The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutlanduse case.boa.861 Ute Ave.018-86 .. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Case 186-18 BEFORE THE CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUsTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: ~ Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962, as amended, a public hearing will be held in the Council Room, City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 24, Official Code of Aspen. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. The particulars of the hearing and of the requested variance are as follows: Date and Time of Meeting: Date: Time: March 26, 1987 4:00 p.m. Owner for Variance: Aopellant for Variance: Name: George & Mary Gleason Address: 861 Ute Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 George & Mary Gleason Location or description of prooerty: Location: 861 Ute Avenue Aspen, Colorado Variance Requested: The variance granted allows the enclosure of a deck along the existing line of the deck, however, the map submitted to the Board indicates this line was 10.5 feet from the rear yard. New map shows it is 5 feet from rear yard. Variance needs clarification to exact measurements of a particular survey and whether these different measurements affect the Board's decision to grant or deny the variance. Duration of Variance: Permanent Will aoolicant be represented by counsel: Yes: No: X The City of Aspen Board of Adjustment 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611 Remo Lavagnino, Chairman Jan Carney, Deputy City Clerk . , Date: March 24, 1987 Case No.: 86-18 Appellant: George & Mary Gleason Address: Phone: Address: 861 Ute Avenue ~l::'-/~~::' 861 Ute Avenue Aspen, Colorado George & Mary Gleason Owner: Location of Property: 861 Ute Avenue Lot 11, Ute Subdivision (Street and Number of Subdivision Block and Lot No.) Building Permit Application and prints or any other pertinent data must accompany this application, and will be made part of CASE No.: 86-18 THE BOARD WILL RETURN THIS APPLICATION IF IT DOES NOT CONTAIN ALL THE FACTS IN QUESTION. DESCRIPTION OF APPEAL OF DECISION, DETERMINATION OR FINDING OF BUILDING AND ZONING OFFICIAL A setback variance was granted to allow construction to the line of the existing wood deck. Since the surveys are part of the applicant's hardship and practical difficulty, clarification is needed to determine the exact variance granted. )( :7 /-c it' ~~<f" o v represented by counsel? J/ /~Ci// 0V\ Yes No x \,ill you be (Applicant's Signature' PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIRING THE BUILDING INSPECTOR TO FOR~'lARD THIS APPI,ICATION TO THE BOA'l.D OF ADJUSTMENT AND REASONS FOR DECISION, D~TE~~INATION OR FINDING: The variance granted allows the enclosure of a deck along the existing line of the deck, however, the map submitted to the Board indicates this line was 10.5 feet from the rear yard. New map shows it is 5 feet from rear yard. Variance needs clarification to exact measurements of a particular survey and whether these different meas remen s affe the Board's decision to grant or deny the variance., Status fJ PERMIT REJECTED, DATE DECISION DATE APPLICATION FILED DATE OF HEARING ~ !-;LC, I s0}. , MAILED SECRETARY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Case 186-l8 BEFORE THE CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962, as amended, a public hearing will be held in the Council Room, City Hall, Aspen, COlorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 24, Official Code of Aspen. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. The particulars of the hearing and of the requested variance are as follows: Date and Time of" Meeting: Date: Time: August 28, 1986 4:00 P.M. Owner for Variance: AIlDellant-f'orVariance: Name: George & Mary Gleason Same Address: 861 Ute Ave. Same Location or "description of "oroperty: Location: 86l ute Ave. Description: Lot 11, ute Subdivision variance" Reqnested: Applicant wishes to enclose their patio deck. Property is located in the R-6 (PUD) zoning category. Sec. 24-3.4 area and bulk requirement. Side yard set back is 5 feet, rear yard set back is 15 feet. Applicant appears to be requesting to enclose a deck that cu r rent ly enc roaches in to those set backs. Sec. 24-l3.3(a) No such non-conforming structure may be enlarged in a way that increases its non-conformity. Dnrationof Variance: Permanent Will "al)olicant" be -- reoresented by ""counsel": Yes: --" No: --xx The City of Aspen Board of Adjustment l30 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado8l6ll Remo Lavagnino, Chairman Kim Wilhoit, Deputy City Clerk Date: March 24, 1987 Case No.: 86-l8 Appellant: George & Mary Gleason Address: Phone: Address: 86l Ute Avenue ~L::'-/~~::' 86l Ute Avenue Aspen, Colorado George & Mary Gleason Owner: Location of Property: 86l Ute Avenue Lot ll, Ute Subdivision (Street and Number of Subdivision Block and Lot No.) Building Permit Application and prints or any other pertinent data must accompany this application, and will be made part of CASE No.: 86-l8 THE BOARD WILL RETURN THIS APPLICATION IF IT DOES NOT CONTAIN ALL THE FACTS IN QUESTION. DESCRIPTION OF APPEAL OF DECISION, DETERMINATION OR FINDING OF BUILDING AND ZONING OFFICIAL A setback variance was granted to allow construction to the line of the existing wood deck. Since the surveys are part of the applicant's hardship and practical difficulty, clarification is needed to determine the exact variance granted. will you be represented by counsel? ./~ _ a )( ~/t' /">;;r'" J l /a,'Z: ~ '1-7V\ Yes No x (Applicant's Signature' --------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIRING THE BUILDING INSPECTOR TO FOR~'lARD THIS APPLICATION TO THE BOA'l.D OF ADJUSTMENT AND REASONS FOR DECISION, DETE~~INATION OR FINDING: The variance granted allows the enclosure of a deck along the existing line of the deck, however, the map submitted to the Board indicates this line was lO.5 feet from the rear yard. New map shows it is 5 feet from rear yard. Variance needs clarification to exact measurements of a particular survey and whether these different meas remen s affe the Board's decision to grant or deny the variance., Status fJ PERMIT REJECTED, DATE DECISION DATE APPLICATION FILED DATE OF HEARING ~ /?-C, I s0}. MAILED SECRETARY . 1'"' - '. M E M 0 RAN DUM City of Aspen, Board of Zoning Adjustment George and Mary J. Gleason 861 Ute Ave., 925-7995 Variance Requested: Permission to enclose existing patio-deeR, which has setbacks less than permitted by present code (See Figure A). ZONING CHANGE House was built by present _ owners in 1961 whn lot was zoned AR-Tourist, and conformed to setback requirements of that designation (rear 10', sides 5'). Zoning later was changed to R6 single-family although neighborhood was composed of apartments and condomindums i.e., Aspen Alps, Clarendon, Black Swan, Gant, etc. Current zoning requires 15' rear, 5'sides. TO: FROM: RE: SU~VEY INEQUITIES -- Subsequent surveys have shifted lot lines, leaving questionable boundaries to west and south (~ee Figure B). Surveyor claims all boundaries in that neighborhood are subject to dispute. IMPACT -- Proposed enclosure of existing deck will not have negative impact on neighborhood or comprehensive plan. Aspen Alps open space lies to rear where alteration will occur, condominiums surround us, new hotels at base of Little Nell are one blocK and two blocKs away, etc. Hardships RESTRICTED SPACE -- House was built as family vacation home; owners now have retired and require space and facilities for fulltime living. For example, there are no closets. The proposed renovation will include six closets and increase living space from 860 sqaare feet to 1190 square feet. SAFETY -- Spiral staircase is steep, narrow and dangerous for senior citizens. Present code requires 7' diameter, ou~ is 4'. This will be replaced with a conventional staircase in new design. ENERGY EFFICIENCY -- Present house has 450 square feet of single-glazed windows, with a 40 percent leat loss. New design has 300 square feet of double-glazed south-facing windows. MEDICAL -- Enlarged master bedroom with slab floor will accommodate water bed which has provided great relief in the past for owner's rheumatoid arthritis. ZONING HINDRANCE -- Reason for denial of permit essentially is that setback requirements are not met under current zoning, which(as single-family in a neighborhood of lodges two blocks from the new gondola) is capricious and unreasonable and has resulted in unnecessary hardship to these longtime residents. ~ ~,>>der><- .;tc ~~t~.d:L /-njf "f...-< -d-e--/<R7 . .' " , r' " ~"" F" .......J UTE AVENUE S3'.3"30~E 50.07' . ~ o : . . . . . . . 5,026 SQ.FT. z , . . . N . 5 ~ I JOHNSON SURVEY 1986 k . N I .1 ~l 0' , ~I ~, z '" N 39"5842 W ~9.29 , I LOT II UTE ADDITION ASPEN, COLORADO FIGURE A 11,1' :or '" 52 I ~f I I " ~I ~I I I . . 't ~ '. u,: . 5 o . 5SZ.12' TO COR. I ASP!:N twWT. f jl i J i .' ( < :t ~--1~ ~~'" ~ ;.-, i= <:> '" - ~ " ~ lib .........:J.. -.l)\:'. ~ .... ... ...... , ...... .. ~ :- '" " " U TC AVENUE ~ "<:> - ~~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ '" . ~-tl\) ~ ~..... 1 00_ t't, t'I\ ~ L- ~~ W"'Trav)( 188"1 G Gle~r4n 1'1'1 Noh~.: /h<< I,~r,.r't'nce. Survfy EN Ufe S'~"J'~/flOr) tin f.'le df C/lt~fA5pm is -fh~ M('A/~'/ "5"rY~j' ~E CHALET /~ c ~, " LJ ,JOi/l.j~"" /186.!'I.e'l' N 'Yf ~8 <fZ:! ()f{Hf /./1) -!jMCIJ8'L ,'81 1f'.ZI'/tI3"~ 39 ofF.d- /,7Z' LO T II UTE SUB. F IGURf 8 "\ ~' ~ I I I I I :CI ~I ~ III I ~ ~ ;::, ~ - '" ~ ; I :t. ~ ~ I;' ~ .. ~ _I ~ ~ "' t.I ,~ .... ~ I It, " ~Ilt~ \l)' -. ~ I ~ ~ ., .. "" 1:'0 -- I ...... .t. I Ul I l.t) ~ ~ , I I - c> - ''!\ I "t ~ ~ - tt~ I O(he f 0,,,"-; OfFset 1,0$ '- ~, ~" ~"-" - UTE AVENUE s :sao!5'30~E 50.07' .. --------- -.. ~ . o = . . . . o . . 5,026 SQ.FT z , . ~ . N ~ " ~ I JOHNSON SURVEY 1986 ~ m N I J ~I 0, ~l ~, I ",-:f71" &e: ~ : I I I N 39"'51 42 W 49.29 I I LOT II UTE ADDITION ASPEN, COLORADO FIGURE A . . c, I ~I z, ~I 0 . . "l ~ " u.~ . " i 0 i ~ I " tj . C) it-" I C"~, I'lL /:;' ;-- X Ii; 13 iT- _ - ------1 582.12' TO COR.I ASPEN lWNST. REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF- ADJUS"I'MENT AUGUST 28. 19~ Case #86-17 The Ranch Chairman Remo Lavagnino read the requested variance that the property is located in the C-l zone district; the building is already over-signed. Section 24-5.10(2) "the aggregate sign area permitted along anyone street shall not exceed 1 square foot of sign area for each 3 feet of lot line frontage. Applicant appears to be requesting a 10 square foot sign variance above the limit." The applicant did not receive a packet of procedure and did not post the sign of hearing on the premises. The adjoining property owners were notified; however, the applicant was not told the post a sign. Lavagnino said the Board cannot hear the case unless the sign has been posted. Lavagnino requested this case be renoticed and signed property and rescheduled. Case #86-18 GleasQll Chairman Remo Lavagnino said this is located at 861 Ute Avenue, George & Mary Gleason. Applicant wishes to enclose their patio, located in R-6 PUD zone category. Section 24-3.4, Area and bulk requirements; side yard setback is 5 feet, rear yard setback 15 feet. Applicant appears to be requesting to enclose a deck that currently encroaches into those setbacks. Section 24-13.3 (a) No such non-conforming structure may be enlarge in a way that increase its non-conformity. George Gleason presented the affidavit of posting requirement. Gleason told the Board they built this house in 1961, retired ~ years ago and have been living in the house full-time. Gleason requested ~ variance to enclose a lO by 32 patio deck. Gleason said living in the existing structure is subjecting them to practical difficulties and unnecessary hardships. Gleason said the special circumstances have not resulted from their action and that special circumstances apply to their property which do not apply to neighbor ing properties. Gleason stated granting of a variance is essential to the enjoyment of basic property rights enj oyed by other neighbor ing properties. The granting of this variance will not adversely effect the comprehensive general plan. Gleason told the Board letters were sent out to adjacent property owners. Gleason showed what the house looked like in 1961 and the surrounding properties. Gleason said at the time the house was built, this property was zoned AR/tourist and the setback requirements were 10 feet from the rear lot line and 5 feet from the side lot line. Seven units could have been built on the property at that time. Downzoning in 1974, this was zoned duplex and the Gleasons decided to put a studio unit in the downstairs. Gleason presented approved building plans from 1974. Whitaker asked if the property lines were still in dispute. Gleason said 1 , 0t-tlt Jill') \ t~ ~\''''I' I , REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AUGUST 28. 1986 they are. Gleason told the Board when the house was built, they used the McNeil 1889 survey and the 5 yard side setback requirement was met. Gleason told the Board he is within the setback on one side of the house and not on the other side because the house is skewed. Bill Drueding, building department, told the Board in R-6/PUD a single family is exempt from PUD review, a duplex is not. Drueding said he was not aware this structure was a duplex and assumed it was a single family house. Drueding said a duplex with a PUD overlay, has to go through a specified review process. Francis Whitaker said under a PUD overlay, setbacks can be varied. Drueding said these can be varied by --------------- and the Board of Adjustment has no jurisdiction over that. Drueding said the Board can hear this variance reqeust if the house is returned to a single family dwelling, which can be done be removing the kitchen and bathroom. Drueding suggested the applicant can change the house to a single family dwell ing and have the Board of Adjustment hear this case, or they may apply to go through PUD review as a duplex. l IA n.4V,.). i,a l" 'f' Gleason said to the south they are less than 15 feet, which is what the R-6 zoning requires. The house was legitimate at 10'6" when the house was built under the AR/tourist zoning. On the west side, the house is 2 feet from the property line according to Johnson's survey. Gleason told the Board he has two other surveys, each showing different property lines. Gleason said is not of their doing and has put the house closer to the lot line than is allowed by Code. Gleason showed slides of the house, surrounding properties, and the effect the enclosed deck would have. Mrs. Gleason pointed out the hanging rod closets, which they plan to replace. Gleason said the house is 860 square feet without a single closet; this variance would allow them to have six closets. The Gleasons showed slides of the proposed addition. The slides show a spiral staircase, which will be replaced for safety reason. The addition will allow solar heating. Gleason told the Board they would tear out the deck and start from scratch, pouring a slab. Gleason said they will be adding about 330 square feet. Rick Head asked why the house wa not extended to the north. Mrs. Gleason said they would have had to re-route a stream and cut down a lot of cottonwoods. The Gleasons showed slides and map of the cottonwoods and the stream. Jim Markalunas, water department, told the Board this stream is part of the Durant Mine water springs and is adj udicated by the city and the appl icant cannot change the stream without getting into litigation. Markalunas told the Board when the Gleason's applied for a building permit in 1961, the survey situation was very uncertain. 2 REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AUGUST 28. 1986 Markalunas said the structure wa since compliance with the zoning regulations at that time. Erickson asked if they planned to remove the brick wall. Gleason told the Board this will become the new wall of the addition. Lavagnino said closet space is not a reason to grant a variance. The safety aspect of the spiral staircase is a valid reason for a variance. To bring a dwelling up to code is beneficial for the homeowner and for the community. Lavagnino pointed out the solar can be installed without a variance. The Board does not deal in conveniences. Lavagnino said he feels the valid reasons for a variance outweigh the convenience reasons. Lavagnino agreed this applicant is asking very little compared to the lodges surrounding this property. Whi taker sa id the appl icant is request ing to enclose a deck. Whitaker said it seems they are not really tearing down a deck but starting from scratch. Whitaker said this case is being submitted on the condition that it revert to a single family dwelling. Whitaker said he feels there is a hardship because of the surveys. Whitaker said he would be in favor of the lO foot setback, but is concerned about the 5 foot side yard setback because of the neighbors. Whitaker said the setback is for protection of the neighbors. Erickson said the Black Swan may have been build to the old survey and the setbacks are correct, even if the lot lines were not. Donna Fisher, representing the Black Swan property owners, told the Board they are against having this deck enclosed. The owners feels this is very close and will block a window in one unit and will be very visible from other units. The owners feel this request will effect their property and this addition will be very visible. Erickson asked if it is possible to jog the deck rather can come straight back. Drueding said it wold still require a variance. Gleason said the area is small, only 8 feet by lO feet, taking 3 feet away is a lot. Lavagnino suggested adding the 3 feet on the street side so they have the same square footage. Mrs. Gleason said they could do some more research into which survey is correct. Lavagnino closed the public hearing. Josephine Mann said the applicant has demonstrated there are practical difficulties. The special conditions do not result from the actions of the applicant because of the variation in the surveys; however, in that area many property owners have difficulties with their surveys. The granting of a variance is essential to enjoyment of a substantial property right enjoyed by all properties in the same vicinity. Ms. Mann said she feels that is very strong in favor of a variance in this case. The 3 , REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AUGUST 28. 1986 granting of a variance will not adversely effect the purpose of the land use plan. Ms. Mann agreed with this because of leaving the trees, contour and the stream. Francis Whitaker said the only problem he has with this case is the 5 foot setback. Whitaker said he would be willing to grant the variance on a hard ship basis with a 10 foot rear yard setback but maintain the 5 foot side yard setback. Whitaker said there is plenty of room to extend to the east, there is 12 feet left. The building could be shifted over and expanded that way. Whitaker said he would like to see the 5 foot setbacks maintained both east and west. Whitaker said this variance is conditioned upon this becoming a single family dwelling. Lavagnino agreed the Board has no jurisdiction unless this is a single family dwell ing. Erickson said eh would approve both side and rear yard setbacks. Erickson said the distance between the two buildings does not change, regardless of the survey. Charles Paterson said he agrees with Ms. Mann. He does not feel the Board should redesign the house, and should grant the variance the way it is being asked of the Board. Paterson said the building is already encroaching in the setback, and 3 inches will not make any difference. Paterson said he is willing to grant a variance based on the old survey. Head said he is willing to grant the variance as applied for. Head moved to approve the variance in its present form; seconded by Paterson. Roll call vote; Whitaker, no; Paterson, yes; Ms. Mann, yes; Head, yes; Lavagnino, no. Motion NOT carried. Whitaker moved to grant a variance the rear yard setback along the line of the existing wood deck as far east as the 5 foot side yard setback but not to encroach on the west side yard setback, deny ing the side yard setbacks; Head seconded. All in favor, motion carried. The Board requested a drawing be made to attached to this case to illustrate the variance granted. Whitaker also requested the city attorney's office draft a resolution for this case. Ms. Mann moved to adjourned at 7:25 p.m.; seconded by head. All in favor, motion carried. 4 ~ Date :11 ,iv/I)' 14,'(6 C Appellant: t;Ec'I\(i[; r 4/;11,''/ h'LB/htJ4 CITY OF ASPEN ""'" .,..tse No.: 810-18 Address,: Phone: ,Address: '<"it} j)"t-"e/J.i/li' -' q:J.~- 0407 \ "3'&/ UriS BI/f Owner: r;?JJK'hE {)/l/f/'</ (;'1 hA-S'/hL i:>IM - U-n::; ~ Location cf Pr6pe-rty: 'F?// /JrA-/J-vE L C' T / / U T ff' ' S'VI3.;}liI!Ji uAI (Street and Number of Subdivision Block and Lot No.) Building Permit Applicationandpdnts or any other' pertinent c1atil must acc9.11)pa~ this application, and will be made part of ClISE NO.: '?2!LJ.-l?S. ", . THE BOARD WILL RETORNTHIS' Al'PLICATION IF IT DOES NOT CONTAIN ALL THE FACTS IN QUESTION. DESCRIPTI9N OF PROPOSED EXCEPTION SHOWING JOSTIFICATIONS . '- ~ l1)t U'ttlt ;-I(~~ crW ~ tpa-tu' tU~k tU~ ~ atfiLelU/Y.. d,.zzrydi. , ' : , " " , t{)~ w1 ~ ~ /9&/ 4?G I'~ t'ltc/<. ~ ~ 'f'-It'-Ur 4-ld".., 5 pf- iJbwW-M-~a..J 11~1;J ~>v/tJ .fkl:?l.'~~~: -'~ L:.u- a,!,'CI\ ~J-.4'/o t!-J'!~~ wJi!; ~ El/<,du.~~. 4 ' ~ Yff Jz~1. e ~ ftt J{ AI- ~ud ,S- f:r- /J t/(~d;, 4~ ~~ ~ ~vI ~ ~, ~ --fo-{~ A:(zL --erZ~ ~a ~ '-U It-~ ~ -h4ht-ui ~ AdklL 4 1,9.lu#- l'1ill yoL1i7 be representEffi b~ counseli' : Yes L- 1/ No I ~ / ~J},,';J A~ Jll C'101.!ltt.,c::::. (Applicant · s Signat,," I ==~===~==============a_c=_====a_____________~__._____&._________~=======--- PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING,ORDINANCE REQUIRI~tG THE BUILDiNGINSPECTOF TO \D\~ . ~~~M~~~~~ "l"'OvI ~ ~ ~~ ~h~.,....~;)'i~I~~~J A0S<<d-. ~~r ^""l k~ cJ~""-=-" Sta tus Si9~ PER1UT REJECTED, DATE DECisION ' ' ~ATE APPLIC1,TION FIL D D)\TE OF HEA~ "!1:1'~l ' H1\ILED 8 SECRETARY ~ A ___ _iJ!.t- .....-.. .' ... ......... .,"",.~.".~'. County of Pitkin ) ) ss. ) State of Colorado AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE BY POSTING OF A VARIANCE HEARING BEFORE THE CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (Pursuant to Section 2-22 (c) of the Municipal Code) follows: The undersigned, being first duly sworn, deposes and says, as , 1. I ,-CE_tdLG~__v.2__.c..~gAIP-2:}__, being or - representing an Applicant b,efore the City of Aspen Board of Adj ustment, personally c~rtify that the attached photograph fairly and accurately represents ,the sign posted as Notice of the variance hear ing on this matt.er in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public from the IS' I'IGlY) and that the said sign was posted 'and visible continuously , 19-'l? , to the day of N OTlCF. OF ,~\PPI.IC AllON FOR A VARIAN(:E FIWM TUE ZONIHG CODE KnIt oIU)Mm-nr- APPI.ICAHT:Jlll C;/~~fT" IHe C.Clf,l,SON _ff(,:: j.::~~lT."':.M pc.t.Uo",. t P. (;!-1!fk/~a:', i; "'/I 'i WAIi~fll. $(CY /liMn.,-!'", nR TYPE OF llalUAlU:iO --ME UUf. 51EI): f?IAIt t SIOF SET HAC t( VARIANCE" "'0 rN'I.O'E ~)(,'rl"'G DECK' . I o Of ....IN.... TlONS'OR COM FEIl:RmiTO Ti liu.. 00.,1t S~tIOU.Jl .. .' :': A-u(i" , ~9~. (Must be posted for t:1. the ,hearing date). AZ4~-?1 ~ /".//<4 Signature Subscribed this /31{1 19~, by and sworn to before me day of liu..!bu 5 r ' (t;fO.0bL (<.1 00:050 z1 ,. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIA1.ln~E{'~;!'1 " . tly Cemll'lfH;~, ~.., U15/13J My coroml S5 10n expl res: IJ.I:n1 ~,,'j.~~ d ,~, ll;; I;, ..:i,'<;".J, ,0\, '=fY2 ,e.. UtG. t.lpen, OJ 61511 <.. .Ld:.k..i..-If_A. ~ {((, Notary Public /~~. . ....t,~"': . - f 'f'lt'tl ,. - 'S!(.~n r fi'n :1.,. .~ .,1Crl,,,, '!O/l t _~.""...".'lt.:J_,...."._ Address ...q.......rii,;',,,. ~ /, . // ~v .---~-~---------7)_tfI1&wt~~~ 4';'/-0-- -------- ______n_ 'n.L_U-d;L cfu.t . - -~--'-----"----~/'4-t2d tit. II ------- ---RP.1ih n_~____~ ~1-LM"J.l-"'" (f"2/~n-,t~,,<, ~ ------~-ft~Ll__2lR71!.e.. r. ((---q!:-4~ - -- ----.---- - ---kfLL--~~...iJ-" ~ '. ----- ~---- .---- --~a ..) (l.a.. ~J./-f)~ II qv' .(; //. .;t"AflAo}. ('It, K'4A~4,Y1 ~ ~~ z;f:ft:~~ ;:~ - ij0Cl-~ ~A~, d-dVr ~d41~~~~ ~------- ~ JI:; -~_i~ Ik,~ ,cl& 7;.4,,:; /I--:1<F _ _____~n___m_ ----L'I31-~~~...Ll'; . - u_ - - __ _~ _ u-.:.d~H-<-v_~~tf~L~_______ / __ __m_ _ ______1E3 _~ .,-f' ~ u~__________ I (, ;YCAj1z/~ :lFf/~ ~L/ .n__ .. _n -9-c"--.-~-i ,41 . ;~ili7.~;," -----.-- ...a.'t,CL);.Lk..,f;:~- . '--,.- -. ---- _____________7'1 P ';;(.A~~ #/ 3 -(!, ~ ~Jiim. -- -..- n___mn - -------21~2?~~~'-1.tl'L<js-:--------! f~3 ~k~/-'_t)~~C -.--- __n___ ,-:~----_,_ ~n__:" ~\ tJ~fl,)- ---~-- n_____IFfa.._0, ~ _~----. . - - --~ --- __utE 0 ~-----G4____---- __ =if:-L'fr:/IA~~Jv-.- ....~..-- --_--~~~~~J~=~~~~-s:-:-~--~~===~=-~-u -75 2b-t__~~3__ _.n__n___ _ _ J:t.r-;---0L2L~~~__n_ ___________ __ __~_~ ..-~- -- ... --- ----- I~L{'d~&ff-.~-- -----j)=I.;-d:.--I!I-~_------- . u..... - niy~'~Zl<_T~_",/ "-_:= m ~-;:;::::4,~~: ~---~---------'~..R..d. ___ ___ ---- ----------- ~~~~ .;<J.-"J..L --~--------~tluuJO T~--~~6JiJ-~--------~==-------~-___ -- -._--- ------_..--_._.._------~----_._---~----- - -- v /~~_ q777 -' \~ ~- Il-So-. -/ ^' ?"'C>L> - =~=~----~-~-I~~ -----" '2a.pL:.::.._=-~-==~::- 3-=3;J,t.-.dlff~Jfd - 74.o/::lIl~~~__ ------ .-------~~/-u-/--f - J2~;r22ddeJJy ----- ---------,.,------ -~- ----- __ n__ ____.~____._._________.___~__._____~..__ ------------':.-4:-'!:-K/l~:;:"JiJ------ ----~_g--'--k~~----:--==------ ------ -- (.p ~~ ,d--4-4---- ._L.lLZ'__ ---'f-----E::._i:i___ .---- 134k~~..i~ -~~r2Lif_-.kl6d:c!---- -~ -_.-._~~-~-~-- ------ " 0, if 13 f~, A..-~--t()-)_f_-71~~J_c_: _ . L/ &l./ t?..tItf~,</ ~- ----~--.J~-;2k LdA./i;~_"'I.J_ . , J ------ -------4<J-;1-v4T4%a~b_--. - ------- -- -)(t:hJ4#&Z:;;-"2~J.,,'f-l-f)3)--- '. v" Y' ..... ~---~' -- ------- 1~;;:~/~b----;J .-~~------ --- ....--------~tcl.;fJ~~.....__,-------------~/"3-~~~Jdf:? ?~-- --- --------d.: ~llr~ -"7 5'"";;)-tL-~ - --.kal-tiir~~ _ 72- ----~---------------~ii~, 1/ ---- v ,J~;ail'~------=- -- -- -n______~~~o$~a '1Lk-4v-t _ ____=;;:;,:~~______ - ------ . --d-l~~k~-<f;7----- ~.xE.(L6Jd:.t2t.k~---- -=---= :.- .-~~~7Jt. :.~- _____;;~~:~"~___ ..- --- --- ----~~~J~. 7 h3~.Cf -- -- -+a..'J __L~______m ==-.=---- ~~*7fi.j[;;=~---~=~:':"~~~~~~- -----------.--~~7J.t~!J-3- ------ ----- -------"._----- '-,----- ----------....------- ------_._--- .----- m____ --.-~'-__d..~__ _______ _ ___________ --- -m~-~---9__DJ_-1_ 15 jJ?~~h-------- - ----------- ----- --- ..-------~/Wk-}-C.t:J..c;LL~- _ n _____n________ ,___ ~ ---~~ 11--v~ (~::ti)---n--m----- - , -----~-----~-~------ ~-----2~~..+-). .1l4f~ all-L/~ ~ tf~ (l/~1i~;;,:-~-.;;;~y-------- -~-_. ----------_._-------~-~--~------- Y(l~jJ~~ g'~ 71z.cd~~__ ... (I,) i'o9.ot,. .J , , -~ c;;?/-i . / " ,; - ------------- l.oat- i7 - _ ~"1~e?t~~~---~-~~---- -- ----.----~:~!:1i~~-------------- __.JL iF 13--~~ 1?'I4~~---- ------(}ku-A~T~-IL~Jp1.Q ---Ji-#=- c-~'2LJ-~kL_______ __~__ ~'1 J-<f ,-./! ;2kd~ 4=e.____ ~=----~~~-=---~~~~=~- --~---Cl~ ~.~~-~-~__/;J)4P-j_ b- ,..---===~-~==--=--=~~~_-==------ - - ~----- ----- ----- ----------- ..- - - ----- .-- - --------------t- --- ____n - ----- -~-LdE.J)____s_:c I!z;d,--y..~~-~----- __________2LE ---5tJy -~~rZ/"!;)d.--------~-- - ------------1:li j~dW-+?~----- --------- - .-~z::( '7,-> -a--f-Y- ____~ - ,/ ~ --------------- ~ ----"" (" . /.:6"",__ . .'<1-,~------- ______. --------v.-~-4?''--- _ / -""'_ _ __ ______<?7;-_IA -1-7 . /1'. .-1E_?_____ .-------------.---.- - - - o-~.L t/t~ ~ :..::d- a..,;'h-- /2." 'i'1 I. 11______________ -~.---------- ---"1' / ~Ir--{-"u -- - {P--L/- -- '- --=~~- ---=---- ~~/~-~~~~=~.:iri~~p~------ =----!!~=-~/==-4~--T2n2J~-(~~?j)-~=~-=~~-=~ ~ , --- ----~---~---------~-------I , --- ---- --.------ ---.__._-----------...._----_.~. ----------- -----1 j ~ .--- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Case 186-18 BEFORE THE CITY OF ASPER BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962, as amended, a public hearing will be held in the Council Room, City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 24, Official Code of Aspen. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. The particulars of the hearing and of the requested variance are as follows: Date 'and-Time of Meetina: Date: Time: August 28, 1986 4:00 P.M. Owner for Variance: ADDel1ant-forVariance: Name: George & Mary Gleason Address: 86l Ute Ave. Same Same Locationor-descriDt~onof-prouerty: Location: 86l Ute Ave. Description: Lot ll, Ute Subdivision VarlanCl!-Reauested: Applicant wishes to enclose their patio deck. Property is located in the R-6 (PUD) zoning category. Sec. 24-3.4 area and bulk requirement. Side yard set back is 5 feet, rear yard set back is 15 feet. Applicant appears to be requesting to enclose a deck that currently encroaches in to those set backs. Sec. 24-l3.3(a) No such non-conforming structure may be enlarged in a way that increases its non-conformity. Duration of Variance: Permanent Will -aDDlicant- be reoresented bv --counsel-: Yes: .. - - .- No: --XX The City of Aspen Board of Adjustment 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado 8l6ll Remo Lavagnino, Chairman Kim Wilhoit, Deputy City Clerk