Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutlanduse case.boa.LotsA&B-Blk104.003-88 , .~.'..~.... :~ HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS LTD 210 SOUTH GALE\lA ASPEN, COLORADO !Hbil 303iCj~5.2867 yJt(t1if 24 March 1988 Board of Zoning Adjustment City of Aspen 506 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Variance Request Spring Street Townhouses Lot A & B, Block 104, City of Aspen, Colorado Dear Board Members: On behalf of the Owners of the Spring Street Townhouses, we seek variance from the recently instated Ordinance 54 to allow the exclusion of 310 sq. ft. of garage FAR, the total FAR for one of two garages, which is accessed off of Hopkins Street. The second garage is accessed off of the alley. Ordinance 54 states: Garages and carports. For the purpose of calculating floor area ratio and allowable floor area for a lot whose principal use is residential, garages and carports shall be excluded up to a maximum area of five hundred (500) square feet per dwelling unit; all garage or carport space in excess of five hundred (500) square feet per dwelling unit shall be included as part of the residential floor area calculation, provided however that on residential properties containing Historic Landmarks that do not meet applicable minimum lot area requirements, garages and carports shall be excluded up to a maximum of five hundred (500) square feet for the property. For any dwelling unit which can be accessed from an alley or from a private road entering at the rear of the dwelling unit, the garage shall only be excluded from floor area calculations if it is located on the alley or at the rear of the unit. The Spring Street Townhouses design and production of construction documents started early in the fall of 1987 and were 90% complete before the acceptance of Ordinance 54. We recently applied for a building permit but were rejected due to the above section of Ordinance 54. Part of our hardship is having a project completed before the acceptance of the Ordinance and recently submitted for a building permit anticipating spring construction, but after the acceptance of the Ordinance. This situation has created an unnecessary hardship of $60,000 and time delays by the rejection of our building permit and resulting redesign to meet the exact letter of this new Ordinance. We feel our project meets the exact intent of Ordinance 54, plus provides additional community benefits and seek a variance to alleviate this hardship. The following further explains our hardship and how the intent of the new Ordinance has been met. .,., Letter to Board of Zoning Adjustment 24 March 1988 Page Two At the outset of our design, it was decided to utilize alley access for one unit and relocate an existing driveway curb cut off of busy Spring Street to Hopkins Street, a less utilized street, for the second unit. This new relocation was reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. This decision was two-fold. First, the most appropriate orientation of units is to the west for unobstructed views downvalley and toward Aspen Mountain. The views to the south are obstructed by the rear of the townhouses across the alley and overlook the alley, driveways and garage of that project. East views are obstructed by the neighboring duplex and north views by two beautiful, full blue spruce trees which are being retained. With the east orientation, the units divide into a north and south unit requiring north (Hopkins Street) and south (alley) access, allowing the Owner the enjoyment of a substantial property right, the best possible orientation and usage of the property. The second factor in the decision was as a corner lot, this property provides two street frontages and two potential rear yards. By orienting to the east, the longer street frontage of 100 feet versus 60 feet is used as unobstructed greenspace for the City's and Owner's benefit. To further maximize the greenspace, the project was set back further to the west than required to provide an additional 1,325 sq. ft. of greenspace to the east or city side of the project. Also by locating the garages and driveways to the west end of the property, an additional 660 sq. ft. of unobstructed greenspace was obtained on the east, giving the west the appearance of the building rear. With the garages located on this perceived rear, one of two potential rears, the impact is the same, if not less, as being located on the alley, the other possible rear. If the garage in discussion was located to the alley side, it would have more impact on the project front, reducing greenspace and being more visible to the public. One of the intents of the new Ordinance is to provide unobstructed greenspace on the street frontage for everyone's benefit. With a corner lot, two such street frontages are provided. This project provides its longest side (Spring Street) as its street front yard which creates the additional benefit of 1,985 sq. ft. of greenspace oriented toward the town. We feel the Spring Street Townhouses meet the intent of the Ordinance with a generous additional benefit, more greenspace. The second intent of the Ordinance is to locate garages to the rear of properties. As previously explained, corner lots have two potential rear sides and, by creating our longer street front at the east side as the perceived front, our perceived rear yard becomes the west, where the garages are located. This placement allows the garages to be hidden as much as possible. " . Letter to Board of Zoning Adjustment 24 March 1988 Page Three The final intent of Ordinance 54 is to prevent property owners from excessive building mass by limiting possible FAR. We did not maximize our FAR which is an allowable 4,500 sq. ft. of FAR, with 1,000 sq. ft. of garage FAR, for a total of 5,500 sq. ft. of FAR. The project has 5,080 sq. ft. of FAR, including 310 sq. ft. of FAR for each garage. We are 400 sq. ft. below the maximum allowable FAR. Again, we have fulfilled the intent of the code by not maximizing or extending our allowable FAR. The Spring Street Townhouses have access off the alley, have the garages located in the perceived rear, provide maximum green- space on the longest street frontage, and are below the maximum allowable FAR. We have not violated the intent of the new Ordinance 54 and feel we should not be penalized for this additional benefits we have provided to the City. We appreciate your consideration of this variance and reqeust you grant its approval. Sincerely, ( J(jJ'1 !) , jfi"y,rt/U,O:Y/:'Q.( Doug GI<~ybeal ~A - Partner DG:sv ~-".. ~ , CITY OF ASPEN . Date: 25 March 1988 Appellant: Hagman Yaw Architects, Ltd Address: Phone: Address: Case No.: '210 S. Galena. Suite 24. Aspen 925-2867 OWner: M & W Properties Tonv Mazza and Frank Woods 205 S. Mill. Suite 301 A Aspen, Colorado 81611 Location of Property: Lots A & B, Block Block and Lot No.) (Street and u Building Permit Application and prints or any other pertinent data must accompany, ,tbis application, and will be made part ~f CASE NO.: .'. . THE BOARD WILL RETURN THIS APPLICATION IF IT DOES NOT CONTAIN ALL THE FACTS IN QUESTION. DESCRIPTION OF-PROPOSED EXCEPTION SHOWING JUSTIFICATIONS "'.'.'.,-", See attache'd letter. "'"IJ--'- 'i '. " .'.:l Will you be represented"by counsel? . '.1 ., <Yes No x -1:'" D~~:~:L~~~~~~_D_=:::::~::::~:=:::::::::) PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIRING THE BUILDING INSPECTOR TO FORWARD T!~~ APfLICATION TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND REA~~N FOR NOT GRAllTING: ~~i4 ~~ Q 3tl7 ~.au- V~ 1j1/( o~f ~~~~~~~~ rtc+/~1..'1-~,?(e)[J)~~ lA'W. Q~~~~~'~Mw...~ ~t--o 5Q; ,.pf--. ~ ~( t:'cn ~ J~. Llfp.:'" ~ CJs~ ~ b.e ~ }),~~_ 0.- ~A~JU'qft-:{~1~/R\~__-C1tt1a. ~~.m;'=~ 10M __ ~ .~d-;,., ~ J'X;~" ~ IT ~.: . -. - "--.. -- ' - '- - . ~Jltu Status . gned PERMIT REJECTED, DATE ~ DECISION DATE APPLICATION FILED DATE OF HEARING MAILED SECRET~~Y 1- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Case 188-3 M & W PROPERTIES BEFORE THE CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962, as amended, a public hearing will be held in the Council Room, City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 24, Official Code of Aspen. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. The particulars of the hearing and of the requested variance are as follows: Date and Time of Meetina: Date: Time: April 7, 1988 4:00 p.m. Second Floor Council Chambers Owner for variance: Appellant for Variance: and Frank Woods) Hagman Yaw Architects Name: M & W Properties, (Tony Mazza Address: 205 S. Mill, Suite 301A Aspen, Colorado 81611 Location or description of property: Location: Lots A & B, Block 104, City of Aspen variance Reauested: Applicant is requesting a 310 sq ft variance for a proposed garage that does not access from the alley. Section 24-3.7 (e) (3) Aspen Muni Code. Garages are excluded from floor area calculations up to 500 sq ft per unit. For any dwelling unit which can be accessed from an alley entering at the rear of the unit, the garage shall only be excluded from floor area calculations if it is located on the alley or at the rear of the unit. Will applicant be represented bv counsel: Yes: No: X The City of Aspen Board of Adjustment 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado8161l Remo Lavagnino, Chairman Jan Carney, Deputy City Clerk 1- ~ . HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS LID 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 303/925.2867 - - 24 March 1988 Board of Zoning Adjustment City of Aspen 506 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Variance Request Spring Street Townhouses Lot A & B, Block 104, City of Aspen, Colorado Dear Board Members: On behalf of the Owners of the Spring Street Townhouses, we seek variance from the recently instated Ordinance 54 to allow the exclusion of 310 sq. ft. of garage FAR, the total FAR for one of two garages, which is accessed off of Hopkins Street. The second garage is accessed off of the alley. Ordinance 54 states: Garages and carports. For the purpose of calculating floor area ratio and allowable floor area for a lot whose principal use is residential, garages and carports shall be excluded up to a maximum area of five hundred (500) square feet per dwelling unit; all garage or carport space in excess of five hundred (500) square feet per dwelling unit shall be included as part of the residential floor area calculation, provided however that on residential properties containing Historic Landmarks that do not meet applicable minimum lot area requirements, garages and carports shall be excluded up to a maximum of five hundred (500) square feet for the property. For any dwelling unit which can be accessed from an alley or from a private road entering at the rear of the dwelling unit, the garage shall only be excluded from floor area calculations if it is located on the alley or at the rear of the unit. The Spring Street Townhouses design and production of construction documents started early in the fall of 1987 and were 90% complete before the acceptance of Ordinance 54. We recently applied for a building permit but were rejected due to the above section of Ordinance 54. Part of our hardship is having a project completed before the acceptance of the Ordinance and recently submitted for a building permit anticipating spring construction, but after the acceptance of the Ordinance. This situation has created an unnecessary hardship of $60,000 and time delays by the rejection of our building permit and resulting redesign to meet the exact letter of this new Ordinance. We feel our project meets the exact intent of Ordinance 54, plus provides additional community benefits and seek a variance to alleviate this hardship. The following further explains our hardship and how the intent of the new Ordinance has been met. ---..I,,~. c --. , ',j Letter to Board of Zoning Adjustment 24 March 1988 Page Two At the outset of our design, it was decided to utilize alley access for one unit and relocate an existing driveway curb cut off of busy Spring Street to Hopkins Street, a less utilized street, for the second unit. This new relocation was reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. This decision was two-fold. First, the most appropriate orientation of units is to the west for unobstructed views downvalley and toward Aspen Mountain. The views to the south are obstructed by the rear of the townhouses across the alley and overlook the alley, driveways and garage of that project. East views are obstructed by the neighboring duplex and north views by two beautiful, full blue spruce trees which are being retained. With the east orientation, the units divide into a north and south unit requiring north (Hopkins Street) and south (alley) access, allowing the Owner the enjoyment of a substantial property right, the best possible orientation and usage of the property. The second factor in the decision was as a corner lot, this property provides two street frontages and two potential rear yards, By orienting to the east, the longer street frontage of 100 feet versus 60 feet is used as unobstructed greenspace for the City's and Owner's benefit. To further maximize the greenspace, the project was set back further to the west than required to provide an additional 1,325 sq. ft. of greenspace to the east or city side of the project. Also by locating the garages and driveways to the west end of the property, an additional 660 sq. ft. of unobstructed greenspace was obtained on the east, giving the west the appearance of the building rear. With the garages located on this perceived rear, one of two potential rears, the impact is the same, if not less, as being located on the alley, the other possible rear. If the garage in discussion was located to the alley side, it would have more impact on the project front, reducing greenspace and being more visible to the public. One of the intents of the new Ordinance is to provide unobstructed greenspace on the street frontage for everyone's benefit. With a corner lot, two such street frontages are provided. This project provides its longest side (Spring Street) as its street front yard which creates the additional benefit of 1,985 sq. ft. of greenspace oriented toward the town. We feel the Spring Street Townhouses meet the intent of the Ordinance with a generous additional benefit, more greenspace. The second intent of the Ordinance is to locate garages to the rear of properties. As previously explained, corner lots have two potential rear sides and, by creating our longer street front at the east side as the perceived front, our perceived rear yard becomes the west, where the garages are located. This placement allows the garages to be hidden as much as possible. . c Letter to Board of Zoning Adjustment 24 March 1988 Page Three The final intent of Ordinance 54 is to prevent property owners from excessive building mass by limiting possible FAR. We did not maximize our FAR which is an allowable 4,500 sq. ft. of FAR, with 1,000 sq. ft. of garage FAR, for a total of 5,500 sq. ft. of FAR. The project has 5,080 sq. ft. of FAR, including 310 sq. ft. of FAR for each garage. We are 400 sq. ft. below the maximum allowable FAR. Again, we have fulfilled the intent of the code by not maximizing or extending our allowable FAR. The Spring Street Townhouses have access off the alley, have the garages located in the perceived rear, provide maximum green- space on the longest street frontage, and are below the maximum allowable FAR. We have not violated the intent of the new Ordinance 54 and feel we should not be penalized for this additional benefits we have provided to the City. We appreciate your consideration of this variance and reqeust you grant its approval. z:;~~ Doug G~ybeal WA --- Partner DG:sv County of Pitkin ) ) SSe ) State of Colorado ~ - AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE BY POSTING OF A VARIANCE HEARING BEFORE THE CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF . ADJUSTMENT (Pursuant to Section 2-22 (c) of the Municipal Code) follows: The undersigned, being first dUly sworn, deposes and says. as " ",. . " " ; . ~ . . ....,., .', 1. I , _o.QLlQ~::.G.BA'i'Bt:.AL , being or . representing an Applicant', hefore the City of Aspen Board of .. ;.;. Adjustment, personally ce'rt'ify that -the attached photograph ... ..~. . fairly and accurately represents ,the sign posted as Notice of the , variance. hearing on thfs matter in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it 'could be seen from the nearest public way) and from the that the said sign was posted 'and d.fl. day of jjAP.-Cl:/. - , , . day of isePJ-L-' . .' , , !9..BfL. C"I. "', ? --- visible continuously , 19.88.., to the (Must be posted for .' ..,ft" at least ten (10) fiull days before the:;headng date). (Attach photograph her~) :".#0 ..... - j '" . . APPLICANT "~~N~~ Signatu Subscribed and sworn to before me this ,J.h day of 4pnl , . ~~~:l'c.~;'<, L fr~)' h,.~ , . . , - , - . WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. My commission expires: z-q-'1c_ U, . Notary Publ:i~ - Z D S 6:-, (Me.... " Address ... .J ~ ..J --_....~__I p.'^, " NORMAN E. LARKINS PRESIDENT ASPEN TITLE CORPORATION DONo\lO 0" VEITCH MAW.OER THE ASPEN PROfESSIONAL DUIltMNO, SUrl. t02 too EAST HOPKINS AVENUE! ASPEN, COlORADO Itell TELEPHONE: ASPEN 13031 920-4050 BASAU 1303)121.474' DENVeR DIRECT 13OJ15.'.....83 ~ ~, Order No. A88-009 TELECOPIER: (303)120-_2 ADJACENT lMNERSlIlP CERTIF ICAIE ASPEN TiTlE OORl'ORATION, II corporlltlon organized IInd existing under and by virtue of the laws of the Stllte of Colorado, IIEREBY CERTI F I ES Hagman Yaw Architects ltd. That It has made a cllreful and diligent search of the records In the office of 1IIe Clerk tlm! Recorder for Pitkin County, COlorado, IInd has determined that those persons, firms or entities set forth on the Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by th I s reference. I ncorporated here I n and made a part hereof, reflect the epparent owners of lots, tracts, parcels and condomInIum un I ts I y I ng with In 300 feet of the follow I n9 descr I bed real properiy situate, lying and being In the Couniy of Pitkin, State o~ Colorado, to-wltl .' lots A and B, Block 104 City and Townsite of Aspen This CertifIcate has been prepared for the use and benefit of the above named applicant and the City or Taln of----8soen In the Oouniy of Pitkin, state of Colorado. TIlE L1l'8ll1TY OF TIlE CO~I'AIIY IIEREUNDER IS EXPRESSLY lIMIlED 10 TIlE AMlUKT OF WE FEE PAID FOR TIllS CERTIFlCA1E PLUS $250.00. DATEI March 24, 1988 at 7 a.m. (SEIIlJ ASPEN TiTlE OORPORATlON, a COlorado corporation BYI JUJ.AIJl;dtl Donald D. Veltch - Vlce h"~ld,,"l/l1a,,ager AfFI.IATEO OFFICEI: ORAND COUNTY: IUMMIT COUNTY:. Tn! TitlE COMPANY,INC. SUMallT CoUNTY An!JTRACT CoMPANY FRASER VALLEY CENfEA/FRASEA 108 'lOATH RIOOE STREET POST OFFICE BOX "5 POST OFFtCE BOX '10 WINTER PAnt<. COlORADO 110482 BAeCKENRIOOE. COlOAADO 10424 13031721.8071 (:J03I'53.&12O . AJ.lI:kI.IOJ 1J\:!<l1581;J '8 31111 HI: n 88, 1'2 Cl\!I4 uau: COUNTYI EAm.E COUN"n TlTut CORPORATION THE VAil PAOFESSIOr4AL BUU>>Uo., SUITE 301 .53 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD WEST VAIl, COlORADO 1I11S57 13031 '11.1423 I'd ".-.".",".......1 ...,,>;,, Block 104 J~-~&~~pring Street Townhouses '-- - 205 South Mi 11 Sui te 301A Aspen, CO 81611 .' v Lots E & F: Theodore B. Oki e, Chil drens Trust 1560 Wilson San Marino, CA 91108 / v Lots G & H: Ralph P Melville & Norman Bache1dor 333 East Durant Aspen, CO 81611 ./ * Lot 1 Jack 0 & Eloise H 11gen 729 East Hopkins Ave Aspen, CO 81611 ,- Lots 0 & P: Hodge Capitol Company Suite 129, 1505 Bridgeway Blvd Sausa1ito, CA 94965 * ASPEN ATHLETIC CLUB CONDOS I V All Units: CDES Partners c/o Coates Reid & Waldron 720 East Hyman Ave Aspen, CO 81611 EDGE OF AJAX CONDOS * Unit 1: Dennis Chookaszian 214 17th Street Wilmette, IL 60091 / j * Unit 2: Tamara & James F Hunting 715 East Hopkins Ave #2 Aspen, CO 81611 / Uni ts 3,4,5: Edge of Ajax Inc P.O. Box 2202 Aspen, CO 81612 * Corrections to preliminary list -. '" ASPEN MAIN CONDO (con't) \1* Unit 303: Schroder, RL & Joan C 53 Pima Ct Boulder, CO 80302 Block 105 , .' , * Lots A - D: Hannah Dustin Building Assoc Box 2238 Aspen, CO 81612 .; Lots E - I: Elaine Kraut 18145 Colline Vue Blvd Brookfield, WI 53220 Block 100 * Lots D & E: Donald M & Jeannie M Lemos James A & Karen D Cutts P.O. Box 321 Aspen, CO 81612 oj Lots 4 & 5: David S Milton 2025 South Brentwood Blvd St Louis, MI 63144 .j * Lots F - I: Spri ng Street PO 616 East Hyman Ave Aspen, CO 81611 Block 98 \/Lots E-G, E10' of D, 5-7: George L & Gerald F Carisch c/o Carisch Theaters, Inc. 641 Lake Suite 212 Wayzata, MN 55391 {Lots K-N, Wi of 0: Thomas D McCloskey, Bonnie F McCloskey; Ronald D Austin, Trustee P.O. Box 7846 Aspen, CO 81612 J Easq of 0, all P: Dayton Heidelberg Distributing Co 1518 Dalton Street Cincinnati, OH 45214 , v' * Lots Q, Westi of R: Kuper, Ellen June 624 E Hopkins Ave Aspen, CO 81611 V* Lots S, East i of R: Hopkins Street Venture Box 166 Aspen, CO 81612 * Corrections to preliminary report .t"'-. Chate1et Condos {con'", .} Unit F: I j Unit G: Block 27 Blitz, Robert G Antone 11 i, John 0 1515 S,W. 15th Ave Fort Lauderdale, FL ~ ~3312 . , . DeBoes, Sky1 er Box 8462 Aspen, CO 81612 ,f West 45' of West End Street; Julia A Lendrex P.O. Box 2191 Aspen, CO 81612 I i North l of Lot A-I: Peterhaus, Stephen H 3415 Briestown Court Walnut Creek, CA 9459B Un it 1: ORIGINAL CURVE CONDOS Daniel W Wardwell, Michael Otte, David Melton, Sun Savings & Loan and the Public Trustee / j Unit 101: T~e~~-E-6owart Mountain State Communication P.O. Box E Aspen, CO 81612 .; Unit 102: Elizabeth Ann P1assman Box 10754 Aspen, CO 81612 ,j Unit 103: WH-l-iiffit-IH3tt~a:way I Unit 104: " Unit 105: V Unit 106: j Unit 107: J Mountain State Communication P.O. Box E Aspen, CO 81612 .Greg Sherwi n 1020 East Hopkins As~en, CO 81611 Saft~ra-H-S~ijller Ave #1 Virginia D Murray 333 East 34th Street New York, MY 10001 '- Margaret Cantrup P.O. Box 852 Aspen, CO 81612 Joan Siegel 125 Midland Ave Aspen, CO 81611 , -', ORIGINAL CURVE CONDOS (con't) .lUnit~ 108: . 'Greg 'Snerwin & Brigitte M Hill 1020 East Hopkins Ave #1 Aspen, CO 81611 V Unit 109: 'f Unit 110: l * Unit 201: Ewald Ranier P.O. Box 1225 Aspen, CO 81611 Marco A Grillo & Julie M Phillips 1824 Greenfield Ave West Los Angeles, CA 91125 Suits, Martha Jane Box 8261 Aspen, CO 81611 ~* Unit 202: Original Curve #202 Associates c/o Mc r~enamy 11 Deni se Ct Lincroft, NJ 07738 1* Unit 203: I Unit 204: I Unit 205: Burton D Smith & J Robert Fisher c/o The Wright Connection 17313~ Sunset Blvd Pacific Palisades, CA 90272 Palmer Casey Apt 8 1047 Euclid Street Santa Monica, CA 90403 Mary Jo Berscheit Box 1414 Aspen, CO 81612 ~j* Unit 206: A Frederick Uhler & Frances M Uhler P.O. Box 49 Washington, NJ 07882 I Unit 207: Barbara & Earl Boland 1240 Meadowsweet Road Golden, CO 80401 I ,/ Unit 208: Ethelyn Daroff 1313 Williams Unit 905 Denver, CO 80220 ,/ "* Unit 209: John F Thibodeau P.O. Box 1149 North Conway, NH 03860 / Unit 210: Wi 11 i am R Dunaway & Robi n R Dunaway P.O. Box E Aspen, CO 81612 * Corrections to preliminary report ~_~"_'~.'~._ ..1. .__. Block 99 / Lots C~E: / Lots F&G: I v * Lots H&I: I J * Lot M: / Lots N&O: {* Lots P&Q: ......""'" Jean Vick Trousdale 1010 North Hillcrest Orive Beverly Hill, CA 90210 Anne Chapman P.O. Box 3150 Aspen, CO 81612 W.R. Walton P.O. Box 665 Aspen, CO 81612 Patricia Moore 610 East Hyman Ave Aspen, CO 81611 Furngulf, Ltd 616 E Hyman Street Aspen, CO 81611 Frank J Woods III 205 South Mill #301A Aspen, CO 81611 J * Lots R&S: Patio Building Company Crandall, Or. Jack S & Gesine P.O. Box 1066 Aspen, CO 81612 ASPEN MAIN CONDO Vi Unit 201: Gerschel, Christime Aubale P.O. Box 2985 Aspen, CO 81612 Unit 202: Cooke, Jay III c/o Business Planning Assoc 2nd floor, 260 Franklin Str Boston, Mass. 02110 ., Unit 203: Hovdesven, Bayard Y Box 3810 Aspen, CO 81612 Unit 301: Anderson, Doreen P.O. Box 10635 Aspen, CO 81612 / Unit 302: Thrasher, Edward L Jr P.O. Box 7974 Aspen, CO 81612 * Corrections to preliminary report ..,.", \/ 700 EAST HYMAN CONDOS I Unit 700: William F Carr Trustee P.O. Box 4609 Aspen, CO 81612 , V Unit 702: James M Royston, Louis G Royston, Brian L Wells 107 S Pasadena Drive Pittsburgh, PA 15215 , . " Umt 704: Kirby A & Melinda Z Hamilton 68 Great Meadows Rd Concord, MA 07142 ;' Unit 706: Ronald J & Dana L Cohen 6500 Rock Spring Drive Bethesda, MD 20817 " .. - ~ l * ORIGINAL CURVE CONDOS (con't) Unit 301: / * Unit 302: ( v * Un it 303: .j * Unit 304: I ! i * Un it 305: J * Unit 306: Trent E Cowart 109 Southway Severna Park, MD 21146 Linda Livingston Davis 1673 34th Street NW Washington, DC 20007 Robert Wayne Krakovitz P.O. Box 9618 Aspen, CO 81612 Martinson, Frederick K P.O. Box 3186 Aspen, CO 81612 M Joyce Carlyle 5 Sunray Ct Box 459 Lambeth, Ontario NOLISO 10 Sterling, William L Box 4723 Aspen, CO 81611 i !* Unit 307: Barbara Birch Apt 4-V 165 66th New York City, New York 10023 IUnit 308: 1* Unit 309: I V Unit 310: * Thomas E Thoburn & Vivian E Thoburn 3206 Buckingham Lane Cocoa, FL 32926 Marilyn J Oberembt 1211 E Donges Ct Milwaukee, WI 53217 Leonard & Sandra Cave 10217 Oldfield Dr Kensington, MD 20895 Corrections to preliminary report ,; -....'.." EAST HOPKINS CONDOS /unit 1 North: Pitkin Partner Special Properties c/o Stirling Homes 600 East Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 /Unit 2 North: Ricchivti, Joseph 558 North 23rd Street Philadelphia, PA 19130 if Unit 3 North: Shiekman, Philip 12 South 12th Street 22nd floor, PSFS Building Philadelphia PA 19107 v Unit 1 South: Knode, Michael C & Theresa P P.O. Box 40 Palisade, CO 81526 , Unit 2 South: Rotko, Denise A Suite 200, 227 South 6th Street Philadelphia, PA 19106 lUnit 3 South: Bell, Anthony & Olwen T Box 449 Aspen, CO 81612 CHATELET CONDOS / " Unit A: Lieb, Madeline P.O. Box 4062 Aspen, CO 81612 / UnitB: Chapman, Colin 250 South Original Apt B Aspen, CO 81611 IUnit C: Roth, Jeanne C 121 E Hopkins Chatelet C Aspen, CO 81611 ,I Unit 0: Jerkins, Joseph J c/o Jerkins, Ulachos & Hurley, Attys P.O. Box 1064 Aspen, CO 81612 /Unit E: Walls,Jack M Jr & Charlotte S Box 29 Aspen, CO 81611 " " ,1...",.,.--- , vlB:-2: Ni xon, Denni s E Longoria Ricardo E Box 1359 Laredo, TX 78040 1! B-3: Siegel, Eugene 800 East Hopkins 8-3 Aspen, CO 81611 / "/B-4: Thau, Harold A P.O. Box 1171 Weston, CT 06883 j B-5: Hovsepian, Vahe 1871 Mt Olympus Drive Los Angeles, CA 90046 COLUMBINE CONDO I I . ~ Unlt 1: Sullivan, Edward Murray Jr 801 East Hopkins Ave Aspen, CO 81611 Unit 2: Anderson, Angus Box 557 Aspen, CO 81612 " Unit 3: Grice, Richard H & Susan N P.O. Box 8996 Aspen, CO 81612 , '/Unit 4: Daly, Frank X & Annette c/o Micheal Daniel Productions 1555 N Astor Street Chicago, IL 60610 Y Unit 5: Kravitz, Michael C 6406 Brentfield Drive Dallas, TX 75248 . " -_._.1-- --.. , SPRING STREET CONDO \f R-1: Spring Street Condominium Partners c/a Mannie J Schaefer 1560 Sherman Street Denver, CO 80203 R-2 : Grant, Neal A & Donna R 15000 Na 11 Stanley, KS 66224 I A: Seid, Mel 1104 Dale Ave Aspen, CO 81611 / VB: Seid, Mel 1104 Dale Ave Aspen, CO 81611 / C' Spri ng Street Associ ates Box 1815 Aspen, CO 81612 y D: Spring Street Associates Box 1815 Aspen, CO 81612 LARKSPUR CONDO A-I: Friedman, Lawrence M.& Lynn L 4042 Hanover Court West Bloomfield, MI 48033 / A-2: Timms, Avery J & ~larie J 800 East Hopkins A-2 Aspen, CO 81612 v' A-3: 1cana, Thomas 800 East Hopkins A-3 Aspen, CO 81611 V A-4: Roark, Ronnie 2100 Newt~1 Street Austin, TX 78704 v A-5: Del phi ni urn Associ ates c/o Liddell, Sap 500 Gulf Bl dg Houston, TX 77002 v B-1 : Tozzi, Sinibaldo & Diane 8100 Denwood Sterling Heights, MI 48077 . ..