HomeMy WebLinkAboutlanduse case.boa.500E-Cooper.023-86
----.-.--
._.;. -_:.
"
....'.""'
,,.p'
NOTICE OF PUBI,IC HEARING
Case 186-23
BEFORE THE CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
TO ALL PROPERTY OI'/NERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE
VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW:
Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962, as
amended, a public hearing will be held in the Council Room, City
Hall, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may
be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said
Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the
provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 24, Official Code of
Aspen. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited
to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you
cannot appear personally at. such meeting, then you are urged to
state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to
such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious
consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and
others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request
for variance.
The particulars of the hearing and of the requested variance are
as follows:
Date and Time of Meet~
.Date:
Time:
November 20, 1986
4:00 p.m.
Name:
Russel H. Volk, Trust
Richard W. Yolk, Trustee
Appellant for
Variance:
Donald A. Fleisher
Owner for Variance:
Address: 1000 Chestnut Street
San Francisco, CA 94104
Location or description of property:
Location: N.E. Corner of Galena Street and Cooper Avenue
500 East Cooper Avenue
Variance Requested:
Application attached
Duration of Variance: Permanent
Will applicant be represented by counsel: Yes: No: X
The City of Aspen Board of Adjustment
130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611
Remo Lavagnino, Chairman Jan Carney, Deputy City Clerk
-
~~~
Tnc.
Case No',:
" "
Address"." 710 East Durant
10/22/86
"......
Appellant: The Donald _Flpi~lipr ro
Date:
phone: 303/925-2122
Owner: Russel H. Volk, Trust, ,J\ddress: 1000 Chestnut St., #88
Richard W. Volk.,Trustee San Francisco, CA 94104
Loc.) t i on Cof l' c6p~ r !:}' : N. E. Corner of Ga 1 ena Strppt ann rOO[1pr AvpnllP
500 East Cooper Avenue
(Street and Number of Subdivision Block and Lot Mo.1
Building pe~mit Application and prints or any other' pertinent.
d~t~ must accompany this applitati~n, and will be made part of
CASE NO.: .
TilE BOARD WILL RETl:fRN' TillS' APPLICATION, IF IT DOES NOT. CONTJ\IN' ALl
. .. .' I
THE FACTS IN QUESTION~ .
-'.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED EXCEPTION SHOWING JUSTIFICATIONS
A cus tom constructed, full fitted awn lng on non-retractable frame des i gned
to suit the specific angle of th{: building's face contigious to its open
space. A retractable awning would cause an. undes.irable compromise in the
design of the awnin~. .'
Awnings were included as an important design feature of the building on all
presentations from the onset of the approval process which included.appear-
ances. before the HPC and P &' Z. During the approval jJrocess.'the b.oards re- . '.
quested enlargement of fenestrations. 'The result was that retractable
awnings ~ould en~roach on each other causing the need to .design a continuous,
non-retractable awning.
J
~ill you be represented by counsel?
Yes
No
x
t2. .,~
,{~O~'
(Applicant's Signature)
==:============:Q==:=a=~=u==~=a_Cd___aa_____a~~~aaa___a___ama_R~~~~====~
. '
PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIRI~G THE BUILDING INSPECTOR T
. FORW^RD:T~~I~ _~IqTI~N ~O_ TIJ~ BOARD... OF ~. JOS. TMENT AND REASON FOR NO
GR1\NTING:~~~,"".u~L4-~'~.~(CCJ~' . .
~~I~~. L/-.:?/7. (d.)'~.' '. ....iAJri..sH.~.~ 31Jwcl:J
. -t'V'^-~J2w.J~~ltP~ .... c:~:\,J^-,";"A-fo6.n.U.tM~
~~'~~'~~~5rita cudt-~~F,~~~-~--j
. .' '. .
~
,L . . .' .'.
. .. 5i .
"
Status ~ .
PERiuT REJECTED, DATE 1"6 2--t~
APPLIC1ITION FILED I d!:i. I r
. I I
HAILED
DECISION
D~TE OF BEA,RING
SECRETARY
DATE
"" . .,...-.... ..
,"
'. .,- ','
. .
........ ....,..I""'.....~'"