HomeMy WebLinkAboutLanduse Case.SM.635 Sneaky Ln.A38-94 i
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen
DATE RECEIVED: 05/12/94 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO.
DATE COMPLETE: 2735- 122 -04 -002 A38 -94
STAFF MEMBER: KJ
PROJECT NAME: Hirsch Stream Margin Review
Project Address: 635 Sneaky Lane
Legal Address: Lot 2 Sneaky Lane Subdivision
APPLICANT: Tom Hirsch
Applicant Address: 25844 Butler Rd. Junction City, OR 97448
REPRESENTATIVE: The Austin Hansen GrouD (Doug Austin)
Representative Address /Phone: 9605 Scranton Rd. Ste. 300
San Diego, CA 92121 503/552/1001
Representative: Wayne Stryker, 300 S. Spring St. Aspen, CO
FEES: PLANNING $ 978 # APPS RECEIVED 1
ENGINEER $ 96 # PLATS RECEIVED 1
HOUSING $
ENV. HEALTH $
TOTAL $ 1038
TYPE OF APPLICATION: STAFF APPROVAL: 1 STEP: X 2 STEP:
N
P &Z Meeting Date �I PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO
VESTED RIGHTS: YES
CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO
VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO
DRC Meeting Date
REFERRALS: v
City Attorney , Parks Dept. School District
` + X City Engineer Bldg Inspector Rocky Mtn NatGas
/0 Housing Dir. Fire Marshal CDOT
Aspen Water Holy Cross
(D City Electric Mtn. Bell Clean Air Board
Open Space Board
Envir.Hlth. ACSD
Other
�— Zoning Energy Center Other
DATE REFERRED: 1 /Z() INITIALS: DUE: q ((J
FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: / ��l/// INITIAIL:A/6)•
City Atty City Engineer _Zoning _Env. Health
Housing Open Space Other:
FILE STATUS AND LOCATION:
.STRYKER /BRO% N
ARCH I T E C T S, P C
7 -1414
FAX TRANSMITTAL & TO: /1/07 .1 C.i
lahason O/e nartQ/ 42
FROM: w
DATE: G r7 .45( VVV
NUMBER OF PAGES:
(Including this cover sheet If you do not � receive all pages, call numberbelow.) tenet
NOTES: sap, sec £a / /Ott/& • 5446oke VM'f'aJ // iT c / V " t9
dantil en a Alto eovisfrtcisoi of -le. #firseA net.
As t it ait ed — ,o% ,n e&cd e. -t a /46nna 00 Qo
2n, a, 'U► A+at#' sio lite, Mesa.) cSiereetn1 Afar h �er�eoJ.
/a you, lbw, fea,o oz. pro6/em s Caoceimito
Conaet E4
300 SOUTH SPRING STREET, SUITE 300 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 303.925.2254 fax:925.2258
y _
_ ' _z.f �T- - -- -- tau
11 .
r -.f --F 6 !, __r- �T =�' =�= {' = r = _ = -3�_ .- ..._.:FAT" - - - � �:= :-- "'-t�=
' /(1\-. I r :;i 1rn
1 KS
Z � Q
I
Z l i -r iLic)t-i_i____ii 16
il i \J 1 - _ , r if, F _-___ J I •
_
_- .- -: 1 � -� - .Ein 4 I J I IS I I - -
1-- _�I - --1
II. W 1 L cp I j!
- f - r T-r_y � °i , 11 I ,
-iii ill
0 Pi
m in
I - - - _ _� r� r
.. ._
I! m�
r- 74 tti�tt I1 --;� .1 i ?
p1 d 1 _ U
�, w .J v
�1 m I r - 0 o .. IT
Q z r '
Ili - --- T 1 1 :4
p
- D j , 74 rn
II
ID
0
„ LT .
W +� I I I
Z i ;
I! r~
IT
if
• � 'II Ili
!I li 1;_ U : __4 -- t
`
l”
jr -71 �"� I
m
. 11
m
0 0
0
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission ,1 G°
FROM: Kim Johnson, Planner iMare
RE: Hirsch Stream Margin Review ' 6"
DATE: June 21, 1994 w0 PA
SUMMARY: The Planning Office recommends approval of the Hirsch
Stream Margin Review with conditions.
APPLICANT: Tom Hirsch, represented by Wayne Stryker
LOCATION: 635 Sneaky Lane (Lot 2, Sneaky Lane Subdivision)
ZONING: R - 30
APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Stream Margin Review approval for the
enlargement of a residence .
PROPOSAL: The applicant wishes to expand an existing 4 bedroom
2,487 s.f. residence to 5 bedrooms and approximately 4,800 s.f.
The lot size is roughly 25,000 s.f. The building site lies within
100' of the high water line of the Roaring Fork River, but lies
outside of the 100 year floodplain. The building footprint meets
required setbacks for the R -30 zone district. See Exhibit "A" for
site plan and floor plans.
REFERRAL COMMENTS: Please refer to Exhibit "B" for complete
referral memos.
Engineering: Cris Caruso forwarded the following:
1. All drainage from impervious surfaces must be maintained on-
site at historic rates and cannot enter either Sneaky Lane or the
stream. Construction documents must specify that any subsurface
drains be away from the stream.
2. The native understory vegetation along the river has been
cleared and replaced over time with turf grasses. This does not
meet the criteria of the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan for maintenance
of native riparian vegetation. Any new landscape planting or
development in the rear yard must be reviewed by Planning and shall
consist of native species found in that river area.
3. A power cord was observed along the bank within in the stream.
It is not known what this serves, but it must be removed
prior to the issuance of any building permits.
Parks: Rebecca Baker has the following comments:
1. The 8" spruce at the southwest part of the house next to the
two story addition is too close to construction to adequately
protect with a barricade at the dripline of the tree. If this tree
U`
dies or is removed due to construction, it must be replaced or
compensated for through the City's tree removal permit system. All
other trees over 6" in the construction area must be protected by
barricades at the driplines.
2. A silt fence (hay bales or similar method) shall be placed 5
feet from the river's edge to minimize sediment and debris from
entering the river should heavy rains occur during construction.
3. A 6.5' pedestrian easement along the high water mark of Castle
Creek is recorded at the County Clerk. This is important in terms
of the Castle Creek Greenway as a priority in the 1 1990 Pedestrian
and Bikeway Plan as well as the State Trails Master Plan. Due to
current adopted trail standards, it is requested that this 6.5'
easement be widened to a 12 ' easement.
This riverbank easement and the other pedestrian easements along
the side and front of the parcel must be shown on the building
permit site plan.
STAFF COMMENTS: Section 7 - 504 outlines the criteria for Stream
Margin Review as follows:
Criteria 1: It can be demonstrated that any proposed development
which is in the Special Flood Hazard Area will not increase the
base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. This
shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a
professional engineer registered to practice in the State of
Colorado which shows that the base flood elevation will not be
raised, including, but not limited to, proposing mitigation
techniques on or off -site which compensate for any base flood
elevation increase caused by the development.
Response: The proposed expansion and site improvements are located
above the 100 year flood plain so the base flood elevation will not
be affected.
Criteria 2: Any trail on the parcel designated on the Aspen Area
Comprehensive Plan: Parks /Recreation /Open Space /Trails Plan map is
dedicated for public use.
Response: As mentioned in the Park's referral, the 6.5' pedestrian
easement along Castle Creek is requested to be widened to 12' in
order to conform to current trail standards. All pedestrian
easements must be shown on the building permit site plan.
Criteria 3: The recommendations of the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan
are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the
greatest extent practicable.
Response: The Plan makes no specific recommendations for this
site. As mentioned above, the native vegetation has already been
removed to a great extent. Any revegetation or landscaping must
be with native riparian species.
0�
Criteria 4: No vegetation is removed or slope grade changes made
that produce erosion and sedimentation of the stream bank.
Response: No regrading of the flat site is needed. The only
removal which may be necessary is the spruce on the south side of
the addition. Precautions must be taken during construction to
prevent sedimentation (e.g. hay bales).
Criteria 5: To the greatest extent practicable, the proposed
development reduces pollution and interference with the natural
changes of the river, stream or other tributary.
Response: No negative effects are anticipated by this project due
to the flat nature of the site and existing manipulation of the
vegetation. The natural changes of the river channel will not be
adversely affected.
Criteria 6: Written notice is given to the Colorado Water
Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a water
course, and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal
Emergency Management Agency.
Response: Not Applicable
Criteria 7: A guarantee is provided in the event a water course
is altered or relocated, that applies to the developer and his
heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying
capacity on the parcel is not diminished.
Response: Not applicable - no impacts on the flood plain will
occur with this proposal.
Criteria 8: Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state
permits relating to work within the one hundred (100) year
floodplain.
Response: Not applicable.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends approval of
the Hirsch Stream Margin Review with the following conditions:
1. All drainage from impervious surfaces must be maintained on-
site at historic rates and cannot enter either Sneaky Lane or
the stream. Construction documents must specify that any
subsurface drains be away from the stream.
2. Any new landscape planting or development in the rear yard
must be reviewed by Planning and shall consist of native
species found in that river area.
�. The power cord observed in the river must be removed
prior to the issuance of any building permits.
fidik --4C
et)3
4. The 8" spruce at the southwest part of the house next to the
two story addition is too close to construction to adequately
protect with a barricade at the dripline of the tree. If this
tree dies or is removed due to construction, it must be
replaced or compensated for through the City's tree removal
permit system. All other trees over 6" in the construction
area must be protected by barricades at the driplines.
5. A silt fence (hay bales or similar method) shall be placed 5
feet from the river's edge to minimize sediment and debris
from entering the river should heavy rains occur during
construction.
6. The riverbank easement and the other pedestrian easements
along the side and front of the parcel must be shown on the
building permit site plan.
1r
Exhibits:
"A" - Application information
"B" - Referral Comments
•
r-...
PLANNINir'& A Z__ONING COMMISSION
EXHIBIT 4T , APPROVED r
19 BY RESOLUTION
—
6 to
U
m
et
to
AN
is 4
- Off 4 . \ 4 4
.i„.
•i..4,,
,,..., , Rd
er
mod a G J
Matra g _...^0Y 4
a ul Mete
i ,
0 , Inset* a Hunt
er c
s r
d Music 1:?a 6 ;: • Tent rgr
- 1 That, Hallam Al
1 Lake °
. �e
I -11111 �� = key
i ° ate W It
a S � Ptmcis St. N' 41.i 133-4 �t48 trill
•41 et
q
J ens St. H -5 Meadow Dr H -2 � ��� ! w
Damnsch St.. ... 041-4.5 Medowood Dr 0-12 � � � � inn Gilbert St *'
Gibson Av . 0.H -5.6 Meadows Rd F-0-3 3 " -c` ' �'• I '7
N -5 Midland Av N67 - * �• .•
P-2-3 Gillespie St P4 Mill St 04 -5 rel d
G44-5 Hallam St .. 0-3-5 Monarch St 041-5 r P p :
£-6 Heather Ln .... 041-2 Mountain View Dr &b3 R • a
tftd _63 Hill St ... H -5 Mt lwrclCt
5 Nornmbke Dr. 13-3 MI Laurel Dr W-8 'aSaa
r &P-2 -3 Hopkins Av...... 0.H -33 Neal Av 11-6 it 'afartly t•• 'P •
1-2-3 Hunter St ,. 11-5 North St P -34 1 e •
•
dig HIRSCH RESIDENCE
AUSTIN
HANSEN
GROUP 11,��
J
ei DiuWT E
AO '
�• ,£6'951 *pp oQ15 ,
or bKT Mlrb
m Y Y! l 1 1• ! , F N a
. rm() C J" h V s I a` c 6
omr,� l • • •
�fgyr mi DA O ^.E rp,
�u • I\I ._ / i 1 O
1. t �2o .oT99 1 -.. r. , + 1 1 Ir IIAII
II'.Y N . I DIS I 1 N r
• v 1 r -al N pl\ 4 � •)• w
A
Vi i f Y a` \\ •
I -p:- 100 il :' %'� { Y
•1 . w i. 2 � d . . � --1 .
I I - !� 4'•• S I D - a i / / / 9 6 '
i �� N
F
4 00 r#44 (Merit)
¥L rit ., p „ r, IA 1 . / ej s. • 0 i t i1 l , .
t A i oo lvi t � ���;��; +�s .�
9: ( EA •- A e p I FPOrn
P i \ • ra, ? \ ,`rl °`O`i. . HISN WATER
u F
• p rj ` N
: i V 1: to
5 1 - 0 1 p �E + �
{ i �
i `
• 'p DO 1 \ , , ! 7 I w I �
it 1.0 o y �� co � ?�q3 tr.', w y�� S • r • I
�. �o! •.;- -/• 1 o f W�
• " rC ` �` ate' 2X • - _ ' [
1 99 -� i l ' - =�•~� F . 91
^ Ay"- T- - .... I` ,P* ICl
IE I @ n � da • " R if DEne , ' `y y_y' as " 2
P: .� 1 "N ,�"�b1 ! vo. qN AND 9v 7� T
v � � h�" VQ NEFp in I JIA t ^ +.•.� - 11 1 x . la " 4. ON
i t 4 4 4 1 ,t41V , ""ry 1 L r r * lit,k di ^ 1A'ry m � I i Y FAS �1 m J � ^ �,� 1 all , 1 � ) rI,i ,{'d6 p,-.1144'• � , AO te9 EM ENT � � Z •� �O W Z
gNGi lh dJ ' P 1 MZM � ��
ii k+ 'ry Il M 1 1 74'1/20,01.; z! Ml l 4Y 'UJJ
w ry' N 1 ,40,4 1 h. y � , , } Mt * II l •Y 4a'' •p'p� 1 M 1 1 b ,,
/ i Po 99 4, 1 Q.. t 1 Y�k !i 4L{' l 1 Ia�.l ....':: V,nw_. \ I \
r, _ _. "Ili
AUSTIN
..111,l •,.a
II .
Em ium in 1
it Br
p
• tot
1\ .' Milk •
I . .
• ,
,,, , \
, a. .
.:),
r _ i 1 ........
ir .i_
,_,„„.
, , • S iglu +,•
(4, 1 18 gi
v
k MI -
• AT -
,/,'
'en HIRSCH RESIDENCE
AST 1` ^�
NUANS �jOU �I.VPtTt �� +_1 -�„ 4 41/4
GROUP
,.
,,
. mil _.:,._ i
, amr-r-sr.• 1
. i =I
. .
, . Nit qa •
Itni I N
El .
I E] _ .
I
m -
n II
tq
® all
iiiei ®I
t
J .
i vies- r'
Ii ilsr-
• IM
1-11
tat
s
an immmn nom II I,_ RNLI_
LI_
11,1,_,11 a H IRSCH RESIDENCE
• AUSTIN �� q �
N AN SEN NO F-114 eI,�VATIO b= 1 = 0" 4y 1 +
GROUP u
• A —.r
• 1 y. -.L f�`� �' a , _�\ - .O1B SEE • .
r •
• y REF. N. i . . To .r
• 6 !I I ■
turillit 1 ti VI I 4 t ilr, — . 1 , it: - E 1 , c . E t \hi ll
• • : i * h
ij ' Z o g ,
•
. ; �4" 1
' a ""11:17,-.1111,04rette,iip" , u , r,--
+j•
Se ma . N iyalini it! 3 r iil ° ti
Er P L A Iligriar A _.
n
{
o fi r
ere
•
1
I " �' %� -
r N
:m.s il- 1
•s.rt. O f
d U n
it I
•
- .
1 •
%%1 HIRSCH RESIDENCE
AUSTIN JJ A I I -� �� 4.O1''1^�Q
HANSEN FIr T ft.00r-' ]b ° -A
GROUP
Stream Margin Development Application
Project: 635 Sneaky Lane, Aspen, CO Page 2 of 2
Attachment 2
Review Standards, Response
1. The proposed development is not located within the Special Flood Hazard
Area.
2. The proposed existing Pedestrian additions are no loser to the side yard Pedestrian easement development.
n this than the existing
structure.
3. The proposed development is in keeping with the recommendations of the Roaring Fork
Greenway Plan.
4. No significant vegetation removal or slope grade changes are proposed by this development.
There will be no additional impact on erosion or sedimentation of the stream bank.
5. The proposed development does not alter any of the existing conditions at the rear half of
the house adjacent to the river, and as such does not add any pollution or interference with
the natural changes of the river. The 99 square feet being added to the rear of the house is
proposed within the area of an existing on grade deck.
6. The proposed development does not alter or relocate a water course.
7. A guarantee will be provided (if applicable) to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen.
8. The proposed development is located outside of the 100 year floodplain, however, if any
Federal and /or State permits relating to the development are required, they will be
provided.
QP
PLANNISAC & ZONING COMMISSION
EXHIBIT 13 , APPROVED
19 BY RESOLUTION
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kim Johnson, Planning Office
THRU: George Robinson, Parks Director
FROM: Rebecca Baker
DATE: June 15, 1994
RE: Hirsch Stream Margin Review
We have reviewed the application submitted by Tom Hirsch for the redevelopment of their property
located at 365 Sneaky Lane. It does not appear as though the remodeling will have any significant
impacts on the surrounding trees and landscape, with the exception of the eight inch spruce located
on the south western side of the house where the second story addition is proposed. Precautions
should be taken to protect the tree, such as no digging within the dripline of the spruce, and/or a
protective fencing placed around the tree during construction. All other trees six inches or greater
in diameter should be protected as well if located within the construction area.
Although little construction will occur in the riparian/river area, it is suggested that silt fencing be
placed five feet from the rivers edge to minimize construction debris or other sediment from
entering the river if heavy rains were to occur during construction.
The final comment is in regards to the site plan. According to the plat filed with the Pitkin County
clerk and recorders (Book 4, page 259) another pedestrian easement is shown and described as
"6.5 feet in width easterly of the high water mark of Castle Creek." This river easement is very
significant in addition to the other pedestrian easements listed on the property due to the
identification of the Castle Creek Greenway as a priority in the 1990 Pedestrian and Bikeway Plan
as well as the State Trails Master Plan. It is unsure at this time which will be the preferred
alignment for a trail in the future (along Sneaky Lane or parallel to the river). However, both
options are necessary in order for the best trail solution to be agreed upon by all involved. In fact,
due to current adopted trail standards, we would request of the applicant to expand the 6.5 foot
easement along the river to a 12 foot easement.
41
Memorandum
To: Kim Johnson, Planning Office
From: Cris Caruso, City Engineer lt"'
Date: June 9, 1994
RE: Hirsh Stream Margin Review
Upon review of the above referenced application and site inspection, the Engineering
Department has the following comments:
The application statements with regards to the Stream Margin Review appear to be accurate.
Statement No. 4 on Page 2 of Attachment 2 states that there will be no additional impact on
erosion or sedimentation of the stream bank.
In addition, I recommend that the new additions not have foundation drains to stream, and the
construction documents represent specifications for any sub - surface drainage away from the
stream. Furthermore, the applicant must provide for run -off from any roof, patio, or other
impermeable surfaces, to be maintained on the site so that no storm run -off greater than
historical will enter either Sneaky Lane or the stream.
The property between the existing house and the stream has been landscaped with natural
vegetation removed and replaced by grass to the stream bank. Natural vegetation remains
growing on adjacent properties. Some trees are growing along the stream bank of this property
and should not be removed without approval by the City Parks Department.
A power cord was observed below the surface of the stream, along the bank. This cord must be
removed. The date of landscaping has not been determined, however if any further development
is planned, it must be reviewed and approved by the appropriate agencies before commencing
work. In addition, any revegetation efforts should be of natural species to that area.
94002sm.ref
a'2-
TO'd 1y1CLL _ �, ,
_.__' -__._ '1 •
•
I rA t.1% ^i r-----:°6- X.,
\\ /
,p, /
1: C S C a •
>-.1-- j) / I �' - O r"�
p y \�,
"" v - r- k 5 -t9 '1/4-\‘1>-.--.
.........„..,,,,,, \` o ` / 11 ■
a �r "�
• o QO
f
..
�/ �� / 2
J ( t
� '
};
/ L' o .
•
I ° r' •
•
...___„, . . t .3 / / • ---- ■..... :„...L. . i
1 ,
`� ..
j �' -� -- o ` 8 L
i /
I kM
i -,l
•
•
l \ l� - ill .
1
.. LArD USE APPLICATION , .,
1) Project Name MR 0/4/ ,ES /ot'tIGt 4o0/T/o"/ a ,Macet
•
G,gv,C or .SNEAre ,4,4.0 SdtP/v /s /a�/,
2) project Location f,TK /N. 571917E 0/ Coto/at°
P�/tr �oK' 4 , Mee la Coo,/ ,
(indicate sl.t.eRt address.
lot & block ember, legal description '"er
appropriate)
/Q30 4) Lot Size n' 24, 990 s:f.
3) Present Zoning �
�O/n r//,eSC// x844 € .eD. .
5 ) Applicant's Name, Address & Phone # 2 9
ONcr/OA/ Cit
T� i/ ,4A a C
1' G.e �vS 4usrai)
6) Representative's Name. Address & Phone # CA 92/2/
9605' Sag/072W ,CO. s7": 806 S ' a/ D/0 6
7) Type of Application (please check all that apply):
Conditional Use
Conceptual SPA __ Conceptual Historic Dev.
-- Final Historic Dev.
Special Review — . - Final SPA
-- POD _ Minor Historic rev
8040 �1�]11�e
Final CUD _ Historic Demolition
Stream Margin -- - -
Maintain View Plane _ _
g,rRivision ___ Historic Designation
— 2ext/bbp Ames __ C Allotment
•
(b��i_ni�]2atlon
--
Lot MIS Exemption
Split/Lot Line
_ Adjustment
and type existing structures;
8) a of Existing bedrooms; a ny previous approvals granted to the
app sq. ft.; number of
prupxsty) - OROO�S-
SnvaLt -AMR. DE? 'CM D '. /O: N - -
6 147 S. • /'sr F4+ ' d /O /NG .330 S. . 0.
4o Co O PG !.I - /u /AJ -
9) Description of Development Application G
?Me S.F. tjeo 'a e0 G/iGsr ycoo■c tN/i✓G 6xfS . 0- ;�w
/ .its -c.f. MeofoSBD SeGOAD PtOOt- C4 (b / P.
720 S.f' A' '' GB Cg, /s7". 'tA)Sc) •
10) Have your tO 2 ' M. S issial Oantents
—141 is iSSiC I Oontents
✓✓ Response se to Atta d tmen t 4 R `''P' , Standards for Yo Application
Stream Margin Development Application
Project: 635 Sneaky Lane, Aspen, CO Page 1 of 2
Attachment 2
1. Letter attached.
2. Project: 635 Sneaky Lane, Aspen, CO
Lot 2 Sneaky lane Subdivision, Plat Book 4 at Page 259, County of Pitkin,
State of Colorado
3. General Warranty Deed attached.
4. Map attached.
5. The development proposes the remodeling and addition to an existing single family, four
bedroom, detached residence. The first floor additions consist of a Library, an Office /Den,
an enlarged Entry Hall and an additional Garage with storage area. A first floor multi-
purpose room will be converted to a bedroom. The upper floor scope of work includes the
remodeling of the existing three bedrooms into a Master Bedroom Suite and the addition of
two new Bedrooms and an Exercise Room. The overall project will increase the number of
bedrooms from four to five. The existing decks to the rear of the house will not be modified
and the majority of the new construction is located on the front half of the house away from
the river. The 99 square feet added to the rear of the house is located within the area of the
existing decks. Two low stone walls will be added within the setbacks adjacent to the
street, as well as an additional low stone wall to screen the garbage cans next to the street
side of the existing garage. Square footage of additions as follows:
First Floor Existing 1,847 S.F.
First Floor New 1.081F.
First Floor Proposed Total 2,928 S.F.
Second Floor Existing 640 S.F.
Second Floor New 1.085 S F.
Second Floor Proposed Total 1,725 S.F.
Total Existing Living Area 2,487 S.R
Total New Living Area 2.
Total Proposed Living Area 4,653 S.F.
Existin Gara a 330 S.F. cvoEh MUb J2M. F Ct�SET 5
New Garage g 112 SE ( N �
Total Proposed Garage 740 S.F.
Existing Building Footprint 2,177 S.F.
New Building Footprint 1.491 ,�F.
Proposed Building Footprint 3,668 S.F.
C 0
Stream Margin Development Application
Project: 635 Sneaky Lane, Aspen, CO
Attachment 2 Page 2 of 2
Review Standards Response
1. The proposed development is not located within the Special Flood Hazard
Area.
2. The existing Pedestrian easements on the property will not be affected by this development.
The proposed additions are no closer to the side yard Pedestrian easement than the existing
structure.
3. The proposed development is in keeping with the recommendations of the Roaring Fork
Greenway Plan.
4. No significant vegetation removal or slope grade changes are proposed by this development.
There will be no additional impact on erosion or sedimentation of the stream bank.
5. The proposed development does not alter any of the existing conditions at the rear half of
the house adjacent to the river, and as such does not add any pollution or interference with
the natural changes of the river. The 99 square feet being added to the rear of the house is
proposed within the area of an existing on grade deck.
6. The proposed development does not alter or relocate a water course.
7. A guarantee will be provided (if applicable) to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen.
8. The proposed development is located outside of the 100 year floodplain, however, if any
Federal and /or State permits relating to the development are required, they will be
provided.
Stream Margin Development Application
Project: 635 Sneaky Lane, Aspen, CO
Attachment 2
To Whom it May Concern:
This letter will serve to authorize those listed below to act on my behalf with regards
to Stream Margin Review Processing
Douglas H. Austin PATA Wayne Stryker
The Austin Hansen Group 300 S. Spring Street
9605 Scranton Road, Suite 300 Aspen, CO 81611
San Diego, CA 92121
Sincerely,
Tom Htrsch
25844 Butler Road
Junction City, OR 97448
Y7/93 SU404 Rec 10 oo H K. 70'L ru
� I Sil 'Pitkin en Cleric, DoC 4100.00 /00. 0 . 1
• • e GENERAL WAR(tANTY t)EET)
- 2, Neligh C. Coates, Jr., ( "Grantor ") whose address is c/o Coates, Reld &
6 "S e Waldron, 720 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, CO 81612, for tftgmisideration of Ten ,,
Dollars ($10.00), in hand paid, hereby sells and conveys to Tom mid—Maureen Hirsch, t,,, .
z 2 ( "Grantees "), whose address is 25844 Butler Rd., Junction City, OR 97448, the following
n 4 described real property in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, to wit:
, • i
o LOT 2, SNEAKY LANE SUBDIVISION, according to the
cc '�I 259, COUNTY OP PITK 17, 1972 in Plat Book 4 at Page
IN, STATE OP COLORADO.
g 17
with all its appurtenances, and warrants the title to the same, subject to and except for:
•
1. General taxes for the years 1993 and thereafter;
v 2. Right as reserved in United States Patent recorded in Book 55 at
> 0 Page 35.
v
v %--4- 3. Rights of way as evidenced in Deeds recorded in Book 172 at Page
cc V 318, in Book 201 at Page 180, and Easement as shown on the Plat
0 �
e , recorded in Plat Book 4 at Page 259.
ro 4. Pedestrian easement as shown on the Plat recorded in Plat Book 4
l ii �-- at Page 259.
u
v rt
a all reference being to the Pitkin County, Colorado real property records.
Ma
N m ? SIGNED this 26th day of January , 1993.
# i p �
C0 1
tea e r n i
Y . Neligh C. tes, Jr. by t Waldron wee i A. ^7 , his attorney -in -fact 'r et
bi 1 &i
g i t
(Notarial thug ea pop 2, famine
Ymartawmacrizimarg
%WI Pls. Myra nue WNW
133 LNW,Ma,
Alm, W..M 11411
FPR- 08 - '94 17:2. ID;HUL1119 /HHN5EN/GROUP TEL 190:5521061 #288 P02
•
Stream Margin Development Application
Project: 635 Sneaky Lane, Aspen, CO
Attachment 2
To Whom it May Concern:
This letter will serve to authorize those listed below to act on my behalf with regards
to Stream Margin Review Processing.
Douglas H. Austin FAIA Wayne Stryker
The Austin Hansen Group 300 S. Spring Street
9605 Scranton Road, Suite 300 Aspen, CO 81611
San Diego, CA 92121
Sincerely,
•
Tom Hirsch
25844 Sutler Road
Junction City, OR 97448
{
1 '