HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.1039 E Cooper Ave.A003-98 RECEIVED
COMES
REID &WALDRON MAR 1 2 1998
,-.rv, r, 1 niN
Real Estate • Rentals • Property Management COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 6, 1998
TO: Christopher Bendon, Planner
City of Aspen, Community Development Department
FROM: Mick Spalding, President
Coates, Reid and Waldron Property Management
RE: CHATEAU ROARING FORK CONDOMINIUMS STREAM MARGIN
EXEMPTION 1039 EAST COOPER
I am writing in regards to Item #7 on the application from Chateau Roaring Fork for
their parking lot repairs and replacement. Item #7 says the applicant is encouraged to
grant an access easement along the south side of the property to the City of Aspen for
the purpose of providing fishermen's access to the Roaring Fork River. I can not grant
that access on behalf of the Condominium Association. In order to give an easement,
the ownership would have to vote. I can put that before the Board at their next
meeting.
As a fisherman, this suggestion is hard for me to understand, because the water that is
accessed from the south side of the building is rather high and fast. In order to get to
fish along the river, one would either have to walk south in front of the Roaring Fork
Apartments which the Roaring Fork Condominiums do not own, or walk on the private
decks of homeowners at the Chateau Roaring Fork Condominiums. Parking is also a
problem I foresee. Would fishermen be able to park in the parking lot? That would
make enforcement impossible for us.
MS /kps
Attachment
cc: Bob Fritsch, Yampah Builders, Inc.
Aspen Office 720 Fast Hyman Avenue • Aspen. Colorado 81611 • (970) 925 - 1400 • FAX (970) 920 - 3765
Snowmass Office: P.O. Box 6450 • Suite 113. Snowmass Center • Snowmass Village, Colorado 81615 (970) 923 - 4700 • FAX (970) 923 - 4198
MEMORANDUM
TO: Stan Clauson, Community Development Director
TT
THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Director ` r ' ' '
FROM: Christopher Bendon, Planner
F Lit t ,5 1999
RE: Chateau Roaring Fork Condominiums Stream Mrrg;$emption
1039 East Cooper Avenue OMMUN OEVE`
CiiIOFASPEN
DATE: February 26, 1998
SUMMARY:
The Chateau Roaring Fork Condominium Association is requesting a Stream
Margin Review Exemption to reconstruct and improve the existing parking lot.
The improvements include a heated drain pan and a drywell to replace the current
surface runoff which enters Cooper Avenue and eventually the river. Staff and
the appropriate referral agencies have reviewed this applicant and recommend
approval with conditions.
APPLICANT:
Chateau Roaring Fork Condominiums Association. Managed by Coates Reid and
Waldron and represented by Robert Fritsch, Yampa Builders.
LOCATION:
1039 East Cooper Avenue.
ZONING:
Residential Multi - Family (RMF)
REVIEW PROCEDURE:
Reconstruction of existing development within the Stream Margin may be
exempted by the Community Development Director.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit "A." Agency
referral comments have been included as Exhibit "B." The application has been
included as Exhibit "C."
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Community Development Director approve this Stream
Margin Exemption with the following conditions:
1
1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide a drainage report which
sizes the drywell appropriately, based on soil percolation and seasonal water tables.
2. The applicant shall submit a Dust Control Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of a building
permit.
3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit an erosion control plan
which maintains sediment on -site during and after construction.
4. The applicant shall maintain construction materials and debris on -site and not within public
rights -of -way. The applicant should encourage employees to park elsewhere and carpool.
5. The applicant shall abide by all noise ordinances. Construction activity is limited to the
hours between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m.
6. The applicant should include an oil and sand separator immediately before the dry well to
prevent contaminants from entering the dry well system. The drywell opening should be
lined with a geotextile fabric. The applicant should consider a round man hole cover. The
applicant should place the drainage inlet 1/2 inch below final grade to prevent damage from
snow plows.
7. The applicant is encouraged to grant an access easement along the south side of the property
to the City of Aspen for the purpose of providing fisherman's access to the Roaring Fork
River.
APPROVAL
I hereby approve this Stream Margin Exemption for reconstruction of an existing
parking lot and addition of a heated drain pan and drywell system for the Chateau
Roaring Fork Condominiums, 1039 East Hopkins Avenue, with the above conditions
listed 1 -7.
date O t ( 4 Q0
Stan Ct uson, Community Development Director
ATTACHMENTS'
Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Findings
Exhibit B -- Referral Agency Comments
Exhibit C -- Application
Post -it® Fax Note 7671 Date
Co./Dept.
Co./Dept.
GI _Ma
1
tpc0401; tip
web
MEMORANDUM
To: Chris Bendon, Planner
Thru: Nick Adeh, City Engineer / d
From: Chuck Roth, Project Engineer ClC_
Date: February 13, 1998
Re: Chateau Roaring Fork Stream Margin Exemption
(1039 East Cooper Avenue)
The Development Review Committee has reviewed the above referenced application at their
February 4, 1998 meeting, and we have the following comments:
1. Drainage - The roof and parking lot currently drain to the Roaring Fork River via East Cooper
Avenue. The applicant has explained the need to provide on site detention for storm water. The
applicant needs to provide a copy of the drainage report, based on soils percolation test and
seasonal water table evaluation, that sizes the drywell for review and acceptance by the Engineering
Department prior to approval of the application.
The excavated drywell opening should be lined with geotextile fabric prior to placement of
screened gravel and inside the drywell pre -cast sections. No overflow pipe is allowed for discharge
into river.
There should be an oil separator sand trap to capture parking lot pollutants that would reduce
the performance of the drywell. A round inlet grate might perform better than a square one.
2. Sediment Containment - I have spoken with the contractor regarding site drainage during
construction. The approval must include the following condition: Site drainage must be kept on
the applicant's private property during construction and must not enter public rights -of -way or the
Roaring Fork River. The applicant must submit an erosion control plan both for construction
period and post - development phase.
3. Streets Department - Construction debris must be kept on site and may not be allowed on East
Cooper Avenue or East Durant Avenue. Parking in the general area is limited. The contractor
should provide employee parking elsewhere and carpool as needed.
The inlet grate to the drywell should be installed 1/2" below the pavement in order to prevent
snow plow blades from damage.
1
4. Parks Department - They are interested in a public access to the Roaring Fork River. They will
contact the applicant.
5. Work in the Public Right -of -way - Given the continuous and unapproved work and
development in public rights -of -way adjacent to private property, we advise the applicant as
follows:
The applicant must receive approval from city engineering (920 -5080) for design of
improvements, including landscaping, within public rights -of -way, parks department (920 -5120)
for vegetation species, and streets department (920 -5130) for mailboxes , street and alley cuts, and
shall obtain permits for any work or development, including landscaping, within public rights -of-
way from the city community development department.
DRC Attendees
Staff: Chris Bendon, Jack Reid, Julie Ann Woods, Rebecca Schickling, John Krueger, Tom
Bracewell, Ed VanWalraven, Chuck Roth
98M24
2
Tigspe JJafec/cSanifafion ' /rid
565 North Mill Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Tele. (970) 925 -3601 FAX #(970) 925 -2537
Sy Kelly - Chairman Michael Kelly
Paul Smith • Treas. Frank Loushin
Louis Popish • Secy. RECEIVED Bruce Matherly, Mgr.
• February 2, 1998 FEB 0 3 1998
ASPEN /Pi I nuN
Chris Bendon COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Community Development
130 S. Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Chateau Roaring Fork Stream Margin Review
Dear Chris:
The addition of a heated drain pan to the Chateau Roaring Fork parking area should have no
effect upon our ability to serve this development. As you know we cannot accept any clear water
flows to our collection system. Directing the heated drain pan snow melt flows to a dry well, as is
suggested by.the applicant, eliminates our concern regarding a potential clear water connection.
You may want to consider requiring an oil and sand separator immediately before the dry well to
keep contaminants from entering the dry well.
Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Bruce Matherly
District Manager
EPA Awards of Excellence
1976•1986•1990
Regional and National
A
MEMORANDUM
To: Chris Bendon, Planner, Planning Office
From: Nancy MacKenzie , Environmental Health Specialist
Date: February 10, 1998
Re: Chateau Roaring Fork Stream Margin Exemption
1039 East Hopkins
Parcel ID #
The Aspen /Pitkin Environmental Health Department has reviewed the Chateau Roaring Fork land use
submittal under authority of the Municipal Code of the City of Asnen, and has the following
comments.
WATER QUALITY IMPACTS: erection 11 -1.3 "For the purpose of maintaining and protecting its
municipal water supply from injury and pollution, the city shall exercise regulatory and
supervisory jurisdiction within the incorporated limits of the City of Aspen and over all streams
and sources contributing to municipal water supplies for a distance of five (5) miles above the
points from which municipal water supplies are diverted."
The drainage plan (snowmelt system and drywell) to mitigate the water quality impacts from drive
and parking areas will be evaluated by the City Engineer. This application is not expected to impact
down stream water quality and should be an improvement to the existing situation.
AIR QUALITY: Sections 11-2.1 "It is the purpose of the air quality section of the Municipal Code] to
achieve the maximum practical degree of air purity possible by requiring the use of all available
practical methods and techniques to control, prevent and reduce air pollution throughout the
city..." The Land Use Regulations seek to 'lessen congestion" and "avoid transportation demands
that cannot be met" as well as to "provide clean air by protecting the natural air sheds and
reducing pollutants ".
FUGITIVE DUST A fugitive dust control plan is required which includes, but is not limited to
fencing, watering of haul roads and disturbed areas, daily cleaning of adjacent paved roads to
remove mud that has been carried out, speed limits, or other measures necessary to prevent
windblown dust from crossing the property line or causing a nuisance.
CONFORMANCE WITH OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LAWS
NOISE ABATEMENT: Section 16 -1 "The city council finds and declares that noise is a significant source
of environmental pollution that represents a present and increasing threat to the public peace
i
4
7
and to the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City of Aspen and it its visitors.
Accordingly, it is the policy of council to provide standards for permissible noise levels in
various areas and manners and at various times and to prohibit noise in excess of those levels."
During construction, noise can not exceed maximum permissible sound level standards, and
construction cannot be done except between the hours of 7 a.m. and 10 p.m.
It is very likely that noise generated during the construction phase of this project will have some
negative impact on the neighborhood. The applicant should be aware of this and take measures to
minimize the predicted high noise levels.
2
LAND USE APPLICATION
PROJECT: t �
Name: 1 E 24 � - -- T
Location: /D ' £- _r' / ,
(Indicate street address, lot : block number, 1 `.al description where appropriate)
APPLICANT: 717-
Name: 6 p-tv t.-. //1 '�
Address: / P 39 � C / t r
Phone #: r- zee 5 �
REPRESENTATIVE: `) �—
Name:
Address: r1 15 - 6 73 .
4- 7/1a
q
—
Phone #: o y5 l 7� ^ 9' S "
TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply):
❑ Conditional Use ❑ Conceptual PUD ❑ Conceptual Historic Devt.
❑ Special Review ❑ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ❑ Final Historic Development
O Design Review Appeal ❑ Conceptual SPA ❑ Minor Historic Devt.
❑ GMQS Allotment ❑ Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) ❑ Historic Demolition
❑ GMQS Exemption ❑ Subdivision ❑ Historic Designation
By ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream ❑ Subdivision Exemption (includes ❑ Small Lodge Conversion/
Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion
Mountain View Plane ��yy--� � "�"te q, �,,
❑ Lot Split ❑ Temporary Use ®' Other: .4tra '
❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Text/Map Amendment
CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.)
n
GLO�L� i y 1 :�' ,
Goa,- .1.4L.2.- caklar .,l. ` 174.- eL-14 7 T ' L °'a ed2-
PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) /
h oliacity cfru,-411
Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 7/5
❑ Pre - Application Conference Summary
❑ Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement
O Response to Attachment #2, Dimensional Requirements Form
O Response to Attachment #3, Minimum' Submission Contents
O Response to Attachment #4, Specific Submission Contents
❑ Response to Attachment #5, Review Standards for Your Application
m 1 • O (f) r to r ,„1\ X O O W-2 O -7 hi t 't, � � )
Mr „ III r W O O (D fin (D jy 1 f '. ,
O N N N 7 p a ,W '
■ y ;, . IV N CP. n O 1 l n ■ E ti
4 �`:. O U1O 00 cu3 A..— -
m U " to 71 I - o n r G) o n n n n n n n o r n o o ( - c:0 W m 0 7 Q . r � �
--, �
_ �, a u - u' n 1 l ti m C ?I W m 0 I
S u _ 7_ i c 1 n ° m co n 0 2 Nj 1
0 r °
r t , 1 c r r [ m N .0 0 m m ' i•- ar, 1 =! CTI
_ u ° � l �' N L a ` IT co _ I O D D f11 V n �V W - 0 f r �
C n 1 1
v •,
j < C> ° _ N to , u n 0 3 _� VI O O - 1
j . m O N V T W 3 o, sc.:. N i ,
io O V = C,
m m m 1i Li
-a 1 (\
1 ". h 1M PA I N(, HO C
ca
.r - -r c z imucCnmm W mD n a
I ° n r o ri i om r�l 0
N W m Z
y Go v t 1, ° w -o . , (.) a
0I-13 ra ?= m U m J m U co CO c∎ 7:1 m m r a E-.) in y �-;11: 5: e " 1 1 I s . + * C
m w LT-I < n ' m 0 ii
n c F N N t
m y [ j ^
c? u. n N n ooA T o m a � o " � �l � 1 ,
Hs. a ^ '� 1 � /x, O •
l NO m `J �+ i + ' ' I 1 1 l /1 O \
Cn 7.I w W a .2 m .e3 '1�
m N 'w I'• .t
N ° e 0) - , 1 I I ' .,
klf�,- .� fl �� � F ✓ ro %
I I
1 ��1� II / '1 .1 c.
i f , a
) (i 9 I
1 I _
/ill I
; / k
� R'i:i SL (�
�� li H 'i ' u < <.�
i � 3.1i-ea-4 11 LI
pi I
e l l i `f raj.'
JJ
3Jlrfja u:... .�._➢ u
SG d
a i v Y V 1 D V
4 .4 - \ ..,.:' f 1 I k ,, y {
N 1
.l m 1r // j f ! ..
--' FI �5 1 + 1 1
O Ii G 1'I t' P d. ) W 1 �
it
. [i. 1 I 1 1�"S I f f l
•
fr! 1. �� f.1 _ II fl Ii fl .�
1
o' :i o ' I 1 1 ' S
i I I ,l - l am � , 1
1 .
to j e
� � ° ^ 064‘!!'
y .
ASPEN/PITIC N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees
(Please Print Clearly) qq
CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and � 2 L� � 7i Ala fit
(hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for a
(hereinafter, THE PROJECT).
2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 43 (Series of 1996)
establishes a fee structure for land use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a
condition precedent to a determination of application completeness.
3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed
project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing
the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties to allow
APPLICANT to make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be
billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining
greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they
are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of
recovering its full costs to process APPLICANTS application.
4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete
processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to
enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project
approval, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision.
5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to
collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an
initial deposit in the amount of $ 7/5" a which is for hours of Planning staff time, and if
actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings
to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including
post approval review. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date.
APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension
of processing.
CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT
Signature: g ' jJ"P
Stan auso Date: / _ "'.r / y /t' y r
Community Development Director Printed Name: IF er /I 4 ts
City of Aspen Mailing Address: yg m f h g /d e r5, Z'
N56 fiwy (,
a /.eww osdf,or % ev 6—, S /60/
l e CO Sli S
REID ez. IVALDRO 41
Peal Estate • kernels • Property Management
January 13, 1998
RE: Authorized Representative for Chateau Roaring Fork permits &
exemptions.
To whom it may concern, please be advised that as the Association
Manager for the Chateau Roaring Fork condominium complex, Coates,
Reid and Waldron authorizes Yampah Builders, Inc., Robert Fritsch
to act as the representative in securing exemptions and permits for
the repaving project at 1039 East Cooper.
Respectfully,
Michele Gallegos
Association Manager
Aspen Office: 720 Fast ligmen Avenue • Aspen. Colorado S1611 • (970) 925 -1400 • FAX (970) 920
Snomnase Office PO. Box 6450 • Sole 113 Snowiness Cenlrr • Snowiness Wlare Colorado 81615 (970) 945-4700 • FAX (970) 923 - 4196
CITY OF ASPEN
PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
PLANNER: Chris Bendon, 920.5072 DATE: 12.31.97
PROJECT: Chateau Roaring Fork
REPRESENTATIVE:
OWNER:
TYPE OF APPLICATION: 0 step - ESA Exemption
DESCRIPTION: Replacing paved area
Land Use Code Section(s)
26.68.040 Stream Margin Exemption
Review by: Staff
Public Hearing: NO
Referral Agencies: Engineering, Environmental Health, Parks, ACSD
Planning Fees: Planning Deposit Minor ($450)
Referral Agency Fees: Engineering, Minor ($110); Env. Health, Minor ($155)
Total Deposit: $575 (additional hours are billed at a rate of $180/hour)
To apply, submit the following information:
1. Proof of ownership
2. Signed fee agreement
3. Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant which states the name,
address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant.
4. Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a
current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado,
listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and
agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application.
5. Total deposit for review of the application
6. 5_ Copies of the complete application packet and maps.
HPC = 12; PZ = 10; GMC = PZ +5; CC = 7; Referral Agencies = 1/ea.; Planning Staff = 1
7. An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen.
8. Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, including all
easements and vacated rights of way, of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of
Colorado. (This requirement, or any part thereof, may be waived by the Community Development Department if
the project is determined not to warrant a survey document.)
9. Additional materials as required by the specific review. Please refer to the application packet for specific
submittal requirements or to the code sections noted above.
10. A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed
development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. Please include
existing conditions as well as proposed.
Disclaimer:
The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is
subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a
legal or vested right.
Nancy MacKenzie, 03:51 PM 3/27,6 -, Re: Wednesday's DRC meeting`T6 !
X- Sender: nancym @comdev
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 1998 15:51:05 -0700
To: Chuck Roth <chuckr @ci.aspen.co.us>
From: Nancy MacKenzie <nancym @ci.aspen.co.us>
Subject: Re: Wednesday's DRC meeting location
Cc: chrisb @ci.aspen.co.us
Chuck and Chris
Since I can't be at the meeting -
EHD comments for the DRC meeting tomorrow on the Chateau Roaring Fork Stream
Margin Exemption would be :
1) engineering will review the drainage plan
2)a Fugitive Dust Control Plan must be on file with Environmental
Health Dept before any building permits can be issued.
I didn't copied in on the other LUR you are reviewing, probaby the
comments would be similar.. ??
nancy
At 12:19 PM 2/2/ 98 -0700, you wrote:
>The Sister Cities meeting room is needed by others.
>We will meet at the meeting room at the Fire Department - 1:30-3:00
>Thank you.
Nancy MacKenzie
920 -5076
minted for Christopher Bendon <chrisb @ci.aspen.co.us> 1
....... _...........
MEMORANDUM
TO: Plans were routed to those departments checked -off below:
4 City Engineer
O Zoning Officer
O Housing Director
Parks Department
O Aspen Fire Marshal
O City Water
4 Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District
O Building Department
r Environmental Health
O Electric Department
O City Attorney
O Streets Department
O Historic Preservation Officer
O Pitkin County Planning
FROM: Chris Bendon, Planner
Community Development Department
130 So. Galena St.; Aspen, CO 81611
Phone 920.5090 Fax 920.5439
RE: Chateau Roaring Fork Stream Margin Exemption
1039 East Hopkins
DATE: January 30, 1998
REFERRAL SCHEDULE
DRC MEETING DATE:(note new time: 1:30 -3:00) February 4, 1998
SECOND DRC MEETING DATE (if necessary) February 11, 1998
OTHER REFERRALS DUE TO ENGINEER & PLANNER: February 11, 1998
ENGINEERING REFERRAL DUE TO PLANNER: February 13,1998
Thank you,
Chris.