HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.CR.Aspen Airpot Auto Center Sub.A061-01
~
CASE NUMBER
PARCEL In #
CASE NAME
PROJECT ADDRESS
PLANNER
CASE TYPE
OWNER/APPLICANT
REPRESENTATIVE
DATE OF FINAL ACTION
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
PZ ACTION
ADMIN ACTION
BOA ACTION
DATE CLOSED
BY
r')
A061-01
2643-344-16300
Aspen Airport Auto Center SUbdivision/PUD County Referr
Greo Woods
County Referral
Chris Smith
6/26/01
Comments Returned
9/24/01
J. Lindt
t"',.
i
f!
I'}
~
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Tamara Pregl, County Planner
FROM:
Greg Woods, City Planning Intern
THRU:
Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Director
RE:
Aspen Airport Auto Center
DATE:
June 26, 2001
The City Planning Staff reviewed the Aspen Airport Auto Center SubdivisionIPUD
Conceptual Subdivision and had the following concerns and/or recommendations.
1. Staff recommends that the County require the applicant to keep the
tree canopy along roadways out of vehicles view plane.
2. Staff recommends that the location of the proposed gas station be
moved across the street, closer to the gas pumps, so that
pedestrians are not walking back and forth across a busy
thoroughfare.
3. Staff recommends that a burm with vegetation be built up on the
north side of Sage Way to conceal the appearance of the auto
center from the highway.
4. Staff recommends a detached sidewalk where ever possible.
5. Staff recommends the County rethink the location of several
parking spaces and the circulation flow throughout the Auto
Center. Ie. Moving the buildings closer to the perimeter in order to
free up the internal space for parking and circulation.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment on this County application.
r'\
o
ASPEN/PITKIN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Phone (970) 920-5090 FAX (970) 920-5439
MEMORANDUM
TO:
City Planning
FROM:
Tamara Pregl, Community Development Department
RE:
Aspen Airport Auto Center Subdivision/PUD Conceptual Submission, Major Plat
Amendment, Rezoning, GMQS Exemption, Scenic Review & Special Review
PID#2643-344-16~300
P#177-00
DATE:
May 25,2001
Attached for your review and comments are materials for an application by Chris Smith, Petrol Aspen,
Inc., and Petrol Wash, Inc. Please return your comments to me no late than June 20, 2001. If you need
more information, please let me know.
PLEASE RETURN APPLICATION MATERIALS TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IF YOU
HAVE NO FURTHER NEED OF THEM.
Thank you.
J
n
C)
<;: . ,. .~
Area Code 970
Facsimile 920-4737
John D. LaSalle
ATTORNEY AT LAW
200 Pitkin Mesa Drive
Aspen, Colorado 81611
May 18, 2001
Area Code 970
Telephone 925-6633
Tamara Pregl
AspenlPitkin Community Development
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: AiJ:port Auto Center GMQS
Dear Tamara:
I am submitting herewith the following in connection with the upcoming P&Z meeting on May
29th: twelve copies of this letter; twelve 36"X 24" copies of the Revised Site Utilization Plan dated
May 15, 2001; twelve 11 "X 17" copies of the Revised Site Utilization Plan; twelve, 11" X 17" copies
of the Revised Land Use Program for Floor Area Ratio and Parking dated May 16, 2001 and twelve
copies of the Traffic Impact Study Update dated May 15,2001.
The revisions to the Site Utilization Plan and Land Use Program, were accomplished
subsequent to the GMQS scoring session byP&Z on February 27,2001. Although the project scored
enough points to proceed through the process, and received the highest possible scores in most
categories, the owners were dissatisfied that the project did not receive a higher overall score, because
it is their desire that the project be of the highest quality possible. Consequently, they instructed the
professionals representing them to address and improve the areas in which they did not receive as high
as score as they could have. That has occurred and those changes may be summarized as follows:
[Incidently, the numerical data on the Site Utilization Plan which has been revised is indicated by
shading, so it is easy to identuy those categories which have been changed. Similarly, the numerical
data which has been changed on the Land Use Program for Floor Area Ratio and Parking is indicated
by bold print]
1. Additional Parkine. An additional 10 parking spaces have been added to the project,
immediately adjacent to the affordable housing component of the self-storage building, for the
convenience of the residents. (The amount of open space had to be re-calculated and reduced as a
result, but at 61,345 sq.ft., it is still well in excess of the code requirement of 1200 square feet per
residential unit or 8400 square feet). The number of parking spaces in the project were re-calculated
which resuhed in the addition of another 24 spaces to the total, because the spaces located at each gas
dispenser (10) and the spaces located in the service, car wash, and quick lube bays (14) had not been
included in the count. Forty-three "stacking" spaces in front of each of those bays and dispensers
were also included in the count because, as a practical matter that is the way gas stations, car washes
and quick lubes operate. If there is no avaiIable dispenser or bay, customers merely line up behind the
car parked at the dispenser or bay, and wait. It is important to note that our transportation and parking
consultants, in their updated report at page 7 concluded that "...the parking supply for the Aspen
Airport Auto Center should be sufficient to acconnnodate the parking demands of the site uses..." even
(),
,
()
Tamara Pregl
May 18,2001
Page 2
though they did not include either "pump positions or queuing positions." If, as common sense would
dictate, one adds those spaces, the parking for the project exceeds both necessity and code
requirements.
2. Sidewalks. Sidewalks and/or boardwalks have been added to the entire perimeter of the
project for the benefit of the affordable housing residents and the residents of the surrounding
neighborhoods to provide access to the transit stops located on Highway 82.
3. Traffic Generation. The Traffic Impact Study Update by Felsburg, Holt & Ullevig now
comes to the unambiguous and unequivocal conclusion that "[NJew trips generated by the proposed
Aspen Airport Auto Center would have a minimal impact to traffic operations at the future signalized
intersection ofSH 82/Front Way/Airport Access. With or without the redevelopment of the Aspen
Airport Auto Center, the SH 82/Front Way/Airport Access is expected to operate at LOS C during
both the AM and PM peak hours."
4. Affordable Housinl!: Mix. As a result of the recommendation of the Housing Board,
which, in turn was adopted by P & Z, the affordable housing component of the storage building was
re-designed, changing the two studios which we had proposed into two, one bedroom units in order
to increase the number of employees that could be housed to 14. The numerical data on the Site
Utilization Plan has also been revised to reflect that change.
5. New Gas Station/Car Rental Buildinll. The New Gas Station/Car Rental Building has
been reduced in size from 900 sq.ft. to 704 sq.ft., primarily to accommodate the entrance to the new
parking spaces adjacent to the affordable housing component of the storage building.
The only other change from the original application filed on November 15, 2000, as amended
by the First Amendment to the original application submitted on January 26, 2001 (the amendment was
in response to objections from some North Forty homeowners) is to the Construction Schedule which
appeared as Figure 8 in the original application. That schedule is completely superceded by the
following.
6. Construction and Phasinl!: Schedule. This application and its timing was dictated by
Pitkin County and memorialized in the recorded Subdivision Improvements Agreement for the North
Forty P.U.D. Subdivision as follows:
"(d) Relocation of the Existing Stop Light. Pitkin County recognizes that the
traffic patterns established by the existence of the traffic light at the intersection of
Colorado Highway 82 and Baltic Avenue has an economic benefit to the Current
Businesses. Thus Pitkin County agrees not to relocate or agree to the relocation of the
traffic light from its existing location at the intersection of Colorado Highway 82 and
Baltic Avenue prior to April, 2003. Following any approval of commercial uses for
Block 2, or any portion thereo:f; Pitkin County agrees to either relocate the traffic light
from the Existing Entrance to the Proposed Entrance no later than April 2003, or allow
the traffic light to be relocated by Bidgle, or its successors or assigns, or by the
Existing Businesses. Further, in the event Bidgle does not submit its land use
~
i
n
. Tamara Pregl
May 18,2001
Page 3
application to re-zone Block 2 as provided in Sub-Paragraph 29(a), above, Pitkin
County may relocate or agree to the relocation of the traffic light from the Existing
Entrance to the New Entrance at anytime after November 15, 2000."
Based on the above, it appears that the traffic light will be relocated in April, 2003. The applicant
plans to coordinate the relocation of the gas dispensers, gas station/car rental building, and significant
underground infrastructure associated with a gas station (government regulation tanks and transmission
lines) so that the gas station will be up and running simultaneously with the relocation of the light. So,
construction of the new dispensers and tanks will begin in the fall of2002 in anticipation of the light
relocation.
The rest of the new development (construction of the storage/affordable housing building, new
car wash bays, quick-lube and addition to health food store is not subject to any critical timing
considerations as the gas pumps are. However, site considerations do require that the cofistruction
occur in a certain order or phasing. For example, the excavation required fur the storage building, two
stories of which are sub-grade, precludes demolition and reconstruction of the car wash until the
storage/affordable housing building is completed. Taking those factors into consideration, the
applicant hereby requests that the approvals granted hereby extend until 2008. The order of
construction phasing over that period has tentatively been scheduled as fullows: Construction of the
storage/affordable housing building is expected to commence in the spring of2003. Demolition and
re-construction of the car wash shalI comruence in the fall of2003 or early 2004. Construction of the
quick-lube and addition to the health food store is not scheduled yet, but an educated guess would be
early, 2005. Thus, the overall development of the project is anticipated to take approximately five
years from date on which the traffic light is relocated and is therefore expected to be complete prior
to December, 2008.
If you have any questions concerning the above, please do not hesitate to contact me.
0iW4
V John D. LaSalle
.
.
I)
HOLT &
ULLEVIG
engineering paths to transportation solutions
May 15, 2001
Mr. Chris Smith
234 West Hopkins
Aspen, CO 81611
RE: Aspen Airport Auto Center
Traffic Impact Study Update (FHU Reference No. 00-237)
Dear Mr. Smith:
We have prepared this letter to update the traffic impact analysis for the Aspen Airport Auto
Center. The original analysis was presented in a letter report dated November 9th, 2000. This
update is necessary in order to address County comments concerning trip generation and traffic
volumes, to re-evaluate operational analyses and to conduct a parking analysis of the site.
Figure 1 shows the location of the proposed development relative to the Town of Aspen. The
site plan, shown in Figure 2, has changed slightly since the original analysis, but access to SH
82 has remained the same. In the new site plan, some of the uses have been shifted around,
and the size of the mini-storage facility has been reduced from 48,993 square feet to 25,990
square feet. The proposed uses for the Aspen Airport Auto Center include a gas station, a car
wash, an existing building, neighborhood grocery store, a car rental facility, a quick lube, six
apartments and a mini storage building. There are several uses on the site which will either be
eliminated, moved or expanded with the proposed redevelopment of the site. This letter will
update the trip generation for the project and re-evaluate traffic impacts based on forecasted
2020 traffic volumes for SH 82.
Existing Conditions
Currently, several uses exist on site. These uses include a auto sales/service station with six
pumps, a self-service car wash with four bays, a grocery store and a 3,400 square foot
commercial building.
Figure 3 illustrates existing average daily traffic (ADT) on SH 82 and peak hour traffic volumes
at nearby intersections. These traffic volumes were compiled from the following sources:
303.721.1440
fax 303.721.0832
fbu@fhueng.com
Greenwood Corporate Plaza
7951 E. Maplewood Ave. Ste. 200
Greenwood Village, CO 80111
.
May 15, 2001
Mr. Chris Smith
Page 2
f'\
n
. Aspen/Pitkin Countv Transit/Transportation Development Plan, Leigh, Scott & Cleary,
Inc., November 1986.
. Transit Development Plan for the Roarino Fork Vallev, Leigh, Scott & Cleary, Inc., April
1996.
. State Hiohwav 82 Entrance toAspen Final Environmental Impact Statement, Colorado
Department of Transportation, August 1997.
As shown in Figure 3, daily traffic volumes on SH 82 currently range between 14,000 and
16,000 vehicles per day. Peak hour traffic volumes shown in Figure 3 were used to evaluate
existing traffic operations at each intersection. Traffic operations were evaluated using the
analysis procedures of the Hiohwav Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board (TRB),
Third Edition, 1997. The Highway Capacity Manual defines traffic operations by a level of
service (LOS), which is qualitative measure of total delay per vehicle at a controlled intersection.
Levels of service are described by a letter designation ranging from LOS "A" to "F", with "A"
representing very little delay and "F" representing extreme delay. Existing traffic operations for
the SH 82/ Baltic Avenue / Airport Access is LOS C during the AM peak hour and LOS B during
the PM peak hour.
Trip Generation
The number of new vehicle-trips for the proposed Aspen Airport Auto Center were eslimated
from trip generation rates documented in Trip Generation published by the Institute of
Transportation Engineers (ITE), Sixth Edition, 1997. As shown in Table 1, the proposed
development would generate nearly 3,200 vehicle-trips per day with over 165 during the AM
peak hour and nearly 275 during the PM peak hour when built out. Considering that most of the
proposed uses of the Aspen Airport Auto Center are oriented toward the service of automobiles,
it was estimated that approximately ten percent of site generated trips would occur internally
between the uses of the site. Therefore, the external trip generation (i.e. trips in/out of driveway
access points on Front Way, Sage Way and Baltic Avenue) is estimated to be just under 2,900
daily trips with approximately 150 during the AM peak hour and 250 during the PM peak hour.
May 15, 2001
Mr. Chris Smith
Page 3
I)
-,
n
Table 1.
Trip Generation Estimates For Proposed Development
Proposed Land Uses for the Aspen Airport Auto Center
Quick Lube 3 Bays 40.00 3.00 5.19 120 6 3 9 9 7 16
Car Wash 6 Positions 108.00 5.79 648 0 0 0 18 17 35
New Car Sales1 1,735 S.F. 37.50 2.21 2.80 65 3 4 2 3 5
Grocery Store 5,008 S.F, 111.51 3.25 11.51 558 8 8 16 28 29 57
Office/Car 1,700 S.F, 11.01 1.56 1.49 20 2 2 4 2 2 4
Rental1
Gas Station 10 positions 168.56 12.27 14.56 1,686 63 60 123 74 71 145
Housing 6 Apts. 6.63 0.51 0.62 40 0 3 3 3 4
Mini.Storage 25,990 S.F. 2.50 0.15 0.26 65 2 2 4 3 4 7
Total Site Trip Generation 3,202 84 79 163 139 134 273
Site Trip Generation Adjusted For Internal Trips 2,882 76 71 147 125 121 246
The existing building is planned to contain the new car sales and the office/car rental uses.
As previously mentioned, there are a number of existing uses which will be incorporated into the
proposed development. These uses and their trip generation characteristics are shown in Table
2. As with the trip generation of the proposed uses, it was estimated that approximately ten
percent of existing trips currently occur between the existing uses of the site.
The trips generated by the existing land uses are accounted for in the existing traffic volume
counts along SH 82. Therefore, the trips generated by the existing uses were subtracted from
the site trip generation estimates presented in Table 1 to estimate the number of new vehicle-
trips to/from SH 82. As a result, the total number of new vehicle-trips generated onto SH 82
from the Aspen Airport Auto Center is estimated to be nearly 1,200 vehicles per day with nearly
70 during the AM peak hour and nearly 105 during the PM peak hour.
May 15, 2001
Mr. Chris Smith
Page 4
f'\
~
Table 2.
Adjustment to Site Trip Generation For Existing Site Land Uses
Site Trip Generation Adjusted For Internal Trips (from Table 1)
Existing Site Trip Generation Based on Existing Site Uses
Grocery Store 4,008 S.F. 111.51 3.25 11.51 447 7 7 14 23 24 47
Auto Sales! 6 Pumps 168.56 12.27 14.56 1,011 38 36 74 45 43 88
Service
Car Wash 4 Positions 108.00 5.79 432 0 0 0 12 11 23
Trip Generation for Existing Uses 1,890 45 43 88 80 78 158
Trip Generation for Existing Uses Adjusted for Internal Trips 1,701 40 39 79 72 70 142
Trip Generation (New Vehicle-Trips) Oriented to/from SH 82 1.181 36 32 68 53 51 104
Background Traffic Conditions
Currently. the Aspen Airport access aligns with Baltic Avenue. In the next few years, the
Colorado Department of Transportation is planning to re-align the Airport access to Front Way
while restricting turn movements at the Baltic Avenue / SH 82 intersection to right turns only.
As mentioned, the traffic impact analysis will be based on 2020 traffic projections for SH 82.
Figure 4 illustrates 2020 background traffic volumes which is the component of roadway traffic
that would already be using the roadway system and that is unrelated to the proposed
development. These background traffic volumes are based on the previously described
realignment of the Airport access, right turn only movements at the Baltic Avenue / SH 82
intersection, traffic estimates for the North Forty PUD and a Iwo percent per year growth rate for
SH 82 traffic. The growth rate was based on projected growth rates presented in the State
Hiohwav 82 Entrance to Aspen EIS. Also, recognizing future roadway improvements along SH
82 include a HOV lane in each direction, it was estimated that 20 percent of the peak hour
through traffic on SH 82 would use the HOV lane.
Upon review of the 2020 traffic projections presented in the earlier (November 9th, 2000) Aspen
Airport Auto Center traffic impact study, it was discovered that the average daily traffic
projections for SH 82 only included single occupant vehicles and did not include HOV's. Taking
into account this omission, the 2020 daily traffic projections on SH 82 have been adjusted from
18,300 to 22,000 vehicles per day (vpd) east of Baltic Avenue and from 17,400 to 21,600 vpd
west of the future Front Way intersection.
May 15, 2001
Mr. Chris Smith
Page 5
,...."
f)
It is anticipated that when the Airport access is aligned with Front Way, the new intersection will
warrant signalization. The analysis presented in the previous report of the SH 82/ Front Way
intersection indicated that the intersection would operate at LOS 0 during both the AM and PM
peak hours, With the addition of an additional turn lane along the Front Way approach and
signal timing adjustments, a better level of service can be achieved.
A more sophisticated and detailed analysis of the SH 82/ Front Way intersection indicates that
at least LOS C operations could be achieved during both the AM and PM peak hours if the
signal timing and phasing are optimized and the Front Way approach geometry (see Figure 4)
consists of dual left turn lanes and a shared through/right turn lane (the previous analysis only
included a single left turn lane). Providing the intersection geometry for Front Way shown in
Figure 4 would reduce the potential of left turn queues stacking back into the Front Way / Sage
Way intersection. It should be noted that this roadway geometry for Front Way is necessary
regardless of the proposed re-development of the Aspen Airport Auto Center,
Distribution of Site Generated Traffic
For all new vehicle-trips along SH 82 it was estimated that 70 percent would be oriented to/from
Aspen while the remaining 30 percent would be oriented down valley,
Assignment of Site Generated Traffic
The assignment of site generated traffic to the roadway network is illustrated in Figure 5. Since,
the site for the Aspen Airport Auto Center is being redeveloped, all site generated trips (less
internal trips) were assigned to the site access pOints on Front Way, Sage Way and Baltic
Avenue. However, because the site currently has existing uses, only the new vehicle-trips were
assigned to the SH 82 intersections. The existing trips are already included in the background
traffic.
Total Traffic Conditions
The site generated traffic volumes along SH 82 (Figure 5) were added to the background traffic
volumes estimates (Figure 4) to produce the 2020 total projected traffic volumes which are
shown in Figure 6. In 2020, lhe proposed Aspen Airport Auto Center would increase the daily
traffic along SH 82 by almost 900 vehicles per day (3.9% increase) south of Baltic Avenue and
by almost 400 vehicles per day (1.8% increase) north of Fronl Way.
It is anticipated that the addition of peak hour traffic at the SH 82/ Front Way intersection will
have little impact on the overall traffic operations of the intersection. Given the intersection
geometry shown in Figure 6, the SH 82/Front Way intersection is expected to operate at LOS C
during both peak hours even with the addition of site generated traffic. Again, dual left turns are
needed to achieve this level of service. In addition, the right turn movement from Baltic Avenue
to SH 82 is expected to operate at LOS A during AM peak hour and LOS B during the PM peak
hour.
May 15. 2001
Mr. Chris Smilh
Page 6
~
,
{\
... . .j
Parking Analysis
Table 3 presents the peak parking demand for uses within the Airport Auto Center. The parking
demand listed in the table does not include the demand associated with vehicles parked at
gasoline pumps or vehicles parked in vehicle bay queues at the Quick Lube or the carwash.
Similarly, the parking supplv only includes those parking spaces within the vicinity of the site use
and does not include pump positions and queuing positions at the Quick Lube or carwash. As
shown in the table, the number of parking spaces within the vicinity of each specific site use is
sufficient to accommodate the estimated demand of each site use, It should further be noted
that the parking for each of the site uses will not peak simultaneously, and the peak parking
demand of the combination of uses may likely be less than that presented in Table 3.
Table 3. Peak Parking Demand
Quick Lube 3 Bays See Note 2 below 8 8
Car Wash 6 Positions See Note 3 below 3
19'
Grocery Store 5,008 SF 2.874 14
Gas Station I convenience 6 pumps / 3.00' 3 11
store 900 SF
Apartments 6 units 1.046 6
1310
Mini-Storage 25,900 SF See Note 7 below 5
Existing Building1 3.435 SF 2.79' 1911 25
I Totals 58 76
Building is planned to containnew car sales and office/car rental uses.
FHU estimate assurning five employees at one time and three cars waiting to be picked up by customers. Vehicles
waiting to be serviced would not need a parking spaces but would queue behind the service doors.
Vehicles waiting for a car wash would not need parking spaces since they would queue behind the carwash bays.
Three vehicles is an FHU estimate recognizing that there is a demand for individuals to dry and/or wax their car after
washing it.
Based on Institute of Transportation Engineers Parkinq Generation, Second Edition.
Based on information presented in Parkino (Robert Weant and Herbert Levinson) for convenience stores. It is
assumed that the convenience store would generate a parking demand while parking for the gas station would all
occur at the pumps.
Based on Institute of Transportation Engineers Parkino Generation, Second Edition.
FHU estimate assuming one employee and a maximum of four customers at the mini-storage facility,
Based on Institute of Transportation Engineers Parkino Generation, Second Edition.
The parking spaces within the site facing Baltic Avenue across from the carwash could be used by grocery store
patrons.
The apartments and mini-storage would both utilize the parking around the mini-storage facility.
Total parking demand incfudes9 spaces reserved for rental cars.
"
"
May 15, 2001
Mr. Chris Smith
Page 7
^
n
Summary
The following items highlight the major findings of this traffic study:
Traffic Analvsis
. The total trip generation estimates for all proposed uses of the Aspen Airport Auto
Center are estimated to generated nearly 3,200 daily vehicle-trips with 167 during the
AM peak hour and 274 during the PM peak hour. Accounting for trips generated by the
existing site uses and for internal trips between proposed land uses, the number of new
vehicle-trips generated by the Aspen Airport Auto Center are estimated to be 1,235 daily
trips with 70 trips during the AM peak hour and 110 lrips during the PM peak hour.
. The analysis of 2020 background traffic conditions (see Figure 5) indicates that the Front
Way roadway geometry between Sage Way and SH 82 should consist of dual left turn
lanes, and a shared through/right lane. This roadway geometry is necessary to achieve
a LOS C and to prevent queues associated with the left turn movement from Front Way
to SH 82 from blocking the Front Way / Sage Way intersection. This roadwav oeometry
for Front Wav is necessary reoardless of whether the Aspen Airport Auto Center is
redevelop or not.
. Based on 2020 traffic volume forecast for SH 82, the Aspen Airport Auto Center would
increase daily traffic along SH 82 between 1,5 and 3.8 percent.
. New trips generated by the proposed Aspen Airport Auto Center would have a minimal
impact to traffic operations at the future signalized intersection of SH 82 / Front Way /
Airport Access, With or without the redevelopment of the Aspen Airport Auto Center,
the SH 82/ Front Way / Airport Access is expected to operate at LOS C during both the
AM and PM peak hours,
Parkino Analvsis
.
As shown in Table 3, the parking supply for the Aspen Airport Auto Center should be
sufficient to accommodate the parking demands of the site uses.
.
The client has indicated that they will actively manage the parking on the site to ensure
that adequate parking is available for the specific site uses.
May 15, 2001
Mr. Chris Smith
Page 8
!""l
n
We hope the information presented in this study is helpful in your planning efforts for the Aspen
Airport Auto Center. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call,
Sincerely,
Fa::::r~& u~~
Christopher J. Fasching, P,E.
Principal
1tdJ 1~
Todd S. Frisbie, E.I.T.
Transportation Engineer
rill FELSBURG
.HOLT&
ULLEVIG
1"""\
Ii
~
"",7r.
,~
~
ASPEN
AIRPORT
\
\~
,~
''f'
\
Aspen Airport
Auto Center
\
\~.
."-
,,~
\
'-~~-
)
Q)'
Q)'
'-C'
~\
12,
",'
~'
(
/
<JV
North
Figure 1
Vicinity Map
Aspen ABC 00-23710/31/00
( .~ FELSBURG
.HOLT&
ULLEVIG
~
.1""'\
F '.J'
ASPEN
~I;S';~H
CENTER
... ......
GREOOElT G=B 0-
HVr.1I2
Aspen ABC 00-237 5/9/01
Figure 2
Site Plan
Aspen Airport Auto Center
~
North
r .~ FELSBURG
.HOLT&
ULLEVIG
,....,
"
~
<(
.>1
""
'"
<ll
C/B
~l
20(100)
-250(820)
14,500 110(260)
135(70) t r
970(570)-
50(35) i 0'0'0'
"'~'"
olO'::::..
'" 0
....
ASPEN
AIRPORT
"-
~
,,-
If
LEGEND
SH82
15,900
XXX(XXX) = AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
Average Daily Traffic Volumes
= AM/PM Peak Hour Signalized Level of Service
= Traffic Signal
~
North
xxxx
XIX
o
Figure 3
Existing Conditions
Aspen ABC 00-237 5/9/01
~
North
.r~ FELSBURG
111 HOLT &
ULLEVIG
~
f
Y
f""\
'7
n
~
~
-~
~
~
ASPEN AIRPORT
AUTO CENTER
'"
~ '"
~
1:; -g
e, ~
LL' c/c ;c
I "- ..... co:
~ll OS I
I j "-
-0(---__ I
-.-- ~
--..-J' -
- -------- -----> _,J
-~ --->
~
21,600
140(85)
1155(680}-
290(170} u~
50(35).
rr
000'
C\J~CO)
'0;:0:::-
C\J 0
/'-
ASPEN
AIRPORT
SH82
0-
o
~
o
CO) L65(130)
*--- 105(320}
410(1270)
22,000
LEGEND
XXX(XXX) = AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
XXXX = Average Daily Traffic Volumes
XIX. = AM/PM Peak Hour Signalized Level of Service
~ xix = AM/PM Peak Hour Unsignafized Lever of Service
= HOV Lane
-'L = Slop Sign
~ = Traffic Signal Figure 4
Year 2020
Background Traffic Conditions
Aspen ABC 00-237 5/10/01
r .~ FELSBURG
11III HOLT &
ULLEVIG
f"'1
n
Turn Movements at the Aspen
Airport Auto Center Accesses
are based on the site trip
generation estimates.
~
~
~
~
,~
P'
~'1>"I~/
~~/
<li
f
~
I
to,'
~I
T :.35(60)
:t r
~iO
"'LO
fOi!f
ASPEN AIRPORT
AUTO CENTER
",'
'1:.,'\
:'1:,
\\'1i
~\~(j;
*\.tb"l '%*
\
iO\
1O':
j I
*(5)t, 11
, ite
1 ;+ LO
<Ii
~
<Y
~
~
_I
~~
i?l~
jj
u'J
Sage Way 5(*)--1 1 t
*(5)-, __
, LO LO
sur
o
g- i
~LO
l.{)-' 0'
"'j*L iL *(5) ~e
:~aO(40) '" LO
--~--~-- J l LlO(15)
=--~:::.-~": +-5 10
<5(30)--1 h -
5(5) ~
tr
cO'
"'"
o'lO
"''''
_iO
0'"
~-
~O
LO'"
j l~
L 20(30)
-5(5)
SH82
0'
~
i?l
j L5(10)
- 20(30)
860
370
10(15) --1
Turn Movements at SH82
access points are based
on new trips generated by
the Aspen Airport Auto Center.
~
LEGEND
xxx (XXX) =
XXXX =
.:- =
','
AM (PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
Average Daily Traffic Volumes
Movement Less Than 5 Vehicles Per Hour
Figure 5
Site Generated Traffic Volumes
North
Aspen ABC 00-237 5/10/01
r -:oa FELSBURG
IIIIlHOLT &
ULLEVIG
n
,
~.
~
(I
7
I
,
I
I
>>,'
~I
"'I
e,
l('
I
I
c/c
~ll
~
~
-----~
-.
22,000
150(1001
1155(680 ---+
290(170 --~
50(35 t
ASPEN
AIRPORT
~
North
r'1
/'
~
~
~
.,~
~
ASPEN AIRPORT
AUTO CENTER
"'--
;c
....
'"
j
-.-
'"
~
<:J
~
Cl:\
I
I
..J
~-----
<-
"'--
.-
..0(---__
~
If
'-------
----->
~
SH82
iO
o
~
0'
..,. L70(140)
-- 105(320)
395(1290)
22,900
LEGEND
XXX(XXX) = AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
XXXX = Average Dally Traffic Volumes
XIX = AM/PM Peak Hour Signalized Level of Service
~ xix = AM/PM Peak Hour Unsignalized Level of Service
= HOV Lane
.JL = Stop Sign
o = Traffic Signal
Figure 6
Year 2020
Total Traffic Conditions
Aspen ABC 00-237 519/01
0J
000-"
~
"
~
0
~
" ~
,
~ "
;)
" 0
0 .
ffi;
r:s
.,
."
"
Ul
CI)
Q
-
"
CI)
'0
~
Q.
.
E
.
o
.
>
~
~
<
e. c
Cli< ..g
E 0 8
:ll! ~.3
<> <( 't
. .
E '0'
. ~
~~
,0
.~
~~~
="'z
0'.
",,,,:5 .
l~o,~
2:-:C~~:~
<::.5 &8:g
5N;i:5J5
~~<:'~ci
~~~~=i
[l....J<...Jll.
~ ~~
" ".
.~ ~g>
~i;"";Za....
~:?8.s1?l
-g~~2g
"'",,-<om
-gE<:>JC:::'liS
~c3:3~~
~*O.2:;;
g ~j!i~
~ ~5~~:~
<> i!:'.QC.OlE'~
8 g~:.i~~~
i ~~ ~~~~
~ :g.l!!<~:5::i
1l c:.3'Og,:'Oa.:
..
~
,
~
~
.
~
!
'j ,
. :g ~
< .
R ~ ! 0
~ ,
.. 8- " . ~
~ :< 0
g.~ ~ 0
z "
! 0
,
0
. "
/ ," ~9~~~W---
\/
)
0 ~ ~
I ~ ~ 0 .
. :!2 ~ " . "
'" ~
0 '. '. 5 . ~
~ . . .
. , 11 ~ 2
. I, ~ ~ ~ g
~ ~
0 ~ ~ ~
. . 8 " ~
~ 0 w w
.
'"
;;;
Q
W
Z
~
,
m
~
!!!
,;f'./
,~
~"
"
~
"
'.
"
"
~,
~
c:
tIl
I-IIl
nllIlli
Z"-ww
W()ZI-
II-II--Z
1Il~~W
<(<(IOU
;;;
Q
W
Z
~
,
.
<<
e
..$0.::<....
~
,
,
,
~'i"
,
00
'"
,
'.
\
::JI.L'T\l8
..
,
.'
c'
"
's
'<,
(~- -
..
"-
,
" "
-o"'~.\'\\\
\ '.
\ \
/T\ \,
...... \,,,/',
"'" (~)~r',
')~,:>:
..
.~
'.
,
'.
I
,
;"f-,
,
I
,
I
,
I
,
,
,
,
,
I-
..1
W
III
z
w
w
Ii
\!)
/
\
('I
'"
~
I
,
-'+ - -:- .
1:-->i~<rw~ ~ ,,/
~1""\.;~!'" ,gl.:;l1JIf --
,.Q",oo::
,
/
I
",
, ,
, \
, ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
,
,
,
,
,-
;
I
,
J
,-'
.
r
/
/
-,
/ ,
, \,
, 'I
/ ~.
/
/ ,-'"
" I '\
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
~,'
II
/.1-,<'
, ~
fj , I I Ii:
~, \, I ' ~z)
,/ ", \ J ~~
'-~ -'. "iil ~
'~!-:
..............1.;
,
,
,
i
/
,
~
Z
()
}-l!!
1->
liiS)
() ~
lL~ffi
:t: tf) ~
~~~
()~
ZII-
r
\
-,
- ,
"
"
, '
---~-' )
"
.....:.::: ::::~;;~~~~~~:-.
/
,
,
I"
Z
()~
}- ill ~
I- > x
Ii - X
() n 3
ILIO~
:)0
:[. d):R
.
I- . ~
Ii n <
n. ~ ~
V . <
Z II- ~
,0 i$f
, //"J "-
"(('" ^ ,,"-. '
/ '....----- ------..,
, l r- - ~ - - - - - - - - - - -., I
I I r - - --.,,--, '1
\: '/ . '\:
/J ' 1 I
, :1/ I I
\ ' ,
\
\
0 <;
13
.'!l 0
'"
:;: <6
0
~ ,..
~ m
",:2
m ~
~
>- E
@ D
~
J: (f)
(f)
0
:2
'"
@ ;;
~ e
w
." '"
rl! E
'" 0
C ij;
'C OJ
c
m "0
a: >-
("') ;;;
S
~
'E
D '"
~ C
(f) :E
(f)
0 '3
:2 ID
'" '"
c
E .;;;
'" ~
0
E J:
w l
E
~ E
c
w 0
E w
'"
('"",
f""';
t"',
c:
:i2
...
l'll
a.
'tl
c:
l'll
o
i
a:
l'll
l!!
cl:
...
o
o
ii:
...
...oS!
.l!! E
c: l'll
Q) ...
o
o e
Sa.
cl: lJl
t:::J
O'tl
e-c:
C(j
'"
C
"
@
a.
lu~~
~ -g
00:
lu"':Z
~ c
00)""':'
00::;:'
L
e
o
W
"CI:S
g ~
"-'0
.9.....:
2i en
=8
:g o.
"''=-
'"
c
"
@
a.
lu~~
~ -g
00:
lu'"
~ c
o w_
oe:::.
lL3
~"-
"'-
e
.9
(f)
'0
o
o
"-
'"
.5
1D
'~
W
'"
c
"
@
a.
lu~~
~ -g
00:
lu'"
~ c
o w_
oo:::.
lL3
~"-
"'-
c.
:c
c e
.9 Q)
"ilim
we
o
rn rn
,,0
",0.
c c
'-;:E
'M'S
WID
lu~~
~ -g
00:
'"
c
"
@
a.
lu'"
~ c
o ~_
00:::,
lL3
~"-
"'-
.lJ
~
];
u
'3
o
'"
c
"
@
a.
lu~~
~ -g
00:
lu'"
~ 0
o ~_
(.) 0:::,
lL<i
w",
~"-
"'-
.0::
o
rn
~
rn
o
lu~~
~ -g
00:
'"
c
"
@
a.
lu'"
~ c
o ~_
(.) 0:::,
lL<i
w'"
~"-
"'-
OJ
E
~
0:
@
~
c
.2
1D
w
"
rn'"
CJ .5
;:;g
" ~
ZID
'"
c
"
@
a.
lu~~
~ -g
00:
lu'"
~ c
o w_
UCI:::.
lL~
w",
~"-
"'-
....:cor-..
iii C':!
000
OJ
'"
or
;,;
'0
-'
;;;
E
w
u
o
* 0
.~ ~
~O:
al m
" ~
8.'"
~ g
~ u:
<o~
0) ~ (lj
.~ Ci a:
'" m
'S ~ ~
al 0'"
"0 No:
~ C';J 0
occiI
g..9:! "0
a: ~ 3l
~ 8.
.2 e
<a.
€
"''''
al~Ll)
",00
'"
o
r-:
'"
:3 0
o~
"'0:
'" m
" w
~<
.5 g
m u::
-< .~ (:)
Olti'fil
.!:: Ci a:
'" m
'S ~ ~
al 0'"
~N
m C';J g
8..aJ u:
ow~
a::g 3l
$ ~ 8-
~~~
,,; 0
"''''
~o
or
w
~ <5
w;;
'"
.~ -g
~.E
~S
"
D
E
'"
~
~ .~
u ~
~~
ti 0
'x '5
w'"
,,;
'"
o
'"
'"
-0
w
'"
.~
"0
E
w
~
"
"
E
~
"
'"
u
J'! c
~~
"0
E
"
"
~
w
o
o
c.
e
a.
Jj
o
>-
,,;
o
c
~
"0
E
w
"
~
w
o
o
0.
e
a.
m
'0
>-
"
N
'"
"':rfl
..'"
":
~'"
"'.
N
-0
w
o
o
0.
o
Q:
m
'0
>-
;;
~
~
o
.3
o
'"
:i:
~
c
m
..u
" al
iil''''
~o
o ~
u iil'
.~~
~ 0
3 Qi
ala.
w vi
"''''
~'"
"'.'"
",ui
"''''
in
'0
-'
U
al
'"
~
c
m
o
'"
:i:
c
o
m
~
'"
E
~
E E
w 0.
E.2
o.~
.2 a;
~"
~~
~ E
w '"
o '
&.~
2..8
a. m
m
'0
>-
;;
'"
m
~
o
o
"0
-'
"''''
"''''
00
"'.
o <Ii
'"
;;;
'"
'"
<;
~
0:
m
~
'"
oa:
~lf:
0:",
os '"
<5 Q) 0
o -< c:
u: 0: 0
.~ ,g 0 -g
';::(i'jU::~
Ba:~.o
m m m
:g ~ C; ~
~ <( Q) <
N 0: ~ 0
cO~~~
(\)"O-oID
:g ~ ~ ~
3:: Co 0.3::
.2 0 0 0
<etc:;;:
-'if.
.....
o
~cO
~
~
~
Viai
os ~
N ~
m '"
0.0
jS
mO
~ '"
w '
~Z
'(ii-c
- c
~ m
"'u
E al
~ '"
0-
u 0
w ~
0.'"
m J'!
o c
o w
~ 0
m ii5
J:a.
,,;
N
o
'"
'"
c
o
E
"0
E
w
"
"C
W
o
o
0.
o
Q:
m
~
...:'#.
....
'"
~
o~
"!.'"
;::
;;
~
'"
00.$
~ 0
m-'
to
~ '"
o '
",Z
c~
"5 ~
:So
~~
m-
~ 0
w w
~ '"
uJ'!
~ c
~ e
m ~
a. a.
...:...:
ui en
"''''
"''''
"'0
..n "d'~
'"
.. {,;i
m w
~ -<
'" ~
~ 0
gE.
ij;"-
(ij'E
E .~
-l'l E
"00 E
w 0
o:U
(ij(ij
00
>->-
"';rf..
.. ~
'"
0';
~'"
.;
'"
;;
~ ~
~~
~'O
,,-'
0.0
0'"
c..z
c~
~ @
~ U
mal
~'"
m'O
~ "
~g'
os _
o c
~ ~
c ~
m w
-,a.
;;
e
'"
"
c.
rn
o
o
'0
c
rn
...
.,;
..
'"
..
'"
~
'"
~
m
0.
(f)
C
W
0.
~
0.
m
o
o
~
c
m
-'
'0
m
w
@
m
'0
>-
Bw
"'''
1'-.g
'" '"
R' Q) .!::
'tt. :5 ~
"<t'~ ~.2
~ c~tl
~~g
.!2lo 00
w::;:
g~~
c~~
~ 0 (,,)
~ '-' .~
;:;: Q) Q)
., 00
~~OJ
o"o.s
()~~ -
~~~ .3:9
~2ai 00
"o._.D III v
~t?:;.~ <Cz
~.c ~ ~:5
~ =: is- g c:
~~.c: -CO
{IJ gj 2 ~
iii ~ ~ .00 c
8 ~ rJ .!!! is
v~2 .m~
~~~.e (ij :fl
~~~~~~
0. 0 rii Q) O).c:
tfJ ~ 0. ~ c: 0)
g,:": 5 ii:i '0 .s
.- 0. -c 'S :s!
~ ~ C:.D.s
~li55e1lQ).D
Q) E ~ Q) ~ ~
d.~ii:i~o-
6-tfJ~1{lo
~~~~:~*
<l> 0) ~ e -E g
E c: ~ 0. 0).....
.~:.i: c:.s
;:) (ij 1ii <l> (IJ C
ere.. Q);:) Q)
Q) *! ~ E
0:: .2 (,,) Q) ;:)
O):JeIl.D<l>O
c: g. -c ;; 0
.- Q) Q) -0 ~
~ ~ g>-a II>
e..-a~~ ~
~~~gj ~
~(ij~~~ ~
.m ~ * tfJ 5-
~ ~ ~ ~ 0-
zo::EE
'"
o
'"
,..
]j
m
E
'x
o
a.
0.0
"'''-
~~e~e