HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.sr.Lot 4 Sunny Park North Ambridge 195 Park Cir.A11-90 MEMORANDUM
TO: Bill Drueding
FROM: Kim Johnson, Planning Office
RE: Ambridge PUD Insubstantial Amendment - Creating a Final
Development Plan
DATE: May 31, 1990
Summary: Planning Staff recommends approval of the Ambridge
expansion of a duplex and the establishment of a Final
Development Plan for 195 Park Circle.
Background: The Ambridge lot is zoned R-15, within a PUD
overlay. There is no Final Development Plan adopted for this
site. An original proposal submitted by Ms. Ambridge consisted
of the construction of a detached two-story office building on
the upper level of the site. On May 14 , 1990, the City Council
denied the proposal (Attachment "A" Council Memo. ) In response
to Council ' s concern that a detached accessory office was not
within the character of an existing residential neighborhood,
Ms. Ambridge submitted a revised proposal which includes a 600
s. f. office, bathroom, and bedroom addition to the upper level of
the existing duplex. The architectural style is consistent with
the existing building. See site sketch, floor plan and
elevations, Attachment "B" .
While reviewing the revised proposal and process, City Attorney
Jed Caswall had concern as to why an expansion of an existing
duplex must go through Final PUD approval (considering that there
is not an approved PUD Final Development Plan on file for this
site. ) Planning Director Amy Margerum and Staff discussed how
this proposal fell within the bounds of Section 7-908 C. of the
Land Use Regulations: Absence of approved Final Development Plan.
This section reads: "In the absence of an approved Final
Development Plan for a site designated Planned Unit Development
(PUD) , an accurate improvements survey of existing conditions may
be substituted to permit evaluation of whether the proposal is an
insubstantial or other amendment. "
Referrals:
See referral comments from Engineering and Environmental Health
as attachments to Council Memo Attachment "A" .
Major concerns involved construction methods on the slope and the
potential that mine tailings may be on the site.
Staff Comments:
The staff consensus was that the revised proposal is consistent
with the residential character of the site and the neighborhood
based on site inspection and the improvement survey. An
objective of the Planning Office is to insure the character of
the PUD area and provide consistency of process. A memo has been
submitted to the Director outlining the decision to treat this
and similar situations as a Director sign-off. This memo will be
added to the Planning Policy Notebook. A Director' s approval of
the current proposal and recordation of the plan and Notice of
PUD Designation with the County Clerk will establish a Final
Development Plan and will be the basis for evaluating future
proposals.
The existing structure is approximately 1,700 s. f. The 600 s. f.
addition will bring total floor area to roughly 2 , 300 s. f. The
lot area is 15, 187 s. f. with an allowable FAR of 4, 511 s. f. As
no bedrooms are being created, there will be no additional
parking required by the addition.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends Planning Director approval of the 5/16/90
Ambridge Development Plan with the following conditions:
1. If mine tailings are found on the site, contact the
Environmental Health Department and EPA for information on
handling the waste.
Prior to issuance of a Building Permit:
2 . The applicant shall verify to the Engineering Department the .
buildable area. Surface easements shall be documented by
providing Schedule B from a current title, or a stamped, signed
statement from an architect or engineer.
3 . The applicant must submit to the Building Department a soils
report and engineering report for the conditions and design of
the slope (compaction, grade, lead and cadmium levels, etc. )
Environmental Health sign-off on any hazardous materials found on
site will be a provision of Building Permit approval.
4 . A Notice of PUD Designation, site plan and building
elevations shall be filed with the Pitkin County Clerk and
Recorder within 180 days of approval.
5. Any revisions to the recorded development plan shall be
processed through the Planning Office.
I hereby approve with conditions the PUD Final
Development Plan for the Ambridge Duplex Expansion.
7--
/(/ 6575'D
y i rg-ru Planning Director Da e
jtkvj/ambridge.dirmem
2
MEMORANDUM J )
TO: Mayor and City Council
THRU: Carol O'Dowd, City Manage 0757
/
THRU: Amy Margerum, Planning Director U
FROM: Kim Johnson, Planner
DATE: May 9, 1990
RE: Ambridge Final PUD for Construction of a Home
Occupations Accessory Office Structure, First Reading
of Ordinance 34
SUMMARY: The Planning Commission recommends approval of the
proposed Final Development Plan for an accessory office structure
at 195 Park Circle.
COUNCIL GOALS: The Planning Office seeks consistency in code
interpretation (goal #14 . ) Sensitivity to nature and each other
may be compromised with this proposal (goal #5. )
BACKGROUND: The applicant, Shirley Ambridge, wishes construct a
480 square foot office structure on her residential lot in order
to relocate her clothing related business from an in-town
commercial location. The proposed office is a two story building
on the street side of the lot, adjacent to .the parking area.
Please see Attachment "A", memo to P&Z with site and floorplan
sketches.
The lot is located in a PUD overlay, and is zoned R-15. There is
no Final Development Plan for this site. In the absence of a
Final Development Plan, the process for approval is two-step,
requiring a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning
Commission and approval by Council. If approved by Council, the
proposed plan will become the Final Development Plan and any
revisions to it will require amendment by P&Z and Council.
PROBLEM DISCUSSION: Planning Staff feels that this proposal
conflicts with the Home Occupations definition item "H" (see
Attachment C of P&Z Memo) in that it will be visible from other
residential structures. The applicant contends that it is no
more visible than other accessory structures such as garages or
sheds. While this statement is true on the surface, staff feels
that since the new structure is being built solely for a
commercial use, it goes beyond the intent of the Home Occupations
section. Staff understands the pressures of the local
office/commercial rent increases. However, there is a concern
that the integrity of residential neighborhoods may be
jeopardized if further commercial infill is allowed to this
extent.
The placement of the structure cantilevered over the slope
concerns Building, Engineering, and Planning. The PUD overlay
allows for flexibility and sensitivity to development on slopes.
Planning feels that the structure, if allowed to be a separate
building, should be located on the abundant flat area of the lot
below the slope.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE VOTE: On April 17, 1990, the P&Z voted 6-1 in
favor of this proposal with the following conditions:
1. Reduction of the size of the structure to comply with the 50%
limitation requirement. Work with Zoning Staff to finalize
calculation of floor areas.
2 . Adherence to item H of the Home Occupations regulating the
visibility of the business from any other residential structures,
that the home occupation must not take place outside of this new
structure.
3 . Only electricity will serve the proposed structure.
Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the following must occur:
4. The applicant shall verify to the Engineering Department the
buildable area. Surface easements shall be documented by
providing Schedule B from a current title, or a stamped, signed
statement from an Architect or Engineer.
5. If mine tailings are found on the site, contact the
Environmental Health Department and EPA for information on
handling the waste.
6. The applicant shall submit for Planning's approval a
landscape plan which shows a vegetation buffer at least 4 ' wide
between the parking area and proposed structure.
7. The applicant must submit to the Building Department a soils
report and engineering report for the conditions and design of
the slope (composition, compaction, grade, etc. )
Within 180 days of City Council's approval of this plan the
following must occur:
8 . A Final PUD Plan and PUD agreement must be filed with the
County Clerk as required by Section 7-907 of the Land Use Code.
KEY ISSUES: Planning Staff recommended to P&Z denial of the
request because of visual impact, slope considerations, and
concern over the construction of new structures for commercial
2
uses in residential zones. Staff suggested to the Commission
that the building would have less visual and slope impact if it
were moved to the flat part of the lot below the slope.
The Home Occupations definition reads "business, occupation, or
trade conducted entirely within a residential building or
accessory structure. . . " However, Staff felt the intent of the
Home Occupations definition does not include projects of this
scope, that being construction of a building soley to house a
business entity. If the Council feels that the Home Occupations
definition should be clarified to restrict new accessory
structures for commercial use, it should direct Planning staff to
amend the code's language to that effect.
Three commissioners expressed concern over the direction the Home
Occupations situation seems to be heading, given the current
office/commercial rental crunch. One suggested that Conditional
Use approval be required for all Home Occupations.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of
the Final Development Plan with conditions. Planning Staff
continues to recommend denial of the structure because of its
location over the slope and commercial intrusion in a residential
area. Staff seeks direction from Council whether or not to amend
the Home Occupation definition regarding new construction and/or
detached structures.
ALTERNATIVES: Locate the business activity within the
residential structure. If a detached building, locate it on the
flat area of the lot below the slope.
PROPOSED MOTION: I move to approve the proposed Ambridge Final
PUD Development Plan for an accessory office structure with
conditions. I move to have first reading of Ordinance 34 .
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
Attachments: "A"- Memo from Staff to Planning and Zoning
Commission
- Ordinance 8 for Consideration
jtkvj/ambridge.ccmem
3
Attachment A
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Kim Johnson, Planner
RE: Amendment to Final PUD - Ambridge Office/Studio
DATE: April 17, 1990
SUMMARY:- Planning staff recommends tabling this request to a-llow-the applicant to resubmit a proposal which more readily complies
with the terms of the Home Occupations definition and is more
compatible with PUD design standards. If the applicant does not
wish to table and redesign the project, Planning recommends
denial of this proposal.
APPLICANT: Shirley Ambridge, represented by Bill Campbell
LOCATION: 195 Park Circle, Lot 4 Sunny Park North Subdivision
ZONING: R-15 PUD
APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Amendment of Final PUD plan. The applicant
proposes to construct a 480 s. f. office/studio structure on the
shoulder of a ridge on the front part of the lot. The two story
structure will be used as an office for the applicant's clothing
business. Existing on the site is a duplex of approximately
1,700 s. f. containing two one-bedroom units, one being deed
restricted. (Attachment "A")
REFERRAL COMMENTS:
Engineering: Chuck Roth submitted the following concerns: The
applicant must submit information which specifies what is
allowable buildable area based on lot size, surface easement
deductions, and slope reduction. Surface easements can be
certified by supplying Schedule B of a current title commitment.
A registered engineer or architect can submit signed and stamped
slope reductions and easement deduction information. (Attachment
"B")
Building Department: Stephen Kanipe verbally discussed the need
to see the design of any filled slope and retaining walls, if
used. A soils report and Engineering statement regarding fill
placement (type, compaction, etc. ) will be required by building
code before building permit approval. Mine tailings are unstable
and may preclude locating this structure on this slope.
1
Environmental Health: Tom Dunlop urges testing of soil which
would be disturbed by foundation construction to verify whether
or not mine tailings exist on site. Hazardous waste must be
handled in specific manners. Contact EPA for guidelines and
restrictions: Paula Schmittdiel (303) 293-1527 or Sonya Pennock
(303) 294-1115.
PROPOSAL: Ms. Ambridge proposes a detached office/studio for her
home occupation. The two level structure will be served by
electricity only. An existing walkway and stairs will link the
office and parking area on the upper level of the lot with the
residence below. Pier and beam construction is proposed on the
30% and greater slope. The finished floor will be 5 to 8 feet
above grade according to the sketches provided in the
application.
STAFF COMMENTS: Home occupations are allowed in the R-15 Zone
District, in compliance with the definition contained in Sec. 3-
101 of the Aspen Land Use Code (Attachment "C") . As proposed,
Planning Staff feels this project does not comply with E. and H.
of this definition. Item E. limits a home occupation use to no
more than 50% of the total floor area of the main level floor of
the dwelling. The upper story of the main structure is about 972
s. f. 50% of this is 485. 6 s. f. Staff calculates the new
structure to be approximately 600 s. f. including loft area and
covered deck above grade. This exceeds the 50% limit. Item H
states that a home occupation shall not be visible from any other
residential structure. A building of this size visually impacts
the surrounding residential properties. In addition, staff is of
the opinion that if a structure is constructed wholly to house a
business concern, it cannot be considered "accessory" to the use
of the residence. Also there is a question that a separate
building is "incidental and secondary" to the residential use as
per item A of the definition.
The Sunny Park North subdivision has a PUD overlay because of
steep slopes on the area. PUD allows flexibility and innovation
in the development of projects in order to protect to natural
features, promote more efficiency of land use, preserve open
space, and improve the design, character and quality of
development. (Section 7-901)
After a visit to the site, staff feels the graphic representation
of the slope in the sketches provided by the applicant is not
accurate. In real life, the slope seems much steeper than
depicted. See photos at the meeting. The proposed building
conforms to the 30 ' front setback requirement for accessory
buildings. As proposed, the 17 ' tall building will be perched
over the slope and will be especially tall as viewed from the
downslope side with an 8 ' tall open area underneath. This
overwhelming visibility is contrary to Home Occupations item H as
well as the intent of PUD design quality. Other structures on
2
the block (including the Ambridge residence) are down below the
slope or are sited farther back from the street and screened with
vegetation and berming. This proposal lacks any landscape
improvements as part of the development. Adding a landscape
buffer of trees and shrubs between the parking area and the
proposed building would soften the visual impact of this
structure.
As the site plan shows, there is a lot of level ground on the
lower area of the site which would be suitable for constructing
floor area for accessory use/home occupation as an attachment to
the main structure. Planning Staff feel that the PUD purpose
statement promotes clustering of uses and structures for
flexibility on difficult sites. Constructing an attached office
addition to the main residence would be in further agreement with
PUD concepts and would not appear to neighboring residences as a
separate business structure. This is Planning's suggested
recommendation for adding floor area for Ms. Ambridge's Home
Occupation office.
As a non-single family development in a PUD, this project must be
granted approval through the Final PUD Development Plan process.
This entails public hearing and approval by P&Z and approval by
Council. The General Requirements for PUD approval are:
a. The proposed development shall be consistent with the Aspen
Area Comprehensive Plan.
Response: The proposal of a separate structure constructed for
commercial use opposes the Plan's designation of this area being
multi-family residential use.
b. The proposed development shall be consistent with the
character of existing land uses in the surrounding area.
Response: As proposed, this project does not fit the Home
Occupation definition regarding the size and use of the
structure. Staff feels the proposed location of the building
does not fit well with the character of the neighborhood.
c. The proposed development shall not adversely affect the future
development of the surrounding area.
Response: No adverse affect on future development is foreseen.
d. Final approval shall only be granted to development to the
extent to which GMQS allotments are obtained by the applicant.
Response: In concept and definition, Home Occupations are not
applicable to GQMS requirements and would not have to compete.
By proposing a separate commercial structure outside of a
residence, the project doesn't comply with Home Occupation. This
3
creates a dilemma - lshould competition be applicable in a
situation like this?
Development in a PUD requires density reduction for sites with
more than 20% slope. Reasons cited in Sec. 7-903 B. 2 .a. of the
Code for reducing density include:
" (3) The land is not suitable for the proposed development
because of slope, ground instability, and possibility of mud
flow, rock falls and avalanche danger. "
" (6) The design and location of any proposed structure,
road, driveway, or trail in the proposed development is not
compatible with the terrain or causes harmful disturbance to
critical natural features. "
This proposal does not deal with a residential unit of density,
so the slope issue cannot be handled in a typical PUD manner.
Staff feels that locating the structure over the slope is not
compatible with the terrain and considers the rest of the lot
more suitable. Comments from Engineering, Building and
Environmental Health reinforce Planning's concern about the
location of this structure.
If approved, the plan will become the Final Development Plan for
this site, and shall be recorded with the Pitkin County Clerk and
Recorder as per Section 7-907 of the Land Use Code.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Planning staff recommends tabling this proposal to allow the
applicant to explore the option of adding floor area to the main
residence for home occupation use. If the applicant does not
wish to table, Planning recommends denial based on non-compliance
with the terms of the Home Occupations definition and PUD site
location.
If the Commission wishes to approve this request, the following
conditions are suggested by Planning Staff:
1. Reduction of the size of the structure to comply with the 50%
limitation requirement. Work with Zoning Staff to finalize
calculation of floor areas.
2 . Relocation of the building to the lower level of the site, in
compliance with required setbacks.
3 . Adherence to item H of the Home Occupations regulating the
visibility of the business from any other residential structures.
4 . Before issuance of a building permit the applicant shall
verify to the Engineering Department the buildable area. Surface
easements shall be documented by providing Schedule B from a
current title, or a stamped, signed statement from an Architect
or Engineer.
4
5. Electrical service only.
6. If mine tailings are found on the site, contact the
Environmental Health Department and EPA for information on
handling the waste.
If the Commission wishes to approve the project as proposed, the
following additional conditions shall apply:
7. Before issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall
submit for Planning's approval a landscape plan which shows a
vegetation buffer at least 4 ' wide between the parking area and
proposed structure.
8. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the applicant must
submit to the Building Department a soils report and engineering
report for the conditions and design of the slope (composition,
compaction, grade, etc. )
Attachments - "A"- Site plan and elevation sketches
"B"- Engineering referral
"C"- Home Occupations definition, Section 3-101 of
Land Use Code
jtkvj/ambridge.memo
5
. • ,
. .
Attachment "A"
. i
-).:-
-1..
- / '--
l3; •
••• ;
•. •
-.> >
■••Co ei-
1... 7.,.A.
t • ..> _ "4 -
.--_, Li•Cls R.;"
A> s)4.. CI.. • .. 62
\\T..,I 1 1•Z /
.:.1 •. 0 C P° • ••,.
1) ,a-rat.4) 947 e• t 1 k\ \ •
■ .
. \-. . • I . --
-...., . . -
SN \
> "--,.. .., , .,..... ■
1 z • ..cl, \ il
0,, -- .....7 i 1, 1 •<, ... ..,,,, /
1D.V 1 -4,%0 r •
I -.41_
c• 1 .
•
- ,--N
,
•4,, /
_,--3 / 47i- i ) --7L * .• Li
'b.... / ..s. _, '.-.
/_ ..„.•.--- /--'-- Ct--- '..- .
C"/ ■ • . ''.› r .,-'' .... .
"..,.......___ ___/" ‘° ---• .' ' .r r /1('..--•:, ..
l ../
...________/../' '-•'''' ''' t --■. ..z.
, ..-
- ---slr---- 1--- f___„4-- ____---- „/ s'4". „---- ....,----_,--• --.-, ‘..---',------ _ --
• 1 . _ , , _ 47 _„_ - , ,, „, - _-
--- . z. -------- . ..• ,,--- --
=-1-----/ • .e.„----2----- , ,- , „„
---__....- / - /
_i_ • ,
, ‘ ,/ / , ,
x . , , . _____-- / 1
0 ---.., 4„:,:lt. , vs , ,
_.._ — s2... .... A.
-- 'tX.-",. ..,,,. N,- ----- ' // ........
..„., , ,
, olt ,..„./
/
--1-1,1 \
----- • .-- --
1 P n.)
'. . ,:, " • f'I. , \
...-- --- •-- ,-
— ' -,.....
----_ _ i _ __1■03 „,..., 9 -::.
0 1 rf L,.... . ...-.----"— / , . • 41--__ Ts: Is-
..-----",,•-•:---- ----"-
\e'CN
-,..„ ,__,_....--------- al ----cp---1 _____ > ••
—----i•• ..1._-- -I I il .t-/- --': • I''•
71' •
- tit 311011-Allik *A-4.■ •••-
, •103-‘4 cP.1 ..
-- -- - • s, ,...is% -...:i.-c.,•sO,
---- r ,_. ._---7-;-----------■________._ :4
•10., '---
via -- %,,,,,,_,A
-It\ ‘,...A
t.) -- \A T ..•
4. Z•• • --' , v.t. .
•I — ' i
\ \,...-• "45 4;›, „)....
in liN -1 r
0- \\ - __7 09?)_;-=c,
s\Ix 4a,\4 < \ I
l \ j'ts R
• ', ,., ,sp,1111WpiP" ,,,.,0 % %
% ‘ ....-"•..-... t.
, r,-6 .— 1 .
s, % " , ,-,..4---00 , ...t.,
a ..,,,4 ., .......- __, so
s, \ liw.- _„----,‘ ., -0-- .,„:1---.:„.. -
\ .94s
61•
1 .•'-‘)
t
I
4,< %
. 7> (C.12:3077.4) ,,1•021 2,,C0,C0.Q N •
.-'.; • -'‹
-, ,
Attachment "C"
HOME OCcuPATION moans a business, occupation or trade conducted
entirely within a residential building or accessory structure for
gain or support by a resident of the dwelling, and no ether,
which:
A. Is clearly incidental and secondary to the residential '
use of the building;
B. Does not change the essential residential character of
the use;
C. Employs no more than one (1) person who is a non-
resident of the building;
D. Operates pursuant to a valid occupational license for
the use held by the resident of the dwelling unit;
E. Is confined to no more than fifty (50%) percent of the
total floor area of the main level floor of the
dwelling;
F. Does not advertise, display, or otherwise indicate the
presence of the home occupation on the premises other
than as provided in Art. 5, Div. 4 ;
G. Does not sell any stock in trade, supplies or products
on the premises;
H. Is not visible from any other residential structure; C
I. Does not store outside of the dwelling any equipment or
materials used in the home occupation;
J. Does not utilize mechanical, electrical or other
equipment or items which produce noise, electrical cr
magnetic interference, vibration, heat, glare, smoke,
dust, odor or other nuisance outside the residential
building or accessory structure;
K. Provides off-street parking to accommodate the needs of
the home occupation; and
L. Does not include any of the following uses as a home
occupation: antique shop, barber shop, beauty parlor,
health or medical clinic, mortuary, nursing home,
restaurant, veterinarian' s clinic or dancing studio.
HOTEL means a building containing three (3) or more individual
rooms for the purpose of providing overnight lodging facilities
on a short-term basis to the general public, for compensation,
with or without meals, and which has common facilities for
reservation and cleaning services, combined utilities and on-site
3-12
Revisions incorporated
through August 14 , 1989
it 7. Before issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall
submit for Planning's approval a landscape plan which shows a
vegetation buffer at least 4 ' wide between the parking area and
proposed structure.
8. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the applicant must
submit to the Building Department a soils report and engineering
report for the conditions and design of the slope (composition,
compaction, grade, etc. )
Attachments - "A"- Site plan and elevation sketches
"B"- Engineering referral
"C"- Home Occupations definition, Section 3-101 of
Land Use Code
jtkvj/ambridge.memo
,e( 1
r-12j- (11' 1 LAI
Itaa (Let, -1-6.." tcaft,i
Np
r �N'
.)1 ,,G — A .c,4 5-C -t 60(u0
r
hJ dL-G� A, PlltiAtti1.4 p A rX{24n,./ NA'C� •• .,tiA;,..J "
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: AMBRIDGE PUD AMENDMENT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on
Tuesday, April 17, 1990 at a meeting to begin at 4 : 30 pm before
the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, 2nd Floor Meeting Room,
130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado to consider an
application submitted by Shirley Ambridge requesting PUD approval
for an amendment to the Sunny Park North Subdivision PUD. The
applicant proposes to construct a detached office/studio at 195
Park Circle which is Lot 4 of Sunny Park North Subdivision.
There currently exists a duplex on the property which is zoned R-
15 PUD.
For further information, contact the Aspen/Pitkin Planning
Office, 130 S. Galena St. , Aspen, CO 920-5090.
sIC. Welton Anderson, Chairman
Planning and Zoning Commission
Published in The Aspen Times on March 29, 1990.
City of Aspen Account.
i
�/2 -7 / I "
ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 920-5090
February 28, 1990
Bill Campbell
175 Big Hat Road
Basalt, Colorado 81621
RE: Ambridge PUD Amendment
Dear Bill,
This is to inform you that the Planning Office has completed its
preliminary review of the captioned application. We have
determined that your application is not complete.
In order to complete this application please submit the following
by March 7th:
1. Proposed elevation dimensions of the structure; and
2. Response to applicable review standards of PUD as listed in
Attachments 3b and 4 which are enclosed.
Although this application is incomplete we have scheduled it for
review by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission at a public
hearing on Tuesday, April 17, 1990 at a meeting to begin at 4: 30
pm. The Friday before the meeting date, we will call to inform
you that a copy of the memo pertaining to your application is
available at the Planning Office.
Public notice as required by the Code is the responsibility of
the applicant. We will send you a Notice of Public Hearing which
you need to send to property owners within 300' of the subject
property.
If you have any questions, please call Kim Johnson, the planner
assigned to your case.
Sincerely,
Debbie Skehan
Administrative Assistant
Enclosures - 2
WI I). CAM I' 0l+JL1.
ARCHITECT, P.C.
175 Big Hat Road
Basalt, Colorado 81621
(303) 927-4425
Aspen/Pttkin-Planning Office
130 S. Galena St.
Aspen, C(1 81611
March 5 , 1990
RE: Ambridge PIJD Amendment
Response to applicable review standards:
Attachment 3b:
(1) The proposed use is Residential/Home occupation. The existing structure is
a duplex with one bedroom in each dwelling unit.
(2) Two off street parking spaces are provided. The addition of the studio will
not generate a need for additional parking.
(3) N/A
(4) Construction will begin May 1, 1990 and be completed by August 1, 1990.
(5) N/A
Attachment 4
(1)a. The proposed development is consistent with the Aspen Area Comprehensive
Plan because it is a permitted use.
b. The proposed development is of a residential character and therefore consistent
with the character of existing land uses in the surronding area.
c. The proposed development will not adversely affect the future development
of the surronding area.
d. N/A
(2) N/A
(3) N/A
(4)The dimensional requirements are those of the underlying zone district.
(4) Off street parking spaces are provided as required by the underlying zone
district.
(5) Open space is provided as required by the underlying zone district.
(6) thru (11) Attached as required.
Sincerely;
c__Sajtj,k)
Uv
William B. Campbell
President
'
.....•
• A . ----
0 --
A ;ri)
El •
•,‘-'
a 4\10.4 '''..9
•
,.. • ,...
..„,
......------) •
• As Ise 400 KO MI _ X;X'•
.1.., nee 1.1 1711E:
FISTIIENW I.- 111F-::illa. 11111L 1..
. ••• ••• .
MAP 01
-....., _ -
../" ,---- -.'7°.•
i;,..-- c • .
s..4.
•1 SCALE
-
.:-..._
:.t.
.„....
,...,
_
.... . ....... .,.
...,
.. .4.
• ,,,-
-7- 1:1-Zt°1/' FAgt(----4
...
,
1 L'
-cp,P,E• . 4(1 . - .
_
— • st, co u p,-,
.... ; ,
lifri.::-----N. .11' , • 41" '41- . ''-'
1 . % r--\\.,• . .., N-, _
l ■ ..',.!.t.-..=(-..il'-' ''. -.0, -- 'I 4'.7Y- .
41,11r..., 01 ■N ;\ ,r.,..
„.......-- ■--: ''.01P...•is ..."--.7 ,..--..„. .__.._ .4.:
-,---- t- ,•1 ..."',..........."*17;-.....i( -44- ___,' . . %`•
...7`..• .. .
,•'''''\
h:„..-\\c-\\....,.......:1\,.....
tl I\I • ■ . - -._..,,s
"VII --11;0.1.i...--.• I i 11 '11 4 j ' '' •
-......•••"" •-■ ..
* '. 1 1,5-
Z .... • --oil . • 1,/\I . „\.. •‘.1":\ , .."\, I
`,.----.---.-----••■ •/:;:‘4.1 ' 3 )1 • ' \ 4 '''
„ • „;), ..-
' 1•,\. - . -
',... - ' ...`"""°(__/ /....." 1 .."QY
ce , ?V 11:110 Ili .. •-.7-;i•
iris.. , A i ...
.....,...-:7-7: .. . 41010 il..*,..„,.., ...AOC:I': -..... pi I A ......"--
i IS 0114 r's\:"1 IIN, * $-' / II' c.Apk " ..:/..---.
L
,.-- viou I Ile PARK.. a ,,,,...----.....sill116111 ,..t . . II'''. • -
--1
,...liii0 WS .N.,11,=•,. .04011‘11\-\ vs....101. ' Ortilikris.‘ ' . I 0.c4 \'4'71 •
0 -a(\.0, \ , b. r. -.
s 4 •
p.,..,,, rf
'• ..) i
Or s J
t;C- fti•-r
'11' c\\ 0 it •
• 1\4 ' 5 It ,,,,o• 1 \ 1, ..,......S.,/.
' 0;.• be '•, 1.• , \ ....... \ •
'•.-' 0 °. •
a. \ii 11 77--".7")
••••1*, :E;;"
4.
gall t '4 %1 t OP\ \I'S Ig'.. s il '11 r ri .4\■ ''1' b ..• t.t•S .\ ,,,,,,,,t
• 'tiV"1
S. S tatiliU I .014%Us' ••■ OW \ Sr.1.7■1 J ,-.,.. .7 ,',/ ■-----\ 1 .
OA la t IISSI%, a ttLT2 WM , •
o■. .0 > '
..-. V. • ...Ain%0 I •
' 1 0 i 055ig 14.,,,OW .■ i I 00401 1 CeJ11:1:41.0%1 ' ' ' , ,, / •,,),,,-. c,,,,,,,\,..,,<A/'N .,....„4
‘, . I 101h OW 1 010Valli -1 57'
-44V. ■
S' 6VP` •..% 0_141,*,V.0 vivo.
at.. 1,. .•-0. 1 .,,. _ ,
, •.. -......, \ .4. x.,L, 1.,,, 44•„,4.4
poi-6P14)4' 4014•" 01`4%Sill t 101 Illtiligi \ -:\\ \ . ,
'..s /...... (-......,. .,' f ; •" 14 ...L.:
Ant .1Zatit 01110
610.0 440 • "I".1111111 s \,. „.
. s
• / . ..., AA •Or•L
\-'liti61 1!1611411::5 06 I t I V 1 '',....., \"..\\:--, ....:(t... 9/ .,v,e .,,l'at‘• 1'... . '‘.* \ ; 4. MIT.. :•c
.,1 --,,,y.9 6' 00101 AO 1 s t■, . IA 9
6 IP r--1 ,i6 11' PK vl. 4
............:,'1,4.1:1 I • 4:k o '-.•
otsPi`P`I 00. • Iiii' s _, ,. t 4, 0 \ . 4 , 4 i: V. Meat
V • P` * ''`''^-11--1 -
■..-9,...0_._, . ....""S ..-ri■;•"`"-,'"
SOU ..-0% % vosb i Au. dits< ,,
*i, - •• ‘‘ % :. • At yo%,. ,--\\ t wo ‘t .
t , litto .;:,„ ---,. IA . ,
fiti, . ....-.:_.::.:_ t.. . .... . -
‘....‘ ...,. /ft. :_..
0.1,v:a ,,,A •_-, • ,.,,
43,31fil ....
, .
olA
_,..it
----7... i 1 — • . 0 -1
, . . ., „,.• If
•,
di,gil 4:1*. I ■lit -
s
gr.■....., ..:los
\ ......
lkilillill:- oi . . ,•,..,.
-m,„,. .0116•
I., , ...0"" . --1.- . - •Pt
,-..i-,• ' , --..„..„......1 .: =
•1111_ 1....tii.,,_ ......._
`t . J...7,7.' , -‘,..i './.4 --......... ..
• 0/E \G li r,..t .
rip -..wafr.s5 •* -4.4 L:i ''''N ‘ t \C.1.014 4, c L'.-
-...,..........
'
tell 4. -.t...0042 ;---. . _ ', % /----) •••. '....., . \
--T-7"---- 3"-1-4is-74.U.,T....LE *Ku/NAs.t..0 TR A0.11.:::.:7:::7 •.-
Aiii..---,...., .1
' IgNallillrf"---- \ 1 _
RoA° AlVd2/4AKIIIPP ....... ,
.. .
:.-. .- -• % -
*• ----4"n,r,?:,•-.A.---, ;:i.. .7-7-L. ....- .0.-- , — mli ......:-.---:-' _ -„,.
veP
•‘. :t;;It%:.*Li4S:',17'.., .'"';--.—* ' Vs'ei.i. via— - __._ s.”-b.coo-Tr* • ..
- ...,
•••••::=4.:,:,---., 4--7,4"-::= :--7:7.---7-7: v- WI"— g
',....:;_•.; ,,,,,,p, t•I-z,.....1..:i].,.. j.,:. :.;..;:• _. \ 92‘._
-,
• ;
- -----1-7-1-i.
"-,..y..--,....-...,:.- .._. . • _ , •.-•.-;:_,.- :, • .....--r.._ -,-----:_---:-.....1-=-......, IMIIIIIIIII" - - -"- ' Y ';'*:::
Shirley Amt. .1dge
lb w t-14-rk it Nay to qco
'f l�.i S tn�l.L c.E►u i(--1 T t r
S P,y itEpittsttn r tint VS (% T 14. rE.
S WMA t.ti (4"No..; n q e ti tA. t pitAz It j
r-e?)Rkark`1 ►5 , I q a.0
\\.\ \ \\ \��\`\ xi 977.2 �._�� \ H
/2(/z"------:,-/
% x7966.5 \, N., �,
) y, ,,____,_, /' ,„,x \ ) \ \1 ��. . �\ \\ \7\1_, , 7996.7x
\
--'_ x796-7.8 t \ r..\ \\
x7954.6 x.7954.2 ( / ��� 1A � � �
Pi
SLOrE STUi9Y OF LOT 4, 7,
5uNNY PAKIc. 1 ;OF`TH Suw.)w.
('fJ T.ENT SLOPE Itv,a.cii OF LOT ,
- - I
x79' o,
i .zo '2.; - =>3 'X, I
7955.2x
. ___ ___--• C�V �� °,6 7 '� Ufa
i
(k,_ ;) / ) l(f -/- --v_----- - 1 / 1 t ---- .
•
980,, ( .
\ // I i.-,..,,,,,:;',V, , ) 1 1///
.4.7 \/ l ( 1 9j'.. Grp"Th `� i /• / / i
s.t,� . r' v l~ ,' 1 � v v
,
,;
:4 ;,'.1'- ( Cis
/ -}t ',?r o 00,,_, /__ , , \ \,\.\\„, \ \/ 11 z i% m , 0\
, Y
‘,-,.:,--- \ ,,...11. I'it:: /
1
l, jr, \ \\1
\ I . / \8002—.5
I -tr, . \9;0,\ \ V' vt, x /:i
7, . - I ,�
. / /- \A\ \\\, \ \�
4 .
8.5', � V y:VA:_ 1
r 77 /) I\\ \ , \ \\�
V\‘,' \:: \\
ijuyersI1t1e
Insurance @poratlon
NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS
RICHMOND,VIRGINIA
SCHEDULE A-LOAN POLICY
CASE NUMBER DATE OF POLICY AMOUNT OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER
PCT-2181 07/08/88 `a 1.51 P.M. $ 30,000.00 82-02-169348
1. NAME OF INSURED:
PITKIN COUNTY BANK AND TRUST COMPANY
2. TT,�
THE ESTATE OR INTEREST 171,1 HREEDt TO ?E.REIN IS AT DATE OF POLICY VESTED _.
SHIRLEY S. AM3RIDGE
3. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THIS SCHEDULE AND WHICH IS ENCUMBERED
BY THE INSURED MORTGAGE IS:
IN FEE SIMPLE
4. THE MORTGAGE, HEREIN REFERRED TO AS THE INSURED MORTGAGE, AND THE ASSIGNMENTS
THEREOF, IF ANY, ARE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
Deed of Trust frown: SHIRLEY S. AMBRIDGE
to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County
for the use of : PITKIN COUNTY BANK AND TRUST COMPANY
to secure : $30,000.00
dated : JUNE 17, 1988
recorded : JULY 08, 1988 IN BOOK 568 AT PAGE 377.
reception no. : 301892
5. TIE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
LOT 4, SUNNY PARK NORTH SUBDIVISION, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO.
ii, PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC.
.� ��
601 E. i?OPKT--ID'S AVE
CO V-77: car
i I 1 1, i. . i 1, . I ik 111, III' 111,
Form 100 Litho in U.S.A.
035-0-100-0041/2
Iil
I
E
4
1
I i
..■ it -r..---••■•••■••- r. _ i.
I
1 filtrilfri; 1
•
I ■ , *111111111111*141:114171!1! ....
c , WW1*? 1( (‘)
[ 1 ,,i , 1 . , .
r p , , ! , (,N__ p 1 1, 1 , , 1 4___ ________ __i_..
� I
i
[ i, i , , „ . _ i_ .,,., _ . , _ x
1 1 Da K___ 1( . 1
1 1
1 . ._____„.
: 1
1 ( 1
__,
poi- _ I 1
1 .
i t ) Cr I� o
1 usi i V C t,_,
1 �_
J
(4 1 ci 1 _ i
1 )011._
1 OAP I
,,
LL4411t+ I t
El ,
1 !
4..._ c..it
...1.....
i 1
i i
_< )1
11c:i _ i
1
I
1
I
✓"---v
3 I-
-_ ,-- a -
I II ' -
. _. 41
' wW41 1 ' * s
l
.1
l
sa ..____ji. - . ., .
, . _ -
E
I _ I
f
. . ____4_,
,D, -
1
.
Ii I
. it-67, t
v
u
411111.1i Elhe 1
. , ligmlium....-----........„,,,„,,,, OF
// v'
/17
ii 1 I
\ .
I
i I' /
4
_.
,_
' � /
Irgra7Zi /
-1 4111
) � ` o
0 t I
V/
.(
'A" we"'
- rivrit-'---- 17 -
11Jft
a
litt
r �
m
toni
;„,„- ----- ---,10:-.-yiorlfl
,,,,Ijk,s7,01.0:
. 1111
kr eol .
r 4-■Ii,"
_ ..,74.4,4
-r!��`.�`a;�!'
_ i 51
(ii�Il.
Iliii
; ,
riot `
rata, i
, ._._
. i 4
• , ______. ,
orn--•• '
minn
NEM■
mum, ; i •
it
i Is'1 ■I
{I
i 1 - �i I l
ii
I ..nall4b'
I I I
I , ! I i inn I
tilii i IIIII i I I I I �J
,,P41
•4 4 ( LI /1-
,I
14, :4
, I I
(to,
.,, :aa-m-.--- ...-- t -
•
1•
dill11.1■........., -',. :4 71:-.."I 41 I I I I I I I I.I r■---"''a q I. I I. fAmmissoffl ,
I I /' /
imi, ,.. „,„,,. ,
. i, .. /
t __id., . .........., , .
. , iii 1
1
, , 1 , ' \I ; , . . . i
\ 1 i ! ' 0-.7 ,..,2„,.. /(--)41//1---
, t t. 411 ..... •
� � e41'M
I
1
all" ,
•
9
....
I
•
. 41
I-Now,
Ai. T... C• 11± , i ►sA1 I.
•___-- , ,
. _ (
i i
e i 1 ii rim). i
: . -, f— NM a
I i
____�
i
Versa i
I'i% i, !a T ii
IIII . IN _ II ,
! MIK ; . 1 H 111 : ;
i i_ID
q §,/ ,
su.I i , i , ii ���_ __,
Ell 7 4P-Tit tj
t r
_.. ;At \9 i i
I `
..) .. a , /
feze
Int?
4th 1 iz,
0. a �
L.1--
1i
L _,,
iii
....'
•
1
, ' •
i ' i '. • *
! ' : i •
. ,
i \ Of-
: , \!
. . . . I
(1,
. .
I . ...-
,
. „
,....i • \ -7, /
0 4#41
k • ! ommmiow■ri oral iffr '''' i*WV
/
:Ai. , 111111111 ■4.4
.
at _ [ .0,•• •4,11!
! .
_______ , .,. 1 mom . 0•%41
• •.1 \
• ,r___1 I._...: i, • ,
man
\ i . -
III . 1 MIMI
•
-,,, 4,=4 t IIIMI.1111 i■ ' 1
• t il■..4,.....i
• . • • •iftliniiii s
11
. / 1
I 118
11W
Attachment "B"
MEMORANDUM
To: Kim Johnson, Planning Office
From: Chuck Roth, City Engineer C 2 6
Date : March 22, 1990
Re : Ambridge PUD Amendment
Having reviewed the above referenced application, the engineering
department has the following comments :
1 . This parcel may have received development allotments through
the 1985 Residential GMP process . The planning office or zoning
enforcement should determine if the conditions of approval for
that application were met before any further approvals are
granted .
2 . Please refer to the definition of "lot area" on page 3-13 of
the land use code . The applicant needs to submit information
which specifies what is the allowable buildable area based on lot
size, surface easement deductions, and slope reduction . In order
to certify surface easement deductions, a Schedule B of a current
title commitment is necessary. The Schedule B will list ease-
ments and other to demonstrate what the surface easements of
record are, if any. Generally, a licensed surveyor perform land
area measurements . If a registered engineer or architect inter-
prets that he or she can submit slope reductions and easement
area deductions which are signed and stamped, then that would be
acceptable . Except for a current Schedule B, the allowable
building area may be contained somewhere in previous applica-
tions . This does not appear to be in engineering department
files .
3 . Is this project condominiumized? Do we have a plat? If
there is a plat, the application should include the amended plat .
Platting for PUD reviews which do not involve condominiumization
is a new requirement and may not be applicable to an amendment .
4 . Storm water runoff facilities must be designed in accordance
with 24 . 7-1004 .c . 4 ( f ) .
cc : Bob Gish, Public Works Director
memo_90 . 54
ATI AQ MENr 1 \ /
'AND USE APPLICATION FORM
1) Project Name A11--1a? nC- t k1 v i
2) Project Location lC15 FWIRAL �, VZ. l Cc d lCo l 1
..� a , ,
(indicate i cate street .•• =- , lot & block number, legal description where
appropriate)
3) Present Zoning ' � V v eD 4) Lot Size J 5 L% S Yt Er t,
5) Applicant's Name, Address & Phone # S L ;-J * 471
6) Representative's Name, Address & Phone #
ti C5% " (((0
7) Type of Application (please check all that apply) :
Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual Historic Dev.
Special Review Final SPA • Final Historic Dev.
8040 Greenline Conceptual' PUD Minor Historic Dev.
Stream Margin X Final PUD/;4M erg• Historic Demolition
McuntainViewElane Subdivision Historic Designation
( can i umi nation Text/Map Am n n as Al._lotn nt
Lot Split/Loot Line GMQS Exemption • • .
Adjustment
8) Description of Existing ncg Uses (number and type of existing ng structures;
approximate sq. ft.; number of bedrooms; any previous approvals granted to the.
ply) - (2.1 00 SQCz—
9) D `scription of Development Application
Cdr t=t A- (1 7117
10) Have you attached the following?
'V C ) Response to Attachment 2, Mi n i mtmi Submission Contents
/t.'(2,. Response to Attachment 3, Specific Submission ssion Contents
y 5 Response to Attad ment 4, Review Standards for Your Application
WI l B. CAMPBELL
ARCHITECT, P.C.
175 Big Hat Road
Basalt, Colorado 81621
(303) 927-4425
April 16, 1990
AFFIDAVIT
I do hereby affirm that on March 30, 1990 I mailed copies of
the attached PUBLIC NOTICE RE: Ambridge PUD Ammendment to the persons named
on the attached list .
UG_A L
William B. Campbell
1 X,„/( rr. ' /Z�
2) c,� /
Z, 7 0/ /
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: AMBRIDGE PUD AMENDMENT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on
Tuesday, April 17, 1990 at a meeting to begin at 4 : 30 pm before
the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, 2nd Floor Meeting Room,
130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado to consider an
application submitted by Shirley Ambridge requesting PUD approval
for an amendment to the Sunny Park North Subdivision PUD. The
applicant proposes to construct a detached office/studio at 501
Park Circle which is Lot 4 of Sunny Park North Subdivision. *'
There currently exists a duplex on the property which is zoned R-
15 PUD.
For further information, contact the Aspen/Pitkin Planning
Office, 130 S. Galena St. , Aspen, CO 920-5090.
s/C. Welton Anderson. Chairman
Planning and Zoning Commission
Published in The Aspen Times on March 29, 1990 .
City of Aspen Account.
* 501 Park Circle flea 195 Park Circle
Sanctity of Contract
STEWART TITLE
OF ASPEN, INC.
602 E. HUMAN • ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 • (303)925-3577
March 28 , 1990
WILLIAM 8 . CAMP8ELL
0175 3 ( C, HAT RD ,
BASALT , CO 81621
RE : SHIRLEY AMSRIDGF ; OUR ORDER NO . 17380
Dear Mr : Campbell ,
The attached eleven pages contain the names and addresses
of owners of all property within 300 feet
North Subdivision . of Lot 4 , Sunny Park
Although we believe the facts stated are true , this letter
is not to be construed as an abstract of title , nor an opinion
of title , nor a guaranty of title , and it is understood and
agreed that Stewart
Title of Aspen , Inc . , neither assumes , nor
will be charged with any financial obligations or liability
whatever on any statement contained herein .
if I can be of further assistance , e
lase give�- ve me a call .
Sincere■ y ,
Peter P . Oelany
A'i .> scant_ Vice Presi ent
Enclosure
0
cJ U Yl Y) cl Y C5 l� J U b ,
Lc-,1- 11 Th1-e 1G i l l s C.olid os
Aqv‘ci ge-rnq trc-,1
Z 9 Fe-icier GI S .
&__,1 chc_c, +cvl 44 . O\ Dc(7
Ural- A z 13civ u o ci tv Ct y
l
s cv) Co S )(012
c„5,-) co/ Ce--)rY)m cLq -k-rn
M U U Cc..)/1-01 V l C C,'Tl L y1 S —d-11
3roC Mc 51-
71- p c,1
1-1 Rober-F-
F Bc5-A 31\Y
-As- ti-, , Cd 2 l?
h 1-41
�� 65
Uh 11-1 2 -4 V1.e ckci r \'1-e - cc►1 L
'Sox, 3-7)
A
71_34) � �-o ) (sc' 2
.4v01- 1- 4 ,3 'M_A r C R O S e_ _.P e Yl tiA e ' +ah
11 ° P r k C;1 lr I e , _� 3
A.sTcn , Cc 4 ►L011
5-is - 3y5 TN L\ \fin Luu qua
p s50
VivA.
Ae ) Co 81(0)2
5r)°1 1- Ahn \N ( )/
,n z-) 0J0
acv- 37 j » 1+ ✓Do j5- ]-0 h Lot-�oU S e )
7,5S 11IA►-be.:r llhe, r � l��
C
Cur‹, le Cc ci Gs
k ' - 1 , q L 1,-179yse1
EL5 I \Sec
pi,„: 1- A2 fC,vs - 11 Rse-1-ieV
) 5.--C fciv, A-n
pQn co 1 (vI 1.
S
'a-fir ✓�_� ' A S ��e-� � �► M c“h c Cr + S o.v_q r1
8 `Pcv Cycle -4 �.,3
45FcA
j1A L1 4 B I ! o u„.1,T V1
X10 . J`';q `, n S;
Co 316 ) I .
. U v f- L2 e.c i G Id - e ben L-Sw, --In cA
1 3 S clAC -c)01,.elA5P1 ;-4-h
A, 5 , may , Cc) -21 (01
-05 - 6a U k � + B� vN) coylzs . V\1Ghe ,fit chJ f\tG\ e 1`1 le Ace
1 -PG r C� rG1„
.gs_p €1n , Cc X1(0
Po 3c), 2 )(-7
Bo () 1 der , -
1-lE0b
FO Bon 1138.5
.Aspen) Co .21CD 1
2 --LS cc.1 1 ci e_
. i ,
�► 1-1-- C 14
/ + e
vti J"l, Hu911)-e--s
O E.c, 3G
A-_splar) , Cd Z I fo 12-,
U rl^ leC�t
G 7 � � SSG r��� L J �
5uhh,/ 1'GrL -2G1Y1 Cl Yole,
• c en
.C 1_c+ � S��� ;G�� 5c.b. I o Bx 3n2_
45-=F -)c , Cc 1
• • !. oy E cfine- 1s lS eX
y 5
-(,o 5 Lc.)`" 1 A(/'\ ay- qt‘nGl IS ci v- b c,.v Go\ccr)-son
A-5-9 \(0 1
ii L , 1 11 � I l
SkJhrn� ��� 1- vcr1"1)\ 6 G ) h Y. tl YLi 1 1 (-4 r cif t� I l�1 I ,2r
C-U")() Nor-Pn n i i /D 1\j1 OUvrirG 11 Chc1N --
33 3 - .J�v fray)-1- : V .
A e v) , cc,
jai �n`f 5 . .[-CJ _G 5lih nY PG'1■ Cpl )1 . )1 cI P . _ct Lh.s4civic,_. S I et,''1 Q✓)
Q)0 U O ) 36u I, U 20 5 i � K CIrck
-A-5_pen ) co s1611
a
U)/ h I ci SU
co - LG-1 q �ey 4
I \ \ Cc7 \ O h n ol oie } a> >--e rDoC
ef �ain) h4a)- 10 ) CANADA *2E
H ( — D) R- 4ctyv, -0J3 JA r
' 6 ,-Bcx3 4 CAcir ,c)0
-A yl , Co, 2 ) (of 2_
W--(9 'ff I " \65 Cu,dc_ C&,,c,Los "
uv6-1. 13ccf r ; -z G- J r ncfnc-1PZ
ccl R M
P (0'1 ■ 9 '7
LEA (&r1
-to)ci U ' 4 2 j/Dabyx---, k P\ u
3 cv-) , Cc ►� � ,
U h ,4- 3 \l }Cjcr icj clnG. 1).C(V l I . Je- 1 o^ 1
a -) a V -
As-p (0_ C
I, 14 4_Dc7, 1,21 E. Solc)
11 (x, 0 KGt) z CohCou\rS 2� �c l
. .
e ,
MlougiA "4 pciir t tU . A eovnd0vhiit 1
Ut41-1--s - 9 .( ps(4 'in C(..x)v)--1-/ HcAlS )v) ''r11 t
. 1 5 -/O addy-e s_s fcc-+ ih e,1,31 (c i'e ccas ,
/
�,3a -1� , m 0 (4-A10 , ,, b , (-Gy+O�
10 ) �Mid ( ghd - Pq : P ) qC, -1VAI0
1 1641 C v') , (_- a \ ) J
5-51 -3-,,-7 U ti ,+ 11 y
C�y,� G �, . Lc Inv) 11.) 0 1 rr'1
1 M idiq C\ PG}4 Pcrc-. 4/g, )
1
:aspen) , Co g1 ;, 11
, /
1 - s9\ L11- '+ k i; .P'AD 1rr-c C-7 , berj
J01 N 1oi 'of PY'1 P rc, 4-A 1c,
1 ?`��p ,r) , C0 ) i (oIl
i
u ` A- 3 / D, ,c_,, N 1 PC(JR- e-n
) C I \ d Q-d p9\*- P\ 11,3
11, -E - l i , „:\ - , al,c,t 1Gr7 C . hqn \rek q n
'1 I c) H id \6v,c, -9,,,, ,, P\qCe A Q'l
A_sc) --v) ) Cv } (,0 ) 1
3-t°1 -31 .. A 22 ue l-1 ekes \Qr
P o &x S1 I
-
U � 1+s -9 > JPi+k Coin i-lou Ac)-1-1 ,r11-1
B cacicIrcis nod- ?optic, re Cc. 5
BD-5
J th 1 1. 13 - Icy /C -Hlev Anne 1 \4G
11 I M ca ( pGr C. P k ce B3
enI CQ UP1I
Lt ,+ •- 11 .,!��ev E R1ce,
/ 1 1 \ \C C��,f lvc�,� IBC - ) t
AA , V (611
U ti, 1+ )-4 , \
PC E Ox 11.3 ) H
c , Co
E � �tick4 Sch cir)
Ill 0\qvIcy' Aqc_e_
Asp _v) ,
L . Cirg \fb-€ gi
9 29
X11?
(,.)
V G Y r& -on ov\ct DeS r-e e
I r tirlo 1 qsnof eqe, 22-
A-S p en , 2 S 1 (A
LLres S, b (1
1---6-1- 1 = 11 p ) A c c-es Ci,otc I
5i(2) i - U t1 ; -1-- / 3fh g. cis 01 �Ct y I 0q r 01 P. � r b e. 4-
Sao e--- .{,bar) AY .
JASpy-)> Cc) SV4
P C ,y ,� X525
spcn , Co - 1 I2
2 -3 = cicclue- c1 4� ��cA os
'
I 4 1-
V l�
G �.� v b Cci d o tAi ►0 i ()AI
u,
i C� Vim ) i c h C,ccrl=e,s
r7aC bngn �v
CcD
M
L_c,-). Ll -- buon -L1S\n oR Jl;bU !v \S )on
LU+" L �r` .S 0 , S 51'104)
1 _ t o ,, T A v 30Ac. rii;
t �131 �, r4 �
-e , C gIL011
4- 1-1 6 14,3
)SeD U n n Gin� 1--U C. l iq
�
CI LI W tM a+cti less Dr
.A5 r.) , C-CD 80a
L�-�'S �� A- 1f)7, Q Ac��es "Vows4'1GUs-Q, No 5
559- Lis 1 Ui:»41 -1'1 C‘hr IS-jr \h P. cis
-9 O gam S'-7
e n , Co ? 1 (D 12--
15 a 4,A.. bi I 2 i ��J i \l1 own L • SI, k., 1 -,1 #� . 'PQ_-1--.rs o h
��
1 a o 9 L_Ci31 l\Je`r ?Gr ti\J c\y
WIY\ ne_Gpo1 �S , M N . 65 y \ '-
i
0
co_olq S u \ RQcu c \ vb
15s4Lic j o f) „
A59 l (p IZ
Si I vet/
lv�b 11< < G-► bso� P a 1 ),( 3��3
Loge Pine ec44- 3 GAG � j '�S - S 5 I
IN ( C/k 14'\-\s
M )y) ,y) C\� , . .� ►�- I ��� T�i �� �� ��,z
C-� C( cj GA re s ao) c- rL c-C;i'd 3
r
- 0 "�lleKS p q �s )0V ovtc/e b'1 �v�)--..) A SCPsS )Y T. i(