Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.sm.Hallam Lake Pipeline.A57-90 CF' °L ) SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 09/20/90 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. DATE COMPLETE: A57 -90 STAFF MEMBER: KJ PROJECT NAME: Hallam Lake Pipeline Stream Margin Review Project Address: Pipeline across Roaring Fork from Rio Grande Legal Address: through Art Museum property & across to Mill St APPLICANT: City of Aspen Applicant Address: 130 South Galena. Aspen, CO REPRESENTATIVE: Jim Gibbard, City Engineering Dept. Representative Address /Phone: 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 PAID: YES IO AMOUNT: NO. OF COPIES RECEIVED TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: P &Z Meeting Date /0 21 PUBLIC HEARING: YES (NCI} ( VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO Planning Director Approval: Paid: Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: Date: REFERRALS: City Attorney Mtn. Bell School District City Engineer Parks Dept. Rocky Mtn Nat Gas Housing Dir. Holy Cross State Hwy Dept(GW) Aspen Water Fire Marshal State Hwy Dept(GJ) City Electric Building Inspector Envir. Hlth. Roaring Fork Other Aspen Con.S.D. Energy Center DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: -- -- FINAL ROUTING: ��// DATE ROUTED: / / /o2Q / o INITIAL II�Y City Atty /� City Engineer _ Zoning _ Env. Health Housing Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: " nPADV PZ RCSo . 9D—/b CLOSING MEMO TO FILE HALLAM LAKE PIPELINE STREAM MARGIN REVIEW On October 2, 1990, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the pipeline project with the following conditions (as amended by P &Z) : 1. Any trees which are removed along the route must receive a tree removal from the Parks Department. They must be replaced immediately upon project completion. Replacement shall be one for one with 2.5" caliper trees of the same species. 2. Prior to excavation permit issuance, a barricade fence shall be erected across the Art Museum parcel defining vehicular movement and materials storage during construction. 3. Where the pipeline crosses the Rio Grande right -of -way, the pipe must be deep enough and strong enough to allow for future train traffic. jA(±( t Ock 4 (19 0 Para # jtkvj /hallam.smclose RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE HALLAM LAKE PIPELINE STREAM MARGIN REVIEW Resolution No. 90- /4 WHEREAS, in order to restore groundwater flow to Hallam Lake lost as a result of construction of the Rio Grande Parking Garage, the Aspen City Council directed the Engineering Department to design a gravity fed pipeline system; and WHEREAS, the most workable route was determined to run through the river corridor in the Art Museum area; and WHEREAS, the Engineering Department submitted for approval to the Commission an application for Stream Margin Review; and WHEREAS, the Planning staff recommended approval of the Stream Margin Review with conditions; and WHEREAS, the Commission reviewed and approved the Stream Margin Review with conditions by a 7 -0 vote on October 2, 1990. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: That it does hereby approve by the Hallam Lake Pipeline Stream Margin Review with conditions as follows: 1. Any trees which are removed along the route must receive a tree removal from the Parks Department. They must be replaced immediately upon project completion. Replacement shall be one for one with 2.5" caliper trees of the same species. 2. Prior to excavation permit issuance, a barricade fence shall be erected across the Art Museum parcel defining vehicular movement and materials storage during construction. 3. Where the pipeline crosses the Rio Grande right -of -way, the pipe must be deep enough and strong enough to allow for future train traffic. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on October 2, 1990. AT T: % PLANN 9 14 S AN' WING COMMISSION: Jan ; arney, Deput Clerk e ton A d: T_on, Chairman jtkvj /Hallam.smreso NOTICE The City of Aspen will commence construction of the Hallam Lake Water Supply on or about October 10, 1990. The construction is anticipated to be completed by early November, 1990. The improvements include installation of water mains from the existing parking structure underdrain at the Roaring Fork River, across the river and the Holy Cross Electric property (near the Art Museum) to a second river crossing at Mill Street and the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District (ACSD) driveway. The pipeline will cross Mill Street, enter the ACSD property at the driveway, cross the ACSD property near the south property line, cross the Rio Grande Trail and continue westerly across the ACES property to Hallam Lake. An on -site discussion of the proposed construction will be held at 12:00 noon, Tuesday, October 9, 1990. The meeting location is at the Arts Park on the south side of the Roaring Fork River, east of Mill Street. Please direct questions and /or comments to Mr. Jim Gibbard, City of Aspen Engineering Department, 920 - 5085. %i W ATER MAIN an SANITATION DISTRICT ti 0 / :-. .. „ 1 - __ l� PUPPY SMITH w 13 r : ; WATER �'��, z MAIN i U \. ic'l. .----- ... --- D - • /I i,. ARTS PART I I MESSAGE DISPLAY TO Amy Margerum CC Chuck Roth CC Kim Johnson From: Kim Johnson Postmark: Oct 05,90 8:23 AM Subject: Reply to: Forwarded: Procedural Problem Reply text: From Kim Johnson: Given the urgency of the timing to get the project complete before snow, and Council's firm decision to have a gravity feed system, Jim Jed and I went for the alternate route with great speed. In effect, we had to get it approved for stream margin at the next upcoming P &Z meeting which was about 6 days later. Jim and I worked to get the memo out within two days. The Engineers,I felt, were in concert on this project, under Bob's wing. I agree this was not ordinary procedure, but the project has been unusually pressured timewise. Preceding message: From Amy Margerum: What's the scoop? From Chuck Roth: The engineering department was not referred to for comments on the Hallam Lake Pipeline Project Stream Margin Review Exemption. In the past we have tried to be careful to provide proper procedure for city projects and subject them to all appropriate public processes. In previous instances, one engineer will prepare application and a different one will review, ye goode olde checks and balances system. X v✓ i MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Kim Johnson, Planner RE: Stream Margin Review - Hallam Lake Water Pipeline DATE: Sept. 21, 1990 (Meeting Date Oct.2) SUMMARY: The Planning Office recommends approval of this Stream Margin Review with conditions. APPLICANT: City of Aspen Engineering Department LOCATION: The pipeline will start at the current discharge point of the parking garage drainage into the Roaring Fork River, on the west side of the pedestrian trestle bridge. The line will cross under the river, crossing the wooded area in the bulge of the river to the s.w of the Art Museum, crossing under the river again just west of the Mill St. bridge. It then crosses under Mill St. and traverses the Sanitation District property. Please see Attachment "A" for the entire alignment. ZONING: PUB (H) - Art Museum, Park (D), and PUB - Sanitation District facility APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL: The City of Aspen has committed to continue the supply of warm spring water to Hallam Lake in order to protect the lake from freezing during the winter. Construction of the Rio Grande Parking Garage interrupted this flow last year. The gravity -fed pipeline route being considered in this review avoids a lengthy section through private property where purchase of an easement would cost the City around one hundred thousand dollars. REFERRAL COMMENTS: Jim Gibbard, project Engineer for the City has prepared the application. He has been working with the City Attorney to prepare easement documents and ownership disclosures for affected property not owned by the City. Attachment "B ". Roxanne Eflin indicates that the Art Museum building is historic as reflected by the "H" overlay, but the pipeline alignment will not affect it. STAFF COMMENTS: Any proposed development within 100' of the high water line or within a flood hazard area must receive Stream Margin approval. Stream Margin applications are reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission according to the standards set forth in Section 7 -504 of the Aspen Land Use Code (August 1989): 1. It can be demonstrated that any proposed development which is in the Special Flood Hazard Area will not increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State of Colorado which shows that the base flood elevation will not be raised, including, but not limited to, proposing mitigation techniques on or off -site which compensate for any base flood elevation increase caused by the development. response: The pipeline will be underground and backfilled to original grade causing no increase in the base flood elevation. 2. Any trail on the parcel designated on the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan: Parks /Recreation /Open Space /Trails Plan map is dedicated for public use. response: There are existing trails on the public property and these will remain. 3. The recommendations of the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable. response: The applicant will take all practical measures to minimize disturbance to the land and will revegetate as needed. The land will otherwise remain in as natural a condition as currently exists. 4. No vegetation is removed or slope grade changes made that produce erosion and sedimentation of the stream bank. response: The slope will be replaced to original conformation after the line is installed. There is little vegetation in the immediate area of the river crossing and that which is removed shall be replaced. A site inspection with the contractor prior to the Commission meeting will reveal an exact tally of tree removal. Photos of the route will be presented at the meeting. At the time of this writing, it is anticipated that a couple of small to medium trees in the Art Museum woods might have to be removed during installation. Replacement with healthy young trees of same species will be a requirement. 5. To the greatest extent practicable, the proposed development reduces pollution and interference with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary. response: Every attempt will be made to limit pollution during installation. No changes will be made to the water course. 6. Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a water course, and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. response: Not applicable as the water course will not be changed. 7. A guarantee is provided in the event a water course is altered or relocated, that applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished. response: Same as no.6. 8. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the one hundred (100) year floodplain. response: A nationwide permit from the Any Corps of Engineers is forthcoming. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends approval of this Stream Margin Review with one condition: 1. Any trees which are removed along the route must be replaced immediately upon project completion. Replacement shall be one for one with 1.5" caliper trees of the same species. Attachments: "A" - Site Plan "B" - Statements from Engineering and the City Attorney jtkvj /Hallam.SMmemo \\ ' \\ \\ ' // ‘ ' D $ \ C :--Q \\ \ _, A-- ii a Tom V \ F i t ...11/4%, .1: ,Th .y1, boa ._, A , \ ar.-...kil tl. 11 ,/ „...._______ _......,,, ,,__. __>s,a....._44.1.,:-N- 09074 ' ' Wr i bib3 - II \ N ifee t N N -1iP A e la illkilk p9 1 N N --..,.. j- i q ttt i ce= ,,, :( ww_ s / I T E PR ERTY \` - - - -■ 'ma \ e g Glit � aA / `�� \► PzAOD Pt/CIN T Rp . kii , � � .� � y . �/ �� �� HI WAT� kg i -,-- - , , , , N. r 0 \ \ o t a i ueo� a !/664.3 .TINA • RIO R• •' PROPERTY wi Z „./cille1/4 a . 1 czisu . ---milirr jp,,... 1 ° - . a -1 otratessi\ I 1 �V � J • 1 1 1 enoviuf. AREA _, 1 0 / 444 kir der GENERAL SUMMARY OF APPLICATION PROCESS The City Engineering Department is requesting Planning and Zoning approval of the construction of a pipeline within the special flood hazard area. This project will take place in the vicinity of the Art Museum property. We have addressed all of the Stream Margin Review criteria and have submitted a site plan showing all the necessary information. Because of the recent change in the pipeline alignment, the property we are working in has changed and disclosure of ownership of some of this property will be submitted at a later date. jg /halpipe2 ATThC ]MNT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1) Project Name Hallam iv4ce Water Tine 2) Project Location Pipeline crosses Roaring Fork from Rio Grande through Art Musuem property and again crossing river to Mill Street. (indicate street address, lot & block number, legal descripticn where • aiwwiats) 3) Present PUB (SPA), PUB (4) PD 4) Lot Size NA 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Plane $ City of Aspen 130 S. Galena .Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611 6) Representative's Name, Address & Phone # .Tim G ;hoard. City Engineering Dept. 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 7) Type of Application (please thesis all that apply): Conditional Use _ Conceptual SPA _ Conceptual Historic Dev. Special Review Final SPA _ Final Historic Dev. _ 8040 Greenline - Conceptual PUD _ Minor Historic Dev. X Stream Margin _ Final PUD _ Historic Demolition Fknmtain View Plane _ Subdivision _ Historic Designation f clam ni umi nation _ 'I1ext/Map Amendment _ Q S Allotment ____ Lot Split/Lot Line ____ GNUS Exemption Adjustment 8) Ie_ cr ptien of Existing Uses (amber and type of existing nr strucbn s; approximate sq. ft.; number of bedraooms; any previous approvals granted to the property). One building which is the Visual Arts Center 9) Description of Development Application Construction of an underground waterline from the Parking Plaza to Hallam Lake 10) Have you attached the following? X Response to Attachment 2, Minimum S'tnission Ortents X Response to Attachment 3, Specific Suhm ssion Contents X Response to Attachment 4, ReviewStandards for Your Application CIT SPEN 6,r , ,, - 130 : . reet asp -. 611 September 12, 1990 Planning & Zoning Department 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Attention: Kim Johnson Bob Gish, Public Works Director for the City of Aspen, of 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, 81611, 920 -5083 as applicant for Strea Margin hereby authorizes Jim Gibbard, of 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611, 920 -5085, to handle said application for the installation of underground pipeline to Hallam Lake. Thank you, •/ obert F. Gish Public Works Director 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 sp/172.90 Stream Margin Review Criteria No development shall be permitted within the floodway, with the exception of bridges or structures for irrigation, drainage, flood control or water diversion, which may be permitted by the City Engineer, provided plans and specifications are provided demonstrating the structure is engineered to prevent blockage of drainage channels during peak flows and the Commission determines the proposed structure complies, to the extent practical, with all the standards set forth below. No development shall be permitted within one hundred feet (100'), measured horizontally, from the high water line of the Roaring Fork River and its tributary streams, or within the Special Flood Hazard Area where it extends beyond one hundred feet (100') from the high water line of the Roaring Fork River and its tributary streams, unless the Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all the standards set forth below. 1. It can be demonstrated that any proposed develop- ment which is in the Special Flood Hazard Area will not increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State of Colorado which shows that the base flood elevation will not be raised, including, but not limited to, proposing mitigation techniques on or off -site which compensate for any base flood elevation increase caused by the development. RESPONSE: There will be no development in the Special Flood Hazard Area which will increase the base flood elevation since this development is underground. 2. Any trail on the parcel designated on the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan: Parks /Recreation /Open Space /Trails Plan map is dedicated for public use. RESPONSE: The designated trails on these parcels are on public property and therefore dedicated for public use. 3. The recommendations of the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable. RESPONSE: The above recommendations will be followed to the greatest extent practicable. 4. No vegetation is removed or slope grade changes made that produce erosion and sedimentation of the stream bank. RESPONSE: The stream banks will be adequately revegetated and there will be no slope grade changes made. 5. To the greatest extent practicable, the proposed development reduces pollution and interference with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary. RESPONSE: During the construction procedure, every attempt possible will be made to reduce pollution and there will be no interference with the natural changes of the river. 6. Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a water course, and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. RESPONSE: There will be no alteration or relocation of the water course. 7. A guarantee is provided in the event a water course is altered or relocated, that applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished. RESPONSE: Same as above. 8. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the one hundred (100) year floodplain. RESPONSE: A Nationwide permit from the Army Corps is forthcoming. jg /criterial 1 GENERAL SUMMARY OF APPLICATION PROCESS The City Engineering Department is requesting Planning and Zoning approval of the construction of a pipeline within the special flood hazard area. This project will take place in the vicinity of the Art Museum property. We have addressed all of the Stream Margin Review criteria and have submitted a site plan showing all the necessary information. Because of the recent change in the pipeline alignment, the property we are working in has changed and disclosure of ownership of some of this property will be submitted at a later date. jg /halpipe2 CITY SPEN 1 :'''' •• 30 _C i f ncil S 303 - 920 -51- j • mistration 303 - 920 -5198 FAX September 24, 1990 City of Aspen Planning Office Aspen, Colorado 81611 Attn: Kim Johnson Dear Kim: This letter is an application for Stream Margin Review for development by the City of Aspen which will be within 100 horizonal feet from the high water line. This project is the underground waterline that will bring discharge from the Parking Plaza to Hallam Lake. Enclosed are the following: 1. The Application Form. 2. The following Minimum Contents of Development Application: a. A letter giving authorization to representative. b. The street address and legal description of the parcels wil be forthcoming. c. Disclosure of ownerships will be forthcoming. d. A vicinity map. e. Responses to review standards. 3. A site plan showing the following Specific Contents for Submission: a. The boundary of the parcel. b. Existing and proposed improvements. c. Any significant natural features. d. The 100 year floodplain line and the high water line. e. Existing grades at two and five -foot contour intervals. 4. A copy of Stream Margin Review Standards is included above in part 2 e. 5. There are no Public Hearing Notice Requirements for this review. 6. A General Summary of Application Process. Please let me know if you need additional information. im Gibbard Engineering Department jg /halpipe cc: Bob Gish Chuck Roth i ..: p 2 01990 CITY R ; SPEN 11, + 1 , • ° eet • 1 30 '. 'fi ,r ney .x September 19, 1990 Ms. Kim Johnson Planning Department City of Aspen Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Hallam Lake Waterline Stream Margin Review Dear Kim: Jim Gibbard of the Engineering Department has asked that I supply the following information pursuant to the City's stream margin review application pertinent to the construction of the Hallam Lake waterline. Attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is a photocopy of a Warranty Deed illustrating the City's ownership of the parcel of land commonly known as the Rio Grande SPA. The proposed pipeline will traverse the Rio Grande parcel on a line running from the municipal parking garage almost due north to the Roaring Fork River. After crossing the river near the pedestrian /bike path bridge, the pipeline will run across a parcel commonly known as the "Art Museum Property ". This parcel was placed in escrow for the benefit of the City in May, 1978, as part of an agreement between the City and the Holy Cross Electric Association, Inc. Pursuant to that agreement, Holy Cross conditionally conveyed title to the parcel to the City as partial consideration for the City awarding a twenty year franchise to Holy Cross to provide electric service in the City. The executed deed is held by the First National Bank of Glenwood Springs as the designated escrow agent. The escrow will expire in 1997, thus permitting actual delivery of the deed to the City. During the escrow period, the City is entitled to the exclusive possession and use of the parcel and may undertake improvements thereon such as the installation of the pipeline. n recycled paper Letter to Kim Johnson September 19, 1990 Page 2 I hope this information is sufficient for purposes of the stream margin review. I have not attached a copy of the City's agree- ment with Holy Cross due to its length, however, should you need to be provided same, please let me know. Very truly yours, Edward M. Caswall City Attorney EMC /mc cc: Jim Gibbard f toe. r..yrC St try; L[ a ..... III I<.•Ar( t4 • t'9: ! s rMwyrl Yw It 8,S ,. !"t rocd rr ?x 00.'1 F • . k ttr . •n *214J • � +rAR1lAerr o : I? 1 15 t l l i ; �[t Lem IRR'O tidy . ` day of �p +,. aid t .,_ •`' R:;`'t1a�'slG }adtritfaal!} , of the `tlrst ' > i ass kn $IZ'! b • . s Snicl ecr pora ti nttl as :": tt: ' 1410.. MM � .4 ,, € ' ` { .. � rid, :i 1' t S S E IP R `'d , . :,,,.. ?" 4..< 0 4444; ./.. " tbipar , of elm r pact for arc* in Cansi der a- j� .., r , �{ .r te 7100,010 1• ti C . s.- ) , ens! of sae +v n�" derst • ta, • th u al0 tv nI the f irst. °, �• ' � .M ! y T � 3k , r E ,;,1 . r , to ' . a $ t "Ara n t "'! 'trt, t*M , , s Fx ; • t ad .66 acknowledged I1 g • r .` Ems: ttt u < 1 k i '. • j° f 0 a t .:`_f's{ • > _ �. ^ yy ' . F � . . t y• �lt `,. ` P� c - Iran r ' � z r A 1f �• �� q. tilt* -th sa Darty� y the • "r tit: �, �.:� Y K .J ;rk•1 r ' ' [ tes l gestic:wee r , a l he Co !:ruing '' 1 t P brad a ituats° 1 ! and ;i, in « r + ." m .. r, . ,„, : rye +,Y [ ? " " ' x 'tM let t t'olarado tc t , - v C i g -1".1-"i l ' " "Mole ly.101 51lIP 20 OrnIt 4, o t r e ` : it 1 . MlID23►M• Pin-- a on O ,fl Inc RC, �, C . . €';' e . [ •• -. 1 1 .lS FOLLOwS ,err., $te � , b k .. " a } k -' ` ..twat O4 4! t 1542 fit) 'OF $i : I OII 7 �, t ' -Ace , • ��Ai�rr' a l , 1542.41 rrttr .. . Ys , .. "V�a�S 3.20 33_ �; : ' � • `• $ 1'14 "H. 67.25 'f`EP' � it s 4 1/4. _ .. 4 •2E _ 121.34 is " - ,,' — K "130.117: -,; � * ` 1 . r f � . 2 t 1114,e, a K a r ' i .. ,S ,f! `,1l ' 309.''2 Fe x . ' - r F a [ "` S6 E '9.37 FEET, , _ 4` r 7 ' , .+ .,, + •• y 74. ♦ - t 141,4! .ITET K a 4 3410'36! L : t1.04'tMett Y ' 4.,7,4„„ r as + . • -, 3 ► 4Y ^ tnt AfiOIK'•61HR ARC A tr ,Td THE n .. , o- 4 BA visa a Z OF; 309.26 1 AMd A �'BORD Wfllcw ISAR� ' <,, S*^ =' 4 . . S 64 S6 O2 ,7x11 frSSr, �"' TRElICS s 03 '0 " 3 0 i b0eJ8 net) ��� i ,, . ` S ]01.31:?!ffi'Y A .T1iE ARC : A G l! TO TtlS RS tilZ A RA0E00. Q , 401..;4 FEET A CNORD mare ! CARS , . x ¢ ' t 64 102a r fi . 1HF7tt7 28'4 1 ''S4•27• x 66.04 FEET t.,._ t1 T ' �"0' ?EAT, Z f t . . 712 m 73•19•31` M 271.it 'Tyr: Twa'NCE S 16 w 90.79 FEET: THENCE >r 57 w 10.54 FEET; F' /M SC! S 11 w 164.44 FEET: THENCE 1 87 it 89.97 FEET: TNERCE S 1I M 75.32 FEET= THENCE >• 43 w 408.97 FEET; TREECE A 19 E 495.73 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CoHTAINING 11.496 ACRES NflPE OR LESS. TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appur- tenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof: and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the said party of the first part, either in law or equity, of, in a-d to the above bargained pre- mises, with the hereditameats and appurtenances. TO HAVE AHD TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with the appurtenances, unto the said party of the second part, for its heirs a-1 assigns forever. And the said party of the fir4t for himself, his heirs, executors, and administrators, does covenant, grant, bargain and agree to and with the said party of the second part, its heirs and assigns, that at the time of the ensealinq and delivery of these presents, he is well seized of the premises above conveyed, as of good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and has good right, full power and lawful authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form as aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, as- sessments and encumbrances of whatever kind or nature soever; except easements to Klaus P. Obermeyer for sewer purposes, and to Aspen One Company for access Purposes; all easements and rights of way„ rights of ore extraction and rights of way for ditches as reserved in United States Patents of Record and canals as reserved in United States Patents of Record, licenses, existing roads, highways, ditches, pipelines, encroachments of fences, fencelines, a e+ I. f # r.0 s :'.k 0 "1 NF.. '''4' .4 r � 5, r '. .' t s i A r '' �' Litt( • • “7 it .4- 747 , = sulllim a it." tonnsnwets, frreit charino by r.•-ast,n of the 4 !melamine of the eablect pr)oerty in the Aspen Metropolitan Sani- to laa Di at en let and Asp Fire Protection District eror.,trd to -',' date of closing, general taxes, instzranee, etc. prorated to date of closing: .% I And the atone bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the said party of the acct. part, its heirs and Y ; assigns against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming 4 or tit clria the whole or any part thereof, the said party of the first part shall and will WARRANT A:ID FOREVER DEFEND. The singu- lar mmrber shall include the plural, the plural the singular, and tha use of any gender shall be applicable to all genders. IN wtnasS manor. the said party of the first part has hereunto set his hand and seal the day and year first above written. _ ^ , , JANES R. TRUEMAN v���/// Party of the First Part , STATE or COLORADO ) 1 ss�. OOOKTT 01 PITRIN ) ,,,,to thelltSoragoing inatrunent was acknowledged before se this ,11" q��,, 1... ./ . ... O Of jc ptt at. t , 1973, b y JAMES R . TRUEMAN. �.... • "G .. s Nor Qo expires: r \ 1 l*,. 1 ' � F >`., xitwiRs sly hand and official seal. Notary Public go 4 STREET ADDRESS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARCELS Rio Grande property - SW 1/4 of Section 7, T 10 S, R 84 W of the 6th Princpal Meridian, Pitkin County, Colorado. Art Museum property - NE 1/4 SW 1/4 and the NW 1/4 SW 1/4 of Section 7, T 10 S, R 84 W of the 6th Principal Meridian, Pitkin County, Colorado. County property - jg /halpipel MESSAGE DISPLAY TO jim gibbard From: Cindy Houben Postmark: Sep 12,90 2:33 PM Subject: aces Message: No need for 1041 review. See tom Cardomone and stay out of wet grassland areas ( 2 small patches). Thanks X MESSAGE DISPLAY TO Jim Gibbard CC Kim Johnson From: Kim Johnson Postmark: Oct 02,90 8:46 AM Status: Urgent Subject: Hallam Trees Message: George Robinson called and reminded me that tree removal permits will be required for this project! It is critical that this is taken care of by you or the contractor prior to commencement (this reminds me - an excavation is required, yes ?) Also - he informed me that tree replacement shall be with 2.5" caliper trees, not 1.5" as I had stated in my recommended conditions of approval. Please update your contract file or whatever. Thanks a bunch. X MESSAGE DISPLAY TO Kim Johnson From: Jim Gibbard Postmark: Oct 01,90 8:44 AM Status: Previously read Subject: Reply to a reply: hallam notice Reply text: From Jim Gibbard: Bob doesn't want to advertize until Council approval so we probably won't do that. We still plan to do the neighborhood meeting though and that will be scheduled for noon on the 9th. Preceding message: From Kim Johnson: But I though they were gonna start work the day after council's approval, n'est pas? From Jim Gibbard: Something we were already planning to do after Council approval of contract. From Kim Johnson: as per our pow -wow yesterday, can you generate a simple line map for a newpaper ad, just like the Red Mtn. ad currently being run? I am also assuming the Engineering Office will actually be the one to run the notice. It should be run for a few days next week. I guess Bob Gish should determine the exact process. Please keep me informed. Gracias. X MESSAGE DISPLAY TO Kim Johnson From: Amy Margerum Postmark: Oct 02,90 9:39 AM Subject: Forwarded: Notice for Hallam lake Pipeline Comments: From Amy Margerum: FYI Message: From Jim Gibbard: We have scheduled a neighborhood meeting for noon on Oct. 9. We will be hand delivering flyers to everyone in the vicinity. We also will have a public announcement on both radio stations. X , I �,11/► Le 7,4 1111 l�'' / 11//1 11//1/1// ll / / % Il � 111 111111; 1I/IIIIH 1111///// ll L OCATION OF PROJECT 7ght, :orry►/ , /„ � 1/11/1/ 1, ,' ` ♦� - s� Ill /1/11 //11,11// 1, 11." ,�� ,r, /ll/ll/ll ,� 11/1//1 /ll�►,�►ll „, u 1 1 11111 // 1 1/llll/,l 1/11/1 1111%/11% 11/1/1 /l/ l/l . lll/Illll �, h :�` l�uo„ 1111111„ , Il„,� I���ul,� lli„� .1111��1 /�� �4op / / Ul/►1,, � ���� 1„11„1, „ ►11 11/1/1 111 /!/11 1 i 1/1//1/1 1 /l�,/11 ZZ't,” � 1/1/ 1/1/ I 'tix 111/1//1/ / 1/1/1// y // I ii!"' oll , l /111/1/ /,11 ., D11/1/1/1 11/1111ll 1/ :S1?z'r x /1 tt'i 1111/1 1111/1/ t% jt4m ,� 1/l, �i 7 ` /1111/1/ I 11///1/1/ 1171,,,, l//lll /l1 /1! „I ►//, �„ ��” lu ti 1u11/111• '!'! ♦�� ~ /loud J wA AV % 9 L r C ,7 •■i. - \\ \ `\ _ "7a,b / / 1 _ ^ l kii* ' \\ \\ C .. .. . \ 4111AlPekirT iii . 7859.4 \ �+ P fik • �, � � A / 7902.x. ‘ 1 ' k, Av. i,_ � v � � . I.� \ \ �. . 7907.4 r i� r ` 7s, � � .7903.1 il N iiiiiiii\ H \ 4‘ _ • ) 4J U E PR % • ERTY \ � I 1 4 '',' .. i ' • - 14\'`\ 1 \ , 1 -,..,„,...,,,„,_ _ ___........„ ___, s. .. 4 ..... \. • , ,� ��� \*. • Q �/ , HIGH WAT • LI III I t 1 1401 - . IF ..,,,"," . / i N ‘•■ I sT ....tfc ,:..- ON , '' . \ •A- / p \, ii.r" ! StfAel-o F O , `, flafiLit.1E. .78644 \ ------ ------ ° • \ 11 4 0 1 04 )Iii , . j — . Ilk Cligalik • _` . • 4 1 --- ,eaa Y — — IF . 416b614.6 11 7p64.1. I .766zo � Q 0 r . . *L' OV65.2 4001 ..k . . '--. --'..*..m..----------- - --...1111PL --APot...ienallilliPtilla\i( ( i RIO RAN • . PROPERTY I F.- / 61° • • 1 , � up �� - -,� 7 wi'`, j. • y Jr , g r a 4 "I , ' �I mss 4 - • K w 1 f • .RB t; .r 4• r . • F "' 1 - � •. s_. ' 11 1 11 i . . i. 1.1 � .. -1 7 It c•. • ir:tifilitt l' r - .... . ' 1 moo! :ue W-•., , • R i *may ': -.: r • R v fZ j 7. - �, i .�, r, , ^ ism • to 1 ' ' , _�''�i ; ` _. _ �. 1 { � , � Y ` � + j , . '' d ' ":4: / , � ■ ' � . - 0 . . # , Lair . ... • .; . . . - - .�` Via k ' �. • 1 w 0 � ' .. "� _ 1%, * .:( yr. pli-..- ANtiop . . _____,,,,, . .,.. • r I Z ' 1 4 . r s*k oO rr' . 41441, - /4 1 .4fttr i bek - ' - i rw t -- 40, • - ^ ... 4 • 4 9.. Im o .4., -.....„. ' blikers, t. hi •:ti ...,,,4 .,• .... ...—„. • .ii„ . .c • . .. - • ,,,,ae. ' 'ill‘ , Fi■ ' , s. , a f ,, 0 il ' ■ - * ' 4 .•1045.- wit , , % i t • , ., . --'" 1 - . . • v t = • • ' 0 '"' ii .- Ir .• , 1..'SA . • .. ■4 • - - . .. • , ■ ": • ' :1*. , • . -e, • - '• ' ' ' , • ' ---% ' . -..11"- ' • Alt All .- ' . . . i ...- ' .• ,, e' V , 14 ; - .. it• - ,7 • - ... I. .. i .. 1 . . • .... - ' f IP'''. i r" irr :44 •:' ' ' :-.-,''''' ." '. -•. '... ^ -_ ..4' y 's ; .* ' t 441111 . . ". .. 4 ' . . . . • . .- . • -, .• ••6 • , 71.914. • - ^ •-. . . . ' Mgr, Ti# • A lift ,Ir (.. -• ....-• • ' '`...? _ \\ . -..0,;,•,, " 2,)4;.. ' --". it, - - • ,. . - .s. . , - - • 'I ,.,., -,. l' ',.. ... . . ''' . \ • ta , ,,k , Kalito - . r ., . ,--..*H4 . . ..,...'s,. .,.. -...■14. , ..-1•A' - -z`zeire• •• ...., .. -....,„ , ' .. -,..- - .-- ''' ' ' .."." '"'' .:,f 8. . ..... 1_, _ _ . .m.. . ,. .'''' , ,4,- , , • / / - -- "iii ' -fie . - , - -4c .,., - - - ' - '. - • - ::..,.. . • . 40./. IN "lb* - •-• "*.-... . , ii*Wir - - . ; . . _. . ' . - ...• ' • 4. • * • . , .. , -'-' IPP" ' •=' , 7.- . " ' - ,....,--, --•.-....... 404 ir , --. . , , .; .r ... _ — _. . • , yg . . z iarrS4 - 1 1 - ? . , . — . _ .0 •.• lb: 40.• / . , • i . . - .. 4 r . -. • - , .: --. , . ,.,-.. _ - . ; . .. • II ' 4 '.. _ • -. - _. _.: _ A -..- V' •■•