The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutlanduse case.boa.209Galena.017-72 . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Case No. 72-17 BEFORE THE CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to the Offi~ial Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962, as amend- ed, a public hearing will be held in the Council Room, City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the Zoning Resolution, Title XI, Official Code of Aspen. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by :.etter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious con- sideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. The particulars of the hearing and of the requested variance are as follows: Date and Time of Meeting: Date: Time: September 7, 1972 3:00 p.m. Name and Address of Applicant for Variance: Name: Gaard Moses, Appellant Address: Box 2388, Aspen, Colo. Harley Baldwin, Owner Box 745, Aspen, Colo. Location or description of property: Location: 209 Galena St. Description: Brand Building Variance requested: Application is made for a building permit to build an addition on the roof of a non-conforming building and remodel part of the attic for use as a work shop. Duration of Variance: (Please cross out one) ][~)IIII""IX.Ii... :If"^ Permanent Q~ ~--' Chairman by Leg - BY . ..~.....~ = : ,. AUG 31-72 211541 to****IO.OO APPEAL TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CITY OF ASPEN Date_.At 9G~ .3\ 1c.r:LZ- Appellant a~ ~S Case No. ?c7 -/7 I Address 130)( 23 <6~ Location of Owner ''''FLE.~ ~~10 64L..9JA "'~8G\lDI~(Q. & N er 0 Su LVLSLon B oc & Lot No. . ,..--- Address ~ 740 . Building Permit application and prints or any other pertinent data must accompany this application, and will be made a part of Case No. The Board will return this application if it does not contain all the facts in question. , X Description of proposed exception showing justification: ~.J/L-O(/Jb -l.j. WALLS J. Ii (2J)oP w/ Nl0'5TL~ S ~~:.NfPT,j:,L4>S 'I,VtNfb<.0> 6k-TefN.OINb f olJe::f2- e.ca::: f1D~ b 41' If VIS/-ll2:>LE DNL~ piX't-Il ?/Y2 r:L, e-Lt::-S f!:,(J ILOIN(; / W{..fECLE72 of, Ifwse GTe.. r _._- ---.---.---.------ Signed -- Provisions of the Zoning Ordinance requiring the uilding Inspector to forward this application to the Board of Adjustment and reaaon for not granting permit. APPLICATION IS MADE FOR A BUILDING PERMIT TO .BUILD AN ADDITION ON THE ROOF OF A NON-CONFORMING BUILDING AND REMODEL PART OF THE ATTIC FOR USE AS A WORK SHOP. A NON-CONFORMING USE OF LAND OR OF A BUILDING OR ANY PORTION THERE HALL NOT EXTENDED. ~ec.24_l0(e) Status Permit rejected date Decision Date Application filed .Date of Hearing Mailed -. Secretary I.;;; ,.......-,--,.--......."".;.~ ,. . CITY OF ?EN FINANCE DEPARTMENT CASHIER'S RECEIPT No. o Bldg. & Wiring 0 Bicycle License 0 Cigarette Tax 0 Contractor License 0 Court Fines 0 Dog License 0 Dog Impound Fee 0 Employee Registration 0 Other 0 Mise. & Short Checks 0 Sales Tax License 0 Business License 0 Spec. SI. Assess. 0 Tow Ticket 0 Traffic Ticket 0 Maps, Codes & Zoning 0 Zerox Copies RECEIVED OF: . . -' __-6 .~ - ----=- ,." . ~G ,f?B "\1S;;:'-- <: ., ~~ . .1 ~! __ 1.. ~ _ :i. \ -h I " u ; ~-- > ~. .s;:::.. ~ I I , 1\ ~ , , ~ \ I I ~- I J , '" . ~i~ . I I I U\ , \).J i>:~ 'l~~ I I ~ B ~ ~ .~~ I I ~ Q Ii< X J f: ) I -8 ~ .' ". @ ~ '. ". ,. 0. TJ ~." f . \ -~ Irl r ~ . ....t. -J:4 "- ~. .' 1 1<J ~ .c: ~ r - " ":J. ~~."*'""- ,,-- "" CU~ , OF ~ - AsPeN L0M6e2-fSdPPUJ en 1MC-. po /DOO (2o&:>>eLL. f4ew Mej{ 't;~OJ A 88~ c.-OrLY c;6 e H G'SLE7J PAtCtf.J ~ S H J P 1-1012-111 S/-LOt2.6 j)tJ V ~ Ot3T(20tT LA ~c- ~ ('I1/IJIv' oh5{)( LARruo- F FGICC;U SoN 02/0 t--JovcTt-J e.c ~l b>CPr2t;~W~ OIJL LA<;. ~<; . -~ SOOT i-/ (~t~ EAST - B (j L.l Dc;. lL S 0 E PA/ZrfJJ i51vL T 810 {2 E //1 SPEN [fJ C ~\.) BDY (00 r GLeN wooD SPbS :..' 0./00/ (JAfl OLp ~; LEO (20 w L4ND fDy S- 06 ~sfeN ('iOfCrJ-l - .. . -- .. "'.- '-. ...~,,;.(.i._,:c';"';;,~c_.. - "'llIo-'....- _ September 5, 1972 To Whom It May Concern: I have been contacted by Gaard Moses regarding the expansion he has added to his office on the top floor of The Brand Building. He has explained the problems to me for appraisal because I am a represen- tative party for adjoining property. I would like to go on record as having no objections to the struc- ture as it now stands. It is barely visible from any street view and, when finished off properly, will be more attractive from any second story vantage point than it was originally. I would support a variance in precedent with this support. poses any problem with regard this case but do not mean to set a I do not feel that the structure to the property I manage. Respectfully yours, - I f} ~, September 5, 1972 To Whom It May Concern: I have been contacted by Gaard Moses regarding the expansion he has added to his office on the top floor of The Brand Building. He has explained the problems to me for appraisal because I am a represen- tative party for adjoining property. I would like to go on record as having no objections to the struc- ture as it now stands. It is barely visible from any street view and, when finished off properly, will be more attractive from any second story vantage point than it was originally. I would support a variance in precedent with this support. poses any problem with regard this case but do not mean to set a I do not feel that the structure to the property I manage. Respectfully yours, L~a~~ ~ /~/ ~ September 5, 1972 To Whom It May Concern: I have been contacted by Gaard Moses regarding the expansion he has added to his office on the top floor of The Brand Building. He has explained the problems to me for appraisal because I am a represen- tative party for adjoining property. I would like to go on record as having not objections to the struc- ture as it now stands. It is barely visible from any street view and, when finished off properly, will be more attractive from any second story vantage point than it was originally. I would support a variance in precedent with this support. poses any problem with regard this case but do not mean to set a I do not feel that the structure to the property I manage. Respectfu??,s, -' . /)?y~ -~ -- c / C.;;J C c7 }7 t --- ---------........., Or- $""", cL//';7 September 5, 1972 To Whom It May Concern: I have been contacted by Gaard Moses regarding the expansion he has added to his office on the top floor of The Brand Building. He has explained the problems to me for appraisal because I am a represen- tative party for adjoining property. I would like to go on record as having no objections to the struc- ture as it now stands. It is barely visible from any street view and, when finished off properly, will be more attractive from any second story vantage point than it was originally. I would support a variance in precedent with this support. poses any problem with regard this case but do not mean to set a I do not feel that the structure to the property I manage. Respectfully yours, ~. t'P'lJ-&,., )II /J#.' 's ~ 7J 1'i7v