The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.council.regular.20130311 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA March 11, 2013 5:00 PM I. Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Scheduled Public Appearances a) Honorary Consul General of the Republic of Lithuania IV. Citizens Comments & Petitions (Time for any citizen to address Council on issues NOT on the agenda. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes) V. Special Orders of the Day a) Councilmembers' and Mayor's Comments b) Agenda Deletions and Additions c) City Manager's Comments d) Board Reports VI. Consent Calendar (These matters may be adopted together by a single motion) a) Resolution #24, 2013 - Agreement and Release with Aspen FSP-ABR, LLC b) Resolutions #21, 22, 23 - 2013 - Rio Grande Park Restroom Building & Pumphouse construction and supply contracts c) Minutes - February 25, 2013 VII. First Reading of Ordinances a) Ordinance #10, Series of 2013, AspenModern negotiation for historic designation of 602 E. Hyman Avenue P.H. 3/18 b) Ordinance #9, 2013 - Code amendment - small campaign contributions - P.H. 3/18 VIII. Public Hearings a) Ordinance #5, 2013 - 223 E. Hallam - Lot Split b) Ordinance #6, 2013 - 401 Castle Creek Rd., Aspen Valley Hospital, Final PUD - Phases III & IV IX. Action Items X. Executive Session XI. Adjournment Next Regular Meeting March 18, 2013 COUNCIL’S ADOPTED GUIDELINES COUNCIL SCHEDULES A 15 MINUTE DINNER BREAK APPROXIMATELY 7 P.M. • Stick to top priorities • Involve others in community problem solving • Be thorough, deliberate and accountable for consequences when making decisions Page 1 of 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: SIRE Test User, Dude THRU: Click here to enter text. DATE OF MEMO: 2/11/2013 MEETING DATE: 3/11/2013 RE: Honorary Consul General of the Republic of Lithuania REQUEST OF COUNCIL: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: BACKGROUND: DISCUSSION: FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACTS: Click here to enter text. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FINANCE REVIEW: Click here to enter text. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: Click here to enter text. RECOMMENDED ACTION: P1 III.a Page 2 of 2 ALTERNATIVES: PROPOSED MOTION: CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: ATTACHMENTS: Notes: • Please use page numbers on all memos and attachments, especially for work sessions • The memo should be as long as it needs to be – but remember, you’re not writing a novel. Use attachments for more detailed information, ordinances and resolutions, etc. • Attachments: All attachments to the memo should be referenced somewhere in the body of the memo. All attachments should be titled as “Attachment”, “Exhibit” or “Schedule” with a letter following: Attachments: A - Exhibit One - Map ... B - Property Description C - Chart of Costs D - Resolution #97-1 P2 III.a Page 1 of 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Lee Ledesma, Utilities Operations Manager THRU: David Hornbacher; Randy Ready; Debbie Quinn DATE OF MEMO: 2/27/2013 MEETING DATE: 3/11/2013 RE: Agreement and Release with Aspen FSP-ABR, LLC REQUEST OF COUNCIL: See attached Utilities Memorandum for Agreement and Release with Aspen FSP-ABR, LLC, as well as Exhibit A (Resolution #24, Series of 2013) and Exhibit B (Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release). PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: BACKGROUND: DISCUSSION: FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACTS: $26,532.05 water credit covering three accounts plus future possible account credit of $26,532.05 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FINANCE REVIEW: Click here to enter text. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: Click here to enter text. P3 VI.a Page 2 of 2 RECOMMENDED ACTION: ALTERNATIVES: PROPOSED MOTION: CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: ATTACHMENTS: Notes: • Please use page numbers on all memos and attachments, especially for work sessions • The memo should be as long as it needs to be – but remember, you’re not writing a novel. Use attachments for more detailed information, ordinances and resolutions, etc. • Attachments: All attachments to the memo should be referenced somewhere in the body of the memo. All attachments should be titled as “Attachment”, “Exhibit” or “Schedule” with a letter following: Attachments: A - Exhibit One - Map ... B - Property Description C - Chart of Costs D - Resolution #97-1 P4 VI.a Page 1 of 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Lee Ledesma, Utilities Operations Manager THRU: David Hornbacher, Director of Utilities and Environmental Initiatives Randy Ready, Assistant City Manager Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney DATE OF MEMO: March 4, 2013 MEETING DATE: March 11, 2013 RE: Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release between Aspen FSP-ABR, LLC and City of Aspen for Water Accounts located at Boomerang Lodge – 500, 510, and 512 West Hopkins Avenue, Aspen REQUEST OF COUNCIL: City Council approval of the proposed Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release between Aspen FSP-ABR, LLC and City of Aspen related to water accounts located at the Boomerang Lodge in Aspen. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: Staff discussed prospective settlement agreement options with City Council in Executive Session. Following discussion, staff prepared the attached agreement and mutual release for Council approval. BACKGROUND: In 1992 the City of Aspen began metered water service at the Boomerang Lodge site. In April of 2007, the Boomerang Lodge (Customer) ceased operations and began demolishing all related structures with the exception of the “East Wing” of the Lodge—512 West Hopkins Avenue. During demolition, water meters were removed at 500 and 510 West Hopkins and these two accounts were placed on construction rate in July of 2007. However, the water services were not abandoned and remained intact and available for customer use during what was then considered to be an imminent construction period on the property. Billing for water service availability and use continued at the construction water rate until an unmetered water rate structure was implemented in June 2008 on all three accounts. DISCUSSION: Provision of water service and related service billing for the Boomerang account were calculated and charged consistent with the City Code. The discussion and proposed resolution is not a result of a billing error (Section 25.16.10 of the Municipal Code), it is a proposed account adjustment taking into consideration the intent of the billing rates, actual water usage and impact, and the specific situation and sequence of events at this property due to the lengthy delay in construction. The methodology of the proposed adjustment is based on an adjustment of the Equivalent Capital Units (ECUs) assigned to each of these three accounts for the period from August 2011 to date. This amounts to a credit of $ 26,532.05. P5 VI.a Page 2 of 2 Additionally, a future water service credit not to exceed $26,532.05 is available to the Customer to install on this property water efficiency fixture that are at least 10% above water efficiency requirements as set forth in the City’s Building Code that are in effect at the time building permit is issued on this property. The active water accounts located at Boomerang Lodge will remain on an unmetered rate until future development occurs. FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACTS: The proposed billing credits decrease overall water fund balance by the same amount. This may have limited impact on the revenue targets utilized to formulate water rates for the next five years as approved by Council in November, 2012. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: Unmetered water rates are intended as a short-term transitional rate to a metered service as required by Municipal Code and do not contain the four- tiered rate component integral to water conservation. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approval of the attached Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release for three unmetered water accounts at Boomerang property. ALTERNATIVES: Council may choose to not credit, or reduce the level of credit provided to the Aspen FSP-ABR, LLC water service account. PROPOSED MOTION: I move to approve the Boomerang water account credits as set forth in attached Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A – Resolution No. 24, Series 2013 Exhibit B – Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release between Aspen FSP-ABR, LLC, and the City of Aspen P6 VI.a RESOLUTION NO. 24 (Series of 2013) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, APPROVING A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE BETWEEN ASPEN FSP-ABR, LLC AND THE CITY OF ASPEN AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID DOCUMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ASPEN. WHEREAS, there has been submitted to the City Council a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release between Aspen FSP-ABR, LLC and the City of Aspen copy of which agreement is annexed hereto as Exhibit 1 and incorporated by this reference (the “Settlement Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the City Council believes that it is in the best interests of the City to approve the Settlement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, that the Settlement Agreement is hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the Settlement Agreement. Dated: _______________________________, 2013. ______________________________ Michael C. Ireland, Mayor P7 VI.a I, Kathryn S. Koch, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held ________________________, 2013. ________________________________ Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk P8 VI.a P9 VI . a P1 0 VI . a P1 1 VI . a P1 2 VI . a P1 3 VI . a P1 4 VI . a P1 5 VI . a P1 6 VI . a Page 1 of 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Scott Chism, Planning and Construction Mgr THRU: Click here to enter text. DATE OF MEMO: 2/28/2013 MEETING DATE: 3/11/2013 RE: Approval of Rio Grande Park Restroom Building & Pumphouse construction and supply contracts REQUEST OF COUNCIL: see attached Staff memo PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: BACKGROUND: DISCUSSION: FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACTS: Construction and supply contracts are within project budget approved by City Council . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FINANCE REVIEW: Click here to enter text. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: Click here to enter text. RECOMMENDED ACTION: P17 VI.b Page 2 of 2 ALTERNATIVES: PROPOSED MOTION: CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: ATTACHMENTS: Notes: • Please use page numbers on all memos and attachments, especially for work sessions • The memo should be as long as it needs to be – but remember, you’re not writing a novel. Use attachments for more detailed information, ordinances and resolutions, etc. • Attachments: All attachments to the memo should be referenced somewhere in the body of the memo. All attachments should be titled as “Attachment”, “Exhibit” or “Schedule” with a letter following: Attachments: A - Exhibit One - Map ... B - Property Description C - Chart of Costs D - Resolution #97-1 P18 VI.b P19 VI.b P20 VI.b P21 VI.b P22 VI.b RESOLUTION #21 (Series of 2013) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, APPROVING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ASPEN AND RUDD CONSTRUCTION, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO. WHEREAS, there has been submitted to the City Council a contract between the City of Aspen and Rudd Construction for Rio Grande Park Restroom and Pump House, a true and accurate copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, That the City Council of the City of Aspen hereby approves that Contract for Rio Grande Park Restroom and Pump House between the City of Aspen and Rudd Construction, a copy of which is annexed hereto and incorporated herein, and does hereby authorize the City Manager to execute said agreement on behalf of the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 11th day of March 2013. Michael C. Ireland, Mayor I, Kathryn S. Koch, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held March 11, 2013 Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk P23 VI.b P2 5 VI . b P2 6 VI . b P2 7 VI . b P2 8 VI . b P2 9 VI . b P3 0 VI . b P3 1 VI . b P3 2 VI . b P3 3 VI . b P3 4 VI . b P3 5 VI . b P3 6 VI . b RESOLUTION #22 (Series of 2013) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, APPROVING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ASPEN AND CLIVUS MULTRUM, INC, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO. WHEREAS, there has been submitted to the City Council a contract between the City of Aspen and Clivus Multrum, Inc. for Compostable toilet and grey water system, a true and accurate copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, That the City Council of the City of Aspen hereby approves that Contract for Compostable toilet and green water system for Rio Grande between the City of Aspen and Clivus Multrum, Inc, a copy of which is annexed hereto and incorporated herein, and does hereby authorize the City Manager to execute said agreement on behalf of the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 11th day of March 2013. Michael C. Ireland, Mayor I, Kathryn S. Koch, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held March 11, 2013 Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk P37 VI.b P3 9 VI . b P4 0 VI . b P4 1 VI . b P4 2 VI . b P4 3 VI . b P4 4 VI . b RESOLUTION #23 (Series of 2013) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, APPROVING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ASPEN AND GRAND JUNCTION PIPE, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO. WHEREAS, there has been submitted to the City Council a contract between the City of Aspen and Grand Junction Pipe for Rio Grande irrigation pump and filter system supply, a true and accurate copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, That the City Council of the City of Aspen hereby approves that Contract for Rio Grande irrigation pump and filter system supply between the City of Aspen and Grand Junction Pipe, a copy of which is annexed hereto and incorporated herein, and does hereby authorize the City Manager to execute said agreement on behalf of the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 11th day of March 2013. Michael C. Ireland, Mayor I, Kathryn S. Koch, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held March 11, 2013 Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk P45 VI.b P4 7 VI . b P4 8 VI . b P4 9 VI . b P5 0 VI . b P5 1 VI . b P5 2 VI . b P5 3 VI . b P5 4 VI . b P5 5 VI . b P5 6 VI . b Regular Meeting Aspen City Council February 25, 2013 1 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION .......................................................................................................... 2 COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS .............................................................................................. 2 CONSENT CALENDAR ............................................................................................................... 3 ORDINANCE #6, SERIES OF 2013 - 401 Castle Creek Rd., Aspen Valley Hospital, Final PUD - Phases III & IV ............................................................................................................................. 3 ORDINANCE #5, SERIES OF 2013 - 223 E. Hallam - Lot Split.................................................. 4 ORDINANCE #7, SERIES OF 2013 - Code Amendment Various Business Obstacles................ 5 ORDINANCE No. 7 ....................................................................................................................... 5 ORDINANCE #3, SERIRES OF 2013 –Code Amendment – Election Procedures....................... 5 ORDINANCE #4, SERIES OF 2013 – Code Amendment ............................................................ 7 RESOLUTION #19, SERIES OF 2013 – Moses Lot Split Annexation ......................................... 8 P57 VI.c Regular Meeting Aspen City Council February 25, 2013 2 Mayor Ireland called the meeting to order at 5:00 PM with Councilmembers Skadron, Johnson, Frisch and Torre present. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION 1. Dan Kitchen showed the driver’s handbook for Colorado licenses and noted that stop signs mean stop, take turns. At bike rodeos, kids are taught that stop means stop, don’t roll through. Kitchen pointed out in the state of Colorado, bicyclist are equal to a motorcycle, they are a moving vehicle and are obligated to obey traffic laws; they do not get exemptions or special privileges and should stop at stop signs. 2. Peter Fornell noted two years ago the city recognized the cash-in-lieu fees were 10 years out of date. Fornell pointed out in October 2011 Council decided to pay for a study to determine what the fees should be. Council received the results of that study 5 months ago. Fornell said Council should make new legislation to address concerns regarding these fees. Fornell asked where this revision is in the process. Mayor Ireland said expansion of residences has been dropped and Council has not finished the process on how to determine cash-in-lieu. Council is interested in having fees reflect the costs to build housing. Chris Bendon, community development department, reminded Council several things came up in the last public hearing; one was the suggestion to have an outside party look at the methodology. The consultant will be hired; the process will be helpful in assigning the correct amount of impact to development. Council will then discuss how much of that cost to assign to development. Bendon said there was also discussion on the methodology used by APCHA to develop those fees; purchase versus construction. 3. Yasmine dePagter told Council she likes the proposed 14 M.P.H. speed limit and the side streets should have that speed limit. This should not be turned into a police state; there can be stop signs. People should slow down. The city should lobby CDOT to put in elevated pedestrian cross walks over Main street. Ms. dePagter said bicyclists should be exempt from stop signs and suggested a designated bike lane so that bicyclists can zip though town. Ms. dePagter said the city should not purchase small lodges but should meet with the lodge owners to see what the city can do to help small lodges survive. 4. Jon Busch brought up the art museum and that the best use for the building is the use which serves the most people in the community. This is a unique building with high ceilings which are perfect for performances and perfect for overflow from the Wheeler, which is currently over-burdened with multiple events. Turning the art museum into offices does not serve the community as well as other uses can. COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS 1. Councilman Johnson announced Thursday at 7 pm is the 1st round of playoffs for the Aspen High School basketball team. P58 VI.c Regular Meeting Aspen City Council February 25, 2013 3 2. Councilman Torre recognized two businesses, Charles Cunniffe architects and Poss architects, for becoming corporate members and supporting the Aspen Historical Society 3. Councilman Torre said this weekend Theatre Aspen has a gala event and Aspen Film celebrated the Oscars with a party. Councilman Torre said it is good to remember how much community involvement there is. 4. Councilman Skadron congratulated Theatre Aspen on their 30 year anniversary party and commended the Wheeler for a great comedy fest. 5. Steve Barwick, city manager, told Council there is no need for the executive session and it should be removed from the agenda. 6. Councilman Skadron reported that the first of 22 CNG buses are being delivered to RFTA. The BRT project is on schedule and on budget. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilman Johnson said he has to recuse himself on (b) Spring Jam request to close the streets as he works for the Ski Company. Mayor Ireland moved to approved the consent calendar items a, c, and d; seconded by Councilman Johnson. All in favor, motion carried. The consent calendar is: Resolution #18, 2013, Pre-annexation Agreement for the South Portion of Lot 1, Moses Lot Split Resolution #20, Series of 2013 - Burlingame Phase II – OZ Architecture Contract Amendment Minutes - February 11, 2013 Councilman Johnson recused himself from the Request to Close streets. Mayor Ireland moved to approve Aspen Ski Company Spring Jam - Request to Close Streets; Noise Variance; seconded by Councilman Torre. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE #6, SERIES OF 2013 - 401 Castle Creek Rd., Aspen Valley Hospital, Final PUD - Phases III & IV Jennifer Phelan, community development department, noted phase II of the hospital is currently being developed including on-site affordable housing. The hospital seeks final approval for phase III and IV for additional expansion and renovation of the hospital site. Council granted conceptual approval for redevelopment of the entire site in 2009 and in 2010 Council granted final approval for phase II. Ms. Phelan told council there are several dates for the public hearing including a site visit on March 5th at 4 pm. Hearing dates are March 11, March 18, April 8 and if necessary April 22nd. P59 VI.c Regular Meeting Aspen City Council February 25, 2013 4 Councilman Johnson moved to read Ordinance #6, Series of 2013; seconded by Mayor Ireland. All in favor, motion carried. Ms. Phelan told Council the applicants have met with the neighbors; there are concerns about the outside lighting. The applicant has hired consultants to look at what is there, what can be retrofitted and changed. Councilman Skadron said when phase II came before Council, there was concern about the overall size of the building and the visual impacts. Councilman Skadron said the view from the roundabout up Castle Creek, the mass of the building is overwhelming and asked if there is anything being done to diminish the visual impact. Ms. Phelan said this was discussed at P&Z along with possible landscape alternatives. The building is within 5% of what was approved by Council. Councilman Johnson said he would like an overall time frame for all construction at the hospital; this is projected as a 20 year program, which seems short return for all the work. Mayor Ireland said he would like phases III and IV shown in relationship to what already exists. Mayor Ireland said he would to know square footages to be added, area to be changed. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE NO._6 (SERIES OF 2013) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEW, FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, AND VESTED PROPERTY RIGHTS FOR PHASE III AND IV OF THE ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT MASTER FACILITIES PLAN, LOCATED ON PARCEL C, ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT SUBDIVISION, COMMONLY DESCRIBED AS 401 CASTLE CREEK ROAD, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO Mayor Ireland moved to adopt Ordinance #6, Series of 2013, on first reading; seconded by Councilman Johnson. Roll call vote; Frisch, yes; Johnson, yes; Skadron, yes; Torre, yes; Mayor Ireland, yes. ORDINANCE #5, SERIES OF 2013 - 223 E. Hallam - Lot Split Councilman Johnson moved to read Ordinance #5, Series of 2013; seconded by Mayor Ireland. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE N0. 5 (SERIES OF 2013) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE BERKO LOT SPLIT FOR THE PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 223 E. HALLAM STREET, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. P60 VI.c Regular Meeting Aspen City Council February 25, 2013 5 Sara Nadolny, community development department, said this is located in the R-6 zone near the Red Brick school. This was historically designated in 1995 and is a 12,000 square foot lot. The application is to divide it into two 6,000 square feet lots. This will cap the number of residential units for the two lots at 3; No non-conformities will be created. Mayor Ireland moved to adopt Ordinance #5, Series of 2013, on first reading; seconded by Councilman Torre. Roll call vote; Johnson, yes; Torre, yes; Frisch, yes; Skadron, yes; Mayor Ireland, yes. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #7, SERIES OF 2013 - Code Amendment Various Business Obstacles Jim Pomeroy, community development department, told Council this is an attempt to simplify some code sections, to delete some sections that no longer apply. After this amendment, staff will move on to more substantive issues. Councilman Johnson said he likes the process of going through the code and identifying issues that need to be addressed and taking care of them. Pomeroy said this amendment modifies the definitions to make sure there is nothing hindering future businesses; eliminates a section of the code on use square footage limitation where certain businesses had limits; simplifies the home occupation section. Councilman Johnson moved to read Ordinance #7, Series of 2013; seconded by Councilman Torre. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE No. 7 (Series of 2013) AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF ASPEN LAND USE CODE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 26.104.100 - DEFINITIONS, 26.575.070 – USE SQUARE FOOTAGE LIMITATIONS, 26.575.090 – HOME OCCUPATIONS, AND 26.575.180 - RESTAURANT. Councilman Skadron moved to adopt Ordinance #7, Series of 2013, on first reading; seconded by Councilman Johnson. Roll call vote; Skadron, yes; Torre, yes; Johnson, yes; Frisch, yes; Mayor Ireland, yes. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #3, SERIRES OF 2013 –Code Amendment – Election Procedures Kathryn Koch, city clerk, told Council these are recommended changes to election procedures after the 2011 election and items the Election Commission and staff felt need to be changed. These are to change the definition of precincts to state they are the same as those most recently established by Pitkin County and a definition of polling places was added to state they will be the same as that for city voters in county elections. These are to make it less confusing for the voters. Ms. Koch reminded Council that in 2011, the city decided not to honor those voters registered as permanent mail in voters because the city was not assured of the capability of signature verification. Ms. Koch recommended the procedures be changed so that voters P61 VI.c Regular Meeting Aspen City Council February 25, 2013 6 registered as PMIV will get a ballot in the mail. The two other members of the Election Commission did not agree with this change. Jim True, city attorney, told Council staff and the election Commission recommend section 9.10.120 Recount be modified. True explained the Election Commission wanted to expand the number that would trigger a recount so this section is proposed to read “one-half of one percent of the total number of ballots cast” rather than the one-half of one percent between the winner and next place. True noted it is still a small number of ballots. True said the other issue is when a recount would be mandated and if a candidate has missed the runoff by 10 votes, is one entitled to a runoff. True said the way the code is written there would not be a recount. This has been revised so that if one is elected, made it into a runoff, or missed a runoff all by a small number of votes, there would be a recount. True reminded Council in 2012, the state legislature modified the open records act to address the examination of ballots. The city had records requests for 2009 and 2011 ballots and the code provision does not allow examination of ballots. This ordinance amends 9.10.130 to incorporate the state legislation. True requested this section be amended to add that it is effective commencing with the 2013 Aspen municipal election. True noted he had previously told Council his intent to amend 9.04, campaign finance, and to do a comprehensive modification and he has been waiting for litigation to finish before drafting legislation. True said the litigation has not been completed yet and he recommends not adopting the comprehensive amendment. True brought up the campaign contribution of less than $20 and state statutes say these do not have to be attributed to individuals but reported in a lump sum. Mayor Ireland stated he supports sending ballots to all those on the permanent mail in voter list; that is indistinguishable from one who writes in for a ballot. The signature verification is the safeguard. Mayor Ireland said he reports all campaign contributions, no matter how small. Mayor Ireland opened the public hearing. Dwight Shellman, city’s election consultant, pointed out the issue with non-itemization of contributions less than $20 is if a donor gives $19.99 in one reporting period and then the same amount in the next reporting period that has to be itemized. Mayor Ireland said the point of campaign finance disclosure is so that the public will know who is supporting whom. Councilman Johnson asked about electronic voting. Shellman said the online technology is authorized for state law only for overseas and Armed Forces voters. There is a lot of concern about security of online voting and it will be several years before this is available. Shellman said sending ballots to those voters on the permanent mail in voter list will foster consistency between city and county election. There should be less confusion and better participation. Shellman noted the city or county cannot control what people do with their ballots once the ballots have been mailed; however, there is control when the ballots are returned to election officials. Shellman said each and every ballot is examined by panels of two judges and compared to signatures on file in a thoughtful process. Councilman Johnson stated he supports lessening voter confusion. Ward Hauenstein, election commission member, said he would support using PMIV as long as signature data base is available to the city to be used in a municipal election. Shellman said because of a program change, counties can now provide cities P62 VI.c Regular Meeting Aspen City Council February 25, 2013 7 with signature data bases. Councilman Johnson said he would like staff to look for a long term solution to obtaining signatures rather than waiting until the last minute. Mayor Ireland closed the public hearing. Mayor Ireland moved to adopt Ordinance #3, Series of 2013, amended that the clerk shall certify that there is access to signature verification prior to sending ballots to those voters on the permanent mail in voter list; that section 9.10.130 be amended to state is commences with the 2013 election; seconded by Councilman Torre. Roll call vote; Skadron, yes; Torre, yes; Frisch, yes; Johnson, yes; Mayor Ireland, yes. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #4, SERIES OF 2013 – Code Amendment Jessica Garrow, community development department, told Council this code amendment updates the employee generation figures for commercial and lodge uses in the city. This is an update of a study done by EPS in 2002; 128 businesses were surveyed and there have been minor changes to the figures. This is divided into commercial zones district and lodging rooms. The commercial zones have been increased to 4.7 FTE/1000 square feet of net leasable square feet. This is a .6 FTE increase. The mixed use was decreased by .1 FTE; the S/C/I zone increased by .4 FTE up to 3.9/1000 square feet. The lodging number is based on rooms. There is no change in the lodge preservation zone which remains at .3 FTEs/room and a .1 increase in lodge zone to .6 FTEs. The second amendment is to eliminate the “double dip” provisions in the growth management code. When a project has multiple mitigation requirements for housing, if one is developing housing on site, they only have to mitigate the larger requirement. The code amendment will eliminate that and state one has to mitigate for all FTEs generated by the proposed redevelopment. This amendment eliminates the current preference for onsite units developed in conjunction with a project. Ms. Garrow told Council the existing code was developed when there was not a lot of development in town and it was seen as a way to encourage more development downtown and it creates an incentive to build actual units. Since then the housing certificate program has been adopted. Councilman Johnson asked what the magnitude of the double dip has been. Ms. Garrow stated over the past 10 years, most buildings downtown have used this provision. Councilman Johnson said this appears to be pushing applicants to the housing credit program by a 100% increase in mitigation requirement. Ms. Garrow said the increase depends on the project; it is not necessarily 100%. Mayor Ireland opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Mayor Ireland closed the public hearing. Mayor Ireland moved to adopt Ordinance #4, Series of 2013, on second reading; seconded by Councilman Torre. Roll call vote; Torre, yes; Frisch, yes; Johnson, yes Skadron, yes; Mayor Ireland, yes. Motion carried. P63 VI.c Regular Meeting Aspen City Council February 25, 2013 8 RESOLUTION #19, SERIES OF 2013 – Moses Lot Split Annexation Debbie Quinn, assistant city attorney, told Council this is a proposed annexation of 600 square feet of the Moses lot split subdivision. Earlier Council found the petition the statutory requirements for a petition was met. This hearing is to determine that the statutory requirements for annexation have been met. Trish Aragon, city engineer, told Council she reviewed the annexation plat; this land is currently outside the city boundaries; the property has more than 1/6th contiguity with the city; there is no intention to deny reasonable access to this parcel; the boundary of the city will not be extended more than 3 miles. Jessica Garrow, community development department, told Council this area is capable of being integrated into the city and services can be provided to this area; this propert y is not divided into separate parcels; all property within identical ownership will be within the city; the property is within the urban growth boundary. Kathryn Koch, city clerk, told Council the required publication and public notice for this public hearing were given; there is no other annexation proceeding for this property. Mayor Ireland moved to adopt Resolution #19, Series of 2013; seconded by Councilman Frisch. All in favor, motion carried. Mayor Ireland moved to adjourn at 7 pm; seconded by Councilman Torre. All in favor, motion carried. Kathryn Koch City Clerk P64 VI.c Page 1 of 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Amy Guthrie, Senior Planner Historic Preservation THRU: Chris Bendon DATE OF MEMO: 3/4/2013 MEETING DATE: 3/11/2013 RE: First Reading of Ordinance #__, Series of 2013, AspenModern negotiation for historic designation of 602 E. Hyman Avenue Notice of HPC approval of Conceptual Major Development, Conceptual Commercial Design Review, Parking Waiver, and Special Review for Utility/Trash/Recycling Area at 602 E. Hyman through HPC Resolution #5, Series of 2012 REQUEST OF COUNCIL: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: BACKGROUND: DISCUSSION: FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACTS: Click here to enter text. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FINANCE REVIEW: Click here to enter text. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: P65 VII.a Page 2 of 2 Click here to enter text. RECOMMENDED ACTION: ALTERNATIVES: PROPOSED MOTION: CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: ATTACHMENTS: Notes: • Please use page numbers on all memos and attachments, especially for work sessions • The memo should be as long as it needs to be – but remember, you’re not writing a novel. Use attachments for more detailed information, ordinances and resolutions, etc. • Attachments: All attachments to the memo should be referenced somewhere in the body of the memo. All attachments should be titled as “Attachment”, “Exhibit” or “Schedule” with a letter following: Attachments: A - Exhibit One - Map ... B - Property Description C - Chart of Costs D - Resolution #97-1 P66 VII.a First Reading of Ordinance #__, Series of 2013 602 E. Hyman Page 1 of 7 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Ireland and City Council THRU: Chris Bendon, Community Development Director FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: First Reading of Ordinance #10, Series of 2013, AspenModern negotiation for historic designation of 602 E. Hyman Avenue Notice of HPC approval of Conceptual Major Development, Conceptual Commercial Design Review, Parking Waiver, and Special Review for Utility/Trash/Recycling Area at 602 E. Hyman through HPC Resolution #5, Series of 2012 DATE: March 13, 2013 SUMMARY: 602 E. Hyman Avenue, at the corner of Hyman and Hunter Streets, was constructed in at least four phases, starting in 1960. The initial development was a one story, concrete block commercial/retail space. Additions/alterations occurred in 1964, 1966 and 1968. A substantial portion of the existing structure was designed and/or remodeled by Ellie Brickham during the 1966 modifications. Ellie Brickham is Aspen’s first known female architect, arriving in town in 1951. Ms. Brickham was a close family friend to the owners of 602 E. Hyman in the 1960s, and also designed their family home on McSkimming Road. Ms. Brickham designed the recently landmarked building immediately to the east, the offices of Charles Cunniffe Architects. The subject property was in the same ownership for approximately 50 years, until 2012, when it was sold. The purchaser pursued and received P&Z approval for a remodel and third floor addition. After further study of the feasibility of the project, it was decided to revise the approach, landmark designating through the AspenModern program. The applicant proposes an interior remodel, an addition at the rear of the building for a garage, staircase and elevator, and minor alterations to other facades and the roof of the building. HPC has granted Conceptual design approval, including a parking waiver and P67 VII.a First Reading of Ordinance #__, Series of 2013 602 E. Hyman Page 2 of 7 HISTORIC DESIGNATION reduction of the on-site utility/trash/recycle area. Council has the opportunity to Call-up HPC’s decision at this meeting. While AspenModern permits negotiation of special preservation incentives, in this case nothing other than standard landmark benefits are requested by the applicant. HPC recommends Council support designation. APPLICANT: EB Building Aspen, LLC, represented by Vann Associates and Zone 4 Architects. PARCEL ID: 2737-182-12-003. ADDRESS: 602 E Hyman Avenue, Lot K&L, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, CO. ZONING: C-1, Commercial. AspenModern Criteria. To be eligible for designation on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures as an example of AspenModern, an individual building, site, structure or object or a collection of buildings, sites, structures or objects must have a demonstrated quality of significance. The quality of significance of properties shall be evaluated according to criteria described below. When designating a historic district, the majority of the contributing resources in the district must meet at least two of the criteria a-d, and criterion e described below: a. The property is related to an event, pattern, or trend that has made a contribution to local, state, regional or national history that is deemed important, and the specific event, pattern or trend is identified and documented in an adopted context paper; b. The property is related to people who have made a contribution to local, state, regional or national history that is deemed important, and the specific people are identified and documented in an adopted context paper; c. The property represents a physical design that embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of construction, or represents the technical or aesthetic achievements of a recognized designer, craftsman, or design philosophy that is deemed important and the specific physical design, designer, or philosophy is documented in an adopted context paper; d. The property possesses such singular significance to the City, as documented by the opinions of persons educated or experienced in the fields of history, P68 VII.a First Reading of Ordinance #__, Series of 2013 602 E. Hyman Page 3 of 7 architecture, landscape architecture, archaeology or a related field, that the property’s potential demolition or major alteration would substantially diminish the character and sense of place in the city as perceived by members of the community, and e. The property or district possesses an appropriate degree of integrity of location, setting, design, materials, workmanship and association, given its age. The City Council shall adopt and make available to the public score sheets and other devices which shall be used by the Council and Historic Preservation Commission to apply this criterion. Staff Response: This is one of the few Ellie Brickham designed buildings that remains in Aspen. The building is part of a set of 1960s/1970s era landmarks that have been designated in the 500s to 700s blocks of East Hyman Avenue, including two buildings designed by Tom Benton, two designed by Robin Molny, and the 610 E. Hyman building by Ellie Brickham. These structures were built during the period that the Aspen Post Office existed at Hyman and Spring Streets, a circumstance that may have contributed to a construction boom in the area. Pictures at right show the building in the late 60s and mid 70s. Some features of the building that have been changed, for instance the historic black and white color scheme, are expected to be restored by the applicant. P69 VII.a First Reading of Ordinance #__, Series of 2013 602 E. Hyman Page 4 of 7 Brickham, reviewing plans with clients, 1973. There is relatively little documentation of the subject building. Ellie Brickham’s drawings have not been preserved. The best information that has been located are building permits and photos from the Assessor’s archives. Ellie Brickham (1923- 2008) moved to Aspen in 1951 after attending the University of Colorado’s School of Architecture from 1941-1944. Construction was a family business, and her motivation to become a designer began as a child. According to the research paper, “Aspen’s Twentieth- Century Architecture: Modernism 1945- 1975:” “Early in her career, Brickham worked in Fritz Benedict’s office and collaborated on projects with both Benedict and Bayer, participating in work going on at the Aspen Institute. Like Benedict, she had a strong interest in passive solar techniques. During her time in that office and, later, in her own practice out of her home, she designed a number of residences and commercial buildings in town, including houses for several Music Festival artists in Aspen Grove, the elegantly simple brick Strandberg Residence (1973, 433 Bleeker Street- demolished) and the Patricia Moore Building (1962, 610 E. Hyman Avenue). In Pitkin County, she designed numerous homes in Pitkin Green and Starwood, on Red Mountain, including her own house (1955), with south and west walls made completely of glass. Her works, which total at least sixty in the Aspen area, are generally characterized by spare, simple forms and minimal detailing. Brickham’s projects focus on an “impeccable sense of proportion and feeling of lightness,” according to a 1977 Aspen Times article.” P70 VII.a First Reading of Ordinance #__, Series of 2013 602 E. Hyman Page 5 of 7 HPC presented an Honor Award to Ellie Brickham in 2001, in recognition of her influence on the built environment in Aspen. Staff finds that historic designation criteria a and c are met. Relatively few of the noted postwar properties are commercial structures. It is important to carefully consider preservation opportunities for this small collection of highly visible downtown structures. The second component of designation is scoring the physical integrity of the building. Staff’s score sheet is attached as Exhibit A. Staff scored the building as a “Best” example of AspenModern, with 17 out of 20 points. Staff finds that designation criterion e is met. HISTORIC PRESERVATION BENEFITS The Community Development Director shall confer with the Historic Preservation Commission, at a public meeting, regarding the proposed land use application or building permit and the nature of the property. The property owner shall be provided notice of this meeting. The Historic Preservation Commission, using context papers and integrity scoring sheets for the property under consideration, shall provide Council with an assessment of the property’s conformance with the designation criteria of Section 26.415.030.C.1. When any benefits that are not included in Section 26.415.110 are requested by the property owner, HPC shall also evaluate how the designation, and any development that is concurrently proposed, meets the policy objectives for the historic preservation program, as stated at Section 26.415.010, Purpose and Intent. As an additional measure of the appropriateness of designation and benefits, HPC shall determine whether the subject property is a “good, better, or best” example of Aspen’s 20th century historic resources, referencing the scoring sheets and matrix adopted by City Council. Staff Response: The existing building contains office space in the basement and main floor, and two residential units on the upper floor, one of which is a “bandit unit” that was former commercial space to which a kitchen and bathroom were added in the past without proper approvals. As part of this project, the “bandit unit” will be absorbed into the larger existing unit, eliminating the zoning violation. The applicant plans an interior remodel, an addition at the rear of the building for a garage, staircase and elevator, and alterations to other facades and the roof of the building. Overall, the project complies with all the dimensional requirements that were in place for the zone district at the time of application. (After the application was filed, code amendments adopted by Council went into effect, limiting height to 28’ and prohibiting all residential development in this zone district.) The net livable area of the P71 VII.a First Reading of Ordinance #__, Series of 2013 602 E. Hyman Page 6 of 7 COUNCIL CALL-UP second floor residential unit is larger than allowed by zoning, unless the owner purchases and lands a TDR on the site, which is their intention. As a proposed landmark, HPC has purview over design review for the property. The applicant requests no special incentives through AspenModern, beyond those available to all landmarks in Section 26.415.110 of the Municipal Code. The only benefit requested of HPC was a parking waiver/parking fee waiver. The proposed project does not trigger additional parking requirements, however the rear addition, which encloses one parking space and creates appropriate circulation/existing and accessibility for this mixed use building displaces 3 existing parking spots. The options for creating additional parking along the alley are greatly restricted by two large trees at the rear of the site. To grant variances, HPC must find that the review standards of Section 26.415.110.C of the Municipal Code are met. They require that: 1. The parking reduction and waiver of payment-in-lieu fees may be approved upon a finding by the HPC that it will enhance or mitigate an adverse impact on the historic significance or architectural character of a designated historic property, an adjoining designated property or a historic district. HPC found it appropriate to waive the 3 displaced parking spaces, thereby eliminating the need to pay a $90,000 cash-in-lieu fee. This was considered a reasonable preservation incentive, consistent with approvals that have been granted to other landmarked properties. As part of their review process, HPC also accepted an alternative design for the required on-site utility/trash/recycling area. HPC accepted a plan endorsed by the Environmental Health Department. The reduction is available for all properties and was not granted as a preservation incentive. On February 27th, the Historic Preservation Commission approved Conceptual Major Development, Conceptual Commercial Design Review, Parking Waiver, and Special Review for Utility/Trash/Recycling Area for 602 E. Hyman. Planning staff recommended continuation of the design review to restudy certain alterations to the building, however HPC approved the design with restudy to be accomplished as part of the Final review application. The board approved the project by a vote of 4-1. P72 VII.a First Reading of Ordinance #__, Series of 2013 602 E. Hyman Page 7 of 7 The HPC approval is represented in their resolution, Exhibit A, and the drawings at Exhibit E. Call-up is not a public hearing, but notification of the HPC approval must be placed on City Council’s agenda within 30 days. City Council has the option of exercising the Call Up provisions outlined in Section 26.412.040(B) within 15 days of notification on the regular agenda. If Council wishes to Call-up the design review aspects of this project, this may take place at the March 18th Second Reading regarding AspenModern designation. If City Council does not exercise the Call Up provision, the HPC Resolution shall stand, and the applicant will move forward to the Final design review hearing. ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff and HPC recommend Council support the proposed AspenModern landmark designation of 602 E. Hyman Avenue, finding that the designation review criteria are met. With regard to Call-up, staff recommends the HPC Conceptual approval be upheld. RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to approve Ordinance No.10, Series of 2013 on First Reading.” CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:__________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ EXHIBITS: Ordinance #10, Series of 2013 Exhibit A: Integrity Score Sheet Exhibit B: Draft, HPC Resolution #5, Series of 2013 Exhibit C: Application Exhibit D: Existing conditions Exhibit E: Proposed remodel P73 VII.a Ordinance #__, Series of 2013 602 E. Hyman, AspenModern Negotation Page 1 of 4 ORDINANCE #10 (Series of 2013) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO APPROVING ASPENMODERN HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 602 E. HYMAN AVENUE, LOTS K AND L, BLOCK 99, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2737-182-12-003 WHEREAS, the applicant, EB Building Aspen, LLC, represented by Vann Associates and Zone 4 Architects, submitted an application on January 11, 2013, pursuant to Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.415.025(C), AspenModern Properties, to voluntarily participate in a ninety-day landmark designation negotiation for the property located 602 E Hyman Avenue, Lot K&L, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, CO; and WHEREAS, Municipal Code Section 26.415.025.C(1)(b) states that, during the negotiation period, “the Community Development Director shall confer with the Historic Preservation Commission, during a public meeting, regarding the proposed building permit and the nature of the property. The property owner shall be provided notice of this meeting;” and WHEREAS, the property owner and representative met with the Historic Preservation Commission on February 27, 2013; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on February 27, 2013, the HPC considered the designation and proposed development, and found that 602 E. Hyman Avenue is a “Best” example of the Modern style in Aspen. HPC recommended City Council approval of Historic Landmark Designation; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.025.C(1)(d), states that, during the negotiation period, “council may negotiate directly with the property owner or may choose to direct the Community Development Director, or other City staff as necessary, to negotiate with the property owner to reach a mutually acceptable agreement for the designation of the property”; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.025.C(1)d establishes that “as part of the mutually acceptable agreement, the City Council may, at its sole discretion, approve any land use entitlement or fee waiver permitted by the Municipal Code and may award any approval that is assigned to another Board or Commission, including variations;” and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department performed an analysis of the application for Landmark Designation and found that the review standards are met; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, P75 VII.a Ordinance #__, Series of 2013 602 E. Hyman, AspenModern Negotation Page 2 of 4 WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Historic Landmark Designation Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the City Council hereby approves Historic Designation for 602 E Hyman Avenue, Lot K&L, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, subject to the conditions described herein. Upon the effective date of this ordinance, the City Clerk shall record with the real estate records of the Clerk and Recorder of the County, a certified copy of this ordinance. The location of the historic landmark property designated by this ordinance shall be indicated on the official maps of the City that are maintained by the Community Development Department. Section 2: Aspen Modern Negotiation Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the City Council hereby accepts the following incentive, granted by HPC. 1. Waiver of the three parking spaces and the cash-in-lieu payment generated by the proposed remodel; and Section 3: Vested Rights The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan and a vested property right attaching to and running with the Subject Property and shall confer upon the Applicant the right to undertake and complete the site specific development plan and use of said property under the terms and conditions of the site specific development plan including any approved amendments thereto. The vesting period of these vested property rights shall be for three (3) years which shall not begin to run until the date of the publications required to be made as set forth below. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of § 26.104.050, Void Permits. Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval by the Historic Preservation Commission, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to Chapter 26.308, Vested Property Rights. Pursuant to § 26.304.070(A), Development Orders, such notice shall be substantially in the following form: P76 VII.a Ordinance #__, Series of 2013 602 E. Hyman, AspenModern Negotation Page 3 of 4 Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 610 E. Hyman Avenue, Lot M, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the Development Order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this Ordinance of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this Ordinance. The vested rights granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review. The period of time permitted by law to exercise the right of referendum to refer to the electorate this Section of this Ordinance granting vested rights; or, to seek judicial review of the grant of vested rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as set forth above. The rights of referendum described herein shall be no greater than those set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. Section 4: Material Representations All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Historic Preservation Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 5: Litigation This ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 6: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. The City Clerk is directed, upon the adoption of this ordinance, to record a copy of this ordinance in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. Section 7: Public Hearing A public hearing on the ordinance shall be held on the 18th day of March, 2013 in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing a public notice of the same was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. P77 VII.a Ordinance #__, Series of 2013 602 E. Hyman, AspenModern Negotation Page 4 of 4 INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 11th day of March, 2013. _______________________ Michael C. Ireland, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Kathryn Koch, City Clerk FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this ___ day of ____, 2013. _______________________ Michael C. Ireland, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________ Kathryn Koch, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________ James R. True, City Attorney P78 VII.a P79 VII.a P80 VII.a P81 VII.a P82 VII.a P83 VII.a P85 VII.a P86 VII.a P87 VII.a P88 VII.a P89 VII.a P90 VII.a P91 VII.a P92 VII.a P93 VII.a P94 VII.a P95 VII.a P96 VII.a P97 VII.a P98 VII.a P99 VII.a P100 VII.a P101 VII.a P102 VII.a P103 VII.a P1 0 5 VI I . a P1 0 6 VI I . a P1 0 7 VI I . a P1 0 8 VI I . a P1 0 9 VI I . a P1 1 0 VI I . a P1 1 1 VI I . a P1 1 3 VI I . a P1 1 4 VI I . a P1 1 5 VI I . a P1 1 6 VI I . a P1 1 7 VI I . a P1 1 8 VI I . a P1 1 9 VI I . a P1 2 0 VI I . a Page 1 of 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Jim True, City Attorney THRU: Click here to enter text. DATE OF MEMO: 3/5/2013 MEETING DATE: 3/11/2013 RE: Code amendment regarding small campaign contributions REQUEST OF COUNCIL: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: BACKGROUND: DISCUSSION: FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACTS: Click here to enter text. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FINANCE REVIEW: Click here to enter text. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: Click here to enter text. RECOMMENDED ACTION: P121 VII.b Page 2 of 2 ALTERNATIVES: PROPOSED MOTION: CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: ATTACHMENTS: Notes: • Please use page numbers on all memos and attachments, especially for work sessions • The memo should be as long as it needs to be – but remember, you’re not writing a novel. Use attachments for more detailed information, ordinances and resolutions, etc. • Attachments: All attachments to the memo should be referenced somewhere in the body of the memo. All attachments should be titled as “Attachment”, “Exhibit” or “Schedule” with a letter following: Attachments: A - Exhibit One - Map ... B - Property Description C - Chart of Costs D - Resolution #97-1 P122 VII.b 1 Memorandum TO: Mayor and Members of Council FROM: James R. True DATE: March 4, 2013 RE: Campaign Contributions of less than $20.00 ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ COUNCIL REQUEST: The attached ordinance proposes a change of the reporting requirements for donations to political campaigns in amounts of less than $20.00. DISCUSSION: Chapter 9.04 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code sets forth the campaign finance laws for the City of Aspen elections. This chapter adopts the State of Colorado Fair Campaign Practices Act, 1-45- 101, et seq., C.R.S., (the “Act”) except as otherwise modified within the Chapter. The Act states that the names and addresses of donors of less than $20 need not be reported. Specifically, Section 1-45-108 of the Act states: (1) (a) (I) All candidate committees, political committees, issue committees, small donor committees, and political parties shall report to the appropriate officer their contributions received, including the name and address of each person who has contributed twenty dollars or more; expenditures made, and obligations entered into by the committee or party. The Act only requires that the total amount of all of the smaller donations be reported. The names of the individual donors are not reported. However, Section 1-45-116, of the Act, states: P123 VII.b 2 Any home rule county or municipality may adopt ordinances or charter provisions with respect to its local elections that are more stringent than any of the provisions contained in this act. In recent elections, parties have collected money in individual amounts of less than $20 in concerted efforts to promote undisclosed donations. Some have argued that obtaining these undisclosed donations, even in such small amounts, are harmful to the election process. It has been argued that this effort promotes a lack of civility in the election process. In addition, the accuracy of the reporting of small donations is very difficult to monitor, as it would never be known whether the reported total of all that was collected were actually received in increments of less than $20. The amendment proposed in the attached ordinance requires that a donor’s name and address be reported regardless of the amount of the donation. It should be noted that the proposed amendment does not address anonymous donations. Anonymous donations are donations from an individual who is not known to the recipient. If a recipient receives a donation from an unknown source, the recipient is required to turn that donation into the Clerk. That donation is then placed into the general fund. Even under the current law, all campaigns should know and keep a record of the names of all donors. Anonymous donations must be delivered to the Clerk. See, Sec. 09.04.04, Aspen Municipal Code. Finally, if passed on second reading on March 18th, the ordinance would take effect on April 17th. This would simply mean that small donations received prior to that date would not need to be reported, while small donations after that date would need to be reported. Since this is in the middle of the current election cycle, Council may wish to consider extending the effective date of the amendment until after the runoff is complete ACTION REQUESTED: A Motion to approve Ordinance No. ____, Series of 2013. CITY MANAGER’S COMMENTS: _________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ cc: City Manager P124 VII.b AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, AMENDING CHAPTER 9.04 OF THE ASPEN MUNICIPAL CODE, SECTION 9.04.___ RELATING TO MINIMUM DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO CITY CANDIDATES, POLITICAL COMMITTEES AND ISSUE COMMITTEES ORDINANCE NO. 9 (Series of 2013) WHEREAS, the electors and governing boards of home rule cities are vested by article XX, §6 of the Colorado Constitution, and the Municipal Home Rule Act of 1971, §§ 31-2-201 to 225 of the Colorado Revised Statutes (“C.R.S.”), as amended, with the constitutional and statutory authority to adopt home rule charters and enact ordinances, establishing the organization and structure of City government; WHEREAS, the electors and governing boards of home rule cities are vested by article XX, §6 of the Colorado Constitution states that a municipality shall have all other powers necessary, requisite or proper for the government and administration of its local and municipal matters, including power to legislate upon, provide, regulate, conduct and control: (d) All matters pertaining to municipal elections in such city or town, and to electoral votes therein …, including … securing the purity of elections, guarding against abuses of the elective franchise, and tending to make such elections or electoral votes non-partisan in character. WHEREAS, §1-45-116, C.R.S., of the Colorado Fair Campaign Practices Act, states: Any home rule county or municipality may adopt ordinances or charter provisions with respect to its local elections that are more stringent than any of the provisions contained in this act. Any home rule county or municipality which adopts such ordinances or charter provisions shall not be entitled to reimbursement pursuant to subsection 1-45-112 (2). The requirements of article XXVIII of the state constitution and of this article shall not apply to home rule counties or home rule municipalities that have adopted charters, ordinances, or resolutions that address the matters covered by article XXVIII and this article. WHEREAS, the manner of electing City officers and of financing political campaigns supporting or opposing candidates for City office and ballot issues and ballot questions referred to or initiated by City electors for a vote of the entire City electorate, are matters affecting the organization and structure of City government and are matters affecting the elective franchise and potential abuses of the elective franchise; and, therefore are within the constitutional and statutory authority of City electors and the governing board to regulate by duly adopted home rule charter or ordinance; WHEREAS, the City of Aspen has been organized and operating as a home rule city by virtue of the adoption of the City of Aspen Home Rule Charter (the “Charter”) on June 16, 1970; P125 VII.b WHEREAS, as a result of its status as a home rule city, the City of Aspen has a forty-two year tradition and culture acknowledging the value and importance of transparency and disclosure in the financing of campaigns in local elections; WHEREAS, the purpose of this Ordinance is to require that the names of all campaign donars be reported regardless of the amount of donation. WHEREAS, the amendments to the Code are delineated as follows:  Text being removed is delineated with strikethrough. Text being removed looks like this.  Text being added is bold and underline. Text being added looks like this.  Text which is not highlighted is not affected; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: Section 1: That Title 9, Section 9.04.020 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen is hereby amended by adding the following: The campaign treasurer, shall prepare, maintain, keep and file records of contributions and expenditures as required by the Act. Notwithstanding any provision within the Act to the contrary, the record of contributions filed pursuant to the Act shall include all contributions regardless of amount. In the event that the provisions of this Chapter are inconsistent with the provisions of the Act, the more stringent shall apply. Section 2: Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 3: Existing Litigation. This ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: P126 VII.b A public hearing on this ordinance shall be held on the 18th day of March, 2013, at a meeting of the Aspen City Council commencing at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 11th day of March, 2013. Attest: _________________________ ____________________________________ Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk Michael C. Ireland, Mayor FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this day of _______________ 2013. Attest: _________________________ ____________________________________ Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk Michael C. Ireland, Mayor Approved as to form: ___________________________ City Attorney P127 VII.b Page 1 of 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Sara Nadolny, Planner Tech THRU: Chris Bendon, Community Development Director DATE OF MEMO: 3/5/2013 MEETING DATE: 3/11/2013 RE: 223 E. Hallam - Lot Split - 2nd Reading REQUEST OF COUNCIL: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: BACKGROUND: DISCUSSION: FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACTS: Click here to enter text. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FINANCE REVIEW: Click here to enter text. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: Click here to enter text. RECOMMENDED ACTION: P129 VIII.a Page 2 of 2 ALTERNATIVES: PROPOSED MOTION: CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: ATTACHMENTS: Notes: • Please use page numbers on all memos and attachments, especially for work sessions • The memo should be as long as it needs to be – but remember, you’re not writing a novel. Use attachments for more detailed information, ordinances and resolutions, etc. • Attachments: All attachments to the memo should be referenced somewhere in the body of the memo. All attachments should be titled as “Attachment”, “Exhibit” or “Schedule” with a letter following: Attachments: A - Exhibit One - Map ... B - Property Description C - Chart of Costs D - Resolution #97-1 P130 VIII.a MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Ireland and Aspen City Council THRU: Chris Bendon, Community Development Director FROM: Sara Nadolny, Planner Technician RE: 223 E. Hallam St. –Lot Split, Ordinance No. 5, Series 2013 –2nd Reading, Public Hearing MEETING DATE: March 11, 2013 APPLICANT /OWNER: Nora Berko, Gina Berko, and David M. Fleisher – 130 Snowbunny Lane, Aspen CO 81611 REPRESENTATIVE: Stan Clauson Associates, Inc. 412 N. Mill Street, Aspen, CO 81611 LOCATION: Block 7, Lots C – F, City and Townsite of Aspen, CO, commonly known as 223 E. Hallam Street CURRENT ZONING & USE Located in R-6 (Medium-Density Residential) Zone District. PROPOSED LAND USE: A lot split that will divide the current 12,000 sq. ft. parcel into two 6,000 sq. ft. parcels, which is the minimum lot size permitted in the R-6 zone district. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds the application meets the criteria for a lot split, a form of subdivision exemption, and recommends the City Council approve the request for the lot split, as proposed, with conditions. SUMMARY: The Applicant requests of the City Council approval for a lot split that will divide the current 12,000 sq. ft. parcel into two 6,000 sq. ft. parcels. The lot split process will cap the total units allowed between the two parcels at three (3) units. Currently the parcel contains three units. Should the lot split be granted, Lot 1 will contain one unit, and Lot 2 will contain two units, thereby representing the maximum allowable density between the two parcels. No new development is proposed with this application, and no new utilities are required as a result of the lot split. Figure A: Subject property P131 VIII.a 2 LAND USE REQUESTS AND REVIEW PROCEDURES: The Applicant is requesting the following land use approval from the City Council: • Lot Split. The split of a lot for the purpose of creating one (1) additional development parcel on a lot formed by a lot split granted subsequent to November 14, 1977, where all of the following conditions are met… (see Exhibit B, Review Criteria). A lot split is considered an exemption from the full review associated with other forms of subdivision, and does not require a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission prior to City Council. BACKGROUND: This parcel consists of four original townsite lots, measuring 12,000 sq. ft. The property contains a two-story Victorian style home that was constructed in 1893, an artist’s studio/residence that was constructed in 1964, and a one-story garage building. The Victorian residence was once home to famed Aspen photographer Ferenc Berko, and the property is still under the ownership of his family members. This is considered an historic resource, and the parcel has been designated as part of the City of Aspen Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures. The original Victorian residence was converted to a duplex, and has been used as such since at least the mid-1950’s. The studio is a single family residence. Figure B: Area map depicting location of subject property. P132 VIII.a 3 PREVIOUS APPROVALS: On November 14, 2012, through Resolution 29, Series of 2012, the Historic Preservation Commission granted the applicant approval to remove a 223 sq. ft. non-historic addition from the west side of the Victorian residence. Through Ordinance 4, Series 1995, the property was included as part of the City of Aspen’s Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures. PROJECT SUMMARY: The Applicant is proposing a lot split of the 12,000 sq. ft. parcel into two 6,000 sq. ft. parcels, which is the minimum size permitted in the R-6 zone district. As proposed, Lot 1 will contain the studio residential unit, and Lot 2 will contain the Victorian residence and garage (see Exhibit A, Site Plan). Since the existing 12,000 sq. ft. parcel has been historically designated, the resulting 6,000 sq. ft. parcels produced by the proposed lot split will remain historically designated. STAFF COMMENTS: Staff finds the application to meet all of the relevant requirements for subdivision, as well as those associated with lot split. The proposed lot split will not change the character or use of the parcels, and is compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood. No new development is proposed at this time, and the existing fits into the architectural character of the area, which primarily reflects the Victorian period of design. No non-conformities will be created as a result of the lot split. The minimum lot size permitted by the R-6 zone district is 6,000 sq. ft., and this proposal creates two lots of this size. The Historic Preservation Commission granted the applicant permission to remove the 223 sq. ft. non-historic portion of the Victorian duplex that currently spans between the proposed lots. This removal will bring the structure into compliance with the required side yard setback for this zone district. According to the criteria for a lot split, no more than three residential units are allowed between the two newly created parcels. Currently three units exist on the site: the residential studio and the duplex Victorian residence. The proposed lot split will maintain the studio on one lot, and the duplex on the other, thereby maximizing the density allowed between the two lots. Should the owners choose to reallocate the density between the lots at a future date, they may do so through an administrative land use application review process under the approval of the Community Development Director. REFERRAL AGENCY COMMENTS: • Parks Department – Future development will require separate landscape/tree protection reviews and permits. Approved tree permits will be required prior to demolition or significant property change, should a tree be affected. • Water/Utilities – As proposed the lot split has negligible utility impacts. If either lot is developed in the future, utility design should be incorporated to address individual services and meters for both lots. Electric utility impacts may include a transformer capacity analysis and transformer locations. P133 VIII.a 4 RECOMMENDATION: In reviewing the proposal, Staff finds the application to be consistent with the applicable review standards as found in the City Land Use Code. Staff recommends approval of the project. RECOMMENDED MOTION (ALL MOTIONS ARE WORDED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE): “I move to approve Ordinance No. 5, Series of 2013, granting a lot split for 223 E. Hallam Street.” CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A – Site Plan Exhibit B – Lot Split Review Criteria Exhibit C – Department Referrals Exhibit D – Application P134 VIII.a 1 ORDINANCE N0. 5 (SERIES OF 2013) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE BERKO LOT SPLIT FOR THE PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 223 E. HALLAM STREET, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 2737-073-16-003 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from the Berko Family, c/o Nora Berko, requesting Lot Split review for the property commonly known as 223 E. Hallam Street; and, WHEREAS, the subject property is zoned R-6 (Medium-Density Residential); and, WHEREAS, the Applicant has requested a Lot Split review by the City Council and approval to divide the current 12,000 sq. ft. lot, comprised of four original townsite lots, into two 6,000 sq. ft. lots; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the lot split proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on March 11, 2013; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on March 11, 2013, the City Council opened the hearing, took public testimony, considered pertinent recommendations from the Community Development Director, and referral agencies of the City of Aspen and adopted Ordinance No. __, Series of 2013, approving Lot Split, which would allow the division of the 12,000 sq. ft. lot into two 6,000 sq. ft. lots at 223 E. Hallam Street; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council finds that the lot split proposal meets or exceeds all the applicable development standards. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, City Council hereby approves the Lot Split request to divide the 12,000 sq. ft. property known as 223 E. Hallam Street into two 6,000 sq. ft. lots, as proposed. P135 VIII.a 2 Section 2: Plat The Applicant shall record a lot split plat that meets the requirements of Land Use Code Section 26.480, Subdivision, within 180 days of approval. Section 3: Subdivision No further subdivision may be granted for the newly created lots. No additional units will be constructed without the required land use approvals and growth management allocations. Section 4: Maximum Density A lot split approval allows for a maximum of three residential units of density to be shared between the two subject lots. Lot 1 may contain one residence. Lot 2 may contain two residences. No further units of density may be added to these lots. The current allocated density of the three units may be amended between the two lots through administrative approval. Section 5: Parks The Parks Department will require separate landscape and tree protection reviews for each new lot upon the request for building permit. Staff will determine if an approved tree permit will be required prior to demolition or significant property changes. Tree removal mitigation will be handled through cash-in-lieu payment or by on-site plantings, such as street trees. Planting in the public right-of-way will be subject to landscaping in the right-of-way requirements. Improvements to the right-of-way should include new grass and irrigation. The applicant shall work with the Parks Department to design an appropriate trench box for any new tree plantings. Plans for tree plantings shall be completed and conceptually approved prior to building permit submittal. Section 6: Water/Utilities Upon future development of either lot, utility design shall be incorporated into plans that will address individual services and meters for each lot. Electric utility impacts should be similarly addressed by any future developer including, but not limited to, transformer capacity analysis and transformer locations. New transformers must be maintained on-site, but outside of the public right- of-way. Section 7: Vested Property Rights The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this ordinance, the City Clerk shall cau se to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: P136 VIII.a 3 Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: Berko Subdivision, Lots N and O, Block 81, City and Townsite of Aspen, by Ordinance No.__, Series of 2013, of the Aspen City Council. Section 8: This Ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be construed and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 9: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 10: A public hearing on the ordinance shall be held on the 11th day of March, 2013, in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing a public notice of the same shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. Section 11: This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days following final adoption. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 25th day of February, 2013. Attest: _________________________ ____________________________________ Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk Michael C. Ireland, Mayor P137 VIII.a 4 FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this 11th day of March, 2013. Attest: _______________________________ _____________________________ Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk Michael C. Ireland, Mayor Approved as to form: __________________________ James R. True, City Attorney P138 VIII.a Exhibit A Site Plan P139 VIII.a 1 Exhibit B Review Criteria Lot split: The split of a lot for the purpose of creating one (1) additional development parcel on a lot formed by a lot split granted subsequent to November 14, 1977, where all of the following conditions are met: a) The land is not located in a subdivision approved by either the Board of County Commissioners or the City Council or the land is described as a metes and bounds parcel which has not been subdivided after the adoption of subdivision regulations by the City on March 24, 1969. This restriction shall not apply to properties listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures. Staff Response: The subject site is not located in a subdivision that has been approved by the Board of County Commissioners or the City Council. The property is an established historic landmark and listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures, and therefore exempt from this restriction. Staff finds this criterion to be met. b) No more than two (2) lots are created by the lot split, both lots conform to the requirements of the underlying Zone District. Any lot for which development is proposed will mitigate for affordable housing pursuant to Chapter 26.470. Staff Response: The Applicant is proposing two lots as a result of this lot split. The current parcel is 12,000 sf, and the lot split will create two 6,000 sf lots. The proposed lots are located in the Medium-Density Residential (R-6) zone district, which requires a minimum gross lot area of 6,000 sf. The proposed lots will conform to the requirements of the R-6 zone district. The Applicant is not proposing any new development on either parcel at this time, and in fact has gained approval of the Historic Preservation Commission to remove a non-historic piece of the original structure, measuring approximately 227 square feet, that would otherwise span the two proposed lots. In the event the parcels are redeveloped in the future, mitigation for affordable housing will be required. Staff finds this criterion to be met. c) The lot under consideration or any part thereof, was not previously the subject of a subdivision exemption under the provisions of this Chapter or a "lot split" exemption pursuant to Chapter 26.470. Staff Response: The subject lot has not been under consideration or previously subject to a subdivision exemption or lot split exemption pursuant to Chapter 26.470. Staff finds this criterion to be met. d) A subdivision plat which meets the terms of this Chapter and conforms to the requirements of this Title, is submitted and recorded in the office of the County Clerk and Recorder after approval, indicating that no further subdivision may be granted for these lots nor will additional units be built without receipt of applicable approvals P141 VIII.a 2 pursuant to this Chapter and growth management allocation pursuant to Chapter 26.470. Staff Response: A subdivision plat has been submitted by the Applicant with a note that reads “No further subdivision may be granted for the newly created lots and no additional units will be constructed without required land use approvals and growth management allocations.” Staff finds this criterion to be met. e) The subdivision exemption agreement and plat shall be recorded in the office of the County Clerk and Recorder. Failure on the part of the applicant to record the plat within one hundred eighty (180) days following approval by the City Council shall render the plat invalid and reconsideration of the plat by the City Council will be required for a showing of good cause. Staff Response: The Applicant understands that the approved plat will need to be recorded in the office of the County Clerk and Recorder within one hundred eighty (180) days following approval by the City Council, or the approval will be rendered invalid. Staff finds this criterion to be met. f) In the case where an existing building occupies a site which is eligible for a lot split, the building need not be demolished prior to application for a lot split. Staff Response: The Applicant has received approval from the Historic Preservation Commission to remove a 227 square foot non-historic addition to the Victorian home that spans between the two proposed lots. This portion of the building has not been demolished prior to the application for lot split, and the Applicant understands that this is not a requirement of the application. Staff finds this criterion to be met. g) Maximum potential residential build-out for the two (2) parcels created by a lot split shall not exceed three (3) units, which may be composed of a duplex and a single- family home. Staff Response: The parcel currently contains one duplex, and a single family residence, for a total of three units on the property. The lot split will create one lot which will host the existing duplex unit, and a second with the single family unit. No further changes to the existing development on the lots are proposed at this time. The number units on the two parcels will not exceed the maximum density of three units at any time, and will be included as a condition of the recorded plat. Staff finds this criterion to be met. P142 VIII.a 3 A. General Requirements 1. The proposed subdivision shall be compatible with the mix of development in the immediate vicinity of the parcel in terms of density, height, bulk, architecture, landscaping and open space, as well as with any applicable adopted regulatory master plan. Staff Response: Staff finds the proposed lot split to be compatible with the mix of development in the immediate vicinity, which is largely residential. The Victorian residence is an historic building and fits with the architecture and character of the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed lot split does not change the use of the property, which will remain residential, and no new development is proposed with this application. There are no regulatory master plans applicable to this property. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. The proposed subdivision shall be consistent with the character of existing land uses in the area. Staff Response: The existing land uses in the area are largely residential, which will be maintained by this subdivision. The proposed lot split will divide the current 12,000 sq. ft. lot into two 6,000 sq. ft. lots, which is the minimum size permitted within the R-6 zone district. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 3. The proposed subdivision shall not adversely affect the future development of surrounding area. Staff Response: Staff does not find any reason why the proposed subdivision would adversely affect the future development of the surround area. The parcel is located in the R-6 zone district, which primarily supports medium density residential uses and development. The proposed subdivision supports the surrounding uses. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 4. The proposed subdivision shall be in compliance with all applicable requirements of the Title. Staff Response: Staff finds the proposed application for a lot split to be in compliance with all applicable requirements of the Title. Staff finds this criterion to be met. B. Suitability of land for subdivision 1. Land suitability. The proposed subdivision shall not be located on land unsuitable for development because of flooding, drainage, rock or soil creep, mudflow, rockslide, avalanche or snowslide, steep topography or any other natural hazard or other condition that will be harmful to the health, safety or welfare of the residents in the proposed subdivision. P143 VIII.a 4 Staff Response: The application proposes a lot split to divide an existing 12,000 sq. ft. lot into two 6,000 sq. ft. lots. The parcel is not in an area that is unsuitable for development due to any of these natural hazards or other conditions that will prove harmful to the health, safety or welfare of the residents to the property, or surrounding properties. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. Spatial pattern efficient. The proposed subdivision shall not be designated to create spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies, duplication or premature extension of public facilities and unnecessary public costs. Staff Response: Staff has no reason to believe that the lot split will create any spatial pattern inefficiencies, or unnecessary public costs. Public facilities are already in place that serves this area of town, and the proposed subdivision will continue to utilize this existing infrastructure. Utilities staff recommends that in the future, upon development of either lot, utility design should be incorporated to address individual services and meters for each lot. Staff finds this criterion to be met. C. Improvements. The improvements set forth at Chapter 26.580 shall be provided for the proposed subdivision. These standards may be varied by special review (See, Chapter 26.430) if the following conditions are met: 1. A unique situation exists for the development where strict adherence to the subdivision design standards would result in incompatibility with an applicable adopted regulatory plan, Title 28, the municipal code, the existing, neighboring development areas and/or the goals of the community. Staff Response: The applicant is not requesting any variation from the standards set forth in Chapter 26.580 (Engineering Department Regulations) of the Code. No new development is being proposed with this lot split application. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. The applicant shall specify each design standard variation requested and provide justification for each variation request, providing design recommendations by professional engineers as necessary. Staff Response: The applicant is not requesting any design standard variation with this application. The applicant was previously granted approval by the Historic Preservation Commission to remove a non-historic, 223 sq. ft. addition to the Victorian residence that would span the two proposed lots. The removal of this will bring the existing building into compliance in regards to meeting the required side yard setbacks for the R-6 zone district. Staff finds this criterion to be met. P144 VIII.a 5 D. Affordable housing. A subdivision which is comprised of replacement dwelling units shall be required to provide affordable housing in compliance with the requirements of Section 26.470.070.5, Demolition or redevelopment of multi-family housing. A subdivision which is comprised of new dwelling units shall be required to provide affordable housing in compliance with the requirements of Chapter 26.470, Growth Management Quota System. Staff Response: The applicant is not proposing any new development, including new or replacement dwelling units, with this application for subdivision. Therefore, no affordable housing is required as part of this application. Staff finds this criterion to be met. E. School land dedication. Compliance with the School land dedication standards set forth at Chapter 26.620. Staff Response: The applicant is not proposing any new development as part of this application, therefore there will be no school land dedication fees associated with this subdivision. Should new development be proposed at a future date, Chapter 26.620 will be revisited at that time, as necessary. Staff finds this criterion to be met. F. Growth management approval. Subdivision approval may only be granted to applications for which all growth management development allotments have been granted or growth management exemptions have been obtained, pursuant to Chapter 26.470. Subdivision approval may be granted to create a parcel(s) zoned Affordable Housing Planned Unit Development (AH-PUD) without first obtaining growth management approvals if the newly created parcel(s) is required to obtain such growth management approvals prior to development through a legal instrument acceptable to the City Attorney. Staff Response: The applicant is not proposing the creation of any new development that would result in requiring any growth management allotments with this application. Should new development be proposed at a future date, growth management will be revisited at that time, if necessary. Staff finds this criterion to be met. P145 VIII.a Page 1 of 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Jennifer Phelan, Deputy Planning Director THRU: Click here to enter text. DATE OF MEMO: 2/11/2013 MEETING DATE: 3/11/2013 RE: 401 Castle Creek Rd., Aspen Valley Hospital, Final PUD - Phases III & IV REQUEST OF COUNCIL: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: BACKGROUND: DISCUSSION: FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACTS: Click here to enter text. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FINANCE REVIEW: Click here to enter text. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: Click here to enter text. RECOMMENDED ACTION: P147 VIII.b Page 2 of 2 ALTERNATIVES: PROPOSED MOTION: CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: ATTACHMENTS: Notes: • Please use page numbers on all memos and attachments, especially for work sessions • The memo should be as long as it needs to be – but remember, you’re not writing a novel. Use attachments for more detailed information, ordinances and resolutions, etc. • Attachments: All attachments to the memo should be referenced somewhere in the body of the memo. All attachments should be titled as “Attachment”, “Exhibit” or “Schedule” with a letter following: Attachments: A - Exhibit One - Map ... B - Property Description C - Chart of Costs D - Resolution #97-1 P148 VIII.b Page 1 of 7 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Ireland and Aspen City Council THRU: Chris Bendon, Community Development Director FROM: Jennifer Phelan, Deputy Planning Director RE: Aspen Valley Hospital – Master Facilities Plan (401 Castle Creek Road) –Final Planned Unit Development, Phases III & IV – Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013 – 2nd Reading, Public Hearing MEETING DATE: March 11, 2013 APPLICANT /OWNER: Aspen Valley Hospital, David Ressler, CEO REPRESENTATIVE: Leslie Lamont, Lamont Planning Services LOCATION: Parcel C, Aspen Valley Hospital District Subdivision, commonly known as 401 Castle Creek Road CURRENT ZONING & USE Located in the Public (PUB) zone district with a Planned Unit Development (PUD) overlay. PROPOSED LAND USE: The Applicant is requesting Final PUD approval and associated land use approvals for Phases III and IV of the master facilities plan for redevelopment and expansion of the hospital campus. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council review the application, ask questions at the hearing and continue the public hearing date to March 18th. SUMMARY: The Applicant requests of the City Council approval of a Growth Management review, Final PUD, and Vested Rights. Photo of the hospital’s current entry. STAFF NOTE: The review of the application is being divided into a number of meetings and topics. At the hearing on March 11th, staff will provide a brief overview of the review process for the audience and then let the applicant present with regard to the topics listed below for the March 11th hearing. The Applicant is also prepared to respond to issues raised by the P149 VIII.b Page 2 of 7 Council at first reading during the next two meetings. As part of the presentation, Nancy Clanton of Clanton and Associates will be presenting her proposal for amending outdoor lighting from Phase II and how the hospital can be proactive with lighting decisions in Phases III and IV. The memo below is a duplicate of the first reading memo of February 25th, providing a general background of the review timeline, land use reviews required for this proposal and background on the project. GENERAL BACKGROUND: Aspen Valley Hospital received Conceptual Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval for the redevelopment of the hospital campus via Resolution No. 3 (Series of 2009) in May of 2009. Conceptually, the approval provided for the redevelopment and expansion of the hospital, the addition of medical office space, site improvements including a parking garage and, at the urging of Council, on-site affordable housing. The master facilities plan anticipated four phases of redevelopment and each phase is required to receive final PUD approval prior to commencement of the subject phase. The first phase was completed under previous approvals and encompassed the remodel and expansion of the birthing center. Phase II, which was approved via Ordinance No. 12 (Series of 2010), is under construction, includes: an expansion of the hospital, development of medical office space, construction of a parking garage, building of affordable housing and extensive site work. The Applicant is currently requesting final approval for Phases III and IV and due to the scale of the hospital expansion, the review for Phases III and IV has been scheduled over a number of meetings. At each hearing certain aspects of the project will be reviewed so that the City Council may comprehensively evaluate the project. The following schedule and topics are proposed: March 11, 2013: Project Overview: Recap of operational needs, program, phasing of master facilities plan; Phase III and IV overview, site lighting Phase II and proposed lighting Phase III and IV; Questions of Applicant and staff March 18, 2013: Responses to issues raised by the Council, detail on dimensions of the project; detail on mechanical equipment and noise study April 8, 2013: Review Criteria analysis; conditions of ordinance, vote April 22, 2013: Additional meeting if necessary LAND USE REQUESTS AND REVIEW PROCEDURES: The Applicant is requesting the following land use approvals from the City Council to undertake Phase III and IV of the redevelopment and expansion of the hospital site: • Growth Management Review for an Essential Public Facility with the development of the hospital pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.470.090 (4). (City Council is the final review authority after considering a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission). P150 VIII.b Page 3 of 7 • Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the development of a site specific development plan pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.445 (City Council is the final review authority after considering a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission). • Vested Property Rights for seven (7) years for Phases III and IV pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.308 (City Council is the final review authority). The Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) reviewed the application on October 30th, November 20th, December 4th of 2012, and January 8, 2013. The minutes from these meetings are attached as Exhibits B through E. The Applicant received the following approval from the Commission: Growth Management Review for Expansion or New Commercial Development pursuant to Resolution 2, Series 2013 (Exhibit A). Additionally, the Commission made a recommendation of approval on the Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) request. Final PUD review before the City Council is the last step in a four-step review process. Conceptual PUD review for the entire proposal, steps one and two, was granted via Resolution No. 3 (Series of 2009) by City Council. Final PUD review was undertaken by the Planning Commission (step 3) and completed in January. City Council now conducts a final review of the application at a public hearing as the fourth step. PAST APPROVALS AND PHASE III AND IV PROJECT SUMMARY: The Applicant, Aspen Valley Hospital District, LLC has requested Final PUD approval for Phases III and IV of the Aspen Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan to redevelop and expand the existing hospital campus. The focus of the proposal is on Parcel C of the campus, where the hospital, senior center/assisted living (Whitcomb Terrace), ambulance barn, heli-pad and the hospital CEO’s residence is located. Parcel C contains approximately 18.5 acres or 805,860 square feet. Parcel A of the campus includes the Schultz building, Mountain Oaks employee housing, and RFTA bus stop. As noted in the application, the Applicant is proposing redevelopment in four (4) phases to maintain existing operations throughout the redevelopment. Phase I was completed with the expansion and remodel of the obstetrics ward (prior to the adoption of a master facilities plan) and Phase II, which received final approval in 2010, is ongoing. Conceptual PUD approval The hospital received Conceptual PUD approval of the Master Facilities Plan via Resolution No. 3 (Series of 2009) for the property in May of 2009 taking into account a twenty year program life cycle. The conceptual approval provided a site plan outlining the expansion of the hospital, accessory parking, installation of a loop service road, as well as a zone for the expansion of senior services (approximately 10 units) and employee housing (approximately 18-22 units). Other items in the conceptual approval, such as employee generation and mitigation, have informed subsequent applications and will be discussed in further detail as part of this review. P151 VIII.b Page 4 of 7 Figure 1: Subject Site, Conceptual Master Plan Phase II The Applicant received final approval for Phase II of the master facilities plan in July of 2010 and it is currently under construction. Phase II includes a two story addition to the existing hospital, development of the 18 on-site affordable housing units in addition to off-site housing, a three level parking garage, partial construction of the loop service road as well as access improvements to the site, drainage and utility improvements, trail realignment, and RFTA bus stop improvements. Specific programming improvements are itemized below: Basement programming – a second loading and receiving area as well as food service receiving. First floor programming – 27 patient care rooms, nuclear medicine, relocated food service (including dining area), reception area, central plant additions, gift shop, 4 intensive care unit rooms, cardiopulmonary, and same day surgery. Second floor programming – cardiac rehabilitation and physical therapy, specialty clinics, administration offices, and medical offices. P152 VIII.b Page 5 of 7 Figure 2: Subject Site, Phase II site plan PHASES III AND IV: Phase III includes a two story addition and a basement, with the greatest amount of expansion (approximately 33,000 sq. ft.) on the ground floor, abutting the west side of the existing building. The upper story addition includes medical office space and circulation (approximately 18,000 sq. ft.), a basement of about 19,000 sq. ft., completion of the loop service road, 3 bay ambulance garage, new entry and parking. Interior remodeling of the existing building also occurs. Basement programming – mechanical, laundry services, information systems, morgue, and unfinished shell space. First floor programming – loading dock, operating suite, endocrinology suite, staff and physician support space, imaging suite, breast center, emergency department, lobby and main entry. Second floor programming – medical offices. P153 VIII.b Page 6 of 7 Phase IV proposes an addition to the ground floor (approximately 6,500 sq. ft.) and basement (approximately 1,800 sq. ft.), as well as a renovation of the existing building. Basement programming – meeting room, auditorium and public toilets. First floor programming – extension of main lobby, four bay registration, cardiology suite, outpatient services, oncology suite, chapel, expanded cafeteria seating. As previously mentioned, the hospital project has been developed in phases in order to accommodate the ongoing operation of the hospital during this redevelopment. Figure 3 shows the extent of the different phases of development. Figure 3: Phasing Plan of Hospital P154 VIII.b Page 7 of 7 CHANGES FROM CONCEPTUAL. As the project has progressed from its conceptual approval to design detail, some aspects of the phases have changed and will need to be memorialized in the PUD approvals for Phases III and IV. The applicant will be providing an overview of these changes and staff will address these issues in greater detail at a later date. In general, the following changes are being proposed for Phases III and IV: • Relocation of the helipad, from the top of the second floor medical office space to the top of the first floor roof of the emergency room. • Development of an ambulance garage versus the carport that was originally proposed. • A reduction in second story medical office space. • An increase in square footage with regard to basements • An increase in square footage at grade. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: During the meeting, staff recommends the Council focus on questions it may have on the additional phases or any clarifications or details members would like to have at the scheduled hearings. Staff recommends the public hearing, after discussion, be continued to March 18, 2013. RECOMMENDED MOTION (ALL MOTIONS ARE WORDED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE): “I move to continue the hearing on Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2013, to March 18, 2013.” CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:_____________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ATTACHMENTS: EXHIBIT A – Planning and Zoning Commission, Resolution No. 2 (Series of 2013) (provided 2/25/13) EXHIBIT B – Planning and Zoning Commission, minutes dates 10/30/12 (provided 2/25/13) EXHIBIT C – Planning and Zoning Commission, minutes dates 11/20/12 (provided 2/25/13) EXHIBIT D – Planning and Zoning Commission, minutes dates 12/4/12 (provided 2/25/13) EXHIBIT E – Planning and Zoning Commission, minutes dates 1/08/13 (provided 2/25/13) EXHIBIT F – Application (provided 2/25/13) EXHIBIT G - Proposal for outdoor lighting, Clanton & Associates P155 VIII.b p:970-963-8434 e:lezlamont@gmail.com c:970-948-1357 Lamont Planning Services, LLC Memo To: Jennifer Phelan, Deputy Director Aspen Community Development Department From: Leslie Lamont Date: March 4, 2013 Re: Aspen Valley Hospital Final PUD Phase III & IV – Lighting Plan Please find attached to this memo various forms of information provided by Clanton and Associates, the lighting specialists that have been retained to advise the Hospital on matters of interior and exterior lighting. The attached relates to the proposed lighting plan for Phase III and IV of the Aspen Valley Hospital’s Master Facilities Plan. The December 28, 2012 memo from Clanton and Associates is also included. This memo was prepared to outline light trespass mitigation measures necessary to correct some issues related to Phase II lighting. This memo was included in the City Council meeting packet for the February 25, 2013 meeting but is included again for convenience of review. Additional renderings will be provided at the March 11, 2013 meeting. Nancy Clanton will attend this Council meeting to thoroughly explain the proposed lighting plan. Attached: 1. Clanton and Associates December 28, 2012 memo. 2. AVH Luminaire Schedule 3. AVH Luminaire Cut Sheets 4. AVH Lighting Plan P157 VIII.b Aspen Valley Hospital Light Trespass Mitigation Options The purpose of the Light Trespass Mitigation is to reduce the brightness of the lights for neighbors. There are five different areas of concern: Whitcomb Terrace traffic circle area and parking, hospital parking lot, hospital parking garage, wall mounted sconces and loop road. Options to mitigate undesirable brightness and light trespass andA VH’sAintended resolution for each area include: 1. Replacing the LED light bars with built-in shielding bars to reduce brightness of the luminaire when viewed from off the site; RESOLUTION: AVH will replace light bars at exterior pole and wall lights as recommended. 2. Reduce LED light bar quantities in order to lower average lighting levels; RESOLUTION: AVH will reduce the light bars from 3 to 2 at all remaining pole and wall lights, pending new and final photometrics using the recommended light bars. 3. Change color temperature of the LED light bar to a warmer 2700K color; RESOLUTION: AVH will change all light bars in pole-mounted lights to the recommended 2700K color. 4. Install LED light bars in the wall sconces with backlight shielding to reduce the amount of brightness on the wall; RESOLUTION: AVH will replace the light bars as recommended. 5. Selectively identify and remove some poles and replace with lower height bollards; RESOLTUION: AVH will selectively remove poles and replace with bollards, pending new and final photometrics using recommended light bars. 6. Turn off lights that are not needed after a designated curfew ; RESOLUTION: AVH has already implemented lighting controls including motion sensors, dimmers, and timers for the parking garage, the top level parking deck, and the entry lobby. Figure 1 – Black cover plate reduces apparent brightness Figure 2 – Spill light shielding on bottom LEDs P158 VIII.b Aspen Valley Hospital – Lighting Design Ideas December 28, 2012 Heery International Page | 2 Figure 4 – The picture above compares the various light distributions and spill light control options. Figure 3 – The color appearance of various light sources can be defined in terms of color temperature, measured in “degrees” Kelvin (K). The Cooper Light Bar is the current specification. Recommend 2700K. P159 VIII.b Aspen Valley Hospital – Lighting Design Ideas December 28, 2012 Heery International Page | 3 Specific Mitigation Ideas andA VH’sAIntendedAResolution 1. Whitcomb Terrace The pole mounted luminaires on this property have the greatest visibility to properties and street below. So, lowering the height of the luminaires will make the greatest impact by reducing visual line of site from the property to the offending luminaire. Mitigation options andA VH’sAintended resolution, pending new and final photometrics include:  Remove some or all luminaires, poles and bases at the traffic circle;  Replace some or all light poles with round bollards with fully shielded bollard without louvers;  Review additional landscape and exterior architectural lighting; 2. Hospital Parking Lot The hospital parking lot has 12-foot high poles with LED luminaires. MitigationAoptionsAandA VH’sA intended resolution include:  Replace LED light bars in parking lot luminaire with 2700K LED bars with Type III distribution and spill light control;  Use black finish light bar cover;  Reduce the number of light bars from 3 to 2, pending new and final photometrics. Fully shielded bollard alternate Current exterior lighting P160 VIII.b Aspen Valley Hospital – Lighting Design Ideas December 28, 2012 Heery International Page | 4 3. Hospital Parking Garage The parking garage LED lighting is currently controlled with motion sensors that switch from a low light level to high as people walk or drive near. Since some of the lighting is visible off site, below are mitigation ideas andA VH’sAintendedAresolution:  Turn off upper deck pole mounted luminaires at a designated curfew as an additional control step beyond the motion sensors already installed;. Use black finish light bar cover to control luminaire brightness where light bars are being replaced as recommended on the top deck only;  Shield perimeter mounted interior garage lighting with permanent shields at fixture locations which are fully visible to the exterior;  Install a permanent mesh fabric at openings at the perimeter to reduce garage luminaire brightness. 2700K LED color temperature with spill light shielding on right pole Shielding demo for garage light P161 VIII.b Aspen Valley Hospital – Lighting Design Ideas December 28, 2012 Heery International Page | 5 4. Rear Loop Drive Navigation on the service loop road can easily be accomplished with lower height bollards. Mitigation optionsAandA VH’sAintendedAresolutionAinclude:  Install non-louvered bollards at each location previously planned to receive vertical light poles. 5. Hospital Wall Sconces The wall sconces have similar issues as the parking lot lighting, such as color and brightness and should be included in the overall mitigation effort. Options for mitigation andA VH’sAintendedAresolutionA include:  Replace light bars with 2700K LED and spill light control bars;  Use black finish light bar cover;  Sconces on the east wall have been disconnected. Sconces at the stair wells will be retrofitted. P162 VIII.b Aspen Valley Hospital – Lighting Design Ideas December 28, 2012 Heery International Page | 6 Future Lighting Design Strategies for Phases III and IV There are many human factors related to lighting in the built environment. These factors will be the primary drivers of the lighting design for the Hospital in order to deliver a high quality visual environment, increased occupant comfort, and foster wellness and productivity. A successful electric lighting design will provide a system of lighting layers (ambient, task, and accent) which respond to the needs of the occupants. This strategy is particularly effective in energy-aggressive, high performance buildings. Separating lighting into layers will increase visual comfort, provide additional flexibility, and create visual interest. Additionally, exterior and lobby interior lighting design will be designed consistent with the principles of minimizing light trespass and brightness to the neighborhood. Exterior  Specify 2700K light sources;  Specify Type III distribution with spill light control for pole-mounted luminaires; ;  Use retaining walls and other hardscape features as lighted elements (face towards building);  Use fully shielded bollards without louvers;  Minimize use of poles in general. When used, specify 2700K LED light bars with built-in shielding as recommended above;  Specify wall sconces with deeply regressed light sources; and  Provide dimming for all lighting and establish a nighttime schedule with automated controls.  Use low lumen (light) output luminaires for reduced brightness and minimum acceptable safe light levels (footcandles). The success of most lighting designs lies in the selection of the correct equipment. Luminaires are built differently in order to optimize specific performance characteristics for which they are applied. Selecting luminaires cannot be done on aesthetics alone, but must also consider photometric performance, energy use, and project goals. Interior Lobby  Specify 2700K light sources;  Specify only non-luminous orAnonA“glowing”Aluminaires;  Use luminaires with fully shielded light sources;  Do not allow direct illumination through exterior windows;  ProvideAaAlowAmountingAheightAlayerAofAlightAsuchAasAstepAlights,AandAwallAwashingA(belowA8’);  Light between windows such that lighted surfaces are not reflected out the windows; and  Provide dimming for all lighting and establish a nighttime schedule with automated controls. Tune (set) minimum acceptable lighting (footcandle) levels.  If ceiling is lighted, aim lights towards interior and either turn off or dim the lights to a low level at night. P163 VIII.b EB N 1 GR A D E M O U N T E D S O L I D S T A T E C U T T O F F B O L L A R D W I T H CA N T I L E V E R E D L U M I N A I R E , T Y P E I V D I S T R I B U T I O N , D I M M A B L E WI T H E L V T Y P E L I N E V O L T D I M M E R , M A T T E B L A C K B A K E D E N A M E L FI N I S H , 3 6 " H E I G H T , U N I V E R S A L V O L T A G E , M O D I F I E D W I T H S I N G L E LE D L I G H T B A R O U T B O A R D P O S I T I O N . 27 0 0 º K L E D 50 , 0 0 0 H R p e r L M 7 9 > 7 0 C R I Dr i v e r : ≥ 0 . 9 P F ≤ 2 0 % T H D LU M I E R E 3 0 3 - B 1 - L E D B 2 - 2 7 0 0 - U N V - T 4 - D I M E L V - B K - 3 6 MO D I F I E D : O U T B O A R D L I G H T B A R O N L Y EB N 2 SA M E A S T Y P E E B N 1 , E X C E P T T Y P E I I D I S T R I B U T I O N SA M E A S T Y P E E B N 2 LU M I E R E 3 0 3 - B 1 - L E D B 2 - 2 7 0 0 - U N V - T 2 - D I M E L V - B K - 3 6 MO D I F I E D : O U T B O A R D L I G H T B A R O N L Y EP N 4 PO L E M O U N T E D S O L I D S T A T E A R E A L U M I N I R E , T W O T Y P E I V S P I L L LI G H T C O N T R O L D I S T R I B U T I O N B A R S W I T H L I G H T B A R C O V E R P L A T E FI N I S H E D B L A C K , N O M I N A L 1 3 X 2 3 X 6 " C A S T A L U M I N U M H O U S I N G , BA K E D B L A C K E N A M E L F I N I S H , I P 6 6 , 5 Y E A R W A R R A N T Y . S U P P L Y WI T H R O U N D S T R A I G H T P O L E , A R M A N D B O L T C O V E R F O R 1 2 ' MO U N T I N G H E I G H T . 27 0 0 º K L E D 50 , 0 0 0 H R p e r L M 7 9 > 7 0 C R I Dr i v e r : ≥ 0 . 9 P F ≤ 2 0 % T H D IN V U E V X S - B O 2 - L E D - E 1 - S L 4 - B K - 2 7 0 0 K EP N L SA M E A S T Y P E E P N 4 , E X C E P T L E F T S P I L L L I G H T E L L I M I N A T O R DI S T R I B U T I O N SA M E A S T Y P E E P N 4 I N V U E V X S - B O 2 - L E D - E 1 - S L L - B K - 2 7 0 0 K EP N R SA M E A S T Y P E E P N 4 , E X C E P T R I G H T S P I L L L I G H T E L L I M I N A T O R DI S T R I B U T I O N SA M E A S T Y P E E P N 4 I N V U E V X S - B O 2 - L E D - E 1 - S L R - B K - 2 7 0 0 K EW N 1 WA L L R E C E S S E D L E D S T E P L I G H T , F U L L C U T - O F F L O N G T H R O W DI S T R I B U T I O N , 1 2 " X 5 " A L U M I N U M F A C E P L A T E , B A K E D B L A C K EN A M E L F I N I S H , I N T E G R A L 0 - 1 0 V D I M M I N G D R I V E R , M O D I F I E D W I T H TE M P E R E D G L A S S L E N S A N D T A M P E R R E S I S T A N T F A S T E N I N G HA R D W A R E , S U I T A B L E F O R W E T L O C A T I O N S , 5 Y E A R F U L L WA R R A N T Y , F O R P O U R E D - I N - P L A C E C O N C R E T E I N S T A L L A T I O N ( S E E CU T S H E E T F O R J - B O X R E Q U I R E M E N T S ) 27 0 0 º K L E D 50 , 0 0 0 H R p e r L M 7 9 > 7 0 C R I Dr i v e r : ≥ 0 . 9 P F ≤ 2 0 % T H D WI N O N A L E D - S T E P 1 3 - 9 - L - 2 7 K - N D 1 2 0 - S G B - W L - MO D : F A C E P L A T E 2 1 6 7 5 1 MO D : T A M P E R R E S I S T A N T IA RE C E S S E D S O L I D S T A T E A C C E N T L I G H T , N O M I N A L 6 " D I A M E T E R SE M I - S P E C U L A R C L E A R S E L F F L A N G E D C O N E , I N T E G R A L EL E C T R O N I C 0 - 1 0 V O L T D I M M I N G D R I V E R . 5 Y E A R W A R R A N T Y . XI C A T O RE M O T E P H O S P H O R L E D 27 0 0 ° K , 8 0 C R I 50 , 0 0 0 H O U R S A T 7 0 % LU M E N M A I N T E N A N C E KU R T V E R S E N A 5 1 4 5 - 2 7 - S S IC SU R F A C E M O U N T E D L I N E A R S O L I D S T A T E C O V E U P L I G H T W I T H ASY M M E T R I C D I S T R I B U T I O N , M C P @ 1 1 0 º F R O M N O R M A L , , N O M I N A L 6" X 2 " H , F O R C O N T I N U O U S R U N S , L E N G T H S A S S H O W N O N P L A N S , IN T E G R A L E L E C T R O N I C 0 - 1 0 V O L T D I M M I N G D R I V E R . 5 Y E A R WA R R A N T Y . 27 0 0 º K L E D 50 , 0 0 0 H R p e r L M 7 9 > 8 0 C R I Dr i v e r : ≥ 0 . 9 P F ≤ 2 0 % T H D WI N O N A S C V 1 - S L C - L E D 1 - X - 2 7 K - D M 2 4 V - P 1 - R A - X - S T D ID RE C E S S E D S O L I D S T A T E D O W N L I G H T , N O M I N A L 6 " D I A M E T E R S E M I - SP E C U L A R C L E A R S E L F F L A N G E D C O N E , I N T E G R A L E L E C T R O N I C 0 - 10 V O L T D I M M I N G D R I V E R . 5 Y E A R W A R R A N T Y . XI C A T O RE M O T E P H O S P H O R L E D 27 0 0 ° K , 8 0 C R I 50 , 0 0 0 H O U R S A T 7 0 % LU M E N M A I N T E N A N C E KU R T V E R S E N A 4 1 3 4 - 2 7 - S S IG RE C E S S E D L I N E A R S O L I D S T A T E W A L L G R A Z I N G L U M I N A I R E , NO M I N A L 6 " W I D E A P E R T U R E , L E N G T H S A S S H O W N O N P L A N , SO U R C E M A S K I N G D E V I S E T O A V O I D V I E W O F L E D S , I N T E G R A L EL E C T R O N I C 0 - 1 0 V O L T D I M M I N G D R I V E R . 5 Y E A R W A R R A N T Y . 27 0 0 º K L E D 50 , 0 0 0 H R p e r L M 7 9 > 8 0 C R I Dr i v e r : ≥ 0 . 9 P F ≤ 2 0 % T H D LI T E C O N T R O L W S - L 6 0 - X - M O - 2 7 K - C W M - D P - D 1 0 - V - L C D IS SU R F A C M O U N T E D S O L I D S T A T E U P L I G H T , T W O A S Y M M E T R I C FO R W A R D T H R O W L E D L I G H T B A R S , N O M I N A L 1 2 " D E E P X 1 4 " W I D E X 4 " H I G H A L U M I N U M H O U S I N G , C O L O R T O B E S E L E C T E D , I N T E G R A L 0- 1 0 V D I M M I N G D R I V E R , M O D I F I E D M O U N T I N G T O A L U M I N U M WI N D O W M U L L I O N , M O D I F I E D W I T H B A C K L I G H T G L A R E S H I E L D S . 5 YE A R W A R R A N T Y . 27 0 0 º K L E D 50 , 0 0 0 H R p e r L M 7 9 > 8 0 C R I Dr i v e r : ≥ 0 . 9 P F ≤ 2 0 % T H D AM E T R I X W L - I N - N - B 0 2 - A I - 2 7 - U N V - T B D - D 1 0 MO D : M O U N T I N G , 2 7 0 0 K , S H I E L D S , 2 B A R S AS P E N V A L L E Y H O S P I T A L - P H A S E 3 & 4 L U M I N A I R E S C H E D U L E TY P E D E S C R I P T I O N S O U R C E M A N U F A C T U R E R C A T A L O G N U M B E R P164VIII.b Eon 303 - B1 and 303 - B2 are compact, low profile, dimmable, LED bollards that provide downlight only via a fixed head. 303 - B1 has a single head on one side of the luminaire and 303 - B2 has two, integrated heads coming off opposite sides of the luminaire. 303 - B1 and 303 - B2 come standard with universal input LED drivers (120 - 277V, 50/60 Hz). Dimming is achieved with a standard ELV, reverse phase dimming driver. Eon fixtures may be used indoors or outdoors and carry an IP66 rating. Our patented LumaLevelTM leveling system provides quick installation, easy adjustment, secure mounting and protection from vibration. Catalog # Project Comments Prepared by Type Date DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION FEATURES www.cooperlighting.com Specification and Dimensions subject to change without notice. Consult your representative for additional options and finishes. Head is precision-machined from corrosion-resistant 6061-T6 alumi- num. Body is extruded aluminum and mounting base is cast from corrosion resistant silicone aluminum alloy. Stainless steel hardware is standard to provide maximum corrosion- resistance. H ... Labels & Approvals B ... Finish Fixture and mounting base are double protected by a RoHS compli- ant chemical film undercoating and polyester powdercoat paint finish, surpassing the rigorous demands of the outdoor environment. Mounting base is painted black. Fixture housing and head are available in a variety of standard colors. In addition to the standard five colors offered by Lumiere, the Eon bollards are also available in colors to match other out- door Cooper brands, such as Invue. See the Finish section in the ordering detail for more information. A ... Material C ... Lens Clear, tempered glass lens, fac- tory sealed with high temperature adhesive to prevent water intrusion and breakage due to thermal shock. EDGE LIT option: when specified with the EDGE option, the glass will be slightly thicker, clear, tempered and sealed in the same manner referenced above. The added glass thickness will offer a brigher line of light around the edge of the glass that will accentuate the fixture’s aesthetics and styling. E ... Hardware F ... Electrical Both models come standard with universal input LED drivers (120-277, 50/60Hz). The standard driver is ELV reverse phase dimmable. G ... LED LEDs are included and available in three color temperatures (2700K, 3000K & 4000K) and a variety of optics. Both color temperature and distribution must be specified when ordering - see reverse side for details and catalog logic. 303 - B1 comes standard with two mini lightbars and 303 - B2 comes standard with four mini lightbars. UL and cUL listed, standard wet label. IP66 rated. I ... Warranty Lumiere warrants it’s fixtures against defects in materials & workmanship for five (5) years. Auxiliary equipment such as transformers, ballasts and LED drivers carry the original manufac- turer’s warranty. 303-B1 / 303-B2 15.5 W LED 31 W LED LED BOLLARD IP66 D ... Adjustable Mounting Base Cast aluminum mounting base is equipped with the patented Luma- LevelTM leveling system that includes mounting chassis, 70 shore neoprene base, stainless steel hardware and 3/4” conduit entry. It provides quick installation, easy adjustment, secure mounting and protection from vibra- tion. 303-B1 303-B2 7.72” 196mm 1.40” 35mm 3.43” 87mm 5.47” 139mm 24.00” 609mm 36.00” 914mm 12.70” 323mm 1.40” 35mm 3.43” 87mm 5.47” 139mm 24.00” 609mm 36.00” 914mm P165 VIII.b www.cooperlighting.com Specification and Dimensions subject to change without notice. Consult your representative for additional options and finishes. ORDERING INFORMATION LED INFORMATION NOTES AND FORUMULAS • Apply appropriate light loss factors where necessary. • Photometry is LM-79 compliant. Input Voltage Series 303-B1 = LED single head bollard Notes:* Consult your Cooper Lighting representative for additional options and nishes UNV=Universal 120 - 277V, 50/60HzQuantity of Mini Lightbars LEDB2 = Sample Number: 303 - B1 - LEDB1 - 3000 - UNV - T2 - BZ Light Emitting Diode, Rev B., Two Mini Lightbar (B1 only) Finish BK = Black BZ = Bronze CS = City Silver VE = Verde WT = White Color Temperature 2700=2700K 3000=3000K 4000=4000K Optics T2 = Type II, Lateral Throw T4 = Type IV, Forward Throw T5X = Type V, Extra Wide Flood Consult factory for other optics Dimming DIMELV = Trailing Edge Phase Dimming Driver Painted 303-B2 = LED dual head bollard LEDB4 =Light Emitting Diode, Rev B., Four Mini Lightbars (B2 only) AP = Grey (Invue) DP = Dark Platinum (Invue) GM = Graphite Metallic (Invue) Height Options 24=24” Height 36=36” Height EDGE = Edgelit Clear Tempered Glass Lens LED Watts Distribution Total Lumens CRI °K Life (hrs.)Volts LEDB2 - 2700 - T2 15.5 Type II - Lateral Throw 725 95 2700 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDB2 - 2700 - T4 15.5 Type IV - Forward Throw 709 85 2700 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDB2 - 2700 - T5X 15.5 Type V - Flood 626 65 2700 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDB2 - 3000 - T2 15.5 Type II - Lateral Throw 95 3000 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDB2 - 3000 - T4 15.5 Type IV - Forward Throw 85 3000 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDB2 - 3000 - T5X 15.5 Type V - Flood 65 3000 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDB2 - 4000 - T2 15.5 Type II - Lateral Throw 1209 95 4000 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDB2 - 4000 - T4 15.5 Type IV - Forward Throw 1181 85 4000 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDB2 - 4000 - T5X 15.5 Type V - Flood 1044 65 4000 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDB4 - 2700 - T2 31 Type II - Lateral Throw 1436 95 2700 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDB4 - 2700 - T4 31 Type IV - Forward Throw 1410 85 2700 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDB4 - 2700 - T5X 31 Type V - Flood 1247 65 2700 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDB4 - 3000 - T2 31 Type II - Lateral Throw 95 3000 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDB4 - 3000 - T4 31 Type IV - Forward Throw 85 3000 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDB4 - 3000 - T5X 31 Type V - Flood 65 3000 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDB4 - 4000 - T2 31 Type II - Lateral Throw 2393 95 4000 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDB4 - 4000 - T4 31 Type IV - Forward Throw 2350 85 4000 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDB4 - 4000 - T5X 31 Type V - Flood 2078 65 4000 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V, 50/60Hz) P166 VIII.b Catalog # Project Comments Prepared by Type Date SPECIFICATION FEATURES Construction HOUSING: Heavy wall one-piece, die-cast aluminum housing has precise tolerance control and repeatability in manufacturing. Housing features a partition wall that isolates driver components for cooler operation. Integral aluminum heat sink provides superior thermal heat transfer in +40°C ambient environments. DOOR: One-piece, die-cast aluminum construction with tool- less release latch. Door swings down and is retained on two (2) catch hinges. GASKET: Continuous gasket provided to seal housing to optic tray. LENS: Downlight lens is LED board integrated acrylic over- optics, each individually sealed for IP66 rating. HARDWARE: Tool-less release door latch is stainless steel/ aluminum construction, painted to match housing and allows access to internal housing and electrical components. Optics DISTRIBUTION: Choice of thirteen (13) patented, high efficiency AccuLED Optics™, featuring designs that maximize light collection and directional distribution onto the application region. Each optical lens is precision manufactured via injection-molding then precisely arranged and sealed on the board media. LEDs: High output LEDs, 50,000+ hours life at >70% lumen maintenance, offered standard in 4000°K (+/- 275K) CCT and nominal 70 CRI. Optional factory- set optic rotation [L90 or R90] allows uniform product orientation on site, independent of optical orientation. Electrical DRIVER: LED drivers are potted and heat sunk for optimal performance and prolonged life. Standard drivers feature electronic universal voltage (120-277V/50-60hz), greater than 0.9 power factor, less than 20% harmonic distortion and feature ambient temperature range of +40°C (104°F) down to minimum starting temperature of -30°C (-22°F). Shipped standard with Cooper Lighting proprietary circuit module designed to withstand 10kV of transient line surge. All LED LightBARS™ and drivers are mounted to dedicated mounting trays and are easily replaced by use of quick disconnects for ease of wiring. Driver tray is hinged and removable without the use of tools. Options to control light levels, energy savings and egress capabilities (battery pack and separate circuit) are available. Mounting ARM: One-piece extruded aluminum arm available in standard 5" lengths. Internal bolts guides allow easy positioning of fixture during installation to pole or wall surface. STRUCTURAL MOUNT: Die-cast aluminum cleat factory mounted to luminaire and finished in luminaire color. Stainless steel structural rod measures 1/2" in diameter and is provided in luminaire finish color or optional natural finish. Product works in conjunction with dedicated accessory arms (order seperately). Invue poles are provided pre-drilled when structural mount option drill pattern is specified. See Invue poles section for complete selection. Additional mounting accessories available. Finish Housing is finished in 5 stage super premium TGIC polyester powder coat paint, 2.5 mil nominal thickness for superior protection against fade and wear. LightBAR™ cover plates are standard white and may be specified to match finish of luminaire housing. Standard colors include black, bronze, grey, white, dark platinum and graphite metallic. RAL and custom color matches available. Consult Outdoor Architectural Colors brochure for a complete selection. Warranty VXS LED features a 5 year limited warranty. VXS VISION SITE SMALL LED 1 - 4 LightBARS Solid State LED ARCHITECTURAL AREA/SITE LUMINAIRE AVU092101 2013-02-26 12:57:30 The classic lines and sophisticated construction of Vision Site LED makes it an ideal complement to site design. Offering LED technology across the VXS and VXM, Vision provides true family scaling in both physical form and lumen capability for architectural site lighting applications. UL/cUL listed for use in wet locations. DESCRIPTION CERTIFICATION DATA UL/cUL Listed ISO 9001 IP66 LIghtBARS ARRA Compliant LM79 / LM80 Compliant 1.5G Vibration Tested ENERGY DATA Electronic LED Driver >0.9 Power Factor <20% Total Harmonic Distortion 120-277V/50 & 60hz, 347V/60hz, 480V/60hz -30°C Minimum Temperature 40°C Ambient Temperature Rating EPA Effective Projected Area: (Sq. Ft.) Single: ~ 1.18 w/arm included Single Structural: ~ 1.27 w/arm included SHIPPING DATA (Approximate) Net Weight: 35 lbs. Volume (cu. ft): 3.00 S Y S T EM S C ERTI F I E D INVUE® 6" [152mm] 13 1/2" [343mm]23" [584mm] 5" [127mm] DIMENSIONS 2013-02-26 16:02:45 P167 VIII.b NOTE: Specifications and dimensions subject to change without notice. Visit our web site at www.cooperlighting.com Customer First Center 1121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City, GA 30269 770.486.4800 FAX 770.486.4801 Standard Street Side House Side Street Side House Side Street Side House Side Optics Rotated Left @ 90° [L90] Optics Rotated Right @ 90° [R90] OPTIC ORIENTATION 12'' [305 mm] Set Screws To p Cap Extruded Arm Direct Mount (Round or Square Pole)Direct Wa ll Mount Wa ll Bracket with Arm Te non Adapter Structural Pole Mount (Round or Square Pole)Structural Wall Mount MOUNTING OPTIONS AND ACCESSORIES Wall Mount Arm Mount Single E.P.A VXS 1.18 Arm Mount 2 @ 180° E.P.A VXS 2.20 Arm Mount 2 @ 90° E.P.A VXS 1.72 Arm Mount 3 @ 120° E.P.A VXS 2.25 Arm Mount 4 @ 90° E.P.A VXS 2.35 Arm Mount 3 @ 90° E.P.A VXS 2.35 MOUNTING VARIATIONS VXS Structural MountVXS (TYPE “F”)(TYPE “E”) 2 13/16''[72mm] 5/16'' [8mm] dia. hole 2 3/4"[70mm] 11 " [280mm] 3/4'' [20mm]dia. holes 3 7/8" [99mm] 3"[77mm] (2) 3/8'' [10mm] dia. holes 3 7/8''[99mm] 3/4'' [20mm]dia. hole 7/8'' [23mm] (2) 3/8" [10mm] dia. holes POLE DRILLING PATTERNS Number of LightBARs DISTRIBUTION Power [Watts] Current @ 120V [A] Current @ 277V [A]T2 T3 T4 SL2 SL3 SL4 5MQ 5WQ 5XQ RW SLR/SLL 7 LED LIGHTBAR C01 27 0.23 0.13 1,819 1,798 1,811 1,805 1,746 1,734 1,923 1,930 1,868 1,834 1,660 C02 54 0.46 0.21 3,509 3,469 3,495 3,484 3,368 3,347 3,711 3,724 3,605 3,540 3,203 C03 77 0.65 0.29 5,291 5,230 5,269 5,252 5,078 5,046 5,594 5,614 5,436 5,337 4,829 C04 101 0.86 0.37 6,983 6,902 6,954 6,932 6,703 6,660 7,383 7,410 7,174 7,043 6,373 21 LED LIGHTBAR B01 27 0.23 0.13 2,237 2,211 2,228 2,220 2,147 2,133 2,365 2,374 2,298 2,256 2,041 B02 51 0.43 0.20 4,317 4,267 4,299 4,285 4,143 4,117 4,564 4,580 4,435 4,354 3,940 B03 73 0.62 0.28 6,508 6,433 6,481 6,460 6,246 6,207 6,881 6,906 6,686 6,564 5,939 B04 95 0.81 0.35 8,589 8,490 8,554 8,526 8,244 8,192 9,081 9,114 8,824 8,663 7,839 POWER AND LUMENS BY BAR COUNT Ambient Lumen Temperature Multiplier 10°C 1.04 15°C 1.03 25°C 1.00 40°C 0.96 LUMEN MULTIPLIER AVU092101 2013-02-26 12:57:30 VXS VISION SITE SMALL LED 2013-02-26 16:02:45 P168 VIII.b NOTE: Specifications and dimensions subject to change without notice. Visit our web site at www.cooperlighting.com Customer First Center 1121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City, GA 30269 770.486.4800 FAX 770.486.4801 AVU092101 2013-02-26 12:57:30 VXS VISION SITE SMALL LED 2013-02-26 16:02:45 ORDERING INFORMATION Distribution T2 Type II= T3 Type III= T4 Type IV= 5MQ Type V Square Medium= 5WQ Type V Square Wide= 5XQ Type V Square Extra Wide = RW Rectangular Wide= SL2 Type II w/Spill Control= SL3 Type III w/Spill Control= SL4 Type IV w/Spill Control= SLL 90 Degree Spill Light Eliminator Left = SLR 90 Degree Spill Light Eliminator Right = Structural Options 2, 6 Pole Mount PRCPS Strut Rod and Clevis Set for Square Pole (Painted to match fixture, does not include arm) 7= PRCCS Stainless Strut Rod and Clevis Set for Square Pole (Clevis painted to match fixture, does not include arm) 7= PRCPR Strut Rod and Clevis Set for Round Pole (Painted to match fixture, does not include arm) 8= PRCCR Stainless Strut Rod and Clevis Set for Round Pole (Clevis painted to match fixture, does not included arm) 8= Wall Mount WRCP Strut Rod and Clevis Set (Painted to match fixture, does not include arm) 9= WRCS Stainless Steel Strut Rod and Clevis Set (Clevis' painted to match fixture, does not include arm) 9= Accessories 15 MA1071-WH 5'' Arm for Square Pole= MA1074-WH 5'' Arm for Round Pole= MA1073-WH Direct Mount for Square Pole= MA1076-WH Direct Mount for Round Pole= MA1077-WH Wall Bracket with 5'' Arm= MA1200-WH Direct Wall Mount Kit= MA1101-WH Single-arm Tenon Adapter for 2 3/8'' O.D. Tenon = MA1102-WH 2@180 DegreeTenon Adapter for 2 3/8'' O.D. Tenon = MA1103-WH 3@120 Degree Tenon Adapter for 2 3/8'' O.D. Tenon = MA1104-WH 4@90 Degree Tenon Adapter for 2 3/8'' O.D. Tenon = MA1105-WH 2@90 Degree Tenon Adapter for 2 3/8'' O.D. Tenon = MA1106-WH 3@90 Degree Tenon Adapter for 2 3/8'' O.D. Tenon = MA1107-WH 2@120 Degree Tenon Adapter for 2 3/8'' O.D. Tenon = MA1108-WH Single-arm Tenon Adapter for 3 1/2'' O.D. Tenon = MA1109-WH 2@180 Degree Tenon Adapter for 3 1/2'' O.D. Tenon = MA1110-WH 3@120 Degree Tenon Adapter for 3 1/2'' O.D. Tenon = MA1111-WH 4@90 Degree Tenon Adapter for 3 1/2'' O.D. Tenon = MA1112-WH 2@90 Degree Tenon Adapter for 3 1/2'' O.D. Tenon = MA1113-WH 3@90 Degree Tenon Adapter for 3 1/2'' O.D. Tenon = MA1114-WH 2@120 Degree Tenon Adapter for 3 1/2'' O.D. Tenon = MA1253 10kV Circuit Module Replacement= Lamp Type LED Solid State Light Emitting Diodes = Product Family 1, 2 VXS Vision Site Small= Number of Lightbars 3, 4 B01 [1] 21 LED LightBAR= B02 [2] 21 LED LightBARs= B03 [3] 21 LED LightBARs= B04 [4] 21 LED LightBARs= C01 [1] 7 LED LightBARs= C02 [2] 7 LED LightBARs= C03 [3] 7 LED LightBARs= C04 [4] 7 LED LightBARs= Voltage E1 Electronic (120-277V)= 347 347V= 480 480V= Finish 5 BK Black= AP Grey= BZ Bronze= WH White= DP Dark Platinum= GM Graphite Metallic= Options 6 PC Button Type Photocell (specify voltage)= 2L Two Circuits10= LCF LightBAR Cover Plate Matches Housing Finish = 7060 70 CRI/6000K CCT11= 8030 80 CRI/3000K CC11= L90 Optics Rotated Left 90 Degrees= R90 Optics Rotated Right 90 Degrees= ICB Integral Cold Weather Battery Pack (Specify 120 or 277) 12= MS-LXX Motion Sensor for on/off operation 13= MS/X-LXX Motion Sensor for bi-level switching 14= 1 DesignLights™Consortium Qualified. Refer to www.designlights.org Qualified Products List under Family Models for details. Notes: 2 Arm not included. Order seperately. See accessories. 3 Standard 4000 K CCT and greater than 70 CRI. 4 21 LED LightBAR powered at 350mA, 7 LED LightBAR powered at 1A. 5 Custom and RAL color matching available upon request. Consult your customer service representative for further information. 6 Add as suffix in the order shown. 7 Compatible with 5" MA1071 arm only. 8 Compatible with 5" MA1074 arm only. 9 Wall mount structual options do not include arm assembly (See Accessories). Compatible with 5" MA1071 arm only. 10 Low-level output varies by bar count. Consult factory. Requires quantity two or more LightBARS. 11 Consult customer service for lead times and lumen multiplier. 12 Available with B01, B02, C01 or C02 configurations only. Specify 120 or 277V. LED cold weather integral battery pack is rated for minimum operating temperature -4°F (-20°C). Operates (1) lightbar for 90 minutes. Not available in all configurations, consult factory. Rated for use in 25°C ambient. 13 Sensor mounted to the luminaire. Available in B01 - B06 and C01 - C06 configurations. Replace XX with mounting height in feet for proper lens selection, (i.e., MS-L25). Consult factory for additional information. 14 Sensor mounted to luminaire. Available in B02 - B06 and C02 - C06 configurations. Replace X with number of bars operating in low output mode and replace XX with mounting height in feet for proper lens selection, (i.e., MS/3-L25). Maximum 4 bars in low output mode. Consult factory for additional information. 15 Order separately, replace XX with color suffix. P169 VIII.b 3760 west fourth street • winona, minnesota 55987 • 507 - 454 - 5113 • fax: 507 - 452 - 8528 Page 1 of 2www.winonalighting.com Type:Project:Qty: STEP13 9 Inch QUICK FIND #: QF-2057 LED STEP13 • 9 Inch ST E P STEP13 9 Inch is a surface mount step light with a concealed optic. Five LED white temperatures and six LED colors are available.Distribution: One light distribution pattern available. Long: For large area illumination.Construction: Die-cast LED module with solid aluminum, brass, or stainless steel faceplates.Mounting: Luminaire is mounted to a standard multi-gang switch box(supplied by others) with four fasteners. Steel City H4BD or equivalent (by others) recommended. Integral Driver: Integral drivers available for 120V-277V AC in both dimming and non-dimming versions.Finish: Recessed surfaces have a ribbed design with a matte black finish to reduce glare. Faceplates in natural metal finishes have protective clear top coat. Faceplates in painted are finished with a two-part wet paint system. Primer only option allows for field painting.Dimming: True 0-100% dimming is compatible with 0V-10V fluorescent-type dimmer.Power Consumption: Non-dimming unit consumes 8.04W. Dimming unit consumes 18W.ETL Listed: Dry Location, Wet Location optionalNote: Winona Lighting reserves the right to make design changes withoutprior notice. Revised: 09-11-12 Visit www.winonalighting.com for the most complete and current information. MOUNTFACEPLATE SPECIALVOLTAGEOPTIONSDISTRIBUTIONSOURCE PRODUCT SPECIFICATION LED CODE STD -standard MOD -modified IES report available on the website. 9 - 9 inchLED Modification: X -no options WL -wet location STEP13 L - long FINISH BAL - brushed aluminum BB - brushed brass BSS - brushed stainless steel PB - polished brass PSS - polished stainless steel CMF - custom metal finish (consult factory) STEP13LED Natural Metal Finishes AB5 - antique brass paint BBP - brushed brass paint LBPS - light bronze paint smooth LSP - light silver paint PGP - pale gold paint SGB - semi-gloss black paint SGW - semi-gloss white paint PRM - primer only CPF - custom paint finish (consult factory) Painted Finishes L9 All fixtures ETL listed, USA and Canada INTERTEK LISTED C US CM Wet Shown MOUNTING DETAIL 5.50" 11.50" 5.50" 11.50" Steel City H4BD or equivalent recommended (by others) WL = Wet Location Option (wet location exposed fasteners) X = No Option (dry location hidden fasteners) Non-Dimming Dimming ND120V - 277V DM120V - 277V * * 0-10V dimmer required (by others) Ribbed design with matte black finish reduces glare CROSS SECTION Integral driver 2.125" box min. LED module with concealed optic 27K - ANSI-binned 2700k 30K - ANSI-binned 3000k 35K - ANSI-binned 3500k 40K - ANSI-binned 4000k 50K - ANSI-binned 5000 003 - amber 004 - blue 005 - cyan 006 - green 007 - red-orange 008 - red 0.1 0.5 1.0 2.0 4.0 8.0 Typical Distribution Based on 30K 9 inch - Long Distribution Grid in 1' increments LumensSize WattsLPW Long3108.0438.6 Lumen Output at 30K Distribution 9 Inch P170 VIII.b DIMMING INSTALLATIONS The integral dimming driver is designed to the 0-10V IEC dimming specification 60929 and is compatible with common 0-10V dimmers and dimming systems. Do NOT connect line voltage to dimming input wires. Connect STEP WHITE wire to power NEUTRAL. Connect STEP BLACK wire to power HOT. Connect STEP VIOLET wire to POSITIVE INPUT of Dimming Control. Connect STEP GREY wire to NEGATIVE INPUT of Dimming Control. WHITE BLACK GREEN 120V or 277V WH I T E BL A C K GR E E N WH I T E BL A C K GR E E N WH I T E BL A C K GR E E N WH I T E BL A C K GR E E N To other STEP fixtures POWER SUPPLY / DIMMING All STEPS models are available with Dimming and Non-Dimming internal drivers in both 120V and 277V input versions. Dimming drivers require a 0-10V fluorescent-type dimming control. NON-DIMMING INSTALLATIONS Connect STEP WHITE wire to power NEUTRAL. Connect STEP BLACK wire to power HOT. Connect STEP GREEN wire to power GROUND. 3760 west fourth street • winona, minnesota 55987 • 507 - 454 - 5113 • fax: 507 - 452 - 8528 Page 2 of 2www.winonalighting.com Type:Project:Qty: Revised: 04-04-12 LED STEP13 • Wiring and Dimming ST E P WH I T E BL A C K GR E E N WHITE BLACK GREEN 120V or 277V WH I T E BL A C K GR E E N WH I T E BL A C K GR E E N WH I T E BL A C K GR E E N WH I T E BL A C K GR E E N To other STEP fixtures WH I T E BL A C K GR E E N VI O L E T GR E Y To other STEP fixtures 0-10V (+) Dimmer (-) VI O L E T GR E Y VI O L E T GR E Y VI O L E T GR E Y VI O L E T GR E Y VIOLET GREY Read all instructions before installation. Do not make live connections! P171 VIII.b Kurt Versen Company Point Source LightingWestwood, New Jersey 07675 A5147 Narrow Beam, 2000 lm A5145 Medium Beam, 2000 lm A5143 Wide Beam 2000 lm 4 3/8" Conoid Directional Downlight Xicato Remote Phosphor Flex Function, MultiSource™ Technology Optics and Applications Directional systems are designed with locking capability to rotate 360° and angulate 25° providing true architectural aiming and control capability. Optics designed to control the rigors of sloped ceiling installations while maintaining a glare free environment. Design Features - MultiSource™ Capable Flex Function design allows future functions to be changed in the field from below. Downlights/Directionals can become wall washers and vice versa. Fixture housings are designed with MultiSource™ plug and play connectors allowing field conversion to PAR LED and MH MR-16 GX10 bases. Proprietary passive heat sinks ensure proper temperatures are maintained. Service from below only. Maximum ceiling thickness is 11⁄2". Modules Xicato remote phosphor packages are standard with 2000 lm module operating on 1A driver. 3000K, 80 CRI is standard. 2700K, 3500K, 4000K available. Rated Life is 50,000 hours at 70% lumen output. Dimming Driver Dimming is standard 0-10V/10%. See accessories for additional dimming options. Specify voltage. Finish Specular Alzak cones are standard. SoftSheen™is a new finish designed to mitigate the color over angle “yellow streak” associated with remote phosphor sources. Softglow®and colors available, see accessories. Steel parts are phosphate conditioned then painted matte black. Warranty 5 year limited. See KV website for manufacturers details. General Fixture is pre-wired and thermally protected, UL and C-UL listed, for damp location and eight wire, 75°C, branch circuit wiring. All products are union made IBEW. Designed and manufactured in the USA. Marked spacing requires fixture centers to be 24" from adjacent luminaire and 12" from nearest wall. Allow 3" clearance above unit in the plenum. Accessories B Black cone.T Titanium cone. G Gold cone.W Wheat cone. H Mocha cone.Y Pewter cone. P Graphite cone.Z Bronze cone. WT White trim flange.WHT White complete cone. SO Fine microprism.FMR4 Flush mount, contact factory. LL Linear lens.DP Fixed downlight position. FR Frosted Lens.FLC4 Full lens cone, specify lens. STC Straight top cone.27 2700 Kelvin temp. R2 26" support rails.35 3500 Kelvin temp. R5 52" support rails.40 4000 Kelvin temp. F Fuse. D1 Lutron to 1%, 3 wire control.* DE Lutron EcoSystem to 1%, digital 4 wire.* *Specify voltage. REM Remote Bodine EM. Includes battery pack, charger light, test switch and single lamp operation for 90 minutes. Ceiling access required. SS SoftSheen™add SS, e.g. SSW, SoftSheen™ Wheat. S Softglow®add S to color, e.g.SC Softglow®clear. A22 Number A Depth B Aperture C Width* D Length LED Module 4 3/8" 111mm 15 7/8" 403mm 16 3/8" 416mm 11" 279mm Dimensions and Sources C D B A A5147 A5145 A5143 2000 lm Xicato Energy and Ordering Information Thermal Protector LED Module Heat Sink Alzak Cone Branch Circuit Junction Box Electronic Driver Primary Reflector Vent Slot Housing Top MultiSource™ Cover Plug-in Connectors *For Lutron dimming use 16 7/8". Fixture provided standard as 3000K operating on 277V, specular cone. Module lumens: 20 for 2000 lm. For other Kelvin color temperatures: change 30 to 27 for 2700K, 35 for 3500K, 40 for 4000K. For 120 volt change 27 to 12. Add D1 for Lutron to 1%, add DE for Lutron Eco to 1%. Finish: add SS for SoftSheenTM, add S for Softglow®. See accessories for colors. e.g.:A5147-2030271AD1SS for A5147 2000 lm 3000K 277V 1A with SoftSheenTM cone, Lutron dimming to 1%. ‡Indicates LM-79 Test Data. rIndicates Preliminary KV Test Data. Fixture Module Lumens Amps System Lumens System Watts lm/W Order Code Model L K V A A5147 2000 1A 1861r 47 39.6 A5147 20 30 27 1A A5145 2000 1A 1515‡46 32.5 A5145 20 30 27 1A A5143 2000 1A 1743r 47 37.1 A5143 20 30 27 1A 1012 P172 VIII.b Kurt Versen Company Point Source LightingWestwood, New Jersey 07675 A22A5147 A5145 A5143 Candlepower Distribution Candelas 1 Photometric Report: A5145 LTL Report No. 29190. 2 Datachart degree headings show one side of nadir. Diameter data includes both sides. Therefore the 10° column shows a 20° pattern diameter at the work plane. Footcandle values are at the diameter edge. 3 Specular colored cone multipliers, contact factory. 4 SoftSheenTM cone multiplier: Clear x .93. Softglow® cone multiplier: Clear x .87. For colored cone multipliers, contact factory. 5 The luminous efficacy (lm/W) refers to the total measured luminous flux (lumens) of the fixture divided by the total measured electrical input power (watts) of the complete fixture. Notes A5145 Xicato 2000 lm 3000K 1 Amp Driver Eff. 32.5 S/M .64 400 800 1200 1600 2000 2400 2800 3200 3600 4000 55° 35° 45° 75° 65° 85° 25°15°5°° Vertical Angles* Luminaire Lumens Kurt Versen Company, Westwood, New Jersey Ceiling to FloorMultiple Units Initial Footcandles, 30" Work Plane Spacing RCR 1RCR 3RCR 8FCDiamFCDiamFCDiamFC Nadir Ceiling 80% Walls 50% Floor 20% Spacing is Maximum Over Work Plane Single Unit Initial Footcandles, 30" Work Plane A5145 Xicato 2000 lm 3000K 1Amp 10°20°30° 94 71 55 44 30 73 55 43 34 23 2' 3' 3' 3' 4' 38 28 22 18 12 5' 5' 6' 7' 8' 2 2 1 1 1 8' 9' 10' 11' 13' 9' 10' 11' 12' 14' 4' 5' 5' 6' 7' 104 78 61 49 33 94 71 55 44 30 76 57 45 36 24 Performance Datachart See note 2. 46W 3971369632312721191581914764266000000000 051015202530354045505560657075808590 1515*° 1012 P173 VIII.b SCV1 SMALL ASYMMETRIC COVE • LED Co v e Type:Project:Qty: Indoor Lamp Code Description Visit www.winonalighting.com for the most complete and current information. SCV1 Asymmetric LED Cove QUICK FIND #: QF-1130 MOUNTING DETAIL 2-1/8" (54mm) 6-1/2" (165mm) Adjustment Range = 20º Peak Ca n d e l a @ 1 1 0 º - f a c t o r y s e t Windirect SCV1 is ETL listedfor dry location. This complieswith UL Standard 2108. 3190865 PROFILE- P1 (basic): Anodized, extruded high-purity aluminum specular reflector with solid aluminum end caps and wireway. Stainless steel hardware. TYPE- Small profile linear luminaire. For indoor use only. MOUNTING- Integral front wireway runs the length of the luminaire allowing for a continuous row mount without spaces betweens sections. Knock outs are located at each end of the housing to allow for through wiring. Individual aiming is achieved with the adjustable locking mechanism. See Mounting Detail above. PERFORMANCE- High performance small profile linear luminaire incorporating an extruded reflector specifically designed for high output LED sources. The optical design allows for maximum beam projection across the target plane and even cove or slot illumination in tight setback applications. Has aimable and lockable optics, is ruggedly constructed and utilizes an extruded aluminum front wireway that allows low profile luminaires to be installed continuously, eliminating socket shadows. ELECTRICAL- Power consumption is 15W/ft. (maximum run length 28 feet). Operates on 24VAC and can be dimmed with commonly available low voltage magnetic dimming equipment. A wide range of remote transformers are available in 120V and 277V primary (see technical section). • Winona Lighting reserves the right to make design revisions without prior notice. FINISHES- Bright anodized specular reflector with mill finish aluminum components and stainless steel hardware. COLOR AND LIGHT OUTPUT - SCV1 Cove Series utilizes Nichia 183 white LEDs in five standard color temperatures. Model SCV1 features (12) LEDs/ft. Estimated LED lamp life is an industry standard 50,000 hours to 70% depreciation. A modular design has been incorporated that allows field replacement of the LED board/heat sink assembly for this product. Color Model SCV1 ANSI-2700K White 341 lm/ft ANSI-3000K White 350 lm/ft ANSI-3500K White 371 lm/ft ANSI-4000K White 427 lm/ft non-ANSI-5000K White 486 lm/ft OPERATING TEMPERATURE - Minimum and Maximum ambient air temperatures around this luminaire shall not exceed -22°F to 113°F (-30°C to 45°C). Any application of this product should also take into consideration air flow and ventilation to ensure performance and reliability. TYPE LAMP CODE CLASSFINISHOPTIONSVOLTAGEMOUNTING PRODUCT SPECIFICATION PROFILE P1 (basic) STD -standard MOD -modified X -no optionsND24V -non-dimming 24 volt AC DM24V -dimming 24 volt AC RA -raw anodized anodized reflector with mill finish components LED CODERUN LENGTH CODE Total Run Length in Feet - SCV1 offered in 12" increments starting at 24"ex. 60FT = 60 foot run or PreconfiguredRun Length Code - see submittal atwww.winonalighting.com(additional informationsee technical section) or To Be Determined - TBD when run length unknown 27K -2700K ANSI-binned 30K -3000K ANSI-binned 35K -3500K ANSI-binned 40K -4000K ANSI-binned 50K -5000K non-ANSI-binned SLC -small LED cove dry label LED1 (12) Nichia 183 high output / ft. SCV1 - front wireway Modification: 3760 west fourth street • winona, minnesota 55987 • 507 - 454 - 5113 • fax: 507 - 494 - 0320 • www.winonalighting.com Page 1 of 6Revised: 11-17-11 P1 RASLCSCV1 XLED1 1 60" = 12 lbs 72" = 14 lbs 84" = 16 lbs 96" = 18 lbs 24" = 5 lbs 36" = 7 lbs 48" = 9 lbs Weight: Report #15314 Nichia 183 LED36" Luminaire3000K Visit the web fordetailed photometryreports PHOTOMETRY P174 VIII.b An integral wireway runs the length of the luminaire allowing for a continuous row mount without spaces between sections. Knock outs are located at each end of the housing to allow for through wiring. Individual aiming is achieved using adjustable locking mechanisms. Mounting Nominal Length 24" 36" 48" 60" 72" 84" 96" Installed Length knock out wireway Peak Ca n d e l a a t 1 1 0 ° - f a c t o r y s e t 6 1/2" 2 1/8" Adjustment Range = 20˚ The Windirect Asymmetric Cove SCV1 Series is available in lengths up to 96" in 12" increments starting at 24". Luminaires can be mounted without space between 24 3/8" 36 3/16" 48" 59 7/8" 71 11/16" 83 1/2" 95 5/16" length (watts) 24"- 36"- 48"- 60"- 72"- 84"- 96"- (30W) (44W) (59W) (74W) (88W) (103W) (118W) 619.25mm 919.23mm 1219.20mm 1520.95mm 1820.93mm 2120.90mm 2420.87mm 54.10mm 165.10mm dust cover lens 3760 west fourth street • winona, minnesota 55987 • 507 - 454 - 5113 • fax: 507 - 494 - 0320 • www.winonalighting.com Page 2 of 6Revised: 10-27-11 SCV1 SMALL ASYMMETRIC COVE • LED Co v e Type:Project:Qty: mounting COVE DIMENSIONS 0˚ 5˚ 2-1/8" 1-9/16" 9" 7-1/2" SIGHT LINE DIM (W)DIM (H) Adjustment Range = 20º Recommended Cove Opening = 12" minimum Peak Ca n d e l a @ 1 1 0 º 5º 0º Sightline 1" (25mm) 6-1/2" (165mm) 2-1/8" (54mm)H W P175 VIII.b 1 2 3 Loosen Phillips head screws and remove wireway cover. Mount in desired location. Lay in power feed wires and make electrical connections with supplied connectors. Screw wireway cover back in place. Luminaire is wired and ready for final aiming (if necessary). 24VAC Transformer POWER REQUIREMENTS WINDIRECT SCV1 consumes 15W/ft. Maximum single run length (from a single 24VAC tap) of WINDIRECT SCV1 is 28' (420W). The WINDIRECT SCV1 series must be powered by a magnetic transformer. Do not use electronic transformers. Choose a transformer with adequate capacity. Total load should not exceed 80% of the rated output of the transformer at 24VAC. DIMMING The WINDIRECT SCV1 Series is easily dimmed with Magnetic Low Voltage (MLV) Dimmers. Not all MLV dimmers are alike, even among the same manufacturer. Confirm with dimming equipment manufacturer that dimmer selected is designed to work with the transformer selected. REMOTE MOUNTING CONSIDERATIONS The WINDIRECT SCV1 Series is powered from remote-mounted transformers. The maximum remote distance of the transformer is dependent on many factors including total LED load, wire size, distance from the transformer to the first fixture in each run, and starting voltage at the transformer. The installer is to ensure that 24VAC is present at the beginning of the run. By using a combination of large-gauge wire and adjusting the output voltage of the transformer, the installer can compensate for voltage drop over long remote distances. The wiring from the start of the run to the last fixture on the run need only be 12 AWG. The WINDIRECT SCV1 Series is to be powered by 24VAC only. Do not connect directly to line voltage under any circumstance. Connection to line voltage will permanently damage internal components and void manufacturer’s warranty. MOUNTING AND WIRING 33% scale Dimming (if required) by others 120V or 277V power, dimming, and wiringSCV1 SMALL ASYMMETRIC COVE • LED Co v e Type:Project:Qty: Luminaires can be mounted without space between 3760 west fourth street • winona, minnesota 55987 • 507 - 454 - 5113 • fax: 507 - 494 - 0320 • www.winonalighting.com Page 3 of 6Revised: 10-27-11 P176 VIII.b BALL Test Report: 15314-LM79-08 Catalog Number: P1-SLC-LED1-36A-30K-ND24V-SCV1-RA-X-STD Description: 36 Nichia 3000K 183 LEDs / 36" Windirect SCV1 Luminaire / Extruded Semi-Specular Reflector / Clear Acrylic Lens Candlepower Distribution Peak Candela 843cd 0 45 90 135 180 0 0 0 0 9 522 800 843 786 700 603 507 437 384 347 322 257 188 127 0 0 0 0 2 359 455 468 442 403 367 337 314 299 281 262 223 175 127 0 0 0 0 0 9 18 32 46 61 76 89 100 109 117 123 130 134 127 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 9 16 20 41 53 64 72 86 103 127 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 5 9 17 29 41 55 77 94 127 0 30 60 80 90 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150 160 170 180 Horizontal Plane An g l e 508 685 923 1050 48.4 65.2 87.9 100.0 1050TotalLuminaire 90-120 90-130 90-150 90-180 Zone 0-180 100.0 Lumens %FixtureZonal LumenSummary Nichia 183 3000K LM79 Data - Windirect SCV1 36" Long Luminaire LampWatts PowerFactorLumensper WattTotalLumens CRI 85.7 87.4 84.5 86.7 70.1 .97 .96 .96 .96 .96 43.1 43.1 43.1 43.1 43.1 23.8 24.4 25.8 29.7 33.9 Candlepower Distribution 72" Luminaire - 3000K 0 45 90 135 180 0 0 0 0 18 1044 1600 1686 1572 1400 1206 1014 874 768 694 644 514 376 254 0 0 0 0 4 718 910 936 884 806 734 674 628 598 562 524 446 350 254 0 0 0 0 0 18 36 64 92 122 152 178 200 218 234 246 260 268 254 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 18 32 40 82 106 128 144 172 206 254 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 10 18 34 58 82 110 154 188 254 0 30 60 80 90 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150 160 170 180 Horizontal Plane An g l e 1016 1370 1846 2100 48.4 65.2 87.9 100.0 2100TotalLuminaire 90-120 90-130 90-150 90-180 Zone 0-180 100.0 Lumens %FixtureZonal LumenSummary Nichia 183 3000K LM79 Data - Windirect SCV1 72" Long Luminaire LampWatts PowerFactorLumensper WattTotalLumens CRI 85.7 87.4 84.5 86.7 70.1 .97 .96 .96 .96 .96 86.2 86.2 86.2 86.2 86.2 23.8 24.4 25.8 29.7 33.9 36" Luminaire - 3000K Peak Candela 1686cd Note:All results based on BALL Test Report 15314.A 2.0 multiplier was used to provide 72" data. Catalog Number: P1-SLC-LED1-72A-30K-ND24V-SCV1-RA-X-STD Description: 72 Nichia 3000K 183 LEDs / 72" Windirect SCV1 Luminaire / Extruded Semi-Specular Reflector / Clear Acrylic Lens 3000K .975 1.00 1.06 1.22 1.39 Multiplier Multiplier 3000K 1024 1050 1113 1280 1459 2048 2100 2226 2560 2918 Color ANSI-binned 2700K ANSI-binned 3000K ANSI-binned 3500K ANSI-binned 4000K non-ANSI-binned 5000K Color ANSI-binned 2700K ANSI-binned 3000K ANSI-binned 3500K ANSI-binned 4000K non-ANSI-binned 5000K .975 1.00 1.06 1.22 1.39 3760 west fourth street • winona, minnesota 55987 • 507 - 454 - 5113 • fax: 507 - 494 - 0320 • www.winonalighting.com Page 4 of 6Revised: 10-27-11 SCV1 SMALL ASYMMETRIC COVE • LED Co v e Type:Project:Qty: photometrics P177 VIII.b 1'22L1VCS 1'33L1VCS 1'44L1VCS SCV1 L5 5'1 1'66L1VCS 1'77L1VCS 1'88L1VCS SCV1 L9 9'1 1 SCV1 L10 10'2 SCV1 L11 11'1 1 2'2121L1VCS 11'3131L1VCS 2'4141L1VCS 11'5151L1VCS 2'6161L1VCS SCV1 L17 17'1 2 31'8181L1VCS 21'9191L1VCS SCV1 L20 20'1 2 SCV1 L21 21'1 2 21'2222L1VCS 21'3232L1VCS 3'4242L1VCS SCV1 L25 25'1 1 2 31'6262L1VCS 31'7272L1VCS SCV1 L28 28'1 3 50 Watt 75 Watt 75 Watt 100 Watt 150 Watt 150 Watt 150 Watt 300 Watt 300 Watt 300 Watt 300 Watt 300 Watt 300 Watt 300 Watt 300 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt Model Code 24"36"48"60"72"84"96"FeetFeet Total Run Watts Actual Run Length Nominal Run Length Preconfigured Run Length System Run Configuration 2'-3/8" 3'-3/16" 4'-0" 4'-11 7/8" 5'-11 11/16" 6'-11 1/2" 7'-11 5/16" 8'-11 7/8" 9'-11 3/4" 10'-11 9/16" 11'-11 3/8" 12'-11 3/16" 13'-11" 14'-10 13/16" 15'-10 5/8" 16'-10 1/4" 17'-11 1/16" 18'-10 13/16" 19'-10 5/8" 20'-10 1/2" 21'-10 5/16" 22'-10 1/8" 23'-9 15/16" 24'-10 1/2" 25'-10 5/16" 26'-10 1/8" 27'-9 15/16" 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150 165 180 195 210 225 240 255 270 285 300 315 330 345 360 375 390 405 420 Transformer Required see website Each submittal has its own Preconfigured Run Length Chart designed to assist you in calculating your System Run Configuration allowing for accurate specification (example below). L indicates which chart you are using (model SCV1) 3 indicates 3 foot L 3 By placing L3 in the run length code field of your specification you have indicated you need SCV1 in a run of 3 feet. run length code L3 System Run Configuration Describes size of luminaires and quantities of each which will be used to configure the run. In this example, L20 is made up of (1) 48" and (2) 96" luminaires. Actual Run Length The final run length dimension. The last row of each chart indicates the maximum single run length from a single 24VAC tap for SCV1. Maximum Single Run Length Required Transformers Identifies the proper size transformer to power a run and includes 20% headroom. Determine how many feet are required. The second column of the chart below provides codes for Nominal Run Lengths between 1 and 28 feet. OPTION 2: Enter the Preconfigured Run Length Code If the information above is not available and the specification process needs to get underway you can supply the total number of linear feet for the entire job. We will be able to provide an approximate budget quote at that time, however, specific Run Length Code information will have to be provided later for accurate pricing. When no fixture run length information is known enter TBD (to be determined) to begin the specification process. No pricing will be determined at this time. If the amount of product required exceeds the length in the last row of a chart, you should break the run into several lengths to arrive at the desired amount. For example a 48' run of SCV1 can be specified as:Quantity Run Length Code Total Feet 2 3 L24 L16 48 48 Determine which model is right for your project. See column 1 of the chart below. In this example, model SCV1 has been selected. Find complete information (catalog, submittals, applications guide) at www.winonalighting.com. Note: Run length codes are nominal lengths. The exact dimensions are displayed in column 4 (actual run length). Total Run Length in Feet SCV1 offered in 12" increments starting at 24" ex. 60FT = 60 foot run or Preconfigured Run Length Code see submittal at www.winonalighting.com or To Be Determined TBD when run length unknown determining the correct preconfigured run length code SCV1 SMALL ASYMMETRIC COVE • LED Co v e Type:Project:Qty: 3760 west fourth street • winona, minnesota 55987 • 507 - 454 - 5113 • fax: 507 - 494 - 0320 • www.winonalighting.com Page 5 of 6Revised: 10-27-11 STEP 1: STEP 2: STEP 3: P178 VIII.b 1'22L1VCS 1'33L1VCS 1'44L1VCS SCV1 L5 5'1 1'66L1VCS 1'77L1VCS 1'88L1VCS SCV1 L9 9'1 1 SCV1 L10 10'2 SCV1 L11 11'1 1 2'2121L1VCS 11'3131L1VCS 2'4141L1VCS 11'5151L1VCS 2'6161L1VCS SCV1 L17 17'1 2 31'8181L1VCS 21'9191L1VCS SCV1 L20 20'1 2 SCV1 L21 21'1 2 21'2222L1VCS 21'3232L1VCS 3'4242L1VCS SCV1 L25 25'1 1 2 31'6262L1VCS 31'7272L1VCS SCV1 L28 28'1 3 50 Watt 75 Watt 75 Watt 100 Watt 150 Watt 150 Watt 150 Watt 300 Watt 300 Watt 300 Watt 300 Watt 300 Watt 300 Watt 300 Watt 300 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt Model Code 24"36"48"60"72"84"96"FeetFeet Total Run Watts Actual Run Length Nominal Run Length Preconfigured Run Length System Run Configuration 2'-3/8" 3'-3/16" 4'-0" 4'-11 7/8" 5'-11 11/16" 6'-11 1/2" 7'-11 5/16" 8'-11 7/8" 9'-11 3/4" 10'-11 9/16" 11'-11 3/8" 12'-11 3/16" 13'-11" 14'-10 13/16" 15'-10 5/8" 16'-10 1/4" 17'-11 1/16" 18'-10 13/16" 19'-10 5/8" 20'-10 1/2" 21'-10 5/16" 22'-10 1/8" 23'-9 15/16" 24'-10 1/2" 25'-10 5/16" 26'-10 1/8" 27'-9 15/16" 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150 165 180 195 210 225 240 255 270 285 300 315 330 345 360 375 390 405 420 Transformer Required see website preconfigured run lengthsSCV1 SMALL ASYMMETRIC COVE • LED Co v e Type:Project:Qty: 3760 west fourth street • winona, minnesota 55987 • 507 - 454 - 5113 • fax: 507 - 494 - 0320 • www.winonalighting.com Page 6 of 6Revised: 10-27-11 P179 VIII.b Kurt Versen Company Point Source LightingWestwood, New Jersey 07675 A4136 Narrow Beam, 2000 lm A4134 Medium Beam, 2000 lm A4132 Wide Beam, 2000 lm 4 3/8" Conoid Downlight Xicato Remote Phosphor Fixed Function, MultiSource™ Technology Optics and Applications Downlight optical systems have been engineered to produce high efficiencies and soft patterns while maintaining excellent brightness control. Beam patterns range from 25˚ to 75˚. Design Features - MultiSource™ Capable Fixture housings are designed with MultiSource™ plug and play connectors allowing field conversion to PAR LED and MH MR-16 GX10 bases. New lighting technologies will be incorporated as they become available assuring continuity. Proprietary passive heat sinks ensure proper temperatures are maintained. Service from below only. Maximum ceiling thickness is 11⁄2". Modules Xicato remote phosphor modules use high efficiency blue LEDs that are converted to white light when directed through a phosphor lens. 2000 lm module operating on 1A driver standard. 3000K, 80 CRI is standard. 2700K, 3500K, 4000K available. Rated Life is 50,000 hours at 70% lumen output. Dimming Driver Dimming is standard 0-10V/10%. See accessories for additional dimming options. Specify voltage. Finish Specular Alzak cones are standard. SoftSheen™is a new finish designed to mitigate the color over angle “yellow streak” associated with remote phosphor sources. Softglow®and colors available, see accessories. Steel parts are phosphate conditioned then painted matte black. Warranty 5 year limited. See KV website for manufacturers details. General Fixture is pre-wired and thermally protected, UL and C-UL listed, for damp location and eight wire, 75°C, branch circuit wiring. All products are union made IBEW. Designed and manufactured in the USA. Accessories B Black cone.T Titanium cone. G Gold cone.W Wheat cone. H Mocha cone.Y Pewter cone. P Graphite cone.Z Bronze cone. WT White trim flange.WHT White complete cone. R2 26" support rails. FMR4 Flush mount,contact factory. R5 52" support rails.27 2700 Kelvin temp. F Fuse.35 3500 Kelvin temp. 40 4000 Kelvin temp. D1 Lutron to 1%, 3 wire control.* DE Lutron EcoSystem to 1%, digital 4 wire.* *Specify voltage. REM Remote Bodine EM. Includes battery pack, charger light, test switch and single lamp operation for 90 minutes. Ceiling access required. SS SoftSheen™add SS, e.g. SSW, SoftSheen™ Wheat. S Softglow®add S to color, e.g.SC Softglow®clear. A2 Dimensions and Sources B A C D Number A Depth B Aperture C Width* D Length LED Module A4136 A4134 A4132 4 3/8" 111mm 15 7/8" 403mm 16 3/8" 416mm 2000 lm Xicato 9" 229mm Dimensions and Sources Energy and Ordering Information Thermal Protector Xicato Module Heat Sink Alzak Cone Branch Circuit Junction Box Housing Top Electronic Driver Plug-in Connectors Vent Slot MultiSource™ Cover *For Lutron dimming use 16 7/8". Fixture provided standard as 3000K operating on 277V, specular cone. Module lumens: 20 for 2000 lm. For other Kelvin color temperatures: change 30 to 27 for 2700K, 35 for 3500K, 40 for 4000K. For 120 volt change 27 to 12. Add D1 for Lutron to 1%, add DE for Lutron Eco to 1%. Finish: add SS for SoftSheenTM, add S for Softglow®. See accessories for colors. e.g.:A4134-2030271AD1SS for A4134 2000 lm 3000K 277V 1A with SoftSheenTM cone, Lutron dimming to 1%. rIndicates Preliminary KV Test Data. Fixture Module Lumens Amps System Lumens System Watts lm/W Order Code Model L K V A A4136 2000 1A 1869r 47 39.8 A4136 20 30 27 1A A4134 2000 1A 1811‡49 37 A4134 20 30 27 1A A4132 2000 1A 1878r 47 40.8 A4132 20 30 27 1A 1012 P180 VIII.b A2 A4136 A4134 A4132 Candlepower Distribution Candelas 1 Photometric Report: A4134 LTL Report No. 26909. 2 Datachart degree headings show one side of nadir. Diameter data includes both sides. Therefore the 10° column shows a 20° pattern diameter at the work plane. Footcandle values are at the diameter edge. 3 Specular colored cone multipliers, contact factory. 4 SoftSheenTM cone multiplier: Clear x .93. Softglow® cone multiplier: Clear x .87. For colored cone multipliers, contact factory. 5 The luminous efficacy (lm/W) refers to the total measured luminous flux (lumens) of the fixture divided by the total measured electrical input power (watts) of the complete fixture. Notes A4134 Xicato 2000 lm 3000K 1 Amp Driver Eff. 78.0 S/M .56 290 580 870 1160 1450 1740 2030 2320 2610 2900 55° 35° 45° 75° 65° 85° 25°15°5°° Vertical Angles* Luminaire Lumens Kurt Versen Company, Westwood, New Jersey Ceiling to FloorMultiple Units Initial Footcandles, 30" Work Plane Spacing RCR 1RCR 3RCR 8FCDiamFCDiamFCDiamFC Nadir Ceiling 80% Walls 50% Floor 20% Spacing is Maximum Over Work Plane Single Unit Initial Footcandles, 30" Work Plane A4134 Xicato 2000 lm 3000K 1Amp 10°20°30° 44 34 27 19 13 49 38 30 21 15 3' 3' 3' 4' 5' 28 22 18 12 9 5' 6' 7' 8' 10' 7 5 4 3 2 9' 10' 11' 13' 16' 10' 11' 12' 14' 16' 6' 7' 8' 9' 11' 55 43 34 23 17 49 38 30 21 15 37 29 23 16 11 Performance Datachart See note 5.A4136 use A1137 1300 lm 1Amp, multiply by 1.4.A4132 use A1133 1300 lm 1Amp, multiply by 1.4. 37W 2447285428602469191492061156532924000000000 051015202530354045505560657075808590 1811*° 1012 P181 VIII.b Wall/Slot 6000 WS-L60 Recessed Perimeter Product Description Small-scale LED recessed perimeter luminaire using Cree MX-6 LED packages for wall grazing applications. Available in three output levels and four color temperatures, with an optional Luminance Control Deflector. Extruded aluminum LED module snaps into steel housing for in-field replacement. CSA and/or UL Listed. revised 11/8/2012 1. Row information, including desired fixture lengths? 2. Output? 3. Color Temperature? 4. Dimming? 5. 120 or 277 volt? 6. Option? L60 Output LO Low Output - output from LED boards approximately 250 lumens/ foot out of the fixture at an input power of approximately 4 Watts/foot. These values may vary based on CCT. Consult test reports for details. MO Medium Output - output from LED boards approximately 500 lumens/ foot out of the fixture at an input power of approximately 8 Watts/foot. These values may vary based on CCT. Consult test reports for details. HO High Output - output from LED boards approximately 775 lumens/foot out of the fixture at an input power of approximately 16 Watts/foot. These values may vary based on CCT. Consult test reports for details. Color Temperature 3500K is standard and available with normal lead times. Other CCTs may require longer lead times; please contact factory for details. Within an individual fixture of 3500K LEDs, color tolerance is limited to +_64K (compared to ANSI allowance of +_245K) and to +_0.0015 Duv (compared to ANSI +_0.006). Color variation over life is expected to be <0.001 (Δu'v'), compared to Energy Star specification of 0.007. See color statement at litecontrol.com for details and for other CCT tolerances. Minimum CRI 80. Ordering Guide WS-L6004-MO-35K-CWM-G-LHI-120 is a typical catalog number for a 4-foot long LED wall/slot fixture, medium output, 3500K correlated color temperature, matte white finish, for grid ceiling wired with a Lutron Hi-Lume dimming power supply, 120 volts. Product, Lamping, & Length WS -L60 CWM - Mounting WS Wall/Slot Series L60 Length in feet (mm) 02 (610) 03 (914) 04 (1219) 06 (1829) 08 (2438) Output LO* MO HO * Low Output not available in 3' lengths Color Temperature 35K is standard 27K, 30K, 40K also available see Color Temperature Finish CWM (matte white) is standard Ceillng Type G grid DP drywall/ plaster Dimming D10 LEC LHI LTW NDM see Dimming Voltage 120 277 Options Options -- LCD Dimming D10 Low-voltage dimming; fixture will be wired for 0-10V dimming. LEC Lutron Ecosystem dimming; fixture will be wired with a Lutron A-series driver for compatibility with Ecosystem controls. Driver provides constant current output and uses constant current reduction dimming. See lutron.com for a list of compatible dimming devices. LHI Lutron Hi-Lume 3-wire dimming; fixture will be wired with a Lutron A-series driver for compatibility with Hi-Lume controls. Driver provides constant current output and uses constant current reduction dimming. See lutron.com for a list of compatible dimming devices. LTW Lutron 2-wire forward phase dimming; fixture will be wired with a Lutron A-series driver for compatibility with 2-wire forward phase controls. Driver provides constant current output and uses constant current reduction dimming. See lutron.com for a list of compatible dimming devices. NDM Non-dimming; fixture will be wired for fixed light output. Ceiling Type Specify the applicable ceiling. DP Drywall/Plaster Accommodates a range of drywall thicknesses: 1/2", 3/4", 5/8" and 1". G Grid Options LCD Luminance Control Deflector. Shields LEDs from direct view and minimizes shadows on wall. Paint finish is Matte White (CWM) baked enamel. Shield is removable without tools and remains attached to the fixture with cable tethers. See photometric reports for details. Lumen Maintenance Lumen maintenance based on LM-80 data and in-situ temperature measurement: L90 calculated at >50,00 hours; L70 calculated at >160,000 hours for Medium Output. Since LM-80 testing ended at 6048 hours, the TM-21 reported L90 and L70 values are >_ 36,288 hours. See litecontrol.com for detailed lumen maintenance statement. These fixtures have a five-year warranty, with a detailed warranty statement available at litecontrol.com. 6 1/2 "(165) Grid Ceiling Also adjustable to 5" (127) and 6" (152) in field Standard ceiling opening is 4"(102 mm) Drywall/Plaster Ceiling with optional Luminance Control Deflector (LCD) Standard ceiling opening is 4" (102 mm) Also adjustable to 5" (127) and 6" (152) in field 6 1/2 "(165) Quick Find litecontrol.com Fixture Type: Project Name: Questions to Ask P182 VIII.b 781 294 0100 f: 781 293 2849 litecontrol.com © 2 0 1 2 L I T E C O N T R O L / 0 2 Specifications FIxTurE SuPPOrT rAIL. Extruded white aluminum, wall-mounted rail provides continuous support and true alignment of fixtures and components. Rail is designed to provide a reveal at the wall to compensate for irregularities in wall construction. Splines are included for continuous alignment. HOuSING. Steel housing, finished white. Ends provided with 7/8" diameter hole to accommodate wiring. Supplied with external brackets for ease of row mounting. LED MODuLE. Extruded aluminum, finished matte white for high reflectance, easily removable for field replacement. Module has 12 Cree LEDs per foot. LENS. The LED module includes a lens comprised of highly efficient diffusion film optically bonded to pure acrylic sheet. SECONDArY OPTIC. Injection molded optical material that incorporates multiple total internal reflection lenses to shape and smooth the light. CEILING TYPE. Compatible with most types of ceiling systems, including grid and plaster. Fixture system must be installed prior to installation of ceiling. Finish of wall should extend 6" above finished ceiling height. CErTIFICATION. Fixture and electrical components shall be CSA, UL and/or CUL Listed. WArrANTY. Five-year product warranty. See litecontrol.com for full warranty details. Note: Litecontrol reserves the right to change specifications without notice for product development and improvement. L60 |2 WS-L60-G-OC-CWM is a typical catalog number for an outside corner connector for a grid ceiling fixture. Catalog Number WS -L60 - CWM Mounting WS Series L60 Ceiling Type G DP Option -- LCD Connector EC End Cap SE Straight Extension IC Inside Corner OC Outside Corner see Connector Details Finish CWM Matte White System Connectors See web site for installation details. SE IC OC Planning for Installation Fxiture lengths: Nominal Fixture Length 2'3'4'6'8' Actual Fixture Length 24" (609)36" (914)48" (1219)72" (1829)96" (2438) 70˚ - 140˚ 70˚ - 160˚ Adjustable Ceiling Opening 6" (152 mm) 6 1/2" (165) 5" (127) 4" (102) Connector Details Connector Ceiling Opening Extension or Corner Dimensions (Minimum-Maximum along wall in parenthesis) SE IC OC 4"SE Straight Extension (2"-12") IC Inside Corner - 90° (6"-16"), 135° (4"-13") OC Outside Corner - 90° (2"-12"), 135° (2"-12") 5"SE Straight Extension (2"-12") IC Inside Corner - 90° (7"-16"), 135° (4"-16") OC Outside Corner - 90° (2"-12"), 135° (2"-12") 6"SE Straight Extension (2"-12") IC Inside Corner - 90° (8"-16"), 135° (5"-16") OC Outside Corner - 90° (2"-12"), 135° (2"-12") Corners, extensions, and end caps, when added to fixtures, permit continuous wall-to- wall installation. Ceiling trim requires field cutting. Corner angles are adjustable, see plan view for angles. Plan View Quick Find litecontrol.com Wall/Slot 6000 WS-L60 P183 VIII.b 781 294 0100 f: 781 293 2849 litecontrol.com L60 |3 3500K 4" opening 0˚ 30˚ 60˚ 150˚ 180˚ 375 750 1125 1500 120˚ 90˚ Across 45 Along WS-L6004-MO-35K with 4" Opening 53 LPW Efficacy 3500K 6" opening 0˚ 30˚ 60˚ 150˚ 180˚ 375 750 1125 1500 120˚ 90˚ Across 45 Along WS-L6004-MO-35K with 6" Opening 54 LPW Efficacy 3500K LCD 6" opening 0˚ 30˚ 60˚ 150˚ 180˚ 300 600 900 1200 120˚ 90˚ Across 45 Along WS-L6004-MO-35K-LCD with 6" Opening 42 LPW Efficacy 3500K LCD 4" opening 0˚ 30˚ 60˚ 150˚ 180˚ 300 600 900 1200 120˚ 90˚ Across 45 Along WS-L6004-MO-35K-LCD with 4" Opening 40 LPW Efficacy Quick Find litecontrol.com Photometric Data (medium output)Wall/Slot 6000 WS-G-L60, WS-R-L60 P184 VIII.b Catalog # Project Comments Prepared by Type Date SPECIFICATION FEATURES 08/17/2012 10:53:09 AMConsult your representative for additional options and finishes. Specifications and Dimensions subject to change without notice.ADY121404 DESCRIPTION The Ametrix Asyx is an LED asymmetric luminaire designed for both general illumination and highlighting architectural features. The sleek minimal design makes it an ideal complement to any modern space. Proprietary AccuLED optics offer precision optical control to maximize light collection and directional distribution onto the application area. The Asyx outperforms similar traditional HID fixtures with a 25% improvement in efficacy as well as a superior lifespan that will minimize maintenance costs. Construction Heavy wall, die-formed aluminum housing and heat sink has precise tolerance control and repeatability in manufacturing. Housing features vents for air flow and thermal management. Fixture is rated for +40°C ambient environment. Finish Housing is polyester powder coat paint for superior protection against fade and wear. LightBAR? cover plates are standard white and may be specified to match finish of luminaire housing. Standard colors include black, bronze, silver, and white. RAL and custom color matches available. Electrical LED drivers are potted and heat sunk for optimal performance and prolonged life. Standard drivers feature electronic universal voltage (120-277V/50-60hz), greater than 0.9 power factor, less than 20% harmonic distortion and feature ambient temperature range of +40°C (104°F) down to minimum starting temperature of -30°C (-22°F). 0-10V dimming option available. LED Optics Asyx luminaires feature patented, high-efficiency AccuLED Optics that maximize light collection and directional distribution onto the application region. Each optical lens is precision manufactured via injection-molding then precisely arranged and sealed on the board media. LEDs: High output LEDs, 50,000+ hours life at >70% lumen maintenance, offered standard in 3000°K and 4000°K (+/- 275K) CCT. 3000k LEDs nominal 80 CRI, and 4000k nominal 70 CRI. Warranty Standard five-year limited warranty. ASYX-WL Wall Mount Indirect LED 2 ⁄” ⁄” 12 ⁄”14 ⁄” 3 ½” 1” WL= Asyx WL Classic “Wedge” shape, LED Asymmetric Indirect WL B03= [3] 21 LED Lightbars, 70 Watts, 6000 lumens Product Number of LightBARsUL Rating IN=Indoor, damp loca- tion rated Lens C= Clear acrylic Lens. AI-Indirect Asymmetric Light Pattern Light Distribution Finish B= Bronze C= Custom Color K= Black S= Silver W= White Mounting RC=Rectangular Canopy Options D10= 0-10V Dimming N= None AI UNV W RCB03IN Voltage UNV= Universal Note: 1 Consult factory for 80 CRI option in 4000K. Color Temperature 30= 3000k 40= 4000k 1 ORDERING INFORMATION P185 VIII.b Ametrix • Customer First Center • 1121 Highway 74 South • Peachtree City, GA 30269 • TEL 770.486.4800 • FAX 770.486.4801 08/17/2012 10:53:09 AM Specifications and Dimensions subject to change without notice.ADY121404 PHOTOMETRICS Ametrix Angle 45-Deg Candela 0-Deg 90-Deg Zone % Lamp % FixtureLumens Zonal Lumen Summary Coecients of Utilization 10%0%30%50%70%80%rc rw RCR Eective oor cavity reectance 20% 70 50 30 10 70 50 30 10 50 30 10 50 30 10 50 30 10 0 0 95 95 95 95 81 81 81 81 56 56 56 32 32 32 10 10 10 0 1 87 83 79 76 74 71 68 65 48 47 45 28 27 26 9 9 8 0 2 79 72 66 62 67 62 57 53 42 40 37 24 23 22 8 7 7 0 3 72 63 56 51 61 54 49 44 37 34 31 21 20 18 7 6 6 0 4 65 56 48 43 56 48 42 37 33 29 26 19 17 16 6 6 5 0 5 60 49 42 36 51 42 36 32 29 25 22 17 15 13 5 5 4 0 6 55 44 36 31 47 38 32 27 26 22 19 15 13 11 5 4 4 0 7 50 39 32 27 43 34 28 23 23 19 17 14 11 10 4 4 3 0 8 47 35 28 23 40 30 24 20 21 17 14 12 10 9 4 3 3 0 9 43 32 25 20 37 28 22 18 19 15 13 11 9 8 4 3 3 0 10 40 29 22 18 34 25 19 16 17 14 11 10 8 7 3 3 2 0 Asyx WL-IN-C-BO3-AI-35-W-RC 6003 lumens 70 Watts 85.8 lm/W Test Report #ITL72651 0 0 0 0 90 0 0 0 95 145 118 36 100 327 494 58 105 827 2773 110 110 3223 5089 497 115 4223 4231 1561 120 3644 2346 1696 125 2157 1421 1380 130 1789 1327 877 135 1871 1391 843 140 1968 1464 920 145 2034 1522 1011 150 2031 1563 1097 155 1943 1586 1162 160 1839 1607 1212 165 1773 1608 1289 170 1663 1560 1391 175 1553 1528 1468 180 1488 1488 1488 90-110 862 N.A.14.4 90-120 2648 N.A.44.1 90-130 3616 N.A.60.2 90-150 4948 N.A.82.4 90-180 6003 N.A.100 110-180 5141 N.A.85.6 0-180 6003 N.A.100 LEGEND: 0-deg 90-deg 180-deg 1800 3600 5400 180˚165˚150˚ 135˚ 120˚ 105˚ 90˚ P186 VIII.b P187VIII.b P188VIII.b P189VIII.b