Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.sm.Bellock Morrison 1420 Red Butte Sr.A64-95 i - r ■ CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 5 /9 /95 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. DATE COMPLETE: 2735- 013 -02 -007 A64 -95 STAFF MEMBER: KJ PROJECT NAME: BELLOCK /MORRISON STREAM MARGIN EXEMPTION /ADU REVISION Project Address: 1420 RED BUTTE DRIVE ASPEN Legal Address: LOT 6, RED BUTTE SUBDIVISION APPLICANT: CHUCK BELLOCK Applicant Address: 1400 28TH ST., #100, BOULDER, CO 442 -2299 REPRESENTATIVE: STAN MATHIS Representative Address /Phone: Aspen, CO 81611 FEES: PLANNING $ 425 # APPS RECEIVED 3 ENGINEER $ # PLATS RECEIVED 1 HOUSING $ ENV. HEALTH $ TOTAL $ 425 TYPE OF APPLICATION: STAFF APPROVAL: XX 1 STEP: 2 STEP: P &Z Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO DRC Meeting Date REFERRALS: City Attorney Parks Dept. School District _ City Engineer Bldg Inspector Rocky Mtn NatGas Housing Dir. Fire Marshal CDOT Aspen Water Holy Cross Clean Air Board City Electric Mtn. Bell Open Space Board Envir.Hlth. ACSD Other Zoning Energy Center Other DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: DUE: p FINAL ROUTING: DATE S ROOUTED: / Z &1/ / INITIAL:A.4C, / City Atty City Engineer X Zoning Env. Health l X \ Housing Open Space Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: y w .� MEMORANDUM TO: Stan Clauson, City Community Development Director FROM: Kim Johnson, Planner RE: Amendment to the Bellock /Morrison Stream Margin Review and Conditional Use for an ADU as a Planning Director's Exemption DATE: June 2, 1995 SUMMARY: Chuck Bellock wishes to amend the approval of stream margin and conditional use for an ADU granted in February of 1994 for the parcel located at 1420 Red Butte Drive. The revised plan for the single family residence meets the criteria for Planning Director approval set forth in Sections 24 -7 -504 (B) and 24 -7 -308 of the land use regulations. The structure exceeds 85% of allowable floor area and will be reviewed by the FAR Overlay Committee later this month. FINDINGS: The original Bellock stream margin and conditional use review was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on February 15, 1994 with 13 conditions of approval (Resolution 93- 41, attached as Exhibit "A ".) This stream margin exemption application indicates that the changes to the structure reduce its FAR on the site by 34 s.f., reduces the size of the ADU by approximately 25 s.f., reduces the size of the garage by 72 s.f. One less tree will need to be relocated or removed. The bulk of the building moves back from the river by at least 25 feet. Approximately 225 s.f. of structure is closer than the 1994 approval, but is still within the envelope approved at that hearing. The home that is on the property now is substantially closer to the river than either the 1994 approved structure or the current proposal. Please refer to the site plan and application information attached. Review criteria in Section 7 -504 (B) reads: 1) the development does not add more than 10% to the floor area of the existing structure. response: The 1994 approval was for a 5,264 s.f. structure. The redesigned building is 5,230 s.f. 2) the development does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit would be required, or the applicant receives a permit by the Parks Department; and response: The revision requires one less tree requiring a permit to be removed than the previous approval. • 3) the development is located such that no portion of the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction will be any closer to the high water line than the existing development; and response: The existing structure is roughly 24 feet from the top of the riverbank. The revised building is 34' at its closest point to the top of the bank, and backs away to more than 70' from the top of the bank. 4) the development does not fall outside of an approved building envelope, if one has been established by prior review; and response: The 1994 approval established an envelope which the revised building honors. The revision application proposes a "development boundary" to allow for demolition of the existing building. 5) the development will cause no increase in the amount of ground coverage of structures within the flood hazard area. response: The structure is located outside of the flood hazard area. The changes to the ADU shall be reviewed by the Planning Director pursuant to the criteria contained in Section 24 -7 -308. Staff believes that the revisions to the ADU (25 s.f. smaller and studio rather than one bedroom configuration) comply with these criteria: 1) The change will not cause negative impacts on pedestrian and vehicular traffic circulation, parking, or noise; and 2) The change will not substantially affect the tourist or local orientation of the conditional use: and 3) The change will not affect the character of the neighborhood in which the use is located; and 4) The change will not increase the use's employee base or the retail square footage in the structure; and 5) The change will not substantially alter the external visual appearance of the building or its site. The 1994 approval was granted subject to conditions stated in Resolution 93 -41. These conditions shall also be carried forward to the revisions approved for this exemption. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Director approve the Bellock /Morrison stream margin exemption and conditional use amendment finding that the criteria in Sections 24- 7 -504 (B) and 24 -7 -308 have been met. The conditions contained in 2 e L Resolution 94 -41 (attached) apply to this amendment approval. I hereby approve Stream Margin Exemption for the Bellock /Morrison residence located at 1420 Red Butte Drive as represented in the amendment application and as conditioned by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Resolu an 94 -41, attached. \I Sta G�aus n, City Community Development Director cis D J Application Drawings and Letter Exhibit "A" P &Z Resolution 94 -41 3 , . 11.07” Hi( 1 Ay . ) . 21 , , 377521 B -770 P -328 12/27/94 09:24A PG 1 OF 4 REC DOC SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CLERK, & RECORDER 20.00 `/7 Gci \ RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL FOR AN ATTACHED ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT WITHIN A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND STREAM MARGIN REVIEW 1 AT 1420 RED BUTTE DRIVE (BLOCK 1, LOT 6, RED BUTTE SUBDIVISION) FOR CHUCK BELLOCK Resolution No. 93 -44 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 24 -5 -510 of the Aspen Land Use Regulations accessory dwelling units may be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission as conditional uses in conformance with the requirements of this Section; and WHEREAS, the Planning Office received an application from Chuck Bellock, represented by Stan Mathis, for a Conditional Use review for an approximately 475 sq.ft. accessory dwelling unit within the second floor of the proposed single family residence; and WHEREAS, the new single family residence is replacing an it existing residence on the parcel and the accessory dwelling unit is being provided as affordable housing mitigation as required by Ordinance 1, Series 1990; and WHEREAS, the proposed unit is 100% above grade, therefore the I site is eligible for an FAR bonus pursuant to Section 24 -3 -101; and WHEREAS, the new single family residence is subject to Section 24 -7 -504 Stream Margin Review because it is located within 100 feet from the high water line of the Roaring Fork River; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted on February 15, 1994, at a regular meeting of the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, in which the Commission considered the applicant's request and voted 4 -0 for approval with conditions. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT_ RESOLVED by the Commission: That the Bellock Stream Margin Review and Conditional Use for an approximately 475 sq.ft. net livable accessory dwelling unit is approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. The owner shall submit appropriate deed restrictions to the Aspen /Pitkin County Housing Authority for approval. The accessory dwelling unit shall be deed restricted to resident occupancy with a minimum six month lease. Upon approval by the Housing Authority, the Owner shall record the deed restriction with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office. 2. Prior to issuance of any building permits, a copy of the ) recorded deed restriction for the accessory dwelling unit must be forwarded to the Planning Office. 377521 B -770 P -329 12/27/94 09:24P PG 2 OF 4 Resolution #94 -_ / I Page 2 3. The accessory dwelling unit shall be clearly identified as a separate dwelling unit on building permit plans and shall - comply with U.B.C. Chapter 35 sound attenuation requirements. 4. During building permit plan review, the Zoning Enforcement Officer shall make the final determination that the unit meets the minimum size requirement of 300 sq.ft. net liveable as defined in the Housing Authority Guidelines. The accessory dwelling unit cannot be less than 300 sq.ft. 5. As recommended by the City Engineer, the applicant shall comply with the following conditions: a. The applicant shall sign and execute a sidewalk, curb, and gutter agreement with the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any building permits. b. The applicant shall designate parking spaces, the pedestrian walkway space in the public right -of -way, fisherman's easement, building envelope, and the trash area on the final development plan, prior to issuance of any building permits. Once this final development plan l is approved by the Engineer and Planning Office's it J shall be filed with Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office.. c. The applicant shall obtain an encroachment license for the fence which encroaches into the public right -of -way or relocate the fence onto private property, prior to issuance of any building permits. d. The applicant shall consult city engineering (920 -5080) for 'design considerations of development within public right -of -ways, parks department (920 -5120) for vegetation species, and shall obtain permits for any work or development, including landscaping, within public rights - of -ways from city streets department (920- 5130). e. A drainage plan prepared by a registered engineer shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer, prior to issuance of any building permits. 6. The Zoning Enforcement Officer shall ensure that erosion fencing and geogrids are in place prior to any earthmoving activities. Erosion fencing and geogrids shall be erected immediately adjacent to the construction envelope during all phases of construction. No construction equipment is permitted outside the northern edge of this envelope. This J I shall prevent any construction debris, soil, rock or vegetation from impacting the stream bank and river. 377521 B - 770 P -330 12/27/94 09:24A PG 3 OF 4 Resolution #94 -_ Page 3 7. No existing vegetation, other than turf, shall be removed between the building envelope and the river. 8. A fisherman's easement must be filed with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder, prior to the issuance of any building permits. This easement shall include the land area under the Roaring Fork River, and on land, a five foot distance measured horizontally from the high water line. 9. Prior to removal of any trees, the applicant shall obtain a tree removal permit from the Parks Department. The applicant is required to either guarantee that the trees survive for up to two years after relocation or, should they die, that they are replaced with comparable trees. Excavating around existing trees will need to be done outside of the dripline of all trees. 10. For new landscaping and irrigation, the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 37, Series 1991 for Water Conservation. This includes protecting existing trees outside of the envelope, replant with wildflower and native grasses on disturbed areas of the site, and limit urban turf treatments that could 1 adversely affect the river. J 11. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall record either the amended Homeowner Covenants or waiver of the Homeowner Covenants which permit an accessory dwelling unit on Lot 6 of the Red Butte Subdivision. If an amendment or waiver from the Covenants cannot be obtained, the applicant shall pay the cash -in -lieu requirements. 12. The applicant shall relocate the proposed patio at least 10 feet back from the top of the stream bank in order to increase the buffer zone between the river and development. 13. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. The site shall be periodically checked by the Zoning Enforcement Officer to enforce all conditions of this approval. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on February 15, 1994. • Resolution #94 - / I Page 4 Attest: Planning an Zoning Co ission: l ./p44lPb 44,.) arney, f, W. Bruce Kerr, Deputy City 'Clerk Chair 377521 B -770 P -331 12/27/94 09:248 P6 4 OF 4 / 1 i i I AsFeh /9kktn Co�v ,9QMv►iv dice CI oP 45vevi vv 1 �. Ga (ev>a wee Aspen , Co(or44O X1 621 ; him c)okYl sro) ff .. �, ff � pp�� (tak�N�orri5o '1eSlctera,e- L471'l�, sulodiut5tovt or 14zo ksci IaY4L rht9e, - S-vegvrt U beau 1301; The Ocuier Cao &k 5) Is rep av1 e'xe y �)}--love tvvti cbtavYn I" I� whe ketl2W ) .•ru Y4 �o I v eoktcv� 1--5o4 Cry) oP 1 L C e axle t sub lecr p co a v i - 4 a Covaiitovlq ( 0% es 4‘arovA -f t, y q - e ? , c €550 buici ;vt VVtt1' ,6to4 e04 Mane ReMeto ovvi ► ter4, Zesoly -li41 1o, q -4I ak1aoheal "leI &v+o, • lei 'cro°o d o 9 t mewl Flom nne�e-ks %pe e6hdictvek i 6 ecc ' 504- (6) �u41ta(n are, 011pe roto opprove e n r t,t iorroyalate l pa.e+2 list 626,4 s, , t6-4- IiC UJC A, b, 0, °ro$l�"1ett 415 5 11' , l us a mar me o o ?ot _ Co'?2 s. . 14 roliws � i e6cAtred ,_ irlekvoCul e AO, 0, 45o S,, Is alOprouivrafd 52 4? 1764 a r cA,eM Ths 142 a ease, of aloe %, I 1 6 I riG r&u l cvs o mesa I 'store 6 fries be �dN eeot 4 � (� �I ` 'o Coe rto / r t n e- vPw6 prop,l vea utres i •I/ees 1�t1c or e o c u q , \ r e r w l r - 1 2 , red/ 5e c, 13 - , 1 3) ere is Ho laW6 o ie Y? )Iseo\ I�rat5Af el 'user 4 'G4 °v Vi! u- I er (i vie +4=01 - 4 6 -- a rroveQ F r o a ( . ek 4)"(rn Veuise of euGl m�eVVteh- e Io ycil doe h P 40 *Le Red 13u%e, Prove sly c -r., eva,eimre. 55 vtt se.t 4eN !ply ot?'�3I e -`4ed 2dcd "P ec 11124 Vg c vea a e 6 41 41e, I Iseck deuel IS � t�-I� ff era roWM -. GlIG�, wad- lime -rnIit one_ uln05 Qrrit70e4 tocr IVa C5ee, Q,H'ac, eA Sfe NIiw. 'base- 44 i' 1 ctvl av*tmer at. botdprlovis - qv? 3415, - 5 , 1 :_ ± .. *3) /vi f L Iz _II ._. L r 1 �' .f. ..";i1 I "" 0 ��- �_ i i , i illi likl . \ 0 MAY B, 1995 ASPEN /PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE CITY OF ASPEN 130 S0. GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO ATTN: KIM JOHNSON RE: BELLOCK /MORRISON RESIDENCE - 1420 RED BUTTE DRIVE LOT 6, RED BUTTE SUBDIVISION DEAR KIM; THE APPLICANT, CHUCK BELLOCK, IS REQUESTING A MINOR REVIEW BY STAFF FOR A MODIFICATION TO THE APPROVED BUILDING ENVELOPE AS IT AFFECTS THE STREAM MARGINE APPROVAL PREVIOUSLY GIVEN. THE FOOTPRINT HAS CHANGED AND THE BULK OF THE BUILDING HAS MOVED AWAY FROM THE RIVER (SEE SITE PLAN). A DEVELOPEMENT BOUNDRY IS SHOWN WHICH DISCRIBES THE AREA ON THE SITE THAT WILL BE DISTURBED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS THE PROPOSED RESIDENCE (5,230 S.F.) IS APPROX- IMATELY THE SAME SIZE AS THE PREVIOUSLY PROPOSED RESIDENCE. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO FOLLOW THE NEW STREAM GUIDELINES ATTACHED HERETO. THE APPLICANT ALSO REQUESTS A MINOR REVIEW FOR A MODIFICATION TO THE A.U.U. GRANTED BY A CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW. THE MODIFICATIONS AMOUNT TO THE A.D.U. BEING LOCATED ON THE GROUND FLOOR AND BEING A STUDIO INSTEAD OF A ONE BEDROOM. THE SIZE OF THE MODIFIED A.D.U. IN APPROXIMATELY 435 S.F. SIMILAR IN SIZE TO THE APPROVED UNIT. THANK YOU, STAN MATHIS FOR CHUCK BELLOCK AI1AC ih1tIIE 1 � LAND USE APPLICATION FoPN � fie. .1) Project Name §el:Coc C' /t W*1` ' .1.9GE 2 ) Project Location 1420 REP &9T _J PZ.IUW. / trB'r fo 1ZFrD E&5CTF, 4016plot2toVJ , AZf' x couoI O (indicate street address, lot & b lock umber, legal description where - appropriate) 3) Present Zoning -12- ls' 4) Lot � Size � 35, 4hj s,E 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Phone $ (MtoMC. �cZ.��LLtc)�. , s fr A # too %oo t . do • - STAN .03 • Z • 27 ►�/� �� 6) Representative's Name, Address & Phone # V Ii+It AS. et). ger (BIZ, I ilkv Cac#2A o to t ‘ , 'U 7)) Type of Application (pleas check all that apply) Conditional Use _ dal SPA _ Conceptual Historic Dev. —ccc special Review Final SPA _ Final Historic Dev. `_/ 8040 creenline _ Conceptual POD _ Minor Historic Dev_ X Stream Margin _ Final FUD _ Historic Demolition // Mountain View Plane _ Subdivision ' _ Historic Designation Co niniuMization' _ Text/Map Amendment = CMQS Allotment _ Lot Split /Lot Line r e - - _ CMQS Exemption. • Adjustment 8) Description of EXisti g Uses '(number and type of existing structures; approximate sq. ft_; number of bedrooms; any previous approvals granted to the ProPerty)- E)(1 S1 • ,3 I -DIPM sll kL . fAM(1 ( REEItt.N)GE. h1: >PE pc f1W 5.F tat LEMot.4sr4fa . tilts Gore %M oat a stkEAti t4AIzc11b6 .l elect A(. 4 OoA)CilipPOkL y,s The. AN &D.0 9) Description of Development Application X012 .Vti)0 rot M0Q1FIt 120tVPIN4 IENUELe = AN)D Amp MbPwuX) ,APO- 5P. fl-ricr44ca PPt1% ? (.tor 10) Rave you attached the following? 'i5 Response to Attachment 2, Minimum Sutmissicn Contents '(e Ike to Attachment 3, Specific Submission Contents "% Response to Attadm>ent 4, Review Standards for Your Application l lulu udri h i 5 ` o d 'a U ' tt25 etc , 2 ci a s ti; v / m 1 2 /IL 1111 1 N 1 , ter z Q g ° 5 n 47 ° o N 1 D S O , Q oo O m ° a ny tr,„ Ay pur o A ao o0 46 4 ' & tr —� U U 3 1S eonldS $ 1 ,ma PJ • T �i , tilt To � a * 0. 6 ' S� ' e � ot o m a J • P � 0 • /Wm. 1-0 l °d J a) u M �i°°w ofy �v 4 ®if Y f 0//c, P a Q\ °° PH u/quno pry v �e fi '$1. W IC ,S direr u-, mo y Yr c f t l ± G ���� f .. I ” ry� e ilii "not, ^n 4 r ° E % `\o ff. EX © � it � � r m V �c i .-1 I °P y uj 7 � = r U ul �� /k... y ,. � 4 � 3 LL x IA FA Plet: Ili c.i tii o la uoreH ayg th a q ° °' , yam C ° H f g ilwt� . 111h1 i . $� !® . d iS P Uly INTIG l :�i?l9 " PH smopeon � � �� EEE p -2 ispna 15 d m ,n m .0 0 S !S x � e Ptl /olvaJ09,991 Q Hlv. P W �I ' o Z U U x V t7 6 • p� F N !! LI a ` 1S , 1 � 1 i ' yG; : a,. ` nXoo c so or t P �ZI+J al/m.3 �. : vie i • � �`° ,10 s t . 6 sm et � sry �P a A'_" "",i -._ r 4. 4121 PPEI MIL! �� P � � L a � A ° 0m N � D � t co „, ca. Cf8e vir; ..‹„A u r o . o l U re A /� V YelePe•H t. 5 H p g n : a l 19111) GI o oJ , t 1 ,. 2 �' U _ •5 C 4 cem et ery 9 • 3 x , it x ?— : w .� ° p% 5 � t�.dA " ?P b wUVUC7 fi GO d r . oo xopeaW, f 4 m S mhe ° , E °� OJt Q C . o ; NUU 4 0 m a/N. u7/°We ° E � Q PHP1r m 4, m ., i m 4 vaa1J 'b q c x U pp t i I uoolt.w 1 9 3 • a °� m c m4 1 i. 0., p 1 11 p r .l f "' t M� 1 :,1 1 r b pm. , L' a S vi y ' , ' , y 9 , e f - b w m PS. 1 1 ; a ... 1 i hA , e � 1 m 1 �0 - . i ,"�`,q - c 1t Au; lara N 11 "'t "� r } i f . ., ., . �..'..1 .. J ia[, :1� ) ,. v l, Y 4 e 'we. ) � i t >+1 i' ' " d ry .R Y i 1+ 11V s l' t i l ' ___ a / t 11 , 1 i . 'F 'M yAY I Y ,1I 4i Z � y r i' i � t Y . C 1 f; A I y� I. e Icy Y 1 �r. e. f. �� k.. c's C 4 ,. rc is a 3 e / it�.j� j $� i S. r: z w , <3 N. y 'Eld 'r CP. e ?f:� L .p. n it ,�4 rsS ii wY if d ,, ++ a #f `•� `k S '� ti> 'e w { i !g ' y: j } y7�s it :1 , C. I u ll S A IL sJ j :NI *! > l t . • I, ter W T = • 1 I ASPEN /PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMP;N'I' Agreement fpr Payntentof City of Aspen Development Application Peel 4 CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and OtterieS T I „or r _ (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: �. 1 • APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for " *) flat/eel (hereinafter, CHRFrECT . Rutstal , , y 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No 68 ',Series of 1994, establishes a fee structure for Planning applications and .1• Jr the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of `i application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or ' F' H scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the null 4 t. extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and, , • CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties to allow APPLICANT ,st to make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to « --- be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they arc necessary as costs are incurred. r • `" CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its fin:. : :'. costs to process APPLICANTS application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for 't CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the t `' Planning Cornsnissien and /or City Council to enable the Planing Commission and /or City Council to make legally required findings for project approval, unless current billings are paid in futi prior to decision. t 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of rhe C TY's waiver of its right ?o collect full fees prior to a determination cf applic4tior completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $'"S which is for _ hours Of Planning staff time, and if actual recorded costs excited the initial deposit, aPPL CA NT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review. Such periodic payments shall be made within 10 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall 'pr grounds for suspension of processing. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT 1 7 .5 ..r iausbn i Community Development Director Date: C,/C r j j .. _ .__ _ Mailing Address: t 400 2 r €+too kuuDeri- (41.i> • 2 u b,M_ • „p cre kAAA--ck o-i1/46 airy a C)r2---1 vs t + L a" efE_ lek_o i de) ,k_ (3d3) lft - za y rel 40r ter „ style 9to Ai La< 9i: t n , - ,B ,e, „S-SO41;1 /99 s' r fi :51; Ie F /999 Pitelcoviii,a,frrnit 1r 27- A /mac. ) o, _ - 1 a- /996 + Sf.,,, C s-ici a s. „_ t haiy > aTAi 1993 Pe/AA-Lf jt‘ T ir e>C t c c/e (