Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.Tiehack Water Tank Site.0055.2011.ASLU F4 11 THE CITY of ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0055.2011.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 273511302801 PROJECTS ADDRESS LOT 1 OF THE MAROON CREEK CLUB PLANNER JENNIFER PHELAN CASE DESCRIPTION PUD REPRESENTATIVE CITY ENGINEERING DEPT DATE OF FINAL ACTION 8/12/11 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 3.20.13 DEVELOPMENT ORDER of the City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. City of Aspen, 130 S. Galena Street Aspen CO 81611 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number Lot 1 Arthur O'Pfister, Fully Developed Lands Subdivision Exemption Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Wireless telecommunications facilit Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Administrative approval, reception number 582566 Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) September 18 2011 Effective Date of Development Order(Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) September 19 2014 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 18" day of September, 2011, by the City of Aspen Community Development Directpr. V V (Z hris BeAdo , Community Dev lopmen Dir t AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of-Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: V Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official Paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice"was acknowledged before me this May of C-��JY , 20 (, byJc ;PUBLIC NOTICE ,`�•-?�W- SS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL Of .. —••....�.- Drcl,gientot APPROVAL F, L;�_o Notice is h EVI(I given to the general public of the approval of a 9ica specific development plan,and . _;y��CQ%n sslon expires: the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24,Article 68,Colorado Revised Statutes, ` O`,•\P t pertaining to the following described property:Lot �. 1,Arthur O'Pfister Fully Developed Lands Subdivision Exemption,by order of the Community Development Director on September 2,2011. The s�' �"� ublic Applicant,the City of Aspen(City Engineer)re- ceived approval of Wireless Telecommunication Services facilities,An Insubstantial PUD Amend- ment,and 8040 Greenline Exemption.For further information contact Jennifer Phelan,at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept.130 S.Ga- lena St,Aspen,Colorado(970)920-5090. ATTACHMENTS: S/City of Aspen Publish in the Aspen Times Weekly on September COPY OF THE PUBLICATION 18,2011 [7006636] NOTICE OF APPROVAL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES FACILITIES /EQUIPMENT APPROVAL, INSUBSTANTIAL PUD AMENDMENT, AND 8040 GREENLINE EXEMPTION FOR LOT 1, ARTHUR O'PFISTER SUBDIVISION Parcel ID No. 273511302801 APPLICANT: City of Aspen, Tricia Aragon, City Engineer SUBJECT &-SITE-OF APPROVAL:- Lot 1, Arthur O'Pfister, Fully Developed Lands Subdivision Exemption (part of Maroon Creek Club PUD) involving the approval of Wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment. SUMMARY: The Applicant has requested approval for the installation of an antenna and cabinet for GPS data to be provided to users of the city system. The antenna is approximately ten feet in height with a small, accessory cabinet. STAFF EVALUATION: Pursuant to Section 26.575.130, Wireless telecommunications services facilities and equipment must comply with a list of general provisions and review standards. These requirements seek to ensure that the placements of these facilities are compatible with surrounding development. Depending on the type of telecommunication device installed (i.e. monopole, whip antenna, ground tower, etc.), specific requirements apply. Setbacks from the property line are required to be met. The applicant has amended the cabinet location to,meet the minimum required setback of 50 feet. For Staff s response to the review criteria see "Exhibit B." The request will also be memorialized via an Insubstantial PUD Amendment as well as an 8040.Greenline Exemption. The property is located within the Maroon Creek Club PUD and meets the criteria for an insubstantial amendment (Exhibit C). Finally, due to the projects elevation it is subject to 8040 Greenline Review; however, it meet the criteria for an exemption (Exhibit D). DECISION: Staff finds that the Wireless telecommunication services and equipment application for the antenna and cabinet should be granted. The location is appropriate for this type of accessory use, and it compatible with surrounding development. Final location of the equipment is shown in Exhibit A. RECEPTION#: 582566, 09/08/2011 at 09:28:15 AM, 1 OF 3, R $21.00 Doc Code APPROVAL Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Page l of 2 APPROVED BY: Chris Bendon Date Community Development Director APPROVED Attachments: Exhibit A—Location map of equipment Exhibit B —Wireless telecommunication review criteria Exhibit C— Insubstantial PUD Amendment review criteria COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Exhibit D — 8040 Greenline Exemption review criteria CITYOFASPEN Exhibit E - Application Page 2of 2 Exhibit B Wireless telecommunication services and equipment Wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment: 26.575.130 The following standards are designed to foster the City's safety and aesthetic interests without imposing unreasonable limitations on wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment: 1. Setbacks. At a minimum, all wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall comply with the minimum setback requirements of the underlying zone district; if the following requirements are more restrictive than those of the underlying zone district, the more restrictive standard shall apply. a. All facilities shall be located at least fifty (50) feet from any property lines, except when roof-mounted (above the eave line of a building). Flat-roof mounted facilities visible from ground level within one-hundred (100) feet of said property shall be concealed to the extent possible within a compatible architectural element, such as a chimney or ventilation pipe or behind architectural skirting of the type generally used to conceal HVAC equipment. Pitched-roof-mounted facilities shall always be concealed within a compatible architectural element, such as chimneys or ventilation pipes. Staff response: The Conservation zone requires a 100 foot front yard setback and then the 50 foot minimum required by the wireless standards must be met. The applicant has amended the location of the cabinet to meet the setback requirement. Staff finds this criterion met. b. Monopole towers shall be set back from any residentially zoned properties a distance of at least three (3) times the monopole's height (i.e., a sixty (60) foot setback would be required for a twenty (20) foot monopole) and the setback from any public road, as measured from the right-of-way line, shall be at least equal to the height of the monopole. Staff response: Not applicable. c. No wireless communication facility may be established within one-hundred (100) feet of any existing, legally established wireless communication facility except when located on the same building or structure. Staff response: The Applicant supplied a vicinity map displaying proximity to other telecommunication devices. The proposed facility will be co-located on the water tank structure meeting the allowance to have two facilities located within 100 feet of each other. Staff finds this criterion met. d. No portion of any antenna array shall extend beyond the property lines or into any front yard area. Guy wires shall not be anchored within any front yard area, but may be attached to the building. Staff response: The proposed antennas and facilities do not extend beyond the property lines. Staff finds this criterion met. 2. Height. The following restrictions shall apply: a. Wireless telecommunication services facilities and/or equipment not attached to a building shall not exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height or the maximum permissible height of the given Zone District, whichever is more restrictive. Staff response: the proposed antenna is approximately ten feet in height, well below the maximum height allowance of the Conservation zone. Staff finds this criterion met. b. Whenever a wireless telecommunication services antenna is attached to a building roof, the antenna and support system for panel antennas shall not exceed five (5) feet above the highest portion of that roof, including parapet walls and the antenna and support system for whip antennas shall not exceed ten (10) feet above the highest portion of that roof, including parapet walls. Staff response: Not applicable. c. The Community Development Director may approve a taller antenna height than stipulated in b. above if it is his or her determination that it is suitably camouflaged, in which case an administrative approval may be granted. Staff response: Not applicable. d. If the Community Development Director determines that an antenna taller than stipulated in b. above cannot be suitably camouflaged, then the additional height of the antenna shall be reviewed pursuant to the process and standards (in addition to the standards of this Section) of Chapter 26.430 (Special review). Staff response: Not applicable. e. Support and/or switching equipment shall be located inside the building, unless it can be fully screened from view as provided in the "Screening" standards (26.475.130 and 26.575.130.F.5) below. Staff response: The proposal includes a plan w for support cables to be located underground. In addition to the antenna a small cabinet will be located on the site and are reasonably shielded by existing vegetation. Staff finds this criterion met. 3. Architectural compatibility. Whether manned or unmanned, wireless telecommunication services facilities shall be consistent with the architectural style of the surrounding architectural environment (planned or existing) considering exterior materials, roof form, scale, mass, color, texture and character. In addition: a. If such facility is accessory to an existing use, the facility shall be constructed out of materials that are equal to or of better quality than the materials of the principal use. b. Wireless telecommunication services equipment shall be of the same color as the building or structure to which or on which such equipment is mounted or as required by the appropriate decision-making authority (Community Development Director, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, as applicable). c. Whenever wireless telecommunication services equipment is mounted to the wall of a building or structure, the equipment shall be mounted in a configuration designed to blend with and be architecturally integrated into a building or other concealing structure, be as flush to the wall as technically possible and shall not project above the wall on which it is mounted. d. Monopole support buildings, which house cellular switching devices and/or other equipment related to the use, operation or maintenance of the subject monopole, must be designed to match the architecture of adjacent buildings. If no recent and/or reasonable architectural theme is present, the Community Development Director may require a particular design that is deemed to be suitable to the subject location. e. All utilities associated with wireless communication facilities or equipment shall be underground (also see "Screening" below). Staff response: The only utilities involved for this proposal are the electrical and coax conduits located underground. The property has no buildings on site only a water tank. The equipment will be painted an earthy tone as requested by neighbors. Staff finds the applicable criteria met. 4. Compatibility with the natural environment. Wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall be compatible with the surrounding natural environment considering land forms, topography and other natural features and shall not dominate the landscape or present a dominant silhouette on a ridge line. In addition: a. If a location at or near a mountain ridge line is selected, the applicant shall provide computerized, three-dimensional, visual simulations of the facility or equipment and other appropriate graphics to demonstrate the visual impact on the view of the affected ridges or ridge lines; an 8040 Greenline Review, pursuant to the provisions of Section 26.435.030, may also be required. Staff response: The wireless communication facility is not located on a ridge and meets the criteria for an 8040 Greenline Exemption. Staff finds this criterion met. b. Site disturbances shall be minimized and existing vegetation shall be preserved or improved to the extent possible, unless it can be demonstrated that such disturbance to vegetation and topography results in less visual impact to the surrounding area. Staff response: Any disturbance of vegetation shall be revegetated as outlined in the application. Staff finds this criterion met. c. Surrounding view planes shall be preserved to the extent possible. Staff response: This property is not located within a Mountain View Plane. Staff finds this criterion met. d. All wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall comply with the Federal Communication Commission's regulations concerning maximum radio frequency and electromagnetic frequency emissions. Staff response: The Applicant is aware of all FCC regulations and committed to compliance. Staff finds this criterion met. 5. Screening. Roof-and-ground-mounted wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment, including accessory equipment, shall be screened from adjacent and nearby public rights-of-way and public or private properties by paint color selection, parapet walls, screen walls, fencing, landscaping and/or berming in a manner compatible with the building's and/or surrounding environment's design, color, materials, texture, land forms and/or topography, as appropriate or applicable. In addition: a. Whenever possible, if monopoles are necessary for the support of antennas, they shall be located near existing utility poles, trees or other similar objects; consist of colors and materials that best blend with their background; and, have no individual antennas or climbing spikes on the pole other than those approved by the appropriate decision- making authority (Community Development Director, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, as applicable). Staff response: Not applicable. b. For ground-mounted facilities, landscaping may be required to achieve a total screening effect at the base of such facilities or equipment in order to screen the mechanical characteristics; a heavy emphasis on coniferous plants for year-round screening may be required. Landscaping shall be of a type and variety capable of growing within one (1) year to a landscape screen which satisfactorily obscures the visibility of the facility. Staff response: The antenna proposed is not very tall and should be adequately screened by the existing vegetation. Staff finds this criterion met. c. Unless otherwise expressly approved, all cables for a facility shall be fully concealed from view underground or inside of the screening or monopole structure supporting the antennas; any cables that cannot be buried or otherwise hidden from view shall be painted to match the color of the building or other existing structure. Staff response: All cables and conduits associated with this facility will be underground. Staff finds this criterion met. d. Chain link fencing shall be unacceptable to screen facilities, support structures or accessory and related equipment (including HVAC or mechanical equipment present on support buildings); fencing material, if used, shall be six (6) feet in height or less and shall consist of wood, masonry, stucco, stone or other acceptable materials that are opaque. Staff response: Not applicable. e. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the facility shall comply with all additional measures deemed necessary to mitigate the visual impact of the facility. Also, in lieu of these screening standards, the Community Development Director may allow use of an alternate detailed plan and specifications for landscape and screening, including plantings, fences, walls, sign and structural applications, manufactured devices and other features designed to screen, camouflage and buffer antennas, poles and accessory uses. For example, the antenna and supporting structure or monopole may be of such design and treated with an architectural material so that it is camouflaged to resemble.a tree with a single trunk and branches on its upper part. The plan should accomplish the same degree of screening achieved by meeting the standards outlined above. Staff response: The proposed screening plan does not require any additional materials or landscaping. By painting the antenna visual impacts created by this plan are significantly reduced. It does not pose a legitimate concern that necessitates additional screening. Staff finds this criterion met. 6. Lighting and signage. In addition to other applicable sections of the code regulating signage or outdoor lighting, the following standards shall apply to, wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment: a. The light source for security lighting shall feature down-directional, sharp cut-off luminaries to direct, control, screen or shade in such a manner as to ensure that there is no spillage of illumination off-site. Staff response: There is no lighting planned for this facility. Staff finds this criterion met. b. Light fixtures, whether free standing or tower-mounted, shall not exceed twelve (12) feet in height as measured from finished grade. Staff response: Not applicable. c. The display of any sign or advertising device other than public safety warnings, certifications or other required seals on any wireless communication device or structure is prohibited. Staff response: There is no signage proposed for this facility. Staff finds this criterion met. d. The telephone numbers to contact in an emergency shall be posted on each facility in conformance with the provisions of Chapter 26.510, Signs, of this Title. Staff response: The equipment will have the contact information of the appropriate entity in the event of an emergency. Staff finds this criterion met. 7. Access ways. In addition to ingress and egress requirements of the Building Code, access to and from wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall be regulated as follows: a. No wireless communication device or facility shall be located in a required parking, maneuvering or vehicle/pedestrian circulation area such that it interferes with or in any way impairs, the intent or functionality of the original design. Staff response: This facility will be located on a water tank. Staff finds this criterion met. b. The facility must be secured from access by the general public but access for emergency services must be ensured. Access roads must be capable of supporting all potential emergency response vehicles and equipment. Staff response: The equipment is located on private property and does not pose a threat to the public. Staff finds this criterion met. c. The proposed easements for ingress and egress and for electrical and telephone shall be recorded at the County Clerk and Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building permits. (Ord. No. 1-2002 § 18; Ord. No. 52-2003, §§ 14, 15) Staff response: Not applicable. Exhibit C Review Criteria and Staff Findings Insubstantial PUD Amendment. 1. A change in the use or character of the development. Staff Finding: The proposed amendments will not change the use or character of the development. The primary use of the property with a water tank is not changing and there already exists a wireless telecommunication facility. The addition of the new antenna will not change the character of the site. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. An increase by greater than three (3) percent in the overall coverage of structures on the land. Staff Finding: The proposed improvements will provide a negligible change in the overall coverage of structures on land. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 3. Any amendment that substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed development, or the demand for public facilities. Staff Finding: Trip generation and demand for public infrastructure are not affected by this amendment. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 4. A reduction by greater than three (3) percent of the approved open space. Staff Finding: The amount of open space will not be reduced by the proposal. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 5. A reduction by greater than one (1) percent of the off-street parking and loading space. Staff Finding: The Applicant is not reducing parking. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 6. A reduction in required pavement widths or rights-of-way for streets and easements. Staff Finding: The Applicant is not proposing changes to right-of-way widths. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application. 1 7. An increase of greater than two (2) percent in the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial buildings. Staff Finding: The Applicant is not proposing to increase the gross leasable floor area. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application. 8. An increase by greater than one (1) percent in the approved residential density of the development. Staff Finding: The Applicant is not proposing a change in the residential density. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application. 9. Any change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project's original approval or which requires granting a further variation from the project's approved use or dimensional requirements. Staff Finding: Staff does not believe that the proposed amendment is inconsistent with a condition of approval or representation made in the property's original approval. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2 Exhibit D Review Criteria and Staff Findings 8040 Greenline Exemption B. Exemption. The Community Development Director may exempt the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction of an existing 8040 Greenline development if the following standards are met: 1. The development does not add more than ten percent (10%) to the floor area of the existing structure or increase the total amount of square footage of areas of the structure which are exempt from floor area calculations by more than twenty-five percent (25%); and Staff Finding: The proposed antenna and accessory cabinet will add approximately 7 sq. ft. of structure on the ground, well under the twenty-five percent allowance. Staff finds this criterion met. 2. The development does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit would be required pursuant to Section 15.04.450 or the applicant receives a permit pursuant to said Section; and Staff Finding: No tree will be removed via this request. Staff finds this criterion met. 3. The development is located such that it is not affected by any geologic hazard and will not result in increased erosion and sedimentation. Staff Finding: The development is not located by any geologic hazard. Staff finds this criterion met. 4. All exemptions are cumulative. Once a development reaches the totals specified in Subsection 26.435.030.B.1, an 8040 Greenline review must be obtained pursuant to Subsection 26.435.030.0. THE CITY of ASPEN WRITTEN DESCRIPTION W/ STANDARD COMPLIANCE The City of Aspen is proposing to install a permanent CORS(continuously operating reference station), located on a city owned parcel of land situated in section 11,township 10 south, range 85 west of the 61n prime meridian,County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. The CORS will be positioned at known coordinates in the National Spatial Reference System (NSRS), currently NAD 83 (North American Datum of 1983). CORS will continuously collect GPS data to be made available, by radio and/or internet,to the public for GPS differential computations. This will allow users within the coverage area the ability to have real time, or post processed, "centimeter accuracy" with a single GPS receiver(capable of differential measuring). 26.575.130(F)-Review Standards: 1)Setbacks:The Antenna is setback approximately 61'from its nearest property edge. The Econolite cabinet is setback a lesser amount of approximately 50'from the nearest property edge. These two (2 setbacks meet the minimum requirement of 50' set for wireless telecommunication structures. 2) Height: The proposed antenna tower will be attached to a structure which also supports an antenna for the City of Aspen Water Department and will not exceed ten (10)feet in height. 3)Architectural compatibility:The structure that the antenna base will be mounted to is currently covered with native soil. After consulting the neighboring property owners and a Landscape Designer it was decided that all equipment would be painted an earthy tone described as matte cream brown. The proposed structure will be anchored directly to the existing concrete cover of the water tank. All utilities associated with the said structure will be buried a minimum of 1.5' below the surface of the existing ground and all disturbed areas will be revegetated with native seed mix. 4)Compatibility with natural environment: Disturbance to existing vegetation will be minimal. Any area that is disturbed will be vegetated with native seed mix to a level equal or greater than its existing state. The proposed facility complies with all FCC regulations. See detailed map showing the locations of all continuously operating reference stations within the United States and world, at the link below. After finishing this application process and establishing the facility we hope to have the antenna recognized by the National Geodetic Survey(NGS). http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/CORS/ 5)Screening: Both structures shall be painted a earthy matte cream brown color as seen in the before and after photos. In addition the property's location and topography supply an exuberant amount of natural screening for the cabinet structure. 6) Lighting and signage: There is no lighting to be placed at this facility. Contact information will be placed at the facility in conformance with the provisions of Chapter 26.510,Signs, of this title. 7)Access ways:The facility meets all access requirements. Furthermore there are currently two existing easements for this property. One allowing access to utilities and the other allowing access and parking from a neighboring property. i I ATTACHMENT 2-LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: Name: m o.t- , CMJ?-k C1011 6P34 +kU" a Location: ph n i i •�t ut� 0. (Indicaie street address,lot&block number,legal description where a rike Parcel ID#(REQUIRED) + k%'n, CO APPLICANT: Name: J'c� 9n t. CCofti Address: 3 G s 11 Phone#: O - REPRESENTATIVE' Name: Address: 1 4 S f�. �:� ve D. Phone#: TYPE OF-APPLICATION:(please check all that apply): ❑ GMQS Exemption ❑ Conceptual PUD ❑ Temporary Use ❑ GMQS Allotment ❑ Final PUD(&PUD Amendment) ❑ Text/Map Amendment ❑ Special Review ❑ Subdivision ❑ Conceptual SPA ❑ ESA-8040 Greenline,Stream, ❑ Subdivision Exemption(includes ❑ Final SPA(&SPA Margin,Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane ❑ Commercial Design Review ❑ Lot Split ❑ Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion ❑ Residential Design Variance ❑ Lot Line Adjustment Other: Conditional Use EXisTING CONDrri Ns: (description of existing buildings,uses previous appWyals,etc. -T`"-s 5 gvr're-n�t 4 oCcu p"T�t?�Qw e, tl fa('nyr<_� 2 A:r l nk PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings,uses,modifications etc.)r / Have you attached the following? FEES DUE:S -4 3 S- ❑ Pre-Application Conference Summary Attachment#1,Signed Fee Agreement Response to Attachment#3,Dimensional Requirements Form Response to Attachment#4,Submittal Requirements-Including Written Responses to Review Standards ❑ 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5"X 11"must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format)must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-1)model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: ft-,,,non C A � ,2b OPS 4 �.,JL.0- OL ,�no, Applicant: C, 1 a f i. ,, 1= . Location: Lo V1 : Qr 1-,or- kr Zone District: C PQ(J Lot Size: (o Z ,SO I P+2 , 1 .143 S Ckc re-5 Lot Area: C, 501 2 i I, y 3,!;� C ,-r-e.S (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area,Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark,easements,and steep slopes.Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: �IIA Proposed. N/A Number of residential units: Existing.- Number of bedrooms: Existing: Proposed. Proposed%of demolition(Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing._ _Allowable: Proposed.• Principal bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Praposed: Access.bldg.height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed.• On-Site parking: Existing: Required: Proposed: %Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: %Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed.• Front Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Rear Setback: Existing: Required.• Proposed: Combined F/R: Existing: Required: Proposed: j Side Setback: Existing. Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required.• Proposed: i Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Proposed.• Distance Between Existing Required- Aroposed: Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Iy 0 4 Variations requested: 1�0 II WEM NW View Before NW View After 1 Before and After Photos SE View Before _ fr I SE View After 0 NE View Before �y NE View After r 4 1 8/01/11 PHASE I QUANTIl��J .� ' 1 COORDINATES(NAD 83-CO STATE PLANE) _F_1 ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY LOCATION NORTHING FASTING ELF.(FT) /f ~�\ I GPS ANTENNA 1499781.395 2617270.461 8123.30 211 FURNISH&INSTALL CONCRETE MASONRY ANCHORS (1/2"X5") EA 4 ✓ \ CABINET 1499817.984 2617280.825 8113.09 211 INSTALL HILTI ANCHORS AND ADHESIVE EA 4 - \ CY 41.7 _� _ � / 203 UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION - THE CITY a> ASPEN CY 41.5 203 EMBANKMENT(PLACE ONLY) LS 1 INSTALL 30"x22"x12 212 LANDSCAPE RESTORATION CONCRETE PAD AND CY 0.2 FASTEN CABINET UPON 601 CONCRETE CLASS B 30 (SEE DETAIL"B°) 602 REINFORCING STEEL(#5) LB 1 . \ &INSTALL 2 INCH SCH 40 E LF 600 ELECTRICAL CONDUIT INSTALL ON PVC 613 FURNISH SCH 40 ON CDUIT i 40 LF 1 A w PHASE II QUANTITIES TRENCH=1.0'DEEP(MIN) R ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY CONSTRUCTION LIMITS LF 280 1� CONSTRUCTION LIMITS I 614 FURNISH AND INSTALL OF/B 6/2 OUTDOOR ELECTRICAL WIRE CATSE LF 280 (/ b 614 FURNISH AND INSTALL OUTDOOR WATERPROOF ETHERNET CABLE O Fail EA 1 '4 700 FURNISH&INSTALL 120V ELECTRICAL OUTLET EA 2 700 FUR/INST 5/8"X 8'COPPER-CLAD GROUND ROD&APPURTENANCES o� PROPE�TY LINE NOTES U M EA 1 W 700 FURNISH AND INSTALL JUNCTION BOX ✓REMOVE 1"PVC !!! 1-FURNISH L INSTALL WI LF / OF-B ND • A PRO-SITE-1 ''= s OUTDOOR ELECTRICAL WIRE W/GROUND AND 2' ° PVC CONDUIT. 0 \ \ 2-FURNISH&INSTALL 280 LF OF OUTDOOR INSTALL 45G BASE PLATE a t 9\ WATERPROOF ETHERNET CABLE AND 2' PVC ANCHOR W/SUPPLIED CONDUIT. HILTI PRODUCTS C� l ) 1 (SEE DETAIL"A") \ ' 3-IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO / LOCATE 4"X4"POST ' ATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO rT Fri•, f \ 0 7.5 60 � TO REMAIN 15 30 CONSTRUCTION. rj MOBILE \ 4-IF TRENCH IS NOT BACKFILLED ON DAY OF F� w COMMUNICATION � 'i EXCAVATION,SILT FENCE IS TO BE INSTALLED ON 1 INCH=30 FEET TOWER WITH LOW SIDE OF TRENCH. SOLAR PANEL \ 5-CONSULT ENGINEER FOR EXACT LOCATIONS r l r l r l OF STRUCTURES TO BE CONSTRUCTED. �/ h+•1 v a ` wv,ry {r 1 INSTALL 2-2"PVC % SCH 40 CONDUITS § 280 LF(EA) �\ TRENCH=1.5'DEEP(MIN) 2 i Cki _ Q `V \ CONDUIT TO CONNECT I / o' TO ETHERNET CABLE Z r (SUPPLIED BY COMCAST) �•/ \ BEGIN ELECTRIC CONDUIT a Vl r 1 C� CONCRETE DRIVE F•� H (DRIVEWAY EASEMENT) ) AND INSTALL GROUND a _ (RECEPTION#439302) I 7 ROD AT METER HOUSING r� C* a ACCESS EASEMENT SCALED FROM THE \ v MAROON CREEK PLAT RECEPTION NO.363275 o-f 2 "�-•^-,. `_ � (NO DIMENSIONS GIVEN) (UTILITY EASEMENT;RECEPTION #367232) ti v 8/01/11 DETAIL A -T * NOTES: ELEVATION (A) 1 - CABINET TO BE SECURED TO THE CONCRETE BASE WITH FOUR(4) CONCRETE MASONRY TmCay of Asn%;- PLAN (A) ANCHORS, MINIMUM 1/2" DIAX 5" LENGTH. 2-#5 @ 8" O/C EACH WAY AT MID DEPTH 12 $ 3- 5/8" X 10' COPPER-CLAD DRIVEN GROUND ROD W/APPROVED GROUND ROD CLAMP w 4- 2-2" SCH 40 PVC CONDUIT TO FURNISH INTERNET CABLE AND OF-B 14/2 OUTDOOR O O 13 11 1 7' 9 ELECTRICAL WIRE WITH GROUND. PVC TO EXTEND A MINIMUM OF TWO(2) INCHES A w .17' ,1 ABOVE CONCRETE SURFACE. _ I 5- 30"W x 22"L x 12" D CONCRETE (CLASS B) FOUNDATION PAD WITH 1" CHAMFER. MINIMUM OF 2" D PROTRUDING FROM EXISTING GROUND. 10 O 6-SIZE 3- 36 IN. G ECONOLITE CABINET(24.5"W x,17.25%x 40.0"H). USE CONCRETE ANCHOR BOLTS TO MOUNT TO CONCRETE FOUNDATION.E 7- a EXISTING 0.81" DIA DRILL HOLE LOCATED 1 HILTI FROM EDGE. TO BE USED WITH Q a M MOUNTING ADHESIVE AND ANCHOR PRODUCTS. (CITY OF ASPEN TO SUPPLY) U W 1.67' 8- EXISTING HOLLOW STUB AND DRILL HOLE FOR SUPPORT OF ANTENNA STRUCTURE. A a "t N� 7 9-3-3/4" MIN DRILL HOLES TO BE DRILLED BY CONTRACTOR, FOR MOUNTING OF BASE w U► PLATE TO EXISTING CONCRETE COVER. C'� p RETE COVER USING HILTI @ 10-4- HIT- RTZ ROD 3/4"TO BE INSTALLED IN EXISTING CONC ►--� MAX-SD ADHESIVE. PRODUCTS SUPPLIED BY CITY OF ASPEN. FOLLOW HILTI INSTALLATION [� INSTRUCTIONS AND CONSULT COA ENGINEER FOR LOCATIONS OF DOWELING. w 14 2.0' 11- ANTENNA STRUCTURE TO BE SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY CITY OF ASPEN. O 12- 1" OF GROUT TO BE USED IF ENGINEER DETERMINES THE EXISTING CONCRETE COVER O IS NOT LEVEL. CONSULT ENGINEER 13-45G BASE PLATE ASSY. TO BE SUPPLIED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN. Z O 14- EXISTING 10 THICK CONCRETE COVER WITH PRESTRESSED AND NONPRESTRESSED U W U A-+ REBAR. CONSULT ENGINEER FOR LOCATIONS OF REBAR. 15 - PVC EXTENSION TO BE LOCATED AS NEAR TO THE CENTER OF THE CABINET AS POSSIBLE. MIN OF 2" EXTENDING PAST CONCRETE FOUNDATION. DETAIL B 16- INSTALL JUNCTION BOX FOR WIRE GAUGE CONVERSION TO 12 GAUGE. 12 GAUGE WIRE TO EXTEND ELECTRICITY TO A 120V OUTLET. Z ELEVATION (6) 17-4 DIA HOLE TO BE CONSTRUCTED FOR INSTALLATION OF GROUND ROD. w REMOVED BE 18- NATIVE SOIL. ENSURE ALL ORGANICS ARE LOW CONCRETE FOUNDATION 2 AND ADEQUATELY COMPACT PRIOR TO FORMING CONCRETE. 16 1 6 PLAN (B) A 5 17 3 Z, 15 U 19 .33' II I III I II I ° Z � � O u u -- I III I II I 1.83 I III I I I I I U I► 08' -�F� a Il I I I I ° (MIN) L/1 II 1 II I 4 ° _LI I I I I .33' I \� ` ��,_--------------- 2.33 ►► �, 2 of 2 u _ ----------------- t I FINAL PLAT OF THE Z ARTHUR O. PFISTER I FULLY DEVELOPED LANDS " SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION _ L_ 5_ VICINITY MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION 5'.r7FCT S17 T 557 f crC-'v ti A7 n AFT rya c- :cervCR ,4� `5 �2 55 t! ��' z 5 77.27'mss„ -c` ter . HERB / F TE 5 33,:ti E,; FET. FEET +C F g� a 347.. -t r _ ✓' N 5 7J E-r LOT 2_ 2 _-C ` + ti > ri 27 rN oc:x. z OWNER'S CERTIFICATE— _ BOARD OF COUNTY r 1 Y _ =H,° = CGMMISSIONERS APPROVAL _ T. •'w. FIAT:Y 1}, � e _� S _45T t2C.--6' f 1. r r ,-. �T ie -<�� +�,8.' t3G�+-lON t.b a. LET t 22 s i SURVEYOR'S_ _ CERTIFICATE _ .55„ `w PL�� E C^'--� Y.' -°cl P Y v 0 - -- _ ` 'x' �J (--__—, ,G9 �t 1.'� �3'•�'�,5 IY OC �.G Y, � n'�4��'" !�LL'2K 7HT_ r A TffJ LOT3 � -� �>=zo- -r ter•'�'. '�-�..'r. .,. T=�'e�._., �_�� .�._ r- _ T-�._. ,�.-��� _ v��" 1 25C -5 EF 1 HAZARD WARNING AND DISCLAIMER -- ! el.NOTES :�, 'Y'-- :J.= 4. :' "'�a ?: Z tE.�` _C� �. .j�Pay= or �y r'..�« i�\ °ti✓v`J C�.0 y CLERK K _& RECORDER'S—ACCE FT_AN CE T^ �tvT N _ - E 4 4 °F L_n', a .,v V.��. S,°. i�...�-' H�- .:'y 'J�. .°� `�_ _. �_�E:., T (zv:2 =.'\-r Y�-a�{j �r_d_pT4�3' P - v� - �✓ z�M � - ���, � ns lyGi,�ri,t�J ;.='tom �T~'2 2�' Fes_°✓ ✓�i = ti i -L v t'EL ti FoeT,� i " o a t Inc. SurWyed n =e:: R *stm Job No Alpine Surveys, r< �e — n�e Surveys, � a - - — _ Drafted � �3 °�- ° �; -c�1�.1 �e _ � � 2 °p t Past Office Box 1730 Ashen,Colorer 8*-m 393 925 2888 K SITE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY OF: LOT 1, ARTHUR OTFISTER A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 11 TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. a COUNTY OF PITKIN,STATE OF COLORADO SHEET 1 OF 1 COMMON PARCEL P .,in f. WO WE � /_-�-• _ W ER OU D A P � 51 AL NE GRAPHICSCAIE 2'PVCP E LOT oe $ F0UNDa5RE8AR VICINITY MAP I IMh.E20 FEET) &PLASTIC CAP L5.20151(ALPINE) PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 1 Pvc PRO-SITE- LOT 1, a+r ro ANTENNAE The Final Plat re Arthur In Pester Fully Developed e Clerk a lands Subdivision of Pt MOUNTED ON Exemption at recorded In the Office of the perk and Recorder of Pltkin z 4X{METALSTAND BiPO County In Plat Book 42 at Page 45 as reception No.403369. ac COUNTY OF PrrKiN /ee 1" STATE OF COLORADO 4 PVC O PRO-SITE-2 MOBIIE ee .L COMMUNICATION / LOT 1 TOWER WITH TOWERWI H NOTES /oe 62,501 SO.FT. 1) Date of Survey:April 25&27,2011. 1.435 ACRES NCR 2) Date of Preparation:April 28,2011. W/DOORA UNDERGROUND ee WATER TANK LIND$5 REBAR 3) Basis of Bearing:A bearing of S 12'32'05"E between the found 85 rebar& &PLASTIC GYP plastic cap L.S.89184 monumenting the Southwest boundary comer of Lot 1 and Y u.mss1 IAIPWE) the found 85 rebar and plastic cap L.S.9184 monumenting the Northwest boundary comer of lot 2,as shown. 4) Basis of Survey:The Final Plat of the Maroon Creek Club as Recorded in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Pltkin County In Plat Book 33 Pages 4-15 as c'VENT PIPE Reception No.363275. EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND The Final Plat of Arthur 0.Pfister Fully Developed Lands Subdivision Exemption as recorded In the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Pltkin County in Plat Book COMMON 42 at Page 45 as reception No.403369,various documents of record,and the C CATV PEDESTAL found monuments,as shown. m TELEPHONE PEDESTAL °.� PARCEL O ELECTRIC METER IV. 5) Th is Survey does not constitute a title Search by Soprls Engineering,LLC(SE) EIECTRIC rnAHSraRntEp todetwmineownenhiporeasemen tsolrecord.For all information regarding m SEWER C TRANSF WA7ERTANK easements,rights of way and/or title of record,SE Talked upon the above said 'VN SEWESTOP CE55 tic- f plets described b note 4.No title commitment was used b the preparation of CURB this aU DC WATERVALVE survey. Y'( WATER HYDRANT FOUND as REKAR ys Q Basis of elevation:An NAVD 88 elevation of 7720.88 feet on the RIGS station PLASTE CAP>- GUY WIRE LS.91184(ALPINE) � —_ 5-159,betty part of the pry of Apen GP5 control monumentatlon 2009 wrvey d prepared by Martin Engineering LLC,which established a project specific v, POWER POLE a benchmark elevation of 80950 feet the found 85 rebar and plastic ap I.S.9184 GAS GAS SKIN monumenting the Northwest boundary corner of kH 2,as shown. DEQDUOUSTREf � 7) Contourintemal:TWO(2)feeL J Sa CONCflEfEDaryE � CONIFEpOUS TREE SURVEYORS STATEMENT EDGE OF VEGRATION `'— ACCESS EASEMENT LLGww�✓✓✓ 81co SCALED FROM THE I,Geoffrey R.Keller,do hereby state that this ste improvement survey was MAROON CREEK PLAT prepared by Soprls Engineering,LLC for The City of Aspen,and that It Is true and d Q B RECEPTION No.363275 (NO DIMENSIONS GNENI not an to Me beat t u ken ,and belief.This she all eas Improvement survey f is not an Nnprovement sure Mtended to show all easements of vOf R r•'ti MOU 997 LOT 48 �e CUB G R.Kell tr LS 7 ° PFEIFER PLACE 4t A PRNATE ACCESS EASEMENT WITHIN LOT 46 SOPRIS ENGINEERING-LLC CIVIL CONSULTANTS LOT 46 502 MAIN STREET,SUITE A3 _ LOT 47 CARBONDALE,COLORADO 81623 w TM m (970)704-0311 SOPRISENG @SOPRISENG.COM THE CITY OF ASPEN LANDSCAPE PLAN Existing vegetative cover and the extents of landscaping are shown on the site improvement survey provided. The representative did not submit a landscape plan due to the minimal disturbance to common vegetation within the identified parcel. It is the representative's vegetative sire to have the landscape plan waived. There shall be no disturbance to any type cover, other than the disturbance to low lying common vegetative cover within the trenched area for the extension of utilities to the facility. All disturbed areas will be reseeded and vegetated to a level equal or greater than its preconstruction state. Existing vegetative cover and the extents of landscaping are shown on the site improvement survey provided. i theem erAspen Oi[Y m mmeft Office Memorandum TO: Community Development Department FROM: John P.Worceste �...__ DATE: June 14,2011 RE: Lot 1,Pfister Subdivision—Tiehack Water Tank Site Please be advised that the City of Aspen is the owner of that certain nds parcel o land identified Exemption oa Lot 1 of the Final Plat of the Arthur O. Pfister Fully Developed recorded in the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder ea de a011 described with Pmetes and boundseinithat commonly known as the Tiehack Water Site legally certain Quit Claim Deed between Arthur O.Pfister and Clerk and H.Recolyders Officein book 60, City of Aspen as grantee, recorded in the Pitk page 385,on February 3, 1984. THE CITY of ASPEN WRITTEN DESCRIPTION W/ STANDARD COMPLIANCE The City of Aspen is proposing to install a permanent CORS(continuously operating reference station), located on a city owned parcel of land situated in section 11,township 10 south, range 85 west of the 6 th prime meridian,County of Pitkin,State of Colorado. The CORS will be positioned at known coordinates in the National Spatial Reference System (NSRS),currently NAD 83 (North American Datum of 1983). CORS will continuously collect GPS data to be made available, by radio and/or internet,to the public for GPS differential computations. This will allow users within the coverage area the ability to have real time, or post processed, "centimeter accuracy"with a single GPS receiver(capable of differential measuring). 26.575.130(F)-Review Standards: 1)Setbacks:The Antenna is setback approximately 61'from its nearest property edge. The Econolite cabinet is setback a lesser amount of approximately 24'from the nearest property edge. It is understood that the proximity of the cabinet is less than the 50' required within the review standards. We are hoping that after viewing the before and after photos the community development team will approve the location do to the surrounding vegetative cover supplied within the said property. This location is not only suggested by the applicant, but also approved by representatives of the managing company, being Sara Smith and Leonard Lansburgh (President),for the Maroon Creek HOA. 2) Height: The proposed antenna tower will be attached to a structure which also supports an antenna for the City of Aspen Water Department and will not exceed ten (10)feet in height. 3)Architectural compatibility:The structure that the antenna base will be mounted to is currently covered with native soil. After consulting the neighboring property owners and a Landscape Designer it was decided that all equipment would be painted an earthy tone described as matte cream brown. The proposed structure will be anchored directly to the existing concrete cover of the water tank. All utilities associated with the said structure will be buried a minimum of 1.5' below the surface of the existing ground and all disturbed areas will be revegetated with native seed mix. 4)Compatibility with natural environment: Disturbance to existing vegetation will be minimal. Any area that is disturbed will be vegetated with native seed mix to a level equal or greater than its existing state. The proposed facility complies with all FCC regulations. See detailed map showing the locations of all continuously operating reference stations within the United States and world,at the link below. After finishing this application process and establishing the facility we hope to have the antenna recognized by the National Geodetic Survey(NGS). http://www.np.s.noaa.gov L CCIRS/ 5)Screening: Both structures shall be painted a earthy matte cream brown color as seen in the before and after photos. In addition the property's location and topography supply an exuberant amount of natural screening for the cabinet structure. 6) Lighting and signage: There is no lighting to be placed at this facility. Contact information will be placed at the facility in conformance with the provisions of Chapter 26.510,Signs,of this title. 7)Access ways:The facility meets all access requirements. Furthermore there are currently two existing easements for this property. One allowing access to utilities and the other allowing access and parking from a neighboring property. - ,` ��'�.,;�},�}-..��` c e • ,.0 .' S� .' � ,`,.,111.5``l fpm`.�1 � ;�'�, �� ¢� � � >>r. :,��``mil#�'� ���(� .-. +�•,,.'�Ar- �'` "`^��'� � � V � iA S�`r,• , •�`/ice• .rr• l�j�� � �%f� 'fir^ � I.-r•'•� • •S: ,._.l �,, � � � ,� it •L. •; ,.fit •••.. ! 1 (' � .�� `•��`1 �� �fit' .ti ' , . .•• \ ��! 'j � •�,� 1 411 S1 TEE,- 4m A .` ,� `_ } f ,?f� /����3, _ •y 'rte __��-��.� I r,� irk`j���. •(Water' l`~~,�� '—'^;.� r"C' i~ ^'�.. _] ��CT,jj'rf -�-;r- � :4 •� �'_ ��.' 14 -/ .�,,I/`'�-�``r ff'1 ��•1� / .f/'l(���itJ% `�/1 j;�` -','!f/-'"/�� , .�If `��` r/� N�,'J f � � • �a�/•"' I �-r-•.."'� � �� ,,lf,�6' r jl� ,� VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" = 2000' CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN(hereinafter CITY)and -Tr r c,i,. Aratie-)n Cbp`reD ) (hereinafter APPLICANT)AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for _ Moxcon Guul Glob cps Wei, heC /�n�enn� (hereinafter,THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that the City of Aspen has an adopted fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size,nature or scope of the proposed project,it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration,unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. S. Therefore,APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of$ r S which is for^ _hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit,APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to,CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above,including post approval review at a rate of$245.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing,and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT By: By; Tr :Ci c� V�ro�AUn , R E Chris Bendon Community Development Director Date: IC21 Billing Address and Telephone Number:} A" �Ct�nn. C . Sibri y L9 o>9Zo-Soto ATTACHMENT 1 CITY OF ASPEN DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FEE POLICY The City of Aspen,pursuant to Ordinance 52(Series of 2007),has established a fee structure for the processing of land use applications. A flat fee or deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted. Referral fees for other City departments reviewing the application will also be collected when necessary. One check including the deposit for Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made payable to the City of Aspen. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required application fee. A flat fee is collected by Community Development for Administrative Approvals which normally take a minimal and predictable amount of staff time to process. The fee is not refundable. A deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff review is required, as hours are likely to vary substantially from one application to another. Actual staff time spent will be charged against the deposit. Several different staff members may charge their time spent on the case in addition to the case planner. Staff time is logged to the case and staff can provide a summary report of hours spent at the applicant's request. After the deposit has been expended, the applicant will be billed monthly based on actual staff hours. Applicants may accrue and be billed additional expenses for a planner's time spent on the case following any hearing or approvals, up until the applicant applies for a building permit. Current billings must be paid within 30 days or processing of the application will be suspended. If an applicant has previously failed to pay application fees as required, no new or additional applications will be accepted for processing until the outstanding fees are paid. In no case will Building Permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. When the case planner determines that the case is completed (whether approved or not approved), the case is considered closed and any remaining balance from the deposit will be refunded to the applicant. Applications which require a deposit must include an Agreement for Payment of Development Application Fees. The Agreement establishes the applicant as being responsible for payment of all costs associated with processing the application. The Agreement must be signed by the party responsible for payment and submitted with the application and fee in order for a land use case to be opened. The current complete fee schedule for land use applications is listed on the next page. THE Cm of ASPEN AUTHORIZATION LETTER To whom it may concern, I, Steve Barwick, hereby authorize the City Engineer, Tricia Aragon, to act on the behalf of the City of Aspen for any and all matters associated with the Maroon Creek Club GPS and Weather Antenna project. This authorization will exist till further written notice from me. You can contact me in case you need any clarification. Thank you, Applicant: Representative: Steve Barwick Tricia Aragon, P.E. City Manager City Engineer City of Aspen City of Aspen City Hall City Hall 130 S. Galena St 130 S. Galena St Aspen, CO 81611 Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 920-5000 (970) 920-5000 X X Steve Ba Tricia Aragon,P.E. City Manager City Engineer THE CITY OF ASPEN STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY All of the structures and anchoring devices associated with this facility have been premanufactured, with exception to the concrete pad (see CDOT Standard), and are assured to be structurally stable by the manufacturing company. Design capacities and details are included. Antenna—ROHN Products Base Plate—ROHN Products Anchoring Products—Hilti Products Concrete Foundation Design—Colorado Department of Transportation Cabinet Foundation Design. (Standard Plan No. M-613-1) This facility is to be erected for the sole purpose of serving as a Continuously Operating Reference Station (CORS). No other antenna is to be constructed or attached within the limits of this proposed structure. After reviewing the allowable stresses for the premanufactured products used to construct this facility, it is apparent that there is no concern for failure of the facility. In the unforeseen case that a failure did occur, it is seen within the site plan that there is adequate space within the Tiehack Water Tank Property limits to easily contain all debris. o $ co D a p -6 a E o v o u 3 o €off m z ul c �F oG z v 3 � m 20.00 7.56 12.44 0.56 (3 HOLES) o; \ 12.00 16.75 I _ _——— 24.00 (REF) I / 12.00 1- 14.50 1.00 L 81 (REF) TEMPORARY STEEL GUYING IS NECESSARY DURING INSTALLATION AND DISMANTLING. 1.00 1.25 X 6 HOLLOW S TUB FOR 45G TOWER 14GA 1.63 0.45 1 .25 DRAIN HOLE 1.63 L I I I (PART NO.BPC45G) �25 BASE PLATE FOR CONCRETE PIER (SEE DRAWING C770972 FOR FABRICATION) NOTES: 1 CUSTOMER'S N OR INSTALLERS RESPONSIBILITY TOEPROVI EST UCTURALLY ADEQUATE SUPPORTS FOR PIER&ANCHOR CONNECTIONS.IT MAY ALSO BE NECESSARY FOR THE CUSTOMER OR INSTALLER TO SECURE THE SERVICE OF A LOCAL ENGINEER TO DETERMINE THAT INSTALLATION COMPLIES WITH LOCAL BUILDING CODES. 2.AFTER GALVANIZING CHECK DRAIN HOLES TO SEE THAT THEY ARE NOT PLUGGED. 3.FOR USE WITH GUYED AND BRACKETED TOWERS ONLY. yp p5:wo1 tWil[2M FILE NO. Standard-45G —9­0" REVISIONS 2'-0"�{ 1'-6" REV. DESCRIPTION OWN CHK All q^ 4 BAYS @ 15 "EACH 2'-0" 1'-0" 94(l.66" Awx Nto A I q E0 B.O.M.tNDU JOM 1 1/9"N.P T. DALE: JuNOtltoo5 PIPE TD.PIPE (2.38 O.D.) TS 2.00 O.D. O.D.) (16 GA.WALL) ASSY P/N:45AG�2 ASSY P/N:45AG ASSY P/N:45AG1 1-R-45A]BK 1-R-45]BK 1-R-K5159 1-R-KS157 1-R-KS158 91-11, 1—T_8„ g,_p„� Et" 2 TS 2.25 O.D. TS 2.75 O.D. ASS P/N:45AG3 (14 GA.WALL) (14 GA.WALL) ASSY P/N:45AG5 1-R-45A78K A55Y P/N:45AG4 -R-45JBK TYPICAL PLAN VIEW 1-R-K5160 1-R-453BK 1-R-K5162 (FOR ALL SECTIONS EXCEPT 45AG4) 1-R-K5161 NOTE: S SECTION NOASG EXCEOPT AS NOT DAABOVE.SAME tV 2Z” 10'-5•' 5X" DWG REFERENCE BAYS @ 15 X"EACH 9°/is" 1'_6" V- '—_ TS 1.25 O.D. BAR 7/16 DIA. (14 GA.WALL) P. SAE GRADE 5 BOLT ASSY'S P/N.45PJBK OR 45JBK REQUIRED 1 1/4 (3)5/16"DIA.X 2 3/8"LG.(NC OR 1 1/2 OD TYP (3)7/16"DIA.X 2 1/2"LG.(NC BOLTS) € 3/16 ASSY P/N:45G SECTION 1-R-45JBK $ 1-R-KS154 B 3 RSIIZE T> 45G TOWER SECTION PROPERTIES LEGS BRACES SECTION NOMENCLATURE 1.25 ODX.083 WALL BAR 7/16 DIA. N/A Fy 50.0 36.0 N/A A =CROSS SECTIONAL AREA(SQUARE INCHES) 0.3043 0.1503 .913 C =COMPRESSION CAPACITY WITH 1/3 INCREASE IN ALLOWABLE STRESS(KIPS) fi718 WEST PLANK ROAD A 4.15 1 =MOMENT OF INERTIA ABOUT CENTROIDAL AXIS(INCHES**4) PEORIA,IL 61604 S 0.0833 0.0082 Fy=MINIMUM YIELD STRENGTH(KSI) 42 7 TOLL FREE BOOJ27-727 I 0.0521 0.0018 K =EFFECTIVE LENGTH FACTOR(DIMENSIONLESS) DnAwJNC srNE mDCEa or noMN.*s DrroeE r 4 6 UNBRACED LENGTH(INCHES) 0.4136 0.109 .84 L = (FT.-KIPS) REmoDUCED,cocJEO Oa raACeD iN wMO�E OA:N anar wmaur mEn cDNSEN*. SE IN ALLOWABLE STRESS L 15.75 22.1 VARIES M =MOMENT CAPACITY WITH 1/3 INCREA DDawR 0.70 1.0 N/A=NOT APPLICABLE SECTION ASSEMBLY K 1.0 r =RADIUS OF GYRATION(INCHES) 45G SECTIONS KL/r 38.0 141.4 VARIES S =ELASTIC SECTION MODULUS(INCHES**3) C 10.6 1.50 N/A T =TENSION CAPACITY WITH 113 INCREASE IN ALLOWABLE STRESS(KIPS) 9.46 N/A N/A W =WEIGHT PER FOOT(POUNDS) OWN: CHK'D: WD U °Feb/13/1988 T �Pw M N/A N/A 11.4 Ws=WEIGHT PER SECTION(POUNDS) ENG R: 0.512 7.000 ROB W 1.035 DRAWING NO: REV: WS 35.0 35.0 70'0 NOTE:CAPACITIES SHOWN ARE BASED ON ANSI/EIA-222-D-1986. C630645 11 BASE PLATE WITH EPDXY ANCHORS SCALF: " ' ROD' H �HILTI x" DIA HI�TI HA — HI TAHY 1 50 MAXS'HI —I�, (FSR 1967) rE 1 lq " THICK 1 " THICK SE P'�ATE E GROUT SpOIE 5L- EDMEN DEr!I� SPEC ITY AOPTIONS: SPAC ING B SPEC IFY DIAMF B ANC QUANTITY SPECIE ROD ` BHA= ROD ( y_>58 ksi) HAS SJPB ROD (fy >_ 105 ksi) �1AS 304 OR 316 SS ROD (fI 5 ksi) SPEC IE ADHESIVE HILTI HIT HY 1 �0 WAy /HIT—ICE HILTI HIT RF 500 r,rD�CTAI rpti!PONENT LIST O 125A1Y120/24 ER REQUIREMENTS.METER HOUSING CONFORMING TO A C " © 12p EE 2-POLE. NEMA 3R. SERVICE CE RATED SCO NCT SWITCH GROUND AND NEUTRAL BARS 24'±2" 18" MIN. © 100A, MLO, 120/24OV-10-3W, 8-SPACE, NEMA 3R LOAD CENTER INSTALL JUNCTION PAVEMENT CUTOUT SURFACING OR FINAL GRADE WR}I BRANCH BREAKERS AS LISTED ON THE PANEL SCHEDULE. PANEL 7/16* DIAMETER HOLES (USE TWO g OD HEAVY DUTY, GALVANIZED C-CHANNEL TYPE RACKING SEf IN CONCR BOX HERE 6, PAINT TO MATCH PANEL COLOR. 3/8' DIAMETER BOLTS WITH NUTS 6" AND WASHERS TO ATTACH UNIT TO MIN. MIN. OE 30-AMP 12-POLE ELECTRICALLY HELD LIGHTING CONTACTOR FURNISHED CONTROL 9"±2' STAKE) 60" p D O WITH 120-VOLT COIL AND NEMA 3R 120V PHOTO ELECTRIC 1� WARNING TAPE WITH TWIST-LOCK RECEPTACLE BASE. WAR STUB CONDUIT 12. 6' NI 12" DEEP 24' MINIMUM UNDER GROUND ROUND ROD WITH APPROVED INTO JUNCTION BOX 2"± /z" 30" MINIMUM UNDER ROADWAY O 5/8 x 8'-0" COPPER-CLAD DRIVEN G 48" MAXIMUM i GROUND ROD CLAMP. COMPACTED BACKFILL NOTE: UNDERGROUND COMBINATION METER/SERVICE PANEL ASSEMBLY 21'/z±' 2• KNOCKOUT FOR CONDUIT MAY BE USED IF APPROVED BY ENGINEER. FINAL GRADE 2" - J7, MAN' 5/8" DIA. x 8' COPPER-CLAD CONDUIT / DRIVEN GROUND ROD 4" (MIN.) __ ���. \\// / //� ° / F ( ) `-- 10• 41'/z"± 2" BELOW SURFACE AND 6" MIN. 6' F u MAN AWAY FROM BASE. CONNECT 8' (MIN.) CONDUCTOR TO GROUND ROD SFCTION TYPICAL COND IT BURIAL 8' (MIN.) WITH APPROVED GROUND ROD REAR FI FVATION reRLPIFT ('OMPONENT LIST CLAMP. NOTES: FRONT ELEVATION 6 FT. LONG GALVANIZED 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE TRENCHING WITH OTHER UNDERGROUND I IGHTING CONTROL CENTER LE -0 OA 30 IN. W. x 48 IN. H. x 12 IN. D. NEMA 3R HINGED ENCLOSURE GALVANIZED STEEL STAKE UTILITIES, RAMP METERING AND IRRIGATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WITH 6 IN. LEGS ANCHORED TO THE CONCRETE FOUNDATION PAD. CONDUITS COMMON TRENCHES AT ALL ROAD CROSSINGS WHERE POSSIBLE. THE BACK OF THE CABINET SHALL BE LOCATED 6 IN. MAXIMUM 2. ONE #14 AWG LOCATE WIRE AND A NYLON PULL STRING FROM THE EDGE OF THE CONCRETE PAD. IN ALL EMPTY CONDUITS. D © NEMA 1, 100-AMP MLO 120V/240V 10 3W LOAD CENTER (SEE SFrONDARY SERVICE PEDESTAL ORIENT PHOTO ELECTRIC G F PANEL SCHEDULE). MINIMUM SPACES AS REQUIRED PLUS A CONTROLS TOWARD MINIMUM OF TWO AVAILABLE SPACES FOR FUTURE USE. INSTALL (FRONT VIEW WITH COVER 11FTED) NORTH IN CABINET WITH FULL-SIZE GROUND, COVER, AND BRANCH \ BREAKERS AS LISTED ON THE SCHEDULE. CONCRETE (CLASS B) SUPPORT RING METER (NOT REQUIRED WHEN EMBEDDED IN © ELECTRICALLY HELD LIGHTING CONTACTOR FURNISHED WITH CONCRETE SIDEWALK OR OTHER SUITABLE IJ I I I `--/ I 120-VOLT COIL AND NUMBER OF POLES REQUIRED. INSTALL CONC CONCRETE PAD) 3/8" x 4" GALVANIZED A INSIDE CABINET. J-BOLT WITH NUT AND -- _ 12" FLAT WASHER --n n J� p NEMA 3R 120V PHOTOELECTRIC CONTROL WITH 3-PRONG (MIN.) " a 12" (4 REQUIRED) © O TWIST-LOCK RECEPTACLE BASE. INSTALL THE BASE INSIDE THE A TOD CABINET. THE PHOTOELECTRIC CONTROL SHALL BE MOUNTED ON TOP OF THE CABINET AND ORIENTED NORTHWARD TO MINIMIZE III II I I THE SUN'S INTERFERENCE. IIII II I I \ �� 60" W. x 36' L x 12" D. O 20-AMP GFCI MNNT. RECEPTACLE IN A 1-GANG BACK BOX WITH I 6"° � CONCRETE (CLASS B) i COVER. INSTALL INSIDE THE CABINET. 12" \/\ I \/ FOUNDATION PAD WITH ELECTRICAL ® (MIN.) \�/\ 10• ° /i/' 1' CHAMFER '12 ° /�/\/\/\/ \\/2/\\\ FO PRO 120/240V, METER HOUSING CONFORMING TO THE UTILITY (MIN.) ° \ ��//\\j/\\j/\ �/////j 16" x 28" PROVIDER'S REQUIREMENTS. / \ PULL BOX NEMA 3R, 100-AMP, 2-POLE FUSED DISCONNECT, UL NE-U FOR 2" © SERVICE EQUIPMENT AND FRN FUSES AS SHOWN ON ONE-LINE ` 6" DEEP GRAVEL BED DIAGRAM WITH NEUTRAL.AND GROUND BARS. MOUNTED ON BACK A ° \ \ /\\/\\/\\\//\ \\�° SIDE OF ENCLOSURE. O 5/g" x g'-0' COPPER-CLAD DRVEN GROUND ROD WITH ° (MIN.).. 24" \ \ APPROVED GROUND ROD CLAMP. SECTION A—A— MIN. #5 AT 8" O.C. EACH/ /\\\//� � � r \1\/\�\ /\// //\//� �� - �.�,nu��� IL. WAY AT MID-DEPTH \\/\\����\\�'� ���%/\\/\�/��//1\/\/\�/� j� �r,�•••�• IIV THE DETA 1�/1 /L` / � r, ice/�^�/\/\��/��/��/�/ %�� P N V ___ �C1� _11__ / / / / 1. VOLTAGE SURGE ARRESTOR, 650V A.C. TO GROUND MAX- TYPIC`AI PULL OR SPI ICE BOX �- -- 7T\T�r/�--nl- H TWO 3" PVC 2• 'HAND-OFF-AUTO" KEY SWITCH. KEYED FOR AGENCY RESPONSIBLE NOTES: 2" PVC ? 8'-0" (MIN.) //�/��// FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM. 1. ALL PULL OR SPLICE BOXES SHALL. BE TRAFFIC RATED 20,000 PSI MINIMUM. � 2. BOX DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE FOR 2 IN. CONDUITS MAXIMUM. FOR CONDUITS I IGHTING CONTROL CENTER (CABINETS n n LARGER THAN 2 IN. REFER TO N.E.C. SECTION 314.28A FOR BOX SIZE REQUIREMENTS. STANDARD PLAN NO. Corn uter File Information Sheet Revisions Colorado Department of Transportation ROADWAY LIGHTING M-613-1 Date: Comments 4201 East Arkansas Avenue Creation Date: 07/04/06 Initials: SJR DOT Denver, Colorado 80222 ® �� Phone: (303) 7-982083 Sheet No. 4 of 4 Last Modification Date: 07/04/06 Initials: LTA Fax: (303) 757-9820 ® "oF,R. 00"r.ro" Full Path: www.dot.state.co.us/DesignSupport/ SRJ LTA Issued By. Project Development Branch on July 04, 200 Drawing File Name: 613010404.dwg Project Development Branch CAD Ver.: MicroStation VB Scale: Not to Scale Units: English ESR-1562* F�� Issued December 1, 2004 ' REPORT TIMI This report is subject to re-examination in one year. BusinesslRegional Office■5360 Workman Mill Road,Whittier,California 90601 ■(562)699-0543 ,CC Evaluation Service, Inc. Regional office■900 Montclair Road,Suite A,Birmingham,Alabama 35213 ■(205)599-9800 www.lec-es.org Regional office■4051 West Flossmoor Road,Country Club Hills,Illinois 60478■(708)799-2305 A 493,AISI Type 316.The minimum tensile strength for both DIVISION:03—CONCRETE HIT-TZ and HIT-RTZ rods is 94,000 psi (650 MPa). Section:03151—Concrete Anchoring Specifications and installation parameters for HIT-TZ and HIT-RTZ rods are noted in Table 2 of this report. REPORT HOLDER: 3,2.2 Hilti HIT HY-150 Adhesive: Hilti HIT HY-150 adhesive, recognized in legacy report ER-5193, is a hybrid HILTI,INC. adhesive mortar combining urethane methacrylate resin, 5400 SOUTH 122ND EAST AVENUE hardener, Portland cement and water. TULSA,OKLAHOMA 74146 (800)879-8000 3.2.3 Normal-weight Concrete: Normal-weight concrete w00)87 -800com shall conform to Section 1903 of the IBC and Section 1905 of NIItiTechEnanriS hilti.com the UBC. 4.0 DESIGN AND INSTALLATION EVALUATION SUBJECT: 4.1 Design: HILTI HIT-TZ AND HIT-RTZ ADHESIVE ANCHOR SYSTEMS Use of Hilti HIT-TZ and HIT-RTZ Adhesive Anchor Systems in conjunction with the HIT-TZ or HIT-RTZ steel rods is 1.0 EVALUATION SCOPE recognized in this evaluation report to resist dead loads,live Compliance with the following codes: loads and short-term loads,such as those resulting from wind or earthquake.Allowable tension and shear loads for the HIT- * 2000 International Building Code®(IBC) TZ or HIT-RTZ anchors in concrete are given in Tables 5 and ■ 2000 International Residential Code®(IRC) 6 of this report. is 1997 Uniform Building Code TM (UBC) The allowable tension loads in Table 5 of this report are permitted to be adjusted for short-term loading conditions in Properties evaluated: accordance with Section 5.2 of this report. Structural Allowable loads for anchors subjected to combined shear and tension forces shall be determined by the following 2.0 USES equation: The Hilti HIT-TZ and HIT-RTZ Adhesive Anchor Systems are (P5/Pt)+ (Vs/Vt) <_ 1 used to resist static tension and shear loads in uncracked, normal-weight concrete having a minimum compressive where: strength of 2,000 psi(13.8 MPa)or 4,000 psi(p7.6MPa).The lace anchors PS _ Applied service tension load. anchor systems are alternatives to cast-in- described in Section 1912 of the IBC and Section 1923.1 of P = Allowable service tension load. the UBC.The anchor systems may also be used in structures V = Applied service shear load. regulated by the IRC, provided an engi eered design is n s submitted in accordance with Section R301.1.2 of the IRC. Vt = Allowable service shear load. 3.0 DESCRIPTION For anchors installed at edge distances less than critical edge distance, c,„ or anchor spacing less than critical 3.1 General: spacing,s or both,the allowable load of the anchor based The on the bond/concrete strength given in Tables 5 and 6 of this cr+ consist ltof spec ally formed steelArodssand Hilti hHIT HY- 50 report shall be reduced in accordance with reduction factors Adhesive. in Table 3 of this report. 3.2 Materials: 4.2 Installation: 3.2.1 HIT-TZ and HIT-RTZ Steel Rods: HIT-TZ and HIT- 4 2.1 General: Installation of the Hilti HIT-TZ and HIT-RTZ RTZ steel rods have a helical cone shape on the embedded end and standard threads on the exposed end. H as System instructions hanld thef�equiremenits of this bieevallduat perpendicular l t are manufactured from carbon steel with specifications referenced in the quality inless control teel HIT-RTZ rods are AST he installation of t and drilled using a drill that is set in roto- manufactured from *Revised March 2006 an PREPORTS- are not to be construed as representing aesthetics ics. any 0shno warranty by ICC Evaluation dService,inca express to implied,as tosany art or a recommendation for endorsement of the subject of the repts finding or other matter in this report,or as to any product covered by the report. fi Page 1 of 5 Coovriaht©2004 Page 2 of 5 ESR-1562 hammer mode and that has carbide-tipped complies with ANSI B212.15-1994, or a matched rltole ance 5.5 The HIT-TZ and HIT-RTZ Adhesive Anchor Systems diamond core bit using a diamond coring machine as shall be installed in holes pre drilled d using range of the specified by Hilti. Holes do not need to be cleaned, but shall tipped drill bit manufactured within the range of the be drilled one drill diameter deeper than the embedment maximum and minimum dimensions of ANSI B212.15- length, to contain any drilling debris remaining in the hole. 1994; or using a matched tolerance diamond core drill Holes are permitted to be wet with standing water. bit of diameter specified by the manufacturer. The dual-cylinder foil cartridge is self-opening, and the 5.6 Special inspection in accordance with Section 4.2.2 of adhesive shall be dispensed through an injection nozzle, this report shall be provided for all anchor installations. equipped with an internal helical mixing element, that is 5.7 Calculations and details demonstrating compliance with attached to the cartridge manifold to ensure proper mixing of this report shall be submitted to the building official for the components.Material from the first two"trigger pulls"shall approval. The calculations shall be prepared by a be discarded to ensure that only properly mixed product is registered design by used. Holes shall be filled approximately two-thirds full with statutes of the j isdi tion of which therprojecct required is to be the mixed adhesive, injecting from the bottom of the hole constructed. towards the top, and the HIT-TZ or HIT-RTZ rod is pushed directly into the hole to the required embedment depth. The 5.8 Anchors are not permitted for use in conjunction with adhesive shall be flush with the concrete surface.The anchor maybe adjusted only during the gel time shown in Table 4 of fire-resistive construction. Exceptions are: ' Anchors resist wind or seismic loading only. this report.Anchors are permitted to be fastened or attached to building components to the design load only after the cure ' For other than wind or seismic loading, special time shown in Table 4 of this report has passed.See Section 5.14 of this evaluation report for limitations on base-material consideration is given to fire exposure conditions. temperature during installation. Installation instructions are 5'9 Adhesive anchors may be used to resist tension and illustrated in Figure 3 of this report. shear forces in overhead or wall installations only if 4.2.2 Special Inspection: Installation of adhesive anchors temperature conditions onoanchoreperformance. Load of elevated requires special inspection in accordance with Section 1704 of the IBC or Section 1701 of the UBC.The special inspector reduction factors for elevated temperatures are shall record product description (includin illustrated in Figure 2 of this report. adhesive production or expiration date; cg product type and 5.10 Since an ICC-ES acceptance criteria for evaluating data strength;anchor type(TZ or RTZ),diameter,and steel grade; compliance of drill bit with this report; hole diameter and s determine the performance of adhesive anchors location; and anchor embedment. Additionally, the special subjected to fatigue or shock loading is unavailable at inspector shall stater the report supplied to the code official conditions is beyond the scope of this report. this time, the use of these anchors under these whether the anchor installation is in accordance with the 5.11 Since an ICC-ES acceptance criteria for evaluating the manufacturer's published installation instructions and this performance of adhesive anchors in cracked concrete evaluation report. The manufacturer's instructions are is unavailable at this time, the use of the anchors is included with each unit of adhesive for the adhesive and in limited to installation in uncracked concrete. Cracking the box for the HIT-TZ and HIT-RTZ rods. occurs when f>f due to service loads or deformations. 5.0 CONDITIONS OF USE 5.12 Use of the HIT-TZ or HIT-RTZ Adhesive Anchor The Hilti HIT-TZ and HIT-RTZ Adhesive Anchor Systems described in this report comply with, or are suitable Systems in conjunction with HIT to carbon steel threaded rods shall alternatives to what is specified in, those codes listed in to limited to interior exposures. Section 1.0 of this report,subject to the following conditions: Installations exposed to severe, moderate or negligible exterior weathering conditions,as defined in Figure 1 of 5.1 The HIT-TZ and HIT-RTZ Adhesive Anchor Systems are ASTM 2161(IB o IRC) or Figure 21-1-1 of UBC Standard permitted to be used to resist dead loads,live loads and stainless steel rods are usedermitted where HIT short-term loads, such as those resulting from wind or earthquake forces as described in Section 4.1 of this 5.13 HIT HY-150 with HIT-TZ or HIT-RTZ rods may be used report. in base materials having interior temperatures between 5.2 When using the basic load combinations in accordance 41°F(5°C)and 110°F(43°C)at the time of installation. with IBC Section 1605.3.1.1 or UBC Section 1612.3.1, interriiorr tlemperatures outside this range is materials beyond the allowable loads are not permitted to be increased for scope this report. The temperature of the HY- 5o wind or earthquake loading.When using the alternative adhesivoe shall be between 41 F(5 C)and 95°F(351 C) basic load combinations in IBC Section 1605.3.2 or UBC Section 1612.3.2 that include wind or seismic at the time of installation. loads, the allowable shear and tension loads for 5.14 When anchors are located where the interior base- anchors installed in normal-weight concrete are permitted to be increased by 331/3 percent.Alternatively, material temperature may exceed 100°F (hall b the basic load combinations may be reduced by a factor adjusted for in-servi a temperatures in accordance(with of 0.75 when using IBC Section 1605.3.2. Figure 2 of this report. The use of HIT HY-150 in base 5.3 The anchors may be installed in holes without special materials having interior temperatures exceeding 212°F cleaning procedures in accordance with the (100°C)during their service life is beyond the scope of manufacturer's published installation instructions and this report. this report. 5.15 The HIT HY-150 adhesive is manufactured by Hilti 5.4 During anchor installation, the hole and surroundin GmbH at their facilities in Kaufering,Germany, under a location shall be permitted to be dry or dam g quality control program with inspections by Underwriters may contain standing water. p. or holes Laboratories Inc. (AA-668). The anchor rods are manufactured by Hilti, Inc., at its facility in Schaan. ESR-1562 Page 3 of 5 Liechtenstein, under a quality control program with 7.0 IDENTIFICATION inspections by Underwriters Laboratories Inc.(AA-668). The HIT-TZ and HIT-RTZ rods are identified by labels on the 6.0 EVIDENCE SUBMITTED packaging bearing the product name, size, and evaluation report number (ESR-1562); the Hilti, Inc., company name; 6.1 Data in accordance with ICC-ES Acceptance Criteria for and the name or logo of Underwriters Laboratories Inc.The Adhesive Anchors in Concrete and Masonry Elements Hilti HY-150 adhesive is identified in accordance with ER-5193. (AC58),dated November 2001. 6.2 A quality control manual. TABLE 1—APPLICATION DESCRIPTION BASE MATERIAL ADHESIVE ANCHOR INSERT SPECIFICATION DATA LOAD DATA PRODUCT Tables 5 and 6 HIT HY-150 HIT-TZ and Tables 2,3,4 Normal-weight concrete HIT-RTZ Rods TABLE 2—SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIT-TZ AND HIT-RTZ RODS IN CONCRETE USING HILTI HIT-HY-150 ADHESIVE ROD DIAMETER PROPERTY s inch '/e inch 'IZ inch 6%e inch /a 0.1963 0.3068 0.4418 An m=Nominal area of threaded rod(inch z) 0.1�05 e/6 „/6 13/,6 BD= bit diameter(inches) 16 75 156 18 30 T=Maximum torque(ft-Ibf) HIT-TZ rods 50 105 HIT-RTZ rods 15 20 Maximum thickness fastened(inches) 1 1'/2 21/4 21/4 4'/2 511/16 7'/,6 89/16 Overall length of anchor rod(inches) 2/ 31/2 4 5'/4 Standard embedment depth(inches) 33' .4 6 7'/6 Minimum base material thickness(inches) 4 For SI: 1 inch=25.4 mm, 1 ft-Ibf=1.4 N-m,1 inch2=645.16 mm'. TABLE 3—REDUCTION FACTORS FOR REDUCED SPACING AND EDGE DISTANCE IN NORMAL-WEIGHT CONCRETE EDGE DISTANCE FACTOR(C), EDGE DISTANCE FACTOR(C), ANCHOR SPACING FACTOR(S), SHEAR ONLY TENSION ONLY TENSION AND SHEAR f FA Cmin fRV rcr Cmin RN Sc, Sm,n n 1.9 x hal 0.7 x he 0.54 2.5 x hel 0.7 x he, 0.7 1.9 x hel 0.7 x hal 0.25 TABLE 4—MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDED CURE TIME FOR HILTI HY-150 ADHESIVE GEL TIME' CURE TIME MINIMUM BASE-MATERIAL TEMPERATURE (minutes) (minutes) CF) 13 90 41 50 68 5 4 40 86 30 104 2 For SI:t°C=(t°F-32)=1.8. 'Gel time is the period during which the anchor rod can be installed and adjusted,and length of time prior to the adhesive beginning to harden. 2 The cure time is the minimum time that must elapse from time of installation until the anchors achieve full design capacity. Page 4 of 5 ESR-1562 TABLE 5-ALLOWABLE TENSION LOADS FOR HIT-TZ AND HIT-RTZ RODS INSTALLED IN 2,000 psi AND 4,000 psi CONCRETE USING HILTI HY-150 ADHESIVE 1,2.3.4 ANCHOR EMBEDMENT CRITICAL EDGE CRITICAL ALLOWABLE TENSION LOAD FOR HIT' DIAMETER DEPTH DISTANCE, SPACING, TZ AND HIT-RTZ RODS BASED ON TENSION LOAD (inch) (inches) car(inches) sir(inches) BOND/CONCRETE CAPACITY BASED ON (pounds) STEEL f�=2,000 psi f�=4,000 psi STRENGTH (pounds): CARON STEEL AND 2% 5,/ TYPE 316 SS z 7 1/2 3,/2 63/ 1,880 2,490 3,170 e 4 9 ,835 -% 2,865 3 5,635 3/4 5'/4 10 10 3,730 5,640 8,805 For SI: 1 inch=25.4 mm, 1 pound=4.45 N. 14 4,375 8,420 12,685 'Allowable load shall be the lesser of tabulated bond/concrete and steel values.Load-reduction factors given in Table 3 for reduced edge distance (c)and anchor spacing(s)shall be applied to values in the bond/concrete capacity column. Linear interpolation may be used for intermediate spacings,edge distances,embedments and concrete strengths.Load-reduction factors are cumulative for anchors with multiple anchor spacings and/or base-material edge distances. 'The tabulated values are for anchors installed in concrete having the designated compressive strength(f�)or higher at the time of installation. 'Concrete thickness shall be equal to or greater than 1.5 times the anchor embedment depth. 'When anchors are used to resist short-term loads,allowable tension loads may be adjusted in accordance with Section 5.2 of this report. TABLE 6-ALLOWABLE SHEAR LOADS FOR HIT-TZ AND HIT-RTZ RODS INSTALLED IN 2,000 psi AND 4,000 psi CONCRETE USING HILTI HIT HY-150 ADHESIVE'.2,3,4,s ANCHOR EMBEDMENT EDGE DISTANCE, SPACING, ALLOWABLE SHEAR LOAD FOR HIT- ALLOWABLE DIAMETER DEPTH car(inches) s,r(inches) TZ AND HIT-RTZ RODS BASED ON SHEAR LOAD (inch) (inches) CONCRETE CAPACITY BASED ON (pounds) STEEL f 2,000 psi f,=4,000 psi I STRENGTH (pounds): CARBON STEEL AND 3/8 2'/8 51/8 7 TYPE 316 SS 1/2 3,/z 63/ 1,725 2,440 1,635 14 4 e 9 2,440 3,450 2,900 3/4 51/4 102 10 3,420 4,835 4,535 14 5,875 8,305 6,535 For SI: 1 inch=25.4 mm, 1 pound=4.45 N. 'Allowable load shall be the lesser of tabulated bond and steel values.Load-reduction factors given in Table 3 for reduced edge distance(c)and anchor spacing(s)shall be applied to values in the concrete capacity column.Linear interpolation may be used for intermediate spacings,edge distances,embedments and concrete strengths.Load-reduction factors are cumulative for anchors with multiple anchor spacings and/or base- material edge distances. 'The tabulated values are for anchors installed in concrete having the designated compressive strength(f'J or higher at the time of installation. 'Concrete thickness shall be equal to or greater than 1.5 times the anchor embedment depth. 'When anchors are used to resist short-term loads,allowable shear loads may be adjusted in accordance with Section 5.2 of this report. ESR-1562 Page 5 of 5 FIGURE 1—HIT-TZ AND HIT-RTZ ROD 110 -� (100°F, 100%) 100 to II 90 I � , > 80 1 � 0 70 Q 60 - (212°F,64°/6) a 50 'I Q 40 1 30 I ti 20 l 101 o 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 I ' iTemperature (°F) ^ Al FIGURE 2—INFLUENCE OF E-MATERIAL HIT HMPE0 ADHES VE ANCHOR OR CONCRETE CAPACITY OF 1 � �•�1ri � ifi � HiHrt54 ee A,f rtir�f f H14CE 1 '/''' HTFtrtdTt f f NITHrI 'r HIfM1�4' lf% rr�l/. HT /�.l ft� f1?`, 1 Jr � - f r /.//f L �f�f �4� r�r f. _{ff✓�: / rf. �f t� ��/ ,r •-r�+'f. 2'r .r.. �.�`. jlr r '':. /. . 4 r .rf='., 5 :r. :r. ,. .• 5 Drill hale rBiog s I'rrdr the H T•T1 is finr hde b lady s Aiident hole Iry'ed adhenixa starting Fil the hde 102.2 ds tuA.N tlra hde hehn3en the gel mnt rotdemrner or Ilki depth(oily Ilmods vidde).For Hoar aFpricnficrs; trap the 6cttorn at wottar,ft t he hdsthd b skirt irjedii9 domend coring µding the rod omrpnds to dill dust. the We. battom of the hde and rill Ord j with adhesive. cnlmy der the sppmpdds rn+cMna. cure fime hnselapsad. FIGURE 3—ILLUSTRATIVE INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration- Off Airport Page 1 of 2 a OE/AAA Federal Aviation Administration Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration-Off Airport _- spwwrt City of Aspen .. Details for case:Continuously operating reference station Stow Project summary pas status .. .. .... ......_.. ._..__._......_. _..... .... ... .. ..........Dais Accepted. 07116/2011 ASN' .._..... 1011-ANM-1695-OE pee.D.tamtned: Status: Accepted Letters: None D.armoets- 07/39/2011 M 11077EX-CONDILC-... - I pre re Summary _......__...........- construction/Alteration lnfortwaSon ....-....._.... - Structure Tres: Mtemla TOwv NoHw Oh IUtemN°n Structure Nome; ConOnuoush opemtluW reference,station lMm6ont permanent NOTAM Numbers IF Temporary 1 Months: Days: FCC Number. Work SdmduN-Stara 09/01/2011 Prior ASN: Work Schod'd.-and' 10/01/1011 *rvr f.raporsry crense-Dose the fewmarmst structure,rqu&&separate ao ko tf/n h?mod. T.tins outr aw tae,No state the ressoa in t sDescrlptise ofProp.ML Plee, IIY 6 not fRd,phase, auto Filing' Not filed with State Common Frequency Bands ..-....... Structure Deta6a High Fra9..._ _.._..'ro4 gph act eR►On ..._.._.__._.___.._.. 39-11'45.43-N LetR.Oa 106- 5P 16,46"W rPp.ane Rrequ.wNes .. ....____ _.._.-...ion Floor- .j11yh Frq Pro9 Onh IIP► alt!V Horizontal Datum: ilAD63 450 470 M 36 W SR.aNvati a(5eh 6123(nearest hot) Structure Height(AGL)r 10(nearest hot). 0 2f the entered AGL 1.a pr.p...d chase•W M se In the V8W PM0 of f're,poaaL the eu» AG +nf Requested MarMeg/Lbhthq+ None Other= Recommended Marking/Lightingr Comm Marking/L1ghtlaS' Nolte Other t Nearest City: Aspen . Colorado Nearest State: Dseerlptlon of L.Cavon: A parcel N MrM situated h section 11 township cw On tfm Profoct Summery page uplowd any certiffed surrey. 10 South,mtge 95 west of the Gth P.M.County of MUdn'State W Coloreds.(lot Sr The Mal plat of Arthur O.Poster Futly oosloped Lands subdivision Exemption.Reception Mo.403369 The IAMIstlon of a P4rma'rem continuously D..-Mien of P-P.-Wr oparetim'oftua rce aamon(MRS).We arc pmpashtg[o mo.et the Mw GpS mcever to the top of e'exMang LTtN Water Tank. THE Gnr of ASPEN FCC LICENSING Frank Kochevar, Mesa County GPS/Survey Supervisor, manages Mesa County's license for liven a and o has agreed to include the City of Aspen's wireless facility on his app roved license will period. The Mesa County license is used for the same frequency and range as our app condition. Mesa County FCC license#WPIV827 The City and its representatives have submitted an FCC form 601 to the FCC for review. This will allloaw Pitkin County to acquire an individual FCC license will be managed by The approvl ° future Mark GaOmRrat, P tkin County process takes approximately 90 days. All licensing tasks Communications Director. Contact Information: Frank Kochevar Frank kochevar@mesacountV•us (970) 244-1826 Mark Gamrat nnark c�amratC�pitkin911.or� (970) 315-2181 THE CITY of ASPEN EVIDENCE OF EFFORT During the winter of 2010 representatives t s pn the Aspen M the etro rAreaKoThe (Mesa County, VRN Coordinator) and visited se veral potential sites receiver needs access to power, clear view Tank Site was found t be arlbest fit for these e )ne ess ties.of the sky with maximum with other equipment. The Tiehack Water Additionally, the location selection of structures within the site was determined lecting locations that would maximize the visual obscurity,of said structures,from neighboring properties. The Tiehack water tank currently serves as a wireless eeWater Deptc telecommunication transmit tt ngedata to Aspen Water Department. The antenna servicing the water plant located in Castle Creek. There will not be any concern for frequency interference between the two antennas. Additionally, computerized projections show that thatrrange toreceive llreapt me adjustments to0their radius range. This will allow any surveyor GPS land survey. THE CITY of ASPEN AFF i DAVIT OF GOOD FAITH State of Colorado County of Pitkin an employee of the City of Aspen GIS Department hereby pledge on this day of,TWV ,RfIZ that a good faith effort was made in locating a facility for the establishment of a CORS(continuously operating reference station)associated with the Maroon creek Club GPS and Weather Antenna Project. Furthermore,I pledge that my facility selection was in accordance with the site selection process outlined in the City of Aspen Land Use Code Section 26.575.130E2. Mary Lac r: Date: messed by: [Print full name after signing] Date: CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Drew Alexander, 970.429.2739 DATE: 10/28/2010 PROJECT: Maroon Creek Club GPS and Weather Antenna Tricia Aragon, 970.429.2785 REPRESENTATIVE: OWNER: City of Aspen TYPE OF APPLICATION: Insubstantial PUD Amendment,Wireless Telecommunication DESCRIPTION: The Engineering Department is representing a proposal to iConservrationn(C) and is the current Maroon ite of a water Cl 9 This area is zone Club Planned Unit Development (PUD). storage tank and cellular tower. osal is subject to two reviews; Insubstantial PUD Amendment and Wireless Telecommunication. This prop Staff reviewed the scope of work and agreed and this oning Commission. Also,aw wireless telecommunication substantial PUD review before the Planning and 9 devices must be reviewed under the criteria found in a review ensures that the section 5 n antenna will conform to the telecommunication services facilities and equipment. This r regulations such as spacing, height, and screening. Both o f these reviews are handled administratively. The applicant or representative shall submit a completed use application with all associated materials to the Comm totcome complete the he revDiewadNo public noticing is land u pp re uirreviewed d. a Below completeness re links to the Land Use Code assigned nd planner Use Application for your convenience. required. B Land Use Code: as en itkin.com/De artments/Communit -Develo ment/Plannin -and-Zonin /Title-26-Land- se- htt ://www.Code/ Land Use Application Form: htt J/www.as en itkin.com/Portals/0/does/Ci /Comdev/A s%20and%20Fees/landusea form. d Land Use Code Section's) (specifically 26.445.100.A Insubstantial PUD Amendment 26. 46.130 Wireless telecommunication Dand F services facilities and equipment (sp Y sections 26.575.130. ) Review by: Community Development Staff for complete application Public Hearing: Not required Planning Fees: $735 for Community Development Administrative n application in response to P g (3) hours of staff review time. $735 for review of an app work completed without permit or in error. Additional time over three (3) hours will be billed at$245 per hour Total Deposit: $735 Total Number of Application Copies: 2 Copies Includes appropriate drawing for board review (HPC = 12; PZ= 10; CC = 7; Referral Agencies = 1 ea.; Planning Staff= 2) To apply, submit the following information General Requirements: Total Deposit for review of application. Pre-application Conference Summary. 0 Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. An 8 1/2"x 11"vicinity map locating the subject parcels within the City of Aspen. Q Completed Land Use application and signed fee agreement. CI Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages,judgments lien easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. s, D 2 copies of the complete application packet and maps. Insubstantial PUD Amendment: A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how a proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application 0 A copy of the approved PUD Wireless Telecommunications: 0 Site plan or plans drawn to a scale of one (1) inch equals ten (10) feet or one (1) in ch equals twenty (20) feet, including "before and after photographs (simulations) specifying the location of antennas, support structures, transmission buildings and/or other accessory uses, access, parking, fences, signs lighting, landscaped areas and all adjacent land uses within one hundred fifty (150) feet. Such p I ans and drawings should demonstrate compliance with the review standards of this Section. CI Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the curren t status, easements and vacated rights of way, of the parcel certified (wet ink signed and stamped a nd (dated within the past twelve (12) months) by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the State. Q Landscape plan drawn to a scale of one (1) inch equals ten (10) feet or one (1) inch equals feet, including "before and after" photographs (simulations) indicating size, spacing and plantings and indicating steps to be taken to provide screening as required b the review twenty s of this Section. The landscape plans shall also indicate the size, location and species g type of vegetation and whether each of those indicated are y eview standards of Mitigation), relocation (indicate from and to) or preservation. The planner can of all existing proposed for removal (indicate proposed plan is necessary; for instance, when an antenna is to be attached to a building, this requirement ement may be waived. q t may Elevation drawings or "before and after" photographs/drawings simulating ands eci in and height of antennas, support structures, transmission buildings and/or other acres ory us s I fences and signs. es D Lighting plan and photometric study indicating the size, height, location and wattage of outdoor lighting sources. This study must also include a graphic indicating the spread d p an and degree/intensity of light from each source/fixture. This requirement can be waived by the Community Development Director if little or no outdoor lighting is proposed. C] Structural integrity report from a professional engineer licensed in the State documenting the following: a. Tower height and design, including technical, engineering, economic and other pertinent factors governing selection of the proposed design; b. Total anticipated capacity of the structure, including number and types of antennas which can be accommodated; c. Failure characteristics of the tower and demonstration that site and setbacks are of adequate size to contain debris in the event of failure; and uired only d. Specific design and reconstruction plans allow shared use. Th use of the facil tylby sbbsequent reinforcement in the event that the applicant intends to and reconstruction of the facility. [� FAA and FCC coordination. Statements Commess on (FCC), respectively, Aviation Administration (FAA) and the Federal Comm unca a. (Required only if the facility is near an airfield) The application has not been found to be a hazard to air navigation under Part 77, Federal Aviation, Federal Aviation Regulations or a statement that no compliance with PartW� lalsogbeerequ�edeif reasons therefor.the Commun ty Devettopmrent the Sardy Field Airport Administrator Director determines that the proposed facility may impact airport operations; b. (Required of all wireless telecommunication services facility or equipment applicants) The with application complies with the regulations nd electromagnetic Federal frequencyCommunications em ss ions a' statement regard to maximum radio frequency from the applicant that no such compliance is necessary and the reasons therefore. 0 Evidence that an effort was made to locate and casalcgy wireless analysis and a brief statement as as to other site including coverage/ interference analysis p reasons for success or no success. Written documentation in the form of n signe of ffreferendce outline tbelow good faith effort in locating facilities in accordance with site selection p Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only he futurelsand binding City. The summary is based on tthat may or may not current zoning, which is subject to change i be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. Fee Waiver Request Fofm City of Aspen TxE CITY of As;? Community Development Department This form should be completed and submitted to the Community Development Director for review. You will be not,fiedwhen a decision hasbeen made to waive or not to waive the fees regarded in this request form. k•1• For what fees are you requesting waiver? ❑ BUILDING PLANNING Applicant Name: �� ���• - �� C Contact Ph.# Mailing address: E-mail address: -fir i es CA,r-' r£so t1 ^ K l�l t G P 5 Project name & address: M G, C Fez nA St- Fee Breakdown: Y�< v„�.�����-% ��� �°'�^ '- '�`''� Original Fee Requested Original Fee Requested Fee Description Amount Waiver Fee Description Amount Waiver Energy Code Fee REMP Fee Excavation Foundation Fee Zoning Review Fee Inspection Fee Planning Application Fee Permit Fee HPC Application Fee Plan Check Other: TOTAL OF FEE WAIVER REQUEST$ Reason for Waiver: General Fund Department ❑ Waived or decreased by City Council (specify ordinance or other decision document) ❑ Other—Please explain: Date A Ii ant Signature For office use only: Type of fees waived: Total fees waived: $ APPROVED ❑ DISAPPROVED Date mmunity Development Director CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FEE WAIVER POLICY PURPOSE Fee waivers to eligible individuals and organizations submitting for building permit or land use application may be considered upon filing a fee waiver request form to the Community Development Department. Approval of fee waiver requests may be made by the Community Development Director, according to the adopted fee policy of the City of Aspen. Costs for all building permit and land use applications, other than those waived by the Community Development Director, shall be paid as specified by the fee policy; prior to the issuance of building permits and at the time of submittal of land use applications. PROCESS Fees administered by the Community Development Department can only be waived by submitting a completed fee waiver form to the Community Development Director. The request shall contain a description of the project along with a statement expressing eligibility for fee waiver. The Community Development Director will review the request and give approval or disapproval in accordance with provisions set forth in this policy. The Community Development Director does not have the ability to waive fees administered by other City Departments or other organizations. All organizations and individuals seeking fee waiver MUST submit their written request to the City of Aspen Community Development Director prior to submitting the building permit or land use application. The approved fee waiver must then be presented at the time the building permit or land use application is submitted to the building or planning departments. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA General Fund Departments do not pay fees to the Community Development Department for building permits or planning applications, with the exception of Capital Projects. The fees waived for these projects will be tracked by the Community Development Department (journal entries are therefore unnecessary). In effort to keep paperwork and applications consistent, General Fund Departments shall still be required to submit the approved fee waiver with all applications for building and planning applications. General Fund Departments include: • E• -. l R 1 Non-Departmental 001.00 Streets Department 001.41 City Council 001.03 Parks Department 001.55 City Manager 001.05 GIS Department 001.60 Personnel 001.06 IT Department 001.61 City Clerk 001.07 Special Events 001.70 City Attorney 001.09 Recreation Activities 001.71 Risk Management 001.10 Aspen Recreation Center(ARC) 001.72 City Finance Department 001.11 Ice Garden Operations 001.74 Community Development 001.13 Cons.Trust FD/Lottery 001.75 Engineering Department 001.15 *Capital Projects 001.90 Building Department 001.21 Asset Management Plan (AMP) 001.91 Environmental Health 001.25 *Tabor Capital Projects 001.94 Police Department 001.31 Outgoing Transfers 001.95 .Records 001.33 .Communications� ," " 001.39 NOTE* Capital Projects are not exempt from fees 2'13S113U2�b1 oo�S• 20 LVI File Edit Record Navigate Form Reports Format Tab Help 1x 1' II . `� Jul_3 Routing Status I Fees Fee Summary Main Actions Attachments'Routing History Valuation ArchlEng Custom Fields Sub Permits i 1 rmit type aslu Aspen Land Use Permit# 0055.2011.ASLU Address 130 S GALENA AptlSuite City ASPEN State CO Zip 81611 Permit Information Master permit Routing queue aslu07 Applied 8M 0+2011 Project Status pending Approved Description FCITYENGINEERING DEPT REQUESTS A PROPOSAL TO INSTALL 3 ANTENNA AT Issued THE MARON CREEK CLUB PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PUDO ClosedlFinal Submitted TRICIA ARAGON,P.E.429 2785 Clock Running Days Expires 814!?012 Submitted via j. Owner fLast name CITY OF ASPEN First name 130 S GALENA ST I ASPEN CO 81611 I Phone (970)920-5000 Address Applicant Ownet is applicant? Contractor is applicant? Last name CITY EN=ERINGDEPT First name TRICIA ARAGON =AVIE Phone f,970)429-2785 Cust# Address Lender Last name F First name ( ) Address Phone I � \ - ____AsaenGold5Jservetl_ angelas 1 oft :;