The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutlanduse case.boa.1006E-Cooper.009-82 Wise shoppers stretch dollar;,; " Mr. Remo Lavagnino, Chairman City of Aspen Board of Adjustment 130 S. Galena Aspen, Colorado 81612 '-- ...._-,~.~ ~ CITY 130 so aspen, SPEN street 81611 GI:W 00 DOM 00 ZE:L6CMN1. , ", . 09/1.6/a;! RE'fl.I/'~N TO '3FN[)f.:"'" Dr-! "V" '... ..., . :. ".1. I:H~BI.../:: AS ADDI'~ESSE[) UNAf.:lI...E TO FOI:::!-,/N;:D ~ - .' .... SPEN street 81611 I ... ,...... \ \ '-.: \ r:,. CITY 130 so aspen, I..A, . I\'''..r~fl_' ',\ '. . " ,',J.' ;)\.',- to. U -)l~. . ,-it, ~t-;............. \ i' l CITY ',-- 130 so aspen, " . \ '"I}I/I I' t \ ,,- , , SPEN street 81611 ~~, !!, 't.": :'\:. to. Hi.. ~, _ _ '., l ~ ~<;.""- eVE 52 2816SD31 09/16/82 RETURN TO SENDE:R BOX CLOSED t , I ~/~ ~X/ /f2Z. 7~ &:7 cY/#/L 1 I ,. ~ ~ "- -..S:. i t~~ ~t~ ~ ~~ ~ '- = ...d" ~w~ ~=.....J = r'-! ~ .. = ~ I J.. ~ . ~ '"' ~ '~ '\ J- ,/ ;.:' , ...-;..- . .- .;: -"-:;,-- '! QCr'-! en .... - ""C ~; - .... ~ L-J .... - Z :r J> " -0 Q :J: N o n :5;::t! !-I- 1'1 fT! ^" O~ ....~ r~ (g ~Z ;:! ~-i ZO Q o (t) ~ > 1> fTl ..... ~Z 0- _0 " gfTl (Xl m" N jg .~ . ,- ,;- . ~ i QCr'-! en t;/i ? ~; ""C ',~ t c:: J~ t'!'j ..., - Z ',N , ~~ f , ; f~"-<~ bJX>i .. i . ~,' f i . ,,;i/ f.' ,,/ n, / '-,;: ,<r(' 3: @~ 1> o 7..'! -; '<~, - " \' \ . \ , I I , ~ ~ ~ I , I: " f, (({{((( = .... ~ ~W~ ~=.....J = r'-! ~ .. = ~ OJ OJ ~ ~ ~ i"") f;;~;:; ~ ...:.. ,..:-- 2?:iJ 0-. ;,!~ ! ...... . . oJ>;:; :; U} ~ :{i ~g~ ~ 5 ~o (: ?3~~ ~ ~ ~ , k < .1'- I Affidavat On Saturday, September 18, 1982, John McCormich, of Realty World and myself instaled at 1006 East Cooper St. the notice of application for a variance from the zoning code. Evidence of placement shown by the attached photograph. Attested to by: ~~ William McCrabb III STATE OF COLORADO) ) ss. County of Pitkin ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 30th day of September, 1982, by William McCrabb, III. My commission expires 1/ - Z C , 198').' Witness my hand and official seal. ~,(ch~otarY $,,)< f Z. r I Public I ~~. ' c <@;..,- . ~ WILUAM Mc:CRABB III I -Construction, Land, Managers, It! Co. Inc. L P. O. Box 1508, Rifle, Colorado 81650_ (303) 625-4545 -,....- -- - 506 Eaat Main Street Aspen. Colorado 81811 30:;v925-5973 (.')BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION ABPEN.PITKIN REGIONAL BUILOING OEPARTMENT General Con5truction Permit 1 Jurisdiction of . Applicant to complete numbered spaces only. Joe ADORESS leGV' ~ NO. 5540 OWNER " " ' ~ p...r .A'Y' 0 .,-Go. :J.T .tl~~',1 BL~K k..... I TRACT OR SU8DIVISION /-. .., MAIL ADDRESS " ';::,. 'It.. ,-.,>~'r ( f?' J ;" < .\l~ V' \ ~ 'r1I.>IJ " LEGAL: I \LOT NOojJ) . 1 - ~ ( . OEseR. ~. , . "f' ~ ~ 2. vi. h-., CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS \.-,~';\'~~" <., 3. r:- ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER 4. h\, (1' <.) f ( MAIL ADDRESS 't tw 1\ ,..'-1.. . ,-- ;:: '" ~- ~"', ,,__ v t i ~'\ 5. ENQINEEA , MAIL 'ADORESS~ .~... -t.... ..\ USE OF BUILDING 'I 6. \i" 'C~ -,~Z,;<;. , , '-- - 7, Class of work: '0 ADDITION ,." Dl~ ~ D ALTERATION o REPAIR aNEW 8. Change of use f!,om ~ R Change of use to , / Q,- PLAN CHECK FEE ~ 9. Valu~tlon of work: $ (;.- "! .... ..L..J.... Typeol,ConsUuction. , 10. REMARKS: Sin 01 Buildin\! ITotal SQua.eF"l.J ~ ..f;ll." ,.'." , ~~ , ,~\ 14'" u.... c ..File Zone .,' ...,"'... " . . 0 " r., { r ,. "'-'. ...., " , 'I.. ..:-~ \.-_ r 'I., 1 '"a.... " '~.A; '. '." I n\A.,,\ \' ~ '...i , .,~'. NO. of D...erun\! UnIts , _", '\'. .(I" .. ,ll,~" . f. ..........l. ___., \\ ., t. (' ~;. ""'-t , - ,.. ..' . Special Approvals .~ ; .. I Ai" .J . vv J,./ "-" .oj __ _.'. ZQN ING .. HEALTH OEPT. ~. .;.~ ....WLICATION .ACCEPTED " BY PLANS ;~ECKED 'BY ..J.JV pATE q !~ t;. ~r PARK DEDICATION APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE BY ~ ":IAE DEPT. SOIL REPOAT.... OATE DATE , , NOTICE WATER TAP SEPARATE PERMITS ARE RErn::Ji'R'ED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING. VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. . THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120 DAYS.'OR IF CQNSTAUC- <?!HER (SPECIFV) liON OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR" ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COM~EN.CED, 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT'-.ALL PROVISIONS Of LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK Will BE -COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GillE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PAOVISIONS OF AN, YOTHER STATE_'OR LOCAL LAW, .'3EGULAT1NG_Co.NSTRUCTIONOR TtjE :t: ~ FOR MANCE OF CONSTRUCTl~N. ,;! Iii:' . ~_ - ~ kvf{:'<l~ It" Cf'4' ~ z.... -= SIGNATURE OF CON!RAC'!.OR o.a,.AUTHORIZED AGENT ENG, DEPT. " ~ (USEE ATTACHEDSHEETI -, ' \;0"':.(; , -. ZIP t\." ; '!l.. I " PHONE ~ t " -' ... , .....J,... PHONE LICENSE NO. PHONE LICENS,? NO. ~: "i';: "7~, \;,/ PHONE LICENSE NO. 11.,... r o MOVE o WRECK I,",..e ....;' \f I~- f\J V I PERMIT FEE ;.~ . - '.'11 ,~ I TOTAL FEE ....- , O(;Cu~ocyGrou.p Olvllloo . No, 01 Sto"el MaJ<,OCC.Lo.(I V' " Us. Zone Fir. Sp,lol<l.rl R.Qulr.a o Ves C NO. ~ OFFST~EE, T PARKING SPACTES' Covered Unto....re<l ~ 1 REQUIRED AUTHORIZED BY DATE .', " .';:t~:..~~' ;-:~t ~..!.-" ,-. , ....".......,..... "m I -, /', ~- ~ I- I. of' '\" :'/:' 't J' \.. ,,,-,, l{-- 10;-7"- 1,,_ \..- \ . "::!Ij~ ~ -. ,-. "'.-'<CI--' .'- ,. - 't ~ ~ ., .1".... ~ ~, .1. ..,,,. -~ ..."- '.... ~ ~~-:~ H .'IlI, "I ...,....' /i 'K... .''/''''. .. THIS !,ORMIS A PERMIT ONLY WI-!EN.VALlDATED ,>' WORK STARTED WITHOUT PERMiT WILL BE DOUBLE FEE . (DATE) t NAT RE F OWNER IF WNEA BUI OER OA E " ;':l :..'S. ...io VALIDATION .;!' CASH 0 PLAN CHECK VALIDATION CK,O -}, . II: ... ... YELLOW - ASSESSOR'S COpy," PINK:- BUILDING DEP!,.R1]>1ENT FILE PERMIT VALIDATION CK,O M.O.O , WHITE ~ 'INSPECTOR'S COPY M.O.O CASH 0 GOLD,,;:,CUSTOMER'S COPY "'=",O''C'"'_''' MARTIN PAUL BRETH, .JR. f'T. COLLINS, COLO. DETACH AND RETAIN THIS STATEMENT THE ATTACHEO CHECK IS IN PAYMENT 0". 'TEMB DEBCR'aED aELOW. ,,,.. NOT CORRECT PLEASE NOT,"'Y US PROMPTLY. NO RECE'PT OES'RE:O DELUXE - f'DRM NWC-2 V-6 DATE DEBCRIPTION AMOUNT DIBTRIBUTIONB ACCT, NO. AMOUNT q,. ~O.ft, \J (l..o( \ ~ ~ e... \00\.0 S. ~ ~\..~ ~ tP1..o ,..{) EMPLDYEE . A . H , H . . . . . U . T , . H . PERIl:JO AIoIDUNT TOTAL OVERTlIolE SOCIAl.. TOTAl.. ENDINII j.\DURS IIATIE I!:AAj.\I!:D AT IEARNINOS SECURITY WITj.\HOl..DIND STATE HIT 'AT AHo DTj.\ER U. S. INe. TAX INCOIolE TAX DEDUCTIONS AItDUl..AIl IlATIt TU V,_ 0 o CITY OF ASPEN FINANCE DEPARTMENT o CASHIER'S RECEIPT LICENSES & PERMITS o GENERAL OCCUPATION BUSINESS L1C, o LIQUOR OCCUPATION LICENSES o BEER, WINE, LIQUOR o L10UOR LICENSE RENEWAL FEE o LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION o EXCAVATION PERMITS o SEPTIC TANK PERMITS o NON-COURT DOG LICENSES o COLORADO FOOD SERVICE LICENSES 00111-61000 00107-60900 00107,61030 00107-61031 00107-61039 00115-61211 00125,61213 00135,61100 00125-61001 FINES & FORFEITS o CITY SHARE,DUI'S o COURT TRAFFIC FINES o TOWING FEE-CITY o PENALTY ASSMTS, ON TOWS o STORAGE FEES o NON,TOW PENALTY ASSMTS, o TRAFFIC FINES o NON,COURT DOG FINES o NON,COURT IMPOUND FEES o NON,COURT VET OR R.V, o NON-COURT ADOPTION FEES o CITY COURT FEES o COURT BOND FORFEITS o COURT COSTS o ACCIDENT REPORTS/XEROX o GENERAL ACCT, NO. 00131,64002 00132-64003 00132-64011 00132,64013 00132,64014 00132,64014 00132,64020 00135-64040 00135-64041 00135-64042 00135-64045 00135-64043 00131,64101 00131,64201 00131-63420 DESCRIPTION: (NAME, NUMBER, ETC,) / /, ...,;......- ->" t-'" ,j ,....""'lIlt - NarICE OF PUBLIC,HEARING Case No. R?_Q BEFORE THE CITY, OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUS'DIENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962. as amended, a public hearing will be held in the Council. Room, City Hall, Aspen, Colo- rado, (or at such other place as the meeting may be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 24, Official Code of Aspen. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at 'such meeting, then you are urged to state.. yo~views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. i , ! -- ..- ,..... [I I! 'I I I II .~ " Ii F ~ 'The particulars of the hearing and of the requested variance are as follows: Date and Time of Meeting: . Date: Time: September 30, 1982 4:00 P.M. Name and address of Applicant for Variance: Name: Martin Breth Address: 700 E. Elizabeth Fort Collins, Co. 80524 Location or description of property: Location: 1006 E. Cooper, Aspen, Colorado Description: Lot 6 plus the west la' of lot M Block 14. 'I :\ : Variance Requested: See attached. ** The building department stated that the property is located in R/MF zone and is a re-existing non-conforming use. Section 24-8.13 - Minimum lot are per dwelling is 6,000 sq. ft. Existing house and proposed house encroaches into set backs. Section 24-8.13. Side yard 5'. Rear yard 10'. Duration of Variance: (Please cross out one) T~~n,..~,..~ Permanent The applicant will not be represented by counsel. THE CITY OF ASPER BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT BY Remo Lavagnino,' Chairman Virginia M. B~all, Deputy City Clerk ...,. , " APPEm,JO BO^RD OF ZorWIG MJUST.,r,J[r1T CITY OF ^SPEU DATE. ~T. \ () I l"'t 'l.'2- ;, '....,' APPELlMlT M..u--+i....:l P.:.1-e.:~ .' I'\o'\fb ii ~eS;"'I.,:S' OWNER f?;\ \ ~r4b\::. (;J.,M ~ Co . CASE NO. ~~-? ADDRESS -, o.a ~,~j,i'Zcti::.e~ ' ,"or1' C::Ol\ltJ~. <<::0. COoc;z,4- PHONE 4-"\" "7':}\ o. ADDRESS I \P v.>. w~""'1e.r 1Ul<l\.6 JOo.~L-t:.""'ood I DI.,..o 4'S"30'Zo"t. .(:5'1';" "b~c...,q"7ct LOCATION OF PROPERTY \oo(,~. COof-e-r ,ASr-e,..,),. Co. "01"" LIAs. ~ we~+ 10' ot ~llt "" e, /..ob~ '"3 -'. . Street. & Number of Subdivision Blk. & Lot No. . '. Building Permit' Application and prints or any other pertinent ~ data must accompany this application, arid will be made part of CASE NO. . . THE BOARD WILL RETURN THIS.APP(ICATION IF IT DOES NOT CONTAIN Alr THE FACTS IN QUESTION. . DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED EXCEPTION SHOHING JUSTIFICATIn~IS: S~~ ~t'\~~eJ \i~..\ 01. .~.~sk'fS . , . . 'Will you be represented by counsel ? y" NO~ ~. ~_ & SIGNED: tOUVVV\ . Appell nt ' PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO FORWARD THIS APPLICATION TO THE FOR NOT GRANTING: REQUIRING THE BUILDING INSPECTOR BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND REASON Property is located in R/MF zone and is a'pre-existing non-conforming use. Section 24-8.13 - ~inimum lot are per dwelling 'is 6,000 s~. ft. Existing house and proposed house encroaches into set backs. S~ct~on 24-8.13. Side.yard 5'. Rear Yard 10'. . The applicant will not be represented by couns~l. . .. . ~ Signed . . 'Status '. . PER~IT REJ ECTED.' DATE !t.t 4t( r"2- . DEC I S I ON APPLICATION FILED DATE IF HEARING ....:..-0 A TE . tlAILED . . SECRETA~Y -,~..,.__.. ... , """" -' '''- ...... HARDSHIPS Illegal Unit: ffl\~ ~tz. & "'ft., 9tl19jeet -let, altRBtl!'J1, ""f1~cofl.fof'mi.Ag:c'~om;-was 9tleelj-,'ieleel ,131 i(),~->..A..~ ,....J.... -.l~ 1 S7'5 :anJ-;,:,'-preS&ft.tly zBAes R MF. T~e.,-~--we~.fi:.e.r-.,c ...I.~utd-tre- ~ .' tilt.... 8~ ts buile ta .the J9resent ]aAil.~. ~''.'_ _. _ .. '11:.,;, tel 'Festr:iet tRe. -1~8r YRit tu a miRiAlbiFM .e:bLJ~8f'-t~.le35e (sJ:._ _ttaGRea eel', sf tb.._sl)_ , Rear Setback: There is presently a shed on the back of the property which straddles the property line (see attached surveyor's certificate), which has been there since the previous owner bought the property. There is also an existing residence located with 2' of the gravel alley on Lot K to the west and a utility pole located between Lot L and Lot M also on the alley (see architectural drawing, Sheet #1). Since our property line is actually located 9'6" from the alley itself, we should be allowed to build inside the normally required 15' rear setback. Enchroachment: The necessity of having a two story addition l' from the property line is not only to our liking from additonal space, but also for aesthetical and practical use of the existing structure. Part of the subject structure is presently located .9' on adjacent Lot K. We are going to remove that part of the building from Lot K, set back 1', and provide 2 hour fire protection to that part of the building which is not within the legal setback requirements. ! '1'" I :1 "' , , ~ '. .. ,- , ~ . CdY OF ASPEN 0 MEMO FROM VIRGINIA BEALL Dear Board Members, I was not able to sched~le the final review of the "information pamphlet" for this meeting. Public notices had.b.en_,sent to adjacent property owners for two ~ases, prior to my knowledge ~hat both City Attorney's will be out of town on Sept. 30, '82. I know the Board would like to have an attorney present at each meeting and I apologize for the scheduling of a public hearing without legal counsel available. , I. II. III. IV. i""'" .-.; I I i it CITY OF~~'ASPEN -~ 130'south galena ~reet . aspen, colorado W1611 '. , 303-925.~.l020 ~ AGE N D A ASPEN ROARD OF ADJUSTMENT September 30, 1982 4:00 PM City Council Chambers APPROVAL OF MINUTES NEW BUSINESS C~se n 82-8 Vickie L. Bagley Case 0 82-9 Martin Breth COMMITTEE COMMENTS ADJOURN r '-" ""'" '-...I - RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 00 Leaves 'lIlIlI'lI C.'.1I0(CK[l8.'..l,Co. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 26, 1982 The Board of Zoning Adjustment held a regular meeting on August 26, 1982 at 4:00 PM in the Council Chambers of City Hall. Remo Lavagnino called the meeting to order with members Josephine Mann, Francis Whitaker, John Herz and Charles Paterson present. , Remo Lava~nino skips the approval of the minutes until after the OLD BUSINESS - Case 82-2 Dale Potvin. Lavagnino reads a note from the secretary stating that the applicant would like clarification from the' Board of Adjustment regarding the minutes of Case n 82-2. Gary Esary,Assistant City Attorney, said that at the variance hearing for Mr. Potvin, the Board granted a variance and then directed the applicant to prepare protective covenant documents to be submitted to the City Attorney for approval within sixty days. The documents were prepared and done on time and when Mr. Esary reviewed them it turned out that Mr. Potvin had a different idea of what the Board meant. The applicant went back to the minutes and found evidence for both positions so Mr. Esary is requesting that the Board clarify it's rulin~ through the minutes. Esary said that as the Board probably recalls Mr. Potvins house has a deck that sticks out between property lines P&O. The Board essentially granted a variance indi- cating that if the adjoining property owner filed restrictive covenants indicating that a five foot set-back maintain around the deck for fire pro- tection, aud the filed restrictive covenants so that nothing could be built on that property. When Mr. Potvin filed the restrictive covenants he provided for the 92 inch set back which appears to be fairly clear from the minutes although there may be some question on that, but it wasn't clear whether the 92 inch block of the other lot that had to be preserved was for the length of the deck or for length of the deck and five feet either side. Francis Whitaker said that is what the motion says. Remo Lavap,nino said length of the deck plus five feet on both sides. Gary Esary said that what Mr. Whitakers motion said is 100 inches or the length of the balcony plus five feet or more on either end. Esary said that the second sentence in the minutes says that Whitaker said the set- back on the Lot P be established for the length of the deck. Esary thinks that the last two sentences are inconsistant, and the applicant is simply here today for clarification. Francis Whitaker said that it was his intent in the motion that the set- back be the length of the deck plus five feet on either end. Whitaker said that he probably failed to add that in those second few remarks. Dale Potvin said that he would like to mention that he was very clear to repeat what he thought was the understanding, which was that the 92 inches was just for the length of the deck. Potvin said that there was discussion that the deck wasn't going to be obstacle in terms of fire protection and that the air and light and bulk and density was not really being encroached upon or made a problem by the deck. The Board and applicant discuss the plans. Remo Lavagnino said that the reason the Board wants the set-back the way it is, is so that th e applicant actually comes into compliance; by not going five foot there, you are not in compliance because you are not clearing this point to this point(Lavagnino points this out on the plans) That was the intent of the Boards variance was to make, the applicant come into total compliance. Gary Esary said that the area that is restricted on the other lot is 92 inches from property line to the new set-back and the deck, which is 29.45 feet in width, the restricted area is now 39.45 feet in width, with the same center line. Dale Potvin said that he does not feel comfortable with that because he was so clear to make sure that that is what they were talking about and you will notice in the minutes twice, the phrase the length of the deck is stated. Francis Whitaker said let's go back to the minutes. He reads what the motion says and the discussion afterwards is not the motion. The motion was made that it be the length of the deck plus five feet on either end. . - 2 - ,., ,....., __ V Charles Paterson said that there are two statements in the motion. Whitaker said that he failed to add in, on either end, in the second state- ment. Gary Esary said that with all respect, Mr. Potvin is confusing contract law with administrative law; what he thought, the meeting of the minds is not important here, what he thought or what he attempted to make clear is not important. The Board grants a variance, it does not contract a variance, so whatever the Board decides has been done, has been done. We are here simply on the clarification on are-argument. Esary said that in purely practical terms he already has a 20 inch break and although in most instances what two parties believe is important in this case it isn't. Remo Lavagnino told the applicant he is sorry that he misunderstood what the Boards intent was and that there is no~ any point in going any further with discussion. Gary Esary said that if the minutes have been approved then a motion, now to resolve the conflict between the two statements in the minutes to show the Boards clear intent. Francis Whitaker moves, for the purpose of clarification, that the variance was granted conditional upon the preparation of the proper documents and that the restrictive portion of the property on Lot P be 7 foot 8 inches from the present property line plus five feet on either end after the length of the deck. Josephine Mann seconds. Remo Lavagnio Aye Josephine Mann Aye Francis Whitaker Aye John Herz Aye Charles Paterson Aye All in favor. Motion carried. I i I . NEW BUSINESS Case 8 82-8 William C. Kurimay Remo Lavagnino said that the variance requested structure is non-conforming due to the FAR and as a Multi family structure in the R-6 zone. Sec. 24-13.3 la}. No such non-conforming structure may be enlarged or altered ,in a way which increases its non-conformities. Applicant appears to be re- questing addition of 34 sq. ft. variance to enclose stairwell. Lavagnino asked the applicant to expand on their request. William Kurimay, here at the request of Dr. Robert Orr who owns a unit and has contracted Kurimay to build in the proposed addition. Kurimay said that basicly what this is, is a stairwell that leads down to the unit. It is a structure that goes in the ground about four feet, he would like to put an enclosure around it to protect it from the elements primarily in the Winter; to reduce the ice hazard on the stairway and to keep the area from filling up with snow. He would like to do this for both, convienience and safety. He does not think that this is an unreasonable request in that it is already an existing structure, the stairwell itself and the portion of the stairwell that would be counted as additional square footage would only be 34 sq. ft. Part of the stairwell is already covered by the roof, which is part of the existing structure. Kurimay stated on the application that the proposed stair enclosure is justified because l} circumstances of subsequent zoning did not result from the action, of the applicant, 2}such enclosure will not adversely affect the neighbor- hood, 3} such enclosure does not alter use of the property, 4} such enclosure greatly reduces potential hazard and inconvenience to users of Unit 85, 5J such enclosure represents an extention of existing existing structure (4' retaining wall) enclosing the stairwell. Kurimay said that Dr. Orr feels that' the visual impact to the condominium project is minimal in that it is between two buildings and barely visable from the street, due to some shrub and the building next door. Kurimay said that the applicant has 100% approval from the owners of all the condominiums in the project. Mr. Kurimay describes the plans to the 'Board. ' RelQo Lavagnino feels that the safety and the hazard aspects of what Kurimay is pertinent and that the Board may be able to act on that basis. Lavagnino said that the Board is not concerned with asthetics of the project. Francis Whitaker asked the applicant what the height would be? Kurimay said that the applicant is required to have at least a 6 1/2 ft minimum head clearance anyway and that it would be 7 to 8 feet high in that front part and would be about 4.feet high in the back. Lavagnino closes the public portion of the meeting. The applicant presents the sign that was posted, the affidavit, arid the photograph of the notice of public hearing sign. "",", """" ..../ '-...; RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves 'OMI'II C.'.1I0ECKEL8.8.oltl.CG. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 26. 1982 - 3 - . John Herz said that it seems the Board can judge this variance on safety because of the snow going down in there and Herz feels that it is a minimal request. Charles Paterson feels that this is a reasonable request and it doesn't affect the neighborhood in any adverse way. Josephine Mann said that she would be in favor of granting this because it specifically says in the Boards powers and duties; U3, where there are practical difficulties and unnecessary hardships... so the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed, public safety and welfare secured and substan- tial justice done. Josephine thinks that the public welfare and safety is the part that concerns her. Francis Whitaker feels that the points in the application are sufficiently well done and since the wall is already there and not increasing the size of the building and that its average is six feet high, on safety reasons alone it is justifiable. Josephine Mann would like to make sure that the secretary note that the stairwell is on the- North side because this is ~he main reason the Board is concerned about the health and safety. Francis Whitaker asked the applicant if they would be putting a handrail on both sides. Kurimay said yes and that it was required by Code to do so. Remo Lavagnino asked when the FAR come into ... Bill Drueding said that is the new Ordinance 11. Josephine Mann moves that the Board of Zoning Adjustment grant a variance to enclose a stairwell, which is an addition of 34 sq. ft. because the stair- well is on the North side of the building is not covered and because it ac- cumulates ice and snow in the Winter time, public safety and welfare are involved. The Board of Zoning Adjustment feels that this is a minimal addition which is in the spirit of our comprehensive plan and in the spirit of that neighborhood. Francis Whitaker asked if Josephine would like to add that the stars and the concrete walls are already existing. Josephine adds that to her motion. Francis Whitaker seconds. Remo Lavagnino Aye Josephine Mann Aye Francis Whitaker Aye John Herz Aye Charles Paterson Aye All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. The Board of Zoning Adjustment reviews the minutes of July 22, 1982. Francis Whitaker said that two names were mispelled. Zepp Kessler should be Sepp Kessler and ~ary Mallard should be spelled Millard. Whitaker said that on page 7 were it says "it is difficult to access whether it was just a zoninl change..." It should read to determine rather than access. Josephine Mann said that on page 7 it does not say why she was reading an excerpt from the eode. Josephine said that if the Board says there is a practical difficulty or hardship then there are other determinations to be made. She was siting this portion of the code because the actions were the result of the applicant. To clarify this statement the secretary is instruc- ted to take out the word ~. Josephine felt there were some unclear parts at the end of page four. "The residents of bonus overlay was finally adopted in May 1980,Josephine thinks that the word and should be put in after 1980. Francis Whitaker moves that the minutes be approved as corrected. Charles Paterson seconds. All in favor. Motion carried. Remo Lavagnino said that the Board of Adjustment was given an information packet for those applying fer a variance. Lavagnino said that there are alot of things in there he feels need attention before they make a finaL draft. He asked this be put on the agena for the next meeting. ,...... '-' '" ,.....I - 4 - Remo Lavagnino asked the Board members to put their comments on the draft copy for the next meeting. Francis Whitaker moves that they adjourn. Josephine Mann seconds. All in favor. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned 5:00pm. . . M. Beall Clerk ,1 ,..:.. '-' """ - NarICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Case No. R?-R BEFORE THE CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962, as amended, a public hearing will be held in the Council Room, City Hall, Aspen, Colo- rado, (or at such other place as the meeting may be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment reques~ing authority for variance from the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 24, Official Code of Aspen. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited'to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state. yo~views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. Date: September 30, 1982 Time: 4:00P.M. / I I I ! I , i I I 1 , The particulars of the hearing and of the requested, variance are as follows: Date and Time of Meeting: Name and address of Applicant for Variance: Name: Vicki L. Bagley Address: 350 West Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado 1 Location or description of property: Locat~on: 232 East Hallam, Aspen, Colorado Descr~pt~on: Tennis Co rt ith 10' hi h d 1 i f u w g woo att ce ence along east and north boundaries. Variance Requested: R~quired setback for 10' high fence creates usable yard space and requires demolition of existing structure. Addition of 27 x 44' play- room with bath and kitchen. Kitchen constitutes duplex. Duration of Variance: (Please cross out one) Temporarv Permanent The applicant will not be represented by counsel. THE CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT BY Remo Lavagnirio, Chairman Virginia M. Beall, Deputy City Clerk ...1.. / APPEll CO BOilRD or ZDrHNG ilDJUSlOflT CITY OF ASPEfJ DATE 9-H12 ~ t..-: ~. ',."':.' CASE NO. J? -;1 APPELLANT Vicki'L. 'RaP'fAv' . " ,t- ......;...'."..,'. . ADDRESS 350 West Hookin.;. Aspen.' Colorado' PHONE 925-8041 OWNER Vicki L. Bagley ADDRESS 350 West Hopkins. Aspen, Colorado LOCATION OF PROPERTY 232 East Hallam. Aspen. Colorado . ....' lStree~ & ~umber of Subdivision Blk. & lot No.) . Building Permit. Application and prints or any other pertinent data must accompany this application, arid will be made part of CASE NO. THE BOARD WILL RETURN THIS,APPLICATION IF IT DOES NOT CONTAIN All THE FACTS IN QUESTION. . DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED EXCEPTION SHO\'IING JUSTIFICATIOtIS: Ten1\is court with 10' high wood lattice fence along east and north bounparies. Required setback for 10' high fence creates unusable yard space, and requires demolition of existing structure. Addition of 27 x 44' playroom with bath and kitchen. Kitchen constitutes duple". . . ~ ? Yes No," I:.. ,--7 f' SIGNED: \/~c/~.'~~~/ _Appellant '''~' 'Will you be represented by counsel PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIRING THE BUILDING INSPECTOR '10 FORWARD THIS APPLICATION TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND REASON FOR NOT GRANTING: Section 24-3.7 (c) Fences; hedges or walls shall be permitt provided that,they sh&ll not exceed six (6) feet above grade~ Section 24-3.1 (f) (2) Two famil~ dwelling (al.6 known as a "duplex") : A detached principal building contAining only two (2) dwelling units sharing a common wall no less than twenty (20) per cent between both dwelling units.or sharin~ a common ceiling or floor;'in whole or in part, connecting two (2) dwelling unJts. The building departments decision is that the proposed configuration does not need the above criteria of a duplex but is a 2 single family dwelling. The applitant will not be represented by counsel. . . . 'St'a tus ;', . PER'~IT REJECTED,' DATE~DECISION APPLICATION FILED DATE IF HEARING .. - ...:.-DATE . ."AILE~ SECRETA~Y I'"' '-" ~ NOTICE OF PUBLIC,HEARING Case No. R?-Q BEFORE THE CITY, OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUS'IHENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962. as amended, a public hearing will be held in the Counci1,Room, City Hall, Aspen, Colo- rado. (or at such other place as the meeting may be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 24. Official Code of Aspen. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views,protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at 'such meeting, then you are urged to state.. yo~views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as ~he Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. The particulars of the hearing and of the requested variance are as follows: " -- ,..- I. II :1 .~ I r Date and Time of Meeting: ,Date: Time: September 30, 1982 4:00 P.M. Name and address of Applicant for Variance: Name: Martin Breth Address: 700 E. Elizabeth Fort Collins, Co. 80524 Location or description of property: Location: 1006 E. Cooper, Aspen, Colorado Description: Lot 6 plus the west 10' of lot M Block 34. I, 'i i Variance Requested: See attached. ** The building department stated that the property is located in re-existing non-conforming use. Section 24-8.13 - Minimum lot is 6,000 sq. ft. Existing house and proposed house encroaches Section 24-8.13. Side yard 5'. Rear yard 10'. Duration of Variance: (Please cross out one) R/MF zone and is a are per dwelling into set backs. 'I',:a'"'1'n"'~T"Y Permanent The applicant will not be represented by counsel. THE CITY OF ASPER BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT BY Remo Lavagnino,' Chairman Virginia M. B~all, Deputy City Clerk ...6.. ~ ". APPEAI,..-TO nOMW OF ZorWIG ^DJUS;LeJI:IIT CITY OF ^SPEtI ',.~ ,..", DATE, ~T. I (5 , 1'1'0"2- APPEllAlIT ""'M-+i~ P...1-e,,~ . '., ,y' ""f b i:t. ~ e <,;"'....:.J' I?;' \ ~f"~b,:> eo....""'.f Co - CASE NO. SL- if ADDRESS -, 0.0 L~r..i"Z.~-I;:.e~ ' ,"ort C::Ol\ I f,,)~, ~. ~ c S z,4' PHONE 4'Ci'>' "''3010. ADDRESS I \.oJ v.>. w'C!o,J "I e.r ~6 5o-~r..t.wood, 0"-'0 4-<;"3>'Z-"l. .r "nt."b >l..' Iq..,.:t 10011 f:.. Co of-e.r" ~!. rt'-.J .. Co . /.01" " pl.....$. ~ wes.t 10' of l-Dth\ P.>l-obk.."3 ,Street. & Number of Subdivision Blk. & Lot No. ~ I'. ' "... "':.' OWNER LOCATION OF PROPERTY -': - , Building Permit'Application and prints or any other pertinent data must accompany this appllcation, and will be made part of . CASE NO. . , THE BlJARoHIlL RETURN THIS ,APPLICATION IF IT DOES NOT CONTAIN All THE FACTS IN QUESTION. . DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED EXCEPTION SHOHING JUSTIFICATIn~IS: S~~ A. t'\~~ eJ \ l ~1: 01.' ~,Js k \ fS . . 'Will you be represented by counsel , Ye, No-.lL _. ~"-tc. & SIGNED: t~V\ , APP~t ' PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO FORHARD THIS APPLICATION TO THE fOR NOT GRANTING: REQUIRING THE BUILDING INSPECTOR BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND REASON Property is located in R/MF zone and is a'pre-e~isting non-conforming use. Section 24-8.13 - 'Minimum lot are per dwelling -is 6,000 sq. ft. Existing house and proposed house encroacnes into set backs. Section 24-8.13. Side.yard 5'. Rear Yard 10'. The applicant will not be represented by couns~l. . . ~ 'Status . PER~IT REJECTED,' DATE .~.t 't{ ~'2- ' DECISION APPLICATION FILED DATE IF HEARING -, ~DATE t:AJLED . . . SECRETA~Y ... I""'. - """"'" '...., HARDSHIPS ;:etg:tI~j:: let, altRetl~I'''''''-COOfORlHflg:4n~;-was~tI''B:::;,~ibc ^",Ch -t\: Hj'a~-pr@seA-tI)' ""R@el R Mr, Thel cf&r'e,-,we l'itf",lt ~I.vufd-be-~.' .tIt\.. ad t'11 bwils ts .th.e. I9resent 18RjPl!f~ t.~~.... ~ .. :II:.'~J t9 T!!.stf"iet the: ~~;ar uAit tu 8 miniJflblAl siH _~8_r~l.t~ lease (s~_ ....ttaeheef esp, sf BL_a). , Rear Setback: There is presently a shed on the back of the property 'which straddles the property line (see attached surveyor's certificate), which has been there since the previous owner bought the property. There is also an existing residence located with 2' of the gravel alley on Lot K to the west and a utility pole located between Lot L and Lot M also on the alley (see architectural drawing, Sheet #1), Since our property line is actually located 9'6" from the alley itself, we should be allowed to build inside the normally required 15' rear setback. Enchroachment: The necessity of having a two story addition I' from the property line is not only to our liking from additonal space, but also for aesthetical and practical use of the existing structure. Part of the subject structure is presently located .9' on adjacent Lot K, We are going to remove that part of the building from Lot K, set back 1', and provide 2 hour fire protection to that part of the building which is not within the legal setback requirements, ! " j , " f , ~ -. , y ,- '. . , . 1"''''\ -,." 1"" ...."" ~'N'U: Unit 1 Peter Hershaw 555 East Durant Apt 3J Aspen, CO 81611 vGnit 2 ~it 3 VUnit 4 ~t 5 iG"nit 6 /' vUnit 7 ~8 ~ Richard J, Box 2329 Aspen, CO & Aliena Meeker 81612 Same as unit 2 Richard J, Barnett Northern Trust Co, 50 Saint La Salle Street Chicago, I L 60675 The Dexter Group 26400 Southfield Rd, Lathrup Village, MI Same as units 2 & 3 C, C, Harris p, O. Box 4390 Aspen, CO 81612 Richard & Helen Morton Security Trust Bldg., Suite 506 Miami, FL 33131 *~~NDOM~M~7'-' ~ 1 Vincenti Building Co, 24054 Greening Novi, MI 48050 Unit 2 Same as unit 1 ~LAGER TOWNHOUS~ Unit 1 Don & Jack Crawford 3401 East Ocean Blvd, Long Beach, CA 90803 Unit 2 Betty 5, Byers Box 1952 Aspen, CO 81612 Unit 3 Melvyn A, anhalt 1100 The Doctors Center 7000 Fannin Houston, Texas 77030 _._----~. I'" '--' "'"'" '..,"" VILLA9ER TOWNHOUSES (cont'd,) Unitt4' Alexander L. Gron Box 10760 Aspen, CO 81612 Unitj Gary & Kathleen Albert Richard & Joyce Weissman 29 Olney Ave. Cherry Hill, NJ Unit I Penny Colburn Anthony Mitchell Box 3896 Aspen, CO 81612 Unit J Susan S, Hojel Reforma 2233 Edif Sauces 501 I Mexico, ID DF Unit Alexander Gron Ronald G. Domont Box 9200 Aspen, CO 81612 08003 PROPERTY Is 1/2 K,L,M, Block 33 VEdward H, & Arlene E. Brennan Box 1965 Aspen. CO 81612 )'J 1/2 K,L,M, Block 33 yL & E Properties, Ltd, 145 South G rape Street Denver, CO 80222 /Lots N & 0, Block 33 Becky Noonan Drew P. 0, Box 492 Aspen 1612 J<6t A, 6lOCK 34 v~eland F, Barllett Box 936 Aspen. CO 81612 ,." "- ""-./ PROPERTY (cont'd.) ot , ock 37 Jennie H, Cowling 939 East Cooper Ave. Aspen, CO 81611 HOUS/~r~~e J:::~: K, .;~;ray -" Y.. Box 352 ~~/-.f\5Pen-;- CO__aT!;1:2 .____ 3"- COOPER AVENUE VICTORIANS Gideon Kaufman Jerome Meister Box 10001 Aspen, CO 81612 Unit/Joseph Samalion 592 S,W. 27th Ave, Miami, FL 33135 unii Barry Edwards 600 E. Hopkins, Suite Aspen, CO 81611 101 uniy Nancy Martori Box 9788 Aspen, CO 81612 Unit, ~ Anthony Podell iI 1312 Vueltz Place Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 1""'\ ...1' PROPERTY A10' of Lot Susan Lum Box 1571 Aspen, CO ,...... '-" 1""'\ ....; 0, all of Lot P, Block 34 81612 RIVERSIDE CONDOMINIUMS Unit ,/ David C. Reeves V P.O,Box 100, Suite 4802 Toronto Dominion Bank Tower Uni~ uni; un;) Larry M, Sali .e'-man Robert M, Levine 2240 Lee Avenue North Minneapolis, MN 55422 Jerry & Joyce Mankarsh 2292 Betty Lane Beverly Hills, CA 90212 Mogulhopper Properties c/o M. A. lighe Northern Trust Co. Chicago, IL 60675 U/iit 5 ichael W, Syete Dave Thomas 257 Consumers Rd, Willowdale, Ontario CANADA N2J 4R un/it 6 Theodore Haftel Howard Parkin 873 Emerald Trail Martinsdale, NJ 08836 U7 Gary Glasyar Estela Beale Denver Nt'l. Bank Bldg, 1125 17th Street, Suite 2480 Denver, CO 80202 Unit 8 Jeffrey H, Sachs I c/o Arnold Greenberg 201 N. Mill St. Aspen, CO 81611 Unit/ Leornard & June Horwitz 1290 Pembrake Lane Topeka, KS 66004 Unit 101 Ann Grace Turnbull iI Box 15005 Aspen, CO 81612 """'" -......; ,""" -......; UTE CONDOS 101 ;/ James T. Newsom Fredrick Beihl c/o Schook, Hardy, & Bacon 1101 Walnut St. Kansas City, MO 64108 102 /Nicholas & Darlene J/ 3639 Virginia St. Louis, MO Bockwinkel 103 ./ John L. Frey Y 415 S, Spring St. Aspen, CO 81611 201 ~artin Greenberg y ~illage Squire Main St. Westport, CT 202 Kurt & Alice Curtis /Curzon Rd, Kew Gardens, NY 11418 203 Same as 202 204 Lovall Anoceatin ,/ c/o Graham Loving r 558 Roaring Fork Rd, Aspen, CO 81611 301/ R, W. Stoly 0166 Caballo Carbondale, CO 81623 302 ,j John M, Custer 1020 East Durant #302 Aspen, CO 81611 303 / Richard S, Reynolds 1020 East Durant Suite 303 Aspen, CO 81611 /Donald & Judy Wrigley I' p, 0, Box 3399 Aspen, CO 81612 304 ,""'\ '-' Block 33 : j Lots A,B,C,D,E IJ/ Harry W, Bass, Jr, 1150 Mercantile Dallas Bldg. Dallas, Texas 75201 ~'G' H, Lot 5, Block 5 Riverside Patricia Williams Card Box 177 Carbondale, CO 81623 Addition P & Q Ten Sixteen East Hyman Condominiums ut1 Warner Villa Inc, A California Corp. P. 0, Box 92 Woody Creek, CO 81656 U/ Mayom Jewelers I nc, 283 Catalonia Ave. Coral Gables, FL 33134 R & S Molny-Eubanks Subdivision Lot~ Robin Molny 1020 East Hyman Ave Aspen, CO 81611 LO;! Dale Eubank P.O,Box 3678 Aspen, CO 81612 Block 34 /H & I V C, M, Clark Joseph T. Zoline p, O. Box 566 Aspen, CO 81612 L'OCk 37 VLot K, W 22' of L Sepp H, & Jane Kenler 960 East Durant Ave. Aspen, CO 81611 E 8' L & W 22' M Little Jewel Condominiums "'it 1 Louise M, Frisby Box 5024 Aspen, CO 81612 Unit 2 Same as Unit Unit 3 Same as Unit 1 -"""'I '-' c :) )BIOCk 35 D,E,F.G Frank & H_zel Loushin P. O. Box 582 Aspen, CO 81612 H & I I Charles D, Tower Box 301li Aspen, CO 81612 M,N,O.P Same as D,E,F,G Q & R Petite Roche Condominiums ~nyt 1 Cooper Street Partnership Ii, 3li26 Old Cantrel Road Little Rock, AR 72203 Unit 2 Same as Unit 1 S lurtis & Ann Slavens t/P. 0, Box 215 Aspen, CO 81612 Block 32 R & S H YJP"l n y1\it 1 Avenue Victorians Perry A, Harvey Box 256 Aspen, CO 81612 72 Kenneth A, Owen Jane C, Owen li751 Ocean Ave. Corpus Christi, Texas 78li08 Unit J / Y Carolyn Carder 37 Eagle Drive Littleton, CO 80123 Block 118 E,F,G ~exander G, Kaspar /0 Clark & Co, Box 566 Aspen, CO 81612 H & I William & Mary Sheehan Box571 Aspen, CO 81612 I"". -- o Block 118 (cont'd,j P,Q,R,S <;-,:> '. Bran Bed Associates 926 East Durant Aspen, CO 8'~11 - .... t' " , , ... ."'- '^-"'" HARDSHIPS Illegal Unit: IYV\~ ~ & ~-Pl-C-sl;lb.;~_l let; -3-ftl1etl~l.. r~':'l /f<rmr~~~~:-."V.'a:s-'-:~H:lbeli'f.iBeEi --f3-Lil5l~ ~t(d'~'..ud Ll 1 r', Oil J :_ .... ___Fltl",. 28FHlel R Mr. ----T't=fe.-I (.ft;i:e~'~~~:'-K(,T-';I't. JLv_k1 L~ d'11 a-;f 19 liawilef li --tJ:tf:_~-~-_... i!!8Ail.ff. rh~ _. _ ,'II:..~ ~_ . _8t)!-':j@t the: 1~-"iif--Ynltl8- 8-.-mmiRH:I~_.s.lli RI_8AtA_ le3se (13.:...... _ttaGAee eep3',' af 8__.1). Rear Setback: There is presently a shed on the back of the property which straddles the property line (see attached surveyor's certificate], which has been there since the previous owner bought the property, There is also an existing residence located with 2' of the gravel alley on Lot K to the west and a utility pole located between Lot L and Lot M also on the alley (see architectural drawing, Sheet #1), Since our property line is actually located 9'6" from the alley itself, we should be allowed to build inside the normally required 15' rear setback, Enchroachment: The necessity of having a two story addition l' from the property line is not only to our liking from additonal space, but also for aesthetical and practical use of the existing structure, Part of the subject structure is presently located ,g' on adjacent Lot K, We are going to remove that part of the building from Lot K, set back 1', and provide 2 hour fire protection to that part of the building which is not within the legal setback requirements. : . :EAL TO BOARD OF ZorHNG' JUST11ErIT CITY OF ASPErl DATE, ~f"" I t5 \ \ '1 't>-z- APPELLANT (V\eU'-\-i...) ~c>1\.. :: ''>'- CASE NO. 82,-? ADDRESS '7 0.0 ~,~l,.i'2.<:t'6et1.-.. ' fori' CoI\IJJ~, t:o' 'O<>Sz.4' PHONE 4',\>'-'~ID. ADDRESS IlP \}.), w~o.J"Ie.r (U)dt6 fo<.~41,.t:.,^-,ood I D"',o "\-'7>'Z-"l.. .r 5' n... <t, ~ t... I q, k . . " ""fbIl. JeS;"'l~ I?i \ \ ~r"",b\::. '" I,.. "".,f Co - OWNER , LOCATION OF PROPERTY 100(, f;., CoOfe-< ,c.~rt'~: Co . /.01" '" I....> -f'h.R- we~t ID' Df ~DtM bl,..obk.. '"3 ..: ,Street. & Number of Subdivision Blk. & Lot No. Building Permit' Application and prints or any other pertinent data must accompany this application, and will be made part of CASE NO. THE BOARD WILL RETURN THIS,APPlICATION IF IT DOES NOT CONTAIN ALl THE FACTS IN QUESTION. . DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED EXCEPTION SHOHING JUSTIFICATImIS: S~~ A. +1~heJ \ l ~1 ot. ~.~ s k, fS 1 y" NO~. ~-r.. 6 SIGNED: ~OVUVV\ , Appell nt ' 'Will you be represented by counsel PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE , TO FORWARD THIS APPLICATION TO THE FOR NOT GRANTING: REQUIRING THE BUILDING INSPECTOR BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND REASON P rt 's loeated in R/MF zone and is a'pre-existing non-conforming use, rope Y ~ ~ 'f E' t' Section 24-8.13 _ 'Minimum lot are per dwelling'is 6,000 sq. t. x~s ~ng house and proposed house encroach.es into set backs, S,ection 21,-8.13. Side, yard 5'. Rear Yard 10'. The applicant will not be represented by couns~l. 'Status . ~ Signed . PERMIT REJECTED t' DATEct\ ~{~'L-' DECISION APPLICATION FILED DATE IF HEARING DATE . ~\A Il [D . ~ - SECRETA~Y NOTICE OF PUBLIC,HEARING Case No. R? Q BEFORE THE CITY, OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTKENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962~ as amended, a public hearing will be held in the Council,Room, City Ball, Aspen, Colo- rado, (or at such other place as the meeting may be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting \ authority for variance from the provisions of the Zoniog Ordinance, Chapter 24, Official Code of Aspen. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at' such meeting, then you are urged to state,. yo~views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. The particulars of the hearing and of the requested variance are as follows: Date and Time of Meeting: Date: Time: September 30, 1982 4:00 P.M. i I i 1 -- Name and address of Applicant for Variance: Name: Martin Breth Address: 700 E. Elizabeth Fort Collins, Co. 80524 Location or description of property: Location: 1006 E. Cooper, Aspen, Colorado Description: Lot 6 plus the west 10' of lot M Block ~4. Variance Requested: See attached. ** The building department stated that the property is located in R/MF zone and is re-existing non-conforming use. Section 24-8.13 - Minimum lot are per dwelling is 6,000 sq. ft. Existing house and proposed house encroaches into set backs. Section 24-8.13. Side yard 5'. Rear yard 10'. Duration of Variance: (Please cross out one) 'T'~-rq;pn,..a-r~ Permanent The applicant will not be represented by counsel. THE CITY OF ASPER BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT BY Remo Lavagnino, Chairman Vlrginia M. B~a11, Deputy City Clerk ..,.