Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.iz.Goomba's 307 S Mill.1973 `r rn i_ : r Y` 100 Lc,.vc..> Spacial Meeting Aspen PI ann1 I FS & Zoning October 23 , 1973 the problem. Chairman Adams stated that he felt parking districts should be formed, Coach light Ms. Baer st_.tec. that thC'. . } ��t.c� � � previous conditions for approval Chalet -- given at the conceptual st.acTe have been agreed upon. Fur- Preliminary and there stated that construction had already begun, but did. Final. Approval not think that a building permit had been issued. Ms . Baer pointed out that the Advisory Board recommended approval of the project. Bryan Johnson arrived. Gillis questioned the Planning Office on punitive measures that might be taken against the owner for beginning con- struction without a building permit. Chairman Adams stated that the Commission could not take action, that the Building Department would be the en- forcing body. Ms . Baer pointed out the owner had agreed to add a parking place on the east side of the building and sidewalks . Vidal made a motion to recommend approval , seconded by Gillis. All in favor, with the exception of Johnson, who abstained. Motion. carried. ORDINANCE #19 REVIEW - CONCEPTUAL PRESENTATIONS ;oomba ' s Ms. Baer pointed out that the Engineering Department had Restaurant recommended that no use be made of the alley -- not a de- 3 1-5 ,mil /t si.rable access . Stated that this was a request for a take-out/delivery restaurant and would require an inter- ior remodel. Ms . Baer stated that the Planning Office was recommending that three parking spaces . Ron Garfield, Attorney representing Tom Ianoco, stated that if the Commission was talking about principal use , they were only required to provide one parking space . Garfield further pointed out that the applicant could provide parking on the property , and that he was entitled to 1 12-foot curb cut. Ms. Baer stated that the applicant, should they choose to buy the parking, would be required to go to the Board of Adjustment. Garfield stated that the project would consist of approxi- mately 622 square feet of princi.pal. u.se . Dr . Barnard was present and stated that they would be willing to put in two paJ`kin ) spaces -- C)eo for the parici n(j requirement and another ice the (.ci:1-_L :ery t-i_c.:1 . Lamnerd further stated that hO had. DO 01)-JCet-i0al tco thy: sidevhi11; being put in , hut did not wan- to be ragcai T ed L put in in October and would like to do the entire hi oak . • • • E:`till`3.►f_ O k : 1, t+E E_Iil G i 100 tit • special a1 Meet_l ng Aspen Planning & Zoning October 23 , 1 973 Chairman. Adams stated that the Commission should leave the parking problem up to the ENgineering Department. Stated he -had -no objections to the proposed use. -- -- -- - Gillis made a motion to approve the conceptual plan on tht following conditions : (1) satisfactory negotiation with engineering and planning office regarding parking require-- Ments and access; (2) Construction of sidewalk as shown on plane Motion was seconded by Johnson. All in favor, motion carried. Bartel stated the Commission n could act on the conceptual plan, preliminary and final approval in the same meeting . Jenkins made a motion to approve the preliminary and final plan with the same conditions , seconded by Gillis . All in favor, motion carried. Paragon Ms. Baer pointed out that the Paragon would be coming to the Commission on a remodel project. Stated that the • Commission would need to look at the parking requirements due to additional restaurant space. Bibbig Ms. Baer explained that this is a request to move a single Residence family dwelling onto 17 , 000 sq. ft. lot. There is an existing single family dwelling on the site, Pointed out that the area is presently zoned multi-family. Vagneur stated that she would like to recommend that the center road service the area rather than Park Avenue . Jenkins made a motion to approve the project in the con- ceptual stage subject to the approval of driveway access and parking requirements by the Engineering and Planning Office. Motion seconded by Johnson. All in favor, motion carried. ,kitcher Ms . Baer_ pointed out that this project was located in the Block C-1 district. Stated the Advisory Board had recommended approval , subject to : (1) closing non-conforming curb cuts and constructing curb and gutter and sidewalk; (2) determining parking requirement with the Engineering, Planning Office and the City Attorney. Leonard Oates , Attorney representing the owner , stated he would like to ask the Commission for reconsideration - would prefer to act as soon as alternatives become avail- able. At this time , would prefer not to close the non- conforming curb cuts . Bartel stated the Commi scion could set the parking re- -quirement for the C--1 district. Oates stated they would be willing to commit to the requirements at some point in time whC:II u.l_t:Cl'I7::1"L"1Vcl be- came t. Vagneur sn■eigest t hey not get ri (1 of the n ng the ., , spaces }�r?i f)I"'.. t_h.' �, �.t.ti'1�l'Jc._L. 1 \ ('. C.C.rC Ms . Baca pointed out that the Advisory Board had 1:-.N : I J tlu:ee parhi n'_f spac(e. 1,e :required . Oates stated that they were wri .1 li ng to plat: in the s:i do.. Oct0-H1c 18 , 19./1 PRESENT: Oh r1: VidA Adrs.111f, . S;Ilith, Donna Baer of Planning Office. PRELTMITI,RY fE rIN/J, Coachlight Chalet - Conditions of appIoval have been agreed upon. Recommended approval . COIVTXPTUAL Goomba' s Restaitfant Roquefi't for talz-,'out/d;-, livery restaurant . Interior remodel. Central District Recommended apptoval of con- ceptual preseatc,tion subject to : 1. Satisfactolty negotia- tion with ongineelirg arid planning offeo regarding perk1n le- quirements and acoss for delivery truck. 2 . ConF.truci-ion of side walk as shorn OD plan. Bibbig Residence - Request to rove a family dvelling onto 17 , 000 lot - (Hire is an existin ringie fai ly dwAling on site) . Multiple Family Recoc.:Liend of co ceptual p. oson.H., LIon io “ ,p3 ov,-,1 of d , '(“o‘v .,;' a,2ces r,P, ; requ rnrdont 1-:,rigineol lug and Planning 01 lice . >7/ifl 47.49111 j / I „f 1 I d /(L'4 _itt) Ce.4.4.(1 aXJ2-4 I eioec, 52) )-• L L7( I i , CITY spEN aspen ,co • ,--: Jn box v „., DATE: Oct. 11, 1973 Goomba' s C/o Tom Iacono Box 4548 Re: 307 S . Mill Aspen, Colo. RE: This is to say that in the context of the existing system this area has adequate access and water supply for FIRE PROTECTION. Yours truly, 1 ....._ - William F. Caille Fire Marshall , She grog Shop P. 0. BOX 380, ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 925-3000 Oct . 1, 1973 Aspen planning and Zoning Commission Aspen, Colorado Gentlemen: The enclosed plans are for the proposed remodelling of the south half of the Aspen Medical Center building located at 307 S . Mill Street in Aspen . We propose to change the use of thst space from medical offices to a fast food, carry out and delivery oT,eration to be known as Goomba' s Inc . All materials and t:-!Tes of construction shall conform to the requirements of the uniform building code in order to satisfy group P occuyancy, division II and fire zone TT . Please note this is not a sit down type restaurant . The facilities in the public area are stand up counters . The food being served is "finger-type" food requiring no silverware or china . Based on this we cannot estimate occupancy figures but we do not estimate to have any more than aucroximately 30 people at any one time . Beverages served on the premises shall be non-alcoholic in nature . Our proposed hours o oPeration at this time will be 12 months a year, 7 days a week, 12 hours a day from 11: 00 A .M . - 11: 00 requiring a staff of aproximately 4 full time employees, : two on each sift . Should you hove any additional euestions please contact me at the Grog Shon . Thank you for your consideration in ti matter. Yours ver :truv, Thomas Iacono, 7resident Goombals Inc . 1 - " 7.1 Ar/ 1 I 1 i 'fitC-A • • • - q 0 \xrd 0 \ , , ./.._ / , ..., .,. 0 , ,.) ---5- , ,