HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.sm.Arundale.A27-90 CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen
DATE RECEIVED: 4/18/90 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO.
DATE COMPLETE: A27 -90
STAFF MEMBER: 0
PROJECT NAME: Arundale Stream Margin Review
Project Address: East Hopkins
Legal Address: Lots 3 & 4, Block 5, Riverside Addition
APPLICANT: Dwight Arundale
Applicant Address:
REPRESENTATIVE: Glenn Horn Davis Horn Inc. 0,0 • 02
Representative Address /Phone: 300 East Hyman, Suite B
Aspen, CO 81611 5 -6587
PAID: YES NO AMOUNT: $983.00 NO. OF COPIES RECEIVED: 3
TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: )< (E)
\ICSTIvu STEP:
P &Z Meeting Date 4/5 PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO
VESTED RIGHTS: S NO
CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO
VESTED RIGHTS: ES_) NO
Planning Director Approval: Paid:
Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: Date:
REFERRALS:
City Attorney Mtn. Bell School District
City Engineer X Parks Dept. Rocky Mtn Nat Gas
10TActree Housing Dir. Holy Cross State Hwy Dept(GW)
Aspen Water Fire Marshall State Hwy Dept(GJ)
City Electric Building Inspector
Envir. Hlth. Roaring Fork Other
Aspen Consol. Energy Center
S.D.
DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: q�
FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: / / /a1I90 INITIAL:
City Atty ity Engi ee ^ Zoning Env. Health
� Y Housing _ Other: `�n,. ii
1 Q FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: Approv e oit P Z Res o 40 j9
ra-P2'
CLOSING MEMO TO FILE
ARUNDALE STREAM MARGIN REVIEW
Date: June 27, 1990 RESO # i 2-
From: Kim Johnson, Planne
On June 5, 1990, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the
Arundale Stream Margin Review for Lots 3 & 4, Block 5 Riverside
Addition (s. side of East Hopkins at the Roaring Fork River.)
The conditions of approval are:
1. Permits for tree removal must be obtained from Parks prior to
issuance of Building Permit. As per representation by the
applicant, no more than 4 trees may be removed from the river
bank. Those removed from the bank shall be replaced with similar
specimens at a ratio of 2:1.
2. The high water line must be drawn and labeled on the site plan
in Engineering's files as well as the site plans submitted for
permits.
3. A fisherman's easement shall be recorded with the.Pitkin
County Clerk and Recorder's Office to include a width of 3 feet
measured horizontally from the high water line along the river.
This shall be recorded prior to issuance of a Building Permit.
4. The project must provide a minimum of 1 on -site parking space
per bedroom, in compliance with dimensional requirements.
5. A "Nationwide Permit" or a letter approving rip -rap proposal
from the Army Corps of Engineers must be submitted to the
Engineering Department prior to issuance of Excavation or
Building Permit.
6. Notify Kim Johnson in the Planning Office one week prior to
start of excavation to allow monitoring of the construction
process.
7. The deck in the middle of the house must be cantilevered and
reduced in size to accommodate the adjacent trees along the bank.
8. Notify Jim Gibbard in the Engineering Department of any
unforseen difficulties which arise during the excavation process.
On Jun 25, 1990 City Council approved Ordinance 47 / 1990 vesting
the development rights of this review for a period of three years
from date of the Commission's approval.
jtkvj /arundale.close
RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION•
FOR 'Tith APPROVAL AND VESTED RIGHTS FOR THE ARUNDALE STREAM MARGIN
REVIEW
Resolution No. 90- 12
WHEREAS, the Planning Office received an application for
Stream Margin Review for a single family residence on Lots 3 & 4
Block 5, Riverside Addition in the name of Dwight Arundale,
represented by Glen Horn; and
WHEREAS, The applicant also requested vesting of
development rights for a period of three years from the date of
approval as allowed by Section 6 -207 of the Aspen Land Use Code,
revision date August 1989; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Office and Engineering Department
reviewed the proposal and recommended to the Commission approval
of the Arundale Stream Margin Review with 8 conditions; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has agreed to comply with the
conditions required by this approval.
WHEREAS, on June 5, 1990 the Planning and Zoning Commission
approved a specific site plan for Stream Margin Review including
the 8 conditions recommended by the Planning Office; and
,j. WHEREAS, on August 7, 1990 at a regular meeting of the
Planning and Zoning Commission, project Architect T.Michael
Manchester returned with a revised building footprint for review.
The revision was necessary due to attempts to reduce impacts to
vegetation and a reconfiguration of the center section of the
residence; and
WHEREAS, the Commission approved the revised site plan by a
vote of 3 -2. The minority opinion felt that further encroachment
was not tolerable; and
WHEREAS, the Commission then directed Planning Staff to
review the standards of Stream Margin Review to explore ways to
increase aesthetic protection of the river corridor.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission:
1. Permits for tree removal must be obtained from Parks prior to
issuance of Building Permit. As per representation by the
applicant, no more than 4 trees may be removed from the river
bank. Those removed from the bank shall be replaced with similar
specimens at a ratio of 2:1.
2. The high water line must be drawn and labeled on the site plan
in Engineering's files as well as the site plans submitted for
permits.
3. A fisherman's easement shall be recorded with the Pitkin
County Clerk and Recorder's Office to include a width of 3 feet
measured horizontally from the high water line along the river.
This shall be recorded prior to issuance of a Building Permit.
4. The project must provide a minimum of 1 on -site parking space
per bedroom, in compliance with dimensional requirements.
5. A "Nationwide Permit" or a letter approving rip -rap proposal
from the Army Corps of Engineers must be submitted to the
Engineering Department prior to issuance of Excavation or
Building Permit.
6. Notify Kim Johnson in the Planning Office one week prior to
start of excavation to allow monitoring of the construction
process.
7. The deck in the middle of the house must be cantilevered and
reduced in size to accommodate the adjacent trees along the bank.
8. Notify Jim Gibbard in the Engineering Department of any
unforseen difficulties which arise during the excavation process.
APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on August
7, 1990.
Attest: Plann nd o ing Commission:
t 7/' , " (L L r
Jan C rney, Deputai City Clerk lton And-rson, Chairman
} kvj /arundale.reso
RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION•
FOR 'rm1 APPROVAL AND VESTED RIGHTS FOR THE ARUNDALE STREAM MARGIN
REVIEW
Resolution No. 90- 12
WHEREAS, the Planning Office received an application for
Stream Margin Review for a single family residence on Lots 3 & 4,
Block 5, Riverside Addition in the name of Dwight Arundale,
represented by Glen Horn; and
WHEREAS, The applicant also requested vesting of
development rights for a period of three years from the date of
approval as allowed by Section 6 -207 of the Aspen Land Use Code,
revision date August 1989; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Office and Engineering Department
reviewed the proposal and recommended to the Commission approval
of the Arundale Stream Margin Review with 8 conditions; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has agreed to comply with the
conditions required by this approval.
WHEREAS, on June 5, 1990 the Planning and Zoning Commission
approved a specific site plan for Stream Margin Review including
the 8 conditions recommended by the Planning Office; and
WHEREAS, on August 7, 1990 at a regular meeting of the
Planning and Zoning Commission, project Architect T.Michael
Manchester returned with a revised building footprint for review.
The revision was necessary due to attempts to reduce impacts to
vegetation and a reconfiguration of the center section of the
residence; and
WHEREAS, the Commission approved the revised site plan by a
vote of 3 -2. The minority opinion felt that further encroachment
was not tolerable; and
WHEREAS, the Commission then directed Planning Staff to
review the standards of Stream Margin Review to explore ways to
increase aesthetic protection of the river corridor.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission:
1. Permits for tree removal must be obtained from Parks prior to
issuance of Building Permit. As per representation by the
applicant, no more than 4 trees may be removed from the river
bank. Those removed from the bank shall be replaced with similar
specimens at a ratio of 2:1.
2. The high water line must be drawn and labeled on the site plan
in Engineering's files as well as the site plans submitted for
permits.
• 3. A fisherman's easement shall be recorded with the Pitkin
County Clerk and Recorder's Office to include a width of 3 feet
measured horizontally from the high water line along the river.
This shall be recorded prior to issuance of a Building Permit.
4. The project must provide a minimum of 1 on -site parking space
per bedroom, in compliance with dimensional requirements.
5. A "Nationwide Permit" or a letter approving rip -rap proposal
from the Any Corps of Engineers must be submitted to the
Engineering Department prior to issuance of Excavation or
Building Permit.
6. Notify Rim Johnson in the Planning Office one week prior to
start of excavation to allow monitoring of the construction
process.
7. The deck in the middle of the house must be cantilevered and
reduced in size to accommodate the adjacent trees along the bank.
8. Notify Jim Gibbard in the Engineering Department of any
unforseen difficulties which arise during the excavation process.
APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on August
7, 1990.
a. Attest: Plann nd o ing Commission: 62„.4,, Jan C rney, Deput City Clerk lton And•rson, Chairman
kvj /arundale.reso
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Kim Johnson, Planner _2
i
RE: Arundale Stream Margin Review - Revised Plan
DATE: August 7, 1990
On June 5, 1990, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved by a
5 -2 vote the Arundale Stream Margin Review for a single family
residence on Lots 3 and 4, Block 5 of the Riverside Addition (s.
side of East Hopkins at the Roaring Fork River.) A building
footprint was noted on the plan. Discussion associated with the
approval was that the architect should explore any ways to move
the structure farther away from the high bank of the river.
T. Michael Manchester, project architect and representative
redesigned portions of the building and pulled the structure away
from the river in some places. In other areas, however, the
building or decks have been expanded so they are closer to the
water's edge. Because this new design does not comply with the
Commission's earlier approval, Planning Director Amy Margerum and
City Attorney Jed Caswall felt that the project should go back to
the P &Z. The Commission has the opportunity to approve the
revised site plan or remain with their June 5 decision regarding
the outer boundaries of the building envelope.
Attached are copies of a letter from Mr. Manchester as well as
the revised site plan including the previously approved
footprint.
jtkvj /arundale.revised
C 3
• T. Michael Manchester
& Associates, INCORPORATED
August 2, 1990
Kim Johnson
Aspen Planning Department / Hand Delivery
Dear Kim,
I have attached ten copies of the comparative footprint study for your use
and distribution.
As we discussed last week, this new footprint was generated as a result of
my response to the Planning Commission's request that I investigate
pulling the east wall of the south end of the building further back from
the river's edge. I have pulled this wall back 2' -8" from its original
location. I have also modified the configuration of the south deck to
further reduce its impact.
The trade -off for these reductions is an enlargement of the center section
off the house, parallel to the river, of approximately two feet.
The third modification is to the deck area of the center section of the
house. The deck shape has been modified in an attempt to minimize the
impact on the existing vegetation.
There are some other modifications on the 'non- river' sides which I would
be happy to review with you at your convenience.
I appreciate the attention you have given this project in our attempt to
achieve a timely resolution to this modification.
Sincerely,
...
T. Michael Manchester
Architect
• 202 C VENTNOR AVENUE, ASPEN, CO 81611 303.920.2302 •
• ARCHITECTURE • INTERIORS • PLANNING •
;44' N ,. \ w Gq/
\ ` \ `
\ ... •••• *w • mak • \ .01"
— • r= a,,
' /1 ..... • .= s yuld ___
1 i 1 all
o d F rame i' i
, _I
TWO S / w / �
1 / l / MI
i I
fr
I r i 1..
1 25.2' `
\ ori 4 Wood Dec I f 1.
1 ` I , ■ /
\W \ \ BOUIdr . V
x 4
,
e ;n o \ •1
P \ t� /
l
itio� `,.1.: . � � � }
� \
0
I 0111 .
L o t 3
r / v ` a
1 1!_ o •, • , . i o , . . . s k . .
, it ....... w
, , 0
, i • • _. .. ..
. . _, .,
\ 411 9 411)
k OW • • ille) .
41 1 '''' \ .
/ / 4 4 .
• ) -
70 ' 0 . . .
r 4.
JOB ra?
I T. MICHAEL MALASTER A
& ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED SHEET NO OF
202 Ventnor Avenue, Suite C CALCULATED BY DATE
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
(303) 920-2302 CHECKED BY DATE 1 r)
E ‘ SCALE
rtet Arr PC41-11141 I 4 ‘10 se, La.1 t e-ae6 - elist
' is c' ° t ar ' 4- WIA 1 4 1 ) 4 ' r
ati
1°641 . 16'
Aorc-144--‘, ceino petvio 1 \t. wi
1 3 . eulat1/41 13S. e•1
144a. . lot 6 1
,
rri e241 4
17 1411 - 14 1 2 &r1 .
1 . • I
. t
1
Is1, , H. 61%41 94*B. 11
. i
zo .00 ' 1
1ft dt. 4& , 1
1 E
, r . L latt5 1Wet "i .r*
i 1 ,
-I 4. S1
eq --HP . M
■ 4.
4
. 191 24o01 :
1 s 1
0.1-3
t ,
i Li 1 - a ,111
. ■
ein ' 11, •"*"? — Q — ,
Term: res-e„.. Age6.
L I i
i; 3 aff4F H/44 Cetie-6 .9,-z-I. io . 1 I 1
"
Lel-lier. 0 I 4 PA 96 1 i 1
1 lc n74. W7
alai 1 .1 ' 04%1Jee , s' 014S 1 i
I [ 1 1 1
_ .
-- ------- -
. ....
- .„..,
..
'T. MICHAEL MANC JOB------. NSTER SHEET NO. OF
& ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED DATE FR- 0 ,
/
202 Ventnor Avenue, Suite C CALCULATED BY
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 CHECKED BY DATE
(303) 920.2302 1..
,
SCALE I 1
r : I
I ' .14:A411111 I /
III I II keee%1: - b 3 2 1
I , I .
! I I 1
.A..1, .11 7 riPe 1.1wep? 1 1 1 1 1 1 i
t ic
Alui:
I
14 C
1
- T 1'. L Ill I W I thiS MI k tt 1 ! I I I I t I I F
I r I I I I I 1 I 1 I I H I l' I I !
! 1 I ! t ! 1 I I I A _ 1 I pi ra &I/OrA I AA) I l
. +I 1 .4. 1 i-ri*Itimr. Lsrese-t v.1-01‘i i F : 1 l i .
i i 1 1 1 ilo/tue 1 e ail -1 - r r 1 b i ,
I l i n t• II
.111111111-t-11-:
1 1.t eiip.007i*J,P 1
eW1 la I 1
i : • , 4 !)C
I I +--t—r-
,
LI I, 1,i 1 I
11 1 1!
lint
• 1 i ii
4
[1111
' ?Li
1 ' _ m1 1 1 1 e i s ter 1lerpCile t 1
1.4 1r I i 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 . 1
•
I 1 1 1 1 1 1 A ls i t 1 1 I 1 4 : 1 1 1
1 , ,
Ors' 1 r ; oh, 41
I I tle I 1 ,
- 4 Li ittr 1 i i i
i •
1 t , 1
I i
1 .; i 4.
1 i i i
1 1 - ]1, 1 1
-4. 01 i ,
1 - t a t . L I 1 1 i 1 1 !
tem
lb o
I t ! I
• 1 1 I
, , 1
1 1 ;
, 1 LH, 1
. i
, 1 ; - . ..
. ,
. ,
, , , 1 „ . 1
t 1 i I I 1 1 I 1
• 1 1 I I I 1 I I .
1 I i 1 1 I 4 1 1
1
i 1 i 1 I
I I i H 1 1 i 1
! I 1
I I I ■
I i 1 L. I 1 I 1
I I
1 - .7! TA 1 1 1 . '
. .. ....
• *Cs , LA,‘*+3 , Pt.. 14 rit4 1 ' i j H 1 I ft 1 ,
I I 14 I
i 1%61'1.0 I • 1 6, , ck 1\4 •-tt-A
1 . 1 e
1
1 i if I t, I I I i 1 1 ,
.1, 4 1 L
I EI 441-1 1 69)< i 11 vg 4,dft . Mk — W
i 1
11114! LI
1
tfri
• 4 01 to 1 • I , 1
, 1 1 1 1
t t 1 1
1 1 1 I I, t !, I 'I
, 4 1 i
1 , 1 .
1 1 i
I 1 1 1
i I 1 1
1
• L
i 1 1 • .
.1 .i..._ , I
, , 1
i. I. 1 i
1
i
1
1 1 , ! ,
I .
! I
, ,
MESSAGE DISPLAY
TO Cindy Wilson CC Kim Johnson
From: Kim Johnson
Postmark: Oct 05,90 11:42 AM
Subject: "Arundale" Ord. 1 fee incoming
Message:
Be on the "lookout" for an Ord.1 Housing Fee coming soon for the
Dwight Arundale residence, lots 3,4 block 5 Riverside Addtn. The
fee must be paid prior to issuance of building permit, and Bill
Drueding has calculated the amount at $8,092 IF PAID ON OR BEFORE
OCT. 15 If paid after that date the fee will be $10,121 (increase
resulting from housing index increase) Call me or Bill if you have
a question. Gracias.
X
ZIG b
c -Y
(::,)
0 i
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission 0
FROM: Kim Johnson, Planning Office
RE: Arundale Stream Margin Review - Amended Recommendation
and Conditions of Approval
DATE: June 5, 1990 9 l )
After several discussions with project representative Glenn Horn
and Architect Michael Manchester, the Planning and Engineering
Departments now recommends approval of the Arundale Stream Margin
Review with the following amended conditions:
1. Permits for tree removal must be obtained from Parks prior to
issuance of Building Permit. As per representation by the
applicant, no more than 4 trees may be removed from the river
bank. Those removed from the bank shall be replaced with similar
specimens at a ratio of 2:1.
2. The high water line must be drawn and labeled on the site plan
in Engineering's files as well as the site plans submitted for
permits.
3. A fisherman's easement shall be recorded with the Pitkin
County Clerk and Recorder's Office to include a width of 3 feet
measured horizontally from the high water line along the river.
This shall be recorded prior to issuance of a Building Permit.
4. The project must provide a minimum of 1 on -site parking space
per bedroom, in compliance with dimensional requirements.
5. A "Nationwide Permit" or a letter approving rip -rap proposal
from the Army Corps of Engineers must be submitted to the
Engineering Department prior to issuance of Excavation or
Building Permit.
6. Notify Rim Johnson in the Planning Office one week prior to
start of excavation to allow monitoring of the construction
process.
7. The deck in the middle of the house must be cantilevered and
reduced in size to accommodate the adjacent trees along the bank.
8. Notify Jim Gibbard in the Engineering Department of any
unforseen difficulties which arise during the excavation process.
jtkvj /arundale.revise
✓ (1I CC)
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council //
THRU: Carol O'Dowd, City Manager E2Y
THRU: Amy Margerum, Planning Directo
FROM: Kim Johnson, Planner
DATE: July 12, 1990
RE: Second Reading of Ordinance 47, Arundale Stream Margin
Vested Rights
SUMMARY: The Planning Office recommends approval and Second
Reading of Ordinance 47.
BACKGROUND: City Council had First Reading of Ordinance 47 on
June 25, 1990. City Attorney Caswall has suggested some format
changes for inclusion in Ordinance 47. These have been
incorporated into the attached ordinance for Second Reading.
On June 5, 1990 the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission approved
with conditions the Arundale Stream Margin Review. As part of
this Stream Margin Review, representative Glenn Horn requested
the establishment of vested property rights for the Stream Margin
action. Pursuant to Section 6 -207, vesting of property rights
requires a Vested Rights Ordinance and two readings before
Council.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Staff recommends that the City
Council approve and have Second Reading of Ordinance 47, the
Arundale Stream Margin Vested Rights Ordinance.
PROPOSED MOTION: I move to approve and have Second Reading of
Ordinance 47, for Vesting Development Rights of the Arundale
Stream Margin Review.
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: 60 nGcir
Attachment - Ordinance 47 for Second Reading
jtkvj /arundale.vest
f _
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
THRU: Carol O'Dowd, City Manager
THRU: Amy Margerum, Planning Director
FROM: Kim Johnson, Planner
DATE: June 18, 1990
RE: First Reading of Ordinance 4 Arundale Stream Margin
Vested Rights
SUMMARY: The Planning Office recommends First Reading of
Ordinance
BACKGROUND: On June 5, 1990, the Aspen Planning and Zoning
Commission approved with conditions the Arundale Stream Margin
Review. As part of this Stream Margin Review, representative
Glenn Horn requested the establishment of vested property rights
for the Stream Margin action. Pursuant to Section 6 -207, vesting
of property rights requires a Vested Rights Ordinance and two
readings before Council.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Staff recommends that the City
Council have First Reading of Ordinance , the Arundale Stream
Margin Vested Rights Ordinance.
PROPOSED MOTION: I move to have the First Reading of Ordinance
for Vesting Development Rights of the Arundale Stream
Margin Review.
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
Attachment - Ordinance for First Reading
jtkvj /arundale.vest
Davis Horn -
PLANNING • APPRAISING • REAL ESTATE CONSULTING
April 117, 1990
Ms. Kim Johnson ..i�pp' a199fl
Aspen - Pitkin Planning Office �„
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Dear Kim:
We represent Dwight Arundale, who is seeking stream margin review
approval to construct a single - family residence on lots 3 and 4
Block 5 Riverside Addition. The applicant requests that the
pending land use approval be vested.
The subject site is currently improved with a small duplex which
will be demolished. The lot is zoned RMF and contains 3,879 square
feet.
The following documents are attached for your review and
consideration:
1. Floodplain Study on Roaring Fork River Lots 5 through 7,
Riverside Addition, Town of Aspen;
2. Floodplain Map (24 "x 36" blueprint);
3. Title Policy; and
4. Letter Authorizing Davis Horn Inc. to represent Dwight
Arundale.
Stream Margin Review Land Use Regulations
Stream margin reviews are considered pursuant to Section 7 -504 of
the Aspen Land Use Regulations. Each of the criteria are addressed
below.
Criteria 7 -504 C.1.
It can be demonstrated that any proposed development which is in
the Special Flood Hazard Area will not increase the base flood
elevation on the parcel proposed for development. This shall be
demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a professional
engineer registered to practice in the State of Colorado which
shows that the base flood elevation will not be raised, including,
but not limited to, proposing mitigation techniques on or off -site
which compensate for any base flood elevation increase caused by
the development.
MICE DAMS, RM S GLENN HORN, MCP
300 EAST HUMAN • SURE 8 • ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 • 303/925 -6587
c 0
Response
Attachment 1, is a floodplain study on the Roaring Fork River
prepared by Jefferey Simonson, P.E. of Schmueser Gordon Meyer.
The floodplain analysis indicates that the proposed building
envelope will result in a maximum rise in the water surface of .03
feet and increase velocity by .3 feet /second.
The Flood Insurance Study for The City of Aspen is accurate to .1
feet. Based upon this accuracy and the slight increased observed
in the proposed conditions, it can be interpreted that there is no
increase in the base flood elevation due to the proposed
improvements on the subject site.
Criteria 7 -504 C.2.
Any trail on the parcel designated on the Aspen Area Comprehensive
Plan: Parks /Recreation /Open Space /Trails Plan map is dedicated for
public use.
Response
The Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan: Parks / Recreation /Open
Space /Trails map does not propose a trail traversing the subject
site. A trail is proposed for the east side of the Roaring Fork
River. Nevertheless, the applicant voluntarily offers the City a
fisherman easement provided that the easement shall limit fisherman
to within the high water mark of the River.
Criteria 7 -504 C.3.
The recommendations of the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan are
implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest
extent practicable.
Response
The land use application is consistent with the recommendations of
the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan.
Criteria 7 -504 C.4.
No vegetation is removed or slope grade changes made that produce
erosion and sedimentation of the stream bank.
Natural vegetation shall be preserved to the maximum extent
possible. In the event that any natural vegetation is disturbed
as a result of excavation, the stream bank shall be revegetated to
insure that there is no erosion.
Criteria 7 -504 C.5.
To the greatest extent practicable, the proposed development
reduces pollution and interference with the natural changes of the
river, stream or other tributary.
The applicant was attracted to the site and purchased it due to its
relationship to the River. The architect and builder have been
instructed by the applicant to minimize disruption to the river.
Criteria 7 -504 C.6.
Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board
prior to any alteration or relocation of a water course, and a copy
of said notice is submitted to the Federal Emergency Management
Agency.
Based upon the degree of accuracy of the Flood Insurance Study for
the City of Aspen, there will not be any alteration to the water
course. Therefore, the applicant has not notified the Colorado
Water Conservation Board.
Criteria 7 -504 C.7.
A guarantee is provided in the event a water course is altered or
relocated, that applies to the developer and his heirs, successors
and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying capacity on the
parcel is not diminished.
As indicated in attachment 1, the change to the water course as a
result of the proposes structure will be negligible.
Criteria 7 -504 C.8.
Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits
relating to work within the one hundred (100) year floodplain.
Prior to construction within the high water mark of the river or
disruption of significant riparian vegetation, an applicant is
required to obtain a 404 Permit from the Army Corps of Engineers.
The applicant is in communication with the Army Corps of Engineers
to determine whether a 404 Permit will be required. It is unlikely
that a permit will be required. In the event a permit is required,
a copy of the permit will be provided to the City.
Setbacks
Lots smaller than 4,500 square feet in size located in the RMF zone
district are required to have a minimum side yard setback of 5
feet. The subject site will have a west side yard setback of 5
feet and a east side yard setback of 21 feet. The east side yard
setback is measured from a the property line which is located in
the middle of the River. At the closest point, the building will
C 3
be located 2 feet from the high water line of the River.
Please give me a call if you have nay questions are need any
additional information.
Sincerely,
c
Glenn Horn AICP
Arundale
a •
T. Michael Manchester
& Associates, INCORPORATED
NIA:
May 23, 1990
Jim Gibbard
City of Aspen, Engineering Department
City Hall
Aspen, CO 81612
Dear Jim,
As per your request, this letter is to address Aspen Land -Use Code,
Sec. 507C2c, and demonstrate the design of foundation systems such that
any and all improvements to the property shall be securely "anchored to
prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement" of the construction.
The preliminary design, as evaluated according to soils reports
#4 404 89 by Chen Northern, Inc., shall be concrete stem wall on spread
footings in widths as required for full bearing. At the building
perimeter these stems shall be continuous at a height of 2' -8" above
finish floor level and depth to minimum 3' -6" below grade. These shall
be stabilized laterally by stems in the opposing direction at three
locations.
The East perimeter will be further stabilized by added rock and boulder
landscaping elements continuous at the building base at natural grade
height. Columns, as required for deck support, shall also be on
concrete base piers, similarly surfaced and surrounded by rock material
and tied to building foundation with grade beams. All added rock shall
be large dense material, angular in shape, and placed to prevent any
movement by forces of the river's flow.
1 hope this letter is sufficient description of the intended foundation
design. Full structural design is in process and will be submitted
loon your request.
Please feel free to call with any questions you may have.
Thank you,
T. Michael Manchester
• 202 C VENTNOR AVENUE, ASPEN, CO 81611 303.920.2302 •
■ ARCHITECTURE • INTERIORS • PLANNING •
�, 1L Grand Avenue, Suite 2 -E
/ SCHMUESER GOROON MEYER INC. Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
May 25, 1990 ' � rl- (303) 945 -1004 (303) 925-6501
`per Fax (303) 945 -5948
Vat % CONSULTING ENGINEERS 8 SURVEYORS/
Mr. Glenn Horn
Planning Consultant
300 East Hyman Avenue
Suite B
Aspen, CO 81611
Mr. Michael Rennard
Michael T. Manchester & Associates
202 Aspen Airport Business Center
Aspen, CO 81611
RE: Arundale Floodplain Study - Certification
Dear Glenn and Michael:
The purpose of this letter is two fold: (1) to clarify the elevation
of the finished floor of the proposed residence as it relates to the
floodplain elevations, and (2) to provide a certification for the
elevation of the base flood. To clarify the elevation of the finished
floor of the proposed residence, I will reference a phone conversation
with Jim Gibbard on May 24, 1990, along with referencing the Municipal
Code of the City of City of Aspen, Section 7 -507 of the Land Use regu-
lations. My conversation with Mr. Gibbard discussed the contents of
Section 7- 507.C.2.c, which reads, "When development is proposed in a
special flood hazard area: Accurate elevations (in relation to mean
sea level) of the lowest floor, including basement, of all new or sub-
stantially improved structures; a verification and recordation of the
actual elevation in relation to mean sea level to which any structure
is constructed; a demonstration that all new construction or substan-
tial improvements will be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or
lateral movement of any structure to be constructed or improved; a
demonstration that the structure will have the lowest floor, including
basement, elevated to at least two (2) feet above base flood elevation,
all as certified by a registered professional engineer or architect."
Based upon wording in the Code, the elevation of the lowest floor
(whether or not it floats behind a stemwall) must be located two feet
above the base flood elevation. Therefore, in accomplishing the second
purpose of this letter, we have determined that at the upstream end of
the proposed residence, the floodplain elevation (or BFE) is 7924.67
feet above mean sea level. At the downstream end of the home, the BFE
is 7922.79 feet above mean sea level. As previously discussed, the
finished floor of the proposed residence needs to be two feet above the
adjacent BFE. I will be sending a copy of this letter as a confirm-
ation of my discussions of May 24, 1990, with Jim Gibbard regarding
this subject. If you have any questions or comments, please do not
hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC.
.4,pnar,
ACC
eff Simonson, P.E.
Attachment "C"
MESSAGE DISPLAY
TO KIM JOHNSON
From: Bill Ness
Postmark: May 16,90 2:17 PM
Status: Certified Previously read
Subject: ARUNDALE STREAM MARGIN REVIEW
Message:
RE: APPLICATION FROM GLEN HORN ON BEHALF OF DWIGHT ARUNDALE
LOTS 3 & 4, BLOCK 5 IN THE RIVERSIDE ADDITION
I HAVE WALKED THE SITE AND EVERYTHING SEEMS TO BE IN ORDER. I HAVE NO
PROBLEM WITH THIS APPLICATION.
X
Attachment "B"
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kim Johnson, Planning Office
FROM: Jim Gibbard, Engineering Department 9-
DATE: May 21, 1990
RE: Arundale Stream Margin Review
Having reviewed the above application and made a site inspection,
the Engineering Department has the following comments:
1. The applicant will need to get a permit from the Parks
Department for the removal of the trees that are over 6 inches in
diameter.
2. The applicant needs to submit an elevation certificate from a
registered professional engineer or architect before approval.
This certificate will demonstrate that the structure will have
the lowest floor elevated at least two feet above the base flood
elevation. Basements are not permitted in the special flood
hazard area.
3. Although not a code requirement, we recommend that the
applicant grant a fisherman's easement in the Roaring Fork River
and for a width of 5 feet along the property side of the river.
4. We recommend that no vegetation be disturbed between the
building envelope and the edge of the river. The applicant needs
to submit a letter to the Engineering Department which outlines
construction procedure and which will confirm that there will be
no impact on the river or river bank. This needs to be submitted
before any building permit is issued.
jg /arundale
cc: Chuck Roth
Il
�T'n+y -h ry ¢nT d
w�.� 1 01 Grand Avenue, Suite 2 -E
SCNMUESER • AN MEYER INC. � �h \ Q nwood Springs, Colorado 81601
N int*
MK Pea i a03) 945 -1004 (303) 925-6501
ISfl!_ UI Fax (303) 945 -5948
SIM'1 q
April 13, 1990 IS"t3�i/ CONSULTING ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS/
Attachment "p"
Mr. Dwight Arundale
c/o T. Michael Manchester Architects
P.O. Box 9292
Aspen, CO 81612
RE: Floodplain Study on Roaring Fork River
Lots 5 through 7, Riverside Addition, Town of Aspen, CO
Dear Mr. Arundale:
The purpose of this letter is to transmit the hydraulic calculations
and the conclusions of a floodplain study performed at the above men-
tioned location. You will find attached the following items:
1. Calculation Set 1. 5. Summary Table 2.
2. Calculation Set 2. 6. Table 1.
3. Calculation Set 3. 7. Table 2.
4. Summary Table 1. 8. Floodplain Map.
Calculation Set 1 is the hydraulic model of the floodplain as calcu-
lated by FEMA for the City of Aspen Flood Insurance Study. Calculation
Set 2 represents a hydraulic model with the FEMA hydraulic model re-
vised by the insertion of cross section 149.1, which is a cross section
cut at the upstream err] of the property. Calculation Set 2 represents
the existing conditions of the floodplain. Calculation Set 3 is a
hydraulic model that revises Calculation Set 2 by making a revision on
cross section 149.1 such that the proposed construction is modeled.
Therefore, Calculation Set 3 represents the proposed conditions of the
Roaring Fork River after construction.
Sununary Table 1 identifies various flow parameters at each cross
section (including water surface elevation) for Calculation Set 2.
Summary Table 2 is identical to Summary Table 1 except for the
information generated in Summary Table 2 is based upon Calculation Set
3. Table 1 identifies the water surface elevations in the existing
condition directly in front of the property. Table 2 identifies the
water surface elevations in the proposed conditions directly in front
of the property. Finally, the Floodplain Map identifies a plan view of
the location of the floodplain line, both in the existing condition
and proposed conditions. As can be interpreted from the information
attached, the maximum rise in water surface due to the proposed condi-
tions is 0.03 feet. In addition, the maximum increase in velocity (in
channel) is 0.3 ft. /second. These maximum increases are being observed
April 13, 1990
Mr. Dwight Arundale
Page two
at cross section 149.1. The City of Aspen Floodplain Regulations
require that the proposed developnent does not increase the water
surface elevations by any amount. In observing the accuracy of the
Flood Insurance Study for the City of Aspen, the accuracy is observed
to be 0.1 feet. Based upon this accuracy and the slight increases
observed in the proposed conditons, it can be interpreted that there
is no increase in the base flood elevation due to the proposed condi—
tions. In essence, if one were to revise the City of Aspen, Flood
Insurance Study based upon the impacts of the proposed conditions, no
revisions would be necessary since no increase in water surface eleva—
tion was more than 0.1 feet.
I hope this information serves its intended purpose. If you have any
questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
SCHMUESE GORDON 1 YER, INC.
1
Jef x y S. imo .n, P.E.
JSS:lec /90071
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Glen Horn
Mr. Michael Manchester
A Tr -i.-y
r
Dwight Arundale
c/o Aspen Square # 416
617 East Cooper Avenue
Aspen, Colorado 81611
April 10, 1990
Amy Margerum
Planning Director
Aspen /Pitkin Planning Office
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Dear Amy,
I authorize Glenn Horn of Davis Horn Inc. to represent me before
the City of Aspen to obtain a land use approval for my lot located
on East Hopkins Avenue.
Sincerely,
Dwight Arundale
1
4. , CITY OF ASPEN �_,. 1t:00
PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY e % .,1•
Vi i- ,-
PROJECT: } nflt i 5 fr&en Wir�c t ; 4
APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: a:r : ••: l 1 4�iA4..TMh %W44' ' ... iLt 1.
REPRESENTATIVE'S PHONE: i t , _ •=t 2. T7 4,
OWNER'S NAME: 1)14 /71/0 6 P kAM l (_ Q
SUMMARY
1. Type of Application: .A.A.PAn.� vV
2. Describe action /type of development being requested:
0 I 6e luzAwis (o+ S tie. ;X31 P-M F Zo, s—
f 1
3. Ar -as is which Applicant has been requested to respond,
types of reports requested:
Policy Area/
Referral Agent Comments
- lr 600p 1V4wni
� „a - FA R, iCi i,4cKs
CJ _
4. Review is: P &Z (CC Only) (P &Z then to CC)
5. Public Hearing: (YES) (NO)
6. Number of copies of the applica ion to be submit ••• _�
7. What fee was applicant requested to submit•' S 0 _ 4 _ -17C)
8. Anticipated date of submission:
kJ // cr°
9. COMMENTS /UNIQUE CONCERNS: r2
frm.pre_app
its
?SIC T !! Cr IC LTIC 11IC L:UC ITIC 11IC ITIC 1 LTIC LTIC LTIC LTIC LTIC LTIC LTIC ITIC 1 IIC LTIC IT1'' ITIC L1IC LTIC LTIC LTIC UIC LTIC LTIC ISIC LTIC
Jwyers1JtIe
Insurance @rporation
NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA
Policy Number
85 -01- 097836
SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND THE PROVISIONS OF
THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS HEREOF, LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION. a Virginia corporation,
herein called the Company, insures, as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the
amount of insurance stated in Schedule A, and costs, attorneys' fees and expenses which the Company may become
obligated to pay hereunder, sustained or incurred by the insured by reason of:
1. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested otherwise than as stated therein;
2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on such title;
3. Lack of a right of access to and from the land; or
4. Unmarketability of such title.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Company has caused this policy to be signed and sealed, to be valid when Schedule A is
countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance with its By -Laws.
1 uryers1itle Ins Crporation
By:
6 c
President
dnt
Attest:
.W. 9NA"
Secretary.
Policy 85/99 Litho in U.S.A. Cover Sheet ALTA Owner's Policy Form 8 - 1970
.ap!pnlald tons ;o wawa
:1al ;eatay) sAep aim 01 A!uo uatl PU8 a n!!e; 4311s Aq pep!pnlaid aq yetis Auedwoj awl
OE u!g1!M a!geAed aq !legs aBewep JO 9901 eel 'A sett ;0 suo!ppuoo ssa!un Ap4od sly) 1a ansu! Lions Aue to siybu ay1 ap!pn1b1d asap
ayi Lil!m apuep1o33e u! pax!! A!a)!ueep uaaq s !!!qe!! uayM (3) ou w pegs A ;11011 01 11ey1 'lanamoy 'papinad :pa!nbal s! 8118011
- Auedwoj 41 ;o uoyezuo4lne 1dwojd tons ya!yn Jo; sJanew 10 tallow ay1 01 pie6ai u! aleu!wJal
uallum 8111 y1!m pamsu! Lions Aq uo 118!11811 uo!1eBmil u! sasuadxa pue 85803 Heys Auedwoj atl ;0 A18!geg He pansu! Lions 01 se U8141
pue sea; ,sAawolle 'swop He pue 'pamsu! tens Jo; Auedwoj 941 •Auedwoj a41 01 uaA!6 aq 10U Heys 83!1011 ldwold t311s ;I 'a!gelal!Jewun
Aq uo peule3 uo!18611!1 u! pamsu! ue uodn pasodw! swop !ie'Aa!!od 9!41 se pal3afa s! 'paJnsu! se 198181U! J3 alel98 all of 61111 ;! (!!!)
Aq 15111068 pamsu! ssop Aue o1 uog!ppe u! 'Aed H!m Auedwoj awl (q) to'Ao!!od s!y1 ;o 8n1J!A Aq algae aq Aew Auedwoj ay1 43!4m no; BBewep
y a(npay7s u! palels aOuansu! ;O wnowe awl (!!) 10 9901 891183 10!W y3!ym pue 'pamsu! se '1sa1aw! 13 mews 841 01
10 'luew!ep pamsue ay) ;o sso! 1811138 ay; (!) apt a(41 0) asJanpe s! y3!ym 19818111! 10 any 10 w!ep Aue ;o Japun81ay
: ;o weal 8111 poems pamsul ue o) OW03 Heys a6p9!moux 8983 u! (e) '9AOge (e) u! Iwo;
0903 ou u! Heys A3!lod s!q1 Japun Auedwoj a(41 ;0 Ateme!! 8 41 (e) 1as se pasodlow! s! asue;ap to unBaq s! Bu!peepold 10 110!138 Aue 8983
$so ;o wewAed pue uo!leu!wlalea '9 u! (!) Bu!lum u! AIdwad Auedwoj eyl A;eou !legs palnsu! awl (q)
'Ap!lod s!q1 Aq lswe6e pamsu! 1alleu 191110
10 'a3ue1gwn3ua 'ue!! 1391911 po 9I!e ue uodn papuno; s! uope6Hg
a 1 Aq azuo Line pue iu ew!e p 43119 1 wawa 941 01 'pue! p!es u! 1sa1aw! 10 alelsa ay1 ;o ales
'AUedwO
j 4 g P 4 P 1 e 101 13811UO3 a 831o;Ua of U01138 ue ue pamsty ue lsweBe pasodIelu!
paJnsu! ay1 Aq 'wawAed 10 lapual 10 luawAed 14311S 10 awe ow of do 89118;811 a Jo pawn)! y3ns 15u!868 peauewwoo s6u!peo3old Jo 9110!138
peUn3w sasuadxa pue 988; sAauloue 1 91503 Aue 41!M /0418801 A3!lod /0 8u1ls!suo3 uo!188e!I He u! pamsu! ue ;o asua;ap 941 10; ap!Aad
sett 'spun 83uelnsu! to 1u110we ay1 ;0 wawAed Buuepual 10 Bu!Aed !lets 'Aelap anpun )noyl!m pue 1503 umo sl! le 'Auedwoj m(41 (e)
Aq Jepunala4 Auedwoj 8147 ;o suo!le6!Igo pue Al!I!ge!I Ile aleu!w1a1 lueW!e!j mewl ue Aq us/0
Ol JO 1911!888 palnsu! w!e!p Aue )uew!ep palnsu! ue ;O eweu ay; eq o1 worm ;o eo!loN— SU0P3V W uo!lnoesold pue 89118 ;ea •g
1.11.10 10; 011109 9S!m10410 10 Aed of uo!ldo 941 eAey II84S Auedwoj 841
sw!e!O ewes eswue410 Jo Aed OJ suo!3d0 •9
palnsu! Lions of ua.46
to sso aBeBUow Aauow asegand a Aq pampas ssaupatgapu! 941 10 19918111!
'a8ewe
P 1 10 alelsa p!es Jatl!e to palnsu! y3ns wo1; t9seg31nd Aue in lone;
gins ()Ise Aagod set; Japun Auedwoj 941 ;o A3!I!gew Aue aleu!w1a1 Heys u! 0310; u! enupuo3 1011 Heys Aa!!od 91(41 '19A9M011 'pap!Aad ':salami!
aBewep 1O SW! 1 luawelels 43119 ys!wn; of 9.111Hej 'pe4S!U1n; uaaq 10 910150 43119 ;0 a3ueAanu03 18;911811 Aue ue palnsu! tons Aq :pew
any Bees luawelels y3ns 1049 sAep 0g 'Run luew!913 pamsu! ue 01 Aluelnem to sweuanoO ;o u0Seal Aq Allege!! eney Heys pamsu! y3ns
011133e !legs U0113810 1148p ou pie peu!wlalep uaaq eney 118149 aBewep se Buol os 10 'palnsu! (43119 W01; lase43md a Aq 119416 aBeBUow Aauow
to sso! y3ns taw sAep 116 11!41!M Auedwoj 8141 •1 pays!UJn; eq Heys aseyalnd a Aq pampas ssaupalgapu! ue splay 10 Iwo! my u! 1se1a1u!
AaHod s!yl lapin elge!I s! Auedwoj 0(41 paw!e13 s! 1! 113!LIm 1o; aBewep Jo 010199 ue simnel pamsu! 113119 se Buoi os pamsu! ue ;0 10Ae; u!
1e 590! Aue ;0 BupuM u! 1uaw91e1s a 'suoeel^d!1S pye suopspuoj A3!pd )o area ;o se 9310; u! 81111!11103 Heys Aaeod sett to a6elanoj 041
898(41 40 (q)E yde1Be1ed 'spun p9J!nbel 983you eyl 01 uaIPPe 111 spa ;o e0u0Aenuo3 mot eouamsu! ;o uopenupuo3 •e
uopey 40 11opepui 7 - 9901 114 eopoN •y ,
" f '111181 p!es 011314121w 91911eu 30 Bayou
1p0111130! 09 asp� tdxas;4 ! DMWn1lsuo3 uedw! met Aq y3!ym sp10391 ()sow :, sp103a1 aignd„ ( ;)
Aue 10; palnsu! y3ns esmgw!a1 Heys Auedwoj 941 pue 'Bu!pae3gp 145' S n1
p 'wawlsu! Alunaas
1101138 4ons Bu!puejop 10 Bupnaasad 10 '90sseu1!m Bu!u! nqo '8311$)9110 f' 10110 JO 'peep )91111 ')91111 paap 'aBeBUow :,,a6e61Jow„ (a)
Buunaas 'luawa!uas Bu!43emo u! 'Bu!pea3wd 10 110938 ljon4¢ - f 'Aaeod set) Aq pamsw s pue% ay; wo1; pue 01 990336
up we algeuosew I B Auedwoj alp EA!6 Heys pamsu! y3ns 'Ausdwbj , , 4, lo 141611 a y3!ym 01 wawa 8111 ewe JO 'Wow Heys u!elay Bu!ywu
9141 Aq palsanbal 19AauayM 'esodmd 43119 Jo; palnsu! y3ns to alyelt _piq 'SAemJelem 10 SAem'sauei '91.9118 'sanu9Ae 'spew 'SW 0119 Bueinge
941 '11011d0 57! le '0511 01 Auedwoj 041 wined pue 'U!aa141 slta.de' N miss ! wew99ee 10 miss 'Isamu! '811!1 '144611 'y Aue tau a!npa43S u! 01
ye .pue 'Bu!paaOad 10 U09138 LIDOS ul swoop ap!AO1d 10 014130 • p0119491 10 paqu3sep A!le3y!aads ease 6141 ;o saw( 84) puoAaq AUado1d
os 01 346!1 941 Auedwoj 041 01 910389 Heys Jepuna1ay - pemaU! Aue epn!ou! 1011 seep „puel„ w101 ay; 7anemoy 'pap!Aad :AUadad peal
ay; '6114paa3ad 10 1101136 Aue to 89118;811 awl to; ap!Aad Jo a4nQ089Jd a1n 1 1I1SUOD me! Aq 43!(4 ola0y1 pax!ye swawanWdw! pue 'y alnPa4
01 Auedwoj ay) saJ!nbat JO s1!w1ad A3Hod 9N1 aaLIM sese3 Ile ul 1$ ''.4 .. � u! 930919;01 Aq Jo AHea!paads 'pequ3sap pue! ay) :,,pue!„ (p)
:Jap10 10 luew6pnf - sp10381
891811118 Aue W01; leadde of 'ualalas!p apps s1! u! 4464 841 994/890/ aggnd Aue in 110988 Aq palnsui ue o1 palndw! aq Aew 143!(4M 83110U
A!ssadxa pue uo!13!psunf 1u91adwo3 ;0 111103 a Aq uopeu!wlelep 10 e8pa!mouy aAppnusuo3 tau 'a6pa!maul 1811138 :, a6palmoul!„ (3)
11811!; 01 11011861111 4D05 Aue ensmd Aew Auedwoj 841 'ADyOd _ 19punay
s!LI1 ;0 uo!s!Aoid awl Aq pewaued 1O papaw se asua;ap a pasod1alu! 1a aBewep JO 9501 Bu!w!ep pamsu! ue :,,wew!813 pamsu!„ (q)
1O U0838 Aue 11480o1q anew Heys 'Auedwoj all l9Aaua(4M (P) '91099933119 Alepnp!; 10 9181od103 JO 'up! to
'Ao!led 941110 U0!9!A01d Aue aA!em 1O AUI!gee 811831103 1x811 'saA!teluasetdal !euos1ad 's10A!A1ns 'seas!A9p 'sealnquls!p 'spay
Ag 1011 Heys pue 'lepuneteyl a!ge!I eq Heys l! 1011 l0 18g1aym '01 pa1!w!! 1011 Intl '6U!pnpu! ase(4and W014 p01sezBups!p se met to
'Aaeod sty; to swum. 941 lapin 001138 e)eudoldde Aue 81!81 Aew uopaedo Aq !taunt)! *43119;0 15818111! ow 01 paa73n9 oym as0(41'pamsu!
Auedwoj awl pue 'palnsut se walelu! JO alma ey101 0114 awl 4s!1g paweu 0111 IsteeB8 peg BAN Aew Auedwoj 8111 989118;911 JD 914811
of 84(181!9911 10 Alesseaeu 04 Aew uo!u!do s1! u! y3!ym toe 10410 Aue 0313afgns 'pue 'y alnpay3s u! paweu palnsu! awl : (e)
Aue op o) 10 Bu!paoaad 10 U01138 Aue aln39sad Aepop anpun 11104111 :ueaw A3eod sly; to peso ua)M suns) &emopo; awl
pue 8111314911! ca woo LIMO Sl! 1e Nap 0(41 eney Heys Auedwoj awl (3)
WWJ91 ;0 UOI4!U! ;ea ' 1
SNOI1VlfldIlS ONV SNOIIIONOO
'Apllad s9 (41 Aq pamsu! 199191U! 10 alelsa 8(43to; ante* pled
pay luew!813 pamsu! a41 4! p9u!elsns uaaq eney 1011 p!nom 434.1m aBewep 10 9901 u! Bu!1lnsal (e) 10 :AO!IOd 40 elea 01 wanbosgns 11938813
10 Bu!g38ue (p) :wew!ep p0111ste 0(41 01 aBewep JO MI OU u! 8upinsa (a) :1apunala) pawn)! ue aweoeq luew!ep pamsu! y3ns Mel) 9111
of JOUd Auedwo3 ay1 0l luew!ep !myna)! ay; Aq Bu!tum u! - pasops!p 1011 pue A311od sett Aq pamsu! 1901010! to Weise ue pa1!nb3e luew!ep
y3ns amp all le 10 A3110d 10 area le 184110 luew!813 palnsu! awl 0111m0U)l 111(4 9)10301 p!Ignd 0141 Aq umoys 3011 pue Auedwoj 84) 01 umoull
1011 (q) :wew!ep palnsu! awl Aq 01 1189168 10 pawnsse 'p0104ns 'p918013 (e) 5Ja118W taw 10 '9411813 aSJBApe 'se3uelgwnpua '911914 1139 0Q
'Ab!lod to 8)80 le 9111039/ °egnd e41 u! sleedde s14611 y3ns ;0 09!310x9 ay; 40 8313011 9991w1 u!ewop )uau!we ;0 5148!H 'Z
- sapu0y1ne Ale ;es 3Hgnd 10 ylleay 'Bu!ppnq 'Bu!uoz 'u0!loelo1d leivawua!A11a 4eoo1
10 81819 '1818118; pp 983!110 941 to Aue u! 91110381 01)111311! 01 /)011/151103 9q 1011 Heys 91110391 143ns %Jay l!w!I lnoyl!M will 'le1AOMOq 'pap!AO1d
:96p8Im011)l 111041!1 pue 8111841o; P1181 9111 ;o 5189e4311141 01 0311011 8A93 1.1edw! 01 181110 11! 130111038 eq 'SOW S93ue1011wn3U9 app 1814)0
10 9118!1 'suapued se 'se6e6Uow 'speap 5911 alels lapin 43!ym u! 91110381 99014) u! A3!113d ;0 area le paplo3a uaaq say uo!lelo!" a WW1
Bupi11sa a3ue1gwn3ua 10 0911 Vamp a ;0 9311011 sselun 'image (a) 10 '(q) •(e) 1epun papnpxa swum() 044 10 uoeelo!A Aue to pew) e(41 (p)
wed a sem 10 s! pue! awl 43!4m
401831ed Aue 10 pue! 814310 eae 10 suo!suew!p 9111 u! thump a 10 d!yslaumo u! u0pe1ed8s a Bue!q!yad 10 ' 0 uo papaw 18138918(4
10 MOU luew8Aadw! Aue ;0 uo4e30110 suo!Su9w!p '1813818)3 941 Buee!new JO 'pue! ay; to luawAolue 10 asn 'A3uedn33o 9441 Bup!q!yold J0
6upe!n681 1O 6097/1359/ (sa3ueu!p10 Bwuoz pue Btepinq o1 pal!wp mou lnq Bu!pnpu!) 110/1811168/ !eluaw111ano6 l0 9311811!1110 'met Auy (3)
- uo439101d Ie3Uawua!AU9 01 611118!91 11098!1180 leluawwano6 10 8311811!1110 'me! Auy (q)
'tamed speed !ewawwan0g (e) '1.
:Aaiod s!yl ;O a :elano3 9441 way papnpxa Als9aldxa ale 518118111 Bu!mollo; e41
30V3l31103 lNOUd SNoisniaX3
II' i F, 1 1 b 4 Ili 1 w 1 n■ 1 IN 1 n, 1 Ili I , - 1 ni 111i 1 Ili 1114 i n■ 1 n, 111i 1 Ili 1111 I Ili 1 ',. 1111 1 n, nit i 1 n i Ili 1114 I I k 1 Ili 1111 1 Ili
J4uyersitIe
Insurance @rporation
NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA
SCHEDULE A- UANER'S POLICY
CASE NUMBER DATE OF POLICY AMOUNT OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER
PCT- 3321 04/28/89 @ 3:15 P.M. $ 385,000.00 85- 01- 097836
1. NAME OF INSURED:
DWIGHT W. ARUNDALE
2. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREIN AND WHICH IS COVERED BY THIS POLICY IS:
IN FEE SIMPLE
3. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST REFERRED TO HEREIN IS AT DATE OF POLICY VESTED IN:
DWIGHT W. ARUNDALE
4. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
LOTS 3 AND 4, BLOCK 5, RIVERSIDE ADDITION TO THE CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY
OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO
��' • PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC.
k J ( 601 E. HOPKINS AVE.
Counters ized Agent ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
(303) 925 -1766
THE POLICY NUMBER SHOWN ON THIS SCHEDULE MUST AGREE WITH THE PREPRINTED NUMBER ON THE
COVER SHEET.
Fnrm 10b 1 ilhn in 11 SA
LI II lh lis H III! Ill! IlIt Ilk Ills I - IIII Ilk III! IlIt III! lis lilt ID lilt IIIt I' lilt Ilk III! Ills lilt lilt Ills lilt .lilt IV(
Juyers]JtIe
Insurance @rporation
NATIONAL HEADOUARTERS
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA
SCHEDULE B- CrelNERS
CASE NUMBER DATE OF POLICY POLICY NUMBER
PCT -3321 04/28/89 @ 3:15 P.M. 85- 01- 097836
THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE AGAINST LOSS OR DAMAGE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING:
1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records.
2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records.
3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any
facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which
are not shown by the public records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereto -
after furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records.
5. Unpatented mining claims, reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authoriz-
ing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water.
6. Taxes for the year 1989 not yet due or payable.
7. Reservations and exceptions as contained in United States Patent recorded June 17,
1949 in Book 175 at Page 246 as follows:
1. That the grant hereby made is restricted in its exterior limits
to the boundaries of the said mining premises, and to any veins
or lodes of quartz or other rock in place bearing gold, silver,
cinnabar, lead, tin, copper or other valuable deposits, which
may have been discovered within said limits subsequent to and
which were not known to exist on March 24, 1885.
2. That any vein or lode of quartz or other rock in place bearing
gold, silver, cinnabar, lead tin, copper or other valuable
deposits, be claimed or known to exist within the above
described premises, at said last named date, the same is
expressly excepted and excluded from the presents.
3. That the premises hereby conveyed may be entered by the
proprietor of any vein or lode of quartz or other rock in place
bearing gold, silver, cinnabar, lead, tin copper or other
valuable deposits, for the purpose of extracting and removing
the ore from such vein or lode, should the same or any part
thereof be found to penetrate or intersect, pass through or dip
into the mining ground or premises hereby granted.
EXCEPTIONS NUMBERED NONE ARE HEREBY OMITTED.
1 Form 100 Litho in U.S.A.
,,
CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS — CONTINUED
7. Limitation of Liability 11. Subrogation Upon Payment or Settlement
No claim shall arise or be maintainable under this policy (a) if the Whenever the Company shall have settled a claim under this policy, all
Company, after having received notice of an alleged defect, lien or right of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of the
encumbrance insured against hereunder, by litigation or otherwise, insured claimant. The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to
removes such defect, lien or encumbrance or establishes the title, as all rights and remedies which such insured claimant would have had
insured, within a reasonable time after receipt of such notice; (b) in the against any person or property in respect to such claim had this policy not
event of litigation until there has been a final determination by a court of been issued, and if requested by the Company, such insured claimant
competent jurisdict ion, and disposition of all appeals therefrom, adverse shall transfer to the Company all rights and remedies against any person
to the title, as insured, as provided in paragraph 3 hereof; or(c) for liability or property necessary in order to perfect such right of subrogation and
voluntarily assumed by an insured in settling any claim or suit without shall permit the Company to use the name of such insured claimant in any
prior written consent of the Company. transaction or litigation involving such rights or remedies. If the payment
does not cover the loss of such insured claimant, the Company shall be
8. Reduction of Liability subrogated to such rights and remedies in the proportion which said
All payments under this policy. except payments made for costs, payment bears to the amount of said loss. If loss should result from any
attorneys' fees and expenses, shall reduce the amount of the insurance act of such insured claimant, such act shall not void this policy, but the
pro tanto. No payment shall be made without producing this policy for Company, in that event, shall be required to pay only that part of any
endorsement of such payment unless the policy be lost or destroyed, in losses insured against hereunder which shall exceed the amount, if any,
which case proof of such loss or destruction shall be furnished to the lost to the Company be reason of the impairment of the right of
satisfaction of the Company. subrogation.
9. Liability Noncumulative
It is expressly understood that the amount of insurance under this
policy shall be reduced by any amount the Company may pay undaf:my
policy insuring either (a) a mortgage shown or referred to in Schedule B 12. Liability Limited to this Policy
hereof which is a lien on the estate or interest covered by this policy, cr(b) This instrument together with all endorsements and other instruments,
a mortgage hereafter executed by an insured which is a charge or f i e n os $eey, attached hereto by the Company is the entire policy and contract
the estate or interest described or referred to in Schedule A, and dte B the insured and the Company.
amount so paid shall be deemed a payment under this policy. The , !y claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, and
Company shall have the option to apply to the payment 01 any su vied* ;wises out of the status of the title to the estate or interest covered
mortgages any amount that otherwise would be payable heregnderto the patty or any action asserting such claim. shall be restricted to the
insured owner of the estate or interest covered by this policy and the previsions and conditions and stipulations of this policy.
amount so paid shall be deemed a payment under this policy to said * amendment of or endorsement to this policy can be made except by
insured owner. wriiitg ,endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the
Apportionment President, a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant Secretary, or
10.
pportionment validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company.
If the land described in Schedule A consists of two or more parcel*
which are not used as a single site, and a loss is established affecting one
or more of said parcels but not all, the loss shall be computed and settled
on a pro rata basis as if the amount of insurance under this policy wes
divided pro rata as to the value on Date of Policy of each separate parcel to
the whole, exclusive of any improvements made subsequent to Date of 13. Notices, Where Sent
Policy, unless a liability or value has otherwise been agreed upon as to All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in
each such parcel by the Company and the insured at the time of the writing required to be furnished the Company shall include the number of
issuance of this policy and shown by an express statement herein or by an this policy and shall be addressed to its Corporate Headquarters, 6630
endorsement attached hereto. West Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia, mailing address: P.O. Box 27567,
Richmond, Virginia 23261.
Leu yers Title Insurance Corporation
National Headquarters — Richmond, Virginia
31T )II JII )III )111 )II. I )Ili )II "I 1111 )II1 1111 )III )Ill All 1111 1111 )III )Ill )111 )III .)I .1111 )III )11 - I )Ili lll' ■I11 )III .111
3ONV8f1SN 1 31111 3O AOIIOd
uoigrod9 aaupinsul
aj�i sia Cai
L9ZEZ e1UI611n 'puowgJPH
L99LZ x 0 d
u0i]ES0d®9 aournnsuI apZ SIaIiC(CIE�
luewiiedea sile; ;y Iawnsuo0
:el
alum Aew noA AO Aogod InoA panes' leyl aoi; ;o
ayl loewoa Aopod siyl Aq pepiAOld uoyoaload eqi lnoge suogsanb Aue aneq noA
einln; lo; algepene Appeal aq I M 11 aJagM aae1d
ales e w U daa>f noA 1se66ns aM pue uolloalold aim amenien sapinoJd Aagod siyl
wniweid 6uuinoej ou sr amyl
uogelodlo0 aauelnsul apij sJaAMe1 ui g1ie; inoA aauepina sIyl ;o uoileiaaldde
ono ssaidxa 01 lueM am 'sploaal luauewlad lno ;o Lied e Aai1od InoA aNew am sy
"'SYNVH.L dO Ol1OM V