HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.Tipplewood Sub Lot 4.19A-88 • . .r
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen
DATE RECEIVED: //7/�//g PA13.CF,s4 ID AND .CASE NO.
DATE COMPLETE: )77-/(Y4-(i1/60-6/9___ _A-
STAFF Y8
MEMBER: f..
PROJECT NAME: 64(07.4fia4/ 1 I) 0/144 61tW a/{AUL
Project Address:
APPLICANT: /7 ` `Cis/, 0//. • _
Applicant A.dressy I/PI
REPRESENTATIVE: , ' eviVi
Representative Address/Phone:
TYPE OF APPLICATION:
PAID: YES NO AMOUNT: 8/a-o0
1 STEP APPLICATION:
P&Z MEETING DATE: 5-K`4- .;1-' PUBLIC HEARING: YES 4
DATE REFERRED: �' 7?-0 8. INITIALS: -/
2 STEP APPLICATION:
CC MEETING DATE: PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO
DATE REFERRED: INITIALS:
REFERRALS:
City Attorney Mtn. Bell School District
City Engineer Parks Dept. Rocky Mtn Nat Gas
Housing Dir. Holy Cross State Hwy Dept(GW)
-�L Aspen Water ■ Fire Marshall State Hwy Dept(G )
City Electric Fire Chief Bldg:Zon/Inspect
. Envir. Hlth. Roaring Fork Roaring Fork
Aspen Consol. Transit Energy Center
S.D. Other
FINAL ROUTING: /DATEOUTED: ( �� " ii' 0 INITIAL':p
•
•
City Atty City Engineer Bldg. Dept.
Other:
f! FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: Wilk-
1
_ t s
ANDERMAN 8040 REVIEW/SUMMARY
The Anderman application for 8040 Greenline review to add on to
an existing house was approved by the Planning Commission on June
21, 1988 with the following conditions of approval.
1) The applicants shall submit a copy of a geotechnical
engineering report regarding the retaining wall and
caissons. This report shall be reviewed by the Engineering
Department. It shall be the obligation of the applicant to
follow the recommendations made by the geotechnical engineer
and the Engineering Department prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the property.
2) If mine waste, waste rock or mine dumps are found during
excavation, the applicants shall report this to the
Environmental Health Department prior to initiation of
construction.
3) The applicants shall install a residential sprinkler system
in the house which shall be inspected by the Fire Marshal
prior to a Certificate of Occupancy.
!r ,
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Cindy Houben, Planning Office
RE: Anderman 8040 Greenline Review
DATE: June 21, 1988
REQUEST: Approval of an 8040 Greenline Review pursuant to the old
Code, Section 24 . 6. 2 .
APPLICANT: George and Joan Anderman.
LOCATION: Lot 4, Tipple Woods Subdivision.
BACKGROUND: The Anderman House is located in the Lodge/Tourist
Residential Zone District. The house was built in the early
1960 ' s. The existing lot is approximately 3 ,792 square feet. The
existing house is approximately 800 sq. ft. in size. The existing
house does not conform to the side yard setback requirements with
regard to the second floor deck. The allowable floor area ratio
in this zone district is 1: 1.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL: The applicants propose a 720 square
foot expansion to the existing structure. This expansion, as
shown on the attached drawing, will not expand beyond the
existing footprint of the house with the exception of a proposed
lower level deck. All the expansion work will be below the
existing structure and materials will match the existing house.
REFERRAL COMMENTS:
1) Engineering Department: In a memorandum dated May 20, 1988,
the Engineering Department notes that this application was
submitted before the regulation requiring investigation of
toxic soils was enacted. However, they note that this is an
area where toxic soils may be encountered. These should be
reported to the Environmental Health Department if they are
encountered. Secondly, the Engineering Department noted
that the applicants must have a registered Geotechnical
Engineer review and certify the structure has met
engineering recommendations prior to a Certificate of
Occupancy on the property.
2) Environmental Health: In a memorandum dated May 23 , 1988,
the Environmental Health Department noted that the
applicants must comply with the regulations regarding wood-
burning devices. No woodburning devices were mentioned in
the application. In addition, the applicants must comply
with the noise regulations in Chapter 16 of the Aspen
Municipal Code.
3) Fire Marshal: The Fire Marshal noted in a memorandum dated
April 25, 1988 that the structure is within a four minute
response time and that there is adequate water supply for
fire protection. However, due to the grade and location
there may be difficulties fighting a fire. Since the time
of this memorandum, the applicants have stated that they
will install a residential sprinkler system.
4) Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District: The ACSD noted that
a single-family residence can be served at this location.
5) Aspen Water Department: Jim Markalunas noted in a memorandum
dated May 18, 1988 that the Water Department can serve the
residence.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Section 24-6. 2 includes criteria for an 8040 Greenline Review.
These criteria area listed below with the applicant and staff
response.
1. CRITERIA: Whether there exists sufficient water pressure and
other utilities to service the intended development;
RESPONSE: The Water and Sanitation Departments have indicted
that the structure can adequately be served.
2 . CRITERIA: The existence of adequate roads to insure fire
protection, snow removal and road maintenance.
RESPONSE: The home is accessed by a tramway. The Fire
Department has commented that they may have difficulty
serving the house due to its location. However, the
applicants will be installing a sprinkler system which will
help the fire protection of the residence. No additional
road maintenance or snow removal will result from this
addition.
3 . CRITERIA: The suitability of the site for the development
considering the slope, ground instability and possibility of
mud flow, rock falls and avalanche dangers;
RESPONSE: The site will require a relatively small amount of
excavation. The new portion of the home will partially be
bermed. An engineered retaining wall will be placed to
withstand the slope pressure. The Engineering Department is
requiring that a geotechnical engineer review the plans as
well as inspect the retaining wall and caissons structure
2
. •
before a Certificate of Occupancy is approved.
4 . CRITERIA: The affects of the development on the natural
watershed, runoff, drainage, soil erosion and consequent
effects on water pollution;
RESPONSE: The application states that the historic flow
/drainage will be maintained on the site.
5. CRITERIA: The possible effects on air quality in the area
and city wide;
RESPONSE: There are no anticipated adverse effects on air
quality as a result of this application.
6. CRITERIA: The design and location of any proposed structure,
roads, driveways or trails and their compatibility with the
terrain;
RESPONSE: The proposed design of the structure is in keeping
with the existing structure which has been in existence
since the 1960 's. The materials to be used to enclose the
bottom level will match the existing siding. The area is
composed of a variety of architectural styles. There is one
house adjacent to the Anderman home which is of the same
style, others are more elaborate and modern in design.
The 700 South Galena project is directly to the North of the
Anderman property. This project will not allow the Anderman
residence to be viewed from town, therefore there will not
be a visual impact of any significance from this proposal.
7. CRITERIA: Whether the proposed grading will result in the
least disturbance to the terrain, vegetation and natural
land features.
RESPONSE: The proposed grading is minor in nature and is
probably the best way to expand on the existing residence
with the least amount of disruption.
8 . CRITERIA: The placement and clustering of structures so as
to minimize roads, cutting and grading, and increase the
open space and preserve the mountain as a scenic resource;
RESPONSE: The placement of the addition will not infringe on
a view of the mountain.
9 . CRITERIA: The reduction of building height and bulk to
maintain the open character of the mountain.
RESPONSE: As noted earlier, the addition of the house does
not increase the height or the width of the existing
3
• •
structure. The proposed lower deck will extend from the
existing structure towards the north. Once again, the
visual impact from this addition will be minimal and reduced
to an even greater extent once the 700 South Galena project
is completed.
In summary, the Planning Office does not object to the proposal
if the referral agency conditions are adequately met.
Specifically the conditions regarding the geotechnical engineer
should be addressed.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends approval of the
application for an 8040 Greenline Review for the Anderman parcel
with the following conditions:
1. The applicants shall submit a copy of a geotechnical
engineering report regarding the retaining wall and
caissons. This report shall be reviewed by the Engineering
Department. It shall be the obligation of the applicant to
follow the recommendations made by the geotechnical engineer
and the Engineering Department prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the property.
2 . If mine waste, waste rock or mine dumps are found during
excavation, the applicants shall report this to the
Environmental Health Department prior to initiation of
construction.
3 . The applicants shall install a residential sprinkler system
in the house which shall be inspected by the Fire Marshal
prior to a Certificate of Occupancy.
CH.ANDERMAN
4
, -,y - .\ . . .y\ so
. • . k. 6) .:...... •
' .( .1 k`I‘
•
% .• ..,
Vs% ......4,....
es
•
\\:::\\\\\ \ \ \ II %)II .k \. :t
\ \ \ \ . \\ i \. .
;.\ . f'v. \ %. % . ; / -
. . — -„\ \ ' ' \\\6) s ./ --- '' •
\. 0(.5 o \ j/ �, ..' /
•
:N.,,,., \ . \ .\\\\
. ------1_:.,......7.17-1 •, .//'; 7:
oo . \ • ��% . �// i/
\ C9 - ....-■ -..•••• '' ..:' .../ : :/
\\ . \ \\\ .--.. ..j,.7._, - --- .- . 77
.. ■ -Z___: ..-. ----:::--:.- -• ' --.--- ,/,
\ ....,-...,, ---/---...._.--- --;,./... .
\ 00
\ \.. - I
• \ .
0,,6, ,. \ . N . , •
\ -,. \
,- lip Oa, , _. ..• ".-.. ). . -
1
\ ` 1 7._t7r 4
'N.,:c. ..................... . \ \‘‘,..‘s\'''\ .. L‘I 41.-2. ..---... %, . s . s•‘...,....
•
~
• .�J ` •
9 %■‘-16 tc..4.\Ny40), """."". . . .. .,. ".....,
/;• • t
•
• j GaL.ENA. 511ZEET .
1-• • N '\ • - ' • .••
Topographic Map I - I Not to scale
I
co
\\
\
i 1 etik . ,
ttN\ t< C .0.1%
W.2
\\
0 ul
\\\ 0
4;1 1'1 \\ cn
w��`r
I .Q.
v s t
';1'7'1'Nt..?;.
.."i::.1,'iii"1-: ' - , L. 7:\
9 15
.-•:,4*.,?:::.:!:,:f1S \ . .4s
, ,..........;;4.... ,--.7.v •\ , \\... .,'4'0,yr:_,,,:. \' 0
?Jig
l'.... ki„4i,,,,,,,,, , . ,i0:., „Ti. , 1— ''.: .. I
. mac : ' fl, e' 16 . _ \ ■''��ii,, n t L .t s
k„,- y to I E1 '1141 ,1. 1 :\
I ,k.:414,... , , ks, \ \
al
rt4..„ 4V-i`:. -A ' lici , ,
:),;.k• ti/,', ; ', t, );_iil ,
't.ff, tt:74, '..qo'k 1..t'a; t�:r�.To 'ks t�$s�C:.11.r��:• . I \
di 541 idiiNSW,A . :,,„ %.
\\
IV
.11`7.2.;Sk wp ∎O'f 3 '�+ �}111' 1' '. _ _J \\\
};J.:JR t'-,1'r f %.0t,„-"?,,:',''..t. t ! 'il i i i:.'; i .� t C
'.-� •T!R" .l. "4f� A; tom, x f:-^x y �r* 3 ,� at.
gt
H
• +■r
U)
•
• •
CD
. 2 01 z
ti%, . , Tr.") 0
o
\ — 6n e,
_ •
•
f - f
---� ii \\) \ Y .1
. co r r .� d LA \ . •.•a •
vtf Y r0 _� I i' ']
O —
; r ®, \\ -,j u ,6 L° •
OZ
• s
a
•,..iII r
P- s i d 0'00 �► \
i , ail
0 I_.
N
�w 5 t.... IL, tb .,
f Nti tr s i,bill T3 •
�, o v.
•
it',S I LIMI , •,,-
., � -N
i
Ic. f ��a.A .,(10. 11- w m .• i
• 1 i es I g
•
IC (‘ Z - ---..\-
t
...
2,.. ..,/m . ,hb12 C;ro2y/M 0'11ib-:t 'E. -•1. . Ip;T
1 NtaN.7,L-,b c i ',1V)i,c-1 • 1 _ S -------- .. -
F' '- .-_II ° N
i t wIMEINSCI ' j
1 G
/D 0�1 1 o
ID • i
0 as
•
U
(n
O
O•
Z
?S?yr f-�¢2 tl =s a ;�°1 i{'":7;._( .{.:;111 l Y.77") : '�i'l✓ll
•.•y /Y✓Y'j,/JJ JY'JJJ,J ., l✓✓JJrIJ,>r'! tf
4i 'AJ✓✓JJIJr!>l✓J \/JJrYJ/{YJ/✓JJJYJJ///,lJ.JJ.JIJ
,. >i r�/ iJ Jk�llJJ�hllllJflJ�ClIJIY✓ll✓/
X71•11151 ;.'i2t !jJ{J J •✓ >IJJ�IJyJ� y/ YX� d✓JII JJti/J�
si •Sji•S• 1✓✓JJ J 'IIJJ, ;;t:VV z ,tJc-J J �✓JJ.dJ/
t;;ji:, j3J,�JJ5,!,77JJ YJJJjJJJIJ✓ lJ Jfl.d J jJ IJJYi
!J�✓�Y/yJJ J✓ :lf,jJJJJJIJrI ✓✓J.{Yll•,�J{
u_ •,: J,�j J J.:✓✓{ JY/JJ.l✓Y,Jxk j{ ' ,,{ ✓*.J j mil.
.;.; ✓Y�'J✓,r-n J✓ lr<{JJYYJ1YJJ 9'l� l.-J- JJYYllly
,1.4.,,::.,. , '�JJ{rY, J , /.c/lJ jl:(1119,,... {-1 j i>F4,6"46 .
�. lxJ✓ llJJIJ :rlJ,>J,.IJJ{ J-{J,,>JJ dJ tlYJ .eYY,d
.4.440....,•11.,:.,:.:5,:,:.....y.,::" . 3 rJJlJ JJ✓..g. . k.. 1J y.1 .tJXJIJ
- ,: ' .ej-JY 3lcJ-Ya . j ,` J Jr Y.. �✓
1 lJY J✓J✓ 7sYjj.:J d .� ij 1 l,, x
iii it j Yl .•J..s.J ✓,> YJ✓ 1J ll�.tli ll�4ij
i •;.„•,,,,,,,•,;.?:-.):,..,:,:.,. fJ-Y,>IJJf ••,JS! jjJf .7djgr .,lYF 3
:'AS 'L ,kJ , ,/ IJ.,,i.1Jj,,XY h ,.J <�,,✓ YJy .,
:SY,a"Ja ,>,P✓JJ{ Y{ .✓,f .,,,Y ✓�{ �•"',: ) Y•'#- .J
1`11'••1•.s•,til Jj s/� J `j i�' .0'y! jti--
I 1,,,A.S JYJ,YJY'°lJJ ,�X.•!�✓*. „:47.Y �'l- a�,! y ,>'ff,'„.1
'"•• , ljJ A-.f l>✓1{XJJ.JIJ1JI fl ✓ > yJ
"44441.4P z✓JFJYJj -JJ{�Jj.✓!¢ JY-✓Y Y-1 j l {
JJ�. {l,X,.!'l.J!,� 5!{Y �/Y'YYJI J JJJ
•S:S`ij.t,. .,cJYjI Jl,,l!JJJJJ l ✓J lf„Y�Y✓*ll'"j�dj�J j�
,� IJl�hx 0t X)*.)W x,dj-eX -gce:( �7.:)Jy"1"Jz
UMW
✓i{=l .lr ,J ia,J> 7%ter
, ,lj e( Ji, i J:
✓'. � -rgUP;lkY ,;bs f�,44 .le-Y JsR✓iJ_ J'1'Yllt jl�jJJJJ✓ I�J�YY MYj ,!Y'i✓JJ
--_--- — `:Y1✓J;> dll J 1 {r
jr dl✓.2Jr 6..4.7 1.7:1.v w YJ✓JJ
-- ,.✓JJ'i✓JJJJJJ'✓jJ Y J,y.I.fJJJ
jJdJiY1G{'✓Yi'J`: a-e-,'{ f.,,
J.zJY✓JJ✓Jt S sd rxlYJJ j'YhJJJJJu
�� P _.. ' !Y -a jJAF : J J-Avv .x✓Js j.c4•9 1 .J. ., J It ,rY f y{:,:
" j✓.IJJ Js j;>Y lJ-JJjiJJ
JYiYj�Y {G�kJIJ Y ll'r
�j ,, !l•Jy.✓Ys>jJ-1/YJ,","Y,/lY JJ.
N 1 , lvJ1jfJJYYJIJ.{JjiJIj:JJJ{
�_x 7JJYKjy ✓/J .,JJi!✓,;✓J,.js•J.
]'.alb ✓�" �IJJJJJ j:lYY, IJJ
+� i JfjJ/�jl.JJf✓✓JlJjJ !//
. '. 7Y✓ ldJ✓.s>JJJJY.,lIIIJJJJ/i
',,5 ;.,l�I;YYJ.ZJlJJJ{JJ�jlJ,j✓/J
,, /YYl Yl,tlYY.ti J/JlJ/.7{/.
, lY-JJ��Y :4 XJJ.-i-../.jJ" {✓JJ
�� 1�?':'f �YYi✓Y�y ✓Y3JjdJJryr
,. ,,, J {W Jtll'Xi•:
MUM iiihNNIki..41.1111.6. MIMI
MIMI
Y ,
mom
Y JY l l .
''''s,y,,, , ,, 97-1?.�fl>JJJrJlJ/
WIMI ) JllIYKJ{/l-•{.i ,, Y .® ; :;qj:,;,.
MEM
=MI alai • .f ryF r% f"l / . ?f (4-Mom 4;;.1.;10,;,,1 : ,�;Y.4.. ` f f r..! rrJr{J {14.t:"s 1110...,',..:11.(.‘7.::(..,,::0,,v,-.,.•r,pfrrJJr,..j�
lrJ crrrir.J i O ,000.1041:44 i
_I IMMO
MEM
MINIM
.f ii :14:1:1: '1.: !,:'fr•• O
ia MINK�: .1,;,/.1.1:1:1;,.,• }. y.,...Ea.CY.•`r •��
g =Mil 1'1.1,,, dy 4 -.'
1:3;!::11:::;1p1;? 1} S Y,.f'r � 1. ED
S;i: i ::f -.`,l i;.l f!.f 11>.1444 . :t: 't: , /
1;,i1:�; ::1:4:44.. .;.414..4. a)
w
(I)
W
• 0
TEI
cn
-
Z
.
'V Z � � '✓. �
. of lll%t� .-rr-va
•r'r' f
. 'r.
Nom 4 .•.r.'.-r.
IMiimmilli7 ::7 '''' ' ...\.,_ 1 - ...i 1
{ ;{-4;r„lit;^•{.{:
�I 4rrrr/rr/r lr
rltr{fi✓{rtffri
rr+ry�rrlt rr ter.
A{! rrrglrfrr
-I `r:ktFi{4dr`fFrr;:
rrr / r
-----.._
o: n.I {{fifrrrfr{'.
'
fr,!.• / X�trafi.r_.-
-__ -- - -- .- _-- / \ � Y;itrlrf {lrrt
Y r .
_ ! f.t ? tX .Z. .
frfft.Yf rrfr`tfr
.,rl•{y//rrrrrr{rr
— _._ --- ' retydfrlr✓tr`tf✓r
- -- — rf rrrrrrr
_ tY{:./f r
f/r/{rrr/frr!
trrlrr//rfr/{r
-- ._-. - -. — -
F �ryry��f ririr
rr.r ! F�klyfrirr
4f•rrrrrtlrrrrr rr .lr lr
-- I ! rltrrrrfr3 gXrr ' t''xt/.
Fir/ fit/rlfrrfrtff f rf{/r
F.+'.�''{t/ft:f{f//r•rl/rr^il^r/.'
- _- ._ !t"rI- rr{{r/rrrrr4 r,rf r{/f
- -- lrt,frrrrtlr rlrrr rr'r/ rrrr
— - rr
- — --- . r `turfi{/�rrrrrrr/t{/rr
— — rrrr/trl,+r {l/rf/r/lyd{r
;'XS`/./4 flf r/tt t rtt t? i i<
ft {
r
�Z trr�{ 1rtttfY`t {fif r ttt/,({r
rlf ffrr ffi„rtf•r/ r rr/r.
,y � > !tr✓rr f tf rrr t ` t
fPx .. fit�/ �rt{rflt 4rVp r/
t.. _ I - � p fit4 g, i fit
I �
■ _ e -. rt +"Y` "rat,..-0t`Y 2:-Vtrrfirrr
f °ry f Y` wt 'fi
--- ` �� ' f` �ft t !ttrv'.f r .l f rr r
- _---__ d{r 4,41:4 .":13 ftrrl¢-rrr�hr /rrl '
--7 r v rr •yfrr r r rra
--1 - _
- f3 , ?tf U.f:f/f r r rYr-r•rs•{.1 _),".
Mfriffi ! /tr/f Yriff4fir
rr yf om' / -f !li
_, t. S r t rr { r'
i
%8.f,r,s/ :rrrr.;7;"4..:4:1.4..Y.:-.!.•:<:`.,...:47...X.7...:.<4:11'...4 •{:r
i?'4.1ZY:'.-r6!/ 'rrrYY/r r{ ri{rryrrr'
MI ,x4.{rvR}t.AfttT��� •frfi" ll�.f(` {lfiy x
r v�'%�`( r�{tr .lf:r.-:-41,:x.12-zr{r{3clv,r{ir
uGX yl?:'!.:14%W.';`r'.,�fi :tc..`_ rt..• !?{i i i f;4:r
.j{ry-trrj••r✓ T fit rrtr+r/r/.r {rr
r`4Y'f/'/ f `Y 5 /flr /rrr/r/r{rr /r
Y�rtpgi:0 S . {rf/rrr{rr-rrrvrr
f{Y.tY 4`<ff rrr r!/rtf rr{,t/rrr
-- r'fir`tfi4-(4,:r"rtd`,f( 4'!ofi`rr,,✓rrrtrrTrr}rrr/
i /t( / {t! {xtr.{r{fl/rrr4rrrrrr
G 0.fi rf,X4;' 'r {.rtd•rrr/{{4'•rlr lrr{r
1}rf7rrfttlrr ,x g rr`/rl''rrrrrrrr/rr{-!r
H S +Y rr/f.�rtltlrri if flllfr{r,r{rrr/}�„�r{!
A) 4''... `X4`t" trlr !r rrr/.r,{-rltrrrr!/ /rf
�s ,Y`rrr-r.{fire f.t ti J it rfi4`t{rCrrefrf rrr
. u1 al .t.4tf./'!`t.'fi�fit:1:..Y7 7 W :4:2 ftt r.i fit rrt;r/
f fi4li {a LPN IjC.IX] ffii {., fifYrr11 rKitf" j• nfrf1F-4'i! O
rr,frrr�jr16a:4:frrlffr`Yttr r{rrrrr,{r{/r
le{rrt/rf.F4`fitfirf4 4 r`Yr4 r✓Y`f/r/r.rr{rr{rr 4-0
ff:.rrrrfttf4"t7i'v`rrfirr4'treft^'f{Arfirrrr4:-:{:rr J
(t' frrrrrff,c.rl4:4�511rr/rrtefrr fr?' rri fist /`1V[
4'tYetttflt rt'tYrf rT fitfi/t r}{+t/ ' rr{t{r
r.-,Cr4'fit-•eC ty'orY` 4r ?�tr.rrrylfYrf`r,`ttrf `
sPf r4xy,:t¢"t•_zzefef'•tt t rfi 4:l'4"rfiryrv:104* `}fi/ >
•
:a-4,4-415z r r l+v,Y{t/`7`t. 4 4`r r rl r„/::..1:{Ylv.! (...4.(...5.4:2:
W
rJ?'ir::rrr.K„}t2:'4::;froz-I Rrt/r:•r n/tf%f:v„fi•rlxrfrrri
w
4—/a
Cl) ..
Cti
w
i •
CZ
a;t ass,:;c;. !iF.(f!;•;t i - ; •
i iii. -'� -j`t"•.:'l L'ti .?,,/,:-'%:.i::,:::a, 0
• r; : : 4-•n "•!: !s": `iiSLSTS,S ll ff�!gh119Xa ) ., ,.;.L S, of r . fit.. 0�
;ti:i;i iyii`=
._ i 01 `.;'.•t�t:.p`t:.,:•s;.:!.�`!Fi%? t74757t .%.�y.,,.,fr z
Q:i ::'•:;ia::•:aot;.!::!;.!rd • ti:t::i -i ri y%-i
Ss:::r:r:i. . A:11,14�f%_f.•'Saf.•!f.•
�( :J '•'t .7C',•f ii (•
:tit!,•': .L:4343:.
—. t;tit. r• ✓i "
t... '
'O"�TY
4.4.4.4 r14ldi y ,./1
�tl
'.t• i r•
Y.r.
f
I -•131313a fCr
f
. 5511 t . ''L.TtL. v:ri:C i 'r-�'r•ri�— u��r•r :••:,:::•::•:::::::',... 1.11—•��
:lr rr,.-44icr:
—
__ _._ ••::....::..,:,........,:...........,...,::•:•;;:-;:-....::.r :i;:': :i:i: ; ;; 3GCtlttti .'�y
— - 'it'r ',.,( 'lt'l!°▪ iT•A•L•t•L ,r r r,;F
t STiq:q:FG' f •C1.:
t i .
� , 1;:717• .4,,;• T.C!`r.•::- ✓
;:3134353 Y;..- 14!:. ,:
---.__ ..:.'i'{(i:!;r 5;5;':7 Z..''.:.-':; �i. '.1
1;':;.;,45: =l. l "ly,<
S;t74;57t,5d,,;�X:f.,tl:j"'Y
i ,7171 are%:i;
e;'<';•':':: • iii ?x:f�:�:. x�.;�.
. ;::%;•` ' x131:1 is✓�1;i;:r;l.:X.7.J''
I
`' ,5;5;:3:747: tirf'>:x :X^: k •
':':".:",:...'•:;':::,:C',..... 43,,535,4, .7' a° '•K. I.' `
`:`t.'; `11'11 x 1'� 'Vf;J-
::::..!..;'?•,•:,11,1.1:171'! "lx / h'f i%.:::::::il: ..,./....„.).k.,v,..05„r„..r,1-:::4
F
_ ................„...:.:::.:.?....::::::.• -.1,:i1:11:1" 9.3ivx,Lyir,:_. ._ ..).:.(:-..g.:
_ - _
r
_.
1 - ,.
._. .. .... __ ....-"_____.
_. .
. .............:....::......,.....:,.?..,.. tt r,.(;Y.%'lv,„...,,y�rx.„.•:5,Ti1iYi .T � il1:75• w xYT.{s, 4l:A & x C X. l,,.l;•l l A XJJ.X ✓Ri._may ,..„,p.:: e
:..:••••,...............:...:,..::.;__
...........-..,,...,..„. ` jUJ sl t!: l Yli J.
....•.•:. :::a'.
i.: 5jt3S3:. l"1.5X1 "l' g�3��Y
I _ t Z`iY•Si;t i7 f1 aa & ,z: i s
71.4',3'4Ti3'; ' y *�' ,,�J'i-:
J.✓s
._ —__ _ ._ ... __... ; ....... }: te' :5.i'4.; tf/1.,�Y
S � ll�
`s 11 t �.__ .. L Sa ��' �IJX YIJly,"ls
AJ1lfJ�x.jl{11x
: .. — A"rYrJlh�+tJe�1 J/Vii:
1 /1XJJ("1.11(,..✓IKC�J✓✓111:.
1 Z a ePl.✓ 1l J.11✓ l�.1,,
l %j.{il ✓.l. ls
{✓ldll4
✓/}
l it Jlll'js
J / rff
�x sal ¢ ;•,.y.• !1� 1.
_ :: � /�1J� lff'JyS1� i¢ir•
X131 ,r ,dY7iy ,:L l'l C•* _ .....-..-....'•.. - vr.....v. ,,' ,-:'-..,,te_14,/.1.:wot=ge.;"
,_____, _ _ .. . :'::■-)'......:',...,....:;•'..,..'..I MEM I :-...:.::.:: . '''•:, '.• 'f0''",i'''Of rir74:F.1 Ctl
' t l z x l J x'. : _ : : Yf _ /s J ,„,w;,....,..1 11G • Y.• am✓ c✓� l.r•i Ifl1,r :p : /•l' c•
� IIyJ 11 jrljl,l✓.,r.J.1,:k;
;- J.Y. . ll' ;, .t.l{t1 z11 R:
bll.!l∎1,t,t,.L, 11/l? .if X:;
l(.('' 'Pl�' J.I�KIXJ?I✓.a1.1 !{111;
".i`Nl iyy,'Y4 fi JC.!&:.V,✓ll% /1 1J/
-�-._.11111 :.,rlU.1.J^J..i;l:/.• .: e 0
z
•
• •
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Attorney
City Engineer
Aspen Water Department
Environmental Health
Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District
Fire Marshal
FROM: Cindy M. Houben, Planning Office
RE: Anderman 8040 Greenline Review
Parcel ID# 2737-182-96-005
DATE: April 22, 1988.
Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted
by George Anderman, requesting 8040 Greenline review to construct
an addition to the existing single-family residence. Elevations
are 7962 and 7980, within 50 yards from the 8040 Greenline. The
property is located on Lot 4, Tipple Woods Subdivision.
Please review this material and return your comments no later
than May 21, 1988 in order for this office to have adequate time
to prepare for its presentation before P&Z.
Thank you.
.. . • •
SINK COMBS DETHLEFS
(:Ini ken S.Sink I'AIA Rickard I..(.oml;AAA Donald R.DeiliICf,Jr..11A
April 18, 1988
Aspen Zoning Commission
City of Aspen
130 S. Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
SUBJECT: 8040 Greenline Review
Anderman Residence
Lot 4, Tipple Woods Subdivision
Aspen, Colorado
PURPOSE FOR 8040 REVIEW
The existing residence on Lot 4 is located between elevations 7962 and 7980,
approximately 20-26 yards vertical distance from the 8040 Greenline. Horizontal
distance at the closest point is 44.67 yards. Therefore, the residence is within 50
yards of the 8040 Greenline (See topographic map). The owners wish to construct an
addition to the existing single family residence.
EXISTING RESIDENCE
The Anderman Residence was constructed in the early 1960's as one of two single
family residences sharing Lot 4 of Tipple Woods Subdivision. On February 14, 1984 the
lot was re-subdivided into separate parcels in recognition of an historic "defacto"
subdivision. The statement of exception is recorded in Book 460, Pages 943 through
946. The accepted plat is filed with the City of Aspen.
The existing residence is an approximate 20'-0" x 40'-0" rectangle (800 s.f.) which sits •
on a fairly steep triangular shaped lot. All nonconformities were accepted as part of the
1984 re-subdivision.
DESCRIPTION OF NEW ADDITION
Due to family expansion, the Andermans want to build an addition which will allow the
entire family to gather. Included will be a family room, bedroom, wet bar, bathroom,
storage, and new mechanical room for the entire structure. They have requested that the
addition satisfy several objectives:
1) Building Envelope - All new enclosed structure will be located below
the existing house and will have a smaller footprint of approximately 720 s.f. No
enclosed portion will expand horizontally or vertically beyond the existing envelope.
•
The visual impact will be minimal. •
.1 Prof xsional( rpurution 1900 Grunt Street (303)130/200
fi r.irrhitr Wrc Suite 1250 F:IN Irk)WA;
Denver,(i)lorndu 10203
----r SINK COMBS DETHLEFS
DESCRIPTION OF NEW ADDITION (cont.)
2) Style and Materials - The house represents a classic example of architecture for
its time; therefore the owners are interested in maintaining the integrity and simple
dignity of the house by using the same materials in a manner which conforms to the
language of the house.
3) Access - An existing tram stop will be opened on the west side and stairs will be
added to provide direct access to the lower level. The lower level will also have
direct access to grade.
4) Conforming Deck - A new lower level exterior deck will be constructed within
the legal side yard. The existing deck above is accepted as nonconforming, but the
owners do not wish to expand upon the nonconformity.
5) Grade Disruption - Minimal disruption of existing grade is desired for both visual
and environmental impact. The new construction will require a small area cut into the
hill below the house. The uphill side will be regraded to allow runoff to proceed in
historic fashion. The majority of the addition will be supported by columns on
caissons which will allow the natural slope to be maintained. All trees of significant
size will be maintained.
6) Safety Improvements - The owners will rebuild and replace all existing guard-
rails and stair railings with new,code conforming rail painted to match the siding.
New decking will also have matching guardrails.
Please refer to the floor plan and elevations for clarification.
REVIEW CRITERIA
Section 24-6.2 (b) of the Aspen Code lists the criteria used for review by the
zoning commission.
The following statements correlate to those 9 items.
1) Water pressure and utilities. Jim Marklunas, Director of the Aspen Water Department
was contacted March 3, 1988. He stated that water supply from the 8140 line should
be more than sufficient and would provide 72 lb. pressure. Other utilities (gas,
electricity) are also adequate to carry the slightly increased capacity. New, more
accessible meter locations will be provided.
2) No roads currently pass the existing house therefore snow removal and maintenance
are not an issue. Two fire access paths currently exist uphill from the house.
Additional emergency access will be enhanced on the downhill side by providing more
direct access to the house from the shallower portion of the slope.
3) The house has existed on the site for over 25 years and has maintained stability. The
new structure below will be supported by replacement caissons in the same location
as the previous supports and by an engineered retaining wall designed to withstand the
slope pressure.
• •
SINK COMBS DETHLEFS
REVIEW CRITERIA(cont.)
4) As stated in the description of the new addition, the grade will be minimally disrupted
by a cut and retaining wall below the house on the uphill side which will be graded
to allow historical flow.
5) Air quality will not be significantly affected and should be improved by the
replacement of inefficient mechanical equipment.
6) Design compatibility with the terrain is maintained by allowing the house to 'float'
above the natural grade. Natural weathered wood and bulk-reducing glass to promote
transparency will be used to enhance the character of the terrain.
7) All significant vegetation will be preserved. Natural land features will be minimally
disrupted by grading as previously explained.
8) Placement of the addition within the footprint of the existing house will assure virtually
no impact on open space or the scenic character of the slope.
9) The addition does not expand vertically or horizontally beyond the existing envelope
and will not impact the openness of the mountain. No additional visual impedance
will be produced by this addition.
It is intended that this summary will alleviate any concerns of the zoning commission regarding the
proposed addition to the Anderman residence. Please contact Emmy Jenson (address below) if
you need any additional information.
Thank you,
4/1r/44i4/ (70/014-
Emmy Jenson AIA
Sink Combs Dethlefs
1900 grant#1250
Denver, CO 80203
.
• •
SINK COMBS DETHLEFS •
A Professional Corporation 1900 Grant Street (303)8301200 11!-)1
forArchitecture , Suite 1250 I ' APR I
Denver,Colorado 80203 91988
• ,
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
To Aspen Zoning Commission
City of Aspen
130 S. Galena
• Aspen, CO 81611 .
Date : 'April 18, 1988- Attention: Cindy Hougan
•
Re: 8040 Greenline Review
Anderman Residence •
Lot 4, Tipple Woods Subdivision
Aspen, CO Federal Exp •
We are sending you' RI Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans .• ❑ Samples
❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter. ❑ Change order ❑
•Copies Date No. Description
5 -sets (9 sheets ea) of the Anderman Residence 8040 Greenline
Review
I Check #07764 —George Anderman Special Acct.
(N. Greenline Review Process $680.00
(@ $135 per hr. refundable)
Environmental Health 50.00
Engineering 80.00
Check Amt. $810.00
These are transmitted as checked below:
❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit—copies for approval
' ® For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return—corrected prints
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ For bids due 19 ❑ Prints returned after loan to us
r•
Remarks • -
-6//0- %�L.. .1-1 , /OIL/A/ • I /IL/ 0 / Ai •
L/ ( I E4t2W/Ce ter,'121 / / ,iit b I/
(110,0 lq oia/pjai-eA,V-i `141cui 5 7 (0-kri-e, "
. ,rf�rf . C7
• Copy to Signed . . &WYK)
.
• I I .. ..
H
SINK. COMBS DETHLEFS
`APR 19 1988
Gluons S.Sink NAI:1 Richard L.Combs MA Donald R.Dcihlt.k Jr.MA
April 18, 1988
Aspen Zoning Commission -
City of Aspen S-6
,e 130 S. Galena
Aspen, CO 81611 /
SUBJECT: 8040 Greenline Review
Anderman Residence
Lot 4,Tipple Woods Subdivision
Aspen, Colorado
PURPOSE FOR 8040 REVIEW
The existing residence on Lot 4 is located between elevations 7962 and 7980,
approximately 20-26 yards vertical distance from the 8040 Greenline. Horizontal
distance at the closest point is 44.67 yards. Therefore, the residence is within 50
yards of the 8040 Greenline (See topographic map). The owners wish to construct an
addition to the existing single family residence.
EXISTING RESIDENCE
The Anderman Residence was constructed in the early 1960's as one of two single
family residences sharing Lot 4 of Tipple Woods Subdivision. On February 14, 1984 the
lot was re-subdivided into separate parcels in recognition of an historic "defacto"
subdivision. The statement of exception is recorded in Book 460, Pages 943 through
946. The accepted plat is filed with the City of Aspen.
The existing residence is an approximate 20'-0" x 40'-0" rectangle (800 s.f.) which sits
on a fairly steep triangular shaped lot. All nonconformities were accepted as part of the
1984 re-subdivision.
DESCRIPTION OF NEW ADDITION
Due to family expansion, the Andermans want to build an addition which will allow the
entire family to gather. Included will be a family room, bedroom, wet bar, bathroom,
storage, and new mechanical room for the entire structure. They have requested that the
addition satisfy several objectives:
1) Building Envelope - All new enclosed structure will be located below
the existing house and will have a smaller footprint of approximately 720 s.f. No
enclosed portion will expand horizontally or vertically beyond the existing envelope.
The visual impact will be minimal. •
1 Nrof asionul Corporation 1900 Grant Start (303).S30 1200
fin-.1trhifrclurrn Suite 12.50 h:d.CB 006/S
Denver.Colorado S0203
SINK COMBS DETHLEFS
DESCRIPTION OF NEW ADDITION(cont.)
2) Style and Materials - The house represents a classic example of architecture for
its time; therefore the owners are interested in maintaining the integrity and simple
dignity of the house by using the same materials in a manner which conforms to the
language of the house.
3) Access - An existing tram stop will be opened on the west side and stairs will be
added to provide direct access to the lower level. The lower level will also have
direct access to grade.
4) Conforming Deck - A new lower level exterior deck will be constructed within
the legal side yard. The existing deck above is accepted as nonconforming, but the
owners do not wish to expand upon the nonconformity.
5) Grade Disruption - Minimal disruption of existing grade is desired for both visual
and environmental impact. The new construction will require a small area cut into the
hill below the house. The uphill side will be regraded to allow runoff to proceed in
historic fashion. The majority of the addition will be supported by columns on
caissons which will allow the natural slope to be maintained. All trees of significant
size will be maintained.
6) Safety Improvements - The owners will rebuild and replace all existing guard-
rails and stair railings with new,code conforming rail painted to match the siding.
New decking will also have matching guardrails.
Please refer to the floor plan and elevations for clarification.
REVIEW CRITERIA
Section 24-6.2 (b) of the Aspen Code lists the criteria used for review by the
zoning commission.
The following statements correlate to those 9 items.
1) Water pressure and utilities. Jim Marklunas, Director of the Aspen Water Department
was contacted March 3, 1988. He stated that water supply from the 8140 line should
be more than sufficient and would provide 72 lb. pressure. Other utilities (gas,
electricity) are also adequate to carry the slightly increased capacity. New, more
accessible meter locations will be provided.
2) No roads currently pass the existing house therefore snow removal and maintenance
are not an issue. Two fire access paths currently exist uphill from the house.
Additional emergency access will be enhanced on the downhill side by providing more
direct access to the house from the shallower portion of the slope.
3) The house has existed on the site for over 25 years and has maintained stability. The
new structure below will be supported by replacement caissons in the same location
as the previous supports and by an engineered retaining wall designed to withstand the
slope pressure.
• ID
SINK COMBS DETHLEFS
REVIEW CRITERIA (cont.)
4) As stated in the description of the new addition, the grade will be minimally disrupted
by a cut and retaining wall below the house on the uphill side which will be graded
to allow historical flow.
5) Air quality will not be significantly affected and should be improved by the
replacement of inefficient mechanical equipment.
6) Design compatibility with the terrain is maintained by allowing the house to'float'
above the natural grade. Natural weathered wood and bulk-reducing glass to promote
transparency will be used to enhance the character of the terrain.
7) All significant vegetation will be preserved. Natural land features will be minimally
disrupted by grading as previously explained.
8) Pace footprint Placement of the addition within the foo rint of the existing house will assure virtually
no impact on open space or the scenic character of the slope.
9) The addition does not expand vertically or horizontally beyond the existing envelope
and will not impact the openness of the mountain. No additional visual impedance
will be produced by this addition.
It is intended that this summary will alleviate any concerns of the zoning commission regarding the
proposed addition to the Anderman residence. Please contact Emmy Jenson (address below) if
you need any additional information.
Thank you,
f 6v171
Emmy Jenson AIA
Sink Combs Dethlefs
1900 grant#1250
Denver, CO 80203
• •
A v 4.4
;02--
cg--? 4*- 7-1*.b
WAYNE L. VANDEMARK, FIRE MARSHAL
420 E. HOPKINS STREET
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
(303) 925-2690
TO: CINDY M. HOUBEN, PLA ING
FROM: WAYNE VANDEMARK, FIRE MARSHAL 1)� ( F+. 111
RE: ANDERMAN 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW � APR 2 5 1988 !�
DATE : APRIL 25 , 1988
I have reviewed the above named application by George Anderman.
The structure is within a four minute response time. There is
adequate water supply for fire protection. We do anticipate some
difficulties fighting a fire due to the grade and location of the
structure.
•
MAY 2 0 1988
ASPEN WATER DEPARTMENT /
MEMORANDUM
TO: CINDY HOUBEN, PLANNING OFFICE
FROM: JIM MARKALUNAS
SUBJECT: ANDERMAN 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW
PARCEL ID# 2737-182-96- 05
DATE : MAY 18, 1988 -
The above referenced parcel co tains an existing structure
connected to the Aspen water syst . As stated in the applicants
submittal , we have indicated to the applicant that the existing
facilities are adequate, pressure is sufficient , and the Water
Department can provide service for this residence.
We have no further comments at this time.
cc: Judy
JM: ab
•
i
MEMORANDUM
TO: Cindy Houben, Planning Office
FROM: Jim Gibbard, Engineering Department !4
DATE: May 20, 1988
RE: Anderman 8040 Greenline Review
Having reviewed the above application and made a site inspection,
the Engineering Department has the following comments:
1 . Although this application was submitted before Code was
revised in regard to hazardous or toxic soils, it should be noted
that this project is located in an area where the potential for
this type of hazard is high.
2 . The applicant has indicated the new structure will be sup-
ported by replacement caissons and by an engineered retaining
wall. It is recommended that a study done by a registered
geotechnical engineer be required for the design of these
structures and before a C.O. is issued for this project, this
engineer should certify - that his recommendations were followed.
jg/andr8040
cc: Jay Hammond
Chuck Roth •
0
ASPEN*PITKIN
ENANMENTAL HEALTH DEPAMENT
I f SAY 2 3198
MEMORANDUM it i'\
11 U
To: Cindy M. Houben, Planning Office ___
From: Rick Bossingham, Environmental Health Department
Date: May 23, 1988
Re: Anderman 8040 Greenline Review, Parcel ID# 2737-182-96-005
The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department has reviewed the
above-mentioned land use submittal for the following concerns.
The authority for this review is granted to this office by the
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office.
SEWAGE TREATMENT AND COLLECTION:
The applicant should contact the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation
District to confirm that the existing service line is adequate
for the addition.
ADEQUATE PROVISIONS FOR WATER NEEDS:
The applicant notes that the Aspen Water Department confirmed
the existing water service line would be sufficient..
AIR QUALITY:
The applicant does not mention wood burning; devices. Any
installed niust comply with applicable regulations. No significant
air quality impact is expected from the proposal.
NOISE:
No adverse noise impacts are anticipated from this proposal.
Construction activity must comply with Chapter 16 of the Aspen
Municipal Code.
CONFORMANCE WITH OTHER LAWS:
The applicant is advised to contact this office if mine waste,
waste rock or mine dumps are found during the excavation phase of
the project. Disposal of such materials off-site. is discouraged
due to the possibility of. excessive heavy metals in the soil.
This is not a requirement, but simply a request based on past
experience in dealing with mine waste.
This proposal is not anticipated to be in violation of any other
laws which fall under this department ' s authority.
130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/925-2020
� ,V mAy t 01988 : 1
MEMORANDUM
1,\\L-___ -- -----"------j _
TO: City Attorney
City Engineer
Aspen Water Department
Environmental Health
Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District
Fire Marshal
FROM: Cindy M. Houben, Planning Office
RE: Anderman 8040 Greenline Review
Parcel ID# 2737-182-96-005
DATE: April 22, 1988
Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted
by George Anderman, requesting 8040 Greenline review to construct
an addition to the existing single-family residence. Elevations
are 7962 and 7980, within 50 yards from the 8040 Greenline. The
property is located on Lot 4, Tipple Woods Subdivision.
Please review this material and return your comments no later
than May 21, 1988 in order for this office to have adequate time
to prepare for its presentation before P&Z. 0,
Thank you.
-f'N ' s A b b y r, o ..- T ft Time f y i i i e. I_ 5 .0— 4 -
EA 'y /..y etas »ea c� CAa- I'SrE S £a...en �Y T14 C.
A see 4._ C OA—Sos..• is Are f
Ski rh,.a 11 i 1.rAr.a c.V"-
/4!A .L r9 4 ff re.....
• •
SINK COMBS DETI-ILEFS
(:I -k,S.Sink I \1:1 Richard L.CouiL:.11A Donald R.Deddrf1 Jr..11.%
April 18, 1988
Aspen Zoning Commission
City of Aspen
130 S. Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
SUBJECT: 8040 Greenline Review
Anderman Residence
Lot 4, Tipple Woods Subdivision
Aspen, Colorado
PURPOSE FOR 8040 REVIEW
The existing residence on Lot 4 is located between elevations 7962 and 7980,
approximately 20-26 yards vertical distance from the 8040 Greenline. Horizontal
distance at the closest point is 44.67 yards. Therefore, the residence is within 50
yards of the 8040 Greenline (See topographic map). The owners wish to construct an
addition to the existing single family residence.
EXISTING RESIDENCE
The Anderman Residence was constructed in the early 1960's as one of two single
family residences sharing Lot 4 of Tipple Woods Subdivision. On February 14, 1984 the
lot was re-subdivided into separate parcels in recognition of an historic "defacto"
subdivision. The statement of exception is recorded in Book 460, Pages 943 through
946. The accepted plat is filed with the City of Aspen.
The existing residence is an approximate 20'-0" x 40'-0" rectangle (800 s.f.) which sits
on a fairly steep triangular shaped lot. All nonconformities were accepted as part of the
1984 re-subdivision.
DESCRIPTION OF NEW ADDITION
Due to family expansion, the Andermans want to build an addition which will allow the
entire family to gather. Included will be a family room, bedroom, wet bar,bathroom,
storage, and new mechanical room for the entire structure. They have requested that the
addition satisfy several objectives:
1) Building Envelope - All new enclosed structure will be located below
the existing house and will have a smaller footprint of approximately 720 s.f. No •
enclosed portion will expand horizontally or vertically beyond the existing envelope.
•
•
The visual impact will be minimal.
1/'ruf asiuna!(impondiou 1100(:rand Street (303)130/20(1
far.Inrhsh lure Suite/250 /•.I.CR30061.;
Dower.Catwalk,10203
i i • •
SINK COMBS DETHLEFS
DESCRIPTION OF NEW ADDITION(cont.)
2) Style and Materials - The house represents a classic example of architecture for
its time; therefore the owners are interested in maintaining the integrity and simple
dignity of the house by using the same materials in a manner which conforms to the
language of the house.
3) Access - An existing tram stop will be opened on the west side and stairs will be
added to provide direct access to the lower level. The lower level will also have
direct access to grade.
4) Conforming Deck - A new lower level exterior deck will be constructed within
the legal side yard. The existing deck above is accepted as nonconforming, but the
owners do not wish to expand upon the nonconformity.
5) Grade Disruption - Minimal disruption of existing grade is desired for both visual
and environmental impact. The new construction will require a small area cut into the
hill below the house. The uphill side will be regraded to allow runoff to proceed in
historic fashion. The majority of the addition will be supported by columns on
caissons which will allow the natural slope to be maintained. All trees of significant
size will be maintained.
6) Safety Improvements - The owners will rebuild and replace all existing guard-
rails and stair railings with new, code conforming rail painted to match the siding.
New decking will also have matching guardrails.
Please refer to the floor plan and elevations for clarification.
REVIEW CRITERIA
Section 24-6.2 (b) of the Aspen Code lists the criteria used for review by the
zoning commission.
The following statements correlate to those 9 items.
1) Water pressure and utilities. Jim Marklunas, Director of the Aspen Water Department
was contacted March 3, 1988. He stated that water supply from the 8140 line should
be more than sufficient and would provide 72 lb. pressure. Other utilities (gas,
electricity) are also adequate to carry the slightly increased capacity. New, more
accessible meter locations will be provided.
2) No roads currently pass the existing house therefore snow removal and maintenance
are not an issue. Two fire access paths currently exist uphill from the house.
Additional emergency access will be enhanced on the downhill side by providing more
direct access to the house from the shallower portion of the slope.
3) The house has existed on the site for over 25 years and has maintained stability. The
new structure below will be supported by replacement caissons in the same location
as the previous supports and by an engineered retaining wall designed to withstand the
slope pressure.
• •
• •
SINK COMBS DETHLEFS
•
REVIEW CRITERIA (cont.)
4) As stated in the description of the new addition, the grade will be minimally disrupted
by a cut and retaining wall below the house on the uphill side which will be graded
to allow historical flow.
5) Air quality will not be significantly affected and should be improved by the
replacement of inefficient mechanical equipment.
6) Design compatibility with the terrain is maintained by allowing the house to 'float'
above the natural grade. Natural weathered wood and bulk-reducing glass to promote
transparency will be used to enhance the character of the terrain.
7) All significant vegetation will be preserved. Natural land features will be minimally
disrupted by grading as previously explained.
8) Placement of the addition within the footprint of the existing house will assure virtually
no impact on open space or the scenic character of the slope.
9) The addition does not expand vertically or horizontally beyond the existing envelope
and will not impact the openness of the mountain. No additional visual impedance
will be produced by this addition.
It is intended that this summary will alleviate any concerns of the zoning commission regarding the
proposed addition to the Anderman residence. Please contact Emmy Jenson (address below) if
you need any additional information.
Thank you, -
yiY1-4i
e1/11C14U
Emmy Jenson AIA
Sink Combs Dethlefs
1900 grant#1250
Denver, CO 80203
411.
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Attorney
City Engineer
Aspen Water Department
Environmental Health
Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District
Fire Marshal
FROM: Cindy M. Houben, Planning Office
RE: Anderman 8040 Greenline Review
Parcel ID# 2737-182-96-005
DATE: April 22, 1988
Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted
by George Anderman, requesting 8040 Greenline review to construct
an addition to the existing single-family residence. Elevations
are 7962 and 7980, within 50 yards from the 8040 Greenline. The
property is located on Lot 4, Tipple Woods Subdivision.
Please review this material and return your comments no later
than May 21, 1988 in order for this office to have adequate time
to prepare for its presentation before P&Z.
Thank you.
S
ASPEN/PITRIN PLANNING OFFICE
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
(303) 925-2020
Date: Vii `'i � 70 �
(/7 (7t61/C0-0( //b
RE: 10 ) ?6.1�
Dear
fi d
This is to inform you that the Planning Office has completed its
preliminary review . of ,they, captioned application. We have determined
that your application C.I. -NOT complete.
Additional items required include:
Disclosure of Ownership (one copy only needed) -
Adjacent Property Owners List/Envelopes/Postage (one copy)
Additional copies of entire application
Authorization by owner for representative to submit applica-
tion
Response to list of items (attached/below ) demonstrating
compliance with the applicable policies and regulations of the
Code, or other specific materials
A check in the amount of $
A. Your application is complete and we h v sch duled it for
review by the on . . We will
call you if we need any additional information prior to that
date. Several days prior to your hearing, we will call • and
make available a copy of the memorandum.. Please note that it
IS NOT your responsibility to post your property with a
sign, which we can provide you for a $3 .00 fee..
B. Your application is incomplete, we have not scheduled it
review at this time. When we receive the materials we have
requested, we will place you on the next available agenda.
If you have any questions, please call il� (�` o
the planner assigned to your case.
Sincerely,
ASPEN/PITRIN PLAANNNING OFFICE
L:2/(,(/),(/04 -
,
• .
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
p City of Aspen
//
DATE RECEIVED: 7////4 1 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO.
DATE COMPLETE: ,)r� - -C�1)�,O49A- 88
STAFF`MEMBER: 'Ah C\
PROJECT NAME: 4/10/-0-70 (7.046 6l e-f( i(A(,L
Project Address:
APPLICANT: , aim/_VZJ {///.
Applicant A•dress, 1 AiIIIVIM IIIIII
REPRESENTATIVE: p:,(A ,{�
Representative Address/Phone:
TYPE OF APPLICATION:
PAID: YES NO AMOUNT: "Al-b7/110
1 STEP APPLICATION:
P&Z MEETING DATE: "� `e- -' PUBLIC HEARING: YES le
DATE REFERRED: �`:7-0/3 INITIALS: -/
2 STEP APPLICATION:
CC MEETING DATE: PUBLIC HEARING: YES . NO
DATE REFERRED: INITIALS:
REFERRALS:
City Attorney Mtn. Bell School District
City Engineer Parks Dept. Rocky Mtn Nat Gas
Housing Dir. Holy Cross State Hwy Dept(GW)
Aspen Water ✓ Fire Marshall State Hwy Dept(GJ)
City Electric Fire Chief Bldg:Zon/Inspect
Envir. Hlth. Roaring Fork Roaring Fork
Aspen Consol. Transit Energy Center
S.D. Other
FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL:
City Atty City Engineer Bldg. Dept.
Other:
FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: