Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutlanduse case.boa.22475hwy82.redroofinn.006-82 ~~ e".'."",. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Case No. Q')_h BEFORE THE CITY. OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962, as amended, a public hearing will be held in the Council Room, City Hall, Aspen, Colo- rado, (or at such other place as the meeting may be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 24, Official Code of Aspen. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at .such meeting, then you are urged to state. yo~views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. The particulars of the hearing and of the requested variance are as follows: Date and Time of Meeting: Date: July 22, 1982 Time: 4:00 P.M. Name and address of Applicant for Variance: Name: Charles Podolak Address: PO Box 8850, Aspen, Co. 81612 Location or description of property: Locat~on: Red Roof Inn at Aspen, 22475 lVest Highway 82, Aspen, Co. 81611 DescrJ.ptJ.on: Applicants request a variation to permit a larger ground sign at a reduced height, and a set of non-illuminated wall letters to aid the travelling public in finding and Variance Requested: reaching the site safely from the highway. SEE ATTACHED ***** Duration of Variance: (Please cross out one) T~~e8r~~7 . Fermanerrt Will the Applicant be represented by Counsel? Yes X -No THE CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT BY __R~!? Lavagnino, Chairman Virginia M. Beall, Deputy City Clerk .' APPEN", TC llC^~D or: ; on I NG ^DJUST"~IlT '~nY Of: ~('r' 'I ,. l'"~ _.u It~oATE, ...,TIme 8. 1982 APPEllANT Charles Podolak CASE 110. JlDDRESS PO Box 8850, Aspen, CO 81612 PHONE (303) 925-:8603 Oil/NER Red Roof Inns, Inc. ADDRESS 4355 Davidson Road, Amlin OR 43002 - . (614) 876-9961 LOCATION ~F PROPERTY Red Roof Inn at Aspen, 22475 West Highway 82, Aspen, CO 81611 IStree~ & Number of Subdivision Blk. & Lot No.) Building Permit. Application' and prints or any other pertinent data must accompany this application. arid will be made part of .f' Gi\SE IIQ. THE BOARD WILL RETURN THIS.APp(rCATION IF IT DOES NOT CONTAIN AL[ THE FACTS IN QUESIIO~. "DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED EXCEPTION SHO\'iING JUSTIFICATIOnS: j~, Present sign code, as applied to this prope;ty, results in undue hardship for . applicants and deprives them of the best and highest use of the property, Pertinent conditions of this site .are; property line is setback 140+ feet from roadway, building is setback 200+ feet fr.om roadway, building is under new ownership and name has bee~ changed. The inn, being in the motel business, is .dependent on the travelling pubiic, as opposed .to local residents, for its livelyhood and the site requires visibility from the hi~hway for adequate identification.. Applicants request a variation -to permit a larger ground sign at a reduced height, and a set of non-illuminated wall letters to aid the travelling public in finding and reaching the site safely from the highway. \~i 11 Site is in a special zone and. considered part "of the commercial core, where ~onditions are very different. Si~n c0ge was writt~n for core conditio~s and y6'oeb'eotr'~VHs~d3a~y. ctJ~~'eth~ y~~ o~ tlNeo slgn al ed Y?/ilo un-safe for traffic purposes on Highway 82. /I~ Cars are unable to Sf!e a sign that SIGNED: (J/~ size from a distance making them unprepared III IlIfI', 1I1t"'rt-'fllrt-~ Lc1U~;1I0 L,urr;\'" !),ob1611~. PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIRING THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ~O FORWARD THIS APPLICATION TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND REASOII ~DR NOT GRANTING: ~B J~~ ~ b .-:-;- , ' PERMIT REJECTED, DATE APPLICATION FILED ~ ~ . .~ DECIS;ON ___DATE IF HEARING ...:.-.DATE . i'ltlIlEO ... SECRETARY /"',,", ....". ,~ RESOliJI'ION OF THE PITKIN COUNTY PLl\NNING AND ZONING CXM-lISSION CCMMENTING UPON ,'IN APPLICATION BY 'TIm RED ImF INN Resolution No. 82 - ll, WHEREAS, the Red lbof Inn at Aspen, located at 22475 W'ost Highway 82, has submitted a request to the Aspen Ibard of Adjustment for a variance fran provisions of the sign code to pennit larger free standing a.'1d wall signs than would otherwise be allowed under the Municipal Code, and WHEREAS, the pitkin County Planning and Zoning Comnission is concerned about the aesthetic appearance of the comnuni ty as it may affect both tourists and residents, particularly in the sensitive Highway 82 co=idor, and WHEREAS, at a regularly scheduled rreeting on July 20, 1982, the Comnission did direct the Planning Office to prepare a resolution transmitting their ccmnents regarding the application for variance to the Aspen Board of Adjustment. NCW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by t..'1e Planning and Zoning Canmission of pitkin County, Colorado, that it does hereby express its feeling that the variances from the ;sign code requested by the Red Roof Inn are inappro- priate for the following reasons: 1. '!he existing limitation upon signs in Aspen and Pitkin County is one aspect of the conmunity which makes it a particularly habitable place for the tourist and the resident. '!he effort to control the proliferation of signs has teen a long standing and ~ll supported policy of both the City and County. 2. '!he signs now in existence along Highway 82 confonn to the standards of the Code. Providing a variance to the Red Roof Inn would provide the applicant an unfair corrpetitive advantage and would be out of character with the scenic Highway 82 co=idor indicated in the adopted master plan for the area. llpproved by the pitkin County Planning and ZOning Comnission at their regular rreeting on July 20, 1982. PITKIN COUNTY PLllNNING A1'ID ZONING CXM-lISSION By: <~L 1 ~::r Peter Guy, cncp-rman A~ D:!puty Clerk and Recorder PEN 130 asp MEMORANDUM TO: Kathryn Koch Gary Esar~ FROM: RE: Red Roof Signage Appeal DATE: June 28, 1982 Bad ~~m afraid. all the people on the It is my opinion that we must send notice to list submitted. Although Red Roof Inns is erecting the sign and Red Roof occupies only a small portion of the Golf Course Subdivision (namely, Lot 2), one of the actual signs will be on Lot 1 on a sign easement pursuant to Section l(A)(v) of the City-Red Roof lease. There- fore, since the sign itself will be on the City's Lot 1, we must notify the landowners adjacent to Lot 1, who are on the gigantic list. Lots of work for $10. As an aside, at Thursday night's Board of Adjustment meeting, the Building Department suggested raising the fees for these modifica- tions. Patsy Newbury said the fees hadn't been raised since at least 1968. Some proposals were (1) a straight doubling of fees, (2) a flat fee plus actual postage costs, (3) a flat fee plus $1.00 per notice mailed. This seems like a good time to get your input on the fees. GSE/mc ~,_."._._----~>_..". "..,._..._--"_..~.,-,--,....,--"~_.~~""---"-^' ***** Note exact size of sign letters must be established by the applicant as well as size of signs to determine variance requested. The building department has scaled the drawings and to aid this hearing has given approximate sizes and vari- ance requested. Sec. 24-5.10(2) (Twenty (20) ) Square feet of sign area is maximum allowed on anyone frontage - applicant appears to be asking for approximately 65 sq. ft. of sign requiring a 45 sq. ft. sign area variance. Sec. 24-5.10 (3)(a) Free Standing sign cannot exceed 10 sq. ft. - Applicant appears o be requesting a 30 sq. ft. free standing sign requiring a 20 sq. ft. variance. Sec. 24-5.3 Letter size limitations are 18" first letter and 12 " Applicant appears to be requesting letters on the wall ~ of 30" requiring a variance of 12" and 28" maximum letter size. The free sign appears to be slightly over the maximum size. Wall sign cannot exceed 10 sq. ft. - Applicant appears to sq. ft. wall sign requiring a variance of 25 sq. ft~ of all other~~::rs and 40" standing Sec. 24-5.l0(3)(c) be asking for a 35 sign. ... ,......, \.."" ,....'., " .'" The Aspen Golf Course Subdivision The following is a list of adjacent property owners names and mailing addresses, as shown in the Pitkin County Assessor's office and Treasurer's office, as of March 24,1981: //~ 1. Montgomery H.W. Ritchie Paloduro Route Clarendon, Texas 79226 /. v 2. Paula M. MosIe and Sara 3471 Locke Lane Houston, Texas 77027 Meredith ~ Castl ubdl.Vl.sl.oll 3. Lot 1 Sarah R. (Werner) Gulick 477 Section, Guemes Isl. Anocartes, washington 98221 ~ , /' \ ;/ ,/ 4. Lot 2 Martha H. Grewal 580 Cemetery Lane Aspen, Co. 81612 -~ -- / / // / // .~ ~Gi~~.... 5. Lot 1 Stewart A. and Lorraine J. Moss V Box 9429 Aspen, Co. 81612 6. Lot 2 Stewart A. and Lorraine J. Moss V' Shirley Berland Box 9429 Aspen, Co. 81612 Aspen Employe'e Housing_No..:.......!. 7. Lot 1 I // Daniel A. McArthur v 705 Cemetery Lane Aspen, Co. 81612 /' Robert A. McClungV 707 Cemetery Lane Aspen, Co. 81612 8. ~/ Ann Freers / 717 Cemetery Lane v' Aspen, Co. 81612 Lot 2 Wayne Chapman 715 Cemetery Lane Aspen, Co. 81612 9. James Hall Box 3161 Aspen, Co. v/ 81612 Page 2 c "'" "'-., West Aspen Subdivision Filing #1 10. Lot 1 Jay R. Kuhne and Charles G. Weaver, JJr. Box 2477 v Aspen, Co. 81612 11. L0t 2 Sam's Condomini urn / James and Mary Hokanson V Box 189 Reedsburg, Wisconsin 53959 12. 13. 14. 15. Ore Bucket Associates 717 17th St. Suite 2440 Denver, Co. 80202 !./ Lot 3 Joseph M. and Judith L. Zanin~ Box 1408 Aspen, Co. 81612 Lot 4 Robert 405 S. Aspen, If P. Winchester / Hunter V" CO. 81612 A: Joachim J. and Renate Weimann 775 Cemetery Ln. Aspen, Co. 81612 F. // Lot 5 Henry L. and Ellen H. 793 Cemetery Ln. Aspen, Co. 81612 Go1dsmi th/ V' Lot 6 Horan Condominiums Stephen P. and Nancy 805 Cemetery Lane Aspen, Co. 81612 " Horan v'" ; 16. Lot 7 Elizabeth E. Grind1ay Box 2154 Aspen, Co. 81612 / / V 17. Lot 8 Lot 8 West Aspen Subdivision Ann Amabile 845 Cemetery Lane / Aspen, Co. 81612 ~/ Condominiums Marilyn C. Beer 845 Cemetery Ln. Aspen,/Co. 81612 v/' 18. Lot 22 The King's Chalet Robert C. Roosen ~120 St. John's Drive Eden prairie, Minnesota 55343 Page 3 19. c -'"""I ,..; Lot 23 Peter A. Brinkmann Box 96 Bear Valley, Ca. 95223 ,,/ v Robert K. and Judith S. Adams V' ' Trustees V/T/D 107 S. Cedros C-2 Solona Beach, Ca. 92075 20. Lot 24 George W. and Barbara S. Nelson' 4658 E. Shadowrock Rd. Phoenix, Arizona 85028 G// 21. 22. 23. Lot 25 Lot 25 West Aspen Subdivision 9ondominiums George and Terry Parry //JOhn S. Cant and fh~/ Box 177 L-/ H. Burt " Aspen, Co. 81612 Box 177 Aspen, Co. 81612 .---- Lot 28 . Oonald B. Helmich // Box 2382 Aspen, Co. 81612 Lot 29 Sierra Vista condominiums ~. David and Ellen Walbert 0/ Box 2152 Aspen, Co. 81612 Sandra D. Ochs I ~ l425B Sierra Vista~r. Aspen, Co. 81612 24. Lot 30 Jean M. Greiner 1435 Sierra vista Dr. Aspen, Co. 81612 25. 26. 27. William W. and Constance M. Owen '1435 Sierra vista Dr. ~ Aspen, Co. 81612 Lot 31 Sierra vista Duplex Mary K. Egan c/o Dr. Donald Egan 600 S. Cherry Suite Denver, Co. 80222 Condominium \ . ./ 1002 Lot 32 Charles Frederic and 3601 East Cove Point Salt Lake City, utah HOPki~/ pamaly Drive 84109 0","- // /// ,. Lot 33 R.P. and Sally Ann 520 E. Cooper A~pen, Co. IJHD Fitsgerald .' -- v /"''''''' Page 4 28. Lots 34 and 35 Claude M. and Claudine M. Conner V Box 345 Aspen, Co. 81612 29. Lot 36 Alexander D. and Donna Marie Henderson 2800 N.E. 30th Ave. Lighthouse Point, Fla. 33064 30. Lot 37 Koji and Sara Sue Katoka Box 790 Aspen, Co. 81612 31. Lot 38 Golf Course Condominium Nikolaus Christ Box 4947 ' Aspen, Co. 81612 S. Michaele Dunsdon and David A. Borkenhagen .Box 3395 Aspen, Co. 81612 32. Lot 39 Gary R. Thurnau Box 660 Aspen, Co. 81612 33. Lot. 40 Larry P. Melnick 3574 South poplar Denver, Co. 80237 34. Lot 41 Rusudan Gabliani 2500 Payson Road R.R. #9 Quincy, II. 62301 West Aspen Subdivision Filing #2 35. Lot 3 Duchess Corporation c/o John J. pavell /~ 4100 W. Vegas Dr. Las Vegas, Nevada 89108 36. Lot 4 Frank and Isabella Segl 1475 Silver King Drive Aspen, Co.- 81612 " 1"'. V ,..., '-" Page 5 37. Lot 5 Richard B. and Cora C. Kelly c/o Kelly Properties, Inc. 409 E. Durant Aspen, Co. 81612 ,.- 38. Lot 14 Charles P. Box 1696 Aspen, Co. Lyons and Edeltraud HolzneL" ," 81612 39. Lot 15 Aaron and Paula Sherman 219 2nd Avenue N.E. Austin, Minnesota 55912 40. Lot 16 Neil and Ronni L. Ross Box 2075 Aspen, Co. 81612 41. Lot 17 Robert F. Stifter 12510 S. 80th Avenue Palos Park, Illinois 60464 42. Lot 18 ManUel G. and Renee Ruiz 1570 Homestake Dr. Aspen, Co. 81612 43. Lot 19 Floyd C. and Josephine S. Mann 1020 Fifteenth Street Apt. 32A Denver, Co. 80202 , / / , , 44. Lot 20 Joan Frensley Smith and Stephen B. Smith 4028 Windsor Dallas, Texas 75205 45. Lot 21 James W: Patterson 1500 Homestake Dr. Aspen, Co. 81612 West Aspen Subdivision Filing ~3 46. Lot 1 Harold K. and Constance Harvey Box 199 Aspen, Co. 81612 c """' ...",,' Page 6 4 7 . Lot 2 Edward D. and Sondra J. Fram Box 3259 Aspen, Co. 81612 48. Lot 3 Michael C. and Linda H. Niven 0060 Garry Drive Box 11749 Aspen, Co. 81612 49. Lot 4 Richard A. and Pat Finley Fallin Box 2711 Aspen~ Co. 81612 50. Lot 5 Bruno A. and Sallie S. Pasquinelli Box 503 Lansing, Illinois 60438 51. Lot 6 Gerta Walls c/o Fred Lane Box 597 Aspen, Co. 81612 52. Lot 7 Albert S. Lowe, III c/o Oates, Austin, McGrath, and Jordan 600 E. Hopkins Aspen, Co. 81612 53. Constance M. and Dr. Harold K. Harvey Box 199 Aspen, Co. 81612 54. Samuel J. and Joy Caudill Box FF Aspen, Co. 81612 55. Zoline Foundation % Joseph T. Zoline 624 N. Canon Drive Beverly Hills, California 90210 56. Parcel A and B Aspen Tennis Club Area United Bank'of Denver, Trustee 1740 Broadway Denver, Co. 80202 . . .. '. - "...... \"...- Page 7 Olasen- Pecjak Subdivision 57. Lot 1 Kenneth and Wendy Larson 0022 Road A Aspen, Co. 81612 Iselin Subdivision 58. Lot 1 Rodger V. Lyons Box 4808 Aspen, Co. 81612 59. Lot 2 Golf Course Properties Associates A Colorado General Partnership Box 4170 Aspen, Co. 81612 60. James E. and Alberta L. Moore Box 707 Aspen, Co. 81612 61. City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Aspen, Co. 81612 62. pitkin County 506 E. Main Aspen, ~o. 81612 63. City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Aspen, Co. 81612 64. Marolt Associates A Colorado General Parnership % 300 Equitable Building 730 Seventeenth Street Denver, Co. 81612 """ ,-..I .' '~. RED ROOF AT ASPEN P,O. BOX 8850 Aspen, Colorado 81612 925-8603 June 11, 1982 Colette Penne Plannin9 Department City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81612 Dear Colette: Please find attached the necessary papers to Appeal to the Board of Zoning Adjustment for a larger sign at the access to the old Plum Tree Inn which is now Red Roof Inn. If you have any questions, please call me. Thank you, Jx.be-aJ-, p ~" Deborah VanCott Plastic Designs Inc 1195 East Fifth Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43219 614/258-1795 o o July 14, 1982 City of Aspen Board of Zoning Adjustment 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Attn: Ms. virginia Beall Ref: Red Roof Inns, Inc. variance Case # 82-6 Dear Ms, Beall, Enclosed are two sign prints for the proposed ground and wall signs for Red Roof at Aspen, 22475 West Highway 82, Aspen, with the letter areas calculated as follows; GROUND SIGN 7.96 sq.ft. 1.13 sq,ft. 9.09 sq,ft. "red roof at Aspen" "Colucci's" Total Letter Area of Ground Sign Letter Sizes: 1'-9" tall lower case "r,e,o" 2'-6" tall with ascender "d,f" 9" & 6" tall "at Aspen" 12" & 6" tall "Colucci's" Sign Structure Size: 8'-6" x 5'-6" and 15'-6" overall height 7'-0" above grade to bottom of sign structure Location: Within easement from city on North side of West Highway 82 at East side of entry drive to Red Roof at Aspen, 22475 West Highway 82, Aspen. WALL SIGN "red roof at Aspen" 18.82 sq.ft. Letter Sizes: 2'-6" tall lower case "r,e,o" ]'-9" tall with ascender "d,f" 12" & 9" tall "at Aspen" Location: on West elevation of building, approximately 225' set back from W. Highway 82 and 130' from the entry drive perpendicular to the letters. We hope this clarifies the dimensions on the signage for the board. If you need any additional information, please contact us at any time. Sincerel y , PLASTIC DE:IIJ' INC. ~t~~)~ Eric W. Grunewald ' ---,--,--~",..,."._- To: Aspen Board of Adjus.ment Re: Hed Roof Inn reque"t for sien variance As a long time member of the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment, I would like to express my personal opinion about the above item, as I feel that this request is unusual in that it affects the lIii'h;:"y 82 Corridor and therefore the entire area. Countless visitors comment on the lack of large and pro~inp.nt signs along this scenic corridor ( twc guests visiting me from Texas just this weekend were especially impressed) aJill this has been a tremendous source of pride Hnd sa"tisfaction for almost ev~ry local resident and b~siness person . The County Board of Adjustment has tried hard to maintain the integrity of the Sign Code, as it makes an invaluable contribution to the Itttract- i veness and unique quality of the valley. I feel that this request should be regarded as an attempt to market tillS particular business to the exclusion of oth..rs along the corridor. I am sure this applicant will attempt to use an exaeeerted safeto' factor as a means to gain "pjJroval. A proliferation of signs along any highway very often adds confusion for the motorist and increasps the safety hazard. cO(se I believe this^should be regarded AS equal'to any similar one in the area , If the code is relaxed for one, there will be countless requeats on the srune 'basis and one of the finest protectio!ls we hHve against bp-COIl'\ing "Anywhere, U.::;.A." will be hopelessly eroded. I urge you to conaider these factors and to deny this request for Bny vRriance in the sign code. ::G~~ Dottie Fox ~ Cuunty Board of Adjustment July 21, 1982 A F F I D A V I T I, Charley Podolak posted a Notice of Application For a Variance From the Zoning Code on July g, 1982 on the Red Roof at Aspen building. arley podolak Witnessed by: Jim Lakin Subscribed and sworn to me this 12th day of July, 1982, ~P.{~ Notary Public My Commission Expires: 3/8/86 To: Aspen Board of Adju~,m~nt Re: lied Roof Inn request for s~en variance As a long time memoer of the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment, I would like to express my personal opinion about the above item, as I feel tha, this request is unusual in that it affects ,he Highlmy 82 Corridor and therefore the entire area. Countless visitors comment on ,he lack of large and proI:linent signs along this scenic corridor ( twc guests visiting me from Texas just this weekend were especially impressed) aIm this has been a tremendous source of pride and sa,isfaction for almost every local resident and business person . The County Board of Adjustment has tried hard to maintain the integri ty of ,he Sign Code, as it makes an invaluable contribution to the attract- iveness and unique quality of the valley. I feel that this request should be regarded as an attempt to market this particular business to the exclusion of others ,dong the corridor. I am sure this "pplicant will attenpt to use an exageerted safety factor as a means to !rain "pproval. A proliferation of signs along any highway very often adds confusion for the motorist and increasps the safety hazard. CCl(Se I believe this^shuuld be reb'arded AS equal'to any similar one in the area. If the code is relaxed for one, there will be countless requeRts on the snme basis and one of the fillest protections we hfive Against becOIfling "Anywhere, U.S.A." will be hopelessly eroded. I urge you to con>>ider tlleRe factors and to deny this requeRt for any variance in the sign code. ~~~ Dottie Fox ~ County Board of Adjustment July 21, 1982 To: Aspen BoaI~ of Adjus.ment He: Hed Roof lIm request for siGO variance As a long time member of the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment, 1 would like to express my personal opinion about the above item, as 1 feel that .hie. request is unusual ill that it affects the Iligh>:ay 82 Corridor and. therefore the entire area. Countless visitors comment on .he lack of large and prominent signs along this scenic corridor ( tWL guests visiting me from Texas just this weekend were especially impressed) aI~ this has been a tremendous source of pride "-nd satisfaction for almost every local resident and business person . The County Board of Adjustment has tried hard to maintain the integrity of the Sign Code, as it nnkes R!1 invaluable contribution to thf' attract- iveness and unique quality of the valley. I feel that this request should be regarded as an attempt to market this particular business to the exclusion of otht'rs alone the corridor. I am sure this applicant will attel1pt to use an exageerted safety factor "s a means to gain approval. A proliferation of signs along any highway very often adds confusion for the motorist and increasp.s the safety hazard. cC<.Se I believe thiS^ should be regarded RS equal. to allY similar one in the area. If the code in relaxed for one, there will be countless rey'ue~ts on the srune bRsis and one of the fillest protections we h"ive against bp-cOIriing "Anywhere, U.0 .A. II will be hopelessly eroded. 1 urge you to consider these factors and to deny this request for any vRriance in the sign code. ::<9~ --4 Dottie Fox ~ County Board of Adjustment JHly 21, 1982 ...-.,.....- ,/ , "--"'"'""l 1 , , , I /; I L... .,./ L.......J Plastic Designs Inc 1195 East Fifth Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43219 614/258-1795 July 14, 1982. Ci ty of Aspen Board of Zoning Adjustment 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Attn: Ms. virginia Beall Ref: Red Roof Inns, Inc. variance Case # 82-6 Dear Ms. Beall, Enclosed are two sign prints for the proposed ground and wall signs for Red Roof at Aspen, 22475 West Highway 82, Aspen, with t"e letter areas calculated as follows; GROUND SIGN "red roof at Aspen" "Colucci's" Total Letter Area of Ground Sign 7.96 sq.ft. 1.13 sq.ft. 9.09 sq.ft. Letter Sizes: 1'-9" tall lower case "r,e,o" 2'-6" tall with ascender "d,f" 9" &.6" tall "at Aspen" 12'" & 6" tall "Colucci' sIt Sign Structure Size: 8'-6" x 5';"'6" and 15'-6" overall height 7'-0" above grade to bottom of sign structure IDcation: Within easement from city on North side of West Highway 82 at East side of entry drive to Red Roof at Aspen, 22475 West Highway 82, Aspen. WALL SIGN "red roof at Aspen" 18.82 sq.ft. Letter Sizes: 2'-6" tall lower case "r,e,o" 3' -9" tall wi th ascender " d, f" 12" << 9" tall "at Aspen" Location: on West elevation of building, approximately 225' set back from W. Highway 82 and 130' from the entry drive perpendicular to the letters. We hope this clarifies the dimensions on the signage for the board. If you need any additional information, please contact us at any time. Sincerely, PLASTIC DESIGNS, INC. ('--..- -... .' ,', / ,/" 1-1 )./7:. 7 ~./vi..~ i"....... ....\..-..1....').(.,) /,' ",., (/ (../ -.... . I ,'-...,-~ ,.'....__.....-._ Eric W. Grunew"hi '''. July 21, 1982 W yk Aspen Board of Adjustement Aspen, Colorado Dear Nembers: As adjoining landowners of the Aspen Golf Course we have received notification of your hearing July 22, 1982 concerning the signs proposed by the owners of the Red Roof Inn, We strongly urge you not to grant exception to the sign code as requested by the Red Roof Inn. Through the years in the City of Aspen and Pitkin County the sign code has consistently been strictly enforced and we feel this enforcement should continue, Thank you for your continued protection of the beauty of our landscape, Yours very truly, Richard A. and Pat Fallin 905 Chatfield Road Aspen, Colorado July 19, 1982 To the City of Aspen Board of Adjustment This letter is regarding your public hearing Case NO~ on July 22, 1982. The hearing concerns an applicati~ a variance to permit a larger ground sign in front of the Red Roof Inn and a set of wall letters. I am writing to object: to this variance. My husband and I own and live in a house directly across from the Red Roof Inn on Highway 82. We feel it will detract from the aesthetics of the neighborhood. I realize there is a business on one side of the highway and residences on the other; however, discrimination should be of prime importance and considera- tion when putting up a sign. No where along highway 82 at the present time is there another sign of this nature. We feel very strongly about not living on a "strip." You as the board must ask yourselves, if you grant this variance, if other businessesalong the highway will want to follow suit with similar signs. Will the quality of li~e in Aspen be the same if such variances are allowed? We do not feel that this is in the best interest of our community; therefore, we would like to see ~ board uphold the city council's ordinance against such signs.. I....-Yincerely, /~ ) 7~L/~ tv./... ~ Kenneth and Wendy Lars 22 Rd A Aspen, Colorado :L2K~-li ~/Co Ubi/ .- ~1f~4~~ /3-0 A. (J.~,x&:-. ~I a g/6/( } \ ~ J \ '< : ~ I \ I ~ !~ ~ ~ \~'\ ~ \' ) \J I K.I"~..,. I J ~ I \ \-~ \0 \ \ <J f"v ) ~ 0, \ .. ~,,~ \ ~" V \ \\ ~ --- .....UldaJondumlD ..J.&I ... western union Su rTf'\' tRnl lTHA 18l' 1'.\ ( r \.'l) '.,~\J \ ,\" . ,,10./1. (,\\\V '. (fjJ J\. t#\' '. Y , .. 'J ~ \' -, - "7~_ ~ ~ - - -- --"- '--" (USPECTF'"n ..\").U 'P LI CATE.'. 4- 05'l2!33 S"-"3 SS" 2 36 ICS, .IPMBN'Z CSP 5123?3933" T\")~n S4n ANTONIO TX 112 11-20 0910P EST MS CITY nF ~SPE~ Bn~q\") OF I\\")JUSTMEUT qPT DLY VGM 30 snUT~ ~4LSnA ST . SPEN cn 81611 , , ~."",,~ ~._._--,~. "'===, ...,...,. ~ ",- """,,--.~~.. ~~-~:.:=.:.- ~ CITY SPEN 130 so street aspen, 81611 <to;. J oi v\~ 0 ~ ~ t' The King' Chalet Robert C. Roosen ~ 11 6120 St. ohn's Drive Eden Prai ie, Minnesota 55343 " CITY 130 so aspen, .' . . , , .",.'U t \ \;. , '," J x." uf.. , .... 1 -. T"~....:...:....... SPEN street 81611 , f'AV 00 1.6090BN1. O//09/fj'> ,. Nor f(ETl/f(N T() p,-- '" ,. /)ELJ;VET AI" . " '~o:.N[)I:.f~ t .. (., .,L.t A~, (.~/)Df(':'S"<'E: JNAI'I ,.. , <...., . :'.<: ro FOHloiAJ:W . J ~'11~ Duchess Corporation c/o John J. Pavell 4100 W. Vegas Dr. Las Vegas, Nevada 89108 CITY 130 so aspen, CITY 130 so aspen, CITY 130 so aspen, 'd' ,\ "'11", \ ./. . ". . J :X. to. If}".. ., - . , , ".(-;....-..... I j ./ /~ rr,l 1'1" .. ,~ ",,"(11' \ .,. . ., X-I. H'/.' ...:. I, f.(:-;....-..: 17- /b ,I ~vJ, SPEN street 81611 SPEN street 81611 SPEN street 81611 ,.....--~ ''''~--~tJl'l",(; '':"'15 TO I,) ..t;:-:::~ '. .~ IV ERAB' '" . .~S;-'iI ~'- Richard B. and Cora C. Kelly c/o Kelly Properties, Inc. 409 E. Durant Aspen, Co. 81612 --._-_._.__._~-_._- - , -" -_.~ -~_._-~---"..- _.."~"_.. -~._-"""'-_.-- .--~. ';'".:- 'D William W. and COnstance M. Owen 1435 Sierra Vista Dr. Aspen, Co. 81612 -~---.--..- ----------...--- .' , (.,., i~ .. / .-~ ...(~,,_..",,'" ,;. , CITY 130 so aspen, ~ CITY ~ 130 so aspen, CITY 130 so aspen, I.. ' 1\ "~/I, I ~ 1 \ '.J. . ' " '..-t_, X'1o., U t. ., .' ... t:~-.:.....-.; -I Ir1 rf ~'.h,. I , ." , . " "J. :\.-,1" U t" ., . ' -.. ~<;............. SPEN street 81611 SPEN street 81611 ~(1t'~ ~'.11;1'. t \\ "f ',. _ ., ~.. \, jt t.. , " 'L. '. r~ ~' .. ~fI l' SPEN street 81611 ........ ~. (',,-': . , , I. .... ,-----? f!,;_ , J .1 I" ~ , ,...-:;;->:; .:'." "I.~'. ,'-..,' ~"', -" ... to " l.....,l, ..i........, ;~ .~ -" . :.; ~("IwOf',,: iij A.~TOE~ UNA.Stf_~ ~YJP "( Sandra D. Ochs l425B Sierra Vista Dr. Aspen, Co. 81612 FHA 5'i ZCO'iCMN:I. 07/0'i/13Z .. F~ETl.JF~N TO BENDEF~ NOT DEU:VERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWAI'm .~~ V , Edward D. an~ Sondra J. Fram Box 3259 / i,.,.,.""., Aspen, Co. /81612 I ,/ t- CITY 130 so aspen, I I l LCITY 130 so aspen, ,,' I '.~I;I ~ .. t\ ." ,".. \ ""t, , If t" - - SPEN street 81611 dijJ i1 I.. .~ "':"~-.-__/ ~t'::~ ,to~ ;, )--') 01":; ~~ ~ (a rr'!Iz, '--:' -~,'? ~ v.""')L)'li.I..'I",Z,,;c,,. > '.____.'!'~ "" if. "v<tlt. '(;9,. ' /.' -. '" A. . . <1,f'a "181./ :. .'. G. r-t'1f' 4,s" / i;Y 't. a", 400 01/. "~~,f> 'lt~~~ ~ J-" "II.!' , '. I ,'.", r''; . '",.-. . ,. \ '.11(1.. '1' ./, ".".. , .. ... "It t.. r~;.: ".. SPEN street 81611 ".,'~., , ....v /~< .', - . - MAI:':l(()() 351311Nl 07/13/82 II NOT flETLJflN TO SEN[)ER DE:L.XVEflAE:LE AS ADl)flESSE[) lINAE:Lf, TO FClF!WAI:':O Marolt Associates A Colorado General Parthership 730 Seventeenth st. ne~ver, Co. 81612 , ~~ , I ( -''hruno A. Box 503 Lansing, and Sallie S. Pasquinelli Illinois 60438 .