FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Council pproved the GMQS Exemption
Council Q and Condominumization.
affordable un fed the $8 4OO
re bi .a G < S zu housing t e ° ti o on
requirement. GMQS houing mitigatin
r
.H.
LAW OFFICES
OATES, HUGHES & KNEZEVICH
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
THIRD FLOOR. ASPEN PLAZA BUILDING
533 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE
LEONARD M. OATES ASPEN. COLORADO 81611
ROBERT W. HUGHES AREA CODE 0-1
RICHARD A. KNEZEVICH TELEPHONE 700
TELECOPIER 030 1131 1
JOHN M. ELY
OF COUNSEL 89
JOHN THOMAS KELLY
Leslie Lamont
Aspen /Pitkin County
Planning Office
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Shadow Mountain Building
Dear Leslie:
On behalf of our client, Shadow Mountain Associates -1989, a
consolidated application is hereby made for:
1. The condominiumization of the Shadow Mountain Building;
2. A Growth Management Quota System Exemption by the Aspen
Planning and Zoning Commission for expansion of office space in
the basement of the Shadow Mountain Building by 500 square feet of
net leasable area.
3. A Growth Management Quota System Exemption by the Aspen
City Council for the construction in the Shadow Mountain Building
of an additional deed - restricted affordable housing containing
approximately 401 square feet.
As you may recall from our pre - application conference, the
Shadow Mountain Building was constructed pursuant to a commercial
Growth Management Plan allocatio, •ranted by the Aspen City
Council. The -
denti. ., '' esi-
flo. "*-
a+ • ,
The entire office space is rented to two local businesses -
Executive Security International ( "ESI ") and Stan Mathis Archi-
tects. The garden level storage space is also rented in its
entirety to such tenants. ESI has requested that Shadow Mountain
Associates - 111101110111ML
once u ntly, we are submi i g t is app i-
cation seek such exemption.
c
OATES, HUGHES & KNEZEVICH, P.C.
Leslie Lamont
June 19, 1989
Page 2
•
_ 1 e ous ng . � •• nal
such unit must be approved as exempt on totthecGMQSrb th of
Aspen City Council. by the
Finally, Shadow Mountain is seeking the condominiumization
of the entire building. In connection with the foregoing land use
matters, we hereby submit the following documentation and infor-
mation:
MINIMUM SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
1. Completed Land Use Application Form;
2. Applicant's name and address:
Shadow Mountain Associates -1989, a
Colorado general partnership
201 South Galena Street, Suite 201
Aspen, Colorado 81611
3. Applicant's phone number: (303) 925 -8803
4. Name and address of Applicant's Authorized Representa-
tive:
Richard A. Knezevich, Esq.
Oates, Hughes & Knezevich, P.C.
533 East Hopkins
Aspen, Colorado 81611
5. Phone number of Applicant's Authorized Representative:
(303) 920 -1700
6. Attached is a letter from Applicant confirming the
appointment of the authorized representative.
7. The street address of the property is 601 W. Main
Street, Aspen, Colorado. The legal description of the property
is:
Lots H and I
Block 25
City and Townsite of Aspen
OATES, HUGHES & KNEZEVICH, P. C.
Leslie Lamont
June 19, 1989
Page 3
8. Attached is a disclosure of ownership of the property,
consisting of a current certificate from Pitkin County Title
Company, listing the name of the owner of the property, and all
mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts, and agreements
affecting the property.
9. Attached is an 81 x 11" vicinity map locating the
property within the City of Aspen.
10. An improvement survey and condominium map is currently
being prepared and will be submitted prior to the final approval.
REVIEW STANDARDS AND SPECIFIC SUBMISSION INFORMATION
CONDOMINIUMIZATION
11. The condominium units are currently being constructed
and have not been occupied. Consequently, there have been no
tenants on the property. Therefore, no notices need be provided
in regard to the rights of first refusal as required by Section
7- 10 08(A)(1)(a) of the Aspen City Code.
12. Upon approval of the condominiumization, all of the
residential condominium units will be deed restricted by the
following rental restrictions:
"R
r
fN11R
13. The buildings proposed for condominiumization will be
inspected by the City of Aspen Building Department throughout the
various phases of construction.
14. Pursuant to Aspen Land Use Code Section 7- 1008(c),
Applicant
based on two residential units being condominiumized as one -
bedroom units. /,
REVIEW STANDARDS AND SPECIFIC SUBMISSION INFORMATION
GMQS EXEMPTION - OFFICE EXPANSION
15. Attached is a sketch plan showing the proposed loca-
tion of the existing basement storage space that is proposed to be
converted to 500 square feet of office space.
.. .- -.....
OATES, HUGHES & KNEZEVICH, P. C.
Leslie Lamont
June 19, 1989
Page 4
16. No drawings of the elevations of the proposed devel-
opment have been included due to the fact that the entire square
footage is simply a conversion of e ' t'n below grade stora e
space. Since t •
space will have no additional visual impact the propose
17. The proposed office expansion will have minimal impact
upon the City because:
a. No additional employees will be generated by the
expansion. The space to be converted to office space is
currently under lease to ESI for six years for storage
purposes. T
efficiency in servicing its inventory stockroom which be located on the garden level; twill
b. Since the expansion will not generate additional
employees, no employee housing will be provided;
c. Since the expansion will not generate additional
employees, no additional parking will be provided;
d. Since the expansion will simply change the use of
existing basement storage to office use, no additional
demands will be placed upon the City's public facilities
from the expansion.
REVIEW STANDARDS AND SPECIFIC SUBMISSION INFORMATION
GMQS EXEMPTION - AFFORDABLE HOUSING
18. Attached is a sketch plan showing the proposed loca-
tion of the additional deed - restricted housing unit.
19. No drawings of the elevations of the proposed devel-
opment have been included due to the fact that the entire square
footage is simply a conversion of existing below -grade storage
space. Since the exemption request seeks only to change the use
of existing storage space into affordable housing usage, the
proposed affordable housing will have no additional visual impact
on the community.
1
OATES, HUGHES & KNEZEVICH, P. C.
Leslie Lamont
June 19, 1989
Page 5
20. The need for additional affordable housing has been
consistently maintained by the Aspen City Council.
21. The proposed affordable housing unit will be an
efficiency unit containing approximately 401 square feet. The
unit will be deed - restricted to the moderate income guidelines,
established by the City of Aspen. Since the unit will be condo -
miniumized, it will be capable of being sold or rented pursuant to
such guidelines.
Check No. /0_3t_ drawn on the account of Shadow Mountain
Associates in the amount of $1,530.00 in payment of the applica-
tion fee and engineering fee.
We have submitted this application as a consolidated
application. However, as indicated above, the application for the
construction of additional affordable housing is conditioned upon
the approval of the office expansion.
The foregoing information should provide you with all of
the information that you need to process the various application.
In the event that you need further information or have any ques-
tions concerning the application, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
cs ES, HU S & KNEZEVICH, P.C.
'icha t . Knezevich
PAK /pjo
Enclosures
cc: I. McA. Cunningham
Stan A. Mathis
Doug Throm
4.98
N //
. Nr* .. w A y- I.
g es or
I� 46.0„,.#0,40:1„....-jja. I.L14_..._..-_-____LI---.--v)
UI It
, ________.__ _
2 , . , 1 - <,
f ,
" +�_ I. t i i _ r . ,i.), I ..t. . : K.."' ,:i
\\ 3 -------
) ., r �►� � .. ., \.....-55--7 ,II
L ,
oco- - / fp 0 a 0 • a J ( ^W ._
C_ f t o ti ' ti \ / 115,1-
_ �a)0 ~ w _ i
Vai �/ / �d :. • a 1.11 In D I DQ me .. 0
d
Q W
a I , � � 00 g _ D = 1 -
k . /, t ., - , - ft- , ,, pill T LAL" / -- -
i ; l i n
1w� �0l �ro w�M
1,1 a //fi` - I► o� -i [TM 0 =00
/ .
___
�tkt o' ; I i °� �- 0� �D _D OR �� .,
r1-101010[111/4M qv
,: \\
- 9 `-� if °' r \,� ilk DO DID ROD p [ �� __
O \,
�� / i o _
r , r °ei!' = \ �
m 1
z Q 1
J
1
MEMORANDUM
TO: ASPEN CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JIM ADAMSKI, HOUSING DIRECTOR
THRU: BOB ANDERSON, CITY MANAGER
DATE: JULY 17, 1989
RE: HOUSING AUTHORITY /CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
The following is the agenda for our work session. Because we only
have one hour to cover the agenda I have placed, what I believe,
to be the least time consuming items first.
Item I. Request for Proposal for the development of
Affordable Resident Housing.
Discussion: The Housing Authority has suggested that we issue a
blanket Request for Proposals to the community for the development
of Affordable Resident Housing. The only criteria would be that
the proposal identify the land and demonstrate that the anticipated
project would be affordable when completed.
Item II. Priority for emergency /volunteer workers for
deed restricted housing.
Discussion: Should emergency /volunteer workers have priority for
sale & rental Affordable Resident Housing? As more and more Aspen
emergency /volunteer workers, e.g., Fire Department, Mountain
Rescue, are forced to live down valley the quality of there
services will suffer, or the city may find itself in the position
of either no service or paid professionals.
Recommendation /Request: It is my opinion that volunteers and
professional emergency workers should be given all opportunities
available to live in the Aspen Metropolitan Area. I base this
opinion on economic, as well as, public safety concerns. It is
economically sound for a community the size of Aspen to have
services such as Mountain Rescue and the Fire Department manned by
volunteers, there are not that many fires or rescue operations to
justify a paid department. As far as public safety, it does not
take much imagination to understand what would happen if there was
a fire after 6:00 p.m. or on a weekend and the community's
volunteer Fire Department lived down valley. Therefore, I request
that you instruct the Housing Department to include as a priority
for sale /rental of Affordable Residential Housing volunteer and
paid emergency workers.
SHADOW MOUNTAIN ASSOCIATES -1989
SUITE 201
121 SOUTH GALENA STREET
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
(303) 925-8803
July 13, 1989
James Adamski
Aspen /Pitkin Housing Department
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Additional Employee Housing
Shadow Mountain Building
605 West Main Street
Aspen, Colorado
Dear Jim:
At your request you will find enclosed an accounting of actual
costs incurred for the development of on site employee housing
in the above - referenced building located on Main Street in Aspen.
Within these cost breakdowns you will find actual fees charged by
governmental agencies for employee unit plan checks, water taps,
sewer taps, park dedication, electric service, as well as employee
housing fees for condominiumization (even though those impacts
were previously assessed in the GMQS):
These fees (numbered 4 through 9) when added to the staggering
Aspen costs of land and construction, make it impossible to con-
struct employee housing in anything other than large attached
public housing projects.
My concern is that if we are to preserve the community fabric of
Aspen, we cannot assess these fees and expect that anyone will
construct employee units within the City.
Under separate cover
amsikiiiiiessimswitinses fir quality
employee housing within the City.
As the founding partner of Centennial Aspen, and an Aspen resident,
I look forward to continuing to work with you and the Housing
James Adamski —
July 13, 1989
Page two
Authority in the creation of affordable housing in the upper
Roaring Fork Valley.
Best regards,
//
cA. C nni am, President
Cunningham vestment Co., Inc.
Managing General Partner
Shadow Mountain Associates -1989
IMC /pjo
Enclosures
cc: City Council
Aspen /Pitkin Planning Office
•
•
SHADOW MOUNTAIN BUILDING
605 West Main Street
Aspen, Colorado
Employee Housing Costs:
(1) Construction (% of total) $ 92,610.00
(2) Employee Unit Finishes 40,000.00
(3) Soft Costs (% of total) 81,438.00
(4) Plan Check Fees
Initial Building (% of total) 183.75
Additional Employee Unit (Voluntary) 765.00
Building Permits (% of total) 363.09
Condominiumization (% of total) 224.40
(5) Water Tap Fee 7,400.00
(6) Sewer Tap Fee 4,200.00
(7) Electrical Transformer Add On (% of total) 1,176.00 or
(8) Park Dedication Fee (% of total)
382.20 (
(9) Employee Housing Impact Fee Condominiumization c/p
(Double Dip) 8,400.00
Total Cost: $237,142.44
Additional Unit and Additional Bedroom are
45.5€ of total employee square footage
Therefore:
Additional Voluntary Employee Housing Cost
45.5% x $237,142.44 $107,792.02
Original Cash In Lieu as part of GMQS (16,625.00)
Cost difference for Voluntarily Building on Site $ 91,167.02
ATr 1
LAND USE APPLICATION FURS
1) Project Name Shadnw Mountain Cnndnmininmc
2) Project Location 601 W . Main St„ Aspen, Colorado
Lots H and I, Block 25, City and Townsite of Aspen
(indicate street address, lot & block amber, l
appropriate) description where
3) Present Zoning Office
4) Lot Size 6,000
5) Applicant's Name Address & Phone # Shadow Mountain Associates -1989, a Colorado
general partnership, 201 South Galena, Suite 201, Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 925 -8803'
6) Representative's Name Address & Phone $ Richard A. Knezevich, Oates, Hughes &
Knezevich, P.C., 533 E ast Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 920 - 1700
7) Type of Application (please dhec c all that apply):
Conditional Use ___ d SPA ConceptualHistoric Dev.
Special Review — Final SPA
Final Historic Dev.
8040 Greenljne — Conceptual HID — Minor historic Dev.
— Stream Margin Final PUD __ Historic Demolition
— Mrnnta; n View Plane _ Subdlvjsian Historic Designation
x Condrmi n; tm)ization _ Text/Map AmendMent
— CMS Allotment
— Lot Split /Lot Line
Adjustment a expan lo (500 sq, ft, office
x GMQS Exemption (affordable housing)
8) Description of FSdsting Use, (umber and type of existing structures;
approximate sq_ ft.; muter of tediums; any previous approvals granted to the
property).
The Property was previously granted GMP approvals (ord. 41, Series of 1986) and HPC
approvals for the construction of the existing building, faaalliiiiimarsiar
fo
on ,. i_:.. •, - use
9) Description of Development Application
The Development Application seeks condominiumization of the building, including
residential units, the office units, and the affordable housing unit. It also
s
se. Finally, it seeks a GMQS exemption to construct
an additional dead - restricted affordable housing unit in currently existing
storage space.
10) Have you attached the following?
yes Response to Attachment 2, Minimum
Submission Contents
yes Response to Attachment 3, SpeCific Sulmission Contents
yes Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application
r _6
LAW OFFICES
OATES, HUGHES & KNEZEVICH
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
THIRD FLOOR. ASPEN PLAZA BUILDING
533 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE
LEONARD M. OATES ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 AREA CODE 303
ROBERT W. HUGHES TELEPHONE 9201900
RICHARD A. KNEZEVICH TELECOPIER 920-1121
JOHN M. ELY August 16, 1989
OF COUNSEL:
JOHN THOMAS KELLY
Leslie Lamont AUG 6
Aspen /Pitkin Planning Office
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Shadow Mountain Building Condominiumization and
GMQS Exemptions
Dear Leslie:
In response to Alan Richman's letter dated July 19,
1989, I am enclosing the improvement survey for the property
that was just completed by Alpine Surveys. Alan also requested
that we submit a table illustrating the following FAR
Calculations:
a. Amount of residential existing FAR - 2,900 square
feet;
b. Amount of commercial existing FAR - 1,772;
c. Amount of residential proposed FAR - 2,900 square
feet; and
d. Amount of commercial proposed FAR - 1,772 square
feet.
As can be seen from the foregoing table, the FAR calculations do
not change. The reason for this is that all areas proposed to
be changed in the land use application are existing below grade
areas that are not included within FAR calculations.
Alan Richman also requested an explanation in regard
to parking spaces. The building was required to provide seven
parking spaces. Such parking spaces are being built as
explained in the land use application, the conversion of the
existing storage area into office area will not create
additional employees as employees from the main floor would be
moved downstairs. Consequently additional parking space is not
needed. In addition, following the concepts contained in the
Accessory Dwelling Unit provisions of newly enacted Sec. 5 -510
of the City Land Use Code, the additional studio employee
housing unit does not require a parking place.
OATES, HUGHES & KNEZEVICH, P. C.
Page 2
Hopefully, that will address the questions raised by
Allen. Leslie if you have any further questions in regard to
the application I would be more than willing to sit down and
discuss them with you.
Sincerely,
OATES & KNEZEVICH, P.C.
By:
- 'c • A. Knezevich
RAK:cre
cc: I.M. Cunningham
Stan A. Mathis
Doug Throm
RAKLTR
ASPEN /PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 920 -5090
July 19, 1989
Rick Knezevich
Oates, Hughes & Knezevich
533 East Hopkins
Aspen, CO 81611
RE: Shadow Mountain Building Condominiumization and GMQS
Exemptions
Dear Rick,
This is to inform you that the Planning Office has completed its
preliminary review of the captioned application. We have
determined that your application is not complete.
Following is a list of the items we require to complete the
application:
1. Please submit an improvement survey. This needs to be aK
submitted now, rather than prior to final approval.
2. Please submit a table illustrating the following:
a. Amount of residential - Existing FAR
b. Amount of commercial - Existing FAR
c. Amount of residential - Proposed F FAR
R
d. Amount of commercial - Proposed
3. This table should also show the
discussion r of the i of arkng
and a
spaces that exist now, reduction sprr
special review approval of the parking
be made. Please explain whether the project continues
to meet the parking standard established by the
Planning and Zoning Commission. If not, additional
space(s) should be shown or a further reduction
requested.
If you have any questions please call. Thank you.
Sincerely,
-
Alan Richman
Planner
ASPEN /PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 920 -5090
September 6, 1989
Rick Knezevich
Oates, Hughes & Knezevich
533 East Hopkins
Aspen, CO 81611
RE: Shadow Mountain Building
Dear Rick,
This is to inform you that the Planning Office has completed its
preliminary review of the captioned application. We have
determined that your application is complete.
We have scheduled your application for review by the Planning and
Zoning Commission on Tuesday, October 17, 1989 at a meeting to
begin at 4:30 pm. The Friday before the meeting date, we will
call to inform you that a copy of the memo pertaining to your
application is available at the Planning Office.
If you have any questions, please call Leslie Lamont, the planner
assigned to your case.
Sincerely,
Debbie Skehan
Administrative Assistant
MEMORANDUM
To: Leslie Lamont, Planning Office
From: Elyse Elliott, Engineering Department
Date: September 29, 1989
Re: Shadow Mountain Building Condominiumization & GMQS
Exemptions
The Engineering Department has the following comments on the
above application:
1. Plat - a •lat must be -•• • -• • the En•ineerin• Department.
g
- The applicant must show that
there is - •' - •• - = <, - S
2. Sidewalk - the applicant must install a sidewalk on the Main
Street frontage that complies with requests from the HPC. I feel
that a bridge over the irrigation ditches will be necessary.
Normally, we would require the applicant to install a sidewalk - on
the 5th Street frontage alsb. However, since Council is not sure
about allowing sidewalks on side streets at this time, the
applicant should agree to install a sidewalk on 5th Street at any
time in the t"uture that the Council deems it appropriate.
3. Alley - the applicant should grade an apply road base to the
alley.
4. Improvement District - the applicant shenn
future improvement districts.
5. Easement - we would like to have a 4' x 4' easement granted
to the City for utility purposes.
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Engineer
Housing Director
FROM: Leslie Lamont, Planning Office
RE: Shadow Mountain Building Condominiumization & GMQS
Exemptions
DATE: September 6, 1989
Attached for your review and comments is an application from Rick
Knezevich on behalf of Shadow Mountain Associates requesting
Condominiumization and GMQS Exemptions.
Please review this material and return your comments no later
than October 4th. Thank you.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Leslie Lamont, Planner f1Vt}Y
RE: Shadow Mountain GMQS Exemption for Expansion of Office
Use - Consent Agenda
DATE: October 3, 1989
SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to convert 500 square feet of
storage space into auxiliary office space to be occupied by a
current tenant of the building. Section 8 -104 B. requires the
expansion of commercial or office uses up to 500 square feet to
be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
The applicant is also seeking to provide a
second deed restricted, to moderate ingenue, an employee unit in
the lower level and a condominiumiz -_ e wholerbuilding.
-
rev ra11x:. .' r,:. d . _ _ 1.
APPLICANT: Shadow Mountain Associates
LOCATION: 601 West Main Street
ZONING: Office
APPLICANT'S REQUEST: GMQS Exemption for the conversion of
storage space into 500 square feet of office space in lower
floor.
STAFF COMMENTS: Section . requires that a demonstration
that the expansion will - B • y•
There will be no new employees added with the new space. The
current book keeper for Executive Security International will
occupy space the proposed 500 square feet of office space.
Because no new employees w
ad
There will be no visual impact from the expansion as it will
occur below grade in the lower level and the space already
exists. The conversion to office space will not create an
additional demand on City services. The storage space that is
being converted into usable /habitable space shall however,
provide handicap access to the floor level by a handicap ramp,
lift, elevator or other approved means according to the State of
Colorado Statutes.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning
Commission approve the GMQS exemption for office expansion with
the following condition:
1. The storage space that is being converte into
usable /habitable space shall provide handicap access to t e floor
level by a handicap ramp, lift, elevator or other Approved means
according to the St utes 'sion of
the handicap access shall a revie approved by the
Building Department.
11 /shadowpz
2
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Council
THRU: Robert S. Anderson, Jr., City Manager Fr
FROM: eslie L ont, Planner
RE: S ow Mo tain Affordable Housing GMQS Exemption and
Condolai ' mization - Consent Agenda
DATE: October 9, 1989
SUMMARY: The Planning Department recommends approval of the
consent agenda with conditions for the GMQS Affordable Housing
Exemption and condominiumization.
BACKGROUND: The applicant seeks to exempt a deed restricted,
moderate income, employee housing unit and condominiumization of
the building.
The Shadow Mountain Building was constructed with a commercial
Growth Management Plan allocation granted by the Aspen City
Council in 1986, with subsequent amendments in 1988/. To medt the
ellerMtroMMV,fir
bed e.
p _ , f;
The applic -• . -s •ro
posed
The
to Section 8 -104 C. a - d
i1.
The applicant also seeks a condominiumization for the building.
The building contains 2,900 square feet of residential FAR but
this excludes the below grade employee units which are 702.5 and
401 squ 72 s are feet of dommeSial space,
which s no Inc u e
This
addition of o fi e pie PPIRMOMOSSIMMMilleby the Planning aQd
Zoning Commission.
e
REFERRAL COMMENTS: Attached are the referral comments from.the
Engineering Department.
PROBLEM DISCUSSION:
1. GMQS Exemption for Affordable Housing:
The applicant proposes to provide a 401 square foot employee
dwelling unit to be deed restricted to moderate income. T h e
dwelling unit shall be reviewed and approved by the Housing
Authority pursuant to their guidelines. Please see attached
plan.
2. Condominiumization:
Section 7 -1008 outlines the criteria for condominiumization.
The building is being constructed and has not been occupied.
Therefore no notices need to be provided to existing tenants
regarding the sale of units.
The applicant agrees to deed restrict the residential condominium
units to a six month minimum lease and not more than two shorter
tenancies per year.
The building has been and will continue to be inspected by the
City of Aspen Building department during the various phases of
construction.
The applicant shall pay an affordable housing impact fee of
as
alkali The affords a ousing at as been provided
on site represents the housing impact generated 'through the
construction of the office space.
The Code requires a parking 3'pace to be 18 feet long. The Atgust
3, 1989 survey indicates that the are only 17 1/2 feet
long. The Zoning Officer does not feel this is significant and
recommends that the applicant seek a variance from the Board of
Appeals.
RECOMMENDATION: I move to approve the GMQS Affordable Housing
Exemption and the condominiumization for the Shadow M
Building with the following conditions:
1. ng
eom� The plat shall indicate the trash service area with
easements, and parking spaces.
2. Prior to filing the final •lat the applicant shall seek a
ox' a reduction in the length
0
3. Prior to suhmissio_n of a 401111MYSSIOSIIINKIMMtnalitng
hall be paid to the Finance Director.
4. The applicant shall, prior to recording the plat, submit a
statement of subdivision exemption in a form acceptable to the
City Attorney which shall include that the applicant will join
any IMMIniSncluding Main Street improvements
district as per HPC guidelines) that is formed and the property
2
is subject to a six month minimum lease agreement for both
residential units.
5. The applicant shall grade and apply road to the alley.
6. TO1111MniffnINTrefirffifforairtsement granted to the
City for utility purposes.
7. Shadow Mountain appears to be a popular name. There is a
Shadow Mountain Lodge, Shadow Mountain Duplex, and Shadow View
Condominium. Prior to filing the final plat the applicant shall
rename the condominiumization.
The applicant has consented to these conditions.
di n C°61 Fag /✓off C iy/ (0 ti1/6,/G wif —
k ,5 u45 t IL Frei ° To e ti,e Pet I�2 4 i , (
I (
�
3
,---
t\----: '
'5•• c.. °
�o 0
- 3'7°4
1
/ lll�YY� ZZ' /0 f __ 'yuy1�
_ _ HIS
1 7I Q
I. ,--„, N i. o y
3 O,C_ T 0 ' ,- III 1
I Via
III J= ., \I
!, -_'
r
Pc-
L.
... ' VI I N- ' --:ji --/ 7-
9 >
7. j7 ® ,
' = c. X F..
- e -o o3DN
- U NC= O -r I I Py { 7 I ' i
N q rn ,A, `` 1
c, 12 _ __ I
: 37
N' I
y
O
® 'tea
U Q \
p 3 .
II
r 7 S\i
%-i ii r 1, :,„.
'
I Z
it xg•
i
f
I
I
� iv i i . _ , )E. ,.... 1..a. „, ,_ It-
: 2� - m Q t 42 t.
titinfiren, - n'
-. 1 0 t i 1 r ri _...... ISM '
1 II
r ' --- a g •
i
N
r ' l k. I .
1 Q
r
O
L
_'rt =-= 1: Q
r
a� ® 1
fo
. i , .1 ii I
i
gi.
t - •
n
, .
8