Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.1270 Snowbunny Ln.A110-00 CASE NUMBER A110 -00 PARCEL ID # 2735 - 013 -13001 CASE NAME Porter Garage DRAC PROJECT ADDRESS 1270 Snowbunny Lane PLANNER Fred Jarman CASE TYPE DRAC OWNER/APPLICANT Joe Porter REPRESENTATIVE DATE OF FINAL ACTION 9/19/00 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION Reso. #43 -2000 ADMIN ACTION Approved BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 10/17/00 BY J. Lindt r Resolution No. 3 (SERIES OF 2000) RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTING AS THE DESIGN REVIEW APPEALS COMMITTEE APPROVING RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE FOR GARAGE LOCATION FOR 1270 SNOWBUNNY LANE, SNOWBUNNY SUBDIVISION, LOT 7, BLOCK 2, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 2735- 013 -13 -001 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Joe and Pip Porter, seeking a variance from Section 26.410 Residential Design Guidelines from the garage location requirement. The applicant's property is located at 1270 Snowbunny Lane, Lot 7, Block 2 of the Snowbunny Subdivision, Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, the applicant's property is an 21,227 sq. ft. lot with an existing duplex and located in the R -15 Zone District; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.410.020 of the Aspen Municipal Code, Community Development Department staff reviewed the applicant's application for compliance with the Residential Design Standards Section of the Aspen Municipal Code and found the submitted development application to be inconsistent with Standard 26.410.040(C)(2)(c), Garage; and WHEREAS, Section 26.410.020(C) of the Aspen Municipal Code provides that if an application is found by Community Development Department staff to be inconsistent with any item of the Residential Design Guidelines, the applicant may either amend the application or appeal staffs findings to the Design Review Appeal Committee pursuant to Chapter 26.222, Design Review Appeal Committee; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.410.020(B) of the Aspen Municipal Code, the applicant submitted a request for a variance from Standard 26.410.040(B)(1) of the Aspen Municipal Code to the Design Review Appeal Committee as it applies to garages; and WHEREAS all applications for appeal from the Residential Design Standards of Section 26.410.040 must meet one of the following review standards in order for the Planning and Zoning Commission acting as the Design Review Appeal Committee or other decision making administrative body to grant an exception, namely the proposal must: a) Yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan; b) More effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to; or b) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints; WHEREAS, the Community Development Director, after review of the requested variances, recommended denial for a variance from the residential design standards for garage location; and WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing at a regular meeting on September 19, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission acting as the Design Review Appeal Committee, approved a variance from garage location standard of Section 26.410.040(C)(2)(c) of the Aspen Municipal Code as it applies to Residential Design Standards for Lot 7, Block 2 of the Snowbunny Subdivision by a vote of four to two (4- 2). NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: Section 1 That a proposed variance for a garage placement for an existing duplex at 1270 Snowbunny Lane, Aspen, Colorado, is approved pursuant to Section 26.410.040(C)(2)(c), garage location of the Residential Design Standards. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on September 19, 2000. APPROVED AS TO FORM: DESIGN REVIEW APPEALS COMMITTEE: City Attorney Robert Blaich, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk C:\My Documents \Current Cases\DRAC\1270Snowbunny V arianceMemo.doc - 1EIg1 MEMORANDUM — TO: Design Review Appeals Committee (DRAC) THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Director job FROM: Fred Jarman, Planner j3 • RE: 1270 Snowbunny Lane Garage Variance DATE: September 14, 2000 laammimai A �le 111 �II "�IIIII ® °r;it _ 1 rail MI = x1 1 ,t: 11 li L I �f� t t� ... + t Y . inn 1., j I Y `` � Z � I � 1 "'MI iiiiiiil�x?r'je.■ n13C a _. I * " .i•41 4 Z r'+yd.A1iiu, iii 11"' Front view of the proposed two -car garage facing Snowbunny Lane in front of the existing duplex APPLICANT: Joe Allen Porter PARCEL ID: 2735- 013 -13 -001 ADDRESS: 1270 Snowbunny Lane, Lot 7, Block 2 of the Snowbunny Subdivision ZONING: R -15 (Medium Density Residential) CURRENT LAND USE: 21,227 sq. ft. lot containing an existing single story duplex PROPOSED LAND UsE: The applicant proposes to construct a two -car garage in front of the existing duplex. In order to do so, the applicant is seeking a Variance from the Residential Design Standards garage location requirements. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant, Joe A. Porter, seeks a variance from Section 26.410 Residential Design Guidelines from the garage location requirement for 1270 Snowbunny Lane, Lot 7, Block 2 of the Snowbunny Subdivision (See Exhibit A for a description of the specific standard.) All applications for appeal from the Residential Design Standards of Section 26.410 must meet one of the following review standards in order for the Design Review Appeal Committee or other decision making administrative body to grant an exception, namely the proposal must: 1 4 -h. 2- -4r `i stw 1. 1 a) Yield greater compliance with 1 the goals of the Aspen Area ' '. Community Plan; More effectively address the - issue or problem a given 1 , standard or provision responds , to; or r' � • , -.-- c) Be clearly necessary for , j ;.4 •reasons of fairness related to 1 ° unusual site - specific constraints. < P _ ne e The existing duplex is built out to the Plan view showing addition in front of the existing setbacks on both side yards existing duplex. and the front yard contains mature trees, which would need to be removed to accommodate a perpendicular approach to a garage located in front of the duplex. There are many existing residences and duplexes in the area which have front loaded garages which extend past the front facade of the houses; however, most, if not all these houses and duplexes were constructed before the residential design standards were drafted or received variances to allow their current placement. Staff has consistently held that prohibiting a property owner to construct a garage /carport on their lot not to be considered a hardship. The applicant's duplex once contained a garage, which was subsequently converted to living space thereby indicating that the lack of a garage was not a hardship. Staff describes this in better detail in Exhibit A. Staff finds that the proposal 1) does not yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan, 2) does not more effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to, and 3) is not clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site - specific constraints. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the variance request for garage location be denied because the proposed garage placement fails to meet one of the review standards listed above, which would allow a variance. RECOMMENDED MOTION (ALL MOTIONS ARE STATED IN THE POSITIVE): "I move to approve Resolution No. 5 , Series of 2000, approving a variance from Residential Design Standard variance for a garage placement for a duplex located at 1270 Snowbunny Lane, Lot 7, Block 2 of the Snowbunny Subdivision." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria & Staff Findings Exhibit B -- Parcel Location Exhibit C -- Applicant's Letter & Plans Exhibit E -- Resolution No. 3 , Series 2000 2 EXHIBIT A REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS The intent of the following parking, garages, and carport standards is to minimize the potential for conflicts between pedestrian and automobile traffic by placing parking, garages, and carports on alleys, or to minimize the presence of garages and carports as a lifeless part of the streetscape where alleys do not exist. The code specifically indicates that for all residential uses that do not have access from an alley or private road, the following standard shall be met: c. On lots of at least 15,000 square feet in size, the garage or carport maybe forward - i of the front facade of the house only if the /Witt j( j garage doors or carport entry are - perpendicular to the street (side loaded). - -/ Staff Finding Staff finds that the proposed garage is allowed to exist in front of the front facade of the house because it is on a lot greater than 15,000 sq. ft. However, as indicated in the standard, it must be side loaded as illustrated the diagram above. The applicant proposes a front loaded garage, thereby requiring a variance from Residential Design Standards. This standard, as indicated above, is intended to minimize the presence of garages and carports as a lifeless part of the streetscape]Staff finds that the proposed street - facing garage significantly adds to the presence of a lifeless and vehicular dominated streetscape for which this standard was written to address. Staff has traditionally held that the denial of the ability to construct a garage on a property does not constitute a hardship. Staff continues to maintain this position with this proposed development. Further, the applicant received a building permit to convert an existing garage in the existing duplex to a den on October 23, 1975 thereby eliminating the garage on the property and allowing cars to be parked in the driveway. 3 EXHIBIT B PARCEL LOCATION AND VICINITY MAP „cur i r e_ air t a g; SNOB BUNNY try 1270 Snow Ln ' Al a 1 1270 Snowbunny Lane R - Zone District Garage Variance Variance N 1111. BV NNV CT VL W _ E OIP. 1 S 4 August 30, 2000 Design Review Appeal Committee 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Members of the Committee, Attached is an application for a design review for a garage addition to the condominium duplex at 1270 Snowbunny Lane in Aspen. This application includes the following enclosures: 1. Application form 2. Property survey showing the street address and legal description property 3. A disclosure of ownership 4. An 8' /2" x 11" vicinity map locating the property 5. A neighborhood block plan @ 1" = 50' 6. A site plan at l' = 10' 7. Building elevations at 1/8" = 1'0" 8. A written explanation of the variance 9. Photographs of surrounding buildings (These will be submitted on Sept. 4) 10. Letter from Robert Beals authorizing Joe and Pip Porter to act in his behalf. This application is being made jointly by the owners of the two homes in the condominium duplex who are: Unit 2 Unit 1 Joe and Margaret Pip Porter Robert Beals 1270 Snowbunny Lane, 81611 1270 Snowbunny Lane, 81611 925 -6840 925 -8267 Pip and Joe Porter are authorized to represent the applicants in the design review and application process. Please refer to the letter from Robert Beals. Sincerely, Pip Porter 08/28/00 23:56 FAX f_101 ROBERT P. BEALS, D.D.S., P.C : T DIPLOMATS AMERICAN BOARD I.V. SEDATION FELLOWSHIP: ACADEMY OP ORAL IMPLANTOLOCY I/O FOR DENTAL PROCEDURES OF GFNFRAI OFNTLWRY August 28, 2000 • Design Review Appeal Committee City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, Colorado Dear Sirs/Madam: I am a joint applicant with Pip and Joe Porter for the Design Review for a garage addition to a condominiumized duplex at 1270 Snow Bunny Lane in Aspen. This letter is to inform you that Pip and Joe Porter are anthnrized to represent me in this application. el, Robe P. Beals • • 606 SPRING STREET . • MACON, GEORGIA 31201 • (912) T46 -4578 • DESCRIPTION OF DESIGN REVIEW APPEAL, GARAGE ADDITION TO 1270 SNOWBUNNY LANE August 21, 2000 Request to allow a two -car garage to be added in the front driveway of a duplex at 1270 Snowbunny Lane. The garage would provide accommodations for one car for each of the duplex units. The Residential Design Standards (Section 26.410.040) indicate that garages that do not have access from alleys or private roads shall be set back 10' farther from the street than the front -most wall of the house, or may be forward of the front facade of the house, if the garage doors are perpendicular to the street. The duplex is located on a pie- shaped lot and the building extends to both side -yard setbacks. The combination of the pie- shaped lot and lack of side -yard building area make it impossible to add a garage that is set back from the front of the build or at right angle to the street. We request that the Design Review Appeal Committee grant a variance from the 10' setback guidelines for reasons of hardship and fairness related to unusual site specific conditions. We have tried to find a solution that provides access from existing bedrooms, has minimum impact on sun exposure and light, is architecturally compatible with the existing building, preserves existing trees on the lot and respects existing front and rear yard setbacks. We have looked at a variety of alternatives to accomplish this and have reviewed several of these alternatives with the city planning staff. This plan has been designed to make the garage as appealing from the street as possible. The building form is compatible with the existing building. Roof overhangs supported with peeled log posts and rustic garage doors are to be utilized. The entry on one side of the duplex is to be remodeled to repeat the peeled log columns to make the entry more compatible with the residential design standards for street - oriented entry doors. ♦ W ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM • 1. Project name LA NELGE LAPIN CH DO MINI' U.n1 C-- ,A2ACv6 1 rt 2. Project location D Ski RuNN Qom, (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning 12, - i 5 4. Lot size as , &a1 t) 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number 7oe A IY kQGAR.ET Rp I�ntrE'L. ` • '.0 ' "tai S • AflfQFCS- C AA 1>otrr - sa5- (.14 -O • BEALS 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number Tom Tie S AA 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use _ Conceptual SPA _ Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline _ Conceptual PUD Minor HPC Stream Margin _ Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision _ Text/Map Amend. _ Historic Landmark GMQS allotment _ GMQS exemption Demo /Partial Demo View Plane — Condominiumization Design Review Lot Split/Lot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) . T • : b u.. c_ : 61'1 + . _ 11 knl rL.om +irA.1 Unitt•s . t A mir ID1 -. � (,AAA.. -iryn ( Arvi rt Ina - 3 La..d n.n -,n- -n . T&rAJ ij5 (v l'it•h (AM t+ 4O90. • 9. Description of development application rjrl ; # ,; n-f 1 l _ it/ ing o -vi d Cfirrt Spat', o„r,,l a.. 10. Have you completed and attached the following? Attachment 1- Land use application form i. A 4 Response to Attachment 2 Response to Attachment 3 • PIP PORTER ATTORNEY AT LAW August 30, 2000 Design Review Appeal Committee 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Members of the Committee, This letter is to confirm that the owners of the property located at 1270 Snowbunny Lane are the following: Unit 101: Joe and Margaret Ann Pip Porter. The existing mortgage is with Homeside Lending. To my best information and belief, there are no judgments, liens, easements, contracts or other agreements affecting the parcel. Unit 102: Robert P. Beals. The existing mortgage is with Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation, P.O. Box 9001068, Louisville, KY 40290 -1068. To my best information and belief, there are no judgments, liens, easements, contracts or other agreements affecting the parcel. All of the owners of the two respective sides of the duplex are applying for the development review. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Colorado. My Supreme Court Registration Number is 17487. Sincerely, Margaret Pip Porter 600 EAST HOPKINS STREET SUITE 302 ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 (970)925 FAX 925 -9398 EXHIBIT D r. Resolution Is (SERIES OF 2000) RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN DESIGN REVIEW APPEALS COMMITTEE APPROVING RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE FOR GARAGE LOCATION FOR 1270 SNOWBUNNY LANE, SNOWBUNNY SUBDIVISION, LOT 7, BLOCK 2, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 2735- 013 -13 -001 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Joe Porter, seeking a variance from Section 26.410 Residential Design Guidelines from the garage location requirement. The applicant's property is located at 1270 Snowbunny Lane, Lot 7, Block 2 of the Snowbunny Subdivision, Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, the applicant's property is an 21,227 sq. ft. lot with an existing duplex and located in the R -15 Zone District; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.410.020 of the Aspen Municipal Code, Community Development Department staff reviewed the applicant's application for compliance with the Residential Design Standards Section of the Aspen Municipal Code and found the submitted development application to be inconsistent with Standard 26.410.040(C)(2)(c), Garage; and WHEREAS, Section 26.410.020(C) of the Aspen Municipal Code provides that if an application is found by Community Development Department staff to be inconsistent with any item of the Residential Design Guidelines, the applicant may either amend the application or appeal staff's findings to the Design Review Appeal Committee pursuant to Chapter 26.222, Design Review Appeal Committee; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.410.020(B) of the Aspen Municipal Code, the applicant submitted a request for a variance from Standard 26.410.040(B)(1) of the Aspen Municipal Code to the Design Review Appeal Committee as it applies to garages; and WHEREAS all applications for appeal from the Residential Design Standards of Section 26.410.040 must meet one of the following review standards in order for the Design Review Appeal Committee or other decision making administrative body to grant an exception, namely the proposal must: a) Yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan; b) More effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to; or d) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints; 5 WHEREAS, the Community Development Director, after review of the requested variances, recommended denial for a variance from the residential design standards for garage location; and WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing at a regular meeting on September 14, 2000, the Design Review Appeal Committee, approved a variance from garage location standard of Section 26.410.040(C)(2)(c) of the Aspen Municipal Code as it applies to Residentia Design Standards for Lot 7, Block 2 of the Snowbunny Subdivision by a vote of ,f to 1 -� . NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Committee: Section 1 That a proposed variance for a garage placement for an existing duplex at 1270 Snowbunny Lane , Aspen, Colorado, is approved pursuant to Section 26.410.040(C)(2)(c), garage location of the Residential Design Standards. APPROVED by the Committee at its regular meeting on September 14, 2000. APPROVED AS TO FORM: DESIGN REVIEW APPEALS COMMITTEE: City Attorney Robert Blaich, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk C: \My Documents \Current Cases \DRAC\1270snowbun ny V arianceMemo.doc 6 Demographics study for the Crystal River Valley a a Primary purpose of the study is to determine who lives in the Crystal River Valley and where they work an, recreate and general lifestyle. Secondarily the study will help to inform residents about the master planning process. SCOPE OF WORK: 1. Meet with the Master Plan Committee to determine the details of the schedule and tasks; A. Determine who will be asked to participate (residents and committee members); B. Forecast future residential /demographic trends. 2. Develop a report to be submitted to accompany the existing conditions report. MEMORANDUM To: Design Review Appeals Committee (DRAC) THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Director FROM: Fred Jarman, Planner RE: 1285 Riverside Drive Secondary Mass Variance DATE: September 14, 2000 IMIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIII ■ APPLICANT: Dale Hower REPRESENTATIVE: John Galumbos and Rich Pavcek of Galumbos /Muir Architects PARCEL ID: 2737-181-17-018 ADDRESS: 1285 Riverside Drive, Lot 19, Block 1, Riverside Subdivision, Aspen, Colorado ZONING: R -15 (Medium Density Residential) CURRENT LAND USE: 11,341 sq. ft. lot containing an existing single - family residence PROPOSED LAND USE: The applicant wishes to raze the existing residence and build a 4,291 sq. ft. two -story single - family residence and including an Accessory Dwelling Unit. In order to do so, the applicant is seeking a Variance from the Residential Design Standards for secondary mass requirements. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant, Dale Hower, represented by John Galumbos and Rich Pavcek of Galumbos / Muir Architects, seeks a variance from Section 26.410 Residential Design Guidelines for secondary mass. (See Exhibit A for a description of the specific standard.) The applicant's property is located in the Riverside Subdivision. Staff believes the applicant can meet the secondary mass standard on this lot through revised architectural design more suited to the site. Property owners all over town satisfy this criterion with single - family homes on 11,000 square foot lots. This memo includes photo examples of single family homes in Aspen that meet the intent and letter of the code as interpreted by Staff. In sum, Staff does not believe the review criteria are satisfied because the lot will be vacant after the existing duplex is demolished, therefore allowing for a full opportunity to design a structure, which meets the Residential Design Standards. The design does not include a linking element to reduce the mass of the proposed residence. Staff believes the secondary mass standard could be met on this site. Staff Recommendation: (Exhibit A contains staff's findings related to the review criteria.) Staff recommends the variance request for "secondary mass" be denied because it fails to address the intent of the code regarding the breaking up of a large mass with a subordinate linking element. RECOMMENDED MOTION (ALL MOTIONS ARE STATED IN THE POSITIVE): "I move to approve Resolution No. , Series of 2000, approving the secondary mass Residential Design Standard variance for a single - family residence at 1285 Riverside Drive, Lot 19, Riverside Subdivision." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria & Staff Findings Exhibit B -- Photo Documentation of Secondary Mass Exhibit C -- Parcel Location and Vicinity Map Exhibit D -- Application Letter Exhibit E -- Resolution No. , Series 2000 2 0 EXHIBIT A REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS The intent of the following building form standards (secondary mass) is to respect the scale of Aspen's historical homes by creating new homes, which are more similar in their massing, by promoting the development of accessory units off of the City alleys, and by preserving solar access. Specifically, the following secondary mass standard is intended to break up the massing of structures so that it humanizes the scale of the structure rather than allowing massive forms to exist thereby dwarfing other adjacent structures, the landscape and minimizing the pedestrian relationship to the structure. The code specifically indicates: 1. Secondary Mass. All new structures shall locate at least 10 %of their total square footage above grade in a mass, which is completely detached from ��®�j;! % / the principal building, or linked to it by a subordinate connecting element. Accessory buildings such as . garages, sheds, and Accessory Dwelling Units are examples of appropriate uses for the secondary mass. Subordinate Linking Element Staff Finding The applicant is requesting approval for a variance from this standard indicating that the proposal more effectively addresses the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to thereby meeting criteria B. As stated above, the secondary mass standard is intended to break up the massing of structures so that it humanizes the scale of the structure rather than allowing massive forms to exist thereby dwarfing other adjacent structures, the landscape and minimizing the pedestrian relationship to the structure. Staff finds that the proposed residence design does not include a massing breakup as viewed from the front facade. The standard indicates that secondary massing can be achieved by 1) completely detaching 10% of its total square footage above grade in a mass from the principal building; or 2) linking the secondary mass to the primary mass with a subordinate connecting element as illustrated in the sketch above. Staff has consistently maintained an interpretation of the code language for secondary mass and it's associated subordinate linking element that the subordinate linking element is not a two -story element and that a true feeling of mass separation should be visually achieved. It is for these reasons Staff does not support this variance so that an undesirable and contrasting building orientation is not continued in a unique neighborhood where almost all of the houses have a direct relationship to the street. 3 County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT } ss. TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATIONS State of Colorado } SECTION 26304.060(E) I, F p -1"-L. , being pr representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.304.060(E) of the Aspen Municipal Code in the following manner: 1 By mailing of notice, a copy of which ' : ttached hereto • , st -class po :::.repaid U c ... M. o. , .'R s of prope withi • three undre• 300) - -t of the s .'ect pr%per y, as i dicat- on the a .ched list; on the '3 day of - " _A4 , 2000 (which is 1 1 says prior to the .lic °�' hearing date of 1p [ A . ). a 2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen fpm the nearest public way) and that the so sign was posted and visible continuously from the a_ day of 0 , 200 , to the I Z day of , 2000. (Must be posted for at least ten (10) full days before the hearing date). A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto. Signature p p kJ.", Signed before me this ' F day of t9'l - 200 by PUBLIC NOTICE DATE ft l' JGP . TIME PLACE PURPOSE WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL . My Commission expires: / 2 1 Notary Public i ,(//t,af...,_...—L,./.