Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.1450 Crystal Lake Rd.44A-85 ' CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET . //��l n(� City of Aspen DATE RECEIVE �U-n(Vji7tk.� . -CASE NO. f'/�- DATE RECEIVED 'SMPLETE: STAF ,inwP btu k a. i// i _ . _ ��,� PROJECT NAME: .Q L /' `� = . � �/ !<J= APPLICANT: Applicant Addres '/hone : 4>' REPRESENTATIVE: L�,_-,'A . i !,it Representative A".dress •hone: #id (,/MWIR . ` r Type of Application: 5 /M. I. GMP/SUBDIV IS ION/PUD (4 step) Conceptual Submission ($2,730 .00) ` Preliminary Plat ($1,640 .00) - Final Plat ($ - 820 .00) 3 II. SUBDIV IS ION/PUD (4 step) 1,j Conce tual Submission ($1,900 .00) . '` Preliminary Plat ($1,220 .00) • / Final Plat • ( $ 820 .00) , V III. EXCEPT ION/EXEMPT ION/REZONING ( 2 step) ( $1,490 .0 0) IV . SPECIAL REVIEW (1 step) ($ 680 .00) Special Review k Use Determination Conditional Use Other : • P&Z CC MEETING DATE: PUBLIC HEARING : YES NO . - DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: ;.fie REFERRALS : City Atty Aspen Co nsol . S. D. School District ` ; City Engineer Mtn. Bell Rocky Mtn. Nat. Gas r Housing Dir. Parks Dept. State Hwy Dept (Glenwd) Aspen Water Holy Cross Electric State Hwy Dept (Gr.Jtn) t City Electric Fire Marshall Bldg: Zoning/Inspectn Envir. Hlth.. Fire Chief Other : FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL : Y: City Atty City Engineer Building Dept. 4 Other : Other : 1 k, FILE STATUS AND LOCATION : q 9 • MEMORANDUM TO: Stan Stevens, Building Department FROM: Alan Richman, Planning Office 64-( RE: Aspen Club FAR DATE: August 13, 1987 As per your request, I have reviewed our Aspen Club files to determine whether they have the ability to add floor area to the Club. I have found the attached letter from Dick Butera, stating that the bubble which was removed included 6717 square feet of floor area. Further, I found the attached letter from Jerome Wood stating that 2400 square feet of area was used in remodeling the exercise rooms, and another 56 square_ feet was used for awnings. Theerefore, the applicant hasj4:261 square feet of floor area still available. Please delete the approximate 1300 square foot expansion from this total, and keep a running count in your offices of how much area they have left to build. I hereby authorize you to issue this permit, if all other issues have been resolved. 1-exit-t4k. blettle) '01 ? 2 et 244 tem , --"ot• 4114i te Ap_mte._ ) • I • Aspen/Pit /9 ; '�; y,'' t a� ing Office 130 s 'tr treet x 4 r aspen , s 0: e , )r,,: 81611 November 26 , 1986 Mr. Jerome Wood 409 Pacific Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Jerome, The Planning Office has reviewed your request to place one awning above the Aspen Club entrance adding 56 square feet of floor area. Pursuant to Section 24-8.26 I consider this proposal an acceptable minor amendment to the Callahan PDD plan that does not change the use or character of the development nor increase overall coverage of structures, and therefore, authorize you to proceed with building permit application. Sincerely, Alan Richman Planning & Development Director ar/ds cc: Bill.- Drueding, Zoning Official • D te©0 11� WOOD/MONTE j 7 '„ D ADVERTISING,INC. Alan Richman Planning Director City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Alan: Enclosed are some sketches of an awning we are proposing for the Aspen Club. Bill Dreuding has asked us to get FAR sign off from the planning office. According to Steve Burstein the Aspen Club is a PUD and the any adjustments to the FAR would require an amendment to the PUD. We are asking you for a determination that this is a minor amendment to the PUD and as such you can make an administrative ruling on our request. The Aspen Club removed their tennis bubble freeing up 6,717 sq. ft. of FAR. They used 2,400 sq. ft. in their remodel of the exercise rooms. They are left with a balance of 4,317 sq. ft. We are requesting to use 56 sq. ft. of that allotment for the awning as shown. Please let me know as soon as possible on this request. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, 7,.,"217,7-477ed; Jerome Wood cc: Bill Dreuding Dick Butera 409 Pacific Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 I 303/925-6256 Member,American Ackerii.sing Federation and socicta of Environmental Graphics Designers . • Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 south galena street aspen , colorado `81611 April 15, 1986 T. Richard Butera The Aspen Club 1450 Crystal Lake Road Aspen, Co 81611 Dear Dick : I am in receipt of your letter dated April 11, 1986 regarding proposed remodeling activities at the Aspen Club. Following are my determinations in this regard: 1 . Racquetball courts 4 and 5, which you indicate are presently in use, may be converted to an aerobics room. 2 . The currently unused, restricted racquetball court which is adjacent to the fitness room can be converted into an addition to the fitness room. Racquetball court #9 must be taken out of use at the time a Certificate of Occupancy is issued for the addition to the fitness room and the building inspector must verify that a total of three (3) racquetball courts are not being used at the time the Certificate of Occupancy is issued. I hereby authorize you to proceed to the Building; Department for plan check and building permit review for these remodeling. activities. I also request that you bring your conditional use/PUD amendment application to complete status as soon as possible so that we can finally, clear up the status of the restricted. racquetball courts. Please let me know if I can otherwise be of assistance . Sincerely, Alan Richman Planning and Development Director AR:nec cc : Jim Wilson Bill Drueding Planning Office Case File . `r T. Richard Butera ao April 11, 1986 Mr. Alan Richman City of Aspen 130 S . Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Alan: Enclosed please find a plan which shows what we would like to do at The Aspen Club. There are two parts to what we would like to get done as quickly as possible . First , we would like to convert existing racquetball courts 4 and 5 to an aerobics room. These courts are presently being used and have no restrictions on them. What we will do is take the wall down between the two of them, put a new floor down and let people dance on them. It doesn ' t appear to me that there is any issue regard- ing this , unless there is something I 'm missing. Secondly, we would like to take one of the three restrict- ed racquetball courts in the fitness room side of the building and put it to use . The fitness room is too small and the members are complaining. The racquetball court we ' d like to open up for use was restricted a couple of years ago when we built the Fitness Institute . I would like to swap existing court #9 on the other side of the building where the racquetball courts are for the use of this court . My request from you is that we temporarily lock off this court , until Andy Hecht has a chance to present his case 1450 Crystal Lake Road, Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/925-8900 Mr. Alan Richman April 11 , 1986 Page 2 to try to convince you that we should be allowed to use the additional F.A.R. Perhaps we could enter a letter of agreement as to the nonuse of that court and within 90 days present our case to see if what we have to say makes any sense. I would appreciate your consideration of the above and so would our members . Sincerely, T. R - and Butera TRB/pn enclosure L\ • T. Richard Butera C r Clad ? ph I roe 23 . June 18, 1986 y~ Mr. Alan Richman City of Aspen 130 S . Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Alan: For the record and your files , I would like to point out that we have removed the bubble and auxiliary connections to the Club from The Aspen Club property. The size of the structure removed was a total of 6 , 717 square feet . In our continued drive to improve the Club for the members , we always are talking to you about needing more square footage . I trust that this removal of the above 6 , 717 square feet will enable us to use the same square -Dotage in-the`-future . 400 I( T. Richard Butera TRB/pn cc: Andy Hecht Garfield & Hecht , P.C . Mr. Bill Druiding City of Aspen • 1450 Crystal Lake Road, Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/925-8900 111 • November 19, 1895 The Honorable William Sterling, Mayor Aspen City Council City Hall 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Mr. Mayor and Members of the City Council: This is an application submitted November 20th, 1985 by Aspen Club International, Inc. for (i) an amendment to the Planned Unit Development ("PUD") for the Callahan Subdivision pursuant to Section 24-8 .26 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen ("Code") ; and (ii) an exemption from compliance with the allotment procedures of the Growth Management Plan ("GMP") pursuant to 24-11 . 2 (a) of the Code. With respect to (i) - the PUD amendment - such amendment is required by changes in conditions that have ocurred since the final plan was approved. Such change arises from the elimination of the commercial use of the "Benedict residence" within the PUD. That residence was at the time of the original plan, approved for 9,400 square feet of commercial use. Under prior applications the applicant has transferred 4, 400 of that 9,400 square feet to the recreational building within the PUD ("Aspen Club") . It is the applicants intention to construct an additional 4, 800 square feet of commercial floor area within the Aspen Club. The square footage the applicant will utilize at the Aspen Club will in the aggregate be no greater than the commercial square footage originally available within Benedict residence for commercial use. All of the additional commercial development will be constructed within the building envelope approved under the original PUD plan. Thus, the effect of this amendment is to trade commercial square footage from one location within the PUD to another in accordance with the plans submitted with this letter. With respect to (ii) - exemption from compliance with GMP - the applicant also believes that the proposed development 411 • is exempt from the allotment procedures of the GMP. The applicant states that there is no expansion of commercial floor • area, but only the demolition of commercial square footage and the reconstruction of that floor area on a contiguous site exempt from GMP allocation procedure under Section 24-11 . 2 (a) of the . Code. • Finally the applicant contends that the provisions of Section 24-3. 3 of the Code are not 'applicable in the present application. That Section provides that " [n] o approved conditional use may be substantially modified, structurally enlarged or expanded in ground area" , without prior approval. It is the applicants position- there is not structural enlargement in ground area involved in this application. Respectfully submitted, GARFIELD &. HECHT, P.C. • For Aspen Club International, Inc. • By / ' • -2- . 411 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Karen Smith FROM: Robert B. Edmondson, Acting City Attorney RE: Goldsamt (Aspen Club) DATE: November 10 , 1980 Concerning the restaurant addition at the Aspen Club: The code requires that for an amendment to the Planned Unit Development, the applicant must show "changes in conditions that have occurred since the final plan was approved or by changes in community policy" . (Section 24-8-26) The changes in conditions that must be shown, in this office' s opinion, come from without. That is , the conditions that change are in community needs and what is appropriate for the community, not the changes in the applicants needs . The club was allowed to be constructed on the premise that it would be a health club for the subdivision and for local use. A restaurant is an entirely new use;. to argue that it is needed to cut down the cost of membership for club membership is what is known as "bootstrapping. " That is , first they have a club then, to support the club they need a restaurant. The next logical step would be to support the restaurant they need shops, boutiques , etc. The applicant also argues that there has been a change in community policy, but the applicant has not informed us of what that change happens to be. Also, I believe a PUD is still governed by the underlying zoning. Is a restaurant a proper use in a residential zoned area? My recommendation to the:. planning department is that a history of the Aspen Club be. compiled. This history should answer the question if this amendment to the PUD is proper, the record will show what the initial purpose of the club was and whether a restaurant fits that purpose. I • GARFIELD & HECHT ATTORNEYS AT LAW RONALD GARFIELD VICTORIA SQUARE BUILDING TELEPHONE ANDREW V.HECHT (303) 925-1936 ASHLEY ANDERSON 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE TELECOPIER ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (303) 925-3008 CRAIG N. BLOCKWICK CABLE ADDRESS K. ROULHAC GARN October 21, 1980 "GARHECLAW" BOBBIE JO QIIIMBY (ADMITTED IN II,I.IMO ONI,Y RICHARD Y.NEII.E1', JR. Planning and Zoning Commission Aspen City Hall 130 Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Chairman and Commission Members : This is an application pursuant to 24-8 . 26 of the Aspen City Code for an amendment to the PUD for the Callahan Subdivision. The applicant, Robert S . Goldsamt, requests that approval be granted for enclosure of approximately 1200 sqaure feet of an existing concrete slab adjoining the recreation building at the Aspen Club. The proposed enclosure would be accomplished through the addition of a greenhouse structure with exterior dimensions of approximately twenty (20) feet by sixty (60) feet. The enclosure will serve as a seating area for the Aspen Club ' s restaurant, with a seating capacity of approximately fifty (50) persons . The proposed enclosure would be located so as to utilize the kitchen and other restaurant facilities presently in existence at the Aspen Club. Access to the new seating facility would be the same as is presently in existence for the snackbar, and which presently permits access to Club members and their guests only. The Aspen Club would not publically advertise its dining facility separately from other Club facilities . According to 28-8 . 26 , amendments to PUD' s may be granted where the proposed amendments are "shown to be required by changes and conditions that have occurred since the final plan was approved or by changes in community policy. " The Aspen Club has seen a change in conditions since the approval of the original plan. Furthermore, the applicant submits that there has been change in community policy such that an amendment to the existing PUD would be appropriate. When the initial PUD and subsequent amendments for the Callahan Subdivision were approved, neither the applicant nor the City foresaw the overwhelming positive response from local residents and the community in general for the development of a facility similar to the Aspen Club. The Aspen Club has consistently attempted to accomodate the demands and needs of the community in its development. To this end, a snackbar with seating for approximately fifty (50) members was built at the Club. Since the opening of the snackbar, it has become apparent that the existing limited facilities do not adequately serve the needs of Club members . Numerous inquiries from GARFIELD & HECHT Club members concerning upgrading the dining facilities, and limited utilization of the existing snackbar facilities by Club members have prompted the applicant to seek amendment to the original PUD. The tremendous demand by Club members for an upgraded restaurant, separated from the pedestrian traffic which presently detracts from the snack- bar, with an expanded menu and quiet surroundings was largely unforeseen by the applicant. Furthermore, the Aspen Club has consistently attempted to develop its facilities in a fashion that will permit a reasonably priced membership rate structure for the benefit of local residents. An improved dining facility with income producing potential will help effectuate this objective. The snackbar presently in operation has not been successful in this respect. As previously mentioned, the proposed enclosure would encompass a small area, only 1200 square feet, an increase of approx- imately 1% over the square footage of the existing Club facilities, and because it would be located on a presently existing concrete slab, no expansion of the existing perimeter of the building would be necessitated. Although minimal, the amendment proposed above is crucial to the applicant' s efforts to provide a vital , comprehensive, first class athletic club to the community, and therefore we respectfully request its approval . Sincerely, GARFIELD & HECHT Andrew V. Hecht for the applicant, Robert S. Goldsamt AVH/agk vi GARFIELD & TEMIHIT, P.C. RONALD GARFIELD ATTORNEYS AT LAW TELEPHONE ANDREW V. HECHT VICTORIAN SQUARE BUILDING (303) 925-1936 TELECOPIER KATHERINE.HENDRICKS 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE (303) 925-3008 WILLIAM K. GUEST, P.C. ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 CABLE ADDRESS - "GARHEC' January 20 , 1984 • • Planning and Zoning Commission City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: T. Richard Butera and Julie Anthony - "The Aspen Club" • Dear Mr. Chairman and Members of the Commission: The Aspen Club requests by this application consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council of i) an amendment to the PUD under which the original approval was granted for development of the Callahan Subdivision ("Subdivision") , ii) an amendment to the conditional use approved for that PUD, iii) a rezoning of Lot 14 known as the "Benedict • residence" from RR to R-15 or R-30 , (iv) a lot split of lot 14 of. the PUD on which the Benedict residence is situated pursuant to Section 20-19 (a) (1) (2) and (3) of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen ("Code") , and (v) a declaration by the appropriate governmental authority that the alterations to the Club as hereinafter outlined do not require a Growth Management Plan allotment. To permit a lot split of lot 14 to form two separate parcels as delineated in Exhibit "A" the applicant requests rezoning of lot 14 to an R 15 classification and agrees to restrict the use of the Benedict residence situated thereon to a single. family residence. Those lots are currently zoned to permit a commercial use of the Benedict residence (lot 14 was originally zoned R-15 and later changed to 'RR) . The applicant requests lot split of lot--14 -to. create one additional single :family site excepted from Growth Management -Plan pursuant to Section 24-11 . 2 (d) and subdivision requlations of the Code. The .aggregate square footage of those lots is 2 ..696 acres. If zoned either `R1,5 compatible with the residential character of the PUD, or R-30 an even more :restrictive 'residential zone classification than the surrounding land it would qualify for an exception from the strict application of the subdivision regulations and an exemption from the Growth Management Plan allotment procedures of the Code. The proposed development of lot 14 after the lot split • iio tARFlELD & HHECHT, P.C. Mr. Sunny Vann January 20 , 1984 Page 2 • shall be limited by applicable requirements of the Code , limiting development to two single family dwellings, one on each lot. • Further the applicant requests permission to make alterations to the Club facility situated on lot 15 of the Subdivision. Such alterations and additions will not expand the - foot print of the building. The unused commercial square footage originally approved for the Benedict residence would be transferred if necessary to the recreation facility on lot 15 to support a tiering of three racquet ball courts thus adding approximately 2 , 500 square feet of usable space within the . existing building. • The following information will be helpful to support • this request and to demonstrate how much commercial square footage has already been approved by the City but unused. The original Benedict residence approved for a restaurant/clubhouse was for 11 , 400 square feet (9, 400 above grade and 2 , 000 in the basement) . The original approval for the recreation building was for 46 ,000 square feet. On June 20 , 1978 4 , 400 square feet of commercial use was taken from the Benedict residence and moved to • the recreational building to support an expansion. The balance of commercial approval of 7 , 000 square feet has not yet been used. Respectfully submitted, T. Richard Butera, Julia Anthony and Robert S. Goldsamt by their attorneys Garfield & Hecht, P.C. Andrew V.- Hecht AVH/mlc Enclosure • • • 1. DATE SUBMITTED: 2. APPLICANT: 3. REPRESENTATIVE: • No. 5s- CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen STAFF: (y jVll& 4. PROJECT NAME: C��1d f ( ern �iu�l Arr\nwlnuit 10 (uG -Ran 5. LOCATION : A4kA CIA CQ.4�I�� -1 S1 �G�i�1i51�� 6. TYPE OF APPLICATION: Rezoning Subdivision Stream Margin P.U.D. Exception 8040 Greenline Special Review Exemption View Plane Growth Management 70:30 - Conditional Use HPC Residential Bonus Other 7. REFERRALS: Attorney Sanitation District School District Engineering Dept. Fire Marshal Rocky Mtn. Nat. Gas Housing Parks State Highway Dept. Water Holy Cross Electric Other City Electric Mountain Bell 8. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS: Council Approved Denied -Date 10. ROUTING: Attorney Building Engineering Other i Subdivision Exemption- Melnick tabled Ord. 34,1978 -T,nv exing & Rezoning Aspen Club Ord. 36, 1978 Defining Subgrade and Calculation of FAR Regular Meeting Johnston. Motion Carried. Aspen City Council October 23, 1978 Councilman Wishart moved to authorize the electrical contractor to go ahead and do $10,000 worth of work now to affect substantial savings; seconded by Councilman Isaac. All in favor, motion carried. SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION - Meln.ick Grice told Council Ordinance #53 requires the application to demonstrate nominal displace ments of the tentants. Danielsen has talked to the tentant and the price has gone up so that she cannot afford it and she will probably be displaced, Grice recommended denial based on tenant displacement. A letter was delivered to Council from the tenant stating she does not feel. her displacement should be a reason for denial, Grice pointed out he felt the tenant is caught in the middle as a friend and a. tenant. Grice stated. he has been getting two different stories. Grice said he felt it would be appropriate to table this until the tenant can be talked to. f Tam Scott, representing the applicant, told Council he had talked to the tenant off and on and had explained this subdivision would enable her or somebody else to buy the unit. Scott said he had urged his client to reach a sales price, although one has not been reached, Scott said he did not feel that the tenant's problems in buy the unit should be the inter- fering factor. Melnick bought the duplex several years ago, lived in it himself, and the current tenant has lived there two years without a written lease. Mark Danielsen told Council the original application was to be a request by Troobnick,.the tenant, to buy the unit. It looks now as if 3 or 4 people would be displaced. Danielsen said he would like to see this tabled until an agreement- can be reached between Troobnick and Melnick. Councilman Isaac moved to table the application; seconded by Councilwoman Johnston. Scott said this is like forcing someone to contract with another person. Councilman Wishart pointed out without a lease, the owner can kick the tenant out within 30 days. City Attorney Stock said his position is that any citizen of the City of Aspen can report any violation of City ordinances to the proper authorities. The City will take action immedi- ately on behalf of the citizen. Many of the City's ordinances can not be enforced without the public bringing these to the City's attention. Mayor Standley told Scott to communi- cate the Council's thinking to his client and have this resolved before it is addressed again. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE #34, SERIES OF 1978 - Annexing and Rezoning Aspen Club Mayor Standley opened the public hearing. Ashley Anderson told Council he has a proposed agreement with Stock and Dave Ellis. Anderson said Ellis wants the right: to have a road go in somewhere, to be decided by the developer and Ellis, if and when there is develop- ment on the property. Jim Reents told Council the reason Ellis is not specifying an exact alignment is there is no detailed topographical map of the site, and he is not sure whether to upgrade Ute Avenue to 60 or 80 feet. Mayor Standley closed the public hearing. Councilman Parry moved. to read Ordinance #34, Series of 1978; seconded by Councilman Van Ness. All in favor, motion carried. ' ORDINANCE #34 (Series of 1978) AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING CERTAIN UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO; AND FOR THE ZONING OF SAID TERRITORY was read by the city clerk. Councilman Parry moved to adopt Ordinance #34, Series of 1978, on second reading; seconded by Councilman Wishart. Roll call vote; Council.members Van Ness, aye; Wishart, aye; Parry, aye; Johnston; nay; Isaac, aye; Mayor Standley, aye. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #36, SERIES OF 1978.- Defining subgrade and calculation of-FAR Mayor Standley opened the public hearing. Ms. Smith, planning office, told Council a basement is defined as anything 50 per cent or more below grade. If it is partially under - ground and has windows, it can be used. Any portion of the below grade area that is.open to the sky counts. Jeffrey Sachs pointed out people who want to avoid the FAR calcula- tions will build submerged basements. This might encourage people to build ratholes, and then people will rent them. This is a safety hazard.. Councilman Parry said he felt this is not a necessary ordinance, and just makes it more difficult to build anything.. Ms. Smith said this ordinance should control massing and usable floor area. The ordinance was written to clarify a word'already in the code. This definition will affect S /C /I, NC, office, lodge and R /MF zones. If the FAR Is adop.ed.in the residential zones, it will also affect them. Mayor Standley suggested that if people wanted to have basements,tthey be allowed to have them and it be included in the FAR. If they don't want basements for commercial uses or housing, and wanted to have windows, Mayor Standly suggested a provision that allows this and deed restricts it. City Attorney Stock said.i.f the Council wanted to encourage base- ments, at the time the adopt the residential. FAR, the Council_ may simply exclude basemen... i from the FAR calculation in residential. districts. This would avoid the argument that there is a benefit to yet more space by having it entirely covered. 4 1* COTTLE GRAYBEAL YAW ARCHITECTS LTD JOHN COTTLE, ALA DOUG GRAYBEAL, ALA LARRY YAW, AIA MARK HENTHORN, ALA 510 EAST HYMAN, SUITE 21 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PHONE (970) 925 -2867 (FAX) 925 -3736 P,0. BOX 3507 107 NORTH FIR STREET TELLURIDE, COLORADO 81435 PHONE (970) 728 -3037 (FAX) 728 -3236 MEMORANDUM TO: Mary Lackner, Sara Thomas CC.: Michael Fox, John Cottle FROM: Susan Hayward RE: The Aspen Club, Existing Floor Area (1450 Crystal Lake Road, Callahan Subdivision Lot No. 15) DATE: November 18, 1996 Our office has been retained by the new owner of The Aspen Club to verify the floor area of the existing facility and, if possible, begin considering some interior alterations. Attached please find floor area calculations which document existing conditions at The Aspen Club. The first two pages summarize existing floor areas with total floor area listed by level. Sheets 1 -3 illustrate these areas in plan and section. The remaining sheets (A 1 -A 16) document subgrade calculations for those areas which are currently partially above grade and partially below grade. All floor areas and subsequent calculations are based upon existing floor plans obtained from the Owner (dated May 1976 and August 1992), Improvements Survey certified by Carl R Carmichael Surveying on 5 November 1996, field verification as required by our office, and the following applicable code: 1995 Municipal Code for the City of Aspen, Colorado, Title 26, Land Use Regulations, Chapter 26.04, General Provisions, Section 26.04.100, Definitions: "FLOOR AREA means the sum of the gross horizontal areas of each story of the building measured from the exterior walls, or from the center line of the party walls, including the floor area of accessory uses and of accessory buildings and structures. In measuring floor areas for floor area ratio and allowable floor areas, the following applies: A. General In measuring floor area for the purposes of calculating floor area ratio and allowable floor area, there shall be included that floor area within the surrounding exterior walls (measured from their exterior surface) of a building, or portion thereof B. Decks, Balconies, Porches, Loggias and Stairways. The calculation of the floor area of a building or a portion thereof shall not include decks, balconies, stairways, terraces and similar features, unless the area of these features is greater than fifteen percent of the maximum allowable floor area of the building. Porches shall not be counted towards FAR. Loggias shall be calculated as 0.5 FAR. D. Subgrade Areas. the area of any story whose top of floor is a maximum of (18) inches above natural or finished grade, whichever is lower, at any point along the perimeter of the building shall be excluded from floor area calculations. For any story which is partly above or partly below natural or finished grade whichever is lower, a calculation of the total volume of the story which is above and which is below grade shall be made, for the purpose of establishing the percentage of the area of the story which shall be included in floor area calculations. This calculation shall be made by determining the total percentage of the perimeter wall area of the story which is above natural or finished grade, whichever is lower, which shall be multiplied by the total floor area of the subject story, and the resulting total shall be that area which is included in the floor area calculation. " Thank you for your time. Unless we hear otherwise from you in the near future, we will proceed with feasibility studies based upon the accuracy and validity of the attached calculations. n:wpdocs:aspenclb:mem 11- 18:9688 -4 10� COTTLE GRAYBEAL YAW ARCHITECTS LTD JOHN COTTLE, ALA DOUG GRAYBEAL, AIA LARRY YAW, AM MARK HENTHORN, ALA 510 EAST HYMAN, SUITE 21 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PHONE (970) 925 -2867 (FAX) 925 -3736 P.O. BOX 3507 107 NORTH FIR STREET TELLURIDE, COLORADO 81435 PHONE (970) 728 -3037 (FAX) 728 -3236 • The Aspen Club Lower Level Floor Plan Floor Areas EXERCISE ROOMS: Indoor Tennis Racquetball 1 Racquetball 2 Racquetball 3 Squash 1 Squash 2 Squash 3 Aerobics Studio 1 Aerobics Studio 2 Exercise Room Fitness 1 Fitness 2 Cardiovascular Sub -Total MEMBER AMENITIES: Massage Rooms Babysitting Gallery Men's Locker Sub -Total ADMINISTRATIVE AREAS: Conference Room Accounting Service Laundry Sub -Total OTHER: Corridors Stairs 1 -5 Elevator/Equipment Room Storage Mechanical/Electrical Rooms Sub -Total TOTAL - Lower Level Floor Area 6,540 410 385 365 355 320 280 1,040 545 120 0 0 330 10,690 0 0 480 0 480 0 0 800 0 800 0 0 0 0 0 0 11,970 t The Aspen Club Upper Level Floor Plan Floor Areas EXERCISE ROOMS: Pool 3,495 Sub -Total 3,495 MEMBER AMENITIES: Pro Shop 890 Women's Locker 1,885 Sports Medicine Institute 2,320 Juice Bar 150 Kitchen 90 Reception 770 Sub -Total 6,105 ADMINISTRATIVE AREAS: Offices 1,585 Sub -Total 1,585 OTHER: Vestibules 250 Corridors 3,155 Stairs 1 -5 740 Elevator 80 Storage 160 Mechanical/Electrical Rooms 365 Sub -Total 4,750 TOTAL - Upper Level Floor Area 15,935 (+ Lower Level Floor Area) +11,970 TOTAL FLOOR AREA 27,905 (At this time, exterior decks, terraces and stairways are not included in the total floor area calculation) TOTAL ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA 52,000 nmpdomaspendblarll- 18:9688 — eQ19 aee fouoD . • i Mt=C; H/F-LEG COTTLE 8101 THE ASPEN CLUB GRAYBEAL mwilli � YAW row asm LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ARCHITECTS 107 NORM rH sr• AREA LTD 1 m Or—ALE: X/A s�, e S Il/181�6 OFF AEROBICS 210 -_ T STUDIO i DECEPTION OPEN TO BELOW SHOP 110 890 AEROBICS STUDIO "1 OPEN TO BELOW v 3ALL 01 OPEN TO BELOW 3ALL "2 OPEN TO BELOW R(2T5AL1- 03 OPEN TO BELOW oPEN To eELoW INDOOR TENNIS OPEN TO BELOW 0 90 JUICE E 150 'S LOCKER 1885 POOL 3495 a FE11 a INSTITUTE 2320 CARD 10 SERVICE ,_, ,__ � 1�►�_�►3 ;i��t-ll 1111111 LJa X91111111111 OPEN TO BELOW 5 215E CORRIDORS = 3155 STAIR "1 = 265 oPEN To eELoW INDOOR TENNIS OPEN TO BELOW 0 90 JUICE E 150 'S LOCKER 1885 POOL 3495 a FE11 a INSTITUTE 2320 CARD 10 SERVICE OPEN TO BELOW VESTIBULES - 250 OPEN TO BELOW 5 215E CORRIDORS = 3155 STAIR "1 = 265 STAIR 02 = 160 STAIR 03 a 125 STAIR "4 = 90 STAIR 05 = 100 1 g ELEVATOR = 80 STORAGE = 160 MECN/ELEC = 365 510 151 ca ei°ii THE ASPEN CLUB COTTLE GRAYHEAL p (Moo-MI YAW UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 2 ARCHITECTS F.0m w 1m mm � SCALE= N/A HAS/% LM i MR. AREA WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 300 TOTAL 400 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 15% @—AE ROBICS STUDIO #2 — NORTH scALE: 1, %1'-o" WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 210 TOTAL 400 z WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 53% @-AE- Asc R OBICS STUDIO #2 - SOUTH ALE: 1/19' =1' -0° .41 @j AER OBICS STUDIO #2 — EAST SCALE: 1 /l8 " =1' -0" WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 490 TOTAL 820 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 60% WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 515 TOTAL. B20 % WALL AFEA A50VE GRADE 63% @--AAEROBIJCS STUDIO #2 - PEST scALS: 1/8 " =1'-0° 4 2 I 9 t GROSS FLOOR AREA 865 9 PERIMETER WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 63% ADJUSTED FLOOR AREA 545 n AEROBICS STUDIO �2 - PLAN SCALE: 1/19 " =1' -0" 510 )�4Y HY1fAH COTTLE P m 81 THE ASPEN CLUB GRAYBEAL YAW rum sw AEROBICS STUDIO #2 A2 ARCHITECTS 107 aaM M sr. ca u SCALE: 1/lb AR5A °�i' -m" 11/18/96 �jS Q UASH _1 -NORTH cALS: 1/16" =1' -0' n SQUASHi -SOUTH S CALE: 1/16" =1' -0" WALL AFEA --' ABOVE GRADE'335 TOTAL 635 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 53% WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 305 TOTAL 635 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 48% I d � 3 � n SQUASH #1 - PLAN SCALE: 1/16 " =1' -0" WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 195 TOTAL 410 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 48% n SQUASH #1 -EAST SCALE: 1/16 " =1' -0" WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 715 TOTAL 410 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 55% &S #1 -WEST SCALE: 1/16 " =1' -0" GROSS FLOOR AREA % PERIMETER WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE ADJUSTED FLOOR AREA 695 51% 355 COTTLE 510 aesl H auel l THE ASPEN CLUB ca el a73GRAYBEAL m se YAW AR HITECTS F SQUASH #1 A3 m 814M LTD F 3M SG ALS: 1/16 " ■1' - ®" 11/18/96 AREA o �• n SQUASH 2 ORTH SCALE: 1/10 " =1' -0" n SQUASH �2 -SOUTH SCALE: 1/10" =1' -0" WALL AREA^.: •.r - -, ABOVE GRADE 320 TOTAL 655 % WALL AREA A50VE GRADE 49% WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 280 TOTAL 655 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 43% SQUASH #2 - PLAN SCALE: WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 110 TOTAL 400 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 43% @—a QUASH 2 —EAST SCALE: 1/10 " =1' -0• WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 205 TOTAL 400 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 51% n SQUASH #2 -WEST SCALE: 1/10 " =1' -0" GROSS FLOOR AREA % PERIMETER WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE ADJUSTED FLOOR AREA 685 4-1% 320 ._ COTTLE P �; THE ASPEN CLUB ca alell GRAYBEAL rsase ARCHITECTS 16 Won SQUASH #2 AL� LTD P�9o97 SCAL:1/16 "•1' ->a" 11/18/96 AREA r eao se _SQUASH #3 —NORTH \� SCME: 1 /16' =1' -O" 3 S UASH �3 —SOUTH SCALE: 1/16 " =1' -O" WALL AREA A50VE GRADE 280 TOTAL 650 % WALL AREA A50VE GRADE 43% WALL AREA A50VE GRADE 230 TOTAL 650 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 35% WALL AIWA A50VE GRADE 140 TOTAL 400 % WALL AREA A50VE GRADE 35% n SQUASH3 —EAST SCALE: 1/16 " =1' -O" WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 180 TOTAL 400 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 45% @-f QUASH 33 —WEST scALE: 1/16" =1 -O" SQUASH #3 — PLAN SCALE: GROSS FLOOR AREA 695 % PERIMETER WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 40% ADJUSTED FLOOR AREA 280 COTTLE �510 � THE ASPEN CLUB ca Bleu GRAYBEAL F {gem AR YAW HITECTS PM ip m sr. SQUASH #3 A 5 Co. mom /� ,45MA LTD P no 5DY1 SCALE: 1/16 "s1' -011 11/18/96 r s�o -= WALL AREA A50YE GRADE IW TOTAL 415 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 46% Q—RA � BALL #1 - NORTH SC18 " =1'-0" WALL AREA A50YE GRADE 185 TOTAL 415 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 45% @---RBA QUETBALL 1 - SOUTH SCALE. 1/18" 1' -0" r @—R A UETBALL #1 - EAST SCALE: 1 /18 " =1' -0" n RAQUET BALL i - WEST __ scnL$. 1/18 ° =1' -0° GRO55 FLOOR AIWA % PERIMETER LUALL AREA ABOVE GRADE ADJUSTED FLOOR AREA WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 380 TOTAL 810 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 41% WALL AREA A50YE GRADE 355 TOTAL 810 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 44% 5110 46% 410 RAQUETBALL #1 - PLAN SCALE: 1/18 " =1' -0" COTTLE 510>>� a1e11 ca THE ASPEN CLUB F Ed ■� GRAYBEAL = YAW Ma w RAQUETBALL #1 A6 ARCHITECTS 107 mm � LTD FM m SCALE: IAW-1' -W il/18/9b AFREA 1 070 W8 WALL AREA A50YE GRADE 185 TOTAL 415 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 45% 1 RAQUETBALL #2 — NORTH SCALE: 1/le " =1' -0" WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 160 TOTAL 415 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 39% @-RA -QUETBALL 2 - SOUTH scALE: i /le " =1' -o- • @—F AQUETBALL j2 — EAST SCALE: 1/19 " =1' -0" RAQUETBALL #2 - WEST �j/ SCALE: 1/19 " =1' -0° -2- -- - -- - O-RA QUETBALL #2 - PLAN SCALE: 1/19 ° =1' -0° WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 310 TOTAL 810 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 46% WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 375 TOTAL 810 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 40% GRO55 FLOOR AREA 890 % PERIMETER WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 43% ADJUSTED FLOOR AREA 385 COTTLE rl r 61 THE . ASPEN CLUB co e1e11 GRAYBEAL r� YAW ]FAM w RAQUETBALL #2 A f Is ARCHITECTS 107 NOM F LTD T • AREA eCA�- /// @—F AQUETBALL j2 — EAST SCALE: 1/19 " =1' -0" RAQUETBALL #2 - WEST �j/ SCALE: 1/19 " =1' -0° -2- -- - -- - O-RA QUETBALL #2 - PLAN SCALE: 1/19 ° =1' -0° WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 310 TOTAL 810 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 46% WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 375 TOTAL 810 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 40% GRO55 FLOOR AREA 890 % PERIMETER WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 43% ADJUSTED FLOOR AREA 385 COTTLE rl r 61 THE . ASPEN CLUB co e1e11 GRAYBEAL r� YAW ]FAM w RAQUETBALL #2 A f Is ARCHITECTS 107 NOM F LTD T • AREA eCA�- n RAQUETBALL #3 - NORTH SCALE: 1 /16° =1' -0° RAQUETBALL3 SOUTH - - -- -- - - �"� SCALE: 1/16 ° WALL AIREA ABOVE GRADE 300 TOTAL ISO % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 35% WALL AIWA ABOVE GRADE 340 TOTAL l80 % WALI AR€A ABOVE GRADE 44% 1 d q 3 A8 WALL A ABOVE GRADE 190 TOTAL 415 % WALL AAA ABOVE GRADE 4671 @AA QU ETBALL #3 - EAST ALE: 1/16 " =1' -0" WALL AAA ABOVE GRADE 150 TOTAL 415 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 36% RAQUETBALL_ 3 -__NEST GROSS FLOOR AREA % f'ERiMETER WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE ADJUSTED FLOOR AREA 888 41% 365 n RAQUETBALL #2 - PLAN SCALE: 1 /16 ° =1' -U° nff mw COTTLE 510 91l THE ASPEN CLUB P 8Id NV GRAYBEAL rrM YAW P.Oim w RAQUETBALL #3 A8 ARCHITECTS 107 NOM I LTD n97.3027 3CAl. 1/16 " =1' -m" 11/18/96 A'REA ' WALL AIWA ABOVE GRADE 145 TOTAL 310 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 41% GALLERY — NORTH 1 SCALE: 1/16` =1' -0" WALL AFMA ABOVE GRADE 130 TOTAL 310 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 42% GALLERY — SOUTH SCALE: 1/16 " =1' -0` &G&GALLERY - EAST SCALE: 0 1/19• =1' -" GALLFRY - NEST SCALE: 1/16 " =1' -0° WALL AFREA ABOVE GRADE bl5 TOTAL 1450 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 42% WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 610 TOTAL 1515 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 43% C=ROSS FLOOR AREA 1090 % PERfM €T €R LUALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 44% ADJUSTED FLOOR AREA 400 n GALLERY PLAN `' scALE: 1 /1st =1' -0" COTTLE A r THE ASPEN CLUB CO. eieii GRAYBEAL r WE-= ARCHITECTS eia � . GALLERY A LTD Y M 33W SCALE: 1./16" -1' -0" 11/18/96 AREA &�IND�001RI TENNIS — NORTH 1/92' =1' -0' INDOOR TENNIS — EAST SCALE: 1 /32' =1' -0' &ILMOOR TENNIS — SOUTH SCALE: 1/32' =1' -0' f WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 185 TOTAL 2415 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 33% WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 1-165 TOTAL 3520 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 50% WALL AREA ABOVE WRADE 695 TOTAL 2415 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 28% ®1e11 COTTLE 510 . co. MW ASPEN CLUB GRAYBEAL m YAW INDOOR TENNIS A10 ARCHITECTS � m LTD P 50� SGA� :1/32 " =1' -0" HAS/% ARE A F 870 92,98 INDOOR TENNIS . _WEST 1 -- SCALE: INDOOR TENNIS — PLAN SCALE: 1132 " =1' -0° WALL ALMA ABOVE GRADE 2230 TOTAL 3920 A WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 63% GROSS FLOOR AREA % PERIMETER WALL AREA 46OVE GRADE ADJUSTED FLOOR AREA 14,865 440 6,540 COTTLE 510 �rrex THE ASPEN CLUB co. e1e11 ItGRAYBEAL YAW P.0m w INDOOR TENNIS All ARCHITECTS 1o7 Nom m LTD i SGALE: 1/32'Y'-011 11/18/96 AREA r i n SERVICE - NORTH 1 SCALE. 1/18' =1' -0' WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 480 TOTAL 1195 % WALL AREA A50VE GRADE 40% WALL AREA A50VE GRADE 95 TOTAL 410 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 23% n SERVICE - EAST SCALE: 1/16 " =1' -0" WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 280 TOTAL 1195 n SERVICE - SOUTH % WALL AREA SCALE: 1/18 ° =1' -0° ABOVE GRADE 23% Q--aE RV ICE - PLAN SCALE: 1/16' =1' -0' WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 220 TOTAL 225 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 98% @ASERICE V - WEST *Al2 GROSS FLOOR AREA 1-135 % PERIMETER WALL AREA A50VE GRADE 469a ADJUSTED FLOOR AREA 800 COTTLE A > Well THE ASPEN CLUB ca elell GRAYBEAL i� ARCHITECTS 10 m w. SERVICE Al2 LTD r m � `�' SCALE: 1A9,11 -tl -o° unarms AREA WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 45 TOTAL. 910 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 5% WALL AREA A60VE GRADE 0 TOTAL 910 X WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 0% ROOM NORTH EXERCISE ROOM - SOUTH @-EEXERCISE SCALE: 1/19 ° =1' -0° �' SCALE: 1/19 ° =1' -0° n EXERCISE ROOM - EAST SCALE: >/ie` =1' -0' ABOVE Z0 @-L XERCISE ROOM - WEST A50YE I 20 SCALE: 1/19' =1' -0' WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 0 TOTAL 1650 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 0% WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 20 TOTAL 1650 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 1% GROSS FLOOR AREA 4 ,015 % PERIMETER WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 3% ADJUSTED FLOOR AREA 120 COTTLE 510>>� uu ca l THE ASPEN CLUB GRAYBEAL psi YAW Pom nor EXERCISE ROOM A 1 3 ARCHITECTS io, mm m ff. L1'D P vro ` 1116"-V-011 AREA j SCALE: 11/18/96 WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 250 TOTAL 925 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 21% CARDIOVASCULAR - NORTH 1 SCALE: 1/18' =I' -0' WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 230 TOTAL 925 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 25% CARDIOVASCULAR - SOUTH scALE: 1/18' =I'-0' WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 150 TOTAL 590 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 25% CARDIOVASCULAR - EAST SCALE: 1 /18' =I' -0° n CARDIOVASCULAR - PLAN e1 SCALE: 1/18 ° =1' -0° WALL AREA A50YE GRADE 50 TOTAL 590 % WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 25% CARDIOVASCULAR - PEST SCALE: 1/18° =I' —o" GROSS FLOOR AREA 1260 % PERIMETER LUALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 2696 ADJUSTED FLOOR AREA 330 COTTLE �b10 `> ca Bleu THE THE ASPEN CLUB GRAYBEAL i (mp& -= YAP P.M w CARDIOVASCULAR A 1 4 ARCHITECTS Io,1 LTD P P16 9aY! SGAL1 == 1/16 " =1' -m" 11/18/96 AREA I 3296 1 WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 250 n SPORTS MEDICINE - NORTH TOTAL 415 1 scaLE: 1/19" =1 -0" z WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 602 s WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 250 SPORTS MEDICINE - SOUTH TOTAL 415 SCALE: 1/19' =1• -0- z WALL AREA A50VE GRADE 60% @ASPORTS MEDICINE - EAST ALE: 1/19 ° =1' -0" r4-)-SPORTS MEDICINE - WEST SCALE: 1/19 ° =1' -0° WALL AREA A50VE GRADE 520 TOTAL 845 S WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE' 622 WALL AREA A50VE GRADE 525 TOTAL 845 z WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 622 n SPORTS MEDICINE INSTITUTE - PLAN SCALE:I /le ° =I' -0° GROSS FLOOR AREA 3,800 % PERIMETER WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 61% ADJUSTED FLOOR AREA 2320 COTTLE blu r> celt ca THE ASPEN CLUB l ItGRAYHEAL Fm YAW P.om 3, SPORTS MEDICINE INSTITUTE A 15 ARCHITECTS 107 Nmm � LTD F Flo w SCALE- AR5A n OFFICE - NORTH 1 SCALE: 1/18 " =1' -0" WALL AREA / WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 730 ABOVE GRADE 105 TOTAL 390 TOTAL 185 :0 WALL AREA z WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 59% ABOVE GRADE 51% n OFFICE - EAST ScnJ 1/18' =1' -0' Bal / WALL AREA WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 190 ABOVE GRADE 95 TOTAL 390 TOTAL 185 x WALL AREA R WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE 4996 ABOVE GRADE 517E OFFICE - SOUTH U SCALE: 1/18 ° =1' -0° n OFFICE - PLAN scaLE: 1/18' =1' -0' n OFFICE - WEST seals: 1/18 ° =1' -0' GROSS FLOOR AREA 9,10 9a PERIMETER LUALL AREA A50VE GRADE 549 ADJUSTED FLOOR AREA 525 COTTLE 51e ter "; THE ASPEN CLUB elell GRAYBEAL ca sr9e YAW AR HITECTS 1o7 mm m sr. OFFICE A1 Co. alm LTD l 990 ffmo 3w SCALE= 1/16 " -1' -m" 11/18/96 '' A