HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.1270 Snowbunny Ln.A110-00 CASE NUMBER A110 -00
PARCEL ID # 2735 - 013 -13001
CASE NAME Porter Garage DRAC
PROJECT ADDRESS 1270 Snowbunny Lane
PLANNER Fred Jarman
CASE TYPE DRAC
OWNER/APPLICANT Joe Porter
REPRESENTATIVE
DATE OF FINAL ACTION 9/19/00
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
PZ ACTION Reso. #43 -2000
ADMIN ACTION Approved
BOA ACTION
DATE CLOSED 10/17/00
BY J. Lindt
r
Resolution No. 3
(SERIES OF 2000)
RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
ACTING AS THE DESIGN REVIEW APPEALS COMMITTEE
APPROVING RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE FOR GARAGE
LOCATION FOR 1270 SNOWBUNNY LANE, SNOWBUNNY SUBDIVISION,
LOT 7, BLOCK 2, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO.
Parcel No. 2735- 013 -13 -001
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application
from Joe and Pip Porter, seeking a variance from Section 26.410 Residential Design
Guidelines from the garage location requirement. The applicant's property is located at
1270 Snowbunny Lane, Lot 7, Block 2 of the Snowbunny Subdivision, Aspen, Colorado;
and
WHEREAS, the applicant's property is an 21,227 sq. ft. lot with an existing
duplex and located in the R -15 Zone District; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.410.020 of the Aspen Municipal Code,
Community Development Department staff reviewed the applicant's application for
compliance with the Residential Design Standards Section of the Aspen Municipal Code
and found the submitted development application to be inconsistent with Standard
26.410.040(C)(2)(c), Garage; and
WHEREAS, Section 26.410.020(C) of the Aspen Municipal Code provides that
if an application is found by Community Development Department staff to be
inconsistent with any item of the Residential Design Guidelines, the applicant may either
amend the application or appeal staffs findings to the Design Review Appeal Committee
pursuant to Chapter 26.222, Design Review Appeal Committee; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.410.020(B) of the Aspen Municipal Code,
the applicant submitted a request for a variance from Standard 26.410.040(B)(1) of the
Aspen Municipal Code to the Design Review Appeal Committee as it applies to garages;
and
WHEREAS all applications for appeal from the Residential Design Standards of
Section 26.410.040 must meet one of the following review standards in order for the
Planning and Zoning Commission acting as the Design Review Appeal Committee or
other decision making administrative body to grant an exception, namely the proposal
must:
a) Yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan;
b) More effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision
responds to; or
b) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific
constraints;
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director, after review of the
requested variances, recommended denial for a variance from the residential design
standards for garage location; and
WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing at a regular meeting on
September 19, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission acting as the Design Review
Appeal Committee, approved a variance from garage location standard of Section
26.410.040(C)(2)(c) of the Aspen Municipal Code as it applies to Residential Design
Standards for Lot 7, Block 2 of the Snowbunny Subdivision by a vote of four to two (4-
2).
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission:
Section 1
That a proposed variance for a garage placement for an existing duplex at 1270
Snowbunny Lane, Aspen, Colorado, is approved pursuant to Section
26.410.040(C)(2)(c), garage location of the Residential Design Standards.
APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on September 19, 2000.
APPROVED AS TO FORM: DESIGN REVIEW APPEALS
COMMITTEE:
City Attorney Robert Blaich, Chair
ATTEST:
Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk
C:\My Documents \Current Cases\DRAC\1270Snowbunny V arianceMemo.doc
- 1EIg1
MEMORANDUM —
TO: Design Review Appeals Committee (DRAC)
THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director
Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Director job
FROM: Fred Jarman, Planner j3 •
RE: 1270 Snowbunny Lane Garage Variance
DATE: September 14, 2000
laammimai
A �le
111 �II "�IIIII ® °r;it _
1 rail MI = x1 1 ,t: 11 li
L I �f� t t� ... + t Y . inn 1., j I Y `` � Z � I � 1
"'MI iiiiiiil�x?r'je.■ n13C a _. I * " .i•41 4 Z r'+yd.A1iiu, iii 11"'
Front view of the proposed two -car garage facing Snowbunny Lane in front of the existing duplex
APPLICANT: Joe Allen Porter
PARCEL ID: 2735- 013 -13 -001
ADDRESS: 1270 Snowbunny Lane, Lot 7, Block 2 of the Snowbunny Subdivision
ZONING: R -15 (Medium Density Residential)
CURRENT LAND USE: 21,227 sq. ft. lot containing an existing single story duplex
PROPOSED LAND UsE: The applicant proposes to construct a two -car garage in front of
the existing duplex. In order to do so, the applicant is seeking a Variance from the
Residential Design Standards garage location requirements.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The applicant, Joe A. Porter, seeks a variance from Section 26.410 Residential Design
Guidelines from the garage location requirement for 1270 Snowbunny Lane, Lot 7, Block
2 of the Snowbunny Subdivision (See Exhibit A for a description of the specific
standard.) All applications for appeal from the Residential Design Standards of Section
26.410 must meet one of the following review standards in order for the Design Review
Appeal Committee or other decision making administrative body to grant an exception,
namely the proposal must:
1 4 -h. 2- -4r `i stw 1. 1
a) Yield greater compliance with 1
the goals of the Aspen Area ' '.
Community Plan;
More effectively address the -
issue or problem a given 1 ,
standard or provision responds ,
to; or r' �
• , -.--
c) Be clearly necessary for , j ;.4
•reasons of fairness related to 1 °
unusual site - specific
constraints. <
P _ ne e
The existing duplex is built out to the Plan view showing addition in front of the
existing setbacks on both side yards existing duplex.
and the front yard contains mature
trees, which would need to be removed to accommodate a perpendicular approach to a garage
located in front of the duplex. There are many existing residences and duplexes in the area
which have front loaded garages which extend past the front facade of the houses; however,
most, if not all these houses and duplexes were constructed before the residential design
standards were drafted or received variances to allow their current placement.
Staff has consistently held that prohibiting a property owner to construct a garage /carport on
their lot not to be considered a hardship. The applicant's duplex once contained a garage,
which was subsequently converted to living space thereby indicating that the lack of a garage
was not a hardship. Staff describes this in better detail in Exhibit A. Staff finds that the
proposal 1) does not yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community
Plan, 2) does not more effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision
responds to, and 3) is not clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site -
specific constraints.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends the variance request for garage location be denied because the
proposed garage placement fails to meet one of the review standards listed above, which
would allow a variance.
RECOMMENDED MOTION (ALL MOTIONS ARE STATED IN THE POSITIVE):
"I move to approve Resolution No. 5 , Series of 2000, approving a variance from
Residential Design Standard variance for a garage placement for a duplex located at 1270
Snowbunny Lane, Lot 7, Block 2 of the Snowbunny Subdivision."
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A -- Review Criteria & Staff Findings
Exhibit B -- Parcel Location
Exhibit C -- Applicant's Letter & Plans
Exhibit E -- Resolution No. 3 , Series 2000
2
EXHIBIT A
REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS
The intent of the following parking, garages, and carport standards is to minimize the
potential for conflicts between pedestrian and automobile traffic by placing parking, garages,
and carports on alleys, or to minimize the presence of garages and carports as a lifeless part
of the streetscape where alleys do not exist. The code specifically indicates that for all
residential uses that do not have access from an alley or private road, the following standard
shall be met:
c. On lots of at least 15,000 square feet in
size, the garage or carport maybe forward
- i
of the front facade of the house only if the /Witt j( j
garage doors or carport entry are
-
perpendicular to the street (side loaded). - -/
Staff Finding
Staff finds that the proposed garage is allowed to exist in front of the front facade of the
house because it is on a lot greater than 15,000 sq. ft. However, as indicated in the standard,
it must be side loaded as illustrated the diagram above. The applicant proposes a front loaded
garage, thereby requiring a variance from Residential Design Standards. This standard, as
indicated above, is intended to minimize the presence of garages and carports as a lifeless
part of the streetscape]Staff finds that the proposed street - facing garage significantly adds to
the presence of a lifeless and vehicular dominated streetscape for which this standard was
written to address.
Staff has traditionally held that the denial of the ability to construct a garage on a property
does not constitute a hardship. Staff continues to maintain this position with this proposed
development. Further, the applicant received a building permit to convert an existing garage
in the existing duplex to a den on October 23, 1975 thereby eliminating the garage on the
property and allowing cars to be parked in the driveway.
3
EXHIBIT B
PARCEL LOCATION AND VICINITY MAP „cur
i r e_ air
t a g;
SNOB BUNNY try
1270 Snow Ln ' Al a
1 1270 Snowbunny Lane
R - Zone District
Garage Variance
Variance
N
1111. BV NNV CT VL
W _ E
OIP. 1 S
4
August 30, 2000
Design Review Appeal Committee
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Dear Members of the Committee,
Attached is an application for a design review for a garage addition to the condominium
duplex at 1270 Snowbunny Lane in Aspen. This application includes the following
enclosures:
1. Application form
2. Property survey showing the street address and legal description property
3. A disclosure of ownership
4. An 8' /2" x 11" vicinity map locating the property
5. A neighborhood block plan @ 1" = 50'
6. A site plan at l' = 10'
7. Building elevations at 1/8" = 1'0"
8. A written explanation of the variance
9. Photographs of surrounding buildings (These will be submitted on Sept. 4)
10. Letter from Robert Beals authorizing Joe and Pip Porter to act in his behalf.
This application is being made jointly by the owners of the two homes in the
condominium duplex who are:
Unit 2 Unit 1
Joe and Margaret Pip Porter Robert Beals
1270 Snowbunny Lane, 81611 1270 Snowbunny Lane, 81611
925 -6840 925 -8267
Pip and Joe Porter are authorized to represent the applicants in the design review and
application process. Please refer to the letter from Robert Beals.
Sincerely,
Pip Porter
08/28/00 23:56 FAX f_101
ROBERT P. BEALS, D.D.S., P.C : T
DIPLOMATS AMERICAN BOARD I.V. SEDATION FELLOWSHIP: ACADEMY
OP ORAL IMPLANTOLOCY I/O FOR DENTAL PROCEDURES OF GFNFRAI OFNTLWRY
August 28, 2000
•
Design Review Appeal Committee
City of Aspen Community Development Department
130 S. Galena St.
Aspen, Colorado
Dear Sirs/Madam:
I am a joint applicant with Pip and Joe Porter for the Design Review for a
garage addition to a condominiumized duplex at 1270 Snow Bunny Lane in
Aspen. This letter is to inform you that Pip and Joe Porter are anthnrized to
represent me in this application.
el,
Robe P. Beals
•
• 606 SPRING STREET . • MACON, GEORGIA 31201 • (912) T46 -4578 •
DESCRIPTION OF DESIGN REVIEW APPEAL, GARAGE ADDITION TO 1270
SNOWBUNNY LANE
August 21, 2000
Request to allow a two -car garage to be added in the front driveway of a duplex at 1270
Snowbunny Lane. The garage would provide accommodations for one car for each of the
duplex units. The Residential Design Standards (Section 26.410.040) indicate that
garages that do not have access from alleys or private roads shall be set back 10' farther
from the street than the front -most wall of the house, or may be forward of the front
facade of the house, if the garage doors are perpendicular to the street.
The duplex is located on a pie- shaped lot and the building extends to both side -yard
setbacks. The combination of the pie- shaped lot and lack of side -yard building area make
it impossible to add a garage that is set back from the front of the build or at right angle to
the street. We request that the Design Review Appeal Committee grant a variance from
the 10' setback guidelines for reasons of hardship and fairness related to unusual site
specific conditions.
We have tried to find a solution that provides access from existing bedrooms, has
minimum impact on sun exposure and light, is architecturally compatible with the
existing building, preserves existing trees on the lot and respects existing front and rear
yard setbacks. We have looked at a variety of alternatives to accomplish this and have
reviewed several of these alternatives with the city planning staff.
This plan has been designed to make the garage as appealing from the street as possible.
The building form is compatible with the existing building. Roof overhangs supported
with peeled log posts and rustic garage doors are to be utilized. The entry on one side of
the duplex is to be remodeled to repeat the peeled log columns to make the entry more
compatible with the residential design standards for street - oriented entry doors.
♦ W
ATTACHMENT 1
LAND USE APPLICATION FORM
•
1. Project name LA NELGE LAPIN CH DO MINI' U.n1 C-- ,A2ACv6 1 rt
2. Project location D Ski RuNN Qom,
(indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description)
3. Present zoning 12, - i 5 4. Lot size as , &a1 t)
5. Applicant's name, address and phone number 7oe A IY kQGAR.ET Rp
I�ntrE'L. ` • '.0 ' "tai S • AflfQFCS- C AA
1>otrr - sa5- (.14 -O • BEALS
6. Representative's name, address, and phone number
Tom Tie S AA
7. Type of application (check all that apply):
Conditional Use _ Conceptual SPA _ Conceptual HPC
Special Review Final SPA Final HPC
8040 Greenline _ Conceptual PUD Minor HPC
Stream Margin _ Final PUD Relocation HPC
Subdivision _ Text/Map Amend. _ Historic Landmark
GMQS allotment _ GMQS exemption Demo /Partial Demo
View Plane — Condominiumization Design Review
Lot Split/Lot Line Appeal Committee
Adjustment
8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures,
approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the
property) . T • : b u.. c_ : 61'1 + . _
11 knl rL.om +irA.1 Unitt•s . t A mir ID1 -. � (,AAA.. -iryn
( Arvi rt Ina - 3 La..d n.n -,n- -n . T&rAJ ij5 (v l'it•h (AM t+
4O90. •
9. Description of development application rjrl ; # ,; n-f 1
l _ it/ ing o -vi d Cfirrt Spat', o„r,,l a..
10. Have you completed and attached the following?
Attachment 1- Land use application form
i. A 4 Response to Attachment 2
Response to Attachment 3
•
PIP PORTER
ATTORNEY AT LAW
August 30, 2000
Design Review Appeal Committee
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Dear Members of the Committee,
This letter is to confirm that the owners of the property located at 1270 Snowbunny Lane
are the following:
Unit 101: Joe and Margaret Ann Pip Porter. The existing mortgage is with Homeside
Lending. To my best information and belief, there are no judgments, liens, easements,
contracts or other agreements affecting the parcel.
Unit 102: Robert P. Beals. The existing mortgage is with Chase Manhattan Mortgage
Corporation, P.O. Box 9001068, Louisville, KY 40290 -1068. To my best information
and belief, there are no judgments, liens, easements, contracts or other agreements
affecting the parcel.
All of the owners of the two respective sides of the duplex are applying for the
development review.
I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Colorado. My Supreme Court
Registration Number is 17487.
Sincerely,
Margaret Pip Porter
600 EAST HOPKINS STREET SUITE 302 ASPEN. COLORADO 81611
(970)925 FAX 925 -9398
EXHIBIT D
r.
Resolution Is
(SERIES OF 2000)
RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN DESIGN REVIEW APPEALS COMMITTEE
APPROVING RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE FOR GARAGE
LOCATION FOR 1270 SNOWBUNNY LANE, SNOWBUNNY SUBDIVISION, LOT
7, BLOCK 2, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO.
Parcel No. 2735- 013 -13 -001
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from
Joe Porter, seeking a variance from Section 26.410 Residential Design Guidelines from the
garage location requirement. The applicant's property is located at 1270 Snowbunny Lane,
Lot 7, Block 2 of the Snowbunny Subdivision, Aspen, Colorado; and
WHEREAS, the applicant's property is an 21,227 sq. ft. lot with an existing duplex
and located in the R -15 Zone District; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.410.020 of the Aspen Municipal Code,
Community Development Department staff reviewed the applicant's application for
compliance with the Residential Design Standards Section of the Aspen Municipal Code and
found the submitted development application to be inconsistent with Standard
26.410.040(C)(2)(c), Garage; and
WHEREAS, Section 26.410.020(C) of the Aspen Municipal Code provides that if an
application is found by Community Development Department staff to be inconsistent with
any item of the Residential Design Guidelines, the applicant may either amend the
application or appeal staff's findings to the Design Review Appeal Committee pursuant to
Chapter 26.222, Design Review Appeal Committee; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.410.020(B) of the Aspen Municipal Code, the
applicant submitted a request for a variance from Standard 26.410.040(B)(1) of the Aspen
Municipal Code to the Design Review Appeal Committee as it applies to garages; and
WHEREAS all applications for appeal from the Residential Design Standards of
Section 26.410.040 must meet one of the following review standards in order for the Design
Review Appeal Committee or other decision making administrative body to grant an
exception, namely the proposal must:
a) Yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan;
b) More effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds
to; or
d) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints;
5
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director, after review of the requested
variances, recommended denial for a variance from the residential design standards for
garage location; and
WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing at a regular meeting on September
14, 2000, the Design Review Appeal Committee, approved a variance from garage location
standard of Section 26.410.040(C)(2)(c) of the Aspen Municipal Code as it applies to
Residentia Design Standards for Lot 7, Block 2 of the Snowbunny Subdivision by a vote of
,f to 1 -� .
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Committee:
Section 1
That a proposed variance for a garage placement for an existing duplex at 1270 Snowbunny
Lane , Aspen, Colorado, is approved pursuant to Section 26.410.040(C)(2)(c), garage
location of the Residential Design Standards.
APPROVED by the Committee at its regular meeting on September 14, 2000.
APPROVED AS TO FORM: DESIGN REVIEW APPEALS
COMMITTEE:
City Attorney Robert Blaich, Chair
ATTEST:
Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk
C: \My Documents \Current Cases \DRAC\1270snowbun ny V arianceMemo.doc
6
Demographics study for the Crystal River Valley
a a
Primary purpose of the study is to determine who lives in the
Crystal River Valley and where they work an, recreate and general
lifestyle. Secondarily the study will help to inform residents about
the master planning process.
SCOPE OF WORK:
1. Meet with the Master Plan Committee to determine the
details of the schedule and tasks;
A. Determine who will be asked to participate (residents
and committee members);
B. Forecast future residential /demographic trends.
2. Develop a report to be submitted to accompany the existing
conditions report.
MEMORANDUM
To: Design Review Appeals Committee (DRAC)
THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director
Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Director
FROM: Fred Jarman, Planner
RE: 1285 Riverside Drive Secondary Mass Variance
DATE: September 14, 2000
IMIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIII
■
APPLICANT: Dale Hower
REPRESENTATIVE: John Galumbos and Rich Pavcek of Galumbos /Muir Architects
PARCEL ID: 2737-181-17-018
ADDRESS: 1285 Riverside Drive, Lot 19, Block 1, Riverside Subdivision, Aspen,
Colorado
ZONING: R -15 (Medium Density Residential)
CURRENT LAND USE: 11,341 sq. ft. lot containing an existing single - family residence
PROPOSED LAND USE: The applicant wishes to raze the existing residence and build a
4,291 sq. ft. two -story single - family residence and including an Accessory Dwelling
Unit. In order to do so, the applicant is seeking a Variance from the Residential
Design Standards for secondary mass requirements.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The applicant, Dale Hower, represented by John Galumbos and Rich Pavcek of
Galumbos / Muir Architects, seeks a variance from Section 26.410 Residential Design
Guidelines for secondary mass. (See Exhibit A for a description of the specific standard.)
The applicant's property is located in the Riverside Subdivision.
Staff believes the applicant can meet the secondary mass standard on this lot through
revised architectural design more suited to the site. Property owners all over town satisfy
this criterion with single - family homes on 11,000 square foot lots. This memo includes
photo examples of single family homes in Aspen that meet the intent and letter of the
code as interpreted by Staff.
In sum, Staff does not believe the review criteria are satisfied because the lot will be
vacant after the existing duplex is demolished, therefore allowing for a full opportunity to
design a structure, which meets the Residential Design Standards. The design does not
include a linking element to reduce the mass of the proposed residence. Staff believes the
secondary mass standard could be met on this site.
Staff Recommendation:
(Exhibit A contains staff's findings related to the review criteria.) Staff recommends the
variance request for "secondary mass" be denied because it fails to address the intent of
the code regarding the breaking up of a large mass with a subordinate linking element.
RECOMMENDED MOTION (ALL MOTIONS ARE STATED IN THE POSITIVE):
"I move to approve Resolution No. , Series of 2000, approving the secondary mass
Residential Design Standard variance for a single - family residence at 1285 Riverside
Drive, Lot 19, Riverside Subdivision."
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A -- Review Criteria & Staff Findings
Exhibit B -- Photo Documentation of Secondary Mass
Exhibit C -- Parcel Location and Vicinity Map
Exhibit D -- Application Letter
Exhibit E -- Resolution No. , Series 2000
2
0
EXHIBIT A
REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS
The intent of the following building form standards (secondary mass) is to respect the scale
of Aspen's historical homes by creating new homes, which are more similar in their massing,
by promoting the development of accessory units off of the City alleys, and by preserving
solar access. Specifically, the following secondary mass standard is intended to break up the
massing of structures so that it humanizes the scale of the structure rather than allowing
massive forms to exist thereby dwarfing other adjacent structures, the landscape and
minimizing the pedestrian relationship to the structure. The code specifically indicates:
1. Secondary Mass.
All new structures shall locate at
least 10 %of their total square
footage above grade in a mass,
which is completely detached from ��®�j;! % /
the principal building, or linked to it
by a subordinate connecting
element. Accessory buildings such as .
garages, sheds, and Accessory
Dwelling Units are examples of
appropriate uses for the secondary
mass. Subordinate Linking Element
Staff Finding
The applicant is requesting approval for a variance from this standard indicating that the
proposal more effectively addresses the issue or problem a given standard or provision
responds to thereby meeting criteria B. As stated above, the secondary mass standard is
intended to break up the massing of structures so that it humanizes the scale of the structure
rather than allowing massive forms to exist thereby dwarfing other adjacent structures, the
landscape and minimizing the pedestrian relationship to the structure.
Staff finds that the proposed residence design does not include a massing breakup as viewed
from the front facade. The standard indicates that secondary massing can be achieved by 1)
completely detaching 10% of its total square footage above grade in a mass from the
principal building; or 2) linking the secondary mass to the primary mass with a subordinate
connecting element as illustrated in the sketch above. Staff has consistently maintained an
interpretation of the code language for secondary mass and it's associated subordinate linking
element that the subordinate linking element is not a two -story element and that a true feeling
of mass separation should be visually achieved.
It is for these reasons Staff does not support this variance so that an undesirable and
contrasting building orientation is not continued in a unique neighborhood where almost all
of the houses have a direct relationship to the street.
3
County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT
} ss. TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATIONS
State of Colorado } SECTION 26304.060(E)
I, F p -1"-L. , being pr representing an
Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice
requirements pursuant to Section 26.304.060(E) of the Aspen Municipal Code in the following
manner:
1 By mailing of notice, a copy of which ' : ttached hereto • , st -class po :::.repaid U c ...
M. o. , .'R s of prope withi • three undre• 300) - -t of the s .'ect pr%per y, as i dicat-
on the a .ched list; on the '3 day of - " _A4 , 2000 (which is 1 1 says prior to the .lic
°�'
hearing date of 1p [ A . ). a
2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen fpm
the nearest public way) and that the so sign was posted and visible continuously from the a_ day
of 0 , 200 , to the I Z day of , 2000. (Must be posted for at least
ten (10) full days before the hearing date). A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto.
Signature p p kJ.",
Signed before me this '
F day of t9'l -
200 by
PUBLIC NOTICE
DATE ft l' JGP .
TIME
PLACE
PURPOSE WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
. My Commission expires: / 2 1
Notary Public
i ,(//t,af...,_...—L,./.