Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Land Use Case.100 Marolt Pl.A57-95
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 4 /25/, 95 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. DATE COMPLETE: (/)/ ( / 2735-123 63-706 A57-95 STAFF MEMBER: LL PROJECT NAME: MAROLT RANCH HOUSING PUD & FINAL PLAT AMEND Project Address: Legal Address: APPLICANT: ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY Applicant Address: 530 E. MAIN STREET REPRESENTATIVE: DAVE TOLEN Representative Address/Phone: 920-5050 Aspen, CO 81611 FEES: PLANNING $ # APPS RECEIVED 6 ENGINEER $ # PLATS RECEIVED iC,,-r^,, ,Lw ' HOUSING $ ENV. HEALTH $ TOTAL $ / TYPE OF APPLICATION: STAFF ApPROVAL: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: XX &Z Meeting Date Li ? .+ / t( PUBLIC HEARING: © NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO ' (N CC Meeting Date , PUBLIC HEARING: YE8 C3 ' , NO r' Igr f l VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO DRC Meeting Date_t q s J , REFERRALS: City Attorney 2 Parks Dept. School District City Engineer Bldg Inspector Rocky Mtn NatGas Housing Dir. Fire Marshal CDOT Aspen Water Holy Cross Clean Air Board City Electric Mtn. Bell Open •ace Boa d 1EE Zonir.Hlth. ACSD Other s_, Zoning Energy Center Other r-C l DATE REFERRED: 4 (2$ INITIALS: 5A) DUE: -iii FINAL ROUTING: DATE RO TED: :7v )V 3`7 INITIAL: P4 City Atty City Engineer Zoning Env. Health Housing Open Space t ex: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: f/ e A MESSAGE DISPLAY TO Leslie Lamont From: Dave Tolen Postmark: Aug 14 , 95 8: 40 AM Subject: Reply to: Forwarded: Marolt PUD Reply text: From Dave Tolen: Let's do as Stan and Amy suggested, and hold off until next year. We' ll resubmit after we get a look at the new parking plan and how well it works this winter. Thanks for your support, though. Preceding message: From Leslie Lamont: as you can see we talbed it until oct. 17 . . .you wanted to continue with this reivew in hopes to make changes this year??? or to get a better reading from both P&Z and CC?? if you want to move this up to a mtg. in sept. it would require a full new noticing. . . let me know From SHARON CARRILLO: The Marolt PUD and public hearing was tabled to October 17, 1995 . Hope this is good news for you. Sharon X H A R R Y T E A,. G U E A A C H I T E C T S 412 N.MILL ASPEN,CO 81611 303-925-2556 FAX-925-7981 • July 13, 1995 Bruce Nethery Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority 530 E. Main, Lower Level Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Bruce, I am writing to respond to your questions regarding the expanded parking plan for Marolt Housing. You asked about whether we had considered diagonal parking and which side of the entry drive has parking. When we looked at the options for providing additional parking spaces we looked a number of different configurations for parking, including diagonal parking. We rejected this option because it would have provided considerably fewer spaces for the same amount of paved area and appeared to serve no other real advantage. There are two reasons for using diagonal parking over head-in. Firstly, diagonal parking may provide for more spaces where the width of the area available does not allow for an efficient head-in layout. Secondly, where there is frequent turn over in the spaces, and ease of getting in and out is a priority, such as in the case of a grocery store. Neither of these conditions applies here. PUBLIC NOTICE RE: MAROLT RANCH HOUSING PUD & FINAL PLAT AMENDMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, July 18, 1995 at a meeting to begin at 4 : 30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, 2nd Floor Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St. , Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, requesting approval for an increase in parking by fifty spaces on the Marolt Ranch open space parcel. The property is located at Marolt Ranch, Lot 2 . For further information, contact Leslie Lamont at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St. , Aspen, CO 920-5101 s/Bruce Kerr, Chairman Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times on July 1, 1995 City of Aspen Account JUL.10 '95 1:56PM P. 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Leslie Lamont,Community Development THRU: George Robinson,Parks Director FROM: Rebecca Baker,Parks Department DATE: July 14, 1995 RE Marolt Rauch Housing PUD and Final Plat Amendment We have reviewed the application submitted by the Housing Authority and have a few comments regarding the application. The plan shows additional parallel parking on the access road.We request that this not be considered formal parking for the housing project but may still be used for back up and overflow parking for the housing complex in an informal manner The City's Parks, Recreation,and Open Space Master Plan identified Marolt as a possible site for development of athletic fields,of which parking will also be a factor.We would like for this to remain undedicated at this time and not a part of the application.The Parks Department has spoken with Bruce,the manager for Marolt Housing,and we have discussed the area as possibly being shared for both parks and housing uses,however,we would request this area not be formally dedicated as parking for housing at this time. Them is a gate at the east end of the parking area,directly adjacent to the trail,which needs to remain accessible. It is usually blocked by cars. The only other comment is in reganSs to the landscape plant. The existing trees at the base of the berm along the access mad show this area as a snow storage area as well. The storing of snow in this area could damage the trees.Another area may be considered for storing snow or relocating a few of the toes be re may be another option. A tree permit should be applied for before moving any of the trees. MEMORANDUM To: Leslie Lamont, Planning Office From: Chuck Roth, Engineering Department LI� Date: July 10, 1995 Re: Marolt Ranch Housing PUD and Final Plat Amendment (Lot 2, Marolt Ranch Subdivision) Having reviewed the above referenced application, and having made a site inspection, the Engineering Department has the following comments: 1. Additional Parking Spaces - The Engineering Department supports the request for additional parking spaces. Incentives for not parking on site and providing off-site parking spaces have both been tried, and both with small success. In discussing the application with the applicant, it appears that the application can be slightly amended to provide 30 additional year round spaces and 40 additional winter spaces, 20 of which would be for storage only. The access road would then be signed for no parking on both sides of the road. 2. Site Design - Based on the site visit, it appears that it would be preferable to set 20 spaces into the berm on the north side of the access road instead of in front of the buildings on the south side of the road. This would permit the continued existing and appealing landscaping and site design in lieu of the proposed parking spaces in front of the buildings. In addition, the parking spaces could be constructed with a new"grass-crete" product which would allow for the appearances of lawn or uncut grass curing the summer while providing structural support for parking during the winter. 3. Lighting - The applicant proposes to add three lights for nighttime pedestrian use. The lights would be low scale and downcast. 4. Drainage - The current site drainage appears to function excellently. There is an adjacent area called the hang glider parking lot which is adjacent to the access road which has a major drainage problem. The area should be surfaced with road base and provided with drainage to prevent the ponding conditions that exist now. But this problem is outside of the scope of this application. cc: Cris Caruso Bruce Nethery, Housing Authority cil. U t M95.158 ;� Jll{. 1 .3 pr, ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone (970) 920-5090 FAX (970) 920-5439 MEMORANDUM TO: City Engineer Parks Transportation - Randy Ready Aspen Historical Society FROM: Leslie Lamont, Planner RE: Marolt Ranch Housing PUD and Final Plat Amendment Parcel ID No. 2735-123-63-706 DATE: June 28, 1995 Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted by the Aspen/Pitkin Housing Authority. Please return your comments to me no later than July 10. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE WILL MEET ON THURSDAY, JULY 6 AT 2:00 PM IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS. Thank you. ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-5090 FAX# (970) 920-5439 June 28, 1995 Dave Tolen Aspen/Pitkin Housing Authority 530 E. Main St. Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Marolt Ranch Housing PUD and Final Plat Amendment Case A57-95 Dear Dave, The Community Development Department has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined that this application is complete. We have scheduled this application for review by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission at a Public Hearing to be held on Tuesday, July 18, 1995 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. We have also scheduled this application for 1st Reading before the Aspen City Council on Monday, August 14, 1995 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. Second Reading and Public Hearing will be on September 11, 1995. Should these dates be inconvenient for you please contact me within 3 working days of the date of this letter. After that the agenda dates will be considered final and changes to the schedule or tabling of the application will only be allowed for unavoidable technical problems. The Friday before the meeting date, we will call to inform you that a copy of the memo pertaining to the application is available at the Community Development Department. Please note that it is your responsibility to mail notice to property owners within 300' and to post the subject property with a sign at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing before the Planning Commission. Please submit a photograph of the posted sign as proof of posting and an affidavit as proof of mailing prior to the public hearing. A Development Review Committee meeting has been scheduled on Thursday, July 6 at 2:00 PM in the Council Chambers. If you have any questions, please call Leslie Lamont, the planner assigned to your case, at 920- 5101. Sincerely, Suzanne L. Wolff Administrative Assistant apz.pb ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 920-5090 May 9, 1995 Dave Tolen, Director Aspen/Pitkin Housing Authority 530 E. Main St. Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Marolt Ranch Housing PUD and Final Plat Amendment Case #A57-95 Dear Dave, The Community Development Department has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined that this application is incomplete. The application will not be scheduled for review until the following items are submitted. 1. Proof of ownership, and a letter from the owner authorizing the processing of this application. 2. Provide an existing improvement survey. 3. Provide a copy of the PUD agreement from the original approval and a copy of the Final Plat. 4. Provide 9 additional copies of the application. If you have any questions, please call Leslie Lamont, the Planner assigned to this case, at 920- 5101. Thank you. Sincerely, Suzanne L. Wolff Administrative Assistant PUD AMENDMENT APCHA MAROLT RANCH PARKING RECONFIGURATION MAY 22, 1995 L INTRODUCTION. The Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority(Applicant) proposes to amend a portion of the final development plan and final plat for the Marolt Ranch Housing Project approved in 1990. This proposed amendment is to provide additional amenities for the residents of this project. Specifically, this application is for the reconfiguration of the existing parking area in order to accommodate fifty additional vehicles currently parking along the access road to the property. The Applicant is required to address Section 7-907(B) Amendment of PUD Development Order. While the Applicant has attempted to address all relevant provisions of the Municipal Land Use Regulation, and to provide sufficient information to enable a thorough evaluation of this application, questions may arise which result in the planning staffs request for additional information and/or clarification. The Applicant will be pleased to provide such information as may be required. II. AMENDMENT OF PUD DEVELOPMENT ORDER(SECTION 7-907(B)). Any other amendment (insubstantial) shall be approved pursuant to the terms and procedures of the final development plan, provided that the proposed change is consistent with or an enhancement of the approved final development plan. If the proposed change is not consistent with the approved final development plan, the amendment shall be subject to both conceptual and final development plan review and approval. During the review of the proposed amendment, the commission and city council may require such conditions of approval as are necessary to insure that the development will be compatible with current community conditions. This shall include, but not be limited to, applying to the portions of the development which have not obtained building permits or are proposed to be amended, any new community policies or regulations which have been implemented since the original approval, or taking into consideration changing community circumstances as they affect the project's original representations and commitments. The proposed amendment to the previous approvals in 1990 for Marolt Ranch represents an enhancement to the approved final development plan. The addition of fifty parking "^ spaces will promote improved quality of life for all tenants at the Marolt Ranch. These �'( additions are consistent with the original approvals because they provide additional incentives for residents to store vehicles thus reducing traffic impacts. Figure 1 shows the current parking configuration which consists of 49 available spaces. M. DEVELOPMENT PLAN The proposed parking reconfiguration(Fig. 2 ) is specifically designed to provide one space per unit which will serve the purpose of moving the vehicles currently parking along the access road into designated parking spaces. This will allow a workable incentive program for tenants to store vehicles and enhance management's ability to monitor vehicles on property. This proposal will also improve snow removal in the winter as well as increase year-round access to the open space, pedestrian walkways and bike path by the general public. The access road which currently handles overflow parking for 70+ cars can continue to be used for this purpose upon approval and completion of this plan, or the road could be closed to all parking. It is the recommendation of management that, since parking is planned for this area for summer recreational use by the parks dept., overflow parking in the winter be allowed with restrictions. The original approval provided on site parking for 49 vehicles and off-site car storage for 190 cars to provide a place for tenants to store vehicles as part of the incentive program. The off-site areas identified by the plan were never created. If approved, reconfiguration will begin on August 22nd after the MAA students leave and concluded by the end of September so as to be effective in the '95/96 season. IV. REVIEW STANDARDS 1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS a. The proposed development shall be consistent with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan. Since the Marolt Ranch project is 100% affordable housing, it is in complete compliance with the Housing Action Plan of the AACP. Auto storage incentives are in accordance with the AACP Transportation Plan section 17 by creating a resident parking permit system b. The proposed development shall be consistent with the character of existing land uses in the surrounding area. Since the proposed development is simply a reconfiguration of the existing parking area, it is consistent with existing land uses. c. The proposed development shall not adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. This parking development poses no significant obstacle to any future development. d. Final approval shall only be granted to the development to the extent to which GMQS allotments are obtained by the applicant. The Marolt Ranch project is 100% affordable housing and is therefore exempt. 2. LAND USES The land uses permitted shall be those of the underlying Zone District. Detached residential units may be authorized to be clustered in a zero lot line or row house configuration, but multi-family dwelling units shall only be allowed when permitted by the underlying Zone District. The underlying Zone District is Public. Marolt Ranch Housing is a conditional use which was reviewed and approved by City Council at that time. 3. OFF-STREET PARKING The number of off-street parking spaces may be varied from that required in the underlying Zone District based on the following considerations. Previous approval for parking at the Marolt Ranch granted in 1990 provided 50 parking spaces for the existing 100 housing units. This housing was designed and approved as an auto disincentive project. The original disincentive program was for the development of vehicle storage for 190 cars in secured parking areas at the MAA school and at the county land fill area as well as financial incentives to tenants in order to reduce on-site vehicle parking. No such off-site lots were provided and the property management provided by the applicant for the Marolt Ranch has determined that, while auto disincentives do work, one parking space per unit is necessary to improve livability and augment management's ability to control resident parking due to the transient nature of the employees this complex houses. Based on the historic needs of both tenants and management, the applicant requests a reconfiguration of existing parking to accommodate the vehicles on property. This reconfiguration ( Fig. 2 ) will allow the majority of the vehicles to be moved off of the access road and into designated lots behind the property berm (some of which will be assigned as storage only). Aside from enhancing the aesthetics of the area, this will allow a workable incentive program for those residents willing to store their vehicles for the winter thus reducing traffic impacts. This incentive program will provide designated parking areas, special permits and rent credits for those residents willing to store their vehicles for the winter season. a. The probable number of cars used by those using the proposed development. The probable number of cars using the Marolt Ranch has been previously estimated at 104 (Fig. 3 ). Management has estimated this number to be accurate to within approximately 10 vehicles. b. The parking needs of non-residential uses. Provided for in the previous estimate (Fig. 3 ). c. The varying time periods of use, whenever joint use of common parking is proposed. Summer time use of the property by the MAA students in residence is significantly lower than that of winter residents, however, surrounding amenities such as open space and bike paths attract additional vehicles during summer months. Winter parking is primarily used by Marolt Ranch tenants only. The removal of vehicles from the access road in the winter will not only improve project access, but will allow non-residents better access to the amenities adjoining the entry road such as hang-gliders and cross-country skiers. d. The availability of public transit and other transportation facilities, including those for pedestrian access and/or the commitment to utilize automobile disincentive techniques in the proposed development. Roaring Fork Transit Agency (RFTA) currently runs bus service close to the property at the Castle Ridge bus stop. This amenity allows for a workable incentive program for tenants to store vehicles on property, thus reducing traffic impacts. RFTA has added additional service on this route including extended hours of service for late night workers. e. The proximity of the proposed development to the commercial core or public recreational facilities in the city. The Marolt Ranch project is located within walking distance of all city facilities as well as having access to public transportation and bike paths. 4. OPEN SPACE The open space requirements shall be that of the underlying Zone District. However, a variation in the minimum open space may be permitted if such variation would not be detrimental to the character of the proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD), and if the proposed development shall include open space for the mutual benefit of all development in the proposed PUD through a common park or recreational area. An area may be approved as a common park or recreation area if Open space for residents will be changed from that of the original approval only minimally at the fence set backs (Fig. 2 ) which are designed for controlled seasonal vehicle storage and improvement of the entry curve area. 5. LANDSCAPE PLAN There shall be approved as part of the Final Development Plan a landscape plan, which exhibits a well designed treatment of exterior spaces. It shall provide an ample quantity and variety of ornamental plant species that are regarded as suitable for the Aspen area climate. See architectural Site plan and Vicinity Map ( Fig. 4 ). 6. LIGHTING All lighting shall be arranged so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. See architectural Site plan and Vicinity Map (Fig. 4 ) 7. PUBLIC FACILITIES The proposed development shall be designed so that adequate public facilities will be available to accommodate the proposed development at the time development is constructed, and that there will be no net public cost for the provision of these public facilities. Further, buildings shall not be arranged such that any structure is inaccessible to emergency vehicles. Reconfiguration of the parking area will not result in any increased need for public facilities. 8. TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION The proposed reconfiguration of parking is designed to enhance traffic, pedestrian circulation and provide for better emergency vehicle access. a- z Y `v C z Ic • � 4 n lye \ F 41 c- d_ \ •9 N. \11 1 1,a ir i11 it ``e C Al i n v / l}�'$C CI (-- --------\, . ,:______ in , ,.., . ,, . \ , , �— —: , — �'1 J„s �' �, ill__ ,—,, _.......„ . .\\ \\ // / �i ---„ ` _- ` Zi 7 I \` i i ICLA. c, 2 L // , r , . q 1 , 1 , . a ? . j � q - % / U L `OMSnox L IO2idN o T N ® • • }�4 U z (� a �_ December 13, 1989 Mr. Richard Shaw Design Workshop, Inc. Page two Proposed projects in the same area, such as the Highlands Hotel and Heatherbed Lodge have suggested their projects would contribute 2 to 6.2 vehicle trips per unit with a strong transit sytsem. The MPA has found that its students average 0.2 cars per person, or 0.6 car per unit. The P.FCAA also anticipates 0.6 car/unit for skier services employees. Given the previously discussed assumptions about this project and alternate transporation methods, we have assumed four vehicle trips per unit for all vehicles using the site. The following table indicates the total number of vehicles anticipated for the activities at the Thomas/ Marolt property. • , a) Residential Seasonal Housing @ 0.6 cars/unit = 60 cars, x 100 units Caretakers Unit @ 2 cars/unit = 2 cars x 1 unit b) Non—Residential Cafeteria employees @ 4 cars/shift = 4 cars Operations and Maintenance @ 4 cars/shift = 4 cars Housing, Visitors @ 12 cars = 12 cars Park, Community Gardens and Historic/Museum Curator = 22 cars TOTAL 'VERICT,FS = 104 cars With 104 vehicles potentially using the site and four vehicle trips per day, one can anticipate an average daily traffic of about 416 VPD. This traffic volume will represent a 16€ increase to Castle Creek Road, and a 7% increase to the Maroon Creek/Highway 82 intersection. The project will access Castle Creek Road near the present hang glider access. This will mean, the project will impact the last 850 feet of Castle Creek Road. The County's Road Management Plan calls for up- grading the road to collector status up to the hospital entrance or approximately 1300 lineal feet of Castle Creek Road. This will entail • widening each shoulder two feet and improving sight distance to achieve a 45 mph design speed standard. Preliminary estimates from County Engineering indicate that the cost of improvements necessary are in the range of $180,000, not including desired guardrail work. rn �1 Y 7- ) C . ) . . E ONIsnox flONVNN - v T J N ° N N a Q ' ® Om„ '' O � r � b b v v T kCd C ro ro � a 0 ri v N O O O lJ (� aka C OD •rl O a > ro m a.) u v v i U Z� . Requested Attachments A-1 Proof of Ownership A-2 Letter of owner authorization A-3 Existing improvement survey A-4 Copy of Original PUD agreement and Final Plat • A � TOPII K„r, 1 COMMERCIAL INSURANCE PACKAGE POLICY SCHEDULE OF ADDITIONAL PROPERTY if Policy Number HAR 69-78-146-01 Insured Aspen/Pi tki n canna;nn Ant-hnri y, 'ESCRIPTION OF COVERED PREMISES 'rem. Bldg. Address Occupancy ' ' 5 1 1017 Fast Hopkins, Aspen, CO GL Only : 6 1 101 Lone Pine, Hunter Longhouse #1, Aspen, CO Apartments 7 1 101 Ione Pine, Hunter Ionghouse #2, Aspen, CX) Apartments 8 1 101 Lone Pine, Hunter Longhouse #3, Aspen, CO Apartments 9 1 200 Marolt Dr., Bldg. A/800, Aspen, CO Apartments 10 1 200 Marolt Dr., Bldg. B/700, Aspen, CO Apartments PROPERTY COVERAGES PROVIDED: Insurance at the described premises applies only for coverages for which a limit is shown. ' Prem. Bldg. Covered Covered Valuation Coinsurance Agreed Value Automatic Limit Property Causes Basis Agreed Value Expiration Adjustment Of of loss or Value Reporting Date Applies Insurance 6 1 Building Special RCV AV 10-18-95 3% Included 6 1 Pers. Prop. Special RCV 90% Not Covered 3% Included 7 1 Building Special RCV AV 10-18-95 3% Included 7 1 Pers. Prop. Special RCV 90% Not Covered 3% Included 8 1 Building Special RCV AV 10-18-95 3% Included 9 1 Building Special ICV AV 10-18-95 3% Included 9 1 Pers. Prop. Special RCV 90 Not Covered 3% Included IO 1 Building Special RCV AV 10-18-95 3% Included 0 1 Pers. Prop. Special RCV 90% Not Covered 3% Included MORTGAGE HOLDER AND/OR LOSS PAYEE Prem. Bldg. Name and Mailing Address Interest 1• , 1 —i i Schedule Page Number 1 TII-30-A(11/90) a TOP II µ iiMMERCIAL INSURANCE ,,, PACKAGE POLICY SCHEDULE OF ADDITIONAL PROPERTY y Number. HAS 69-78-346-01 Insured Aspen/Pitkin Housing Authority SCRIPTION OF COVERED PREMISES Occupancy • m. Bldg. Address ' 11 1 200 Marolt Dr:, Bldg. C/600, Aspen, CO Apartments 12 1 200 Marolt Dr. , Bldg. D/500, Aspen, 00 Apartments 13 1 200 Marolt Dr. , Bldg. E/400, Aspen, CO Apartments 14 1 200 Marolt Dr. , Bldg. F/300, Aspen, CO apartiients n >-t�rents 15 1 200 Marolt Dr. , Bldg. G/200, Aspen, CO Cafeteria 16 1 200 Marolt Dr. , Bldg. Cafeteria, Aspen, CO Cafeterias 17 1 414 Part Circle, Aspen, CO GL fly 18 1 715 Fast Hymn, Aspen, CO .OPERTY COVERAGES PROVIDED: Insurance at the described premises applies only for coverages for which a limit is shown. i . .m. Bldg. Covered Covered Valuation Coinsurance Agreed Value Automatic Limit Property Causes Basis Agreed Value Expiration Adjustment Of of loss or Value Reporting Date Applies Insurance 11 1 Building Special RCV AV 10-18-95 3% included 11 1 Pers. Prop. Special RCV 90% Not Covered 3% Included 12 1 Building Special RCV AV 10-18-95 3% Included 12 1 Pers. Prop. Special RCV 90% Not Covered 3% Included 13 1 Building Special RCV AV 10-18-95 3% Included 13 1 Pers. Prop. Special 1V 90% Not Covered 3% included 14 1 Building Special RCV AV 10-18-95 3% Included 14 1 Pers. Prop. Special RCV 90% Not Covered 3% Included 15 1 Building Special RCV AV 10-18-95 3% Included 1 15 1 Pers. Prop. Special RCV 90% Not Covered 3% Included 16 1 Building Special RCV AV 10-18-95 3% Included 16 1 Pers. Prop. Special RCV 90% Not Covered 3% Included 17 1 Building Special ITV AV 10-18-95 3% Included 17 1 Pers. Prop. Special RCV 90% Not Covered 3% Included MORTGAGE HOLDER AND/OR LOSS PAYEE Interest ".:1 Prem. Bldg. Name and Mailing Address Schedule Page Number 2 TII-30-A(11/90) • 1 May 22, 1995 Ms. Suazanne L. Wolff Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO. 81611 Dear Suzanne: Our letter is to confirm that the City of Aspen owns the parcel located at 100 Marolt Place. The City of Aspen has authorized the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority to prepare and submit the attached PUD Amendment on its behalf. Please call Bill Elting if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Bill Elting '- a. ®® i C JI C m N T m T >Y 9 ° 0 y N N { .I' • ® N i 14 t o /!, IT ` l'I 11 � �o f‘411/44e.‘> 4,` -c a . \ o. •1 -gi ® /�� / 7 ./ If ii°ip\ VL / y r' t l 0t P it � `� .. :.ti ... o ay 4 v 9_ 61 c N- i T 7 f• •A:. ".� c�g±r t r/ Ill 'j 1�r. °�B- �� �^ r 11 ��ti- • ' d1 ✓v fli i i. • •a ; x`1.9 \t ii s•e � `.r f Of �� x� 7r.! . �� \ 7 •'.dI1 1 r , Kla U V Rw Z 4 \ce . / o r. II , / / IJ. ff I . .o......M. . ". • N n ft... .M• • .�.i Av MNOM-dltl15 oa30,O° •.. 1 L! . if [rj G z � �,. 1 I' ' /f 1tk1 ,/S . p a ar .. // ..3 _ e ainbtd 4 0%.,vii f 1;1 rii il il • , :tar :ID , 0 0, 0 0 = r „ "t _ --'\ -1 z 0 . I 12/ . ‘ W M C < 0 j• 2 2 t I-1 c r 0 / /1'N ,O .., ::\. 1 t z z 0 i ....- 0 z •< ... i z_4 = = ; i -.,, ' n •: ______j (ft n = ; 2.II.',. • -,-.• , IA% :. , ,, ,„ • -,, : :: \ '--7, •-- 4 1 ' , r ; 2:71 . . 7 pi* • . F / ' , • ifitt" . ' ' '... ,■ip ' ;: • 4 i 411, .. 7i-iI n . 83/4. . ii p ' . . 4, ' • ' ■ 1 :, ,i, Ii l: , ;,1 . H , -- ,..:r. :, . P n T, ' : Wei ' ' --- i '''.' ,I.,,','? ' 0 i!:i '...1: .• FL ' , .- ir • ,\\:;;V,, - • \‘' 'c - Ole 'I\I .`••1, 22? 52= 2q 2 ,I\ 4011 • J \■, .•••• • •.. S C>■■ • a '.:l I' •I' - r i.,,, ' I \\ -••,- -,7,,,, / •4•■■ ' •?■••• ■-■-• ziz... Po, z• ' /*\\ •\ A .L. y • : :\;1 i" i•P''' ( 7, ‘. tg A ------n---r- 1. $4';,', i\ "; \ (-- ;,•1 - • \ 2 ,,,,:\ N•--\ /2 ' sEE.,,EET3 (IT ,--,P0.---7. ,--"' , M FOR,NLARgEYPP . .\- Vet ' L2%112EIASN1 AZ -"--- V'e.,' ■ cm \ .te:: ii ,,„..\\..s ,'F :,': • , • \ _As ^,y.,, \,,,,- lit sb--44 iliti-4, '' '3. 'LL.3" - , r' . gamy ,, 7Th, s r , . ir.- prr - 4 24:•/ - Arr -,/ % • t I I • /4 / I\ • ' : ail \ ,%' /. i 0 0 • .,: ,,,I 1 -,...• , \ y e ‘; FriV \ c;.,!,7 • , zP• z z - - 6 ■ i, ,7 1 / 0. 0 . 2 2 2 ., 6 v ,• 2E 2. 22 t - :g r - 2 t• ' ' pn , - a• z • . 2 . . " • t r , : a g , 7 , , • 12, r ,; 4 > • 2 V) ___ • C lkl m = .. • . a ' wocHLINE ---i ggeeitEmmt . . _ _ L., , 2 g lz 2 tt ■• / - ' ura m e; a a nu, SinHEET k o� J� •9 Z � ;I✓,),, 1 m r s%%Dye "N:'f P m ®® nr iii,\, I ;� ' gut,`. • 0 ; „, J 1 - I^5 / IuITT'IAAl, a� y I k, f �1 llli m V. r '�1�1 ��1 .41 n �: G 1 i' ! 7 'I i,ab� ‘ i /, i I ,//a,. !, • ;'� �Gt ;l e 7 ` ;1 :1� c in i:ID it i Si ...i. . „ i aan �i� , _ v4 --t"v• c a;,01. , , i '� 1 „ / i ;�/,;ice 't\\°, "s >,/,,f,,, , , • 3 \ a `,u ' ▪ 1 . I , m , n I ` N., /Fr'Ip ,n/ _ ' te ( l� � s_ v Et I „ i ,, Q:t1. , „lamp • I M-, ,,ccek::..,,,/ I '. \ • ,--." I I I , - ....w , , i MAICIII-PIE • ''..c C7-7 —7\-.--:: ----- 11. 7\7,— 1..4 TT. (...1-,- • .',,.:",■•&..:;,.• •• ‘-,_,.../ I , '''' ' . t \ \\ \ . I' ° / /I NT 4, ..-. k • , •A> t Yp■ i 1. \ ' El lad ;3 433 ",;,,..4. ..<:..„.;„:7„;...... . • 40__ , ... ita, , , \ . g 0 711' i 1 ss: *43 1,:-••2* 4/' 1 I '‘ - i , etor '• I ' \ • • T71 - 1,"ratimilr . ' • ... sA,.- -wal....;-:-,:),;,, . ,,v .— . . i „- ,- ar „ti -,,, ?1 ..,, 11 '.. r`:. '1/41=1., tr. 1 . , ) ii, .. , \ .. ..t /I 1 C:stRallilt , t ■ \ , lc / , .. ... / \ 1 \ I ' tiq I '1,_ ebirmt„,45....!---r--1/4 . \ -\. --•---- -, 4 C5 ----' • 2 l• ' . '4 • 3),. , s't...—•••• '''/I' II•III i / = 5inalliMir ''t 1.''IlL• \\ \ t.- V/ -..---- Is • )3 '•':IXII:-.. ss, "".. 211 f..A ... ,'/ ., ,r ./. , -,* ' - t7 $ " •-• 4. -.--.,,,... , Ili. 4 " Y..‘■ • --". / 1 \\ 6 CI C.-4 - ---..- --_, , „.. „Nif tt ( (.3..,\ •;.-*(// ' '--c;:o. -- - ‘, df. 1 \ - - - ....,-,-_ - __- - • ,, k, _ - • L A ) % <■'7---.--•,, ) 2 1 ..-- • . I '`....\•.;<'-••• \\, \ ' , WI±.1 , • -- --- . - • ,- -• \ ‘'‘,.N ....,..,\y fil• : .7.-ts. - / . ///,• ! : , ,:. 77,4 ,• , . . _ . . .,/,./ .- " . • ----__ ......i....-- .1, IVA / I • - ,;---.11:;..:---,,-,N,\, ; - I ‘ if / 1 : i ,. . _ - _ __...,_:-.„......„..... ,‘, , \\_ _ •v 1 : ' I 1 il ,,a' i , ,,,,,,,'„ -,,__ , ,., ‘• , , A • \ ., ., .. ' . ,, , ,, , .„....- ,, ,,,\„, \0 , 0 ; I i \ I\ !--• \ • ' 7//////;----::::::':.--:::,`:\ , ` ‘ ■ \ ' \ \\ / ' .- ' /," ,-, - •,. ,\. ,, ■ x , , , / \\‘`,‘„ \■1 • \ i \ '. ' % 1,, \\\. t.•-,.\\•\ r -.....‘ It\ 1 \ \ \ \•\\ „ , i ,' •1\ "\\\ • k\ -k A ■ % ‘ ■ • k\ \\ \ N \ f 'AC""V";:/7 '' ‘." ?.+S \\\\ \\\\" \ k 10 e\- - ...,.c. ' ....,..,. ,/, ,, ." 3------..ss-,.. ‘\\. tt tss. 0) •. s \ \‘ ,..,.. ..,...;-, --____ ---- , --,"---,K2••• ....----s....ss, '''• I ) ' 1 t 1) 1 ' It\I • I 1 ‘ 3 s. - \• •, '. ' ■ \ • \• ."..--....•-•.>., -----------<.S53?----- s-•"--.------ C -: i ) I 10 I \ WI \ I II\s•Isti !a stst•s), •s ss \\\\,•\‘‘ (.....-...).):.:-.„,,s.,---.:______________--- ......2>.--;;;;;>••••.4)--._.-11"-___---,'''' s-.''' -7 ' 7 •I II II' ! I I;1's\kV ‘‘•‘•\ 2\\ \ \ ‘‘ \\ `-''Z':I-ZI:I----•12:-----------2- ----2-:-05J2 • ‘. -7-T- -----------:-/-• :-------.' /I/ if I I I I I I I\‘‘\; —___ •) • \ \ • \ •\\‘`• s. 4. •-•--::------_,Z-Zr_---C----------------•- ' ' ' -- ..---"' ------/ -•••• "-•3-—-"--2 /// / 1 1 I I I/? \I ‘s sss,s, ‘ , ‘ ••‘,..\\\•\::, ,.. 4-__L--_-___-,====--_-__-__-7 ......,,,,-;.. __- /---.. _s.."--, ___../,, r 1 i / 1 II 1 \ •L'‘. ‘••,:%, \ \ \\<\‘‘'...,L••>:', t: -"1. ---t-i77) --#2-2."..../2------- ------th--- -------- --////0 /../ lit II , '•,,,•,\, •, •x.' ,`: ,-''---. ---_:.`----3.---,. „.:\\---5"------C,-,:-----------------. -_-------' //, / /17 t•' I -'-, '•(: .:'.`:._' b.‘ :'f:-:"1-1--_-_77:•?_,--rt ".1: - .9-..- ----2---:._-_--- \-;;C ////// _.. . . --., „- ------:-"---- --------- -- -- - ---- - ----/----- -------- ----- ----A‘ "....., ..,..... .--_-.:.-z-----------:.------ . • - - .' ,:e...z,_----------- ...--- _ 0 4 .?„ 1 . . ____:--__,___-----__- _ _ _ __.. , , /7; ,\ ,, , , , ,,,,,, , 7 Or— _ 0 -I E : 0 ;/; - , ■ . "1 s', ----• \- \• \ \ -, ,,■■\ . \\\\, , • 0 0 , ,,,,, z i- -r, )....• N N .., I Z Z N \, \ N "-----' . 2: z I = . \ / n . - , \ ---1-0■-. ....,„,,\Ht \ 0 . . . ... .., t - I . --.... 74 . . ./. -.1• r r 2 , i ° •- C f B I n T :� �j�.. E., z N I, ,>, • c : 1:. t. ,. m , ; i �; ill �,t 4 f fI /is- l � m �y s .r co C' --‘'.--se t �A / Ole'`�1 ' t.11 11 m !' a ! 1. c 1 �i* ��1 � e At 14' 0 �ti .. . . aan6i� ` 3C! ti to Imo' � !` \1 ; _ Lt, t� . x 4.. \\: r ,/ ® ja" _ice... ;P O • X1 )I' Y Ci) 3,:-i • '� • ,,, aY % r E. µ , , • I 1 • Tc6.3} r 1LNLHE —— • o "v • \''''' • y , y rl1 \ M f a Lt /04'52. _ f,q ,a� alit 1. rl• PAN , ; r. A Oa a W.:744%s i 0. co AI \ \ . t f' rar x F+'1 � �Vito..Il Eta `3 n. '�� " ti ���4� j>7 1 ry �� r j / 'N._ % ,•. X //' . �+ 1 a15 14. t} 1 ,S^',,4'•, .. ',. i 4xh.tS„111 \, 1\•CD , • Y/ O. . �' 999 - / \ �-a / i _ \ Y \ \ // j JR / / r lrr/ 11.' /.lti.yl am 52.1\1 I, y ^ .1 •\•�.""�7 1 L. . \ \\\ e Z o r � • Z /! / noes • z s ° ° . � 5 _& S 8 Y N = � . _m V.. c g s as S3 a £ s 8 s _o mly s a Y $ C Seal mm • n “ e.i E •d S Y ? I' 1 a n F a iii .1 S4 ' o K `` 9 : : a i N 8 R 6 U C H _ 4t: ` A .. i ICr • PUD AGREEMENT FOR THE MAROLT RANCH AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT This Agreement is made this 31st day of August, 1991, between ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY ("Lessee") and the CITY OF ASPEN, a municipal corporation (the "City") . RECITALS WHEREAS, Owner owns that certain real property located in the City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, legally described as: A tract of land situated in Lots 8 , 9, 10, 13 , SW 1/4 SW 1/4 Sec. 12 . T10S. R85W. 6th P.M. and Lot 5 and NW 1/4 NW 1/4 Sec. 13 . T10S. P35W. 6th P.M. commonly known as the Marolt Ranch Parcel ; and WHEREAS, at a public hearing on March 6, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved_with conditions the Final PUD Development Plan submitted by (10Kne-r for the development of an affordable housing project (the "POject") ; and e 5)r WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council granted with conditions the Final PUD Development Plan request for the Project at a public hearing on April 23 , 1990, pursuant to Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1990; and WHEREAS, The City and the Lessee wish to enter into a PUD Agreement for the Project that will establish a final PUD Development Plan; and WHEREAS, the Lessee has submitted to the City for approval, execution and recordation a Final PUD Development Plan for the Project (the "Plan") and the City agrees to approve, execute and record the Plan on the agreement of the wgig_t to the matters described herein, subject to the provisions of he Municipal Code of the City of Aspen (the "Code") and other applicable rules and regulations; and WHEREAS, the City has imposed conditions and requirements in connection with its approval, execution and acceptance of the Plan and such matters as are necessary to protect, promote and enhance the public health, safety and welfare, and pursuant to the Code, the City is entitled to assurances that the matters set forth herein will be faithfully performed by the Lessee and the Lessee' s successors and assigns; and WHEREAS, the Lessee is willing to enter into such agreement with the City and to provide assurances to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants A - V contained herein and the approval, execution and acceptance of the Plan for recordation by the City, it is agreed as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Description. The Project consists of one hundred units of approximately 500 sf each, a cafeteria building with laundry and music practice facilities, and a 50 space parking area. 2. Acceptance of Plan. Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties hereto, the City agrees to approve the Plan for the Project submitted herewith, reduced-size copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibit A, which Plan conforms to the requirements of the Code. The City agrees to accept such Plan for recording in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder upon payment of the recordation fee and costs to the City by ¢wner. 2- fssee 3 . Construction Schedule and Phasing. The City and Lessee mutually acknowledge that exact construction schedules cannot be determined at this time. However, construction will commence upon issuance of the excavation permit in April 1990. It is anticipated that construction will be completed not later than December 1, 1990. Final landscaping will be completed in the Spring, 1991. 4 . Outdoor Lighting. Outdoor lighting shall be downcast fixtures. Lighting will be provided on the bike path from the bus stop to the parking lot, at the fire lane, and at the parking lot. 5. Public Improvements. There are not public improvements required or provided on the site. 6. Parking. There shall be one 50 space parking lot provided on Marolt Park site for joint use with open space users. 7 . Existing Ditch. Any changes to the existing ditch on site shall be designed by a professional engineer and reviewed by the City of Aspen Engineering Department. 8 . Drainage. The drainage system shall be designed to mitigate non-point source pollutants from street and parking area and run off. 9 . Employee Housing Requirements. The Project shall provide 100 one-bedroom deed restricted units. 10. Park Dedication Fees. There are no park dedication fees required by the Owner.Apssrf 11. Trails Easement. A trail easement will be maintained through the project containing an 8 ' asphalt path to serve pedestrian, bicycle, and Nordic ski trail uses. 12 . Material Representations. All material representations made by Lessee on the record to the City in accordance with the Final PUD Development Plan approval shall be binding on the Lessee. 13 . Enforcement. In the event the City maintains that the Lessee is not in substantial compliance with the terms of this Agreement or the Final Development Plan, the City Council may serve a notice of noncompliance and request that the deficiency be corrected within a period of forty-five days. In the event the Lessee believes that it is in compliance or that the noncompliance is insubstantial, Lessee may request a hearing before the City Council to determine whether the alleged noncompliance exists or whether any amendment, variance or extension of time to comply should be granted. On request, the City shall conduct a hearing according to its normal procedures and take such action as it deems appropriate. 14 . Notices. Notices to the parties shall be sent by United States certified mail to the addresses set forth below or to any other address which the parties may substitute in writing. To the Lessee: James Curtis cy .7;Vn,I APCHA 39551 Highway 82 Aspen, CO 81611 To the City of Aspen: City Manager 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 with a copy to: City Attorney 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 15. Binding Effect. The provisions of this Agreement shall run with an constitute a burden on the land on which the Project is located and shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the Ci-=;rk Owner and the City ' s successors, personal representatives and assigns. 16. Amendment. This Agreement may be altered or amended only by a written instrument executed by both parties. 17 . Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such determination shall not affect the validity of any other provision and the remaining provisions shall be considered severable and remain in full force and effect. THE CITY OF ASPEN, a municipal corporation By: John Bennett ATTEST: By: Kathryn Koch, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Edward M. Caswall , City Attorney LESSEE: By: James Curtis, APCHA STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF PITKIN The foregoing instrument was sworn and subscribed before me this day of , by James Curtis, APCHA. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public b ,-,....,. . % I F i " ^: ooh: „ 1 ,( / / [0 ° N t /1 / / (b °zt4 r1 - ; / !p n a ,'a t to 1 / //. Q. jo�`o t " \ / 1 r Mao8 1 ° 1 / / .• BR 14" 1 / Pi/ 1 4 1 VY /, 1 1 goy 11L11 / 1 • I /i , ky: / QI I '1 / 1 1 1,.„ / r t 1Y.;4i Y .--------y/ T o 11 Sn \ / 4,p // r\ f yl/ // �ti \� V sel\ 50t 1,5 \ I. l N 71j'77•E 4„1 S -`49 / t . /' - / / 0 N / m / "1, 0 // / MO \� N, A ....4° 0 / tititi w / / K AD \a n / cm. ti, I i •` - S Bl sa.,' l \ 111 754.45 / . \`” III / 1 ^,2,\ II I' I 6 1 G] y� o �+1 r• 0 8 o ?.. 4 'U yg1 Ft 1 o / V b l u / r S 74•CO�pp' µ. ` / I �. 2J535'� ° !' scan JII° .9!'092 41 .00.Sf99 S \--. , y- e S PUD AMENDMENT APCHA MAROLT RANCH PARKING RECONFIGURATION APRIL 24, 1995 I. INTRODUCTION. The Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority (Applicant) proposes to amend a portion of the final development plan and final plat for the Marolt Ranch Housing Project approved in 1990. This proposed amendment is to provide additional amenities for the residents of this project. Specifically, this application is for the reconfiguration of the existing parking area in order to accommodate fifty additional vehicles currently parking along the access road to the property. The Applicant is required to address Section 7-907(B) Amendment of PUD Development Order. While the Applicant has attempted to address all relevant provisions of the Municipal Land Use Regulation, and to provide sufficient information to enable a thorough evaluation of this application, questions may arise which result in the planning staffs request for additional information and/or clarification. The Applicant will be pleased to provide such information as may be required. II. AMENDMENT OF PUB DEVELOPMENT ORDER (SECTION 7-907(B)). Any other amendment (insubstantial) shall be approved pursuant to the terms and procedures of the final development plan, provided that the proposed change is consistent with or an enhancement of the approved final development plan. If the proposed change is not consistent with the approved final development plan, the amendment shall be subject to both conceptual and final development plan review and approval. During the review of the proposed amendment, the commission and city council may require such conditions of approval as are necessary to insure that the development will be compatible with current community conditions. This shall include, but not be limited to, applying to the portions of the development which have not obtained building permits or are proposed to be amended, any new community policies or regulations which have been implemented since the original approval, or taking into consideration changing community circumstances as they affect the project's original representations and commitments. The proposed amendment to the previous approvals in 1990 for Marolt Ranch represents an enhancement to the approved final development plan. The addition of fifty parking spaces will promote improved quality of life for all tenants at the Marolt Ranch. These additions are consistent with the original approvals because they provide additional incentives for residents to store vehicles thus reducing traffic impacts. Figure 1 shows the current parking configuration which consists of 49 available spaces. III. DEVELOPMENT PLAN The proposed parking reconfiguration (Fig. 2 ) is specifically designed to provide one space per unit which will serve the purpose of moving the vehicles currently parking along the access road into designated parking spaces. This will allow a workable incentive program for tenants to store vehicles and enhance management's ability to monitor vehicles on property. This proposal will also improve snow removal in the winter as well as increase year-round access to the open space, pedestrian walkways and bike path by the general public. The access road which currently handles overflow parking for 70+ cars can continued to be used for this purpose upon approval and completion of this plan, or the road could be closed to all parking. It is the recommendation of management that, since parking is planned for this area for summer recreational use by the parks dept., overflow parking in the winter be allowed with restrictions. The original approval provided on site parking for 49 vehicles and off-site car storage for .190 cars to provide a place for tenants to store vehicles as part of the incentive program. The off-site areas identified by the plan were never created. If approved, reconfiguration will begin on August 22nd after the MAA students leave and concluded by the end of September so as to be effective in the '95/96 season. IV. REVIEW STANDARDS 1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS a. The proposed development shall be consistent with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan. Since the Marolt Ranch project is 100% affordable housing, it is in complete compliance with the Housing Action Plan of the AACP. Auto storage incentives are in accordance with the AACP Transportation Plan section 17 by creating a resident parking permit system b. The proposed development shall be consistent with the character of existing land uses in the surrounding area. Since the proposed development is simply a reconfiguration of the existing parking area, it is consistent with existing land uses. c. The proposed development shall not adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. This parking development poses no significant obstacle to any future development. d. Final approval shall only be granted to the development to the extent to which GMQS allotments are obtained by the applicant. The Marolt Ranch project is 100% affordable housing and is therefore exempt. 2. LAND USES The land uses permitted shall be those of the underlying Zone District. Detached residential units may be authorized to be clustered in a zero lot line or row house configuration, but multi-family dwelling units shall only be allowed when permitted by the underlying Zone District. The underlying Zone District is Public. Marolt Ranch Housing is a conditional use which was reviewed and approved by City Council at that time. 3. OFF-STREET PARKING The number of off-street parking spaces may be varied from that required in the underlying Zone District based on the following considerations. Previous approval for parking at the Marolt Ranch granted in 1990 provided 50 parking spaces for the existing 100 housing units. This housing was designed and approved as an auto disincentive project. The original disincentive program was for the development of vehicle storage for 190 cars in secured parking areas at the MAA school and at the county land fill area as well as financial incentives to tenants in order to reduce on-site vehicle parking. No such off-site lots were provided and the property management provided by the applicant for the Marolt Ranch has determined that, while auto disincentives do work, one parking space per unit is necessary to improve livability and augment management's ability to control resident parking due to the transient nature of the employees this complex houses. Based on the historic needs of both tenants and management, the applicant requests a reconfiguration of existing parking to accommodate the vehicles on property. This reconfiguration ( Fig. 2 ) will allow the majority of the vehicles to be moved off of the access road and into designated lots behind the property berm (some of which will be assigned as storage only). Aside from enhancing the aesthetics of the area, this will allow a workable incentive program for those residents willing to store their vehicles for the winter thus reducing traffic impacts. This incentive program will provide designated parking areas, special permits and rent credits for those residents willing to store their vehicles for the winter season. a. The probable number of cars used by those using the proposed development. The probable number of cars using the Marolt Ranch has been previously estimated at 104 (Fig. 3 ). Management has estimated this number to be accurate to within approximately 10 vehicles. b. The parking needs of non-residential uses. Provided for in the previous estimate ( Fig. 3 ). c. The varying time periods of use, whenever joint use of common parking is proposed. Summer time use of the property by the MAA students in residence is significantly lower than that of winter residents, however, surrounding amenities such as open space and bike paths attract additional vehicles during summer months. Winter parking is primarily used by Marolt Ranch tenants only. The removal of vehicles from the access road in the winter will not only improve project access, but will allow non-residents better access to the amenities adjoining the entry road such as hang-gliders and cross-country skiers. d. The availability of public transit and other transportation facilities, including those for pedestrian access and/or the commitment to utilize automobile disincentive techniques in the proposed development. Roaring Fork Transit Agency (RFTA) currently runs bus service close to the property at the Castle Ridge bus stop. This amenity allows for a workable incentive program for tenants to store vehicles on property, thus reducing traffic impacts. RFTA has added additional service on this route including extended hours of service for late night workers. e. The proximity of the proposed development to the commercial core or public recreational facilities in the city. The Marolt Ranch project is located within walking distance of all city facilities as well as having access to public transportation and bike paths. 4. OPEN SPACE The open space requirements shall be that of the underlying Zone District. However, a variation in the minimum open space may be permitted if such variation would not be detrimental to the character of the proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD), and if the proposed development shall include open space for the mutual benefit of all development in the proposed PUD through a common park or recreational area. An area may be approved as a common park or recreation area if Open space for residents will be changed from that of the original approval only minimally at the fence set backs ( Fig. 2 ) which are designed for controlled seasonal vehicle storage and improvement of the entry curve area. 5. LANDSCAPE PLAN There shall be approved as part of the Final Development Plan a landscape plan, which exhibits a well designed treatment of exterior spaces. It shall provide an ample quantity and variety of ornamental plant species that are regarded as suitable for the Aspen area climate. See architectural Site plan and Vicinity Map ( Fig. 4 ). 6. LIGHTING All lighting shall be arranged so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. See architectural Site plan and Vicinity Map ( Fig. 4 ) 7. PUBLIC FACILITIES The proposed development shall be designed so that adequate public facilities will be available to accommodate the proposed development at the time development is constructed, and that there will be no net public cost for the provision of these public facilities. Further, buildings shall not be arranged such that any structure is inaccessible to emergency vehicles. Reconfiguration of the parking area will not result in any increased need for public facilities. 8. TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION The proposed reconfiguration of parking is designed to enhance traffic, pedestrian circulation and provide for better emergency vehicle access. ' 1 a Z Y `- C n� a ' \ Ic _ �' •�4 h • ,. P c. ``1,,a 2• • aq Ifs i y - d ;tom'3 v . -T----- :, r, / i 7.,_______ ,, 1 \\.. ^ ,I p---------r di Cato \ 1 • � \ I I g \ I J (11. �e a V >7ry I / II � , 0 T IN il . 7 A i R GA eal Orasnox 1.1011V W „ E, . „ ( ( 2 g - €l ¢a ® \ \\ y O O . ( U CD December 13, 1989 Mr. Richard Shaw Design WDrkshop, Inc. Page two iI Proposed projects in the same area, such as the Highlands Hotel and Heatherbed Lodge have suggested their projects would contribute 2 to 6.2 vehicle trips per unit with a strong transit sytsem. The MAA has found that its students average 0.2 cars per person, or 0.6 car per unit. The APCHA also anticipates 0.6 car/unit for skier services employees. Given the previously discussed assumptions about this project and alternate transporation methods, we have assumed four vehicle trips per unit for all vehicles using the site. The following table indicates the total number of vehicles anticipated for the activities at the Thomas/ Marolt property. a) Residential Seasonal Housing @ 0.6 cars/unit = 60 cars x 100 units Caretakers Unit @ 2 cars/unit = 2 cars x 1 unit b) Non-Residential Cafeteria employees @ 4 cars/shift = 4 cars Operations and Maintenance @ 4 cars/shift = 4 cars Housing, Visitors @ 12 cars = 12 cars Park, Community Gardens and Historic/Museum Curator = 22 cars TOTAL VEHICLES = 104 cars With 104 vehicles potentially using the site and four vehicle trips per day, one can anticipate an average daily traffic of about 416 VPD. This traffic volume will represent a 16% increase to Castle Creek Road, and a 7% increase to the Maroon Creek/Highway 82 intersection. The project will access Castle Creek Road near the present hang glider access. This will mean, the project will impact the last 850 feet of Castle Creek Road. The County's Road Management Plan calls for up- grading the road to collector status up to the hospital entrance or approximately 1300 lineal feet of Castle Creek Road. This will entail _ widening each shoulder two feet and improving sight distance to achieve a 45 mph design speed standard. Preliminary estimates from County Engineering indicate that the cost of improvements necessary y are in the range of $180,000, not including desired guardrail work. M 4 E (- - 1)1211grd - --"N. 5 ' ° 5 ' I " 5 : V5 V Y::. , . ONISLIOH irlOIN,P■1 2 ( 7-- • • t . " 41/ is, --mi r- 1 cq it 0 0. .in 0 ,- 0 44 0 „,, - bC t.0 I ?_ 71"..il ,