The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.1125 Ute Ave.0037.2012.ASLU 40 THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0037.2012.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2737 18 2 68 001 PROJECTS ADDRESS 1125 UTE AVE PLANNER JIM POMEROY CASE DESCRIPTION 8040 GREELINE EXEMPTION REPRESENTATIVE JULIE FRANKLIN DATE OF FINAL ACTION 07/28/12 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 7/2/13 2oI37 — 8 -- 2 — .-oo DO • 20tz- LA4 Permits I t File Edit Record Navigate Form Reports Format Tab Help o � ii` lumpl � � Routing Status; Fees Fee Summary Main Actions Attachments Routing History Galuatlon Archf Eno Custom Fields Sub Permits Parcels �I.y ikpen Land Use 003��Q1ZJ�I.0 _� PEN, oil t —�——I Routng queue Ap aslu07 ed 6�8r2012 � Master perM+,��— � f Projegt�` Status pending Approvtd Description APPLICATION FOR ESA 8040 GREENLINE E(EMPTICN Issued ClosedjFina L�J Mood:JULIE FRANKLIN 0141,15 9618 ' Cio& unning Days F7 Expres!6rt?013 a' - aubmwd via l_--__- -..;1 Owner Last name FRANKLIN First name JULIE 1125 UTE AVE ASPEN CO 81611 Phone ( a Address Applicant Owner is applicant? Contractor is applicant? Last name FRAPJKLII+1 i First name JULIE 1125 UTE AVE -, Phone ( ) Oust� 9297 � Address ASPEN CO 81611 Lander Last name r� First name Phone O Address I 164)' khe mik finder' address kpgnadd5 jsetvei angels Gam_ 22 7 O 1��ssII2L o -4 � Zit- W Q DEVELOPMENT ORDER of the City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Julie Franklin 62 Rye Ridge Road Harrison NY 10528 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number Lot 3 Hoag Subdivision 1125 Ute Ave. Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property 8040 Greenling exemption to construct a second story deck and vary a facade. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Administrative approval July 18 2012 Land Use Approval(s)Received and Dates(Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) July 26 2012 Effective Date of Development Order(Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) July 27 2015 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 28`h day of July, 2012, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. (W— Chris Bendon, Community Development Director Q AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 1)2 5- lx r An_,- - Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. County of Pitkin ) 1, �lr >n �c c�-�-� (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: ✓ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fourteen(14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official Paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Signature The foregoing"Affidavit of Notice"was acknowledged before me this day of , 20_12,by WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: a 1 l PUBLIC NOTICE Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the PyA approval of a site specific development plan,and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to Not Public the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24,Article 68,Colorado Revised Statutes,pertain- ing to the following described property:Lot 3 Hoag Subdivision and commonly known 1125 Ute Ave., I Aspen,Colorado,81611,by order of the Commu- nity Development Director on July 18,2012. The 8040 Greenonei Review Exempt on to allow a for ATTACHMENTS: the construction of a second story balcony and COPY OF THE PUBLICATION changes to a facade of the buPhilding For further in- formation contact Jennifer elan,at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept.130 S.Ga- lena St,Aspen,Colorado(970)920-5090. s/City of Aspen Publish in the Aspen Times Weekly on July 26, 2012. [8186329] C . NOTICE OF APPROVAL For an 8040 Greenline Review Exemption 1125 Ute Ave. Lot 3, Hoag Subdivision Parcel ID No.: 2737-182-68-001 APPLICANT: Julie Franklin REPRESENTATIVE: Sophie Harvey SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1125 Ute Avenue Lot 3, Hoag Subdivision REQUEST: 8040 Greenline Review Exemption SUMMARY: The applicant has requested an 8040 Greenline Review Exemption to permit the expansion of the single-family residence with additional deck space. Specifically, the request is to build a second story deck of approximately 198 sq. ft. and change the look of an existing fagade. A property may be available for an 8040 Greenline Review Exemption if the proposed development: 1) does not add more than ten percent to the floor area of the existing structure or increase the total amount of square footage of areas of the structure which are exempt from floor area calculations by more than twenty- five percent; and, 2) does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit is required; and, 3) is not affected by geologic hazard; and 4) does not, over time, cumulatively go over certain floor area limitations. Standards 1 and 4 relate to floor area allowances and calculations. Current Floor Area calculations (Exhibit A) are provided by the applicant showing the existing Floor Area of the property to be 4,401 sq. ft. No more than ten percent or 440 sq. ft. of the existing structure's Floor Area may be cumulatively added through an administrative exemption. Staff has reviewed the record with regard to Lot 3 and has found evidence of two 8040 Greenline Review applications that have been submitted in the past and approved. • Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 4 (Series of 1990) granted development for a single family residence and was subsequently revoked by Resolution No. 7 (Series of 1993), again by the Planning and Zoning Commission, due to non-compliance issues. • A subsequent approval was granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission for the development of a single-family residence and accessory dwelling unit via Resolution No. 28 (Series of 1996). There is no record of any subsequent applications after the 1996 approval for the property with regard to 8040 Greenline Review and this application appears to be the first exemption application submitted for the property. Page 1 of 2 The Applicant has submitted an Allowable Floor Area calculation for the lot by first subtracting 15,978 sq. ft. of private access easement from the 133,167 sq. ft. lot resulting in 117, 189 sq. ft. of net lot size (Exhibit B). As the survey provided was somewhat unclear with regard to the exact size and location of the private vehicular easement, a large area was considered part of the easement for calculation purposes. A second assumption was made in calculating the Allowable Floor Area by assuming that the property is primarily covered with steep slopes, so the most restrictive reduction of 25% of Allowable Floor Area for slope reduction was included as part of the calculation. The Allowable Floor Area for 117,189 sq. ft. of net lot area is 7,943 sq. ft. and with a 25% reduction for steep slopes the resulting Allowable Floor Area is 5,958 sq. ft. for Lot 3 which is greater than the 4,401 sq. ft. that currently exists. Included below is a breakdown of existing Floor Area that is categorized as counting towards Allowable Floor Area or being exempt from Allowable Floor Area. The 198 sq. ft. addition of a deck represents a 4.5% increase to the floor area of the existing structure. Table 1: Floor Area Floor Area Exempt Floor Area Above Grade House 2,830 0 Sub-grade House 568 1,455 Shed 205 32 Garage 225 375 Decks/Patios 573 893 Sub-Total 4,401 2,755 Proposed Deck 198 0 Total 4,599 2,755 STAFF EVALUATION: Per the application, the request is to permit the addition of 198 sq. ft. of Floor Area as a second story deck. The 198 sq. ft. of Floor Area is less than the ten percent or 440 sq, ft. permitted to be added to the existing structure via an administrative review. No tree is proposed to be removed and the addition is located within the building envelope. DECISION: The Community Development Director finds the administrative application for an 8040 Greenline Review Exemption as noted above to be consistent with the review criteria (Exhibit C) and thereby, APPROVES the request conditioned on submission of an engineering report finding the proposed balcony will not present any increased risk due to mudflow or avalanche hazards to be submitted with the building permit application. APP VED B m v 2U Chris Bendon Date Community Development Director Attachments: Exhibit A: Floor Area Calculations(recorded) Exhibit B: Net Lot Area Study(recorded) Exhibit C: Review Criteria(on file) Exhibit D: Application(on file) Page 2 of 2 f i `L7�/I,��rI , ►, O �fF��-- l� -I i t - I r r r � o , I MIA I I� 'it ,,,�l�•�^':.J�� 1 �il /1, 1 ��— ,� /ail li I .� / Op.O•op•.•:,. ,----- _ ter/ 1'------- li I I oo...o.G'YOO BEER o oo. I I a0000000� o.. i I POP a...o.•a.o...... d ...00..1....0..0 • �� 1-I ar - • • I I , I � ' �titi I I I • ' I I I,• 1■ �� I I i I I ',, . �■ II '. I I III■II■II■11■II■II�IhII�i O� I' _ _ ] F,A,R. CALCULATI❑NS 1125 UTE AVE, ALLOYED' EXISTING" s 5,858 Sq.Ft.RESIDENCE 4,401 Sq.Ft.RESIDENCE 0 0 151 1 3 151 133,218 Sq.Ft.Lot((WR-b Zone)less 25%Slope Reduction [3,3g85ENERAL+2256ARA6E+536DECK/PATIO = o Iass access easement per survey(15,g18 5q.Ft) +205 5q.Ft.STORAGE] (n 'a N 15%OF 5,858 5q Ft.=893.7 5q.Ft.DECK/PATIO Y °o o 0 Qf o x a 0 00 V)3: oaN II 195 I t o 242 AN zV V)N II 90 , 56 m — I a U) = ALLOYIED• _ 0 133,218 lot area ::) 5,g18 access easement O 111,240 far.lot area = 'o0 =bboo (61240\100)'2=1344+6,600=1,944 P7 ? 1,944'25%raduction=+5q.58 Sgft• O Q 00 EXISTING FLOOR PLAN-LEVEL 2 EXISTING FLOOR PLAN-LEVEL 1 J w o CEILING HEIGHT W-10'or Sq.Ft.DIAGRAM CEILING HEIGHT q'-b" Li 1— U F,A,R. CALCULATI❑NS 1125 UTE AVE, In w 63 , —i=1i=-jl= 62 �d N a- LEVEL I ® GENERAL 2,023 Sq.Ft. 568 Sq.Ft. Q Q 311 FILLY EXPOSED WALL 14'-0'X q'-b'=703 5q.Ft. SEC.26515.020 Il PART. EXPOSED WALL 15'-4" X 4'-0'= 61 5q.Ft. D.MEASURING FLOOR AREA TOTAL WALL 164+84+(196'-0"X q'6°)=2,110 Sq.Ft. I.GENERAL FAR 3,388 SgFt. z t 164/2110=.281 X 100=26.1%OF 2023=568 Sq.FT. 2.CIRCULATION we talcs ® DECK/PATIO 488 Sq.Ft. 480 Sq.Ft. 3.ATTIC SPACE 0 5q.Ft. 4.DEGK/PATIO 513 Sq.Ft. 5.FRONT PORCH O 5q.Ft. W 238 �� 352 LEVEL 2® GENERAL 2,340 Sq.Ft. 1,493 Sq.R, 6.TERRACES o sq.Ft. t FULLY EXP05ED WALLS 56+1415+151+180+193+116+151=1,042 5q.Ft. 1.GARAGE 225 Sq.Ft. PART. EXP05EP WALL 14'-3" X 6-4"= q0 'Ft. 8.51.15=6RADE see talcs q.AM INCLUDED 20 TOTAL WALL 1132+50+(b0'-O"X9'-10")=1,112 Sq.Ft, 10.A.DA.DEED WA 1132AT12=.638 X 100=63.8%OF 2340=1,493 Sq.FT. IL SHEDS ETC. 205 55qq Ft, F R,PLAN 8 3 ® GARAGE 600 5q.Ft. 2.HISTORIC WA 3.TRASH AREA WA *•suAsntt _ 15T 250=0,2ND 250=125,3RD 100=100 225 SgFt. 4.MIXED USE WA _ ® DECK/PATIO b80 5q.Ft. 680 Sq.Ft. 15.AIRLOCKS WA I - 4,401 5q.Ft.of F.A.R. LEVEL 3 GENERAL 1,800 5q.Ft. 1,331 Sq.Ft. n.r:,�. _r•o FULLY EXPOSED WALL $52+162+63+238=815 Sq.Ft. PART. EXPOSED WALL 311+215+83= 609 Sq.Ft. i "I TOTAL WALL 1424+350+40=1014 5q.Ft. ' ASSUMING UNDERLYING ZONING qty s,tors — — — 1424A814=J85 X 100=185%OF(1,800-q7)=1,331 Sq.FT. *' PER P6RWORK5HOP LESS VERTICAL CIRCULATION(-71 SgFt STAIR)(-20 SgFt ELEV) sassy: EXISTING FLOOR PLAN-LEVEL 3 ® DECK/PATIO 298 Sq.Ft. 2q8 Sq.Ft. CEILING HE16HT 8'-8'or Sq.Ft.DIAGRAM 5TORAGE SHED 231 5q.Ft. (-32 Sq.Ft.ALLOYED) 205 5q.Ft. I1 ' (� 1125 U TE AVE. NO SCALE - REPRESENTATIVE 6:28:12 FAR LOT AREA STUDY ,� aw LOT 3 133,167 sq. ft. � f EKSTNIG 4R�a PROPOSE [ LOT 3 �. 117,189 sq. ft. APPROXIMATE EASEMENT AREA REMOVED 0 EXHIBIT `C' Sec. 26.435.030. 8040 Greenline review. B. Exemption. The Community Development Director may exempt the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction of an existing 8040 Greenline development if the following standards are met: 1. The development does not add more than ten percent(10%) to the floor area of the existing structure or increase the total amount of square footage of areas of the structure which are exempt from floor area calculations by more than twenty-five percent (25%); and Staff Comment: Current Floor Area calculations are provided by the applicant showing the existing Floor Area of the property to be 4,401 sq. ft. No more than ten percent or 440 sq. ft. of the existing structure's Floor Area may be cumulatively added through an administrative exemption. The 198 sq. ft. addition of a deck represents a 4.5% increase to the floor area of the existing structure. Staff finds this criterion met. 2. The development does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit would be required pursuant to Section 15.04.450 or the applicant receives a permit pursuant to said Section; and Staff Comment: No tree removal is required with this proposal. Staff finds this criterion met. 3. The development is located such that it is not affected by any geologic hazard and will not result in increased erosion and sedimentation. Staff Comment: The Engineering department will require an engineering report finding the proposed balcony will not present any increased risk due to mudflow or avalanche hazards to be submitted with the building permit application. 4. All exemptions are cumulative. Once a development reaches the totals specified in Subsection 26.435.030.B.1, an 8040 Greenline review must be obtained pursuant to Subsection 26.435.030.C. Staff Comment: this appears to be the first exemption that has been submitted since the 1996 approval and is within the parameters for exemption. The deck at 198 square feet represents a 4.5% increase to the floor area of the existing structure. A'► ,ACHMENT 2-LAND USE APPLICA..JN PROJECT: a Name: 1 �,� Location: 1 ?+ Ufa AVE., Indicate street address, lot& block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID#(REQUIRED) IS APPLICANT: Name: J U U F, ozAg ' x�p Address: 12� 6i A ✓`A 6O cl�I(oI I Phone#: 91.4 . '4-I jj. 0(pi Z REPRESENTATIVE: �V Name: • F� Address: 1?,7'0 ow) aiTiti r*'1 VF, 4 ArSM44 60 Phone#: • S-.4!f- 02-46- IM 31b. . (o+47 Z &EA1 TYPE OF APPLICATION:(please check all that apply): ❑ GMQS Exemption ❑ Conceptual PUD ❑ Temporary Use ❑ GMQS Allotment ❑ Final PUD(&PUD Amendment) ❑ Text/Map Amendment ❑ Special Review ❑ Subdivision ❑ Conceptual SPA [� ESA—8040 Greenline, Stream ❑ Subdivision Exemption(includes ❑ Final SPA(&SPA Margin,Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane ❑ Commercial Design Review ❑ Lot Split ❑ Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion ❑ Residential Design Variance ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Other: ❑ Conditional Use EnSUNG CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings,uses,previous approvals,etc. E')(16-NA 15WALe-VWILY P" 4A 61 rokwo 14 Z-003 , N0 fg-C c 0�1 PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings,uses modifications,etc. 1ktV 1064 OF: ZOO SF PAM*F- ow-4-- (gX"tr-'4 * - DF.ck� .0 0 ;-xTr5rA 411A.V eE Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ [�Ate-Application Conference Summary tachment#1, Signed Fee Agreement 1Response to Attachment#3,Dimensional Requirements Form [Response to Attachment#4, Submittal Requirements-Including Written Responses to Review Standards ❑ 3-D Model for large project AA All plans that are larger than 8.5"X 11"must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format)must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. Written description for Franklin Residence remodel (cr 1125 Ute Ave. The proposed project is to expand the second story deck by 198 square feet to the west, along with a minor remodel to a portion of the existing north exterior wall by modifying the existing fireplace and glazing. The proposed 198 square foot deck expansion adds less than 10% of the existing over all floor area. The remodel and expansion does NOT require the removal of any trees. The proposed deck expansion over an existing terrace is not affected by any geological hazard and does not result in increased erosion and sedimentation. Please see report/letter from HP Geotech in regards to this finding. Rr ATTACHMENT 3 L'° 0 , CD 8 2012 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM CITY C3F COMMUNITY ASF�EN Project: t�Q I �I�DE.�� OEVELOPMEAff Applicant: O Location: j C,' Zone District: Lot Size: ,0 b 21 Lot Area: I?b,rj,'• C I nSyg (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area,Lot Area. -may be reduced for areas within the high water mark,easements,and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed.• Number of residential units: Existing• _Proposed: Number of bedrooms: E.zisting:_ j Proposed: �UV Proposed%of demolition(Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing:�llowable: 6t 09 Proposed: (c2` Principal bldg. height: Existing:Allowable: 2,OV I Proposed.• Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: t4vk Proposed: _ On-Site parking: Existing: 2 Required. Proposed. � % Site coverage: Existing: 2._-So O Required.• Proposed: �, (• 3% % Open Space: Existing: tLk Required.• Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: oZ Required: 100 rr Proposed: 2.0 Pr Rear Setback: Existing: (O Required: 30 Proposed:-11� j Combined F/R: Existing:A&6 Required.• 130 er Proposed.• Fr Side Setback: Existing:__Required. Proposed: _ 'r' Side Setback: Existing: Required.• Proposed.-0 Combined Sides: Existing:_ Required: (� Proposed.•__(p5� � Distance Between Existing Required:! Proposed. Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Variations requested: OJIUMV!6 012 Agreement to Pay Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Anagreement between the City of As n. "Ci and Property ZaW� 1�iA Phone No.: 1f•, l�j. �p�g Owner("I"): Email: Address of If 1.4 UT& A*,,/ Billing pq:-�b Bu1-1-E t:OVF, Property: Address: �r, ► Cc g 1(p t (subject of (send bills here) application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $. 0 flat fee for Select Dept p 0 ® flat fee for Select Dept p $_ _ $ 0 flat fee for Select Dept Q $ 0 p flat fee for Select Review For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $1260.00 deposit for 3 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at$315 per hour. $265.00 deposit for 1 hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at$265 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: Chris Bendon Community Development Director Name: City Use: Title: Fees Due: $1525 Received: $ !/jr?'r N CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Jennifer Phelan, 970.429.2759 DATE: 5/23/12 PROJECT: 1125 Ute Ave REPRESENTATIVE: Alain, zg81611 @gmail.com TYPE OF APPLICATION: 8040 Greenline Exemption DESCRIPTION: The property owner is interested in expanding a second story deck by 200 sq. ft. and remodel an existing exterior wall of the residence by modifyini the glazing and fireplace. The property is zoned Conservation and is located in the Hoag Subdivision. The property is located within 150 feet of the 8040 elevation line, and is therefore subject to an 8040 Greenline Review. A property can expand floor area by up to 10% or expand exempt space up to 25% and qualify for an 8040 Greenline exemption. These figures are cumulative — once exemptions have been received for a 10% increase in floor area or a 25% increase in exempt space, the property is subject to a regular 8040 Greenline Review with the P8Z. The applicant must provide documentation regarding the increase in square footage from any previous application to ensure it qualifies for the exemption process. In addition, the applicant must provide documentation regarding the allowable floor area for the parcel and if what is being proposed meets the exemption allowance. Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.435.030 Environmentally Sensitive Areas—8040 Greenline Review Follow link below to view the City of Aspen Land Use Code http:/4"w.aspeng)itkin.com/Departments/Comm unity-DevelopmenUPlanning-and-Zoning/Title- 26-Land-Use-Code/ Follow the link below to view the City of Aspen Land Use Application http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/A_pps%20and_%20Fees/2011%201and% 20use%20app%20form.pdf Review by: Community Development Staff, Public Hearing: None, if the exemption thresholds are not triggered. , Planning Fees: $1,260.00 for administrative review. Additional time over three (3) hours will be billed at $315 per hour. Referral Fees: 265.00 per hour for Engineering. A one hour deposit is required Total Deposit: $1,525.00 7_% MED R�,., Total Number of Application Copies: 2, 1 set of full size plans iU J,v 0 R 2'012 To apply, submit the following information: CITY Or xs.r'EN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Total Deposit for review of application. O T) JUN 0 Q CITY Vi t,.. , rN Q Pre-application Conference Summary. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Q Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. Q A site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the State of Colorado. Q A site plan depicting the proposed layout and the project's physical relationship to the land and its surroundings. Q Completed Land Use application and signed fee agreement. = An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcels within the City of Aspen. Q 2 copies of the complete application packet and maps. Q A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how a proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application § 26.435.030.6, 8040 Greenline Review Exemption. B. Exemption. The Community Development Director may exempt the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction of an existing 8040 Greenline development if the following standards are met: 1. The development does not add more than ten percent (10%) to the floor area of the existing structure or increase the total amount of square footage of areas of the structure which are exempt from floor area calculations by more than twenty- five percent (25%); and V/ 2. The development does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit would be required pursuant to Section,15.04.450 or the applicant receives a permit pursuant to said Section; and 3. The development is located such that it is not affected by any geologic hazard and will not result in increased erosion and sedimentation. -w 4. All exemptions are cumulative. Once a development reaches the totals specified in Subsection 26.435.030.B.1, an 8040 Greenline review must be obtained pursuant to Subsection 26.435.030.C. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. RF CrMIED jUel a g 2012 CITY nv. AbvEN COMNN W&OP ENT Franklin Residence 1125 Ute Ave, Aspen CO 81611 Owner: Julie Franklin 62 Rye Ridge Road .. Q Harrison, NY 10528 914.715.9618 u 8 2012 CITY Oi Aot'EN Applicant and Owner representatives: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Sophie Harvey Sophie Harvey Design, LLC 1220 Red butte Drive, Aspen, CO 81611 970.544.0245 Schlumberger Construction 314 C Aspen Business Center Aspen, CO 81611 970.925.8630 Martin and Julie Franklin 1125 Ute Avenue As en CO 81611 To whom it may concern, I the home owner of the property 1 125 Ute Ave, Aspen CO give Schlumberger Construction and Sophie Harvey Design the authority to act on behalf of us as owner representative in pulling a Building Permit in the City Of Aspen for the remodel work to be performed per Sophie Harvey Design documents dated 4.11.12 . Signed : V Dated: �'d 16L99WK6 unusaj eqnr 899:06 U LO unr II J211r63 �� Gl9ety9 ►�12y103 L,b D/ 77y / WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, made November 18, 2003, Between WWH3 LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY of the County of , State of(e GRANTOR, AND JULIE L. FRANKLIN, GRANTEE whose legal address is: 62 RYE RIDGE ROAD, HARRISON, NY, 10528 of the County of UL S lw , State of NY WITNESSETH, That for and in consideration of the sum of ten dollars and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,the grantor has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey and confirm unto the grantee, his heirs and assigns forever,all the real property together with improvements, if any, situate and lying and being in the County of PITKIN, State of COLORADO,described as follows: LOT 3, HOAG SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat filed November 5, 1971 in Plat Book 4 at Page 218. (VIII!VIII IIIIII IIII 11111111 49163e VIII IIIIIII IIII If Page: l 2 I VIII 11/24/2003 SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO 01.43P R 11.00 D 626.25 TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right,title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the grantor either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises,with the hereditaments and appurtenances, TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described,with the appurtenances, unto the grantee, his heirs and assigns forever.And the i Grantor,for himself, his heirs and assigns,does covenant,grant, bargain, and agree to and with the Grantee, his heirs and assigns,that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these presents, he is well seized of the premises above conveyed, has good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and has good right,full power and lawful authority to grant,bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form as aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens,taxes,assessments, encumbrances and restrictions of whatever kind or nature soever, except those matters as set forth on Exhibit"A"attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The grantor shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the grantee, his heirs and assigns,against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming the whole or any part thereof. The singular number shall include the plural, the plural the singular, and the use of gender shall be applicable to all genders. IN WITNESS WHERE"t grantor has executed this deed. C,A C DO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY STATE OF �^ /,-j � 491638 gs TRANSFER DECLARATION RECEIVED 11/24/2003 COUNTY OF_E ;,y The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2003, by W,W^Hn3 LLC,A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY BY AS WITNESS my hand and official seal my commission expires: t•l'a^ Notary Pub Ic till ( o"l �•. b Q, C. tANIBl f "A" 1. Taxes for the year 2003 n tt due or payable. 2. Right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted and right of way for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States as reserved in United States Patent recorded August 26, 1949 in Book 175 at Page 229. 3. Easement and right of way for access purposes, as granted by Hoag Investment Associates, Ltd., a Colorado Limited Partnership to the Owners of Lot 4, Hoag Subdivision in instrument recorded November 7, 1980 in Book 398 at Page 639. 4. Easement and right of way for multi-recreational trail purposes granted by Jack Barker to The City of Aspen in instrument recorded February 24, 1988 in Book 557 at Page 729 and in instrument recorded in Book 610 at Page 877. 5. All matters in regard to the easement and right of way for access purposes, as granted by The United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management to Blue Sky Corporation in instrument recorded December 27, 1977 in Book 341 at Page 11,August 23, 1978 in Book 353 at Page 316. 6. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of subject property recorded November 5, 1971 in Plat Book 4 at Page 218. 7. All matters as set forth in Easement Agreement by and between Gordon Miller,Stanley R. Shaffran and Joseph S.Zaluba and Ronald C. Collen recorded June 17, 1992 in Book 681 at Page 147 and re-recorded June 25, 1992 in Book 681 at Page 873. 8. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Survey of subject property recorded October 20, 1997 in Plat Book 43 at Page 91, 9. Easement and right of way for access as set forth in Grant of Easement recorded July 2, 1999 as Reception No. 432975 and July 2, 1999 as Reception No.432976 and November 13,2000 as Reception No.448751 and November 13,2000 as Reception No.448752. 10. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Resolution of the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission recorded February 11, 2000 as Reception No.440388 as Resolution No. 00-06. 11. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Occupancy Deed Restriction recorded April 12,2000 as Reception No.442215. 12. Easement and right of way for Utilities as set forth in Utility Easement Agreement recorded December 6, 2000 as Reception No.449446. 13. Terms, conditions,provisions and obligations as set forth in Utility Connection Permit and Water Service Agreement recorded December 8,2000 as Reception No.449524. 14. Easement and right of way for construction and maintenance of trail as set forth in Trail Easement and Vacation Agreement recorded April 20, 2001 as Reception No.453600. 15. Terms,conditions,provisions and obligations as set forth in Private Road Easement recorded September 19, 2003 as Reception No.488662. 16. Terms, conditions,provisions and obligations as set forth in Utility Easement Agreement recorded October 16, 2003 as Reception No.489826 and Correction to Utility Easement Agreement recorded November 3, 2003 as Reception No.490662. HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL May 31, 2012 Revised June 7, 2012 Schlumberger Construction Company Attn: Gary Krill 407Q AABC Aspen, Colorado 81611 Job No. 112 158A Subject: Evaluation of Mudflow Blockage, Proposed Deck Expansion, Franklin Residence, 1125 Ute Avenue, Aspen, Colorado Dear Mr. Krill: As requested,the undersigned representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. met with you at the subject site on May 29, 2012 to observe the proposed deck expansion area for potential change in mudflow impact condition caused by the proposed construction. The findings of our observations and evaluation are presented in this report. The services were performed in accordance with our agreement for professional engineering services to Schlumberger Construction Company, dated May 25, 2012. We have been provided a copy of the structural drawings for the deck expansion by Pattillo Associates Engineers as part of our review. We have not evaluated the overall potential mudflow or debris avalanche risk to the property. The proposed deck expansion is off of the lower level, outside deck at the northwest corner of the residence. The deck expansion is proposed to be about 12 feet wide and 16 feet long and overlies an existing patio slab with hot tub. No excavation is proposed into the steep, northeast facing hillside that adjoins the northwest side of the patio area. The deck expansion will be supported by the existing structure foundation and a new footing pad located near the northwest end of the patio. The potential mudflow and debris avalanche impact would be from upslope along the northwest side of the residence that would flow down across the relatively flat benches cut into the hillside along the northwest side and discharge onto the pedestrian path along the north side of the residence. No indications of past mudflow impacts to the patio area were observed at the time of our visit to the site. The natural hillside is covered with a relatively thick conifer and aspen forest. Parker 303-841-7119 • (._:OIoraLl0 Springs 719-633-5562 * Silverthc�rne 970,468-1959 Schlumberger Construction Company p Y May 31, 2012 Revised June 7, 2012 Page 2 Considering the conditions observed at the site and the proposed construction, the potential area of blockage to a mudflow or debris avalanche event will remain unchanged as a result of the proposed deck expansion. The potential mudflow event along the northwest side of the residence would flow down over the existing graded benches and the new deck and onto the pedestrian path below the residence as it would do now. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH— PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. cQ 1 52222 Rev. by: DEH .1 p Cy a JA. trp6Y ..V'� SLP/Ijg ` Cit Co 'y" Job No. 112 158A G95tech ArclMS Viewer 6/6/12 4:24 PM r-- 610. Mo. K&MMIC 55 T8 / 246, R87VY t 1103 1106, 2645 TSS R86IN ,N P 610. 2723 T10S R86IN Ltj 60 610. 11619, 5 T11 S R87V4f 610. 1 , I. 11 L r6. 0. 23J7 T125 R,85 C* 6, 1110. Mc*4* Lol 610 1112 610. 1610 GCMCO 1, , , COMOW 1 11 — l r.tt 1116. 1114. j "Ilia-mim 020. 14W. 1274 "I 37 765. 007�3 CO 17. / 67 071 tj, 1 -7 We Flaco 01 AA j/f % 1408, 0. U,�m =r 070. 2737 TiOS 4 0\1 � W"O. 74. Roan-ag Fork Riv& Asp"C MINO loll ' lool 141 1001 1001 Uls Amems At' N 1115. 1260 wTvA-cWS,CQpyTq*(Cj ICja2 2012ESRIkT-- — — — — — — ........... .................... USF 3 mmpa Vi cl� 111v� oo k��, Famif # Oo4o- http://205.170.51.230/website/parcels/MapFrame.htm Page 1 of 4